Abstract
Iron is essential for a healthy pregnancy, and iron supplementation is nearly universally recommended, regardless of maternal iron status. A signal of potential harm is the U-shaped association between maternal ferritin, a marker of iron stores, and risk of adverse pregnancy outcomes. However, ferritin is also induced by inflammation and may overestimate iron stores during inflammation or infection. In this study, we use mouse models to determine whether maternal iron loading, inflammation, or their interaction cause poor pregnancy outcomes. Only maternal exposure to both iron excess and inflammation, but not either condition alone, causes embryo malformations and demise. Maternal iron excess potentiates embryo injury during both LPS-induced acute inflammation and obesity-induced chronic mild inflammation. The adverse interaction depends on TNFα signaling, causes apoptosis of placental and embryo endothelium, and is prevented by anti-TNFα or antioxidant treatment. Our findings raise important questions about the safety of indiscriminate iron supplementation during pregnancy.
Subject terms: Apoptosis, Homeostasis, Reproductive biology, Obesity, Acute inflammation
Iron is essential during pregnancy for embryo and placental development and maternal health. However, in this study using mouse models, the authors demonstrate that excess maternal iron causes adverse embryo outcomes in pregnancies with underlying systemic inflammation.
Introduction
Iron is an essential micronutrient required by all tissues for metabolic and cellular processes. Iron requirements increase substantially over the course of pregnancy to support growth of the fetus and placenta and for maternal erythropoietic expansion1. To meet these demands, both dietary iron absorption and mobilization of iron from stores increase, and this is mediated by a decrease in maternal hepcidin, the iron regulatory peptide hormone produced in the liver2.
Severe iron deficiency and associated anemia is detrimental for both mother and fetus3 which has led to the policy of universal iron supplementation even without screening for preexisting iron deficiency in most countries, including the United States. In developed countries, most women of reproductive age have adequate iron stores, and less than 25% of pregnant women have mild iron deficiency and anemia4,5, prompting considerations of the potential risks of indiscriminate iron supplementation.
Although iron is essential for cell function and viability, excess iron can be toxic. In iron overload conditions, high iron concentrations in plasma exceed the iron-binding capacity of transferrin, and non-transferrin-bound iron (NTBI) appears in circulation, damaging cells and tissues through the generation of reactive oxygen species6,7. How elevated transferrin saturation and/or the presence of NTBI in maternal circulation affects placental and fetal tissues is unknown. Pregnancies associated with iron excess include patients with hereditary hemochromatosis or β-thalassemia, the latter having well-documented complications including prematurity, abortion, and intrauterine fetal death8,9. However, even normal pregnancies may be exposed to excess iron and NTBI when iron-supplemented10, in part because of decreased maternal hepcidin allowing for highly efficient iron absorption. High iron status is associated with gestational diabetes and impaired fetal growth11–17. Furthermore, large epidemiological studies show a U-shaped association between maternal ferritin, a marker of iron stores, and risk of adverse outcomes such as low birthweight, stillbirth, preterm birth (<37 weeks), very preterm birth (<32 weeks’ gestation), and neonatal asphyxia18–25. However, these harms are not necessarily caused by iron excess as ferritin is also increased by inflammation and may not accurately reflect iron stores in the presence of inflammation or infection.
Maternal systemic inflammation is independently associated with adverse outcomes including increased risk of schizophrenia, autism, and other psychiatric disorders26,27. This was observed with acute inflammation during bacterial or viral infectious episodes28,29 and in milder chronic conditions such as obesity30,31. Animal models that investigated the underlying mechanisms implicated proinflammatory cytokines as a cause of abnormal fetal brain development and autism-associated behaviors in offspring32–35. In humans, maternal serum tumor necrosis factor α (TNFα) is elevated in pathologic pregnancies36 and in first trimester loss37. Moreover, elevated interleukin (IL) 8, TNFα, and C-reactive protein are associated with the risk of schizophrenia in offspring38–40.
Since high ferritin is a marker of both high iron and inflammation, it is unclear if adverse birth outcomes associated with high maternal ferritin are caused by high iron, inflammation, or a combination of both, and which pathways mediate injury to the fetus. To address these questions, we developed and examined mouse models of maternal iron excess and systemic inflammation during pregnancy and discovered an adverse synergy: only the presence of both resulted in embryotoxicity. Embryotoxicity was observed in a LPS-induced sepsis model and with diet-induced obesity. The underlying mechanism is dependent on iron-induced oxidative stress sensitizing endothelium in the placenta and embryo to TNFα-mediated apoptosis. These findings are surprising in view of the remarkable resistance of mouse models to tissue injury from massive iron overload induced by dietary or genetic manipulations. Synergistic toxicity of iron and inflammation expands our understanding of the potential effects of iron supplementation not only in pregnant women but also during other inflammatory conditions.
Results
Maternal iron overload and systemic inflammation synergize to cause embryotoxicity
To model iron supplementation, C57BL/6 females were fed high-iron diet (2500–5000 ppm carbonyl iron) for 1–3 weeks prior to and during pregnancy (4–6 weeks total). In addition, we used a genetic model of iron excess: C57BL/6 mice deficient in the iron regulatory hormone hepcidin (hepcidin knockout (KO)) which accumulate iron naturally on standard chow (185 ppm iron). Control iron-adequate dams were fed standard chow. Non-pregnant females were age- and diet-matched to pregnant females. In both models of iron loading, pregnant females had higher hepatic iron compared to iron-adequate dams at E15.5 and 18.5 (all P < 0.01) (Supplementary Fig. 1a). Serum iron was significantly elevated in hepcidin KOs but not in dietary-loaded wild-type dams which express hepcidin (Supplementary Fig. 1b). Embryos were relatively protected from iron overload on E15.5, but by E18.5, embryo liver iron stores and serum iron were significantly higher in both iron-loading models relative to iron-adequate controls (both P < 0.01) (Supplementary Fig. 1c, d). Of note, the severity of embryo liver iron loading was much lower than in the dams. Placenta iron concentration was increased in both iron loading groups at E15.5 and 18.5 but was more pronounced at E18.5 (both P < 0.001) (Supplementary Fig. 1e). Iron loading did not alter litter size (Supplementary Fig. 1f).
Acute systemic maternal inflammation was induced by a single subcutaneous injection of LPS on E8.5 or 15.5 in the three group of dams: those on iron-adequate or high-iron diet and hepcidin KOs. Control dams in each group were injected with solvent. After the E8.5 injection, embryo outcome was evaluated on E18.5 (Fig. 1a). Injection of solvent did not cause abnormalities in any groups except we observed embryo loss (fatal subcutaneous hemorrhaging) in a single litter in dietary iron-loaded dams at E18.5 (Fig. 1b–f). Thus, iron loading by itself did not cause severe embryo damage. E8.5 LPS injection in iron-adequate pregnancies caused adverse outcomes in 36% of pregnancies, involving embryo loss (embryo resorption or fatal hemorrhaging) but not embryo malformations (Fig. 1b–f). Remarkably, when dams were both iron-loaded and LPS-injected, we observed a striking synergistic effect: adverse outcomes were observed in 90% of hepcidin KO and dietary iron-loaded dams and involved embryo loss or malformations (both P < 0.001) (Fig. 1c), indicating that elevated maternal iron rather than the lack of hepcidin was the pathogenic factor synergizing with inflammation. Similar embryo outcomes observed in wild-type dams fed high iron diet and hepcidin KO dams fed standard diet were indicative that neither diet composition nor potential iron-related changes to maternal microbiome contributed to adverse embryo outcomes. Embryo loss was noted in 73% of dietary iron-loaded pregnancies (P = 0.036) and in 80% of hepcidin KO pregnancies (P = 0.032) (Fig. 1b, d). Embryo malformations occurred in 67% of dietary iron-loaded embryos (P < 0.001) and 33% of hepcidin KO embryos (P = 0.033) (Fig. 1b, e). Embryonic malformations most commonly included anencephaly and/or anophthalmia, and less commonly hernia or cleft palate (Fig. 1b, e, f). We observed mild decreases in E18.5 placenta weights after E8.5 LPS treatment in the iron-adequate and hepcidin KO group (Supplementary Fig. 1g). Embryo weights were mildly increased in the iron-adequate group but decreased in the dietary iron loaded group following LPS treatment (Supplementary Fig. 1h). Of note, embryo weights represent healthy and malformed embryos but exclude resorbing embryos in which weights were not accurately obtained.
