Evolution of Our Understanding of XIAP Deficiency

Abstract

X-linked inhibitor of apoptosis (XIAP) deficiency is a rare inborn error of immunity first described in 2006. XIAP deficiency is characterised by immune dysregulation and a broad spectrum of clinical manifestations, including haemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis (HLH), inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), hypogammaglobulinemia, susceptibility to infections, splenomegaly, cytopaenias, and other less common autoinflammatory phenomena. Since the first description of the disease, many XIAP deficient patients have been identified and our understanding of the disease has grown. Over 90 disease causing mutations have been described and more inflammatory disease manifestations, such as hepatitis, arthritis, and uveitis, are now well-recognised. Recently, following the introduction of reduced intensity conditioning (RIC), outcomes of allogeneic haematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT), the only curative treatment option for XIAP deficiency, have improved. The pathophysiology of XIAP deficiency is not fully understood, however it is known that XIAP plays a role in both the innate and adaptive immune response and in immune regulation, most notably through modulation of tumour necrosis factor (TNF)-receptor signalling and regulation of NLRP3 inflammasome activity. In this review we will provide an up to date overview of both the clinical aspects and pathophysiology of XIAP deficiency.

Introduction

X-linked inhibitor of apoptosis (XIAP) deficiency is a rare inborn error of immunity caused by mutations in the XIAP/BIRC4 gene. The disease is estimated to occur in 1–2 per million live male births (1). XIAP deficiency was first described in 2006 and is associated with a variety of disease manifestations, including recurrent haemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis (HLH), inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), hypogammaglobulinemia, severe and/or recurrent infections, splenomegaly, and cytopaenias (2–4). However, as more patients have been identified over the years, other disease manifestations are now well-described. Treatment generally consists of immunosuppression and, in severe cases, allogeneic haematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT). The XIAP protein is believed to be involved in both the innate and adaptive immune response. Furthermore, XIAP has a role in regulation of inflammasome activity (3, 5, 6). However, the pathophysiology of XIAP deficiency remains to be fully comprehended. This review will provide an up to date summary of our understanding of XIAP deficiency.

History

The XIAP/BIRC4 gene was first characterised in 1996 (7–9). However, XIAP deficiency underlying a primary immunodeficiency disorder was not described until 2006, when Rigaud et al. (2) found pathogenic variants in XIAP in male patients from 3 families with X-linked lymphoproliferative syndrome (XLP) phenotypes who lacked SH2D1A mutations. Following this initial report, XIAP deficiency was classified as XLP-2, while signalling lymphocytic activation molecule (SLAM)-associated protein (SAP) deficiency was referred to as XLP-1. XIAP deficient patients were initially observed to suffer from similar symptoms to SAP deficient patients, including HLH that was frequently triggered by an EBV infection, splenomegaly, cytopaenias, and hypogammaglobulinemia (2, 10). However, over time it became clear that the clinical features of XIAP deficiency differ significantly from those observed in SAP deficiency. Most striking is the fact that XIAP deficient patients do not develop lymphomas (2, 3, 11). Additionally in XIAP deficiency, HLH generally has a milder disease course with a lower mortality rate, but occurs more frequently and is often recurrent (1, 3, 12–14). A significant number of XIAP patients suffer from colitis, a disease manifestation that is observed less frequently in SAP deficient patients (4, 11, 12, 15, 16). Underlying these distinct disease manifestations is a difference in disease pathophysiology. Contrary to SAP deficiency, T and NK cell-cytotoxicity responses are normal, including those specific for EBV, as are numbers of switched memory B cells (2, 3, 17). On a genetic level no relation between the SH2D1A and XIAP/BIRC4 genes has been identified, despite the fact that the two genes are localised in close proximity of each other in Xq25 (12, 18). Subsequent clinical observations led to a proposal that XIAP deficiency more readily fit the classical phenotype of familial HLH (FHL) (12), however a significant number of XIAP deficient patients do not develop HLH (4, 11, 14). Today, XIAP deficiency is regarded primarily as a disorder of immune dysregulation and hyperinflammation.

Genetics

XIAP is encoded by the XIAP/BIRC4 gene, which consists of 6 coding exons. To date over 90 disease causing mutations have been described (Figure 1). Mutations are distributed along the length of the gene and include nonsense and missense mutations, large whole exon deletions, small insertions and deletions, often leading to a frameshift mutation, and intronic mutations. Nonsense mutations and deletions generally lead to absence of XIAP protein, whereas missense and splice site mutations may lead to residual expression of full-length or truncated, but non- or dysfunctional protein. Our updated overview of all known mutations corroborates the observation that missense mutations cluster in two hotspots that target either the BIR2 domain or the RING domain, highlighting the importance of these two domains in XIAP function (1, 5, 19). There is no clear correlation between genotype and phenotype, as shown by the large variability in clinical manifestations observed in affected siblings (4, 11, 20–22). Speckmann et al. (4) even found that neither the nature of the mutation, nor residual protein expression was correlated to clinical presentation. In contrast, Pachlopnik Schmid et al. found that XIAP deficient patients with null mutations more frequently developed HLH (14). It is likely that other genetic and environmental factors influence the clinical phenotype.

