Skip to main content
The British Journal of Radiology logoLink to The British Journal of Radiology
. 2021 May 21;94(1123):20210088. doi: 10.1259/bjr.20210088

The diagnosis of pulmonary metastases on chest computed tomography in primary bone sarcoma and musculoskeletal soft tissue sarcoma

Asif Saifuddin 1, Mirza Shaheer Baig 2,, Paras Dalal 3, Sandra J Strauss 4,5,4,5
PMCID: PMC8248210  PMID: 33989031

Abstract

The lungs are the commonest site of metastasis for primary high-grade bone and soft tissue sarcoma, but current guidelines on the management of pulmonary nodules do not specifically cater for this group of patients. The current article reviews the literature from the past 20 years that has reported the CT features of pulmonary metastases in the setting of known primary bone and soft tissue sarcoma, with emphasis on osteosarcoma, chondrosarcoma, and trunk and extremity soft tissue sarcoma, the aim being to aid radiologists who report chest CT of musculoskeletal sarcoma patients in deciding which lesions should be considered metastatic, which lesions are indeterminate and require follow-up, and which lesions are of no concern.

Introduction

The lungs are the commonest site of metastatic disease at presentation and relapse in patients with high-grade bone and soft tissue sarcoma (STS), and therefore thin section chest CT is required for both staging and surveillance in both conditions.1,2 However, there are currently no guidelines as to which CT features allow a confident non-invasive diagnosis of pulmonary metastases based on nodule size, characteristics, or number, which creates challenges for radiologists reporting chest CT studies in this patient group. Most clinical studies related to pulmonary metastases in bone and STS simply state that metastases were present, without describing the CT features which led to the diagnosis. Also, it is well-recognised that not all pulmonary nodules identified on chest CT in patients with sarcoma represent metastases,3,4 and that chest CT is relatively insensitive compared to lung palpation/thoracotomy in the identification of pulmonary metastases.5–7

The aim of the current article is to review the published literature from 2000 onwards relating to pulmonary metastases in bone and soft-tissue sarcoma, with an emphasis on studies which provide details of nodule characteristics on CT which were diagnostic of pulmonary metastatic disease.

Primary bone sarcoma

Primary bone sarcomas are rare, accounting for <0.2% of all cancers.8 Osteosarcoma (OS) and Ewing sarcoma (ES) are the commonest bone sarcomas in children and adolescents, while chondrosarcoma (CS) is the commonest bone sarcoma in adults.9 With regards to the investigation of pulmonary metastases in bone sarcoma, most studies have focused on high-grade intramedullary OS.

Osteosarcoma

Of 1765 patients with newly diagnosed OS registered in the neoadjuvant Cooperative Osteosarcoma Study Group studies before 1999, 202 patients (11.4%) had metastases at diagnosis.10 The incidence of pulmonary metastases in less common subtypes of OS such as parosteal OS is much lower, and almost confined to dedifferentiated parosteal OS particularly when associated with local recurrence.11

Several studies have examined the relevance of pulmonary nodules identified on staging chest CT in OS, the most informative being those which compared nodule characteristics on CT with histology from biopsy or metastasectomy. The earliest is by Picci et al12 who studied 51 patients considered to have pulmonary metastases based on chest CT who underwent surgical resection. All nodules were considered to represent metastases irrespective of size. They evaluated nodule number, location (unilateral vs bilateral), size and presence of calcifications. Histological analysis confirmed metastases in 29 (57%) patients and no metastases in the remainder, with 109 of 204 (53%) excised nodules representing metastases. Regarding nodule number, only 4 of 13 (31%) patients with a single nodule at surgery had metastases, while all 7 patients (100%) with >7 nodules had metastases. With regards to nodule size, 68% of non-metastatic nodules were <5 mm in size compared to 35% of metastases (p = 0.035). Non-metastatic nodules were more likely to show no change in size (63% vs 22%; p = 0.01) and were also more likely to show no change in their number or size following chemotherapy. Conversely, either an increase or decrease in the number or size of nodules was more likely to indicate metastases. Nodule density did not differentiate between benign lesions and metastases. The commonest histological diagnoses of non-metastatic lesions included atelectasis, lymphoid inflammation/infiltration and interstitial fibrosis. Therefore, if all pulmonary nodules in OS patients were considered metastatic, the positive predictive value of CT was only 53%. Brader et al13 reviewed the CT features of 30 children with OS who underwent thoracotomy due to apparent increase in nodule size. In total, 117 nodules were resected, 80 (68%) of which were malignant in 25 (83.3%) patients indicating that 5 (16.7%) patients had only benign nodules. Between 68–74% of nodules were correctly classified by the CT reporting radiologists. The only features significantly associated with malignant histology were nodule size >/=5 mm (Figures 1 and 2) and nodule calcification (Figures 2 and 3), which had odds ratios (OR) of 6.09–6.77 and 8.47–17.44 for metastases. The commonest causes of benign nodules were fibrosis and lymph nodes. Ciccarese et al14 reviewed chest CTs in 70 patients with OS referred for thoracotomy, with 283 nodules seen on CT having been resected. Of these, 234 (82.7%) were metastases. The mean maximal diameter of metastases was 9.6 mm ( ± 8.9 mm) compared to 3.7 mm ( ± 2.2 mm) for benign lesions (p < 0.0001), with an optimal cut-off of 6 mm for distinguishing benign from malignant nodules. Lesions > 6 mm in size had a specificity of 89.8% for metastases while the specificity was 100% for nodules > 13 mm. Calcification was noted in 61.6% of malignant nodules compared to 12% of benign nodules (p < 0.0001), the pattern of calcification varying from complete (28.7%) (Figure 2) to partial (71.3%) (Figure 3). Both benign and malignant lesions had a nodular shape in >85% of cases, but atypical morphology of metastases was seen in 14.1%, the commonest being the presence of striae, consolidation, and cavitation. In three cases, pneumothorax was the presenting feature of metastasis. When comparing multiple CT studies, benign lesions remained stable or resolved in 87.7% of patients on follow-up while almost 60% of metastases progressed. The presence of bilateral nodules was not a differentiating feature, but benign nodules were more frequently sub pleural in location (p = 0.002).

