Skip to main content
Animals : an Open Access Journal from MDPI logoLink to Animals : an Open Access Journal from MDPI
. 2021 Jun 15;11(6):1787. doi: 10.3390/ani11061787

Effects of Exogenous 6-Phytase (EC 3.1.3.26) Supplementation on Performance, Calcium and Phosphorous Digestibility, and Bone Mineralisation and Density in Weaned Piglets

Núria Tous 1, Joan Tarradas 1, Maria Francesch 1, Maria Font-i-Furnols 2, Peter Ader 3, David Torrallardona 1,*
Editor: Beob Gyun Kim
PMCID: PMC8232799  PMID: 34203822

Abstract

Simple Summary

Supplementation with a low dose (up to 500 FTU/kg feed) of a new 6-phytase, obtained by assembling gene sequences of various phytase-producing bacteria, increases phosphorous and calcium availability in phosphorus-limiting piglet diets. Therefore, this phytase can be used to reduce the use of unsustainable sources of inorganic phosphorous without compromising piglets’ performance and bone mineralization and density, and the higher phosphorous utilization will also reduce its excretion to the environment. This study also demonstrates that the effects of phytase on bone density can be evaluated using computed tomography, which may be useful for studies with live animals.

Abstract

Phosphorus (P) is an essential mineral for growing piglets, which is poorly accessible in vegetable feedstuffs as it is stored as phytates. Thus, phytase supplementation is essential to increase P availability. Two experiments were conducted to evaluate a novel 6-phytase (EC 3.1.3.26) in weaned pigs fed low-P diets. In each experiment, one hundred and twenty piglets were fed a positive control (PC; adequate in Ca and P), a negative control (NC; limiting in Ca and P), or NC supplemented with 125, 250, or 500 FTU/kg of phytase (NC125, NC250, and NC500, respectively). P content was lower in diets of Experiment 1 than diets of Experiment 2. In Experiment 1, piglets offered PC or phytase diets had higher growth and efficiency compared with NC diets. In Experiment 2, similar effects were obtained, but the effects were less significant. In both experiments, P and Ca ATTD and bone density were significantly increased with phytase supplementation. Moreover, PC and NC500 had higher P concentrations and lower alkaline phosphatase activity in plasma than NC. To conclude, supplementation with the new 6-phytase at doses up to 500 FTU/kg enhanced P utilization, growth performance, and bone density in piglets fed P-limiting diets.

Keywords: bone density, computed tomography, phosphorous digestion, phytase, pigs

1. Introduction

Phosphorus (P) is an essential mineral, necessary for bone mineralization and for the regulation of key enzymes in several metabolic and physiological processes in growing animals [1]. In plant seeds and grains, this element is mostly stored in the salt form of phytic acid (phytate), myo-inositol hexaphosphate (IP6) being the predominant form, and this is the main source of P for animal nutrition [2,3]. The production of endogenous phytase by pigs is limited, and these animals are not able to hydrolyse enough phytate-bound P to satisfy their nutritional requirements [4,5,6].

Phytic acid also has several antinutritional effects that have been reviewed recently [7]. Due to its large chelating capacity, phytic acid can interact with minerals (calcium [Ca], sodium, iron, and zinc) and other substances (amino acids, starch, and lipids) and compromise their absorption [8,9,10,11,12]. Furthermore, as phytate can also bind to proteins, it could inhibit the activity of digestive enzymes (i.e., trypsin, α-amylase, and pepsin) and impair digestibility [13,14]. As a result, phytates in animal feed are responsible for reduced nutrient absorption, limited energy availability, and reduced animal growth [15]. Moreover, pigs may excrete up to 50–80% of P intake [16], and this is considered to have a major environmental impact on soils and water [17,18].

In order to reduce these effects, the supplementation of feeds with exogenous microbial phytases has become a common practice [19]. Phytases have a specific affinity for IP6 and myo-inositol pentaphosphate (IP5). The formation of lower phosphorylated and more soluble inositol phosphates (IP5, IP4) by the action of phytase improves the susceptibility to further enzymatic hydrolysis and accelerates further degradation to IP3 and IP2, as lower phosphorylated inositol phosphates show less mineral binding capacity [20]. Therefore, phytases increase the available P, reducing the phytate excretion and increasing digestibility [21,22].

Exogenous phytases are usually of microbial origin, and they can be classified as 3-phytases (EC 3.1.3.8) or 6-phytases (EC 3.1.3.26), depending on the position at which the hydrolysis of the phytate molecule is initiated (C3 or C6, respectively). Besides type of activity, the efficacy of phytases depends on many factors, including microorganism of origin, optimal pH and temperature, type of substrate or species or age of the animals [15,23], and specific pattern of potential P-hydrolysis from phytic acid via various inositol phosphate isomers to myo-inositol (IP0) [24]. Recently, a newly developed composited bacterial 6-phytase has been tested, obtaining promising results [25]. The novelty of that phytase is that the phytase gene was assembled from sequences of various phytase-producing bacteria (i.e., Hafnia ssp., Yersinia ssp., and Buttauxiella ssp.). The production was done by fermentation in Aspergillus niger.

The evaluation of phytase efficacy varies depending on the measurement used for its assessment. Performance and P apparent total tract digestibility (ATTD) are probably the most commonly used, but bone breaking strength, bone mineralization, and probably bone density are the most sensitive criteria of P availability [26]. Dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA or DEXA) is the technique of choice to determine bone density [27]. It allows the evaluation of thick body parts or complex bone formations, because it obviates the need for assumptions about soft-tissue shape and attenuation [28]. On the other hand, quantitative computed tomography (CT) is the only three-dimensional densitometer available, capable of selectively measuring cortical or trabecular bone [29]. Computed tomography has also been used to determine bone density, studying the surface with certain Hounsfields values [30,31,32]. Both DXA and CT have the advantage that allows the study of bone characteristics non-destructively, either applied to live animals or carcasses or directly to the bones.

Two experiments were conducted with the objective of evaluating the efficacy of different doses of this new phytase on performance, bone mineralization, and ATTD of Ca and P in diets formulated with low digestible P fed to weaned piglets. Measurement of bone density using CT was also evaluated as a possible tool to evaluate the efficacy of phytases in piglet feeding.

2. Materials and Methods

The two experiments were conducted at the Experimental Farm of the “Institut de Recerca i Tecnologia Agroalimentària–IRTA” at Centre Mas Bové, Constantí (Spain).

