Skip to main content
PLOS One logoLink to PLOS One
. 2021 Jul 1;16(7):e0253984. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0253984

“We need our own clinics”: Adolescents’ living with HIV recommendations for a responsive health system

Nataly Woollett 1,*, Shenaaz Pahad 2, Vivian Black 3
Editor: Brian C Zanoni4
PMCID: PMC8248739  PMID: 34197529

Abstract

Adolescents living with HIV comprise a significant patient population in sub Saharan Africa but are poorly retained in care with consequent increased mortality and morbidity. We conducted in-depth interviews with 25 adolescents living with HIV engaged in care from five clinics in Johannesburg regarding their recommendations for the healthcare system. Findings included advocating for adolescent clinics, recognizing the importance of clinic-based support groups, valuing the influence lay counselors have in providing healthcare to adolescents, improving widespread education of vertical HIV transmission and meaningfully linking clinics to the community. Our study offers guidance to the differentiated care model recommended for adolescent treatment highlighting that a positive youth development approach and use of lay and peer counselors may act as cornerstones of this model. Serving the mental health needs of adolescents living with HIV in a responsive manner may strengthen their use of the system and elevate it to a source of resilience.

Introduction

Adolescents living with HIV comprise nearly 2 million in sub-Saharan Africa (SSA) [1], a region disproportionately affected by the virus. There is mounting evidence indicating adolescent living with HIV are progressively poorly retained in care, have low rates of adherence and viral suppression, with increased mortality and morbidity [13]. Vertically infected children are reaching adolescence in large numbers and incident HIV infection is high in this age group, particularly in adolescent girls [4, 5]. These rates are concentrated in SSA where health systems tend to be overburdened and poorly resourced, especially the case in South Africa [6] and where adolescents comprise a sizeable proportion of the population [7]. The health system in Johannesburg is overwhelmed with large numbers of patients, often in excess of healthcare providers; leading to rapid expansion of a range of paraprofessionals being employed to address services delivery gaps [8, 9]. Healthcare systems in SSA will be managing adolescent HIV for decades to come [10], a reality calling for intentional investment to curb onward transmission and viral resistance, and improve maintenance and care for this vulnerable group [11].

Recent systematic reviews have endeavored to unearth the reasons contributing to the poor health outcomes of adolescents living with HIV. Reasons identified include stigma, perceived lack of confidentiality at clinics, poor treatment by healthcare providers, treatment fatigue, ineffective transitioning from pediatric to adult clinics, poor disclosure, and lack of adolescent-friendly services [1214]. At present there are limited best practices to mitigate these problems [15, 16]. There are currently no national guidelines on how to transition adolescents when they reach adulthood at 18 years or before if they are stable on treatment [17]. There is recognition that adolescence is a challenging developmental period, marked by rapid physiological, psychological, familial and social change [18]. These challenges are compounded for adolescents living with HIV, who tend to have a ‘stacking of odds against them’ in terms of psychological, social and health needs [19, 20]. However, there is also a dearth of evidence of what improves outcomes, particularly under the ‘treat all’ strategy, acknowledging that more comprehensive healthcare is required for this group and further commitment from all who serve them [21]. Differentiated models of care have been proposed to manage adolescent HIV in public health systems, but substantiation on how to implement these well remains imprecise [22, 23]. Specifically, with the scant confirmation from adolescents themselves on what works for them in terms of their HIV care and treatment [24].

Our study sought to address this research gap by asking adolescents living with HIV engaged in care for many years about their recommendations for a more responsive healthcare system in adolescence.

Methods

Participants and procedures

This study (n = 25) nested qualitative research in an observational study (n = 343) conducted in five HIV clinics serving adolescents in Johannesburg, South Africa. Three of the clinics were hospital based; one was a community health center and one a primary healthcare clinic. All offered routine care except one hospital based ‘flagship’ clinic that offered specialized pediatric ART services. All facilities had an ‘adolescent clinic’, generally a day when adolescent patients were scheduled for care, except the flagship clinic that offered adolescent care every day. These clinics typically saw patients aged 13-22yrs for treatment. There was a push to refer stable patients on ART to more general adult clinics to manage clinic congestion and many of these were generally referred around age 12-13yrs. All clinics were located in urban settings typified by poverty, violence, and poor infrastructure (6). Data was collected over a period of eight months.

Clinic-based research counselors familiar to the adolescents living with HIV purposively recruited them based on consent and willingness to engage in in-depth interviews. Research counselors were clinic based lay counselors trained in pediatric HIV and advanced counseling, and volunteered to participate in the research, engaging in principles of ethical research with minors. They received an additional five-day training for this study as well as weekly debriefing and supervision throughout the course of data collection.

All participants reported experience of being disclosed to regarding their HIV-status, were on treatment for HIV infection, were currently retained in care, had been accessing treatment for a number of years, and participated in a clinic-based support group. Most had histories of varying levels of adherence to treatment as well as retention. Twenty-five adolescents were recruited equally from all five facilities. The first five participants that met inclusion criteria at each of the five sites were invited to participate in the qualitative interviews. No participants refused and we felt we reached saturation with 25 participants in total. They ranged in age from 13–19 years (mean 16 years; 15 female). Participants were infected at birth or early childhood and had lived with HIV as long as they remembered. Participants were interviewed for approximately 60 minutes by (author) using a semi-structured interview guide at their clinic visit. The interviews were audio recorded with participant consent and conducted in English as all participants spoke English fluently.

Participants were given a pocket-sized card with active referrals for services in their area including counseling, legal and crisis resources. Upon completion of the interview, they received reimbursement for travel; a snack; and a gift voucher for R50 (US $3) at a local clothing retailer. These items were endorsed and recommended by the adolescent community advisory board (ACAB) instituted for the research. The ACAB gave advice on methods and were also engaged with the findings of the study.

Characteristics of adolescent clinics

Adolescent clinics were implemented by scheduling all 13–19 year old patients on the same day, creating a critical mass of young people to engage with from all five clinics. All staff implementing the clinics were trained in child and adolescent development and the needs of HIV infected young people, i.e. disclosure, adherence, retention in care and supportive down referral. Values clarification exercises were undertaken to ensure a rights-based approach was understood.

Open clinic support groups were offered and any adolescent was welcome to join after their visit with the doctor/nurse. Groups changed weekly based on adolescent visits to the clinic and most groups comprised 10–40 participants depending on the clinic. Not all adolescents attending these clinics were aware of their HIV status or had been disclosed to. Consequently support groups covered topics such as taking medicine in correct doses at specific times, the importance of adherence and the need to be adherent for the medication to work, managing school difficulties and other similar issues raised by the adolescents. No overt discussion of HIV infection was provided. In addition, caregiver support groups were offered at the clinic with an emphasis on treatment literacy and supporting caregivers to disclose HIV status to children and adolescents in their care.

Closed support groups were hosted on Saturdays and during school holidays. These groups tended to have consistent participation over time and comprised approximately 20 adolescents per group. Inclusion required that adolescents knew their HIV status and had disclosed their status to at least one other person, making it safe to speak openly about HIV and ART. The content of these groups ranged from understanding of medication regimes and ART adherence requirements for viral suppression, to adolescents living with HIV specific concerns such as how to manage adherence on weekends and holidays amongst friends or family when one had not disclosed, what to do when one missed a dose, treatment fatigue and medication vacations/ weekends off, self management skills, dealing with disclosure, discrimination and internalized stigma. Regular adolescent issues such as sexual reproductive health matters, adolescent pregnancy, romantic relationships and gender equality, managing peer pressure, mental health problems (particularly trauma, depression, bereavement and suicide) and caregiver communication challenges were also explored.

The closed groups subscribed to a rights based, participatory practice [25] and positive youth development model [26]. Positive youth development programs included actively promoting personal agency and responsibility, using respectful means to engage young people and focus on their strengths and competencies to help them overcome some of their adversities and risks [26]. Instead of viewing adolescents as patients with ‘problems to be managed’, the view is rather that adolescents are resources to be developed and have the means to critically engage in solving their own difficulties. Adolescents defined what they wanted to cover in the groups and how. Frequently non-verbal means of working were utilized such as art and play therapy. Experts were invited to present on topics such as yoga and mindfulness practices, self-defense skills, nutrition, and job readiness. These groups were co-led by psychologists, social workers and lay counselors and lasted approximately 3–4 hours. All facilitators received monthly supervision and debriefing from experienced mental health clinicians. Lunch and transportation costs to attend the groups were provided.

Ethics

The South African National Health Act states that ‘for health research with minors (<18-year olds), consent from a legal parent or guardian for research with children must be obtained’ (Section 71, 2012). It was speculated that the proposed study participants may not have legal guardians from whom to obtain consent. Resultantly, the ethics committee of the University of the Witwatersrand advised seeking permission from the court to enroll participants in the study. A court order was granted that led to full ethics clearance and permission to interview participants without parental or guardian consent (M130258). Adolescents gave verbal assent and written consent to participate in this study. All participation was sought on the basis of good clinical practice guidelines and protective procedures were built in to support adolescents in need of additional assistance. Permission was also granted from Gauteng Provincial Department of Health, Johannesburg District Department of Health, and the research committees of individual facilities where participants were recruited from.

Data analysis

All interviews were transcribed verbatim in English. All identifying information was removed and transcripts were saved by a coded name. Data were managed in QSR NVivo 10, constructing an analytical framework of broad codes by generating a ‘start list’ of potential themes and building upon the research questions. Each broad code, or wide thematic basket of concepts [27], was applied to every transcript and ‘fine codes’ were expounded using an inductive method deriving meaning from the data itself as opposed to imposing pre-formed impressions [28]. To ensure intercoder consensus, fine codes were developed by three researchers experienced in qualitative data analysis by printing out a full set of excerpts (from each data set) associated with each code for each transcript and identifying sub-themes arising from the data. Two researchers applied the thematic codes to every transcript. Each week during the double coding, the findings were critiqued and discussed within the group to guarantee research results. During analysis, we found that data reached a point of saturation, which suggests the sample size was sufficient.

Results

Please see Table 1 for a description of the sample.

Table 1. Description of the sample.

Name (pseudonym) F/M Age Know how became infected? Orphan status Living arrangement
Jabulile F 15 No Double Grandmother
Kagiso M 17 Yes Double Children’s home
Banele M 18 No Double Grandmother
Ayanda F 16 No Double Foster home
Nobuhle F 19 Yes Double Aunt
Buhle F 15 No Single Grandmother (bio father alive no relationship)
Thabisile F 17 Yes Double Grandmother
Sindiswa F 16 No Single Bio father and stepmother
Phindile F 16 No Double Aunt
Zodwa F 18 Yes Non Bio mother (bio father alive no relationship)
Lesedi M 13 Yes Double Great grandmother
Tebogo F 18 Yes Single Bio mother
Tshepo M 18 Yes Non Bio mother (bio father alive no relationship)
Sithembile M 18 No Double Grandmother
Nomphumelelo F 17 No Double Grandmother
Ntokoza M 13 No Double Grandmother
Palesa F 14 Yes Single Grandmother (bio mother alive poor relationship)
Lerato F 18 Yes Non Bio mother (bio father alive poor relationship)
Mahlatsi M 17 No Single Bio mother
Bafense M 16 Yes Double Children’s home
Ntombi F 14 No Single Bio mother
Amahle F 14 Yes Double Aunt
Mati F 18 Yes Double Grandmother
Bongani M 18 No Single Bio father
Siphiwe M 18 No Non Bio mother (bio father alive no relationship)

Note all names attached to quotes are fictional to protect confidentiality.

1. Advocating for adolescent clinics

1.1 Being with peers less threatening than being in adult clinics

Many stable adolescent patients had been down referred to adult clinics and soon returned to the adolescent clinics, Kagiso and Bafense below remembered this experience. Findings indicated that many adolescents did not have the agency and confidence to navigate adult settings on their own and felt it would be more comfortable to receive healthcare within their own peer group.

