Skip to main content
eLife logoLink to eLife
. 2021 Jun 30;10:e66582. doi: 10.7554/eLife.66582

The Ca2+-activated cation channel TRPM4 is a positive regulator of pressure overload-induced cardiac hypertrophy

Yang Guo 1,2,3,, Ze-Yan Yu 1,2,3,, Jianxin Wu 1, Hutao Gong 2, Scott Kesteven 2,3, Siiri E Iismaa 1,3, Andrea Y Chan 1, Sara Holman 1, Silvia Pinto 4,5, Andy Pironet 4,5, Charles D Cox 1,3, Robert M Graham 1,3, Rudi Vennekens 4,5, Michael P Feneley 2,3,6,, Boris Martinac 1,3,
Editors: Noriaki Emoto7, Matthias Barton8
PMCID: PMC8245133  PMID: 34190686

Abstract

Pathological left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH) occurs in response to pressure overload and remains the single most important clinical predictor of cardiac mortality. The molecular pathways in the induction of pressure overload LVH are potential targets for therapeutic intervention. Current treatments aim to remove the pressure overload stimulus for LVH, but do not completely reverse adverse cardiac remodelling. Although numerous molecular signalling steps in the induction of LVH have been identified, the initial step by which mechanical stretch associated with cardiac pressure overload is converted into a chemical signal that initiates hypertrophic signalling remains unresolved. In this study, we show that selective deletion of transient receptor potential melastatin 4 (TRPM4) channels in mouse cardiomyocytes results in an approximately 50% reduction in the LVH induced by transverse aortic constriction. Our results suggest that TRPM4 channel is an important component of the mechanosensory signalling pathway that induces LVH in response to pressure overload and represents a potential novel therapeutic target for the prevention of pathological LVH.

Research organism: Mouse

Introduction

Pathological left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH) is the most powerful independent predictor for cardiovascular mortality (Levy et al., 1990; Mudd and Kass, 2008). It occurs in response to two very common clinical conditions: systemic hypertension and aortic valve stenosis. It manifests as increased cardiomyocyte volume and weight (Frey et al., 2004; Nicks et al., 2020; Swynghedauw, 1999; Wilde and Brugada, 2011), which results in increased heart mass, particularly left ventricular (LV) mass. Although pathological LVH commonly occurs as a response to increased cardiac wall stress, sometimes termed ‘compensatory hypertrophy’, it is now well established that the effects of pathological LVH are deleterious for heart function, leading to increased cardiac failure and death (Levy et al., 1990; Mudd and Kass, 2008). So far, the only treatment for this condition is lowering elevated blood pressure or replacing a stenotic aortic valve. However, these treatments cannot completely reverse the pathological effects on the myocardium once LVH is established. Consequently, understanding the molecular mechanisms underlying pathological LVH may lead to therapies directed at preventing, inhibiting, or reversing pathological LVH and reducing its associated morbidity and mortality.

The development of pathological LVH depends on upstream stimuli, such as mechanical forces (e.g. pressure overload) or neuroendocrine hormones (e.g. angiotensin II), and distinct downstream signalling mechanisms (Maillet et al., 2013; Nakamura and Sadoshima, 2018; Saucerman et al., 2019; Tham et al., 2015; van Berlo et al., 2013). Importantly, a large body of work implicates intracellular Ca2+ levels and subsequent activation of Ca2+/calmodulin (CaM)-dependent signalling pathways, such as the calcineurin-nuclear factor of activated T-cells (NFAT)-GATA4 axis, in the induction of pathological LVH (Bers, 2008; Kehat and Molkentin, 2010; Molkentin, 2000; Molkentin, 2013; Molkentin et al., 1998; Wilkins et al., 2004; Wilkins and Molkentin, 2004; Zarain-Herzberg et al., 2011). Gq-coupled receptors are thought to play an important role in the induction of pathological LVH in response to both neurohumoral stimulation (Adams et al., 1998; Nakamura and Sadoshima, 2018; Paradis et al., 2000) and mechanical forces, such as the increase in LV afterload induced by experimental aortic constriction (Keys et al., 2002). Once activated, Gq-coupled receptors are thought to then activate the calcineurin-NFAT pathway (Kehat and Molkentin, 2010; Molkentin, 2000; Molkentin, 2013; Molkentin et al., 1998; Wilkins et al., 2004; Wilkins and Molkentin, 2004).

Our previous experimental work, however, has demonstrated that although Gq-coupled receptors and the calcineurin-NFAT pathway are essential for the induction of LVH in response to angiotensin II, neither are required for the induction of LVH in response to transverse aortic constriction (TAC), the most common experimental model of LV pressure overload (Yu et al., 2021), and one not associated with activation of the renin–angiotensin system (Zou et al., 2004). In contrast to the lack of activation of the calcineurin-NFAT pathway with TAC, an alternative Ca2+/CaM-dependent signalling pathway, the Ca2+/CaM-dependent protein kinase II (CaMKII)-histone deacetylase (HDAC)-myocyte enhancer factor 2 (MEF2) pathway (Backs et al., 2009; Backs et al., 2006; Passier et al., 2000), is activated in response to TAC (Yu et al., 2021).

Left unexplained by our previous work, however, is the mechanism by which the CaMKII-HDAC-MEF2 pathway is activated by TAC, given that this activation is not dependent on Gq-coupled receptors. Prime candidates for mediating this mechanism are mechanosensitive ion channels. In cardiac mechanotransduction, where mechanical stimuli are converted into electrical or chemical signals (Martinac and Cox, 2017; Peyronnet et al., 2016), Ca2+-dependent ion channels, such as transient receptor potential (TRP) channels, act as important modulators of intracellular Ca2+ homeostasis (Wang et al., 2018) and are thought to be unique biosensors that activate specific pathological LVH signalling pathways (Eder and Molkentin, 2011; Wu et al., 2010). As a Ca2+- and voltage-activated non-selective monovalent cation channel, TRP cation channel subfamily melastatin 4 (TRPM4) may contribute to an increase in intracellular Ca2+ concentration by causing membrane depolarisation (Launay et al., 2002), although we and others (Constantine et al., 2016; Gottlieb et al., 2008; Nikolaev et al., 2019) have demonstrated that mammalian TRP channels, including TRPM4, are not directly activated by membrane stretch. Consequently, if TRPM4 plays a role in TAC-induced LVH, it acts as an amplifier of the primary Ca2+ or voltage signal from a yet to be determined mechanosensitive ion channel or channels. TRPM4 has been functionally characterised in atrial and ventricular cardiomyocytes, both human and rodent (Guinamard et al., 2004; Guinamard et al., 2006; Watanabe et al., 2008). Other studies indicate that TRPM4 contributes to both cardiac function and disease development, including cardiac hypertrophy and heart failure (Frede et al., 2020; Gueffier et al., 2017; Hedon et al., 2021; Jacobs et al., 2015; Mathar et al., 2014). Previous studies using Trpm4 cardiomyocyte-specific knock-out (Trpm4 cKO) mice have shown that TRPM4 is a negative regulator of angiotensin II-induced cardiac hypertrophy in mice, which involves the calcineurin-NFAT pathway (Kecskés et al., 2015), and that TRPM4 is essential for survival after myocardial infarction (Hedon et al., 2021; Jacobs et al., 2015). However, whether TRPM4 plays a role in mechanical pressure overload-induced LVH has yet to be determined.

Here, we investigate the role of TRPM4 in pressure overload LVH induced by TAC in homozygous Trpm4 cKO mice (Kecskés et al., 2015) as compared to wild-type (WT) control mice. We demonstrate that loss of cardiomyocyte TRPM4 significantly attenuates the development of LVH observed in response to TAC in WT mice. Moreover, this effect is associated with reduced activation of the CaMKII-HDAC4-MEF2 pathway.

Results

Development of LV hypertrophy in response to pressure overload at 14 days after TAC in WT mice

As documented in our previous study (Yu et al., 2021), TAC-induced cardiac hypertrophy is a response to LV pressure overload. As expected, LV systolic pressure increased by ~65 mmHg (p<0.001) 14 days after TAC (Table 1), whereas heart rate (Table 1), dP/dtmax, and dP/dtmin (Table 1) remained unaltered. Consistent with 14 days of TAC resulting in a compensated LVH model, body weight (BW) and lung weight (LW) (Table 1) remained unchanged in TAC mice compared to sham-operated mice. These results indicate that our TAC model at 14 days remains an excellent model of compensated LVH rather than heart failure.

Table 1. Haemodynamic parameters were measured in wild-type (WT) mice 14 days after subjected to TAC versus sham-operated controls (n = 7–11/group).

Post-mortem analysis of mice 2 days or 14 days after sham or TAC; LVH developed 14 days after TAC, indicated by the ratios of HW/BW, LVW/BW, and LVW/TL in WT mice subjected to TAC versus sham-operated controls. Cardiac fibrosis was evaluated by Masson’s trichrome staining of LV tissue from WT mice subjected to 2 days or 14 days of TAC versus sham-operated controls; cardiac fibrosis areas were graded (n = 5–6/group). Relative Collagen III (Col3a1) mRNA expression was normalised by GAPDH and calculated as fold change relative to sham in 2 days and 14 days groups, respectively (n = 4/group). LVSP: left ventricular systolic pressure; HR: heart rate; dP/dt: first derivative of pressure with respect to time. BW: body weight; HW: heart weight; LVW: left ventricular weight; LW: lung weight; TL: tibia length; HW/BW: heart weight to body weight ratio; LVW/BW: LV weight to body weight ratio; LVW/TL: LV weight to tibia length ratio; LW/BW: lung weight to body weight ratio. Results are presented as means ± SEM. **p<0.01, ***p<0.001, compared between sham- and TAC-operated groups.

Table 1—source data 1. Haemodynamic and anatomical parameters.
2 days 14 days
Sham TAC Sham TAC
Haemodynamic parameter
n 7 7
HR (bpm) 506 ± 4 506 ± 3
Aortic systolic pressure (mmHg) 103 ± 1 164 ± 2***
Aortic diastolic pressure (mmHg) 76 ± 1 74 ± 1
LV systolic
Pressure (mmHg)
105 ± 3 164 ± 8***
dP/dtmax (mmHg/s) 9438 ± 367 9838 ± 259
dP/dtmin (mmHg/s) −9666 ± 377 −10108 ± 364
Anatomical parameter
n 8 8 11 11
BW (g) 28.5 ± 0.3 27.7 ± 0.5 28.6 ± 0.3 27.2 ± 0.5
HW (mg) 136.7 ± 2.2 132.8 ± 1.3 133.1 ± 1.9 176.1 ± 3.6 ***
LVW (mg) 98.0 ± 2.0 97.7 ± 1.4 96.4 ± 1.8 136.1 ± 1.4 ***
LW (mg) 141.9 ± 0.9 143.6 ± 1.5 146.9 ± 1.8 147.0 ± 1.9
TL (mm) 17.4 ± 0.1 17.5 ± 0.2 17.5 ± 0.2 17.2 ± 0.1
HW/BW (mg/g) 4.8 ± 0.1 4.8 ± 0.1 4.6 ± 0.1 6.6 ± 0.1 ***
LVW/BW (mg/g) 3.4 ± 0.1 3.5 ± 0.1 3.4 ± 0.1 5.1 ± 0.1 ***
LVW/TL (mg/mm) 5.6 ± 0.1 5.6 ± 0.1 5.3 ± 0.1 7.9 ± 0.1 ***
LW/BW (mg/g) 5.0 ± 0.1 5.2 ± 0.1 5.2 ± 0.1 5.4 ± 0.1
Assessment of cardiac fibrosis
n 5 5 6 6
Fibrosis areas (%) 4.0 ± 0.2 3.6 ± 0.2 4.4 ± 0.1 12.4 ± 0.5***
n 4 4 4 4
Collagen III mRNA expression
(fold change)
1.0 ± 0.1 5.7 ± 0.8** 1.0 ± 0.1 5.1 ± 0.7**

Representative photos illustrate the size differences of WT mouse hearts after 2 days and 14 days of sham or TAC (Figure 1—figure supplement 1A). LVH was not detected 2 days after TAC (Table 1, Figure 1—figure supplement 1A), whereas we observed significant LVH in WT mice 14 days after TAC, as evidenced by increases in heart weight (HW, p<0.001), left ventricular weight (LVW, p<0.001), and the ratios of heart weight/body weight (HW/BW, p<0.001), left ventricle weight/body weight (LVW/BW, p<0.001), and left ventricle weight/tibial length (LVW/TL, p<0.001), without changes in BW or TL, when compared with the sham-operated animals (Table 1). Consistent with the development of pathological hypertrophy, TAC was associated with an increase in cardiac fibrosis (p<0.001, Table 1, Figure 1—figure supplement 1B) and enhanced collagen III (Col3a1) expression (p<0.001, Table 1).

