Skip to main content
BMC Complementary Medicine and Therapies logoLink to BMC Complementary Medicine and Therapies
. 2021 Jul 1;21:185. doi: 10.1186/s12906-021-03354-7

Insight into the characteristics of research published in traditional, complementary, alternative, and integrative medicine journals: a bibliometric analysis

Jeremy Y Ng 1,2,
PMCID: PMC8246686  PMID: 34210316

Abstract

Background

Traditional, complementary, alternative and integrative medicine (TCAIM) can be described as diverse medical and healthcare interventions, practices, products, or disciplines that are not considered as part of conventional medicine. Inherent in its definition, TCAIMs are comprised of a wide variety of therapies with highly variable safety and effectiveness evidence profiles. Despite this, the use of many TCAIMs is highly prevalent among patients globally. The present study consists of a bibliometric analysis of TCAIM journals.

Methods

A single search of all International Standard Serial Number (ISSNs) of all journals categorized as “complementary and alternative medicine” (code 2707) based on the All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) was run on Scopus on April 17, 2021. All publication types were included; no further search limits were applied. The following bibliometric data were collected: number of publications (in total and per year), authors and journals; open access status; journals publishing the highest volume of literature and their impact factors; language, countries, institutional affiliations, and funding sponsors of publications; most productive authors; and highest-cited publications. Trends associated with this subset of publications were identified and presented. Bibliometric indicators of production were calculated, and bibliometric networks were constructed and visualized using the software tool VOSviewer.

Results

A total of 172,466 publications (42,331 open access), were published by 219,680 authors in 143 journals from 1938 to 2021. Since the 1940s, an upward trend with respect to the volume of publications can be observed, with a steep increase observed between the mid-2000s and mid-2010s. The journal that published the largest number of publications was the Journal of Natural Products (n = 15,144). The most productive countries included China (n = 45,860), the United States (n = 29,523), and Germany (n = 10,120); a number of the most common institutional affiliations and funding sponsors also originated from these three countries.

Conclusions

The number of publications collectively published in TCAIM journals follows an upward trend. Given a high prevalence of TCAIM use among patients, increased acceptance of TCAIM among conventional healthcare providers, and growing interest in the research of TCAIM, future work should continue to investigate and track changes in the publication characteristics of the emerging research on this topic.

Keywords: Bibliometric analysis, Complementary and alternative medicine, Integrative health, Integrative medicine, Research trends, Scientometrics

Background

Complementary and alternative medicine is generally defined as a group of diverse medical and healthcare interventions, practices, products or disciplines that are not considered as part of conventional medicine [1]. Specifically, the National Center for Complementary and Integrative Health (NCCIH) defines “complementary” medicine as a non-mainstream practice used together with conventional medicine, whereas “alternative” medicine refers to a non-mainstream practice used in place of conventional medicine [2]. In contrast, “integrative health” is defined as the coordinated delivery of conventional and complementary approaches together [2]. These three words – complementary, alternative, and integrative – comprise the most common ways to refer to these types of therapies [3], in additional to “traditional medicine” which has been defined by the World Health Organization as “the sum total of the knowledge, skill and practices based on the theories, beliefs and experiences indigenous to different cultures, whether explicable or not, used in the maintenance of health as well as in the prevention, diagnosis, improvement or treatment of physical and mental illness” [4]. For the purpose of the present study, these therapies will be referred to collectively as “traditional, complementary, alternative and integrative medicine” or “TCAIMs” hereafter. At present, a lack of consensus exists regarding how to categorize TCAIMs; in fact, by definition every therapy that falls under the umbrella of “TCAIM” exists as a result of being considered outside of the purview of conventional Western medical practices [3]. Therefore, one TCAIM therapy can be highly unrelated to another due to the fact that each originates from a different region in the world, culture, system of traditional medicine, and school of thought [4, 5]. Despite these challenges, attempts have been made to categorize TCAIMs. For example, the NCCIH divides TCAIM therapies into two main types: 1) natural products and 2) mind and body practices. Within the former category, they include therapies such as herbs, vitamins and minerals, and probiotics, while in the latter, they include therapies such as yoga, chiropractic and osteopathic manipulation, and meditation, as well as acupuncture, relaxation techniques, tai chi, qi gong, and hypnotherapy, among others [2]. Despite these efforts, the NCCIH has stated, however, that some TCAIMs may not fit neatly into either of these two groups, citing many systems of TCAIM including practices of traditional healers, Ayurvedic medicine, traditional Chinese medicine, homeopathy, naturopathy, and functional medicine [2].

Regardless of how TCAIMs are categorized, these therapies are perceived to be of value by their proponents for their emphasis on a holistic, patient-focused approach to healthcare, which include mental, emotional, functional, spiritual, economic, and social aspects [2, 6]. TCAIM is widely used around the world, with 88% of World Health Organization member states acknowledging their use, which by definition means that these 170 countries have formally developed policies, laws, regulations, programs and offices for TCAIM [4]. The prevalence of TCAIM use is high in many Western countries; for example, it is estimated that around 80% of Canadians have used TCAIM [7]. The prevalence of TCAIM use is also documented to be high among certain patient populations; in cancer patients, as many as 90% report using some type of TCAIM [810]. TCAIM is used by these patients for a variety of reasons, including symptom relief, improved quality of life, supplementing conventional therapy, supporting one’s philosophical orientations toward health, and achieving a sense of control over one’s care [1113]. Integrative medicine (the use of complementary and conventional therapies) is becoming increasingly popular among patients and practitioners [14, 15], and sub-specializations of integrative care for specific diseases/conditions have also been established, such as integrative oncology [16, 17].

While some TCAIMs, such as meditation and yoga [18, 19], have undergone more thorough testing and have been found to be generally safe and effective, others have not been adequately researched to determine their effectiveness, and some have been found to be potentially harmful or interact negatively with conventional medicines [2022]. The belief among patients that “natural means safe and better” [23] is well-documented, however, evidence from the research literature suggests otherwise. Many herbal and dietary supplements can be harmful when taken in large quantities. Certain weight loss and bodybuilding supplements have been shown to cause hepatotoxicity or even hepatic failure at therapeutic doses [24]. Furthermore, systemized pharmacovigilance of TCAIMs is poorly coordinated on a national and international level, and TCAIM therapies are generally not held to the same standards of regulation as that of pharmaceutical medicines in terms of quality, effectiveness, and safety [20].

The increase in popularity and prevalence of TCAIM use among patients, and growing acknowledgement among conventional healthcare providers that a need exists to approach TCAIM therapies, their traditions, and their practitioners with respect, are among some of the reasons for an increase in TCAIM research productivity which has resulted in a growth in the volume of the published literature over the past few decades [2527]. The application of a research method known as a bibliometric analysis can facilitate a better understanding of a given field, such as that of TCAIM. A bibliometric analysis involves the statistical assessment of scientific publications, to identify the characteristics and determine the impact of the literature published in a specific academic discipline [2830]. This increased interest in TCAIM research has led to the establishment and indexing of multiple TCAIM journals. While a number of bibliometric analyses have made attempts to evaluate the characteristics of all publications published in the area of traditional, complementary, alternative, and/or integrative medicine through the use of various search strategies [3135], no study has comprehensively assessed the characteristics of the publications found within these source titles to date. Thus, the purpose of the present study is to provide current insight into the characteristics of publications published across TCAIM journals through a bibliometric analysis.

Methods

Publication search and characteristics

The 2021 Scopus Source List [36] was downloaded, and all Scopus-indexed journals belonging to the “complementary and alternative medicine” category (code 2707) were identified based on the All Science Journal Classification (ASJC). A single search containing the International Standard Serial Numbers (ISSNs) of all of these journals was run on Scopus on April 17, 2021; the search strategy can be found in Table 1. Search results were exported on the same day to prevent discrepancies between daily database updates. Searches were only conducted on Scopus because it is the largest abstract and citation database of peer-reviewed literature [37]; in comparison, Web of Science contains considerably fewer TCAIM-categorized journals, while OVID databases do not provide certain metrics such as publication citation counts [38]. All publication types were included, and no further search limits were applied. The following bibliometric data were collected: number of publications (in total and per year), authors and journals; open access status; journals publishing the highest volume of literature and their impact factors; language, countries, institutional affiliations, and funding sponsors of publications; most productive authors; and highest-cited publications. Trends associated with this subset of publications were identified and presented. Bibliometric networks were constructed and visualized using the software tool VOSviewer (version 1.6.16) [39, 40]. All aforementioned steps were conducted by a single author (JYN).

Table 1.

Scopus Search Strategy Executed on April 17, 2021

ISSN (23755776) OR ISSN (03601293) OR ISSN (09645284) OR ISSN (22129588) OR ISSN (26624052) OR ISSN (01896016) OR ISSN (16146891) OR ISSN (10762809) OR ISSN (10814000) OR ISSN (1096942X) OR ISSN (10895159) OR ISSN (10786791) OR ISSN (15223396) OR ISSN (00913960) OR ISSN (0192415X) OR ISSN (00029157) OR ISSN (17535174) OR ISSN (16148339) OR ISSN (1573420X) OR ISSN (18339735) OR ISSN (2209119X) OR ISSN (10338330) OR ISSN (10338330) OR ISSN (14726882) OR ISSN (07177917) OR ISSN (00070785) OR ISSN (16720415) OR ISSN (20956975) OR ISSN (17498546) OR ISSN (02532670) OR ISSN (09302786) OR ISSN (2045709X) OR ISSN (17461340) OR ISSN (10360913) OR ISSN (08896976) OR ISSN (14611449) OR ISSN (15332101) OR ISSN (02684055) OR ISSN (25042092) OR ISSN (17443881) OR ISSN (09652299) OR ISSN (13536117) OR ISSN (22150838) OR ISSN (04156412) OR ISSN (18763820) OR ISSN (13516647) OR ISSN (1741427X) OR ISSN (11762330) OR ISSN (15508307) OR ISSN (14653753) OR ISSN (16614119) OR ISSN (00180599) OR ISSN (08879311) OR ISSN (14754916) OR ISSN (09747168) OR ISSN (09725938) OR ISSN (15347354) OR ISSN (1546993X) OR ISSN (23252812) OR ISSN (11773936) OR ISSN (22134220) OR ISSN (19406223) OR ISSN (09624562) OR ISSN (10471979) OR ISSN (19826206) OR ISSN (17460689) OR ISSN (19723539) OR ISSN (09750185) OR ISSN (20052901) OR ISSN (16723597) OR ISSN (10755535) OR ISSN (10286020) OR ISSN (09759476) OR ISSN (22311866) OR ISSN (13608592) OR ISSN (15446301) OR ISSN (01438042) OR ISSN (15563499) OR ISSN (15533840) OR ISSN (14468263) OR ISSN (17464269) OR ISSN (21565872) OR ISSN (13094572) OR ISSN (12268453) OR ISSN (22108033) OR ISSN (10496475) OR ISSN (19960875) OR ISSN (16840240) OR ISSN (18610293) OR ISSN (01633864) OR ISSN (08344825) OR ISSN (20936966) OR ISSN (10841288) OR ISSN (13263390) OR ISSN (1715894X) OR ISSN (22254110) OR ISSN (18801447) OR ISSN (18638678) OR ISSN (00252514) OR ISSN (19336586) OR ISSN (11239395) OR ISSN (15763080) OR ISSN (07346875) OR ISSN (1934578X) OR ISSN (22103155) OR ISSN (19408153) OR ISSN (08098131) OR ISSN (08039828) OR ISSN (09747877) OR ISSN (15982386) OR ISSN (16159071) OR ISSN (13880209) OR ISSN (09737847) OR ISSN (09580344) OR ISSN (09723293) OR ISSN (09447113) OR ISSN (16248597) OR ISSN (16286847) OR ISSN (00320943) OR ISSN (18193455) OR ISSN (15160572) OR ISSN (15760952) OR ISSN (18878369) OR ISSN (18888526) OR ISSN (18789730) OR ISSN (10150684) OR ISSN (10950656) OR ISSN (15564061) OR ISSN (13021192) OR ISSN (23264500) OR ISSN (09735070) OR ISSN (00986151) OR ISSN (1560604X) OR ISSN (26160684) OR ISSN (23118571) OR ISSN (0722348X) OR ISSN (22129596) OR ISSN (26624060) OR ISSN (15734218) OR ISSN (22091203) OR ISSN (26627671) OR ISSN (23788763) OR ISSN (19930402) OR ISSN (18755364) OR ISSN (25042106) OR ISSN (22150846) OR ISSN (14394359) OR ISSN (17414288) OR ISSN (16614127) OR ISSN (15505138) OR ISSN (14764245) OR ISSN (23207094) OR ISSN (9751068) OR ISSN (22134239) OR ISSN (15322106) OR ISSN (19930399) OR ISSN (14772213) OR ISSN (9762809) OR ISSN (22311874) OR ISSN (2515690X) OR ISSN (21463298) OR ISSN (20934947) OR ISSN (22108041) OR ISSN (15403580) OR ISSN (21468397) OR ISSN (15206025) OR ISSN (22346856) OR ISSN (20957548) OR ISSN (18813747) OR ISSN (14330466) OR ISSN (15559475) OR ISSN (22103163) OR ISSN (22111069) OR ISSN (17445116) OR ISSN (9762787) OR ISSN (10991565) OR ISSN (17652847) OR ISSN (14390221) OR ISSN (19885806) OR ISSN (23264519) OR ISSN (26160692) OR ISSN (10035257) OR ISSN (25892894) OR ISSN (16721977) OR ISSN (10015302)

The journal titles associated with each ISSN provided in this search strategy is provided in Table 2

Bibliometric indicators of production

Relative growth rates and doubling times were calculated for publications published between 1938 and 2020. The relative growth rate represents the increase in the number of publications published per unit of time. The relative growth rate was calculated based on the following equation: [Relative Growth Rate = (logeW2 - logeW1)/(T2 - T1)], where loge W1 represents the log of initial number of articles, and loge W2 represents the log of final number of articles after a specific period of interval. T2-T1 represents the unit difference between the initial time and the final time. Doubling time is defined as the amount of time required for the subject matter to double its production. The doubling time was calculated based on the following equation: [DT = 0.693/Relative Growth Rate]. Price’s law was also applied to the subset of publications analysed [41]. This law proposes that the growth of scientific production follows an exponential function, and represents one of the most common indicators used to analyse productivity in a specific discipline or subset of publications. To assess whether the increase in data conforms to Price’s law of exponential growth, we carried out a linear adjustment of the values and another adjustment to an exponential curve.