Why send a kid who is only starting to learn about life, his situation in life, the purpose for their life to an adult clinic? How are they going to speak to an adult who has already been through their life issues about a kid who’s only growing up? It’s best to put him in a clinic where he’s in his own age group. Everything is understandable to kids to their age group so I don’t understand the point in sending a kid to a clinic where it only accommodates older people. It doesn’t make sense–Kagiso, male 17yrs

Some reported being disrespected in adult clinics.

Because the nurses in the children’s clinic are more polite than the ones in the other clinics and so they make sure they enjoy coming to the clinicno one is going to shout at me or do anything, unlike the other clinics–Bafense, male, 16yrs

1.2. Regular health system increases discrimination towards adolescents living with HIV

It appeared that within the adolescent clinic, their HIV status may seem anonymized but at adult clinics, where there are fewer adolescents, they would be more conspicuous and their status more apparent.

It’s hard for them because they’re sitting with adults. Some of the adults are in their communities, they’re going to start talking about what happened to this kid and all those things–Ayanda, female, 16yrs

Similarly there seemed to be a suggestion that many adults, including nurses, would not understand vertical transmission and might discriminate against adolescents living with HIV.

The nurses there don’t really understand. They don’t come to terms with the kids who is on ART, they’d simply think that the kid was reckless when that wasn’t the main reason behind the infection–Sithembile, male, 18yrs

As opposed to adolescents all being treated for HIV, participants highlighted that most adult clinics don’t integrate care and in that way the system facilitated inadvertent HIV disclosure and discrimination.

Other clinics they differ with things. Say TB here, HIV here, sugar [diabetes] here, that’s not what you want to do… because of this, people they will see, people are not just like them and we’ll start to hate each other and maybe your friend comes in and see you in the HIV line, what he will say, he’ll go and spread it and they will laugh you all over and hey, talking silly things about you–Mahlatsi, male, 17yrs

1.3. Appeal of adolescent-friendly attitude

A strong theme emerged highlighting that adolescent clinics tend to have staff that understand and respond to adolescent health and developmental needs enhancing their access to treatment and retention in care.

The people here are like, they have a mind of a kid which is very good. They know what a kid is thinking, they’re very supportive…they know what a kid has to go through to fight this kind of thing–Kagiso, male, 17yrs

All participants appreciated consistent, supportive and non-judgemental staff working within a culture of care towards young people.

They never, actually they always encourage me to take my medicine because they know that, they say that I must take care of myself so I must always take my medicine. They were never like talking bad things to me, they always telling me, advising me, if you keep on taking your medicine well, you can grow well and you can be as healthy as a person that doesn’t have this disease–Sithembile, male, 18yrs

There was also an appreciation of having a long-term relationship with staff and being known over time with counseling being offered on a regular basis.

Because they are always there when we needed them and they give us information, they teach us everything we want to know in life, they know me and they know my family–Nobuhle, female, 19yrs

Part of the appropriate care adolescents received was being told the facts about their disease and its treatment.

Because they tell you they don’t like hide secrets because she is going to like [upset]…they tell you straight you are like this and that’s what you must do to handle it–Phindile, female, 16yrs

1.4. Attributes of convenient healthcare for adolescents

There was support for adolescent clinics being scheduled after school (most regular clinics work on a ‘first come first served basis’).

You could set a schedule for them by timetable, OK, maybe attend when they come back from school so they don’t miss out on schooling–Banele, male, 18yrs

In busy healthcare environments, an effective means of creating an adolescent clinic is to schedule all patients who are adolescents on the same day.

Yes, that’s why I choose to go on Fridays because there it’s just young people–Bongani, male, 18yrs

Although there was some support for caregiver involvement…

I think the parents is supposed to be getting counseling with the child, going together and understanding, learning more about HIV so that they get full information and so that they understand and when they understand then they disclose their status because some parents they say they fear that the child will kill themselves–Lerato, female, 18yrs

There was also recognition that adolescents need privacy with their healthcare professionals to meet their needs with confidentiality.

Okay adults can accompany the kids, but the adults, as far as they go is the door, what happens inside is all about the kids for the kids by the kids. Adults shouldn’t be involved in the life of an adolescent kid who’s on ARVs–Kagiso, male, 17yrs

2. Value of support groups

Findings revealed robust endorsement of clinic-based support groups for adolescents.

2.1 Open disclosure was liberating

The idea of ‘being free to talk’ underscored the gravity of secrecy in the lives of many vertically infected adolescents living with HIV and highlighted how few opportunities these adolescents had to practice safe ways of disclosure.

No, because all of us we are HIV positive like teenagers. Even if we are as a group, ja [yes] like we feel free because we are all the same. Like even with status, there’s no one with negative status–Amahle, female, 14yrs

Some of them never said anything about their status…that’s the only opportunity because you are all at the same stage, we are all HIV positive, so you can be free sometimes to talk–Mati, female, 18yrs

At the end of the day you won’t have secrets with your friends here–Phindile, female, 16yrs

2.2. Group-facilitated support, shared problem solving and the realization that adolescents were not alone

Young people recognized the value of peers similarly placed in life being able to give authentic support around shared issues.

That’s where people at your age, who are also in your situation, so those people teach you what they know and you learn from them. So it’s helpful–Tshepo, male, 18yrs

Because there are other children who are HIV positive and just like can help me understand what is going on in the support group–Ntombi, female, 14yrs

Many participants identified the group as a means of finding solutions to personal problems.

For me, I think it’s a good idea to have support group and talk about how we feel about even living with HIV, everyone of us must come with the ideas and then we discuss the problems that we’re having…so for us to have support groups it can be easy for us to discuss or to talk about how we feel about this thing, how can we do, to deal with this disease–Phindile, female, 16yrs

Many vertically infected adolescents may feel isolated and alone, not realizing there are other young people infected as they were.

Sometimes it makes me feel that I’m not alone and all that, so ja [yes], it didn’t only happen to me and all that–Bongani, male, 18yrs

It was like the way people shared their problems, it made me feel like I’m not the only one who is having the same problem as I do–Lerato, female, 18yrs

Support groups also facilitated mental health gains such as hope, optimism and relief of burdensome emotions.

They will have to support us in what we are doing because we will help this virus to get down and down because if they are not supporting us, this virus will busy getting up and higher because we are losing a lot of youth because they are scared to be HIV, but as we are, we are not scared cause they mustn’t lose hope, there is hope out there, we can help them handle person with pain–Sithembile, male, 18yrs

Discuss everything that you want to discuss about you take out all the pain inside you, there by the group–Tebogo, female, 18yrs

2.3. Benefits of adolescent-friendly ways of expressing oneself

Young people who attended the group particularly valued the use of non-verbal ways of expressing feelings and ideas.

We would get to speak whatever’s on our mind and even express our feelings and some with drawing and so on, so you get to relieve your anger and all that–Zodwa, female, 18yrs

2.4. Learning more about HIV and sexual reproductive health issues

Although adolescents had generally been taking treatment for a long time, there was still need to educate about their disease and its impact. A support group structure was effective in this outcome.

Many children don’t understand their treatment because their parents or their caregivers aren’t telling them about it, so the only place they get good information is at the clinic–Sindiswa, female, 16yrs

Very few adolescents had an accurate understanding of vertical transmission or prevention methods such as prevention of mother-to-child transmission (PMTCT), reflecting that they were not being well informed around sexual reproductive health (SRH) and future parenting options. In fact, the interviewer explained PMTCT at length to all participants as there was not comprehensive understanding of this prevention method in the sample.

Interviewer: So do you know how you contracted HIV?

Interviewee: Not really, but by him [the doctor], he thinks maybe I got it at birth, but I think if I got it at birth maybe I would have been dead by now, I’m not sure, so I don’t know how I got it–Bongani, male, 18yr

Interviewee: That used to freak me out, just thinking of the fact that if I would just get pregnant, what if I also do the same thing to my own child? Maybe my own child wouldn’t forgive me, would always be angry like I am to my mom.

Interviewer: What does it feel like to know you have these options [PMTCT] and that the chances of you transmitting the virus are very small?

Interviewee: It’s kind of relieving–Thabisile, female, 17yrs

3. Significance of inclusion of lay counselors into multidisciplinary clinic teams

Many participants spoke about the important relationships they had with lay counselors at the clinic and the value this cadre of worker had in providing education and support to patients.

Interviewee: Well, I can be honest with them all, you know, because the doctor, I have to go to the doctor first and the doctor will also take me to the counselor.

Interviewer: But it’s easier to talk to the counselor or is it the same?

Interviewee: It’s not the same because the doctor just advises you not to do it, just to take your medication. So the counselors just ask you questions, again and again, you know, you talk–Mati, female, 18yrs

Unmet sexual reproductive healthcare needs were typically met by lay counselors.

Interviewer: So if you need help with like guy stuff, like I don’t know, how to have safe sex, I don’t know what you might talk to a guy about, do you know what I mean? But if you did, who do you talk to about that stuff?

Interviewee: At home there is no one, but I’ll come and talk to [male counselor], because he told me that I can come and talk to him with anything.

Interviewer: Ahso you and he are tight [close]?

Interviewee: Yes.

Interviewer: He’s a good counselor.

Interviewee: Very–Siphiwe, male, 18yrs

Participants seemed to rely heavily on counselors for information about HIV and their treatment, but also sought guidance and emotional support from them.

We need to put more counselors in clinics to support us, maybe telling us what is going on about our lives, what should we do if there is time that’s come difficult maybe–Nomphumelelo, female, 17yrs

Counselors appeared to be perceived as more trustworthy than other personnel and more likely to maintain confidentiality.

Interviewee: Because if you have counselor you are open to say things with her, others didn’t have. Maybe I told you [healthcare professional] my status, OK, they are writing, then others come…you say ah, ‘you see that lady is HIV positive’ and that’s not nice at all.

Interviewer: So you feel like counselors are more confidential and they don’t necessarily just tell people other people’s status in the clinic?

Interviewer: Yes, others tell but counselors don’t–Tebogo, female, 18yrs

4. Employment opportunities for HIV infected youth within the healthcare system

A theme around young people themselves being active in the care of other HIV infected youth within the health system became evident.

Well, kids understand kids better. Parents are too controlling over kids and how they live their lives. Obviously parents want their kids to live their lives a certain way because they couldn’t live their life the way that they wanted to so obviously so, they want their kids to live their life so just too much stress for a kid at the time. This side is the parent, this side is the medication. There’s too much–Kagiso, male, 17yrs

Some participants identified their ability to add value and strengthen the health system’s treatment of infected youth by being employed within it.

Maybe give people the work, you see, like I’m having HIV, then they offer me a job to go maybe in KZN, I could do that, I don’t mind. Maybe talking to a person like just the way we do, encouraging, teaching people how to take their medicine in order to have a better living–Banele, male, 18yrs

If I was talking to the minister of health, I would tell him that he must hire people like me that can talk to the children and tell them why they are taking their treatment–Ayanda, female, 16yrs

5. Need for widespread education regarding vertical infection

There appeared to be a persuasive theme advocating for widespread education to the public around vertical HIV infection. Participants shared that there isn’t a common understanding of vertical transmission and most assume young people are infected through sexual transmission. This limits their motivation to disclose their status to others.

If I disclose to my girlfriend she will feel sad and she will think that I slept with other girls…we need to advertise that HIV it’s not what we get only from sleeping with other people–Lesedi, male, 13yrs

I think even negative people must be told about these things [vertical infection], must be told, so that they can understand what is going on–Tshepo, male, 18yrs

6. Meaningfully linking clinic to community

An interesting theme became clear around linking the clinic to community activities, strengthening the adolescent community’s ties to the clinic. One participant reflected on a soccer tournament that was hosted in the community and comprised teams from various clinic-based support groups for HIV infected youth.

We went for a soccer tournament and then we had so much fun. Even girls were playing soccer and all that so you get to enjoy you know what even though you’re an HIV person you get to enjoy a lot of things in life–Thabisile, female, 17yrs

There was also support for school-based testing from participants.

