Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2022 Apr 5.
Published in final edited form as: Menopause. 2021 Apr 5;28(7):735–740. doi: 10.1097/GME.0000000000001772

Predictors of the Age at which Natural Menopause Occurs in Women with Type 1 Diabetes: The Pittsburgh Epidemiology of Diabetes Complications (EDC) Study

Yan Yi 1, Samar R El Khoudary 1, Jeanine M Buchanich 2, Rachel G Miller 1, Debra Rubinstein 1, Trevor J Orchard 1, Tina Costacou 1
PMCID: PMC8225549  NIHMSID: NIHMS1677490  PMID: 33828035

Abstract

Objective:

Women with type 1 diabetes (T1D) are thought to experience menopause earlier than women without diabetes, although not all studies agree. We assessed metabolic predictors of the age at which natural menopause occurs among women with T1D participating in the Epidemiology of Diabetes Complications study.

Methods:

Women with childhood-onset (<17 years) T1D who underwent natural menopause without use of hormone therapy during their menopausal transition were included in the analysis (n=105; mean baseline age, 29.5 and diabetes duration, 20.2 years). Self-reported reproductive history and the Women’s Ischemia Syndrome Evaluation hormonal algorithms were used to determine menopause status. Linear regression was used to ascertain whether time-weighted metabolic factors (e.g. BMI, lipids, HbA1c, insulin dose, albumin excretion rate (AER)) were associated with age at natural menopause.

Results:

Univariately, only insulin dose (β=−4.87, p=0.04) and log(AER) (β=−0.62, p=0.02) were associated (negatively) with age at natural menopause. Adjusting for BMI, smoking status, lipids, HbA1c, number of pregnancies and oral contraceptive use, each 0.1 unit increase in the daily dose of insulin per kilogram body weight was associated with 0.64 years younger age at natural menopause (p=0.01), while for every 30% increase in AER, age at natural menopause decreased by 0.18 years (p=0.03).

Conclusion:

Higher average levels of insulin dose and AER over time were significantly associated with a younger age at which natural menopause occurred among women with T1D. The biologic mechanisms underlying the observed associations between exogenous insulin dose and AER on reproductive health should be investigated among women with T1D.

Keywords: type 1 diabetes, age at natural menopause, insulin dose, albumin excretion rate

Introduction

Natural menopause is the cessation of ovarian function and the end of women’s reproductive life, resulting from natural oocyte depletion. Age at natural menopause and its related factors have attracted great research interest due to the substantial impact menopause has on women’s health. Earlier age at menopause is associated with increased risks of cardiovascular disease 1, osteoporosis 2, and fracture 3 later in life. Importantly, earlier age at menopause is related to increased all-cause mortality 4 and also mortality from cardiovascular disease 1, 5, atherosclerosis 6, and stroke 7, with a 2% increase in age-adjusted mortality per year decline in age at menopause 8.

Due to the important role of insulin in maintaining normal functioning of the female reproductive system, it is logical to postulate that women with type 1 diabetes who have a disruption in insulin regulation might experience earlier natural menopause compared to women without diabetes. Indeed, several studies have provided evidence to support this hypothesis, although not all studies agree 9, 10. The Familial Autoimmune and Diabetes (FAD) study was the first to report that women with type 1 diabetes reached menopause at a younger age compared with their nondiabetic sisters or unrelated control participants 11. The European Prospective Investigation into Cancer and Nutrition (EPIC) study also suggested that early-onset diabetes (onset before the age of 20 years) was associated with an earlier onset of menopause, compared with nondiabetic controls 12. In our recent study, we noted that natural menopause occurred 2.0 years earlier in women with childhood-onset type 1 diabetes compared with non-diabetic women after adjustment for age at baseline, age at menarche, race, BMI, smoking status, blood pressure, HDL, and non-HDL cholesterol, number of pregnancies, and having ever taken oral contraceptives 13.