Results

A total of 172,466 publications (42,331 open access), were published by 219,680 unique authors in 143 journals from 1938 to 2021. Since the 1940s, an upward trend with respect to the volume of publications can be observed, with a steep increase observed between the mid-2000s and mid-2010s. This upward trend has continued with 2020 marking the year with the highest number of publications to date. The Journal of Natural Products (n = 15,144) published the largest number of publications indexed in Scopus, followed by Zhongguo Zhongyao Zazhi (n = 14,577), and Planta Medica (n = 10,793). All journals included within this bibliometric analysis were hand-searched on InCites Journal Citation Reports [42]. As of 2020, 83 journals were still active (57.6%), of which 35 had a 2019 impact factor (range from 0.200 to 5.487). Table 2 provides complete details of the journals included in this bibliometric analysis, including the journal name, ISSN, whether the journal is active or inactive (as of 2020), coverage period, title history indication, publisher name, number of publications indexed in Scopus, and the 2019 impact factor (if available).

Table 2.

Characteristics of TCAIM Journals Indexed in Scopus (n = 143)

Position Journal Name ISSN Active or Inactive (as of 2020) Coverage Period Title History Indication Publisher Name Number of Publications Indexed in Scopus 2019 Impact Factor
1 Journal of Natural Products 1633864 (Print); 15206025 (Electronic) Active 1978-ongoing, 1973, 1971, 1949 Formerly known as Lloydia; not categorized as “complementary and alternative medicine” by Scopus American Chemical Society 15144 3.782
2 Zhongguo Zhongyao Zazhi 10015302 (Print) Active 1989-ongoing Formerly known as Zhong Yao Tong Bao (Beijing, China: 1981); not categorized as “complementary and alternative medicine” by Scopus Zhongguo Zhongyi Yanjiuyuan 14577 N/A
3 Planta Medica 00320943 (Print); 14390221 (Electronic) Active 1965-ongoing, 1961 N/A Georg Thieme Verlag 10793 2.687
4 The Journal of the American Osteopathic Association 986151 (Print) Active 1945-ongoing N/A American Osteopathic Association 9533 N/A
5 Evidence-Based Complementary and Alternative Medicine 1741427X (Print); 17414288 (Electronic) Active 2005-ongoing N/A Hindawi Publishing Corporation 9261 1.813
6 Chinese Traditional and Herbal Drugs 02532670 (Print) Active 2006-ongoing N/A Chung Tsao Yao Tsa Chih Pien Chi Pu 8704 N/A
7 Natural Product Communications 1934578X (Print); 15559475 (Electronic) Active 2008-ongoing N/A SAGE Publications Inc. 5800 0.468
8 Pharmaceutical Biology 13880209 (Print); 17445116 (Electronic) Active 1975-ongoing, 1961-1972 Formerly known as International Journal of Pharmacognosy; not categorized as “complementary and alternative medicine” by Scopus Taylor & Francis 4901 2.971
9 Phytomedicine 09447113 (Print) Active 1994-ongoing N/A Elsevier BV 4212 4.268
10 BMC Complementary and Alternative Medicine 14726882 (Print) Inactive 2001-2019 Continued as BMC Complementary Medicine and Therapies; see position #63 BioMed Central 3902 N/A (Inactive)
11 Journal of Alternative and Complementary Medicine 10755535 (Print) Active 1995-ongoing N/A Mary Ann Liebert Inc. 3709 2.256
12 Journal of Asian Natural Products Research 10286020 (Print); 14772213 (Electronic) Active 1998-ongoing N/A Taylor & Francis 2822 1.345
13 American Journal of Chinese Medicine 0192415X (Print) Active 1979-ongoing, 1974-1977 Formerly known as Comparative Medicine East and West; not categorized as “complementary and alternative medicine” by Scopus World Scientific Publishing Co 2719 3.682
14 British Homeopathic Journal 00070785 (Print) Inactive 1998-2001, 1945-1995 Continued as Homeopathy: The Journal of the Faculty of Homeopathy; see position #44 Elsevier BV 2652 N/A (Inactive)
15 American Journal of Clinical Hypnosis 00029157 (Print) Active 1958-ongoing N/A Taylor and Francis Inc. 2573 0.766
16 Complementary Therapies in Medicine 09652299 (Print) Active 1993-ongoing Formerly known as Complementary Medical Research; see position #123 Churchill Livingstone 2436 2.063
17 Chinese Journal of Integrative Medicine 16720415 (Print); 19930402 (Electronic) Active 2005-ongoing Formerly known as Chinese Journal of Integrated Traditional and Western Medicine; not categorized as “complementary and alternative medicine” by Scopus Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2170 1.545
18 Manuelle Medizin 00252514 (Print); 14330466 (Electronic) Active 1973-ongoing N/A Springer Verlag 2003 N/A
19 Journal of Bodywork and Movement Therapies 13608592 (Print) Active 1996-ongoing N/A Churchill Livingstone 1987 N/A
20 Phytochemical Analysis 09580344 (Print); 10991565 (Electronic) Active 1990-ongoing N/A John Wiley & Sons Inc. 1954 2.772
21 Alternative Therapies in Health and Medicine 10786791 (Print) Active 1995-ongoing N/A InnoVision Communications 1892 0.937
22 Zhong Xi Yi Jie He Xue Bao = Journal of Chinese integrative medicine 16721977 (Print) Inactive 2003-2012 Continued as Journal of Integrative Medicine; not categorized as “complementary and alternative medicine” by Scopus Shanghai Association of Integrative Medicine 1861 N/A (Inactive)
23 Holistic Nursing Practice 08879311 (Print); 15505138 (Electronic) Active 1986-ongoing Formerly known as Topics in Clinical Nursing; not categorized as “complementary and alternative medicine” by Scopus Lippincott Williams & Wilkins Ltd. 1722 0.968
24 Zeitschrift für Phytotherapie: Offizielles Organ der Ges. f. Phytotherapie e.V 0722348X (Print) Active 1985-ongoing, 1982 N/A Hippokrates Verlag 1648 N/A
25 Alternative and Complementary Therapies 10762809 (Print) Active 1999-ongoing N/A Mary Ann Liebert Inc. 1631 N/A
26 Journal of Medicinal Plant Research 19960875 (Print) Inactive 2009-2011 N/A Academic Journals 1495 N/A (Inactive)
27 EXPLORE: The Journal of Science and Healing 15508307 (Print) Active 2005-ongoing N/A Elsevier BV 1462 1.485
28 Journal of Natural Medicines 18610293 (Print) Active 2006-ongoing Formerly known as Natural Medicines; not categorized as “complementary and alternative medicine” by Scopus Springer Verlag 1461 2.055
29 Indian Journal of Traditional Knowledge 09725938 (Print); 09751068 (Electronic) Active 2008-ongoing N/A National Institute of Science Communication and Information Resources 1446 0.731
30 Acupuncture in Medicine 09645284 (Print) Active 1996-ongoing N/A BMJ Publishing Group 1391 2.129
31 Deutsche Zeitschrift für Akupunktur 04156412 (Print); 14394359 (Electronic) Inactive 1984-2016 (cancelled) N/A Springer Medizin 1344 N/A (Inactive)
32 Integrative Cancer Therapies 15347354 (Print) Active 2002-ongoing N/A Sage Science Press 1258 2.379
33 Complementary Therapies in Clinical Practice 17443881 (Print) Active 2005-ongoing Formerly known as Complementary Therapies in Nursing and Midwifery; see position #76 Elsevier BV 1231 1.770
34 Focus on Alternative and Complementary Therapies 14653753 (Print) Inactive 2004-2016 N/A Wiley-Blackwell 1165 N/A (Inactive)
35 Journal of Acupuncture and Tuina Science 16723597 (Print); 19930399 (Electronic) Active 2007-ongoing N/A Springer Nature Switzerland AG 1156 N/A
36 Chinese Journal of Natural Medicines 20956975 (Print); 18755364 (Electronic) Active 2004-ongoing N/A China Pharmaceutical University 1147 2.014
37 European Journal of Integrative Medicine 18763820 (Print) Active 2008-ongoing N/A Elsevier BV 1120 0.974
38 Revista Brasileira de Plantas Medicinais 15160572 (Print) Inactive 1999-2016 N/A Fundacao do Instituto de Biociencias 1115 N/A (Inactive)
39 Journal of Medicinal Plants 16840240 (Print) Active 2004-ongoing N/A Pizhuhishkadh-i giyahan-i darayiva faravardah ha-vi tabbii 1090 N/A
40 Phytotherapie 16248597 (Print); 17652847 (Electronic) Active 2005-ongoing N/A Springer Verlag 1071 N/A
41 African Journal of Traditional, Complementary and Alternative Medicines 01896016 (Print) Inactive 2006-2016 (cancelled), 2002, 1995, 1991, 1981-1982, 1973-1978, 1970 N/A African Networks on Ethnomedicines 995 N/A (Inactive)
42 Forschende Komplementarmedizin 16614119 (Print); 16614127 (Electronic) Inactive 2006-2016, 2002 Formerly known as Forschende Komplementarmedizin und Klassische Naturheilkunde; not categorized as “complementary and alternative medicine” by Scopus S. Karger AG 990 N/A (Inactive)
43 Schweizerische Zeitschrift für GanzheitsMedizin 10150684 (Print) Inactive 2002-2017 N/A Dr. Becker & Partner AG-Verlag fuer Ganzheits Medizin 934 N/A (Inactive)
44 Homeopathy: The Journal of the Faculty of Homeopathy 14754916 (Print); 14764245 (Electronic) Active 1998-ongoing Formerly known as British Homeopathic Journal; see position #14 Churchill Livingstone 934 N/A
45 Journal of Ethnobiology and Ethnomedicine 17464269 (Print) Active 2005-ongoing N/A BioMed Central 928 2.264
46 Journal of Herbs, Spices and Medicinal Plants 10496475 (Print); 15403580 (Electronic) Active 1992-ongoing N/A The Haworth Herbal Press 922 N/A
47 American Journal of Acupuncture 00913960 (Print) Inactive 1975-1999 N/A American Journal of Acupuncture 843 N/A (Inactive)
48 Acupuncture and Electro-Therapeutics Research 03601293 (Print) Active 1976-ongoing N/A Cognizant Communication Corporation 838 0.200
49 Medical Acupuncture 19336586 (Print) Active 2008-ongoing N/A Mary Ann Liebert Inc. 825 N/A
50 Journal of Ginseng Research 12268453 (Print); 20934947 (Electronic) Active 2010-ongoing N/A Elsevier BV 770 5.487
51 Boletin Latinoamericano y del Caribe de Plantas Medicinales y Aromaticas 07177917 (Print) Active 2008-ongoing N/A Universidad de Santiago de Chile 701 0.819
52 Journal of Complementary and Integrative Medicine 15533840 (Print) Active 2006-ongoing N/A Walter de Gruyter GmbH 699 N/A
53 Journal of Ayurveda and Integrative Medicine 09759476 (Print); 09762809 (Electronic) Active 2010-ongoing N/A Elsevier BV 690 N/A
54 Chinese Medicine 17498546 (Print) Active 2006-ongoing N/A BioMed Central 619 2.960
55 Integrative Medicine 1546993X (Print) Active 2013-ongoing, 2005-2010 Formerly known as International Journal of Integrative Medicine; not categorized as “complementary and alternative medicine” by Scopus InnoVision Communications 611 N/A
56 Alternative Medicine Review 10895159 (Print) Inactive 1996-2012 N/A Thorne Reasearch Inc. 587 N/A (Inactive)
57 Journal of Traditional and Complementary Medicine 22254110 (Print) Active 2011-ongoing N/A Elsevier BV 562 N/A
58 JAMS Journal of Acupuncture and Meridian Studies 20052901 (Print) Active 2008-ongoing N/A Elsevier BV 531 N/A
59 Chiropractic and Manual Therapies 2045709X (Print) Active 2011-ongoing Formerly known as Chiropractic and Osteopathy; see position #113 BioMed Central 475 1.512
60 Osteopathische Medizin 16159071 (Print) Inactive 2004-2017 (cancelled) N/A Elsevier BV 470 N/A (Inactive)
61 Medicina Naturista 15763080 (Print) Active 2012-ongoing N/A Zaragoza: Universidad de Zaragoza, Facultad de Medicina 462 N/A
62 Journal of Chinese Medicine 01438042 (Print) Active 2016-ongoing, 2001-2013 N/A Eastland Press 459 N/A
63 BMC Complementary Medicine and Therapies 26627671 (Electronic) Active 2020-ongoing Formerly known as BMC Complementary and Alternative Medicine; see position #10 BioMed Central Ltd. 456 2.833
64 International Journal of Osteopathic Medicine 17460689 (Print) Active 2005-ongoing N/A Elsevier Ltd 454 1.208
65 Revista Internacional de Acupuntura 18878369 (Print) Active 2007-ongoing N/A Elsevier BV 452 N/A
66 Tropical Journal of Natural Product Research 26160684 (Print); 26160692 (Electronic) Active 2017-ongoing N/A Faculty of Pharmacy, University of Benin 452 N/A
67 Nordic Journal of Music Therapy 08098131 (Print) Active 2001-ongoing Formerly known as Nordisk Tidsskrift for Musikkterapi; see position #104 Taylor & Francis 442 0.913
68 Chinesische Medizin 09302786 (Print) Inactive 1999-2017 (cancelled) N/A Springer International Publishing AG 437 N/A (Inactive)
