Skip to main content
Cureus logoLink to Cureus
. 2021 May 28;13(5):e15304. doi: 10.7759/cureus.15304

Long-Term X-ray Findings in Patients With Coronavirus Disease-2019

Aarzoo Gupta 1, Ishan Garg 2, Abbas Iqbal 3, Abdul Subhan Talpur 4, Alyanna Marie B Mañego 5, Rama Kalyani Kavuri 6, Parkash Bachani 7, Sidra Naz 8,, Zoya Qamar Iqbal 9
Editors: Alexander Muacevic, John R Adler
PMCID: PMC8236307  PMID: 34211809

Abstract

Introduction: Reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) and chest X-ray (CXR) are commonly used techniques for diagnosing and assessing prognosis in patients with coronavirus disease-2019 (COVID-19). This study aims to highlight the long-term radiological findings observed on CXR after recovery, in patients with COVID-19. This will help identify patients suffering from long-term consequences of COVID-19 and help them provide adequate care.

Methods: This study was conducted in the COVID-19 unit of a tertiary care hospital, Pakistan from August 2020 to February 2021. CXR of patients who were being discharged after negative PCR was done. Participants with positive X-ray findings, which included consolidation, reticular thickening, ground-glass opacities (GGO), pulmonary nodules, and pleural effusions, were enrolled in the study after getting informed consent. All findings were recorded in a self-structured questionnaire. Participants were scheduled to come for follow-up on day 30 after their initial CXR, where their CXR was repeated.

Result: Our results showed that n=429 (60.2%) participants had positive CXR at the time of discharge. After 30 days, n=371 participants returned for a follow-up X-ray. Out of the 371 participants, after 30 days, 123 participants still had positive CXR. Fatigue (41.4%) was the common symptom after 30 days. The most common finding was consolidation (82.1%), followed by reticular thickening (23.5%) on day 30.

Conclusion: In this study, although most of the patients completely recovered serologically from COVID-19, they still had radiological findings in their chest X-rays. Radiological findings are especially important in predicting the clinical course of the disease and may be used to monitor long-term complications.

Keywords: radiological finding, corona virus, covid-19, chest x-ray, long-term impact

Introduction

The novel coronavirus, widely known as severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), has infected over 100 million humans worldwide. The first case of coronavirus disease-2019 (COVID-19) was recognized in Wuhan, China in December 2019 [1]. Due to its highly contagious nature, it quickly spread to other parts of the world, leading to the declaration of a pandemic by the World Health Organization (WHO) in March 2020 [2,3].

The symptoms of COVID-19 have been shown to range from mild fever, cough, headache, and fatigue to a more severe presentation with dyspnea, hemoptysis, and atypical pneumonia [4]. In the most severe cases, COVID-19 can lead to severe acute respiratory syndrome, respiratory failure, multi-organ failure with the resultant high mortality [4,5]. The diagnosis is confirmed by reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) of samples obtained from oropharyngeal or nasopharyngeal mucosa and is supported by parenchymal changes seen on chest imaging [6,7]. The more common radiological changes noted on the chest imaging include ground-glass opacities (GGO) and consolidations while cavitation, pleural effusions, pleural thickening, bronchiectasis, and lymphadenopathy occur less frequently [8-10].

Improvement in the chest X-ray (CXR), along with negative PCR, has been seen to guide patient discharge in several studies [11]. Although RT-PCR and CXR are the more commonly used techniques for diagnosis, computed tomography (CT) scans of the chest have shown to have superiority in terms of higher sensitivity (98%) and can diagnose the disease even prior to symptom onset [12]. For this reason, most studies published in COVID-19 patients describe parenchymal changes seen on CT scans [9,10]. Limited studies have highlighted the role of CXR in monitoring disease course and in the follow-up of long-term changes in the lung parenchyma [7,13]. As CXR is the more readily available and cheaper imaging modality, it is essential that its role in disease progression and disease improvement should be known. Therefore, this study aims to highlight the long-term radiological findings observed on CXR after recovery, in patients with COVID-19.

