Percutaneous resection of anteriorly located midline prostatic cyst: A case report and description of technique

Highlights

• •Anterior midline prostatic cysts are very rare.
• •They might cause sever urinary symptoms.
• •They are usually treated with transurethral resection of the prostate.
• •Occasionally, transurethral resection is not feasible due to cyst location.
• •Percutaneous resection of the cyst is a safe alternative if indicated.

Abstract

Introduction

Midline prostatic cysts are common and are usually discovered incidentally. However, anterior midline prostatic cysts are considered rare.

Presentation of Case

We report a 36-year-old man who presented with severe lower urinary tract symptoms. The patient was diagnosed with an anterior midline prostatic cyst bulging into the bladder. The location of the cyst did not allow for a safe transurethral resection. He was managed successfully through a percutaneous approach.

Conclusion

Percutaneous resection of an anteriorly located prostatic cyst is simple and safe. This procedure is advised if bladder neck injury is possible during transurethral resection to avoid retrograde ejaculation.

1. Introduction

Midline prostatic cysts (MPCs) are common and are usually discovered incidentally. The incidence of an MPC on autopsy is 1% [1]. With the recent advances and expanded use of imaging, the rate has increased to 8.6 % [2]. In infertile men undergoing transrectal ultrasound, the incidence reaches 17 % [3]. However, symptomatic cysts are less frequent and are usually treated with transurethral resection of the cyst [4]. However, anteriorly located MPCs are considered rare, with only a few case reports in the literature [5].

We report a patient diagnosed with a symptomatic anterior MPC bulging into the bladder. In addition, we describe a safe surgical treatment method for such cases. The case is reported according to SCARE criteria [6].

2. Case report

A 36-year-old man presented with a history of dysuria, weak urine stream, urgency and frequency for three years. The patient was diagnosed with prostatitis and received multiple courses of antibiotics with no relief. His medical and surgical history were unremarkable. His International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) was 22, and his quality of life score due to his urinary symptoms was five. A physical examination was normal.

Biochemical laboratory examinations were within normal ranges (including PSA). Urine analysis and culture were normal. Uroflowmetry revealed a flat curve with a maximum flow rate of 6 mL/s. Pelvic ultrasound revealed a cyst, measuring 1.4 × 1.2 cm, that was associated with the proximal part of the prostate gland (Fig. 1). MRI was suggestive of an anteriorly located prostatic cyst (Fig. 2).

Fig. 1.

US pelvic male revealed a cyst measuring approximately 1.4*1.2 cm which is related to the proximal part of the prostate gland and in close relation to the proximal urethra. It could represent an exophytic prostate cyst or less likely ureterocele with ectopic ureter insertion (arrow).

Fig. 2.

Coronal (A) and sagittal (B) pelvic male MRI images showing a well-defined midline cystic arising from the prostatic base projecting into the urinary bladder with no clear communication with the urethra. It measures 1.5*1.3 cm and shows bright T2 signal intensity and hypo intense T1 signal intensity with peripheral wall enhancement suggestive of a cyst (arrow).

The patient was scheduled for transurethral resection of the cyst. However, the decision was changed intraoperatively due to the location of the cyst and the possibility of retrograde ejaculation if transurethral resection was attempted (Fig. 3). Instead, the cyst was incised with a Holmium laser while the cystoscope was in the retroflexion position [5]. The patient improved and was satisfied with his voiding. Unfortunately, eight months later, he presented with the same preoperative urinary symptoms. Pelvic ultrasound revealed a recurrence of the cyst, which measured 1.5 × 1.4 cm (Fig. 4). We decided to resect the cyst through a percutaneous approach to avoid any risk of retrograde ejaculation.

Fig. 3.

flexible cystoscope showing the cyst in the upper part of the bladder neck in the midline.

Fig. 4.

US pelvic male revealed a recurrence of the cyst measuring approximately 1.5*1.4 cm (arrow).

The patient was placed in the supine position. A urethral catheter was inserted, and the bladder was filled with saline. Then, the catheter was removed. Ultrasound-guided access was obtained using an 18-gauge access needle. After the insertion of a guidewire through the needle, balloon dilation of the tract was performed, and a 30 Fr sheath was introduced. A 26 Fr resectoscope was used to unroof the cyst (Fig. 5). The skin was closed with subcuticular sutures. The urethral catheter was reinserted for postoperative urinary drainage. The patient was discharged on the same day, and the urethral catheter was removed after three days.

Fig. 5.

Illustration of the surgical approach of the percutaneous resection of the prostatic cyst.

The patient improved and was satisfied with his voiding. His IPSS score improved to five, and his quality of life score due to his urinary symptoms improved to one. His follow-up extended for two years post-resection, and no change in his voiding was reported.

3. Discussion

Different treatment options have been described for symptomatic cysts, including transrectal aspiration, sclerotherapy, marsupialization and, less frequently, open surgery [7,8].

Percutaneous approaches to treat different pathologies in the urinary tract have been described before. This approach has been used to treat large bladder stones and benign prostatic hypertrophy [9,10]. To our knowledge, this is the first description of its use to treat an anterior MPC. Anteriorly located midline cysts are rare and are usually treated by transurethral resection due to easy accessibility with good results [5].

The decision to proceed with this surgery was based on the location of the cyst (Fig. 3). Resection without the involvement of the bladder neck was impossible, as the position of the cyst was at 12 o’clock and it could not be visualized by a 30-degree rigid cystoscope. Thus, retrograde ejaculation could be a consequence of transurethral resection. However, percutaneous resection with such protruding cysts will avoid such complications (Fig. 5). The procedure was well tolerated by the patient, with an excellent 2-year outcome.

4. Conclusion

Percutaneous resection of anteriorly located prostatic cysts is simple and safe.

Declaration of Competing Interest

None.

Sources of funding

None.

Ethical approval

IRB approval was obtained.

Consent

Written informed consent was obtained from the patient for publication of this case report and accompanying images. A copy of the written consent is available for review by the Editor-in-Chief of this journal on request.

Author contribution

Raed Almannie the sole author.

Registration of research studies

Not Applicable.

Guarantor

None.

Provenance and peer review

Not commissioned, externally peer-reviewed.