69 International Journal of Phytomedicine 09750185 (Print) Inactive 2010-2016 (cancelled) N/A Advanced Research Journals 427 N/A (Inactive)
70 Revue d'Homeopathie 18789730 (Print) Active 2010-ongoing N/A Elsevier Masson 416 N/A
71 Studies on Ethno-Medicine 09735070 (Print) Active 2009-ongoing N/A Kamla-Raj Enterprises 406 N/A
72 Journal of Herbal Medicine 22108033 (Print); 22108041 (Electronic) Active 2011-ongoing N/A Urban und Fischer Verlag Jena 405 2.221
73 Journal of Biologically Active Products from Nature 22311866 (Print); 22311874 (Electronic) Active 2011-ongoing N/A Taylor and Francis Ltd. 402 N/A
74 Natural Products Journal 22103155 (Print); 22103163 (Electronic) Active 2011-ongoing N/A Bentham Science Publishers B.V. 395 N/A
75 Music Therapy Perspectives 07346875 (Print) Active 2011-ongoing N/A Oxford University Press 391 N/A
76 Complementary Therapies in Nursing and Midwifery 13536117 (Print) Inactive 1995-2004 Continued as Complementary Therapies in Clinical Practice; see position #33 Elsevier BV 385 N/A (Inactive)
77 Complementary Health Practice Review 15332101 (Print) Inactive 2007-2010, 1996-1999 Continued as Journal of Evidence-Based Complementary and Alternative Medicine; see positions #79 and #125 SAGE Publications Inc. 375 N/A (Inactive)
78 Integrative Medicine Alert 23252812 (Print) Active 2013-ongoing Formerly known as Alternative Medicine Alert; see position #99 American Health Consultants, Inc. 374 N/A
79 Journal of Evidence-Based Complementary and Alternative Medicine 21565872 (Print) Inactive 2014-2018, 1995 Continued as Journal of Evidence-Based Integrative Medicine; see positions #77, #125 and #136 SAGE Publications 369 N/A (Inactive)
80 Oriental Pharmacy and Experimental Medicine 15982386 (Print); 22111069 (Electronic) Inactive 2012-2019 Continued as Advances in Traditional Medicine; see position #108 Springer Science + Business Media 357 N/A (Inactive)
81 KIM - Komplementare und Integrative Medizin, Artztezeitschrift für Naturheilverfahren 18638678 (Print) Inactive 2007-2009 Formerly known as Arztezeitschrift fur Naturheilverfahren und Regulationsmedizin; see position #91 Urban & Fischer Verlag 336 N/A (Inactive)
82 Complementary Medicine Research 25042092 (Print); 25042106 (Electronic) Active 2017-ongoing, 2015 N/A S. Karger AG 314 1.089
83 Research Journal of Medicinal Plant 18193455 (Print) Inactive 2009-2016 (cancelled) N/A Academic Journals Inc. 311 N/A (Inactive)
84 International Journal of Aromatherapy 09624562 (Print); 15322106 (Electronic) Inactive 1995-2006 N/A Essential Oil Resource Consultants 307 N/A (Inactive)
85 International Journal of High Dilution Research 19826206 (Print) Active 2011-ongoing N/A Universidade Estadual Paulista - UNESP 300 N/A
86 Herba Polonica 00180599 (Print) Active 2018-ongoing, 1973-1979 N/A Instytut Roslin i Przetworow Zielarskich 284 N/A
87 Sleep and Hypnosis 13021192 (Print) Active 2000-ongoing N/A Kure Iletisim Grubu A S 282 N/A
88 Thermology International 1560604X (Print) Active 2002-ongoing N/A European Association of Thermology 278 N/A
89 Journal of the Australian Traditional-Medicine Society 13263390 (Print) Inactive 2008-2016 N/A Australian Traditional-Medicine Society 276 N/A (Inactive)
90 Journal of Traditional Medicines 18801447 (Print); 18813747 (Electronic) Inactive 2004-2013 N/A Medical and Pharmaceutical Society for WAKAN-YAKU 268 N/A (Inactive)
91 Arztezeitschrift für Naturheilverfahren und Regulationsmedizin 16148339 (Print) Inactive 2004-2006 Continued as KIM - Komplementare und Integrative Medizin, Artztezeitschrift fur Naturheilverfahren see position #81 Medizinisch Literarische Verlagsgesellschaft mbH 266 N/A (Inactive)
92 Revista Medica de Homeopatia 18888526 (Print) Inactive 2008-2017 N/A Elsevier Doyma 261 N/A (Inactive)
93 Pharmacognosy Reviews 09737847 (Print); 09762787 (Electronic) Inactive 2009-2018 (cancelled) N/A Medknow Publications 255 N/A (Inactive)
94 Advances in Integrative Medicine 22129588 (Print); 22129596 (Electronic) Active 2013-ongoing N/A Elsevier BV 254 N/A
95 Journal of Chiropractic Humanities 15563499 (Print) Active 2010-ongoing N/A Elsevier BV 247 N/A
96 Asian Medicine 1573420X (Print); 15734218 (Electronic) Active 2007-ongoing N/A Brill 241 N/A
97 Natural Solutions 19408153 (Print) Inactive 2009-2011, 1996-1997 N/A Alternative Medicine.com 226 N/A (Inactive)
98 Spirituality in Clinical Practice 23264500 (Print); 23264519 (Electronic) Active 2014-ongoing N/A American Psychological Association Inc. 222 N/A
99 Alternative Medicine Alert 1096942X (Print) Inactive 2009-2012 Continued as Integrative Medicine Alert; see position #78 American Health Consultants, Inc. 220 N/A (Inactive)
100 Journal of Complementary Medicine 14468263 (Print) Inactive 2008-2009 N/A Australian Pharmaceutical Publishing Co., Ltd. 205 N/A (Inactive)
101 World Journal of Traditional Chinese Medicine 23118571 (Print); 25892894 (Electronic) Active 2017-ongoing N/A Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications 200 N/A
102 Australian Journal of Medical Herbalism 10338330 (Print) Inactive 2006-2017 Continued as Australian Journal of Herbal and Naturopathic Medicine; see position #130 National Herbalists Association of Australia 177 N/A (Inactive)
103 International Journal of Applied Research in Natural Products 19406223 (Print) Inactive 2008-2016 (cancelled) N/A Healthy Synergies Publications 176 N/A (Inactive)
104 Nordisk Tidsskrift for Musikkterapi 08039828 (Print) Inactive 1992-2000 Continued as Nordic Journal of Music Therapy; see position #67 Taylor and Francis Ltd. 175 N/A (Inactive)
105 Journal of Pharmacopuncture 20936966 (Print); 22346856 (Electronic) Active 2016-ongoing N/A Korean Pharmacopuncture Institute 173 N/A
106 European Journal of Oriental Medicine 13516647 (Print) Inactive 2017, 2006-2014 N/A British Acupuncture Council 159 N/A (Inactive)
107 Phytomedica 09723293 (Print) Inactive 1999-2006 Formerly known as Indian Journal of Indigenous Medicines; not categorized as “complementary and alternative medicine” by Scopus Scientific Publishers 158 N/A (Inactive)
108 Advances in Traditional Medicine 26624052 (Print); 26624060 (Electronic) Active 2020-ongoing Formerly known as Oriental Pharmacy and Experimental Medicine; see position #80 Springer Singapore 157 N/A
109 Chiropractic Journal of Australia 10360913 (Print) Active 2016-ongoing, 2010-2013 N/A Chiropractors' Association of Australia 151 N/A
110 Journal of Sports Chiropractic and Rehabilitation 10841288 (Print) Inactive 1996-2001 Formerly known as Chiropractic Sports Medicine; see position #115 Atwood Publishing 147 N/A (Inactive)
111 Cannabis and Cannabinoid Research 23788763 (Electronic) Active 2016-ongoing N/A Mary Ann Liebert Inc. 147 N/A
112 Revista de Fitoterapia 15760952 (Print); 19885806 (Electronic) Active 2009-ongoing N/A Cita Publicaciones y Documentacion SL 144 N/A
113 Chiropractic and Osteopathy 17461340 (Print) Inactive 2005-2010 Continued as Chiropractic and Manual Therapies; see position #59 BioMed Central 135 N/A (Inactive)
114 Scientific Review of Alternative Medicine 10950656 (Print) Inactive 2000-2007 N/A Prometheus Books Inc. 134 N/A (Inactive)
115 Chiropractic Sports Medicine 08896976 (Print) Inactive 1987-1995 Continued as Journal of Sports Chiropractic and Rehabilitation; see position #110 Atwood Publishing 133 N/A (Inactive)
116 Clinical Acupuncture and Oriental Medicine 14611449 (Print) Inactive 1999-2003 N/A Churchill Livingstone 133 N/A (Inactive)
117 International Journal of Ozone Therapy 19723539 (Print) Inactive 2007-2013 N/A Centauro SRL 129 N/A (Inactive)
118 Journal of the Society for Integrative Oncology 1715894X (Print) Inactive 2006-2010 Formerly known as Journal of Cancer Integrative Medicine; see position #140 B.C. Decker Inc. 128 N/A (Inactive)
119 Journal of Intercultural Ethnopharmacology 21468397 (Electronic) Inactive 2016-2017 (cancelled) N/A Ejmanager LLC 122 N/A (Inactive)
120 Medicina Clinica e Termale 11239395 (Print) Inactive 2008, 2005-2006, 2001-2003, 1997-1998 N/A Tipografia la Commerciale s.n.c. 122 N/A (Inactive)
121 Phytotherapie Europeenne 16286847 (Print) Inactive 2007-2010 N/A Meditions Carline 121 N/A (Inactive)
122 Alternative Medicine 10814000 (Print) Inactive 2007-2008 N/A Future Medicine Pub. 119 N/A (Inactive)
123 Complementary Medical Research 02684055 (Print) Inactive 1988-1992 Continued as Complementary Therapies in Medicine; see position #16 Routledge & Kegan Paul 119 N/A (Inactive)
124 Journal of Traditional Chinese Medical Sciences 20957548 (Electronic) Active 2019-ongoing N/A Beijing University of Chinese Medicine 115 N/A
125 Journal of Evidence-Based Integrative Medicine 2515690X (Electronic) Active 2018-ongoing Formerly known as Journal of Evidence-Based Complementary and Alternative Medicine; see positions #77, 79 #125 and #136 SAGE Publications Ltd 113 N/A
126 Alternative Therapies in Womens Health 15223396 (Print) Inactive 2006-2009 N/A American Health Consultant 97 N/A (Inactive)
127 Integrative Medicine Research 22134220 (Print); 22134239 (Electronic) Active 2020-ongoing N/A Elsevier BV 96 2.172
128 Australian Journal of Acupuncture and Chinese Medicine 18339735 (Print) Inactive 2016-2016, 2011-2014 N/A Australian Acupuncture and Chinese Medicine Association Ltd 83 N/A (Inactive)
129 AAO Journal 23755776 (Print) Active 2006-ongoing N/A American Academy Of Osteopathy 83 N/A
130 Australian Journal of Herbal and Naturopathic Medicine 2209119X (Print); 22091203 (Electronic) Active 2018-ongoing Formerly known as Australian Journal of Medical Herbalism; see position #102 Naturopaths and Herbalists Association of Australia 63 N/A
131 Indian Journal of Research in Homoeopathy 09747168 (Print); 23207094 (Electronic) Active 2019-ongoing N/A Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications 61 N/A
132 Akupunktur und Traditionelle Chinesische Medizin 16146891 (Print) Inactive 2004-2006 Formerly known as Akupunktur; not categorized as “complementary and alternative medicine” by Scopus Medizinisch Literarische Verlagsgesellschaft mbH 59 N/A (Inactive)
133 Seminars in Preventive and Alternative Medicine 15564061 (Print) Inactive 2005-2007 N/A Elsevier 43 N/A (Inactive)
134 Open Access Journal of Medicinal and Aromatic Plants 09747877 (Print) Active 2010-ongoing N/A Medicinal and Aromatic Plants Association of India 41 N/A
135 Archives of Drug Information 17535174 (Print) Inactive 2008-2011 N/A John Wiley & Sons Inc. 35 N/A (Inactive)
136 Integrative Medicine Insights 11773936 (Print) Inactive 2008-2018 Continued as Journal of Evidence-Based Integrative Medicine; see positions #79 and #125 Libertas Academica 33 N/A (Inactive)
137 Evidence-Based Integrative Medicine 11762330 (Print) Inactive 2005 N/A Adis Press 31 N/A (Inactive)
138 Current Traditional Medicine 22150838 (Print); 22150846 (Electronic) Inactive 2015-2016 N/A Bentham Science Publishers B.V. 16 N/A (Inactive)
139 Journal of Experimental and Integrative Medicine 13094572 (Print); 21463298 (Electronic) Inactive 2014-2016 N/A Gesdav 16 N/A (Inactive)
140 Journal of Cancer Integrative Medicine 15446301 (Print) Inactive 2005 Continued as Journal of the Society for Integrative Oncology; see position #118 Prime National Publishing Corp. 15 N/A (Inactive)
141 International Journal of Clinical Acupuncture 10471979 (Print) Inactive 2014-2016 N/A Allerton Press Inc. 4 N/A (Inactive)
142 World Journal of Acupuncture - Moxibustion 10035257 (Electronic) Inactive 2013 N/A Elsevier BV 4 N/A (Inactive)
143 Journal of Orthomolecular Medicine 08344825 (Print) Inactive 2017, 1988-2015 Formerly known as Journal of Orthomolecular Psychiatry; not categorized as “complementary and alternative medicine” by Scopus Canadian Schizophrenia Foundation 0 N/A (Inactive)

