Skip to main content
ERJ Open logoLink to ERJ Open
letter
. 2021 Oct 7;58(4):2100979. doi: 10.1183/13993003.00979-2021

Steroid use in elderly critically ill COVID-19 patients

Christian Jung 1,✉, Bernhard Wernly 2, Jesper Fjølner 3, Raphael Romano Bruno 1, David Dudzinski 4, Antonio Artigas 5, Bernardo Bollen Pinto 6, Joerg C Schefold 7, Georg Wolff 1, Malte Kelm 1, Michael Beil 8, Sviri Sigal 8, Peter Vernon van Heerden 9, Wojciech Szczeklik 10, Miroslaw Czuczwar 11, Muhammed Elhadi 12, Michael Joannidis 13, Sandra Oeyen 14, Tilemachos Zafeiridis 15, Brian Marsh 16, Finn H Andersen 17,18, Rui Moreno 19, Maurizio Cecconi 20, Susannah Leaver 21, Ariane Boumendil 22,23, Dylan W De Lange 24, Bertrand Guidet 22,23, Hans Flaatten 25,26, and the COVIP study group
PMCID: PMC8246007  PMID: 34172464

More than a year after the onset of the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) pandemic, treating patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) remains a challenge. In contrast to the rapid development of effective vaccines against SARS-CoV-2, the development of specific and effective therapeutics against COVID-19 remains largely unresolved.

Short abstract

This secondary analysis of the COVIP study shows a higher 30-day mortality in critically ill elderly COVID-19 patients who received steroids as part of their treatment @cjungMD https://bit.ly/3xdyEur


To the Editor:

More than a year after the onset of the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) pandemic, treating patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) remains a challenge. In contrast to the rapid development of effective vaccines against SARS-CoV-2, the development of specific and effective therapeutics against COVID-19 remains largely unresolved.

In addition to standard intensive care, including oxygen therapy and organ support when required, the use of systemic corticosteroids was found to have a positive effect in randomised trials. However, data regarding treatment of elderly COVID-19 patients are scarce.

Importantly, treatment with corticosteroids has well documented deleterious effects [1]: While the immunosuppressive effect in patients with COVID-19 is presumably responsible for the desired therapeutic effect, it may also render the patients more prone to secondary bacterial infections and potentially decrease viral clearance [2]. Corticosteroid therapy is also associated with hyperglycaemia, has catabolic effects and is associated with neuropathy. This could potentially affect the risk–benefit balance, especially in vulnerable patient groups, such as elderly, frail patients.

The aim of this secondary analysis was to investigate the effects of corticosteroid therapy in an international observational prospective study of critically ill elderly patients with COVID-19.

The COVIP study (“Corona Virus disease (COVID19) in Very Elderly Intensive care Patients (VIPs)”; NCT04321265) included patients aged 70 years or older with proven COVID-19 and admitted to an intensive care unit (ICU) [3]. 30-day mortality was defined as the primary endpoint. The study was conducted by the Very old Intensive care Patient (VIP) network [4] across 207 ICUs in 35 countries. Data were collected through an electronic case report form. A prospective study design was chosen to achieve high-quality data. Informed consent was taken if not waived by the local ethical committee.

Two multi-level logistic regression models were utilised: the first model used the hospital unit as random effect and the steroid use as fixed effect; the second model was a multi-variable model adjusting for “The Sequential Organ Failure Assessment” (SOFA) score and frailty as assessed by the Clinical Frailty Scale. Sensitivity analyses complemented the analysis.

In total, 3082 patients were included in the COVIP study; 2115 patients received corticosteroids, and 967 patients received none. Median age was 75 (interquartile range (IQR) 72–79) years in both groups. With a median SOFA score of 5 (IQR 3–8), there was no difference between the two groups.

30-day mortality was 53% in the group treated with corticosteroids and 42% in the no-corticosteroid group (p<0.001).

The univariate 30-day mortality rates were higher in patients receiving corticosteroids (53 versus 42%; aOR 1.16, 95%CI 1.28–2.02; p<0.001). This association of corticosteroid use was even more pronounced after 3 months (69% versus 49%; p<0.001; figure 1a). In addition, we found that corticosteroids remained associated with increased odds of 30-day mortality after multivariable adjustment (aOR 1.60, 95% CI 1.26–2.04; <0.001). Further sensitivity analyses consistently confirmed the finding in subgroups stratifying for age (<80/≥80 years), frailty (fit/vulnerable/frail), mechanical ventilation (yes/no), noninvasive ventilation (yes/no), sex (female/male), symptom onset (≤7 days/>7 days), and vasopressor therapy (yes/no) (figure 1b). Furthermore, in sensitivity analyses evaluating patients in the first surge (March–May, aOR 1.38, 95% CI 1.05–1.82; p=0.02; n=1448) and the second surge (September–December, aOR 2.09, 95% CI 1.04–4.21; p=0.04; n=1414) the finding was sustained.

FIGURE 1.

FIGURE 1

a) Plot of the Kaplan–Meier estimator illustrating survival probability up to 90 days after admission to the intensive care unit for patients with and without corticosteroid treatment. Log-rank-test: p<0.001. b) Sensitivity analyses stratifying 30-day mortality in subgroups for patient-specific characteristics and management strategies using multi-level logistic regression models. We depicted adjusted odds ratios from the model with the hospital unit as random effect and steroid use as fixed effect. CFS: Clinical Frailty Scale; NIV: noninvasive ventilation.

In this prospective study of more than 3000 critically ill COVID-19 patients aged 70 years and older, we have found an independent association of steroid use with increased mortality.