Haemodynamic parameters were measured in wild-type (WT) mice 14 days after being subjected to TAC versus sham-operated controls (n = 7–11/group). Post-mortem analysis of mice 2 days or 14 days after sham or TAC; LVH developed 14 days after TAC, indicated by the ratios of HW/BW, LVW/BW, and LVW/TL in WT mice subjected to TAC versus sham-operated controls. Cardiac fibrosis was evaluated by Masson’s trichrome staining of LV tissue from WT mice subjected to 2 days or 14 days of TAC versus sham-operated controls; cardiac fibrosis areas were graded (n = 5–6/group). Relative Collagen III (Col3a1) mRNA expression was normalised by GAPDH and calculated as fold change relative to sham in 2 days and 14 days groups, respectively (n = 4/group). LVSP: left ventricular systolic pressure; HR: heart rate; dP/dt: first derivative of pressure with respect to time; BW: body weight; HW: heart weight; LVW: left ventricular weight; LW: lung weight; TL: tibia length; HW/BW: heart weight to body weight ratio; LVW/BW: LV weight to body weight ratio; LVW/TL: LV weight to tibia length ratio; LW/BW: lung weight to body weight ratio. Results are presented as means ± SEM. **p<0.01, ***p<0.001, compared between sham- and TAC-operated groups.

Early gene markers of induction of pathological hypertrophy in WT mice

Although there was no significant LVH 2 days after TAC (Table 1, Figure 1—figure supplement 1A), induction of hypertrophy-associated genes (atrial natriuretic peptide [ANP, Nppa; 9.9-fold, p<0.01], brain natriuretic peptide [BNP, Nppb; 8.1-fold, p<0.01], and α-skeletal actin [α-SA, Acta1; 4.5-fold, p<0.01]) was already evident at this time (Table 2), and expression of these genes remained high at 14 days (ANP, Nppa; p<0.001, BNP, Nppb; p<0.001, and α-SA, Acta1; p<0.001,Table 2).

Table 2. Early markers of LVH induction in response to left ventricular pressure overload in WT mice.

Relative mRNA expression of ANP (Nppa), BNP (Nppb), and a-SA (Acta1) after 2 days or 14 days of TAC compared to sham (n = 4–5/group). The relative mRNA expression was normalised by GAPDH and calculated as fold change relative to sham in 2 days and 14 days groups, respectively.Results are presented as means ± SEM. **p<0.01, ***p<0.001, compared between sham- and TAC-operated groups.

Table 2—source data 1. Early gene markers.
2 days 14 days
Sham TAC Sham TAC
LVH markers (fold change)
n 4 4 5 5
ANP 1.0 ± 0.1 9.9 ± 1.1** 1.0 ± 0.1 9.6 ± 0.7***
BNP 1.0 ± 0.1 8.1 ± 0.8** 1.0 ± 0.2 7.5 ± 0.4***
α-SA 1.0 ± 0.1 4.5 ± 0.5** 1.0 ± 0.1 4.2 ± 0.4***

TRPM4 expression was downregulated in response to LV pressure overload in WT mice

To examine whether the TRPM4 ion channel is involved in TAC-induced LVH, we conducted real-time quantitative PCR (RT-PCR) on LV tissues or isolated LV cardiomyocytes from TAC- or sham-operated hearts. Trpm4 mRNA expression in LV tissue (Figure 1A) and isolated cardiomyocytes (Figure 1B) fell by 50% (p<0.001) and 57% (p<0.001), respectively, in response to 2 days of TAC, and expression continued to be reduced by 30% (p<0.05, Figure 1A) and 40% (p<0.001, Figure 1B), respectively, at 14 days. Consistent with the mRNA changes, TRPM4 protein expression in LV tissue and isolated cardiomyocytes also fell significantly, particularly in cardiomyocytes, after 14 days of TAC (p<0.001) (Figure 1C–E).

Figure 1. TRPM4 expression was downregulated in response to left ventricular (LV) pressure overload.

(A) Relative mRNA expression of Trpm4 in LV tissue and (B) in LV cardiomyocytes (CMs) after 2 days and 14 days of sham and TAC. (C) Representative western blots of TRPM4 protein expression in LV tissue (left panel) and in LV cardiomyocytes (right panel). (D) Western blots from LV tissue and (E) LV cardiomyocytes after 2 days and 14 days of TAC were quantified for TRPM4 protein expression. Relative TRPM4 mRNA and protein expression in the LV tissue and cardiomyocytes were normalised by GAPDH and calculated as fold change relative to sham in 2 days and 14 days groups, respectively. Results are presented as means ± SEM. *p<0.05, ***p<0.001 vs. sham-operated groups.

Figure 1—source data 1. Source data file (Excel) for Figure 1A,B,D and E.

Figure 1.

Figure 1—figure supplement 1. Enlarged heart and cardiac fibrosis were detected 14 days after TAC.

Figure 1—figure supplement 1.

(A) Representative photos of hearts from WT mice 2 days or 14 days after sham or TAC. (B) Representative photos of cardiac fibrosis, evaluated by Masson’s trichrome staining of LV tissue from WT mice subjected to TAC versus sham-operated controls. Scale bar = 100 µm.

TRPM4 deficiency decreases the hypertrophic response to TAC-induced pressure overload

To further investigate the role of TRPM4 channels in pressure overload-induced LVH, we performed TAC or sham surgery in mice with cardiomyocyte-specific, conditional deletion of Trpm4 (Trpm4 cKO) using Cre expression driven by the Myl7 promoter (Kecskés et al., 2015). Results obtained in these Trpm4 cKO mice were compared with those in WT (Trpm4+/+) mice. Haemodynamic and anatomical parameters obtained after 2 days and 14 days of sham/TAC in WT and Trpm4 cKO mice are shown in Supplementary file 1. TAC produced a similar degree of LV pressure overload in both WT (p<0.001) and Trpm4 cKO (p<0.001) mice when compared with sham-operated groups (Figure 2A) but did not alter heart rate (Figure 2B), cardiac contractility (Figure 2C,D), LW (Figure 2E), or BW (Figure 2G). Figure 2F illustrates representative images of WT and Trpm4 cKO mouse hearts after 14 days of sham or TAC. No LVH was detected 2 days after TAC in either Trpm4 cKO mice or WT mice when compared with sham-operated groups (Figure 2H–J). After 14 days, TAC induced a 32, 42, and 44% increase (all p<0.001) in HW/BW ratio, LVW/BW ratio, and LVW/TL ratio, respectively, in WT mice when compared with sham-operated controls (Figure 2H–J). However, this hypertrophic response to 14 days of TAC was attenuated in Trpm4 cKO mice, as evident by only a 17, 20, and 23% increase (all p<0.001) in HW/BW ratio, LVW/BW ratio, and LVW/TL ratio, respectively (Figure 2H–J). These findings demonstrate that when compared with WT mice, Trpm4 cKO mice developed approximately 50% less LVH (p<0.001) in response to TAC.

Figure 2. The hypertrophic response of WT and Trpm4 cKO mice to TAC-induced LV pressure overload.

Figure 2.

(A) Systolic pressure, (B) heart rate, (C, D) dP/dt after 14 days of sham or TAC in WT and Trpm4 cKO mice. (n = 6–7/group). (E) Lung weight after 14 days of sham or TAC in WT and Trpm4 cKO mice. (n = 7–9/group). (F) Representative photos indicate heart size differences after 14 days of sham or TAC in WT and Trpm4 cKO mice. (G) Body weight, (H) Heart weight, and (I, J) LV weight normalised to body weight and tibia length, in WT and Trpm4 cKO mice after 2 days and 14 days of sham or TAC. (n = 7–9/group). (K) Representative micrographs and (L) quantitation of Masson’s trichrome staining of LV tissue from WT mice and Trpm4 cKO mice after 14 days of sham or TAC (n = 3/group), scale bar = 200 µm in (K). (M) Relative collagen III (Col3a1) mRNA expression after 14 days of sham or TAC. (n = 6/group). The mRNA relative expression was normalised by comparison to GAPDH and calculated as fold change relative to sham in WT and Trpm4 cKO groups, respectively. Results are presented as means ± SEM. *p<0.05, ***p<0.001.

Figure 2—source data 1. Source data file (Excel) for Figure 2A,B,C,D,E,G,H,I,J,L, and M.

Reduced fibrosis in Trpm4 cKO hearts after TAC

We evaluated cardiac fibrosis in response to pressure overload in Trpm4 cKO hearts and WT hearts by Masson’s trichrome staining (Figure 2K). When compared with an average 3.17-fold increase (p<0.001) in cardiac fibrosis in WT TAC hearts, the increase in Trpm4 cKO TAC hearts was only 1.75-fold (p<0.05) (Figure 2L). In addition, we found a significant increase in collagen III (Col3a1) mRNA expression in WT TAC hearts when compared with WT sham hearts (p<0.001). However, there was no significant increase in collagen III (Col3a1) mRNA expression in Trpm4 cKO TAC hearts when compared with sham hearts (Figure 2M). Thus, Trpm4 inactivation attenuated the fibrotic response to TAC.

TRPM4 deficiency reduced the expression of hypertrophy markers in response to TAC-induced pressure overload

Consistent with the development of pathological hypertrophy, both 2 and 14 days of TAC in WT mice significantly enhanced expression of the hypertrophy-associated genes, ANP (Nppa), BNP (Nppb), and α-SA (Acta1) (Figure 3A,B). However, these gene markers remained unchanged with TAC in Trpm4 cKO mice (Figure 3A,B), except for ANP (Nppa) at 14 days. These data indicate that loss of TRPM4 attenuates the activation of hypertrophic marker genes in response to TAC.

Figure 3. Comparison of gene expression of LVH markers in response to TAC-induced pressure overload in WT and Trpm4 cKO mice.

Figure 3.

(A) Relative mRNA expression of ANP (Nppa), BNP (Nppb), and α-SA (Acta1) after 2 days of TAC compared to sham-operated mice. (n = 6/group). (B) Relative mRNA expression of ANP (Nppa), BNP (Nppb), and α-SA (Acta1) after 14 days of sham and TAC. (n = 6/group). The mRNA relative expression was normalised by GAPDH and calculated as fold change relative to WT sham in 2 days and 14 days groups, respectively. Results are presented as means ± SEM, *p<0.05, **p<0.01, ***p<0.001.

Figure 3—source data 1. Source data file (Excel) for Figure 3A,B.

CaMKII-HDAC4-MEF2 hypertrophic signalling pathway in WT and Trpm4 cKO mouse hearts

We next examined the molecular signalling pathways mediating LVH in both WT and Trpm4 cKO hearts after 2 days of TAC, a time at which molecular signalling is already activated in response to the increased haemodynamic load induced by TAC (Yu et al., 2021), but before measurable LVH has developed.

The cytoplasmic and the nuclear fractions of LV tissue were separated as described in Materials and methods. High fraction purity was confirmed by western blot using antibodies against marker proteins specific for cytoplasmic (glyceraldehyde 3-phosphate dehydrogenase, GAPDH) and nuclear (Histone H2B) fractions (Figure 4—figure supplement 1).

