Skip to main content
Springer logoLink to Springer
. 2020 Oct 2;51(8):2569–2577. doi: 10.1007/s10803-020-04710-1

Peripheral Blood S100B Levels in Autism Spectrum Disorder: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Zhen Zheng 1,#, Peng Zheng 2,#, Xiaobing Zou 1,
PMCID: PMC8254719  PMID: 33006697

Abstract

The S100 calcium-binding protein beta subunit (S100B) protein, which mostly exists in the central nervous system, is commonly noted as a marker of neuronal damage. We conducted the first systematic review with meta-analysis to compare peripheral blood S100B levels in individuals with ASD with those in healthy controls. A systematic search was carried out for studies published before May 5, 2020. In total, this meta-analysis involved ten studies with 822 participants and 451 cases. The meta-analysis revealed that individuals with ASD had higher peripheral blood S100B levels than healthy controls [standardized mean difference (SMD) = 0.97, 95% confidence interval (95% CI) = 0.41–1.53; p < 0.001]. Peripheral blood S100B levels may have potential as a useful biomarker for ASD.

Keywords: Autism spectrum disorder, Blood, S100B, Meta-analysis

Introduction

Autism spectrum disorder (ASD) comprises neurodevelopmental disorders specified by stereotypic behaviour, limited social interaction, and impaired communication. The worldwide prevalence of ASD is approximately 1% (Baxter et al. 2015). A higher prevalence of one per 54 children aged 8 years was reported in the United States, and the male-to-female ratio was about 4.3:1 (Maenner et al. 2020). The prevalence of ASD has increased rapidly, while there is a lack of specific treatment for ASD. ASD starts early and lasts throughout the lifetime, which affects the quality of life for individuals with ASD and places a financial burden on families. Therefore, ASD is considered a major concern for public health worldwide.

However, the cause of ASD has not yet been identified. Current evidence suggests that ASD may be a genetically and environmentally determined disorder (Mandy and Lai 2016; Robinson et al. 2016). To date, there are no specific biomarkers for ASD, and the diagnosis must be based on behaviour. Abnormal behaviour is not obvious until about 12–18 months old. In addition, ASD is correlated with mental diseases such as anxiety and schizophrenia (Lai et al. 2019; Zheng et al. 2018) but is not correlated with medical diseases such as allergies and asthma (Lyall et al. 2015; Zheng et al. 2016a). This complexity has spurred a search for biomarkers that can provide early diagnosis and predict treatment response. Multiple studies have reported that biomarkers like glutamate and brain-derived neurotrophic factor can help diagnose ASD and Alzheimer’s disease early (Qin et al. 2017, 2016; Zheng et al. 2016b, c). However, there is still a need for specific biomarkers relevant only to ASD.

The S100 calcium-binding protein beta subunit (S100B) protein is commonly noted as a marker of neuronal damage and blood–brain barrier dysfunction (Koh and Lee 2014). The S100B protein mainly exists in the Schwann cells and glial cells of the central nervous system. The S100B protein plays important roles in neuronal survival, differentiation, apoptosis, astrocytic proliferation and the regulation of neuroinflammation (Michetti et al. 2019). Evidence suggested that following inflammation and stress, neurons were damaged and blood–brain barrier was dysfunction. S100B may release from the damaged neurons into the bloodstream, and its concentration in the peripheral blood is increased (Michetti et al. 2019). Recently, important clinical findings indicated that peripheral blood S100B levels can rule out central nervous system damage which was measured by magnetic resonance imaging in patients (Moss et al. 2020; Thompson et al. 2016). Therefore, scientists assume that peripheral blood S100B levels may reflect the presence of neuropathological conditions (Hughes et al. 2018; Shotar et al. 2019). The measurement of S100B in peripheral blood is much easier than the direct evaluation of S100B in the brain, and S100B levels in peripheral blood may have potential as a useful biomarker for ASD.

The view that “the periphery is a window to the brain” prompted scientists to evaluate the correlation between peripheral blood S100B levels and ASD. But the correlation is still uncertain. Some studies have shown that individuals with ASD had higher peripheral blood S100B levels than healthy controls (Al-Ayadhi and Mostafa 2012; Guloksuz et al. 2017). Other studies have found that there is no correlation between peripheral blood S100B levels and ASD (Esnafoglu et al. 2017; Ma et al. 2019).

Thus, a meta-analysis on this topic is necessary. In this study, we systematically reviewed studies investigating the correlation between peripheral blood S100B levels and ASD. Then, subgroup and meta-regression analyses were carried out to estimate heterogeneity.