2.1. Animals, Dietary Treatments, and Experimental Design

One hundred and twenty newly weaned pigs ([Duroc × Landrace] × Pietrain; mixed entire males and females) were used in each of the two experiments. Piglets had average ages of 26 and 28 days and body weights of 7.3 ± 1.37 and 9.2 ± 1.24 kg (mean ± SD) at the start of Experiments 1 and 2, respectively. Pigs in each experiment were allotted to a randomized complete block design with body weight as the blocking factor. There were five experimental treatments consisting of a positive control diet (PC) that was formulated to contain adequate levels of Ca and P, a basal negative control diet (NC) that was formulated to contain limiting levels of Ca and P, and the basal NC diet supplemented with either 125, 250, or 500 FTU/kg of the novel phytase under study (NC125, NC250, and NC500, respectively). The phytase activity (FTU/kg) of diets NC125, NC250, and NC500, analysed according to Engelen et al. [33], were 96, 266, and 422 (pre-starter; Experiment 1); 100, 253, and 577 (pre-starter; Experiment 2); 111, 223, and 454 (starter; Experiment 1); and 106, 245, and 469 (starter; Experiment 2), respectively. The PC diets were formulated to provide 0.36% and 0.29% digestible P (ATTD) in the pre-starter and starter period, respectively, according to NRC [34] for Experiment 1 and 0.38% and 0.33% digestible P according to FEDNA [35] for Experiment 2. This meant that higher digestible P contents were used in Experiment 2 compared to Experiment 1. For the basal NC diets, digestible P contents were reduced by half by reducing the amount of dicalcium phosphate in the diets. The total Ca:P ratio was maintained at 1.2 for all diets. Besides Ca and P, PC and NC diets were formulated to be iso-nutritive for each phase in both experiments. Each experimental treatment comprised eight replicates with three piglets per pen. Pigs had ad libitum access to feed and water according to a 2-phase feeding program: pre-starter phase (14.1 MJ ME; 12.5 g/kg SID lysine) between 0–21 days, and starter phase (14.0 MJ ME; 11.5 g/kg SID lysine) between 21–42 days of the experiment. The composition of the diets and their analysed nutrient composition are shown in Table 1. Feed was presented in pelleted form, and phytase was added in a liquid formulation by post-pelleting liquid application. Titanium dioxide (5 g/kg) was added to the pre-starter phase experimental diets as a marker for digestibility measurements.

Table 1.

Composition and nutrient content of basal diets 1.

1–21 d (Pre-Starter) 21–42 d (Starter)
Experiment 1 Experiment 2 Experiment 1 Experiment 2
PC NC PC NC PC NC PC NC
Ingredients (%)
 Maize 48.4 50.5 48.1 50.1 65.9 67.5 64.9 66.6
 Soybean meal (48% CP) 24.2 24.2 24.4 24.4 27.8 27.8 28.5 28.5
 Extruded soybeans 10.0 10.0 10.0 10.0 - - - -
 Sweet milk whey 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 - - - -
 Lard 2.69 1.86 2.75 1.91 2.83 2.14 2.89 2.20
 L-Lysine-HCl 0.32 0.31 0.31 0.31 0.38 0.37 0.38 0.37
 L-Threonine 0.13 0.13 0.13 0.12 0.15 0.14 0.15 0.15
 DL-Methionine 0.18 0.17 0.18 0.17 0.15 0.15 0.15 0.14
 L-Tryptophan 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.03
 Salt 0.16 0.16 0.16 0.16 0.36 0.36 0.36 0.36
 Calcium carbonate 0.38 0.55 0.21 0.38 0.45 0.59 0.28 0.42
 Dicalcium phosphate 2 1.39 0.05 1.63 0.29 1.41 0.30 1.65 0.54
 Ethoxyquin 3 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02
 Vit-Min complex 4 0.60 0.60 0.60 0.60 0.60 0.60 0.60 0.60
 TiO2 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 - - - -
Analysed nutrient content (%)
 Dry matter 89.7 89.3 88.1 88.0 89.0 88.4 87.4 87.3
 Crude Protein 21.0 20.1 20.5 20.9 19.0 19.0 19.4 19.1
 Fat 6.06 5.31 7.77 6.40 5.58 4.91 5.31 4.32
 Ash 6.14 5.02 5.68 4.86 4.92 4.11 4.66 3.97
 Gross Energy (MJ/kg) 17.4 17.3 17.0 16.9 17.3 17.1 16.9 16.7
 Calcium 0.83 0.55 0.81 0.47 0.78 0.60 0.67 0.57
 Phosphorous 0.57 0.31 0.66 0.40 0.56 0.38 0.63 0.44

PC = positive control; NC = negative control. 1 Calculated phytate-P levels for both experiments were 0.23% (PC) and 0.24% (NC) in pre-starter diets and 0.24% (PC) and 0.25% (NC) in starter diets. 2 DCP had a phosphorous content of 17.5%, and digestible P content from that source was assumed to be 13.5%. 3 Provides per kg feed: vitamin A 10,000 UI; vitamin D3 2000 UI; vitamin E (alfa-tocopherol) 25 mg; vitamin B1 1.5 mg; vitamin B2 3.5 mg; vitamin B6 2.4 mg; vitamin B12 20 µg; vitamin K3 1.5 mg; calcium pantothenate 14 mg; nicotinic acid 20 mg; folic acid 0.5 mg; biotin 50 µg; Fe (FeSO4·H2O) 120 mg; I (Ca(I2O3)2) 0.75 mg; Cu (CuSO4·5H2O) 150 mg; Mn (MnO) 60 mg; Zn (ZnO) 110 mg; Se (Na2SeO3) 0.37 mg. 4 Antioxidant 6-ethoxy-1,2-dihydro-2,2,4-trimethylquinoline (Andrés Pintaluba S.A., Spain).

2.2. Experimental Procedures, Sampling, and Analyses

Individual BW and feed intake for each pen were recorded at days 0, 21, and 42, and the pen’s average initial and final live body weight (BW), average daily weight gain (ADG), average daily feed intake (ADFI), and average gain to feed ratio (GFR) between 0–21, 21–42, and 0–42 days of the experiment were calculated. Between days 18–21, fresh faeces from each pen were collected and stored at −20 °C until freeze-drying and analysis. Feed and faeces were analysed for Ca, P, and TiO2. Calcium was analysed by inductively coupled plasma-optical emission spectrometry (ICP-OES Optima 2100DV, Perkin Elmer Life and Analytical Sciences, USA). Total P was determined colorimetrically by the vanadomolybdate method-AOAC 965.17 (AOAC, 2000), and the concentrations of TiO2 were measured as described by Short et al. [36]. The ATTD coefficients for Ca and P were calculated by the index method [37].

At the end of each experiment (d 42), the piglets with the intermediate initial body weight in each pen (one piglet per pen) were slaughtered under isofluorane anesthesia. After confirmation of death, the left front foot of the piglets was sampled and stored at −20 °C until analysis. Feet were defrosted overnight and autoclaved at 105 °C for 15 min, after which the Os metacarpale III and IV were dissected. Os metacarpale III was used for the analysis of dry matter and ash content, and Os metacarpale IV was reserved for CT scanning. For the piglets belonging to treatments PC, NC, and NC500, a blood sample was obtained before slaughtering using lithium heparin tubes. Calcium (o-cresolphthalein complexone method) and phosphate (ammonium-molybdate reaction method) concentrations and AP activity (IFCC method, 37 °C) in blood plasma were analysed with a Roche Hitachi 917 clinical chemistry analyser (Roche Diagnostics, Basel, Switzerland).

2.3. Computed Tomography Scanning of the Bones

The Os metacarpale IV bones were scanned by CT in groups of five bones (one from each treatment) according to the initial blocks of BW. The bones from the five piglets in each block were placed in parallel on the CT table, and an axial image was taken from the centre of the bone by means of a General Electric HiSpeed Zx/l CT device (GE Healthcare, Boston, Massachusetts, USA). The following acquisition parameters were used: 140 kV, 145 mA, 512 × 512 matrix, 1 mm-thick image, and a displayed field of view of 350 mm. Figure 1 shows an example of the disposition of the bones and the axial image obtained with CT.