Representative images of key cytoplasmic and nuclear proteins detected by western blot analysis are shown in Figure 4A. Quantitative data for cytoplasmic and nuclear proteins, normalised by GAPDH and Histone H2B, respectively, are shown in Figure 4B. We first investigated whether CaMKIIδ activity is increased in response to pressure overload by measuring both total CaMKIIδ expression and auto-phosphorylated CaMKII (p-CaMKII) at threonine 287 (Thr287), a marker of CaMKII activation (Lai et al., 1987; Luczak et al., 2020). We found that in WT hearts, 2 days of TAC resulted in a significant increase in the total CaMKIIδ protein level in cytoplasmic (p<0.01) and nuclear fractions (p<0.01), accompanied by increased p-CaMKII protein levels in both the cytoplasm (p<0.05) and nucleus (p<0.01). Associated with this increase, there was a rise in total cytoplasmic HDAC4 (p<0.01) and phosphorylated HDAC4 (p-HDAC4) levels (p<0.001), but no change in nuclear HDAC4. This 2.11-fold increase in the cytoplasmic/nuclear ratio of HDAC4 (p<0.01) in WT hearts indicates that TAC-induced pressure overload leads to the nuclear export of HDAC4 in WT TAC hearts. This increase was accompanied by a 1.76-fold increase of MEF2A levels in the nucleus (p<0.05), which together with the de-repression of MEF2A activity would account for the induction of LVH.

Figure 4. CaMKII-HDAC4-MEF2 signalling pathway in response to TAC after 2 days in WT and Trpm4 cKO mouse hearts.

(A) Representative western blots showing the expression of key proteins in the CaMKII-HDAC4-MEF2 signalling pathway in the cytoplasm (left) and nucleus (right). (B) Cytoplasmic (left) and nuclear (right) quantitative data were normalised by GAPDH and Histone H2B, respectively. Fold changes and cytoplasmic/nuclear ratios were calculated relative to sham groups, in each genotype. Results are presented as means ± SEM, n = 6/group, *p<0.05, **p<0.01, ***p<0.001.

Figure 4—source data 1. Source data file (Excel) for Figure 4B.

Figure 4.

Figure 4—figure supplement 1. Demonstration of successful fractionation of compartments.

Figure 4—figure supplement 1.

The purity of the fractions extracted from the LV tissue was assessed by western blot using specific marker proteins: GAPDH for cytoplasmic fraction and histone H2B for nuclear fraction. Each fraction (n = 6/group) was run side-by-side on the same blot and then probed separately against each of two primary antibodies: anti-GAPDH and anti-Histone H2B to validate purity of fraction.
Figure 4—figure supplement 2. Cytoplasmic/nuclear ratio of the key proteins in CaMKII-HDAC4-MEF2 signalling pathway.

Figure 4—figure supplement 2.

Cytoplasmic/nuclear ratios are shown as fold changes relative to sham groups, in each genotype. Results are presented as means ± SEM, n = 6/group, *p<0.05, ***p<0.001.
Figure 4—figure supplement 2—source data 1. Source data file (Excel) for Figure 4—figure supplement 2.

In contrast to the effects of TAC in WT hearts, in Trpm4 cKO hearts, TAC produced a decrease in cytoplasmic CaMKIIδ levels (0.66-fold of that observed in sham hearts; p<0.001). Consistent with this, the cytoplasmic p-CaMKII levels in TAC hearts also decreased (0.63-fold of that observed in sham hearts; p<0.01). Although the increase in nuclear CaMKIIδ was similar (p<0.05) to that observed with TAC in WT hearts, the nuclear p-CaMKII levels showed no significant difference between sham and TAC in Trpm4 cKO hearts, which indicates less nuclear CaMKIIδ activation by TAC in Trpm4 cKO hearts. We found that p-HDAC4 increased in Trpm4 cKO TAC hearts in both the cytoplasm (p<0.05) and the nucleus (p<0.05), but there was no change in total HDAC4. Thus, the cytoplasmic/nuclear ratio of HDAC4 remained the same in Trpm4 cKO TAC hearts as in sham hearts, indicating inhibition of nuclear HDAC4 export in TAC-treated Trpm4 cKO hearts. In addition, consistent with MEF2A activation driving hypertrophy development, reduced LVH in Trpm4 cKO TAC hearts was associated with a smaller (1.26-fold) increase in MEF2A levels in the nucleus (p<0.05) when compared with WT TAC hearts. For completeness, the cytoplasmic/nuclear ratios of other relevant proteins in this signalling pathway are shown in Figure 4—figure supplement 2.

Taken together, these data implicate the CaMKII-HDAC4-MEF2 hypertrophic signalling pathway in mediating TAC-induced LVH, but the extent of the hypertrophic response is regulated by TRPM4 channels.

Calcineurin-NFAT hypertrophic signalling pathway in WT and Trpm4 cKO mouse hearts

Next, we examined the expression of proteins involved in the calcineurin-NFAT hypertrophic signalling pathway. Representative images of key cytoplasmic and nuclear proteins detected by western blot analysis are shown in Figure 5A. Quantitative data for cytoplasmic and nuclear proteins, normalised by GAPDH and Histone H2B, respectively, are shown in Figure 5B. In WT hearts, there was no significant difference in cytoplasmic or nuclear NFATc4 protein expression in sham and TAC hearts after 2 days. Consistent with these findings, total GSK3β, serine-9 phosphorylated GSK3β and GATA4 levels were also unchanged in response to TAC. These findings indicate that TAC did not result in increased nuclear translocation of NFATc4, the most reliable indicator of calcineurin activation (Molkentin, 2013), and confirm our previous finding (Yu et al., 2021) that the calcineurin-NFAT pathway is not activated by TAC.

Figure 5. Calcineurin-NFAT signalling pathway in response to TAC after 2 days in WT and Trpm4 cKO mouse hearts.

(A) Representative western blots showing the expression of key proteins in the calcineurin-NFAT signalling pathway in cytoplasm (left) and nucleus (right). (B) Cytoplasmic (left) and nuclear (right) quantitative data were normalised by GAPDH and Histone H2B, respectively. Fold changes and cytoplasmic/nuclear ratios were calculated relative to sham groups, in each genotype. Results are presented as means ± SEM, n = 5–6/group, *p<0.05, **p<0.01.

Figure 5—source data 1. Source data file (Excel) for Figure 5B.

Figure 5.

Figure 5—figure supplement 1. Cytoplasmic/nuclear ratio of the key proteins in calcineurin-NFAT signalling pathway.

Figure 5—figure supplement 1.

Cytoplasmic/nuclear ratios are shown as fold changes relative to sham groups, in each genotype. Results are presented as means ± SEM, n = 6/group.
Figure 5—figure supplement 1—source data 1. Source data file (Excel) for Figure 5—figure supplement 1.

In contrast to WT hearts, a 1.28-fold increase in nuclear NFATc4 (p<0.05) was observed in Trpm4 cKO hearts after TAC, which led to a 0.31-fold decrease in the cytoplasmic/nuclear ratio compared to sham-operated hearts (p<0.01). This indicated lower nuclear export of NFATc4 in the Trpm4 cKO TAC hearts when compared to sham hearts. Accordingly, we found a 1.20-fold increase in nuclear p-GSK3β (serine 9, Ser9) (p<0.05) in Trpm4 cKO TAC hearts. As phosphorylation at the serine 9 residue indicates inactivation of GSK3β, these findings suggest that the GSK3β-mediated export of NFATc4 from the nucleus was partially inhibited, which is consistent with the increased level of NFATc4 in the nucleus. Furthermore, accompanied by the increase in nuclear NFATc4, a 1.18-fold increase in GATA4 expression (p<0.05) in the nucleus was observed in Trpm4 cKO TAC hearts. All these observations are consistent with a reduction in the tonic inhibition of calcineurin by CaMKII (De Koninck and Schulman, 1998; Kreusser et al., 2014; MacDonnell et al., 2009) in Trpm4 cKO hearts after TAC. For completeness, the cytoplasmic/nuclear ratios of other relevant proteins in this signalling pathway are shown in Figure 5—figure supplement 1.

Discussion

In the present study, we employed mice subjected to TAC as an in vivo cardiac hypertrophy model to investigate the role of the TRPM4 ion channels in pressure overload-induced pathological LVH. We compared Trpm4 cKO mice with WT controls. The experimental animals were examined 2 days after surgery when the molecular signalling pathway that drives LVH is switched on in response to the increased haemodynamic load induced by TAC but, importantly, before LVH has developed. In addition, the experimental animals were examined 14 days after surgery when the TAC-induced LVH phenotype is evident.

First, we found that TRPM4 channel expression in the WT mouse heart was modified by TAC-induced pressure overload hypertrophy. At 2 days and 14 days after TAC, both Trpm4 mRNA and protein expression were downregulated in LV tissue and isolated cardiomyocytes, suggesting that TRPM4 plays a role in TAC-induced LVH. Second, we demonstrated that the role of TRPM4 was pro-hypertrophic by performing sham and TAC surgery in Trpm4 cKO mice. This demonstrated that a reduction in TRPM4 expression in cardiomyocytes dampens the hypertrophic response to TAC, as evident by an approximately 50% reduction in the degree of LVH and LV fibrosis in Trpm4 cKO animals at 14 days after TAC, as compared with WT animals. Finally, to investigate the hypertrophic signalling pathways activated in response to pressure overload, we examined both the CaMKII-HDAC4-MEF2 and calcineurin-NFAT signalling pathways 2 days after TAC in WT and Trpm4 cKO mice (Figure 6). This confirmed our previous finding that the CaMKII-HDAC4-MEF2 pathway was activated in response to TAC in WT mice (Yu et al., 2021), but also revealed the new finding of reduced activation of the CaMKII-HDAC4-MEF2 pathway after TAC in Trpm4 cKO animals.

Figure 6. Schematic of the putative TAC-induced pathway that culminates in left ventricular hypertrophy.

Figure 6.

A Ca2+-permeable MS channel (e.g. Piezo1, TRPV2, TRPV4) acts as the mechanotransducer providing local Ca2+ that in turn stimulates TRPM4. The Na+-permeable TRPM4 activity then could either stimulate voltage-gated Ca2+ channels through membrane depolarisation or induce reverse activity of the Na+/ Ca2+exchanger through local Na+ loading. Either of these outcomes would lead to a high-amplitude increase in local Ca2+. Calmodulin then responds to this high-amplitude Ca2+ stimulus through the lower affinity Ca2+ binding site at its N-lobe which subsequently activates CaMKIIδ and thus stimulates the CaMKII-HDAC4-MEF2 pathway as shown in Yu et al., 2021. Calcineurin activation is inhibited by the activated CaMKIIδ and is activated preferentially by low-amplitude Ca2+ signalling via Gq-coupled receptors and calmodulin (see Discussion). ECM: extracellular matrix, MS: mechanosensitive, Cav: voltage-gated Ca2+ channel, ΔVm: membrane depolarisation, CaM: calmodulin.

Previous studies reported that the TRPM4 current contributes to the mammalian atrial action potential (Simard et al., 2013) as well as to the notch and early repolarisation phases of the action potential in Purkinje cells (Hof et al., 2016), providing a potential link to cardiac arrhythmias (Guinamard et al., 2015; Hedon et al., 2021; Wang et al., 2018). Importantly, there is evidence that the TRPM4 channel is a critical modulator of ventricular remodelling in cardiac hypertrophy and heart failure (Frede et al., 2020; Jacobs et al., 2015; Kecskés et al., 2015; Mathar et al., 2014). Kecskés et al., 2015 reported that TRPM4 activation suppresses angiotensin II-induced cardiac hypertrophy, which is dependent on the activation of the calcineurin-NFAT pathway. It has been proposed that this is due to the Ca2+-dependent modulation of TRPM4 activity, which leads to membrane depolarisation in cardiomyocytes and thus reduces the driving force for Ca2+ influx via store-operated calcium entry (SOCE) through TRP canonical type 1 (TRPC1) and type 3 (TRPC3) ion channels (Kecskés et al., 2015; Wu et al., 2004).

