Skip to main content
NCBI home page
Wiley Open Access Collection logoLink to Wiley Open Access Collection
. 2020 Dec 15;36(3):313–321. doi: 10.1002/jca.21861

Direct hemoperfusion using a polymyxin B‐immobilized polystyrene column for COVID‐19

Daisuke Katagiri 1,✉, Masahiro Ishikane 2, Yusuke Asai 3, Shinyu Izumi 4, Jin Takasaki 4, Hiyori Katsuoka 5, Isao Kondo 1, Satoshi Ide 2, Keiji Nakamura 2, Takato Nakamoto 2, Hidetoshi Nomoto 2, Yutaro Akiyama 2, Yusuke Miyazato 2, Tetsuya Suzuki 2, Noriko Kinoshita 2, Tatsunori Ogawa 5, Tomiteru Togano 6, Manabu Suzuki 4, Masao Hashimoto 4, Keita Sakamoto 4, Yusaku Kusaba 4, Takashi Katsuno 4, Takashi Fukaya 5, Masayuki Hojo 4, Masaya Sugiyama 7, Masashi Mizokami 7, Tatsuya Okamoto 8, Akio Kimura 9, Eisei Noiri 10, Norio Ohmagari 2, Fumihiko Hinoshita 1, Haruhito Sugiyama 10
PMCID: PMC8246724  PMID: 33325084

Abstract

Objective

To evaluate the efficacy and safety of direct hemoperfusion using a polymyxin B‐immobilized polystyrene column (PMX‐DHP) in severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS‐CoV‐2)‐positive pneumonia patients.

Methods

This study was a case series conducted at a designated infectious diseases hospital. Twelve SARS‐CoV‐2‐positive patients with partial pressure of arterial oxygen/percentage of inspired oxygen (P/F) ratio < 300 were treated with PMX‐DHP on two consecutive days each during hospitalization. We defined day 1 as the first day when PMX‐DHP was performed. PMX‐DHP efficacy was assessed on days 7 and 14 after the first treatment based on eight categories. Subsequently, improvement in P/F ratio and urinary biomarkers on days 4 and 8, malfunctions, and ventilator and extracorporeal membrane oxygenation avoidance rates were also evaluated.

Results

On day 14 after the first treatment, disease severity decreased in 58.3% of the patients. P/F ratio increased while urine β2‐microglobulin decreased on days 4 and 8. Cytokine measurement pre‐ and post‐PMX‐DHP revealed decreased levels of interleukin‐6 and the factors involved in vascular endothelial injury, including vascular endothelial growth factor. Twenty‐two PMX‐DHPs were performed, of which seven and five PMX‐DHPs led to increased inlet pressure and membrane coagulation, respectively. When the membranes coagulated, the circuitry needed to be reconfigured. Circuit problems were usually observed when D‐dimer and fibrin degradation product levels were high before PMX‐DHP.

Conclusions

Future studies are expected to determine the therapeutic effect of PMX‐DHP on COVID‐19. Because of the relatively high risk of circuit coagulation, coagulation capacity should be assessed beforehand.

Keywords: cytokine, pneumonia, steroids

1. INTRODUCTION

Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID‐19) is a global threat, causing serious illness and death not only among the elderly but also among young people with no history of the disease. Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS‐CoV‐2), the causative virus, binds to the angiotensin‐converting enzyme 2 receptor, and it is gradually becoming clear that it causes abnormalities not only in the respiratory system but also in the other systems, including the circulatory, digestive, nervous, hematological, and immune systems. 1

Although several promising drugs are being tested in clinical trials for COVID‐19, a definitive treatment has not yet been established. 2 The involvement of increased cytokine levels has been noted, and anti‐inflammatory therapy including corticosteroids or anti‐human interleukin (IL)‐6 receptor monoclonal antibodies, such as tocilizumab, is expected to be effective in such patients. 3 , 4 , 5 Direct hemoperfusion using a polymyxin B‐immobilized polystyrene column (PMX‐DHP) is a treatment that selectively adsorbs endotoxins; it is also expected to adsorb a variety of endogenous substances. 6 In our institution, a total of 12 patients with COVID‐19 requiring O2 supplementation have been treated using PMX columns. In this retrospective observational study, we report our experience with circuit coagulation while treating patients with COVID‐19 by performing PMX‐DHP.

