Skip to main content
The Journal of Nutrition logoLink to The Journal of Nutrition
. 2021 Mar 9;151(6):1479–1486. doi: 10.1093/jn/nxab016

Plasma ω-3 and ω-6 PUFA Concentrations and Risk of Atrial Fibrillation: The Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis

Parveen K Garg 1,, Weihua Guan 2, Sarah Nomura 3, Natalie Weir 4, Amy B Karger 5, Daniel Duprez 6, Susan R Heckbert 7, Michael Y Tsai 8
PMCID: PMC8243886  PMID: 33693794

ABSTRACT

Background

Current literature examining the prospective relation of circulating omega-3 (n–3) and omega-6 (n–6) PUFAs and atrial fibrillation (AF) is limited to predominantly white populations.

Objectives

We investigated the association of circulating n–3 and n–6 PUFAs with incident AF in participants from the Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis.

Methods

A total of 6229 participants (mean age = 62 y; 53% female; 39% white, 27% black, 22% Hispanic, and 12% Chinese) who were free of baseline AF and with plasma phospholipid PUFAs measured at baseline using GC were prospectively followed for the development of AF. Incident AF was ascertained using International Classification of Diseases-9 codes from hospital discharge records and Medicare claims data with follow-up through 2014. Multivariable Cox proportional hazards regression analysis was performed to determine the risk of incident AF.

Results

During a median follow-up of 12.9 y, 813 (13%) participants developed AF. Each higher SD increment in arachidonic acid (AA; 20:4n–6) concentrations was associated with an 11% decreased risk of incident AF (HR: 0.89; 95% CI: 0.82, 0.96). Similarly, higher overall n–6 PUFA concentrations were also associated with a reduced AF risk (HR per SD increment: 0.93; 95% CI: 0.87, 1.00). Although no significant overall associations were observed for any individual n–3 PUFAs, higher circulating concentrations of DHA (22:6n–3) and EPA (20:5n–3) were associated with a decreased AF risk in blacks and Hispanics (DHA only) but not whites or Chinese Americans.

Conclusions

In a multiethnic cohort of individuals free of baseline cardiovascular disease, higher plasma concentrations of n–6 PUFAs, particularly AA, were associated with a reduced risk of incident AF. Important differences in AF risk were also noted across race/ethnicity for the n–3 PUFAs DHA and EPA.

Keywords: fatty acids, arachidonic acid, atrial fibrillation, cardiovascular disease, primary prevention

Introduction

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most frequently encountered cardiac arrhythmia in clinical practice, with an estimated prevalence of 11 million people in Europe and 9 million people in the United States (1, 2). The presence of AF is associated with an >2-fold increased risk of stroke, heart failure, and cardiovascular mortality (3). After accounting for known modifiable risk factors, nearly half of the population attributable risk of AF development still remains unexplained (4).

Long-chain omega-3 (n–3) PUFAs have been suggested to have a variety of biological effects that may reduce AF incidence. Increased intake of n–3 PUFAs provides anti-inflammatory and antifibrotic effects that may reduce long-term atrial remodeling and limit substrate for AF development (5–7). Cellular studies suggest n–3 PUFAs may also have direct antiarrhythmic effects as well (8–10). The protective effects of long-chain ω-6 (n–6) PUFAs are less clear. Arachidonic acid (AA; 20:4n–6) has been reported, in some studies, to give rise to a range of eicosanoids considered to be proinflammatory and prothrombotic (11–13). Other studies, however, suggest AA is also the precursor to key anti-inflammatory metabolites (14).

Current literature examining the prospective relation of circulating PUFAs and AF is limited to predominantly white populations (15–18). A Mendelian randomization analysis of >500,000 individuals found that plasma concentrations of n–3 and n–6 PUFAs were not associated with AF risk (18). In contrast, REDUCE-IT (the Reduction of Cardiovascular Events with Icosapent Ethyl–Intervention Trial) recently reported an increased risk of hospitalized AF in those randomly assigned to Icosapent Ethyl, a purified version of EPA (20:5n–3) (19). Over 90% of participants in these studies, however, were white. The risk of developing AF is not evenly distributed among the various racial and ethnic groups. Despite underrepresented racial and ethnic groups experiencing a higher burden of traditional AF risk factors and a poorer AF-associated outcome profile, a paradox exists in that the overall incidence and prevalence of AF in these groups are nearly half of what is observed for whites (20, 21). Continued investigation into identifying additional risk factors is important to improve our understanding of not only the mechanisms that underlie AF but also the differences in AF incidence observed across various racial and ethnic groups.

The purpose of this study is to evaluate associations of circulating concentrations of both n–3 and n–6 PUFAs with the risk of incident AF in the Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis (MESA).

Methods

Study participants

MESA is a prospective cohort study designed to investigate risk factors associated with subclinical cardiovascular disease across race/ethnicities. MESA recruited, in 6 US study centers, 6814 male and female white, black, Hispanic, and Chinese-American participants aged 45–84 y at baseline (2000–2002) who were free of clinical cardiovascular disease, including AF, at that time (22). There were 585 participants excluded from the present analysis (missing PUFA measurements, n = 306; missing follow-up AF data, n = 5; missing covariate data, n = 274). Protocols were approved by local institutional review boards, and all participants gave written informed consent.

Plasma n–3 and n–6 PUFA measurements

α-Linolenic acid (ALA; 18:3n–3), EPA, docosapentaenoic acid (DPA; 22:5n–3), DHA (22:6n–3), linoleic acid (LA; 18:2n–6), and arachidonic acid (AA; 20:4n–6) were measured at baseline. The band of phospholipids was then harvested and individual phospholipid fatty acids were extracted from EDTA plasma using a chloroform/methanol extraction method (23) and subsequently separated from cholesterol esters, triglycerides, and free fatty acids by TLC. Individual phospholipid fatty acids were derivatized to methyl esters and detected by GC flame ionization. Phospholipid fatty acid measurements were expressed as a percentage of total fatty acids. Our primary focus of interest was n–3 PUFAs (ALA; EPA; DPA; DHA; EPA + DPA + DHA) and n–6 PUFAs (LA; AA; AA + LA). For each fatty acid, the limit of detection was 0.03%. Interassay CVs were 13.5% (ALA), 7.6% (EPA), 8.3% (DPA), 8.5% (DHA), 6.8% (LA), and 7.4% (AA).