To our knowledge, however, a role for TRPM4 in the LVH induced by mechanical pressure overload has not been demonstrated previously. We propose here that a mechanical stimulus, such as that exerted by TAC, is converted to downstream Ca2+ signalling via the activity of mechanosensitive ion channels in the plasma membrane. Although the mechanosensitivity of TRP-type ion channels is still the subject of debate (Cox et al., 2019; Gottlieb et al., 2008), mammalian TRP ion channels, including TRPM4, have recently been shown to be insensitive to membrane stretch (Constantine et al., 2016; Nikolaev et al., 2019). Therefore, TRPM4 does not appear to be the primary mechanosensor responding to pressure overload. It is more likely to be a secondary ionotropic receptor downstream of a Ca2+-permeable mechanosensitive ion channel, such as Piezo1 (Gnanasambandam et al., 2015; Syeda et al., 2016) or TRPV2/4 (Lieben and Carmeliet, 2012), that functions as the primary mechanoreceptor responding directly to pressure overload and thus initiating the hypertrophic response in TAC, which is not dependent on activation of the calcineurin-NFAT pathway (Yu et al., 2021).

Stimulated by the local Ca2+ influx through a Ca2+-permeable mechanosensitive ion channel, the Na+-permeable TRPM4 activity then could either induce reverse activity of the Na+/ Ca2+ exchanger through local Na+ loading (Conway and Koushik, 2001; Wang et al., 2018) or depolarise the cardiomyocyte cell membrane to stimulate voltage-gated Ca2+ channels. Such potential downstream ion channels include the L-type Ca2+ channels, which were reported to mediate hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (Viola and Hool, 2017), as well as the T-type Ca2+ channels whose splice variants were found to be regulated in rat LV hypertrophic hearts induced by aortic constriction (Cribbs, 2010). Either of these outcomes would lead to a high-amplitude increase in local Ca2+. Thus, as a Ca2+-dependent non-selective monovalent cation channel (Constantine et al., 2016; Launay et al., 2002; Nilius et al., 2003; Nilius et al., 2005), TRPM4 could contribute to TAC-induced LVH by modulating downstream voltage-gated Ca2+ ion channels or the Na+/Ca2+ exchanger (Figure 6).

In this study, we confirmed the involvement of TRPM4 in TAC-induced LVH using Trpm4 cKO mice. Despite identical TAC-induced increases in haemodynamic load in both WT and Trpm4 cKO mice, the latter displayed a significantly reduced LVH response. This is in contrast to the increased hypertrophy reported in angiotensin II-treated Trpm4 cKO mice that is mediated by the calcineurin-NFAT pathway (Kecskés et al., 2015). These differential effects of TRPM4 on angiotensin II-mediated (Kecskés et al., 2015) and TAC-induced LVH support our previous finding that these two hypertrophic stimuli are mediated by distinct signalling mechanisms. Thus, in agreement with the present findings, we showed previously that the CaMKII-HDAC4-MEF2 pathway, but not the calcineurin-NFAT signalling pathway, is activated in response to TAC-induced pressure overload (Yu et al., 2021). This is most likely because CaMKIIδ and calcineurin respond to different characteristics of intracellular Ca2+ signalling (De Koninck and Schulman, 1998; Dolmetsch et al., 1997). Whereas calcineurin activation requires a sustained increase in the resting intracellular Ca2+ concentration, CaMKIIδ activation is more sensitive to high-frequency/high amplitude Ca2+ oscillations (Colella et al., 2008; De Koninck and Schulman, 1998), which are known to occur with TAC-induced aortic constriction (Chen et al., 2011). CaM responds to this high-amplitude Ca2+ stimulus through the lower affinity Ca2+ binding site at its N-lobe (Evans and Shea, 2009; Saimi and Kung, 2002), which subsequently activates CaMKIIδ and thus stimulates the CaMKII-HDAC4-MEF2 pathway (Yu et al., 2021). Moreover, once activated, CaMKII has been shown to inhibit calcineurin activity (Kreusser et al., 2014; MacDonnell et al., 2009Figure 6).

The high-frequency/high-amplitude Ca2+ oscillations characteristic of TAC and the consequent intermittent nature of the resulting TRPM4 activation, as distinct from the persistent activation associated with angiotensin II-induced hypertrophy, may mean that TAC-induced TRPM4 activation does not reduce the driving force for Ca2+ influx via SOCE that characterises the anti-hypertrophic action of TRPM4 in angiotensin II-induced hypertrophy (see above). Rather, in TAC-induced hypertrophy, TRPM4 acts as a second messenger, amplifying the small load-dependent Ca2+ signal produced by a mechanosensitive Ca2+-permeable ion channel. This would account for the pro-hypertrophic effect of TRPM4 in TAC-induced hypertrophy as distinct from its anti-hypertrophic effect in angiotensin II-induced hypertrophy.

In terms of the signalling pathway mediating pressure overload-induced LVH, we found that in Trpm4 cKO TAC hearts, the reduced LVH response was associated with significantly less activation of the CaMKII-HDAC4-MEF2 pathway, with reduced CaMKIIδ activation resulting in reduced nuclear export of HDAC4. Since nuclear HDAC4 inhibits MEF2A activity, a reduction in HDAC4 nuclear export would result in diminished MEF2A disinhibition and, given that MEF2A is a critical nuclear transcriptional regulator causing pathological cardiac remodelling, reduced hypertrophy development (Passier et al., 2000) as, indeed, observed here in Trpm4 cKO TAC hearts.

Decreased expression of TRPM4 channels in Trpm4 cKO animals likely modifies Ca2+-signalling, which directly regulates CaMKIIδ activation and its downstream pathway in response to TAC. Comparable with a study reporting that blockade of MEF2 acetylation can permit recovery from pathological cardiac hypertrophy without impairing physiologic adaptation (Wei et al., 2017), the lower concentration and reduced activity of MEF2A that we found in Trpm4 cKO TAC hearts suggest that inhibition of TRPM4 channels is potentially a viable therapeutic option for reducing pathological hypertrophy in response to pressure overload.

Interestingly, although the calcineurin-NFAT hypertrophic signalling pathway is not activated by TAC in WT hearts, it was partially activated in Trpm4 cKO TAC hearts, which manifested itself in the inhibition of GSK3β-mediated NFATc4 nuclear export and by an increase in GATA4. This may be explained by the reduction of the cytoplasmic CaMKIIδ in Trpm4 cKO TAC hearts, as CaMKII negatively regulates calcineurin activity (Kreusser et al., 2014; MacDonnell et al., 2009Figure 6). It is notable, nevertheless, that the net effect of the loss of TRPM4 was a significant reduction in TAC-induced LVH, indicating that the direct effect of less activation of the CaMKII-HDAC4-MEF2 pathway in reducing hypertrophy development outweighed the indirect pro-hypertrophic effect resulting from blunting CaMKIIδ’s inhibition of calcineurin.

In summary, our study provides compelling evidence that TRPM4 plays an important role in pressure overload-induced pathological LVH, with diminished TRPM4 expression reducing TAC-induced hypertrophy. Furthermore, we demonstrated that TRPM4 is a likely component of a cardiac mechanotransduction process that activates the CaMKII-HDAC4-MEF2 pathway in response to TAC. It is likely that TRPM4 is activated by upstream primary mechanoreceptors, such as Piezo1 or TRPV2/4 channels, which provide the first step in this mechanotransduction pathway. These findings expand our understanding of the molecular mechanism underlying mechanical pressure overload-induced LVH. Moreover, our work provides new insights into possible treatment strategies for limiting pressure overload-induced pathological hypertrophy.

Methods

Key resources table.

Reagent type (species) or resource Designation Source or reference Identifiers Additional information
Antibody Anti-TRPM4
(rabbit polyclonal)
Alomone Labs Cat# ACC-044,
RRID:AB_2040250
Western blot (1:200)
Antibody Anti-CaMKII delta
(rabbit monoclonal)
Abcam Cat# ab181052,
RRID:AB_2891241
Western blot (1:1000)
Antibody Anti-p-CaMKII (Thr287)
(rabbit polyclonal)
Thermo Fisher Scientific Cat# PA5-37833,
RRID:AB_2554441
Western blot (1:5000)
Antibody Anti-HDAC4
(rabbit monoclonal)
Cell Signaling Technology Cat# 7628
RRID:AB_10860255
Western blot (1:1500)
Antibody Anti-p-HDAC4 (Ser246)
(rabbit monoclonal)
Cell Signaling Technology Cat# 3443
RRID:AB_2118723
Western blot (1:1500)
Antibody Anti-MEF2A
(rabbit polyclonal)
Cell Signaling Technology Cat# 9736
RRID:AB_10691852
Western blot (1:3000)
Antibody Anti-NFATc4
(rabbit polyclonal)
Abcam Cat# ab99431, RRID:AB_10675673 Western blot (1:1500)
Antibody Anti-GSK3β
(rabbit monoclonal)
Cell Signaling Technology Cat# 9315,
RRID:AB_490890
Western blot (1:500)
Antibody Anti-p-GSK3β (Ser9)
(rabbit polyclonal)
Cell Signaling Technology Cat# 9336,
RRID:AB_331405
Western blot (1:1500)
Antibody Anti-GATA4
(mouse monoclonal)
Santa Cruz Biotechnology Cat# sc-25310, RRID:AB_627667 Western blot (1:1000)
Antibody Anti-GAPDH
(rabbit monoclonal)
Cell Signaling Technology Cat# 2118,
RRID:AB_561053
Western blot
(1:10,000)
Antibody Anti-Histone H2B
(rabbit polyclonal)
Abcam Cat# ab1790, RRID:AB_302612 Western blot (1:5000)
Antibody Goat anti-rabbit IgG (goat polyclonal) Abcam Cat# ab6721,
RRID:AB_955447
Western blot (1:10,000)
Antibody Rabbit anti-mouse IgG
(rabbit polyclonal)
Abcam Cat# ab6728, RRID:AB_955440 Western blot (1:5000)
Sequence-based reagent ANP
(Nppa)_F
Sigma-Aldrich PCR primers TGATAGATGAAGGCAGGAAGCCGC
Sequence-based reagent ANP(Nppa)_R Sigma-Aldrich PCR primers AGGATTGGAGCCCAGAGTGGACTAGG
Sequence-based reagent BNP (Nppb)_F Sigma-Aldrich PCR primers TCTCCAGAGCAATTCAAGAT
Sequence-based reagent BNP (Nppb)_R Sigma-Aldrich PCR primers AACAACTTCAGTGCGTTACA
Sequence-based reagent α-SA (Acta1)_F Sigma-Aldrich PCR primers GTGAGATTGTGCGCGACATC
Sequence-based reagent α-SA (Acta1)_R Sigma-Aldrich PCR primers GGCAACGGAAACGCTCATT
Sequence-based reagent Collagen III (Col3A1)_F Sigma-Aldrich PCR primers GACAGATTCTGGTGCAGAGA
Sequence-based reagent Collagen III (Col3A1)_R Sigma-Aldrich PCR primers CATCAACGACATCTTCAGGAAT
Sequence-based reagent Trpm4_F Sigma-Aldrich PCR primers GAGAAGCCCACAGATGCCTATG
Sequence-based reagent Trpm4_R Sigma-Aldrich PCR primers AGCACCGACACCACCAAGTTTG

Mice

In the first part of the study, we performed experiments on 11–13 week old male C57BL/6J WT mice at the Victor Chang Cardiac Research Institute, Australia. In the second part of this study, we performed surgery on C57BL/6N WT and age- and sex-matched cardiac-specific Trpm4 cKO mice in Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, Belgium. Trpm4flox mice were crossbred with Myl7-Cre mice to generate the Trpm4 cKO mice (Kecskés et al., 2015). All animals were entered into the study in a randomised order, and the investigators were blinded to genotype. All experimental procedures were approved by the Animal Ethics Committee of Garvan/St Vincent’s (Australia) or Katholieke Universiteit Leuven (Belgium), respectively, in accordance with the guidelines of both the Australian code for the care and use of animals for scientific purposes (8th edition, National Health and Medical Research Council, AU, 2013) and the Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals (8th edition, National Research Council, USA, 2011).

Induction of LVH

WT and Trpm4 cKO mice were subjected to TAC to induce pressure overload. Mice were anesthetised with 5% isoflurane and ventilated at 120 breaths/min (Harvard Apparatus Rodent Ventilator). The transverse aortic arch was accessed via an incision in the second intercostal space and constricted with a ligature tied around a 25-gauge needle, which was then removed. The TAC procedure was modified from a published paper (Rockman et al., 1994). Sham mice underwent the same procedure but the ligature was not tied. Simultaneous direct pressure recordings (1.4 F pressure catheter, AD Instruments, P/L) from both the right carotid artery and the aorta distal to the ligature (n = 20 mice) indicated a TAC pressure gradient of 60 ± 8 mmHg with this technique. Animals were sacrificed after 2 days or 14 days.