Materials and methods

This study was conducted in the COVID-19 unit of a tertiary care hospital, Pakistan from August 2020 to February 2021. CXR of patients who were being discharged after recovery was done and participants with positive X-ray findings were enrolled in the study after informed consent via consecutive convenient non-probability sampling. Recovery was defined as a negative PCR test for COVID-19. Positive CXR findings were consolidations, reticular thickening, GGO, pulmonary nodules, and pleural effusions. Ethical review board approval was taken.

Out of 712 participants, n=429 (60.25%) participants had positive CXR at the time of discharge. All findings were recorded in a self-structured questionnaire. The highest C-reactive protein (CRP) and lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) were recorded in questionnaires. Participants were scheduled for follow-up on day 30 after their initial chest X-ray, where their CXR was repeated. Fifty-eight (58) participants were lost to follow-up. Only participants who completed the study were included in the final analysis.

Statistical analysis was done using Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS) v. 22.0 (IBM Corporation, Armonk, New York, USA). Categorical data were presented as frequency and percentage. Numerical data were presented as mean and standard deviation.

Results

Out of 712 participants, n=429 (60.2%) participants had positive CXR at the time of discharge. The most common symptom at the time of discharge was fatigue (77.3%). The most common finding was consolidation (78.9%), followed by reticular thickening (24.5%). In terms of location of findings, 66.5% of participants had bilateral radiological findings (Table 1).

Table 1. Symptoms, laboratory, and radiological findings on discharge.

CRP: C-reactive protein, GGO: ground-glass opacities, LDH: lactate dehydrogenase, SOB: shortness of breath, mg/L: milligram per liter, IU: International Unit.

Characteristics Frequency (percentages; n=371)
Age in years (mean ± SD) 42 ± 10
Gender
   Male 179 (48.2%)
   Female 192 (51.8%)
Laboratory findings
   CRP (mg/L) 122.7 ± 21.4
   LDH (IU) 328.1 ± 97.1
Symptom at discharge
   Fatigue 287 (77.3%)
   Cough 101 (27.2%)
   Dyspnea 61 (16.4%)
   SOB 58 (15.6%)
Chest X-ray findings (location)
   Right 62 (16.7%)
   Left 65 (17.5%)
   Both 247 (66.5%)
Radiological findings
   Consolidation 293 (78.9%)
   Reticular thickening 91 (24.5%)
   GGO 81 (21.8%)
   Pulmonary nodules 20 (5.3%)
   Pleural effusions 18 (4.8%)

After 30 days, 371 participants returned for a follow-up X-ray. Out of 371 participants, on day 30, 123 (33.1%) participants still had positive CXR; 51 (41.4%) participants reported fatigue; 63.4% had bilateral radiological findings and the most common finding was consolidation (82.1%), followed by reticular thickening (23.5%; Table 2).

Table 2. Symptoms and radiological findings on 30-day follow-up.

GGO: ground-glass opacities, SOB: shortness of breath.

Characteristics Frequency (percentages; n= 123)
Gender
   Male 63 (51.3%)
   Female 60 (48.7%)
Symptom at 30 days
   Fatigue 51 (41.4%)
   Cough 22 (17.8%)
   SOB 15 (12.1%)
   Dyspnea 18 (8.1%)
Chest X-ray findings at 30 days (location)
   Right 22 (17.8%)
   Left 23 (18.6%)
   Both 78 (63.4%)
Radiological findings
   Consolidation 101 (82.1%)
   Reticular thickening 29 (23.5%)
   GGO 20 (16.2%)
   Pleural effusions 06 (4.8%)
   Pulmonary nodules 05 (4.1%)

Discussion

The result of our study demonstrated that 429 (60.9%) participants had positive CXR at the time of discharge. Among the symptoms, fatigue (77%) was found to be the most common one at the time of discharge. In terms of location of findings, 66.5% of participants had bilateral radiological findings. Consolidation (78.9%), followed by reticular thickening (24.5%) was the most common finding. 371 patients returned for a follow-up after 30 days, of which 123 (33.1%) participants still had positive CXR. After 30 days, 41.4% of the patients reported symptoms of fatigue, 63.4% had bilateral radiological findings and the most common finding was consolidation (82.1%), followed by reticular thickening (23.5%).