Figure 1.

Overview of all disease causing mutations in the XIAP/BIRC4 gene that have thus far been reported. The position of each of the reported mutations associated with XIAP deficiency is depicted along the XIAP protein and gene structure. Shown are the 6 coding exons that are present in the XIAP/BIRC4 gene and the 5 functional domains of the XIAP protein. Mutations are grouped by mutation type. Missense mutations cluster in the BIR2 and RING domain of the XIAP protein.

Female carriers of a XIAP/BIRC4 mutation are generally asymptomatic. However, symptomatic female carriers have been described, expressing a variety of symptoms, including HLH-like disease, colitis and skin manifestations (21, 23, 24). Studies show that in the peripheral blood leukocytes of symptomatic female carriers, X-chromosome inactivation is either random or skewed to the mutant allele. In contrast, X-chromosome inactivation is skewed towards the wild type allele in asymptomatic female carriers, suggesting that cells expressing wild type XIAP have a selective survival advantage, possibly due to the anti-apoptotic activity of XIAP (2). Why certain female carriers have an abnormal inactivation pattern and whether the severity of the clinical presentation depends on the degree of X-inactivation and the corresponding residual expression of wild type XIAP protein and function in female carriers, remains to be discovered.

XIAP Protein Structure and Function

XIAP is a highly conserved, ubiquitously expressed protein belonging to the inhibitor of apoptosis (IAP) family of proteins. It has important structural and functional characteristics in common with cIAP-1 and cIAP-2. The protein is 497 amino acids long and consists of three zinc-binding baculovirus IAP repeat (BIR) domains (hallmarks of IAPs), a ubiquitin-associated (UBA) domain and a really interesting new gene (RING) finger domain (Figure 2) (9, 37). The BIR domains directly inhibit caspase-3, −7 and −9, giving XIAP its anti-apoptotic activity (18, 25–27, 37–39). Besides XIAP's well-known anti-apoptotic properties, more recent studies have shown that XIAP has key functions in immunity (Figure 2). XIAP's BIR domains are involved in non-caspase protein interactions by binding to a specific peptide sequence, the IAP-binding motif (IBM) (35). These interactions mediate XIAP's role in various signalling pathways. The UBA domain can bind directly to polyubiquitin (polyUb) chains, thereby enabling XIAP to participate in Ub-dependent signalling pathways (34). Finally, the RING domain has E3 ubiquitin ligase activity, enabling XIAP to target proteins for proteasomal degradation or alter the activity of modified proteins (35).

Figure 2.

XIAP's protein domains and their individual specific protein interactions and functions. Well-known is that XIAP's BIR2 and 3 domains directly inhibit caspase-3, −7 and −9 (18, 25–27). BIR1 has been isolated as the BCL10-binding region within XIAP. This interaction plays a role in the Dectin-1 signalling pathway (28). Furthermore, BIR1 recruits the TAB1/TAK1 complex, which is essential for activation of the NF-κB and MAPK pathways (29–31). BIR2 interacts with RIPK2, which forms a necessary step in the NOD1/2 signalling pathways leading to NF-κB and MAPK activation (5, 32, 33). The UBA domain is able to directly bind polyubiquitin chains and is required for activation of NF-κB, likely via its binding to polyubiquitinated NEMO (34). The C-terminal RING finger domain of XIAP has E3 ubiquitin ligase function, enabling XIAP to target proteins for proteasomal degradation or alter protein function (35). For example, the ubiquitin ligase activity of XIAP is critical for NOD2 mediated activation of NF-κB, via the polyubiquitination of RIKP2 (36). Created with BioRender.com.

Disease Pathophysiology

Our understanding of the key functions XIAP plays in the immune response (Figures 3, 4) is expanding. Through its anti-apoptotic functions, XIAP is involved in the adaptive immune response. T cells from XIAP deficient patients, particularly invariant natural killer T cells (iNKT) and mucosal-associated invariant T (MAIT) cells which express elevated levels of caspases that are inhibited by XIAP, have an increased sensitivity to activation-induced cell death (AICD) (2–4, 51, 52). Thus, it is thought that upon infection, expansion of virus-specific T-cells is suboptimal in XIAP deficient patients.

