Significance
Only recently have multiple, anabolic, bone-forming agents become available, raising the possibility that osteoporosis might be more effectively treated by combinatorial or sequential treatments rather than single agents. The discovery of osteolectin raised two important questions in this regard. First, what is the epistatic relationship between these agents? Second, would osteolectin have additive effects if combined with another agent? Our discovery that osteolectin mediates part of the effect of parathyroid hormone (PTH) on bone formation identifies a new mechanism by which PTH acts. The observation that PTH and osteolectin have additive effects provides proof-of-principle that combinatorial use can increase osteogenesis.
Keywords: osteogenesis, parathyroid hormone, osteolectin, stem cells, sclerostin
Abstract
We previously described a new osteogenic growth factor, osteolectin/Clec11a, which is required for the maintenance of skeletal bone mass during adulthood. Osteolectin binds to Integrin α11 (Itga11), promoting Wnt pathway activation and osteogenic differentiation by leptin receptor+ (LepR+) stromal cells in the bone marrow. Parathyroid hormone (PTH) and sclerostin inhibitor (SOSTi) are bone anabolic agents that are administered to patients with osteoporosis. Here we tested whether osteolectin mediates the effects of PTH or SOSTi on bone formation. We discovered that PTH promoted Osteolectin expression by bone marrow stromal cells within hours of administration and that PTH treatment increased serum osteolectin levels in mice and humans. Osteolectin deficiency in mice attenuated Wnt pathway activation by PTH in bone marrow stromal cells and reduced the osteogenic response to PTH in vitro and in vivo. In contrast, SOSTi did not affect serum osteolectin levels and osteolectin was not required for SOSTi-induced bone formation. Combined administration of osteolectin and PTH, but not osteolectin and SOSTi, additively increased bone volume. PTH thus promotes osteolectin expression and osteolectin mediates part of the effect of PTH on bone formation.
The maintenance and repair of the skeleton require the generation of new bone cells throughout adult life. Osteoblasts are relatively short-lived cells that are constantly regenerated, partly by skeletal stem cells within the bone marrow (1). The main source of new osteoblasts in adult bone marrow is leptin receptor-expressing (LepR+) stromal cells (2–4). These cells include the multipotent skeletal stem cells that give rise to the fibroblast colony-forming cells (CFU-Fs) in the bone marrow (2), as well as restricted osteogenic progenitors (5) and adipocyte progenitors (6–8). LepR+ cells are a major source of osteoblasts for fracture repair (2) and growth factors for hematopoietic stem cell maintenance (9–11).
One growth factor synthesized by LepR+ cells, as well as osteoblasts and osteocytes, is osteolectin/Clec11a, a secreted glycoprotein of the C-type lectin domain superfamily (5, 12, 13). Osteolectin is an osteogenic factor that promotes the maintenance of the adult skeleton by promoting the differentiation of LepR+ cells into osteoblasts. Osteolectin acts by binding to integrin α11β1, which is selectively expressed by LepR+ cells and osteoblasts, activating the Wnt pathway (12). Deficiency for either Osteolectin or Itga11 (the gene that encodes integrin α11) reduces osteogenesis during adulthood and causes early-onset osteoporosis in mice (12, 13). Recombinant osteolectin promotes osteogenic differentiation by bone marrow stromal cells in culture and daily injection of mice with osteolectin systemically promotes bone formation.
Osteoporosis is a progressive condition characterized by reduced bone mass and increased fracture risk (14). Several factors contribute to osteoporosis development, including aging, estrogen insufficiency, mechanical unloading, and prolonged glucocorticoid use (14). Existing therapies include antiresorptive agents that slow bone loss, such as bisphosphonates (15, 16) and estrogens (17), and anabolic agents that increase bone formation, such as parathyroid hormone (PTH) (18), PTH-related protein (19), and sclerostin inhibitor (SOSTi) (20). While these therapies increase bone mass and reduce fracture risk, they are not a cure.
PTH promotes both anabolic and catabolic bone remodeling (21–24). PTH is synthesized by the parathyroid gland and regulates serum calcium levels, partly by regulating bone formation and bone resorption (23–25). PTH1R is a PTH receptor (26, 27) that is strongly expressed by LepR+ bone marrow stromal cells (8, 28–30). Recombinant human PTH (Teriparatide; amino acids 1 to 34) and synthetic PTH-related protein (Abaloparatide) are approved by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for the treatment of osteoporosis (19, 31). Daily (intermittent) administration of PTH increases bone mass by promoting the differentiation of osteoblast progenitors, inhibiting osteoblast and osteocyte apoptosis, and reducing sclerostin levels (32–35). PTH promotes osteoblast differentiation by activating Wnt and BMP signaling in bone marrow stromal cells (28, 36, 37), although the mechanisms by which it regulates Wnt pathway activation are complex and uncertain (38).
Sclerostin is a secreted glycoprotein that inhibits Wnt pathway activation by binding to LRP5/6, a widely expressed Wnt receptor (7, 8), reducing bone formation (39, 40). Sclerostin is secreted by osteocytes (8, 41), negatively regulating bone formation by inhibiting the differentiation of osteoblasts (41, 42). SOSTi (Romosozumab) is a humanized monoclonal antibody that binds sclerostin, preventing binding to LRP5/6 and increasing Wnt pathway activation and bone formation (43). It is FDA-approved for the treatment of osteoporosis (20, 44) and has activity in rodents in addition to humans (45, 46).
The discovery that osteolectin is a bone-forming growth factor raises the question of whether it mediates the effects of PTH or SOSTi on osteogenesis.
Results
PTH Treatment Increases Serum Osteolectin Levels in Patients.