Figure 1.

Figure 1.

A 14-year-old girl with femoral osteosarcoma. Chest CT demonstrates multiple nodules (arrows) measuring >5 mm in size consistent with pulmonary metastases.

Figure 2.

Figure 2.

A 12-year-old girl with tibial osteosarcoma. Chest CT demonstrates multiple large nodules (arrows) measuring >5 mm in size consistent with pulmonary metastases. The lesion on the left is completely calcified.

Figure 3.

Figure 3.

A 32-year-old female with scapular osteosarcoma. Chest CT demonstrates a partially calcified peripheral nodule (arrow) measuring >5 mm in size. Histologically confirmed pulmonary metastasis.

Several studies have been published which investigated chest CT findings in a mixed group of patients, but with a significant proportion having OS. McCarville et al15 assessed differentiating features between benign and malignant pulmonary nodules in 50 children/young adults with solid tumours, 30 of which were OS. After exclusions, 41 patients remained with a total of 81 nodules that had histological correlation. 24 of 41 patients (58%) had at least one biopsy proven malignant nodule while 17 (42%) had only benign nodules. In 15 cases, multiple nodules were sampled and 4 had both benign and malignant nodules. Of the 81 nodules, 45 (55.6%) were benign with the commonest three diagnoses being fibrosis (n = 12), granuloma (n = 9) and lymphatic tissue (n = 8). Features predictive of malignant nodules included distinct nodule margins, development of new nodules, bilaterality and a larger number of nodules (specific number not stated). However, larger nodule size was not predictive of malignancy. Absalon et al16 reviewed chest CT studies in 210 children and young adults with sarcoma, 61 (29.1%) of whom had OS. They looked at the relevance of lung lesions at presentation, defining round opacities </=3 cm as nodules and lesions > 3 cm as masses. Lesions were seen in 72 (34.3%) patients overall and 36.1% of OS patients. Of the total group, 6 lesions were >3 cm and presumed to be malignant, so not further assessed. Of the remaining 66, the median size of the largest nodule was 5 mm (range 1–20 mm). Histological analysis was available in 24 cases (18 cases of OS), 10 of which were metastases, 5 granulomata, while the remainder showed normal lung, fibrosis or lymphatic tissue. For the 24 cases with histological confirmation, the significant predictive factors for metastases were nodule number >3 and bilateral distribution. Although there was a tendency to nodule size >5 mm being associated with metastases, this did not reach statistical significance. Cho et al17 performed computerised texture analysis of 42 nodules resected from 16 children with OS, 24 (57.1%) of which proved to be metastases. Logistic regression analysis showed that higher mean attenuation (OR 1.014; p = 003) and larger effective diameter (OR 1.745; p = 0.012) were significant differentiators for pulmonary metastases. A subgroup analysis was undertaken of small (<5 mm) non-calcified nodules, which showed that small metastases could be differentiated from non-malignant nodules based on higher mean attenuation (OR 1.007; p = 0.008).

The relevance of so-called ‘indeterminate’ nodules has also been reviewed, these generally being nodules </=5 mm in size. Cipriano et al18 reviewed 126 young patients with sarcoma (66 OS) to determine the relevance of what they termed pulmonary ‘micronodules’. Based on chest CT appearances, patients were classified as having no nodules (Group 1), a single <5 mm nodule (Group 2),>1 nodule <5 mm (Group 3) or any nodule >5 mm (Group 4). Significantly decreased survival was seen in Group 3 patients compared to Group 1, but there was no statistically significant difference between Groups 1 and 2 or 4. Ghosh et al19 investigated the relevance of indeterminate pulmonary nodules (IPN) in 104 patients with OS, these being defined as non-calcified nodules <10 mm in size. Follow-up CT studies were reviewed in patients whose initial studies were classified as non-metastatic (n = 55) or indeterminate (n = 30). Of the latter subgroup, 21 (70%) remained static, 6 (20%) progressed to metastases at the same site as the IPN, while 3 (10%) progressed to metastases separate from the IPN. Of the 21 cases that remained stable only 2 (9.5%) were >5 mm in size, while of the 6 IPNs which progressed to metastases 3 (50%) were >5 mm in size (p = 0.014). No other features in terms of nodule number or location were predictive of IPNs progressing to metastases.