Yes, even if the schools, I think there must maybe be doctors to come to the school and check children if they are HIV positive or not… Because other parents they are scared to come to the hospitals yes, they think that if I have HIV I will die, what if my child finds out, what if my child does this. I think they should try it–Palesa, female, 14yrs

Discussion

Our study highlighted adolescent recommendations for a more effective health system that included advocating for adolescent clinics, recognizing the importance of clinic-based support groups, valuing the influence lay counselors have in providing healthcare to adolescents, improving widespread education of vertical HIV transmission and meaningfully linking the clinic to the community.

Mental health needs of children and adolescents globally do not get the attention and resources required, but are severely underserved in low and middle-income countries (LMICs) [29, 30]. Adolescents living with HIV tend to have mental health challenges that impact negatively on adherence and retention in care [31]. Health systems that appreciate this reality may be more responsive to it. There is growing evidence that clinic-based support groups help retain adolescents living with HIV in care and if managed well, can be taken to scale [14, 32]. Groupwork is a powerful method in reaching young people who tend to enjoy the company of their peers, and in resource-constrained contexts, it is a cost-effective means of intervention. The social component of group treatment (i.e. cohesion, interpersonal learning etc.) is a dominant mechanism through which change occurs [33], facilitating psychoeducational and mental health benefits. Support groups are valuable for education, i.e. facilitating understanding through experiential learning rather than simply providing information. Those that intentionally address some of the mental health difficulties of adolescents living with HIV and that are facilitated by staff grounded in understanding adolescent development and mental health, could mitigate risk, improve health system use and treatment adherence.

Keeping secrets is onerous and burdensome through development, a finding articulated in this study. Young people welcome honest communication with adults who serve them [34]. Social support is particularly appreciated for those struggling through development with prolonged mental health problems, depression and complicated grief being particularly noteworthy for vertically infected youth who are frequently orphaned [2]. Depression and complicated grief are associated with young people’s perceptions and poor understanding of death in epidemic regions, and need to be addressed in psychosocial programming [35]. Acceptance and belonging cannot be underestimated in terms of adolescent identity formation and development especially with vertically infected young people who commonly experience feelings of isolation and rejection [36]. This reality is underscored in our study with participants placing strong emphasis on adolescent clinics and clinic-based support groups for similarly placed adolescents living with HIV.

Many vertically infected children and adolescents live in communities characterized by poverty and exposure to violence [37] as was the case in our sample [31]. Women living with HIV tend to experience higher rates of intimate partner violence [38] and adolescents exposed to this kind of violence show not only poorer mental health outcomes [39], but also have poor virological and immunological outcomes [40] and poorer adherence [41]. In addition, orphaned adolescents are at risk for heightened exposure to physical, emotional and sexual violence [42]. Cumulative exposure to adversity such as violence, abuse and neglect is associated with increased risky sexual behavior amongst vertically infected adolescents in South Africa, leading to higher probable rates of secondary transmission and potential reinfection and resistance to ART [43]. Very few adolescents living with HIV report disclosing their HIV status to their sexual partner [44], possibly on account of the reality of discrimination from peers [45]. Disclosure protects against mental health risks [2] and as our participants describe, is liberating. Having opportunities to practice disclosure is vital for this group and is encouraged in support groups and adolescent clinics.

Adolescents need more reliable and comprehensive information regarding vertical transmission. Our participants had both a lack of understanding of PMTCT and future reproductive health options, as well as unreliable comprehension of how they contracted HIV and pathways to vertical transmission. These findings are similar to others [46] but highlight that many providers may make assumptions that vertically infected adolescents understand vertical transmission when that may not be the case [47]. Having opportunities to fully and repeatedly explain these mechanisms is important and as our study reveals, is strengthened by strong interpersonal relationship with healthcare providers.

Adolescents living with HIV are sexually active and have intentions of parenthood. However, evidence indicates that female adolescents living with HIV rarely discuss pregnancy intentions with family or providers, suggesting a potential fear of being judged for wanting to conceive when living with HIV [48]. Indeed, 16% of all adolescents in South Africa experience pregnancy, many of whom will be or are HIV infected [7]. HIV infected pregnant adolescents show much higher rates of mother-to-child transmission [49] perhaps on account of not fully understanding vertical transmission or the strength of prevention methods such as PMTCT. Another potential contributor is not feeling comfortable in antenatal clinics where adolescents make up a minority of patients. Health providers need to explain modes of transmission and educate adolescents living with HIV regarding family planning and contraception, including routinely screening for fertility intentions and strengthening access to safer conception assistance. Safer conception services, that support the reproductive goals of women living with HIV and their partners, can minimize the risks of HIV transmission through pregnancy, can enhance ART adherence and promote limiting pregnancy attempts until viral suppression can be achieved and maintained [50]. In addition, vertically infected pregnant adolescents are likely to experience poorer adherence on account of depression in the peripartum period [51] indicating that mental health screening and support in this population is prudent.

Effective programming to reduce sexual risk behavior of adolescents living with HIV is essential. Unfortunately, topics such as sexual and reproductive health are taboo and are not easily spoken about in families, thus healthcare environments are positioned to fill this gap with factual and developmentally appropriate information [52]. In addition, evidence shows the manner in which young HIV infected patients want to be engaged in SRH matters is similar to their HIV management, i.e. adolescent-friendly and convenient with improved service quality from clinic staff [53]. Our study also highlights the benefits of investing in male providers to address SRH education and treatment.

Lack of understanding of vertical infection and discrimination towards adolescents living with HIV in society, especially by adults, leads to young people’s distrust of adults and particularly health system personnel [54]. However, in our study, counselors appeared to be trusted to maintain confidentiality, take time to explain things, provided honest and understandable information, and were a constant presence in the clinic that were highly prized. The lay counselors conducted many individual ‘adherence counseling’ sessions with patients but were central in delivering the psychosocial support groups held at the clinic.

Lack of skilled mental health professionals available to intervene and the need to utilize and upskill lay counselors to meet the demand ethically with targeted training and consistent expert supervision [55, 56] is now vital to public health systems. There is expanding proof that lay counselors are able to provide skillful and effective task-sharing interventions locally [57] and our study provides additional support for this.

HIV infected youth have the ability to educate peers, both those uninfected as well as newly infected, as they understand healthcare utilization, the challenges of care and treatment over time, as well as youth difficulties. Adolescent peers have influence over each other, especially those that are marginalized in similar ways. Friendships with peers moderate personal adversity [58], and HIV infected youth with other infected youth in their social networks report being able to accept their diagnosis more easily [59]. Care models that capitalize on this may have influence in retaining adolescents in treatment and impact HIV related stigma in beneficial ways [60]. As such, programs that work with adolescents living with HIV may profit from peer interventions at clinic level in the shape of peer led support groups, peer treatment navigators/counselors for youth (supervised by trained facilitators), and inclusion of young adolescents living with HIV in multidisciplinary teams. Peer educators or counselors located in adult clinics may also help with the transition of stable adolescents from pediatric to adult clinics and keep them retained in care. They may increase adolescent access to testing and timely initiation on treatment. In tandem, these young people would be gaining constructive workplace skills that can be capitalized on as they age into the workforce.

Linking clinic to community through activities such as soccer tournaments and informative productions drives home the positive aspects of health and depathologizes HIV; it was a significant recommendation from this study. Community-based adherence clubs that have shown positive outcomes for adult patients [61] may be equally effective for adolescents, especially if there is a support group component to implementation and if the groups are adolescent only [32].

A positive youth development style to service delivery of adolescents living with HIV is recommended to foster adolescents’ growing autonomy, actively including them in decision making, highlighting their rights and also their responsibilities through positive, respectful and mutually beneficial relationships with service providers [26]. Offering opportunities for adolescents living with HIV to exercise their agency leads to engagement and positive health benefits including accessing their resilience [62]. It also adds another resource available to young people: a responsive and supportive healthcare system. An adolescent’s ability to cope is influenced by the degree to which they are able to connect with their community and negotiate assistance from it thus enabling environments that include their participation lead to optimal coping. As such, the healthcare environment could be actively employed as a coping-enabling social environment for adolescent patients, facilitating opportunities for resilience, and promoting participation as a tactic to cope with adversity [63]. Indeed, recent resilience studies in South Africa have shown perceptions of care are associated with improved help-seeking behaviors from adolescents, suggesting that higher perceptions of physical and psychological ‘caring’ from providers are associated with increased use of formal supports [64]. It seems obvious, but health providers that intentionally build relationships with adolescent patients, especially over time, also improve their resilience.

An interesting outcome from this study was that many adolescents living with HIV recommended linking professionals from adolescent-friendly clinics to schools, highlighting that schools provide an untapped option to spot unreached young people living with HIV, particularly slow-progressors, and connect them to care [65]. However, consent issues obscure access in countries like South Africa with generalized HIV epidemics, where there are elevated rates of AIDS orphans, adolescents are in the custody of numerous caretakers, legal documentation of guardianship is not widespread, and guidelines around consent for HIV testing are wide-ranging, without clear direction on procedure [66].

Another noteworthy finding was the support of dynamic counseling approaches that appeal to the interests and capacities of adolescents. The effectiveness of non-verbal therapies, such as drawing, writing, drama, digital storytelling and photovoice interventions that address mental health and psychosocial issues in this population needs to be rigorously tested and controlled for. A study in Zimbabwe using body-mapping, an art therapy technique, shows value in treatment of depression in adolescents living with HIV [67]. These forms of intervention should be upscaled to lay counselors who appear well placed to utilize and deliver them with precise assessment of effectiveness [68]. It is imperative that culturally appropriate adolescent-centered interventions are developed that engage youth in a therapeutic process, acknowledge their life experiences and help them cope with their situations so that can move beyond them.

The findings from this study are limited in several ways. Firstly, all participants in this study were retained in care at the time of the interview and the factors identified by this group as significant to healthcare provision and system strengthening may differ from those of adolescents who had discontinued their care. Secondly, the adolescents in this sample were vertically infected and their views may differ significantly to horizontally infected adolescents who may not have accessed the healthcare system as intensely throughout development. However, we do believe the recommendation may be beneficial to all adolescents living with HIV regardless of mode of transmission. Thirdly, the adolescents were conveniently sampled and recruited from primary healthcare facilities in an urban setting and where adolescents communicated easily in English hence findings may not be generalizable to adolescents in other contexts or to those who are not comfortable speaking English. Fourthly, we didn’t ascertain viral suppression rates in this study and successfully virally suppressed adolescents may have different impressions of healthcare needs. Lastly, our adolescents were selected from their adolescent clinics and were giving feedback on adolescent clinics. This may have led to reporting bias, however we attempted to mitigate this risk by recruiting our sample from a variety of clinics. Similarly, the healthcare staff who recruited participants may also have been influential in the accounts given by encouraging a form of social desirability bias. Notwithstanding these limitations, the views of participants in this study may be helpful in guiding services for adolescents living with HIV in South Africa.

Conclusion

Our study adds to the literature on what adolescents feel might be of value to them in terms of HIV treatment and care within the health system, heeding the call for more participatory methods of adolescent inclusion [69]. It also gives guidance to the differentiated care model recommended for adolescent care and treatment that at its core is client centered and rights based. This care model simplifies and modifies HIV services across the cascade to both address the needs of patients more efficiently and reduce unnecessary burdens on an already overstretched health system [60]. Concepts such as task-shifting, decentralization, community-based care all become more focal within the differentiated care model. Lay and peer counselors are a valuable, and often untapped or overlooked resource to adolescents living with HIV, both in the clinic and community, and may serve as a cornerstone of this model. In addition, serving their psychosocial and mental health needs in a responsive, caring and informed manner may strengthen adolescents’ use of the healthcare system and the structure itself can be elevated to become a source of resilience for young people.

Supporting information

S1 File. In-depth interview guide.