2. PATIENTS AND METHODS

2.1. Patient population

The patients included were those whose respiratory samples tested positive for SARS‐CoV‐2 upon real‐time reverse transcription‐polymerase chain reaction (RT‐PCR) 7 and underwent PMX‐DHP during hospitalization at the National Center for Global Health and Medicine between January 30 and April 25, 2020. PMX‐DHP was considered when an image of pneumonia consistent with COVID‐19 was obtained on a computed tomography (CT) scan of the chest and the partial pressure of arterial O2/percentage of inspired O2 (P/F) ratio was less than 300 or O2 saturation (SpO2) was 93% or less (room air). Patients aged ≤16 years at the time of obtaining consent were excluded. Demographic data, information on clinical symptoms, and laboratory data were collected. This study was conducted ethically in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki. The study protocol was approved by the institutional review board (approval no: NCGM‐G‐003472‐02) and written informed consent for publication was obtained from each patient.

2.2. Clinical procedure

A temporary blood access catheter was inserted, and extracorporeal circulation was established. PMX‐DHP was performed using Toraymyxin PMX‐20R (Toray Industries, Tokyo, Japan) at a blood flow rate of 100 ml/min for 3 hours on two consecutive days for each patient. Nafamostat mesylate (30 mg/h) or 50 U/kg/h of low‐molecular‐weight heparin (LMWH) was used for anticoagulation therapy. In the event of circuit coagulation, a new circuit was primed and re‐established after returning blood.

2.3. Measurement

The efficacy of PMX‐DHP was assessed based on the proportion of improvement (decrease) of 1 point or more on days 8 and 15 of the first PMX‐DHP regimen in the following eight categorical assessments 8 : (a) no hospitalization and resumption of normal activities; (b) no hospitalization but no resumption of normal activities; (c) hospitalization without a requirement for O2 supplementation; (d) hospitalization requiring O2 supplementation; (e) hospitalization requiring nasal high‐flow O2 therapy, noninvasive mechanical ventilation, or both; (f) requirement for invasive mechanical ventilation; (g) requirement for a ventilator and extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO); and (h) death. We defined disease severity as follows: categories 1‐3 as mild, 4‐5 as moderate, and 6‐8 as severe. The secondary objectives were as follows: improvement in the P/F ratio, improvement in urinary biomarker levels on days 4 and 8; changes in cytokine levels before and after PMX treatment; occurrence of serious adverse events or malfunctions; ventilator avoidance rate; and proportion of ECMO avoidance. Urinary β2‐microglobulin (β2MG) and liver‐type fatty acid‐binding protein (L‐FABP) levels were determined using latex‐enhanced turbidimetric immunoassays (Denka Seiken and Sekisui Medical, Tokyo, Japan). 9 , 10 IL‐6; IL‐1β; IL‐8; IL‐10; IL‐17; platelet‐derived growth factor‐BB (PDGF‐BB); regulated on activation, normal T cell expressed and secreted (RANTES); and vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) levels in the serum samples from patients with COVID‐19 were analyzed using a Bio‐Plex suspension assay kit and array system (BioRad Laboratories, California) according to the manufacturer's instructions. The Bio‐Plex analysis of the serum samples was conducted at the National Center for Global Health and Medicine.

2.4. Statistical analysis

Data are expressed as median (maximum and minimum) values. Patients' baseline characteristics and clinical findings on admission are presented. All analyses were conducted using R software (version 3.5.1., R Core Team, 2018).

3. RESULTS

3.1. Patients' demographics

Patients' baseline characteristics are shown in Table 1 (N = 12, nine male and three female patients). The mean age, body mass index, and days from onset to admission were 66.5 (36‐83) years, 25.4 (19.2‐31.9), and 6.5 (3‐16) days, respectively. As a coexisting condition, 5 of the 12 patients (41.7%) had hypertension. All (100%) patients had obvious COVID‐19 pneumonia on CT and required O2 supplementation. As shown in Figure 1 and Figure S1, at the start of the PMX treatment, two patients were very sick and had already received ECMO (A and B), five were already intubated (C‐G), and five required O2 supplementation (H‐L).

TABLE 1.