The relevance of CT detected pulmonary nodules at follow-up has also been investigated. Fernandez-Pineda et al20 identified 16 patients with OS between 1982 and 2007 who had a solitary pulmonary nodule (SPN) on CT following treatment, and in all cases only a single metastasis was identified at thoracotomy. They suggested that in this small group of patients a minimally invasive approach to nodule removal could be considered. Similarly, Daw et al21 reported on young (<21 years) OS patients who had no metastases at presentation but relapsed with a SPN > 1 year after diagnosis. Over 50% of these were long-term survivors. McCarville et al22 identified recurrent pulmonary nodules in 32 of 35 OS patients following thoracotomy, 19 of whom underwent resection of the recurrent lesions and 1 who died underwent an autopsy, with 18 of 20 confirmed to have metastatic disease. The only CT finding predictive of metastases was progressive pleural thickening, while the occurrence of a SPN in the contralateral lung was almost always associated with a benign process. CT could not distinguish reliably between benign and metastatic recurrent pulmonary disease.

A summary of the CT features suggestive of pulmonary metastases in OS is presented in Table 1.

Table 1.

Summary of features of pulmonary metastases on chest CT for OS

Features of pulmonary metastases in OS
Features likely indicative of metastases:
  •  Multiple nodules (especially >7)

  •  Nodule size >5 mm (>6 mm specificity ~90%;>13 mm specificity 100%)

  •  Nodule calcification (~60 vs 12% in benign nodules)

  •  Change in number or size of nodules after chemotherapy

Features likely indicative of benign nodules:
  •  Single nodule (~70% non-metastatic)

  •  Nodule size <5 mm (~70% non-metastatic)

  •  Subpleural location

  •  No change in size or number after chemotherapy

OS, osteosarcoma.

Ewing sarcoma

There were no studies which reported on the CT characteristics of pulmonary metastases in Ewing sarcoma specifically. Therefore, the same features reported for OS are used when assessing patients with Ewing sarcoma, apart from nodule calcification.

Chondrosarcoma

The incidence of lung metastases in CS overall is extremely low, metastases being seen on chest CT in 4.3% of patients with high-grade CS and 30% with dedifferentiated CS.23 The diagnostic significance of pulmonary nodules on chest CT in patients with CS of bone was reported in detail by McLoughlan et al.24 They reviewed chest CT studies in 444 patients with either newly diagnosed or recurrent CS, of whom 92 (20%) were found to have at least one pulmonary nodule. 14 patients were excluded from the review leaving a total of 78 cases with at least a single pulmonary nodule, 49 (63%) on initial chest CT and 29 (37%) at follow-up. Of these, 26 nodules were >10 mm in dimension of which 24 (92.3%) were metastatic, all but one occurring in high-grade CS (n = 17) or differentiated CS (n = 6). The single metastasis associated with Grade 1 CS occurred at the time of local recurrence. The two non-metastatic nodules (one in Grade 1 and one in Grade 3 CS) were single, unilateral, peripheral in location and irregular in contour. Of the 24 metastases, 19 (79.2%) were solid, 4 (16.7%) were calcified, 18 (75%) were multiple, 11 (45.8%) were located peripherally, 16 (66.75) were bilateral and 19 (79.2%) had a lobular contour (Figure 4). Nodules measuring <10 mm were classified as indeterminate pulmonary nodules (IPNs), which accounted for 52 of 78 (66.7%) identified lesions. Of these, 40 (76.9%) were considered non-metastatic based on a stable appearance or resolution on subsequent imaging, while 12 (23.1%) were considered metastatic based on growth and/or increase in nodule number (Figure 5). Of the 40 IPNs, 20 (50%) were associated with Grade 1 CS and 18 (45%) with Grade 2 CS, 20 (50%) appeared solid, 11 (27.5%) ground-glass and 9 (22.5%) were calcified. 21 (52.5%) were single and 19 (47.5%) multiple, 38 (95%) peripheral and 31 (77.5%) unilateral, while 29 (72.5%) had smooth margins and 11 (27.5%) were irregular in outline. Conversely, of the 12 IPNs which progressed to presumed metastases, 10 (83.3%) were associated with high-grade or dedifferentiated CS, all (100%) were solid in configuration, 9 (75%) were multiple, all (100%) were either peripherally and peripherally/centrally located, 8 (66.7%) were unilateral and 5 (41.7%) were smooth in contour while the remainder were lobular. Therefore, when combining the characteristics of all 36 metastases, 75% were multiple, 66.7% were >10 mm in size, 86.1% were solid in density, 72.2% had a lobular contour, only 1 was purely centrally located, and 55.6% were bilateral.

Figure 4.

Figure 4.

