Graphical abstract
Keywords: High-throughput experiments, Drug screening, Dose-response, Bioassay readouts
Highlights
-
•
DMSO impacts on C. elegans feeding behaviour in short-term and in a reversible manner.
-
•
DMSO affects the cellular integrity of C. elegans.
-
•
nlg-1 mutant is refractory to DMSO induced pumping inhibition.
-
•
Judicious consideration of the effect of the DMSO in bioassays in C. elegans.
Abstract
Caenorhabditis elegans provides a multi-cellular model organism for toxicology and drug discovery. These studies usually require solvents such as dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO), ethanol or acetone as a vehicle. This raises the need to carefully consider whether the chemical vehicles used in these screens are anodyne towards C. elegans. Here, we use pharyngeal pumping as a bioassay to assess this. Pharyngeal pumping is a visually scoreable behaviour that is controlled by environmental cues activating sensory and integrative neural signalling to coordinate pharyngeal activity. As such it serves as a rich bioassay to screen for chemical modulation. We found that while pumping was insensitive to high concentrations of the widely used drug solvents ethanol and acetone, it was perturbed by concentrations of DMSO above 0.5 % v/v encompassing concentrations used as drug vehicle. This was manifested as an inhibition of pharyngeal pump rate followed by a slow recovery in the continued presence of the solvent. The inhibition was not observed in a neuroligin mutant, nlg-1, consistent with DMSO acting at the level of sensory processing that modulates pumping. We found that bus-17 mutants, which have enhanced cuticle penetration to drugs are more sensitive to DMSO. The effect of DMSO is accompanied by a progressive morphological disruption in which internal membrane-like structures of varying size accumulate. These internal structures are seen in all three genotypes investigated in this study and likely arise independent of the effects on pharyngeal pumping. Overall, these results highlight sensory signalling and strain dependent vehicle sensitivity. Although we define concentrations at which this can be mitigated, it highlights the need to consider time-dependent vehicle effects when evaluating control responses in C. elegans chemical biology.
1. Introduction
One approach to developing robust experimental systems to define drug mode of action and/or toxicology is through the use of simple model organisms [[1], [2], [3]]. This approach represents an intermediary between in vitro and in vivo platforms. Caenorhadbitis elegans is an attractive model organism for medium and high-throughput screening. Among the advantages one can highlight its easy manipulation, a short life cycle, low-cost and accessibility to whole organism imaging. This experimental tractability is further supported by its genetic tractability, significant conservation of the proteome and genetic pathways with humans [[4], [5], [6]]. C. elegans is a particularly suitable model for approaches where genetic manipulations need to be combined with pharmacological studies. This flexibility has led to discovery platforms and mode of action investigations for nematicides, compounds with anti-aging properties as well as a range of therapeutic interventions [[7], [8], [9]].
The employment of model organisms in high-throughput screening is viewed as a promising strategy to identify genes or drugs potentially relevant to health and fitness as well as to target key determinants in disease. In particular, the ability to generate large numbers of animals allied to high throughput observational measurement lends itself to the development of whole organism bioassays [[10], [11], [12], [13], [14]]. In the context of C. elegans, motility and to some extent feeding behaviour, have been successfully used strategies [[15], [16], [17]].
In the case of C. elegans feeding behaviour the ability to rapidly present and remove bacteria allows the investigator to trigger and readily score increases in pharyngeal pumping. The response reflects a sensory detection and downstream neuronal signalling to execute an increase in the frequency of the contraction-relaxion cycle that can be visually observed or recorded in the intact worm [18,19]. This provides a quantitative readout that is underpinned by a range of transmitter pathways and embedded molecular targets providing an excellent model system per se for drug screening and has been used to identify receptor targets. More widely the pharyngeal system can be combined with the intrinsic genetic tractability to heterologously express drug targets from a range of different species including humans in which the bioassay embedded in pharyngeal pumping can be used to investigate the expressed drug target [20]. Finally, the pharynx is a sensitive biosensor that can provide a sub-lethal readout of drug toxicity [21,17]. This all evidences the value of the pharyngeal system as an important platform of drug investigation in the intact worm [22,23].
A confound of pharmacological approaches in the intact organism is control of drug access to the internal tissues and organs of the worm due to the cuticle. The presence of this surrounding exoskeleton can make drug access more difficult to predict [[24], [25], [26]]. However, mutations that increase cuticular permeability and/or judicious utilization of suitable drug vehicle can help overcome these limitations [2].
Chemical compound screens are regularly performed in popular amphipathic solvents like dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) or dimethyl formamide (DMF). However, studies identify differential interference of the biological assays by distinct classes of drug solvent. In the case of DMSO, which is the stock solvent in many industrial and commercial libraries per se effects on C. elegans physiology and homeostasis are documented. These solvent effects include effects on fertility, lifespan or feeding mechanisms [[27], [28], [29], [30], [31], [32], [33], [34]].
