Skip to main content
. 2021 May 31;13(6):1890. doi: 10.3390/nu13061890

Table 3.

Main findings related to gut microbiota variability and composition in active subjects compared to inactive controls from the selected studies.

Author, Country,
Year
Variability Firmicutes Bacteroidetes Actinobacteria Proteobacteria Akkermansia Synthesis of the Results in Relation with Diet References
Bressa, Spain, 2017 ↔ alpha diversity, beta diversity ↑* ↓* Barnesiellaceae
Odoribacteraceae
/ / ↑* Dairy products and cereals were, respectively, positively and negatively related to the abundance of Turicibacter; proteins were negatively related to Bifidobacterium abundance; diet lipids were positively associated with Odoribacter and negatively related to Ruminococcaceae; the inverse correlation between fat intake and muscle parameters, and between fiber intake and body fat composition, prevented multiple regression analysis of dietary factors and exercise-related factors together because of collinearity problems. [32]
Cronin, Ireland, 2018 ↑ Shannon index
↔ alpha diversity
/ / / / After the intervention period, bacterial diversity was greater in the exercise–protein-supplementation group than in the protein-supplementation-only group, while the diversity of virus species was lower in the exercise–protein-supplementation group and in the protein-supplementation-only group than in the exercise-only group. [34]
Gallè, Italy, 2020 ↔ Shannon index
↑* beta diversity
↓* Megasphaera
↓* Lachnobacterium
↓* Dialister
↓* Paraprevotella / / / Nor PA level nor diet were significantly associated with the Shannon index and with the F/B ratio. [35]
Manor, USA,
2020
↑* Shannon index ↑* Ruminococcaceae
↑* Clostridiales
↑* Veillonella
↑* Lachnospira
↑* Faecalibacterium
/ / / / Associations were tested by fitting linear regression models of Shannon diversity on PA analytes, adjusting for dietary factors. The association with moderate and vigorous activity remained significant. [38]
Taniguchi,
Japan,
2018
↔ alpha diversity ↓* C. difficile / / / / The nutritional intake was not significantly altered during the exercise intervention; changes in diet during intervention did not seem to influence the
results of the study.
[40]

↔ no differences between groups; ↓* significant decrease; ↓ nonsignificant decrease; ↑* significant increase; ↑ nonsignificant increase.