Abstract
Mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) maintain the musculoskeletal system by differentiating into multiple lineages, including osteoblasts and adipocytes. Mechanical signals, including strain and low-intensity vibration (LIV), are important regulators of MSC differentiation via control exerted through the cell structure. Lamin A/C is a protein vital to the nuclear architecture that supports chromatin organization and differentiation and contributes to the mechanical integrity of the nucleus. We investigated whether lamin A/C and mechanoresponsiveness are functionally coupled during adipogenesis in MSCs. siRNA depletion of lamin A/C increased the nuclear area, height, and volume and decreased the circularity and stiffness. Lamin A/C depletion significantly decreased markers of adipogenesis (adiponectin, cellular lipid content) as did LIV treatment despite depletion of lamin A/C. Phosphorylation of focal adhesions in response to mechanical challenge was also preserved during loss of lamin A/C. RNA-seq showed no major adipogenic transcriptome changes resulting from LIV treatment, suggesting that LIV regulation of adipogenesis may not occur at the transcriptional level. We observed that during both lamin A/C depletion and LIV, interferon signaling was downregulated, suggesting potentially shared regulatory mechanism elements that could regulate protein translation. We conclude that the mechanoregulation of adipogenesis and the mechanical activation of focal adhesions function independently from those of lamin A/C.
Keywords: lamin A/C, LINC, nucleoskeleton, nuclear envelope, adipogenesis, mechanical signals, mesenchymal stem cells
1. Introduction
As one of the lamin family proteins that form the nucleoskeleton, lamin A/C (gene symbol: Lmna) plays a vital role in providing the mechanical and structural integrity of the cell nucleus [1,2,3]. Mutations in Lmna lead to premature aging in Hutchinson–Gilford progeria syndrome [2,3,4], also known as progeria [1,2,3], where the progeroid farnesylated lamin A/C (i.e., progerin) causes alterations to heterochromatin and DNA damage [3,4,5,6]. Mechanical and structural attributes of the cell and nucleus also change during loss and mutation of lamin A/C [7,8]. Nuclei containing progerin show increased stiffness when visualized under strain [9]. When lamin A/C is depleted, cellular elasticity and viscosity of the cytoplasm decrease [10]. Additionally, irregular nuclear morphology, including blebbing and loss of circularity, is attributed to progerin presence and lamin A/C depletion [7,8]. Such a change in mechanical properties affects the response to external forces. The nucleus of lamin-A/C-deficient cells displays a higher displacement magnitude in response to biaxial strain, indicating lower nuclear stiffness compared to wild-type nuclei [11]. Therefore, lamin A/C plays a critical role in determining human health and regulating cellular and nuclear mechanical structure and shape.
Mesenchymal stem/stromal cells (MSCs) are tissue-resident somatic multipotent cells that can differentiate into musculoskeletal lineages, including osteoblasts and adipocytes [12]. Depletion of lamin A/C in MSCs impedes osteoblast differentiation. MSCs treated with an siRNA targeting Lmna shows reduced osteoblast differentiation transcription factors such as osteocalcin (Bglap), osterix (Sp7), and bone sialoprotein (Ibsp) and an increase in fat droplet formation [13]. Additionally, mouse studies have shown that Lmna−/− mice have a significant reduction in bone mass compared to WT mice, reflecting reduced osteoblast numbers [14]. Lamin A/C overexpression induces osteogenesis while simultaneously inhibiting adipogenesis in human MSCs [15]. In addition to causing progeria and inhibition of osteogenesis, mutations of Lmna also produce lipodystrophy syndromes. Heterozygous mutations of Lmna cause familial partial lipodystrophy, Dunnigan variety (FPLD2), which is characterized by the loss of subcutaneous fat in the upper and lower extremities [16]. The FPLD2-associated Lmna p.R482W mutation slows adipogenic differentiation in fibroblastic cells extracted from FPLD2 patients and in human adipose stem cells [17]. At the same time, lamin-A/C-depleted MSCs, when cultured on softer substrates, are more permissive of adipogenic differentiation compared to control MSCs [18]. While these findings suggest a role for lamin A/C in regulating differentiation at both the organism and the cellular level, whether lamin A/C depletion contributes to mechanical regulation of MSC differentiation remains insufficiently explored.
MSCs replace and rejuvenate skeletal and connective tissues in response to environmental mechanical signals [19,20,21]. For example, application of external mechanical challenge in the form of LIV over 14 days increases proliferation and osteogenic differentiation markers and subsequent mineralization of MSC cultures in vitro [22,23]. An important signaling node for mechanical control of MSCs is focal adhesions, macromolecule protein complexes located on the cellular membrane, that connect the cytoskeleton to the extracellular matrix (ECM) where the cell is anchored to the extracellular environment through integrins [24]. During dynamic mechanical stimulus, integrin engagement is regulated by activation of focal adhesion kinase (FAK) at the tyrosine 397 residue [25]. We have reported that both LIV and substrate strain lead to FAK phosphorylation at tyrosine 397 [26]. This activation of FAK at focal adhesions both recruits signaling molecules that lead to cytoskeletal restructuring and activates concomitant mechanosignaling events such as the Akt/ß-catenin (Akt1/Ctnnb1) pathway [27]. For example, application of mechanical stimuli with strain, fluid flow, and LIV has been shown to activate both ß-catenin and RhoA signaling in MSCs [26,28,29]. Within the context of MSC adipogenesis, activation of these parallel signaling pathways results in decelerated adipogenic commitment of MSCs, as measured by reduced production of adipogenesis-related proteins such as adiponectin (encoded by the adiponectin gene Adipoq) and peroxisome-proliferator-activated receptor gamma (Ppparg1) [30].
In addition to cytomechanical signaling events initiated at focal adhesions and the cytoskeleton, control of MSC differentiation is also dependent on nuclear connectivity within the cytoskeleton. Inhibiting nucleo-cytoskeletal connectivity by disabling the function of linker of nucleoskeleton and cytoskeleton (LINC) complexes impedes the nuclear entry of important molecular transducer mechanical information such as YAP/TAZ and ß-catenin, which act as co-transcriptional factors for regulating MSC adipogenesis and osteogenesis [31]. As opposed to LINC complex depletion, lamin A/C depletion has no effect on mechanically induced nuclear ß-catenin entry [32], suggesting that lamin A/C may be dispensable for the mechanically induced activation of focal adhesions that lead to the de-phosphorylation and subsequent nuclear entry of ß-catenin. These previous studies show that lamin A/C plays a central role in nuclear organization and structure, as well as contributing to the cell’s ability to sense structural qualities of the extracellular matrix to guide differentiation of MSCs. However, the role of lamin A/C in focal adhesion signaling and mechanically induced control of MSCs’ fate in response to dynamic mechanical challenges remains incompletely understood. Here we tested the requirement of lamin A/C for the mechanical response of MSCs. Using LIV, we investigated the role of lamin A/C depletion on the mechanical control of MSC adipogenesis.