Methods

Literature Search

A search for relevant studies published before May 5, 2020 in the Embase, Scopus, PubMed, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, Wanfang, and China National Knowledge Infrastructure databases was performed. The terms applied for the database search included “autism spectrum disorder,” “ASD,” “autism,” “pervasive developmental disorder,” “Asperger syndrome,” “autistic disorder,” “S100B,” “S100 calcium-binding protein β subunit,” “S100b,” “S100β,” “S100B protein,” and “S100 calcium binding protein beta subunit.” Studies in humans and published in either the English language or the Chinese language were adopted.

Study Selection

Inclusion criteria were (1) an evaluation of peripheral blood S100B levels in individuals with ASD and (2) a description of S100B levels in the median and range, the mean and standard deviation (SD), or the mean and standard error of the mean (SEM).

Exclusion criteria were (1) animal studies, reviews, abstracts, and letters; (2) study populations duplicated in another study; (3) studies that did not measure peripheral blood S100B levels, including pharmacology, genetics, brain imaging, and postmortem studies; and (4) studies that showed peripheral blood S100B levels in dot plot or histogram format, with no numerical results provided.

Data Extraction

Data on the author, number of samples, number of males, participant age and publication year were extracted. Data on country, ASD diagnostic criteria, adjusted confounders, study design, analytical technology, biomaterial, S100B and measurement unit were also extracted. Different measurement units (ng/ml, pg/ml, or ug/l) were used in the studies. All S100B levels were reported in pg/ml in this meta-analysis. If data were expressed in terms of the median and range, the sample mean and SD were calculated according to the method of Wan et al. (Wan et al. 2014). If data were presented with the SEM, then the sample SD was calculated using the formula SD = SEM x √n (n: sample size).

Quality Evaluation

The quality of the studies was estimated by the Newcastle–Ottawa Scale (NOS) (Stang 2010). The studies were evaluated as high (scored 7–9), medium (scored 4–6), or low (scored 0–3) quality.

Statistical Analysis

The standard mean difference (SMD) was summarized to calculate peripheral blood S100B levels in ASD. Heterogeneity was determined by the I2 and Q statistics. The I2 values of 0.25, 0.5, and 0.75 revealed small, medium and high heterogeneity, respectively.

Publication bias was confirmed by funnel plot analysis as well as by Begg’s and Egger’s tests. Subgroup analyses were carried out by using study design, biomaterial, analytical technology, and geographic location. Meta-regressions were conducted to evaluate whether sample size, mean age, publication year, and gender affected the outcome. Sensitivity analysis was carried out by the omission of studies one by one to evaluate whether any study changed the overall outcome. Stata 12.0 and Review Manager 5.1.2 software were used to perform the statistical tests.

Results

Literature Search

We first conducted a systematic search and identified 16 studies from PubMed, 29 studies from Embase, two studies from the Cochrane Library, 38 studies from Scopus, 26 studies from the Web of Science, 16 studies from China National Knowledge Infrastructure, nine studies from the Wanfang database, and two additional studies from the scanning of references. After reviewing titles and abstracts, 13 papers on peripheral blood S100B levels in ASD were selected for full-text review. Subsequently, one study was excluded due to its irrelevant topic. One report without sufficient data was excluded. One report was excluded for not being published in English. Eventually, 10 studies with 822 participants and 451 cases met the criteria for inclusion in the present meta-analysis (Fig. 1).

