Skip to main content
Microbiology Resource Announcements logoLink to Microbiology Resource Announcements
. 2021 Jul 1;10(26):e00493-21. doi: 10.1128/MRA.00493-21

Complete Genome Sequence of the Cluster B4 Mycobacteriophage Lolalove, Isolated in Charleston, South Carolina

Christine A Byrum a,, Hannah Marie Rozier a, Toni E Allison a, Emilia Ballou a, Lauren Bergen a, Reilley A Chamness a, Madison E Davis a, Mouna S DiBenedetto a, Nathaniel C Elston a, Lyric A Graham a, Keiana L Haigh a, Tessa M Jansen a, Gabrielle S Kostur a, Nicholas A Larson a, Fiona L Lewis a, Carlo Negroni a, Isabella V Rupert a, Isabel S Wood a, Anastasia M Zimmerman a, Veronique A Delesalle b
Editor: Kenneth M Stedmanc
PMCID: PMC8248883  PMID: 34197200

ABSTRACT

Lolalove, a B4 subcluster soil bacteriophage of Mycobacterium smegmatis, was isolated in Charleston, SC. It possesses a 71,111-bp linear double-stranded DNA (dsDNA) genome with 99 protein-coding genes and a GC content of 68.9%. genome BLASTn alignments indicate high sequence identity to the related B4 subcluster M. smegmatis phages BrownCNA, Mithril, and Hangman.

ANNOUNCEMENT

The mycobacteriophage Lolalove was discovered in damp soil at a Shell gas station in Charleston, SC (32.787021N, 79.934143W), as part of the Howard Hughes Medical Institute (HHMI) Science Education Alliance Phage Hunters Advancing Genomics and Evolutionary Science (SEA-PHAGES) (1) effort to compare genomes of novel actinobacteriophages. This virus infects Mycobacterium smegmatis mc2155 and was isolated using enrichment (37°C, 48 h) followed by 3 purification and amplification cycles in 7H9 top agar (see SEA-PHAGES Phage Discovery Guide for details) (2). Transmission electron microscopy revealed that this virus has Siphoviridae morphology with a mean capsid diameter of 76.83 nm, tail length of 329.34 nm, and tail diameter of 12.8 nm (Fig. 1).

FIG 1.

FIG 1

Lolalove morphology was examined using a JEOL JEM-1010 transmission electron microscope. A high-titer lysate placed on Formvar-coated copper grids was negatively stained with 1% uranyl acetate (2).

DNA was extracted using the Promega Wizard DNA cleanup system and a sequencing library prepared with an NEBNext Ultra II library prep kit. Pittsburgh Bacteriophage Institute sequenced the genome using Illumina MiSeq technology (v3 reagents) (3) and 609,904 single-end reads (150 bp) were collected. During assembly, ∼20% of reads were from a second B4 subcluster virus. The two genomes were resolved using AceUtil (3) based on differences in contig coverage. Lolalove reads were assembled de novo into a single contig using Newbler v2.9 (4) and verified using Consed v29.0 (3, 5). The Lolalove genome is 71,111 bp with 1,193× coverage. The GC content is 68.9%, and the termini are circularly permuted as the contig ends overlap (3). Base 1 in the genome was selected relative to the terminase sequence (identified using DNA Master) (6) as described by Russell (3).

After sequencing, the genome was annotated using PECAAN (7), and data were subsequently transferred to DNA Master v5.22.23 (https://phagesdb.org/DNAMaster). To identify genome features and assign putative gene functions, programs used included GLIMMER v3.0 (8), GeneMark v2.5 (9), Starterator v1.1 (https://seaphages.org/media/docs/Starterator_Guide_2016.pdf), BLASTp v2.9 (10), HHpred (11), NCBI Conserved Domain Database (12), TMHMM2 (http://www.cbs.dtu.dk/services/TMHMM), TOPCONS v2 (13), Phamerator (14), ARAGORN v1.2.38 (15), and tRNAscan-SE v3.0 (16). Default settings were used in all programs.

Lolalove is a cluster B/subcluster B4 bacteriophage whose genome contains 99 putative protein-coding genes with 31 assigned functions but no tRNAs or transfer-messenger RNAs (tmRNAs) (viruses are in the same cluster if they share >50% nucleotide sequence similarity) (17). Predicted genes for structural assembly occur on the forward strand of the left arm, and as in other B4 subcluster members, no frameshift is detected in the tail chaperone protein (gp23). Putative genes on the reverse strand include gp6, gp7, gp19, gp40 to gp43, gp46 to gp60, and gp75 to gp99.