2. Results
2.1. siRNA Depletion of Lamin A/C Weakens the Nuclear Elastic Modulus in MSCs
We investigated the effects of lamin A/C depletion on cellular and nuclear morphology as well as mechanical properties. MSCs treated with either a control siRNA (siCntl) or a lamin-A/C-specific siRNA (siLmna) were stained against F-actin and DNA. Compared to the siCntl group, siLmna-treated MSCs showed a more elongated nuclear morphology but no apparent changes in the F-actin cytoskeleton (Figure 1a). As shown in Figure 1b, 3D morphology quantification indicated a 9% decrease in nuclear sphericity in siLmna-treated MSCs when compared to MSCs treated with a control siRNA (p < 0.001). The maximal nuclear area, volume, and height were increased by 32%, 31%, and 11% in siLmna-treated MSCs, respectively, when compared to siCntl-treated cells (Figure 1b; p < 0.001). Young’s modulus was measured for both whole cells and extracted nuclei treated with either siLmna or siCntl. Young’s modulus was measured using a rounded AFM probe tip, which was pressed onto the surface of the whole cell directly above the nucleus or on an isolated nucleus (Figure 1c,d). Confocal imaging with DNA and lamin A/C labeling of a representative isolated nucleus (Figure 1e) indicated that the nuclear structure remains intact following isolation. Treatment with siLmna caused a 45% reduction in whole-cell stiffness when compared to siCntl-treated MSCs (Figure 1f; p < 0.001), while extracted nuclei exhibit a 55% reduction in stiffness in lamin-A/C-depleted cells compared to the siCntl group (p < 0.01, Figure 1g).
2.2. siRNA Depletion of Lamin A/C Increases SUN2 Nuclear Levels and Focal Adhesion Proteins
To further characterize the effects of lamin A/C depletion on the nuclear envelope and focal adhesions, the LINC complex and focal adhesion proteins were investigated. Confocal images of the siCntl and siLmna groups indicated that there were no visible changes in the LINC proteins SUN1 and SUN2 when lamin A/C was depleted (Figure 2a). Quantitative analysis of the confocal images detected no differences in SUN1 or SUN2 nuclear envelope localization (Supplementary Materials Figure S1). Hoechst-stained images can be found in Supplementary Materials Figure S2. We examined the same proteins using cellular fractionation followed by Western blotting and densitometry analysis (Figure 2b,c). All the measurements were normalized to whole-cell siCntl protein amounts, which were set to 1. Comparing siLmna treatment with siCntl, lamin A/C was significantly decreased in whole-cell fractions (−35%, p < 0.05). The relative lamin A/C concentration was greater in the nuclear fraction and led to larger values, while band intensities of the siLmna group remained significantly lower compared to the siCntl group (−11%, p < 0.05). Except for a small amount of SUN1 detection in the cytoplasm, both SUN1 and SUN2 were largely restricted to the nucleus. In contrast to the results from confocal imaging (Supplementary Materials Figure S1b,c), Western blots quantifying cell fractionations from lamin-A/C-depleted cells showed an increase in nuclear SUN2 (+44%, p < 0.05). Focal adhesion proteins were also altered under siLmna treatment. Total focal adhesion kinase (FAK) adhered to the cell culture plate experienced an increase of 39% compared to control-treated cells (p < 0.05; Figure 2d,e). The amount of Akt adhering to cell culture plates also increased by 50% (p < 0.05). No changes in vinculin were detected.
2.3. Focal Adhesions Maintain Response to Mechanical Stimulus in Lamin-A/C-Depleted MSCs
Based on the observed increases in basal levels of FAK during lamin A/C depletion (Figure 2d,e) we next asked whether mechanical activation of FAK is altered by further quantifying the mechanical activation of FAK via its phosphorylation at the tyrosine 397 residue (pFAK), which is indicative of integrin engagement [25]. MSCs were treated with either strain or LIV and compared to non-mechanically stimulated controls. Basal pFAK levels normalized to total FAK (TFAK) were 85% elevated in the siLmna group when compared to the siCntl group (p < 0.05) (Figure 3a,b). Phosphorylated FAK levels in both siCntl- and siLmna-treated groups increased by 101% (p < 0.05) and 87% (p < 0.001), respectively, in response to a 20 min strain (2%, 0.1 Hz) when compared to non-strained counterparts (Figure 3c,d). LIV also activated FAK, increasing pFAK by 331% (p < 0.001) in siCntl- and 83% (p < 0.001) in siLmna-treated MSCs in response to LIV (0.7 g, 90 Hz) (Figure 3a,b).
2.4. Application of Daily LIV Treatment Decreases Adipogenic Differentiation in MSCs
As focal adhesion signaling was intact in siLmna-treated MSCs, we next probed downstream processes to ask whether LIV application, known to slow adipogenesis [33], was effective when lamin A/C was depleted. In our experiment timeline, cells were first treated with siRNA on day 1 and then cultured in adipogenic media concomitant with LIV treatment up to 7 days (Figure 4a). On day 2, adipogenic media were placed on cells and LIV treatment started. LIV treatment occurred twice a day for 20 min with 2 h rests in between treatments. On day 7, cell protein, imaging plates, and RNA samples were collected together for Western blotting, lipid droplet staining, and RNA-seq analysis. Probing the adipogenesis marker adiponectin (gene symbol: Adipoq) between non-LIV controls, lamin-A/C-depleted cells showed a 39% decrease in adiponectin at 7 days (Figure 4c,d). Similarly, compared within LIV-treated groups, adiponectin levels in the siLmna group was 51% lower than in siCntl-treated cells with LIV (p < 0.01). Compared to non-LIV controls, daily LIV application decreased adiponectin levels by 30% in the siCntl group (p < 0.01) and 44% in the siLmna group (p < 0.001). To further validate the reduction in adipogenesis during LIV treatment, lipid droplets were imaged via Oil Red O (Figure 4d) and LipidSpot 610 florescent lipid droplet staining (Biotium, CA; Figure 4e). Quantification of the mean florescent lipid droplet intensity per cell from individual imaging fields revealed that LIV-treated siCntl samples had a reduction of 49% in lipid droplet intensity when compared to non-LIV-treated siCntl samples (n = 36, p < 0.0001) (Figure 4f). Non-LIV-treated siLmna samples had a 42% decrease in lipid droplet intensity compared to non-LIV-treated siCntl samples (n = 36, p < 0.001). When comparing non-LIV- and LIV-treated siLmna samples, lipid droplet intensity per cell was reduced in LIV-treated samples by 44% (n = 36, p < 0.05).
2.5. Differential Effect of Lamin A/C Depletion and LIV on mRNA Transcription during Adipogenic Differentiation
RNA-seq was performed to determine the effects of LIV and siLmna treatment on differential expression of mRNA in MSCs during adipogenesis. Read values were filtered for expression by selecting genes with average minimal levels of 0.3 fragments per kilobase of transcript per million mapped reads (FPKM; t-test p < 0.05 and fold change > 1.4). Hierarchical clustering of these genes generated a heatmap (Figure 5a) in which siCntl-treated samples clustered together in one clade, while undifferentiated and siLmna-treated samples were clustered together in another clade that was visually separated from siCntl-treated samples. Principal component analysis (Figure 5b) showed further grouping of siCntl and siLmna samples. Principal components 1 and 2 explained 40.4% and 15.9% of the total variance, respectively, with prediction ellipses indicating the probability of 0.95 that a new observation of the same group will fall inside the ellipse. FPKM levels for adipogenic genes with at least one group having significantly differentially expression (log2 fold change ≥ 1, Wald p < 0.05) compared to the non-LIV siCntl group as detected by DESEQ2 analysis (Figure 5c). Results showed significant differential expression between siCntl and siLmna groups.