A 36-year-old female with recurrent scapular high-grade chondrosarcoma. Chest CT demonstrates a large lobular calcified pulmonary nodule (arrow) measuring >10 mm in size. Histologically confirmed pulmonary metastasis.

Figure 5.

Figure 5.

A 61-year-old male with previously resected right scapular Grade 2 chondrosarcoma. (A) Chest CT 13 months after diagnosis demonstrates a single <10 mm pulmonary nodule (arrow) which is indeterminate in nature. (B) Chest CT 23 months after diagnosis shows growth of the indeterminate nodule and at least three new nodules (arrows) consistent with pulmonary metastases.

A summary of the CT features suggestive of pulmonary metastases in CS is presented in Table 2.

Table 2.

Summary of features of pulmonary metastases on chest CT for CS

Features of pulmonary metastases in CS
Nodule size >10 mm:
  •  ~92% metastatic

  •  Particularly in HG-CS and DD-CS

Nodule size <10 mm:
  •  ~77% non-metastatic

  •  Low-grade CS

  •  But more likely metastatic in HG-CS and DD-CS

CS, chondrosarcoma ; DD-CS, dedifferentiated chondrosarcoma; HG-CS, high-grade chondrosarcoma.

Bone and extremity or trunk soft tissue sarcoma

Several studies combined the results of bone and STSs, two of which had a large proportion of OS as discussed above.16,18 Mayo et al25 reviewed the relevance of incidental findings on chest/abdomen/pelvis CT studies in 149 patients presenting with a variety of bone and STSs, 135 (91%) of whom had at least a single abnormality. Of these, 49 (33%) had indeterminate lung nodules (lesions < 1 cm which were not obviously granulomata or lymph nodes). Of these, 15 (31%) were assumed to be metastatic disease manifest by increase in size and/or number of nodules within 6 months of diagnosis. Factors suggestive of indeterminate nodules being metastatic were primary tumour size >14 cm (p < 0.001), and indeterminate nodules measuring 7–10 mm in size were more likely metastatic than those measuring <7 mm although this did not reach statistical significance (p = 0.427). Indeterminate nodules were also more likely to be metastatic for high-grade primary sarcomas (p = 0.042), while no indeterminate nodules for low-grade primary tumours progressed to metastases.

Extremity and trunk soft tissue sarcoma

The incidence of pulmonary metastases in STS was the subject of a report by Billingsley et al.26 Of 3149 adult patients with STS at all sites treated at Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Centre between 1982 and 1997, 719 (22.8%) were diagnosed with pulmonary metastases at either presentation or follow-up based on chest radiography and/or CT. Of 403 patients presenting to the centre with STS, 129 (32%) had synchronous pulmonary metastases, while the remainder developed metastases at follow-up. Christie-Large et al27 determined the incidence of pulmonary metastases on chest radiography/CT in 1170 patients with a newly diagnoses STS including all age groups, 96 (8.2%) patients being diagnosed with a metastasis. Most recently, Saifuddin et al28 reported on the incidence of pulmonary metastases in patients with trunk and extremity STS based on two nodule size criteria, >5 mm and >10 mm. Based on a >5 mm nodule size 36.5% of patients had no metastases, 21% had metastases and 42.5% of studies were considered indeterminate (size <5 mm), while based on a >10 mm nodule size 36.5% of patients had no metastases, 14% had metastases and 49.5% of studies were considered indeterminate (size <10 mm). There was no histological correlation.

The value of chest radiography and CT at presentation for different surgical stages of STS has been investigated. Fleming et al29 reviewed 125 patients with American Joint Committee on Cancer Stage T1 (<5 cm) STS, 51 of whom underwent chest CT. 49 (96.1%) had Grade 2 or Grade 3 lesions. Only a single patient with suspicion of a metastasis on CXR had metastatic disease confirmed on CT, although the CT criteria for diagnosis of metastases were not given. Porter et al30 performed a similar analysis for 600 patients with American Joint Committee on Cancer Stage T2 (>5 cm) STS. Of patients who underwent routine chest CT, 19.2% demonstrated pulmonary metastases. Indeterminate nodules were defined as non-calcified nodules <5 mm in diameter, and therefore it is assumed that the definition of pulmonary metastases was based on the presence of non-calcified nodules >5 mm in size.

Nakamura et al31 provided a detailed analysis of pulmonary nodules identified on chest CT in 124 patients (mean age 61 years; range 8–94 years) with high-grade STS, 49 (39.5%) having pulmonary nodules at presentation. Of these, 34 (69.4%) had benign lesions, 13 (26.5%) had metastases, 1 (0.8%) had a lung carcinoma while 1 (0.8%) remained indeterminate. During follow-up, pulmonary nodules developed in 30 of the 124 patients, of which 7 (23.3%) were benign, 21 (70%) were considered metastases while 2 (6.7%) were lung cancers. Nodules were diagnosed as being metastatic if there was histological confirmation from CT-guided biopsy or if there was an increase in number and/or size at follow-up. Nodules were considered benign if proven histologically or if there was no increase in size and/or number over a minimum of 1 year follow-up. Features which significantly differentiated malignant from benign nodules were nodule size (malignant median 6.1 mm; benign median 3.5 mm: p < 0.0001), nodule number (malignant median 2 (range 1–5); benign 1 (range 1–2): p = 0.0008) (Figure 6), and timing of nodule detection (13 of 34 at presentation were metastases compared to 21 of 30 at follow-up: p < 0.0001). 20% of patients with nodules </=3 mm had metastases, while 32.7% of patients with nodules </=5 mm had metastases. Conversely, 92.3% of patients with nodules >5 mm had metastases. Therefore, the timing of nodule detection in patients with STS is also of relevance to the likelihood of metastases, in addition to nodule size.