(DOCX)

Acknowledgments

We are grateful to all participants for sharing their stories. We acknowledge the remarkable efforts of the research counselors (Thamsanqa Jabavu, Nombulelo Shezi, Linda Mazibuko, Princess Mbatha, Tebogo Moloi, Honey Nyapoli, Bafana Gxubane, Shanaaz Randeria and Relebohile Maleka) both in their capacity as counselors and for their support of this research. Thanks to Pirilani Banda for managing the administrative parts of the study. We are grateful to the Department of Health for granting access to the patients and facilities in Johannesburg, and Adv. John Peter (SC) for readily assisting to gain the court order to conduct the research.

Data Availability

Please note there are special circumstances regarding this research. A court order was needed as a result of a change in legislation in South Africa and on account of participants not having legal guardians, i.e. it is not customary for children whose parents have died and who go on to live with other caregivers, for those caregivers to approach the state to become 'legal guardians'. As such, I had to approach the high court in Johannesburg to give consent to recruit participants. The court order does not give me consent to share data. For researchers interested in the data set, please contact Professor CB Penny, Chairperson of the Human Research Ethics Committee (Medical) at the University of Witwatersrand, on telephone no. +2711 717 2301, or by e-mail at Clement.Penny@wits.ac.za. Please reference ethics approval number M130258.

Funding Statement

The author(s) received no specific funding for this work.

References

  • 1.Adejumo OA, Malee KM, Ryscavage P, Hunter SJ, Taiwo BO. Contemporary issues on the epidemiology and antiretroviral adherence of HIV-infected adolescents in sub-Saharan Africa: a narrative review. Journal of the International AIDS Society. 2015. Jan;18(1):20049. doi: 10.7448/IAS.18.1.20049 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Lowenthal ED, Bakeera-Kitaka S, Marukutira T, Chapman J, Goldrath K, Ferrand RA. Perinatally acquired HIV infection in adolescents from sub-Saharan Africa: a review of emerging challenges. The Lancet infectious diseases. 2014. Jul 1;14(7):627–39. doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(13)70363-3 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Boerma RS, Boender TS, Bussink AP, Calis JC, Bertagnolio S, Rinke de Wit TF, et al. Suboptimal viral suppression rates among HIV-infected children in low-and middle-income countries: a meta-analysis. Clinical infectious diseases. 2016. Sep 22:ciw645. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciw645 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Idele P, Gillespie A, Porth T, Suzuki C, Mahy M, Kasedde S, et al. Epidemiology of HIV and AIDS among adolescents: current status, inequities, and data gaps. JAIDS Journal of Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndromes. 2014. Jul 1;66:S144–53. doi: 10.1097/QAI.0000000000000176 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Burrage AB, Mushavi A, Shiraishi RW, Barr BT, Shambira G, Nyakura J, et al. Mother-To-Child Transmission of HIV in Adolescents and Young Women: Findings From a National Prospective Cohort Survey, Zimbabwe, 2013–2014. Journal of Adolescent Health. 2020. Apr 1;66(4):455–63. doi: 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2019.10.023 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Mayosi BM, Benatar SR. Health and health care in South Africa—20 years after Mandela. New England Journal of Medicine. 2014. Oct 2;371(14):1344–53. doi: 10.1056/NEJMsr1405012 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Statistics South Africa (STATS SA). Demographic profile of adolescents in South Africa. 2018 http://www.statssa.gov.za/publications/Report%2003-00-10/Report%2003-00-102016.pdf (accessed May 29, 2020).
  • 8.Sprague C, Woollett N, Hatcher AM. Enhancing agency for health providers and pregnant women experiencing intimate partner violence in South Africa. Global public health. 2020. Dec 1;15(12):1820–35. doi: 10.1080/17441692.2020.1780290 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Sharp C, Jardin C, Marais L, Boivin M. Orphanhood by AIDS-related causes and child mental health: A developmental psychopathology approach. Journal of HIV and AIDS. 2015. Nov;1(3). doi: 10.16966/2380-5536.114 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Maskew M, Bor J, MacLeod W, Carmona S, Sherman GG, Fox MP. Adolescent HIV treatment in South Africa’s national HIV programme: a retrospective cohort study. The Lancet HIV. 2019. Nov 1;6(11):e760–8. doi: 10.1016/S2352-3018(19)30234-6 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Pettifor A, Filiatreau L, Delany-Moretlwe S. Time to strengthen HIV treatment and prevention for youth. The Lancet HIV. 2019. Nov 1;6(11):e727–8. doi: 10.1016/S2352-3018(19)30232-2 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Murray KR, Dulli LS, Ridgeway K, Dal Santo L, Darrow de Mora D, Olsen P, et al. Improving retention in HIV care among adolescents and adults in low-and middle-income countries: a systematic review of the literature. PloS one. 2017. Sep 29;12(9):e0184879. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0184879 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Ridgeway K, Dulli LS, Murray KR, Silverstein H, Dal Santo L, Olsen P, et al. Interventions to improve antiretroviral therapy adherence among adolescents in low-and middle-income countries: A systematic review of the literature. PloS one. 2018. Jan 2;13(1):e0189770. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0189770 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Zanoni BC, Sibaya T, Cairns C, Haberer JE. Barriers to retention in care are overcome by adolescent-friendly services for adolescents living with HIV in South Africa: a qualitative analysis. AIDS and Behavior. 2019. Apr 15;23(4):957–65. doi: 10.1007/s10461-018-2352-6 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Ammon N, Mason S, Corkery JM. Factors impacting antiretroviral therapy adherence among human immunodeficiency virus–positive adolescents in Sub-Saharan Africa: a systematic review. Public health. 2018. Apr 1;157:20–31. doi: 10.1016/j.puhe.2017.12.010 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Casale M, Carlqvist A, Cluver L. Recent interventions to improve retention in HIV care and adherence to antiretroviral treatment among adolescents and youth: a systematic review. AIDS patient care and STDs. 2019. Jun 1;33(6):237–52. doi: 10.1089/apc.2018.0320 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Jones C, Ritchwood TD, Taggart T. Barriers and facilitators to the successful transition of adolescents living with HIV from pediatric to adult care in low and middle-income countries: A systematic review and policy analysis. AIDS and Behavior. 2019. Sep;23(9):2498–513. doi: 10.1007/s10461-019-02621-6 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Sawyer SM, Afifi RA, Bearinger LH, Blakemore SJ, Dick B, Ezeh AC, et al. Adolescence: a foundation for future health. The lancet. 2012. Apr 28;379(9826):1630–40. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(12)60072-5 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Cluver L, Pantelic M, Toska E, Orkin M, Casale M, Bungane N, et al. STACK ing the odds for adolescent survival: health service factors associated with full retention in care and adherence amongst adolescents living with HIV in South Africa. Journal of the International AIDS Society. 2018. Sep;21(9):e25176. doi: 10.1002/jia2.25176 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Frigati LJ, Ameyan W, Cotton MF, Gregson CL, Hoare J, Jao J, et al. Chronic comorbidities in children and adolescents with vertically acquired HIV infection in sub-Saharan Africa in the era of antiretroviral therapy. The Lancet Child & Adolescent Health. 2020. Apr 30. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Enane LA, Davies MA, Leroy V, Edmonds A, Apondi E, Adedimeji A, et al. Traversing the cascade: urgent research priorities for implementing the ‘treat all’strategy for children and adolescents living with HIV in sub-Saharan Africa. Journal of virus eradication. 2018. Nov;4(Suppl 2):40. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.MacPherson P, Munthali C, Ferguson J, Armstrong A, Kranzer K, Ferrand RA, et al. Service delivery interventions to improve adolescents’ linkage, retention and adherence to antiretroviral therapy and HIV care. Tropical Medicine & International Health. 2015. Aug;20(8):1015–32. doi: 10.1111/tmi.12517 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Grimsrud A, Bygrave H, Doherty M, Ehrenkranz P, Ellman T, Ferris R, et al. Reimagining HIV service delivery: the role of differentiated care from prevention to suppression. Journal of the International AIDS Society. 2016;19(1). doi: 10.7448/IAS.19.1.21484 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Armstrong A, Nagata JM, Vicari M, Irvine C, Cluver L, Sohn AH, et al. A global research agenda for adolescents living with HIV. Journal of Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndromes (1999). 2018. Aug 15;78(1):S16. doi: 10.1097/QAI.0000000000001744 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Berglas NF, Constantine NA, Ozer EJ. A rights-based approach to sexuality education: Conceptualization, clarification and challenges. Perspectives on sexual and reproductive health. 2014. Jun;46(2):63–72. doi: 10.1363/46e1114 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Sanders J, Munford R, Thimasarn-Anwar T, Liebenberg L, Ungar M. The role of positive youth development practices in building resilience and enhancing wellbeing for at-risk youth. Child Abuse & Neglect. 2015. Apr 1;42:40–53. doi: 10.1016/j.chiabu.2015.02.006 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Creswell JW, Creswell JD. Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. Sage publications; 2017. Nov 27. [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Hutchison AJ, Johnston LH, Breckon JD. Using QSR-NVivo to facilitate the development of a grounded theory project: an account of a worked example. International journal of social research methodology. 2010. Oct 1;13(4):283–302. [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Kieling C, Baker-Henningham H, Belfer M, Conti G, Ertem I, Omigbodun O, et al. Child and adolescent mental health worldwide: evidence for action. The Lancet. 2011. Oct 22;378(9801):1515–25. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(11)60827-1 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Erskine HE, Baxter AJ, Patton G, Moffitt TE, Patel V, Whiteford HA, et al. The global coverage of prevalence data for mental disorders in children and adolescents. Epidemiology and psychiatric sciences. 2017. Aug;26(4):395–402. doi: 10.1017/S2045796015001158 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Woollett N, Cluver L, Bandeira M, Brahmbhatt H. Identifying risks for mental health problems in HIV infected adolescents accessing HIV treatment in Johannesburg. Journal of Child & Adolescent Mental Health. 2017. May 31;29(1):11–26. doi: 10.2989/17280583.2017.1283320 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Mavhu W, Willis N, Mufuka J, Bernays S, Tshuma M, Mangenah C, et al. Effect of a differentiated service delivery model on virological failure in adolescents with HIV in Zimbabwe (Zvandiri): a cluster-randomised controlled trial. The Lancet Global Health. 2020. Feb 1;8(2):e264–75. doi: 10.1016/S2214-109X(19)30526-1 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Yalom ID, Leszcz M. The Theory and Practice of Group Psychotherapy. 5th Edn Basic Books. New York, NY. 2005. [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Wood K, Chase E, Aggleton P. ‘Telling the truth is the best thing’: Teenage orphans’ experiences of parental AIDS-related illness and bereavement in Zimbabwe. Social Science & Medicine. 2006. Oct 1;63(7):1923–33. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2006.04.027 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Rochat TJ, Mitchell J, Lubbe AM, Stein A, Tomlinson M, Bland RM. Communication about HIV and death: Maternal reports of primary school-aged children’s questions after maternal HIV disclosure in rural South Africa. Social Science & Medicine. 2017. Jan 1;172:124–34. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2016.10.031 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Willis N, Milanzi A, Mawodzeke M, Dziwa C, Armstrong A, Yekeye I, et al. Effectiveness of community adolescent treatment supporters (CATS) interventions in improving linkage and retention in care, adherence to ART and psychosocial well-being: a randomised trial among adolescents living with HIV in rural Zimbabwe. BMC Public Health. 2019. Dec 1;19(1):117. doi: 10.1186/s12889-019-6447-4 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Collishaw S, Gardner F, Aber JL, Cluver L. Predictors of mental health resilience in children who have been parentally bereaved by AIDS in urban South Africa. Journal of abnormal child psychology. 2016. May 1;44(4):719–30. doi: 10.1007/s10802-015-0068-x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Li Y, Marshall CM, Rees HC, Nunez A, Ezeanolue EE, Ehiri JE. Intimate partner violence and HIV infection among women: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Journal of the international AIDS society. 2014. Jan;17(1):18845. doi: 10.7448/IAS.17.1.18845 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Roman NV, Frantz JM. The prevalence of intimate partner violence in the family: a systematic review of the implications for adolescents in Africa. Family practice. 2013. Jun 1;30(3):256–65. doi: 10.1093/fampra/cms084 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Kacanek D, Malee K, Mellins CA, Tassiopoulos K, Smith R, Grant M, et al. Exposure to violence and virologic and immunological outcomes among youth with perinatal HIV in the pediatric HIV/AIDS cohort study. Journal of Adolescent Health. 2016. Jul 1;59(1):30–7. doi: 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2016.03.004 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Cluver L, Meinck F, Toska E, Orkin FM, Hodes R, Sherr L. Multitype violence exposures and adolescent antiretroviral nonadherence in South Africa. AIDS (London, England). 2018. May 15;32(8):975. doi: 10.1097/QAD.0000000000001795 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Kidman R, Palermo T. The relationship between parental presence and child sexual violence: evidence from thirteen countries in sub-Saharan Africa. Child abuse & neglect. 2016. Jan 1;51:172–80. doi: 10.1016/j.chiabu.2015.10.018 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Kidman R, Nachman S, Dietrich J, Liberty A, Violari A. Childhood adversity increases the risk of onward transmission from perinatal HIV-infected adolescents and youth in South Africa. Child abuse & neglect. 2018. May 1;79:98–106. doi: 10.1016/j.chiabu.2018.01.028 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Fair C, Albright J. “Don’t tell him you have HIV unless he’s ‘the one’”: Romantic relationships among adolescents and young adults with perinatal HIV infection. AIDS patient care and STDs. 2012. Dec 1;26(12):746–54. doi: 10.1089/apc.2012.0290 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Maughan-Brown B, Spaull N. HIV-related discrimination among grade six students in nine Southern African countries. PLoS One. 2014. Aug 8;9(8):e102981. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0102981 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Birungi H, Mugisha JF, Obare F, Nyombi JK. Sexual behavior and desires among adolescents perinatally infected with human immunodeficiency virus in Uganda: implications for programming. Journal of Adolescent Health. 2009. Feb 1;44(2):184–7. doi: 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2008.06.004 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Woollett N, Black V, Cluver L, Brahmbhatt H. Reticence in disclosure of HIV infection and reasons for bereavement: Impact on perinatally infected adolescents’ mental health and understanding of HIV treatment and prevention in Johannesburg, South Africa. African Journal of AIDS Research. 2017. Apr 3;16(2):175–84. doi: 10.2989/16085906.2017.1337646 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Echenique M, Rodriguez VJ, LaCabe RP, Privette CK, Jones DL, Potter JE, et al. Behaviorally and perinatally HIV-infected young women: targets for preconception counseling. AIDS care. 2017. Mar 4;29(3):372–7. doi: 10.1080/09540121.2016.1220483 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Ramraj T, Jackson D, Dinh TH, Olorunju S, Lombard C, Sherman G, et al. Adolescent access to care and risk of early mother-to-child HIV transmission. Journal of Adolescent Health. 2018. Apr 1;62(4):434–43. doi: 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2017.10.007 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Rucinski KB, Schwartz SR, Powers KA, Pence BW, Chi BH, Black V, et al. Fertility intentions and clinical care attendance among women living with HIV in South Africa. AIDS and Behavior. 2020. Jun;24(6):1585–91. doi: 10.1007/s10461-019-02564-y [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Sheth SS, Coleman J, Cannon T, Milio L, Keller J, Anderson J, et al. Association between depression and nonadherence to antiretroviral therapy in pregnant women with perinatally acquired HIV. AIDS care. 2015. Mar 4;27(3):350–4. doi: 10.1080/09540121.2014.998610 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Vujovic M, Struthers H, Meyersfeld S, Dlamini K, Mabizela N. Addressing the sexual and reproductive health needs of young adolescents living with HIV in South Africa. Children and Youth Services Review. 2014. Oct 1;45:122–8. [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Smith P, Marcus R, Bennie T, Nkala B, Nchabeleng M, Latka MH, et al. What do South African adolescents want in a sexual health service? Evidence from the South African Studies on HIV in Adolescents (SASHA) project. South African Medical Journal. 2018;108(8). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Pantelic M, Casale M, Cluver L, Toska E, Moshabela M. Multiple forms of discrimination and internalized stigma compromise retention in HIV care among adolescents: findings from a South African cohort. Journal of the International AIDS Society. 2020. May;23(5):e25488. doi: 10.1002/jia2.25488 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Patel V, Chowdhary N, Rahman A, Verdeli H. Improving access to psychological treatments: lessons from developing countries. Behaviour research and therapy. 2011. Sep 1;49(9):523–8. doi: 10.1016/j.brat.2011.06.012 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Padmanathan P, De Silva MJ. The acceptability and feasibility of task-sharing for mental healthcare in low and middle income countries: a systematic review. Social science & medicine. 2013. Nov 1;97:82–6. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2013.08.004 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Mendenhall E, De Silva MJ, Hanlon C, Petersen I, Shidhaye R, Jordans M, et al. Acceptability and feasibility of using non-specialist health workers to deliver mental health care: stakeholder perceptions from the PRIME district sites in Ethiopia, India, Nepal, South Africa, and Uganda. Social science & medicine. 2014. Oct 1;118:33–42. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Criss MM, Pettit GS, Bates JE, Dodge KA, Lapp AL. Family adversity, positive peer relationships, and children’s externalizing behavior: A longitudinal perspective on risk and resilience. Child development. 2002. Jul;73(4):1220–37. doi: 10.1111/1467-8624.00468 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Ramaiya MK, Sullivan KA, O’Donnell K, Cunningham CK, Shayo AM, Mmbaga BT, et al. A qualitative exploration of the mental health and psychosocial contexts of HIV-positive adolescents in Tanzania. PloS one. 2016. Nov 16;11(11):e0165936. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0165936 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Grimsrud AT, Pike C, Bekker LG. The power of peers and community in the continuum of HIV care. The Lancet Global Health. 2020. Feb 1;8(2):e167–8. doi: 10.1016/S2214-109X(19)30544-3 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Hanrahan CF, Schwartz SR, Mudavanhu M, West NS, Mutunga L, Keyser V, et al. The impact of community-versus clinic-based adherence clubs on loss from care and viral suppression for antiretroviral therapy patients: Findings from a pragmatic randomized controlled trial in South Africa. PLoS medicine. 2019. May 21;16(5):e1002808. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1002808 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Woollett N, Cluver L, Hatcher AM, Brahmbhatt H. “To be HIV infected is not the end of the world”: Resilience among perinatally infected HIV infected adolescents in Johannesburg. Children and Youth Services Review. 2016. Nov 1;70:269–75. [Google Scholar]
  • 63.Skovdal M, Daniel M. Resilience through participation and coping-enabling social environments: the case of HIV-affected children in sub-Saharan Africa. African journal of AIDS research. 2012. Oct 1;11(3):153–64. doi: 10.2989/16085906.2012.734975 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64.van Rensburg AC, Theron LC, Rothmann S. Adolescent perceptions of resiliencepromoting resources: the South African Pathways to Resilience Study. South African Journal of Psychology. 2018. Mar;48(1):73–85. [Google Scholar]
  • 65.Toska E, Cluver L, Orkin M, Bains A, Sherr L, Berezin M, et al. Screening and supporting through schools: educational experiences and needs of adolescents living with HIV in a South African cohort. BMC public health. 2019. Dec 1;19(1):272. doi: 10.1186/s12889-019-6580-0 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 66.Zuch M, Mason-Jones AJ, Mathews C, Henley L. Changes to the law on consent in South Africa: implications for school-based adolescent sexual and reproductive health research. BMC international health and human rights. 2012. Dec;12(1):1–5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 67.Willis N, Mavhu W, Wogrin C, Mutsinze A, Kagee A. Understanding the experience and manifestation of depression in adolescents living with HIV in Harare, Zimbabwe. PloS one. 2018. Jan 3;13(1):e0190423. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0190423 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 68.Woollett N, Brahmbhatt H, Dodd K, Booth M, Berman H, Cluver L. Revealing the impact of loss: Exploring mental health through the use of drawing/writing with HIV infected adolescents in Johannesburg. Children and Youth Services Review. 2017. Jun 1. [Google Scholar]
  • 69.Mannell J, Willan S, Shahmanesh M, Seeley J, Sherr L, Gibbs A. Why interventions to prevent intimate partner violence and HIV have failed young women in southern Africa. Journal of the International AIDS Society. 2019. Aug;22(8):e25380. doi: 10.1002/jia2.25380 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Decision Letter 0