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Example of disposition of the bones (one of each treatment) for the computed tomography (CT) acquisition and axial image obtained of the centre of the bones (discontinuous line).

From the axial images of the bones, the volumes associated with each Hounsfield unit (HU) were obtained individually for each bone by means of the software VisualPork, developed by the University of Girona and IRTA [38,39]. Bones were considered to have HU values higher than 140 [40], and the volume associated with these HU values was obtained. This limit also allows the discarding of the marrow of the bone analysis, since it has lower density [41,42], and the consideration of only the cortical bone. This volume for each axial image and the distribution of volumes for each bone were used to determine bone density according to the formula developed by Picouet et al. [43]. In addition, bone tissues were classified between those that have low density (HU values between 141 and 500) and those that have high density (HU values above 500), as proposed by du Chazaud et al. [30] and applied in other works [31]. The proportion of low (volume between HU 141 and 500 with respect to total bone, i.e., HU > 140) and high-density (volume with >500 with respect to total bone, i.e., HU > 140) bone tissues was calculated as a measure of bone strength.

2.4. Statistics

The effects of dietary treatment were analysed by ANOVA using the GLM procedure of SAS (SAS Inst. Inc., Cary, NC, USA) whereby the pen was considered as an experimental unit. The following model was used:

Yij = μ + τi + βj + eij (1)

where Yij is the observed dependent variable, μ is the overall mean, τi is the effect of dietary treatment, βj is the effect of block, and eij is the random error within the model. All the animals completed the experiments satisfactorily, and their data has been included in the calculations and the statistical analysis, and no outliers were detected according to Smirnoff-Stefansky’s test [44]. Linear and quadratic polynomial contrasts were also used to determine the response to phytase supplementation of the NC diets. When the effect of the dietary treatment was significant, multiple comparisons of treatment means were performed using Fisher’s LSD test. The level of significance was set at p < 0.05, and trends are discussed at p < 0.1.

3. Results

3.1. Performance

Growth performance parameters are shown in Table 2. In Experiment 1, no statistically significant differences in performance among treatments were observed during the pre-starter phase (0–21 days), except for GFR, which tended to be lower in piglets fed the NC diet than in those fed the NC125 diet (p = 0.06). A quadratic response to the addition of phytase to the NC diets was also observed for GFR in the pre-starter phase (p < 0.05). During the starter phase (21–42 days) piglets fed the NC diet had significantly lower ADG and ADFI than any of the other treatments (PC or phytase-supplemented NC diets) (p < 0.01). No differences were observed between PC and the NC diets supplemented with phytase. Linear responses to increasing doses of phytase were observed for ADG and ADFI (p < 0.01). Finally, during this phase, the GFR of the animals fed the NC diet was lower than that of the animals fed the PC and NC500 diets (p < 0.05), and for the NC supplemented diets, a linear increase with the dose of phytase was observed (p < 0.05). Over the whole experiment (0–42 days), piglets fed the NC diet had significantly lower final BW and ADG than those fed the PC or any of the phytase-supplemented diets (p < 0.01), lower GFR than those fed the PC, NC125, and NC500 diets (p < 0.01), and smaller ADFI than those fed the PC and NC500 diets (p < 0.05). Linear responses to the dose of phytase were observed for final BW, ADG, and ADFI (p < 0.01).

Table 2.

Effect of 6-phytase supplementation to negative control diets on performance of weaned pigs 1.

PC NC NC125 NC250 NC500 RMSE p-Value L 2 Q 3
Experiment 1
 Body weight (kg)
 0 d 7.33 7.37 7.30 7.33 7.29 0.090 0.414 0.145 0.737
 21 d 13.0 12.4 13.4 12.7 13.3 1.022 0.302 0.265 0.623
 42 d 24.1 a,b 21.2 c 23.8 a,b 23.1 b 25.0 a 1.609 <0.001 <0.001 0.368
 Weight gain (g/d)
 0–21 d 270 241 293 257 285 48 0.227 0.210 0.597
 21–42 d 527 a,b 418 c 494 b 493 b 559 a 40 <0.001 <0.001 0.261
 0–42 d 398 a,b 329 c 393 a,b 375 b 422 a 38 <0.001 <0.001 0.360
Feed intake (g/d)
 0–21 d 387 383 393 372 414 59 0.696 0.356 0.430
 21–42 d 854 a,b 733 c 804 b 835 b 903 a 61 <0.001 <0.001 0.361
 0–42 d 621 a,b 558 c 598 b,c 603 a,b,c 658 a 55 0.019 0.001 0.937
Gain/feed
 0–21 d 0.698 0.627 0.743 0.693 0.691 0.073 0.060 0.332 0.047
 21–42 d 0.618 a 0.573 b 0.616 a 0.595 a,b 0.619 a 0.034 0.039 0.036 0.438
 0–42 d 0.643 a 0.592 b 0.658 a 0.625 a,b 0.642 a 0.035 0.010 0.063 0.089
Experiment 2
Body weight (kg)
 0 d 9.20 9.20 9.18 9.18 9.17 0.031 0.293 0.337 0.356
 21 d 15.3 15.0 15.2 15.3 14.8 0.817 0.722 0.561 0.274
 42 d 29.1 27.1 28.0 28.8 28.3 1.482 0.093 0.111 0.089
Weight gain (g/d)
 0–21 d 292 277 289 291 270 39 0.729 0.582 0.261
 21–42 d 655 a 575 b 608 a,b 645 a 643 a 57 0.048 0.021 0.165
 0–42 d 473 426 449 468 456 35 0.085 0.111 0.085
Feed intake (g/d)
 0–21 d 416 397 397 395 389 46 0.814 0.729 0.889
 21–42 d 1017 938 963 1024 977 76 0.156 0.262 0.090
 0–42 d 717 668 680 710 683 50 0.256 0.484 0.169
Gain/feed
 0–21 d 0.718 0.717 0.740 0.749 0.718 0.070 0.824 0.932 0.265
 21–42 d 0.646 0.613 0.633 0.629 0.658 0.030 0.054 0.007 0.939
 0–42 d 0.665 0.640 0.663 0.660 0.671 0.028 0.273 0.063 0.434

PC = positive control; NC = negative control; NC125 = NC diet with phytase at 125 FTU/kg feed; NC250 = NC diet with phytase at 250 FTU/kg feed; NC500 = NC diet with phytase at 500 FTU/kg feed; RMSE = root mean square error; d = day. 1 Values in the table are LSMEANS of 8 pens per treatment for each experiment. 2 p-value for linear effect of phytase supplementation of the negative control diet. 3 p-value for quadratic effect of phytase supplementation of the negative control diet. a,b,c Values within a row with different superscripts differ significantly at p < 0.05 (LSD test).

In Experiment 2, the performance responses to the different dietary treatments were in line with those of Experiment 1, although no significant differences were reached for most of them. Only ADG of pigs fed the NC diet during the starter phase was significantly lower than that of pigs fed the PC, NC250, or NC500 diets (p < 0.05). Pigs fed the NC diet also tended to have lower final BW and poorer ADG over the whole experiment than the pigs fed PC or NC250 diets (p < 0.10) and lower GFR during the starter phase than the pigs fed PC or NC500 diets (p < 0.10). Linear responses to the dose of phytase added to the NC diets were observed for ADG (p < 0.05) and GFR (p < 0.01) during the starter phase.

