Skip to main content
PLOS One logoLink to PLOS One
. 2021 Jun 28;16(6):e0247542. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0247542

Effects of intravenous magnesium sulfate on serum calcium-regulating hormones and plasma and urinary electrolytes in healthy horses

Stephen A Schumacher 1,2, Ahmed M Kamr 1,3, Jeffrey Lakritz 1, Teresa A Burns 1, Alicia L Bertone 1, Ramiro E Toribio 1,*
Editor: Angel Abuelo4
PMCID: PMC8238178  PMID: 34181644

Abstract

Intravenous magnesium sulfate (MgSO4) is used in equine practice to treat hypomagnesemia, dysrhythmias, neurological disorders, and calcium dysregulation. MgSO4 is also used as a calming agent in equestrian events. Hypercalcemia affects calcium-regulating hormones, as well as plasma and urinary electrolytes; however, the effect of hypermagnesemia on these variables is unknown. The goal of this study was to investigate the effect of hypermagnesemia on blood parathyroid hormone (PTH), calcitonin (CT), ionized calcium (Ca2+), ionized magnesium (Mg2+), sodium (Na+), potassium (K+), chloride (Cl-) and their urinary fractional excretion (F) after intravenous administration of MgSO4 in healthy horses. Twelve healthy female horses of 4–18 years of age and 432–600 kg of body weight received a single intravenous dose of MgSO4 (60 mg/kg) over 5 minutes, and blood and urine samples were collected at different time points over 360 minutes. Plasma Mg2+ concentrations increased 3.7-fold over baseline values at 5 minutes and remained elevated for 120 minutes (P < 0.05), Ca2+ concentrations decreased from 30–60 minutes (P < 0.05), but Na+, K+ and Cl- concentrations did not change. Serum PTH concentrations dropped initially to rebound and remain elevated from 30 to 60 minutes, while CT concentrations increased at 5 minutes to return to baseline by 10 minutes (P < 0.05). The FMg, FCa, FNa, FK, and FCl increased, while urine osmolality decreased from 30–60 minutes compared baseline (P < 0.05). Short-term experimental hypermagnesemia alters calcium-regulating hormones (PTH, CT), reduces plasma Ca2+ concentrations, and increases the urinary excretion of Mg2+, Ca2+, K+, Na+ and Cl- in healthy horses. This information has clinical implications for the short-term effects of hypermagnesemia on calcium-regulation, electrolytes, and neuromuscular activity, in particular with increasing use of Mg salts to treat horses with various acute and chronic conditions as well as a calming agent in equestrian events.

Introduction

Intravenous magnesium sulfate (MgSO4) is used in equine medicine to treat dysrhythmias, neurological disorders, hypomagnesemia in critical illness, and refractory hypocalcemia [1]. More recently, intravenous MgSO4 has been used in equine events as a calming and performance-enhancing agent, with the ultimate goal of giving a competitive edge to horses that receive it [2,3].

Magnesium (Mg) is an essential macroelement involved in a multitude of physiological processes, including enzymatic activation, intermediary metabolism of carbohydrates, fats, and proteins, nucleic acid synthesis, cell membrane ion transport, neuromuscular excitability, cell proliferation, and calcium homeostasis [1]. The secretion of PTH and activity of the PTH receptor are modulated by Mg. Thus, Mg depletion could impair calcium regulation [4].

Similar to total calcium (Ca), in which ionized calcium (Ca2+) represents the active fraction, ionized Mg (Mg2+) is the active fraction of total Mg. Considering that a multitude of cellular processes are highly dependent on Mg, intracellular Mg concentrations are tightly regulated [1]. However, extracellular Mg2+ is not under tight hormonal homeostatic control as is Ca2+, and its plasma concentrations depend on gastrointestinal absorption, renal excretion, and bone exchange [1,5]. A number of hormonal and non-hormonal factors influence extracellular Mg2+ concentrations [6].

Parathyroid hormone (PTH) and calcitonin (CT) are important Ca-regulating hormones [7,8]. Hypocalcemia stimulates and hypercalcemia suppresses PTH secretion, while the opposite occurs with CT release [9]. In addition to its effects on Ca2+ homeostasis, PTH stimulates renal reabsorption of Mg2+ and its release from bone [10]. Calcitonin (CT) is secreted by the thyroid gland C cells in response to hypercalcemia to restore normocalcemia by blocking osteoclast-mediated bone resorption and reducing renal calcium reabsorption. There is evidence in other species that hypermagnesemia also stimulates CT secretion [11,12].

The ability of the parathyroid gland chief cells and thyroid gland C cells to detect extracellular Ca2+ concentrations depends on the calcium-sensing receptor (CaSR), a G-protein-coupled cell surface receptor [13,14]. The CaSR is also expressed in the renal tubular cells where it regulates the reabsorption of Ca2+, Mg2+, Na+, K+, Cl-, and water in various species, including the horse [4,13,15]. Excessive CaSR activation promotes diuresis and could lead to dehydration in patients with chronic hypercalcemia [4,15]. Relevant to this study, the CaSR also detects other polyvalent cations, including Mg2+, Sr2+, Gd3+, and neomycin [16]. Therefore, hypermagnesemia could potentially influence PTH and CT secretion, plasma Ca2+ concentrations, as well as the urinary excretion of electrolytes.

Hypercalcemia affects calcium-regulating hormones, as well as plasma and urinary electrolytes in horses [4]. In addition, hypercalcemia decreases Mg2+ concentrations in horses [4]. Therefore, based on the Ca2+ and Mg2+ interactions, as well as the ability of Mg2+ to activate CaSR, one can speculate that hypermagnesemia could affect a number of blood and urinary variables in horses, which could have clinical implications, including calcium homeostasis, urinary electrolyte wasting, neuromuscular excitability, and cardiovascular function.

The goal of this study was to investigate the effect of experimentally induced hypermagnesemia with intravenous MgSO4 on blood PTH, CT, Mg2+, Ca2+, Na+, K+, and Cl- concentrations, as well as on their urinary excretion in healthy horses. We hypothesized that hypermagnesemia will reduce Ca2+ concentrations, initially suppress to later stimulate PTH secretion, with the opposite effects on CT concentrations. We also proposed that hypermagnesemia, similar to hypercalcemia, will increase the urinary fractional excretion of Mg2+, Ca2+, Na+, K+ and Cl- in horses.

Materials and methods

Animals criteria and experimental design

This study was approved by The Ohio State University Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee and adhered to the principles of humane treatment of animals in veterinary clinical investigations as stated by the American College of Veterinary Internal Medicine and National Institute of Health guidelines.

Twelve healthy Standardbred mares with a median age of 8 years (4–18 years) and weighing 509 kg (432–600 kg) from The Ohio State University teaching herd were included in the study. Horses had no history of illness 6 months prior to the study, were under a routine health program, and were considered healthy based on physical examination, hematology, serum chemistry, and urine analysis. They were fed the same diet of grass and grass hay (0.5% calcium and 0.25% phosphorus), alfalfa hay (1.4% calcium and 0.25% phosphorus), and no concentrate feed.

MgSO4 administration

All horses were administered a single intravenous dose of MgSO4 (60 mg/kg) (Magnesium Sulfate 50% solution, Wedgewood Pharmacy, Swedesboro, NJ, USA) over 5 minutes to induce hypermagnesemia. This dose was chosen because it increases Mg2+ concentrations 3-fold over baseline values, which is expected to activate CaSR, and is also the dose anecdotally used for its calming effects at equestrian events [3]. This represented approximately 30 grams of MgSO4 (60 ml) for a 500 kg horse [3].