In this study we use Bristol N2 (wild-type), bus-17 and nlg-1 C. elegans strains to test the effect of the widely used drug solvents DMSO, ethanol and acetone. bus-17 is one of a class of genes (bus-2, bus-4, bus-12, srf-3, bus-8) that encode proteins that impact on the composition of the worm cuticle which when mutated increase worm permeability to drugs [35]. We chose pharyngeal pumping as an integrated bioassay in C. elegans. We show that DMSO has an effect on the pharyngeal activity in the wild type N2 strain, leading to inhibition of the pharyngeal pumping in a short-term. This effect was recovered ∼3 h after initial exposure in the continued presence of DMSO and was not seen in nlg-1 mutants that are known to control sensory processing of environmental cues [36]. In contrast this inhibition appeared more pronounced in bus-17 mutants, a genetic background used to sensitize bioassays to drug exposure. Finally, and independent of the modulation of the expression of sensory effects of DMSO and its modulation by cuticle integrity, we describe morphological changes of internal body composition following prolonged exposure to DMSO. These effects arise over a time course that would be encountered in some drug screening paradigms. Overall, this highlights the need to analyse an underling modulatory effect of organic solvents at concentrations that might be otherwise well tolerated in in vitro assays of drug action. Thus, when using simple drug exposure strategies in whole organism bioassays of C. elegans these confounding vehicle effects should be considered and controlled for.
2. Methods
2.1. Culturing of C. elegans
Wild-type, Bristol N2, the mutant strains nlg-1 (ok259) X and bus-17 (e2800) X, were obtained from the Caenorhabditis elegans Genetic Centre (University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA). nlg-1 and bus-17 strains were backcrossed 6 and 3 times respectively with Bristol N2 strain. All strains were grown and maintained at 20 °C under standard conditions [50]. Worm age was synchronized by picking L4 larval stage animals to new plates 18 h prior to performing the behavioral and/or imaging experiments.
2.2. Making assay plates
50 μl, 5 μl or 2.5 μl volumes of 100 % analytical grade DMSO, ethanol or acetone were soaked into 5 ml of NGM-medium of individual wells of a 6-well plate. This gave desired final concentrations of each solvent: 1 %, 0.75 %, 0.5 %, 0.25 %, 0.1 % and 0.05 % (V/V). This is equivalent to the following mM predicted concentrations of each solvent: DMSO – 141 mM, 105.75 mM, 70.5 mM, 35.25 mM, 14 mM, 7 mM; ethanol – 171 mM, 128.25 mM, 85.5 mM, 42.75 mM, 17 mM, 8.5 mM; acetone – 136 mM, 13.5 mM, 6.7 mM.
After adding the desired volumes of solvents, plates were immediately sealed and left for 12 h at RT to allow equilibration of the solvent into wells, as previously described [43]. Then 50 μl of E. coli OP50 (OD600 of 0.8 AU) were deposited on top of the vehicle laced agar and incubated for a further 12 h at RT (≈20−23°C) (Fig. 1).
2.3. Measuring pharyngeal pumping activity
Pharyngeal activity was scored by measuring frequency of pharyngeal pumping, where a single pharyngeal pump is one contraction-relaxation cycle of the terminal bulb of the pharyngeal muscle. This was visually scored by counting the number of pharyngeal pumps for 1 min using a binocular dissecting microscope (Nikon SMZ800; ×63). 1-day-old adult worms (L4 + 1) grown at 20 °C were picked onto the middle of the bacterial lawn (OD600 of 0.8 AU seeded the day before), where they were exposed to solvent for up to 24 h. After 10 min (time 0) the pharyngeal pumping was recorded using a hand counter. Five consecutive measurements (1 min each) at each time point were made and the mean of pharyngeal pumping rate was calculated. Pumping was monitored at the time-points: 0 min (10 min. post picking to food laced observation place with and without vehicles), 15 min, 30 min, 1 h, 3 h, 4 h, 5 h, 6 h and 24 h.
2.4. Imaging worms to assess motility posture and integrity and appearance of internal compartments
After the indicated time of exposure to solvents in solid agar plates, the whole worm posture (loss of naïve body bends against straight or coiled forms) was observed and imaged. During these observations we noted the apparent disruption in the appearance of the worm’s internal structures. This included the accumulation of internal membrane-like structure. These structures were captured by imaging with a Nikon Eclipse X. After incubation on untreated or solvent containing agar the worms were transferred into 0.5 μL M9 buffer on a thin 2% agarose pad containing sodium azide (10 mM).
These mounted worms were then covered with a 24 × 24 mm cover slip and were observed with a 40–63X objective magnification for no more than 10 min after being placed onto the sodium azide agarose pad. At least 5 independent worms per condition were analyzed and imaged. Images were captured through a Hamamatsu Photonics camera and acquired using IC Capture 2.2 software and composed with Abode PhotoShop® (Adobe Systems) and ImageJ (NIH) softwares.