Figure 3.

XIAP plays a key function in various immune pathways. (A) XIAP is required for pattern recognition receptors (PPR) mediated innate immune responses. (i) XIAP is essential for the NOD1/2 induced activation of the NF-κB and MAPK pathways and secretion of pro-inflammatory cytokines and chemokines (40). NOD1 and NOD2 are intracellular PRRs that bind DAP and MDP, respectively (41, 42). Upon ligand binding, XIAP, together with cIAP1/2, ubiquitinates RIPK2, which subsequently acts as a scaffold for the TAK/TAB1 and IKK complexes, leading to activation of the MAPK and NF-κB pathways, respectively (5, 36, 40). The TAK/TAB1 also links to the IKK complex, thereby inducing activation of the NF-κB pathway (5, 36, 43, 44). Upon NOD activation, XIAP also recruits LUBAC, which in turn conjugates linear Ub chains to RIPK2. The concurrent ubiquitination of RIPK2 by XIAP and LUBAC is necessary for efficient activation of the canonical IKK for NF-κB activation (36, 44, 45). (ii) XIAP is necessary in Dectin-1 signalling. Dectin-1 is a transmembrane PRR that detects β-glucan. Upon Dectin-1 stimulation, XIAP binds and ubiquitinates BCL-10, which is essential for the activation of the NF-κB and MAPK pathways and cytokine production. BCL-10 is also involved in Rac1-dependent phagocytosis, which again relies on ubiquitination of BCL-10 by XIAP (28). (B) XIAP regulates the activation of inflammasomes via TLR/TNFR signalling. (i) Following TNFR1 and TLR signalling, RIPK3 can recruit RIKP1 to activate caspase-8 (46, 47). In this process, XIAP has an inhibitory effect on the ripopotosome by controlling the ubiquitination of RIKP1 in a RIPK3-dependent manner (6, 48). (ii) XIAP inhibits MLKL necroptotic signalling, which is promoted by RIPK3 in the absence of caspase-8 (48). (iii) TLR-MyD88 signalling causes the proteasomal degradation of cIAP1 and its adaptor TRAF2 by inducing TNF and TNFR2 signalling. This proteasomal degradation is inhibited by TLR-TRIF induced IFN-β. Loss of XIAP promotes LPS-induced cIAP1 degradation. Subsequently, cIAP1 loss in the absence of XIAP promotes TLR-induced RIPK3 caspase-8 and IL-1β activity, eventually leading to IL-1β maturation, caspase-8 cleavage and enhanced cell death (49). (iiii) TNFR2 activation acts as a signal 1 for priming the canonical inflammasome and induces expression of pro-inflammatory cytokines. XIAP loss and TNFR1 signalling play a role as signal 2 for activation of the inflammasome. This is mediated by RIPK1 and ROS production. In the absence of XIAP, TNFR2 stimulation leads to TNF production, followed by TNFR1 mediated cell death (50). Created with BioRender.com.

Figure 4.

Simplified model of the disease pathophysiology underlying the inflammatory phenomena that are observed in XIAP deficiency. In XIAP deficiency, both the adaptive immune response and the innate immune response are compromised. Additionally, intracellular pathogens are less effectively cleared through xenophagy in the absence of XIAP. Taken together, this results in the persistence of pathogens, which, in turn leads to uncontrolled activation of inflammasomes when regulation by XIAP is lacking. Overall, the result is overproduction of pro-inflammatory cytokines and cell death, leading to a chronic state of hyperinflammation, which can manifest as HLH, IBD, HLH-like disease, arthritis and other inflammatory phenomena. Created with BioRender.com.

Besides its anti-apoptotic role however, XIAP is also involved in other signalling pathways that are essential for the innate immune response. Firstly, XIAP is required for NOD1 and NOD2 signalling via the ubiquitination of RIPK2, which results in activation of NF-κB and MAPK pathways and secretion of pro-inflammatory cytokines and chemokines (Figure 3A) (5, 32, 33, 36, 40). NOD-like receptors (NLRs) are intracellular pattern recognition receptors (PRRs) involved in the recognition of degraded products of peptidoglycans from the bacterial cell wall, thereby playing an important role in the innate immune response (5, 36, 40). NOD2, the most studied NLR in relation to XIAP deficiency, is expressed mainly by cells of haematopoietic origin and by Paneth cells in the gut, and is activated by muramyl dipeptide (MDP), a constituent of Gram-negative and Gram-positive bacteria (41, 42). Upon ligand binding, XIAP mediates the ubiquitination of RIPK2 and recruits the linear ubiquitin chain assembly complex (LUBAC) to the NOD receptor, which is essential for NOD2 mediated NF-κB activation (5, 36, 40, 43–45).