AF

After the baseline examination, participants were followed up every 9–12 mo by telephone to obtain information on hospitalizations and medical records, including discharge diagnoses. Incident AF through December 2014 was identified from study electrocardiograms verified for AF at Visit 5 (2010–2012), International Classification of Diseases-9 hospital discharge diagnoses consistent with AF (427.31 or 427.32), and, for participants enrolled in fee-for-service Medicare, inpatient and outpatient AF claims data.

Covariates

Standardized questionnaires were used at baseline to obtain demographic information, level of education, annual household income, physical activity, smoking history, alcohol use, and medication usage, including antihypertensive and antidiabetic use. BMI was calculated as kg/m2. Three separate systolic and diastolic blood pressure measurements were taken in seated participants at rest, with the last 2 measurements being averaged for analysis. Physical activity was recorded as participant-reported number of intentional exercise metabolic equivalent-minutes per week. Cigarette smoking was calculated in pack-years and also defined as current, former, or never. Total and HDL cholesterol, triglycerides, and glucose were measured from fasting blood samples. LDL cholesterol was calculated by the Friedewald equation in those with triglyceride concentrations <400 mg/dL. Diabetes was defined as a fasting glucose concentration >125 mg/dL or use of antidiabetic medications.

Statistical analysis

Descriptive statistics were reported for baseline variables according to 1) total n–3 PUFA concentrations, 2) total n–6 PUFA concentrations, and 3) race/ethnicity. Pearson correlation coefficients were calculated between the different n–3 and n–6 PUFAs. We used Cox regression models to estimate the HRs and 95% CIs of risk of incident AF according to each circulating PUFA, with time at risk until the first AF event, death, or last follow-up. Associations with each circulating fatty acid were evaluated in quartiles and continuously per SD increment. The linear relation between continuous PUFA measures and risk of AF was examined using splines and showed no violation. Models were adjusted for age, race/ethnicity, sex, education, income, site, height, BMI, cigarette smoking, diabetes, systolic blood pressure, diastolic blood pressure, antihypertensive medication, physical activity, total cholesterol, HDL cholesterol, and alcohol consumption. The covariates were modeled (continuous compared with categorical) as described in Tables 1 and 2. Effect modification by race/ethnicity was evaluated by stratifying and comparing models with and without interaction terms. Statistical significance was defined as P < 0.05. Stata version 15.1 (StataCorp LLC) was used for all analyses. The proportional hazard assumption was examined on the basis of Schoenfeld residuals after the Cox regression was fitted. There was no evidence of violation of the proportional hazard assumption in our data. The functional form (linearity) of continuous fatty acid measures was examined using Martingale residuals and the smoothing technique.

TABLE 1.

Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis participant baseline characteristics according to plasma n–3 PUFA concentrations1

Characteristic Quartile 1 (0.51–1.46) Quartile 2 (1.46–1.77) Quartile 3 (1.77–2.21) Quartile 4 (2.21–15.97) P value
n 1568 1545 1558 1558
Age, y 61 ± 10 62 ± 10 62 ± 10 63 ± 10 0.002
Male 755 (48.2) 753 (48.7) 734 (47.1) 700 (44.9) 0.15
Race/ethnicity
 White 543 (34.6) 605 (39.2) 641 (41.1) 633 (40.6) <0.001
 Chinese-American 141 (9.0) 142 (9.2) 170 (10.9) 326 (20.9)
 Black 343 (21.9) 422 (27.3) 454 (29.1) 411 (26.4)
 Hispanic 541 (34.5) 376 (24.3) 293 (18.8) 188 (12.1)
Education
 High school or less 660 (42.1) 589 (38.1) 530 (34.0) 445 (28.6) <0.001
 Some college 467 (29.8) 457 (29.6) 440 (28.2) 407 (26.1)
 College or more 441 (28.1) 499 (32.3) 588 (37.7) 706 (45.3)
Income, $
 <25,000 582 (37.1) 504 (32.6) 456 (29.3) 410 (26.3) <0.001
 25,000–49,999 462 (29.5) 463 (30.0) 451 (28.9) 418 (26.8)
 50,000–74,999 262 (16.7) 263 (17.0) 286 (18.4) 253 (16.2)
 ≥75,000 262 (16.7) 315 (20.4) 365 (23.4) 477 (30.6)
Height, cm 166 ± 10 167 ± 10 167 ± 10 166 ± 9.7 <0.001
BMI, kg/m2 29 ± 5.6 29 ± 5.7 28 ± 5.5 27 ± 4.9 <0.001
Smoking status
 Never 753 (48.0) 726 (47.0) 808 (51.9) 862 (55.3) <0.001
 Former 573 (36.5) 585 (37.9) 551 (35.4) 560 (35.9)
 Current 242 (15.4) 234 (15.1) 199 (12.8) 136 (8.7)
Pack-years smoking 13 ± 23 12 ± 26 11 ± 21 9.3 ± 19 <0.001
Alcohol consumption
 Never 326 (20.8) 293 (19.1) 312 (20.1) 335 (21.6) <0.001
 Former 451 (28.8) 376 (24.5) 350 (22.5) 279 (18.0)
 Current 788 (50.4) 866 (56.4) 892 (57.4) 937 (60.4)
Physical activity, MET-min/wk 5704 ± 5984 5982 ± 5944 6163 ± 5836 5465 ± 6041 0.006
Diabetes 215 (13.7) 188 (12.2) 191 (12.3) 163 (10.5) 0.051
SBP, mm Hg 126 ± 22 126 ± 21 127 ± 22 125 ± 21 0.25
DBP, mm Hg 72 ± 10 72 ± 10 72 ± 10 72 ± 10 0.42
Plasma total cholesterol, mg/dL 191 ± 37 195 ± 36 196 ± 35 196 ± 34 <0.001
Plasma HDL cholesterol, mg/dL 49 ± 14 49 ± 14 52 ± 15 53 ± 15 <0.001
Plasma triglycerides, mg/dL 135 ± 88 137 ± 105 133 ± 84 123 ± 74 <0.001
Antihypertensive use 538 (34.3) 571 (37.0) 566 (36.3) 572 (36.7) 0.40
1