2.5. Statistical analysis
Statistical analyses were made using GraphPad Prism software. Data are expressed as means ± s.e.m. The statistical tests and post-hoc analyses are indicated individually in graphs.
3. Results
3.1. DMSO impacts on C. elegans feeding behaviour in short-term and in a reversible manner
To determine the effect of the solvents DMSO, ethanol and acetone on feeding behaviour we monitored the pharyngeal pumping over time in the wild type Bristol N2 strain. First, we measured the frequency of pumping in the presence of each solvent (1%) relative to untreated conditions (Fig. 1). We did not observe any effects on the bacterial lawns in control and solvent loaded plates. We observed a strong reduction of the pharyngeal pumping rate of N2 (wt) worms in presence of 1% (v/v) (141 mM) DMSO after 3 h of exposure to the solvent (Fig. 2). In contrast, we did not find any reduction in pharyngeal pumping when animals feed in the presence of ethanol (1% (v/v); 171 mM) and/or acetone (1% (v/v); 136 mM).
We also studied the effect of solvent on pumping rate at lower concentrations to analyse the threshold of the effect on feeding behaviour. We found that N2 animals feeding on bacteria in the presence of low concentrations of DMSO (0.05 %–0.1 % (v/v); 7−14 mM) do not have a reduction in the pumping rate when compared to untreated animals (Fig. 3A). For the rest of the solvents, no significant differences were observed when comparing the rate of pumping at lower concentrations relative to the highest concentration tested (1% (v/v)) (Fig. 3A).
Next, we monitored the pharyngeal pump rate at increasing times following exposure to solvent. We wanted to analyse what the longer-term exposure to these concentrations of solvents would be by monitoring pumping after 24 h of incubation at the distinct doses. Protracted exposure to 1 % (v/v) ethanol (171 mM) and acetone had no effect on the pump rate when compared to untreated worms. In keeping with the observations made when considering short exposure to DMSO we noted inhibition in the pump rate steadily increased up to a maximal inhibition at the previously investigated 3 h time-point (Fig. 3A). Surprisingly, by 4 h the pumping had recovered to pre-exposure levels and this recovered pumping was maintained for up to 24 h despite worms being continually exposed to 1% v/v DMSO throughout. This indicates a recovery from the inhibition in the face of persistent solvent exposure. For the other DMSO doses, no changes across the time course were observed compared to the untreated group (Fig. 3B).
We also monitored pharyngeal pumping in the presence of these solvents in the bus-17 mutants. When considering these solvents, acetone showed no impact on the pharyngeal pump in bus-17. Surprisingly, we observed an apparent sensitivity to ethanol not observed in N2 (wt) animals (Fig. 4). This is a surprise as our previous experiments suggested that solvents like ethanol readily equilibrate across the cuticle [43]. We also noted a shift in the sensitivity of pumping in the bus-17 worms. This is highlighted by the DMSO at a concentration of 0.1 % (v/v), which failed to inhibit pumping in the N2 (wt) animals, causing a significant inhibition of pharyngeal pumping (Fig. 4). Although the bus-17 mutants seemed to be sensitized to the DMSO induced inhibition, pumping recovered to pre-exposure levels after a peak inhibition in the bus-17 mutants. Thus, as for N2 (wt), pumping recovers in the bus-17 mutants despite the protracted incubation in the DMSO.
3.2. The sensory processing deficient-mutant nlg-1 is refractory to DMSO induced pumping inhibition
We tested the impact of DMSO on the feeding behaviour of the neuroligin-deficient mutant nlg-1 (ok259). These mutants present sensory processing deficits against a wide range of mechanical, chemical and gustatory cues [36,37]. First, we measured the frequency of pharyngeal pumping in nlg-1 mutants in untreated conditions and we found that nlg-1 animals have a low frequency of pumping on food compared to wild-type (Fig. 5) [38]. Secondly, we tested the pharyngeal behaviour of nlg-1 animals incubated with the highest dose (1% (v/v)) of DMSO tested in the previous experiments with N2 (wt) animals. nlg-1 mutants did not show a decrease of the feeding rate in presence of this dose of DMSO (Fig. 5). These results are consistent with the fact that neuroligin mutants have a deficit between the sensing of environmental cues by sensory neurons, and the processing and integration that generates an aversive response to DMSO.
3.3. Chronic exposure to DMSO induces a disruption of normal body posture during locomotion and further morphological changes in the internal structures
During observation of the effects of solvent on pharyngeal function we noticed disruption of the worm’s gross motility and morphology particular to exposures longer than 3 h. To gain further insight we investigated the consequence of exposing worms to this solvent on the anatomical integrity of the treated worms.