Sampling

Polyurethane catheters (Mila International, Florence, KY, USA) were placed aseptically in the left and right jugular veins for MgSO4 administration and blood sample collection and were removed after the last blood sample was collected. Blood samples were collected at 0 (baseline; before MgSO4 administration), 5, 10, 15, 30, 45, 60, 120, 180, 240, 300, and 360 minutes after MgSO4 administration. A Foley catheter was placed aseptically into the bladder and urine samples collected at baseline (time 0; before MgSO4 administration) and at 10, 30, 60, 120, 180, 240, 300, and 360 minutes after MgSO4 administration.

Blood was collected into serum clot tubes, allowed to clot for one hour at room temperature and centrifuged at 2,000 × g for 10 minutes at 4°C. Serum was aliquoted in smaller volumes and stored at -80°C until analysis. At each time point, blood was also collected into heparinized syringes for immediate electrolyte and creatinine measurements. Urine samples were processed immediately after collection to measure electrolyte and creatinine concentrations. The urinary fractional excretion of Mg2+ (FMg), Ca2+ (FCa), Na+ (FNa), K+ (FK), and Cl- (FCl) was calculated as [Ux/Sx]/[Ucr/Scr])×100, where U = urine, S = serum, x = each electrolyte, and cr = creatinine concentrations [4]. Urinary fractional excretions were calculated from 9 horses and results are expressed as a fraction (%) of the urinary excretion of creatinine [4].

Laboratory analyses

Concentrations of Mg2+, Ca2+, Na+, K+, Cl-, and creatinine were determined in heparinized plasma with a biochemistry analyzer (pHOx Ultra Analyzer, Nova Biomedical Corp., Waltham, MA, USA). Urine creatinine and electrolyte concentrations were measured using an automated chemistry system (Cobas C501, Roche Diagnostics, Indianapolis, IN, USA).

PTH and calcitonin measurements

Serum PTH concentrations were measured with a human-specific immunoradiometric assay (Scantibodies Laboratory, Santee, CA, USA) with a working range of 6.5–2328 pg/mL, a sensitivity of 1 pg/mL, and previously validated for horses [17]. Serum CT concentrations were determined with a human-specific immunoradiometric assay (Scantibodies Laboratory, Santee, CA, USA) with a working range of 10–1000 pg/mL and a detection limit of 1 pg/mL. The CT assay was validated for equine samples, with intra and inter-assay coefficients of variation <10%, and linear parallelism at 1:2, 1:4 and 1:8 dilutions (R2 = 0.96).

Statistical analysis

Sample size was calculated based on a power of 0.8 and a significance of 0.05 (alpha) to demonstrate statistical PTH differences using information from a similar study on the effects of hypercalcemia on serum and urine electrolytes [4]. Based on this, 8 horses would suffice, but number was increased because a lower effect of Mg compared to calcium over calcium-regulating hormones and electrolytes was expected. Data were assessed for normality with Shapiro-Wilk statistic and were normally distributed. Therefore, results are expressed as means with standard errors (S.E.). Data were analyzed using repeated measures One-Way ANOVA with Tukey’s test to determine significance between different time points (Prism 8.0, GraphPad Software, Inc., La Jolla, CA, USA). Figures were generated using graphics software (SigmaPlot 14, Systat Software, Inc., San Jose, CA, USA). Significance was set at P < 0.05.

Results

Plasma Mg2+, Ca2+, Na+, K+, and Cl- concentrations and Mg2+/ Ca2+

Plasma Mg2+ concentrations increased sharply by 5 minutes and remained significantly higher than baseline for 180 minutes (Fig 1A and Table 1; P < 0.05). At 5, 15 and 60 minutes, plasma Mg2+ concentrations were 3.7, 2.8, and 1.7-fold baseline values, respectively (P < 0.05). At 360 minutes, 4 horses still had Mg2+ concentrations that were 30% higher than their baseline values. Hypermagnesemia led to a sharp and short lasting increase in plasma Ca2+ concentrations to then cause a steady and statistically significant decrease in Ca2+ concentrations (P < 0.05), reaching its lowest values at 45 minutes (12.5% decrease from time 0) to subsequently return to baseline values at 120 minutes (Fig 1A and Table 1). Plasma Na+, K+, Cl-, and creatinine concentrations and plasma osmolality did not change over time (Table 1). The Mg2+/Ca2+ ratio was elevated by 5 minutes and remained above baseline values for 120 minutes (Table 1; P < 0.05).

Fig 1.

Fig 1

Plasma Mg2+ and Ca2+ (A) and serum PTH and CT (B) concentrations following IV administration of MgSO4 (60 mg/kg) in healthy horses. Values expressed as mean with S.E. * indicates statistically different than time 0. Rectangle over X axis represents IV administration of MgSO4 over 5 minutes. Mg2+, plasma ionized magnesium; Ca2+, plasma ionized calcium PTH, parathyroid hormone; CT, calcitonin.

Table 1. Plasma Mg2+, Ca2+, Na+, K+ and Cl-, and serum PTH and CT concentrations, and Mg+2/Ca2+ ratio following IV administration of MgSO4 (60 mg/kg) in healthy horses.

Variables Time (minutes)
0 5 10 15 30 45 60 120 180 240 300 360
Mg2+ (mg/dL) 1.3±0.1 4.7±0.3* 3.7±0.1* 3.3±0.1* 2.7±0.1* 2.3±0.1* 2.2±0.1* 1.9±0.1* 1.7±0.1 1.6±0.1 1.6±0.1 1.6±0.1
Ca2+ (mg/dL) 5.9±0.1 6.0±0.1 5.9±0.1 5.9±0.1 5.6±0.1* 5.4±0.0* 5.6±0.1* 5.8±0.1 5.8±0.2 5.8±0.1 5.8±0.1 6.1±0.1
Mg2+/ Ca2+ 0.2±0.0 0.8±0.1* 0.6±0.0* 0.6±0.0* 0.5±0.0* 0.4±0.0* 0.4±0.0* 0.4±0.0* 0.3±0.0 0.3±0.0 0.3±0.0 0.3±0.0
Na+ (mmol/L) 137.5±0.4 136.5±0.5 137.0±0.5 136.8±0.5 137.1±0.6 137.2±0.4 136.6±0.6 136.4±0.7 137.0±0.6 138.2±0.5 137.2±0.6 137.2±0.4
K+ (mmol/L) 3.6±0.3 3.3±0.1 3.3±0.1 3.3±0.0 3.4±0.1 3.3±0.1 3.3±0.1 3.4±0.1 3.3±0.1 3.5±0.1 3.4±0.1 3.6±0.2
Cl- (mmol/L) 104.0±0.6 103.3±0.6 102.9±0.7 102.5±0.6 102.7±0.7 102.9±0.7 103.0±0.1 103.1±1.2 103.5±0.5 104.5±0.3 104.3±0.4 104.03±0.8
PTH (pg/mL) 45.5±19.3 10.1±1.4 5.0±1.1 11.0±2.7 113.9±37.6* 109.8±40.0* 92.8±30.7* 62.6±15.7 62.6±16.2 64±18.8 80.3±17.9 69.9±16.8
CT (pg/mL) 13.4±9.9 116.3±32.6* 22.0±7.5 9.7±2.3 5.1±1 4.2±0.1 4.8±1.7 3.2±0.8 4.0±0.8 3.0±0.7 4.0±1.2 2.7±0.7
Creatinine (mg/dL) 1.1±0.1 1.10±0.1 1.1±0.1 1.0±0.1 1.1±0.1 1.0±0.5 1.1±0.1 1.1±0.1 1.1±0.1 1.1±0.1 1.1±0.1 2.1±0.1
Osmolality (mOsm/kg) 275.9±1.5 274.6±1.7 275.1±1.5 275.3±1.3 276.0±1.6 276.8±1.8 275.2±1.8 275.0±1.2 275.6±1.3 272.8±4.5 275.2±1.5 275.3±1.8

Mg2+, ionized magnesium; Ca2+, ionized calcium; Na+, sodium; K+, potassium; Cl-, chloride; PTH, parathyroid hormone; CT, calcitonin.