Natella Y Rakhmanina

4 Feb 2021

PONE-D-20-34639

“We need our own clinics”: HIV infected adolescents’ recommendations for a responsive health system

PLOS ONE

Dear Dr. Woollett,

Thank you for submitting your manuscript to PLOS ONE. After careful consideration, we feel that it has merit but does not fully meet PLOS ONE’s publication criteria as it currently stands. Therefore, we invite you to submit a revised version of the manuscript that addresses the points raised during the review process.

Please submit your revised manuscript by Mar 21 2021 11:59PM. If you will need more time than this to complete your revisions, please reply to this message or contact the journal office at plosone@plos.org. When you're ready to submit your revision, log on to https://www.editorialmanager.com/pone/ and select the 'Submissions Needing Revision' folder to locate your manuscript file.

Please include the following items when submitting your revised manuscript:

  • A rebuttal letter that responds to each point raised by the academic editor and reviewer(s). You should upload this letter as a separate file labeled 'Response to Reviewers'.

  • A marked-up copy of your manuscript that highlights changes made to the original version. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Revised Manuscript with Track Changes'.

  • An unmarked version of your revised paper without tracked changes. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Manuscript'.

If you would like to make changes to your financial disclosure, please include your updated statement in your cover letter. Guidelines for resubmitting your figure files are available below the reviewer comments at the end of this letter.

If applicable, we recommend that you deposit your laboratory protocols in protocols.io to enhance the reproducibility of your results. Protocols.io assigns your protocol its own identifier (DOI) so that it can be cited independently in the future. For instructions see: http://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/submission-guidelines#loc-laboratory-protocols

We look forward to receiving your revised manuscript.

Kind regards,

Natella Y. Rakhmanina

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Journal Requirements:

When submitting your revision, we need you to address these additional requirements.

1. Please ensure that your manuscript meets PLOS ONE's style requirements, including those for file naming. The PLOS ONE style templates can be found at

https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/file?id=wjVg/PLOSOne_formatting_sample_main_body.pdf and

https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/file?id=ba62/PLOSOne_formatting_sample_title_authors_affiliations.pdf

2. Please include your table as part of your main manuscript and remove the individual file. Please note that supplementary tables should be uploaded as separate "supporting information" files.

3. Please ensure that you include a title page within your main document.

We do appreciate that you have a title page document uploaded as a separate file, however, as per our author guidelines (http://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/submission-guidelines#loc-title-page) we do require this to be part of the manuscript file itself and not uploaded separately.

Could you therefore please include the title page into the beginning of your manuscript file itself, listing all authors and affiliations.

4. Please include additional information regarding the survey or questionnaire used in the study and ensure that you have provided sufficient details that others could replicate the analyses.

For instance, if you developed a questionnaire as part of this study and it is not under a copyright more restrictive than CC-BY, please include a copy, in both the original language and English, as Supporting Information.

Additional Editor Comments:

This is an overall well written paper which provides important insight into the adolescents' needs and views on their HIV care settings and support. Minor revisions are recommended by the reviewers, and in addition authors are encouraged to consider shortening the Discussion while preserving major points to make the paper more concise.

[Note: HTML markup is below. Please do not edit.]

Reviewers' comments:

Reviewer's Responses to Questions

Comments to the Author

1. Is the manuscript technically sound, and do the data support the conclusions?

The manuscript must describe a technically sound piece of scientific research with data that supports the conclusions. Experiments must have been conducted rigorously, with appropriate controls, replication, and sample sizes. The conclusions must be drawn appropriately based on the data presented.