We incubated the worms for 3 h, where the maximum inhibition of pharyngeal pumping had been observed, at concentrations between 0.05–1 % of DMSO. Under control conditions the C. elegans posture was described by changes to the sinusoidal body’s bends as the worm bends its body during crawling in “S” shapes (Fig. 6A). In contrast this was disrupted in the worms exposed to 1% (v/v) DMSO (Fig. 6A). This was reflected in a flattening of the typical S posture expressed by the worms when moving on food. This flattening during movement on food was more obvious in bus-17 animals and in some cases the worms lost all undulatory appearance and adopted a straight posture, such postural changes were modest in N2 (wt) or nlg-1 animals (Fig. 6A). This postural effect was reversed after 24 h when the affected worms were removed to a DMSO free bacterial agar plate, returning to a normal pattern of locomotion. With respect to these observer-based descriptions of motility posture no changes were noted at concentrations lower than 1% DMSO (from 0.1−0.75%).
When observing the shift in worm’s motility we recognized a change in the appearance of the internal organization of the worm under light microscope. At concentration of 1% DMSO, which are used in some drug treatments, we noted that the worms started to accumulate internal membrane-like inclusions. These structures, which are not observed in age matched untreated worms, accumulated along the entire worm’s pseudocoelom surrounding the pericellular (Fig. 6B). We also observed a progressive accumulation of these internal membrane-like inclusions which ranged from between 3 and 10 μm after 1% DMSO dosing for 24 h in the N2 (wt), nlg-1 and bus-17 mutants (Fig. 6C). They were not observed at the DMSO doses described below 1%. The appearance of these internal membrane-like inclusions was sustained over time with no clearance after 24 h of chronic exposure (Supplement to Fig. 6). The formation of internal membrane-like inclusions appeared selective to DMSO solvent exposure and was not observed in animals after chronic exposure to ethanol or acetone.
4. Discussion
Our study highlights the importance of choosing a suitable solvent during experimental approaches based on drug treatments of C. elegans. Our analysis was motivated by our attempts to improve throughput for whole organism approaches focussed on using pharyngeal pumping as a bioassay for drug action. We and others have usefully developed this feeding organ as a robust bioassay and convenient approach to investigate the activity and mode of action of an increasing number of compounds [23,38]. Furthermore, the C. elegans pharynx offers itself as a suitable platform for heterologous expression of drug target activity to allow it to serve for wider drug screening [20,39]. An underappreciated determinant of drug screening is the vehicle dilution of the solvents that are routinely used to provide multiplexed chemical and drug libraries [[40], [41], [42]]. The widely used solvent DMSO is favoured as it shows good solvation for a wide range of chemical classes and can be well tolerated by screening platforms at concentrations up to and below 1 % [42].
In C. elegans the pharyngeal system offers a robust bioassay for whole organism drug testing but is a readout that is dependent on complex cellular and intercellular communications that are additionally susceptible to integrating environmental cues [38,17]. Here, we show that common drug vehicles are well tolerated but identify potential DMSO sensitivity at the higher concentrations at which it is sometimes used as drug vehicle in other systems. Thus, we observe that DMSO interferes with food induced pharyngeal pumping activity of C. elegans in the N2 (wt) strain. This impact is noted to concentrations above 0.1 % (v/v) which are sometimes used in drug screening approaches. We also found the C. elegans bus-17 mutant which has a compromised cuticular integrity and is used to sensitize efficacy in whole organism drug screens has an enhanced sensitivity to DMSO [2]. Thus, when using these mutants, one should make a careful consideration of confounding vehicle effects.
It is interesting that there was also a slight sensitization to an inhibition of pharyngeal pumping at the higher concentrations of ethanol tested in this study. Our previous experiments highlighted based on bioassay readouts that ethanol readily crossed the intact cuticle which did not present as a permeability barrier to this solvent [43]. However, the experiments presented here indicate ethanol permeability in the context of food may impact the rate at which ethanol equilibrates into the worm [43,44].
The chemical nature of DMSO allows it to interact with chemicals and provide a shield from water and promote solubility of hydrophobic molecules that are otherwise insoluble in water. Although attractive as a solvent, DMSO can perturb integrity of biological systems. The more dramatic of these effects are usually played out at much higher concentrations than it would be used at in drug vehicle experiments. We observed a significant inhibitory response to DMSO concentrations above 0.1 % (v/v) (14 mM) at pharynx level in both N2 (wt) and bus-17 mutants. The acute onset of inhibition observed is reversed upon prolonged exposure to the drug. This suggests that sensory processing might be an important determinant of this inhibitory effect. In line with our observations, it has been described that DMSO concentrations between 0.8–1 % induce a reduced brood size, as well as significantly increase lifespan, likely acting through a mechanism dependent on insulin-like signalling. This suggests that there could be a fitness cost for the observed pharmacologically induced long-lived animals [34]. In our bioassays, at that concentration (1%), we observed a severe impact on pharyngeal activity in C. elegans, which is in line with the suggestions of an impact of the global fitness state.