Nevertheless, data on determinants of an earlier age at menopause in women with type 1 diabetes are scarce. In the general population, it is well known that smoking accelerates natural menopause onset 14, 15, whereas high parity is associated with later natural menopause onset 16. However, little is known about the effects of traditional risk factors, such as smoking and BMI, or diabetes-specific factors, such as glycemic control, insulin dose, and diabetes complications, on the age at which natural menopause occurs among women with type 1 diabetes. Previous work from the Diabetes Control and Complications Trial (DCCT) and its observational follow-up, the Epidemiology of Diabetes Interventions and Complications (EDIC) study examined the impact of intensive treatment, HbA1c, and microvascular complications on menopause onset among women with type 1 diabetes 17. However, in this study, the age at menopause did not differ by treatment group.

Given evidence of an earlier menopause onset in type 1 diabetes, and the enormous health impact induced by early menopause, identifying modifiable factors which contribute to early menopause in type 1 diabetes would have great public health significance. Therefore, our objective was to identify metabolic factors (HbA1c, lipids, blood pressure, insulin dose, etc.) that are independently associated with age at natural menopause in a cohort of women with type 1 diabetes.

Methods

Study population

The Pittsburgh Epidemiology of Diabetes Complications (EDC) Study recruited childhood-onset (<17 years) type 1 diabetes patients diagnosed, or seen within one year of diagnosis, at Children’s Hospital of Pittsburgh between 1950 and 1980. All participants (n=658) attended a first clinical assessment in 1986-1988. The mean participant age at study entry was 28 years (ranging from 8 to 48 years) and their diabetes duration was 19 years (ranging from 8 to 37 years). These 658 participants (325 female and 333 male) were then prospectively followed via surveys and/or clinical examinations for up to 30 years. The EDC Study has been described in detail elsewhere 18. All study participants provided written informed consent prior to performing any study procedures. The EDC study protocol was approved by the University of Pittsburgh Institutional Review Board.

For this study, exclusion criteria comprised unavailability of data on plasma follicle stimulating hormone and estradiol due to missingness (n=53) or death (n=75), having had a hysterectomy or oophorectomy prior to menopause (n=35), or having used sex hormones during the menopausal transition (n=20). Additionally, 37 women who were premenopausal at their last available follow-up (baseline age 18.3±4.0 years; age at last follow-up 47.5±3.7 years) were also excluded. The data analyses therefore included 105 female EDC participants who had gone through natural menopause. Comparisons of women who were or were not included in analyses are presented in Supplemental Table 1.

Covariate Assessment

Risk factors were assessed at baseline and repeated at 2-, 4-, 6-, 8-, 10-, and 18-years of follow-up. Demographic information, as well as data on medical history and diabetes self-care were obtained by self-report. Anthropometric characteristics were assessed during the clinical visits: body mass index (BMI, in kilograms (kg) per meters squared (m2)) and waist to hip ratio (WHR). Blood pressure was assessed according to the HDFP protocol 19. Hypertension was defined as blood pressure ≥140/90 mm Hg or use of medications for high blood pressure. Stable glycosylated hemoglobin (HbA1) was initially (baseline-18 months) measured using Ion exchange chromatography (Isolab, Akron, OH), and via automated high-performance liquid chromatography (Diamat, BioRad, Hercules, CA) subsequently for 10 years. There was high correlation (r=0.95) between the two assays. These HbA1 values were standardized to DCCT HbA1c values as previously described 20. At the 18-year follow-up, HbA1c was measured using the DCA 2000 analyzer (Bayer Healthcare LLC. Elkhart, IN) and converted to DCCT standard HbA1c values using an equation (DCCT HbA1c = [EDC HbA1c-1.13]/0.81) 20. An estimate of glucose disposal rate (eGDR) was calculated using a regression equation with terms for WHR, hypertension and HbA1c 21.

From baseline through the 10 year follow-up, high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C) was assessed via a precipitation technique (heparin and manganese chloride), modified from the Lipid Research Clinics method 18, 22 whereas an enzymatic method was used to measure total cholesterol and triglycerides 18, 22. At the 18-year follow-up, serum lipids were measured using the Cholestech LDX (Cholestech Corp., Hayward, CA). Non-HDL cholesterol (non-HDL-C) was computed by subtracting HDL-C from total cholesterol. White blood cell count was measured using a counter S-plus IV. Serum and urinary albumin were measured by immunonephelometry 23, and creatinine was assayed by an Ectachem 400 Analyzer (Eastman Kodak Co., Rochester, NY). Glomerular filtration rate was estimated (eGFR) by the Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration (CKD-EPI) creatinine formula 24