To test if Osteolectin levels are altered by PTH treatment, we quantified osteolectin levels in serum samples from patients treated daily with Teriparatide, a polypeptide containing the first 34 amino acids of PTH (18). These samples were collected from patients in a phase II clinical trial of Teriparatide for the treatment of idiopathic osteoporosis in premenopausal women (NCT01440803) (47). The patients were divided into two prespecified groups according to whether or not they exhibited a significant increase in lumbar spine bone mineral density after 12 mo of PTH treatment. In responders (n = 32), lumbar spine bone mineral density increased above the manufacturer-provided least-significant change (0.026 g/cm2), whereas nonresponders (n = 8) exhibited an absolute change in lumbar spine bone mineral density below the manufacturer-provided least-significant change (16). We measured osteolectin levels in the serum of these prespecified groups while blinded to sample identity. We observed a significant increase in serum osteolectin levels at 3, 6, and 12 mo after initiating PTH treatment in all patients relative to pretreatment levels in the same patients (Fig. 1A). The responders also exhibited a significant increase in serum osteolectin levels at 3, 6, and 12 mo, but not the nonresponders (Fig. 1B). The differences between responders and nonresponders in serum osteolectin levels were not statistically significant; however, there was a statistically significant correlation between the percentage change in lumbar spine bone mineral density and the percentage change in serum osteolectin levels in all patients after 12 mo of PTH treatment (Fig. 1C). Increased bone formation after PTH treatment in humans is thus associated with an increase in serum osteolectin levels.
Osteolectin Mediates Part of the Effect of PTH on Bone Volume.
To test if PTH treatment increased serum osteolectin levels in mice, 2-mo-old wild-type mice were administered daily subcutaneous injections of Teriparatide for 2 or 4 wk. Consistent with the results in patients, PTH treatment also significantly increased serum osteolectin levels in mice (Fig. 2A). We did not detect an increase in serum osteolectin levels after PTH treatment for less than 24 h (SI Appendix, Fig. S1A), suggesting that longer-term treatment is required to observe a change in serum osteolectin levels.
To test if osteolectin mediates the effect of PTH on bone formation, we treated Osteolectin-deficient (Oln−/−) and sex-matched littermate control mice with daily injections of PTH for 4 wk. PTH treatment significantly increased cortical bone volume and cortical thickness in control mice but had little or no effect in Osteolectin-deficient mice (Fig. 2 B–E). PTH treatment also significantly increased trabecular bone volume, trabecular number, and trabecular thickness in control mice but had significantly reduced effects in Osteolectin-deficient mice (Fig. 2 F–H). Consistent with this, we observed a significant reduction in trabecular spacing in control mice, but a significantly smaller effect in Osteolectin-deficient mice (Fig. 2I). PTH treatment increased trabecular connectivity density in male and female Osteolectin-deficient mice, although there was a trend toward larger effects in control mice (Fig. 2J). Osteolectin deficiency thus reduced, but did not completely eliminate, the effects of PTH treatment on cortical and trabecular bone volume.
PTH treatment significantly increased serum procollagen type 1 N-terminal propeptide (P1NP) levels, a marker of bone formation, in both Osteolectin-deficient and control mice, but the effect of PTH was significantly larger in the control mice (SI Appendix, Fig. S1B). PTH treatment also significantly increased serum C-telopeptide of type I collagen (CTX1) levels, a marker of bone resorption, in both Osteolectin-deficient and control mice (SI Appendix, Fig. S1C). There was no effect of Osteolectin deficiency on CTX1 levels. Serum SOST levels were not significantly affected by PTH treatment or Osteolectin deficiency (SI Appendix, Fig. S1D). Consistent with a prior study (13), these data suggest that Osteolectin deficiency reduced the effect of PTH on bone formation without affecting bone resorption.
We previously reported that osteolectin administration to Osteolectin-deficient or control mice had no effect on CFU-F frequency in the bone marrow (13). Osteolectin administration and Osteolectin deficiency also had no effect on the frequency of osteolectin+LepR+ periarteriolar osteogenic progenitors (5) in the bone marrow (SI Appendix, Fig. S1 E and F). Therefore, we have no evidence that osteolectin promotes the expansion of an osteogenic progenitor, though it may accelerate the differentiation of skeletal stem/progenitor cells.
Osteolectin Is Not Required for the Effects of SOSTi on Bone Volume.
To test if treatment with SOSTi influences serum osteolectin levels, we treated 2-mo-old wild-type mice with biweekly subcutaneous injections of SOSTi for 2 or 4 wk. In contrast to PTH, we observed no effect of SOSTi treatment on serum osteolectin levels (Fig. 3A). To test if osteolectin mediates the effect of SOSTi on bone volume, Osteolectin-deficient and sex-matched littermate control mice were administered biweekly injections of SOSTi for 4 wk. Both wild-type and Osteolectin-deficient mice exhibited similarly robust increases in cortical bone volume and cortical thickness after SOSTi treatment (Fig. 3 B–E). We also observed robust increases in trabecular bone volume, trabecular number, trabecular thickness, and trabecular connectivity density in both male and female wild-type and Osteolectin-deficient mice (Fig. 3 F–L). Consistent with this, we observed a significant reduction in trabecular spacing in both male and female wild-type and Osteolectin-deficient mice (Fig. 3I). These data suggest that osteolectin is not required for SOSTi to increase cortical or trabecular bone volume.
Osteolectin Contributes to Wnt Pathway Activation by PTH.
To test whether Osteolectin deficiency affects the ability of PTH to promote Wnt pathway activation, we adherently cultured bone marrow stromal cells from Osteolectin-deficient and sex-matched littermate control mice. We treated the cells with PTH, SOSTi, or vehicle control. Total GSK3, Smad1, and P38 levels were similar in Osteolectin-deficient and control stromal cells, and were not affected by PTH or SOSTi treatment (Fig. 4A). Consistent with the observation that osteolectin is secreted by bone marrow stromal cells in culture and promotes autocrine Wnt pathway activation (12), phosphorylated GSK3 levels were higher in control cells than in Osteolectin-deficient cells (Fig. 4 A and B). PTH treatment increased the levels of phosphorylated GSK3 (Ser21/9) to a greater extent in control cells than in Osteolectin-deficient cells (Fig. 4 A and B), suggesting Wnt pathway activation by PTH was attenuated in the absence of osteolectin. In contrast, PTH treatment increased phosphorylated Smad1 and P38 levels to similar extents in both Osteolectin-deficient and control cells (Fig. 4 A, C, and D), suggesting a similar ability to promote BMP pathway activation (28, 48).