We had previously shown that the synaptic protein neuroligin (NLG-1) was an important extrapharyngeal determinant of pharyngeal pumping. nlg-1 mutants present a reduced pumping that suggests that neuroligin organizes extrapharyngeal circuits that regulate the pharynx, highlighting the role of neuroligin in discretely impacting functional circuits underpinning complex behaviours [38]. Interestingly, nlg-1 mutants lost their sensitivity to DMSO. This does not rule out important contribution of direct perturbation effects of key cells involved in co-ordinating pharyngeal pumping but does highlight that DMSO at 1% and above concentrations can provide an additional selective modulation of sensory modalities. This could imply interference with sensory detection of food in the neural circuits that regulate pharyngeal activity. This is consistent with sensory processing defects in nlg-1 previously described [38], as the lack of an aversive response by the normally aversive chemical 1-octanol, or the defects in the processing of two conflicting chemosensory inputs [37].
Interestingly, we observed a response to 1 % (v/v) (141 mM) DMSO at the whole worm level disrupting the C. elegans posture typical of untreated worms. These observations showed that DMSO exposed animals, do not likely induce lethal changes in metabolism. However, we did note changes in worm posture from which they recovered and consistent with effects of the solvent on the body wall muscle system that controls motility [49]. In addition, we observe exposure to DMSO resulted in the formation of a disrupted morphology. This coincided with the appearance and accumulation of internal membrane-like structures. These changes seem to be particular to DMSO relative to the solvents tested in this study. These structures appear membranous in structure however at the light microscopic level we cannot resolve if these are double membrane vesicles or single lipid boundaries defined by visible lipid droplets that are present and dynamically change in nematodes [45,46]. Both remain a possibility and the accumulation of DMSO and solvents within the pseudocoelom, following external exposure, would be well placed to trigger signaling and metabolic changes that disrupt cellular and wider sub-compartment integrity. The size and features of the internal membrane-like structures would be compatible with DMSO triggering the accumulation of corpuscular apoptotic cells [47], disrupted and enlarged lipid droplet trafficking [45] or the activation of the recently recognized cellular vacuolization that arises through the processes of methuosis [48]. One speculation is these structures are a stress response and/or metabolic disruption, potentially compromising the intra and/or extra cellular integrity, and that is subject to regulation by the scavenging systems of the worm encompassed in coelomocytes. We observe these changes in the extreme of prolonged DMSO exposure at the upper range at which it is used for drug vehicle. However, the selective effect of DMSO relative to other solvents tested, alerts to potential confounds associated with chronic dosing experiments in which DMSO is the background vehicle. Indeed, their appearance within the worms pseudocoelom and persistence following DMSO removal would be consistent with this idea (Fig. 5B).
In conclusion, here we provide direct evidence for a differential effect of molar equivalents of a common drug solvent DMSO used in the investigation of drug administration in C. elegans. These data highlight that the function of the pharynx, the neuromuscular organ that controls feeding is not affected by DMSO up to concentrations of 0.1 %. However, higher concentrations including those that are used for vehicle controls impact on pharyngeal function. Although, we have limited the investigation of these solvents in solid phase in this study, it is worth considering that the effective concentrations of solvents impacting on physiological parameters such as development, fitness or complex behaviour could vary in different media i.e. axenic liquid culture. In the current paper we directly monitor pharyngeal pumping as this is feasible in the agar plate format. Higher throughput assays are achieved in liquid culture in which animals are supported by bacteria in solution rather than those plated in solid phase on agar [10,11]. The confounds in which DMSO disrupts feeding as mapped out in this paper are likely to pertain to other experimental formats that utilize DMSO dissolved drugs as a central factor to their approach. DMSO while acting as an excellent drug vehicle has known concentration dependent disruptive effects. As shown here, it has the ability to initiate and or modulate sensory modalities in whole organism bioassays. Overall, the findings alert investigators to judicious consideration of both the acute and chronic effect of the common drug vehicle DMSO in bioassays in the model organism C. elegans.
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
CRediT authorship contribution statement
Fernando Calahorro: Conceptualization, Data curation, Formal analysis, Investigation, Methodology, Validation, Visualization, Funding acquisition, Writing - original draft. Lindy Holden-Dye: Conceptualization, Funding acquisition, Methodology, Supervision, Writing - review & editing. Vincent O’Connor: Conceptualization, Funding acquisition, Methodology, Supervision, Writing - review & editing.
Acknowledgements
F.C. is supported by Biotechnology and Biological Sciences (BBSRC) grant number BB/T002867/1. Some C. elegans strains were provided by the CGC, which is funded by NIH Office of Research Infrastructure Programs (P40 OD010440).