2.6. Lamin A/C Depletion Impedes Adipogenic Transcription in MSCs
DESEQ2 analysis was conducted on non-LIV siLmna and siCntl groups to determine differential gene expression between siRNA treatments during adipogenic treatment. A volcano plot for the comparison between siLmna- and siCntl-treated samples under adipogenic constraints (Figure 6a) revealed that there are 52,607 statistically unchanged transcripts between lamin-A/C-depleted and control MSCs with Wald values of p > 0.05 (gray and green data points). As shown in green data points, 2000 genes showed at least a 2-fold difference (i.e., log2 fold change ≥ 1), while 749 genes showed a statistically significant change between lamin-A/C-depleted and control MSCs with Wald values of p < 0.05 (shown in blue), and 427 of them had a less than 2-fold difference (i.e., log2 fold change ≤ 1). The remaining 322 genes showed at least a 2-fold difference (i.e., log2 fold change ≥ 1), which represents significant and differentially expressed genes. Upregulated (red genes on the right side, n = 173) and downregulated genes (red genes on the left side, n = 149) upon lamin A/C depletion were then assessed by clustering analysis using STRING [34]. As highlighted in Figure 6b, upregulated genes upon lamin A/C depletion were associated with cellular processes such as (i) tissue repair (e.g., genes generally involved in angiogenesis, hematopoiesis, and mechanical stress shielding), (ii) ECM remodeling (e.g., genes generally involved in take-up and intra-cellular transport of ECM debris as well as suppression of apoptosis), and (iii) cell surface transporters (e.g., genes that mediate the trafficking of compounds across membranes. The detected GO term pathways with FDR < 0.05 are presented in Supplementary Materials Table S1. Collectively, the biological function of these genes appears to be related to tissue repair, inflammation, and extracellular matrix homeostasis. As depicted in Figure 6c, downregulated gene groups upon lamin A/C depletion included (i) cell adhesion and cytoskeletal organization, (ii) interferon signaling and regulation of gene expression (e.g., DNA and RNA binding and protein degradation), (iii) G-protein-coupled receptor signaling (e.g., diverse range of cell surface receptors and components of the angiotension system), (iv) lipid metabolism and paracrine inflammatory signaling, and (v) adipogenic phenotype. The detected GO term pathways with FDR < 0.05 are presented in Supplementary Materials Table S2. These downregulated genes together are generally involved in cell migration, energy metabolism, and adipogenic differentiation. The results from Gene Ontology and gene network analysis revealed that lamin A/C depletion has pleiotropic effects on gene expression, yet many gene pathways converge on cell-surface-related biochemical events, interactions with the extracellular matrix, and internal metabolic pathways.
2.7. Low-Intensity Vibration (LIV) Decreases Interferon Signaling Pathway Gene Expression
To determine the effects of LIV, DESEQ2 analysis was performed comparing non-LIV siCntl and siLmna controls against their LIV-treated counterparts during adipogenesis. The volcano plot comparing siCntl adipogenesis with or without LIV treatment (siCntl ± LIV) is shown in Figure 7a. There were 53,326 statistically unchanged genes between with Wald values of p > 0.05 (gray and green data points), with 1939 of them showing at least a 2-fold difference (green). While 76 genes showed a statistically significant change between LIV-treated and control MSCs with Wald values of p < 0.05, shown in blue, 26 of them had a less than 2-fold difference. The remaining 53 genes showed at least a 2-fold difference (red). Assessing downregulated genes via clustering revealed an interferon-related gene cluster in the LIV treatment group (Figure 7b). Similarly, LIV treatment upon lamin A/C depletion also revealed an interferon-related gene cluster that was downregulated (Figure 7d). Together, cells treated with siCntl had 11 genes and those treated with siLmna had 16 genes associated with the interferon signaling pathway that experienced decreased expression during LIV treatment (Figure 7e). Excluding this latter finding, it appears that while lamin A/C loss has a dramatic impact on gene expression programs, LIV has minimal effects on the transcriptome of differentiating MSCs.
3. Discussion and Conclusions
In lamin-A/C-depleted cells, microscopic observations of increased blebbing, elongated nuclear shape, and ruffled nuclear membrane [7,35,36] indicate a compromised nuclear structure. Our quantification of the 3D nuclear structure of lamin-A/C-depleted cells supported these previous observations and showed reduced sphericity and an increased planar nuclear area, while nuclear height and volume increased compared to controls. It has been reported that lamin A/C depletion increases nuclear height and volume in part due to reduced recruitment of perinuclear and apical F-actin cables [37]. While reduction in apical F-actin may contribute to a decrease in elastic modulus in lamin-A/C-depleted intact MSCs, a similar decrease was observed in our lamin-A/C-depleted isolated live nuclei. The similarities in decreased stiffness in both intact cells and isolated nuclei suggest that nuclear softening is the primary driver of decreased cell stiffness upon lamin A/C loss of function and that loss of lamin A/C is a major contributor to nuclei stiffness.
Our data suggest that MSCs compensate for lamin-A/C-mediated nuclear softening by increasing their focal adhesions. Not only was total FAK and Akt accumulation at focal adhesions more robust in lamin-A/C-depleted MSCs, but also tyrosine 397 phosphorylated FAK (pFAK) was higher, which suggests increased integrin engagement [25]. These findings are not surprising as depletion of both lamin A/C [38] and nucleo-cytoskeletal connector nesprin-1 (Syne1) [39] are shown to increase substrate traction in cells. Both LIV and strain pushed acute FAK phosphorylation of lamin-A/C-depleted cells higher than control cells, indicating that the focal adhesion signaling remains intact despite lamin A/C depletion in MSCs. Phosphorylation of FAK in siCntl and siLmna cells during LIV increased proportionally to their basal pFAK levels. However, strain-induced pFAK increases were increased to similar levels of LIV-treated siLmna samples despite being a stronger mechanical force. It is known that the number of focal adhesions determine the amount of pFAK [21,40]. While it is possible that LIV and strain activate pFAK differently, our previous findings show that LIV and strain responses are additive [26], and therefore this option is unlikely. Therefore, it possible that the strain-activated pFAK was saturated and did not increase pFAK levels higher than that of LIV mechanical activation. Ultimately, these data show that lamin A/C is also not required for the activation of focal adhesions during mechanical stimulation.
Similar to focal adhesions, nucleo-cytoskeletal connectivity provided by the LINC complex remained intact under lamin A/C depletion. Previous studies have shown that LINC proteins SUN1 and SUN2 bind to the lamin A/C in order to mediate a connection from the inner nucleus to the cytoskeleton and ultimately to the focal adhesions that make a physical connection to the extracellular matrix [41,42]. Quantification of confocal images of SUN1 and SUN2 revealed no changes compared to controls. However, quantification of three biological replicates showed that nuclear SUN2 protein levels were increased. We previously reported that depletion of LINC complex function impedes LIV-mediated FAK activation in MSCs [26]. As shown in Figure 3a, basal FAK phosphorylation levels were higher, and LIV resulted in a larger FAK phosphorylation response of lamin-A/C-depleted cells, indicating that the LINC complex function is intact despite lamin A/C depletion. This is not surprising as the localization of SUN1 and SUN2 proteins to the nuclear envelope is not entirely dependent upon lamin A/C [42,43]. While noted changes in SUN proteins after lamin A/C depletion suggest a putative relationship (Figure 2c), loss of lamin A/C did not negatively impact the SUN protein levels, suggesting that LINC complex connectivity remains intact.