The subject area containing the largest number of publications was medicine (n = 172,456), followed by pharmacology, toxicology and pharmaceutics (n = 86,902), then biochemistry, genetics and molecular biology (n = 40,262). Publications were primarily published in English (n = 135,718), followed by Chinese (n = 24,614), then German (n = 8611). The most common document types were article (n = 139,540) and review (n = 13,418); articles primarily include original research, while reviews include literature, scoping, and systematic reviews. The most productive countries included China (n = 45,860), the United States (n = 29,523), and Germany (n = 10,120). The most common affiliations were the China Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences (n = 3560), the Beijing University of Chinese Medicine (n = 2896), and the Chinese Academy of Sciences (n = 2896); the most common funding sponsors were the National Natural Science Foundation of China (n = 5711), the National Institutes of Health (n = 4055), and the US Department of Health and Human Services (n = 4032). The general characteristics of eligible publications are summarized in Table 3. In addition, the 100 most highly published authors are provided in Table 4, and the 100 highest-cited publications are provided in Table 5.

Table 3.

General Characteristics of Publications in TCAIM Journals

Publication Volume
Number of Total Publications n = 172466 100.0%
Number of Open Access Publications n = 42331 24.5%
Document Type (# of publications) Article n = 139540 80.9%
Review n = 13418 7.8%
Note n = 5873 3.4%
Editorial n = 4643 2.7%
Letter n = 3096 1.8%
Conference Paper n = 2706 1.6%
Short Survey n = 1774 1.0%
Erratum n = 1293 0.7%
Retracted n = 23 0.0%
Conference Review n = 5 0.0%
Undefined n = 95 0.1%
Number of Unique Authors n = 219680
Source Titles (Journals) Across All Publications n = 144
Subject Area of Publication (10 Highest)
(# of publications) Medicine n = 172456 100.0%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics n = 86902 50.4%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology n = 40262 23.3%
Chemistry n = 31845 18.5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences n = 12124 7.0%
Health Professions n = 11487 6.7%
Nursing n = 7428 4.3%
Social Sciences n = 1949 1.1%
Mathematics n = 1461 0.8%
Arts and Humanities n = 1249 0.7%
Language of Publication (10 Highest)
(# of publications) English n = 135718 78.7%
Chinese n = 24614 14.3%
German n = 8611 5.0%
Spanish n = 1741 1.0%
French n = 1645 1.0%
Portuguese n = 1065 0.6%
Persian n = 691 0.4%
Polish n = 200 0.1%
Italian n = 162 0.1%
Arabic n = 120 0.1%
Country of Publication (20 Highest)
(# of publications) China n = 45860 26.6%
United States n = 29523 17.1%
Germany n = 10120 5.9%
India n = 9116 5.3%
Japan n = 6774 3.9%
South Korea n = 6120 3.5%
United Kingdom n = 6057 3.5%
Brazil n = 4915 2.8%
Australia n = 3844 2.2%
Taiwan n = 3660 2.1%
Iran n = 3558 2.1%
Italy n = 3341 1.9%
France n = 3325 1.9%
Canada n = 2607 1.5%
Spain n = 2449 1.4%
Switzerland n = 2238 1.3%
Austria n = 1835 1.1%
Nigeria n = 1814 1.1%
Malaysia n = 1798 1.0%
Turkey n = 1754 1.0%
Institutional Affiliation (20 Highest)
(# of publications) China Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences n = 3560 2.1%
Beijing University of Chinese Medicine n = 2896 1.7%
Chinese Academy of Sciences n = 2896 1.7%
Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College n = 2613 1.5%
Ministry of Education China n = 2595 1.5%
Shanghai University of Traditional Chinese Medicine n = 1949 1.1%
Nanjing University of Traditional Chinese Medicine n = 1868 1.1%
China Pharmaceutical University n = 1403 0.8%
Kyung Hee University n = 1302 0.8%
Tianjin University of Traditional Chinese Medicine n = 1171 0.7%
China Medical University Taichung n = 1165 0.7%
Chengdu University of Traditional Chinese Medicine n = 1153 0.7%
Shenyang Pharmaceutical University n = 1147 0.7%
Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine n = 1078 0.6%
Institute of Materia Medica, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College n = 1069 0.6%
Institute of Medicinal Plant Development, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College n = 1035 0.6%
Peking University n = 963 0.6%
Kunming Institute of Botany Chinese Academy of Sciences n = 941 0.5%
Jiangxi University of Traditional Chinese Medicine n = 853 0.5%
Korea Institute of Oriental Medicine n = 785 0.5%
Funding Sponsor (20 Highest)
(# of publications) National Natural Science Foundation of China n = 5711 3.3%
National Institutes of Health n = 4055 2.4%
US Department of Health and Human Services n = 4032 2.3%
National Cancer Institute n = 1477 0.9%
Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology n = 1057 0.6%
Ministry of Science and Technology of the People’s Republic of China n = 979 0.6%
National Research Foundation of Korea n = 944 0.5%
National Center for Complementary and Integrative Health n = 932 0.5%
Japan Society for the Promotion of Science n = 903 0.5%
Ministry of Education of the People’s Republic of China n = 749 0.4%
Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico n = 694 0.4%
Ministério da Ciência, Tecnologia e Inovações n = 574 0.3%
Coordenação de Aperfeicoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior n = 527 0.3%
National Institute of General Medical Sciences n = 442 0.3%
National Center for Research Resources n = 427 0.3%
National Key Research and Development Program of China n = 397 0.2%
Ministry of Science, ICT and Future Planning n = 353 0.2%
Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities n = 323 0.2%
European Commission n = 309 0.2%
Chinese Academy of Sciences n = 293 0.2%

Table 4.

100 Most Productive Authors Across Publications in TCAIM Journals

Position Author Name Number of Publications Author H-Index
1 Huang, L.Q. 330 42
2 Goetz, P. 314 5
3 Ernst, E. 311 106
4 Xie, Y.M. 264 14
5 Lee, M.S. 232 47
6 Tu, P.F. 231 48
7 Pezzuto, J.M. 223 88
8 Jia, X.B. 213 33
9 Kinghorn, A.D. 207 72
10 Cordell, G.A. 205 61
11 Guo, L.P. 186 23
12 Yang, M. 186 18
13 Dossey, L. 179 12
14 Wang, Z.Z. 176 27
15 Kingston, D.G.I. 170 60
16 Yao, X.S. 169 51
17 Khan, I.A. 168 60
18 Farnsworth, N.R. 167 66
19 White, A. 167 56
20 Hostettmann, K. 166 63
21 Schulz, V. 162 9
22 Hamburger, M. 161 46
23 Qin, X.M. 161 27
24 Allen, T.W. 160 4
25 Donnelly, G.F. 160 5
26 Sun, H.D. 156 50
27 Duan, J.A. 153 44
28 Proksch, P. 152 65
29 Wu, Y.C. 152 56
30 Guo, Q.S. 151 18
31 Setzer, W.N. 146 43
32 Adams, J. 145 38
33 Efferth, T. 145 75
34 Ammer, K. 140 16
35 Ye, W.C. 140 42
36 Zhang, T.J. 140 15
37 Bauer, R. 137 51
38 Yang, S.L. 136 26
39 Hart, J. 134 5
40 Lee, K.H. 134 80
41 Sticher, O. 134 50
42 Yarnell, E. 134 13
43 Pettit, G.R. 133 89
44 Uehleke, B. 133 16
45 Yang, X.W. 131 31
46 Chen, S.L. 130 57
47 Wang, Z.M. 128 18
48 Xiao, X.H. 127 38
49 Lin, J.G. 126 46
50 Beyer, L. 124 6
51 Kiefer, D. 124 7
52 Choudhary, M.I. 122 57
53 Pieters, L. 122 58
54 Chen, R.Y. 120 57
55 Robinson, N. 120 33
56 Verpoorte, R. 119 86
57 Liao, X. 118 11
58 Zhang, W.D. 116 46
59 Hao, X.J. 115 42
60 Block, K.I. 114 17
61 Kraft, K. 114 9
62 Liebenson, C. 114 9
63 Kadota, S. 112 66
64 Lao, L. 112 50
65 Litscher, G. 112 29
66 Wagner, H. 112 49
67 Niemtzow, R.C. 111 14
68 Yu, D.Q. 111 28
69 Fisher, P. 110 26
70 Kong, L.Y. 110 47
71 Omura, Y. 110 17
72 McLaughlin, J.L. 108 55
73 Tezuka, Y. 108 61
74 Chang, F.R. 107 54
75 Fong, H.H.S. 106 55
76 Gibson, D.M. 106 1
77 Cramer, H. 105 41
78 Yuan, Y. 105 16
79 Horowitz, S. 104 7
80 Walach, H. 104 40
81 Gerwick, W.H. 103 73
82 Wright, A.D. 103 49
83 Naghdi Badi, H. 102 18
84 Qian, D.W. 102 31
85 Kuo, Y.H. 101 53
86 Schwartz, S.A. 101 7
87 Dai, H.F. 100 31
88 Guo, D.A. 100 56
89 Hsieh, C.L. 100 36
90 Xiao, P.G. 100 42
91 Li, P. 99 56
92 Morita, H. 99 52
93 De Tommasi, N. 98 39
94 Ots, T. 98 4
95 Tokuda, H. 97 68
96 Weeks, J. 97 8
97 Witt, C.M. 97 42
98 Saller, R. 96 33
99 Steel, A. 96 22
100 König, G.M. 95 (tied for 100th place) 54
101 Xiao, W. 95 (tied for 100th place) 14

Table 5.