Since E8.5 LPS injection caused embryo loss in iron-loaded dams, this limited the availability of embryo tissue for analysis. We thus injected LPS or solvent on E15.5 and analyzed outcomes after 24 h (Fig. 1g). Solvent injections did not cause preterm birth or embryo resorption in any groups, confirming that maternal iron loading by itself does not cause severe damage to embryos. In dams with normal iron status, E15.5 LPS injection caused preterm birth in 50% of dams, but embryos appeared normal with only 2% lethality (Fig. 1h–k). In iron-loaded dams, however, LPS injection induced much higher embryonic lethality: 43% in dietary iron-loaded dams (P = 0.003), and 88% in hepcidin KO dams (P < 0.001) (Fig. 1g–k). Similar to the E8.5 LPS treatment group, we observed mild decreases in E16.5 placental weights in the iron-adequate and hepcidin KO group after E15.5 LPS treatment (Supplementary Fig. 1i). Collectively, these data show that maternal iron excess, elicited by dietary or genetic means, potentiates the adverse effects of systemic inflammation during pregnancy.
LPS is a component of Gram-negative bacteria but numerous viral and bacterial infections during pregnancy are known to cause adverse outcomes41,42. We tested if high maternal iron potentiates adverse outcomes in dams injected with different pathogen-associated molecules (PAMPs). Iron-adequate wild-type and hepcidin KO dams were treated with polyinosinic:polycytidylic acid, lipoteichoic acid, pam3csk4, or flagellin on E15.5, and outcomes were analyzed on E16.5 (Supplementary Table 1). In order to study synergy with iron excess, we chose doses that were lower than those previously reported to trigger preterm birth in iron-adequate mice43, but most were sufficient to induce maternal inflammation comparable to the LPS group as measured by liver Saa1 expression (Supplementary Table 1). However, these PAMPS had no obvious detectable effects on mouse pregnancy compared to the severe outcomes with LPS. We did not observe preterm birth nor adverse embryo outcomes in either iron-adequate or iron-loaded dams, but we did not evaluate subtler or delayed phenotypes such as behavioral deficits, delayed embryo loss or stillbirth at term since the pregnancies did not continue past 24 h of PAMP injection. It is also possible that different PAMPs induce different cytokine profiles. It remains to be determined whether higher PAMP doses or live infections would synergize with iron excess.
To address the underlying mechanisms of adverse synergy observed in the LPS model, we examined if maternal iron loading augments the inflammatory response in the dam, placenta, and embryo. Multiplex analysis of 32 cytokines in maternal serum showed that although 24 cytokines were induced by LPS within 6 h, the induction was similar between iron-adequate and iron-loaded dams (either dietary-loaded or hepcidin KOs), including TNFα, IL6, IL1β, and IL10 (Supplementary Fig. 2a–d). In the placenta, Tnf and Il6 expression increased 6 h after LPS independently of iron status (Supplementary Fig. 2e, f). To obtain enough volume for embryo serum cytokine analysis, a separate cohort of iron-adequate and iron-loaded dams were injected with LPS on E17.5 for 6 h and embryo serum was pooled from each litter. Out of 32 cytokines measured, only IL6 and GCSF (Supplementary Fig. 2g, h) increased in embryo serum but this was independent of maternal iron status. We did not detect any increases in embryo serum TNFα, IL1β, or IL10 (Supplementary Fig. 2i–k). LPS was undetectable in embryo serum after subcutaneous injection in the dam on E17.5 (Supplementary Fig. 3a), suggesting that at least for the E15.5 time point, LPS likely did not cross the placenta to directly cause embryotoxicity.
Collectively, our data show that LPS injection induces acute, transient inflammation that is primarily restricted to the dam and placenta and is independent of maternal iron status. Thus, differential activation of maternal inflammatory pathways is not responsible for the synergistic effects observed with maternal iron excess and systemic inflammation.
We next measured maternal progesterone, as premature progesterone withdrawal triggers preterm birth in mice44. LPS treatment induced progesterone withdrawal within 6 h regardless of iron status (Supplementary Fig. 3b), consistent with the incidence of preterm birth observed in Fig. 1i. Additionally, since high iron is associated with oxidative stress, we measured malondialdehyde (MDA) in maternal serum. There was no difference in MDA between iron-adequate and iron-loaded groups at baseline or 6 h after LPS. MDA was elevated in iron-loaded dams 24 h after LPS treatment (Supplementary Fig. 3c), suggesting that the increase in MDA is not a causative factor leading to embryo demise but rather a consequence of embryo resorption. These data suggest that neither maternal progesterone changes nor maternal systemic oxidative stress are responsible for the adverse synergy between iron excess and inflammation.
Adverse synergy between maternal iron excess and inflammation targets placental and embryo endothelium to cause its apoptosis
We performed a screen of activated cell death pathways in placentas and embryo tissues. No iron-dependent difference was observed in protein levels of pyroptotic markers IL1β or cleaved caspase-1, mRNA for the NLRP3 component of inflammasome, lipid peroxidation marker MDA, or putative ferroptosis marker Ptgs2 (Supplementary Fig. 3d–k). To assess oxidative stress, we measured expression of the NRF2 target gene Nqo1, as a marker of antioxidant pathway activation. Nqo1 expression in embryo liver did not differ between iron-adequate and loaded groups (Supplementary Fig. 3l). In whole placentas, Nqo1 was moderately increased in the iron-loaded group 6 and 24 h after LPS treatment (both P < 0.001) (Supplementary Fig. 3m). Similarly, Hmox1 was moderately increased at baseline (P = 0.026) and 24 h after LPS treatment (P < 0.001) (Supplementary Fig. 3n), suggesting that iron loading and inflammation synergize to induce placental oxidative stress.
To examine apoptosis, we measured cleaved caspase-3, a canonical marker of programmed cell death. Placental cleaved caspase-3 was not increased after 6 h (Supplementary Fig. 3o), however, 24 h after maternal LPS injection, cleaved caspase-3 increased in placenta and embryo liver in iron-loaded, inflamed pregnancies (Fig. 2a, b). TUNEL staining of placental sections confirmed increased cell death in the labyrinth layer only when the dam was both iron-loaded and LPS-injected (Fig. 2c), with a distribution pattern suggesting endothelial cell death. Co-staining of placental and whole embryo sections for cleaved caspase-3 and endothelial marker CD31 demonstrated colocalization of the two proteins in the placenta, embryo lung, heart, liver, and umbilical cord only in iron-loaded, inflamed pregnancy (Fig. 2d, Supplementary Fig. 4a), indicating that the adverse synergy targets the placental and embryo endothelial cells and causes their apoptosis. In some embryos, however, we observed widespread apoptosis in organs, and thus cannot exclude the possibility that cell types other than endothelial cells are also susceptible to the adverse interaction between iron and inflammation.
To identify the mechanisms leading to endothelial apoptosis, we used human umbilical vein endothelial cells (HUVEC), primary fetal endothelial cells from the umbilical cord, a tissue that was affected by endothelial apoptosis in the mouse model. HUVECs were treated with ferric ammonium citrate (FAC) to induce iron loading (confirmed by ferritin immunoblotting), then stimulated with cytokines IL6, IFNγ, IL1α, IL1β, and TNFα (Fig. 2e). All of these except IL1α were elevated in maternal circulation 6 h after LPS treatment, independently of the dam iron status. In HUVECs, IL6 and IFNγ did not induce cleaved caspase-3 in either solvent or iron-treated cells, whereas IL1α and IL1β did induce cleaved caspase-3 but similarly in solvent or iron-treated groups. Only the induction of cleaved caspase-3 by TNFα was strongly potentiated by iron loading (P < 0.001, Fig. 2e). Direct LPS treatment did not induce HUVEC cleaved caspase-3 (Supplementary Fig. 4b). The specificity of the interaction between iron and TNFα was demonstrated by treating HUVECs with other metals. Only iron but not copper or zinc potentiated TNFα induction of cleaved caspase-3 (Supplementary Fig. 4c). Furthermore, co-treating HUVECs with FAC and iron chelator deferoxamine prevented TNFα-mediated apoptosis (Supplementary Fig. 4d). Time course of apoptosis in solvent and FAC-treated HUVECs indicated that cleaved caspase-3 expression was potentiated in iron-laden cells as early as 6 h after TNFα treatment (P < 0.0001) (Supplementary Fig. 4e).
Collectively, our data show that iron accumulation sensitizes endothelial cells to TNFα-induced cell death.
Synergistic toxicity of iron and inflammation is mediated by maternal TNFα
Pathways leading to apoptosis are categorized into the extrinsic or death receptor pathway, and the intrinsic or mitochondrial pathway45, but both lead to caspase-3 cleavage. We did not detect any iron-dependent differences in cleaved caspase-9 or mitochondrial oxidative phosphorylation complexes in HUVECs treated with FAC and TNFα, or in placenta lysates from the iron-loaded, inflamed group (Supplementary Fig. 5a, b), further suggesting that iron excess alters the extrinsic apoptotic pathway.