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1

Flow-chart of study selection

Study Characteristics

The included studies were published from 2012 to 2019 (Abou-Donia et al. 2019; Al-Ayadhi and Mostafa 2012; Ayaydin and Kirmit 2020; Esnafoglu et al. 2017; Guloksuz et al. 2017; Ma et al. 2019; Peng and Zhu 2017; Shaker et al. 2016; Tomova et al. 2019; Zhou 2015) (Table 1). Ten studies encompassed 822 participants and 451 cases. Three studies were performed in China (Ma et al. 2019; Peng and Zhu 2017; Zhou 2015), three in Turkey (Ayaydin and Kirmit 2020; Esnafoglu et al. 2017; Guloksuz et al. 2017), one in the USA (Abou-Donia et al. 2019), one in Saudi Arabia (Al-Ayadhi and Mostafa 2012), one in Egypt (Shaker et al. 2016), and one in the Slovak Republic (Tomova et al. 2019). The sample sizes ranged from 10 (Abou-Donia et al. 2019) to 89 (Tomova et al. 2019). The mean age of participants varied from 1.8 (Peng and Zhu 2017) to 18 (Abou-Donia et al. 2019) years old. The mean S100B values of cases ranged from 0.36 ± 0.19 pg/ml (Abou-Donia et al. 2019) to 298,630 ± 161,140 pg/ml (Ma et al. 2019). Two different biomaterials for S100B assays were used in this systematic review: serum (Abou-Donia et al. 2019; Al-Ayadhi and Mostafa 2012; Ayaydin and Kirmit 2020; Esnafoglu et al. 2017; Ma et al. 2019; Peng and Zhu 2017; Shake 2016; Zhou 2015) and plasma (Guloksuz et al. 2017; Tomova et al. 2019). Moreover, 9 studies performed S100B assessment using enzyme linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) (Al-Ayadhi and Mostafa 2012; Ayaydin and Kirmit 2020; Esnafoglu et al. 2017; Guloksuz et al. 2017; Ma et al. 2019; Peng and Zhu 2017; Shaker et al. 2016; Tomova et al. 2019; Zhou 2015) as an analytical procedure, whereas 1 adopted Western blot (WB) (Abou-Donia et al. 2019). In addition, ten studies considered gender and age as adjusted confounders (Abou-Donia et al. 2019; Al-Ayadhi and Mostafa 2012; Ayaydin and Kirmit 2020; Esnafoglu et al. 2017; Guloksuz et al. 2017; Ma et al. 2019; Peng and Zhu 2017; Shaker et al. 2016; Tomova et al. 2019; Zhou 2015). Two studies considered body mass index (BMI) as adjusted confounder (Esnafoglu et al, 2017; Guloksuz et al, 2017). One study considered socioeconomic status as adjusted confounder (Shaker et al. 2016).

Table 1.

Characteristics of the studies

First author, year Country Study design Sample sizes
ASD/controls
Male (n)
ASD/controls
Age Mean ± SD(range)
ASD/controls
ASD diagnostic criteria Analytical technology Biomaterial S100B Mean ± SD ASD/controls Unit of measure Adjusted confounders
Abou-Donia MB,2019 USA Cross-sectional 10/10 2/2

3–18

6–12

ADIR、ADOS、DSM-V WB Serum

0.36 ± 0.19

0.20 ± 0.13

None Gender, age
Al-Ayadhi LY,2012 Saudi Arabia Cross-sectional 64/46 50/34

8.4 ± 2.5

9.1 ± 2.4

DSM-IV ELISA Serum

207.97 ± 52.6

171.33 ± 34.65

pg/ml Gender, age
Ayaydin H,2020 Turkey Cross-sectional 43/41 30/31

6 ± 2.2

7 ± 2.2

DSM-IV ELISA Serum

49.13 ± 1.57

24.33 ± 24.2

pg/ml Gender, age
Esnafoglu E,2017 Turkey Cross-sectional 35/31 26/25

7.6 ± 3.62

6.85 ± 3.16

DSM-V ELISA Serum

3.33 ± 4.19

3.42 ± 4.56

pg/ml Gender, age, BMI
Guloksuz SA,2017 Turkey Cross-sectional 40/35 30/22

7.13 ± 3.89

6.75 ± 3.96

DSM-IV ELISA Plasma

182.50 ± 34.61

48.13 ± 13.17

pg/ml Gender, age, BMI
Ma F,2019 China Cross-sectional 35/40 22/25

4.3 ± 0.5

4.4 ± 0.6

DSM-V ELISA Serum

298,630 ± 161,140

272,440 ± 122,280

pg/ml Gender, age
Peng ZQ,2017 China Cross-sectional 65/72 53/61

1.8–9.5

2.1–9.4

DSM-IV ELISA Serum

296,700 ± 154,690

244,390 ± 154,060

pg/ml Gender, age
Shaker NM,2016 Egypt Case–control 30/22 27/20

3–14

3–13

ICD-10 ELISA Serum

123.8 ± 123.4

112.8 ± 9.3

pg/ml Gender, age, socioeconomic status
Tomova A,2019 Slovak Republic Cross-sectional 89/34 89/34

2–16

2–12

DSM-V、ADOS-2、ADIR ELISA Plasma

33.04 ± 31.6

23.26 ± 16.7

pg/ml Gender, age
Zhou YY,2015 China Cross-sectional 40/40 32/30

2–5

2–5

ABC ELISA Serum

195.43 ± 41.62

151.88 ± 21.06

pg/ml Gender, age

To identify ASD cases, researchers adopted the diagnostic criteria from the Autism Diagnostic Interview-Revised (ADI-R) (Abou-Donia et al. 2019; Tomova et al. 2019), Diagnostic and Statistical Manual (DSM-IV) (Al-Ayadhi and Mostafa 2012; Ayaydin and Kirmit 2020; Guloksuz et al. 2017; Peng and Zhu 2017), DSM-V (Abou-Donia et al. 2019; Esnafoglu et al. 2017; Ma et al. 2019; Tomova et al. 2019), Autism Diagnostic Observation Schedule (ADOS) (Abou-Donia et al. 2019), ADOS-2 (Tomova et al. 2019), Autism Behavior Checklist (ABC) (Zhou 2015), and International Classification of Diseases, 10th Revision (ICD-10) (Shaker et al. 2016).