Patients' demographics

Patient number N = 12
Age 66.5 (36‐83)
Sex Male 9 (75.0%), female 3 (25.0%)
Onset to admission (days) 6.5 (3‐16)
BMI 25.4 (19.2‐31.9)
Smoking 5 (41.7%)
HTN 5 (41.7%)
DM 3 (25.0%)
SOFA on admission 2 (0‐10)
AKI Stage 1 2 (16.6%)
Stage 2 1 (8.3%)
Stage 3 1 (8.3%)
O2 supplementation (not ventilated), when PMX treatment was initiated 5 (41.7%)
Artificial respiration (not V‐V ECMO), when PMX treatment was initiated 5 (41.7%)
V‐V ECMO, when PMX treatment was already being used 2 (16.6%)
Disease status (points) Day 1 5.50 (4‐7)
Day 8 5.33 (3‐8)
Day 15 5.27 (3‐8)
Disease status, day 8 Improvement 4 (33.3%)
Sustained 4 (33.3%)
Worsening 4 (33.3%)
Disease status, day 15 Improvement 7 (58.3%)
Sustained 1 (8.3%)
Worsening 4 (33.3%)
P/F ratio Day 1 153.9 (69.0‐327.1)
Day 4 214.1 (122.3‐438.1)
Day 8 271.3 (172.8‐464.8)
Urinary β2MG (μg/l) Day 1 16 630 (62‐70 725)
Day 4 3390 (79‐11 173)
Day 8 1698 (30‐9435)
Urinary L‐FABP (μg/gCre) Day 1 67.3 (0.1‐167.0)
Day 4 61.7 (12.3‐151.6)
Day 8 87.5 (1.1‐803.4)
Ventilator avoidance rate 4/5 (80.0%)
ECMO avoidance rate 3/5 (60.0%)
Mortality 3 (25.0%)
Open in a new tab

Note: The ventilator avoidance rate is the percentage of patients with an oxygen demand (N = 5) who were able to avoid intubation (N = 4). The ECMO avoidance rate is the percentage of patients who avoided ECMO (N = 3) among those who were already on ventilator management (N = 5).

Abbreviations: AKI, acute kidney injury; BMI, body mass index; DM, diabetes mellitus; HTN, hypertension; P/F, PaO2/FiO2; VV‐ECMO, veno‐venous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation.

FIGURE 1.

FIGURE 1

Open in a new tab

Clinical course of the six representative cases. The dates of the first and second PMX regimen and the presence or absence of increased inlet pressure or circuit coagulation events are noted. At the start of the PMX treatment, five patients were on oxygen supplementation (moderate), five were already intubated (severe), and two were very sick and on ECMO (critical). N = 6. PMX, polymyxin B; ICU, intensive care unit; ECMO, extracorporeal membrane oxygenation; RRT, renal replacement therapy; P/F, PaO2/FiO2; β2MG, β2‐microglobulin; L‐FABP, liver‐type fatty acid‐binding protein

3.2. Effect of PMX‐DHP on the severity of COVID‐19

The clinical courses of six representative patients are shown in Figure 1. The remaining six patients are shown in Figure S1. The mean disease statuses on days 1, 8, and 15 were 5.50, 5.33, and 5.27, respectively, with gradual improvement; 33.3% and 58.7% of the patients improved on days 7 and 14, respectively (Table 1). Of the five patients receiving O2 supplementation (H‐L), intubation was avoided in four (I‐L, 80%), and ECMO was avoided in three (E‐G, 60%) of the five patients (C‐G) who were already on ventilation management. Two patients (A, B) were already on ECMO and both unfortunately died. Patient A temporarily received continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT) with polymethyl methacrylate membranes 11 from day 16 to day 27; as PMX‐DHP was performed on day 35, CRRT was completed prior to this treatment.

3.3. Improved test values and circuit coagulation

Overall, there was an increase in the P/F ratio and a downward trend in urine β2MG levels on days 4 and 8 (Table 1, Figure 1, Figure S1). Urinary L‐FABP levels tended to decline after PMX‐DHP in 10 patients. There were 22 instances of PMX‐DHP, of which seven resulted in increased inlet pressure and five resulted in membrane coagulation, necessitating reconfiguration of the circuit. Interestingly, in all cases of coagulation, after the second reassembly of the PMX circuit, PMX‐DHP could be completed without any problems. Such circuit troubles tended to be observed if D‐dimer and fibrin degradation product (FDP) levels were high before PMX‐DHP (Figure 2). Furthermore, patients who did not experience any problems during the first session of PMX‐DHP did not have any circuit problems during the second session of the treatment. Eight of the 12 patients (66.6%) did not receive systemic LMWH; four of the 12 patients (33.3%) received systemic LMWH in the treatment dose. Of the four patients receiving LMWH, two patients experienced circuit coagulation. They both had high D‐dimer levels (3.9 and 10.9 μg/ml). The D‐dimer levels of the other two patients who did not experience any problems during the procedure were in the normal range (0.6 and 0.5 μg/ml).

FIGURE 2.