Secondly, XIAP is necessary for Dectin-1 signalling (Figure 3A) (28). Dectin-1 is a transmembrane PRR that is involved in antifungal immunity through recognition of β-glucan, a major carbohydrate structure found in fungal cell walls (53). Upon Dectin-1 activation XIAP binds and ubiquitinates BCL10, an essential step for NF-κB and MAPK activation, cytokine production and phagocytosis (28).

Furthermore, XIAP is important in regulating the activation of the NLRP3 inflammasome (Figure 3B). XIAP loss results in dysregulation of classical caspase-1/NLRP3 inflammasome activation, overproduction of pro-inflammatory cytokines and cell death (6, 40, 48, 50, 54–57). First described was the inhibitory effect XIAP has on the ripoptosome, a death-inducing complex comprised of RIKP1, FADD and caspase-8, following both TNFR1 and TLR signalling. This inhibitory effect appears to be mediated by the regulation of RIPK1 ubiquitination by XIAP in a RIPK3-dependent manner (6, 46–48). More recently, XIAP also has been shown to play a role in TNFR2 signalling. In this context, XIAP inhibits the proteasomal degradation of cIAP1 that follows TLR-MyD88 induced TNFR2 signalling. In case of XIAP loss, the degradation of cIAP1 leads to inflammasome activation (49). XIAP also mediates RIPK1 kinase activity and ROS production that occur upon TNFR2 activation, thereby inhibiting the activation and upregulation of the canonical inflammasome (50). It has become clear that the role of XIAP in inflammasome regulation is important, but complex and not yet fully understood. Surprisingly, patients with Cryopyrin-associated periodic syndrome (CAPS), which is caused by a gain-of-function mutations in the NLRP3 gene, do develop recurrent fever, uveitis and arthritis, similar to XIAP deficient patients, but do not develop HLH, splenomegaly or IBD (1, 58, 59).

Finally, recent studies have shown that XIAP is involved in the autophagic elimination of intracellular bacteria and is required for the efficient fusion of lysosomes with autophagosomes (60, 61). Overall, it is clear that XIAP is important for both the clearance of pathogens and the regulation of the inflammatory response.

It is theorised that in XIAP deficiency there is abnormal persistence of pathogens due to the ineffective immune response, characterised by a decreased cytokine production by myeloid cells and subsequent impaired attraction of neutrophils and phagocytes. Additionally there is uncontrolled inflammasome activation, with overproduction of pro-inflammatory cytokines, and death of lymphocytes and myeloid cells (Figure 4). Overall these processes result in a chronic state of hyperinflammation, which can lead to HLH, IBD, HLH-like disease, arthritis and other inflammatory phenomena.

Most likely, the dysregulation of inflammasome activation plays an important role in the occurrence of HLH in XIAP deficiency (6, 56, 57). Immunisation of mice with alum, an agent that induces an inflammatory response primarily driven by NLRP3 inflammasome activation, caused splenomegaly and elevated splenic infiltration of inflammatory cells, which is reminiscent of the splenomegaly observed in XIAP deficient patients (6). In addition, dysregulation of inflammasome activation causes recurrent HLH, autoinflammation and elevated IL-18 levels in humans that have an activation mutation in the NLRC4 inflammasome (62).

In contrast, it seems that impaired NOD2 signalling is important for the development of IBD in XIAP deficiency. NOD2 is the most important susceptibility gene for the development of Crohn's disease, indicating the importance of NOD signalling in maintaining intestinal homeostasis (63–65). NOD2 signalling in Paneth cells normally results in secretion of chemokines such as IL-8 and MCP-1. Following impaired signalling, reduced chemoattraction of granulocytes to the gut leads to reduced clearance of pathogens and the chronic granulomatous inflammation that is seen in Crohn's disease (42, 66–72). On the other hand, diminished IL-10 production, which has important anti-inflammatory functions, upon defective NOD2 signalling contributes to the loss of immune regulation (42, 68, 73). This is supported by the fact that IL-10 and IL-10 receptor mutations lead to severe very-early-onset IBD (74). It is likely that other processes also play a role in the aetiology of IBD, such as the impaired NOD1 signalling, diminished xenophagy of intracellular bacteria and the increased susceptibility to apoptosis of MAIT and iNKT cells, which are important cells for the gut immune homeostasis (32, 75, 76). Complete remission of IBD has been described post-HSCT, confirming that the cause most likely involves haematological lineages. Furthermore, XIAP expression was found to be strongly reduced in monocytes from female carriers suffering from IBD, whilst expression in lymphocytes was normal, suggesting a predominant role for myeloid cells (21).