n = 6229. Values are mean ± SD or n (%) unless otherwise indicated. n–3 PUFA concentrations are the sum of DHA, n–3 docosapentaenoic acid, and EPA. DBP, diastolic blood pressure; MET, metabolic equivalent; SBP, systolic blood pressure.

TABLE 2.

Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis participant baseline characteristics according to plasma n–6 PUFA concentrations1

Characteristic Quartile 1 (8.23–29.95) Quartile 2 (29.95–32.03) Quartile 3 (32.03–34.00) Quartile 4 (34.00–47.30) P value
n 1562 1557 1545 1565
Age, y 63 ± 10 62 ± 10 62 ± 10 60 ± 10 <0.001
Male 685 (43.9) 694 (44.6) 738 (47.8) 825 (52.7) <0.001
Race/ethnicity
 White 799 (51.2) 653 (41.9) 556 (36.0) 414 (26.5) <0.001
 Chinese-American 102 (6.5) 128 (8.2) 195 (12.6) 354 (22.6)
 Black 361 (23.1) 412 (26.5) 428 (27.7) 429 (27.4)
 Hispanic 300 (19.2) 364 (23.4) 366 (23.7) 368 (23.5)
Education
 High school or less 512 (32.8) 559 (35.9) 555 (35.9) 598 (38.2) 0.002
 Some college 425 (27.2) 449 (28.8) 468 (30.3) 429 (27.4)
 College or more 625 (40.0) 549 (35.3) 522 (33.8) 538 (34.4)
Income, $
 <25,000 440 (28.2) 491 (31.5) 488 (31.6) 533 (34.1) 0.018
 25,000–49,999 446 (28.6) 462 (29.7) 448 (29.0) 438 (28.0)
 50,000–74,999 269 (17.2) 269 (17.3) 264 (17.1) 262 (16.7)
 ≥75,000 407 (26.1) 335 (21.5) 345 (22.3) 332 (21.2)
Height, cm 166 ± 9.9 166 ± 10 166 ± 10 167 ± 9.8 0.68
BMI, kg/m2 28 ± 5.5 29 ± 5.5 28 ± 5.7 27 ± 5.0 <0.001
Smoking status
 Never 780 (49.9) 782 (50.2) 789 (51.1) 798 (51.0) 0.37
 Former 600 (38.4) 563 (36.2) 557 (36.1) 549 (35.1)
 Current 182 (11.7) 212 (13.6) 199 (12.9) 218 (13.9)
Pack-years smoking 13 ± 28 11 ± 21 11 ± 21 9.9 ± 19 0.002
Alcohol consumption
 Never 266 (17.1) 331 (21.3) 316 (20.5) 353 (22.7) <0.001
 Former 357 (22.9) 308 (19.8) 394 (25.6) 397 (25.5)
 Current 933 (60.0) 914 (58.9) 829 (53.9) 807 (51.8)
Physical activity, MET-min/wk 5567 ± 5827 5947 ± 6209 5790 ± 5879 6007 ± 5899 0.17
Diabetes 155 (9.9) 187 (12.0) 204 (13.2) 211 (13.5) 0.009
SBP, mm Hg 127 ± 21 127 ± 22 127 ± 22 124 ± 21 <0.001
DBP, mm Hg 72 ± 10 72 ± 10 72 ± 10 72 ± 9.9 0.74
Plasma total cholesterol, mg/dL 195 ± 36 197 ± 35 194 ± 35 191 ± 36 <0.001
Plasma HDL cholesterol, mg/dL 51 ± 16 50 ± 14 51 ± 14 51 ± 15 0.11
Plasma triglycerides, mg/dL 138 ± 83 137 ± 76 132 ± 89 122 ± 104 <0.001
Antihypertensive use 589 (37.7) 565 (36.3) 609 (39.4) 484 (30.9) <0.001
1

n = 6229. Values are mean ± SD or n (%) unless otherwise indicated. n–6 PUFA concentrations are the sum of arachidonic acid and linoleic acid. DBP, diastolic blood pressure; MET, metabolic equivalent; SBP, systolic blood pressure.

Results

A total of 6229 participants were included in the prospective analysis (mean age ± SD: 61.6 ± 10 y; 53% female; 39% white, 27% black, 22% Hispanic, and 12% Chinese American). Eight hundred and thirteen (13%) participants developed AF (incidence rate per 1000 person-years = 11.6; person-years of follow-up = 70,205 y) over a median follow-up of 12.9 y. Baseline characteristics for included participants according to total n–3 PUFA and n–6 PUFA concentrations are presented in Tables 1 and 2, respectively. Participants with higher total n–3 PUFA concentrations were older, reported a higher level of education and income, and were more likely to drink alcohol (Table 1). Opposite trends were noted in these baseline characteristics for participants with higher total n–6 PUFA concentrations (Table 2). In addition, participants with higher total n–3 PUFA concentrations were less likely to be Hispanic, whereas those with higher total n–6 PUFA concentrations were less likely to be white. Supplemental Table 1 reports baseline characteristics according to race/ethnicity. Supplemental Table 2 shows correlations between each of the measured n–3 and n–6 PUFAs.

