Skip to main content
. 2021 May 3;22(9):885–893. doi: 10.1002/cphc.202001025

Figure 5.

Figure 5

Comparison of calculated potential changes during GITT pulses at 25 °C and −40 °C (red left axis) as a function of t . Respective rate constant and diffusion coefficient were chosen to demonstrate expected changes of the potential with lowering the temperature. For better comparability, the pulse at 25 °C is also displayed in a scaled version (dash‐dotted line, purple right axis). Further parameters: x0=0.9 , iGS=0.01Am-2 .