*P<0.05.

Values expressed as mean ± S.E.

PTH and CT concentrations

Serum PTH concentrations initially decreased followed by a marked increase at 30–60 minutes after MgSO4 administration (P < 0.05), remaining elevated for the rest of the study although not statistically different than baseline (Fig 1B and Table 1). Serum CT concentrations increased rapidly at 5 minutes corresponding with the end of MgSO4 administration and highest Mg2+ concentrations (P < 0.05), decreasing at 10 minutes and remaining at baseline values for the rest of the study (Fig 1B and Table 1).

Urinary electrolytes and osmolality

Urine Mg2+ concentrations increased steadily to reach statistical significance at 120 and 180 minutes compared to time 0 (Table 2; P < 0.05), to decrease to baseline values by 240 minutes. Urinary Ca2+ concentrations also increased by 180 minutes (Table 2; P < 0.05), to return to baseline at 240 minutes. Urine Na+ concentrations increased at 60 minutes, while urine K+ concentrations decreased at 30 minutes and returned to baseline at 360 minutes (Table 2; P < 0.05). Urinary Cl- concentrations did not change overtime. Urinary osmolality decreased at 30 and 60 minutes to return to baseline thereafter (Table 2; P < 0.05).

Table 2. Urine Mg2+, Ca2+, Na+, K+, Cl-, and creatinine concentrations and urine osmolality following IV administration of MgSO4 (60 mg/kg) in healthy horses.

Variables Time (minutes)
0 10 30 60 120 180 240 300 360
Mg2+ (mg/dL) 49.6±11.8 109.9±27.7 143±36 111.8±20.5 138.9±20.6* 154.2±22.1* 125.3±20.3 98.0±17.4 96.7±8.5
Ca2+ (mg/dL) 59.7±28.2 67.2±26.5 51.4±8.1 71.9±45.4 109.5±84.8 119.5±94. 7* 64.3±31.5 19.9±8.7 88.5±44.0
Na+ (mEq/L) 34.2±9.7 64.9±13.8 74.3±17.2 115.3±37.1* 62.8±20.2 38.0±14.0 34.3±12.5 38.0±19.7 18.4±0.9
K+ (mEq/L) 272.8±17.6 206.3±28.2 134.5±21.7* 172.8±31.5 221.4±24.8 263±26.3 266.2±26.4 226±34.7 267.9±24.7
Cl- (mEq/L) 174.1±23.8 150.8±18.8 153.6±16.6 152.8±21.4 145.1±17.3 133.3±11.9 139.9±23.4 131.6±36.1 139±35.1
Creatinine (mg/dL) 316.1±53.6 204.5±60.2 97.7±27.8* 92.9±19.2* 183.7±39.6 287±54.78 336.5±65.2 412.9±117.1 463.6±132.9
Osmolality (mOsm/kg) 1249±125.9 856±143 624±75.8* 674.2±74.0* 845±116.2 1028±129.8 1053±138.8 1103±145.1 1292±148.6

Mg2+, ionized magnesium; Ca2+, ionized calcium; Na+, sodium; K+, potassium; Cl-, chloride.

*P < 0.05.

Values expressed as mean and S.E.

Urinary fractional excretion of electrolytes

The FMg increased by 3-fold at 30–120 minutes after MgSO4 administration, then returned to baseline values by 360 minutes (Fig 2A; Table 3; P < 0.05). The FCa, FNa, FK, and FCl increased statistically by 60 minutes, and returned to baseline thereafter (Fig 2A and 2B; Table 3; P < 0.05).

Fig 2.

Fig 2

FMg and FCa (A) and FNa, FK and FCl (B) (%) following IV administration of MgSO4 (60 mg/kg) in healthy horses. Values expressed as mean with S.E. * indicates statistically different than time 0 (P < 0.05). Rectangle over X axis represents IV administration of MgSO4 over 5 minutes. FMg, urinary fractional excretion of Mg2+; FCa, urinary fractional excretion of Ca2+; FNa, urinary fractional excretion of Na+; FK, urinary fractional excretion of K+; FCl, urinary fractional excretion of Cl-.

Table 3. Urinary fractional excretion of Mg2+, Ca2+, Na+, K+, and Cl- following IV administration of MgSO4 (60 mg/kg, IV) in healthy horses.

Variables Time (minutes)
0 10 30 60 120 180 240 300 360
FMg (%) 16.7±4.3 27.2±10.5 56.4±6.3* 64.1±13.5* 50.9±7.1* 39.1±5.6 30.6±7.6 20.0±5.8 25.7±4.5
FCa (%) 4.9±2.3 11.2±4.4 10.8±1.4 14.3±7.1* 11.6±6.4 9.1±6.5 7.0±3.6 0.7±0.2 6.7±3.8
FNa (%) 0.13±0.1 0.7±0.4 1.0±0.4 1.2±0.4* 0.8±0.4 0.3±0.3 0.1±0.0 0.04±0.0 0.1±0.0
FK (%) 30.4±3.8 43.6±7.7 44.7±5.1 57.4±5.3* 48.0±8.1 33.8±5.3 27.5±6.4 18.6±4.2 27.1±5.7
FCl (%) 0.8±0.2 1.7±0.7 2.1±0.5 2.4±0.8* 1.6±0.6 0.9±0.3 0.7±0.3 0.4±0.2 0.6±0.2

FMg, urinary fractional excretion of magnesium; FCa, urinary fractional excretion of calcium; FNa, urinary fractional excretion of sodium; FK, urinary fractional excretion of potassium; FCl, urinary fractional excretion of chloride.

*P < 0.05.

Values expressed as mean ± S.E.

Discussion

In the present study, experimentally-induced hypermagnesemia in healthy horses led to a short lasting decrease in Ca2+ concentrations, with transient changes in PTH and CT concentrations, increasing the urinary fractional excretion of Mg2+, Ca2+, Na+, K+, and Cl-, and decreasing urine osmolality.