3.2. Apparent Total Tract Digestibility of P and Ca

The ATTD of P and Ca are shown in Table 3. In Experiment 1, ATTD of P for the NC diet was significantly lower than that of the PC and all the phytase-supplemented diets (p < 0.01). Linear (p < 0.01) and quadratic (p < 0.05) responses were also observed to the increasing doses of phytase on the NC diet. Furthermore, Ca ATTD of the NC diet was not different from that of the PC diet, but it was enhanced by phytase supplementation relative to NC (all doses) or PC (250 and 500 FTU doses; p < 0.01). Linear and quadratic responses to the dose of phytase on the NC diet were observed for Ca ATTD (p < 0.01).

Table 3.

Effect of 6-phytase supplementation to negative control diets on Ca and P apparent total tract digestibility (ATTD, %) of the starter diets between 18–21 days 1.

PC NC NC125 NC250 NC500 RMSE p-Value L 2 Q 3
Experiment 1
 P ATTD 41.2 a 9.80 d 21.0 c 33.3 b 42.0 a 6.77 <0.001 <0.001 0.023
 Ca ATTD 54.2 b,c 51.3 c 57.9 b 69.3 a 68.6 a 4.26 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001
Experiment 2
 P ATTD 52.0 a 29.1 d 28.0 d 40.0 c 46.8 b 4.36 <0.001 <0.001 0.763
 Ca ATTD 48.6 a 32.6 b 37.5 b 48.9 a 45.0 a 6.37 <0.001 <0.001 0.004

PC = positive control; NC = negative control; NC125 = NC diet with phytase at 125 FTU/kg feed; NC250 = NC diet with phytase at 250 FTU/kg feed; NC500 = NC diet with phytase at 500 FTU/kg feed; RMSE = root mean square error. 1 Values in the table are LSMEANS of 8 pens per treatment for each experiment. 2 p-value for linear effect of phytase supplementation of the negative control diet. 3 p-value for quadratic effect of phytase supplementation of the negative control diet. a,b,c,d Values within a row with different superscripts differ significantly at p < 0.05 (LSD test).

In Experiment 2, P ATTD of the NC diet was significantly lower than that of the PC and the NC250 and NC500 supplemented diets (p < 0.01), and a linear (p < 0.01) response to the dose of phytase on the NC diet was observed. Ca ATTD of the NC diet was also lower than that of the PC, NC250, and NC500 diets (p < 0.01), and it augmented linearly (p < 0.01) and quadratically (p < 0.01) with increasing doses of phytase on the NC diet.

3.3. Bone Mineralization and Bone Density

The parameters of bone mineralization and density are shown in Table 4. In Experiment 1, Os metacarpale III’s dry weight and ash content (both expressed as percentage and as total weight) and bone density of Os metacarpale IV were lower for the NC diets than for the PC diets (p < 0.01), and relative to NC, phytase supplementation increased bone dry weight and total ash content for all phytase containing diets (p < 0.01), and ash percentage and bone density for NC250 and NC500 diets (p < 0.01).

Table 4.

Effect of 6-phytase supplementation to negative control diets on bone mineralization (left Os metacarpale III) and density (left Os metacarpale IV) 1.

PC NC NC125 NC250 NC500 RMSE p-Value L 2 Q 3
Experiment 1
 Dry weight (g) 2.65 a,b 1.85 c 2.37 b 2.46 a,b 2.81 a 0.364 <0.001 <0.001 0.185
 Ash (%) 42.6 a 30.1 d 33.0 c,d 36.0 b,c 36.6 b 3.34 <0.001 <0.001 0.083
 Ash (g) 1.12 a 0.56 d 0.78 c 0.88 b,c 1.03 a,b 0.145 <0.001 <0.001 0.095
 Density (g/cm3) 1.56 a,b 1.41 c 1.49 b,c 1.59 a 1.62 a 0.075 <0.001 <0.001 0.047
Experiment 2
 Dry weight (g) 3.24 a 2.31 c 2.64 b,c 2.76 b 2.98 a,b 0.337 <0.001 <0.001 0.310
 Ash (%) 43.3 a 36.7 c 37.6 c 39.8 b,c 40.9 a,b 3.19 0.002 0.008 0.602
 Ash (g) 1.41 a 0.85 d 0.99 c 1.09 b,c 1.22 b 0.135 <0.001 <0.001 0.246
 Density (g/cm3) 1.70 1.62 1.68 1.72 1.71 0.135 0.595 0.217 0.306

PC = positive control; NC = negative control; NC125 = NC diet with phytase at 125 FTU/kg feed; NC250 = NC diet with phytase at 250 FTU/kg feed; NC500 = NC diet with phytase at 500 FTU/kg feed; RMSE = root mean square error. 1 Values in the table are LSMEANS of one animal per pen (8 pens per treatment) for each experiment. 2 p-value for linear effect of phytase supplementation of the negative control diet. 3 p-value for quadratic effect of phytase supplementation of the negative control diet. a,b,c,d Values within a row with different superscripts differ significantly at p < 0.05 (LSD test).

In Experiment 2, Os metacarpale III’s dry weight and ash content (both, expressed as percentage and as total weight) were lower for the NC diets than for the PC diets, and relative to NC, phytase supplementation increased bones’ dry weight for diets NC250 and NC500 (p < 0.01); ash percentage for NC500 (p < 0.01), and total ash content for all phytase containing diets (p < 001). No significant differences in bone density of Os metacarpale IV were observed for this experiment.

Significant linear responses to the doses of phytase in the NC diet were observed in both experiments for bone’s dry weight and total ash content (p < 0.01) and for ash percentage (p < 0.01). In Experiment 1, linear and quadratic responses were also observed for bone density (p < 0.01).

3.4. Image Analysis of Bones by Computed Tomography Scanning

Figure 2 shows the proportion of the Os metacarpale IV bones with tissue of low density (HU values between 141 and 500) and tissue of high density (HU values above 500) in Experiments 1 (Figure 2a) and 2 (Figure 2b). In Experiment 1, pigs fed the NC diets presented a lower proportion of high-density bone tissue compared to PC (p < 0.01). Phytase supplementation also increased the proportion of bone tissue with high density compared to NC, and this was significant for all the phytase diets (p < 0.05). The proportion of high-density bone tissue also increased linearly (p < 0.01) and quadratically (p < 0.05) with the dose of phytase. Similar patterns were observed for Experiment 2, but no significant effect was observed. However, a tendency for a linear response to phytase supplementation was detected (p = 0.06).

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Proportion of low-density (HU values ranging from 141–500) and high-density (HU values above 500) tissues with respect to total bone (HU > 140) in left Os metacarpale IV bone of piglets as measured by computed tomography in (a) Experiment 1 and (b) Experiment 2. NC = negative control; NC125 = NC diet with phytase at 125 FTU/kg feed; NC250 = NC diet with phytase at 250 FTU/kg feed; NC500 = NC diet with phytase at 500 FTU/kg feed. Values in the table are LSMEANS of one animal per pen (8 pens per treatment) for each experiment. Bars with different letters differ significantly at p < 0.05 (LSD test). Significant linear and quadratic responses to phytase dose addition to the NC diet were observed in Experiment 1 (p < 0.001 and p = 0.016, respectively).