Invasive haemodynamic measurements

After 14 days of sham or TAC, mice were anesthetised by inhalation of isoflurane (1.5%) and a 1.4 F micro-tip pressure catheter (Millar Instruments Inc, Houston, TX) was inserted into the left ventricle via the right carotid artery. The heart rate, systolic aortic pressure, LV systolic pressure, +dP/dt, and –dP/dt were recorded (LabChart 6 Reader, AD Instruments, P/L). Animals were sacrificed, and the heart weight (HW) and left ventricle weight (LVW) normalised to BW and to tibia length (TL) were measured as indicators of LVH.

Mouse LV cardiomyocytes isolation and purification

WT mice were heparinised and euthanised according to the Animal Research Act 1985 No 123 (New South Wales, Australia). Hearts were dissected and perfused through the aorta and the coronary arteries by 10 ml pH 7.2 perfusion buffer containing 135 mM NaCl, 4 mM KCl, 1 mM MgCl2, 0.33 mM NaH2PO2, 10 mM HEPES, 10 mM glucose, 10 mM 2,3-butanedione 2-monoxime (BDM), and 5 mM taurine, with a Langendorff apparatus at 37°C for 5 min. Next, 30 ml digestion buffer composed of the above solution and Collagenase B, D (dose by BW: 0.4 mg/g, Roche) and Protease Enzyme Type XIV (dose by BW: 0.07 mg/g, Sigma-Aldrich) was used to perfuse the hearts for 15 min. After the perfusion, the heart was removed from the setup and placed into a pH 7.4 transfer buffer containing 135 mM NaCl, 4 mM KCl, 1 mM MgCl2, 0.33 mM NaH2PO2, 10 mM HEPES, 5.5 mM glucose, 10 mM BDM, and 5 mg/ml BSA. Both atria and the right ventricle were discarded, and the LV muscle was torn into small pieces and gently dispensed into the transfer buffer repeatedly with a pipette to isolate cardiomyocytes. The suspension was then filtered through a 200 micro filcon cup filter (BD) and centrifuged at 20 g for 2 min. After that, the cardiomyocytes were purified by a method described in a separate paper (Nicks et al., 2020). We confirmed that rod-shaped cardiomyocytes accounted for more than 85% of the total purified cardiomyocytes. The isolated cardiomyocytes were frozen immediately in liquid nitrogen and stored at −80°C for following experiments.

Quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction

Gene expression was determined by quantitative RT-PCR. Total RNA was extracted and purified from LV tissue and isolated cardiomyocytes with the RNeasy Fibrous Tissue Mini Kit (QIAGEN), following the manufacturer’s protocol. RNA (500 ng) was reverse transcribed into cDNA using the SuperScript III First-Strand Synthesis SuperMix kit (Invitrogen). cDNA was subjected to PCR amplification to detect ANP (Nppa), BNP (Nppb), α-SA (Acta1), collagen III (Col3a1), and Trpm4 gene expression, performed with the CFX384 Touch Real-Time PCR Detection System (Bio-Rad), PCR master mix LightCycler 480 SYBR Green I Master (Invitrogen). Samples were run in technical triplicate, and the mRNA expression levels were normalised to those of GAPDH to calculate relative gene expression using delta-delta Ct method. The mouse RT-PCR primers (Sigma-Aldrich) used are shown in (Key resources table).

Western blotting

For total protein extraction, LV tissue and isolated cardiomyocytes were lysed in a pH 7.4 lysis buffer containing 150 mM NaCl, 50 mM Tris–HCL, 1% Triton X-100, 1 mM sodium orthovanadate, 1 mM beta-glycerophosphate, 5 mM dithiothreitol, and MiniComplete protease inhibitors (Roche); for cytoplasmic and nuclear protein extraction, LV tissue was lysed using NE-PER nuclear and cytoplasmic extraction reagents (Pierce Biotechnology) and Protesase Inhibitor Cocktail Kit and Halt Phosphatase Inhibitor Cocktail (Pierce Biotechnology), both with a homogeniser (PRO Scientific). Protein (40 μg for each sample) was loaded on 4–20% Mini-PROTEAN TGX Gels (Bio-Rad) and separated by electrophoresis. Samples were transferred to PVDF membranes (Bio-Rad), blocked with 5% bovine serum albumin (BSA), and then labelled overnight with primary antibodies (Key resources table): anti-TRPM4 (1:200, Alomone Labs), anti-CaMKIIδ (1:1000; Abcam), anti-p-CaMKII (Thr287, 1:5000; Thermo Scientific), anti-HDAC4 (1:1500; Cell Signaling Technology), anti-p-HDAC4 (Ser246, 1:1500; Cell Signalling Technology), anti-MEF2A (1:3000; Cell Signalling Technology), anti-NFATc4 (1:1500; Abcam), anti-GSK3β (1:500; Cell Signaling Technology), anti-p-GSK3β (Ser9, 1:1500; Cell Signaling Technology), and anti-GATA4 (1:1000; Santa Cruz Biotechnology). Anti-GAPDH (1:10000; Cell Signaling Technology) and anti-Histone H2B (1:5000; Abcam) were used to standardise for loading. Horseradish peroxidase-conjugated goat anti-rabbit (1:10,000) or rabbit anti-mouse (1:5000) secondary antibodies (Abcam) (Key resources table) were used at room temperature for 1 h. Immunologic detection was accomplished using Amersham ECL Western blotting detection reagents (GE Healthcare). Protein levels were quantified by densitometry using ImageJ (NIH) software. Protein levels were normalised to relative changes in Histone H2B for the nuclear fraction and GAPDH for the cytoplasmic fraction and expressed as fold changes relative to those of control animals.

Histology

Masson’s trichrome stain was used to quantify fibrosis in the LV (collagen fibres stain blue). The hearts were excised from isoflurane-euthanised mice and washed with phosphate-buffered saline. Then the hearts were longitudinally cut at the frontal plane, embedded into optimal cutting temperature compound (Sakura Finetek), gradually frozen in liquid nitrogen via isopentane to avoid tissue damage. Serial sections with a thickness of 6 microns were sliced with a cryostat (Leica). The slides were then stained with a Masson’s trichrome staining kit (Sigma-Aldrich) following the manufacturer’s instructions. Images of the LV were obtained with 4–6 fields per section (McMullen et al., 2004) using a brightfield microscope (Leica). Blue-stained fibrosis areas within sections were determined using colour-based thresholding (Abràmoff et al., 2004) and measured with ImageJ software (NIH; http://rsbweb.nih.gov/ij/). The percentage of total fibrosis area was calculated by taking the sum of the blue-stained areas divided by the total LV area.

Statistics

All experiments and analyses were blinded. Averaged data are presented as means ± standard error of the mean (SEM). The statistical analysis was performed using GraphPad Prism software, version 7.04 (GraphPad). For comparisons between two sets of data, unpaired t-test was used to determine the statistical significance. For comparisons among multiple sets of data with one factor or two factors, one-way or two-way ANOVA was used accordingly, followed by Tukey’s post-hoc test. p<0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Acknowledgements

The authors gratefully acknowledge funding from the National Health and Medical Research Council (NHMRC) of Australia to BM and MF through a project grant (APP1108013), as well as the NHMRC of Australia for a Principal Research Fellowship (APP1135974) and NSW Cardiovascular Disease Senior Scientist Grant to BM. RV, SP, and AP are supported by the BOF Katholieke Universiteit Leuven (TRPLe) and the FWO-Vlaanderen (G0E0317N). CDC is supported by an NSW Health EMCR Fellowship. YG is supported by the Australian Government Research Training Program (RTP). This work is part of a PhD thesis of YG.

Funding Statement

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Contributor Information

Michael P Feneley, Email: michael.feneley@svha.org.au.

Boris Martinac, Email: b.martinac@victorchang.edu.au.

Noriaki Emoto, Kobe Pharmaceutical University, Japan.

Matthias Barton, University of Zurich, Switzerland.

Funding Information

This paper was supported by the following grants:

  • National Health and Medical Research Council APP1108013 to Yang Guo, Ze-Yan Yu, Charles D Cox, Michael P Feneley, Boris Martinac.

  • National Health and Medical Research Council APP1135974 to Boris Martinac.

  • Fonds Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek G0E0317N to Silvia Pinto, Andy Pironet, Rudi Vennekens.

  • KU Leuven TRPLe to Silvia Pinto, Andy Pironet, Rudi Vennekens.

  • NSW Health EMCRFellowship to Charles D Cox.

Additional information

Competing interests

No competing interests declared.

Author contributions

Data curation, Formal analysis, Validation, Investigation, Methodology, Writing - original draft.

Conceptualization, Data curation, Formal analysis, Supervision, Investigation, Visualization, Writing - original draft.

Data curation, Supervision, Validation, Investigation, Methodology.

Data curation, Formal analysis, Validation, Investigation, Visualization, Methodology.

Formal analysis, Validation, Investigation, Methodology.

Data curation, Supervision, Methodology.

Data curation, Validation, Investigation, Methodology.

Data curation, Validation, Methodology.

Data curation, Validation, Investigation, Methodology.

Data curation, Investigation, Methodology.

Conceptualization, Supervision, Investigation, Writing - original draft.

Resources, Funding acquisition, Writing - original draft.

Resources, Funding acquisition, Methodology, Writing - original draft, Project administration.

Conceptualization, Resources, Supervision, Funding acquisition, Validation, Methodology, Writing - original draft, Project administration.

Conceptualization, Resources, Supervision, Funding acquisition, Validation, Methodology, Writing - original draft, Project administration.

Ethics

Animal experimentation: This study was performed in strict accordance with the recommendations in the Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals of the National Health and Medical Research Council of Australia. All of the animals were handled according to approved institutional animal care and use. The protocol was approved by the Garvan Institute of Medical Research/St Vincent's Hospital Animal Ethics Committee (Project No. 20_06). All surgery was performed under sodium pentobarbital anesthesia, and every effort was made to minimize suffering.

Additional files

Source data 1. Western blots.
elife-66582-data1.zip (37.9MB, zip)
Supplementary file 1. Haemodynamic and anatomical parameters after 2 days and 14 days of sham/TAC in WT and Trpm4 cKO mice.

Haemodynamic measurements include heart rate (HR), aortic systolic and diastolic pressure, LV systolic pressure, dP/dtmax and dP/dtmin; anatomical measurements include body weight (BW), heart weight (HW), LV weight (LVW), lung weight (LW), tibial length (TL), heart weight normalised by body weight (HW/BW), LV weight normalised by body weight and tibial length (LVW/BW; LVW/TL), lung weight normalised by body weight (LW/BW). Data are presented as means ± SEM. Comparison between sham and TAC in WT or Trpm4 cKO groups: **p<0.01, ***p<0.001; Comparison between WT and Trpm4 cKO TAC groups: #p<0.05, ###p<0.001.

elife-66582-supp1.docx (19.1KB, docx)
Transparent reporting form

Data availability

All data generated or analysed during this study are included in the manuscript and supporting files. Source data files have been provided for all the figures and tables.