We examined the contribution of TNFα in mediating embryo demise in vivo by treating pregnant iron-loaded hepcidin KO dams with TNFα-neutralizing antibody or control IgG antibody targeting trinitrophenol, prior to E15.5 LPS treatment (Fig. 3a). Importantly, in contrast to the control IgG group where LPS caused a high rate of embryo resorption, neutralizing TNFα nearly completely prevented embryo resorption and demise (P = 0.002, Fig. 3b). The specificity of TNFα-neutralizing antibody was confirmed in HUVECs: in iron-loaded cells, treatment with TNFα-neutralizing antibody prevented cleaved caspase-3 induction by TNFα but not IL1α or IL1β (Supplementary Fig. 6a). In pregnant hepcidin KO mice, neutralizing TNFα in maternal circulation had no effect on LPS-induced hepatic expression of serum amyloid A1 (Saa-1), Il6, Cxcl2, Ccl2, or Il1b, but reduced Cxcl9 expression (Fig. 3c–e, Supplementary Fig. 6b–d). This suggests that except for Cxcl9, the tested biomarkers are largely independent of TNFα. Thus, anti-TNFα therapy improved embryo outcomes despite the presence of systemic maternal inflammation from TNFα-independent cytokines. Placentas from dams treated with anti-TNFα therapy had lower expression of Tnf, Il6, Il1b, and Cxcl9 (all P < 0.01) (Fig. 3f–i), showing that anti-TNFα therapy attenuates placental inflammation. Importantly, neutralizing TNFα prevented placenta and embryo apoptosis as reflected by reduced caspase-3 cleavage in placentas (P = 0.009) and embryo livers (P = 0.029), and decreased TUNEL staining in placental sections (Fig. 3j–l). Co-staining shows that anti-TNFα prevented apoptosis of endothelial cells in the placenta, embryo heart, lung, and liver (Fig. 3m). These data confirm that maternal TNFα is the pathogenic factor causing endothelial apoptosis and embryo demise. Of note, we have not formally tested the role of TNFα-mediated apoptosis after E8.5 LPS injection, and it remains to be determined whether the same underlying mechanism leads to embryo demise even at this early time-point, when placenta is not fully formed and vascularized.
Maternal iron loading promotes oxidative stress in placental endothelial cells
To determine why endothelial cells from iron-loaded pregnancies are more susceptible to inflammation-induced apoptosis, we performed RNA-Seq of isolated placental endothelial cells from iron-adequate wild-type and iron-loaded hepcidin KO dams 6 h after solvent or LPS injection (Fig. 4a). Isolation of endothelial cells was confirmed by 80-fold enrichment of Cd31 mRNA (P < 0.0001) (Fig. 4b). Placental endothelial cells from hepcidin KO compared to wild-type dams had lower expression of iron-importer transferrin receptor (Tfrc, P = 0.014), indicative of cellular iron loading (Fig. 4c). Ingenuity pathway analysis of differentially expressed genes showed upregulation of reactive oxygen species and canonical inflammatory signaling pathways in endothelial cells from hepcidin KO dams compared to wild-type dams (Fig. 4d). After LPS treatment, endothelial cells from hepcidin KO dams compared to LPS-treated WT dams showed further enrichment in genes in oxidative stress pathways, namely reactive oxygen species, Nrf2-oxidative stress, and Hmgb1 signaling (Fig. 4e). This agrees with the finding that whole placenta oxidative stress was increased at baseline and after LPS treatment (Supplementary Fig. 3m, n). We treated HUVECs with NTBI, heme, and iron-rich ferritin to induce iron accumulation, which was confirmed by the reduction in TFRC (P < 0.0001) (Fig. 4f). All forms of iron caused over 2-fold induction in NQO1 and over 4-fold induction in HMOX1 expression compared to solvent-treated cells (Fig. 4g, h), indicative of oxidative stress. These data suggest that iron loading sensitizes endothelial cells to injury through oxidative stress and enhanced inflammatory signaling.
Synergistic toxicity of iron and inflammation is prevented by α-Tocopherol treatment
We tested the contribution of oxidative stress in iron-dependent cell death in HUVECs by treating iron-laden cells with vitamin E analog Trolox prior to TNFα stimulation. Iron loading potentiated TNFα-mediated apoptosis, which was rescued by Trolox pretreatment (Fig. 5a). To confirm the role of oxidative stress in mediating embryo demise in vivo, we treated pregnant iron-loaded hepcidin KO dams with antioxidant α-tocopherol, the most abundant isomer of vitamin E. Hepcidin KO dams were treated with subcutaneous α-tocopherol (100 µg/g) 14 and 2 h prior to LPS injection on E15.5 (Fig. 5b). Maternal pretreatment with α-tocopherol was completely protective against embryo demise (P = 0.001) (Fig. 5c). α-Tocopherol had no effect on maternal inflammation as shown by comparable hepatic expression of Il6, Il1b, Cxcl2, Cxcl10, Ccl2, and Cxcl9 (Fig. 5d, Supplementary Fig. 6e–i). Instead, maternal α-tocopherol treatment attenuated LPS-induced inflammation in the placenta, reflected by lower expression of Il1b, Cxcl2, Il6, Cxcl1, Ccl2, and Cxcl9 (Fig. 5e–g, Supplementary Fig. 6j-l). Notably, maternal α-Tocopherol treatment reduced expression of placental cleaved caspase-3 (P = 0.015), and prevented endothelial apoptosis in the placenta, embryo lung, and liver (Fig. 5h, i). Collectively, these data show that oxidative stress mediates endothelial apoptosis and embryotoxicity in iron-loaded and inflamed pregnancies.
Iron supplementation potentiates embryonic malformation and placental apoptosis in a mouse model of Western diet-induced obesity
To investigate if maternal iron excess adversely interacts with chronic inflammation during pregnancy, we used a mouse model of diet-induced obesity in WT and hepcidin KOs (Fig. 6a). WT C57BL/6 females were fed an iron-adequate Western diet (100 ppm iron) for 8 weeks, then half of the mice continued on the same Western diet (iron-adequate group), and the other half were switched to a high-iron Western diet (3700 ppm carbonyl iron) for 1–3 weeks (dietary iron loading group), then mated and fed the same diet in pregnancy. The third group (genetic iron loading) consisted of hepcidin KO females maintained on the iron-adequate Western diet for the same duration. Dams in all three Western diet groups weighed ~40% more at mating than their respective controls fed non-obesogenic standard diet or high iron diet (Fig. 6b). At E18.5, compared to iron-adequate dams, hepcidin KOs were most iron-loaded with >20-fold higher liver iron and >2-fold higher serum iron (both P < 0.001), whereas dietary iron-loaded dams had ~6-fold higher liver iron (P = 0.038) but no increase in serum iron (Supplementary Fig. 7a, b). Placental iron increased in both dietary-loaded and hepcidin KO groups (P < 0.05) (Supplementary Fig. 7c). Embryos were completely protected from iron loading and had liver iron and serum iron concentrations comparable to embryos from iron-adequate dams (Supplementary Fig. 7d, e).
Examination of embryos for gross malformations demonstrated higher incidence of adverse embryo outcomes when both maternal iron excess and obesity were present. Obesity in iron-adequate dams caused embryo complications including eye malformations in only ~6% of embryos (Fig. 6c–i). Dietary iron loading of obese dams caused complications in 41% of pregnancies (Fig. 6c), including embryo loss characterized by resorption or fatal subcutaneous hemorrhaging (P < 0.001) (Fig. 6d, e), with eye malformations affecting <5% of embryos (Fig. 6f–i). Obesity in the most iron-loaded hepcidin KO dams caused complications in 22% of pregnancies (P = 0.010) (Fig. 6c), and prominently caused eye malformations (P = 0.010, Fig. 6d–i). Interestingly, only anophthalmia was worsened by genetic iron loading of obese dams (P = 0.006), whereas microphthalmia was similar between the groups (Fig. 6g–i). Like our acute LPS model, we observed an increase in placental cleaved caspase-3 in iron-loaded obese dams (P = 0.028) (Fig. 6j), suggesting similarities in the pathogenic mechanism between our acute and chronic inflammation models. It remains to be determined whether additional, less visible embryo abnormalities, are also induced by iron excess in obese pregnancy.