Clinical Manifestations

Immune dysregulation leads to a range of clinical manifestations in XIAP deficiency including recurrent HLH which is often triggered by EBV infection, IBD, splenomegaly, hypogammaglobulinemia, cytopaenias, and autoinflammatory phenomena (1–3, 21). Table 1 summarises the occurrence of common disease manifestations and their observed frequencies. There may be an intrinsic selection bias in many of the reported case series as a result of the study design. For example, in the paper from Rigaud et al. all patients were first diagnosed with XLP based on their clinical phenotype (2), Aguilar et al. focused their study on patients with colitis (21), while others have focussed on identifying monogenetic causes of early-onset IBD (83, 109), or on patients who have been treated with allogeneic HSCT (77). The clinical phenotype of XIAP deficient patients is highly variable; many different symptoms, that all can occur independently from each other, have been described to date (Tables 1, 2). Patients may suffer from one or multiple symptoms during their disease course. In addition, age of onset of disease is highly variable, with some patients presenting as early as the neonatal period, while others remain symptom free until adulthood. Asymptomatic XIAP deficient males have also been identified by family testing (4, 11).

Table 1.

Occurrence of common clinical characteristics of XIAP deficiency reported to date.

	(2)	(3)	(14)	(22)	(11)	(77)	(4)	(78)	(79)	(21)	(24)	(80)	(81)	(82)	Case reports and small case series (10, 12, 23, 51, 83–108)	Total*
No. of patients	12	10	30	7	9	19	27	10	12	17	6	17	29	7	47	226
No. of families	3	8	11	1	6	NA	17	9	11	11	1	12	19	6	38
Family History	NA	5 (50)	NA	7 (100)	6 (67)	NA	NA	4 (40)	NA	NA	6 (100)	NA	19 (66)	2 (29)	4
HLH	11 (92)	9 (90)	22 (73)	0 (0)	6 (67)	16 (84)	10 (37)	10 (100)	7 (58)	7 (41)	1 (17)	11 (65)	23 (79)	3 (43)	30	137 (61%)
EBV-HLH	8 (67)	3 (30)	15 (50)	0 (0)	4 (44)	6 (32)	6 (22)	4 (40)	NA	NA	0	NA	8 (28)	2 (29)	9	56 (25%)
Recurrent HLH or HLH-like illness	6 (50)	6 (60)	20 (67)	1 (14)	5 (56)	NA	NA	8 (80)	5 (42)	NA	1 (17)	10 (59)	NA	2 (29)	19	73 (32%)
Splenomegaly	9 (75)	9 (90)	20 (67)	5 (71)	4 (44)	NA	17 (63)	7 (70)	7 (58)	7 (41)	1 (17)	6 (35)	11 (38)	4 (57)	25	108 (48%)
Cytopenia	NA	9 (90)	NA	3 (43)	6 (67)	NA	NA	8 (80)	1 (8)	NA	1 (17)	1 (6)	13 (45)	2 (29)	21	48 (21%)
Hypogammaglobulinemia	4 (33)	2 (20)	8 (27)	3 (43)	2 (22)	NA	4 (15)	1 (10)	2 (17)	NA	NA	4 (24)	3 (10)	1 (14)	5	32 (14%)
IBD	2 (17)	0	5 (17)	2 (29)	2 (22)	2 (11)	7 (26)	1 (10)	1 (8)	17 (100)	4 (67)	6 (35)	13 (45)	0	14	51 (23%)
Hepatitis	0	0	0	1 (14)	0	0	1 (4)	0	0	0	0	0	NA	0	4	6 (3%)
Uveitis	0	0	0	0	0	0	1 (4)	0	0	0	0	0	NA	0	1	2 (1%)
Arthritis	0	0	0	0	0	0	1 (4)	0	0	1 (6)	1 (17)	0	NA	0	0	2 (1%)
Skin abscesses	0	0	0	0	0	0	1 (4)	0	0	5 (29)	3 (50)	0	NA	0	2	11 (5%)
Recurrent/complicated infections	0	2 (20)	2 (7)	5 (71)	1 (11)	3 (16)	0	0	0	0	3 (50)	0	NA	1 (14)	6	22 (10%)
Age at onset in years(median, range)	3.5	-	4	6	0.5	1	6	1.25	4	7	NED	1.3	3	3.5	-
	(0.6–22)	(Infancy-8)	(0.1–22)	(1–21)	(0.2–1.7)	(0.2–17)	(0.1–20)	(0.1–3)	(0.25–17)	(0–20)		(0.1–14)	(0.1–17)	(0–5.3)	0–16
No. of patients with other manifestations	0	0	4 (13)	0	0	2 (11)	5 (19)	0	1 (8)	5 (29)	3 (50)	3 (18)	NA	0	11
Asymptomatic patients	0	1 (10)	1 (3)	1 (14)	1 (11)	1 (5)	2 (7)	0	1 (8)	0	0	1 (6)	0	1 (14)	5
Survival	8 (67)	7 (70)	17 (57)	4 (57)	7 (78)	7 (37)	26 (96)	8 (80)	12 (100)	14 (82)	4 (67)	15 (88)	26 (90)	6 (86)	36

Numbers indicate the number of patients and, in brackets, the relative frequency in percentage, unless otherwise specified. Data from case reports and small case series with ≤ 5 patients are summarised in one column. NA, not assessed; NED, not enough data.