The genome similarity of Lolalove to related viruses was evaluated using tools online at https://phagesdb.org to measure whole-genome BLASTn alignment (10) and genome content similarity scores (GCSs) (18) (Table 1). Based on percent identity, Lolalove shows the highest nucleotide similarity to the B4 subcluster genomes of BrownCNA, Mithril, Hangman, Waleliano, Zemanar, and Fortunato. These mycobacteriophages were predominately isolated from sites in the southeastern United States.

TABLE 1.

Comparison of the Lolalove genome to related B4 subcluster genomes

Phage name GenBank accession no. Genome size (bp) GC content (%) Fold coverage (×) Location found No. of CDSsa % identity % query coverage GCS score
Lolalove MT818419.1 71,111 68.9 1,193 Charleston, SC 99 NAb NA NA
BrownCNA KT270441 71,214 68.9 1,433 Winder, GA 97 98.46 98 95.3
Mithril MN369759 70,937 69.0 211 Louisville, KY 95 98.41 97 94.2
Hangman MH513970 71,376 68.9 2,011 Conway, SC 97 97.87 97 97.4
Waleliano MK524486 70,963 68.9 408 Catonsville, MD 96 97.83 97 96.9
Zemanar JF704104 71,092 68.9 NA Fredericksburg, VA 95 97.75 97 94.2
Fortunato KX589269 70,679 69.0 196 Arkadelphia, AR 94 96.89 96 90.5
a

CDSs, coding DNA sequences.

b

NA, not applicable.

Data availability.

The Lolalove virus is available at the Pittsburgh Bacteriophage Institute in freezer box 93/grid E3. The genome sequence and raw reads appear in DDBJ/ENA/GenBank under accession number MT818419.1 and SRA under accession number SRX9117730.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

This study was generously supported by the HHMI SEA-PHAGES program as well as the Department of Biology at the College of Charleston.

Special thanks go to Nancy Smythe of the Medical University of South Carolina for her assistance with transmission electron microscopy and to College of Charleston students Stephanie Jackson and Cody Johnson for assistance in isolating Lolalove. We also thank Graham F. Hatfull, Deborah Jacobs-Sera, Daniel A. Russell, Welkin H. Pope, and Rebecca A. Garlena at the University of Pittsburgh for sequencing, quality control, and assembly of the genome.

Contributor Information

Christine A. Byrum, Email: byrumc@cofc.edu.