3.5. Concentration of Ca and P and Alkaline Phosphatase Activity in Blood Plasma

The concentrations of Ca and P and the activity of AP in blood plasma are reported in Table 5. No statistically significant effects of dietary treatment on Ca plasma levels were observed in any of the two experiments. In both experiments, relative to PC and NC500 diets, the NC diets resulted in reduced concentrations of P (p < 0.01), increased Ca:P ratios (p < 0.01), and increased AP activity (p < 0.01 and p < 0.05 for Experiments 1 and 2, respectively).

Table 5.

Calcium (Ca) and phosphate (P) concentration and alkaline phosphatase activity in blood plasma of piglets fed a positive control diet (PC), a negative control diet (NC) with limiting levels of Ca and P, or an NC diet supplemented with 500 FTU/kg of phytase for 42 days 1.

PC NC NC500 RMSE p-Value
Experiment 1
 Calcium (mmol/L) 2.45 2.31 2.46 0.158 0.145
 Phosphate (mmol/L) 2.79 a 1.79 b 2.55 a 0.347 <0.001
 Ca:P ratio 0.89 b 1.33 a 0.98 b 0.190 0.001
 Alkaline Phosphatase (I.U./L) 414 b 1001 a 506 b 227.5 <0.001
Experiment 2
 Calcium (mmol/L) 2.82 2.83 2.88 0.194 0.807
 Phosphate (mmol/L) 2.95 a 2.19 b 3.18 a 0.321 <0.001
 Ca:P ratio 0.96 b 1.34 a 0.92 b 0.176 <0.001
 Alkaline Phosphatase (I.U./L) 173 b 225 a 168 b 36.5 0.013

PC = positive control; NC = negative control; NC500 = NC diet with phytase at 500 FTU/kg feed; RMSE = root mean square error. 1 Values in the table are LSMEANS of one animal per pen (8 pens per treatment) for each experiment. a,b Values within a row with different superscripts differ significantly at p < 0.05 (LSD test).

4. Discussion

It is well known that a large amount of P from plant-based diets is not available for monogastric animals, because it is found as a phytate form [2]. The addition of phytases to the diets favours P hydrolysis and may also increase the digestibility and absorption of other nutrients and performance [15,45,46,47].

This study showed that phytase supplementation of NC diets resulted in values of body weight, weight gain, feed intake, and gain/feed ratio that were equivalent to those observed with the corresponding PC diets. These performance parameters were significantly improved in the phytase-supplemented diets compared to NC, and linear dose effects were observed. These significant improvements in performance with the addition of phytase were observed mainly during the starter phase (21–42 d), but no statistically significant differences were reached during the pre-starter phase (0–21 d after weaning). Other authors from similar studies have also reported less statistical significance for performance parameters for the immediate period after weaning. Bento et al. [48] conducted two experiments of 24 days (animals from 8 to 12 kg) and observed that Buttiauxella phytase supplementation (at 250, 500, 1000, or 2000 FTU/kg) did not have an effect on the performance parameters, despite increasing Ca and P digestibility. In another experiment with weaned piglets, 1000 FTU/kg of phytase did not have a significant effect on performance during the first 21 days of the experiment, but significant improvements were found at day 35 [49]. A study with an E. coli-derived phytase in weaning pig diets over 28 days indicated that phytase supplementation improved growth performance and Ca and P digestibility in pigs during the starter phase [50]. In a recently published meta-analysis [51], it has been estimated that phytase supplementation increases P digestibility by an average of 25.6% digestibility units. This metanalysis identified diet composition, animal’s age, and phytase characteristics as the main factors influencing the efficiency of phytases. In the current studies, the differences in phytase efficiency observed between the pre-starter and starter phases could be explained by a higher variability in the immediate period post-weaning, associated with post-weaning stress [52], but also by a limited ability of the piglets during this period to secrete HCl and acidify the stomach contents to pH values that optimise the activity of the phytase. Whereas the pH in the stomach of young piglets remains close to that of the diet, in the adult pig, pH rapidly falls to values close to pH 2 [53]. In weaned piglets, it has been described that the pH of digesta in the fundus region of the stomach of piglets was close to 3.5 at weaning and during the first week postweaning, and it was not until the second week post-weaning that average pH values below 3 were achieved [54].

On the other hand, it is well recognised that exogenous phytases increase nutrient digestibility and reduce the antinutritional effects of phytates, both effects contributing to enhancing animal performance and reducing the impact of animal production on the environment [15,25]. In the case of P, the key issue is how much additional P is potentially released and made available to the animals, which mainly depends on the composition of the diet. However, the impact on performance and bone mineralisation also depends on how well the basal control diet meets the P requirements of the piglets. In the current experiments, at day 21 post-weaning, phytase supplementation of low-P diets with the 500 FTU increased P digestibility by up to 32% and 18% in digestibility units, respectively. In a previous experiment with the same phytase and dosage, an increase of 37% in digestibility units and an additional release of 1.57 g of P per kg were observed [25]. An average response to phytase supplementation of 19% units of P digestibility has been reported for piglets [55], which indicates a high efficacy for the novel phytase tested. It should be noted that P digestibility in the current study is very low in the NC diet (particularly in Experiment 1). According to the exponential prediction model proposed by Sung et al. [56], ATTD P contents of 1.079 and 1.663 g/kg should be expected for the NC pre-starter diets in Experiments 1 and 2, respectively. Our results were much lower than expected with this prediction model, as for these diets, we obtained values of 0.304 and 1.164 g ATTD P/kg, respectively. This could be explained by the low P digestibility of corn diets in young pigs, as has been previously reported [57,58].

Serum AP activity is negatively correlated with bone mineralisation and has been used as an indicator for Ca and P status in pigs [5,59,60]. In the present experiments, the pigs consuming the NC diet presented lower P concentration and higher PA activity in blood serum than pigs from the PC group or pigs fed the NC diet supplemented with 500 FTU of phytase, which confirms a shortage of available P with the NC diet but adequate and equivalent levels for the PC and NC supplemented diets. This agrees with other studies in which a higher availability of P resulting from phytase supplementation caused a reduction in serum PA activity [61,62,63,64]. It is worth noticing that lower values of serum PA activities and higher P concentrations were found in Experiment 2 than in Experiment 1. These may be explained by a higher P availability in the basal diets of Experiment 2, resulting from the addition of an additional 0.24% of dicalcium phosphate.