Menopause status assessment

Reproductive history information was self-reported. Natural menopause is defined as cessation of menstruation, which is not induced by surgical procedures (e.g., hysterectomy, oophorectomy) or medications (e.g., hormone medications). Having had a hysterectomy or an oophorectomy before menopause or having used sex hormone therapy during the menopausal transition therefore comprised exclusion criteria. Women younger than 45 years with regular menstrual cycles were classified as pre-menopausal; women older than 55 years who had not experienced menstrual periods for at least 12 months were classified as post-menopausal. In women falling outside the above classification, we measured plasma follicle stimulating hormone (FSH) and estradiol and used the Women’s Ischemia Syndrome Evaluation (WISE) hormonal and historical algorithms 25 to assess menopausal status, without distinguishing peri- from pre-menopausal women (Figure 1).

Figure 1.

Figure 1.

Classification of menopausal status within the EDC study

Statistical analyses

Time-weighted mean values of continuous metabolic factors were constructed based on clinical assessments at baseline and at 2-, 4-, 6-, 8-, 10-, and 18-years of follow-up. They were used for all continuous metabolic factors of interest to represent their average levels over time up to the exam cycle prior to the onset of menopause. The time-weighted mean values were calculated as a sum of the products of average values from two consecutive follow-up visits multiplied by the time interval (years) between the two visits and then divided by the total follow-up time until the examination cycle prior to reaching natural menopause. E.g., time-weighted BMI = (((BMI1 + BMI2)/2)*(time2 - time1)+((BMI2 + BMI3)/2)*(time3 - time2)+((BMI3 + BMI4)/2)*(time4 - time3)+⋯)/((time2 - time1)+(time3 - time2)+(time4 - time3)+⋯) . Risk factors evaluated included BMI, blood pressure, total cholesterol, HDL-C, non-HDL-C, LDL-C, triglycerides, HbA1c, eGDR, insulin dose, albumin excretion rate (AER), eGFR, and white blood cell count (WBC). The distribution of AER was skewed, thus natural log transformation was used for this variable. Univariate and multivariable linear regression models (PROC REG) were used to assess whether time-weighted factors were associated with age at natural menopause. In the multivariable models, covariates were selected if p<0.2 in univariate models or if they were previously associated with age at menopause (e.g. smoking status, BMI, lipids, contraceptive use, and pregnancy etc.) 16. To assess the importance of insulin resistance, models were also constructed with eGDR as a covariate. However, since eGDR is derived from WHR, hypertension, and HbA1c, these three variables were excluded in models with eGDR. SAS version 9.4 (SAS Institute, Cary, NC) was used for all analyses.

Results

Among the 105 EDC women in the present study, mean baseline age was 29.5 years and duration of type 1 diabetes, 20.2 years. All these 105 women had been pre-menopausal at the baseline assessment. The vast majority (96.2%) were non-Hispanic white. A summary of the study population’s characteristics at the baseline assessment is presented in Table 1. By the last available follow-up (after an average of 29.2±7.1 years from baseline), 63.5% of the study participants reported having used oral contraceptives and 72.4 % had been pregnant. Among those who reported at least one pregnancy (n=76), the mean number of pregnancies was 2.4 and the mean number of live births was 1.4. The average age at natural menopause in the study population was 49.5 years. A comparison of women who were or were not included in analyses were presented in Supplemental Table 1.

Table 1.

Characteristics of EDC female participants at the baseline assessment, 1986-88 (n=105)

