Skip to main content
Current Cardiology Reviews logoLink to Current Cardiology Reviews
editorial
. 2021 Mar;17(2):116–117. doi: 10.2174/1573403X1702210311093359

Social Media for Cardiovascular Medicine: Real Reflections from Virtual Medium

Purvi Parwani 1,2,3,4,5, Mirvat Alasnag 6,7,8,9, Mamas A Mamas 10,11,12,13
PMCID: PMC8226198  PMID: 34110276

Social media has transformed the face of cardiovascular medicine, as a platform for delivering educational content, building collaborative research and clinical networks across the globe in real time, advocacy and peer review [1]. Although in 2019 only, 1,111 American College of Cardiology members were found to use twitter [2], and this number is increasing day by day. Cardiovascular healthcare professionals across the globe are increasingly utilizing social media for asynchronous learning at any time or place, whereby interesting cases are discussed, research is disseminated and connections as well as collaborations with like-minded clinicians and researchers with similar subspecialty expertise are formed. Social Media enables healthcare professionals to unite their voices in their quest for knowledge and health care related matters by connecting with colleagues across the globe.

The focus of this special edition is to shed light on different cardiovascular arenas where social media has allowed the dissemination of the educational message to a wider audience and facilitated discussions across a wide range of specialties and themes. This edition highlights the value of social media for the clinician, the patient, researcher and patient advocates in a broad range of arenas including interventional cardiology, imaging, heart failure, women in cardiology and scientific meetings.

The recent COVID19 outbreak has delineated the importance of social media as one of the most important platforms for healthcare professionals to share information, treatment protocols and clinical pathways for a disease where little was known only 6 months ago. Physicians, particularly from the outbreak epicenters such as Wuhan, New York and Italy, have shared their individual insights as they discover the complexity of the disease, diagnostic pathways and impact of their management decisions widely and instantly via social media through webinars and through pre-print servers such as medRxiv [3] and bioRxiv [4] allowing rapid dissemination of knowledge often weeks or months before traditional peer-reviewed scientific literature is able to do so. The network of professional connectivity created by the pandemic is here to stay and may place social media at the center stage in future healthcare crises. Furthermore, all the main scientific cardiovascular conferences, including the American College of Cardiology (ACC) and the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) have cancelled physical scientific meetings this year to comply with social distancing regulations and nationwide governmental lockdowns and replaced them with virtual meetings, that have been delivered through virtual platforms. Even when this pandemic is over, social media platforms may represent an important means by which the digital content of future scientific meetings will be shared.

The role of social media in medicine is constantly evolving. It is important to foresee the revolution it may bring to healthcare and have a virtual voice in this interconnected community. Nevertheless, it is also imperative to realize its limitations and exercise our obligations as responsible healthcare professionals on social media [1, 5]. We begin this special issue by overviewing social media best practices for the cardiologist [6]. We then focus around how social media can be used to disseminate and advocate research, focusing on best practices [7]. Social media can be used to augment educational activities at meetings, which is the subject of focus by Mihailidou et al . [8] and can be used to engage and educate our patients as overviewed by Gulati et al ., [9]. Social media is a powerful tool that can be used to advocate for profession groups where significant disparities exist, with a growing movement within women in cardiology for equity. Volgman et al discuss how social media can be used towards this end [10]. Finally, our focus turns on the utilisation of social media in sub-specialties with cardiology including imagin g [11], interventional cardiology [12] and heart failure [13]. We thank all the authors for their valuable insights and contributions to this novel and unique edition.

References

  • 1.Parwani P., Choi A.D., Lopez-Mattei J., et al. Understanding social media: Opportunities for cardiovascular medicine. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 2019;73(9):1089–1093. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2018.12.044. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Douglas A., Suero-Abreu G., Barajas-Ochoa A. Cardiology in 280 characters: Cardiologists use of twitter in the United States. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 2019;73(9) Suppl. 1:3034. [Google Scholar]
  • 3. https://www.medrxiv.org/
  • 4. https://www.biorxiv.org/
  • 5.Alasnag M., Mamas M., Fischman D., et al. View point on social media use in interventional cardiology. Open Heart. 2019;6:e001031. doi: 10.1136/openhrt-2019-001031. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Alasnag M., Ahmed W., Mamas M. Best practices of social media for the clinician. Curr. Cardiol. Rev. 2021;17(2):118–121. doi: 10.2174/1573403x16666200128101509. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Lee G., Choi A.D., Michos E.D. Social media as a means to disseminate and advocate cardiovascular research: Why, how, and best practices. Curr. Cardiol. Rev. 2021;17(2):122–128. doi: 10.2174/1573403X15666191113151325. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Mihailidou A.S., McCall D., Hiremath S., Costello B., Tunuguntla A., Mihailidis H. Use of social media at cardiovascular congresses: Opportunities for education and dissemination. Curr. Cardiol. Rev. 2021;17(2):129–136. doi: 10.2174/1573403X16666200206103328. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Chirumamilla S., Gulati M. Patient education and engagement through social media. Curr. Cardiol. Rev. 2021;17(2):137–143. doi: 10.2174/1573403X15666191120115107. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Patel H., Volgman A.S. Women in cardiology: Role of social media in advocacy. Curr. Cardiol. Rev. 2021;17(2):144–149. doi: 10.2174/1573403X16666200203104851. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Parwani P., Lee J., Khalique O.K., Bucciarelli-Ducci C. Social media use in cardiovascular imaging. Curr. Cardiol. Rev. 2021;17(2):150–156. doi: 10.2174/1573403X15666191107125304. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Fischman D.L., Savage M.P. Cardiotwitter: New virtual tools to advance skillsets in interventional cardiology. Curr. Cardiol. Rev. 2021;17(2):157–160. doi: 10.2174/1573403X15666191126104402. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Eliya Y., Pellegrini D., Gevaert A., Code J., Spall H.G.C.V. Social media in heart failure: A mixed-methods systematic review. Curr. Cardiol. Rev. 2021;17(2):161–170. doi: 10.2174/1573403X15666191210143657. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Current Cardiology Reviews are provided here courtesy of Bentham Science Publishers

RESOURCES