Figure 6.

Figure 6.

A 63-year-old male with undifferentiated pleomorphic sarcoma of the thigh. Chest CT demonstrates multiple peripheral pulmonary nodules (arrows) measuring >10 mm in size consistent with pulmonary metastases.

The relevance to outcome of indeterminate pulmonary nodules (IPNs) has been reported by Rissing et al,32 who prospectively studied 331 consecutive sarcoma patients. Indeterminate nodules were defined as non-calcified subcentimetre nodules within the lung parenchyma, and all such cases were followed-up with repeat chest CT at a 2–3 month interval. 71 (21%) had an indeterminate nodule on initial chest CT, 26 with a single nodule, 14 with 2 nodules and 31 with three or more nodules. Of these 71, 20 (28%) progressed to presumed metastatic disease at a mean of 12.4 months, 18 (90%) at the site of initial IPN while 2 developed a metastasis at another site while the IPN remained stable. When comparing outcome, patients with IPNs >/=5 mm in size had a worse prognosis than those with a normal chest CT, but a better prognosis than those with definite metastases. IPNs < 5 mm in size had no effect on outcome.

Regarding specific STS subtypes, the relevance of IPNs at presentation in children with non-metastatic rhabdomyosarcoma has been investigated.33 IPN were defined as </=4 pulmonary nodules < 5 mm or one nodule measuring >5 mm but <10 mm, being identified in 21.2% of 316 children. The remaining children had no lung nodules identified on CT, and no significant difference was demonstrated in 5 year event free survival or overall survival between the two groups. Therefore, IPNs as defined were considered of no clinical relevance.

With regards to follow-up, Baig et al34 reviewed the value of repeat chest CT at first local recurrence of trunk and extremity STS, identifying a prevalence of 23.9% pulmonary metastases. This supports the need for chest CT at the time of local recurrence, in line with the UK guidelines for the management of STS.2

A summary of features of pulmonary metastases on chest CT for STS is presented in Table 3.

Table 3.

Summary of features of pulmonary metastases on chest CT for STS.

Features of pulmonary metastases in STS
Features likely indicative of metastases:
  •  Nodule size >5 mm (~92% metastatic; median size of metastases 6.1 mm))

  •  New nodules at follow-up (~70% metastatic)

Features likely indicative of benign nodules:
  •  Nodule size <5 mm (~67% non-metastatic; median size of benign nodules 3.5 mm)

  •  Nodule size <3 mm (~80% non-metastatic)

  •  No increase in size or number after 1 year follow-up

STS, soft tissue sarcoma.

CT features of benign intrapulmonary lymph nodes

Sykes et al35 compared the CT appearances of benign intrapulmonary lymph nodes (IP-LN) with sarcoma metastases. Chest CT studies of 41 patients with benign IP-LN and 33 patients with sarcoma metastases were retrospectively reviewed and compared with pathology. Of 57 benign IP-LN, 26 (46%) were subpleural in location, 38 (67%) were oval in shape (Figure 7), and 46 (81%) were located in the lower lungs, while 43 (75%) had a lymphatic distribution on CT and 54 (95%) at pathological review. Of 98 sarcoma metastases 13 (13%) were subpleural in location, 15 (15%) were oval, and 56 (57%) were in the lower lungs, while 29 (30%) had a lymphatic distribution on CT and 45 (46%) at pathological review. Therefore, benign IP-LNs are more likely to be oval, to occur in a lymphatic distribution and to be located subpleurally than sarcoma metastases (Table 4).

Figure 7.

Figure 7.

A 10-year-old boy with fibular Ewing sarcoma. (A) Coronal and (B) sagittal chest CT images demonstrate a single oval pulmonary nodule (arrows) related to the left oblique fissure consistent with an intrapulmonary lymph node.

Table 4.