In adjusted analyses, higher circulating concentrations of total n–3 PUFAs were not found to be associated with a reduced risk of AF development (Table 3). When each individual n–3 PUFA was examined separately, although some significant interquartile associations were observed, results were similar (Table 3).

TABLE 3.

HRs of incident atrial fibrillation according to baseline n–3 PUFA concentrations in Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis participants1

Quartiles of plasma phospholipid FAs2
PUFA Quartile 1 Quartile 2 Quartile 3 Quartile 4 SD increment3
Phospholipid ALA, % total FA (median = 0.16)
n cases/total 182/1563 219/1572 215/1538 197/1556 813/6229
 HR (95% CI) 1 (referent) 1.19 (0.98, 1.46) 1.10 (0.90, 1.35) 1.12 (0.91, 1.38) 1.00 (0.94, 1.07)
Phospholipid EPA, % total FA (median = 0.67)
n cases/total 197/1567 187/1545 208/1558 221/1559 813/6229
 HR (95% CI) 1 (referent) 0.88 (0.72, 1.08) 0.95 (0.78, 1.16) 0.93 (0.76, 1.15) 1.03 (0.96, 1.10)
Phospholipid n–3 DPA, % total FA (median = 0.90)
n cases/total 227/1563 196/1562 180/1548 210/1556 813/6229
 HR (95% CI) 1 (referent) 0.83 (0.68, 1.00) 0.78 (0.64, 0.95)4 0.88 (0.72, 1.06) 0.96 (0.89, 1.03)
Phospholipid DHA, % total FA (median = 3.58)
n cases/total 200/1567 200/1561 219/1547 194/1554 813/6229
 HR (95% CI) 1 (referent) 0.81 (0.66, 0.99)4 0.89 (0.71, 1.10) 0.78 (0.62, 0.98)4 0.95 (0.87, 1.03)
Phospholipid EPA + DHA + n–3 DPA, % total FA (median = 1.77)
n cases/total 208/1568 190/1545 205/1558 210/1558 813/6229
 HR (95% CI) 1 (referent) 0.88 (0.72, 1.07) 0.90 (0.74, 1.10) 0.88 (0.72, 1.08) 0.98 (0.90, 1.06)
1

Cox proportional hazard model adjusted for age, race/ethnicity, sex, education, income, site, height, BMI, cigarette smoking, diabetes, blood pressure, antihypertensive medication, physical activity, and alcohol consumption. ALA, α-linolenic acid; DPA, docosapentaenoic acid; FA, fatty acid.

2

Quartile ranges were as follows: ALA: first, 0.03–0.12; second, 0.12–0.16; third, 0.16–0.20; fourth, 0.20–2.54; EPA: first, 0.09–0.48; second, 0.48–0.67; third, 0.67–0.99; fourth, 0.99–14.46; n–3 DPA: first, 0.04–0.77; second, 0.77–0.90; third, 0.90–1.05; fourth, 1.05–2.42; DHA: first, 0.57–2.71; second, 2.71–3.58; third, 3.58–4.68; fourth, 4.68–10.56; EPA + DHA + n–3 DPA: first, 0.51–1.46; second, 1.46–1.77; third, 1.77–2.21; fourth, 2.21–15.97.

3

SD increment = 0.08 (phospholipid ALA), 0.79 (phospholipid EPA), 0.23 (phospholipid n–3 DPA), 1.48 (phospholipid DHA), and 0.93 (phospholipid DHA + n–3 DPA + EPA).

4

0.01 < P < 0.05.

Table 4 shows the risk of incident AF according to baseline n–6 PUFA concentrations. Higher overall concentrations of n–6 PUFAs (LA + AA) were associated with a 7% reduced risk of incident AF in adjusted analyses. When each individual n–6 PUFA was examined separately, AA was significantly associated with lower risk of AF, with a 29% and 21% lower risk in the third and fourth quartiles, respectively, than in the lowest. When evaluated continuously, each SD increment in AA was associated with an 11% lower risk of AF. No significant association was observed for LA concentrations and risk of developing AF.

TABLE 4.

HRs of incident atrial fibrillation according to baseline n–6 PUFA concentrations in Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis participants1

Quartiles of plasma phospholipid FAs2
PUFA Quartile 1 Quartile 2 Quartile 3 Quartile 4 SD increment3
Phospholipid LA, % total FA (median = 20.1)
n cases/total 221/1544 188/1545 201/1568 203/1572 813/6229
 HR (95% CI) 1 (referent) 0.87 (0.71, 1.06) 0.95 (0.78, 1.16) 1.04 (0.84, 1.29) 1.02 (0.94, 1.10)
Phospholipid AA, % total FA (median = 11.55)
n cases/total 229/1577 238/1562 169/1565 177/1525 813/6229
 HR (95% CI) 1 (referent) 1.03 (0.86, 1.24) 0.71 (0.58, 0.87)4 0.79 (0.64, 0.98)5 0.89 (0.82, 0.96)4
Phospholipid LA + AA, % total FA (median = 32.03)
n cases/total 234/1562 214/1557 185/1545 180/1565 813/6229
 HR (95% CI) 1 (referent) 0.98 (0.81, 1.18) 0.88 (0.72, 1.07) 0.89 (0.72, 1.09) 0.93 (0.87, 1.00)
1

Cox proportional hazard model adjusted for age, race/ethnicity, sex, education, income, site, height, BMI, cigarette smoking, diabetes, blood pressure, antihypertensive medication, physical activity, and alcohol consumption. AA, arachidonic acid; FA, fatty acid; LA, linoleic acid.

2

Quartile ranges: LA: first, 5.66–18.00; second, 18.00–20.10; third, 20.10–22.33; fourth, 22.33–36.13; AA: first, 1.71–9.84; second, 9.84–11.53; third, 11.53–13.32; fourth, 13.32–22.17; LA + AA: first, 8.23–29.95; second, 29.95–32.03; third, 32.03–34.00; fourth, 34.00–47.30.