Reviewer #1: Partly

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

2. Has the statistical analysis been performed appropriately and rigorously?

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: N/A

**********

3. Have the authors made all data underlying the findings in their manuscript fully available?

The PLOS Data policy requires authors to make all data underlying the findings described in their manuscript fully available without restriction, with rare exception (please refer to the Data Availability Statement in the manuscript PDF file). The data should be provided as part of the manuscript or its supporting information, or deposited to a public repository. For example, in addition to summary statistics, the data points behind means, medians and variance measures should be available. If there are restrictions on publicly sharing data—e.g. participant privacy or use of data from a third party—those must be specified.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

4. Is the manuscript presented in an intelligible fashion and written in standard English?

PLOS ONE does not copyedit accepted manuscripts, so the language in submitted articles must be clear, correct, and unambiguous. Any typographical or grammatical errors should be corrected at revision, so please note any specific errors here.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

5. Review Comments to the Author

Please use the space provided to explain your answers to the questions above. You may also include additional comments for the author, including concerns about dual publication, research ethics, or publication ethics. (Please upload your review as an attachment if it exceeds 20,000 characters)

Reviewer #1: Thanks for a well written manuscript. The title is catchy and directs the reader to what the manuscript is about.

Introduction: Need to describe a bit more the health system as pertains South Africa, and especially in Johannesburg. Is it any different from other areas? Need to also describe more what the national guidelines state regarding transitioning of ALHIV ( Adolescents living with HIV) to adults clinic. What is the definition of adults in SA?

Methodology: The methodology is sufficiently detailed. Im concerned that the participant selection seemed a bit biased and may have affected the results. The participants seem to be ALHIV who are adherence to clinics, stable on ART, disclosed to status, retained in care for several years and attend support groups. The participants were also all fluent in English- which is another level of bias. Or was this a selection criteria at recruitment stage? So it seems likely that the results are skewed to what these "perfect" clients desire. The mention of lay workers and support for support groups is influenced by the type of participants. How would you tell of the influence the support groups of lay workers have had on those who are not stable, not been on ART for long time and have poor adherence? What of the opinion of ALHIV who are horizontally infected? who may not have been on ART for long or attended clinics for a long time? who may not have similar relations and freedom with lay counselors as those vertically infected? These new ALHIV may also have been identified in adult settings such as ANC clinics or STI clinics and may have a differing opinion on transition to adult clinics. This paper should consider opinions of both sides to be more objective. Or consider to make it clear that these are opinions of vertically infected adolescents. Would be important to describe in the results a bit more the number of participants who were screened and the proportion who were left out. What was the reason for non recruitment of these other participants attending the adolescent clinics? And how many were recruited from the once weekly clinics as opposed to the hospital that has daily adolescents clinics?

The paper describes some experiences in adult clinics. Among the participants- were there any who have been referred to adult clinics and returned to the adolescent clinics? Or were the opinions expressed based on what they have heard others say?

Additional concern on the methodology is the fact that the author did the IDI themselves. How did you ensure fidelity of the data by reducing author influence in data collection?

Results: the results are presented within context and there is visible contextualization of the quoted data. Was there consideration for participant review of the results? Was there effort to see if the participants connect with these findings?

Discussion: While part of the discussion focuses on what the findings are- including championing for support groups, need for lay workers as part of multi disciplinary teams , need to stay longer in adolescent clinics and need for widespread community education on perinatal infections, there are elements included in the discussion that were not brought out in the results section. There is discussion on issues of mental health and influence on retention and treatment outcomes. This doesn't seem to be included in the themes in the methodology or the results section. There is discussion on knowledge gaps such as on SRH and PMTCT among the ALHIV but this is not clear in the results. Furthermore, seeing that the participants were the ALHIV who have been on ART for a long time and considered in chronic care- its a surprise that they would not have knowledge on SRH and PMTCT yet these are mentioned to be discussed in the closed support groups. There is mention of Intimate partner violence among women and how it affects the ALHIV IN question. This link is not made in the results so not sure how this would be relevant. Yes, in Johannesburg violence is rampant but its not clear how this is linked to the 25 adolescents who were interviewed. The theme of Employment opportunities for ALHIV is explored much in the discussion. This is an important element that may need more unpacking.

Reviewer #2: the authors attempt to address a very important issue in pediatric HIV, with the availability of ART and decrease in mortality, the increase in the numbers of adolescents surviving and needing to transition into care is a critical issue.Understanding the adolescents' perspective is critical in order to transitioning them successfully.

There are some clarifying points/questions :

1)what was the sampling strategy, why were these 25 participants selected?

Data collection and instruments otherwise clearly described

2)how have differentiated care models been successful in other settings in overcoming the barriers identified by these adolescents?

3) What is the HIV status of these participants, viremia, CD4 cell count etc...? as participants who are successfully virally suppressed may have a different impression of health care needs etc...

**********

6. PLOS authors have the option to publish the peer review history of their article (what does this mean?). If published, this will include your full peer review and any attached files.

If you choose “no”, your identity will remain anonymous but your review may still be made public.

Do you want your identity to be public for this peer review? For information about this choice, including consent withdrawal, please see our Privacy Policy.

Reviewer #1: No

Reviewer #2: No

[NOTE: If reviewer comments were submitted as an attachment file, they will be attached to this email and accessible via the submission site. Please log into your account, locate the manuscript record, and check for the action link "View Attachments". If this link does not appear, there are no attachment files.]

While revising your submission, please upload your figure files to the Preflight Analysis and Conversion Engine (PACE) digital diagnostic tool, https://pacev2.apexcovantage.com/. PACE helps ensure that figures meet PLOS requirements. To use PACE, you must first register as a user. Registration is free. Then, login and navigate to the UPLOAD tab, where you will find detailed instructions on how to use the tool. If you encounter any issues or have any questions when using PACE, please email PLOS at figures@plos.org. Please note that Supporting Information files do not need this step.

PLoS One. 2021 Jul 1;16(7):e0253984. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0253984.r002

Author response to Decision Letter 0


15 Feb 2021

13th February, 2021

Dear Dr. Heber and PLoS One Reviewers,

We thank the reviewers for their suggested edits to our manuscript entitled “We need our own clinics”: HIV infected adolescents’ recommendations for a responsive health system

(Manuscript ID PONE-D-20-34639).

We appreciate the time taken by the reviewers to provide detailed feedback on our manuscript and hope we have sufficiently responded to the feedback.

Sincerely,

Nataly Woollett

Editor comments:

When submitting your revision, we need you to address these additional requirements.

1. Please ensure that your manuscript meets PLOS ONE's style requirements, including those for file naming. The PLOS ONE style templates can be found at

https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/file?id=wjVg/PLOSOne_formatting_sample_main_body.pdf and

https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/file?id=ba62/PLOSOne_formatting_sample_title_authors_affiliations.pdf

Thank you – we have endeavoured to complete per instruction and apologies for the oversight in the first submission.

2. Please include your table as part of your main manuscript and remove the individual file. Please note that supplementary tables should be uploaded as separate "supporting information" files.

Apologies – the table is now included in the text.

3. Please ensure that you include a title page within your main document.

Could you therefore please include the title page into the beginning of your manuscript file itself, listing all authors and affiliations.

Apologies – the title page is now included at the beginning of the document.

4. Please include additional information regarding the survey or questionnaire used in the study and ensure that you have provided sufficient details that others could replicate the analyses.

For instance, if you developed a questionnaire as part of this study and it is not under a copyright more restrictive than CC-BY, please include a copy, in both the original language and English, as Supporting Information.

The in-depth interview guide has been added as a file in supporting information.

5. This is an overall well written paper which provides important insight into the adolescents' needs and views on their HIV care settings and support. Minor revisions are recommended by the reviewers, and in addition authors are encouraged to consider shortening the Discussion while preserving major points to make the paper more concise.

Thanks for the positive feedback. We have shortened the discussion section in line with what reviewers have also recommended and hopefully this reads better.

Reviewer 1:

6. Thanks for a well written manuscript. The title is catchy and directs the reader to what the manuscript is about.

Many thanks for this positive feedback.

7. Introduction: Need to describe a bit more the health system as pertains South Africa, and especially in Johannesburg. Is it any different from other areas? Need to also describe more what the national guidelines state regarding transitioning of ALHIV ( Adolescents living with HIV) to adults clinic. What is the definition of adults in SA?

Thank you – we have added the following sentences to the introduction to address these comments:

The health system in Johannesburg is overwhelmed with large numbers of patients, often in excess of healthcare providers; leading to rapid expansion of a range of paraprofessionals being employed to address services delivery gaps (8, 9).

There are currently no national guidelines on how to transition adolescents when they reach adulthood at 18 years or before if they are stable on treatment (17).

8. Methodology: The methodology is sufficiently detailed. Im concerned that the participant selection seemed a bit biased and may have affected the results. The participants seem to be ALHIV who are adherence to clinics, stable on ART, disclosed to status, retained in care for several years and attend support groups. The participants were also all fluent in English- which is another level of bias. Or was this a selection criteria at recruitment stage? So it seems likely that the results are skewed to what these "perfect" clients desire.

Thanks for bringing this to our attention. The participants had been retained in care for a long time, we wanted their views as they knew the health system well. But, they were not always adherent and some had histories of challenges with adherence. They were also not all retained consistently through their development, but were rather currently retained in care. We have included the following in the text to enhance clarity:

All participants reported experience of being disclosed to regarding their HIV-status, were on treatment for HIV infection, were currently retained in care, had been accessing treatment for a number of years, and participated in a clinic-based support group. Most had histories of varying levels of adherence to treatment as well as retention.

We did find most participants could communicate well in English – perhaps a factor of an urban environment. We will add this as a limitation as follows:

Thirdly, the adolescents were conveniently sampled and recruited from primary healthcare facilities in an urban setting and where adolescents communicated easily in English hence findings may not be generalizable to adolescents in other contexts or to those who are not comfortable speaking English.

9. The mention of lay workers and support for support groups is influenced by the type of participants. How would you tell of the influence the support groups of lay workers have had on those who are not stable, not been on ART for long time and have poor adherence? What of the opinion of ALHIV who are horizontally infected? who may not have been on ART for long or attended clinics for a long time? who may not have similar relations and freedom with lay counselors as those vertically infected? These new ALHIV may also have been identified in adult settings such as ANC clinics or STI clinics and may have a differing opinion on transition to adult clinics. This paper should consider opinions of both sides to be more objective. Or consider to make it clear that these are opinions of vertically infected adolescents.

Thanks for raising this point. This qualitative study was nested in a larger quantitative study that administered a questionnaire to 343 adolescents at 5 HIV clinics. The clinics were in a variety of areas in Johannesburg and regular standard of care was given at all except 1 that was a flagship clinic with an enhanced standard of care. The participants in the qualitative study were recruited equally from the 5 sites so were not a biased sample from the flagship clinic. To our surprise, of the 343 adolescents recruited for the quantitative study, only 4 participants were known to be horizontally infected and they were from the same regular standard of care clinic. As such, the majority of the sample was vertically infected and all those for the qualitative study were vertically infected too. We didn’t recruit in ANC or STI clinics and agree, in those environments, we could have harnessed a more diverse patient population.

We draw the reviewers attention to this sentence in the methods section that does state the sample was vertically infected:

Participants were infected at birth or early childhood and had lived with HIV as long as they remembered.

And also this sentence in the limitations section:

Secondly, the adolescents in this sample were vertically infected and their views may differ significantly to horizontally infected adolescents who may not have accessed the healthcare system as intensely throughout development.

10. Would be important to describe in the results a bit more the number of participants who were screened and the proportion who were left out. What was the reason for non recruitment of these other participants attending the adolescent clinics? And how many were recruited from the once weekly clinics as opposed to the hospital that has daily adolescents clinics?

Thank you for the recommendation – we have added the following sentence to the methods section:

The first five participants that met inclusion criteria at each of the five sites were invited to participate in the qualitative interviews. No participants refused and we felt we reached saturation with 25 participants in total.