^*Some patients may have been reported in more than one publication.

Table 2.

Overview of infrequent disease manifestations that have been described in XIAP deficient male patients.

Non-classical manifestation in XIAP deficiency		No. of patients	References
Gastro-intestinal	Celiac-like disease	2	(4)
	Eosinophilic colitis	1	(97)
Hepatic	Cholangitis	4	(14, 21)
	Granulomatous hepatitis	1	(87)
	Other liver disease	3	(14, 77, 105)
Renal	Acute kidney disease	1	(101)
	Renal failure	1	(21)
Dermatologic	Erythema Nodosum	2	(4, 24)
	Folliculitis	2	(24, 98)
	Epidermolysis bullosa dystrophica	1	(24)
	Cutaneous Crohn's Disease	1	(83)
Cardiovascular	IgA vasculitis with nephritis	1	(98)
	Takayasu arteritis	1	(98)
	Coronary artery dilatation	1	(101)
	Ventricular septal defect	1	(77)
Haematological	Coagulopathy	1	(85)
Pulmonary	Granulomatous and lymphocytic interstitial lung disease	1	(87)
	Nodular lung disease	1	(77)
	Respiratory failure	1	(91)
Infectious	Giardiasis	2	(4)
	Cryptococcosis	1	(14)
	EBV-related pancreatitis	1	(90)
	Persistent urethritis	1	(89)
Malignancy	Malignancy	2	(21, 80)
Neurological	Facial palsy	1	(4)
	Encephalitis	1	(80)
Musculoskeletal	Arthralgia	3	(21, 79, 85)
	JIA	1	(80)
Other	Multisystem LCH	1	(103)

More than half of the reported XIAP deficient patients develop HLH. HLH is a life-threatening syndrome characterised by hyperinflammation caused by an uncontrolled and ineffective immune response, in which activated T lymphocytes and macrophages accumulate in organs, and produce high levels of pro-inflammatory cytokines, such as IFN-γ, TNF-α and IL-6, resulting in tissue damage and organ failure (110, 111). The observed high risk for HLH is at least partly related to dysregulation of the NLRP3 inflammasome. Accordingly, patients are known to have chronically elevated IL-18 levels (78, 112). In many cases HLH is triggered by an EBV infection, however patients have also been described to develop HLH in the course of a CMV or HHV6 infection, or in the absence of any clear trigger (1, 4). Given the strong association between HLH and XIAP deficiency, measurement of XIAP expression should be considered at an early stage of evaluation of patients presenting with HLH. Patients presenting with macrophage activation syndrome (MAS) should also be considered for XIAP deficiency testing. There is clinical overlap between HLH and MAS, though the driving pathophysiologic process is thought to differ, but the discussion of the distinctions and the best classification to use for patients with XIAP deficiency is beyond the scope of this review.

In XIAP deficiency, it is not uncommon for patients to suffer from recurrent episodes of HLH, or HLH-like disease. During the latter, patients often have fevers, cytopaenias, splenomegaly or combinations of these, but do not fulfil ≥ 5 of the HLH-2004 diagnostic criteria, or may technically fulfil them but have mild or transient symptoms. This most likely represents attenuated forms of HLH, and in the authors' experience, may be responsive to brief courses of corticosteroids. In support, following splenectomy histopathology revealed haemophagocytosis in the spleen of a XIAP deficient patient (1, 14). Splenomegaly is a classical manifestation of XIAP deficiency, with approximately half of the patients having persistent splenomegaly or experiencing one or more episodes of splenomegaly (4).