Main Correlation of Peripheral Blood S100B Levels with ASD

The results showed that individuals with ASD had higher peripheral blood S100B levels than healthy controls [SMD = 0.97, 95% confidence interval (95% CI) = 0.41–1.53; p < 0.001] but with significant heterogeneity (I2 = 93%, p < 0.001) (Fig. 2).

Fig. 2.

Fig. 2

Forest plot of the relative peripheral blood S100B levels in individuals with ASD

Quality Evaluation

The quality evaluation results showed that the ten studies were high quality. The mean score was 7.7 (Table 2).

Table 2.

Quality assessment of the studies

First author, year Study design Selection Comparability Exposure/Outcome Total scores
Abou-Donia et al. 2019 Cross-sectional ★★★★ ★★ ★★★ 9
Al-Ayadhi and Mostafa 2012 Cross-sectional ★★★★ ★★ ★★ 8
Ayaydin and Kirmit 2020 Cross-sectional ★★★ ★★ ★★ 7
Esnafoglu et al. 2017 Cross-sectional ★★★ ★★ ★★★ 8
Guloksuz et al. 2017 Cross-sectional ★★★ ★★ ★★ 7
Ma et al. 2019 Cross-sectional ★★★★ ★★ ★★ 8
Peng and Zhu 2017 Cross-sectional ★★★★ ★★ ★★ 8
Shaker 2016 Case–control ★★★ ★★ ★★ 7
Tomova et al. 2019 Cross-sectional ★★★★ ★★ ★★ 8
Zhou 2015 Cross-sectional ★★★ ★★ ★★ 7

Publication Bias

Asymmetry was found by funnel plot analysis (Fig. 3). Begg’s and Egger’s tests demonstrated no obvious publication bias (Begg’s test, p = 0.37; Egger’s test, p = 0.07).

Fig. 3.

Fig. 3

Funnel plot of the relative peripheral blood S100B levels in individuals with ASD

Subgroup Analysis

We performed subgroup analysis based on study design. The pooled SMDs were 1.07 (95% CI = 0.46–1.68, p < 0.001) for cross-sectional studies and 0.12 (95% CI = −0.44–0.67, p = 0.68) for case–control study. Further subgroup analysis of biomaterials showed that individuals with ASD had higher peripheral blood S100B levels in serum [0.62 (95% CI = 0.24–1.01, p = 0.002)] but not in plasma [2.63 (95% CI = −1.89–7.15, p = 0.25)]. In addition, we conducted subgroup analysis on the basis of which analysis techniques were applied. The effect values of S100B levels in individuals with ASD were 0.94 (95% CI = 0.01–1.88, p = 0.05) for WB and 0.97 (95% CI = 0.37–1.57, p = 0.001) for ELISA. We also carried out subgroup analysis in terms of geographic locations. The results demonstrated that individuals with ASD had higher peripheral blood S100B levels in other countries [0.5 (95% CI = 0.16–0.85, p = 0.004)] but not in China [0.6 (95% CI =−0.03–1.23, p = 0.06)] or Turkey [2.09 (95% CI = −0.16–4.34, p = 0.07)] (Table 3).

Table 3.

Stratified analysis of peripheral blood S100B levels in individuals with ASD

Variables No. of comparisions No. of subjects Meta-analysis Heterogeneity Test for subgroup differences
ASD Controls SMD 95%CI p-value I2 p-value I2 p-value
Study design
Case–control 1 30 22 0.12 −0.44 0.67 0.68 Not applicable Not applicable 80.6 0.02
Cross-sectional 9 421 349 1.07 0.46 1.68  < 0.001 93  < 0.001
Biomaterial
Plasma 2 129 69 2.63 −1.89 7.15 0.25 99  < 0.001 0 0.39
Serum 8 322 302 0.62 0.24 1.01 0.002 81  < 0.001
Analytical technology
WB 1 10 10 0.94 0.01 1.88 0.05 Not applicable Not applicable 0 0.95
ELISA 9 441 361 0.97 0.37 1.57 0.001 93  < 0.001
Geographic location
China 3 140 152 0.6 −0.03 1.23 0.06 85 0.001 0 0.39
Turkey 3 118 107 2.09 −0.16 4.34 0.07 98  < 0.001
Others 4 193 112 0.5 0.16 0.85 0.004 45 0.14

No. number, CI confidence interval.