Characteristics
Baseline age, in years 29.5 ± 6.2
Age at diabetes onset (years) 9.3 ± 3.9
Type 1 diabetes duration, baseline, in years 20.2 ± 7.0
Race
 Non-Hispanic White 96.2 (101)
 Black 3.8 (4)
Marital status
 Currently single and never married 37.1 (39)
 Married or living with a partner as if married 48.6 (51)
 Divorced 7.6 (8)
 Other (e.g., separated, widowed) 6.7 (7)
Education (n=103)
 Less than high school or high school graduate 35.0 (36)
 At least some college or college graduate 56.3 (58)
 Post bachelor’s degree education 8.7 (9)
Smoking status
 Never smoked 67.6 (71)
 Used to smoke 13.3 (14)
 Currently smokes 19.1 (20)
BMI (kg/m2) 22.9 ± 2.9
Waist to hip ratio (n=104) 0.77 ± 0.05
Systolic blood pressure (mmHg) 107.9 ± 11.7
Diastolic blood pressure (mmHg) 68.5 ± 9.6
Hypertension (n=105) 8.6 (9)
Blood pressure medication use (n=103) 6.8 (7)
Total cholesterol (mg/dl) 181.0 (162.0, 197.0)
HDL-C (mg/dl) 61.0 (50.6, 73.0)
LDL-C (mg/dl) (n=100) 100.9 (87.0, 127.4)
Triglycerides (mg/dl) (n=102) 74.0 (51.0, 100.0)
Use of lipid medications (n=104) 0 (0)
HbA1c (%, n=104) 8.4 ± 1.2
HbA1c (mmol/mol, n=104) 68 ± 13.1
eGDR (mg*kg-1*min-1, n=103) 8.9±1.5
Insulin dose (units/day/kg, n=100) 0.71 ± 0.19
AER (μg/min) 10.4 (6.2, 25.7)
eGFR (mL/min/1.73 m2) 102.3 ± 27.9
WBC x 103/mm2 6.4 ± 1.9
At the last available follow-up
Percent ever contraceptive use (n=104) 63.5 (66)
Percent ever pregnant 72.4 (76)
No. of pregnancies (n=76) 2.4 ± 1.3
No. of live births (n=76) 1.4 ± 0.8
Age at last available follow-up (years) 58.7 ± 6.1
Age at natural menopause (years) 49.5 (4.1)

Data shown are means (SD) for normally distributed continuous variables, median (IQR) for non-normally distributed continuous variables and percent (n) for categorical variables.

AER, albumin excretion rate; BMI, body mass index; eGDR, estimated glucose disposal rate; eGFR, estimated glomerular filtration rate; HDL-C, high-density lipoprotein cholesterol; LDL-C, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol; and WBC, white blood cell count.

In univariate linear regression models (Table 2), insulin dose (β±Standard Error (SE)= −4.87 ± 2.3, p=0.04) and ln(AER) (−0.62 ± 0.27, p=0.02) were significantly inversely associated with age at natural menopause. Each 0.1 unit increase in daily insulin dose per kilogram body weight was associated with 0.487 years younger age at natural menopause, whereas for every 30% increase in AER, age at natural menopause decreased by 0.16 years (back transformation: −0.62 * log (1.30) = −0.16). No other statistically significant associations were observed. Insulin dose, ln(AER), and HbA1c were thus included in multivariable linear regression models as their p values were <0.2 and smoking status, BMI, lipids, contraceptive use, and pregnancy were also included as they were associated with age at natural menopause based on previous studies.

Table 2.

Univariate associations between time-weighted values of metabolic factors of interest and age at natural menopause (n=105)

Time-weighted values Change in age at natural menopause 95% C.I. P values
BMI 0.001 −0.24 to 0.25 0.99
Systolic blood pressure −0.01 −0.09 to 0.07 0.85
Diastolic blood pressure −0.04 −0.15 to 0.06 0.43
Total cholesterol −0.01 −0.04 to 0.01 0.36
HDL cholesterol −0.01 −0.08 to 0.06 0.76
Non-HDL cholesterol −0.01 −0.04 to 0.02 0.45
LDL cholesterol −0.01 −0.04 to 0.02 0.58
Triglycerides −0.002 −0.02 to 0.02 0.83
HbA1c −0.61 −1.41 to 0.18 0.13
eGDR −0.22 −0.78 to 0.33 0.42
Insulin dose −4.87 −9.46 to −0.28 0.04
AER (log) −0.62 −1.15 to −0.10 0.02
eGFR −0.02 −0.05 to 0.02 0.35
WBC 0.06 −0.38 to 0.51 0.78

AER, albumin excretion rate; BMI, body mass index; eGDR, estimated glucose disposal rate; eGFR, estimated glomerular filtration rate; HDL, high-density lipoprotein; LDL, low-density lipoprotein; WBC, white blood cell count.