FIGURE 2

Open in a new tab

Association of coagulation factors with episodes of increased inlet pressure and circuit coagulation during PMX treatment. D‐dimer, FDP, and fibrinogen are shown on the vertical axis. The left side shows the first PMX regimen and the right side shows the second PMX regimen. The normal values for each parameter are shown in the gray area: D‐dimer, 0‐1.0 μg/ml; FDP, 0‐4.9 μg/ml; fibrinogen, 200‐400 mg/dl. PMX, polymyxin B; FDP, fibrin degradation product; Fib, fibrinogen

3.4. Effect on cytokines

Serum IL‐6, IL‐1β, IL‐8, IL‐10, IL‐17, PDGF‐BB, RANTES, and VEGF levels were evaluated in six patients (A, B, E, F, I, and J) before and after PMX‐DHP. Samples were collected within 6 hours before the first PMX‐DHP and within 6 hours after the second PMX‐DHP. As shown in Figure 3, IL‐6 levels showed an overall downward trend. Except for one patient who died, IL‐8, IL‐10, and IL‐17 levels remained almost unchanged or trended downward. The levels of PDGF‐BB, RANTES, and VEGF markers of arteriosclerosis and vascular endothelial injury also showed an overall downward trend after PMX‐DHP.

FIGURE 3.

FIGURE 3

Open in a new tab

Serum cytokines before and after PMX treatment. Serum IL‐6, IL‐1β, IL‐8, IL‐10, IL‐17, PDGF‐BB, RANTES, and VEGF levels were evaluated in six patients (A, B, E, F, I, and J) before and after PMX treatment. Samples were collected within 6 hours before the first treatment and within 6 hours after the second treatment. The same symbol indicates the same patient. Severity is indicated by color. IL‐6 showed an overall downward trend. Except for one patient (B) who died, IL‐8, IL‐10, and IL‐17 remained almost unchanged or trended downward in the other patients. The levels of PDGF‐BB, RANTES, and VEGF, markers of arteriosclerosis and vascular endothelial injury, also showed an overall downward trend around PMX treatment. The severity after PMX treatment is indicated by the severity on day 8 of the treatment. IL‐6, interleukin‐6; PDGF‐BB, platelet‐derived growth factor‐BB; RANTES, regulated on activation, normal T cell expressed and secreted; VEGF, vascular endothelial growth factor; PMX, polymyxin B

4. DISCUSSION

Biopsy specimens obtained during the autopsy of a patient who died from severe COVID‐19 showed bilateral diffuse alveolar damage (DAD) with cytosolic fibromyxoid exudation on histological examination. 12 PMX itself is used in the treatment of endotoxemia and septic shock caused by gram‐negative rods. However, it is also expected to adsorb endogenous substances and cytokines, including tumor necrosis factor (TNF)‐α, IL‐6, and high mobility group protein B1 (HMGB‐1), 6 , 13 and prevent the migration of activated leukocytes to the lungs. 14

The therapeutic effects of PMX‐DHP on DAD, pneumocystis pneumonia, idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis, and various other lung diseases have been reported. 15 , 16 , 17 At present, the only treatments for severely ill patients with COVID‐19 pneumonia are highly invasive treatments such as ventilation and ECMO, necessitating a prolonged stay in the intensive care unit which is a major burden on medical facilities. Several membranes, including PMX, may play an important role in the treatment of COVID‐19 in terms of cytokine adsorption. 18 Inhibition of viral replication due to antiviral action is expected to be effective when the initial SARS‐CoV‐2 replication rate is suppressed. However, access to treatment options for preventing the transition from rapidly worsening interstitial pneumonia to DAD is the most unmet medical need as the disease progresses from moderate to severe in patients who are at the onset of requiring O2. The mechanism of action underlying treatment with PMX has been hypothesized to be a combination of removal of activated leukocytes 14 , 19 and cytokines 6 that are risk factors for severe COVID‐19‐related pneumonia, reduction in abnormalities in the coagulation fibrinolytic system, and the rapid decline in lymphocytes during COVID‐19, as well as an improvement in oxygenation capacity. We treated one COVID‐19 patient having acute respiratory distress syndrome with PMX‐DHP and found it to be effective. 20 Since then, we have treated 12 patients. A PMX cartridge (Toraymyxin) was recently approved in Canada for extended‐label use in patients with COVID‐19. 21 Its use is indicated in patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome or fluid retention, DAD on CT, and P/F ratio < 300. In the US, PMX has been approved by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) as a compassionate use device for critically ill patients with septic shock who also tested positive for SARS‐CoV‐2. Currently, four blood purification devices have been approved according to the FDA COVID‐19 Emergency Use Authorizations for Medical Devices, namely, “Spectra Optia” (Terumo BCT) in combination with “Depuro D2000” (Marker Therapeutics AG), “CytoSorb” (CytoSorbents), “Oxiris” (Baxter Healthcare) and “Seraph 100” (ExThera Medical). The functions of each device are different, and include the removal of cytokines or viruses, or plasma exchange. PMX is the only direct hemoperfusion device targeting endotoxin and is also reported to remove activated leukocytes and several cytokines.