Meta-Regression Analysis

The meta-regression analyses indicated that none of the covariates (sample size, mean age, publication year, and gender) significantly influenced the results (Table 4).

Table 4.

Meta-regression of peripheral blood S100B levels in individuals with ASD

Moderator No. of comparisions No. of subjects Meta-regression Proportion of
variance explained
ASD Controls Slope 95%CI p-value R2 analog
Age(mean, years) 10 451 371 0.77 −1.58 3.15 0.47 −5.76
Gender(%man) 10 451 371 −0.52 −0.07 0.04 0.62 −9.38
Sample size 10 451 371 −0.3 −0.04 0.029 0.77 −12.83
Publication year 10 451 371 −0.03 −0.5 0.49 0.98 −14.66

No. number, CI confidence interval.

Sensitivity Analysis

Sensitivity analysis revealed that the overall results were not affected by a particular study.

Discussion

To our knowledge, this is the first meta-analysis to explore peripheral blood S100B levels in ASD. Pooling the ten studies, 822 participants and 451 cases were encompassed. Our study showed that individuals with ASD had higher peripheral blood S100B levels than healthy controls. Sensitivity analysis indicated that the outcome was not unduly influenced by a particular study. In addition, no obvious publication bias was observed. This study demonstrated that individuals with ASD had higher peripheral blood S100B levels.

High levels of heterogeneity were detected in this study. Subgroup analyses revealed that different study designs contributed to the heterogeneity. Individuals with ASD who had higher peripheral blood S100B levels were detected in cross-sectional studies but not in case–control study, indicating that the association may be affected by the study design. But this analysis may have been underpowered owing to only one case–control study was included in the subgroup. This potential confounding factor needs to be considered in the future analysis of S100B in individuals with ASD.

Individuals with ASD had higher S100B levels when measured in serum but not when measured in plasma. In the meta-analysis, most studies provided serum S100B levels; therefore, enough data were available to conclude that ASD is correlated with elevated serum S100B levels. Evidence that changes in serum S100B levels may reflect changes occurring in the brain has been reported (Vos et al. 2010). In some central nervous system disorders, such as intracerebral haemorrhage and ischaemia–reperfusion injury, the increase in serum S100B levels was consistently detected by biochemical analyses of S100B levels in the brain (Liu et al. 2015; Neves et al. 2017). Furthermore, serum S100B levels have been used as a standard indicator of treatment response in cerebral ischaemia–reperfusion injury (Li and Liu 2017). Therefore, in our meta-analysis, elevated serum S100B levels in individuals with ASD may reflect what is happening in the brains of individuals with ASD. Few studies have analyzed plasma S100B levels. It is necessary to further study the plasma S100B levels in this population.

Interestingly, the peripheral blood S100B levels were higher in individuals with ASD than in healthy controls when measured by ELISA but not when measured by WB, indicating that different assay methods may affect the correlation. Assay properties such as sensitivity and inter-assay and intra-assay coefficients of variability should be considered. In addition, differences in the way samples are collected and handled might contribute to the discrepancies in reported S100B levels in individuals with ASD. But only one study utilized WB in the subgroup, the result was not robust. Further investigations are needed to explore the correlation between S100B levels measured by WB and ASD.

In addition, individuals with ASD were discovered to have higher peripheral blood S100B levels than healthy controls in other countries, but there was no difference between the groups in China or Turkey. Genetic factors, environmental factors, lifestyle and economic conditions may contribute to this difference.

Furthermore, some clinical confounders were not analyzed in our meta-analysis, such as BMI, leptin and other adipose-related factors, may contribute to the observed heterogeneity. Scientists have reported that S100B levels were closely correlated with BMI, leptin and other adipose-related factors (Steiner et al. 2010). The studies included in our meta-analysis did not report BMI, leptin and other adipose-related factors, which made it impossible to analyze whether they were confounders contributed to the heterogeneity. It raises awareness of the need to consider these factors in future works.

