Table 1.
Parameters | HS Patients n. (%) or Mean ± SD n. 35 |
Controls n. (%) or Mean ± SD n. 35 |
p-Value |
---|---|---|---|
Sex, females (n, %) | 24 (68.6%) | 24 (68.6%) | χ2 = 0.07, p = 0.796 |
Age (years) | 25.37 ± 8.36 | 26.14 ± 7.28 | 0.350 |
Smoking habit (yes) | 18 (51.4%) | 17 (48.6%) | χ2 = 0.00, p = 1.00 |
Physically active subjects | 15 (42.9%) | 13 (37.1%) | χ2 = 0.06, p = 0.807 |
BMI (kg/m2) | 29.26 ± 5.33 | 29.22 ± 5.62 | 0.950 |
Normal-weight (n, %) | 7 (20.0%) | 10 (28.6%) | χ2 = 0.24, p = 0.624 |
Overweight (n, %) | 12 (34.3%) | 11 (31.4%) | χ2 = 0.00, p = 1.00 |
Grade I obesity (n, %) | 12 (34.3%) | 8 (22.9%) | χ2 = 0.63, p = 0.427 |
Grade II obesity (n, %) | 4 (11.4%) | 6 (17.1%) | χ2 = 0.12, p = 0.732 |
Waist circumference (cm) | 92.19 ± 15.19 | 91.82 ± 15.51 | 0.833 |
PREDIMED score | 7.68 ± 3.18 | 8.60 ± 2.31 | 0.002 |
PREDIMED categories | |||
Low adherence (n, %) | 10 (28.6%) | 3 (8.6%) | χ2 = 3.40, p = 0.065 |
Average adherence (n, %) | 16 (45.7%) | 20 (57.1%) | χ2 = 0.52, p = 0.473 |
High adherence (n, %) | 9 (25.7%) | 12 (34.3%) | χ2 = 0.27, p = 0.602 |
Total energy intake (kcal) | 2233.30 ± 239.57 | 2271.22 ± 158.14 | 0.193 |
BIA parameters | |||
R (Ω) | 492.77 ± 76.86 | 500.60 ± 66.17 | 0.695 |
Xc (Ω) | 53.26 ± 9.37 | 59.37 ± 7.81 | 0.010 |
PhA (°) | 6.18 ± 0.63 | 6.79 ± 0.60 | <0.001 |
Differences between the two groups were analyzed by Student’s paired t-test. The chi square (χ2) test was used to determine the significance of differences in frequency distribution in categorical variables. Results were expressed as number (%) or mean ± SD. A p value in bold type denotes a significant difference (p < 0.05). HS, hidradenitis suppurativa; BMI, body mass index; PREDIMED, PREvención con DIeta MEDiterránea; BIA, bioelectrical impedance analysis; R, resistance; Xc, reactance; PhA, phase angle; SD, standard deviation.