A single intravenous dose of MgSO4 at 60 mg/kg resulted in sustained hypermagnesemia for over 120 minutes. Similar results were observed in horses in which MgSO4 was evaluated as a treatment for trigeminal headshaking syndrome and in human patients with preeclampsia [18,19]. These findings also suggest that the in horses the physiological effects of the single dose of MgSO4 used in this study could last up to 6 hours. In addition, this information may be relevant to venues such as equestrian competitions, knowing that for at least 60 minutes after administration of this dose, serum [Mg2+] will be twice baseline values, potentially explaining the calming effects of hypermagnesemia in horses [2,3], which has potential regulatory connotations. An increase in Mg2+ concentrations coupled with a high Mg2+/Ca2+ ratio could be a potential biomarker for nefarious administration of MgSO4 to competing horses [3,20]. It was also demonstrated that hypermagnesemia reduced headshaking behavior in horses [19]. These actions of Mg have been attributed to its ability to block N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) ionotropic receptors and voltage-dependent calcium channels, reducing neuronal excitability [1,2,21,22]. The inhibitory effect of Mg2+ over NMDA receptor activity has also been the rationale for its use in acute brain injury, nociception, anesthesia, and behavioral disorders [13,19,21].

A decrease in Ca2+ concentrations after MgSO4 infusion has been documented in human patients, horses and dogs [3,19,2326] and could be attributed to excessive Mg2+ activation of CaSR in the renal tubules, increasing the urinary excretion of Ca and Mg, as reported in human patients [23,26,27]. We anticipated this response based on a previous study where experimental hypercalcemia decreased Mg2+ in healthy horses [4]. It is also possible that hypermagnesemia suppressed PTH secretion by activating CaSR [23], at least at early time points in the horses of this study, because subsequently there was a PTH rebound response that we attributed to the drop in Ca2+ concentrations. One difference between this study and publications using MgSO4 as a tocolytic agent was the rapid intravenous administration of MgSO4 to these horses compared to how it is administered to pregnant women [28]. One study in healthy horses showed that hypercalcemia has a similar effect as hypermagnesemia, increasing the urinary excretion of Ca2+, Mg2+, Na+, K+, and Cl-, increasing urine output, and decreasing urine osmolality [4].

Parathyroid hormone promotes renal calcium reabsorption and bone resorption to maintain normocalcemia [29,30]. The PTH receptor, via cAMP, mediates the renal actions of PTH by increasing the activity of the Na+/K+/2Cl- type 2 cotransporter (NKCC2), raising the electropositivity of the renal tubular lumen to promote paracellular cation reabsorption [31]. Activation of CaSR interferes with NKCC2, similar to furosemide, and inhibits vasopressin-mediated traffic of aquaporin-containing vesicles, explaining the diuretic actions of hypercalcemia in multiple species [15,32,33]. Under a similar premise supported by physiological studies showing that Mg2+ activates CaSR [13], hypermagnesemia could interfere with PTH secretion and renal reabsorption of electrolytes and water. In fact, CaSR has been described as a promiscuous receptor because it can sense multiple cations at different extracellular concentrations [13].

The initial PTH suppression could be attributed to excessive CaSR activation by Mg2+. This effect was likely counteracted by the drop in Ca2+ concentrations, which likely triggered a rebound PTH response, reflecting the preference of CaSR for Ca2+ over Mg2+ [13]. The increase in serum PTH concentrations occurred in parallel with the decrease in Ca2+ concentrations, supporting the rapid response of this system to protect against hypocalcemia [34,35]. After its rapid rise, CT concentrations returned to baseline values for the rest of the study, despite hypermagnesemia. This indicates that Mg2+ stimulated the secretion of CT stored in granules but was not sufficient to stimulate additional synthesis and secretion, in particular in the presence of low to normal Ca2+ concentrations. It is likely that a mechanism similar to that which occurred in the parathyroid gland chief cells, but with opposite endocrine secretion, was involved in thyroid gland C cell CT secretion. A similar CT response was observed in pigs after magnesium chloride infusion [36].

In addition to the increased FMg and FCa, the most feasible explanation for increased FNa, FK, and FCl were the effects of increased extracellular Mg2+ on transepithelial ion transport and water reabsorption, as previously discussed [37,38].

While no effect of hypermagnesemia on plasma Na+, K+, and Cl- concentrations was documented, its evident effect on urinary electrolyte excretion indicates that in the short term, other homeostatic systems could maintain their concentrations. Evaluating the effect of prolonged hypermagnesemia on calcium-regulating hormones and electrolyte balance could provide additional insight on equine Mg2+ physiology.

The clinical implications of short-term hypermagnesemia on behavior, cardiovascular function, and neuromuscular activity in horses were recently documented [2,3,19], further demonstrating that Mg is a pleiotropic ion. Magnesium supplementation is recommended for a number of human disorders and is being promoted as a pre-anesthetic to reduce pain [21]. In addition, due to its calcium-channel and NMDA receptor blocking properties and prolonged half-life in horses, MgSO4 supplementation should be considered for conditions associated with nociception, neuronal hyperexcitability, and energy dysregulation [1,2,21]. However, it is important to emphasize that intravenous administration of MgSO4 to horses to give a competitive edge is a nefarious and dangerous practice.

The effect of intravenous MgSO4 at the dose used in this study has not been prospectively evaluated in hospitalized horses, although lower doses of MgSO4 are routinely used in equine patients with hypomagnesemia or dysrhythmias. It is anticipated that similar effects to the horses of this study would be expected in these patients. Oral magnesium supplements are used by horse owners and trainers to enhance systemic health and in general considered a low risk of causing hypermagnesemia because doses are low. One can speculate that chronic hypermagnesemia in horses could alter calcium and electrolyte homeostasis as well as neuromuscular activity, however, high Mg doses for a long time would be required. This would be a valid question to investigate to further understand Mg biology in healthy and sick horses.

Conclusions

A single intravenous bolus administration of MgSO4 to healthy horses causes prolonged hypermagnesemia, a transient decrease in Ca2+ concentrations, and rapid changes in calcium-regulating hormones, increasing the urinary excretion of electrolytes and decreasing urine osmolality. This information enhances our understanding of equine Mg and Ca biology and has clinical implications. For example, based on information from this study, it would be of interest to know whether prolonged hypermagnesemia from excessive Mg supplementation leads to electrolyte depletion, water wasting, altered calcium homeostasis, with subsequent clinical consequences, including changes in neuromuscular activity, cardiovascular function, and behavior.

Data Availability

Data has been deposited in the Open Science Framework: doi.org/10.17605/osf.io/ckvbh.

Funding Statement

This study was funded by the United States Equestrian Federation (USEF) and the Ohio State University, which also provided support in the form of salary (SS), but did not have a role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.