The time-weighted mean values were calculated as a sum of the products of average values from two consecutive follow-up visits multiplied by the time interval (in years) between the two visits and then divided by the total follow-up time until the examination cycle prior to reaching natural menopause. E.g., time-weighted BMI = (((BMI1 + BMI2)/2)*(time2 - time1)+((BMI2 + BMI3)/2)*(time3 - time2)+((BMI3 + BMI4)/2)*(time4 - time3)+⋯)/((time2 - time1)+(time3 - time2)+(time4 - time3)+⋯) .

In multivariable linear regression (Table 3, model 1), adjusting for BMI, smoking status, HDL-C, non-HDL-C, triglycerides, HbA1c, number of pregnancies, having ever taken oral contraceptives and AER, each 0.1 unit increase in daily insulin dose per kilogram body weight was associated with 0.64 years younger age at natural menopause (p=0.01). Moreover, after adjustment for the above-mentioned time-weighted covariates, including daily insulin dose, one natural log microgram per minute increase in AER was associated with 0.67 years earlier age at natural menopause (p=0.03). For every 30% increase in AER, age at natural menopause decreases by 0.18 years (back transformation: −0.67 * log (1.30) = −0.18). In the multivariable model with eGDR (Table 3, model 2), while insulin sensitivity itself (eGDR) was not associated with age at natural menopause (p=0.21), insulin dose (p=0.01) and ln(AER) (p=0.02) both maintained their significant inverse association.

Table 3.

Multivariable linear regression analysis for the prediction of age at natural menopause (n=105)

Variables Model 1 Model 2
Change in age at natural menopause (95% C.I.) p-value Change in age at natural menopause (95% C.I.) p-value
Ever smoked 0.50 (−1.85 to 2.85) 0.68 0.41 (−1.96 to 2.78) 0.74
Time-weighted BMI −0.12 (−0.37 to 0.13) 0.39 −0.07 (−0.32 to 0.18) 0.57
Time-weighted HDL-C −0.06 (−0.14 to 0.02) 0.11 −0.05 (−0.13 to 0.03) 0.25
Time-weighted non-HDL-C −0.01 (−0.05 to 0.03) 0.52 −0.01 (−0.05 to 0.03) 0.47
Time-weighted triglycerides 0.02 (−0.02 to 0.06) 0.21 0.01 (−0.03 to 0.05) 0.53
Time-weighted HbA1c −0.76 (−1.62 to 0.10) 0.09 NA NA
Time-weighted eGDR NA NA −0.43 (−1.12 to 0.26) 0.21
Time-weighted insulin dose −6.35 (−11.23 to −1.47) 0.01 −6.3 (−11.22 to −1.38) 0.01
Time-weighted AER (log) −0.67 (−1.28 to −0.06) 0.03 −0.72 (−1.33 to −0.11) 0.02
Ever contraceptive use 0.28 (−1.39 to 1.95) 0.74 0.07 (−1.62 to 1.76) 0.93
No. of pregnancies −0.41 (0.28) 0.14 −0.39 (0.28) 0.17

AER, albumin excretion rate; BMI, body mass index; eGDR, estimated glucose disposal rate; HbA1c, hemoglobin A1c; HDL-C, high-density lipoprotein cholesterol

Note:

In Model 1, predictors were selected if their p values were less than 0.2 in Table 2 (e.g. HbA1c, insulin dose, AER) or based on previous literature (e.g. smoking status, BMI, HDL, non-HDL, triglycerides, contraceptive use, and number of pregnancies).

In Model 2, the importance of insulin resistance was assessed; thus, this model was constructed with eGDR as a covariate. However, since eGDR is derived from WHR, hypertension, and HbA1c (eGDR (mg/kg/min)=24.395-(12.971*WHR)-(3.388*Hypertension)-(0.601*HbA1c)), HbA1c was excluded from Model 2.

Discussion

In this study, we evaluated predictors of the age at which natural menopause occurs among women with long duration type 1 diabetes. We observed that higher average levels of insulin dose and AER over time were significantly associated with an earlier age at natural menopause after multivariable adjustments, including for HbA1c. Interestingly, despite insulin dose being a predictor after accounting for HbA1c levels, insulin sensitivity (eGDR) did not predict age at natural menopause in a separate model. These findings suggest, that the adverse effect of insulin dose does not reflect insulin resistance but rather may suggest that the higher exogenous insulin concentrations have a direct, deleterious effect on ovarian aging in women with type 1 diabetes.