Adipogenesis has recently been shown to decrease with mutated Lmna, specifically in cells expressing the lipodystrophy-associated Lmna p.R482W mutation [17]. Our data support this previous observation: MSCs treated with siLmna experienced slower adipogenic differentiation compared to siCntl-treated cells, as marked by reduced adiponectin levels and reduced lipid droplet formation and intensity (Figure 4c,f). Further investigation revealed that siLmna-treated MSCs show a reduction in lipid droplet intensity compared to siCntl-treated MSCs (Supplementary Materials Figure S2a–f). A multiple linear regression analysis with two- and three-way interactions was performed to identify possible determinants of decreased lipid accumulation in siLmna-treated MSCs. ANOVA of the parameters for the multiple linear regression model showed that the nuclear perimeter as well as interactions between lamin A/C:area, lamin A/C:perimeter, lamin A/C:area:circularity, and lamin A/C circularity:perimeter comparisons were found to be significant (p < 0.05; Supplementary Materials Figure S2f). As shown in Supplementary Materials Figure S2h, a multiple linear regression model with these main affects, two-way interactions, and three-way interactions was able to predict the average lipid droplet intensity per cell with an R2 of 0.507, suggesting that decreased lamin A/C levels alone do not explain the decreased lipid droplet accumulation in lamin-A/C-depleted cells. Our RNA-seq analysis of the RNA samples taken from the same samples as the Western blotting and imaging data indicate that MSCs display an undifferentiated phenotype upon lamin A/C depletion, reflected by reduced expression of genes associated with adipogenic and lipid-related metabolic pathways (Figure 5c and Figure 6c). LIV treatment did not have a significant impact on adipogenic gene expression, indicating that lamin A/C and not low-intensity vibration has a greater influence on adipogenic differentiation.
In contrast to large shifts in transcription found after lamin A/C depletion, RNA-seq data from the same samples as the Western blotting data from Figure 4b indicated that only 21 genes for siCntl- and 74 genes for siLmna-treated cells were differentially expressed as a result of LIV treatment. Despite the lack of changes at the transcriptional level, lamin-A/C-depleted MSCs retain the ability to respond to mechanical signals and exhibit decelerated adipogenesis reflected by reduced adiponectin and lipid droplet intensity in LIV-treated cells. Although mechanical stimulation using LIV does not produce widespread alteration in mRNA expression, we did observe a distinct LIV-dependent signature characteristic of interferon-responsive genes. Relationships between the type 1 interferon signaling pathway and mechanical forces, specifically low-intensity forces such as shear strain and vibration, have been shown to inactivate interferons [44]. Regulating activation of the interferon signaling pathway is likely to impact the cellular interpretation and response to their physical environment, which may be done through controlling protein translation. Indeed, the absence of major transcriptome changes during adipogenesis in response to LIV points to post-transcriptional or post-translational regulatory events. However, further research is needed to elucidate any post-transcriptional or post-translational mechanoregulation effects of LIV mechanical stimulation on adipogenesis.
In this study, we did not validate our RNA-seq data using qPCR. While this may be seen as a limitation of the study, qPCR can be highly biased as it depends upon primer sequence design, variances in the target annealing temperatures, and the fact that results are usually referenced to a reference gene [45,46]. RNA-seq, in contrast, minimizes these inherent biases, especially the ones related to unforeseen variances in the reference gene due to experimental conditions, as the raw mRNA fragments are sequenced and aligned to the entire genome, thus providing an unbiased view of gene expression across all samples. Given the extremely close correlations between qPCR and RNA-seq as, reported by others [47,48,49,50,51], and the fact that we sequenced three independent biological replicates and ensured sequencing and alignment quality, we are confident that the mRNA data are representative of a true biologic response.
In summary, we showed that lamin A/C depletion results in decreased nuclear integrity, with more robust focal adhesions contributing to reduced adipogenic differentiation. This resulting adaptive response in the cytoskeletal structure maintains LIV-induced focal adhesion signaling and maintains the ability of LIV to limit adipogenesis of MSCs. Findings of this study indicate that lamin A/C is required for proper adipogenic commitment of MSCs and that the mechanical regulation of adipogenesis uses lamin-A/C-independent pathways to elicit a response in MSCs.
4. Materials and Methods
4.1. MSC Isolation
Bone-marrow-derived MSCs (mdMSC) from 8–10-week-old male C57BL/6 mice were isolated, as described in [52], from multiple mouse donors and MSC pools, providing a heterogenous MSC cell line. Briefly, tibial and femoral marrow was collected in RPMI-1640, 9% FBS, 9% HS, 100 µg/mL of penicillin/streptomycin, and 12 µM L-glutamine. After 24 h, non-adherent cells were removed by washing with phosphate-buffered saline and adherent cells cultured for 4 weeks. Passage 1 cells were collected after incubation with 0.25% trypsin/1 mM EDTA × 2 min, and re-plated in a single 175 cm2 flask. After 1–2 weeks, passage 2 cells were re-plated at 50 cells/cm2 in expansion medium (Iscove modified Dulbecco’s, 9% FBS, 9% HS, antibiotics, L-glutamine). mdMSCs were re-plated every 1–2 weeks for two consecutive passages up to passage 5 and tested for osteogenic and adipogenic potential and subsequently frozen.
4.2. Cell Culture, Pharmacological Reagents, and Antibodies
Fetal calf serum (FCS) was obtained from Atlanta Biologicals (Atlanta, GA, USA). Culture media, trypsin-EDTA, antibiotics, and phalloidin–Alexa Fluor 488 were obtained from Invitrogen (Carlsbad, CA, USA). MSCs were maintained in IMDM with FBS (10%, v/v) and penicillin/streptomycin (100 µg/mL). For phosphorylation measurements, the seeding cell density was 10,000 cells/cm2. For immunostaining experiments, the seeding cell density was 3000 cells/cm2. For phosphorylation measurements and immunostaining experiments, all groups were cultured for 48 h before beginning experiments and were serum-starved overnight in serum-free medium.
For adipogenic differentiation experiments, the seeding cell density was 10,000 cells/cm2. Cells were transfected 24 h after cell seeding with siRNA targeting Lmna (siLmna) or a control sequence (siCntl) using RNAiMax from Invitrogen. Adipogenic media and LIV treatment followed a previously published protocol, where 24 h after transfection, adipogenic media was added that contained dexamethasone (0.1 µM) and insulin (5 µg/mL) [19]. Cell cultures were incubated with the combined transfection media and adipogenic differentiation media for 7 days after adipogenic media was added with or without LIV treatment (2 × 20 min per day separated by 2 h).
The following antibodies were purchased: Akt (#4685), p-Akt Ser473 (#4058L), β-tubulin (D3U1W), and p-FAK Tyr397 (#328 3) from Cell Signaling Technology (Danvers, MA, USA); adiponectin (PA1-054) from Thermo Fisher Scientific (Rockford, IL, USA); and FAK (sc-558) and lamin A/C (sc-7292) from Santa Cruz Biotechnology (Dallas, TX, USA).
4.3. LIV and Strain
Vibrations were applied at peak magnitudes of 0.7 g at 90 Hz twice for 20 min separated by a 2 h rest period at room temperature. Uniform 2% biaxial strain was delivered at 10 cycles per minute for 20 min using the Flexcell FX-5000 system (Flexcell International, Hillsborough, NC, USA). Controls were sham-handled. During adipogenesis experiments, LIV was applied 24 h after initial transfection, a regimen we have previously shown be effective [26].