References

  • 1.Toribio RE. Magnesium and Disease. In: Reed SM, Bayly WM, Sellon DC, editors. Equine Internal Medicine. Fourth edition. ed. St. Louis, Missouri: Elsevier; 2018. p. 1052–8. [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Schumacher SA, Toribio RE, Lakritz J, Bertone AL. Radio-Telemetric Assessment of Cardiac Variables and Locomotion With Experimentally Induced Hypermagnesemia in Horses Using Chronically Implanted Catheters. Front Vet Sci. 2019;6:414. Epub 2019/12/19. doi: 10.3389/fvets.2019.00414 ; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC6881382. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Schumacher SA, Toribio RE, Scansen B, Lakritz J, Bertone AL. Pharmacokinetics of magnesium and its effects on clinical variables following experimentally induced hypermagnesemia. J Vet Pharmacol Ther. 2020;43(6):577–90. Epub 2020/06/12. doi: 10.1111/jvp.12883 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Toribio RE, Kohn CW, Rourke KM, Levine AL, Rosol TJ. Effects of hypercalcemia on serum concentrations of magnesium, potassium, and phosphate and urinary excretion of electrolytes in horses. Am J Vet Res. 2007;68(5):543–54. Epub 2007/05/03. doi: 10.2460/ajvr.68.5.543 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Swaminathan R. Magnesium metabolism and its disorders. Clin Biochem Rev. 2003;24(2):47–66. ; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC1855626. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Quamme GA. Effect of calcitonin on calcium and magnesium transport in rat nephron. Am J Physiol. 1980;238(6):E573–8. doi: 10.1152/ajpendo.1980.238.6.E573 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Davey RA, Findlay DM. Calcitonin: physiology or fantasy? J Bone Miner Res. 2013;28(5):973–9. Epub 2013/03/23. doi: 10.1002/jbmr.1869 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Mundy GR, Guise TA. Hormonal control of calcium homeostasis. Clin Chem. 1999;45(8 Pt 2):1347–52. Epub 1999/08/03. . [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Toribio RE. Disorders of Calcium and Phosphorus. In: Reed SM, Bayly WM, Sellon DC, editors. Equine Internal Medicine. Fourth edition. ed. St. Louis, Missouri: Elsevier; 2018. p. 1029–52. [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Favus MJ, Bushinsky DA, Jr JL. Regulation of Calcium, Magnesium, and Phosphate Metabolism. 2006:76–117. [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Felsenfeld AJ, Levine BS. Calcitonin, the forgotten hormone: does it deserve to be forgotten? Clin Kidney J. 2015;8(2):180–7. doi: 10.1093/ckj/sfv011 ; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC4370311. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Suzuki K, Kono N, Onishi T, Tarui S. The effect of hypermagnesaemia on serum immunoreactive calcitonin levels in normal human subjects. Acta Endocrinol (Copenh). 1987;116(2):282–6. Epub 1987/10/01. doi: 10.1530/acta.0.1160282 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Conigrave AD. The Calcium-Sensing Receptor and the Parathyroid: Past, Present, Future. Front Physiol. 2016;7(December):563. doi: 10.3389/fphys.2016.00563 ; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC5156698. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Toribio RE, Kohn CW, Capen CC, Rosol TJ. Parathyroid hormone (PTH) secretion, PTH mRNA and calcium-sensing receptor mRNA expression in equine parathyroid cells, and effects of interleukin (IL)-1, IL-6, and tumor necrosis factor-alpha on equine parathyroid cell function. J Mol Endocrinol. 2003;31(3):609–20. doi: 10.1677/jme.0.0310609 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Riccardi D, Kemp PJ. The calcium-sensing receptor beyond extracellular calcium homeostasis: conception, development, adult physiology, and disease. Annu Rev Physiol. 2012;74:271–97. Epub 2011/10/25. doi: 10.1146/annurev-physiol-020911-153318 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Chang W, Shoback D. Extracellular Ca2+-sensing receptors—an overview. Cell Calcium. 2004;35(3):183–96. Epub 2004/06/18. doi: 10.1016/j.ceca.2003.10.012 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Kamr AM, Dembek KA, Reed SM, Slovis NM, Zaghawa AA, Rosol TJ, et al. Vitamin D Metabolites and Their Association with Calcium, Phosphorus, and PTH Concentrations, Severity of Illness, and Mortality in Hospitalized Equine Neonates. PLoS One. 2015;10(6):e0127684. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0127684 ; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC4457534. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Hudali T, Takkar C. Hypocalcemia and hyperkalemia during magnesium infusion therapy in a pre-eclamptic patient. Clin Case Rep. 2015;3(10):827–31. Epub 2015/10/29. doi: 10.1002/ccr3.356 ; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC4614650. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Sheldon SA, Aleman M, Costa LRR, Santoyo AC, Howey Q, Madigan JE. Intravenous infusion of magnesium sulfate and its effect on horses with trigeminal-mediated headshaking. J Vet Intern Med. 2019;33(2):923–32. doi: 10.1111/jvim.15410 ; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC6430935. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Schumacher SA, Yardley J, Bertone AL. Ionized magnesium and calcium concentration and their ratio in equine plasma samples as determined by a regulatory laboratory compared to a clinical reference laboratory. Drug Test Anal. 2019;11(3):455–60. doi: 10.1002/dta.2509 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Shin HJ, Na HS, Do SH. Magnesium and Pain. Nutrients. 2020;12(8). Epub 2020/07/29. doi: 10.3390/nu12082184 ; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC7468697. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Shimosawa T, Takano K, Ando K, Fujita T. Magnesium inhibits norepinephrine release by blocking N-type calcium channels at peripheral sympathetic nerve endings. Hypertension. 2004;44(6):897–902. Epub 2004/10/13. doi: 10.1161/01.HYP.0000146536.68208.84 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Cholst IN, Steinberg SF, Tropper PJ, Fox HE, Segre GV, Bilezikian JP. The influence of hypermagnesemia on serum calcium and parathyroid hormone levels in human subjects. N Engl J Med. 1984;310(19):1221–5. doi: 10.1056/NEJM198405103101904 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Gussow A, Schulz N, Bauer N, Moritz A. [Hypermagnesemia of ionized magnesium in 199 dogs—A hospital population-based study on prevalence, etiology and prognosis with special emphasis on kidney disease and the measurement of total magnesium]. Tierarztl Prax Ausg K Kleintiere Heimtiere. 2018;46(6):370–9. doi: 10.1055/s-0038-1677389 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Koontz SL, Friedman SA, Schwartz ML. Symptomatic hypocalcemia after tocolytic therapy with magnesium sulfate and nifedipine. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2004;190(6):1773–6. Epub 2004/07/31. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2004.02.050 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Mayan H, Hourvitz A, Schiff E, Farfel Z. Symptomatic hypocalcaemia in hypermagnesaemia-induced hypoparathyroidism, during magnesium tocolytic therapy—possible involvement of the calcium-sensing receptor. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 1999;14(7):1764–6. Epub 1999/08/06. doi: 10.1093/ndt/14.7.1764 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Suzuki K, Nonaka K, Kono N, Ichihara K, Fukumoto Y, Inui Y, et al. Effects of the intravenous administration of magnesium sulfate on corrected serum calcium level and nephrogenous cyclic AMP excretion in normal human subjects. Calcif Tissue Int. 1986;39(5):304–9. Epub 1986/11/01. doi: 10.1007/BF02555195 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Elliott JP. Magnesium sulfate as a tocolytic agent. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1983;147(3):277–84. Epub 1983/10/01. doi: 10.1016/0002-9378(83)91111-0 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Kumar R, Thompson JR. The regulation of parathyroid hormone secretion and synthesis. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2011;22(2):216–24. doi: 10.1681/ASN.2010020186 ; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC5546216. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Toribio RE. Disorders of calcium and phosphate metabolism in horses. Vet Clin North Am Equine Pract. 2011;27(1):129–47. Epub 2011/03/12. doi: 10.1016/j.cveq.2010.12.010 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Ares GR, Caceres PS, Ortiz PA. Molecular regulation of NKCC2 in the thick ascending limb. Am J Physiol Renal Physiol. 2011;301(6):F1143–59. Epub 2011/09/09. doi: 10.1152/ajprenal.00396.2011 ; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC3233874. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Ranieri M. Renal Ca(2+) and Water Handling in Response to Calcium Sensing Receptor Signaling: Physiopathological Aspects and Role of CaSR-Regulated microRNAs. Int J Mol Sci. 2019;20(21):5341. doi: 10.3390/ijms20215341 . [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Riccardi D, Brown EM. Physiology and pathophysiology of the calcium-sensing receptor in the kidney. Am J Physiol Renal Physiol. 2010;298(3):F485–99. doi: 10.1152/ajprenal.00608.2009 ; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC2838589. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Toribio RE, Kohn CW, Hardy J, Rosol TJ. Alterations in serum parathyroid hormone and electrolyte concentrations and urinary excretion of electrolytes in horses with induced endotoxemia. J Vet Intern Med. 2005;19(2):223–31. doi: . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Levine BS, Rodriguez M, Felsenfeld AJ. Serum calcium and bone: effect of PTH, phosphate, vitamin D and uremia. Nefrologia. 2014;34(5):658–69. doi: 10.3265/Nefrologia.pre2014.Jun.12379 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Littledike ET, Arnaud CD. The influence of plasma magnesium concentrations on calcitonin secretion in the pig. Proc Soc Exp Biol Med. 1971;136(3):1000–6. doi: 10.3181/00379727-136-35415 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Ferre S, Hoenderop JG, Bindels RJ. Sensing mechanisms involved in Ca2+ and Mg2+ homeostasis. Kidney Int. 2012;82(11):1157–66. doi: 10.1038/ki.2012.179 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Wagner CA. The calcium-sensing receptor directly regulates proximal tubular functions. Kidney Int. 2013;84(2):228–30. doi: 10.1038/ki.2013.128 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Decision Letter 0