The mechanisms of increased S100B in ASD are not completely clear, but several mechanisms have been proposed. First, autoimmunity may be involved in the development of ASD (Edmiston et al. 2017). Brain-specific autoantibodies have been found in individuals with ASD (Ramirez-Celis et al. 2020). Autoantibodies can bind to brain tissue antigens by passing through the blood–brain barrier, forming immune complexes and leading to neuronal damage (Al-Ayadhi and Mostafa 2012). Elevated S100B levels may indicate neuronal damage in ASD. Second, neuroinflammation was found in the brains of individuals with ASD (Matta et al. 2019). It has been reported that S100B may modulate cytokine secretion and may also be modulated by pro-inflammatory cytokines (Di Sante et al. 2020). S100B may function as a cytokine and support the implication of neuroinflammation in the development of ASD (Shaker NM 2016). Third, S100B has both trophic and toxic effects on neurons, depending on its concentration. When S100B levels are excessively increased, S100B acts as a neurotoxic protein that induces apoptosis. Ayaydın H et al. (Ayaydin and Kirmit 2020) reported that S100B plays an important role in neuronal apoptosis, which may contribute to the pathogenesis of ASD. The pathophysiological roles of S100B in ASD are not well explained, and more studies are warranted to verify this assumption in the future.

This meta-analysis had the following strengths. First, this is the first meta-analysis carried out to evaluate peripheral blood S100B levels in ASD. Second, no significant publication bias existed, indicating the high reliability of the results. Third, the sensitivity analysis found that no study could change the outcome, demonstrating that the conclusion was robust.

However, there were some limitations. First, because of the small sample size, studies with larger samples are required to illustrate the role of peripheral blood S100B levels in ASD. Second, since only a few studies analyzed the severity of ASD and S100B levels, the correlation between them was not evaluated. Future studies should pay attention to this subject. Third, the meta-analysis provides us with comprehensive results mainly from cross-sectional studies. Therefore, whether S100B levels are the cause or the result of ASD development remains unclear. Fourth, significant heterogeneity was found in this meta-analysis. Random-effects, subgroup and regression analyses were performed, and different study designs explained the heterogeneity. But residual confounding factors such as a wide range of mean S100B values reported across studies, which may be related with the different measurement units and different analytical technologies used in the included studies, are still a problem worthy of attention. Therefore, heterogeneity may influence the accuracy of the final results.

Despite these limitations, this study may have clinical application value for using S100B levels in the early identification and evaluation of ASD progression. This meta-analysis provides clinical evidence that individuals with ASD have increased peripheral blood S100B levels. Scientists have reported that changes in peripheral blood S100B levels may reflect changes occurring in the brain (Vos et al. 2010). Thus, higher peripheral blood S100B levels may reveal higher brain S100B levels in individuals with ASD. Brain S100B levels in individuals with ASD are warranted to be evaluated to confirm this hypothesis, which may further support that S100B can be used as a reliable biomarker for ASD.

Conclusions

This analysis provides evidence that individuals with ASD have increased peripheral blood S100B levels. Peripheral blood S100B levels may have potential as a useful biomarker for ASD. Studies with large samples are warranted to investigate the severity of the clinical symptoms and the causal relationship between ASD and S100B levels.

Acknowledgements

This work was funded by the National Science Foundation of China (81901523, 81873801) and a Grant from the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities (19ykpy38).

Author Contributions

ZZ and PZ designed the study. ZZ conducted literature searches and collected data. PZ analyzed the data. ZZ wrote the manuscript. XZ revised the manuscript.

Compliance with Ethical Standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

Footnotes

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Zhen Zheng, Peng Zheng have contributed equally to this report.

