Skip to main content
. 2020 Aug 17;37(5):711–713. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btaa732

Table 1.

Evaluation results for ipDMR, comb-p and ENmix-combp with different seed threshold and bin sizes

Method Seed Bin size TP (SD) FD (SD)
ipDMR 0.01 310 0.44 (0.11) 0.21 (0.13)
0.01 50 0.44 (0.12) 0.19 (0.12)
0.1 310 0.61 (0.11) 0.59 (0.10)
0.1 50 0.61 (0.11) 0.57 (0.10)
Comb-p 0.01 310 0.40 (0.11) 0.43 (0.14)
0.01 50 0.36 (0.11) 0.31 (0.14)
0.1 310 0.50 (0.11) 0.69 (0.07)
0.1 50 0.45 (0.10) 0.57 (0.11)
ENmix-combp 0.01 310 0.45 (0.12) 0.47 (0.12)
0.01 50 0.30 (0.11) 0.17 (0.14)
0.1 310 0.60 (0.11) 0.74 (0.06)
0.1 50 0.50 (0.10) 0.44 (0.12)