Neutralizing maternal TNFα is protective against embryonic malformation induced by the combination of high maternal iron and Western diet
We evaluated if maternal exposure to high iron while on an obesogenic diet affected inflammation, as both obese humans and animal models are reported to have elevated TNFα and IL646–48. Clustering analysis of Luminex 32-plex cytokine panel in maternal serum from obese and lean mouse pregnancies with and without iron loading identified the most severe group—obese hepcidin KO dams—as having a distinct cytokine profile compared to the other groups and showed increases in TNFα and related cytokines (Fig. 7a). Elevated TNFα levels were confirmed in obese hepcidin KO dams (P = 0.017), but not in others (Fig. 7b). No differences in TNFα levels were found in sera from their embryos or amniotic fluid, or in placental Tnf expression (Fig. 7c–e), suggesting that maternal TNFα is the driver of embryonic complications. Thus, we treated hepcidin KO dams maintained on Western diet with neutralizing TNFα antibody or isotype control IgG antibody throughput pregnancy (E5.5, E8.5, E12.5, and E15.5) and analyzed embryo outcome at E18.5 (Fig. 7f). We observed eye malformations in embryos from obese hepcidin KO dams treated with IgG control, whereas neutralizing TNFα reduced the incidence of embryo eye malformations including a reduction in anophthalmia (P < 0.001) (Fig. 7g–j), confirming the role of maternal TNFα in mediating adverse embryo outcomes in iron-loaded, obese pregnancies.
Discussion
While the WHO recommends that all pregnant women take daily iron supplements49, the US Preventive Services Task Force concluded that there are insufficient data to assess the balance of benefits and harms of iron supplementation during pregnancy50. In developed countries, most women have sufficient iron stores, but women are still advised to take 30–60 mg elemental iron daily starting at the first prenatal visit3, even without screening for iron deficiency. We recently showed that the maternal homeostatic adaptations during pregnancy include suppression of the iron regulatory hormone hepcidin2, which would promote the rapid absorption of iron supplements, potentially exposing pregnant women to iron excess.
Maternal serum ferritin, a marker of body iron stores, shows a U-shaped risk curve where both low and high ferritin are associated with adverse pregnancy outcomes. However, ferritin is also induced by inflammation and does not accurately reflect iron stores in the setting of inflammation or infection. Thus, the association of high ferritin with adverse outcomes could reflect the pathogenic role of iron excess or inflammation, or the combination of both. We addressed this question and explored the relevant mechanisms using mouse models and identified an interaction between iron and inflammation. Our study demonstrates iron-dependent apoptotic injury in inflamed pregnancy and the potential consequences to embryo health and development when dams are concurrently exposed to iron overload and inflammation.
The interaction between iron overload and inflammation is surprising because uninflamed mice are resistant to tissue injury from even massive iron overload. We analyzed the consequences of pure iron excess in pregnancy by modeling two modes of iron loading. One model involved feeding mice high iron diet during pregnancy to mimic the common practice of iron supplementation of human pregnancy. The range of iron content in the mouse diet was proportionally similar to what is recommended to pregnant humans. In pregnant women, depending on the country and woman’s iron status, iron supplementation ranges from 30 to 200 mg of elemental iron per day51,52, up to 20-fold more than the daily dietary iron intake of ~10 mg53. In our purified diets, the iron content varied from 2500–5000 ppm iron, which is ~13–27-fold more than what is supplied in house diet (~185 ppm iron). Of note, iron exposure of mice in our study was much shorter (4 weeks) than in human pregnancy (several months). Our second model, hepcidin KO mice, a genetic model of iron overload, is representative of iron overload caused by hepcidin deficiency in human hemochromatosis. Other differences between murine and human iron homeostasis include proportionally greater dietary iron absorption as well as iron losses in mice than in humans, but also greater resistance of mice to iron-induced tissue toxicity54. In our study, both genetic and dietary maternal iron loading resulted in higher placental iron and embryo iron stores. Although consequences of fetal iron excess in humans are not fully understood, it has been suggested that excessive iron supplementation of infants may have adverse effects on growth, risk of infections, cognition, and brain development55. In the hepcidin KO model, we did not detect any phenotypic effect of maternal genetic iron loading on embryo development, and hepcidin KO mice are viable, survive until adulthood, and are fertile. With dietary iron-loading, we observed a small but insignificant increase in embryo subcutaneous hemorrhaging. Given the resistance of mice to iron excess, additional studies are needed to better determine the long-term effects on offspring of excess iron during human pregnancy.
When both iron excess and inflammation were present in pregnant animals, we found an adverse synergy that resulted in dire consequences for the fetus. In our LPS model of acute inflammation, both dietary and genetic loading were associated with high incidence of embryo mortality or malformations. In our model of diet-induced obesity, representing a milder chronic inflammatory state, we similarly observed that iron loading caused embryo subcutaneous hemorrhaging or malformations. Our data question the safety of iron supplementation in women with acute or chronic inflammation.
Importantly, we defined the mechanism underlying the adverse synergy between acute inflammation and maternal iron excess. Our animal models show that maternal iron excess increased oxidative stress in the whole placenta and specifically in placental endothelial cells, which was further exacerbated in the presence of inflammation. Iron-induced oxidative stress sensitized placenta and embryo endothelium to inflammation-induced apoptosis, ultimately resulting in fetal death or malformations. Although also iron-dependent, this mechanism is distinct from ferroptosis as it does not involve iron-dependent changes in markers of lipid peroxidation, Ptgs2, or MDA. Of note, treating dams with vitamin E isomer α-Tocopherol prior to the inflammatory insult completely prevented endothelial apoptosis and fetal demise, likely due to the attenuation of placental inflammation. Vitamin E exerts its broad cytoprotective effects as an antioxidant by scavenging reactive oxygen species, inhibiting caspase activity56,57, and reducing inflammation58–61. Although the WHO reports no beneficial effect of routine vitamin E supplementation for women with or without a high risk pregnancy62, our study suggests that acute vitamin E therapy may be specifically beneficial in pregnancies with underlying inflammation when the women are receiving iron supplementation. We speculate that the mechanism of iron-dependent apoptosis and its prevention by vitamin E supplementation apply beyond pregnancy, to broader clinical problems associated with endothelial dysfunction, oxidative stress, and inflammation, and expect that iron loading could similarly worsen outcomes in hypertension, sickle cell disease, renal failure, and other cardiovascular and metabolic diseases.
We demonstrated that TNFα was the pathogenic factor synergizing with maternal iron excess. TNFα is a pleiotropic cytokine that regulates diverse biological functions including cell growth, viral replication, septic shock, inflammation, and autoimmunity63, and aberrant TNFα production is associated with many inflammatory diseases in humans. Although both our acute inflammatory LPS model and chronic inflammatory obesity model resulted in similar adverse embryo outcomes and placental apoptosis, there seem to be differences in how iron excess alters TNFα signaling in acute and chronic inflammatory settings. In acute inflammation caused by LPS injection, there was no difference in maternal TNFα production between iron-adequate and iron-loaded dams. Thus, iron excess in our acute inflammatory model alters downstream TNFα signaling rather than TNFα production. In contrast, in our obesity model, genetic iron loading increased circulating TNFα levels in the dam but not in placentas or embryos, suggesting that maternal iron excess did modulate TNFα production. TNFα is produced by adipose tissue and its secretion correlates with the degree of adiposity64, suggesting that iron excess may further promote TNFα production by adipose tissue in obesity.
Interestingly, embryopathies in obese pregnancies differed depending on the model of iron loading. Although we do not know the cause, it is likely that the extent and timing of maternal iron loading as well as the severity of their inflammation may affect their embryotoxicity. Hepcidin deficiency was associated with more severe maternal tissue and serum iron overload compared to dietary iron loading (although placental iron loading was similar between the two models). Hepcidin deficiency likely also promotes iron loading earlier during pregnancy compared to dietary iron loading, considering that maternal hepcidin suppression in WT mice only occurs in the second part of pregnancy2. Furthermore, hepcidin KO obese dams had higher levels of cytokines at the end of pregnancy compared to mothers with dietary iron loading. Thus, any of these factors could contribute to the specific embryo outcomes.
Notably, maternal anti-TNFα therapy was sufficient to prevent embryotoxicity in iron-loaded pregnancies in either the acute LPS inflammatory model, or in obese mice. The development of anti-TNFα therapy has been indispensable for the treatment of several inflammatory-mediated autoimmune conditions65,66. Monoclonal anti-TNFα antibodies are considered safe during pregnancy, although they are actively transported across the placenta particularly in the third trimester67,68, and are detectable in newborns until 6 months post-partum67,69,70. Despite measurable levels in offspring, studies report no association between anti-TNFα concentrations in infants at birth and risk of infection or in reaching developmental milestones in the first year of life69,71.