SOSTi did not increase the levels of phosphorylated GSK3, Smad1, or P38 in either Osteolectin-deficient or control cells (Fig. 4 A–D). This may reflect the absence of sclerostin in bone marrow stromal cell cultures before they undergo osteogenic differentiation (8, 41).
GSK3 phosphorylation inhibits the degradation of β-catenin, promoting the transcription of Wnt pathway target genes (15, 17, 49). Consistent with autocrine Wnt pathway activation by osteolectin in control cell cultures (12) (Fig. 4 A and B), β-catenin levels were higher in control cells than in Osteolectin-deficient cells (Fig. 4 E and F). Moreover, after 24 h, PTH treatment increased the levels of β-catenin to a significantly greater extent in control as compared to Osteolectin-deficient cells (Fig. 4 E and F), further suggesting that Wnt pathway activation by PTH was attenuated in the absence of osteolectin.
Consistent with the effects of PTH on serum osteolectin levels (Figs. 1A and 2A), PTH treatment increased osteolectin production by bone marrow stromal cells (Fig. 4 E, G, and H). This may not have been a consequence of Wnt pathway activation as treatment of control stromal cells with a small molecule that stabilizes β-catenin (Fig. 4L) promoted the transcription of other Wnt pathway targets but not Osteolectin (Fig. 4 M–P). We also treated bone marrow stromal cells with PTH for 0.5, 1, 2, 4, 8, or 24 h. We observed a significant increase in Osteolectin transcript levels at 8 and 24 h after PTH treatment (SI Appendix, Fig. S2C). We observed no significant change in the numbers of live cells in these cultures and cell death was rare at all time points (SI Appendix, Fig. S2 A–D). PTH thus acutely promoted Osteolectin expression by bone marrow stromal cells.
PTH promoted osteogenic differentiation by control cells, but not by Osteolectin-deficient cells, in culture (Fig. 4 Q and R). Consistent with this, and the increased Wnt pathway activation in control as compared to Osteolectin-deficient cells (Fig. 4 A, B, E, and F), control cells exhibited significantly higher transcription of the Wnt pathway target genes Alpl (50), Lef1 (51), and Runx2 (52) as compared to Osteolectin-deficient cells (Fig. 4 I–K). Moreover, PTH treatment increased the transcription of Wnt pathway target genes to a greater extent in control than Osteolectin-deficient cells (Fig. 4 I–K), further indicating that Wnt pathway activation by PTH was attenuated in the absence of osteolectin. Treatment with SOSTi did not significantly affect the transcription of Wnt target genes (Fig. 4 I–K), consistent with the lack of Wnt pathway activation by SOSTi in these cultures (Fig. 4 A, B, E, and F).
To test if osteolectin is acutely required by bone marrow stromal cells to exhibit increased Wnt pathway activation in response to PTH treatment, we cultured bone marrow stromal cells from UBCCreER;Osteolectinflox/flox mice and treated them with tamoxifen for 2 d in culture to conditionally delete Osteolectin (SI Appendix, Fig. S2 E–G). Conditional deletion of Osteolectin was confirmed at the protein and mRNA levels (SI Appendix, Fig. S2 H and I). PTH treatment increased β-catenin protein levels and Alpl, Lef1, and Runx2 transcript levels to a significantly greater extent in control as compared to Osteolectin-deficient cells (SI Appendix, Fig. S2 H–L). Thus, acute deletion of Osteolectin attenuated Wnt pathway activation and osteogenic differentiation (SI Appendix, Fig. S2 M and N) in response to PTH treatment (Fig. 4S).
PTH and Osteolectin Additively Increase Bone Volume.
To test if PTH and osteolectin had additive effects on bone parameters, 2-mo-old wild-type mice were administered daily injections of PTH, osteolectin, PTH+osteolectin, or PBS (control) for 3 mo. All three treatments significantly increased cortical bone volume relative to control mice, though PTH treatment had larger effects on cortical bone volume and thickness than this dose of osteolectin (Fig. 5 A–D). For cortical bone parameters, the combination of PTH and osteolectin did not significantly differ from PTH alone. All three treatments also significantly increased trabecular bone volume, trabecular number, and trabecular connectivity density relative to control mice and reduced trabecular spacing (Fig. 5 E–K). While each of osteolectin and PTH alone had significant effects on most trabecular bone parameters, the effects of PTH were significantly greater than this dose of osteolectin. Nonetheless, the combination of osteolectin and PTH had significantly greater effects on most trabecular bone parameters (the only exception was trabecular thickness) than PTH alone or osteolectin alone (Fig. 5 E–K). Recombinant PTH and osteolectin thus have additive effects on trabecular bone parameters.
We also tested if SOSTi and osteolectin had additive effects on bone parameters by administering SOSTi, osteolectin, SOSTi+osteolectin, or PBS to 2-mo-old mice for 1 mo. Treatment with SOSTi significantly increased cortical bone volume and thickness, whereas osteolectin treatment for only 1 mo did not (SI Appendix, Fig. S3 A–D). The combination of SOSTi and osteolectin did not significantly differ from SOSTi alone. All three treatments significantly increased trabecular bone volume and trabecular number while reducing trabecular spacing relative to control mice (SI Appendix, Fig. S3 E–K). The effects of SOSTi were significantly greater than the effects of osteolectin. In contrast to the additive effects of PTH and osteolectin, the combination of osteolectin and SOSTi did not significantly differ from SOSTi alone.
Discussion
We found that osteolectin mediates part of the effect of PTH, but not SOSTi, on Wnt pathway activation and bone formation. One possibility is that osteolectin and PTH both increase the number of osteogenic progenitors or accelerate their differentiation into osteoblasts while SOSTi acts on more differentiated cells. The PTH receptor, PTH1R, is more highly expressed by LepR+ bone marrow stromal cells than osteoblasts (8), raising the possibility that it acts mainly by promoting the differentiation of undifferentiated cells. Osteolectin also promotes the differentiation of LepR+ cells and other undifferentiated stromal cells (12, 13). In contrast, the sclerostin receptor, LRP5/6, is more highly expressed by osteoblasts than LepR+ cells (7, 8), raising the possibility that sclerostin acts primarily on more differentiated cells. Recombinant osteolectin and PTH may thus both promote Wnt signaling in undifferentiated cells, such that when combined, they activate the pathway more than either factor alone. In contrast, SOSTi may act primarily on mature osteoblasts and quiescent bone-lining cells (45).