References

  1. Abou-Donia MB, Suliman HB, Siniscalco D, Antonucci N, ElKafrawy P. De novo blood biomarkers in autism: autoantibodies against neuronal and glial proteins. Behavioral Sciences (Basel) 2019 doi: 10.3390/bs9050047. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Al-Ayadhi LY, Mostafa GA. A lack of association between elevated serum levels of S100B protein and autoimmunity in autistic children. Journal of Neuroinflammation. 2012;9:54. doi: 10.1186/1742-2094-9-54. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Ayaydin H, Kirmit A. High serum levels of serum 100 beta protein, neuron-specific enolase, Tau, active caspase-3, M30 and M65 in children with autism spectrum disorders. Clinical Psychopharmacology and Neuroscience. 2020;18(2):270–278. doi: 10.9758/cpn.2020.18.2.270. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Baxter AJ, Brugha TS, Erskine HE, Scheurer RW, Vos T, Scott JG. The epidemiology and global burden of autism spectrum disorders. Psychological Medicine. 2015;45(3):601–613. doi: 10.1017/S003329171400172X. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Di Sante G, Amadio S, Sampaolese B, Clementi ME, Valentini M, Volonte C, et al. The S100B inhibitor pentamidine ameliorates clinical score and neuropathology of relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis mouse model. Cells. 2020 doi: 10.3390/cells9030748. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Edmiston E, Ashwood P, Van de Water J. Autoimmunity, autoantibodies, and autism spectrum disorder. Biological Psychiatry. 2017;81(5):383–390. doi: 10.1016/j.biopsych.2016.08.031. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Esnafoglu E, Ayyildiz SN, Cirrik S, Erturk EY, Erdil A, Dagli A, Noyan T. Evaluation of serum neuron-specific enolase, S100B, myelin basic protein and glial fibrilliary acidic protein as brain specific proteins in children with autism spectrum disorder. International Journal of Developmental Neuroscience. 2017;61:86–91. doi: 10.1016/j.ijdevneu.2017.06.011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Guloksuz SA, Abali O, Aktas Cetin E, Bilgic Gazioglu S, Deniz G, Yildirim A, et al. Elevated plasma concentrations of S100 calcium-binding protein B and tumor necrosis factor alpha in children with autism spectrum disorders. Revista Brasileira de Psiquiatria. 2017;39(3):195–200. doi: 10.1590/1516-4446-2015-1843. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Hughes CG, Patel MB, Brummel NE, Thompson JL, McNeil JB, Pandharipande PP, et al. Relationships between markers of neurologic and endothelial injury during critical illness and long-term cognitive impairment and disability. Intensive Care Medicine. 2018;44(3):345–355. doi: 10.1007/s00134-018-5120-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Koh SX, Lee JK. S100B as a marker for brain damage and blood-brain barrier disruption following exercise. Sports Medicine. 2014;44(3):369–385. doi: 10.1007/s40279-013-0119-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Lai MC, Kassee C, Besney R, Bonato S, Hull L, Mandy W, et al. Prevalence of co-occurring mental health diagnoses in the autism population: a systematic review and meta-analysis. The Lancet Psychiatry. 2019;6(10):819–829. doi: 10.1016/S2215-0366(19)30289-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Li Y, Liu S. The effect of dexmedetomidine on oxidative stress response following cerebral ischemia-reperfusion in rats and the expression of intracellular adhesion molecule-1 (ICAM-1) and S100B. Medical Science Monitor. 2017;23:867–873. doi: 10.12659/MSM.899855. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Liu S, Zhang Y, Zhao Y, Cui H, Cao C, Guo J. Effects of hypothermia on S100B and glial fibrillary acidic protein in asphyxia rats after cardiopulmonary resuscitation. Cell Biochemistry and Biophysics. 2015;71(1):401–406. doi: 10.1007/s12013-014-0212-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Lyall K, Van de Water J, Ashwood P, Hertz-Picciotto I. Asthma and allergies in children with autism spectrum disorders: results from the CHARGE study. Autism Research. 2015;8(5):567–574. doi: 10.1002/aur.1471. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Ma F, Ren L, Chen SH. Detection and significance of serum BDNF and S100B protein levels in autistic children. Chinese Pediatrics of Integrated Traditional Western Medicine. 2019;11(3):251–253. [Google Scholar]
  16. Maenner MJ, Shaw KA, Baio J, Washington A, Patrick M, DiRienzo M, et al. Prevalence of autism spectrum disorder among children aged 8 years - autism and developmental disabilities monitoring network, 11 sites, United States, 2016. Morbidity and mortality weekly report Surveillance Summaries. 2020;69(4):1–12. doi: 10.15585/mmwr.ss6904a1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Mandy W, Lai MC. Annual research review: the role of the environment in the developmental psychopathology of autism spectrum condition. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, and Allied Disciplines. 2016;57(3):271–292. doi: 10.1111/jcpp.12501. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Matta SM, Hill-Yardin EL, Crack PJ. The influence of neuroinflammation in autism spectrum disorder. Brain, Behavior, and Immunity. 2019;79:75–90. doi: 10.1016/j.bbi.2019.04.037. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Michetti F, D’Ambrosi N, Toesca A, Puglisi MA, Serrano A, Marchese E, et al. The S100B story: from biomarker to active factor in neural injury. Journal of Neurochemistry. 2019;148(2):168–187. doi: 10.1111/jnc.14574. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Moss BP, Patel DC, Tavee JO, Culver DA. Evaluating S100B as a serum biomarker for central neurosarcoidosis. Respiratory Medicine. 2020;162:105855. doi: 10.1016/j.rmed.2019.105855. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Neves JD, Aristimunha D, Vizuete AF, Nicola F, Vanzella C, Petenuzzo L, et al. Glial-associated changes in the cerebral cortex after collagenase-induced intracerebral hemorrhage in the rat striatum. Brain Research Bulletin. 2017;134:55–62. doi: 10.1016/j.brainresbull.2017.07.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Peng ZQ, Zhu LR. Serum GDNF and S100B protein levels in autistic children. Chinese Journal for Clinicians. 2017;45(1):36–39. [Google Scholar]
