Skip to main content
Wiley - PMC COVID-19 Collection logoLink to Wiley - PMC COVID-19 Collection
. 2021 May 12;69(3):1656–1658. doi: 10.1111/tbed.14122

SARS‐CoV‐2 B.1.1.7 variant of concern detected in a pet dog and cat after exposure to a person with COVID‐19, USA

Sarah A Hamer 1,, Ria R Ghai 2, Italo B Zecca 1, Lisa D Auckland 1, Christopher M Roundy 3, Edward Davila 1, Rachel E Busselman 1, Wendy Tang 3, Alex Pauvolid‐Corrêa 1,4, Mary Lea Killian 5, Melinda Jenkins‐Moore 5, Mia Kim Torchetti 5, Suelee Robbe Austerman 5, Ailam Lim 6, Yao Akpalu 7, Rebecca S B Fischer 8, Casey Barton Behravesh 2, Gabriel L Hamer 3
PMCID: PMC8242881  PMID: 33955193

Abstract

As part of a longitudinal household transmission study of pets living with persons with COVID‐19 in Texas, two pets were confirmed to be infected with the SARS‐CoV‐2 B.1.1.7 variant of concern (VOC). The pets were a dog and a cat from the same household, sampled two days after their owner tested positive for COVID‐19. The oral, nasal and fur swabs for both pets tested positive for SARS‐CoV‐2 by qRT‐PCR and consensus whole‐genome sequences from the dog and cat were 100% identical and matched the B.1.1.7 VOC. Virus was isolated from the cat's nasal swab. One month after initial detection of infection, the pets were re‐tested twice at which time only the fur swabs (both pets) and oral swab (dog only) remained positive, and neutralizing antibodies for SARS‐CoV‐2 were present in both animals. Sneezing by both pets was noted by the owner in the weeks between initial and follow‐up testing. This study documents the first detection of B.1.1.7. in companion animals in the United States, and the first genome recovery and isolation of B.1.1.7 variant of concern globally in any animal.

Keywords: cat, COVID‐19, dog, one health, SARS‐CoV‐2, spillback, variant of concern

1. INTRODUCTION

The evolution and emergence of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS‐CoV‐2) variants have caused concern for increased transmissibility (Davies, et al., 2021), pathogenicity (Davies et al., 2021), and altered effectiveness of diagnostics (Ascoli, 2021), therapeutics and vaccines (Altmann et al., 2021). Human‐to‐animal transmission of SARS‐CoV‐2 is well‐documented in pets (Hosie et al., 2021), which typically become infected after exposure to owners with COVID‐19 (OIE 2021). However, the impact of infections with SARS‐CoV‐2 variants of concern on the clinical presentation and duration of infection in pets and the transmissibility between people and pets remains unknown. Since June 2020, we have conducted a longitudinal household transmission study of pets living with one or more persons with COVID‐19 (Hamer et al., 2020) to better understand the role of virus transmission between humans and pets.

As part of this ongoing study, two pets from the same household were sampled for SARS‐CoV‐2 on 12 February 2021, two days after their owner—one of two residents in a home in Brazos County, Texas—received a positive test result for COVID‐19 through a commercial laboratory; no viral sequence was generated from the owner. The pets—the only animals in the home—were a 15‐year‐old Labrador retriever mix dog and a 12‐year‐old domestic shorthair cat. On initial visit, the animals were asymptomatic. The owner described a high degree of contact with both pets, including sleeping in the same room (dog) and bed (cat). Following previously described methods (Hamer et al., 2020), oral, nasal and fur swabs from both pets were found to be positive for SARS‐CoV‐2 by real‐time (RT) PCR. Rectal swabs tested negative. Sera tested negative for SARS‐CoV‐2 neutralizing antibodies using a 96‐well virus neutralization test as previously described (Table 1; McAloose et al., 2020). Live virus isolation was attempted from all positive samples and was successful from the cat's nasal swab. SARS‐CoV‐2 whole‐genome sequencing was attempted and successful from the cat's nasal swab and the dog's oral swab. Consensus sequences from both animals were 100% identical to each other and were identified as the B.1.1.7 variant of concern by single‐nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) analysis and alignment. In addition to characteristic B.1.1.7 mutations, sequences from both animals also showed 8 SNPs in ORF1ab and ORF8.

TABLE 1.

