Skip to main content
Wiley - PMC COVID-19 Collection logoLink to Wiley - PMC COVID-19 Collection
letter
. 2021 Apr 15;56(7):2377–2378. doi: 10.1002/ppul.25408

A child with SARS‐CoV2‐induced croup

Kathleen Tsoi 1, Kate C Chan 1,, Lawrence Chan 1, Geoffrey Mok 1, Albert M Li 1, Hugh S Lam 1
PMCID: PMC8251437  PMID: 33857338

To the Editor,

Children with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID‐19), an infection caused by severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS‐CoV‐2) are usually asymptomatic or only mildly symptomatic. The most common symptoms are coryzal in nature including fever and cough. 1 Most children are clinically stable 1 and require no medical intervention. However, despite their stable condition, stringent infection control measures are still required.

In this letter, we describe a child infected with SARS‐CoV‐2 who presented atypically with croup features. With the current COVID‐19 pandemic, infection control measures need to be appropriately heightened and early diagnostic sampling for SARS‐CoV‐2 should be carried out even in symptomatology that is atypical of COVID‐19.

A 21‐month‐old boy was admitted with a 1‐day history of fever, noisy breathing, mild cough, and hoarseness. The cough was not “barking” and there were no drooling, gastrointestinal, or urinary symptoms. On examination, he was febrile at 40.2°C, respiratory rate was 32–36/min and SpO2 was 94%–97% in room air. He had hoarseness and exhibited inspiratory stridor during vigorous cry. Breath sounds were vesicular, air entry bilaterally equal and no other signs were present. The clinical features were compatible with mild croup.

In view of a history of close contact 5 days before admission with his maternal grandmother who was confirmed as SARS‐CoV‐2 positive 3 days ago he was tested for SARS‐CoV‐2. He tested positive for SARS‐CoV‐2 by nasopharyngeal swab (NPS) PCR on admission with a C t value of 16.4. NPS was negative for other respiratory pathogens including adenovirus, human metapneumovirus, human enterovirus/rhinovirus, influenza A, influenza B, parainfluenza types 1‐4, respiratory syncytial virus, Bordetella pertussis, Chlamydia pneumoniae, and Mycoplasma pneumoniae. The chest radiograph showed a positive steeple sign and no consolidation.

He was treated for croup with one dose of 0.6 mg/kg oral dexamethasone on Day 1 of illness. The symptoms improved initially but deteriorated 12 h after the first dexamethasone dose with worsening of tachypnoea and persistence of stridor with agitation. A second dose of 0.6 mg/kg dexamethasone was given on Day 2 of illness. There was then gradual resolution of noisy breathing and tachypnoea. His cough and sputum sounds subsided on Day 9 but the hoarseness persisted till Day 15. NPS SARS‐CoV‐2 PCR C t value rose to 31.78 by Day 9 and 35 by Day 18. Blood for SARS‐CoV‐2 antibody was positive by Day 19. The patient was asymptomatic by that time and was discharged.

Croup is a common viral infection in the pediatric population that is usually associated with parainfluenza, rhinovirus, and respiratory syncytial virus infections. Children with croup usually present with a characteristic barking cough, stridor, and respiratory distress. Compared with COVID‐19, for croup, the presentation and initial management strategies are distinctly different. Treatment including dexamethasone and nebulized adrenaline can be considered. Croup is usually diagnosed by clinical assessment. Healthcare workers deliberately avoid uncomfortable procedures such as blood‐taking and nasopharyngeal sampling in these children as agitating the child may worsen any airway obstruction. Croup symptoms usually last for 2–3 days and sometimes up to 1 week.

Our case was an uncommon manifestation of pediatric SARS‐CoV‐2 infection. Very few cases of SARS‐CoV‐2 infection presenting with features of croup have been reported in the literature. Pitstick et al. 2 reported a SARS‐CoV‐2 positive case with fever, cough, and intermittent stridor, while Venn et al. 3 reported three SARS‐CoV‐2 positive cases with the first case exhibiting fever, cough, and stridor; the second case cough and dyspnea without fever; and the third child fever, tachypnoea and inspiratory stridor at rest.

Our patient had persistent symptoms lasting 15 days which is much longer than the usual 2–3 days. Such prolonged symptomatology is unusual amongst pediatric COVID‐19 cases 1 and also uncommon amongst children with croup. Apart from this, the presentation of croup caused by SARS‐CoV‐2 is similar to that of those caused by parainfluenza type 1. Patients described by Pitstick and Venn also had similar presentations as per usual parainfluenza croup, so whether SARS‐CoV‐2 can cause a longer duration of symptoms for croup remains to be seen.

Nasopharyngeal aspiration (NPA) is an aerosol‐generating procedure, that should be carried out in an airborne infection isolation room (AIIR) by staff protected with adequate personal protective equipment (PPE). In our practice, patients with croup usually are not tested for fear of the risk of airway obstruction when agitating the child. As symptoms of croup caused by parainfluenza virus and SARS‐CoV‐2 are similar, it would be difficult to differentiate the two by clinical assessment alone. However, the implications regarding aerosol‐generating procedures, isolation facilities, and treatment may be very different. Hence, under the current pandemic, we would recommend to proceed with early testing in children presenting with clinical features of croup so that appropriate treatment and infection control measures may be instituted. As there is a risk of worsening airway obstruction with sampling, expertise, and equipment needed for advanced airway support should be available while the patient is undergoing nasopharyngeal sampling. Instead of NPAs, alternative sampling such as throat swabs or NPSs for SARS‐CoV‐2 may be considered to minimize aerosol generation as much as possible.

Patients with croup are often treated with oral dexamethasone. For more serious cases, nebulized adrenaline may be considered. Should nebulized adrenaline be indicated, medical staff should wear full PPE and administer a nebulizer in AIIR. In case AIIR and adequate PPE are unavailable, there is limited evidence supporting the use of a metered‐dose inhaler for epinephrine delivery. 4

Repeated doses of dexamethasone should be considered if appropriate. In case of deterioration, early intubation should be considered by medical personnel equipped with appropriate PPE and nebulized medication can be administered via a closed ventilatory circuit.

In conclusion, under the current COVID‐19 pandemic, even for children presenting atypically, for example, with croup, after careful consideration of patient's clinical condition, availability of PPE and AIIR and choice of treatment, early testing for SARS‐CoV‐2 is still strongly recommended. Clinicians may consider waiting for approximately 2 h for an initial dose of dexamethasone to take effect. 5 Appropriate detection of children with SARS‐CoV‐2 infection is important to help prevent the spread of disease, and patients should also remain housed in an AIIR if possible.

CONFLICT OF INTERESTS

The authors declare that there are no conflict of interests.

AUTHOR CONTRIBUTIONS

Kathleen Tsoi: conceptualization (equal); writing original draft (equal); writing review and editing (equal). Kate C. Chan: conceptualization (equal); writing review and editing (equal). Geoffrey Mok: conceptualization (equal); supervision (equal). Albert M. Li: conceptualization (equal); supervision (equal); writing review and editing (equal). Hugh S. Lam: conceptualization (equal); supervision (equal); writing review and editing (equal).

KEYWORDS

COVID‐19, croup, viral infection, SARS‐CoV‐2

REFERENCES


Articles from Pediatric Pulmonology are provided here courtesy of Wiley

RESOURCES