Handling Editor Dr. Aristidis Tsatsakis
Footnotes
Supplementary material related to this article can be found, in the online version, at doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.toxrep.2021.06.007.
Appendix A. Supplementary data
The following is Supplementary data to this article:
References
- 1.Hunt P.R. The C-elegans model in toxicity testing. J. Appl. Toxicol. 2017;37(1):50–59. doi: 10.1002/jat.3357. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Xiong H.J., Pears C., Woollard A. An enhanced C. elegans based platform for toxicity assessment. Sci. Rep. 2017;7 doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-10454-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Hahn M.E., Sadler K.C. Casting a wide net: use of diverse model organisms to advance toxicology. Dis. Model. Mech. 2020;13(4) doi: 10.1242/dmm.043844. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Lai C.H., Chou C.Y., Ch’ang L.Y., Liu C.S., Lin W.C. Identification of novel human genes evolutionarily conserved in Caenorhabditis elegans by comparative proteomics. Genome Res. 2000;10(5):703–713. doi: 10.1101/gr.10.5.703. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Antoshechkin I., Sternberg P.W. The versatile worm: genetic and genomic resources for Caenorhabditis elegans research. Nat. Rev. Genet. 2007;8(7):518–532. doi: 10.1038/nrg2105. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Calahorro F., Ruiz-Rubio M. Caenorhabditis elegans as an experimental tool for the study of complex neurological diseases: Parkinson’s disease, Alzheimer’s disease and autism spectrum disorder. Invertebr. Neurosci. 2011;11(2):73–83. doi: 10.1007/s10158-011-0126-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Chen X., Barclay J.W., Burgoyne R.D., Morgan A. Using C. elegans to discover therapeutic compounds for ageing-associated neurodegenerative diseases. Chem. Cent. J. 2015;9 doi: 10.1186/s13065-015-0143-y. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Lucanic M., Garrett T., Yu I., Calahorro F., Shahmirzadi A.A., Miller A., Gill M.S., Hughes R.E., Holden-Dye L., Lithgow G.J. Chemical activation of a food deprivation signal extends lifespan. Aging Cell. 2016;15(5):832–841. doi: 10.1111/acel.12492. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Mathew M.D., Mathew N.D., Miller A., Simpson M., Au V., Garland S., Gestin M., Edgley M.L., Flibotte S., Balgi A., Chiang J., Giaever G., Dean P., Tung A., Roberge M., Roskelley C., Forge T., Nislow C., Moerman D. Using C. elegans forward and reverse genetics to identify new compounds with anthelmintic activity. PLoS Negl. Trop. Dis. 2016;10(10) doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0005058. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Kwok T.C.Y., Ricker N., Fraser R., Chan A.W., Burns A., Stanley E.F., McCourt P., Cutler S.R., Roy P.J. A small-molecule screen in C-elegans yields a new calcium channel antagonist. Nature. 2006;441(7089):91–95. doi: 10.1038/nature04657. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Lehner B., Tischler J., Fraser A.G. RNAi screens in Caenorhabditis elegans in a 96-well liquid format and their application to the systematic identification of genetic interactions. Nat. Protoc. 2006;1(3):1617–1620. doi: 10.1038/nprot.2006.245. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.O’Reilly L.P., Long O.S., Cobanoglu M.C., Benson J.A., Luke C.J., Miedel M.T., Hale P., Perlmutter D.H., Bahar I., Silverman G.A., Pak S.C. A genome-wide RNAi screen identifies potential drug targets in a C. elegans model of alpha 1-antitrypsin deficiency. Hum. Mol. Genet. 2014;23(19):5123–5132. doi: 10.1093/hmg/ddu236. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.O’Reilly L.P., Luke C.J., Perlmutter D.H., Silverman G.A., Pak S.C. C. elegans in high-throughput drug discovery. Adv. Drug Deliv. Rev. 2014;69:247–253. doi: 10.1016/j.addr.2013.12.001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.O’Reilly L.P., Perlmutter D.H., Silverman G.A., Pak S.C. alpha l-Antitrypsin deficiency and the hepatocytes - an elegans solution to drug discovery. Int. J. Biochem. Cell Biol. 2014;47:109–112. doi: 10.1016/j.biocel.2013.12.006. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Krajacic P., Shen X.N., Purohit P.K., Arratia P., Lamitina T. Biomechanical profiling of caenorhabditis elegans motility. Genetics. 2012;191(3):1015–U1613. doi: 10.1534/genetics.112.141176. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Buckingham S.D., Partridge F.A., Sattelle D.B. Automated, high-throughput, motility analysis in Caenorhabditis elegans and parasitic nematodes: Applications in the search for new anthelmintics. Int. J. Parasitol. Drugs Drug Resist. 2014;4(3):226–232. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpddr.2014.10.004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Izquierdo Patricia G., Christopher Green V.O.C., Holden-Dye Lindy, Tattersall John. C. elegans pharyngeal pumping provides a whole organism bio-assay to investigate anti-cholinesterase intoxication and antidotes. Neurotoxicology. 2020 doi: 10.1016/j.neuro.2020.11.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Scholz M., Lynch D.J., Lee K.S., Levine E., Biron D. A scalable method for automatically measuring pharyngeal pumping in C. elegans. J. Neurosci. Methods. 2016;274:172–178. doi: 10.1016/j.jneumeth.2016.07.016. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Rodriguez-Palero M.J., Lopez-Diaz A., Marsac R., Gomes J.E., Olmedo M., Artal-Sanz M. An automated method for the analysis of food intake behaviour in Caenorhabditis elegans. Sci. Rep. 2018;8(1):3633. doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-21964-z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Crisford A., Murray C., O’Connor V., Edwards R.J., Kruger N., Welz C., von Samson-Himmelstjerna G., Harder A., Walker R.J., Holden-Dye L. Selective toxicity of the anthelmintic emodepside revealed by heterologous expression of human KCNMA1 in Caenorhabditis elegans. Mol. Pharmacol. 2011;79(6):1031–1043. doi: 10.1124/mol.111.071043. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Leung M.C.K., Williams P.L., Benedetto A., Au C., Helmcke K.J., Aschner M., Meyer J.N. Caenorhabditis elegans: an emerging model in biomedical and environmental toxicology. Toxicol. Sci. 2008;106(1):5–28. doi: 10.1093/toxsci/kfn121. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Lockery S.R., Hulme S.E., Roberts W.M., Robinson K.J., Laromaine A., Lindsay T.H., Whitesides G.M., Weeks J.C. A microfluidic device for whole-animal drug screening using electrophysiological measures in the nematode C. elegans. Lab Chip. 2012;12(12):2211–2220. doi: 10.1039/c2lc00001f. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Weeks J.C., Robinson K.J., Lockery S.R., Roberts W.M. Anthelmintic drug actions in resistant and susceptible C-elegans revealed by electrophysiological recordings in a multichannel microfluidic device. Int. J. Parasitol. Drugs Drug Resist. 2018;8(3):607–628. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpddr.2018.10.003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Johnstone I.L. Cuticle collagen genes - expression in Caenorhabditis elegans. Trends Genet. 2000;16(1):21–27. doi: 10.1016/s0168-9525(99)01857-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Fritz J.A., Behm C.A. CUTI-1: a novel tetraspan protein involved in C. elegans CUTicle formation and epithelial integrity. PLoS One. 2009;4(4) doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0005117. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Giacomotto J., Segalat L. High-throughput screening and small animal models, where are we? Br. J. Pharmacol. 2010;160(2):204–216. doi: 10.1111/j.1476-5381.2010.00725.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Croll Neil A., Smith J.M. Integrated behaviour in the feeding phase of Caenorhabditis elegans (Nematoda) J. Zool. 1978;184(4):507–517. [Google Scholar]
- 28.Goldstein P., Magnano L., Rojo J. Effects of dimethyl sulfone (Dmso2) on early gametogenesis in caenorhabditis-elegans - ultrastructural aberrations and loss of synaptonemal complexes from pachytene nuclei. Reprod. Toxicol. 1992;6(2):149–159. doi: 10.1016/0890-6238(92)90117-c. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Sze J.Y., Victor M., Loer C., Shi Y., Ruvkun G. Food and metabolic signaling defects in a Caenorhabditis elegans serotonin-synthesis mutant. Nature. 2000;403(6769):560–564. doi: 10.1038/35000609. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Chiang J.T., Steciuk M., Shtonda B., Avery L. Evolution of pharyngeal behaviors and neuronal functions in free-living soil nematodes. J. Exp. Biol. 2006;209(Pt 10):1859–1873. doi: 10.1242/jeb.02165. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Hobson R.J., Hapiak V.M., Xiao H., Buehrer K.L., Komuniecki P.R., Komuniecki R.W. SER-7, a Caenorhabditis elegans 5-HT7-like receptor, is essential for the 5-HT stimulation of pharyngeal pumping and egg laying. Genetics. 2006;172(1):159–169. doi: 10.1534/genetics.105.044495. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.David Raizen B.-m.S., Trojanowski Nick, You Young-Jai. In: Methods for Measuring Pharyngeal Behaviors. WormBook, editor. 2012. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Dillon J., Andrianakis I., Mould R., Ient B., Liu W., James C., O’Connor V., Holden-Dye L. Distinct molecular targets including SLO-1 and gap junctions are engaged across a continuum of ethanol concentrations in Caenorhabditis elegans. FASEB J. 2013;27(10):4266–4278. doi: 10.1096/fj.11-189340. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Frankowski H., Alavez S., Spilman P., Mark K.A., Nelson J.D., Mollahan P., Rao R.V., Chen S.F., Lithgow G.J., Ellerby H.M. Dimethyl sulfoxide and dimethyl formamide increase lifespan of C-elegans in liquid. Mech. Ageing Dev. 2013;134(3-4):69–78. doi: 10.1016/j.mad.2012.10.