3

SD increment = 3.30 (phospholipid LA), 2.54 (phospholipid AA), and 3.27 (phospholipid AA + LA).

4

0.001 < P < 0.01.

5

0.01 < P < 0.05.

Table 5 presents race/ethnicity-stratified analyses for each of the n–3 and n–6 PUFAs. Differing associations with risk of incident AF were noted across race/ethnicity for circulating concentrations of EPA and DHA, with P values for interaction of 0.031 and 0.016, respectively. When comparing the 2 extreme groups of fatty acid concentrations (fourth compared with first quartile), higher concentrations of EPA or DHA were not associated with AF risk in whites or Chinese Americans but were associated with a decreased risk in blacks (EPA HR: 0.62; 95% CI: 0.39, 0.99 and DHA HR: 0.47; 95% CI: 0.27, 0.79) and Hispanics (DHA HR: 0.52; 95% CI: 0.27, 0.98).

TABLE 5.

HRs of incident atrial fibrillation according to baseline n–3 and n–6 PUFA concentrations (fourth compared with first quartile) in Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis participants stratified by race/ethnicity1

PUFA White Chinese American Black Hispanic P-interaction
Phospholipid ALA
n cases/total 390/2422 105/779 171/1630 147/1398
 HR (95% CI) 1.20 (0.87, 1.65) 1.22 (0.67, 2.23) 1.09 (0.69, 1.73) 1.09 (0.68, 1.75) 0.82
Phospholipid EPA
n cases/total 390/2422 105/779 171/1630 147/1398
 HR (95% CI) 1.02 (0.74, 1.40) 1.11 (0.61, 2.03) 0.62 (0.39, 0.99)2 0.94 (0.55, 1.61) 0.031
Phospholipid n–3 DPA
n cases/total 390/2422 105/779 171/1630 147/1398
 HR (95% CI) 0.81 (0.60, 1.09) 1.08 (0.63, 1.84) 0.86 (0.57, 1.30) 0.69 (0.41, 1.16) 0.10
Phospholipid n–3 DHA
n cases/total 390/2422 105/779 171/1630 147/1398
 HR (95% CI) 1.02 (0.73, 1.41) 0.53 (0.18, 1.51) 0.47 (0.27, 0.79)3 0.52 (0.27, 0.98)2 0.016
Phospholipid LA
n cases/total 390/2422 105/779 171/1630 147/1398
 HR (95% CI) 0.99 (0.72, 1.35) 0.70 (0.31, 1.59) 0.91 (0.52, 1.58) 1.04 (0.64, 1.69) 0.70
Phospholipid AA
n cases/total 390/2422 105/779 171/1630 147/1398
 HR (95% CI) 0.90 (0.66, 1.22) 0.92 (0.47, 1.79) 0.59 (0.36, 0.97)2 0.71 (0.43, 1.20) 0.55
1

Cox proportional hazard model adjusted for age, sex, education, income, site, height, BMI, cigarette smoking, diabetes, blood pressure, antihypertensive medication, physical activity, and alcohol consumption. AA, arachidonic acid; ALA, α-linolenic acid; DPA, docosapentaenoic acid; LA, linoleic acid.

2

0.01 < P < 0.05.

3

0.001 < P < 0.01.

Discussion

In a multiethnic cohort of individuals, higher plasma concentrations of n–6 PUFAs, particularly AA, were associated with a reduced risk of AF. Important differences in AF risk were also noted across race/ethnicity for the n–3 PUFAs EPA and DHA.

The mechanisms by which n–6 PUFAs can affect the cardiovascular system are not clear. LA, the dietary source of n–6 PUFAs, has favorable effects on inflammation, blood pressure, and body composition (24–26). The conversion of LA into AA, however, is reported to give rise to a range of eicosanoids considered to be proinflammatory and prothrombotic (11–13). The level of conversion of LA to AA in humans in stable isotope studies and actual effects of increasing dietary LA on plasma and adipose tissue AA concentrations in trials appear limited, however (24, 27, 28). In addition, other studies suggest AA is also the precursor to key anti-inflammatory metabolites and other mediators that actively resolve inflammation (14). It also gives rise to prostacyclin, a potent antiaggregatory and vasodilatory molecule (29). A large recent meta-analysis of 30 cohort studies found that higher circulating concentrations of LA and possibly AA were associated with lower risk of major cardiovascular events (30).

Prior studies evaluating the relation between n–6 PUFAs and incident AF have not demonstrated an association. The Danish Diet, Cancer, and Health cohort assessed dietary intakes of LA and AA in >50,000 participants at baseline and found that neither were associated with AF risk over a median follow-up time of 13.5 y (31). LA is an essential fatty acid not synthesized by humans and is the main dietary n–6 PUFA. In contrast, the dietary intake of AA is limited and plasma concentrations are largely dependent upon the endogenous conversion of LA into AA. Prior studies evaluating the correlation between circulating and dietary n–6 PUFAs have found a weakly significant relation (32–35). In a prior analysis of 2593 participants in this same MESA cohort, correlations for circulating and dietary n–6 PUFAs were 0.05 for AA and 0.13 for LA, whereas correlations for the n–3 PUFAs EPA and DHA were 0.34 and 0.43, respectively (32). Similarly, in a smaller French study of 257 individuals, circulating and dietary intakes of AA, LA, EPA, and DHA were all significantly correlated with their respective percentages in plasma total fatty acids but only mildly (coefficients between 0.16 and 0.28) (33). Although this may explain the difference in results seen here, more cohort studies are needed to better discern whether a true difference exists.