References

  1. Abràmoff MD, Magalhães PJ, Ram SJ. Image processing with ImageJ. Biophotonics International. 2004;11:36–42. [Google Scholar]
  2. Adams JW, Sakata Y, Davis MG, Sah VP, Wang Y, Liggett SB, Chien KR, Brown JH, Dorn GW. Enhanced galphaq signaling: a common pathway mediates cardiac hypertrophy and apoptotic heart failure. PNAS. 1998;95:10140–10145. doi: 10.1073/pnas.95.17.10140. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Backs J, Song K, Bezprozvannaya S, Chang S, Olson EN. CaM kinase II selectively signals to histone deacetylase 4 during cardiomyocyte hypertrophy. Journal of Clinical Investigation. 2006;116:1853–1864. doi: 10.1172/JCI27438. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Backs J, Backs T, Neef S, Kreusser MM, Lehmann LH, Patrick DM, Grueter CE, Qi X, Richardson JA, Hill JA, Katus HA, Bassel-Duby R, Maier LS, Olson EN. The Delta isoform of CaM kinase II is required for pathological cardiac hypertrophy and remodeling after pressure overload. PNAS. 2009;106:2342–2347. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0813013106. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Bers DM. Calcium cycling and signaling in cardiac myocytes. Annual Review of Physiology. 2008;70:23–49. doi: 10.1146/annurev.physiol.70.113006.100455. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Chen X, Nakayama H, Zhang X, Ai X, Harris DM, Tang M, Zhang H, Szeto C, Stockbower K, Berretta RM, Eckhart AD, Koch WJ, Molkentin JD, Houser SR. Calcium influx through Cav1.2 is a proximal signal for pathological cardiomyocyte hypertrophy. Journal of Molecular and Cellular Cardiology. 2011;50:460–470. doi: 10.1016/j.yjmcc.2010.11.012. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Colella M, Grisan F, Robert V, Turner JD, Thomas AP, Pozzan T. Ca2+ oscillation frequency decoding in cardiac cell hypertrophy: role of calcineurin/NFAT as Ca2+ signal integrators. PNAS. 2008;105:2859–2864. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0712316105. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Constantine M, Liew CK, Lo V, Macmillan A, Cranfield CG, Sunde M, Whan R, Graham RM, Martinac B. Heterologously-expressed and Liposome-reconstituted human transient receptor potential melastatin 4 channel (TRPM4) is a functional tetramer. Scientific Reports. 2016;6:19352. doi: 10.1038/srep19352. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Conway SJ, Koushik SV. Cardiac sodium-calcium exchanger: a double-edged sword. Cardiovascular Research. 2001;51:194–197. doi: 10.1016/S0008-6363(01)00356-X. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Cox CD, Bavi N, Martinac B. Biophysical principles of Ion-Channel-Mediated mechanosensory transduction. Cell Reports. 2019;29:1–12. doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2019.08.075. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Cribbs L. T-type calcium channel expression and function in the diseased heart. Channels. 2010;4:447–452. doi: 10.4161/chan.4.6.12870. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. De Koninck P, Schulman H. Sensitivity of CaM kinase II to the frequency of Ca2+ oscillations. Science. 1998;279:227–230. doi: 10.1126/science.279.5348.227. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Dolmetsch RE, Lewis RS, Goodnow CC, Healy JI. Differential activation of transcription factors induced by Ca2+ response amplitude and duration. Nature. 1997;386:855–858. doi: 10.1038/386855a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Eder P, Molkentin JD. TRPC channels as effectors of cardiac hypertrophy. Circulation Research. 2011;108:265–272. doi: 10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.110.225888. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Evans TI, Shea MA. Energetics of calmodulin domain interactions with the calmodulin binding domain of CaMKII. Proteins: Structure, Function, and Bioinformatics. 2009;76:47–61. doi: 10.1002/prot.22317. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Frede W, Medert R, Poth T, Gorenflo M, Vennekens R, Freichel M, Uhl S. TRPM4 modulates right ventricular remodeling under pressure load accompanied with decreased expression level. Journal of Cardiac Failure. 2020;26:599–609. doi: 10.1016/j.cardfail.2020.02.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Frey N, Katus HA, Olson EN, Hill JA. Hypertrophy of the heart: a new therapeutic target? Circulation. 2004;109:1580–1589. doi: 10.1161/01.CIR.0000120390.68287.BB. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Gnanasambandam R, Bae C, Gottlieb PA, Sachs F. Ionic selectivity and permeation properties of human PIEZO1 channels. PLOS ONE. 2015;10:e0125503. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0125503. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Gottlieb P, Folgering J, Maroto R, Raso A, Wood TG, Kurosky A, Bowman C, Bichet D, Patel A, Sachs F, Martinac B, Hamill OP, Honoré E. Revisiting TRPC1 and TRPC6 mechanosensitivity. Pflügers Archiv - European Journal of Physiology. 2008;455:1097–1103. doi: 10.1007/s00424-007-0359-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Gueffier M, Zintz J, Lambert K, Finan A, Aimond F, Chakouri N, Hédon C, Granier M, Launay P, Thireau J, Richard S, Demion M. The TRPM4 channel is functionally important for the beneficial cardiac remodeling induced by endurance training. Journal of Muscle Research and Cell Motility. 2017;38:3–16. doi: 10.1007/s10974-017-9466-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Guinamard R, Chatelier A, Demion M, Potreau D, Patri S, Rahmati M, Bois P. Functional characterization of a ca(2+)-activated non-selective cation channel in human atrial cardiomyocytes. The Journal of Physiology. 2004;558:75–83. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.2004.063974. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Guinamard R, Demion M, Magaud C, Potreau D, Bois P. Functional expression of the TRPM4 cationic current in ventricular cardiomyocytes from spontaneously hypertensive rats. Hypertension. 2006;48:587–594. doi: 10.1161/01.HYP.0000237864.65019.a5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Guinamard R, Bouvagnet P, Hof T, Liu H, Simard C, Sallé L. TRPM4 in cardiac electrical activity. Cardiovascular research. 2015;108:21–30. doi: 10.1093/cvr/cvv213. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Hedon C, Lambert K, Chakouri N, Thireau J, Aimond F, Cassan C, Bideaux P, Richard S, Faucherre A, Le Guennec JY, Demion M. New role of TRPM4 channel in the cardiac excitation-contraction coupling in response to physiological and pathological hypertrophy in mouse. Progress in Biophysics and Molecular Biology. 2021;159:105–117. doi: 10.1016/j.pbiomolbio.2020.09.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Hof T, Sallé L, Coulbault L, Richer R, Alexandre J, Rouet R, Manrique A, Guinamard R. TRPM4 non-selective cation channels influence action potentials in rabbit purkinje fibres. The Journal of Physiology. 2016;594:295–306. doi: 10.1113/JP271347. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Jacobs G, Oosterlinck W, Dresselaers T, Geenens R, Kerselaers S, Himmelreich U, Herijgers P, Vennekens R. Enhanced β-adrenergic cardiac reserve in Trpm4−/− mice with ischaemic heart failure. Cardiovascular Research. 2015;105:330–339. doi: 10.1093/cvr/cvv009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Kecskés M, Jacobs G, Kerselaers S, Syam N, Menigoz A, Vangheluwe P, Freichel M, Flockerzi V, Voets T, Vennekens R. The ca(2+)-activated cation channel TRPM4 is a negative regulator of angiotensin II-induced cardiac hypertrophy. Basic Research in Cardiology. 2015;110:43. doi: 10.1007/s00395-015-0501-x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Kehat I, Molkentin JD. Molecular pathways underlying cardiac remodeling during pathophysiological stimulation. Circulation. 2010;122:2727–2735. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.110.942268. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Keys JR, Greene EA, Koch WJ, Eckhart AD. Gq-coupled receptor agonists mediate cardiac hypertrophy via the vasculature. Hypertension. 2002;40:660–666. doi: 10.1161/01.HYP.0000035397.73223.CE. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Kreusser MM, Lehmann LH, Keranov S, Hoting M-O, Oehl U, Kohlhaas M, Reil J-C, Neumann K, Schneider MD, Hill JA, Dobrev D, Maack C, Maier LS, Gröne H-J, Katus HA, Olson EN, Backs J. Cardiac CaM kinase II genes δ and γ contribute to adverse remodeling but redundantly inhibit Calcineurin-Induced myocardial hypertrophy. Circulation. 2014;130:1262–1273. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.114.006185. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Lai Y, Nairn AC, Gorelick F, Greengard P. Ca2+/calmodulin-dependent protein kinase II: identification of autophosphorylation sites responsible for generation of Ca2+/calmodulin-independence. PNAS. 1987;84:5710–5714. doi: 10.1073/pnas.84.16.5710. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Launay P, Fleig A, Perraud AL, Scharenberg AM, Penner R, Kinet JP. TRPM4 is a Ca2+-activated nonselective cation channel mediating cell membrane depolarization. Cell. 2002;109:397–407. doi: 10.1016/S0092-8674(02)00719-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Levy D, Garrison RJ, Savage DD, Kannel WB, Castelli WP. Prognostic implications of echocardiographically determined left ventricular mass in the framingham heart study. New England Journal of Medicine. 1990;322:1561–1566. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199005313222203. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Lieben L, Carmeliet G. The involvement of TRP channels in bone homeostasis. Frontiers in Endocrinology. 2012;3:99. doi: 10.3389/fendo.2012.00099. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Luczak ED, Wu Y, Granger JM, Joiner MA, Wilson NR, Gupta A, Umapathi P, Murphy KR, Reyes Gaido OE, Sabet A, Corradini E, Tseng WW, Wang Y, Heck AJR, Wei AC, Weiss RG, Anderson ME. Mitochondrial CaMKII causes adverse metabolic reprogramming and dilated cardiomyopathy. Nature Communications. 2020;11:4416. doi: 10.1038/s41467-020-18165-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. MacDonnell SM, Weisser-Thomas J, Kubo H, Hanscome M, Liu Q, Jaleel N, Berretta R, Chen X, Brown JH, Sabri AK, Molkentin JD, Houser SR. CaMKII negatively regulates calcineurin-NFAT signaling in cardiac myocytes. Circulation Research. 2009;105:316–325. doi: 10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.109.194035. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Maillet M, van Berlo JH, Molkentin JD. Molecular basis of physiological heart growth: fundamental concepts and new players. Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology. 2013;14:38–48. doi: 10.1038/nrm3495. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Martinac B, Cox C. Reference Module in Life Science. Comprehensive Biophysics. Elsevier; 2017. Mechanosensory transduction: focus on ion channels; pp. 108–141. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  39. Mathar I, Kecskes M, Van der Mieren G, Jacobs G, Camacho Londoño JE, Uhl S, Flockerzi V, Voets T, Freichel M, Nilius B, Herijgers P, Vennekens R. Increased β-adrenergic inotropy in ventricular myocardium from Trpm4-/- mice. Circulation Research. 2014;114:283–294. doi: 10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.114.302835. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  40. McMullen JR, Shioi T, Huang W-Y, Zhang L, Tarnavski O, Bisping E, Schinke M, Kong S, Sherwood MC, Brown J, Riggi L, Kang PM, Izumo S. The Insulin-like growth factor 1 receptor induces physiological heart growth via the phosphoinositide 3-Kinase(p110α) Pathway. Journal of Biological Chemistry. 2004;279:4782–4793. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M310405200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  41. Molkentin JD, Lu JR, Antos CL, Markham B, Richardson J, Robbins J, Grant SR, Olson EN. A calcineurin-dependent transcriptional pathway for cardiac hypertrophy. Cell. 1998;93:215–228. doi: 10.1016/S0092-8674(00)81573-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  42. Molkentin JD. Calcineurin and beyond: cardiac hypertrophic signaling. Circulation research. 2000;87:731–738. doi: 10.1161/01.res.87.9.731. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  43. Molkentin JD. Parsing good versus bad signaling pathways in the heart: role of calcineurin-nuclear factor of activated T-cells. Circulation research. 2013;113:16–19. doi: 10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.113.301667. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  44. Mudd JO, Kass DA. Tackling heart failure in the twenty-first century. Nature. 2008;451:919–928. doi: 10.1038/nature06798. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  45. Nakamura M, Sadoshima J. Mechanisms of physiological and pathological cardiac hypertrophy. Nature Reviews Cardiology. 2018;15:387–407. doi: 10.1038/s41569-018-0007-y. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  46. Nicks AM, Kesteven SH, Li M, Wu J, Chan AY, Naqvi N, Husain A, Feneley MP, Smith NJ, Iismaa SE, Graham RM. Pressure overload by suprarenal aortic constriction in mice leads to left ventricular hypertrophy without c-Kit expression in cardiomyocytes. Scientific Reports. 2020;10:15318. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-72273-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  47. Nikolaev YA, Cox CD, Ridone P, Rohde PR, Cordero-Morales JF, Vásquez V, Laver DR, Martinac B. Mammalian TRP ion channels are insensitive to membrane stretch. Journal of Cell Science. 2019;275:jcs.238360. doi: 10.1242/jcs.238360. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  48. Nilius B, Prenen J, Droogmans G, Voets T, Vennekens R, Freichel M, Wissenbach U, Flockerzi V. Voltage dependence of the Ca2+-activated cation channel TRPM4. Journal of Biological Chemistry. 2003;278:30813–30820. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M305127200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  49. Nilius B, Prenen J, Tang J, Wang C, Owsianik G, Janssens A, Voets T, Zhu MX. Regulation of the Ca2+ sensitivity of the nonselective cation channel TRPM4. Journal of Biological Chemistry. 2005;280:6423–6433. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M411089200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  50. Paradis P, Dali-Youcef N, Paradis FW, Thibault G, Nemer M. Overexpression of angiotensin II type I receptor in cardiomyocytes induces cardiac hypertrophy and remodeling. PNAS. 2000;97:931–936. doi: 10.1073/pnas.97.2.931. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  51. Passier R, Zeng H, Frey N, Naya FJ, Nicol RL, McKinsey TA, Overbeek P, Richardson JA, Grant SR, Olson EN. CaM kinase signaling induces cardiac hypertrophy and activates the MEF2 transcription factor in vivo. Journal of Clinical Investigation. 2000;105:1395–1406. doi: 10.1172/JCI8551. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  52. Peyronnet R, Nerbonne JM, Kohl P. Cardiac Mechano-Gated ion channels and arrhythmias. Circulation Research. 2016;118:311–329. doi: 10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.115.305043. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  53. Rockman HA, Wachhorst SP, Mao L, Ross J. ANG II receptor blockade prevents ventricular hypertrophy and ANF gene expression with pressure overload in mice. American Journal of Physiology-Heart and Circulatory Physiology. 1994;266:H2468–H2475. doi: 10.1152/ajpheart.1994.266.6.H2468. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  54. Saimi Y, Kung C. Calmodulin as an ion channel subunit. Annual Review of Physiology. 2002;64:289–311. doi: 10.1146/annurev.physiol.64.100301.111649. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  55. Saucerman JJ, Tan PM, Buchholz KS, McCulloch AD, Omens JH. Mechanical regulation of gene expression in cardiac myocytes and fibroblasts. Nature Reviews Cardiology. 2019;16:361–378. doi: 10.1038/s41569-019-0155-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  56. Simard C, Hof T, Keddache Z, Launay P, Guinamard R. The TRPM4 non-selective cation channel contributes to the mammalian atrial action potential. Journal of Molecular and Cellular Cardiology. 2013;59:11–19. doi: 10.1016/j.yjmcc.2013.01.019. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  57. Swynghedauw B. Molecular mechanisms of myocardial remodeling. Physiological Reviews. 1999;79:215–262. doi: 10.1152/physrev.1999.79.1.215. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  58. Syeda R, Florendo MN, Cox CD, Kefauver JM, Santos JS, Martinac B, Patapoutian A. Piezo1 channels are inherently mechanosensitive. Cell Reports. 2016;17:1739–1746. doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2016.10.033. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  59. Tham YK, Bernardo BC, Ooi JY, Weeks KL, McMullen JR. Pathophysiology of cardiac hypertrophy and heart failure: signaling pathways and novel therapeutic targets. Archives of Toxicology. 2015;89:1401–1438. doi: 10.1007/s00204-015-1477-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  60. van Berlo JH, Maillet M, Molkentin JD. Signaling effectors underlying pathologic growth and remodeling of the heart. Journal of Clinical Investigation. 2013;123:37–45. doi: 10.1172/JCI62839. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  61. Viola HM, Hool LC. The L-type Ca2+ channel: a mediator of hypertrophic cardiomyopathy. Channels. 2017;11:5–7. doi: 10.1080/19336950.2016.1213053. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  62. Wang C, Naruse K, Takahashi K. Role of the TRPM4 channel in cardiovascular physiology and pathophysiology. Cells. 2018;7:62. doi: 10.3390/cells7060062. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  63. Watanabe H, Murakami M, Ohba T, Takahashi Y, Ito H. TRP channel and cardiovascular disease. Pharmacology & Therapeutics. 2008;118:337–351. doi: 10.1016/j.pharmthera.2008.03.008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  64. Wei J, Joshi S, Speransky S, Crowley C, Jayathilaka N, Lei X, Wu Y, Gai D, Jain S, Hoosien M, Gao Y, Chen L, Bishopric NH. Reversal of pathological cardiac hypertrophy via the MEF2-coregulator interface. JCI Insight. 2017;2:91068. doi: 10.1172/jci.insight.91068. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  65. Wilde AA, Brugada R. Phenotypical manifestations of mutations in the genes encoding subunits of the cardiac sodium channel. Circulation Research. 2011;108:884–897. doi: 10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.110.238469. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  66. Wilkins BJ, Dai YS, Bueno OF, Parsons SA, Xu J, Plank DM, Jones F, Kimball TR, Molkentin JD. Calcineurin/NFAT coupling participates in Pathological, but not physiological, cardiac hypertrophy. Circulation Research. 2004;94:110–118. doi: 10.1161/01.RES.0000109415.17511.18. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  67. Wilkins BJ, Molkentin JD. Calcium-calcineurin signaling in the regulation of cardiac hypertrophy. Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications. 2004;322:1178–1191. doi: 10.1016/j.bbrc.2004.07.121. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  68. Wu X, Zagranichnaya TK, Gurda GT, Eves EM, Villereal ML. A TRPC1/TRPC3-mediated increase in store-operated calcium entry is required for differentiation of H19-7 hippocampal neuronal cells. Journal of Biological Chemistry. 2004;279:43392–43402. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M408959200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  69. Wu X, Eder P, Chang B, Molkentin JD. TRPC channels are necessary mediators of pathologic cardiac hypertrophy. PNAS. 2010;107:7000–7005. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1001825107. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  70. Yu ZY, Gong H, Wu J, Dai Y, Kesteven SH, Fatkin D, Martinac B, Graham RM, Feneley MP. Cardiac Gq receptors and calcineurin activation are not required for the hypertrophic response to mechanical left ventricular pressure overload. Frontiers in Cell and Developmental Biology. 2021;9:639509. doi: 10.3389/fcell.2021.639509. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  71. Zarain-Herzberg A, Fragoso-Medina J, Estrada-Avilés R. Calcium-regulated transcriptional pathways in the normal and pathologic heart. IUBMB Life. 2011;63:847–855. doi: 10.1002/iub.545. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  72. Zou Y, Akazawa H, Qin Y, Sano M, Takano H, Minamino T, Makita N, Iwanaga K, Zhu W, Kudoh S, Toko H, Tamura K, Kihara M, Nagai T, Fukamizu A, Umemura S, Iiri T, Fujita T, Komuro I. Mechanical stress activates angiotensin II type 1 receptor without the involvement of angiotensin II. Nature Cell Biology. 2004;6:499–506. doi: 10.1038/ncb1137. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Decision letter