Several authors have used bone mineralisation as an adequate indicator of P status [26,65,66]. Many studies have observed a positive response in bone mineralization to phytase supplementation of a low-P diet, providing similar values to those obtained with P-adequate diets [54,67,68]. With the phytase evaluated in the present work, the bone mineralization response, in terms of changes in overall bone density, was maximised with supplementation doses ranging between 250 and 500 FTU/kg of phytase, which are lower activities than those reported in previous studies to achieve the same effect [26,62,68,69,70,71,72]. In Experiment 1, a linear increase in bone density to phytase dose was also observed, but this effect was not as clear in the piglets of Experiment 2. This is probably because of the different P contents of the basal diets. In Experiment 1, the highest bone density was 1.62 g/cm3, and this was observed for the highest dose of phytase, the PC being 1.56 g/cm3, whereas in Experiment 2, the highest bone density was 1.72 g/cm3 for the 250 FTU dose of phytase, a value that was very similar to that observed for the 125 and 500 FTU doses and the PC (ranging from 1.68 to 1.71 g/cm3), which suggests that the maximal response may have already been achieved with the lower doses of phytase. In a similar study with fattening pigs, it has been shown that supplemental inorganic P can be completely removed from the diet without affecting performance if phytase is added to the diet [26]. These authors tested the morphometric, geometrical, densitometric, and mechanical properties of the pig’s femur at the end of the study. The results showed that the strength and bone density (measured by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry) of the pigs fed an inorganic-P free diet and supplemented with 1175 FTU of phytase were better than those of the pigs fed the control diet supplemented with 5.04 g monocalcium phosphate per kg. It demonstrates that, if enough substrate (phytate) is available, phytase may satisfy P requirements. In the present studies, it was also observed that supplementing low-P diets with phytase resulted in equivalent bone densities to those obtained with diets adequate in P.

5. Conclusions

The supplementation of low-P diets with the novel bacterial 6-phytase tested at dose rates up to 500 FTU/kg improves performance, phosphorous digestibility, and bone mineralization and density in piglets fed P-limiting diets, and these effects were more evident for the basal diet with lower P content. In addition, it has also been shown that bone density evaluated by computed tomography can be used to test the phytase efficacy in piglets.

Acknowledgments

The authors acknowledge IRTA’s farm and laboratory staff for their practical support in the experiments and Raquel Sousa and Albert Brun for their assistance in measuring bone densities.

Author Contributions

M.F., P.A., and D.T., contributed to the conceptualization, description of the methodology, and experiment development. M.F.-i.-F. carried out CT scanning and analysis of bones. Formal analysis of data was performed by N.T., J.T., M.F.-i.-F., and D.T. N.T., J.T., and D.T. wrote the original draft preparation. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

This work was conducted at the Experimental Farm of the Institute of Agrifood Research & Technology (IRTA) after approval by IRTA’s Ethical Committee on Animal Experimentation (CEEA); Experiment codes P-504/P-521, resolution code E-24/2021.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest. The authors have read the journal’s guideline and have the following competing interests: the co-author P.A. is an employee of BASF company, which partially financed the project and provided the phytase. The other authors have no competing interests.