Although osteolectin had less potent effects on bone parameters than PTH or SOSTi, this may not reflect a fundamental limitation of osteolectin. No structure/function or dosage optimization studies have been performed with osteolectin. Higher doses of osteolectin might have more dramatic effects. Variant forms of the protein or altered dosing schedules could also have more potent effects.
Patients commonly become less responsive to anabolic, bone-forming agents after 1 y of treatment and may stop responding entirely after 3 y (53–55). This may be a consequence of depletion of osteogenic stem/progenitor cells. An important issue for future studies will be to test whether sequential treatment with different anabolic agents can sustain osteogenic responses for a longer period of time. That is, do patients retain the ability to respond to a second anabolic agent after they stop responding to a first agent? If so, the sequential use of multiple anabolic agents could sustain osteogenesis for longer.
While PTH (Teriparatide) and SOSTi (Romosozumab) are FDA-approved for use in patients with osteoporosis (20, 31), both drugs have risks. PTH regulates calcium metabolism (23–25), mild hypercalcaemia was observed in 11% of patients in a clinical trial (18), and PTH should not be used in patients with hypercalcaemia (56). A study in rats found that long-term PTH administration induced osteosarcoma (57). Although no evidence of osteosarcoma has been observed in humans treated with PTH (18, 58), PTH should be avoided in patients with elevated risk of osteosarcoma and a history of cancer, including adolescents in whom the epiphyses have not yet closed, those with Paget’s disease or prior skeletal radiation, and patients with unexplained increases in alkaline phosphatase (59). SOSTi was found to modestly increase the risk of cardiovascular events (60), raising concerns about the use of SOSTi in patients with cardiovascular conditions.
The safety of long-term osteolectin administration has not been tested but Osteolectin-deficient mice have no known phenotypes other than reduced bone formation during adulthood (13). Moreover, the osteolectin receptor, α11 integrin, is widely expressed by osteolineage cells but rarely by nonosteolineage cells. These observations raise the possibility that osteolectin treatment might have limited effects on nonosteolineage cells and a favorable safety profile.
We observed increased serum osteolectin levels after PTH treatment in premenopausal women with idiopathic osteoporosis, but whether similar effects would be observed in older postmenopausal women remains unclear. We also demonstrated the osteogenic effect of recombinant osteolectin on cortical and trabecular bone in young adult mice (Fig. 5). However, whether osteolectin has similar effects in older mice requires future study. Further exploration of the functions of osteolectin in skeletal homeostasis at different ages could reveal new mechanisms that influence the development of osteoporosis during aging.
Materials and Methods
Mice.
Osteolectin−/− (Clec11a−/−) (13) mice were backcrossed at least six times onto a C57BL/Ka background and compared with sex-matched wild-type littermate controls. Osteolectintdtomato/+ and Osteolectintdtomato/− mice (5) were also backcrossed at least six times onto a C57BL/Ka background and compared with sex-matched littermate controls. To generate Osteolectinflox mice, CleanCap Cas9 mRNA (TriLink) and single-guide RNAs (transcribed using MEGAshortscript Kit [Ambion], purified using the MEGAclear Kit [Ambion]), and recombineering single-strand DNA were microinjected into C57BL/Ka zygotes. Chimeric mice were genotyped by restriction fragment-length poly-morphism analysis and confirmed by sequencing of the targeted allele. Founders were mated with C57BL/Ka mice to obtain germline transmission then backcrossed with wild-type C57BL/Ka mice for at least three generations prior to analysis. All procedures were approved by the University of Texas Southwestern Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee (protocol number 2017-101896).
PTH, Osteolectin, and SOSTi Treatments.
In some experiments, mice were treated with daily injections of 40 µg/kg human PTH (amino acids 1 to 34, APExBIO), daily injections of 50 µg/kg recombinant mouse osteolectin (13), biweekly injections of 25 mg/kg SOSTi (Romosozumab, Amgen), or 100 µL phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) as vehicle control. Romosozumab is a humanized monoclonal antibody against sclerostin that has been approved by the FDA to treat osteoporosis in postmenopausal women. This antibody also has activity against sclerostin in rodents (45, 46). All injections were subcutaneous.
Genotyping Primers.
To genotype Osteolectin−/− and control mice, the following primers were used: 5′-TTT GGG TGC TGG GAA GCC C-3′ and 5′-TTG CAC TGA GTC GCG GGT G-3′, 5′-GAG GAA GAG GAA ATC ACC ACA GC-3′ and 5′-TTG CAC TGA GTC GCG GGT G-3′. To genotype UBCCreER;Osteolectinflox/flox and control mice, the following primers were used: 5′-ATG TCC AAT TTA CTG ACC GTA CA-3′ and 5′-CGC ATA ACC AGT GAA ACA GCA TT-3′ for Cre, and 5′-CAG CTG GAT GCA GGC AGC CTG GCT CT-3′ and 5′- AGG TGC TGT GGT GAT TTC CTC TTC CTC T-3′ for Osteolectinflox.
Recombinant Osteolectin Purification.
As previously described (12, 13), mouse Osteolectin cDNA was cloned into pcDNA3 vector (Invitrogen) containing a C-terminal 1XFlag-tag and transfected into HEK293 cells with Lipofectamine 2000 (Invitrogen) then stable clones were selected using 1 mg/mL G418 (Sigma). Stable clones with high osteolectin expression were cultured in DMEM plus 10% FBS (Sigma), and 1% penicillin/streptomycin (Invitrogen). Culture medium was collected every 2 d, centrifuged to eliminate cellular debris, and stored with 1 mM phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride at 4 °C to inhibit protease activity. One liter of culture medium was filtered through a 0.2-µm membrane to further eliminate cellular debris (Nalgene) before being loaded onto a chromatography column containing 2 mL anti-FLAG M2 Affinity Gel (Sigma) with a flow rate of 1 mL/min. The column was sequentially washed using 20 mL of high salt buffer (20 mM Tris⋅HCl, 300 mM KCl, 10% Glycerol, 0.2 mM EDTA) followed by 20 mL of low salt buffer (20 mM Tris⋅HCl, 150 mM KCl, 10% Glycerol, 0.2 mM EDTA) and finally 20 mL of PBS. The FLAG-tagged osteolectin was then eluted from the column using 10 mL 3× FLAG peptide (100 μg/mL) in PBS or protein storage buffer (50 mM Hepes, 150 mM NaCl and 10% glycerol, pH = 7.5). Eluted protein was concentrated using Amicon Ultra-15 Centrifugal Filter Units (Ultracel-10K, Millipore), then quantitated by SDS/PAGE and colloidal blue staining (Invitrogen) and stored at −80 °C.