In summary, we investigated the consequences of excess maternal iron during healthy and inflamed pregnancy and discovered an adverse interaction. Maternal iron excess, accrued through dietary or genetic means, potentiated the adverse effects of inflammation during pregnancy, causing embryo malformations and demise. We observed this synergy between iron and acute inflammation utilizing an LPS-induced sepsis model and with chronic mild inflammation caused by diet-induced obesity. We provide specific evidence that the interaction between iron excess and inflammation is dependent on TNFα signaling causing lethal apoptotic damage to endothelial cells in the embryo and the placenta which can be prevented by maternal antioxidant therapy. Our data suggest that pregnant women could be at risk for adverse birth outcomes when the mother is exposed to both high iron levels and systemic inflammation during pregnancy and underscores the importance of screening pregnant women for iron deficiency before recommending iron supplementation. Given the increasing prevalence of inflammatory disorders worldwide, and that iron supplementation of pregnant women is universal, our study raises important questions about the safety of indiscriminate iron supplementation in inflamed pregnancy. Our work also details the mechanistic signature of this type of iron-dependent injury and potential therapies that could ameliorate it. Future studies will assess whether iron also represents a modifiable factor to decrease detrimental effects of inflammation in conditions other than pregnancy.
Methods
Animals
All animal experiments were approved by the University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA) Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee and were carried out in accordance with the Guide for Care and Use of Laboratory Animals (National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD). The following strains of animals were maintained on a 12-h light–dark schedule in a temperature- (22–25 °C) and humidity-controlled environment: wild-type (WT) C57BL/6J (Jackson Laboratory, Bar Harbor, ME, stock #000664), and hepcidin-1 knockout (KO) mice on C57BL/6 J background72. Unless specified, mice received a standard diet (PicoLab Rodent Diet 20, 5053 Irradiated, 185 ppm iron). For purified diets, iron content was determined by ICP-MS (Veterinary Diagnostic Laboratory, Michigan State University).
To model maternal dietary iron overload, female WT mice were fed a purified high iron diet containing 2500–5000 ppm carbonyl iron (Envigo Teklad TD. 160249 and TD.08043) for 1–3 weeks prior to mating and for the duration of pregnancy. Non-pregnant controls were subjected to the same iron treatment and were age-matched to pregnant dams.
For maternal obesity studies, female WT and hepcidin KO mice were fed a Western diet containing 100-ppm ferric citrate (Envigo Teklad TD.180722) starting at 3 weeks of age. After 8 weeks, WT mice were fed a Western diet supplemented with 3700-ppm carbonyl iron (Envigo Teklad TD.180723) for 1 week prior to mating and throughout pregnancy. Dietary iron loaded dams were compared to WT mice (iron adequate, fed standard diet) and hepcidin knockout dams (genetic iron overload) maintained on Western diet. The Western diet contains 0.2% total cholesterol, saturated fat >60% of total fat (42% calories from fat), and high sucrose (43% calories from carbohydrate), and 15% calories from protein.
After the indicated treatments, placentas and embryos were dissected from the maternal uterus and embryos were euthanized by decapitation. Placentas and embryo tissues were snap-frozen, or whole embryos and placentas were formalin-fixed and stored until analysis. Depending on the analysis, 1–3 placenta and embryo samples were randomly selected from each litter, so that all litters were represented in the analysis. Since samples were randomly selected, in assays where both placental and fetal tissues were analyzed, samples were generally not matched. We did not include in the analyses those embryos that were collected outside the uterus as a result of preterm deliveries.
Embryo “adverse outcomes” were scored based on whether abnormalities were present but not based on severity of abnormality. The score of 0 was assigned to embryos with no abnormalities, and the score of 100 to embryos with any abnormalities, and then the litter average of adverse outcomes was determined. The term “embryo loss” includes embryo resorption or fatal hemorrhaging, but not embryo malformations. “Embryo malformations” includes anencephaly, anophthalmia, hernia, and cleft palate. During the harvesting of embryos, embryos with anophthalmia and/or anencephaly were scored as positive for encephalic malformations, and negative for cleft palate or hernia. Thus, embryos with both anophthalmia and anencephaly (which were sometimes observed together) received the same score as embryos with either condition alone.
Maternal systemic inflammation model
To induce inflammation in early gestation, pregnant mice on E8.5 were weighed and received a single subcutaneous injection of 0.5 µg/g LPS (Escherichia coli serotype O55:B5, Sigma-Aldrich L2880) or equivalent volume of sterile solvent as a control. Mice were weighed daily after injection, and mice that lost pregnancy weight gain were euthanized from E11.5-E18.5 to confirm embryo loss (miscarriage or resorption of embryos).
To induce inflammation in late gestation, pregnant mice on E15.5 received a single subcutaneous injection of LPS, 100 µg pam3csk4 (InvivoGen tlrl-pms), 30 µg flagellin (Bacillus subtilis, InvivoGen tlrl-bsfla), or single intravenous injection of 10 µg/g polyinosinic:polycytidylic acid (high molecular weight, InvivoGen tlrl-pic) or 10 µg/g lipotechoic acid (Staph aureus, InvivoGen tlrl-pslta). Preterm birth was recorded as the delivery of at least one pup within 24 h of injection. At the indicated times, mice were euthanized by isoflurane overdose and tissues collected for analysis.
For TNFα neutralizing experiments, pregnant E14.5 hepcidin KO dams received a single intravenous injection via the retroorbital sinus of 500 μg rat antibody targeting mouse TNFα (BioXCell) or rat IgG1 isotype control antibody targeting trinitrophenol (TNP, BioXCell) prior to LPS injection on E15.5 for 24 h. Pregnant hepcidin knockout dams fed a Western diet received intravenous injections of 250 μg of anti-TNFα or anti-TNP on E5.5, E8.5.5, E12.5, and E15.5, and mice were euthanized on E18.5. The antibodies are listed in Supplementary Table 2.
For antioxidant experiments, pregnant hepcidin KO dams received subcutaneous injections of 100 µg/g (±)-α-Tocopherol phosphate disodium salt (Sigma T2020) 14 and 2 h prior to LPS injection on E15.5 for 24 h.
Cytokine and chemokine analysis
Cytokine and chemokine analyses were performed by the UCLA Integrated Molecular Technologies Core using a multiplex bead immunoassay (Millipore Milliplex Cytokine/Chemokine 32-plex Kit on Luminex FlexMap3D). Levels of mouse cytokines interleukin (IL)-1α, IL-1β, IL-2, IL-3, IL-4, IL-5, IL-6, IL-7, IL-9, IL-10, IL-12 (p40), IL-12 (p70), IL-13, IL-15, IL-17, leukemia inhibitory factor (LIF), interferon (IFN)-γ, and tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-α; chemokines interferon-inducible protein (IP)-10, keratinocyte derived chemokine (KC), LPS-induced CXC chemokine (LIX), monocyte chemotactic protein (MCP)-1, and Eotaxin/CCL11; colony-stimulating factors (CSF) macrophage (M)-CSF, monocyte induced by gamma-interferon (MIG), macrophage inflammatory protein (MIP)-1α, MIP-1β, MIP-2, regulated on activation normal T cells expressed and secreted (RANTES), granulocyte (G), granulocyte macrophage (GM)-CSF, and vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), were quantified in maternal serum 6 and 24 h after E15.5 LPS injection. For embryo serum, a separate cohort of dams were treated on E17.5 for 6 h and embryo serum from each litter was pooled to generate sufficient volume for analysis. For Western diet mouse experiments, cytokines in maternal serum collected on E18.5 were determined by the multiplex ELISA, and TNFα in pooled embryo serum and amniotic fluid was determined by a separate ELISA (Biolegend 430901) following the manufacturer’s instructions.
Histopathology and immunohistochemistry
Placentas and whole embryos were fixed in 10% neutral buffered formalin for 48 h at room temperature, rinsed once in distilled water, and stored in 70% ethanol until processing. The tissues were paraffin-embedded and sectioned at 4 µm thickness by the UCLA Translational Pathology Core Laboratory. Prior to staining, sections were heated for 45 min at 50 °C and deparaffinized through serial changes of xylenes and ethanol and rehydrated to distilled water.
For TUNEL staining, tissue sections were processed using ApopTag Plus Peroxidase in situ Apoptosis Detection Kit (EMD Millipore #S7101) following the manufacturer’s instructions.