A recent Mendelian randomization analysis including >500,000 individuals, however, evaluated whether genetic predisposition to higher concentrations of the n–3 and n–6 PUFAs was associated with AF risk and also found no relation (18). The risk of developing AF is not evenly distributed among the various racial and ethnic groups and this study was comprised of an almost exclusively white population. Although race/ethnicity did not significantly influence the relation of AA with incident AF in our study, power was limited and the HRs for black and Hispanic participants were considerably lower than for whites.

Prior prospective studies evaluating the relation of circulating n–3 PUFAs and incident AF were limited to predominantly white populations (15–17). The Kuopio Ischemic Heart Disease Risk Factor Study and the Cardiovascular Health Study found that participants in the highest quartile of DHA concentrations were at a 42% and a 23% reduced risk of incident AF compared with participants in the lowest quartile, respectively (15, 16). Unlike these previous studies, we did not find a significantly decreased AF risk for higher overall or individual n–3 PUFA concentrations.

Our study builds upon the previous n–3 PUFA literature by evaluating associations in a multiethnic cohort. We observed significant differences across race/ethnicity for EPA and DHA. The reasons for such differences are unclear. Heterogeneous associations across races/ethnicities with respect to n–3 PUFAs have been reported in the MESA cohort before. Circulating DPA concentrations were inversely associated with cardiovascular disease in whites and Chinese Americans, but not for other races/ethnicities (32). Genetic variants of enzymes involved in the metabolic conversion of n–3 DPA have been associated with altered inflammatory responses and risk of coronary heart disease (36, 37). Mean concentrations of both EPA and DHA, however, do not differ across race/ethnicity in MESA, with the exception of Chinese participants having significantly higher DHA concentrations than Hispanic participants (38). More importantly, associations for mean concentrations of these fatty acids with biomarkers of inflammation and endothelial function were not modified by race/ethnicity (38). Whether race/ethnic-specific genetic or biochemical differences in n–3 PUFA metabolism could also explain the observed heterogeneity by race/ethnicity in the present study still requires more investigation.

The findings reported here are also important in the context of the REDUCE-IT trial which found that individuals randomly assigned to icosapent ethyl, a highly purified and stable EPA ester, were at significantly increased risk of hospitalized AF. Over a median follow-up of nearly 5 y, 1 more individual out of every 100 randomly assigned to 4 g icosapent ethyl experienced AF than the same number assigned to placebo (14). The REDUCE-IT trial participants were overwhelmingly white (90%) and it would be of interest to determine whether race plays a role in AF risk for individuals on very-high-dose EPA. Prior studies have also demonstrated that increased supplemental EPA is associated with a reduction in overall n–6 PUFA and AA concentrations (39–42). It is possible that AA concentrations observed in the lowest quartile of study participants were low enough that the ability of AA to maintain eicosanoid functions, particularly those related to immunity, vasodilation, and inflammation, was compromised, which then led to an increased susceptibility to AF.

Our study has limitations. Although we used physician claims for those in fee-for-service Medicare, our method for AF detection was not sensitive to cases of paroxysmal AF that either were asymptomatic or did not require hospitalization, and these cases were missed. Because no information regarding symptom presence or the paroxysmal compared with permanent nature of AF was available, we could not determine whether specific PUFAs may have had stronger associations with certain AF subtypes. Imprecision in the measurement of circulating PUFAs may have resulted in exposure misclassification, attenuating measures of association toward the null. Thus, our findings could have underestimated the true associations. Power for the analyses stratified by race/ethnicity was limited, particularly for Chinese-American participants, and the presence of additional significant associations cannot be excluded based on these results. Finally, this is an observational study and we cannot exclude residual confounding, despite adjusting for potential covariates.

In conclusion, higher concentrations of long-chain n–6 PUFAs, particularly AA, were associated with a lower incident AF risk. In addition, higher circulating concentrations of EPA and DHA were not associated with AF risk in whites or Chinese Americans but were associated with a decreased risk in blacks and Hispanics (DHA only). Studies in other prospective cohorts are needed to corroborate associations found for AA and further research is needed to better understand potential racial/ethnic differences.

Supplementary Material

nxab016_Supplemental_File

Acknowledgments

The authors’ responsibilities were as follows—PKG, WG, and MYT: contributed to the conception or design of the work; PKG and WG: drafted the manuscript; and all authors: contributed to the acquisition, analysis, or interpretation of data for the work, critically revised the manuscript, agree to be accountable for all aspects of the work ensuring integrity and accuracy, and read and approved the final manuscript.

Notes

Supported by National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute contracts HHSN268201500003I, N01-HC-95159, N01-HC-95160, N01-HC-95161, N01-HC-95162, N01-HC-95163, N01-HC-95164, N01-HC-95165, N01-HC-95166, N01-HC-95167, N01-HC-95168, and N01-HC-95169 and grant R01-HL-127659, and by National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences grants UL1-TR-000040, UL1-TR-001079, and UL1-TR-001420 (to PKG).

Author disclosures: The authors report no conflicts of interest.

Supplemental Tables 1 and 2 are available from the “Supplementary data” link in the online posting of the article and from the same link in the online table of contents at https://academic.oup.com/jn/.

Abbreviations used: AA, arachidonic acid; AF, atrial fibrillation; ALA, α-linolenic acid; DPA, docosapentaenoic acid; LA, linoleic acid; MESA, Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis; REDUCE-IT, Reduction of Cardiovascular Events with Icosapent Ethyl–Intervention Trial.

Contributor Information

Parveen K Garg, Division of Cardiology, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA.

Weihua Guan, Division of Biostatistics, School of Public Health, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA.

Sarah Nomura, Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA.

Natalie Weir, Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA.

Amy B Karger, Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA.

Daniel Duprez, Division of Cardiology, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA.

Susan R Heckbert, Department of Epidemiology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.

Michael Y Tsai, Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA.