100 Highest-Cited Publications in TCAIM Journals

Position Title Authors Year Source Title Citation Count
1 Natural products as sources of new drugs over the last 25 years Newman D.J., Cragg G.M. 2007 Journal of Natural Products 3258
2 Flavonoids as antioxidants Pietta P.-G. 2000 Journal of Natural Products 3162
3 Natural products as sources of new drugs over the 30 years from 1981 to 2010 Newman D.J., Cragg G.M. 2012 Journal of Natural Products 3122
4 Brine shrimp: A convenient general bioassay for active plant constituents Meyer B.N., Ferrigni N.R., Putnam J.E., Jacobsen L.B., Nichols D.E., McLaughlin J.L. 1982 Planta Medica 2939
5 Natural products as sources of new drugs from 1981 to 2014 Newman D.J., Cragg G.M. 2016 Journal of Natural Products 2750
6 Natural products as sources of new drugs over the period 1981–2002 Newman D.J., Cragg G.M., Snader K.M. 2003 Journal of Natural Products 2285
7 Free radicals, antioxidants and functional foods: Impact on human health Lobo V., Patil A., Phatak A., Chandra N. 2010 Pharmacognosy Reviews 1939
8 Pharmacology of Curcuma longa Ammon H.P.T., Wahl M.A. 1991 Planta Medica 1415
9 A sensitive and quick microplate method to determine the minimal inhibitory concentration of plant extracts for bacteria Eloff J.N. 1998 Planta Medica 1320
10 Screening of plant extracts for antioxidant activity: A comparative study on three testing methods Koleva I.I., Van Beek T.A., Linssen J.P.H., De Groot A., Evstatieva L.N. 2002 Phytochemical Analysis 1186
11 Influence of piperine on the pharmacokinetics of curcumin in animals and human volunteers Shoba G., Joy D., Joseph T., Majeed M., Rajendran R., Srinivas P.S.S.R. 1998 Planta Medica 1178
12 Natural products in drug discovery and development Cragg G.M., Newman D.J., Snader K.M. 1997 Journal of Natural Products 1126
13 Natural polyphenols (vegetable tannins) as drugs: Possible modes of action Haslam E. 1996 Journal of Natural Products 960
14 Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: The PRISMA statement (Chinese edition) Moher D., Liberati A., Tetzlaff J., Altman D.G., Altman D., Antes G., Atkins D., Barbour V., Barrowman N., Berlin J.A., Clark J., Clarke M., Cook D., D’Amico R., Deeks J.J., Devereaux P.J., Dickersin K., Egger M., Ernst E., Gøtzsche P.C., Grimshaw J., Guyatt G., Higgins J., Ioannidis J.P.A., Kleijnen J., Lang T., Magrini N., McNamee D., Moja L., Mulrow C., Napoli M., Oxman A., Pham B., Rennie D., Sampson M., Schulz K.F., Shekelle P.G., Tovey D., Tugwell P. 2009 Journal of Chinese Integrative Medicine 933
15 The role of natural product chemistry in drug discovery Butler M.S. 2004 Journal of Natural Products 918
16 Natural products from endophytic microorganisms Strobel G., Daisy B., Castillo U., Harper J. 2004 Journal of Natural Products 916
17 Anti-inflammatory properties of curcumin, a major constituent of Curcuma longa: A review of preclinical and clinical research Jurenka J.S. 2009 Alternative Medicine Review 837
18 Dose escalation of a curcuminoid formulation Lao C.D., Ruffin IV M.T., Normolle D., Heath D.D., Murray S.I., Bailey J.M., Boggs M.E., Crowell J., Rock C.L., Brenner D.E. 2006 BMC Complementary and Alternative Medicine 833
19 Structure-activity relationship and classification of flavonoids as inhibitors of xanthine oxidase and superoxide scavengers Cos P., Ying L., Calomme M., Hu J.P., Cimanga K., Van Poel B., Pieters L., Vlietinck A.J., Vanden Berghe D. 1998 Journal of Natural Products 823
20 Mindfulness-based stress reduction for stress management in healthy people: A review and meta-analysis Chiesa A., Serretti A. 2009 Journal of Alternative and Complementary Medicine 789
21 Th1/Th2 balance: The hypothesis, its limitations, and implications for health and disease Kidd P. 2003 Alternative Medicine Review 781
22 Annonaceous acetogenins: Recent progress Alali F.Q., Liu X.-X., McLaughlin J.L. 1999 Journal of Natural Products 745
23 Antidiabetic plants and their active constituents Marles R.J., Farnsworth N.R. 1995 Phytomedicine 744
24 Trends in use of complementary and alternative medicine by us adults: 1997–2002 Tindle H.A., Davis R.B., Phillips R.S., Eisenberg D.M. 2005 Alternative Therapies in Health and Medicine 724
25 Antioxidant principles from Bauhinia tarapotensis Braca A., De Tommasi N., Di Bari L., Pizza C., Politi M., Morelli I. 2001 Journal of Natural Products 712
26 Synergy research: Approaching a new generation of phytopharmaceuticals Wagner H., Ulrich-Merzenich G. 2009 Phytomedicine 695
27 Safety and anti-inflammatory activity of curcumin: A component of tumeric (Curcuma longa) Chainani-Wu N. 2003 Journal of Alternative and Complementary Medicine 683
28 Natural products from plant-associated microorganisms: Distribution, structural diversity, bioactivity, and implications of their occurrence Gunatilaka A.A.L. 2006 Journal of Natural Products 664
29 The pharmacological potential of mushrooms Lindequist U., Niedermeyer T.H.J., Jülich W.-D. 2005 Evidence-based Complementary and Alternative Medicine 648
30 Fixed oil of Nigella sativa and derived thymoquinone inhibit eicosanoid generation in leukocytes and membrane lipid peroxidation Houghton P.J., Zarka R., De Las Heras B., Hoult J.R.S. 1995 Planta Medica 641
31 Marine natural products and related compounds in clinical and advanced preclinical trials Newman D.J., Cragg G.M. 2004 Journal of Natural Products 626
32 Synergy and other interactions in phytomedicines Williamson E.M. 2001 Phytomedicine 621
33 Nrf2 as a master redox switch in turning on the cellular signaling involved in the induction of cytoprotective genes by some chemopreventive phytochemicals Surh Y.-J., Kundu J.K., Na H.-K. 2008 Planta Medica 593
34 Use and expenditure on complementary medicine in England: A population based survey Thomas K.J., Nicholl J.P., Coleman P. 2001 Complementary Therapies in Medicine 577
35 In vitro antibacterial activity of some plant essential oils Prabuseenivasan S., Jayakumar M., Ignacimuthu S. 2006 BMC Complementary and Alternative Medicine 572
36 Antioxidant and antiinflammatory activities of anthocyanins and their aglycon, cyanidin, from tart cherries Wang H., Nair M.G., Strasburg G.M., Chang Y.-C., Booren A.M., Gray J.I., DeWitt D.L. 1999 Journal of Natural Products 572
37 Alkaloids from amphibian skin: A tabulation of over eight-hundred compounds Daly J.W., Spande T.F., Garraffo H.M. 2005 Journal of Natural Products 558
38 Scientific basis for the therapeutic use of Withania somnifera (ashwagandha): A review Mishra L.-C., Singh B.B., Dagenais S. 2000 Alternative Medicine Review 538
39 Acetylcholinesterase inhibitors from plants Mukherjee P.K., Kumar V., Mal M., Houghton P.J. 2007 Phytomedicine 522
40 Extraction, isolation and characterization of bioactive compounds from plants’ extracts Sasidharan S., Chen Y., Saravanan D., Sundram K.M., Yoga Latha L. 2011 African Journal of Traditional, Complementary and Alternative Medicines 514
41 Annonaceous acetogenins: A review Rupprecht J.K., Hui Y.-H., McLaughlin J.L. 1990 Journal of Natural Products 498
42 Synergism between natural products and antibiotics against infectious diseases Hemaiswarya S., Kruthiventi A.K., Doble M. 2008 Phytomedicine 489
43 Lead toxicity, a review of the literature. Part I: Exposure, evaluation, and treatment Patrick L. 2006 Alternative Medicine Review 481
44 Complementary and alternative medicine use in Australia: A national population-based survey Xue C.C.L., Zhang A.L., Lin V., Da Costa C., Story D.F. 2007 Journal of Alternative and Complementary Medicine 460
45 Traditional Chinese medicine network pharmacology: Theory, methodology and application Li S., Zhang B. 2013 Chinese Journal of Natural Medicines 455
46 Beneficial effects of green tea: A literature review Chacko S.M., Thambi P.T., Kuttan R., Nishigaki I. 2010 Chinese Medicine 454
47 Therapeutic applications of pomegranate (Punica granatum L.): A review Jurenka J. 2008 Alternative Medicine Review 451
48 Recent extraction techniques for natural products: Microwave-assisted extraction and pressurised solvent extraction Kaufmann B., Christen P. 2002 Phytochemical Analysis 447
49 Astaxanthin, a carotenoid with potential in human health and nutrition Hussein G., Sankawa U., Goto H., Matsumoto K., Watanabe H. 2006 Journal of Natural Products 429
50 Antimicrobial activity of essential oils: A 1976–1986 literature review. Aspects of the test methods Janssen A.M., Scheffer J.J.C., Baerheim Svendsen A. 1987 Planta Medica 429
51 Antioxidant activity, total phenolic and total flavonoid contents of whole plant extracts Torilis leptophylla L Saeed N., Khan M.R., Shabbir M. 2012 BMC Complementary and Alternative Medicine 426
52 Clinical applications of N-acetylcysteine Kelly G.S. 1998 Alternative Medicine Review 422
53 Nutritional quality of organic versus conventional fruits, vegetables, and grains Worthington V. 2001 Journal of Alternative and Complementary Medicine 421
54 Chemotherapy-associated oxidative stress: Impact on chemotherapeutic effectiveness Conklin K.A. 2004 Integrative Cancer Therapies 419
55 Iridoids. A review El-Naggar L.J., Beal J.L. 1980 Journal of Natural Products 418
56 Anti-aids agents, 11. Betulinic acid and platanic acid as anti-HIV principles from Syzigium claviflorum, and the anti-HIV activity of structurally related triterpenoids Fujioka T., Kashiwada Y., Kilkuskie R.E., Cosentino L.M., Bailas L.M., Jiang J.B., Janzen W.P., Chen I.-S., Lee K.-H. 1994 Journal of Natural Products 415
57 Bleomycin: New perspectives on the mechanism of action Hecht S.M. 2000 Journal of Natural Products 406
58 Plant-derived leading compounds for chemotherapy of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection Vlietinck A.J., De Bruyne T., Apers S., Pieters L.A. 1998 Planta Medica 404
59 Antioxidants and cancer III: Quercetin Lamson D.W., Brignall M.S. 2000 Alternative Medicine Review 403
60 A microwell cytotoxicity assay using Artemia salina (brine shrimp) Solis P.N., Wright C.W., Anderson M.M., Gupta M.P., Phillipson J.D. 1993 Planta Medica 403
61 How many cancer patients use complementary and alternative medicine: A systematic review and metaanalysis Horneber M., Bueschel G., Dennert G., Less D., Ritter E., Zwahlen M. 2012 Integrative Cancer Therapies 395
62 The BBC survey of complementary medicine use in the UK Ernst E., White A. 2000 Complementary Therapies in Medicine 395
63 The scientific rediscovery of an ancient Chinese herbal medicine: Cordyceps sinensis part I Zhu J.-S., Halpern G.M., Jones K. 1998 Journal of Alternative and Complementary Medicine 389
64 Therapeutic applications of whey protein Marshall K. 2004 Alternative Medicine Review 383
65 Chemical toxins: A hypothesis to explain the global obesity epidemic Baillie-Hamilton P.F. 2002 Journal of Alternative and Complementary Medicine 377
66 Quantitative 1H NMR: Development and potential of a method for natural products analysis Pauli G.F., Jaki B.U., Lankin D.C. 2005 Journal of Natural Products 376
67 Antimicrobial activity of some ethnomedicinal plants used by Paliyar tribe from Tamil Nadu, India Duraipandiyan V., Ayyanar M., Ignacimuthu S. 2006 BMC Complementary and Alternative Medicine 375
68 Goji (Lycium barbarum and L. chinense): Phytochemistry, pharmacology and safety in the perspective of traditional uses and recent popularity Potterat O. 2010 Planta Medica 374
69 Constituents of Cannabis sativa L. XVII. a review of the natural constituents Turner C.E., Elsohly M.A., Boeren E.G. 1980 Journal of Natural Products 373
70 Recent natural products based drug development: A pharmaceutical industry perspective Shu Y.-Z. 1998 Journal of Natural Products 371
71 Cyclooxygenase inhibitory and antioxidant cyanidin glycosides in cherries and berries Seeram N.P., Momin R.A., Nair M.G., Bourquin L.D. 2001 Phytomedicine 370
72 Zingiberis rhizoma: A comprehensive review on the ginger effect and efficacy profiles Chrubasik S., Pittler M.H., Roufogalis B.D. 2005 Phytomedicine 368
73 Ayurveda and traditional Chinese medicine: A comparative overview Patwardhan B., Warude D., Pushpangadan P., Bhatt N. 2005 Evidence-based Complementary and Alternative Medicine 366
74 A-type proanthocyanidin trimers from cranberry that inhibit adherence of uropathogenic P-fimbriated Escherichia coli Foo L.Y., Lu Y., Howell A.B., Vorsa N. 2000 Journal of Natural Products 366
75 Historical review of medicinal plants’ usage Petrovska B.B. 2012 Pharmacognosy Reviews 363
76 Plant sources of hepatotoxic pyrrolizidine alkaloids Smith L.W., Culvenor C.C.J. 1981 Journal of Natural Products 361
77 Steaming of ginseng at high temperature enhances biological activity Wang Yu Kim, Jong Moon Kim, Sang Beom Han, Seung Ki Lee, Nak Doo Kim, Park M.K., Chong Kook Kim, Park J.H. 2000 Journal of Natural Products 360
78 Recent trends and important developments in propolis research Bankova V. 2005 Evidence-based Complementary and Alternative Medicine 357
79 Therapeutic applications of fenugreek Basch E., Ulbricht C., Kuo G., Szapary P., Smith M. 2003 Alternative Medicine Review 357
80 Antioxidant and free radical scavenging activity of Spondias pinnata Hazra B., Biswas S., Mandal N. 2008 BMC Complementary and Alternative Medicine 354
81 Antioxidant and radical scavenging effects of aged garlic extract and its constituents Imai J., Ide N., Nagae S., Moriguchi T., Matsuura H., Itakura Y. 1994 Planta Medica 350
82 Pentacyclic triterpenes of the lupane, oleanane and ursane group as tools in cancer therapy Laszczyk M.N. 2009 Planta Medica 346
83 Antioxidant and antimicrobial activity of Foeniculum vulgare and crithmum maritimum essential oils Ruberto G., Baratta M.T., Deans S.G., Dorman H.J.D. 2000 Planta Medica 346
84 Medicinal plants used by traditional healers in Kancheepuram District of Tamil Nadu, India Muthu C., Ayyanar M., Raja N., Ignacimuthu S. 2006 Journal of Ethnobiology and Ethnomedicine 344
85 Lead toxicity part II: The role of free radical damage and the use of antioxidants in the pathology and treatment of lead toxicity Patrick L. 2006 Alternative Medicine Review 343
86 A rapid and effective method for RNA extraction from different tissues of grapevine and other woody plants Gambino G., Perrone I., Gribaudo I. 2008 Phytochemical Analysis 341
87 Benefits and requirements of vitamin D for optimal health: A review Grant W.B., Holick M.F. 2005 Alternative Medicine Review 341
88 Antimicrobial and antioxidant activities of three Mentha species essential oils Mimica-Dukić N., Božin B., Soković M., Mihajlović B., Matavulj M. 2003 Planta Medica 338
89 The taxane diterpenoids Baloglu E., Kingston D.G.I. 1999 Journal of Natural Products 337
90 Flavonoids: A versatile source of anticancer drugs Chahar M.K., Sharma N., Dobhal M.P., Joshi Y.C. 2011 Pharmacognosy Reviews 332
91 Resilience: A historical review of the construct Tusaie K., Dyer J. 2004 Holistic Nursing Practice 332
92 α-glucosidase inhibitors from plants: A natural approach to treat diabetes Kumar S., Narwal S., Kumar V., Prakash O. 2011 Pharmacognosy Reviews 331
93 Flavonoids from Hypericum perforatum show antidepressant activity in the forced swimming test Butterweck V., Jürgenliemk G., Nahrstedt A., Winterhoff H. 2000 Planta Medica 328
94 Stigmasterols from Typha latifolia Greca M.D., Monaco P., Previtera L. 1990 Journal of Natural Products 327
95 Flavonoids and phenolic acids: Role and biochemical activity in plants and human Ghasemzadeh A., Ghasemzadeh N. 2011 Journal of Medicinal Plant Research 326
96 Alternative antimicrobial approach: Nano-antimicrobial materials Beyth N., Houri-Haddad Y., Domb A., Khan W., Hazan R. 2015 Evidence-based Complementary and Alternative Medicine 324
97 Anti-inflammatory activity of linalool and linalyl acetate constituents of essential oils Peana A.T., D’Aquila P.S., Panin F., Serra G., Pippia P., Moretti M.D.L. 2002 Phytomedicine 324
98 Immunostimulant agents from Andrographis paniculata Puri A., Saxena R., Saxena R.P., Saxena K.C., Srivastava V., Tandon J.S. 1993 Journal of Natural Products 324
99 The health benefits of yoga and exercise: A review of comparison studies Ross A., Thomas S. 2010 Journal of Alternative and Complementary Medicine 320
100 Anti-inflammatory compounds of plant origin. Part II. Modulation of pro-inflammatory cytokines, chemokines and adhesion molecules Calixto J.B., Campos M.M., Otuki M.F., Santos A.R.S. 2004 Planta Medica 319