These results question the routine use of corticosteroid treatment in elderly COVID-19 patients. While the immunosuppressive effect of steroids is undisputed and desirable in the context of severe COVID-19 treatment, the adverse effects of steroid treatment in elderly patients may outweigh the potential benefits.

This is the largest prospective analysis of critically ill elderly patients in relation to corticosteroid use to treat severe COVID-19 disease. Corticosteroid therapy has been established as standard of care in all ICU patients. However, even landmark randomised controlled trials do not support this with evidence in elderly patients. The RECOVERY study [5] showed no effect of corticosteroids in their subgroup of patients >70 years. Of note, only 169 patients in this group were on mechanical ventilation. The CoDEX study found no effect on mortality after 28 days, but no data was supplied specifically looking at patients above 70 years old [6]. Thus, both studies included far fewer patients than our current analysis. It is important to note that our data does not question the corticosteroid strategy in younger COVID-19 patients. It just emphasises that the decision to use corticosteroids needs to be individually tailored, first and foremost according to age, but also with regards to comorbidities and other factors [7].

Our analysis has limitations: First, this is a secondary analysis of a prospective study. Second, our study is not randomised and, despite multivariable adjustment, it is likely that unknown confounding factors may have contributed to our findings. Third, we have no detailed information about dosage and duration of corticosteroid treatment.

In conclusion, in this prospective observational study we found a higher 30-day mortality in critically ill elderly COVID-19 patients who received steroids as part of their treatment.

Shareable PDF

This one-page PDF can be shared freely online.

Shareable PDF ERJ-00979-2021.Shareable (484.1KB, pdf)

Footnotes

This study is registered at Clinicaltrials.gov as NCT04321265.

Conflict of interest: C. Jung has nothing to disclose.

Conflict of interest: B. Wernly has nothing to disclose.

Conflict of interest: J. Fjølner has nothing to disclose.

Conflict of interest: R.R. Bruno has nothing to disclose.

Conflict of interest: D. Dudzinski has nothing to disclose.

Conflict of interest: A. Artigas reports grants from Grifols and Fisher&Paykel, personal fees for advisory board work from Grifols, Novartis and Lilly Foundation, outside the submitted work.

Conflict of interest: B. Bollen Pinto has nothing to disclose.

Conflict of interest: J.C. Schefold has nothing to disclose.

Conflict of interest: G. Wolff has nothing to disclose.

Conflict of interest: M. Kelm has nothing to disclose.

Conflict of interest: M. Beil has nothing to disclose.

Conflict of interest: S. Sigal has nothing to disclose.

Conflict of interest: P.V. van Heerden has nothing to disclose.

Conflict of interest: W. Szczeklik has nothing to disclose.

Conflict of interest: M. Czuczwar has nothing to disclose.

Conflict of interest: M. Elhadi has nothing to disclose.

Conflict of interest: M. Joannidis has nothing to disclose.

Conflict of interest: S. Oeyen has nothing to disclose.

Conflict of interest: T. Zafeiridis has nothing to disclose.

Conflict of interest: B. Marsh has nothing to disclose.

Conflict of interest: F.H. Andersen has nothing to disclose.

Conflict of interest: R. Moreno has nothing to disclose.

Conflict of interest: M. Cecconi has nothing to disclose.

Conflict of interest: S. Leaver has nothing to disclose.

Conflict of interest: A. Boumendil has nothing to disclose.

Conflict of interest: D.W. De Lange has nothing to disclose.

Conflict of interest: B. Guidet has nothing to disclose.

Conflict of interest: H. Flaatten has nothing to disclose.

Support statement: This work was supported by the European Commission, APHP and Health Region West (Norway). Funding information for this article has been deposited with the Crossref Funder Registry.

References

  • 1.Waterer GW, Rello J. Steroids and COVID-19: we need a precision approach, not one size fits all. Infect Dis Ther 2020; 9: 701–705. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Britt RC, Devine A, Swallen KC, et al. Corticosteroid use in the intensive care unit: at what cost? Arch Surg 2006; 141: 145–149. doi: 10.1001/archsurg.141.2.145 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Jung C, Flaatten H, Fjolner J, et al. The impact of frailty on survival in elderly intensive care patients with COVID-19: the COVIP study. Crit Care 2021; 25: 149. doi: 10.1186/s13054-021-03551-3 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Guidet B, de Lange DW, Boumendil A, et al. The contribution of frailty, cognition, activity of daily life and comorbidities on outcome in acutely admitted patients over 80 years in European ICUs: the VIP2 study. Intensive Care Med 2020; 46: 57–69. doi: 10.1007/s00134-019-05853-1 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Horby P, Lim WS, Emberson JR, et al. Dexamethasone in hospitalized patients with Covid-19. N Engl J Med 2021; 384: 693–704. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2021436 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Tomazini BM, Maia IS, Cavalcanti AB, et al. Effect of dexamethasone on days alive and ventilator-free in patients with moderate or severe acute respiratory distress syndrome and COVID-19: the CoDEX randomized clinical trial. JAMA 2020; 324: 1307–1316. doi: 10.1001/jama.2020.17021 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Gogali A, Kyriakopoulos C, Kostikas K. Corticosteroids in COVID-19: one size does not fit all. Eur Respir J 2021; 57: 2100224. doi: 10.1183/13993003.00224-2021 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

This one-page PDF can be shared freely online.

Shareable PDF ERJ-00979-2021.Shareable (484.1KB, pdf)


Articles from The European Respiratory Journal are provided here courtesy of European Respiratory Society

RESOURCES