References

  • 1.Krijthe BP, Kunst A, Benjamin EJ, Lip GY, Franco OH, Hofman A, Witteman JC, Stricker BH, Heeringa J. Projections on the number of individuals with atrial fibrillation in the European Union from 2000 to 2060. Eur Heart J. 2013;34:2746–51. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Miyasaka Y, Barnes ME, Gersh BJ, Cha SS, Bailey KR, Abhayaratna WP, Seward JB, Tsang TS. Secular trends in incidence of atrial fibrillation in Olmsted County, Minnesota, 1980 to 2000, and implications on the projections for future prevalence. Circulation. 2006;114:119–25. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Odutayo A, Wong CX, Hsiao AJ, Hopewell S, Altman DG, Emdin CA. Atrial fibrillation and risks of cardiovascular disease, renal disease, and death: systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ. 2016;354:i4482. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Huxley RR, Lopez FL, Folsom AR, Agarwal SK, Loehr LR, Soliman EZ, Maclehose R, Konety S, Alonso A. Absolute and attributable risks of atrial fibrillation in relation to optimal and borderline risk factors: the Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities (ARIC) study. Circulation. 2011;123:1501–8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Chen J, Shearer GC, Chen Q, Healy CL, Beyer AJ, Nareddy VB, Gerdes AM, Harris WS, O'Connell TD, Wang D. Omega-3 fatty acids prevent pressure overload–induced cardiac fibrosis through activation of cyclic GMP/protein kinase G signaling in cardiac fibroblasts. Circulation. 2011;123:584–93. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Duda MK, O'Shea KM, Tintinu A, Xu W, Khairallah RJ, Barrows BR, Chess DJ, Azimzadeh AM, Harris WS, Sharov VGet al. Fish oil, but not flaxseed oil, decreases inflammation and prevents pressure overload-induced cardiac dysfunction. Cardiovasc Res. 2009;81:319–27. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Nodari S, Triggiani M, Campia U, Manerba A, Milesi G, Cesana BM, Gheorghiade M, Cas LD. Effects of n–3 polyunsaturated fatty acids on left ventricular function and functional capacity in patients with dilated cardiomyopathy. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2011;57:870–9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Naccarelli GV, Wolbrette DL, Samii S, Banchs JE, Penny-Peterson E, Gonzalez MD. New anti-arrhythmic treatment of atrial fibrillation. Expert Rev Cardiovasc Ther. 2007;5:707–14. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Eckel RH. The fish oil story remains fishy. Circulation. 2010;122:2110–12. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Lombardi F, Terranova P. Anti-arrhythmic properties of N–3 poly-unsaturated fatty acids (n–3 PUFA). Curr Med Chem. 2007;14:2070–80. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Ramsden CE, Zamora D, Majchrzak-Hong S, Faurot KR, Broste SK, Frantz RP, Davis JM, Ringel A, Suchindran CM, Hibbeln JR. Re-evaluation of the traditional diet-heart hypothesis: analysis of recovered data from Minnesota Coronary Experiment (1968–73). BMJ. 2016;353:i1246. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Simopoulos AP, Leaf A, Salem N Jr. Essentiality of and recommended dietary intakes for omega-6 and omega-3 fatty acids. Ann Nutr Metab. 1999;43:127–30. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Calder PC. Polyunsaturated fatty acids and inflammatory processes: new twists in an old tale. Biochimie. 2009;91:791–5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Shearer GC, Walker RE. An overview of the biologic effects of omega-6 oxylipins in humans. Prostaglandins Leukot Essent Fatty Acids. 2018;137:26–38. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Virtanen JK, Mursu J, Voutilainen S, Tuomainen T. Serum long-chain n-3 polyunsaturated fatty acids and risk of hospital diagnosis of atrial fibrillation in men. Circulation. 2009;120:2315–21. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Wu J, Lemaitre RN, King IB, Song X, Sacks FM, Rimm EB, Heckbert SR, Siscovick DS, Mozaffarian D. Association of plasma phospholipid long-chain omega-3 fatty acids with incident atrial fibrillation in older adults: the Cardiovascular Health Study. Circulation. 2012;125:1084–93. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Gronroos NN, Chamberlain AM, Folsom AR, Soliman EZ, Agarwal SK, Nettleton JA, Alonso A. Fish, fish-derived n–3 fatty acids, and risk of incident atrial fibrillation in the Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities (ARIC) study. PLoS One. 2012;7:e36686. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Yuan S, Larsson SC. Plasma phospholipid fatty acids and risk of atrial fibrillation: a Mendelian randomization study. Nutrients. 2019;11:1651. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Bhatt DL, Steg G, Miller M, Brinton EA, Jacobson TA, Ketchum SB, Doyle RT Jr, Juliano RA, Jiao L, Granowitz C. Cardiovascular risk reduction with icosapent ethyl for hypertriglyceridemia. N Engl J Med. 2019;380:11–22. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Borzecki AM, Keith Bridgers D, Liebschutz JM, Kader B, Lewis E, Kazis S, Berlowitz DR. Racial differences in the prevalence of atrial fibrillation among males. J Natl Med Assoc. 2008;100:237–46. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Rodriguez CJ, Soliman EZ, Alonso A, Swett K, Okin PM, Goff DC, Heckbert SR. Atrial fibrillation incidence and risk factors in relation to race-ethnicity and the population attributable fraction of atrial fibrillation risk factors: the Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis. Ann Epidemiol. 2015;25:71–6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Bild DE, Bluemke DA, Burke GL, Detrano R, Diez Roux AV, Folsom AR, Greenland P, Jacob DR, Kronmal R, Liu Ket al. Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis: objectives and design. Am J Epidemiol. 2002;156:871–81. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Cao J, Schwichtenberg KA, Hanson NQ, Tsai MY. Incorporation and clearance of omega-3 fatty acids in erythrocyte membranes and plasma phospholipids. Clin Chem. 2006;52:2265–72. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Bjermo H, Iggman D, Kullberg J, Dahlman I, Johansson L, Persson L, Berglund J, Pulkki K, Basu S, Uusitupa Met al. Effects of n–6 PUFAs compared with SFAs on liver fat, lipoproteins, and inflammation in abdominal obesity: a randomized controlled trial. Am J Clin Nutr. 2012;95:1003–12. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Miura K, Stamler J, Nakagawa H, Elliott P, Ueshima H, Chan Q, Brown IJ, Tzoulaki I, Saitoh S, Dyer ARet al. Relationship of dietary linoleic acid to blood pressure: the International Study of Macro-Micronutrients and Blood Pressure Study. Hypertension. 2008;52:408–14. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Rosqvist F, Iggman D, Kullberg J, Cedernaes J, Johansson H-E, Larsson A, Johansson L, Ahlström H, Arner P, Dahlman Iet al. Overfeeding polyunsaturated and saturated fat causes distinct effects on liver and visceral fat accumulation in humans. Diabetes. 2014;63:2356–68. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Hussein N, Ah-Sing E, Wilkinson P, Leach C, Griffin BA, Millward DJ. Long-chain conversion of [13C] linoleic acid and α-linolenic acid in response to marked changes in their dietary intake in men. J Lipid Res. 2005;46:269–80. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Sarkkinen ES, Agren JJ, Ahola I, Ovaskainen ML, Uusitupa MI. Fatty acid composition of serum cholesterol esters, and erythrocyte and platelet membranes as indicators of long-term adherence to fat-modified diets. Am J Clin Nutr. 1994;59:364–70. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Mitchell JA, Kirkby NS. Eicosanoids, prostacyclin and cyclooxygenase in the cardiovascular system. Br J Pharmacol. 2019;176:1038–50. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Marklund M, Wu JHY, Imamura F, Del Gobbo LC, Fretts A, de Goede J, Shi P, Tintle N, Wennberg M, Aslibekyan Set al. Biomarkers of dietary omega-6 fatty acids and incident cardiovascular disease and mortality: an individual-level pooled analysis of 30 cohort studies. Circulation. 2019;139:2422–36. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Mortensen LM, Lundbye-Christensen S, Schmidt EB, Calder PC, Schierup MH, Tjønneland A, Parner ET, Overvad K. Long-chain n–3 and n–6 polyunsaturated fatty acids and risk of atrial fibrillation: results from a Danish cohort study. PLoS One. 2017;12:e0190262. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.de Oliveira Otto MC, Wu JHY, Baylin A, Vaidya D, Rich SS, Tsai MY, Jacobs DR Jr, Mozaffarian D. Circulating and dietary omega-3 and omega-6 polyunsaturated fatty acids and incidence of CVD in the Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis. J Am Heart Assoc. 2013;2:e000506. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Astorg P, Bertrais S, Laporte F, Arnault N, Estaquio C, Galan P, Favier A, Hercberg S. Plasma n–6 and n–3 polyunsaturated fatty acids as biomarkers of their dietary intakes: a cross-sectional study within a cohort of middle-aged French men and women. Eur J Clin Nutr. 2008;62:1155–61. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Madsen MTB, Bjerregaard AA, Furtado JD, Halldorsson TI, Ström M, Granström C, Giovannucci E, Olsen SF. Comparisons of estimated intakes and plasma concentrations of selected fatty acids in pregnancy. Nutrients. 2019;11:568. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Sun Q, Ma J, Campos H, Hankinson SE, Hu FB. Comparison between plasma and erythrocyte fatty acid content as biomarkers of fatty acid intake in US women. Am J Clin Nutr. 2007;86:74–81. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Lemaitre RN, Tanaka T, Tang W, Manichaikul A, Foy M, Kabagambe EK, Nettleton JA, King IB, Weng L, Bhattacharya Set al. Genetic loci associated with plasma phospholipid n–3 fatty acids: a meta-analysis of genome-wide association studies from the CHARGE Consortium. PLoS Genet. 2011;7:e1002193. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Simopoulos AP. Genetic variants in the metabolism of omega-6 and omega-3 fatty acids: their role in the determination of nutritional requirements and chronic disease risk. Exp Biol Med (Maywood). 2010;235:785–95. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Steffen BT, Steffen LM, Tracy R, Siscovick D, Jacobs D, Liu K, He K, Hanson NQ, Nettleton JA, Tsai MY. Ethnicity, plasma phospholipid fatty acid composition and inflammatory/endothelial activation biomarkers in the Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis (MESA). Eur J Clin Nutr. 2012;66:600–5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Horrobin DF. Interactions between n–3 and n–6 essential fatty acids (EFAs) in the regulation of cardiovascular disorders and inflammation. Prostaglandins Leukot Essent Fatty Acids. 1991;44:127–31. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Berstad P, Seljeflot I, Veierod MB, Hjerkinn EM, Arnesen H, Pedersen JI. Supplementation with fish oil affects the association between very long-chain n–3 polyunsaturated fatty acids in serum non-esterified fatty acids and soluble vascular cell adhesion molecule-1. Clin Sci (Lond). 2003;105:13–20. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Hlavatý P, Kunešová M, Gojová M, Tvrzická E, Vecka M, Roubal P, Hill M, Hlavatá K, Kalousková P, Hainer Vet al. Change in fatty acid composition of serum lipids in obese females after short-term weight-reducing regimen with the addition of n–3 long chain polyunsaturated fatty acids in comparison to controls. Physiol Res. 2008;57(Suppl 1):S57–65. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Pishva H, Amini M, Eshraghian MR, Hosseini S, Mahboob SA. Effects of EPA supplementation on plasma fatty acids composition in hypertriglyceridemic subjects with FABP2 and PPARα genotypes. J Diabetes Metab Disord. 2012;11:25. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

nxab016_Supplemental_File

Articles from The Journal of Nutrition are provided here courtesy of American Society for Nutrition

RESOURCES