11. The paper describes some experiences in adult clinics. Among the participants- were there any who have been referred to adult clinics and returned to the adolescent clinics? Or were the opinions expressed based on what they have heard others say?

Yes, there were a couple of participants who had been referred and came back to the adolescent clinic. Kagiso, Bafense and Sithembile experienced this. To increase clarity, we have altered the sentence to read as follows:

Many stable adolescent patients had been down referred to adult clinics and soon returned to the adolescent clinics, Kagiso and Bafense below remembered this experience.

12. Additional concern on the methodology is the fact that the author did the IDI themselves. How did you ensure fidelity of the data by reducing author influence in data collection?

Thanks, however, the purpose was not to be wholly objective, since every qualitative researcher approaches data collection with explicit or implicit understandings of the phenomenon at hand (Maxwell, 1992), but rather interpret the findings in light of the participant voices themselves. For this reason we draw heavily on verbatim participant quotes to illustrate key points. In addition, the analysis of the data was undertaken by multiple researchers to ensure consensus and guarantee research findings. This is from the data analysis section:

To ensure intercoder consensus, fine codes were developed by three researchers experienced in qualitative data analysis by printing out a full set of excerpts (from each data set) associated with each code for each transcript and identifying sub-themes arising from the data. Two researchers applied the thematic codes to every transcript. The findings were critiqued and discussed within the group to guarantee research results.

13. Results: the results are presented within context and there is visible contextualization of the quoted data. Was there consideration for participant review of the results? Was there effort to see if the participants connect with these findings?

We didn’t go back to participants with the findings unfortunately, however, our adolescent community advisory group did engage with the findings and seemed to relate to them. All ACAB members were adolescents that were engaged in care in the public health system in Johannesburg. The following sentence has been added at the end of the ‘Participants and Procedures’ section:

The ACAB gave advice on methods and were also engaged with the findings of the study.

14. Discussion: While part of the discussion focuses on what the findings are- including championing for support groups, need for lay workers as part of multi disciplinary teams , need to stay longer in adolescent clinics and need for widespread community education on perinatal infections, there are elements included in the discussion that were not brought out in the results section. There is discussion on issues of mental health and influence on retention and treatment outcomes. This doesn't seem to be included in the themes in the methodology or the results section.

We bring the reviewers attention to this part of the results section:

Support groups also facilitated mental health gains such as hope, optimism and relief of burdensome emotions.

They will have to support us in what we are doing because we will help this virus to get down and down because if they are not supporting us, this virus will busy getting up and higher because we are losing a lot of youth because they are scared to be HIV, but as we are, we are not scared cause they mustn’t lose hope, there is hope out there, we can help them handle person with pain – Sithembile, male, 18yrs

Discuss everything that you want to discuss about you take out all the pain inside you, there by the group – Tebogo, female, 18yrs

And this section of the results as well:

Participants seemed to rely heavily on counselors for information about HIV and their treatment, but also sought guidance and emotional support from them.

We need to put more counselors in clinics to support us, maybe telling us what is going on about our lives, what should we do if there is time that’s come difficult maybe – Nomphumelelo, female, 17yrs

15. There is discussion on knowledge gaps such as on SRH and PMTCT among the ALHIV but this is not clear in the results. Furthermore, seeing that the participants were the ALHIV who have been on ART for a long time and considered in chronic care- its a surprise that they would not have knowledge on SRH and PMTCT yet these are mentioned to be discussed in the closed support groups.

Yes, this was a surprising findings for the research team too. SRH and PMTCT had been spoken about in multiple contexts with these young patients by multiple adults, at clinic level, within groups and presumably at school as well. However, either the concepts were not explained clearly and articulately or they were not understood well for these twenty five participants. Our research team discussed why this might be the case at length and concluded perhaps with these more ‘technical’ issues in HIV treatment and care, the words and concepts are stated but the particularities are not discussed at length at all or how prevention methods really prevent disease transmission for individuals. Perhaps adults who manage vertically infected adolescents assume they know this material. All the participants had heard of PMTCT and would say it was to prevent transmission but they didn’t actually understand how it prevented transmission. In situations of teaching when young people are expected to listen, perhaps there isn’t much agency to ask adults directly what they mean and perhaps adults don’t necessarily have the technical detail and comprehensive understanding to explain well. This following sentence has been added to the findings to aid in clarity:

In fact, the interviewer explained PMTCT at length to all participants as there was not comprehensive understanding of this prevention method in the sample.

16. There is mention of Intimate partner violence among women and how it affects the ALHIV IN question. This link is not made in the results so not sure how this would be relevant. Yes, in Johannesburg violence is rampant but its not clear how this is linked to the 25 adolescents who were interviewed.

In our larger study that these participants were recruited from, there was high exposure and experience of multiple forms of violence. We have now added a reference to that study and included a sentence that makes the link as follows:

Many vertically infected children and adolescents live in communities characterized by poverty and exposure to violence (37) as was the case in our sample (31).

17. The theme of Employment opportunities for ALHIV is explored much in the discussion. This is an important element that may need more unpacking.

Thank you, we agree. Unfortunately, we are constrained by the word limitation and other reviewers recommendations to shorten the discussion section. We trust that the paragraph in the discussion section will suffice on this topic.

Reviewer 2:

18. The authors attempt to address a very important issue in pediatric HIV, with the availability of ART and decrease in mortality, the increase in the numbers of adolescents surviving and needing to transition into care is a critical issue. Understanding the adolescents' perspective is critical in order to transitioning them successfully.

We agree and value your comment thank you.

19. What was the sampling strategy, why were these 25 participants selected?

We have added these sentences to the methods section to explain further:

The first five participants that met inclusion criteria at each of the five sites were invited to participate in the qualitative interviews. No participants refused and we felt we reached saturation with 25 participants in total.

20. Data collection and instruments otherwise clearly described.

Great thank you.

21. How have differentiated care models been successful in other settings in overcoming the barriers identified by these adolescents?

We have identified a couple of areas, such as community-based adherence clubs, support groups (otherwise known as ‘Teen Clubs’) and mental health counselling and make recommendation of them in the discussion:

Community-based adherence clubs that have shown positive outcomes for adult patients (58) may be equally effective for adolescents, especially if there is a support group component to implementation and if the groups are adolescent only (29).

There is growing evidence that clinic-based support groups help retain HIV infected adolescents in care and if managed well, can be taken to scale (14, 32).

Those (support groups) that intentionally address some of the mental health difficulties of HIV infected adolescents and that are facilitated by staff grounded in understanding adolescent development and mental health, could mitigate risk, improve health system use and treatment adherence.

22. What is the HIV status of these participants, viremia, CD4 cell count etc...? as participants who are successfully virally suppressed may have a different impression of health care needs etc.

This is a valuable question and regretably not one that we investigated. We didn’t verify viral suppression rates or review medical records in this study unfortunately. We will add this as a limitation as follows:

Fourthly, we didn’t ascertain viral suppression rates in this study and successfully virally suppressed adolescents may have different impressions of healthcare needs.

Reference:

Maxwell J. Understanding and validity in qualitative research. Harvard educational review. 1992 Sep 1;62(3):279-301.

Attachment

Submitted filename: PLoS One Reviewer Response_Feb 2021.docx

Decision Letter 1

Brian C Zanoni

19 Apr 2021

PONE-D-20-34639R1

“We need our own clinics”: HIV infected adolescents’ recommendations for a responsive health system

PLOS ONE

Dear Dr. Woollett,

Thank you for submitting your manuscript to PLOS ONE. After careful consideration, we feel that it has merit but does not fully meet PLOS ONE’s publication criteria as it currently stands. Therefore, we invite you to submit a revised version of the manuscript that addresses the points raised during the review process.

==============================

ACADEMIC EDITOR: Thank you for your submission of this important manuscript. We feel that this manuscript has merit but requires minor revision before final acceptance. Please address Reviewer #3 comments, in particular the use of person-first language throughout, description of coding conflicts, and the formatting of Table 1. Also respond to Review #3's comment about higher order analysis which would strengthen the manuscript but would not be required.

==============================

Please submit your revised manuscript by Jun 03 2021 11:59PM. If you will need more time than this to complete your revisions, please reply to this message or contact the journal office at plosone@plos.org. When you're ready to submit your revision, log on to https://www.editorialmanager.com/pone/ and select the 'Submissions Needing Revision' folder to locate your manuscript file.

Please include the following items when submitting your revised manuscript:

  • A rebuttal letter that responds to each point raised by the academic editor and reviewer(s). You should upload this letter as a separate file labeled 'Response to Reviewers'.

  • A marked-up copy of your manuscript that highlights changes made to the original version. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Revised Manuscript with Track Changes'.

  • An unmarked version of your revised paper without tracked changes. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Manuscript'.

If you would like to make changes to your financial disclosure, please include your updated statement in your cover letter. Guidelines for resubmitting your figure files are available below the reviewer comments at the end of this letter.

If applicable, we recommend that you deposit your laboratory protocols in protocols.io to enhance the reproducibility of your results. Protocols.io assigns your protocol its own identifier (DOI) so that it can be cited independently in the future. For instructions see: http://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/submission-guidelines#loc-laboratory-protocols. Additionally, PLOS ONE offers an option for publishing peer-reviewed Lab Protocol articles, which describe protocols hosted on protocols.io. Read more information on sharing protocols at https://plos.org/protocols?utm_medium=editorial-email&utm_source=authorletters&utm_campaign=protocols.

We look forward to receiving your revised manuscript.

Kind regards,

Brian C. Zanoni, MD

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Journal Requirements:

Please review your reference list to ensure that it is complete and correct. If you have cited papers that have been retracted, please include the rationale for doing so in the manuscript text, or remove these references and replace them with relevant current references. Any changes to the reference list should be mentioned in the rebuttal letter that accompanies your revised manuscript. If you need to cite a retracted article, indicate the article’s retracted status in the References list and also include a citation and full reference for the retraction notice.

Additional Editor Comments (if provided):

Please address the comments by reviewer 3 in your revised manuscript.

[Note: HTML markup is below. Please do not edit.]

Reviewers' comments:

Reviewer's Responses to Questions

Comments to the Author

1. If the authors have adequately addressed your comments raised in a previous round of review and you feel that this manuscript is now acceptable for publication, you may indicate that here to bypass the “Comments to the Author” section, enter your conflict of interest statement in the “Confidential to Editor” section, and submit your "Accept" recommendation.

Reviewer #1: All comments have been addressed

Reviewer #3: (No Response)

**********

2. Is the manuscript technically sound, and do the data support the conclusions?

The manuscript must describe a technically sound piece of scientific research with data that supports the conclusions. Experiments must have been conducted rigorously, with appropriate controls, replication, and sample sizes. The conclusions must be drawn appropriately based on the data presented.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #3: Yes

**********

3. Has the statistical analysis been performed appropriately and rigorously?

Reviewer #1: N/A

Reviewer #3: Yes

**********

4. Have the authors made all data underlying the findings in their manuscript fully available?

The PLOS Data policy requires authors to make all data underlying the findings described in their manuscript fully available without restriction, with rare exception (please refer to the Data Availability Statement in the manuscript PDF file). The data should be provided as part of the manuscript or its supporting information, or deposited to a public repository. For example, in addition to summary statistics, the data points behind means, medians and variance measures should be available. If there are restrictions on publicly sharing data—e.g. participant privacy or use of data from a third party—those must be specified.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #3: Yes

**********

5. Is the manuscript presented in an intelligible fashion and written in standard English?

PLOS ONE does not copyedit accepted manuscripts, so the language in submitted articles must be clear, correct, and unambiguous. Any typographical or grammatical errors should be corrected at revision, so please note any specific errors here.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #3: Yes

**********

6. Review Comments to the Author

Please use the space provided to explain your answers to the questions above. You may also include additional comments for the author, including concerns about dual publication, research ethics, or publication ethics. (Please upload your review as an attachment if it exceeds 20,000 characters)

Reviewer #1: (No Response)

Reviewer #3: This is an important study given the increasing numbers of adolescents living with HIV surviving into adulthood and eventual need to transition to adult-oriented care settings. The authors attempt to address this critical time by examining the attitudes and experiences of perinatally infected adolescents living with HIV regarding transition from pediatric to adult care in South Africa, including their recommendations for a successful transition. The study provided insights from adolescents about this critical time through in-depth interviews, including the importance of clinic-based support groups, the value of lay counselors in providing education, counseling, and support to adolescents, increasing widespread education of different modes of HIV transition (especially vertical transmission), and linking the clinic to the community.