  23. Qin XY, Cao C, Cawley NX, Liu TT, Yuan J, Loh YP, et al. Decreased peripheral brain-derived neurotrophic factor levels in alzheimer’s disease: A meta-analysis study (N=7277) Molecular Psychiatry. 2017;22(2):312–320. doi: 10.1038/mp.2016.62. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Qin XY, Feng JC, Cao C, Wu HT, Loh YP, Cheng Y. Association of peripheral blood levels of brain-derived neurotrophic factor with autism spectrum disorder in children: A systematic review and meta-analysis. JAMA Pediatrics. 2016;170(11):1079–1086. doi: 10.1001/jamapediatrics.2016.1626. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Ramirez-Celis A, Edmiston E, Schauer J, Vu T, Van de Water J. Peptides of neuron specific enolase as potential ASD biomarkers: From discovery to epitope mapping. Brain, Behavior, and Immunity. 2020;84:200–208. doi: 10.1016/j.bbi.2019.12.002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Robinson EB, St Pourcain B, Anttila V. Genetic risk for autism spectrum disorders and neuropsychiatric variation in the general population. Nature Genetics. 2016;48(5):552–555. doi: 10.1038/ng.3529. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Shaker NM, Taha G, Kholeif H, Sayed NM, El-Sheikh MM, Abulmagd ML. Serum levels of S100b, interleukin-6 and anti-transglutaminase II IgA as immune markers in a sample of egyptian children with autistic spectrum disorders. Autism Open Access. 2016;6(5):1–7. [Google Scholar]
  28. Shotar E, Amouyal C, Jacquens A, Mathon B, Boulouis G, Monneret D, et al. S100B serum elevation predicts in-hospital mortality after brain arteriovenous malformation rupture. Stroke. 2019;50(5):1250–1253. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.119.025033. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Stang A. Critical evaluation of the Newcastle-Ottawa scale for the assessment of the quality of nonrandomized studies in meta-analyses. European Journal of Epidemiology. 2010;25(9):603–605. doi: 10.1007/s10654-010-9491-z. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Steiner J, Schiltz K, Walter M, Wunderlich MT, Keilhoff G, Brisch R, et al. S100B serum levels are closely correlated with body mass index: An important caveat in neuropsychiatric research. Psychoneuroendocrinology. 2010;35(2):321–324. doi: 10.1016/j.psyneuen.2009.07.012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Thompson WH, Thelin EP, Lilja A, Bellander BM, Fransson P. Functional resting-state fMRI connectivity correlates with serum levels of the S100B protein in the acute phase of traumatic brain injury. NeuroImage Clinical. 2016;12:1004–1012. doi: 10.1016/j.nicl.2016.05.005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Tomova A, Kemenyova P, Filcikova D, Szapuova Z, Kovac A, Babinska K, et al. Plasma levels of glial cell marker S100B in children with autism. Physiological Research. 2019;68(Suppl 3):S315–s323. doi: 10.33549/physiolres.934350. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Vos PE, Jacobs B, Andriessen TM, Lamers KJ, Borm GF, Beems T, et al. GFAP and S100B are biomarkers of traumatic brain injury: An observational cohort study. Neurology. 2010;75(20):1786–1793. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0b013e3181fd62d2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Wan X, Wang W, Liu J, Tong T. Estimating the sample mean and standard deviation from the sample size, median, range and/or interquartile range. BMC Medical Research Methodology. 2014;14:135. doi: 10.1186/1471-2288-14-135. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Zheng Z, Zhang L, Zhu T, Huang J, Qu Y, Mu D. Association between asthma and autism spectrum disorder: A meta-analysis. PLoS ONE. 2016;11(6):e0156662. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0156662. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Zheng Z, Zhang L, Zhu T, Huang J, Qu Y, Mu D. Peripheral brain-derived neurotrophic factor in autism spectrum disorder: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Scientific Reports. 2016;6:31241. doi: 10.1038/srep31241. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Zheng Z, Zheng P, Zou X. Association between schizophrenia and autism spectrum disorder: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Autism Research. 2018;11(8):1110–1119. doi: 10.1002/aur.1977. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Zheng Z, Zhu T, Qu Y, Mu D. Blood glutamate levels in autism spectrum disorder: A systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS ONE. 2016;11(7):e0158688. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0158688. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. Zhou, Y.Y. (2015) Association between serum levels of S100B protein and anti-ganglioside M1 auto-antibodies in children with ASD. University of Sourth China. 30(09), 3599B. (UMI No. 7005121).

Articles from Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders are provided here courtesy of Springer

RESOURCES