Already in the first description of XIAP deficiency Rigaud et al. identified two patients who suffered from colitis (2). Subsequently, Worthey et al. described XIAP deficiency as the underlying disorder in a patient who presented with IBD (51). Today, IBD is a well-recognised manifestation of XIAP deficiency. It strongly resembles Crohn's disease clinically and histologically and is generally severe and refractory to immunosuppressive therapy. Notably, XIAP deficiency can be observed in up to 4% of paediatric-onset IBD and is now considered a Mendelian cause of IBD. Genomic screening for XIAP deficiency and other monogenetic disorders should be considered in paediatric onset or severe and therapy refractory IBD (21, 83, 84, 109, 113, 114). Female carriers of pathologic XIAP mutations can also develop IBD (21, 24). Endoscopy reveals patchy disease, alternating inflammatory lesions with healthy mucosa. All segments of the gastrointestinal tract can be affected, including the stomach, ileum, anus and, in the majority of the cases, the colon (14, 21). Patients may suffer from severe (perianal) fistulae, ulcerations, recurrent strictures and abscesses (4, 14, 21, 51). Infants and young children often present with severe diarrhoea and failure to thrive. Histopathology reveals acute inflammatory lesions, including crypt abscesses, polymorphic infiltrations and epithelioid granulomas in combination with chronic inflammation. Generally, colitis presents at an early age, however, age of onset has been shown to vary widely, ranging from the postnatal period well into adulthood (21, 81). Disease course can be very severe and IBD related mortality in XIAP deficiency has been reported to be relatively high, estimated to be around 10–40%, usually due to gastrointestinal haemorrhage (1, 14). Besides colitis, other gastrointestinal manifestations have also been described in context of XIAP deficiency, including coeliac-like disease characterised by blunted villi and lymphocytic infiltrates, chronic diarrhoea and severe or chronic parasitic infections (4).

Hypogammaglobulinemia, which may be mild and transient, occurs in up to one third of the patients (14, 16). The aetiology of hypogammaglobulinemia in XIAP deficiency seems to differ from that in SAP deficiency. In the latter, a decrease in Ig-isotype switched B-cells is observed, due to a block in germinal centre formation. In contrast, in XIAP deficiency memory B-cell levels are generally normal and the underlying cause of hypogammaglobulinemia is unknown. Various theories on the aetiology have been proposed, including increased AICD of B-cells and the effect of immunosuppressive treatment (14).

Previous reports have shown that ~7% of XIAP deficient patients suffer from other, more rare, inflammatory manifestations (Table 2) (1). With numbers of identified cases increasing, it has become clear that some of these disease manifestations are not uncommon. The importance of recognising these symptoms as possible manifestations of XIAP deficiency should be emphasised. Firstly, hepatitis has been described in various patient cohorts. It is unclear if the liver disease should be considered as an incomplete form of HLH (1, 14). In addition, uveitis and arthritis are now well-recognised manifestations of XIAP deficiency. Both have been described to be recurrent, occurring at a young age and, in the case of uveitis, difficult to treat (4, 21, 24, 85). Some patients with XIAP deficiency also suffer from repeated skin boils and abscesses, or severe acne (4, 24, 86). Besides inflammatory symptoms, XIAP deficient patients regularly suffer from recurrent, prolonged or complicated viral and bacterial infections. These may, but do not necessarily, occur during a period of hypogammaglobulinemia (14).

Finally, asymptomatic XIAP deficient males have been identified in various families, carrying the same XIAP mutation as their symptomatic siblings. Often, absence of XIAP protein and/or XIAP function has been demonstrated in these asymptomatic individuals, once again highlighting the possible importance of other genetic and environmental factors on disease phenotype (4).

Additional Immunological Findings

No gross abnormalities in the classical immunological parameters and lymphocyte subsets have been reported in asymptomatic or clinically stable XIAP deficient patients. Contrary to what is observed in SAP efficiency, iNKT cell numbers are normal in XIAP patients during wellness (52, 115, 116). T and NK cell cytotoxic responses are normal in XIAP deficiency, which is again in contrast to what is observed in SAP deficiency (11, 12). Serum levels of pro-inflammatory cytokines, including IL-6, IL-2, IFN-γ, TNF-α and neopterin are elevated in XIAP deficient patients with HLH, similar to observations in XLP and FHL patients (78). However, IL-18 levels are found to be greatly elevated during HLH in XIAP deficiency, with significantly higher levels compared to patients with XLP, FHL and EBV-HLH, and levels remain high even during remission (78).