The results of our study are in line with other studies [2,14]. In concordance with our study, results from the systematic review of imaging findings conducted by Salehi et al. also showed the initial finding of CT scan in COVID-19 patients is bilateral, multilobar GGO with a peripheral or posterior distribution (or both), mainly in the lower lobes and less frequently within the right middle lobe [2]. Some studies also suggested that CT findings may vary among age groups, with consolidation more common in older groups and GGO in younger people [14]. The CT findings of COVID-19 patients in Korea were similar to those in China. However, the proportion of consolidation lesions were more common in Chinese people. On the basis of these radiological findings, Korean patients seem to experience a milder disease course than Chinese people [15]. In cases of long-term follow-up, studies have shown that approximately 98.1% of the chest CTs will show abnormalities even after 28 days of the onset of symptoms [16], and several case reports have demonstrated that post-discharge chest CTs show abnormalities but with slight improvements [17,18]. This has also been demonstrated in the findings of our study.

Even though the clinical and radiological course of COVID-19 is not predictable [19,20], there is proof that complications can exist for over a month. Even if patients do not show symptoms after being discharged for quite a few weeks or months, the idea of reinfection cannot go unnoticed. Additionally, abnormalities in the pulmonary function and radiological findings will exist and should be monitored for a long span of time. These could be more prominent in patients with pre-existing pulmonary or extrapulmonary diseases [21-23].

To the best of our knowledge, it is the first study from this region that highlights the long-term impact of COVID-19 on chest X-ray findings. However, since the study was conducted in a single institute, care should be taken while implying its result for a large population. Further large-scale studies are needed to identify the long-term CXR findings associated with COVID-19.

Conclusions

In the case of COVID-19, keeping the long-term abnormal CXR in mind, follow-up visits after discharge are particularly important. They are just a check-up to observe changes in patient’s clinical conditions and ensure they are not any complications. It is also a great time to talk to a primary care provider about anything else or ask questions about mental wellbeing. The goal is to keep patients healthy and out of the hospital to prevent complications from happening again. Although most of the patients completely recovered from the disease, they are likely to have long-term lung damage. Radiological findings are particularly important in predicting the clinical course of the disease and may be used to monitor long-term complications.

The content published in Cureus is the result of clinical experience and/or research by independent individuals or organizations. Cureus is not responsible for the scientific accuracy or reliability of data or conclusions published herein. All content published within Cureus is intended only for educational, research and reference purposes. Additionally, articles published within Cureus should not be deemed a suitable substitute for the advice of a qualified health care professional. Do not disregard or avoid professional medical advice due to content published within Cureus.

The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Human Ethics

Consent was obtained or waived by all participants in this study. University of Health Sciences Lahore issued approval UHS/IRB-Ofc/2020/21

Animal Ethics

Animal subjects: All authors have confirmed that this study did not involve animal subjects or tissue.