Figure 1 depicts the number of publications published per year from 1938 to 2020, inclusive of an exponential and linear curve. Mathematical adjustment to an exponential curve (y = 30.699e0.073x), as shown in this figure, resulted in a correlation coefficient r = 0.9698, which indicates that 5.94% of variability remains unexplained by this adjustment. In contrast, the linear adjustment (y = 97.915x - 1971.9) of the measured values provides an r = 0.8160, and thus an unexplained variability of 33.42%. These results suggest fulfilment of Price’s Law, with scientific production within CAIM journals showing exponential growth. Additionally, the relative growth rate was found to range from 0.05 to 0.67. Doubling time was found to range from 1.04 to 15.02. Table 6 provides annual relative growth rates and doubling times.

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1

Number of Publications in Scopus-Indexed TCAIM Journals per Year from 1938 to 2020

Table 6.

Relative Growth Rates and Doubling Times

Year Number of Publications Cumulative Total W1 W2 Relative Growth Rate Doubling Time
1938 13 13 2.57
1939 10 23 2.57 3.14 0.57 1.21
1940 12 35 3.14 3.56 0.42 1.65
1941 14 49 3.56 3.89 0.34 2.06
1942 12 61 3.89 4.11 0.22 3.16
1943 16 77 4.11 4.34 0.23 2.97
1944 12 89 4.34 4.49 0.14 4.78
1945 52 141 4.49 4.95 0.46 1.51
1946 134 275 4.95 5.62 0.67 1.04
1947 162 437 5.62 6.08 0.46 1.50
1948 125 562 6.08 6.33 0.25 2.75
1949 93 655 6.33 6.49 0.15 4.52
1950 170 825 6.49 6.72 0.23 3.00
1951 153 978 6.72 6.89 0.17 4.07
1952 167 1145 6.89 7.04 0.16 4.40
1953 164 1309 7.04 7.18 0.13 5.18
1954 132 1441 7.18 7.27 0.10 7.21
1955 142 1583 7.27 7.37 0.09 7.37
1956 159 1742 7.37 7.46 0.10 7.24
1957 181 1923 7.46 7.56 0.10 7.01
1958 180 2103 7.56 7.65 0.09 7.74
1959 190 2293 7.65 7.74 0.09 8.01
1960 197 2490 7.74 7.82 0.08 8.41
1961 248 2738 7.82 7.92 0.09 7.30
1962 274 3012 7.92 8.01 0.10 7.27
1963 251 3263 8.01 8.09 0.08 8.66
1964 279 3542 8.09 8.17 0.08 8.45
1965 286 3828 8.17 8.25 0.08 8.92
1966 263 4091 8.25 8.32 0.07 10.43
1967 310 4401 8.32 8.39 0.07 9.49
1968 369 4770 8.39 8.47 0.08 8.61
1969 284 5054 8.47 8.53 0.06 11.98
1970 340 5394 8.53 8.59 0.07 10.64
1971 423 5817 8.59 8.67 0.08 9.18
1972 362 6179 8.67 8.73 0.06 11.48
1973 408 6587 8.73 8.79 0.06 10.84
1974 469 7056 8.79 8.86 0.07 10.07
1975 576 7632 8.86 8.94 0.08 8.83
1976 520 8152 8.94 9.01 0.07 10.51
1977 492 8644 9.01 9.07 0.06 11.82
1978 408 9052 9.07 9.11 0.05 15.02
1979 734 9786 9.11 9.19 0.08 8.89
1980 591 10377 9.19 9.25 0.06 11.82
1981 776 11153 9.25 9.32 0.07 9.61
1982 785 11938 9.32 9.39 0.07 10.19
1983 746 12684 9.39 9.45 0.06 11.43
1984 727 13411 9.45 9.50 0.06 12.43
1985 774 14185 9.50 9.56 0.06 12.35
1986 870 15055 9.56 9.62 0.06 11.64
1987 923 15978 9.62 9.68 0.06 11.65
1988 846 16824 9.68 9.73 0.05 13.43
1989 1060 17884 9.73 9.79 0.06 11.34
1990 1628 19512 9.79 9.88 0.09 7.95
1991 1544 21056 9.88 9.96 0.08 9.10
1992 1545 22601 9.96 10.03 0.07 9.79
1993 1720 24321 10.03 10.10 0.07 9.45
1994 1475 25796 10.10 10.16 0.06 11.77
1995 1865 27661 10.16 10.23 0.07 9.93
1996 1800 29461 10.23 10.29 0.06 10.99
1997 1877 31338 10.29 10.35 0.06 11.22
1998 1982 33320 10.35 10.41 0.06 11.30
1999 2089 35409 10.41 10.48 0.06 11.40
2000 2330 37739 10.48 10.54 0.06 10.87
2001 2499 40238 10.54 10.60 0.06 10.81
2002 2751 42989 10.60 10.67 0.07 10.48
2003 2802 45791 10.67 10.73 0.06 10.97
2004 3061 48852 10.73 10.80 0.06 10.71
2005 3908 52760 10.80 10.87 0.08 9.00
2006 4637 57397 10.87 10.96 0.08 8.23
2007 5310 62707 10.96 11.05 0.09 7.83
2008 6216 68923 11.05 11.14 0.09 7.33
2009 6582 75505 11.14 11.23 0.09 7.60
2010 7088 82593 11.23 11.32 0.09 7.72
2011 8691 91284 11.32 11.42 0.10 6.93
2012 8194 99478 11.42 11.51 0.09 8.06
2013 8920 108398 11.51 11.59 0.09 8.07
2014 8642 117040 11.59 11.67 0.08 9.03
2015 8825 125865 11.67 11.74 0.07 9.53
2016 8930 134795 11.74 11.81 0.07 10.11
2017 8471 143266 11.81 11.87 0.06 11.37
2018 8212 151478 11.87 11.93 0.06 12.43
2019 8471 159949 11.93 11.98 0.05 12.73
2020 9591 169540 11.98 12.04 0.06 11.90

Bibliometric networks were constructed and visualized using the software tool VOSviewer, and include all 172,466 captured by the present study’s search. This added layer of analysis of the most influential subset of publications captured provides a greater understanding of the relationship that exists between certain items (i.e. countries, keywords, authors, journals, etc.). In each bibliometric network (figure), each item is represented in a network visualisation by a label and a circle; the weight of an item determines the size of the label and the circle of an item. Figure 2 depicts a co-authorship analysis of the 50 most productive countries. In a co-authorship analysis, the relatedness of items is determined based on the number of co-authored publications. From this figure, it can be seen that while China is the most productive country, Chinese authors tend to collaborate less with researchers in other countries as shown by the distance between lines. In contrast, American authors tend to collaborate with many countries internationally, while German authors tend to collaborate more with researchers in other European countries. Figure 3 depicts a co-occurrence analysis of the 500 most frequent author keywords used across all publications. In a co-occurrence analysis, the relatedness of items is determined based on the number of publications in which they occur together. From this figure, a number of clusters can be observed representing different TCAIM topics. The yellow, red and dark blue clusters represent a large network of keywords related to laboratory-based studies, while the green cluster represents keywords related to clinical research and review-type studies. The smaller light blue cluster also highlights research conducted on traditional and indigenous medicines. This figure also provides insights into some of the most highly studied diseases/conditions published in TCAIM journals, which include breast and lung cancer, diabetes, anxiety, and low back pain.