Footnotes

Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

References

  • 1.O’Dell B.L., Sunde R.A. Handbook of Nutritionally Essential Mineral Elements. 1st ed. CRC Press; New York, NY, USA: 1997. [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Angel R., Tamim N., Applegate T., Dhandu A., Ellestad L. Phytic acid chemistry: Influence on phytin-phosphorus availability and phytase efficacy. J. Appl. Poult. Res. 2002;11:471–480. doi: 10.1093/japr/11.4.471. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Ravindran V., Bryden W., Kornegay E. Phytates: Occurrence, bioavailability and implications in poultry nutrition. Poult. Avian. Biol. Rev. 1995;6:125–143. [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Jongbloed A.W., Mroz Z., Kemme P.A. The effect of supplementary Aspergillus niger phytase in diets for pigs on concentration and apparent digestibility of dry matter, total phosphorus, and phytic acid in different sections of the alimentary tract. J. Anim. Sci. 1992;70:1159–1168. doi: 10.2527/1992.7041159x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Pointillart A. Enhancement of phosphorus utilization in growing pigs fed phytate-rich diets by using rye bran. J. Anim. Sci. 1991;69:1109–1115. doi: 10.2527/1991.6931109x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Selle P., Ravindran V., Caldwell A., Bryden W. Phytate and phytase: Consequences for protein utilisation. Nutr. Res. Rev. 2000;13:255–278. doi: 10.1079/095442200108729098. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Torrallardona D., Tarradas J., Tous N. The use of exogenous enzymes to optimise gut function in pigs. In: Bailey M., Stokes C., editors. Understanding Gut Microbiomes as Targets for Improving Gut Health. Volume 1. Burleigh Dodds Science Publishing Limited; Sawston, Cambridge, UK: 2021. p. 50. [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Cheryan M., Rackis J.J. Phytic acid interactions in food systems. Crit. Rev. Food Sci. Nutr. 1980;13:297–335. doi: 10.1080/10408398009527293. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Cowieson A., Ravindran V., Selle P. Influence of dietary phytic acid and source of microbial phytase on ileal endogenous amino acid flows in broiler chickens. Poult. Sci. J. 2008;87:2287–2299. doi: 10.3382/ps.2008-00096. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Reddy N., Sathe S., Salunkhe D. Phytates in legumes and cereals. Adv. Food Nutr. Res. 1982;28:1–92. doi: 10.1016/s0065-2628(08)60110-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Woyengo T., Nyachoti C. Anti-nutritional effects of phytic acid in diets for pigs and poultry-current knowledge and directions for future research. Can. J. Anim. Sci. 2013;93:9–21. doi: 10.4141/cjas2012-017. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Woyengo T.A., Cowieson A.J., Adeola O., Nyachoti C.M. Ileal digestibility and endogenous flow of minerals and amino acids: Responses to dietary phytic acid in piglets. Br. J. Nutr. 2009;102:428–433. doi: 10.1017/S0007114508184719. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Deshpande S., Cheryan M. Effects of Phytic Acid, Divalent Cations, and Their Interactions on α-Amylase Activity. J. Food Sci. 1984;49:516–519. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2621.1984.tb12456.x. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Singh M., Krikorian A. Inhibition of trypsin activity in vitro by phytate. J. Agric. Food Chem. 1982;30:799–800. doi: 10.1021/jf00112a049. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Dersjant-Li Y., Awati A., Schulze H., Partridge G. Phytase in non-ruminant animal nutrition: A critical review on phytase activities in the gastrointestinal tract and influencing factors. J. Sci. Food Agric. 2015;95:878–896. doi: 10.1002/jsfa.6998. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Kornegay E., Harper A., Jones R., Boyd L. Environmental nutrition: Nutrient management strategies to reduce nutrient excretion of swine. Prof. Anim. Sci. 1997;13:99–111. doi: 10.15232/S1080-7446(15)31861-1. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Correll D.L. The role of phosphorus in the eutrophication of receiving waters: A review. J. Environ. Qual. 1998;27:261–266. doi: 10.2134/jeq1998.00472425002700020004x. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Smith V.H., Tilman G.D., Nekola J.C. Eutrophication: Impacts of excess nutrient inputs on freshwater, marine, and terrestrial ecosystems. Environ. Pollut. 1999;100:179–196. doi: 10.1016/S0269-7491(99)00091-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Selle P.H., Ravindran V. Phytate-degrading enzymes in pig nutrition. Livest. Sci. 2008;113:99–122. doi: 10.1016/j.livsci.2007.05.014. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Schlemmer U., Jany K.D., Berk A., Schulz E., Rechkemmer G. Degradation of phytate in the gut of pigs-Pathway of gastrointestinal inositol phosphate hydrolysis and enzymes involved. Arch. Anim. Nutr. Arch. Fur Tierernahr. 2001;55:255–280. doi: 10.1080/17450390109386197. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Wyss M., Brugger R., Kronenberger A., Rémy R., Fimbel R., Oesterhelt G., Lehmann M., van Loon A.P. Biochemical characterization of fungal phytases (myo-inositol hexakisphosphate phosphohydrolases): Catalytic properties. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 1999;65:367–373. doi: 10.1128/AEM.65.2.367-373.1999. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Yu S., Cowieson A., Gilbert C., Plumstead P., Dalsgaard S. Interactions of phytate and myo-inositol phosphate esters (IP) including IP isomers with dietary protein and iron and inhibition of pepsin. Anim. Sci. J. 2012;90:1824–1832. doi: 10.2527/jas.2011-3866. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Lei X.G., Weaver J.D., Mullaney E., Ullah A.H., Azain M.J. Phytase, a new life for an “old” enzyme. Annu. Rev. Anim. Biosci. 2013;1:283–309. doi: 10.1146/annurev-animal-031412-103717. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Zeller E., Schollenberger M., Kühn I., Rodehutscord M. Hydrolysis of phytate and formation of inositol phosphate isomers without or with supplemented phytases in different segments of the digestive tract of broilers. J. Nutr. Sci. 2015;4:e1. doi: 10.1017/jns.2014.62. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Torrallardona D., Ader P. Effects of a novel 6-phytase (EC 3.1. 3.26) on performance, phosphorus and calcium digestibility, and bone mineralization in weaned piglets. Anim. Sci. J. 2016;94:194–197. doi: 10.2527/jas.2015-9746. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Skiba G., Sobol M., Raj S. Femur morphometry, densitometry, geometry and mechanical properties in young pigs fed a diet free of inorganic phosphorus and supplemented with phytase. Arch. Anim. Nutr. 2017;71:81–92. doi: 10.1080/1745039X.2016.1250542. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Nielsen D.H., McEvoy F.J., Madsen M.T., Jensen J.B., Svalastoga E. Relationship between bone strength and dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry measurements in pigs. Anim. Sci. J. 2007;85:667–672. doi: 10.2527/jas.2006-025. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Doroudinia A., Colletti P.M. Bone mineral measurements. Clin. Nucl. Med. 2015;40:647–657. doi: 10.1097/RLU.0000000000000860. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Ibanez R. Bone mineral density measurement techniques. Anales Sist. Sanitario Navar. 2003;26:19–27. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.du Chazaud B.B., Monziols M., Gaudre D., Quemeneur B. La tomographie rayons X chez le porcelet comme prédicteur de l’état de minéralisation du squelette; Proceedings of the Journées Recherche Porcine; Paris, France. 3–4 February 2015; pp. 121–122. [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Fabà L., Gasa J., Tokach M.D., Font-i-Furnols M., Vilarrasa E., Solà-Oriol D. Effects of additional organic micro-minerals and methionine on carcass composition, gait score, bone characteristics, and osteochondrosis in replacement gilts of different growth rate. Anim. Feed Sci. Technol. 2019;256:114262. doi: 10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2019.114262. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Gaudré D., Lebas N., Monziols M. Effets d’une séquence déplétion-réplétion en phosphore en engraissement; Proceedings of the Journées Recherche Porcine; Paris, France. 4–5 February 2014; pp. 119–120. [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Engelen A.J., Van Der Heeft F.C., Randsdorp P.H., Smtt E.L. Simple and rapid determination of phytase activity. J. AOAC Int. 1994;77:760–764. doi: 10.1093/jaoac/77.3.760. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.NRC . Nutrient Requirements of Swine. 11th ed. The National Academies of Press; Washington, DC, USA: 2012. p. 210. [Google Scholar]