For immunohistochemistry, antigen retrieval was performed by boiling in Tris-EDTA (10 mM Tris base 1 mM disodium EDTA dihydrate, pH 9.0) for 10 min. Sections were quenched with BLOXALL (Vector Laboratories SP-6000) for 10 min and washed with TBS containing 0.1% Tween-20. Blocking was performed using 2.5% normal horse serum in PBS. Sections were incubated with primary antibodies in blocking buffer at 4 °C overnight in a humidified chamber. Negative control sections were incubated with normal IgG from the same species and at the same concentrations as primary antibodies. The secondary reaction was performed using ImmPRESS IgG (Vector Laboratories) conjugated to horseradish peroxidase (HRP) or alkaline peroxidase (AP). HRP and AP were developed using DAB and vector red per the manufacturer’s instructions (Vector Laboratories). Sections were counterstained with Gill’s hematoxylin. Light microscopy images were captured by a digital camera (Spot Imaging). The antibodies are listed in Supplementary Table 2.
Cell culture
Primary human umbilical vein endothelial cells (HUVECs) pooled from 10 donors were obtained from ATCC (ATCC PCS-100-013) and cultured in complete endothelial cell growth medium (Cell Applications #211-500) at 37 °C in a 5% CO2 95% air atmosphere. For experiments, HUVECs were seeded at 1 × 105/well on collagen-coated plates (Corning BioCoat). All experiments were performed from passages 3 to 5.
For iron loading experiments, HUVECs were plated in regular media or media supplemented with 100 μM ferric ammonium citrate (FAC) (MP biomedicals #158040), or cupric chloride (Sigma #C-6917), or zinc sulfate (Fisher #Z-58) for 24 h. For iron depletion studies, HUVECs were treated with 100 µM FAC with and without 100 µM deferoxamine (Sigma D9533) for 24 h. The optimal time of culture was based on preliminary concentration and time-dependence studies.
For inflammation studies, HUVECs were treated with solvent, 2 mg/ml LPS O55:B5, or 50 ng/mL recombinant human IL6 (R&D Systems #206-IL), IFNγ (PeproTech #300-02), IL1α (PeproTech #200-01 A), IL1β (PeproTech #200-01B), or TNFα (Biolegend #570102) for the indicated time points. The optimal time of culture with cytokines was based on preliminary concentration and time-dependence studies.
For TNFα neutralizing experiments, HUVECs were treated with 100 µM FAC and 1 µg human TNFα neutralizing antibody (listed in Supplementary Table 2) for 24 h and stimulated with 50 ng/ml IL-1α, IL-1β, or TNFα for 16 h.
RNA-Sequencing
RNA-Sequencing was performed by the UCLA Technology Center for Genomics & Bioinformatics on endothelial cells isolated from mouse placentas. Briefly, 5 placentas/dam were pooled, and endothelial cells were isolated by magnetic separation using the MidiMACS system following the manufacturer’s instructions (Miltenyi #130-095-927, #130-097-418). Total RNA was extracted using a RNeasy Micro kit (Qiagen) following the manufacturer’s instructions. Expression data were analyzed by comparing cells from the following groups of mice: iron adequate (WT) and iron loaded (HKO) pregnant mice injected on E15.5 with solvent or 0.5 µg/g LPS for 6 h (n = 4 dams/group). Data were sequenced on Illumina HiSeq 3000 for a single-read 50 bp run, and depth of coverage was 2 lanes for >30 million reads/sample. Partek flow and Ingenuity Pathway Analysis (IPA) were used for bioinformatics methods and data analysis, respectively. The reads were mapped to the latest UCSC transcript set using STAR-2.6.1d. The Partek E/M was used to quantify reads to an annotation model. After obtaining gene counts, the counts were normalized by TPM. The Principal Component Analysis was applied to the transcript counts. The differential gene expressions were examined using DESeq2 algorithm. Canonical pathway analysis was performed by IPA using significantly differentially expressed genes (genes filtered by P < 0.05).
Non-heme iron measurements
Serum was obtained from maternal and embryo blood by centrifugation at 2700 × g for 10 min. Serum iron concentration was measured by colorimetric spectrophotometry using an iron calibrator (Iron-SL, Sekisui Diagnostics 157-30)73, excluding hemolyzed samples. For maternal liver iron measurements, 75 μL of whole liver homogenate was weighed and incubated in 1125 μL protein precipitation solution (0.53 N HCl 5.3% trichloroacetic acid) at 100 °C for 1 h. For embryo tissue iron measurements, half of each placenta and liver were weighed and homogenized in 1200 μL protein precipitation solution prior to boiling. Samples were centrifuged at 17,000 × g for 10 min and the supernatant was analyzed by colorimetric spectrophotometry using an iron standard (1000-ppm iron in 3% HCl, Ricca Chemical Company).
Serum endotoxin assay
Endotoxin in maternal and embryo serum was determined by a limulus amebocyte assay kit following the manufacturer’s instructions (BioWhittaker #50-648U).
Serum progesterone assay
Progesterone in maternal serum was measured by ELISA according to the manufacturer’s instructions (Cayman Chemicals #582601).
Lipid peroxidation assay
Lipid peroxidation was quantified in serum and embryonic tissues by colorimetric spectrophotometry using the Thiobarbituric Acid Reactive Substances (TCA Method) Assay Kit (Cayman Chemicals #700870) following the manufacturer’s instructions.
Western blot analysis
Placenta pieces from pregnant mice treated with LPS or solvent on E15.5 were homogenized in RIPA lysis buffer with freshly added protease inhibitor cocktail (Santa Cruz #24948). For cell culture experiments, HUVECs were lysed in RIPA buffer by mechanical disruption. Tissue and cell lysates were centrifuged at 17,000 × g for 15 min at 4 °C and protein concentration was measured by the bicinchoninic acid assay using bovine serum albumin as a standard. Proteins from placentas (30 μg/lane) and HUVECs (20 μg/lane) were separated by SDS-PAGE and transferred to nitrocellulose membranes. Membranes were blocked for 1 h in 5% w/v dried nonfat milk or bovine serum albumin in TBS with 0.1% Tween-20 and incubated with primary antibodies in blocking buffer overnight at 4 °C The secondary reaction was performed using HRP-conjugated anti-rabbit IgG diluted in blocking buffer. Protein blots were visualized by chemiluminescence using the ChemiDoc XRS+ imaging system and quantified using Image Lab software (Bio-RAD). The antibodies, dilutions, and catalog numbers are listed in Supplementary Table 2.
Gene expression quantification by RT-PCR
Frozen mouse tissues or cell cultures were homogenized in TRIzol Reagent (Life Technologies) and total RNA was isolated by chloroform extraction. One μg (mouse tissues) or 500 ng (cell cultures) of RNA was reverse transcribed using the iScript cDNA Synthesis Kit (Bio-RAD). Quantitative real-time PCR was performed on cDNA using SsoAdvanced SYBR Green Supermix (Bio-RAD) on the CFX Real-Time PCR Detection System (Bio-RAD). Samples were measured in duplicate and target genes were normalized to Rpl4 or Hprt. Data are expressed as 2−∆∆Ct. The primers are listed in Supplementary Table 3.
Statistical analysis
Statistical analysis was performed using GraphPad Prism 9. Data are presented as individual values representing the mean ± SEM. Statistical differences between groups were determined by one-way ANOVA followed by Holm-Sidak for multiple comparisons for normally distributed values, one-way ANOVA on ranks followed by Dunn’s method for multiple comparisons of non-normally distributed values, two-tailed student’s t-test for normally distributed values, Mann–Whitney U test for non-normally distributed values, or Fisher’s exact test. Shapiro-Wilk test was used to test normality. Statistical test, number of animals in each group, experimental replicates, and P-value are indicated in each figure panel or legend. A P-value of <0.05 was considered significant.
Reporting summary
Further information on research design is available in the Nature Research Reporting Summary linked to this article.
Supplementary information
Acknowledgements
The authors thank Victoria Gabayan for her assistance with animal experiments; Emmanuelle Faure-Kumar and the UCLA Integrated Molecular Technologies Core for performing the multiplex cytokine assay; the UCLA Translational Pathology Core Laboratory for histology processing; the UCLA Technology Center for Genomics & Bioinformatics for performing RNA-Seq. This study was supported by the Executive Advisory Board of the Iris Cantor–UCLA Women’s Health Center and National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences UCLA Clinical and Translational Science Institute grants UL1TR0001881 and UL1TR000124 (to E.N.), NIH grant R01 HD096863 (to E.N.), NIH Ruth L. Kirschstein National Research Service Awards T32GM065823 and F31HD097931 (to A.F.).
Source data
Author contributions
A..L.F. designed and performed experiments, analyzed data, and wrote the manuscript. V.S. performed experiments and assisted with data interpretation. K.B. performed experiments. N.J.P. assisted with data analysis. T.G. and E.N. conceived the project, analyzed data, and wrote the manuscript.
Data availability
All data are included in this published article and its Supplementary Information files. The RNA-Seq data that support the findings of this study have been deposited in the NCBI Gene Expression Omnibus74 and are accessible through the GEO Series accession number GSE153528. Source data are provided with this paper.