References

  • 1.SARS-CoV-2 causing pneumonia-associated respiratory disorder (COVID-19): diagnostic and proposed therapeutic options. Chakraborty C, Sharma AR, Sharma G, Bhattacharya M, Lee SS. Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci. 2020;24:4016–4012. doi: 10.26355/eurrev_202004_20871. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19): a systematic review of imaging findings in 919 patients. Salehi S, Abedi A, Balakrishnan S, Gholamrezanezhad A. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2020;215:87–93. doi: 10.2214/AJR.20.23034. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Improved molecular diagnosis of COVID-19 by the novel, highly sensitive and specific COVID-19-RdRp/Hel real-time reverse transcription-PCR assay validated In vitro and with clinical specimens. Chan JF, Yip CC, To KK, et al. J Clin Microbiol. 2020;58:0–20. doi: 10.1128/JCM.00310-20. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Clinical progression of patients with COVID-19 in Shanghai, China. Chen J, Qi T, Liu L, et al. J Infect. 2020;80:0–6. doi: 10.1016/j.jinf.2020.03.004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Clinical features of patients infected with 2019 novel coronavirus in Wuhan, China. Huang C, Wang Y, Li X, et al. Lancet. 2020;395:497–506. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)30183-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Correlation of chest CT and RT-PCR testing for Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) in China: a report of 1014 cases. Ai T, Yang Z, Hou H, et al. Radiology. 2020;296:0–40. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2020200642. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.COVID-19 infection: early lessons. Lei Y, Zhang HW, Yu J, Patlas MN. Can Assoc Radiol J. 2020;71:251–252. doi: 10.1177/0846537120914428. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Chest radiographic and CT findings of the 2019 novel Coronavirus disease (COVID-19): analysis of nine patients treated in Korea. Yoon SH, Lee KH, Kim JY, et al. Korean J Radiol. 2020;21:494–500. doi: 10.3348/kjr.2020.0132. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Chest CT features of COVID-19 in Rome, Italy. Caruso D, Zerunian M, Polici M, et al. Radiology. 2020;296:0–85. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2020201237. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Chest CT findings in Coronavirus disease-19 (COVID-19): relationship to duration of infection. Bernheim A, Mei X, Huang M, et al. Radiology. 2020;295:200463. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2020200463. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Patient follow-up after discharge after COVID-19 pneumonia: considerations for infectious control. Zheng Z, Yao Z, Wu K, Zheng J. J Med Virol. 2020;92:2412–2419. doi: 10.1002/jmv.25994. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Sensitivity of chest CT for COVID-19: comparison to RT-PCR. Fang Y, Zhang H, Xie J, Lin M, Ying L, Pang P, Ji W. Radiology. 2020;296:0–7. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2020200432. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Familial cluster of COVID-19 infection from an asymptomatic. Zhang J, Tian S, Lou J, Chen Y. Crit Care. 2020;24:119. doi: 10.1186/s13054-020-2817-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Chest CT findings in 2019 novel Coronavirus (2019-nCoV) infections from Wuhan, China: key points for the radiologist. Kanne JP. Radiology. 2020;295:16–17. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2020200241. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Imaging profile of the COVID-19 infection: radiologic findings and literature review. Ng MY, Lee EYP, Yang J, et al. Radiol Cardiothorac Imaging. 2020;2:0. doi: 10.1148/ryct.2020200034. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Chest CT findings of COVID-19 pneumonia by duration of symptoms. Ding X, Xu J, Zhou J, Long Q. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejrad.2020.109009. Eur J Radiol. 2020;127:109009. doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2020.109009. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Serial CT features in discharged COVID-19 patients with positive RT-PCR re-test. Dou P, Zhang S, Wang C, et al. Eur J Radiol. 2020;127:109010. doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2020.109010. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Three cases of re-detectable positive SARS-CoV-2 RNA in recovered COVID-19 patients with antibodies. Fu W, Chen Q, Wang T. https://doi.org/10.1002/jmv.25968. J Med Virol. 2020;92:2298–2301. doi: 10.1002/jmv.25968. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Considerations for postacute rehabilitation for survivors of COVID-19. Sheehy LM. JMIR Public Health Surveill. 2020;6:0. doi: 10.2196/19462. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Coronavirus (COVID-19) outbreak: what the department of radiology should know. Kooraki S, Hosseiny M, Myers L, Gholamrezanezhad A. J Am Coll Radiol. 2020;17:447–451. doi: 10.1016/j.jacr.2020.02.008. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Radiology perspective of Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19): lessons from severe acute respiratory syndrome and middle east respiratory syndrome. Hosseiny M, Kooraki S, Gholamrezanezhad A, Reddy S, Myers L. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2020;214:1078–1082. doi: 10.2214/AJR.20.22969. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Extrapulmonary manifestations of COVID-19: radiologic and clinical overview. Behzad S, Aghaghazvini L, Radmard AR, Gholamrezanezhad A. Clin Imaging. 2020;66:35–41. doi: 10.1016/j.clinimag.2020.05.013. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Chest-CT findings of COVID-19 in patients with pre-existing malignancies: a pictorial review. Katal S, Aghaghazvini L, Gholamrezanezhad A. Clin Imaging. 2020;67:121–129. doi: 10.1016/j.clinimag.2020.06.004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Cureus are provided here courtesy of Cureus Inc.

RESOURCES