Kenneth M. Stedman, Portland State University

REFERENCES

  • 1.Jordan TC, Burnett SH, Carson S, Caruso SM, Clase K, DeJong RJ, Dennehy JJ, Denver DR, Dunbar D, Elgin SCR, Findley AM, Gissendanner CR, Golebiewska UP, Guild N, Hartzog GA, Grillo WH, Hollowell GP, Hughes LE, Johnson A, King RA, Lewis LO, Li W, Rosenzweig F, Rubin MR, Saha MS, Sandoz J, Shaffer CD, Taylor B, Temple L, Vazquez E, Ware VC, Barker LP, Bradley KW, Jacobs-Sera D, Pope WH, Russell DA, Cresawn SG, Lopatto D, Bailey CP, Hatfull GF. 2014. A broadly implementable research course in phage discovery and genomics for first-year undergraduate students. mBio 5:e01051-13. doi: 10.1128/mBio.01051-13. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Poxleitner M, Pope W, Jacobs-Sera D, Sivanathan V, Hatfull G. 2018. Phage discovery guide. Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Chevy Chase, MD. seaphagesphagediscoveryguide.helpdocsonline.com/home. [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Russell DA. 2018. Sequencing, assembling, and finishing complete bacteriophage genomes. Methods Mol Biol 1681:109–125. doi: 10.1007/978-1-4939-7343-9_9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Margulies M, Egholm M, Altman WE, Attiya S, Bader JS, Bemben LA, Berka J, Braverman MS, Chen Y-J, Chen Z, Dewell SB, Du L, Fierro JM, Gomes XV, Godwin BC, He W, Helgesen S, Ho CH, Irzyk GP, Jando SC, Alenquer MLI, Jarvie TP, Jirage KB, Kim J-B, Knight JR, Lanza JR, Leamon JH, Lefkowitz SM, Lei M, Li J, Lohman KL, Lu H, Makhijani VB, McDade KE, McKenna MP, Myers EW, Nickerson E, Nobile JR, Plant R, Puc BP, Ronan MT, Roth GT, Sarkis GJ, Simons JF, Simpson JW, Srinivasan M, Tartaro KR, Tomasz A, Vogt KA, Volkmer GA, Wang SH, Wang Y, Weiner MP, Yu P, et al. 2005. Genome sequencing in microfabricated high-density picolitre reactors. Nature 437:376–380. doi: 10.1038/nature03959. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Gordon D, Green P. 2013. Consed: a graphical editor for next-generation sequencing. Bioinformatics 29:2936–2937. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btt515. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Pope WH, Jacobs-Sera D. 2018. Annotation of bacteriophage genome sequences using DNA Master: an overview. Methods Mol Biol 1681:217–229. doi: 10.1007/978-1-4939-7343-9_16. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Rinehart CA, Gaffney BL, Smith JR, Wood JD. 2016. PECAAN: Phage Evidence Collection and Annotation Network. Western Kentucky University Bioinformatics and Information Science Center, Bowling Green, KY. https://seaphages.org/media/docs/PECAAN_User_Guide_Dec7_2016.pdf. [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Delcher AL, Harmon D, Kasif S, White O, Salzberg SL. 1999. Improved microbial gene identification with GLIMMER. Nucleic Acids Res 27:4636–4641. doi: 10.1093/nar/27.23.4636. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Lukashin AV, Borodovsky M. 1998. GeneMark.hmm: new solutions for gene finding. Nucleic Acids Res 26:1107–1115. doi: 10.1093/nar/26.4.1107. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Altschul SF, Gish W, Miller W, Myers EW, Lipman DJ. 1990. Basic local alignment search tool. J Mol Biol 215:403–410. doi: 10.1016/S0022-2836(05)80360-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Söding J, Biegert A, Lupas AN. 2005. The HHpred interactive server for protein homology detection and structure prediction. Nucleic Acids Res 33:W244–W248. doi: 10.1093/nar/gki408. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Marchler-Bauer A, Derbyshire MK, Gonzales NR, Lu S, Chitsaz F, Geer LY, Geer RC, He J, Gwadz M, Hurwitz DI, Lanczycki CJ, Lu F, Marchler GH, Song JS, Thanki N, Wang Z, Yamashita RA, Zhang D, Zheng C, Bryant SH. 2015. CDD: NCBI’s conserved domain database. Nucleic Acids Res 43:D222–D226. doi: 10.1093/nar/gku1221. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Tsirigos KD, Peters C, Shu N, Käll L, Elofsson A. 2015. The TOPCONS Web server for consensus prediction of membrane protein topology and signal peptides. Nucleic Acids Res 43:W401–W407. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkv485. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Cresawn SG, Bogel M, Day N, Jacobs-Sera D, Hendrix RW, Hatfull GF. 2011. Phamerator: a bioinformatic tool for comparative bacteriophage genomics. BMC Bioinformatics 12:395. doi: 10.1186/1471-2105-12-395. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Laslett D, Canback B. 2004. ARAGORN, a program to detect tRNA genes and tmRNA genes in nucleotide sequences. Nucleic Acids Res 32:11–16. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkh152. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Lowe TM, Eddy SR. 1997. tRNAscan-SE: a program for improved detection of transfer RNA genes in genomic sequence. Nucleic Acids Res 25:955–964. doi: 10.1093/nar/25.5.955. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Hatfull GF. 2014. Molecular genetics of mycobacteriophages. Microbiol Spectr 2:1–36. doi: 10.1128/microbiolspec.MGM2-0032-2013. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Mavrich TN, Hatfull GF. 2017. Bacteriophage evolution differs by host, lifestyle and genome. Nat Microbiol 2:17112. doi: 10.1038/nmicrobiol.2017.112. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Data Availability Statement

The Lolalove virus is available at the Pittsburgh Bacteriophage Institute in freezer box 93/grid E3. The genome sequence and raw reads appear in DDBJ/ENA/GenBank under accession number MT818419.1 and SRA under accession number SRX9117730.


Articles from Microbiology Resource Announcements are provided here courtesy of American Society for Microbiology (ASM)

RESOURCES