Competing interests
T.G. and E.N. are shareholders of and scientific advisors for Intrinsic LifeSciences and Silarus Therapeutics and consultants for Ionis Pharmaceuticals, Protagonist, and Vifor. T.G. is a consultant for Akebia. All other authors declare no competing interests.
Footnotes
Peer review information Nature Communications thanks Stephen Renaud and the other, anonymous, reviewer(s) for their contribution to the peer review of this work. Peer reviewer reports are available.
Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary information
The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1038/s41467-021-24333-z.
References
- 1.Fisher AL, Nemeth E. Iron homeostasis during pregnancy. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 2017;106:1567S–1574S. doi: 10.3945/ajcn.117.155812. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Sangkhae V, et al. Effects of maternal iron status on placental and fetal iron homeostasis. J. Clin. Invest. 2020;130:625–640. doi: 10.1172/JCI127341. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Breymann C. Iron deficiency anemia in pregnancy. Semin. Hematol. 2015;52:339–347. doi: 10.1053/j.seminhematol.2015.07.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Le CHH. The prevalence of anemia and moderate-severe anemia in the US population (NHANES 2003-2012) PLoS ONE. 2016;11:e0166635. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0166635. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.WHO. Iron Deficiency Anaemia: Assesment, Prevention and Control: a Guide for Programme Managers. (World Health Organization, 2001).
- 6.Breuer W, et al. The assessment of serum nontransferrin-bound iron in chelation therapy and iron supplementation. Blood. 2000;95:2975–2982. doi: 10.1182/blood.V95.9.2975.009k03_2975_2982. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Emerit J, Beaumont C, Trivin F. Iron metabolism, free radicals, and oxidative injury. Biomed. Pharmacother. 2001;55:333–339. doi: 10.1016/S0753-3322(01)00068-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Tuck SM, Jensen CE, Wonke B, Yardumian A. Pregnancy management and outcomes in women with thalassaemia major. J. Pediatr. Endocrinol. Metab. 1998;11:923–928. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Fozza C, et al. Pregnancy outcome among women with beta-thalassemia major in North Sardinia. Acta Haematol. 2017;138:166–167. doi: 10.1159/000480450. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Baron J, Ben-David G, Hallak M. Changes in non-transferrin-bound iron (NTBI) in pregnant women on iron supplements. Eur. J. Obstet. Gynecol. Reprod. Biol. 2008;140:281–282. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2008.01.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Rawal S, et al. A longitudinal study of iron status during pregnancy and the risk of gestational diabetes: findings from a prospective, multiracial cohort. Diabetologia. 2017;60:249–257. doi: 10.1007/s00125-016-4149-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Scholl TO. Iron status during pregnancy: setting the stage for mother and infant. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 2005;81:1218S–1222S. doi: 10.1093/ajcn/81.5.1218. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Scholl TO, Reilly T. Anemia, iron and pregnancy outcome. J. Nutr. 2000;130:443S–447S. doi: 10.1093/jn/130.2.443S. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Khambalia AZ, et al. High maternal iron status, dietary iron intake and iron supplement use in pregnancy and risk of gestational diabetes mellitus: a prospective study and systematic review. Diabet. Med. 2016;33:1211–1221. doi: 10.1111/dme.13056. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Guo W, et al. Analysis of the correlation of gestational diabetes mellitus and peripheral ferritin with iron levels in early pregnancy. Minerva Endocrinol. 2019;44:91–96. doi: 10.23736/S0391-1977.18.02734-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Lao TT, Chan PL, Tam KF. Gestational diabetes mellitus in the last trimester—a feature of maternal iron excess? Diabet. Med. 2001;18:218–223. doi: 10.1046/j.1464-5491.2001.00453.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Hou J, Cliver SP, Tamura T, Johnston KE, Goldenberg R. Maternal serum ferritin and fetal growth. Obstet. Gynecol. 2000;95:447–452. doi: 10.1016/s0029-7844(99)00562-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Gonzales GF, Steenland K, Tapia V. Maternal hemoglobin level and fetal outcome at low and high altitudes. Am. J. Physiol. Regulatory, Integr. Comp. Physiol. 2009;297:R1477–R1485. doi: 10.1152/ajpregu.00275.2009. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Knottnerus JA, Delgado LR, Knipschild PG, Essed GG, Smits F. Haematologic parameters and pregnancy outcome. A prospective cohort study in the third trimester. J. Clin. Epidemiol. 1990;43:461–466. doi: 10.1016/0895-4356(90)90134-B. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Mamun AA, Padmadas SS, Khatun M. Maternal health during pregnancy and perinatal mortality in Bangladesh: evidence from a large-scale community-based clinical trial. Paediatr. Perinat. Epidemiol. 2006;20:482–490. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-3016.2006.00752.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Scanlon KS, Yip R, Schieve LA, Cogswell ME. High and low hemoglobin levels during pregnancy: differential risks for preterm birth and small for gestational age. Obstet. Gynecol. 2000;96:741–748. doi: 10.1016/s0029-7844(00)00982-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Stephansson O, Dickman PW, Johansson A, Cnattingius S. Maternal hemoglobin concentration during pregnancy and risk of stillbirth. JAMA. 2000;284:2611–2617. doi: 10.1001/jama.284.20.2611. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Khambalia AZ, et al. High maternal serum ferritin in early pregnancy and risk of spontaneous preterm birth. Br. J. Nutr. 2015;114:455–461. doi: 10.1017/S0007114515001932. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Xiao R, et al. Maternal second-trimester serum ferritin concentrations and subsequent risk of preterm delivery. Paediatr. Perinat. Epidemiol. 2002;16:297–304. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-3016.2002.00448.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Lao TT, Tam K-F, Chan LY. Third trimester iron status and pregnancy outcome in non-anaemic women; pregnancy unfavourably affected by maternal iron excess. Hum. Reprod. 2000;15:1843–1848. doi: 10.1093/humrep/15.8.1843. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Jones KL, et al. Autism with intellectual disability is associated with increased levels of maternal cytokines and chemokines during gestation. Mol. Psychiatry. 2017;22:273–279. doi: 10.1038/mp.2016.77. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Allswede, D. M., Yolken, R. H., Buka, S. L. & Cannon, T. D. Cytokine concentrations throughout pregnancy and risk for psychosis in adult offspring: a longitudinal case-control study. Lancet Psychiatry, 10.1016/S2215-0366(20)30006-7 (2020). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 28.Ginsberg Y, et al. Maternal infection requiring hospitalization during pregnancy and attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder in offspring: a quasi-experimental family-based study. J. Child Psychol. Psychiatry. 2019;60:160–168. doi: 10.1111/jcpp.12959. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Atladottir HO, et al. Maternal infection requiring hospitalization during pregnancy and autism spectrum disorders. J. Autism Dev. Disord. 2010;40:1423–1430. doi: 10.1007/s10803-010-1006-y. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Catalano PM, Shankar K. Obesity and pregnancy: mechanisms of short term and long term adverse consequences for mother and child. BMJ. 2017;356:j1. doi: 10.1136/bmj.j1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Sanchez CE, et al. Maternal pre-pregnancy obesity and child neurodevelopmental outcomes: a meta-analysis. Obes. Rev. 2018;19:464–484. doi: 10.1111/obr.12643. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Choi GB, et al. The maternal interleukin-17a pathway in mice promotes autism-like phenotypes in offspring. Science. 2016;351:933–939. doi: 10.1126/science.aad0314. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Hsiao EY, Patterson PH. Activation of the maternal immune system induces endocrine changes in the placenta via IL-6. Brain Behav. Immun. 2011;25:604–615. doi: 10.1016/j.bbi.2010.12.017. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Wu W-L, Hsiao EY, Yan Z, Mazmanian SK, Patterson PH. The placental interleukin-6 signaling controls fetal brain development and behavior. Brain, Behav., Immun. 2017;62:11–23. doi: 10.1016/j.bbi.2016.11.007. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Garay PA, Hsiao EY, Patterson PH, McAllister AK. Maternal immune activation causes age- and region-specific changes in brain cytokines in offspring throughout development. Brain Behav. Immun. 2013;31:54–68. doi: 10.1016/j.bbi.2012.07.008. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Gücer F, et al. Maternal serum levels of tumor necrosis factor-α and interleukin-2 receptor in threatened abortion: a comparison with normal and pathologic pregnancies. Fertil. Steril. 2001;76:707–711. doi: 10.1016/S0015-0282(01)02002-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Kaislasuo, J. et al. IL-10 to TNFalpha ratios throughout early first trimester can discriminate healthy pregnancies from pregnancy losses. Am. J. Reprod. Immunol. 