MicroCT Analysis.
MicroCT analysis was performed using the settings described previously (12, 13). As described previously (61), mouse femurs were dissected, fixed overnight in 4% paraformaldehyde (Thermo Fisher Scientific) and stored in 70% ethanol at 4 °C. Femurs were scanned at an isotropic voxel size of 3.5 μm and 7 μm, respectively, with peak tube voltage of 55 kV and current of 0.145 mA (μCT 35; Scanco). A three-dimensional Gaussian filter (s = 0.8) with a limited, finite filter support of one was used to suppress noise in the images, and a threshold of 263 to 1,000 was used to segment mineralized bone from air and soft tissues. Trabecular bone parameters were measured in the distal metaphysis of the femurs. The region of interest was selected from below the distal growth plate where the epiphyseal cap structure completely disappeared and continued for 100 slices toward the proximal end of the femur. Contours were drawn manually a few voxels away from the endocortical surface to define trabecular bone in the metaphysis. Cortical bone parameters were measured by analyzing 100 slices in middiaphysis femurs.
ELISAs.
As previously described (13), mouse blood serum was diluted 1:1 using 2× PBS and 100 μL of the diluted serum was coated on each well of a 96-well ELISA plate (COSTAR 96-well EIA/RIA stripwell plate) at 4 °C for 16 h. The plate was then washed three times with washing buffer (PBS with 0.1% Tween-20), blocked with 300 μL ELISA Blocking Buffer (Thermo, N502) for 2 h at room temperature, and washed three times with washing buffer. Antiosteolectin antibody (1 μg/mL diluted in 100 μL of PBS with 0.1% Tween-20 per well) was then added and incubated at room temperature for 2 h, washed three times with washing buffer, followed by incubating with HRP-conjugated donkey anti-goat IgG secondary antibody (0.8 μg/mL diluted in 100 μL of PBS with 0.1% Tween-20 per well) at room temperature for 1 h. After washing three times, 100 μL of SureBlue TMB microwell peroxidase substrate was added to each well and incubated at room temperature in the dark for 15 min. Finally, 100 μL of the TMB stop solution was added into each well and the optical density was measured at 450 nm. Serum P1NP levels were determined using the Procollagen type 1 N-terminal Propeptide (P1NP) ELISA Kit (Antibodies-online, ABIN415750). Serum CTX1 levels were determined using the Mouse CTX1 ELISA Kit (Novus Biologicals, NBP2-69074). SOST levels were determined using the mouse/rat SOST/Sclerostin Quantikine ELISA Kit (R&D Systems, MSST00).
Measurement of Human Serum Osteolectin Levels.
Serum samples were obtained from 40 female patients with premenopausal idiopathic osteoporosis in a phase IIb trial (NCT01440803) (47). All patients received PTH (Teriparatide, PTH amino acids 1 to 34; Eli Lily), 20 µg subcutaneous injection daily for 12 mo. Fasting, morning serum samples were collected at baseline before initiating Teriparatide treatment and then at 3, 6, and 12 mo after initiating treatment. Based on the presence or absence of lumbar spine bone density responses in these patients, they were categorized as responders or nonresponders (47). We measured serum osteolectin levels in these samples with the Bio-Plex Pro Human Cytokine SCGF-β Set (Bio-Rad), which detects native osteolectin, using the Bio-Plex 200 System (Bio-Rad). To quantitate human osteolectin levels, known concentrations of recombinant human osteolectin/Clec11a/SCGF-α (R&D Systems) were used to create a standard curve with the Bio-Plex system. Osteolectin levels were then measured in samples in a manner blinded to sample identity by J.Z. and then sent to A.C. for unblinding and analysis.
Bone Marrow Stromal Cell Cultures.
As previously described (12, 13), mouse femurs and tibias were cut at both ends to flush out intact bone marrow plugs. These flushed plugs and crushed bone metaphyses were subjected to two rounds of enzymatic digestion in prewarmed digestion buffer containing 3 mg/mL type I collagenase (Worthington), 4 mg/mL dispase (Roche Diagnostic), and 1 U/mL DNase I (Sigma) in HBSS with calcium and magnesium, at 37 °C for 15 min in each round of digestion. During each round of digestion, the suspension was vortexed six times for 10 s each time at speed level three using a Vortex-Genie 2 to promote more complete dissociation. Dissociated cells were transferred into a tube with staining medium (HBSS without calcium and magnesium +2% fetal bovine serum) and 2 mM EDTA to stop the digestion. Cells were then centrifuged, resuspended in staining medium, and passed through a 90-μm nylon mesh to generate a single-cell suspension.
The freshly dissociated bone marrow cell suspensions were cultured adherently at clonal density in six-well plates (5 × 105 cells per well) or 10-cm plates (5 × 106 cells per dish) with DMEM (Gibco) plus 20% fetal bovine serum (Sigma F2442), 10 mM ROCK inhibitor (Y-27632, Selleck), and 1% penicillin/streptomycin (Invitrogen) at 37 °C in gas-tight chambers (Billups-Rothenberg) flushed with 1% O2 and 6% CO2 (balance N2) to maintain a more physiological oxygen level that promoted survival and proliferation (62). The culture dish was rinsed with HBBS without calcium and magnesium and replenished with fresh medium on the second day after plating to wash out contaminating macrophages. Cultures were then maintained in the gas-tight chambers that were flushed daily for 1 min with the low oxygen gas mix (1% O2, 6% CO2, balance N2). The culture medium was changed every 4 d. To conditionally delete Osteolectin from bone marrow stromal cells from UBCCreER;Osteolectinflox/flox mice, 200 nM 4-hydroxytamoxifen was added to the culture medium for 2 d.