Fig. 2.

Fig. 2

Co-Authorship Analysis of the 50 Most Productive Countries

Fig. 3.

Fig. 3

Co-Occurrence Analysis of the 500 Most Frequent Author Keywords

Discussion

The objective of the present bibliometric analysis is to capture the characteristics of the research literature published in TCAIM journals. The search conducted on Scopus yielded over 170,000 publications, representing the largest bibliometric analysis of TCAIM literature to date to the author’s knowledge. Since the 1940s, an upward trend with respect to the volume of publications can be observed, with a steep increase observed between the mid-2000s and mid-2010s. This upward trend has continued with 2020 marking the most productive year globally to date. Unsurprisingly, therefore, the production in this body of literature follows Price’s law of exponential growth, which is characteristic of fields of research which have experienced great and continued advances and interest from the international research community; other bodies of research literature that have experienced exponential growth include the topics of medical informatics [43], glaucoma [44], psychopharmacology [45], and antipsychotic drugs [46]. This growth in the volume of research published over the most recent decades can largely be explained by an increase in funding support by government and nongovernment sectors for TCAIM research [4750]. In the present study, it was found that China was the most productive country with respect to TCAIM research at 45,860 publications, followed by the United States at 29,523 and Germany at 10,120. A vast amount of research continues to be conducted on traditional Chinese medicine in China [5153], while the United States and Germany have both historically been the leading countries with respect to the research of various TCAIM therapies [3134]. While the vast majority of publications were written in English, which is largely regarded as the international language of academic publication, it is also unsurprising that the second most common language was Chinese, and the third was German, as this corresponds with the national languages of the most productive countries. Of the top 20 institutional affiliations responsible for publishing this TCAIM research, 17 originated from China, with the remaining two from South Korea and one from Taiwan; a number of affiliations based in the United States and Germany existed as well, but below the top 20. Additionally, with respect to the top 20 funding sponsors, the countries with the largest number were China and the United States, with six organizations each.

In interpreting these results, the reader should be aware of a number of caveats. For example, authors who have spent more years working in research, and journals that have been publishing for a longer period of time and/or have a greater proportion of their archive indexed in Scopus, will have more publications, citations, and collaborations. Additionally, older publications will have an increased chance of receiving citations, as evidenced by only 15 of the most 100 cited articles being published since 2020. Additionally, it is worthwhile to note that while only the journal’s impact factor was reported in Table 2, other indices are increasingly being used to rank the impact of journals (and authors), such as the H-index and SJR ranking, and differences may be observed based on the metric used.

Comparative literature

The findings from published bibliometric analyses specific to the TCAIM research literature can be compared to that of the present study. One of the first bibliometric analyses of the TCAIM research literature was published by Barnes et al. in 1999 [31]. Using a number of TCAIM-related keywords, the authors conducted searches on MEDLINE and analysed the literature published from 1966 to 1996. At the time, they reported that the volume of TCAIM publications per year rose between 1972 and 1986, and then remained stable and approximated 1500 per year up until 1996. Although in the present study a growth in the volume of literature is still observed from 1986 to 1996, the mean number of publications per year over this decade was approximately 1400, which aligns closely with the findings of the authors [31]. Fu et al. (2011) analysed 17,002 publications found in 19 complementary and alternative medicine journals over approximately three decades [32]. They found that the most productive countries included the United States, China, India, England and Germany, all of which fell within the top seven most productive countries in the present study. A number of institutions were also identified by both Fu et al. (2011) [32] as well as the present study to be among the most productive internationally, including China Medical University and Kyung Hee University. Danell et al. analysed four decades’ worth of complementary and alternative medicine publication activity from 1966 to 2007 [33], then later repeated their study again to include five decades from 1966 to 2016 [34]. In their more recent study, they analyzed 105,216 publications, which prior to the present study, was the largest bibliometric analysis on this topic. Unlike the present study which sought to characterize publications in TCAIM journals, Danell et al.’s (2020) inclusion criteria included publications that had “Complementary Therapies” as their Medical Subject Heading major topic, in the MEDLINE database [34]. Lastly, Youn et al. (2021) conducted a bibliometric analysis of the integrative medicine research literature based on a search query using two keywords joined by the Boolean operator “OR”: “complementary and integrative medicine” OR “integrative medicine”, retrieving and analysing a total of 4660 publications. Although their study’s focus was on integrative medicine, a number of their findings are shared with the present study; for example, they also identified United States, China, and Germany to be the most productive countries (albeit in this order), and they also found that cancer was one of the most commonly studied diseases/conditions [35].

In line with the findings made by Barnes et al. (1999) [31], Danell et al. (2009) [33], Fu et al. (2011) [32], Danell et al. (2020) [34], and Youn et al. (2021) [35], the present study also found an upward trend with respect to the volume of TCAIM research being published each year over the past decades. With respect to the number of publications captured, although Danell et al.’s (2020) study was published in 2020, their coverage of the TCAIM literature only extended up until 2016 [34]. In the present study, over 37,000 publications were found to be published between 2017 and April 2021, comprising over 20% of the entire body of literature analysed.

Future directions

Beyond the aforementioned comparative literature, it is worth noting that it has been far more common for bibliometric analyses to be conducted on a specific TCAIM-related topic. These have included acupuncture [5456], aromatherapy [57], apitherapy [58], complementary and integrative oncology [59], ethnopharmacology [60], homeopathy [61], medicinal plants [62], qi gong [63], and yoga [64, 65], as just some examples among others. Others have conducted bibliometric analyses specific to methodologies, such as clinical trials [64, 66, 67] or guidelines [55] in TCAIM. Bibliometric analyses of the TCAIM literature with specific sub-topics are more straightforward to conduct, as the keywords and searches applied are likewise also easier to standardize. One of the main challenges in conducting comprehensive bibliometric analyses of the TCAIM literature in its entirety is the fact that it is very difficult to operationalize a dynamic and unrelated group of therapies that have been defined on the basis that they lie outside of the purview of conventional Western medical care [68, 69]. As a result, all of the bibliometric analyses of the TCAIM literature to date have been based on searches of TCAIM-specific journals or TCAIM-specific indexed headings, both of which unquestionably provide an incomplete picture of all the TCAIM literature. Thus, future directions of value include 1) the creation of an operational definition of TCAIM informed by a systematic search strategy, and 2) the development of standardized search strategies for major academic databases based on this operational definition.

Strengths and limitations

This present bibliometric study captured and analysed the characteristics of over 170,000 publications, making it the largest conducted to date with respect to the TCAIM literature, and the most comprehensive with regards to TCAIM journal inclusion. Searches were conducted on Scopus as this academic database has a larger coverage in comparison to other databases such as Web of Science. Despite this, it must be acknowledged that all academic databases contain gaps in their indexing, and this was realized at the point of analysis in the present study. Publication data collected from Scopus was not externally verified against another source, and it is also important to note that the number of publications reflect what was indexed by the database as of the search date, and not necessarily the true number of publications published by the included journals themselves. It should be noted that publications included in this bibliometric analysis were based on the fact that they were published in a journal belonging to the “complementary and alternative medicine” category (code 2707), identified based on the ASJC provided by Scopus; as evidenced by Table 2, certain journals that changed names over their history were either not indexed in Scopus or were not included in the same ASJC category. Furthermore, it is always possible that some literature may not have been captured by not searching other databases, however, this would have introduced considerable complexities with respect to the ability to analyse search results efficiently (i.e. deduplication of such a large volume of publications, bibliometric network visualizations). The use of the software tool VOSviewer to create and visualize bibliometric networks serves as an additional strength to the present study, providing a deeper layer of analysis with respect to the strength and nature of relationships between different items (countries, keywords, authors, journals). Two final limitations include the fact that independent search results were extracted and analysed by a single author, and therefore, were prone to increased error as opposed to had the analysis been conducted in duplicate; additionally, results were not screened as this would have been impractical, and possibly unfeasible without the application of an operational definition of TCAIM. Without doing this, however, it is possible that this analysis also included non-TCAIM literature published in journals categorized as “complementary and alternative medicine” by Scopus.

Conclusions

The present study provides current insight into the characteristics of publications published across TCAIM journals, and represents the largest bibliometric analysis conducted to date with respect to the TCAIM literature. The most productive countries included China, the United States, and Germany; unsurprisingly, a large proportion of common institutional affiliations and funding sponsors associated with this subset of publications also originated from these countries. The volume of publications has increased steadily since the 1940s, and a steep increase was observed between the mid-2000s and mid-2010s, which is largely attributable to increased available funding for TCAIM research globally. This upward trend has continued with 2020 marking the year with the most publications to date. Beyond identifying the large diversity of TCAIMs studied, this study also highlights therapies which may be understudied and warrant further investigation. Given a high prevalence of TCAIM use among patients, increased acceptance of TCAIM among conventional healthcare providers, and growing interest in the research of TCAIM, future work should continue to investigate and track changes in the publication characteristics of the emerging research on this topic. The creation of an operational definition of TCAIM informed by a systematic search strategy, followed by the development of standardized search strategies for major academic databases based on this operational definition, may serve to achieve these goals more comprehensively.

Acknowledgements

JYN was awarded a Research Scholarship and an Entrance Scholarship from the Department of Health Research Methods, Evidence and Impact, Faculty of Health Sciences at McMaster University.

Abbreviations

ASJC

All Science Journal Classification

TCAIM

Complementary, alternative, and integrative medicine

NCCIH

National Center for Complementary and Integrative Health

Author’s contributions

JYN: conceptualized and designed the study, collected the data, interpreted and analysed the data, drafted the manuscript, and gave final approval of the version to be submitted.

Funding

This study was not funded.

Availability of data and materials

All data generated or analysed during this study are included in this published article.

Declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

This study involved a bibliometric analysis of the literature only; it did not require ethics approval or consent to participate.

Consent for publication

The author consents to this manuscript’s publication.

Competing interests

The author declares that they have no competing interests.