Summary of CT features of benign intrapulmonary lymph nodes

Features of benign intrapulmonary lymph nodes
  •  Subpleural in location (46%)

  •  Oval in shape (67%)

  •  Located in the lower lungs (81%)

  •  Lymphatic distribution (75%)

Discussion

The current article has aimed to determine features on chest CT which are likely to be indicative of pulmonary metastases in high-grade primary bone and musculoskeletal STS. This was primarily achieved by reviewing those studies where nodules identified on chest CT had been excised, and there was therefore definitive histological confirmation as to whether they represented metastases or non-metastatic lesions. Therefore, the question has to be raised as to whether this introduced selection bias, since for most of the studies it was not absolutely clear as to why patients had undergone thoracotomy. Nevertheless, the overall findings for both bone and STS were that non-calcified nodules >10 mm in diameter should be considered metastatic, non-calcified nodules >6 mm are highly likely to be metastatic, while non-calcified nodules <5 mm in diameter were unlikely to be metastatic. The latter was true even for children with OS. In the setting of OS, calcified nodules were also more likely to be metastases, while a small proportion of lung metastases in CS were calcified. Another potential limitation of some of the reported studies was the criterion of increasing nodule number or size being indicative of metastases. Brader et al13 found that 32% of nodules that had apparently increased in size in children with OS were in fact benign (Figure 8).

Figure 8.

Figure 8.

A 16-year-old boy with right scapular Ewing sarcoma. (A) Chest CT at presentation shows no evidence of metastases. (B) Chest CT 22 months later demonstrates a single left para-mediastinal pulmonary nodule (arrow) thought to be consistent with development of a pulmonary metastasis as there was an increase in size 5 months later from 3 to 5 mm. However, histology revealed a benign inflammatory lesion.

Regarding nodule size, the findings for bone and STS are similar to those reported in patients with extra pulmonary cancers of other types. Hanamiya et al36 reported on the frequency and relevance of pulmonary nodules demonstrated on thin-section chest CT in 308 patients with extra pulmonary cancers, less than 10 of whom had STS. One or more non-calcified pulmonary nodules were identified in 75% of patients, and nodules <10 mm in size were more likely to be benign while those >10 mm were more likely to be malignant. 91% of nodules within 10 mm of the pleura were benign whereas 47% of nodules >10 mm from the pleura were malignant. Caparica et al4 reviewed needle biopsy findings of pulmonary nodules in 228 patients with non-pulmonary cancers over a 36-month period, less than 14 cases being sarcomas. 64% had metastatic disease, 26.3% were diagnosed with a new lung cancer and 9.6% of cases had a benign diagnosis. On multivariate analysis, findings which were significantly predictive of metastases were multiple nodules >5 mm in size and the presence of cavitation.

The 2017 Fleischner Society Guidelines for the assessment of incidental pulmonary nodules do not cater for patients with known primary malignancies.37 In this clinical scenario, Bueno et al38 suggested that the clinical and imaging management should be aimed at ruling out or confirming the presence of pulmonary metastases, with shorter interval for imaging follow-up and biopsy being placed higher in the management algorithm. Conversely, the British Thoracic Society Guidelines for assessment of pulmonary nodules includes those identified in staging patients with known malignancy.39,40 Several of their reviewed series revealed conflicting associations of extra pulmonary cancers with their likelihood of pulmonary metastases. Overall, it was suggested that nodules <5 mm in size required no follow-up, and that nodules measuring 5–6 mm in size should have follow-up imaging in 1 year. However, the latter time scale is unacceptable to patients with known sarcoma or to the oncologists treating them. Also, as detailed in the above review, it is clear that a small percentage of nodules <5 mm in size may be metastatic based on growth at follow-up.

In conclusion, the current article has reviewed the available literature form the past 20 years which has assessed the features of pulmonary metastases on thin section chest CT in patients with bone and STS. These would suggest that non-calcified nodules >10 mm in size should be considered metastatic, but there is lack of consensus regarding nodules measuring between 5 and 10 mm. Nodules <5 mm are likely to be benign, but calcified nodules in a setting of OS or CS are likely to be malignant. At present, there are no clear guidelines for the management of pulmonary nodules identified on chest CT in patients with musculoskeletal sarcoma.

Contributor Information

Asif Saifuddin, Email: asif.saifuddin@nhs.net.

Mirza Shaheer Baig, Email: mirza.baig7@nhs.net.

Paras Dalal, Email: p.dalal@rbht.nhs.uk.

Sandra J Strauss, Email: s.strauss@ucl.ac.uk.