Longitudinal SARS‐CoV‐2 test results for a pet dog and cat from the same household in Texas that were confirmed for infection with the B.1.1.7. variant of concern

Animal ID number, date of sample collection N1/N2 real‐time (RT) PCR Ct values for swab testing a Viral neutralization endpoint titre Viral isolation Genome sequence GISAID accession b
oral nasal rectal fur
Dog TAMU−466
Feb 12 2021 28.8/28.7 28.5/28.8 nd/nd nd/37.9 nd Oral, nasal, fur negative hCoV−19/dog/USA/TX‐TAMU−21–005988–002−466/2020
Mar 11 2021 nd/nd nd/nd nd/nd 35.9/38.4 1:16 na na
Mar 15 2021 36.9/39.4 nd/nd nd/nd nd/nd 1:8 na na
Cat TAMU−467
Feb 12 2021 31.4/31.7 24.8/24.3 nd/39.2 35.2/34.9 nd Oral, fur negative; nasal positive hCoV−19/cat/USA/TX‐TAMU−21–005988–005−467/2020
Mar 11 2021 nd/nd nd/nd nd/nd 34.6/37.4 1:64 na na
Mar 15 2021 nd/nd nd/nd nd/nd 36.7/38.1 1:64 na na

Abbreviations: N1/N2, virus nucleocapsid gene target region 1 and 2; na, not attempted; nd, not detected.

a

Testing was conducted at both the Wisconsin Veterinary Diagnostic Laboratory and National Veterinary Services Laboratory (NVSL). When detected in both laboratories, the Ct values were averaged by target.

b

Texas dog and cat viral genome sequences available at GISAD under these accession numbers, which include state of origin (TX); submitting laboratory (TAMU/Texas A&M University); NVSL accession (21–00598): and animal ID (dog, 466; cat, 467).

These pets were resampled on March 11, at which time the owner disclosed both had been sneezing over the past weeks. Pets were resampled again on March 15, and clinical signs had resolved. Nasal and rectal swabs from both resample time points tested negative, while fur swabs (both animals) and the oral swab (dog) remained positive with high Ct. Neutralizing antibodies were detected in both animals (Table 1).

This study documents the first detection of B.1.1.7. in companion animals in the United States, and the first genome recovery and isolation of B.1.1.7 variant of concern globally in any animal. These findings are coincident with detection of B.1.1.7 infection in rectal swabs of three U.K. pets with myocarditis (Ferasin et al., 2021). These results support public health guidance that recommends people with COVID‐19 isolate from animals (CDC, 2021) and the continued application of a One Health approach to SARS‐CoV‐2 investigations. Given the continued emergence (Galloway et al., 2021) and enhanced transmissibility and pathogenicity of B.1.1.7 in humans (Davies, Abbott, et al., 2021), onward transmission of this and other variants of concern from animals should remain the subject of ongoing research.

CONFLICTS OF INTEREST

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

AUTHOR CONTRIBUTIONS

S.A.H, R. R. G, C.B.B. and G.L.H.: involved in conceptualization. S.A.H., I.B.Z., L.D.A., C.M.R., E.D., R.E.B., W.T., A.P.‐C., M.L.K., M.J.‐M., M.K.T., S.R.A., A.L. and G.L.H.: involved in methodology. M.L.K., M.J.‐M. and M.K.T.: involved in validation. S.A.H., R.R.G., M.J.‐M., M.K.T., S.R.A. and G.L.H.: involved in formal analysis. S.A.H., I.B.Z., L.D.A., C.M.R., E.D., R.E.B., W.T., M.J.‐M., M.K.T., S.R.A. and A.L.: involved in investigation. S.A.H, R.R.G., Y.A., R.S.B.F., C.B.B. and G.L.H.: involved in resources. S.A.H., L.D.A. and C.M.R.: involved in data curation. S.A.H. and G.L.H: involved in writing—original draft preparation. all authors: involved in writing—review and editing. S.A.H, R. R. G, C.B.B. and G.L.H.: involved in supervision. S.A.H, L.D.A., Y.A., R.S.B.F. and G.L.H.: involved in project administration. S.A.H., R.R.G.,C.B.B., G.L.H.: involved in funding acquisition. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

ETHICAL APPROVAL

All samples were obtained from privately owned animals in accordance with guidelines approved by the Texas A&M University's Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee and Clinical Research Review Committee on May 14, 2020 (2018–0460 CA). Research was exempt from Institutional Review Board oversight.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

We appreciate the participation of the owner and their pets in this study. We thank Dr. Susan Rollo of Texas Animal Health Commission and Drs. Laura Robinson, Paul Gruenwald and David Smonko of Texas Department of State Health Services for assistance in the case investigation, and Dan Christensen from Wisconsin Veterinary Diagnostic Lab. This publication was supported by Grant No. 75D30120P09884 from the CDC‐NIOSH. The findings and conclusions in this report are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent the official position of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention or the USDA.

[Correction added on 27 May 2021, after first online publication: The funding statement has been added before the last sentence of the Acknowledgments in this current version.]