4.4. Isolation of Focal Adhesions
Cells were incubated with triethanolamine (TEA)-containing low-ionic-strength buffer (2.5 mM TEA, pH 7.0) for 3 min at RT and 1× PBS containing protease/phosphatase inhibitors. A Waterpik nozzle (Fort Collins, CO, USA; www.waterpik.com, accessed on 17 May 2021) held 0.5 cm from the plate surface at approximately 90° supplied the hydrodynamic force to flush away cell bodies, membrane-bound organelles, nuclei, cytoskeleton, and soluble cytoplasmic materials so that residual focal adhesions could be isolated, as reported previously [26].
4.5. siRNA-Silencing Sequences
For transient silencing of MSCs, cells were transfected with gene-specific small interfering RNA (siRNA) or control siRNA (20 nM) using RNAiMax (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. The following Stealth Select siRNAs (Invitrogen, Waltham, MA, USA) were used in this study: Lmna 5′-UGGGAGAGGCUAAGAAGCAGCUUCA-3′ and negative control for Lmna 5′-UGGGAGUCGGAAGAAGACUCGAUCA-3′.
4.6. Isolation of Nuclei for Young’s Modulus
MSCs were plated at 10,000 cells/cm2 cell density. For mechanical and structural testing, nuclei were isolated by scraping cells in PBS and then suspending cells in hypotonic solution, followed by centrifugation at 3000× g. Nuclei were then extracted by using percol (81% percol, 19% hypotonic buffer) and centrifugation at 10,000× g. Nuclei were then diluted in PBS and plated. Young’s modulus of the nuclei was determined using atomic force microscopy (AFM). For strain experiments, cells were plated on BioFlex collagen-I-coated silicone plates.
4.7. RNA-Seq
Seven days after adipogenic and LIV treatment, following the above protocols, three samples per group were sent to Novogene for RNA extraction and sequencing. Quality control of raw data was done using FASTQC. Read alignment of the genome to the raw reads was done using STAR [53]. Read count generation was performed using feature counts, and differential gene expression analysis was performed using DESEQ2 [54]. For analysis using fragments per kilobase of transcript per million mapped reads (FPKM), data were assessed as previously described [55,56,57,58]. Briefly, RNA-seq data were analyzed using a Mayo Bioinformatics Core called MAPRSeq v.1.2.1 [59], which includes TopHat 2.0.6 alignment [60] and gene expression quantification using HTSeq software [61]. Normalized gene counts were obtained from MAPRSeq as FPKM. Hierarchical clustering and principal component analysis were assessed and visualized using ClustVis [62]. Genes with significant differential expression compared to non-LIV controls (p < 0.05, log2FC > 1.0) as detected by DESEQ2 were analyzed via STRING [34]. Biological and cellular gene clusters that had a false discovery rate (FDR) less than 0.05 were further subjected to supervised analysis to determine proper naming of clusters. Sequencing data were deposited in the Gene Expression Omnibus of the National Institute for Biotechnology Information (GSE157056).
4.8. Immunofluorescence
Twenty-four hours after siRNA treatment against lamin A/C protein, cells were fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde. Cells were permeabilized by incubation with 0.3% Triton X-100. Cells were incubated in a blocking serum in PBS with 5% donkey serum (017-000-121, Jackson Immuno Research Laboratories, West Grove, PA, USA). Primary antibody solutions were incubated on the cells for 1 h at 37 °C, followed by secondary antibody incubation of either Alexa Flour 594 goat anti-rabbit (Invitrogen, Waltham, MA, USA) or Alexa Fluor 647 donkey anti-mouse. For nuclear staining, cells were incubated with NucBlue Hoechst stain (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA). For actin staining, cells were incubated with Alexa Fluor 488–phalloidin (Life Technologies, Carlsbad, CA, USA). Primary and secondary concentrations were both 1:300.
4.9. Lipid Droplet Analysis
Seven days after adipogenic media and LIV treatment, cells were fixed and were stained with Oil Red O (Poly Scientific, Baywood, NY, USA, #k043), Lipid Spot 610 (Biotium, Fremont, CA, USA, #70069), and NucBlue Hoechst stain. Images were taken using a 20× objective and exported to quantify lipid droplet formation via a custom-made MATLAB program (MathWorks, Natick, MA, USA) previously published [63]. A minimum pixel intensity of 80 was used to isolate lipid droplet staining. The mean lipid droplet intensity per cell was calculated by dividing the sum of lipid droplet stain intensity by the nuclei count per image. For determining the effects of siLmna on lipid droplet formation, nuclear area, nuclear perimeter, and nuclear circularity, siCntl- and siLmna-treated cells were differentiated with previously stated adipogenic media and indomethacin (1 µg/mL) for 5 days. Cells were then stained for lamin A/C, as previously described, Lipid Spot 610, and NucBlue Hoeschst. Exported images were used to quantify lipid droplet formation, lamin A/C, nuclear area, nuclear perimeter, and nuclear circularity via the custom-made MATLAB program. A minimum pixel intensity of 80 was used to isolate lipid droplet staining and lamin A/C intensity.
4.10. Nuclear Morphology
To test the nuclear morphology to correlate with the mechanical constraint on the nucleus, as measured by AFM, MSCs were seeded at 3000 cells/cm2 on plastic slide chambers (iBIDI µslide # 80421). Then, 72 h after siRNA treatment against lamin A/C protein, cells underwent immunofluorescence staining following the above protocols for lamin A/C and DNA (Hoechst 33342; Life Technologies, Carlsbad, CA, USA) and/or were stained against actin (Alexa Fluor 488–phalloidin; Life Technologies, Carlsbad, CA, USA). Z-stack confocal 3D images were obtained with Zeiss LSM 710 with a separation interval of 0.15 µm. Z-stack images were analyzed using IMARIS software.
4.11. Western Blotting
Whole-cell lysates were prepared using radio immunoprecipitation assay (RIPA) lysis buffer (150 mM NaCl, 50 mM Tris HCl, 1 mM EDTA, 0.24% sodium deoxycholate, 1% Igepal, pH 7.5). To protect the samples from protein degradation, NaF (25 mM), Na3VO4 (2 mM), aprotinin, leupeptin, pepstatin, and phenylmethylsulfonylfluoride (PMSF) were added to the lysis buffer. Western protein amounts were normalized to 15 µg through BCA protein assay (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA; #23225). Cell fractionation protein amounts were normalized to 10 µg via detergent-compatible Bradford assay (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA; #23246). LDHA and PARP were used as fractionation total loading protein controls for nuclear and cytoplasmic fractions, respectively. Whole-cell lysates (15 µg) were separated on 10% polyacrylamide gels and transferred to polyvinylidene difluoride (PVDF) membranes. Membranes were blocked with milk (5%, w/v) diluted in Tris-buffered saline containing Tween 20 (TBS-T, 0.05%). Blots were then incubated overnight at 4 °C with appropriate primary antibodies. Following primary antibody incubation, blots were washed and incubated with horseradish-peroxidase-conjugated secondary antibody diluted at 1:5000 (Cell Signaling Technology) at RT for 1 h in 5% milk in TBST-T. Chemiluminescence was detected with ECL plus (Amersham Biosciences, Piscataway, NJ, USA). At least three separate experiments were used for densitometry analyses of Western blots, and densitometry was performed using NIH ImageJ software 1.52.