While treating patients with COVID‐19, we found that the levels of urinary biomarkers, such as β2MG and L‐FABP, fluctuated according to the severity of pneumonia. 22 Therefore, data on urinary β2MG and L‐FABP levels was obtained to determine the time‐course and outcome. Because the lung and kidney are often impaired in multi‐organ failure, it is worthwhile to evaluate kidney injury biomarkers while keeping in mind the complications of acute kidney injury. 23 β2MG is a 11 870 Da single‐chain polypeptide present on almost all nucleated cells. It is a component of major histocompatibility class (MHC) I molecules and can be expressed in the process of cytokine hyperproduction. It is a marker of tubular function; however, its expression can also be elevated in autoimmune diseases, malignancy, and infection. Because interferon (IFN)α, which plays a critical role in innate immunity, upregulates the expression of MHC class I and β2MG, 24 we assume that the urinary β2MG level may reflect the type 1 IFN response in COVID‐19 patients. Therefore, the decrease in the urinary β2MG level after PMX‐DHP in most of the patients in the present study suggests a potential cytokine suppressive effect of PMX in COVID‐19 patients. Serum β2MG was measured using stored sera within 6 hours before the first PMX‐DHP and within 6 hours after the second PMX‐DHP. With the exception of Case A, which had a poor prognosis, all cases remained unchanged or showed decreased serum β2MG levels (N = 9, data not shown). L‐FABP is expressed in renal proximal tubules and is shed into the urine under hypoxic conditions. 25 To date, L‐FABP has been clinically used as a novel biomarker for the detection of acute kidney injury; however, it can also be used as a predictor of severity and mortality in the intensive care unit. 26 Nakamura et al. reported the effect of PMX on urinary L‐FABP reduction in patients with septic shock. 27 It was suggested that urinary L‐FABP levels were significantly elevated in patients with septic shock and that treatment using PMX was effective in reducing these levels. In the future, larger‐scale studies of PMX in COVID‐19 patients will need to determine the prognostic effect of treatment using PMX on L‐FABP.

Increased thrombotic complications and coagulation disorder are known to occur in COVID‐19 patients. 28 , 29 , 30 In our study, the PMX circuit coagulated in five sessions and had to be reassembled. In retrospect, among patients with high D‐dimer and FDP levels, episodes of circuit coagulation, especially in membranes, were noted in the first 15 to 30 minutes. Although the membrane itself cannot be examined in detail due to infection control issues, it may be necessary to assess the patients' coagulation status, and if necessary, initiate systemic heparinization before treatment with PMX. We also checked the levels of soluble fibrin (SF) and thrombin‐antithrombin (TAT) complex, which are known as factors involved in early coagulation, in three cases. The levels of SF and the TAT complex reflect the coagulation phase and are useful predictors of coagulation. 31 Despite these levels being elevated in all three cases, the circuit did not coagulate in two cases. The D‐dimer and FDP levels in these two cases were normal. Compared to COVID‐19 survivors, COVID‐19 non‐survivors have been reported to have significantly higher D‐dimer and FDP levels and longer prothrombin time and activated partial thromboplastin time. 32 In our hospital, we consider using LMWH for anticoagulation treatment in patients with moderate‐to‐severe COVID‐19 who require O2. 33 Nafamostat mesylate acts effectively against COVID‐19 by inhibiting the entry of the virus into human cells. 34 An observational study on the compassionate use of nafamosat mesylate and favipiravir in combination therapy in SARS‐CoV‐2‐positive patients has been reported. 35 This effect may be expected when using nafamostat as an anticoagulant in PMX‐DHP; however, further studies are obviously needed to confirm this effect. There is a known association between cytokine storms and vascular endothelial injury in COVID‐19. 36 , 37 In the present study, PMX was able to inhibit IL‐6, 38 which is one of the cytokines that have been the focus of attention in COVID‐19. It was also suggested that PMX may have beneficial effects on the cytokines (PDGF‐BB, RANTES, and VEGF) involved in atherosclerosis and vascular endothelial injury, which have been rarely mentioned in reports related to PMX until now.