Angel Abuelo

27 Mar 2021

PONE-D-21-04318

Effects of Intravenous Magnesium Sulfate on Calcium-Regulating Hormones, Plasma and Urinary Electrolytes in Healthy Horses

PLOS ONE

Dear Dr. Toribio,

Thank you for submitting your manuscript to PLOS ONE. After careful consideration, we feel that it has merit but does not fully meet PLOS ONE’s publication criteria as it currently stands. Therefore, we invite you to submit a revised version of the manuscript that addresses the points raised during the review process.

Both experts reviewers are very supportive of your manuscript but have highlighted some points that would need to be addressed through a minor revision.

Please submit your revised manuscript by May 11 2021 11:59PM. If you will need more time than this to complete your revisions, please reply to this message or contact the journal office at plosone@plos.org. When you're ready to submit your revision, log on to https://www.editorialmanager.com/pone/ and select the 'Submissions Needing Revision' folder to locate your manuscript file.

Please include the following items when submitting your revised manuscript:

  • A rebuttal letter that responds to each point raised by the academic editor and reviewer(s). You should upload this letter as a separate file labeled 'Response to Reviewers'.

  • A marked-up copy of your manuscript that highlights changes made to the original version. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Revised Manuscript with Track Changes'.

  • An unmarked version of your revised paper without tracked changes. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Manuscript'.

If you would like to make changes to your financial disclosure, please include your updated statement in your cover letter. Guidelines for resubmitting your figure files are available below the reviewer comments at the end of this letter.

If applicable, we recommend that you deposit your laboratory protocols in protocols.io to enhance the reproducibility of your results. Protocols.io assigns your protocol its own identifier (DOI) so that it can be cited independently in the future. For instructions see: http://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/submission-guidelines#loc-laboratory-protocols. Additionally, PLOS ONE offers an option for publishing peer-reviewed Lab Protocol articles, which describe protocols hosted on protocols.io. Read more information on sharing protocols at https://plos.org/protocols?utm_medium=editorial-email&utm_source=authorletters&utm_campaign=protocols.

We look forward to receiving your revised manuscript.

Kind regards,

Angel Abuelo, DVM, MRes, MSc, PhD, DABVP (Dairy), DECBHM

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Journal Requirements:

Please review your reference list to ensure that it is complete and correct. If you have cited papers that have been retracted, please include the rationale for doing so in the manuscript text, or remove these references and replace them with relevant current references. Any changes to the reference list should be mentioned in the rebuttal letter that accompanies your revised manuscript. If you need to cite a retracted article, indicate the article’s retracted status in the References list and also include a citation and full reference for the retraction notice.

When submitting your revision, we need you to address these additional requirements.

1. Please ensure that your manuscript meets PLOS ONE's style requirements, including those for file naming. The PLOS ONE style templates can be found at

https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/file?id=wjVg/PLOSOne_formatting_sample_main_body.pdf and

https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/file?id=ba62/PLOSOne_formatting_sample_title_authors_affiliations.pdf

2. Thank you for stating the following in the Competing Interests:

"Dr. Stephen Schumacher is employed by the sponsor of the project (USEF). However, experimental design and studies were carried out by guidance of faculty from The Ohio State University."

We note that one or more of the authors have an affiliation to the commercial funders of this research study : United States Equestrian Federation.

2.1. Please provide an amended Funding Statement declaring this commercial affiliation, as well as a statement regarding the Role of Funders in your study. If the funding organization did not play a role in the study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript and only provided financial support in the form of authors' salaries and/or research materials, please review your statements relating to the author contributions, and ensure you have specifically and accurately indicated the role(s) that these authors had in your study. You can update author roles in the Author Contributions section of the online submission form.

Please also include the following statement within your amended Funding Statement.

“The funder provided support in the form of salaries for authors [insert relevant initials], but did not have any additional role in the study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript. The specific roles of these authors are articulated in the ‘author contributions’ section.”

If your commercial affiliation did play a role in your study, please state and explain this role within your updated Funding Statement.

2.2. Please also provide an updated Competing Interests Statement declaring this commercial affiliation along with any other relevant declarations relating to employment, consultancy, patents, products in development, or marketed products, etc. 

Within your Competing Interests Statement, please confirm that this commercial affiliation does not alter your adherence to all PLOS ONE policies on sharing data and materials by including the following statement: "This does not alter our adherence to  PLOS ONE policies on sharing data and materials.” (as detailed online in our guide for authors http://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/competing-interests). If this adherence statement is not accurate and  there are restrictions on sharing of data and/or materials, please state these. Please note that we cannot proceed with consideration of your article until this information has been declared.

Please include both an updated Funding Statement and Competing Interests Statement in your cover letter. We will change the online submission form on your behalf.

Please know it is PLOS ONE policy for corresponding authors to declare, on behalf of all authors, all potential competing interests for the purposes of transparency. PLOS defines a competing interest as anything that interferes with, or could reasonably be perceived as interfering with, the full and objective presentation, peer review, editorial decision-making, or publication of research or non-research articles submitted to one of the journals. Competing interests can be financial or non-financial, professional, or personal. Competing interests can arise in relationship to an organization or another person. Please follow this link to our website for more details on competing interests: http://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/competing-interests

3. We noted in your submission details that a portion of your manuscript may have been presented or published elsewhere.

"Some clinical and laboratory information from a number of horses in this study were used in another publication"

Please clarify whether this publication was peer-reviewed and formally published. If this work was previously peer-reviewed and published, in the cover letter please provide the reason that this work does not constitute dual publication and should be included in the current manuscript.

4. We note that you have indicated that data from this study are available upon request. PLOS only allows data to be available upon request if there are legal or ethical restrictions on sharing data publicly. For information on unacceptable data access restrictions, please see http://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/data-availability#loc-unacceptable-data-access-restrictions.