4.12. Statistical Analysis and Reproducibility
Results for densitometry were presented as the mean ± SEM. Densitometry and other analyses were performed on at least three separate experiments. Differences between groups were identified by two-tailed Student’s t-test. Analysis of nuclear morphology and Young’s modulus measurement were performed using the Whitney–Mann test, and results were presented as the mean ± STD. Differential gene expression analysis via DESEQ2 was done using Wald test. Image analysis groups were analyzed using the Kruskal–Wallis test. p-Values of less than 0.05 were considered significant. All experiments were conducted in triplicate to ensure reproducibility.
Supplementary Materials
The following are available online at https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/ijms22126580/s1, Figure S1: Quantification of confocal images for SUN1, SUN2, and lamin A/C in siCntl and siLmna groups; Figure S2: Representative photos of nuclei (blue, Hoechst 33342) for Figure 2a; Figure S3: Quantification of lamin A/C, lipid levels, and cell structural parameters during adipogenesis in siCntl and siLmna groups; Figure S4: Full-size, annotated gene cluster for Figure 6b; Figure S5: Full-size, annotated gene cluster for Figure 6d; Figure S6: Full-size, annotated gene cluster for Figure 7b–d; Figure S7: Gene lists for Figure 6b,c; Figure S8: Unprocessed blots used in Figure 2, as obtained by LiCor C-DiGit blot scanner; Figure S9: Unprocessed blots used in Figure 3, as obtained by LiCor C-DiGit blot scanner; Figure S10: Unprocessed blots used in Figure 4, as obtained by LiCor C-DiGit blot scanner; Figure S11: Lmna FPKM levels for RNA-seq samples; Table S1: Table of biological and cellular pathways with FDR < 0.05 detected in STRING analysis from Figure 6b; Table S2: Table of top 72 biological and cellular pathways with FDR < 0.05 detected in STRING analysis from Figure 6d; Table S3: Table of biological and cellular pathways with FDR < 0.05 detected in STRING analysis from Figure 7c; Table S4: Table of biological and cellular pathways with FDR < 0.05 detected in STRING analysis from Figure 7d; Table S5: Cell culture and pharmacological reagents and their final concentrations; Table S6: Antibodies used and their final concentrations for Western blots; Table S7: Immunostaining antibodies and reagents and their final concentrations.
Author Contributions
Concept/design, data analysis/interpretation, manuscript writing, M.G.; manuscript writing, data analysis, final approval of manuscript, A.D. and A.J.v.W.; concept/design, data analysis/interpretation, final approval of manuscript, M.O.; data analysis, final approval of manuscript, B.S. and J.R.; final approval of manuscript, E.O.; concept/design, data analysis/interpretation, financial support, manuscript writing, final approval of manuscript, G.U. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.
Funding
This research was funded by the NIH (AG059923 and P20GM109095), the NSF (1929188 and 2025505 (G.U.), R01AR049069 (A.J.v.W.), and AR075803 (J.R.)), the Career Development Award in Orthopedics Research (A.D.), and the Scientific and Technological Research Council of Turkey 2214-A (M.O.).
Data Availability Statement
The datasets generated and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.
Conflicts of Interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
Footnotes
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
References
- 1.Shumaker D.K., Dechat T., Kohlmaier A., Adam S.A., Bozovsky M.R., Erdos M.R., Eriksson M., Goldman A.E., Khuon S., Collins F.S., et al. Mutant nuclear lamin A leads to progressive alterations of epigenetic control in premature aging. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 2006;103:8703–8708. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0602569103. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Schreiber K.H., Kennedy B.K. When lamins go bad: Nuclear structure and disease. Cell. 2013;152:1365–1375. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2013.02.015. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.De Sandre-Giovannoli A., Bernard R., Cau P., Navarro C., Amiel J., Boccaccio I., Lyonnet S., Stewart C.L., Munnich A., Le Merrer M., et al. Lamin a truncation in Hutchinson-Gilford progeria. Science. 2003;300:2055. doi: 10.1126/science.1084125. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Constantinescu D., Gray H.L., Sammak P.J., Schatten G.P., Csoka A.B. Lamin A/C expression is a marker of mouse and human embryonic stem cell differentiation. Stem Cells. 2006;24:177–185. doi: 10.1634/stemcells.2004-0159. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Chojnowski A., Ong P.F., Foo M.X.R., Liebl D., Hor L.P., Stewart C.L., Dreesen O. Heterochromatin loss as a determinant of progerin-induced DNA damage in Hutchinson-Gilford Progeria. Aging Cell. 2020;19:e13108. doi: 10.1111/acel.13108. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Hilton B.A., Liu J., Cartwright B.M., Liu Y., Breitman M., Wang Y., Jones R., Tang H., Rusinol A., Musich P.R., et al. Progerin sequestration of PCNA promotes replication fork collapse and mislocalization of XPA in laminopathy-related progeroid syndromes. FASEB J. 2017;31:3882–3893. doi: 10.1096/fj.201700014R. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Sullivan T., Escalante-Alcalde D., Bhatt H., Anver M., Bhat N., Nagashima K., Stewart C.L., Burke B. Loss of A-type lamin expression compromises nuclear envelope integrity leading to muscular dystrophy. J. Cell Biol. 1999;147:913–920. doi: 10.1083/jcb.147.5.913. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Sabatelli P., Lattanzi G., Ognibene A., Columbaro M., Capanni C., Merlini L., Maraldi N.M., Squarzoni S. Nuclear alterations in autosomal-dominant Emery-Dreifuss muscular dystrophy. Muscle Nerve. 2001;24:826–829. doi: 10.1002/mus.1076. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Verstraeten V.L., Ji J.Y., Cummings K.S., Lee R.T., Lammerding J. Increased mechanosensitivity and nuclear stiffness in Hutchinson-Gilford progeria cells: Effects of farnesyltransferase inhibitors. Aging Cell. 2008;7:383–393. doi: 10.1111/j.1474-9726.2008.00382.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Lee J.S., Hale C.M., Panorchan P., Khatau S.B., George J.P., Tseng Y., Stewart C.L., Hodzic D., Wirtz D. Nuclear lamin A/C deficiency induces defects in cell mechanics, polarization, and migration. Biophys. J. 2007;93:2542–2552. doi: 10.1529/biophysj.106.102426. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Lammerding J., Schulze P.C., Takahashi T., Kozlov S., Sullivan T., Kamm R.D., Stewart C.L., Lee R.T. Lamin A/C deficiency causes defective nuclear mechanics and mechanotransduction. J. Clin. Investig. 2004;113:370–378. doi: 10.1172/JCI200419670. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Moghadam F.H., Tayebi T., Dehghan M., Eslami G., Nadri H., Moradi A., Vahedian-Ardakani H., Barzegar K. Differentiation ofC bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells into chondrocytes after short term culture in alkaline medium. Int. J. Hematol. Oncol. Stem Cell Res. 2014;8:12–19. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Akter R., Rivas D., Geneau G., Drissi H., Duque G. Effect of lamin A/C knockdown on osteoblast differentiation and function. J. Bone Miner. Res. 2009;24:283–293. doi: 10.1359/jbmr.081010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Li W., Yeo L.S., Vidal C., McCorquodale T., Herrmann M., Fatkin D., Duque G. Decreased bone formation and osteopenia in lamin a/c-deficient mice. PLoS ONE. 2011;6:e19313. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0019313. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Bermeo S., Vidal C., Zhou H., Duque G. Lamin A/C Acts as an Essential Factor in Mesenchymal Stem Cell Differentiation Through the Regulation of the Dynamics of the Wnt/β-Catenin Pathway. J. Cell. Biochem. 2015;116:2344–2353. doi: 10.1002/jcb.25185. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Patni N., Li X., Adams-Huet B., Vasandani C., Gomez-Diaz R.A., Garg A. Regional Body Fat Changes and Metabolic Complications in Children with Dunnigan Lipodystrophy-Causing LMNA Variants. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 2019;104:1099–1108. doi: 10.1210/jc.2018-01922. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Oldenburg A., Briand N., Sørensen A.L., Cahyani I., Shah A., Moskaug J.Ø., Collas P. A lipodystrophy-causing lamin A mutant alters conformation and epigenetic regulation of the anti-adipogenic MIR335 locus. J. Cell Biol. 2017;216:2731–2743. doi: 10.1083/jcb.201701043. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Swift J., Ivanovska I.L., Buxboim A., Harada T., Dingal P.C.D.P., Pinter J., Pajerowski J.D., Spinler K.R., Shin J.-W., Tewari M., et al. Nuclear Lamin-A Scales with Tissue Stiffness and Enhances Matrix-Directed Differentiation. Science. 2013;341:6149. doi: 10.1126/science.1240104. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Sen B., Xie Z., Case N., Styner M., Rubin C.T., Rubin J. Mechanical signal influence on mesenchymal stem cell fate is enhanced by incorporation of refractory periods into the loading regimen. J. Biomech. 2011;44:593–599. doi: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2010.11.022. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Sen B., Xie Z., Case N., Ma M., Rubin C., Rubin J. Mechanical strain inhibits adipogenesis in mesenchymal stem cells by stimulating a durable beta-catenin signal. Endocrinology. 2008;149:6065–6075. doi: 10.1210/en.2008-0687. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Sen B., Guilluy C., Xie Z., Case N., Styner M., Thomas J., Oguz I., Rubin C., Burridge K., Rubin J. Mechanically induced focal adhesion assembly amplifies anti-adipogenic pathways in mesenchymal stem cells. Stem Cells. 2011;29:1829–1836. doi: 10.1002/stem.732. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Uzer G., Pongkitwitoon S., Ete Chan M., Judex S. Vibration induced osteogenic commitment of mesenchymal stem cells is enhanced by cytoskeletal remodeling but not fluid shear. J. Biomech. 2013;46:2296–2302. doi: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2013.06.008. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Bas G., Loisate S., Hudon S.F., Woods K., Hayden E.J., Pu X., Beard R., Oxford J.T., Uzer G. Low Intensity Vibrations Augment Mesenchymal Stem Cell Proliferation and Differentiation Capacity during in vitro Expansion. Sci. Rep. 2020;10:9369. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-66055-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Geiger B., Spatz J.P., Bershadsky A.D. Environmental sensing through focal adhesions. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 2009;10:21–33. doi: 10.1038/nrm2593. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Hamadi A., Bouali M., Dontenwill M., Stoeckel H., Takeda K., Rondé P. Regulation of focal adhesion dynamics and disassembly by phosphorylation of FAK at tyrosine 397. J. Cell Sci. 2005;118:4415–4425. doi: 10.1242/jcs.02565. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Uzer G., Thompson W.R., Sen B., Xie Z., Yen S.S., Miller S., Bas G., Styner M., Rubin C.T., Judex S., et al. Cell Mechanosensitivity to Extremely Low-Magnitude Signals Is Enabled by a LINCed Nucleus. Stem Cells. 2015;33:2063–2076. doi: 10.1002/stem.2004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Uzer G., Fuchs R.K., Rubin J., Thompson W.R. Concise Review: Plasma and Nuclear Membranes Convey Mechanical Information to Regulate Mesenchymal Stem Cell Lineage. Stem Cells. 2016;34:1455–1463. doi: 10.1002/stem.2342. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Sen B., Xie Z., Case N., Thompson W.R., Uzer G., Styner M., Rubin J. mTORC2 regulates mechanically induced cytoskeletal reorganization and lineage selection in marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cells. J. Bone Miner. Res. 2014;29:78–89. doi: 10.1002/jbmr.2031. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Thompson W.R., Yen S.S., Uzer G., Xie Z., Sen B., Styner M., Burridge K., Rubin J. LARG GEF and ARHGAP18 orchestrate RhoA activity to control mesenchymal stem cell lineage. Bone. 2018;107:172–180. doi: 10.1016/j.bone.2017.12.001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Tontonoz P., Spiegelman B.M. Fat and Beyond: The Diverse Biology of PPARγ. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 2008;77:289–312. doi: 10.1146/annurev.biochem.77.061307.091829. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Pagnotti G.M., Styner M., Uzer G., Patel V.S., Wright L.E., Ness K.K., Guise T.A., Rubin J., Rubin C.T. Combating osteoporosis and obesity with exercise: Leveraging cell mechanosensitivity. Nat. Rev. Endocrinol. 2019;15:339–355. doi: 10.1038/s41574-019-0170-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Uzer G., Bas G., Sen B., Xie Z., Birks S., Olcum M., McGrath C., Styner M., Rubin J. Sun-mediated mechanical LINC between nucleus and cytoskeleton regulates βcatenin nuclear access. J. Biomech. 2018;74:32–40. doi: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2018.04.013. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Baskan O., Mese G., Ozcivici E. Low-intensity vibrations normalize adipogenesis-induced morphological and molecular changes of adult mesenchymal stem cells. Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng. Part H J. Eng. Med. 2017;231:160–168. doi: 10.1177/0954411916687338. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.von Mering C., Huynen M., Jaeggi D., Schmidt S., Bork P., Snel B. STRING: A database of predicted functional associations between proteins. Nucleic Acids Res. 2003;31:258–261. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkg034. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Lammerding J., Fong L.G., Ji J.Y., Reue K., Stewart C.L., Young S.G., Lee R.T. Lamins A and C but not lamin B1 regulate nuclear mechanics. J. Biol. Chem. 2006;281:25768–25780. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M513511200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Raharjo W.H., Enarson P., Sullivan T., Stewart C.L., Burke B. Nuclear envelope defects associated with LMNA mutations cause dilated cardiomyopathy and Emery-Dreifuss muscular dystrophy. J. Cell Sci. 2001;114:4447–4457. doi: 10.1242/jcs.114.24.4447. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Kim J.-K., Louhghalam A., Lee G., Schafer B.W., Wirtz D., Kim D.-H. Nuclear lamin A/C harnesses the perinuclear apical actin cables to protect nuclear morphology. Nat. Commun. 2017;8:2123. doi: 10.1038/s41467-017-02217-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Corne T.D.J., Sieprath T., Vandenbussche J., Mohammed D., Te Lindert M., Gevaert K., Gabriele S., Wolf K., De Vos W.H. Deregulation of focal adhesion formation and cytoskeletal tension due to loss of A-type lamins. Cell Adhes. Migr. 2017;11:447–463. doi: 10.1080/19336918.2016.1247144. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Chancellor T.J., Lee J., Thodeti C.K., Lele T. Actomyosin tension exerted on the nucleus through nesprin-1 connections influences endothelial cell adhesion, migration, and cyclic strain-induced reorientation. Biophys. J. 2010;99:115–123. doi: 10.1016/j.bpj.2010.04.011. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Fan Y., Abrahamsen G., Mills R., Calderón C.C., Tee J.Y., Leyton L., Murrell W., Cooper-White J., McGrath J.J., Mackay-Sim A. Focal Adhesion Dynamics Are Altered in Schizophrenia. Biol. Psychiatry. 2013;74:418–426. doi: 10.1016/j.biopsych.2013.01.020. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Wang W., Shi Z., Jiao S., Chen C., Wang H., Liu G., Wang Q., Zhao Y., Greene M.I., Zhou Z. Structural insights into SUN-KASH complexes across the nuclear envelope. Cell Res. 2012;22:1440–1452. doi: 10.1038/cr.2012.126. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Haque F., Lloyd D.J., Smallwood D.T., Dent C.L., Shanahan C.M., Fry A.M., Trembath R.C., Shackleton S. SUN1 Interacts with Nuclear Lamin A and Cytoplasmic Nesprins to Provide a Physical Connection between the Nuclear Lamina and the Cytoskeleton. Mol. Cell. Biol. 2006;26:3738–3751. doi: 10.1128/MCB.26.10.3738-3751.2006. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Liang Y., Chiu P.H., Yip K.Y., Chan S.Y. Subcellular Localization of SUN2 Is Regulated by Lamin A and Rab5. PLoS ONE. 2011;6:e20507. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0020507. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Cartwright T., Senussi O., Grady M.D. The Mechanism of the Inactivation of Human Fibroblast Interferon by Mechanical Stress. J. Gen. Virol. 1977;36:317–321. doi: 10.1099/0022-1317-36-2-317. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Ruijter J.M., Ruiz-Villalba A., van den Hoff A.J.J., Gunst Q.D., Wittwer C.T., van den Hoff M.J.B. Removal of artifact bias from qPCR results using DNA melting curve analysis. FASEB J. 2019;33:14542–14555. doi: 10.1096/fj.201901604R. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Gaby J.C., Buckley D.H. The Use of Degenerate Primers in qPCR Analysis of Functional Genes Can Cause Dramatic Quantification Bias as Revealed by Investigation of nifH Primer Performance. Microb. Ecol. 2017;74:701–708. doi: 10.1007/s00248-017-0968-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Asmann Y.W., Klee E.W., Thompson E.A., Perez E.A., Middha S., Oberg A.L., Therneau T.M., Smith D.I., Poland G.A., Wieben E.D., et al. 3′ tag digital gene expression profiling of human brain and universal reference RNA using Illumina Genome Analyzer. BMC Genom. 2009;10:531. doi: 10.1186/1471-2164-10-531. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Wu A.R., Neff N.F., Kalisky T., Dalerba P., Treutlein B., Rothenberg M.E., Mburu F.M., Mantalas G.L., Sim S., Clarke M.F., et al. Quantitative assessment of single-cell RNA-sequencing methods. Nat. Methods. 2014;11:41–46. doi: 10.1038/nmeth.2694. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Shi Y., He M. Differential gene expression identified by RNA-Seq and qPCR in two sizes of pearl oyster (Pinctada fucata) Gene. 2014;538:313–322. doi: 10.1016/j.gene.2014.01.031. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Wang Z., Gerstein M., Snyder M. RNA-Seq: A revolutionary tool for transcriptomics. Nat. Rev. Genet. 2009;10:57–63. doi: 10.1038/nrg2484. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Griffith M., Griffith O.L., Mwenifumbo J., Goya R., Morrissy A.S., Morin R.D., Corbett R., Tang M.J., Hou Y.C., Pugh T.J., et al. Alternative expression analysis by RNA sequencing. Nat. Methods. 2010;7:843–847. doi: 10.1038/nmeth.1503. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Peister A., Mellad J.A., Larson B.L., Hall B.M., Gibson L.F., Prockop D.J. Adult stem cells from bone marrow (MSCs) isolated from different strains of inbred mice vary in surface epitopes, rates of proliferation, and differentiation potential. Blood. 2004;103:1662–1668. doi: 10.1182/blood-2003-09-3070. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Dobin A., Davis C.A., Schlesinger F., Drenkow J., Zaleski C., Jha S., Batut P., Chaisson M., Gingeras T.R. STAR: Ultrafast universal RNA-seq aligner. Bioinformatics. 2013;29:15–21. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/bts635. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Love M.I., Huber W., Anders S. Moderated estimation of fold change and dispersion for RNA-seq data with DESeq2. Genome Biol. 2014;15:550. doi: 10.1186/s13059-014-0550-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Dudakovic A., Camilleri E., Riester S.M., Lewallen E.A., Kvasha S., Chen X., Radel D.J., Anderson J.M., Nair A.A., Evans J.M., et al. High-resolution molecular validation of self-renewal and spontaneous differentiation in clinical-grade adipose-tissue derived human mesenchymal stem cells. J. Cell. Biochem. 2014;115:1816–1828. doi: 10.1002/jcb.24852. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Wang H., Rodríguez A. Identifying pediatric cancer clusters in Florida using loglinear models and generalized lasso penalties. Stat. Public Policy. 2014;1:86–96. doi: 10.1080/2330443X.2014.960120. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Dudakovic A., Camilleri E.T., Paradise C.R., Samsonraj R.M., Gluscevic M., Paggi C.A., Begun D.L., Khani F., Pichurin O., Ahmed F.S., et al. Enhancer of zeste homolog 2 (Ezh2) controls bone formation and cell cycle progression during osteogenesis in mice. J. Biol. Chem. 2018;293:12894–12907. doi: 10.1074/jbc.RA118.002983. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58.Dennison E., Cooper C. Epidemiology of osteoporotic fractures. Horm. Res. 2000;54:58–63. doi: 10.1159/000063449. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59.Kalari K.R., Nair A.A., Bhavsar J.D., O’Brien D.R., Davila J.I., Bockol M.A., Nie J., Tang X., Baheti S., Doughty J.B., et al. MAP-RSeq: Mayo Analysis Pipeline for RNA sequencing. BMC Bioinform. 2014;15:224. doi: 10.1186/1471-2105-15-224. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60.Kim D., Pertea G., Trapnell C., Pimentel H., Kelley R., Salzberg S.L. TopHat2: Accurate alignment of transcriptomes in the presence of insertions, deletions and gene fusions. Genome Biol. 2013;14:R36. doi: 10.1186/gb-2013-14-4-r36. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61.Anders S., Pyl P.T., Huber W. HTSeq—A Python framework to work with high-throughput sequencing data. Bioinformatics. 2015;31:166–169. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btu638. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62.Metsalu T., Vilo J. ClustVis: A web tool for visualizing clustering of multivariate data using Principal Component Analysis and heatmap. Nucleic Acids Res. 2015;43:W566–W570. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkv468. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 63.Thompson M., Woods K., Newberg J., Oxford J.T., Uzer G. Low-intensity vibration restores nuclear YAP levels and acute YAP nuclear shuttling in mesenchymal stem cells subjected to simulated microgravity. NPJ Microgravity. 2020;6:35. doi: 10.1038/s41526-020-00125-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Data Availability Statement
The datasets generated and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.