Type 1 diabetes is characterized by endogenous insulin deficiency and thus exogenous insulin administration is needed for survival. However, unlike insulin produced by the pancreas, injected exogenous insulin does not go through hepatic first-pass metabolism and clearance; rather, it goes into systemic circulation directly, and thus peripheral tissues, including the ovary, are exposed to excessive insulin levels in type 1 diabetes and its potential sequalae26. Evidence provided from experimental studies suggest that insulin stimulates the transition from primordial to primary follicles 2729. It is thus possible that increased exposure of the ovary tissue to excessive insulin in women with type 1 diabetes leads to excessive, early follicle maturation, resulting in a premature depletion of the primordial follicle pool and an earlier age at menopause.

Another possible explanation would be that women who required higher insulin doses early in the course of the disease may have had worse beta cell function and were in fact exposed to inadequate insulin doses. However, given the long duration of type 1 diabetes in this analysis, essentially all patients have complete loss of beta cell function. It is also possible that higher doses of insulin led to an increased occurrence of hypoglycemic events, and therefore greater exposure to counterregulatory hormones, which, in turn, could have affected ovarian function. Nonetheless, in contrast to our results, findings from the DCCT/EDIC study suggested that greater insulin dose was associated with lower menopause risk in women with type 1 diabetes, although age at menopause per se was not evaluated as an outcome in this study 17.It is possible, however, as study investigators note, that the DCCT/EDIC was a chance finding given the relatively high number of comparisons in the study 17.

It has been suggested that increased oxidative stress is associated with significant adverse effects on women’s reproductive function, including ovarian vascular endothelium damage and abnormalities in follicular growth, oocyte maturation, corpus luteum formation, and embryonic growth 30. While there was no direct evidence in type 1 diabetes, HbA1c (r = −0.51, P < 0.001), and fasting blood glucose (r = −0.69, P < 0.001) were found to be negatively correlated with antral follicle count (AFC) in women with type 2 diabetes 31. We thus hypothesized that poor glycemic control would be associated with premature ovarian aging in type 1 diabetes, given the potential ovarian vascular damage caused by advanced glycation end-product (AGE) induced oxidative stress 32, 33. However, the average level of HbA1c over time was not associated with age at natural menopause after multivariable adjustments. Although in the present study the non-significant finding regarding HbA1c may result from the small sample size (n=105) or the small variability in time-weighted HbA1c (8.6±1.0), our findings are consistent with results from the DCCT/EDIC study 17 and a Finnish study 10 which also reported no HbA1c association with age at menopause .

Within the EDC study, AER was also an independent predictor of menopause onset in women with type 1 diabetes, even after adjustment for diabetes-specific confounders (e.g. HbA1c, insulin sensitivity and insulin dose). A general population study previously suggested that women with chronic kidney disease (CKD) tend to experience menopause earlier than women from the general population (47.2 vs. 47.8 years) 34. Although a direct impact of CKD on the hypothalamic-pituitary-ovary axis is speculative, CKD could lead to cellular senescence and premature aging through the effects of uremic toxins, oxidative stress and persistent inflammation 35, and premature ovarian aging could be one of the aging phenotypes. Our findings therefore provide further insight on the potential effects of kidney disease on ovarian reserve among women with type 1 diabetes. Further evidence of a role of kidney disease on age at menopause comes for the above-mentioned Finnish study, in which end-stage renal disease (ESRD) was associated with early age at menopause, despite only nine ESRD cases in this analysis 10. On the contrary, no association between nephropathy and menopause was observed in the DCCT/EDIC study 17. Should further studies confirm that diabetic kidney complications play a role in ovarian function, women with these two risks of early menopause, type 1 diabetes and kidney complications, could be targeted for timely interventions to prevent the health consequences of premature ovarian aging.

Limitations of the present study were the relatively small sample size (n=105) and lacking racial diversity. Another limitation relates to the exclusion of women who died or dropped out before menopause occurred, potentially leading to selection or survival bias. One strength of the present study was that the analysis was based on longitudinal repeated measurements, which could better reflect the cumulative effect of metabolic factors on menopause compared with using baseline assessments only.