Our study has some limitations. First, the extremely limited number of cases and the lack of comparators limit the interpretation of the treatment efficacy of PMX in COVID‐19. A prospective study comparing the use and non‐use of PMX in the treatment of COVID‐19 pneumonia is necessary. The duration of PMX‐DHP should be 2 hours in general according to the package insert. In contrast, it has been reported that longer (>12 hours) treatment with PMX might be more effective in terms of improving oxygenation. 39 , 40 , 41 , 42 Therefore, we decided to extend the duration to 3 hours, but not more, due to the limited medical resources and strict infection control implemented in this study. In addition, various treatments, including steroids and antiviral drugs, were administered to our patients; hence, it is unclear whether PMX alone was effective. In nine of the 12 cases, steroids and PMX were introduced at the same time (within 24 hours). Of the three patients for whom the time between steroid treatment and initiation of PMX was more than 48 hours, two (Figure S1A, B) died and one (Figure 1C) required ECMO. In the current study, no patients were treated with tocilizumab or convalescent plasma. In terms of controlling cytokines, it was suggested that steroid treatment and PMX might be more effective if started at the same time. However, the indication for steroids in COVID‐19 remains controversial and needs to be further investigated.

5. CONCLUSION

PMX‐DHP may have a beneficial effect on patients with COVID‐19. Therefore, future prospective studies with a control group are expected to evaluate the therapeutic effect of PMX‐DHP in patients with COVID‐19. Because of the risk of circuit coagulation during the treatment, it is necessary to evaluate the coagulation status of the patient in advance.

Supporting information

Supplementary Figure S1 Clinical course of the six remaining cases. The date of the first and second PMX regimen and the presence or absence of increased inlet pressure or circuit coagulation events are noted. At the start of the PMX treatment, five patients were on oxygen supplementation (moderate), five were already intubated (severe), and two were very sick and on ECMO (critical). N = 6. Abbreviations: PMX, polymyxin B; ICU, intensive care unit; ECMO, extracorporeal membrane oxygenation; RRT, renal replacement therapy; P/F, PaO2/FiO2; β2MG, β2‐microglobulin; L‐FABP, liver‐type fatty acid‐binding protein.

Click here for additional data file. (3.4MB, tif)

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

We thank all the clinical staff at the National Center for Global Health and Medicine (NCGM) for their dedicated clinical practice and patient care. We would like to thank Dr. Arata Azuma (Nippon Medical School) for his support in promoting the research. This work was supported in part by Japan Agency for Medical Research and Development (AMED; 20he0822003j0001) and Grants‐in‐Aid for Research from the National Center for Global Health and Medicine (20A‐3002).

Katagiri D, Ishikane M, Asai Y, et al. Direct hemoperfusion using a polymyxin B‐immobilized polystyrene column for COVID‐19. J Clin Apher. 2021;36:313–321. 10.1002/jca.21861

Funding information Grants‐in‐Aid for Research from the National Center for Global Health and Medicine, Grant/Award Number: 20A‐3002; Japan Agency for Medical Research and Development, Grant/Award Number: 20he0822003j0001

DATA AVAILABILITY STATEMENT

The data that support the findings of this study are available on request from the corresponding author. The data are not publicly available due to privacy or ethical restrictions.