To perform experiments with the bone marrow stromal cells, they were then transferred into 48-well plates at confluent cell density (25,000 cells/cm2). On the second day after plating, the culture medium was replaced with osteogenic differentiation medium (StemPro Osteogenesis Differentiation kit, Gibco). 10 nM PTH or vehicle (PBS) was added into the cultures. PTH treated cells received intermittent PTH stimulation by adding PTH (10 nM) to the culture medium for 1 h every day, then the medium was replaced with fresh osteogenic differentiation medium to wash out the PTH. Cells were cultured in this way for 14 d and then osteogenic differentiation was analyzed by staining with Alizarin red S (Sigma). To quantitate Alizarin red staining, the stained cells were rinsed with PBS, and extracted with 10% (wt/vol) cetylpyridinium chloride in 10 mM sodium phosphate (pH 7.0) for 10 min at room temperature. Alizarin red in the extract was quantitated by optical density measurement at 562 nm.
Western Blots.
Primary bone marrow stromal cells were transferred into 48-well plates at confluent cell density (25,000 cells/cm2). On the second day after plating, the culture medium was replaced with osteogenic differentiation medium (StemPro Osteogenesis Differentiation kit, Gibco). Next, 10 nM PTH, 10 ng/mL SOSTi, 10 µM Wnt agonist (Santa Cruz), or vehicle were then added. To intermittently stimulate with PTH, PTH was added to the cultures (10 nM) for 1 h every day, then the medium was replaced with fresh osteogenic differentiation medium to wash out the PTH. Prior to extracting proteins, cells were washed with PBS and then lysis buffer was added (50 mM Tris⋅HCl, 150 mM NaCl, 1% Nonidet P-40, 0.5% sodium deoxycholate, 0.1% SDS, 1 mM sodium vanadate, 0.5 mM sodium fluoride, and cOmplete Mini EDTA-free Protease Inhibitor Mixture [Sigma]). The cells were scraped off the plate in the lysis buffer, transferred to an Eppendorf tube on ice, incubated for 20 min with occasional vortexing, then centrifuged at 17,000 × g for 10 min at 4 °C to clear cellular debris. The cell lysates were Western blotted with the indicated antibodies and immunoreactive bands were detected using ECL reagent (Pierce). Antibodies included anti–β-catenin (D10A8), anti–β-actin (D6A8), anti-–SK-3β (27C10), antiphospho-GSK-3α/β (Ser21/9, 9331S), anti-Smad1 (D5907), antiphospho-Smad1 (Ser206; D40B7), anti-P38 MAPK (D13E1), antiphospho-p38 MAPK (Thr180/Tyr182; D3F9), and HRP-linked anti-rabbit IgG secondary antibody, all from Cell Signaling. We also used anti-mouse osteolectin antibody (AF3729) and HRP-linked anti-goat IgG secondary antibody from R&D Systems. Band intensities on Western blots were quantitated using ImageJ.
Reverse-Transcription Quantitative PCR.
Bone marrow stromal cells were washed with PBS and lysed using TriReagent (Sigma). RNA was extracted and reverse transcribed into cDNA using iScript RT (oligo dT and random priming; Bio-Rad). Quantitative PCR was performed using the CFX384 Real-Time System (Bio-Rad). The primers used for qPCR analysis of mouse RNA included: Osteolectin: 5′-AGG TCC TGG GAG GGA GTG-3′ and 5′-GGG CCT CCT GGA GAT TCT T-3′; Actb: 5′-GCT CTT TTC CAG CCT TCC TT-3′ and 5′-CTT CTG CAT CCT GTC AGC AA-3′; Lef1: 5′-TGT TTA TCC CAT CAC GGG TGG-3′ and 5′-CAT GGA AGT GTC GCC TGA CAG-3′; Runx2: 5′-TTA CCT ACA CCC CGC CAG TC-3′ and 5′-TGC TGG TCT GGA AGG GTC C-3′; Alpl: 5′-CCA ACT CTT TTG TGC CAG AGA-3′ and 5′-GGC TAC ATT GGT GTT GAG CTT TT-3′.
Cell Imaging.
To quantify live or dead cells in cultures of bone marrow stromal cells, cells were washed with 1× HBSS and stained with the LIVE/DEAD Cell Imaging Kit (488/570) (Invitrogen, R37601). Cells were then imaged using a Zeiss LSM880 confocal microscope and analyzed using Zeiss Zen-2.
Statistical Methods.
In each type of experiment, multiple mice were tested in multiple independent experiments performed on different days. Mice were allocated to experiments randomly and samples processed in an arbitrary order, but formal randomization techniques were not used. Prior to analyzing the statistical significance of differences among treatments, we tested whether the data were normally distributed and whether variance was similar among treatments. To test for normal distribution, we performed the Shapiro–Wilk test when 3 ≤ n < 20 or the D’Agostino Omnibus test when n ≥ 20. To test if variability significantly differed among treatments, we performed Levene’s median tests. When the data significantly deviated from normality or variability significantly differed among treatments, we log2-transformed the data and tested again for normality and variability. If the transformed data no longer significantly deviated from normality and equal variability, we performed parametric tests on the transformed data. If log2-transformation was not possible or the transformed data still significantly deviated from normality or equal variability, we performed nonparametric tests on nontransformed data.
We used two-sided statistical tests where applicable (see figure legends for details). All statistical analyses were performed with GraphPad Prism 9.0.0. All data represent mean ± SD. Samples sizes were not predetermined based on statistical power calculations but were based on our experience with these assays.
Supplementary Material
Acknowledgments
We thank Nicolas Loof and the Moody Foundation Flow Cytometry Facility and Megan Nitcher for mouse colony management. S.J.M. is an HHMI Investigator, the Mary McDermott Cook Chair in Pediatric Genetics, the Kathryn and Gene Bishop Distinguished Chair in Pediatric Research, the director of the Hamon Laboratory for Stem Cells and Cancer, and a Cancer Prevention and Research Institute of Texas Scholar. This work was supported by funding from the Josephine Hughes Sterling Foundation. B.S. was supported by a Ruth L. Kirschstein National Research Service Award Postdoctoral Fellowship (F32) from the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (F32 HL139016). A.T. was supported by the Leopoldina Fellowship Program (LPDS 2016–16) from the German National Academy of Sciences.