REFERENCES

  • 1.Gerrand C, Athanasou N, Brennan B, Grimer R, Judson I, Morland B, et al. Uk guidelines for the management of bone sarcomas. Clin Sarcoma Res 2016; 6: 7. doi: 10.1186/s13569-016-0047-1 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Dangoor A, Seddon B, Gerrand C, Grimer R, Whelan J, Judson I. Uk guidelines for the management of soft tissue sarcomas. Clin Sarcoma Res 2016; 6: 20. doi: 10.1186/s13569-016-0060-4 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Khokhar S, Vickers A, Moore MS, Mironov S, Stover DE, Feinstein MB. Significance of non-calcified pulmonary nodules in patients with extrapulmonary cancers. Thorax 2006; 61: 331–6. doi: 10.1136/thx.2005.051508 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Caparica R, Mak MP, Rocha CH, Velho PHI, Viana P, Moura MRL, et al. Pulmonary nodules in patients with Nonpulmonary cancer: not always metastases. J Glob Oncol 2016; 2: 138–44. doi: 10.1200/JGO.2015.002089 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Kayton ML, Huvos AG, Casher J, Abramson SJ, Rosen NS, Wexler LH, et al. Computed tomographic scan of the chest underestimates the number of metastatic lesions in osteosarcoma. J Pediatr Surg 2006; 41: 200–6. doi: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2005.10.024 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Heaton TE, Hammond WJ, Farber BA, Pallos V, Meyers PA, Chou AJ, et al. A 20-year retrospective analysis of CT-based pre-operative identification of pulmonary metastases in patients with osteosarcoma: a single-center review. J Pediatr Surg 2017; 52: 115–9. doi: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2016.10.034 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Gao E, Li Y, Zhao W, Zhao T, Guo X, He W, et al. Necessity of thoracotomy in pulmonary metastasis of osteosarcoma. J Thorac Dis 2019; 11: 3578–83. doi: 10.21037/jtd.2019.07.65 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Siegel RL, Miller KD, Jemal A. Cancer statistics. CA A Cancer J Clin 2020; 2020: 7–30. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Whelan J, McTiernan A, Cooper N, Wong YK, Francis M, Vernon S, et al. Incidence and survival of malignant bone sarcomas in England 1979-2007. Int J Cancer 2012; 131: E508–17. doi: 10.1002/ijc.26426 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Kager L, Zoubek A, Pötschger U, Kastner U, Flege S, Kempf-Bielack B, et al. Primary metastatic osteosarcoma: presentation and outcome of patients treated on neoadjuvant cooperative osteosarcoma Study Group protocols. J Clin Oncol 2003; 21: 2011–8. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2003.08.132 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Rajakulasingam R, Attard V, Botchu R, James SL, Saifuddin A. The value of chest and skeletal staging in parosteal osteosarcoma: two-centre experience and literature review. Skeletal Radiol 2021; 50: 301–9. doi: 10.1007/s00256-020-03557-y [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Picci P, Vanel D, Briccoli A, Talle K, Haakenaasen U, Malaguti C, et al. Computed tomography of pulmonary metastases from osteosarcoma: the less poor technique. A study of 51 patients with histological correlation. Ann Oncol 2001; 12: 1601–4. doi: 10.1023/A:1013103511633 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Brader P, Abramson SJ, Price AP, Ishill NM, Emily ZC, Moskowitz CS, et al. Do characteristics of pulmonary nodules on computed tomography in children with known osteosarcoma help distinguish whether the nodules are malignant or benign? J Pediatr Surg 2011; 46: 729–35. doi: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2010.11.027 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Ciccarese F, Bazzocchi A, Ciminari R, Righi A, Rocca M, Rimondi E, et al. The many faces of pulmonary metastases of osteosarcoma: retrospective study on 283 lesions submitted to surgery. Eur J Radiol 2015; 84: 2679–85. doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2015.09.022 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.McCarville MB, Lederman HM, Santana VM, Daw NC, Shochat SJ, Li C-S, et al. Distinguishing benign from malignant pulmonary nodules with helical chest CT in children with malignant solid tumors. Radiology 2006; 239: 514–20. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2392050631 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Absalon MJ, McCarville MB, Liu T, et al. Pulmonary nodules discovered during the initial evaluation of pediatric patients with bone and soft-tissue sarcoma: pulmonary nodules in pediatric sarcomas. Pediatr Blood Cancer 2008; 50: 1147–53. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Cho YJ, Kim WS, Choi YH, Ha JY, Lee S, Park SJ et al. Computerized texture analysis of pulmonary nodules in pediatric patients with osteosarcoma: Differentiation of pulmonary metastases from non-metastatic nodules.. In: Heymann D, ed.PLoS ONE. 14; 2019. e0211969.e0211969. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0211969 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Cipriano C, Brockman L, Romancik J, Hartemayer R, Ording J, Ginder C, et al. The clinical significance of initial pulmonary micronodules in young sarcoma patients. J Pediatr Hematol Oncol 2015; 37: 548–53. doi: 10.1097/MPH.0000000000000393 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Ghosh KM, Lee LH, Beckingsale TB, Gerrand CH, Rankin KS. Indeterminate nodules in osteosarcoma: what's the follow-up? Br J Cancer 2018; 118: 634–8. doi: 10.1038/bjc.2017.453 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Fernandez-Pineda I, Daw NC, McCarville B, Emanus LJ, Rao BN, Davidoff AM, et al. Patients with osteosarcoma with a single pulmonary nodule on computed tomography: a single-institution experience. J Pediatr Surg 2012; 47: 1250–4. doi: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2012.03.033 