In this article [Dunaway SB, Maxwell CL, Tantalo LC, et al. Neurosyphilis Treatment Outcomes After Intravenous Penicillin G versus Intramuscular Procaine Penicillin Plus Oral Probenecid. Clin Infect Dis 2020; 71(2):267–273. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciz795], there is an error in Figure 1. The lower box on the right (number of subjects treated with CDC recommended neurosyphilis regimen) has transposed numbers of those treated with intravenous aqueous penicillin G (PenG) versus intramuscular aqueous procaine penicillin G plus oral probenecid (APPG-P). It should read: APPG-P, n = 118 and PenG, n = 32. The authors regret the error.
. 2021 Jan 9;72(5):911. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciaa1714
Erratum
Collection date 2021 Mar 1.
© The Author(s) 2021. Published by Oxford University Press for the Infectious Diseases Society of America. All rights reserved. For permissions, e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.
This article is published and distributed under the terms of the Oxford University Press, Standard Journals Publication Model (https://academic.oup.com/journals/pages/open_access/funder_policies/chorus/standard_publication_model)
PMCID: PMC8244562 PMID: 33421055
This corrects the article "Neurosyphilis Treatment Outcomes After Intravenous Penicillin G Versus Intramuscular Procaine Penicillin Plus Oral Probenecid" in volume 71 on page 267.