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Partridge F.A., Tearle A.W., Gravato-Nobre M.J., Schafer W.R., Hodgkin J. The C. elegans glycosyltransferase BUS-8 has two distinct and essential roles in epidermal morphogenesis. Dev. Biol. 2008;317(2):549–559. doi: 10.1016/j.ydbio.2008.02.060. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Calahorro F., Ruiz-Rubio M. Functional phenotypic rescue of Caenorhabditis elegans neuroligin-deficient mutants by the human and rat NLGN1 fenes. PLoS One. 2012;7(6) doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0039277. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Hunter J.W., Mullen G.P., McManus J.R., Heatherly J.M., Duke A., Rand J.B. Neuroligin-deficient mutants of C. elegans have sensory processing deficits and are hypersensitive to oxidative stress and mercury toxicity. Dis. Model. Mech. 2010;3(5-6):366–376. doi: 10.1242/dmm.003442. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Calahorro F., Keefe F., Dillon J., Holden-Dye L., O’Connor V. Neuroligin tuning of pharyngeal pumping reveals extrapharyngeal modulation of feeding in Caenorhabditis elegans. J. Exp. Biol. 2019;222(3) doi: 10.1242/jeb.189423. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Law W.J., Wuescher L.M., Ortega A., Hapiak V.M., Komuniecki P.R., Komuniecki R. Heterologous expression in remodeled C. elegans: a platform for monoaminergic agonist identification and anthelmintic screening. PLoS Pathog. 2015;11(4) doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1004794. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Castro C.A., Hogan J.B., Benson K.A., Shehata C.W., Landauer M.R. Behavioral-effects of vehicles - DMSO, ethanol, Tween-20, Tween-80, and emulphor-620. Pharmacol. Biochem. Behav. 1995;50(4):521–526. doi: 10.1016/0091-3057(94)00331-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Maes J., Verlooy L., Buenafe O.E., de Witte P.A.M., Esguerra C.V., Crawford A.D. Evaluation of 14 organic solvents and carriers for screening applications in zebrafish embryos and larvae. PLoS One. 2012;7(10) doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0043850. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Timm M., Saaby L., Moesby L., Hansen E.W. Considerations regarding use of solvents in in vitro cell based assays. Cytotechnology. 2013;65(5):887–894. doi: 10.1007/s10616-012-9530-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Mitchell P., Mould R., Dillon J., Glautier S., Andrianakis I., James C., Pugh A., Holden-Dye L., O’Connor V. A differential role for neuropeptides in acute and chronic adaptive responses to alcohol: behavioural and genetic analysis in Caenorhabditis elegans. PLoS One. 2010;5(5) doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0010422. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Davies A.G., Pierce-Shimomura J.T., Kim H., VanHoven M.K., Thiele T.R., Bonci A., Bargmann C.I., McIntire S.L. A central role of the BK potassium channel in behavioral responses to ethanol in C-elegans. Cell. 2003;115(6):655–666. doi: 10.1016/s0092-8674(03)00979-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Vrablik T.L., Petyuk V.A., Larson E.M., Smith R.D., Watts J.L. Lipidomic and proteomic analysis of Caenorhabditis elegans lipid droplets and identification of ACS-4 as a lipid droplet-associated protein. Biochim. Biophys. Acta. 2015;1851(10):1337–1345. doi: 10.1016/j.bbalip.2015.06.004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Smus J.P., Ludlow E., Dalliere N., Luedtke S., Monfort T., Lilley C., Urwin P., Walker R.J., O’Connor V., Holden-Dye L., Mahajan S. Coherent anti-Stokes Raman scattering (CARS) spectroscopy in Caenorhabditis elegans and Globodera pallida: evidence for an ivermectin-activated decrease in lipid stores. Pest Manag. Sci. 2017;73(12):2550–2558. doi: 10.1002/ps.4707. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Arvanitis M., Li D.D., Lee K., Mylonakis E. Apoptosis in C. elegans: lessons for cancer and immunity. Front. Cell. Infect. Microbiol. 2013;3:67. doi: 10.3389/fcimb.2013.00067. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Rajasekharan S.K., Lee J. Hydropic anthelmintics against parasitic nematodes. PLoS Pathog. 2020;16(1) doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1008202. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Richmond J.E., Jorgensen E.M. One GABA and two acetylcholine receptors function at the C. elegans neuromuscular junction. Nature Neurosc . 1999;2(9):791–797. doi: 10.1038/12160. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Brenner S. The genetics of Caenorhabditis elegans. Genetics. 1974;77:71–94. doi: 10.1093/genetics/77.1.71. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.