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Daw NC, Chou AJ, Jaffe N, Rao BN, Billups CA, Rodriguez-Galindo C, et al. Recurrent osteosarcoma with a single pulmonary metastasis: a multi-institutional review. Br J Cancer 2015; 112: 278–82. doi: 10.1038/bjc.2014.585 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.McCarville MB, Kaste SC, Cain AM, Goloubeva O, Rao BN, Pratt CB. Prognostic factors and imaging patterns of recurrent pulmonary nodules after thoracotomy in children with osteosarcoma. Cancer 2001; 91: 1170–6. doi: [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Oliveira I, Singla N, Chavda A, Saifuddin A. The value of chest and skeletal staging studies in conventional chondrosarcoma. Skeletal Radiol 2021; 50: 125–35. doi: 10.1007/s00256-020-03539-0 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.McLoughlin E, Davies AM, Iqbal A, James SL, Botchu R, et al. The diagnostic significance of pulmonary nodules on CT thorax in chondrosarcoma of bone. Clin Radiol 2020; 75: 395.e7–395.e16. doi: 10.1016/j.crad.2019.11.017 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Mayo Z, Kennedy S, Gao Y, Miller BJ. What is the clinical importance of incidental findings on staging CT scans in patients with sarcoma? Clin Orthop Relat Res 2019; 477: 730–7. doi: 10.1007/s11999.0000000000000149 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Billingsley KG, Burt ME, Jara E, Ginsberg RJ, Woodruff JM, Leung DH, et al. Pulmonary metastases from soft tissue sarcoma: analysis of patterns of diseases and postmetastasis survival. Ann Surg 1999; 229: 602. doi: 10.1097/00000658-199905000-00002 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Christie-Large M, James SLJ, Tiessen L, Davies AM, Grimer RJ. Imaging strategy for detecting lung metastases at presentation in patients with soft tissue sarcomas. Eur J Cancer 2008; 44: 1841–5. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2008.06.004 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Saifuddin A, Sheikh H, Rajakulasingam R, et al. A review of staging chest CT in trunk and extremity soft tissue sarcoma. BJR. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Fleming JB, Cantor SB, Varma DG, Holst D, Feig BW, Hunt KK, et al. Utility of chest computed tomography for staging in patients with T1 extremity soft tissue sarcomas. Cancer 2001; 92: 863–8. doi: [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Porter GA, Cantor SB, Ahmad SA, Lenert JT, Ballo MT, Hunt KK, et al. Cost-Effectiveness of staging computed tomography of the chest in patients with T2 soft tissue sarcomas. Cancer 2002; 94: 197–204. doi: 10.1002/cncr.10184 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Nakamura T, Matsumine A, Matsusaka M, Mizumoto K, Mori M, Yoshizaki T et al. Analysis of pulmonary nodules in patients with high-grade soft tissue sarcomas.. In: Rota R, ed.PLoS ONE. 12; 2017. e0172148.e0172148. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0172148 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Rissing S, Rougraff BT, Davis K. Indeterminate pulmonary nodules in patients with sarcoma affect survival. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2007; 459: 118–21. doi: 10.1097/BLO.0b013e31805d8606 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Vaarwerk B, Bisogno G, McHugh K, Brisse HJ, Morosi C, Corradini N, et al. Indeterminate pulmonary nodules at diagnosis in rhabdomyosarcoma: are they clinically significant? A report from the European paediatric soft tissue sarcoma Study Group. J Clin Oncol 2019; 37: 723–30. doi: 10.1200/JCO.18.01535 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Baig MS, Habib W, Attard V, Sharif B, Lindsay D, Upadhyay B, et al. The value of re-staging chest CT at first local recurrence of extremity and trunk soft tissue sarcoma. Eur Radiol 2021; 31: 2377-2383. doi: 10.1007/s00330-020-07366-8 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Sykes A-MG, Swensen SJ, Tazelaar HD, Jung S-H. Computed tomography of benign intrapulmonary lymph nodes: retrospective comparison with sarcoma metastases. Mayo Clin Proc 2002; 77: 329–33. doi: 10.4065/77.4.329 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Hanamiya M, Aoki T, Yamashita Y, Kawanami S, Korogi Y. Frequency and significance of pulmonary nodules on thin-section CT in patients with extrapulmonary malignant neoplasms. Eur J Radiol 2012; 81: 152–7. doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2010.08.013 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.MacMahon H, Naidich DP, Goo JM, Lee KS, Leung ANC, Mayo JR, et al. Guidelines for management of incidental pulmonary nodules detected on CT images: from the Fleischner Society 2017. Radiology 2017; 284: 228–43. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2017161659 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Bueno J, Landeras L, Chung JH. Updated Fleischner Society guidelines for managing incidental pulmonary nodules: common questions and challenging scenarios. Radiographics 2018; 38: 1337–50. doi: 10.1148/rg.2018180017 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Callister MEJ, Baldwin DR, Akram AR, Barnard S, Cane P, Draffan J, et al. British thoracic Society guidelines for the investigation and management of pulmonary nodules. Thorax 2015; 70 Suppl 2(Suppl 2): ii1–54. doi: 10.1136/thoraxjnl-2015-207168 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Graham RNJ, Baldwin DR, Callister MEJ, Gleeson FV. Return of the pulmonary nodule: the radiologist's key role in implementing the 2015 BTS guidelines on the investigation and management of pulmonary nodules. Br J Radiol 2016; 89: 20150776. doi: 10.1259/bjr.20150776 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from The British Journal of Radiology are provided here courtesy of Oxford University Press

RESOURCES