Footnotes
Competing interest statement: University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center has filed a patent application on the use of osteolectin for the treatment of osteoporosis.
See QnAs, e2109572118, in vol. 118, issue 25.
This article contains supporting information online at https://www.pnas.org/lookup/suppl/doi:10.1073/pnas.2026176118/-/DCSupplemental.
Data Availability
All study data are included in the article and SI Appendix.
References
- 1.Park D., et al., Endogenous bone marrow MSCs are dynamic, fate-restricted participants in bone maintenance and regeneration. Cell Stem Cell 10, 259–272 (2012). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Zhou B. O., Yue R., Murphy M. M., Peyer J. G., Morrison S. J., Leptin-receptor-expressing mesenchymal stromal cells represent the main source of bone formed by adult bone marrow. Cell Stem Cell 15, 154–168 (2014). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Mizoguchi T., et al., Osterix marks distinct waves of primitive and definitive stromal progenitors during bone marrow development. Dev. Cell 29, 340–349 (2014). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Ono N., et al., Vasculature-associated cells expressing nestin in developing bones encompass early cells in the osteoblast and endothelial lineage. Dev. Cell 29, 330–339 (2014). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Shen B., et al., A mechanosensitive peri-arteriolar niche for osteogenesis and lymphopoiesis. Nature 591, 438–444 (2021). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Matsushita Y., et al., A Wnt-mediated transformation of the bone marrow stromal cell identity orchestrates skeletal regeneration. Nat. Commun. 11, 332 (2020). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Baryawno N., et al., A cellular taxonomy of the bone marrow stroma in homeostasis and leukemia. Cell 177, 1915–1932.e16 (2019). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Tikhonova A. N., et al., The bone marrow microenvironment at single-cell resolution. Nature 569, 222–228 (2019). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Ding L., Morrison S. J., Haematopoietic stem cells and early lymphoid progenitors occupy distinct bone marrow niches. Nature 495, 231–235 (2013). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Ding L., Saunders T. L., Enikolopov G., Morrison S. J., Endothelial and perivascular cells maintain haematopoietic stem cells. Nature 481, 457–462 (2012). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Himburg H. A., et al., Distinct bone marrow sources of pleiotrophin control hematopoietic stem cell maintenance and regeneration. Cell Stem Cell 23, 370–381.e5 (2018). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Shen B., et al., Integrin alpha11 is an osteolectin receptor and is required for the maintenance of adult skeletal bone mass. eLife 8, e42274 (2019). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Yue R., Shen B., Morrison S. J., Clec11a/osteolectin is an osteogenic growth factor that promotes the maintenance of the adult skeleton. eLife 5, e18782 (2016). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Harada S., Rodan G. A., Control of osteoblast function and regulation of bone mass. Nature 423, 349–355 (2003). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Liberman U. A.et al.; The Alendronate Phase III Osteoporosis Treatment Study Group , Effect of oral alendronate on bone mineral density and the incidence of fractures in postmenopausal osteoporosis. N. Engl. J. Med. 333, 1437–1443 (1995). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Black D. M.et al.; Fracture Intervention Trial Research Group , Randomised trial of effect of alendronate on risk of fracture in women with existing vertebral fractures. Lancet 348, 1535–1541 (1996). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Michaëlsson K.et al.; The Swedish Hip Fracture Study Group , Hormone replacement therapy and risk of hip fracture: Population based case-control study. BMJ 316, 1858–1863 (1998). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Neer R. M., et al., Effect of parathyroid hormone (1-34) on fractures and bone mineral density in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis. N. Engl. J. Med. 344, 1434–1441 (2001). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Miller P. D.et al.; ACTIVE Study Investigators , Effect of abaloparatide vs placebo on new vertebral fractures in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis: A randomized clinical trial. JAMA 316, 722–733 (2016). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Cosman F., et al., Romosozumab treatment in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis. N. Engl. J. Med. 375, 1532–1543 (2016). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Tam C. S., Heersche J. N., Murray T. M., Parsons J. A., Parathyroid hormone stimulates the bone apposition rate independently of its resorptive action: Differential effects of intermittent and continuous administration. Endocrinology 110, 506–512 (1982). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Hock J. M., Gera I., Effects of continuous and intermittent administration and inhibition of resorption on the anabolic response of bone to parathyroid hormone. J. Bone Miner. Res. 7, 65–72 (1992). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Qin L., Raggatt L. J., Partridge N. C., Parathyroid hormone: A double-edged sword for bone metabolism. Trends Endocrinol. Metab. 15, 60–65 (2004). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Silva B. C., Bilezikian J. P., Parathyroid hormone: Anabolic and catabolic actions on the skeleton. Curr. Opin. Pharmacol. 22, 41–50 (2015). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Jilka R. L., Molecular and cellular mechanisms of the anabolic effect of intermittent PTH. Bone 40, 1434–1446 (2007). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Jüppner H., et al., A G protein-linked receptor for parathyroid hormone and parathyroid hormone-related peptide. Science 254, 1024–1026 (1991). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Abou-Samra A. B., et al., Expression cloning of a common receptor for parathyroid hormone and parathyroid hormone-related peptide from rat osteoblast-like cells: A single receptor stimulates intracellular accumulation of both cAMP and inositol trisphosphates and increases intracellular free calcium. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 89, 2732–2736 (1992). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Yu B., et al., Parathyroid hormone induces differentiation of mesenchymal stromal/stem cells by enhancing bone morphogenetic protein signaling. J. Bone Miner. Res. 27, 2001–2014 (2012). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Ono W., Sakagami N., Nishimori S., Ono N., Kronenberg H. M., Parathyroid hormone receptor signalling in osterix-expressing mesenchymal progenitors is essential for tooth root formation. Nat. Commun. 7, 11277 (2016). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Fan Y., et al., Parathyroid hormone directs bone marrow mesenchymal cell fate. Cell Metab. 25, 661–672 (2017). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Reeve J., et al., Anabolic effect of low doses of a fragment of human parathyroid hormone on the skeleton in postmenopausal osteoporosis. Lancet 1, 1035–1038 (1976). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Ishizuya T., et al., Parathyroid hormone exerts disparate effects on osteoblast differentiation depending on exposure time in rat osteoblastic cells. J. Clin. Invest. 99, 2961–2970 (1997). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Jilka R. L., et al., Increased bone formation by prevention of osteoblast apoptosis with parathyroid hormone. J. Clin. Invest. 104, 439–446 (1999). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Keller H., Kneissel M., SOST is a target gene for PTH in bone. Bone 37, 148–158 (2005). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Balani D. H., Ono N., Kronenberg H. M., Parathyroid hormone regulates fates of murine osteoblast precursors in vivo. J. Clin. Invest. 127, 3327–3338 (2017). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Wan M., et al., Parathyroid hormone signaling through low-density lipoprotein-related protein 6. Genes Dev. 22, 2968–2979 (2008). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Li C., et al., Disruption of LRP6 in osteoblasts blunts the bone anabolic activity of PTH. J. Bone Miner. Res. 28, 2094–2108 (2013). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Wein M. N., Kronenberg H. M., Regulation of bone remodeling by parathyroid hormone. Cold Spring Harb. Perspect. Med. 8, a031237 (2018). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Li X., et al., Sclerostin binds to LRP5/6 and antagonizes canonical Wnt signaling. J. Biol. Chem. 280, 19883–19887 (2005). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Kim J., et al., Sclerostin inhibits Wnt signaling through tandem interaction with two LRP6 ectodomains. Nat. Commun. 11, 5357 (2020). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.van Bezooijen R. L., et al., Sclerostin is an osteocyte-expressed negative regulator of bone formation, but not a classical BMP antagonist. J. Exp. Med. 199, 805–814 (2004). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Poole K. E., et al., Sclerostin is a delayed secreted product of osteocytes that inhibits bone formation. FASEB J. 19, 1842–1844 (2005). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Boyce R. W., Niu Q. T., Ominsky M. S., Kinetic reconstruction reveals time-dependent effects of romosozumab on bone formation and osteoblast function in vertebral cancellous and cortical bone in cynomolgus monkeys. Bone 101, 77–87 (2017). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Chavassieux P., et al., Bone-forming and antiresorptive effects of romosozumab in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis: Bone histomorphometry and microcomputed tomography analysis after 2 and 12 months of treatment. J. Bone Miner. Res. 34, 1597–1608 (2019). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Kim S. W., et al., Sclerostin antibody administration converts bone lining cells into active osteoblasts. J. Bone Miner. Res. 32, 892–901 (2017). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Wu J., Cai X. H., Qin X. X., Liu Y. X., The effects of sclerostin antibody plus parathyroid hormone (1-34) on bone formation in ovariectomized rats. Z. Gerontol. Geriatr. 51, 550–556 (2018). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Cohen A., et al., Effect of teriparatide on bone remodeling and density in premenopausal idiopathic osteoporosis: A phase II trial. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 105, dgaa489 (2020). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Halloran D., Durbano H. W., Nohe A., Bone morphogenetic protein-2 in development and bone homeostasis. J. Dev. Biol. 8, 19 (2020). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Kousteni S., Bilezikian J. P., The cell biology of parathyroid hormone in osteoblasts. Curr. Osteoporos. Rep. 6, 72–76 (2008). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Rawadi G., Vayssière B., Dunn F., Baron R., Roman-Roman S., BMP-2 controls alkaline phosphatase expression and osteoblast mineralization by a Wnt autocrine loop. J. Bone Miner. Res. 18, 1842–1853 (2003). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Hovanes K., et al., Beta-catenin-sensitive isoforms of lymphoid enhancer factor-1 are selectively expressed in colon cancer. Nat. Genet. 28, 53–57 (2001). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Gaur T., et al., Canonical WNT signaling promotes osteogenesis by directly stimulating Runx2 gene expression. J. Biol. Chem. 280, 33132–33140 (2005). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.McClung M. R., et al., Effects of 24 months of treatment with romosozumab followed by 12 months of denosumab or placebo in postmenopausal women with low bone mineral density: A randomized, double-blind, Phase 2, parallel group study. J. Bone Miner. Res. 33, 1397–1406 (2018). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Leder B. Z., et al., Effects of teriparatide treatment and discontinuation in postmenopausal women and eugonadal men with osteoporosis. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 94, 2915–2921 (2009). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Gatti D., et al., The waning of teriparatide effect on bone formation markers in postmenopausal osteoporosis is associated with increasing serum levels of DKK1. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 96, 1555–1559 (2011). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Dobnig H., A review of teriparatide and its clinical efficacy in the treatment of osteoporosis. Expert Opin. Pharmacother. 5, 1153–1162 (2004). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Vahle J. L., et al., Skeletal changes in rats given daily subcutaneous injections of recombinant human parathyroid hormone (1-34) for 2 years and relevance to human safety. Toxicol. Pathol. 30, 312–321 (2002). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58.Harper K. D., Krege J. H., Marcus R., Mitlak B. H., Osteosarcoma and teriparatide? J. Bone Miner. Res. 22, 334 (2007). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59.Ishtiaq S., Fogelman I., Hampson G., Treatment of post-menopausal osteoporosis: Beyond bisphosphonates. J. Endocrinol. Invest. 38, 13–29 (2015). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60.Saag K. G., et al., Romosozumab or alendronate for fracture prevention in women with osteoporosis. N. Engl. J. Med. 377, 1417–1427 (2017). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61.Bouxsein M. L., et al., Guidelines for assessment of bone microstructure in rodents using micro-computed tomography. J. Bone Miner. Res. 25, 1468–1486 (2010). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62.Morrison S. J., et al., Transient Notch activation initiates an irreversible switch from neurogenesis to gliogenesis by neural crest stem cells. Cell 101, 499–510 (2000). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Data Availability Statement
All study data are included in the article and SI Appendix.