Hamer SA, Ghai RR, Zecca IB, et al. SARS‐CoV‐2 B.1.1.7 variant of concern detected in a pet dog and cat after exposure to a person with COVID‐19, USA. Transbound Emerg Dis. 2022;69:1656–1658. 10.1111/tbed.14122

DATA AVAILABILITY STATEMENT

The whole‐genome sequences from this study are available at GISAID accession numbers hCoV‐19/dog/USA/TX‐TAMU‐21–005988–002‐466/2020 and hCoV‐19/cat/USA/TX‐TAMU‐21–005988–005‐467/2020.

REFERENCES

  1. Altmann, D. M. , Boyton, R. J. , & Beale, R. (2021). Immunity to SARS‐CoV‐2 variants of concern. Science, 371(6534), 1103–1104. 10.1126/science.abg7404 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Ascoli, C. A. (2021). Could mutations of SARS‐CoV‐2 suppress diagnostic detection? Nature Biotechnology, 39, 274–275. 10.1038/s41587-021-00845-3 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. CDC (2021). COVID‐19; pets and other animals. : Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Retrieved from https://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019‐ncov/animals/pets‐other‐animals.html [Google Scholar]
  4. Davies, N. G. , Abbott, S. , Barnard, R. C. , Jarvis, C. I. , Kucharski, A. J. , Munday, J. D. , & Edmunds, W. J. (2021). Estimated transmissibility and impact of SARS‐CoV‐2 lineage B.1.1.7 in England. Science, 372, eabg3055. 10.1126/science.abg3055 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Davies, N. G. , Jarvis, C. I. , Group, C. C.‐W. , Edmunds, W. J. , Jewell, N. P. , Diaz‐Ordaz, K. , & Keogh, R. H. (2021). Increased mortality in community‐tested cases of SARS‐CoV‐2 lineage B.1.1.7. Nature, https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.02.01.21250959 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Ferasin, L. , Fritz, M. , Ferasin, H. , Becquart, P. , Legros, V. , & Leroy, E. M. (2021). Myocarditis in naturally infected pets with the British variant of COVID‐19. bioRxiv, 2021.2003.2018.435945. 10.1101/2021.03.18.435945 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  7. Galloway, S. E. , Paul, P. , MacCannell, D. R. , Johansson, M. A. , Brooks, J. T. , MacNeil, A. , Slayton, R. B. , Tong, S. , Silk, B. J. , Armstrong, G. L. , Biggerstaff, M. , & Dugan, V. G. (2021). Emergence of SARS‐CoV‐2 B.1.1.7 Lineage — United States, December 29, 2020–January 12, 2021. MMWR. Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report, 70(3), 95–99. 10.15585/mmwr.mm7003e2 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Hamer, S. A. , Pauvolid‐Corrêa, A. , Zecca, I. B. , Davila, E. , Auckland, L. D. , Roundy, C. M. … Hamer, G. L. (2020). Natural SARS‐CoV‐2 infections, including virus isolation, among serially tested cats and dogs in households with confirmed human COVID‐19 cases in Texas, USA. bioRxiv, 2020.2012.2008.416339. 10.1101/2020.12.08.416339 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  9. Hosie, M. J. , Hofmann‐Lehmann, R. , Hartmann, K. , Egberink, H. , Truyen, U. , Addie, D. D. , Belák, S. , Boucraut‐Baralon, C. , Frymus, T. , Lloret, A. , Lutz, H. , Marsilio, F. , Pennisi, M. G. , Tasker, S. , Thiry, E. , & Möstl, K. (2021). Anthropogenic Infection of Cats during the 2020 COVID‐19 Pandemic. Viruses, 13(2), 10.3390/v13020185 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. McAloose, D. , Laverack, M. , Wang, L. , Killian, M. L. , Caserta, L. C. , & Yuan, F. … Diel, D. G. (2020). From People to Panthera: Natural SARS‐CoV‐2 Infection in Tigers and Lions at the Bronx Zoo. Mbio, 11(5), 1–13. 10.1128/mBio.02220-20 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. OIE (2021). COVID‐19; Pets and other animals. : World Organisation for Animal Health. Retrieved from https://www.oie.int/en/scientific‐expertise/specific‐information‐andrecommendations/questions‐and‐answers‐on‐2019novel‐coronavirus/events‐in‐animals/ [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Data Availability Statement

The whole‐genome sequences from this study are available at GISAID accession numbers hCoV‐19/dog/USA/TX‐TAMU‐21–005988–002‐466/2020 and hCoV‐19/cat/USA/TX‐TAMU‐21–005988–005‐467/2020.


Articles from Transboundary and Emerging Diseases are provided here courtesy of Wiley

RESOURCES