In your revised cover letter, please address the following prompts:

a) If there are ethical or legal restrictions on sharing a de-identified data set, please explain them in detail (e.g., data contain potentially identifying or sensitive patient information) and who has imposed them (e.g., an ethics committee). Please also provide contact information for a data access committee, ethics committee, or other institutional body to which data requests may be sent.

b) If there are no restrictions, please upload the minimal anonymized data set necessary to replicate your study findings as either Supporting Information files or to a stable, public repository and provide us with the relevant URLs, DOIs, or accession numbers. Please see http://www.bmj.com/content/340/bmj.c181.long for guidelines on how to de-identify and prepare clinical data for publication. For a list of acceptable repositories, please see http://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/data-availability#loc-recommended-repositories.

We will update your Data Availability statement on your behalf to reflect the information you provide.

5. Please remove your figures from within your manuscript file, leaving only the individual TIFF/EPS image files, uploaded separately.  These will be automatically included in the reviewers’ PDF.

[Note: HTML markup is below. Please do not edit.]

Reviewers' comments:

Reviewer's Responses to Questions

Comments to the Author

1. Is the manuscript technically sound, and do the data support the conclusions?

The manuscript must describe a technically sound piece of scientific research with data that supports the conclusions. Experiments must have been conducted rigorously, with appropriate controls, replication, and sample sizes. The conclusions must be drawn appropriately based on the data presented.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

2. Has the statistical analysis been performed appropriately and rigorously?

Reviewer #1: I Don't Know

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

3. Have the authors made all data underlying the findings in their manuscript fully available?

The PLOS Data policy requires authors to make all data underlying the findings described in their manuscript fully available without restriction, with rare exception (please refer to the Data Availability Statement in the manuscript PDF file). The data should be provided as part of the manuscript or its supporting information, or deposited to a public repository. For example, in addition to summary statistics, the data points behind means, medians and variance measures should be available. If there are restrictions on publicly sharing data—e.g. participant privacy or use of data from a third party—those must be specified.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

4. Is the manuscript presented in an intelligible fashion and written in standard English?

PLOS ONE does not copyedit accepted manuscripts, so the language in submitted articles must be clear, correct, and unambiguous. Any typographical or grammatical errors should be corrected at revision, so please note any specific errors here.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

5. Review Comments to the Author

Please use the space provided to explain your answers to the questions above. You may also include additional comments for the author, including concerns about dual publication, research ethics, or publication ethics. (Please upload your review as an attachment if it exceeds 20,000 characters)

Reviewer #1: This manuscript is well written, the physiology governing these electrolytes is systematically approached in the introduction and revisited in the discussion. The motivation for this study is clear to the reader; in order to understand how the nefarious use of supplements/drugs in competition horses might result in potential negative clinical implications we first need to understand their effect on physiological status of the horse. I would like to see a better explanation of how Mg has a calming influence on the demeanor of horses, if this is described, with citation(s).

Reviewer #2: This paper by Schumacher et al. investigates the effect of experimentally induced hypermagnesemia (using intravenous administration of magnesium sulfate) on blood parathyroid hormone (PTH), calcitonin, ionized calcium, ionized magnesium, sodium, potassium, chloride and their urinary fractional excretion. The authors speculate that the effects of hypermagnesemia on these plasma and urinary variables could have clinical implications and this forms the justification for the research.

Overall, this is a well considered and well conducted study. The manuscript is succinct and well written. The authors provide sound justification/reasoning for conducting the research. The introduction includes relevant information regarding the physiology of magnesium and calcium and the effects of magnesium on calcium regulation which provides appropriate background information for the study. Knowledge of the physiology also supports the hypothesis that there could be effects of hypermagnesemia on plasma and urinary variables. The authors clearly state their hypothesis at the end of the introduction.

The materials and methods section is succinct, yet provides adequate detail on how the study was conducted. The authors clearly explain how the dose of magnesium sulfate used in this study was determined.

The statistical analyses are appropriate and results are clearly presented. The figures provide a clear representation of the results and all results are provided in the accompanying tables.

The discussion provides a succinct summary of the results of the study and the authors clearly discuss their interpretation and provide excellent and detailed reasoning (based on physiological concepts and supported by relevant literature) for the results found. Ideas for research extending beyond this study, including investigating the effects of prolonged hypermagnesemia, are also discussed in the conclusion.

There are some minor points listed below which the authors should address before the submission can be accepted for publication.

1. Title: the title needs the addition of 'and' ("Effects of Intravenous Magnesium Sulfate on Calcium-Regulating Hormones and Plasma and Urinary Electrolytes in Healthy Horses') to clarify that the effects on plasma electrolytes etc is of interest, not the effects on plasma.

2. The research was conducted in 12 horses. Was a sample size calculation performed? This should be discussed in the materials and methods.

3. Line 78: At the end of this sentence, the authors state that the effects of hypermagnesemia could have clinical implications. The authors should expand on this slightly.

4. The authors conclude that the hypermagnesemia alters calcium-regulating hormones, reduces plasma calcium concentrations and increases the urinary excretion of a number of electrolytes in healthy horses.

Line 39: 'This information has clinical implications on the short-term effects of hypermagnesemia on calcium-regulating hormones as well as plasma and urine electrolytes.' This needs to be reworded. The clinical implications aren't on the short-term effects of hypermagnesemia. Perhaps, 'clinical implications for the short-term effects of hypermagnesemia' is more appropriate.

As this is an important conclusion of the study, more detail should be provided in the discussion with further explanation of the clinical implications. How important are these clinical implications? What are the potential consequences for the patient? Are the clinical effects likely to be acute or is there potential for chronic alterations in calcium-regulating hormones and plasma and urinary electrolytes?

5. As this study has been performed in healthy horses, the authors should discuss whether similar responses in the parameters of interest may be expected to occur in clinical cases? For example, would similar effects be expected in a horse presenting with hypomagnesemia or a dysrhythmia? If this cannot be ascertained from this study, the authors could still provide some discussion on proposed effects and/or how this could be further investigated.

**********

6. PLOS authors have the option to publish the peer review history of their article (what does this mean?). If published, this will include your full peer review and any attached files.

If you choose “no”, your identity will remain anonymous but your review may still be made public.

Do you want your identity to be public for this peer review? For information about this choice, including consent withdrawal, please see our Privacy Policy.

Reviewer #1: No

Reviewer #2: No

[NOTE: If reviewer comments were submitted as an attachment file, they will be attached to this email and accessible via the submission site. Please log into your account, locate the manuscript record, and check for the action link "View Attachments". If this link does not appear, there are no attachment files.]

While revising your submission, please upload your figure files to the Preflight Analysis and Conversion Engine (PACE) digital diagnostic tool, https://pacev2.apexcovantage.com/. PACE helps ensure that figures meet PLOS requirements. To use PACE, you must first register as a user. Registration is free. Then, login and navigate to the UPLOAD tab, where you will find detailed instructions on how to use the tool. If you encounter any issues or have any questions when using PACE, please email PLOS at figures@plos.org. Please note that Supporting Information files do not need this step.

Attachment

Submitted filename: Manuscript for Plos One - Hypermagnesemia in horses TPW Edits.docx

PLoS One. 2021 Jun 28;16(6):e0247542. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0247542.r002

Author response to Decision Letter 0


19 May 2021

Effects of Intravenous Magnesium Sulfate on Serum Calcium-Regulating Hormones and Plasma and Urinary Electrolytes in Healthy Horses

PONE-D-21-04318

• We appreciate the comments and suggestions by the reviewers to improve this manuscript. Comments are valid and have been addressed.