Editor: Noriaki Emoto1
Reviewed by: Ken Takahashi2, Robert Blanton3

Our editorial process produces two outputs: i) public reviews designed to be posted alongside the preprint for the benefit of readers; ii) feedback on the manuscript for the authors, including requests for revisions, shown below. We also include an acceptance summary that explains what the editors found interesting or important about the work.

Acceptance summary:

In this work, the authors subjected mice with cardiomyocyte-specific deletion of ion channel TRPM4 to transverse aortic constriction-induced pressure overload. The study demonstrates that cell-specific loss of TRPM4 in cardiomyocytes protects against pathological left ventricular hypertrophy which is associated with an attenuation of pathological changes, including the expression of genes that become dysregulated during the development of pathological hypertrophy. These findings highlight the importance of tissue-specific changes in the pathogenesis of pressure-induced LVH which will further the understanding of heart disease and pathophysiology in the context of heart failure due to arterial hypertension.

Decision letter after peer review:

Thank you for submitting your article "The Ca2+-activated cation channel TRPM4 is a positive regulator of pressure overload-induced cardiac hypertrophy" for consideration by eLife. Your article has been reviewed by 3 peer reviewers, one of whom is a member of our Board of Reviewing Editors, and the evaluation has been overseen by a Senior Editor. The following individuals involved in review of your submission have agreed to reveal their identity: Ken Takahashi (Reviewer #2); Robert Blanton (Reviewer #3).

The reviewers and Editors have discussed the reviews with one another, and this letter to help you prepare a revised submission.

Essential revisions:

This study demonstrates how the TRPM4 ion channel might act as a contributor to the mechanosensory transduction of pressure overload. Using and experimental model, the authors successfully demonstrated that cardiomyocyte-specific deletion of TRPM4 ion channel protects the left ventricle from pressure overload-induced hypertrophy. The conclusions of this paper are mostly supported by data, but some of the wording and data analysis need to be clarified and extended. Improving the following aspects would strengthen the manuscript as described below.

1. While the TRPM4 channel is well known for its association with cardiomyocyte action potential formation and arrhythmia, this manuscript only describes its role in mechanotransduction that was found in this study. The findings of this study may be more comprehensively accepted if there is a hypothesis that links the finding of this study with previous findings.

2. The authors should highlight the differences between this study and the Angiotensin II-induced cardiac hypertrophy Trpm4cKO mice model that has previously been reported (Kecskes et al., Basic Res Cardiol. 2015; 110(4): 43).

3. Signaling studies. Teasing out the effects of TRPM4 deletion on NFAT vs CaMKII signaling would be strengthened by more detailed measures of CaMKII activation state (such as phospho-specific AB to activated CaMKII); NFAT signaling (such as qPCR for RCAN); calcineurin activity or expression levels.

4. Nuclear localization studies. To improve clarity and understanding, the reviewer would prefer for authors to express all of the findings as cytoplasmic/nuclear. Further, would help to do the GAPDH and H2B blots on both the cytoplasmic and nuclear blots, to demonstrate successful fractionation of compartments.

5. Ideally, in cell culture or in vivo, it would be useful to test whether augmentation of CaMKII would restore the normal LV hypertrophy response, which would provide good evidence that CaMKII truly mediates the downstream effects of TRPM4.

eLife. 2021 Jun 30;10:e66582. doi: 10.7554/eLife.66582.sa2

Author response


Essential revisions:

This study demonstrates how the TRPM4 ion channel might act as a contributor to the mechanosensory transduction of pressure overload. Using an experimental model, the authors successfully demonstrated that cardiomyocyte-specific deletion of TRPM4 ion channel protects the left ventricle from pressure overload-induced hypertrophy. The conclusions of this paper are mostly supported by data, but some of the wording and data analysis need to be clarified and extended. Improving the following aspects would strengthen the manuscript as described below.

1. While the TRPM4 channel is well known for its association with cardiomyocyte action potential formation and arrhythmia, this manuscript only describes its role in mechanotransduction that was found in this study. The findings of this study may be more comprehensively accepted if there is a hypothesis that links the finding of this study with previous findings.

We thank the reviewer for this comment and agree that the significance of TRPM4 for cardiac electrical activity is important to mention. On p. 15, line 327-331 we now write:

“Previous studies reported that the TRPM4 current contributes to the mammalian atrial action potential (Simard, Hof, Keddache, Launay, and Guinamard, 2013) as well as to the notch and early repolarization phases of the action potential in Purkinje cells (Hof et al., 2016), providing a potential link to cardiac arrhythmias (Guinamard et al., 2015; Hedon et al., 2021; Wang et al., 2018).”

Moreover, globally speaking the influence of TRPM4 on cardiomyocyte Na+ and Ca2+ handling will almost certainly contribute to arrhythmia propensity as well as cardiac hypertrophy. Previous work suggests that increased TRPM4 activation may influence arrhythmias through local Na+ loading and reverse mode of the N+/Ca2+ exchanger (NCX) which in turn causes an increase in intracellular Ca2+ (Wang et al., 2018). In fact, this mechanism could be shared in TAC-induced hypertrophy and may provide a plausible explanation for how TRPM4 activation influences Ca2+ signalling to activate the CaMKII-HDAC-MEF2 pathway (Figure 6). As a result, we have included this putative link between TRPM4 and NCX activity in the Discussion as part of our hypothesis for the involvement of TRPM4 in TAC-induced LVH pathway. However, we should note that this is very distinct from the effects of TRPM4 in angiotensin II-mediated hypertrophy where channel activation is thought to reduce the driving force for store operated Ca2+ entry through TRPC1 and TRPC3, as discussed at length in Major Point 2.