  • 35.De Blas C., Gasa J., Mateos G. Necesidades Nutricionales Para Ganado Porcino. Normas FEDNA. 2nd ed. Fundación Española para el Desarrollo de la Nutrición Animal; Madrid, Spain: 2013. p. 36. [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Short F., Gorton P., Wiseman J., Boorman K. Determination of titanium dioxide added as an inert marker in chicken digestibility studies. Anim. Feed Sci. Technol. 1996;59:215–221. doi: 10.1016/0377-8401(95)00916-7. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Adeola O. Digestion and balance techniques in pigs. In: Lewis A., Southern L., editors. Swine Nutrition. 2nd ed. CRC Press; New York, NY, USA: 2001. pp. 903–916. [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Bardera A., Martίnez R., Boada I., Font-i-Furnols M., Gispert M. VisualPork towards the simulation of a virtual butcher; Proceedings of the First Annual Conference on Body and Carcass Evaluation, Meat Quality, Sofware and Traceability (FAIM I). Conference of COST Action FA1102; Ashtown, Dublin, Ireland. 24–26 September 2012; pp. 25–26. [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Boada I., Spinola J., Rodriguez J., Martínez R., Font i Furnols M. VisualPork towards the simulation of a virtual butcher; Proceedings of the II Workshop on the use of computed tomography (CT) in pig carcass classification. Other CT applications: Live animals and meat technology; Monells, Spain. 16–17 April 2009; pp. 16–17. [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Font-i-Furnols M., Carabús A., Pomar C., Gispert M. Estimation of carcass composition and cut composition from computed tomography images of live growing pigs of different genotypes. Animal. 2015;9:166–178. doi: 10.1017/S1751731114002237. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Olsen E.V., Christensen L.B., Nielsen D.B. A review of computed tomography and manual dissection for calibration of devices for pig carcass classification-Evaluation of uncertainty. Meat Sci. 2017;123:35–44. doi: 10.1016/j.meatsci.2016.08.013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Xiberta P., Bardera A., Boada I., Gispert M., Brun A., Font-i-Furnols M. Evaluation of an automatic lean meat percentage quantification method based on a partial volume model from computed tomography scans. Comput. Electron. Agric. 2018;151:365–375. doi: 10.1016/j.compag.2018.06.019. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Picouet P.A., Teran F., Gispert M., i Furnols M.F. Lean content prediction in pig carcasses, loin and ham by computed tomography (CT) using a density model. Meat Sci. 2010;86:616–622. doi: 10.1016/j.meatsci.2010.04.039. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Grubbs F.E. Procedures for Detecting Outlying Observations in Samples. Technometrics. 1969;11:1–21. doi: 10.1080/00401706.1969.10490657. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Humer E., Schwarz C., Schedle K. Phytate in pig and poultry nutrition. J. Anim. Physiol. Anim. Nutr. 2015;99:605–625. doi: 10.1111/jpn.12258. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Pallauf J., Rimbach G. Nutritional significance of phytic acid and phytase. Arch. Fur Tierernahr. 1997;50:301–319. doi: 10.1080/17450399709386141. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Selle P.H., Cowieson A.J., Cowieson N.P., Ravindran V. Protein-phytate interactions in pig and poultry nutrition: A reappraisal. Nutr. Res. Rev. 2012;25:1–17. doi: 10.1017/S0954422411000151. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Bento M.H., Pedersen C., Plumstead P.W., Salmon L., Nyachoti C.M., Bikker P. Dose response of a new phytase on dry matter, calcium, and phosphorus digestibility in weaned piglets. Anim. Sci. J. 2012;90:245–247. doi: 10.2527/jas.53988. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Jolliff J.S., Mahan D.C. Effect of dietary inulin and phytase on mineral digestibility and tissue retention in weanling and growing swine. Anim. Sci. J. 2012;90:3012–3022. doi: 10.2527/jas.2011-4424. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Blavi L., Munoz C.J., Broomhead J.N., Stein H.H. Effects of a novel corn-expressed E. coli phytase on digestibility of calcium and phosphorous, growth performance, and bone ash in young growing pigs. Anim. Sci. J. 2019;97:3390–3398. doi: 10.1093/jas/skz190. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Rosenfelder-Kuon P., Siegert W., Rodehutscord M. Effect of microbial phytase supplementation on P digestibility in pigs: A meta-analysis. Arch. Anim. Nutr. 2020;74:1–18. doi: 10.1080/1745039X.2019.1687249. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Campbell J.M., Crenshaw J.D., Polo J. The biological stress of early weaned piglets. J. Anim. Sci. Biotechnol. 2013;4:19. doi: 10.1186/2049-1891-4-19. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Manners M.J. The development of digestive function in the pig. P Nutr. Soc. 1976;35:49–55. doi: 10.1079/PNS19760008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Snoeck V., Cox E., Verdonck F., Joensuu J.J., Goddeeris B.M. Influence of porcine intestinal pH and gastric digestion on antigenicity of F4 fimbriae for oral immunisation. Vet. Microbiol. 2004;98:45–53. doi: 10.1016/j.vetmic.2003.10.020. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Torres-Pitarch A., Hermans D., Manzanilla E.G., Bindelle J., Everaert N., Beckers Y., Torrallardona D., Bruggeman G., Gardiner G.E., Lawlor P.G. Effect of feed enzymes on digestibility and growth in weaned pigs: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Anim. Feed Sci. Tech. 2017;233:145–159. doi: 10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2017.04.024. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Sung J.Y., Kim B.G. Prediction models for apparent and standardized total tract digestible phosphorus in swine diets. Anim. Feed Sci. Tech. 2019;255:114224. doi: 10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2019.114224. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Calvert C.C., Besecker R.J., Plumlee M.P., Cline T.R., Forsyth D.M. Apparent Digestibility of Phosphorus in Barley and Corn for Growing Swine. Anim. Sci. J. 1978;47:420–426. doi: 10.2527/jas1978.472420x. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Huang K., Allee G. Bioavailability of Phosphorus in Selected Feedstuffs for Pigs. Kans. Agric. Exp. Stn. Res. Rep. 1980:28–29. doi: 10.4148/2378-5977.6046. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Boyd R.D., Hall D., Wu J.F. Plasma alkaline phosphatase as a criterion for determining biological availability of phosphorus for swine. J. Anim. Sci. 1983;57:396–401. doi: 10.2527/jas1983.572396x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Eeckhout W., De Paepe M., Warnants N., Bekaert H. An estimation of the minimal P requirements for growing-finishing pigs, as influenced by the Ca level of the diet. Anim. Feed Sci. Tech. 1995;52:29–40. doi: 10.1016/0377-8401(94)00709-I. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Aasmundstad T., Kongsro J., Wetten M., Dolvik N., Vangen O. Osteochondrosis in pigs diagnosed with computed tomography: Heritabilities and genetic correlations to weight gain in specific age intervals. Animal. 2013;7:1576–1582. doi: 10.1017/S1751731113001158. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Guggenbuhl P., Calvo E.P., Fru F. Effects of dietary doses of three phytases on performance in pigs. J. Anim. Sci. 2016;94:286–288. doi: 10.2527/jas.2015-9806. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 63.Huff W.E., Moore P.A., Jr., Waldroup P.W., Waldroup A.L., Balog J.M., Huff G.R., Rath N.C., Daniel T.C., Raboy V. Effect of dietary phytase and high available phosphorus corn on broiler chicken performance. Poult. Sci. J. 1998;77:1899–1904. doi: 10.1093/ps/77.12.1899. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64.Saikia A., Sarma D.N., Bhuyan R., Sarmah B.C., Kalita D. Effect of zinc and phytase supplementation on performance, serum biochemical profiles and carcass quality of crossbred (Hampshire × Assam local) pigs. J. Appl. Anim. 2016;44:230–233. doi: 10.1080/09712119.2015.1031773. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 65.Lagos L.V., Walk C.L., Murphy M.R., Stein H.H. Effects of dietary digestible calcium on growth performance and bone ash concentration in 50- to 85-kg growing pigs fed diets with different concentrations of digestible phosphorus. Anim. Feed. Sci. Tech. 2019;247:262–272. doi: 10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2018.11.019. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 66.Lee S.A., Lagos L.V., Bedford M.R., Stein H.H. Quantities of ash, Ca, and P in metacarpals, metatarsals, and tibia are better correlated with total body bone ash in growing pigs than ash, Ca, and P in other bones. J. Anim. Sci. 2021;99:1–6. doi: 10.1093/jas/skab054.080. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 67.Omogbenigun F.O., Nyachoti C.M., Slominski B.A. The effect of supplementing microbial phytase and organic acids to a corn-soybean based diet fed to early-weaned pigs. J. Anim. Sci. 2003;81:1806–1813. doi: 10.2527/2003.8171806x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 68.Zeng Z.K., Piao X.S., Wang D., Li P.F., Xue L.F., Salmon L., Zhang H.Y., Han X., Liu L. Effect of Microbial Phytase on Performance, Nutrient Absorption and Excretion in Weaned Pigs and Apparent Ileal Nutrient Digestibility in Growing Pigs. Asian Australas. J. Anim. Sci. 2011;24:1164–1172. doi: 10.5713/ajas.2011.11016. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 69.Guggenbuhl P., Calvo E.P., Fru F. Effect of a bacterial 6-phytase on plasma myo-inositol concentrations and P and Ca utilization in swine. J. Anim. Sci. 2016;94:243–245. doi: 10.2527/jas.2015-9803. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 70.Guggenbuhl P., Calvo E.P., Fru F. Effect of high dietary doses of a bacterial 6-phytase in piglets fed a corn–soybean meal diet. J. Anim. Sci. 2016;94:307–309. doi: 10.2527/jas.2015-9807. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 71.Skiba G., Weremko D., Sobol M., Raj S. Bone mineralisation of weaned piglets fed a diet free of inorganic phosphorus and supplemented with phytase, as assessed by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry. Arch. Anim. Nutr. 2015;69:267–275. doi: 10.1080/1745039X.2015.1054163. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 72.Zeng Z.K., Wang D., Piao X.S., Li P.F., Zhang H.Y., Shi C.X., Yu S.K. Effects of Adding Super Dose Phytase to the Phosphorus-deficient Diets of Young Pigs on Growth Performance, Bone Quality, Minerals and Amino Acids Digestibilities. Asian Australas. J. Anim. Sci. 2014;27:237–246. doi: 10.5713/ajas.2013.13370. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.


Articles from Animals : an Open Access Journal from MDPI are provided here courtesy of Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute (MDPI)

RESOURCES