Reviewer #1: This manuscript is well written, the physiology governing these electrolytes is systematically approached in the introduction and revisited in the discussion. The motivation for this study is clear to the reader; in order to understand how the nefarious use of supplements/drugs in competition horses might result in potential negative clinical implications we first need to understand their effect on physiological status of the horse. I would like to see a better explanation of how Mg has a calming influence on the demeanor of horses, if this is described, with citation(s).

• Thank you for the comments. We have added some information on the potential mechanisms behind the calming effects of Mg in horses. We have previously shown that hypermagnesemia has calming effects/reduces locomotion in horses (Refs #2,3), however, for this manuscript we did not expand on this subject since the goal of this study was specific to hormones and electrolytes and we feel the neurological aspect was beyond the scope of this article. We could provide additional mechanistic information if the reviewer prefers.

Reviewer #2: This paper by Schumacher et al. investigates the effect of experimentally induced hypermagnesemia (using intravenous administration of magnesium sulfate) on blood parathyroid hormone (PTH), calcitonin, ionized calcium, ionized magnesium, sodium, potassium, chloride and their urinary fractional excretion. The authors speculate that the effects of hypermagnesemia on these plasma and urinary variables could have clinical implications and this forms the justification for the research.

Overall, this is a well considered and well conducted study. The manuscript is succinct and well written. The authors provide sound justification/reasoning for conducting the research. The introduction includes relevant information regarding the physiology of magnesium and calcium and the effects of magnesium on calcium regulation which provides appropriate background information for the study. Knowledge of the physiology also supports the hypothesis that there could be effects of hypermagnesemia on plasma and urinary variables. The authors clearly state their hypothesis at the end of the introduction.

The materials and methods section is succinct, yet provides adequate detail on how the study was conducted. The authors clearly explain how the dose of magnesium sulfate used in this study was determined.

The statistical analyses are appropriate and results are clearly presented. The figures provide a clear representation of the results and all results are provided in the accompanying tables.

The discussion provides a succinct summary of the results of the study and the authors clearly discuss their interpretation and provide excellent and detailed reasoning (based on physiological concepts and supported by relevant literature) for the results found. Ideas for research extending beyond this study, including investigating the effects of prolonged hypermagnesemia, are also discussed in the conclusion.

• Thank you for your comments and recognizing the strengths of this study.

There are some minor points listed below which the authors should address before the submission can be accepted for publication.

1. Title: the title needs the addition of 'and' ("Effects of Intravenous Magnesium Sulfate on Calcium-Regulating Hormones and Plasma and Urinary Electrolytes in Healthy Horses') to clarify that the effects on plasma electrolytes etc is of interest, not the effects on plasma.

• The title has been revised as suggested.

2. The research was conducted in 12 horses. Was a sample size calculation performed? This should be discussed in the materials and methods.

• Yes. Additional details were included in the data analysis about power calculation.

3. Line 78: At the end of this sentence, the authors state that the effects of hypermagnesemia could have clinical implications. The authors should expand on this slightly.

• Yes. Additional details were included on potential clinical implications.

4. The authors conclude that the hypermagnesemia alters calcium-regulating hormones, reduces plasma calcium concentrations and increases the urinary excretion of a number of electrolytes in healthy horses.

Line 39: 'This information has clinical implications on the short-term effects of hypermagnesemia on calcium-regulating hormones as well as plasma and urine electrolytes.' This needs to be reworded. The clinical implications aren't on the short-term effects of hypermagnesemia. Perhaps, 'clinical implications for the short-term effects of hypermagnesemia' is more appropriate.

• Valid comment. We rephrase this sentence (lines 39-42).

As this is an important conclusion of the study, more detail should be provided in the discussion with further explanation of the clinical implications. How important are these clinical implications? What are the potential consequences for the patient? Are the clinical effects likely to be acute or is there potential for chronic alterations in calcium-regulating hormones and plasma and urinary electrolytes?

• Additional information on potential clinical implications was included (lines 272-289).

5. As this study has been performed in healthy horses, the authors should discuss whether similar responses in the parameters of interest may be expected to occur in clinical cases? For example, would similar effects be expected in a horse presenting with hypomagnesemia or a dysrhythmia? If this cannot be ascertained from this study, the authors could still provide some discussion on proposed effects and/or how this could be further investigated.

• Information on potential implications of Mg in clinical cases was included (lines 272-289).

Attachment

Submitted filename: Response to reviewers.docx

Decision Letter 1

Angel Abuelo

24 May 2021

Effects of Intravenous Magnesium Sulfate on Serum Calcium-Regulating Hormones and Plasma and Urinary Electrolytes in Healthy Horses

PONE-D-21-04318R1

Dear Dr. Toribio,

We’re pleased to inform you that your manuscript has been judged scientifically suitable for publication and will be formally accepted for publication once it meets all outstanding technical requirements.

Within one week, you’ll receive an e-mail detailing the required amendments. When these have been addressed, you’ll receive a formal acceptance letter and your manuscript will be scheduled for publication.

An invoice for payment will follow shortly after the formal acceptance. To ensure an efficient process, please log into Editorial Manager at http://www.editorialmanager.com/pone/, click the 'Update My Information' link at the top of the page, and double check that your user information is up-to-date. If you have any billing related questions, please contact our Author Billing department directly at authorbilling@plos.org.

If your institution or institutions have a press office, please notify them about your upcoming paper to help maximize its impact. If they’ll be preparing press materials, please inform our press team as soon as possible -- no later than 48 hours after receiving the formal acceptance. Your manuscript will remain under strict press embargo until 2 pm Eastern Time on the date of publication. For more information, please contact onepress@plos.org.

Kind regards,

Angel Abuelo, DVM, MRes, MSc, PhD, DABVP (Dairy), DECBHM

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Additional Editor Comments (optional):

Reviewers' comments:

Acceptance letter

Angel Abuelo

14 Jun 2021

PONE-D-21-04318R1

Effects of Intravenous Magnesium Sulfate on Serum Calcium-Regulating Hormones and Plasma and Urinary Electrolytes in Healthy Horses

Dear Dr. Toribio:

I'm pleased to inform you that your manuscript has been deemed suitable for publication in PLOS ONE. Congratulations! Your manuscript is now with our production department.

If your institution or institutions have a press office, please let them know about your upcoming paper now to help maximize its impact. If they'll be preparing press materials, please inform our press team within the next 48 hours. Your manuscript will remain under strict press embargo until 2 pm Eastern Time on the date of publication. For more information please contact onepress@plos.org.

If we can help with anything else, please email us at plosone@plos.org.

Thank you for submitting your work to PLOS ONE and supporting open access.

Kind regards,

PLOS ONE Editorial Office Staff

on behalf of

Dr. Angel Abuelo

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Associated Data

    This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

    Supplementary Materials

    Attachment

    Submitted filename: Manuscript for Plos One - Hypermagnesemia in horses TPW Edits.docx

    Attachment

    Submitted filename: Response to reviewers.docx

    Data Availability Statement

    Data has been deposited in the Open Science Framework: doi.org/10.17605/osf.io/ckvbh.


    Articles from PLoS ONE are provided here courtesy of PLOS

    RESOURCES