83, e13195 (2019). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 38.Brown AS, et al. Elevated maternal interleukin-8 levels and risk of schizophrenia in adult offspring. Am. J. Psychiatry. 2004;161:889–895. doi: 10.1176/appi.ajp.161.5.889. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Buka SL, et al. Maternal cytokine levels during pregnancy and adult psychosis. Brain Behav. Immun. 2001;15:411–420. doi: 10.1006/brbi.2001.0644. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Canetta S, et al. Elevated maternal C-reactive protein and increased risk of schizophrenia in a national birth cohort. Am. J. Psychiatry. 2014;171:960–968. doi: 10.1176/appi.ajp.2014.13121579. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Racicot K, Mor G. Risks associated with viral infections during pregnancy. J. Clin. Investig. 2017;127:1591–1599. doi: 10.1172/JCI87490. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Adams Waldorf KM, McAdams RM. Influence of infection during pregnancy on fetal development. Reproduction. 2013;146:R151–R162. doi: 10.1530/REP-13-0232. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Ilievski V, Lu S-J, Hirsch E. Activation of toll-like receptors 2 or 3 and preterm delivery in the mouse. Reprod. Sci. 2007;14:315–320. doi: 10.1177/1933719107302959. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Dudley DJ, Branch DW, Edwin SS, Mitchell MD. Induction of preterm birth in mice by RU486. Biol. Reprod. 1996;55:992–995. doi: 10.1095/biolreprod55.5.992. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Elmore S. Apoptosis: a review of programmed cell death. Toxicol. Pathol. 2007;35:495–516. doi: 10.1080/01926230701320337. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Aronson D, et al. Obesity is the major determinant of elevated C-reactive protein in subjects with the metabolic syndrome. Int J. Obes. Relat. Metab. Disord. 2004;28:674–679. doi: 10.1038/sj.ijo.0802609. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Katsuki A, et al. Serum levels of tumor necrosis factor-α are increased in obese patients with noninsulin-dependent diabetes mellitus1. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 1998;83:859–862. doi: 10.1210/jcem.83.3.4618. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Roytblat L, et al. Raised interleukin-6 levels in obese patients. Obes. Res. 2000;8:673–675. doi: 10.1038/oby.2000.86. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.WHO. WHO Recommendations on Antenatal Care for a Positive Pregnancy Experience. (World Health Organization, 2016). [PubMed]
- 50.Siu AL, U.S. Preventive Services Task Force Screening for iron deficiency anemia and iron supplementation in pregnant women to improve maternal health and birth outcomes: U.S. Preventive Services Task Force Recommendation Statement. Ann. Intern. Med. 2015;163:529–536. doi: 10.7326/M15-1707. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Stoffel NU, von Siebenthal HK, Moretti D, Zimmermann MB. Oral iron supplementation in iron-deficient women: How much and how often? Mol. Asp. Med. 2020;75:100865. doi: 10.1016/j.mam.2020.100865. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.WHO. Daily iron and folic acid supplementation during pregnancy, http://www.who.int/elena/titles/daily_iron_pregnancy/en/ (2016).
- 53.USDA Agricultural Research Group Food Surveys Research Group. What We Eat in America, NHANES 2011-2012, Day 1 Food and Supplement Intake Data, https://www.ars.usda.gov/northeast-area/beltsville-md/beltsville-human-nutrition-research-center/food-surveys-research-group/ (2014).
- 54.Wang X, Garrick MD, Collins JF. Animal models of normal and disturbed iron and copper metabolism. J. Nutr. 2019;149:2085–2100. doi: 10.1093/jn/nxz172. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Domellof M. Benefits and harms of iron supplementation in iron-deficient and iron-sufficient children. Nestle Nutr. Workshop Ser. Pediatr. Program. 2010;65:153–162. discussion 162-155. doi: 10.1159/000281159. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Uemura M, et al. Alpha-tocopherol prevents apoptosis of vascular endothelial cells via a mechanism exceeding that of mere antioxidation. Eur. J. Pharm. 2002;456:29–37. doi: 10.1016/S0014-2999(02)02639-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Wu D, et al. Vitamin E reversed apoptosis of cardiomyocytes induced by exposure to high dose formaldehyde during mice pregnancy. Int Heart J. 2017;58:769–777. doi: 10.1536/ihj.16-279. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58.Wu D, et al. Effects of vitamin E on reproductive protection in pregnant mice infected with pseudorabies virus (PRV) via regulating expression of Toll-like receptors (TLRs) and cytokine balance. J. Nutr. Sci. Vitaminol. (Tokyo) 2010;56:353–363. doi: 10.3177/jnsv.56.353. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59.Li C-J, Li RW, Kahl S, Elsasser TH. Alpha-tocopherol alters transcription activities that modulates tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNF-α) Induced inflammatory response in bovine cells. Gene Regul. Syst. Bio. 2012;6:1–14. doi: 10.4137/GRSB.S8303. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60.Devaraj S, Jialal I. Alpha-tocopherol decreases tumor necrosis factor-alpha mRNA and protein from activated human monocytes by inhibition of 5-lipoxygenase. Free Radic. Biol. Med. 2005;38:1212–1220. doi: 10.1016/j.freeradbiomed.2005.01.009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61.Huey KA, Fiscus G, Richwine AF, Johnson RW, Meador BM. In vivo vitamin E administration attenuates interleukin-6 and interleukin-1beta responses to an acute inflammatory insult in mouse skeletal and cardiac muscle. Exp. Physiol. 2008;93:1263–1272. doi: 10.1113/expphysiol.2008.043190. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62.Rumbold, A., Ota, E., Hori, H., Miyazaki, C. & Crowther, C. A. Vitamin E supplementation in pregnancy. Cochrane. Database. Syst. Rev.10.1002/14651858.CD004069.pub3 (2015). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 63.Aggarwal BB, Gupta SC, Kim JH. Historical perspectives on tumor necrosis factor and its superfamily: 25 years later, a golden journey. Blood. 2012;119:651–665. doi: 10.1182/blood-2011-04-325225. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 64.Tzanavari T, Giannogonas P, Karalis KP. TNF-alpha and obesity. Curr. Dir. Autoimmun. 2010;11:145–156. doi: 10.1159/000289203. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 65.Berns M, Hommes DW. Anti-TNF-alpha therapies for the treatment of Crohn’s disease: the past, present and future. Expert Opin. Investig. Drugs. 2016;25:129–143. doi: 10.1517/13543784.2016.1126247. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 66.Dretzke J, et al. A systematic review and economic evaluation of the use of tumour necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-alpha) inhibitors, adalimumab and infliximab, for Crohn’s disease. Health Technol. Assess. 2011;15:1–244. doi: 10.3310/hta15060. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 67.Mahadevan U, et al. Placental transfer of anti-tumor necrosis factor agents in pregnant patients with inflammatory bowel disease. Clin. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 2013;11:286–292. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2012.11.011. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 68.Kane SV, Acquah LA. Placental transport of immunoglobulins: a clinical review for gastroenterologists who prescribe therapeutic monoclonal antibodies to women during conception and pregnancy. Am. J. Gastroenterol. 2009;104:228–233. doi: 10.1038/ajg.2008.71. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 69.Julsgaard M, et al. Concentrations of adalimumab and infliximab in mothers and newborns, and effects on infection. Gastroenterology. 2016;151:110–119. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2016.04.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 70.Esteve-Solé, A. et al. Immunological changes in blood of newborns exposed to anti-TNF-α during Pregnancy. Front. Immunol.10.3389/fimmu.2017.01123 (2017). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 71.Mahadevan, U. et al. 1 Achievement of developmental milestones among offspring of women with inflammatory bowel disease: The PIANO Registry. Gastroenterology146, S–1 (2014).
- 72.Lesbordes-Brion JC, et al. Targeted disruption of the hepcidin 1 gene results in severe hemochromatosis. Blood. 2006;108:1402–1405. doi: 10.1182/blood-2006-02-003376. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 73.Fisher, A. L. et al. Fetal and amniotic fluid iron homeostasis in healthy and complicated murine, macaque, and human pregnancy. JCI Insight10.1172/jci.insight.135321 (2020). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 74.Edgar R, Domrachev M, Lash AE. Gene Expression Omnibus: NCBI gene expression and hybridization array data repository. Nucleic Acids Res. 2002;30:207–210. doi: 10.1093/nar/30.1.207. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Data Availability Statement
All data are included in this published article and its Supplementary Information files. The RNA-Seq data that support the findings of this study have been deposited in the NCBI Gene Expression Omnibus74 and are accessible through the GEO Series accession number GSE153528. Source data are provided with this paper.