2. The authors should highlight the differences between this study and the Angiotensin II-induced cardiac hypertrophy Trpm4cKO mice model that has previously been reported (Kecskes et al., Basic Res Cardiol. 2015; 110(4): 43).

We must admit that we were slightly surprised by this comment from the reviewer because we specifically cited the Kecskes et al. (2015) Trpm4 cKO study in the Introduction of our original manuscript, and we then devoted approximately half of the Discussion in our original manuscript to highlighting and explaining the differences between the Kecskes et al. (2015) Trpm4 cKO study and the results of our own study. For your convenience, we have reproduced the relevant sections of our original manuscript below:

Excerpt from the Introduction: (line 111-116)

“Previous studies using Trpm4 cardiomyocyte-specific knock-out (Trpm4 cKO) mice have shown that TRPM4 is a negative regulator of angiotensin II-induced cardiac hypertrophy in mice, which involves the calcineurin-NFAT pathway (Kecskes et al., 2015), and that TRPM4 is essential for survival after myocardial infarction (Hedon et al., 2021; Jacobs et al., 2015). However, whether TRPM4 plays a role in mechanical pressure overload-induced LVH has yet to be determined.”

Excerpt from the Discussion: (line 331-387)

“Importantly, there is evidence that the TRPM4 channel is a critical modulator of ventricular remodelling in cardiac hypertrophy and heart failure (Frede et al., 2020; Jacobs et al., 2015; Kecskes et al., 2015; Mathar et al., 2014). […] Moreover, once activated, CaMKII has been shown to inhibit calcineurin activity (Kreusser et al., 2014; MacDonnell et al., 2009) (Figure 6).”

Clearly, we are arguing that the role of TRPM4 in angiotensin II-induced cardiac hypertrophy is mechanistically distinct from its role in TAC-induced cardiac hypertrophy, and that this mechanistic distinction explains the inhibitory effect of TRPM4 activation on hypertrophy in the former case and the pro-hypertrophic effect of TRPM4 activation in the latter case. In the revised manuscript, we have added the following paragraph to the discussion, which provides a possible mechanism by which TRPM4 is pro-hypertrophic in response to TAC but anti-hypertrophic in response to angiotensin II: (line 388-396)

“The high-frequency/high amplitude Ca2+oscillations characteristic of TAC and the consequent intermittent nature of the resulting TRPM4 activation, as distinct from the persistent activation associated with angiotensin II-induced hypertrophy, may mean that TAC-induced TRPM4 activation does not reduce the driving force for Ca2+ influx via SOCE that characterises the anti-hypertrophic action of TRPM4 in angiotensin II-induced hypertrophy (see above). Ca2+Ca2+[…] This would account for the pro-hypertrophic effect of TRPM4 in TAC-induced hypertrophy as distinct from its anti-hypertrophic effect in angiotensin II-induced hypertrophy.”

3. Signaling studies. Teasing out the effects of TRPM4 deletion on NFAT vs CaMKII signaling would be strengthened by more detailed measures of CaMKII activation state (such as phospho-specific AB to activated CaMKII); NFAT signaling (such as qPCR for RCAN); calcineurin activity or expression levels.

CaMKII activation status

Measuring CaMKII activation using a phospho-specific antibody was a great suggestion. We thank the reviewer for this recommendation. We have performed the new western blot experiments using a p-CaMKII antibody, specifically a marker of phosphorylation at threonine 287 which is auto-phosphorylated by CaMKII after activation and thus acts as a marker of CaMKII activation (Lai et al., 1987; Luczak et al., 2020). Briefly, we found that p-CaMKII increased in response to TAC in WT mice and this increased p-CaMKII was abolished in TAC-operated hearts from Trpm4 cKO mice. Our new results are consistent with our conclusion that the CaMKII-HDAC-MEF2 pathway was activated in response to TAC-induced LV pressure overload. We have provided this data in the new Figure 4. Also, we have added these contents in both the Methods and Results sections.

Calcineurin activity

With due respect to the reviewer’s comments re calcineurin activity and NFAT signalling, the only incontrovertible evidence of calcineurin-NFAT pathway activation is direct measurement of nuclear translocation of NFAT based on measurements of the nuclear and cytoplasmic NFAT fractions, as was done in our current study – please see the review paper by Molkentin, in which he addresses this specific issue, which was cited in our original manuscript [Molkentin, J.D. (2013). Parsing good versus bad signalling pathways in the heart: role of calcineurin-nuclear factor of activated T-cells. Circ Res 113, 16-19]. On the issue of RCAN measurements, in particular, we have recently published our important finding that RCAN (MCIP1) is a particularly poor method of discriminating between calcineurin-NFAT4 pathway activation and CaMKII pathway activation: we observed similar elevations of RCAN (MCIP1) with calcineurin activation alone and with CaMKII activation in the absence of calcineurin activation (see our updated reference to Yu, ZY et al. Cardiac Gq receptors and calcineurin activation are not required for the hypertrophic response to mechanical left ventricular pressure overload. Front Cell Dev Biol. 2021 Feb 15;9:639509, originally cited as appearing in bioRxiv). As explained in our recent paper, the poor specificity of RCAN (MCIP1) is a consequence of the convergence of these two distinct signalling pathways onto a common intra-nuclear complex to initiate hypertrophic transcription and the fact that nuclear export of HDAC4 relieves the repression not only of MEF2 but also of NFAT. Derepression of both MEF2 and NFAT by CaMKII activation results in gene transcription downstream of intra-nuclear NFAT, including expression of RCAN (MCIP1). It follows that increased RCAN gene expression cannot be regarded as a specific marker of calcineurin activation. For the same reason, a similar caveat should apply to conclusions regarding calcineurin activation drawn from experiments based on the NFAT luciferase reporter. In short, we encourage the reviewer to examine our recent publication for further detail, but we are confident that our method of determining calcineurin-NFAT pathway activation and discriminating it from CaMKII pathway activation is superior to the methods suggested by the reviewer. Because we have already published these findings in detail elsewhere, we think it is sufficient to direct the reader to our previous publication (Yu et al., 2021) and the Molkentin (2013) review paper. In the Results section of the revised manuscript, therefore, we have slightly modified the text (yellow highlight) describing the absence of activation of the calcineurin-NFAT pathway after TAC, as follows: (line 286-289)

“These findings indicate that TAC did not result in increased nuclear translocation of NFATc4, the most reliable indicator of calcineurin activation (Molkentin, 2013), and confirm our previous finding (Yu et al., 2021) that the calcineurin-NFAT pathway is not activated by TAC.”

4. Nuclear localization studies. To improve clarity and understanding, the reviewer would prefer for authors to express all of the findings as cytoplasmic/nuclear. Further, would help to do the GAPDH and H2B blots on both the cytoplasmic and nuclear blots, to demonstrate successful fractionation of compartments.

We have seriously considered the reviewer’s suggestion to express all of our findings as cytoplasmic/nuclear ratios. We have now re-analysed our results and provided new data for cytoplasmic/nuclear ratios in Figure 4—figure supplement 2 and Figure 5—figure supplement 1, although we think that these data are not essential to support the main conclusions of our study. The cytoplasmic/nuclear ratio is of mechanistic significance only when there is a shuttle of the protein of interest between the nucleus and the cytoplasm, as is the case for HDAC4, but this is not the case for CaMKII, for example.

As requested, to confirm the purity of the fractions extracted from the LV tissue, we have performed the new estern blot experiments using the specific marker proteins: GAPDH for the cytoplasmic fraction and Histone H2B for the nuclear fraction. Each fraction was run side-by-side on the same blot and then probed separately against each of two primary antibodies: GAPDH and Histone H2B to validate the purity of each fraction. Our results demonstrated that we have successfully separated cytoplasmic and nuclear extracts with exceptionally high purity. This result has now been included in the Results section, and we have also provided the blot images in Figure 4—figure supplement 1.

5. Ideally, in cell culture or in vivo, it would be useful to test whether augmentation of CaMKII would restore the normal LV hypertrophy response, which would provide good evidence that CaMKII truly mediates the downstream effects of TRPM4.

We thank the reviewer for this suggestion, but we believe such an undertaking would require an extensive amount of work that would warrant a separate study. This is because in order to ‘augment’ CaMKII, we envisage two options: (1) a genetic approach (cardiomyocyte over- expression) or (2) a pharmacological approach (selective CaMKII activator).

Regarding the genetic approach, we would require a new inducible transgenic mouse model. Even if we were to attempt the same type of experiment in vitro and develop a plasmid-based approach to over-express CaMKII, in combination with electroporation or viral transduction, we have no method in vitro to mechanically stimulate adult cardiomyocytes or cardiomyocyte-like cell lines to induce hypertrophy to mimic our surgical mouse model.

Regarding the pharmacological approach, no selective CaMKII activators exist. There are CaMKII selective inhibitors such as KN-93 and this molecule even has an inactive derivate, KN-92, that can be used as a control but here we must point out that extensive studies have already documented a key role for CaMKIIδ in pressure overload induced hypertrophy using knockout mouse models. Particularly Kreusser et al., 2014 Circulation provide compelling evidence that CaMKIIδ is essential for pressure overload induced hypertrophy using a similar TAC model (see Kreusser et al., 2014 Figure 3c). This publication and others that support the role of CAMKII in TAC-induced hypertrophy are discussed at length in our previous publication: Yu et al. (2021). Frontiers in Cell and Developmental Biology.

In summary, because CaMKII is indispensable for the hypertrophic response to TAC and that nuclear export of HDAC4 is reduced in Trpm4 cKO mice, we believe our data strongly supports the presented model that TRPM4 is part of the mechanosensory machinery that drives the CaMKII-HDAC4-MEF2 pathway that is selectively activated under pressure overload conditions to induce cardiac hypertrophy (Yu et al., 2021, Frontiers in Cell and Developmental Biology).

Associated Data

    This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

    Supplementary Materials

    Table 1—source data 1. Haemodynamic and anatomical parameters.
    Table 2—source data 1. Early gene markers.
    Figure 1—source data 1. Source data file (Excel) for Figure 1A,B,D and E.
    Figure 2—source data 1. Source data file (Excel) for Figure 2A,B,C,D,E,G,H,I,J,L, and M.
    Figure 3—source data 1. Source data file (Excel) for Figure 3A,B.
    Figure 4—source data 1. Source data file (Excel) for Figure 4B.
    Figure 4—figure supplement 2—source data 1. Source data file (Excel) for Figure 4—figure supplement 2.
    Figure 5—source data 1. Source data file (Excel) for Figure 5B.
    Figure 5—figure supplement 1—source data 1. Source data file (Excel) for Figure 5—figure supplement 1.
    Source data 1. Western blots.
    elife-66582-data1.zip (37.9MB, zip)
    Supplementary file 1. Haemodynamic and anatomical parameters after 2 days and 14 days of sham/TAC in WT and Trpm4 cKO mice.

    Haemodynamic measurements include heart rate (HR), aortic systolic and diastolic pressure, LV systolic pressure, dP/dtmax and dP/dtmin; anatomical measurements include body weight (BW), heart weight (HW), LV weight (LVW), lung weight (LW), tibial length (TL), heart weight normalised by body weight (HW/BW), LV weight normalised by body weight and tibial length (LVW/BW; LVW/TL), lung weight normalised by body weight (LW/BW). Data are presented as means ± SEM. Comparison between sham and TAC in WT or Trpm4 cKO groups: **p<0.01, ***p<0.001; Comparison between WT and Trpm4 cKO TAC groups: #p<0.05, ###p<0.001.

    elife-66582-supp1.docx (19.1KB, docx)
    Transparent reporting form

    Data Availability Statement

    All data generated or analysed during this study are included in the manuscript and supporting files. Source data files have been provided for all the figures and tables.


    Articles from eLife are provided here courtesy of eLife Sciences Publications, Ltd

    RESOURCES