REFERENCES

  • 1. Terpos E, Ntanasis‐Stathopoulos I, Elalamy I, et al. Hematological findings and complications of COVID‐19. Am J Hematol. 2020;95(7):834‐847. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2. Sanders JM, Monogue ML, Jodlowski TZ, Cutrell JB. Pharmacologic treatments for coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID‐19): a review. JAMA. 2020;323(18):1824‐1836. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3. Mehta P, McAuley DF, Brown M, Sanchez E, Tattersall RS, Manson JJ. COVID‐19: consider cytokine storm syndromes and immunosuppression. Lancet. 2020;395(10229):1033‐1034. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4. Xu X, Han M, Li T, et al. Effective treatment of severe COVID‐19 patients with tocilizumab. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2020;117(20):10970‐10975. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5. Ye Q, Wang B, Mao J. The pathogenesis and treatment of the ‘cytokine Storm’ in COVID‐19. J Infect. 2020;80(6):607‐613. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6. Ronco C, Klein DJ. Polymyxin B hemoperfusion: a mechanistic perspective. Crit Care. 2014;18(3):309. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.National Institution of Infectious Disease in Japan. Manual for the Detection of Pathogen 2019‐nCoV Ver. 2.6. https://www.niid.go.jp/niid/images/epi/corona/2019-nCoVmanual20200217-en.pdf. Accessed September 9, 2020.
  • 8. Cao B, Wang Y, Wen D, et al. A trial of lopinavir‐ritonavir in adults hospitalized with severe COVID‐19. N Engl J Med. 2020;382(19):1787‐1799. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9. Mise K, Hoshino J, Ueno T, et al. Prognostic value of tubulointerstitial lesions, urinary N‐acetyl‐beta‐D‐glucosaminidase, and urinary beta2‐microglobulin in patients with type 2 diabetes and biopsy‐proven diabetic nephropathy. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2016;11(4):593‐601. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10. Katagiri D, Doi K, Honda K, et al. Combination of two urinary biomarkers predicts acute kidney injury after adult cardiac surgery. Ann Thorac Surg. 2012;93(2):577‐583. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11. Katagiri D, Ishikane M, Ogawa T, et al. Continuous renal replacement therapy for a patient with severe COVID‐19. Blood Purif. 2020;1‐3. 10.1159/000508062. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12. Xu Z, Shi L, Wang Y, et al. Pathological findings of COVID‐19 associated with acute respiratory distress syndrome. Lancet Respir Med. 2020;8(4):420‐422. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13. Abe S, Hayashi H, Seo Y, et al. Reduction in serum high mobility group box‐1 level by polymyxin B‐immobilized fiber column in patients with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis with acute exacerbation. Blood Purif. 2011;32(4):310‐316. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14. Abe S, Seo Y, Hayashi H, et al. Neutrophil adsorption by polymyxin B‐immobilized fiber column for acute exacerbation in patients with interstitial pneumonia: a pilot study. Blood Purif. 2010;29(4):321‐326. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15. Takeda S, Munakata R, Abe S, et al. Hypercytokinemia with 2009 pandemic H1N1 (pH1N1) influenza successfully treated with polymyxin B‐immobilized fiber column hemoperfusion. Intensive Care Med. 2010;36(5):906‐907. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16. Abe S, Azuma A, Mukae H, et al. Polymyxin B‐immobilized fiber column (PMX) treatment for idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis with acute exacerbation: a multicenter retrospective analysis. Intern Med. 2012;51(12):1487‐1491. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17. Tachikawa R, Tomii K, Murase K, et al. Therapeutic effect of direct hemoperfusion with a polymyxin B‐immobilized fiber column in the treatment of HIV‐negative severe pneumocystis pneumonia. Respiration. 2011;81(4):318‐324. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18. Ronco C, Reis T. Kidney involvement in COVID‐19 and rationale for extracorporeal therapies. Nat Rev Nephrol. 2020;16(6):308‐310. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19. Nishibori M, Takahashi HK, Katayama H, et al. Specific removal of monocytes from peripheral blood of septic patients by polymyxin B‐immobilized filter column. Acta Med Okayama. 2009;63(1):65‐69. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20. Kusaba Y, Izumi S, Takasaki J, et al. Successful recovery from COVID‐19‐associated acute respiratory failure with polymyxin B‐immobilized fiber column‐direct hemoperfusion. Intern Med. 2020;59:2405‐2408. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21. Canada Go . Authorized medical devices for uses related to COVID‐19: list of medical devices for expanded use. https://wwwcanadaca/en/health-canada/services/drugs-health-products/covid19-industry/medical-devices/authorized/expanded‐usehtml. Accessed September 9, 2020.