Conclusion

Higher insulin dose (after accounting for HbA1c levels or insulin sensitivity) and increased AER independently predicted age at natural menopause among women with type 1 diabetes. While these results require validation in large cohorts of women with type 1 diabetes, our findings raise significant questions relating to a potentially deleterious effect of high exogenous insulin doses, in addition to that of kidney disease, and may (upon replication) constitute a useful source in clinical reproductive counseling for women with type 1 diabetes.

Supplementary Material

SDC

Supplemental Table 1. Descriptive characteristics of female study participants by eligibility for analyses.

Acknowledgements:

We thank the EDC study staff and all participants of the EDC study for their contribution and support for more than 30 years.

Sources of funding: Support for the Pittsburgh Epidemiology of Diabetes Complications (EDC) Study was provided by the National Institutes of Health (NIH grant DK34818) and the Rossi Memorial Fund.

Conflicts of interest: Dr. Rachel Miller receives funding from the American Diabetes Association. The other authors have nothing to disclose.

References

  • 1.Hu FB, Grodstein F, Hennekens CH, et al. Age at natural menopause and risk of cardiovascular disease. Arch Intern Med. 1999;159(10):1061–6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Kritz-Silverstein D, Barrett-Connor E. Early menopause, number of reproductive years, and bone mineral density in postmenopausal women. American journal of public health. 1993;83(7):983–8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.van Der Voort DJ, van Der Weijer PH, Barentsen R. Early menopause: increased fracture risk at older age. Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA. 2003;14(6):525–30. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Jacobsen BK, Heuch I, Kvale G. Age at natural menopause and all-cause mortality: a 37-year follow-up of 19,731 Norwegian women. Am J Epidemiol. 2003;157(10):923–9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Jacobsen BK, Knutsen SF, Fraser GE. Age at natural menopause and total mortality and mortality from ischemic heart disease: the Adventist Health Study. J Clin Epidemiol. 1999;52(4):303–7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Joakimsen O, Bonaa KH, Stensland-Bugge E, Jacobsen BK. Population-based study of age at menopause and ultrasound assessed carotid atherosclerosis: The Tromso Study. J Clin Epidemiol. 2000;53(5):525–30. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Lisabeth LD, Beiser AS, Brown DL, Murabito JM, Kelly-Hayes M, Wolf PA. Age at natural menopause and risk of ischemic stroke: the Framingham heart study. Stroke. 2009;40(4):1044–9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Ossewaarde ME, Bots ML, Verbeek AL, et al. Age at menopause, cause-specific mortality and total life expectancy. Epidemiology. 2005;16(4):556–62. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Yarde F, Van Der Schouw YT, De Valk HW, et al. Age at menopause in women with type 1 diabetes mellitus: The OVADIA study. Human Reproduction. [Article]. 2015;30(2):441–6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Sjöberg L, Pitkäniemi J, Harjutsalo V, et al. Menopause in women with type 1 diabetes. Menopause. [Article]. 2011;18(2):158–63. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Dorman JS, Steenkiste AR, Foley TP, et al. Menopause in type 1 diabetic women: is it premature? Diabetes. 2001;50(8):1857–62. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Brand JS, Onland-Moret NC, Eijkemans MJC, et al. Diabetes and onset of natural menopause: Results from the European Prospective Investigation into Cancer and Nutrition. Human Reproduction. [Article]. 2015;30(6):1491–8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Yi Y, El Khoudary S, Buchanich J, et al. Women with Type 1 Diabetes (T1D) Experience a Shorter Reproductive Period Compared with Nondiabetic Women: The Pittsburgh Epidemiology of Diabetes Complications (EDC) Study and the Study of Women's Health Across the Nation (SWAN). Menopause. 2021(In press). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Van Asselt KM, Kok HS, Van Der Schouw YT, et al. Current smoking at menopause rather than duration determines the onset of natural menopause. Epidemiology. 2004;15(5):634–9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Parente RC, Faerstein E, Celeste RK, Werneck GL. The relationship between smoking and age at the menopause: A systematic review. Maturitas. 2008;61(4):287–98. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Gold EB. The timing of the age at which natural menopause occurs. Obstetrics and gynecology clinics of North America. 2011;38(3):425–40. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Kim C, Cleary PA, Cowie CC, et al. Effect of glycemic treatment and microvascular complications on menopause in women with type 1 diabetes in the Diabetes Control and Complications Trial/Epidemiology of Diabetes Interventions and Complications (DCCT/EDIC) cohort. Diabetes Care. 2014;37(3):701–8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Orchard TJ, Dorman JS, Maser RE, et al. Prevalence of complications in IDDM by sex and duration. Pittsburgh Epidemiology of Diabetes Complications Study II. Diabetes. 1990;39(9):1116–24. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Borhani NO KE, Langford HG, Payne GH, Remington RD, Stamler J. The hypertension detection and follow-up program. Prev Med. 1976;5(2):207–15. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Prince CT, Becker DJ, Costacou T, Miller RG, Orchard TJ. Changes in glycaemic control and risk of coronary artery disease in type 1 diabetes mellitus: findings from the Pittsburgh Epidemiology of Diabetes Complications Study (EDC). Diabetologia. 2007;50(11):2280–8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Williams KV, Erbey JR, Becker D, Arslanian S, Orchard TJ. Can clinical factors estimate insulin resistance in type 1 diabetes? Diabetes. 2000;49(4):626–32. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Orchard TJ, Dorman JS, Maser RE, et al. Factors associated with avoidance of severe complications after 25 yr of IDDM. Pittsburgh Epidemiology of Diabetes Complications Study I. Diabetes Care. 1990;13(7):741–7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Ellis D, Coonrod BA, Dorman JS, et al. Choice of Urine Sample Predictive of Microalbuminuria in Patients With Insulin-Dependent Diabetes Mellitus. American Journal of Kidney Diseases. 1989;13(4):321–8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Levey AS, Stevens LA, Schmid CH, et al. A new equation to estimate glomerular filtration rate. Annals of internal medicine. 2009;150(9):604–12. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Johnson BD, Merz CN, Braunstein GD, et al. Determination of menopausal status in women: the NHLBI-sponsored Women’s Ischemia Syndrome Evaluation (WISE) Study. J Womens Health (Larchmt). 2004;13(8):872–87. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Codner E, Soto N, Merino PM. Contraception and pregnancy in adolescents with type 1 diabetes: A review. Pediatric Diabetes. [Review]. 2012;13(1):108–23. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Willis D, Mason H, Gilling-Smith C, Franks S. Modulation by insulin of follicle-stimulating hormone and luteinizing hormone actions in human granulosa cells of normal and polycystic ovaries. The Journal of clinical endocrinology and metabolism. 1996;81(1):302–9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Willis D, Franks S. Insulin action in human granulosa cells from normal and polycystic ovaries is mediated by the insulin receptor and not the type-I insulin-like growth factor receptor. The Journal of clinical endocrinology and metabolism. 1995;80(12):3788–90. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Kezele PR, Nilsson EE, Skinner MK. Insulin but not insulin-like growth factor-1 promotes the primordial to primary follicle transition. Mol Cell Endocrinol. 2002;192(1–2):37–43. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Agarwal A, Gupta S, Sharma RK. Role of oxidative stress in female reproduction. Reproductive biology and endocrinology : RB&E. 2005;3:28. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Isik S, Ozcan HN, Ozuguz U, et al. Evaluation of ovarian reserve based on hormonal parameters, ovarian volume, and antral follicle count in women with type 2 diabetes mellitus. The Journal of clinical endocrinology and metabolism. 2012;97(1):261–9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Pertynska-Marczewska M, Diamanti-Kandarakis E. Aging ovary and the role for advanced glycation end products. Menopause. 2017;24(3):345–51. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Ceriello A Hyperglycaemia: the bridge between non-enzymatic glycation and oxidative stress in the pathogenesis of diabetic complications. Diabetes, nutrition & metabolism. 1999;12(1):42–6. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Cheung KL, Stefanick ML, Allison MA, et al. Menopausal symptoms in women with chronic kidney disease. Menopause. 2015;22(9):1006–11. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Stenvinkel P, Larsson TE. Chronic kidney disease: a clinical model of premature aging. Am J Kidney Dis. 2013;62(2):339–51. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

SDC

Supplemental Table 1. Descriptive characteristics of female study participants by eligibility for analyses.

RESOURCES