Diagnosis

The gold standard for diagnosing XIAP deficiency remains the identification of a disease-causing mutation in the XIAP/BIRC4 gene by genetic sequencing. Ideally, this is complemented by analysis of XIAP expression and functional assays (4). Flow cytometry provides a rapid screening technique in suspected individuals, as the majority of the XIAP deficient patients have decreased or absent XIAP expression (12, 117). Although it must be noted that monoclonal antibodies available for flow cytometry do not recognise XIAP protein truncated before residue 397, while truncated proteins may still retain some cellular functions. Also, patients with a full-length dysfunctional protein may not be identified as XIAP deficient by flow cytometry if missense mutations do not alter the antibody-antigen interaction or protein stability (4). In addition, a functional assay, based on the understanding that XIAP is necessary for NOD2 signalling, can be used for the screening diagnosis of XIAP deficiency; flow cytometric measurement of TNF-α production by monocytes in response to a NOD ligand, such as L18-MDP, can distinguish XIAP deficient cells that have reduced TNF-α production, from wild type cells (21, 51, 79, 83). Flow cytometric studies of XIAP expression or TNF-α production and X-chromosome inactivation profile analysis can also be useful in the evaluation of symptomatic female carriers. Detection of elevated levels of IL-18 in peripheral blood samples can be useful during the evaluation or monitoring of XIAP deficient patients and symptomatic carriers.

Treatment

Given the large variability in presentation and disease course, there is no general therapeutic recommendation for XIAP deficiency and treatment depends on disease manifestations (3). HLH can be treated according to established protocols (HLH-94 and 2004), which includes corticosteroids and etoposide, though in the authors' experience HLH may be readily controlled with steroid treatment alone (10, 14, 78, 111). Rituximab should be considered in cases of EBV-associated HLH (118). Splenomegaly generally does not require intervention. Only in rare cases of hypersplenism has splenectomy been reported, but recurrent pneumococcal infections may then complicate the clinical course (4). Hypogammaglobulinemia is often transient, but may require treatment with immunoglobulin replacement therapy (11). IBD is initially treated with conventional immunosuppressive agents, including corticosteroids, azathioprine, anti-TNF-α and mesalazine (14, 21, 83, 87). However, as stated previously, IBD is often refractory to immunosuppressive treatment and surgical intervention, including colectomy, abscess drainage and resection of fistulae, is not uncommon (21).

Currently, the only curative treatment option for XIAP deficiency is allogeneic HSCT. In patients with severe disease, including HLH and severe refractory IBD, HSCT may be the treatment of choice. Early reports of HSCT in XIAP deficiency revealed poor outcomes, with long-term survival rates below 50%. Factors associated with an unfavourable outcome were a myeloablative conditioning regimen, with reported survival post-HSCT dropping to 14% in this group, and ongoing HLH at time of transplantation (77). Conditioning regimen related toxicities, such as pulmonary haemorrhage and hepatic veno-occlusive disease, were a common cause of complications early post-HSCT, implying that chemotherapeutics cause increased cytotoxicity in the absence of XIAP (77, 88). Recent reports have shown a more favourable outcome of HSCT following reduced-intensity conditioning (RIC) approaches (1, 88–90, 119). In a larger study Arnold et al. observed a 2-year overall survival of 74% in XIAP deficient HSCT recipients who had been treated with RIC or reduced toxicity conditioning (RTC) regimens, which is similar to reported mortality rates post-HSCT for other forms of HLH [manuscript submitted]. In a Japanese series of patients transplanted with reduced toxicity approaches, 90% survival was observed (81). HLH may complicate the early post-transplantation course, but response to treatment is generally good (78, 81). GvHD was associated with a significantly increased risk of mortality in patients with XIAP deficiency in the study by Arnold et al. [manuscript submitted]. It is hypothesised that the XIAP-deficient tissue environment and the chronic inflammasome activation play a role in the increased risk of GvHD (120, 121). Notably, XIAP-deficient recipient tissues have been shown to predispose to increased GvHD severity and mortality in murine models. Nonetheless, when HSCT is indicated, the combination of a RIC/RTC regimen with a more aggressive approach to GvHD prevention will likely result in lowest mortality and morbidity risks in XIAP deficiency.

Concluding Remarks

Due to the seriousness of XIAP deficiency and the high-risk nature of curative allogeneic HSCT, it remains important to study novel long-term treatment approaches. New therapeutics may be used to avoid the need for HSCT or as bridging therapy to help improve the patient's clinical condition prior to treatment with curative intent, thereby increasing the chances of a favourable and uncomplicated outcome. Greater understanding of the pathophysiology of XIAP deficiency and the pleiotropic effects that XIAP has on the immune system might create insight into pathways that can be targeted by novel therapeutic agents, such as small molecules. In addition, following the rapid development of gene therapy and editing technologies, lentiviral mediated gene addition or targeted gene correction of the defective XIAP gene in autologous haematopoietic stem cells may offer future alternative management options.

Data Availability Statement

The original contributions presented in the study are included in the article/supplementary materials, further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding author/s.

Author Contributions

AM wrote the first draught of the manuscript and designed and prepared all figures. CB and RM were responsible for critical revision of the article. All authors contributed to defining the structure and content of the article, manuscript revision, read, and approved the submitted version.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.