The authors have adequately responded to the previous reviewers’ comments; This is my first review of this revised manuscript. Overall, the methods, interpretation, and communication of the findings are excellent. The major strengths of this manuscript are the focus on a population (perinatally-infected adolescents living with HIV in South Africa) that has high rates of morbidity and mortality at each point of the continuum of care, especially healthcare transition, as well as a richness of quotations from the participants to support your discussion. However, a few additional points to consider, including the use of identity-first vs person-first language, unclear methodology with regards to intercoder agreement, incorrect formatting of table 1, and lack of synthesis of data to broader analytical themes.

1. I am concerned with the authors use of identity-first language in the title and throughout the manuscript. The authors should use person-first language in the title and throughout the manuscript. For example: “HIV infected adolescents” can be changed to “adolescents living with HIV;” and “HIV infected women” can be changed to “women living with HIV.”

2. Additional concern with the methodology is regarding the intercoder reliability; specifically how were discrepancies between independent coders resolved?

3. Within the results section, table 1 is formatted incorrectly with the table split with text dividing the table. Authors should fix the formatting for table 1.

4. An additional concern with the results section is the authors dependence on quotations and their interpretation of these quotations for development of descriptive themes. The authors could consider synthesizing results to a higher order to generate new analytical themes or explanations.

**********

7. PLOS authors have the option to publish the peer review history of their article (what does this mean?). If published, this will include your full peer review and any attached files.

If you choose “no”, your identity will remain anonymous but your review may still be made public.

Do you want your identity to be public for this peer review? For information about this choice, including consent withdrawal, please see our Privacy Policy.

Reviewer #1: No

Reviewer #3: No

[NOTE: If reviewer comments were submitted as an attachment file, they will be attached to this email and accessible via the submission site. Please log into your account, locate the manuscript record, and check for the action link "View Attachments". If this link does not appear, there are no attachment files.]

While revising your submission, please upload your figure files to the Preflight Analysis and Conversion Engine (PACE) digital diagnostic tool, https://pacev2.apexcovantage.com/. PACE helps ensure that figures meet PLOS requirements. To use PACE, you must first register as a user. Registration is free. Then, login and navigate to the UPLOAD tab, where you will find detailed instructions on how to use the tool. If you encounter any issues or have any questions when using PACE, please email PLOS at figures@plos.org. Please note that Supporting Information files do not need this step.

PLoS One. 2021 Jul 1;16(7):e0253984. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0253984.r004

Author response to Decision Letter 1


18 May 2021

Reviewer #3: This is an important study given the increasing numbers of adolescents living with HIV surviving into adulthood and eventual need to transition to adult-oriented care settings. The authors attempt to address this critical time by examining the attitudes and experiences of perinatally infected adolescents living with HIV regarding transition from pediatric to adult care in South Africa, including their recommendations for a successful transition. The study provided insights from adolescents about this critical time through in-depth interviews, including the importance of clinic-based support groups, the value of lay counselors in providing education, counseling, and support to adolescents, increasing widespread education of different modes of HIV transition (especially vertical transmission), and linking the clinic to the community.

The authors have adequately responded to the previous reviewers’ comments; This is my first review of this revised manuscript. Overall, the methods, interpretation, and communication of the findings are excellent. The major strengths of this manuscript are the focus on a population (perinatally-infected adolescents living with HIV in South Africa) that has high rates of morbidity and mortality at each point of the continuum of care, especially healthcare transition, as well as a richness of quotations from the participants to support your discussion.

Thank you Reviewer 3 for that positive feedback.

However, a few additional points to consider, including the use of identity-first vs person-first language, unclear methodology with regards to intercoder agreement, incorrect formatting of table 1, and lack of synthesis of data to broader analytical themes.

1. I am concerned with the authors use of identity-first language in the title and throughout the manuscript. The authors should use person-first language in the title and throughout the manuscript. For example: “HIV infected adolescents” can be changed to “adolescents living with HIV;” and “HIV infected women” can be changed to “women living with HIV.”

Thank you for bringing this important point to our attention. Please note that person-first language has now been incorporated throughout the text.

2. Additional concern with the methodology is regarding the intercoder reliability; specifically how were discrepancies between independent coders resolved?

A group of 3 researchers where part of the analysis team and we double coded every transcript. We met weekly to discuss the coding, resolve any conflicts and learn from the data in an iterative way. We were not aiming for perfect alignment in terms of intercoder reliability but rather consensus in terms of the meaning of codes and we felt we were able to reach this successfully through this process. We have added the following to improve clarity:

To ensure intercoder consensus, fine codes were developed by three researchers experienced in qualitative data analysis by printing out a full set of excerpts (from each data set) associated with each code for each transcript and identifying sub-themes arising from the data. Two researchers applied the thematic codes to every transcript. Each week during the double coding, the findings were critiqued and discussed within the group to guarantee research results. During analysis, we found that data reached a point of saturation, which suggests the sample size was sufficient.

3. Within the results section, table 1 is formatted incorrectly with the table split with text dividing the table. Authors should fix the formatting for table 1.

Apologies, the table has been realigned now. Thanks.

4. An additional concern with the results section is the authors dependence on quotations and their interpretation of these quotations for development of descriptive themes. The authors could consider synthesizing results to a higher order to generate new analytical themes or explanations.

Although higher order analysis may strengthen this manuscript, we do believe we were able to use a grounded theory approach to analysis effectively. We were interested in analyzing the data and deriving meaning from it in the first instance. We feel through this method we were able to meaningfully construct and describe the views and lives of our participants, adding to the literature around their recommendations for their healthcare and bringing their voices more demonstrably to that conversation.

Please also note that reference to Table 1 has been made within the text as required.

Attachment

Submitted filename: PLosOne reviewer response_April 2021.docx

Decision Letter 2

Brian C Zanoni

17 Jun 2021

“We need our own clinics”: Adolescents living with HIV recommendations for a responsive health system

PONE-D-20-34639R2

Dear Dr. Woollett,

We’re pleased to inform you that your manuscript has been judged scientifically suitable for publication and will be formally accepted for publication once it meets all outstanding technical requirements.

Within one week, you’ll receive an e-mail detailing the required amendments. When these have been addressed, you’ll receive a formal acceptance letter and your manuscript will be scheduled for publication.

An invoice for payment will follow shortly after the formal acceptance. To ensure an efficient process, please log into Editorial Manager at http://www.editorialmanager.com/pone/, click the 'Update My Information' link at the top of the page, and double check that your user information is up-to-date. If you have any billing related questions, please contact our Author Billing department directly at authorbilling@plos.org.

If your institution or institutions have a press office, please notify them about your upcoming paper to help maximize its impact. If they’ll be preparing press materials, please inform our press team as soon as possible -- no later than 48 hours after receiving the formal acceptance. Your manuscript will remain under strict press embargo until 2 pm Eastern Time on the date of publication. For more information, please contact onepress@plos.org.

Kind regards,

Brian C. Zanoni, MD

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Additional Editor Comments (optional):

Reviewers' comments:

Reviewer's Responses to Questions

Comments to the Author

1. If the authors have adequately addressed your comments raised in a previous round of review and you feel that this manuscript is now acceptable for publication, you may indicate that here to bypass the “Comments to the Author” section, enter your conflict of interest statement in the “Confidential to Editor” section, and submit your "Accept" recommendation.

Reviewer #1: All comments have been addressed

Reviewer #3: All comments have been addressed

**********

2. Is the manuscript technically sound, and do the data support the conclusions?

The manuscript must describe a technically sound piece of scientific research with data that supports the conclusions. Experiments must have been conducted rigorously, with appropriate controls, replication, and sample sizes. The conclusions must be drawn appropriately based on the data presented.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #3: Yes

**********

3. Has the statistical analysis been performed appropriately and rigorously?

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #3: Yes

**********

4. Have the authors made all data underlying the findings in their manuscript fully available?

The PLOS Data policy requires authors to make all data underlying the findings described in their manuscript fully available without restriction, with rare exception (please refer to the Data Availability Statement in the manuscript PDF file). The data should be provided as part of the manuscript or its supporting information, or deposited to a public repository. For example, in addition to summary statistics, the data points behind means, medians and variance measures should be available. If there are restrictions on publicly sharing data—e.g. participant privacy or use of data from a third party—those must be specified.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #3: Yes

**********

5. Is the manuscript presented in an intelligible fashion and written in standard English?

PLOS ONE does not copyedit accepted manuscripts, so the language in submitted articles must be clear, correct, and unambiguous. Any typographical or grammatical errors should be corrected at revision, so please note any specific errors here.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #3: Yes

**********

6. Review Comments to the Author

Please use the space provided to explain your answers to the questions above. You may also include additional comments for the author, including concerns about dual publication, research ethics, or publication ethics. (Please upload your review as an attachment if it exceeds 20,000 characters)

Reviewer #1: The authors have responded satisfactorily to the reviewer comments. There was concern on the methodology and the analysis and these have been addressed.

Reviewer #3: The authors have provided a nicely detailed and thorough response to the comments from the previous review and have addressed my concerns. The study findings are important and will be of interest to a broad audience.

**********

7. PLOS authors have the option to publish the peer review history of their article (what does this mean?). If published, this will include your full peer review and any attached files.

If you choose “no”, your identity will remain anonymous but your review may still be made public.

Do you want your identity to be public for this peer review? For information about this choice, including consent withdrawal, please see our Privacy Policy.

Reviewer #1: No

Reviewer #3: No

Acceptance letter

Brian C Zanoni

23 Jun 2021

PONE-D-20-34639R2

“We need our own clinics”: Adolescents’ living with HIV recommendations for a responsive health system

Dear Dr. Woollett:

I'm pleased to inform you that your manuscript has been deemed suitable for publication in PLOS ONE. Congratulations! Your manuscript is now with our production department.

If your institution or institutions have a press office, please let them know about your upcoming paper now to help maximize its impact. If they'll be preparing press materials, please inform our press team within the next 48 hours. Your manuscript will remain under strict press embargo until 2 pm Eastern Time on the date of publication. For more information please contact onepress@plos.org.

If we can help with anything else, please email us at plosone@plos.org.

Thank you for submitting your work to PLOS ONE and supporting open access.

Kind regards,

PLOS ONE Editorial Office Staff

on behalf of

Dr. Brian C. Zanoni

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Associated Data

    This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

    Supplementary Materials

    S1 File. In-depth interview guide.

    (DOCX)

    Attachment

    Submitted filename: PLoS One Reviewer Response_Feb 2021.docx

    Attachment

    Submitted filename: PLosOne reviewer response_April 2021.docx

    Data Availability Statement

    Please note there are special circumstances regarding this research. A court order was needed as a result of a change in legislation in South Africa and on account of participants not having legal guardians, i.e. it is not customary for children whose parents have died and who go on to live with other caregivers, for those caregivers to approach the state to become 'legal guardians'. As such, I had to approach the high court in Johannesburg to give consent to recruit participants. The court order does not give me consent to share data. For researchers interested in the data set, please contact Professor CB Penny, Chairperson of the Human Research Ethics Committee (Medical) at the University of Witwatersrand, on telephone no. +2711 717 2301, or by e-mail at Clement.Penny@wits.ac.za. Please reference ethics approval number M130258.


    Articles from PLoS ONE are provided here courtesy of PLOS

    RESOURCES