  • 22. Katagiri D, Ishikane M, Asai Y, et al. Evaluation of coronavirus disease 2019 severity using urine biomarkers. Crit Care Explor. 2020;2(8):e0170. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23. Joannidis M, Forni LG, Klein SJ, et al. Lung‐kidney interactions in critically ill patients: consensus report of the acute disease quality initiative (ADQI) 21 workgroup. Intensive Care Med. 2020;46(4):654‐672. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24. Nissen MH, Larsen JK, Plesner T, Olesen BK, Ernst P. Alpha‐interferon induces enhanced expression of HLA‐ABC antigens and beta‐2‐microglobulin in vivo and in vitro in various subsets of human lymphoid cells. Clin Exp Immunol. 1987;69(3):632‐638. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25. Noiri E, Doi K, Negishi K, et al. Urinary fatty acid‐binding protein 1: an early predictive biomarker of kidney injury. Am J Physiol Renal Physiol. 2009;296(4):F669‐F679. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26. Doi K, Negishi K, Ishizu T, et al. Evaluation of new acute kidney injury biomarkers in a mixed intensive care unit. Crit Care Med. 2011;39(11):2464‐2469. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27. Nakamura T, Sugaya T, Koide H. Urinary liver‐type fatty acid‐binding protein in septic shock: effect of polymyxin B‐immobilized fiber hemoperfusion. Shock (Augusta, Ga). 2009;31(5):454‐459. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28. Giannis D, Ziogas IA, Gianni P. Coagulation disorders in coronavirus infected patients: COVID‐19, SARS‐CoV‐1, MERS‐CoV and lessons from the past. J Clin Virol. 2020;127:104362. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29. Klok FA, Kruip M, van der Meer NJM, et al. Incidence of thrombotic complications in critically ill ICU patients with COVID‐19. Thromb Res. 2020;191:145‐147. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30. McGonagle D, O'Donnell JS, Sharif K, Emery P, Bridgewood C. Immune mechanisms of pulmonary intravascular coagulopathy in COVID‐19 pneumonia. Lancet. 2020;2(7):E437‐E445. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31. Aota T, Wada H, Fujimoto N, et al. Evaluation of the diagnostic criteria for the basic type of DIC established by the Japanese Society of Thrombosis and Hemostasis. Clin Appl Thromb Hemost. 2017;23(7):838‐843. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32. Tang N, Li D, Wang X, Sun Z. Abnormal coagulation parameters are associated with poor prognosis in patients with novel coronavirus pneumonia. J Thromb Haemost. 2020;18(4):844‐847. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33. Sato R, Ishikane M, Kinoshita N, et al. A new challenge of unfractionated heparin anticoagulation treatment for moderate to severe COVID‐19 in Japan. Global Health Med. 2020;2:190‐192. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34. Yamamoto M, Kiso M, Sakai‐Tagawa Y, et al. The anticoagulant nafamostat potently inhibits SARS‐CoV‐2 S protein‐mediated fusion in a cell fusion assay system and viral infection in vitro in a cell‐type‐dependent manner. Viruses. 2020;12(6):629. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35. Doi K, Ikeda M, Hayase N, Moriya K, Morimura N. Nafamostat mesylate treatment in combination with favipiravir for patients critically ill with COVID‐19: a case series. Crit Care. 2020;24(1):392. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36. Varga Z, Flammer AJ, Steiger P, et al. Endothelial cell infection and endotheliitis in COVID‐19. Lancet. 2020;395(10234):1417‐1418. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37. Gheblawi M, Wang K, Viveiros A, et al. Angiotensin‐converting enzyme 2: SARS‐CoV‐2 receptor and regulator of the renin‐angiotensin system: celebrating the 20th anniversary of the discovery of ACE2. Circ Res. 2020;126(10):1456‐1474. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38. Kermali M, Khalsa RK, Pillai K, Ismail Z, Harky A. The role of biomarkers in diagnosis of COVID‐19 – a systematic review. Life Sci. 2020;254:117788. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39. Kono M, Suda T, Enomoto N, et al. Evaluation of different perfusion durations in direct hemoperfusion with polymyxin B‐immobilized fiber column therapy for acute exacerbation of interstitial pneumonias. Blood Purif. 2011;32(2):75‐81. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40. Mitaka C, Tsuchida N, Kawada K, Nakajima Y, Imai T, Sasaki S. A longer duration of polymyxin B‐immobilized fiber column hemoperfusion improves pulmonary oxygenation in patients with septic shock. Shock (Augusta, Ga). 2009;32(5):478‐483. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41. Kawazoe Y, Sato T, Miyagawa N, et al. Mortality effects of prolonged hemoperfusion therapy using a polymyxin B‐immobilized fiber column for patients with septic shock: a sub‐analysis of the DESIRE trial. Blood Purif. 2018;46(4):309‐314. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42. Miyamoto K, Kawazoe Y, Kato S. Prolonged direct hemoperfusion using a polymyxin B immobilized fiber cartridge provides sustained circulatory stabilization in patients with septic shock: a retrospective observational before‐after study. J Intensive Care. 2017;5:19. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Supplementary Figure S1 Clinical course of the six remaining cases. The date of the first and second PMX regimen and the presence or absence of increased inlet pressure or circuit coagulation events are noted. At the start of the PMX treatment, five patients were on oxygen supplementation (moderate), five were already intubated (severe), and two were very sick and on ECMO (critical). N = 6. Abbreviations: PMX, polymyxin B; ICU, intensive care unit; ECMO, extracorporeal membrane oxygenation; RRT, renal replacement therapy; P/F, PaO2/FiO2; β2MG, β2‐microglobulin; L‐FABP, liver‐type fatty acid‐binding protein.

Click here for additional data file. (3.4MB, tif)

Data Availability Statement

The data that support the findings of this study are available on request from the corresponding author. The data are not publicly available due to privacy or ethical restrictions.

Articles from Journal of Clinical Apheresis are provided here courtesy of Wiley

RESOURCES