Footnotes

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

References

  • 1.Ventola CL. Current issues regarding complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) in the United States: part 1: the widespread use of CAM and the need for better-informed health care professionals to provide patient counseling. Pharm Ther. 2010;35(8):461–468. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.National Center for Complementary and Integrative Health (NCCIH) Complementary, Alternative, or Integrative Health: What's In a Name? 2018. [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Ng JY, Boon HS, Thompson AK, Whitehead CR. Making sense of “alternative”, “complementary”, “unconventional” and “integrative” medicine: exploring the terms and meanings through a textual analysis. BMC Complement Altern Med. 2016;16(1):134. doi: 10.1186/s12906-016-1111-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.World Health Organization. WHO global report on traditional and complementary medicine 2019: Institutional Repository for Information Sharing (IRIS); 2019. p. 226. https://apps.who.int/iris/handle/10665/312342. Cited 2021 Mar28
  • 5.Petri RP, Jr, Delgado RE, McConnell K. Historical and cultural perspectives on integrative medicine. Med Acupunct. 2015;27(5):309–317. doi: 10.1089/acu.2015.1120. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.World Health Organization . WHO traditional medicine strategy 2014–2023. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2013. p. 76. [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Esmail N. Complementary and Alternative Medicine: Use and Public Attitudes 1997, 2006, and 2016. Vancouver: Fraser Institute; 2017. p. 87. [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Savas P, Robertson A, Beatty L, Hookings E, McGee M, Marker J, McCaleb B, Bowen J, Richards A, Koczwara B. Patient preferences on the integration of complementary therapy with conventional cancer care: Complementary therapy and cancer preferences. Asia Pac J Clin Oncol. 2016;12(2):e311–e318. doi: 10.1111/ajco.12226. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Verhoef MJ, Balneaves LG, Boon HS, Vroegindewey A. Reasons for and characteristics associated with complementary and alternative medicine use among adult cancer patients: a systematic review. Integr Cancer Ther. 2005;4(4):274–286. doi: 10.1177/1534735405282361. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Horneber M, Bueschel G, Dennert G, Less D, Ritter E, Zwahlen M. How many cancer patients use complementary and alternative medicine: a systematic review and metaanalysis. Integr Cancer Ther. 2012;11(3):187–203. doi: 10.1177/1534735411423920. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Astin JA. Why patients use alternative medicine: results of a national study. JAMA. 1998;279(19):1548–1553. doi: 10.1001/jama.279.19.1548. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Kristoffersen AE, Stub T, Musial F, Fønnebø V, Lillenes O, Norheim AJ. Prevalence and reasons for intentional use of complementary and alternative medicine as an adjunct to future visits to a medical doctor for chronic disease. BMC Complement Altern Med. 2018;18(1):1–8. doi: 10.1186/s12906-018-2179-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.McCaffrey AM, Pugh GF, O'Connor BB. Understanding patient preference for integrative medical care: results from patient focus groups. J Gen Intern Med. 2007;22(11):1500–1505. doi: 10.1007/s11606-007-0302-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Snyderman R, Weil AT. Integrative medicine: bringing medicine back to its roots. Arch Intern Med. 2002;162(4):395–397. doi: 10.1001/archinte.162.4.395. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Maizes V, Rakel D, Niemiec C. Integrative medicine and patient-centered care. Explore. 2009;5(5):277–289. doi: 10.1016/j.explore.2009.06.008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Society for Integrative Oncology. What is Integrative Oncology? Available from: https://integrativeonc.org/knowledge-center/what-is-integrative-oncology. Cited 2021 Apr 17.
  • 17.Yun H, Sun L, Mao JJ. Growth of integrative medicine at leading cancer centers between 2009 and 2016: a systematic analysis of NCI-designated comprehensive cancer center websites. JNCI Monographs. 2017;2017(52). 10.1093/jncimonographs/lgx004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 18.National Center for Complementary and Integrative Health (NCCIH) Safe Use of Complementary Health Products and Practices. 2021. [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Cramer H, Lauche R, Langhorst J, Dobos G. Yoga for depression: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Depress Anxiety. 2013;30(11):1068–1083. doi: 10.1002/da.22166. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Bellanger RA, Seeger CM, Smith HE. Safety of complementary and alternative medicine treatments and practices. In: Side effects of drugs annual, vol. 41: Elsevier; 2019. p. 559–71. 10.1016/bs.seda.2019.06.004.
  • 21.Pratt M, Wieland S, Ahmadzai N, Butler C, Wolfe D, Pussagoda K, Skidmore B, Veroniki A, Rios P, Tricco AC, Hutton B. A scoping review of network meta-analyses assessing the efficacy and safety of complementary and alternative medicine interventions. Syst Rev. 2020;9(1):1–25. doi: 10.1186/s13643-020-01328-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Rossi EG, Bellandi T, Picchi M, Baccetti S, Monechi MV, Vuono C, Sabatini F, Traversi A, di Stefano M, Firenzuoli F, Albolino S, Tartaglia R. Patient safety in complementary medicine through the application of clinical risk management in the public health system. Medicines. 2017;4(4):93. doi: 10.3390/medicines4040093. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.National Center for Complementary and Integrative Health (NCCIH) Natural Doesn't Necessarily Mean Safer, or Better. 2021. [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Navarro VJ, Khan I, Björnsson E, Seeff LB, Serrano J, Hoofnagle JH. Liver injury from herbal and dietary supplements. Hepatology. 2017;65(1):363–373. doi: 10.1002/hep.28813. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Coulter I, Willis E. Explaining the growth of complementary and alternative medicine. Health Sociol Rev. 2007;16(3–4):214–225. doi: 10.5172/hesr.2007.16.3-4.214. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Jonas WB, Eisenberg D, Hufford D, Crawford C. The evolution of complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) in the USA over the last 20 years. Complement Med Res. 2013;20(1):65–72. doi: 10.1159/000348284. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Walach H. Good morning future: Complementary Medicine's next 25 years. Complement Med Res. 2018;25(1):4–6. doi: 10.1159/000486887. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Pritchard A. Statistical bibliography or bibliometrics. J Doc. 1969;25(4):348–349. [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Price DD. A general theory of bibliometric and other cumulative advantage processes. J Am Soc Inf Sci. 1976;27(5):292–306. doi: 10.1002/asi.4630270505. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Hicks D, Wouters P, Waltman L, De Rijcke S, Rafols I. Bibliometrics: the Leiden manifesto for research metrics. Nature News. 2015;520(7548):429–431. doi: 10.1038/520429a. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Barnes J, Abbot NC, Harkness EF, Ernst E. Articles on complementary medicine in the mainstream medical literature: an investigation of MEDLINE, 1966 through 1996. Arch Intern Med. 1999;159(15):1721–1725. doi: 10.1001/archinte.159.15.1721. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Fu JY, Zhang X, Zhao YH, Huang MH, Chen DZ. Bibliometric analysis of complementary and alternative medicine research over three decades. Scientometrics. 2011;88(2):617–626. doi: 10.1007/s11192-011-0391-0. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Danell JA, Danell R. Publication activity in complementary and alternative medicine. Scientometrics. 2009;80(2):539–551. doi: 10.1007/s11192-008-2078-8. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Danell JA, Danell R, Vuolanto P. Fifty years of Complementary and alternative medicine (CAM): a bibliometric analysis of publication activity and general content of the publications. J Sci Res. 2020;9(3):268–276. doi: 10.5530/jscires.9.3.34. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Youn BY, Song HJ, Yang K, Cheon C, Ko Y, Jang BH, et al. Bibliometric analysis of integrative medicine studies from 2000 to 2019. Am J Chin Med. 2021:1–3. 10.1142/S0192415X21500397. [DOI] [PubMed]
  • 36.Scopus Preview. Sources; 2021. Available from: https://www.scopus.com/sources.uri?zone=TopNavBar&origin=searchbasic. Cited 2021 Apr 17.
  • 37.Elsevier. Scopus; 2021. Available from: https://www.elsevier.com/solutions/scopus. Cited 2021 Apr 17.
  • 38.Gusenbauer M, Haddaway NR. Which academic search systems are suitable for systematic reviews or meta-analyses? Evaluating retrieval qualities of Google scholar, PubMed, and 26 other resources. Res Synth Methods. 2020;11(2):181–217. doi: 10.1002/jrsm.1378. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Van Eck NJ, Waltman L. VOSviewer manual. Leiden: Univeristeit Leiden; 2020. [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Van Eck NJ, Waltman L. Software survey: VOSviewer, a computer program for bibliometric mapping. Scientometrics. 2010;84(2):523–538. doi: 10.1007/s11192-009-0146-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Price D. Little science, big science, New York: Columbia University Press. Science. 1963;149(3683):10–515. [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Clarivate Analytics . InCites Journal Citation Reports. 2021. [Google Scholar]
  • 43.DeShazo JP, LaVallie DL, Wolf FM. Publication trends in the medical informatics literature: 20 years of" medical informatics" in MeSH. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2009;9(1):1–3. doi: 10.1186/1472-6947-9-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.López-Muñoz F, Weinreb RN, Moghimi S, Povedano-Montero FJ. A bibliometric and mapping analysis of glaucoma research between 1900 and 2019. Ophthalmol Glaucoma. 2021. 10.1016/j.ogla.2021.05.008. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 45.Portillo-Salido EF. A bibliometric analysis of research in psychopharmacology by psychology departments (1987–2007) Span J Psychol. 2010;13(1):503–515. doi: 10.1017/S1138741600004054. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.López-Muñoz F, Shen WW, Shinfuku N, Pae CU, Castle DJ, Chung AK, Sim K, Álamo C. A bibliometric study on second-generation antipsychotic drugs in the Asia–Pacific region. J Exp Clin Med. 2014;6(4):111–117. doi: 10.1016/j.jecm.2014.06.001. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.National Center for Complementary and Integrative Health (NCCIH) Complementary and Alternative Medicine Funding by NIH Institute/Center. 2019. [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Lewith G, Verhoef M, Koithan M, Zick SM. Developing CAM research capacity for complementary medicine. Evid Based Complement Alternat Med. 2006;3(2):283–289. doi: 10.1093/ecam/nel007. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Cyranoski D. Why Chinese medicine is heading for clinics around the world. Nature. 2018;561(7724):448. doi: 10.1038/d41586-018-06782-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.World Health Organization . Traditional, complementary and integrative medicine. 2021. [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Consentino R, Santos MJ, Matos LC, Machado JP. Bibliometric analysis of traditional Chinese medicine scientific production between 1982 and 2016 indexed in PubMed. Medicines. 2018;5(2):41. doi: 10.3390/medicines5020041. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Huang Y, Zhou M, Deng Q, Zhang J, Zhou P, Shang X. Bibliometric analysis for the literature of traditional Chinese medicine in PubMed. Scientometrics. 2015;105(1):557–566. doi: 10.1007/s11192-015-1686-3. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Chen YB, Tong XF, Ren J, Yu CQ, Cui YL. Current research trends in traditional Chinese medicine formula: a bibliometric review from 2000 to 2016. Evid Based Complement Alternat Med. 2019;2019. 10.1155/2019/3961395. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 54.Ma Y, Dong M, Zhou K, Mita C, Liu J, Wayne PM. Publication trends in acupuncture research: a 20-year bibliometric analysis based on PubMed. PLoS One. 2016;11(12):e0168123. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0168123. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Birch S, Lee MS, Alraek T, Kim TH. Overview of treatment guidelines and clinical practical guidelines that recommend the use of acupuncture: a bibliometric analysis. J Altern Complement Med. 2018;24(8):752–769. doi: 10.1089/acm.2018.0092. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Lee IS, Lee H, Chen YH, Chae Y. Bibliometric analysis of research assessing the use of acupuncture for pain treatment over the past 20 years. J Pain Res. 2020;13:367–376. doi: 10.2147/JPR.S235047. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Koo M. A bibliometric analysis of two decades of aromatherapy research. BMC Res Notes. 2017;10(1):1–9. doi: 10.1186/s13104-016-2371-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Şenel E, Demir E. Bibliometric analysis of apitherapy in complementary medicine literature between 1980 and 2016. Complement Ther Clin Pract. 2018;31:47–52. doi: 10.1016/j.ctcp.2018.02.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Moral-Munoz JA, Carballo-Costa L, Herrera-Viedma E, Cobo MJ. Production trends, collaboration, and main topics of the integrative and complementary oncology research area: a bibliometric analysis. Integr Cancer Ther. 2019;18:1534735419846401. doi: 10.1177/1534735419846401. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Yeung AW, Heinrich M, Atanasov AG. Ethnopharmacology—a bibliometric analysis of a field of research meandering between medicine and food science? Front Pharmacol. 2018;9:215. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2018.00215. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Chiu WT, Ho YS. Bibliometric analysis of homeopathy research during the period of 1991 to 2003. Scientometrics. 2005;63(1):3–23. doi: 10.1007/s11192-005-0201-7. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Salmerón-Manzano E, Garrido-Cardenas JA, Manzano-Agugliaro F. Worldwide research trends on medicinal plants. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020;17(10):3376. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17103376. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63.Zhang YP, Hu RX, Han M, Lai BY, Liang SB, Chen BJ, Robinson N, Chen K, Liu JP. Evidence base of clinical studies on qi gong: a bibliometric analysis. Complement Ther Med. 2020;50:102392. doi: 10.1016/j.ctim.2020.102392. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64.Cramer H, Lauche R, Dobos G. Characteristics of randomized controlled trials of yoga: a bibliometric analysis. BMC Complement Altern Med. 2014;14(1):1–20. doi: 10.1186/1472-6882-14-328. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 65.Jeter PE, Slutsky J, Singh N, Khalsa SB. Yoga as a therapeutic intervention: a bibliometric analysis of published research studies from 1967 to 2013. J Altern Complement Med. 2015;21(10):586–592. doi: 10.1089/acm.2015.0057. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 66.Vickers AJ. Bibliometric analysis of randomized trials in complementary medicine. Complement Ther Med. 1998;6(4):185–189. doi: 10.1016/S0965-2299(98)80026-5. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 67.Wieland LS, Manheimer E, Sampson M, Barnabas JP, Bouter LM, Cho K, Lee MS, Li X, Liu J, Moher D, Okabe T. Bibliometric and content analysis of the Cochrane Complementary medicine field specialized register of controlled trials. Syst Rev. 2013;2(1):1–3. doi: 10.1186/2046-4053-2-51. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 68.Wieland LS, Manheimer E, Berman BM. Development and classification of an operational definition of complementary and alternative medicine for the Cochrane collaboration. Altern Ther Health Med. 2011;17(2):50–59. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 69.Veziari Y, Leach MJ, Kumar S. Barriers to the conduct and application of research in complementary and alternative medicine: a systematic review. BMC Complement Altern Med. 2017;17(1):1–4. doi: 10.1186/s12906-017-1660-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Data Availability Statement

All data generated or analysed during this study are included in this published article.


Articles from BMC Complementary Medicine and Therapies are provided here courtesy of BMC

RESOURCES