Abstract
Cardiac fibrosis is the final event of heart failure and is associated with almost all forms of cardiovascular disease. Cardiac fibroblasts (CFs), a major cell type in the heart, are responsible for regulating normal myocardial function and maintaining extracellular matrix homeostasis in adverse myocardial remodeling. In this study, we found that C188‐9, a small‐molecule inhibitor of signal transducer and activator of transcription 3 (STAT3), exhibited an antifibrotic function, both in vitro and in vivo. C188‐9 decreased transforming growth factor‐β1‐induced CF activation and fibrotic gene expression. Moreover, C188‐9 treatment alleviated heart injury and cardiac fibrosis in an isoproterenol‐induced mouse model by suppressing STAT3 phosphorylation and activation. These findings may help us better understand the role of C188‐9 in cardiac fibrosis and facilitate the development of new treatments for cardiac fibrosis and other cardiovascular diseases.
Keywords: C188‐9, cardiac fibroblasts, cardiac fibrosis, STAT3
Cardiac fibroblasts (CFs) play important roles in myocardial remodeling by maintaining extracellular matrix homeostasis. Here, we report that C188‐9 exerts an antifibrotic role by inhibiting the phosphorylation and activation of signal transducer and activator of transcription 3 in CFs, both in vitro and in vivo. C188‐9 may be a potential agent for the clinical therapy of cardiac fibrosis and related heart diseases.
Abbreviations
- CFs
cardiac fibroblasts
- CVDs
cardiovascular diseases
- ECM
extracellular matrix
- ISO
isoproterenol
- STAT3
signal transducer and activator of transcription 3
- TGF‐β1
transforming growth factor‐β1
- WGA
wheat germ agglutinin
Cardiovascular diseases (CVDs) are the most common disease worldwide, with the highest morbidity and mortality rates [1]. Nearly all forms of heart disease exhibit cardiac fibrosis, characterized by excessive deposition of extracellular matrix (ECM) in the myocardium [2]. Cardiac fibrosis is a repair process that protects the heart from rupture during early stages of injury; however, excessive cardiac fibrosis at the late stage leads to cardiac dysfunction and an increased risk of heart failure [3]. Despite many improvements in treatment strategies, understanding cardiac fibrosis pathogenesis and identifying novel potential therapeutic targets remain an urgent need for heart disease.
An essential cell type in the heart, cardiac fibroblasts (CFs) are the major cells implicated during cardiac fibrosis because they synthesize ECM throughout the myocardium [4, 5]. Quiescent CFs activate and migrate to damaged areas of the heart in response to various damages or stresses and convert into myofibroblasts, which secrete ECM such as collagen and α‐smooth muscle actin (α‐SMA) to maintain myocardium structural and functional integrity [6]. However, CFs may continuously activate, synthesize, and excrete excessive ECM after the initial wound healing process, resulting in the development of cardiac fibrosis [7], and even heart failure [8, 9]. Therefore, clarifying the activation mechanism of CFs and finding agents to inhibit CFs activation may provide new strategies for treating myocardial fibrosis and heart failure.
Indeed, activated CF inhibition and reversion have been proposed as potential therapeutic strategies for cardiac fibrosis [10]. Extensive evidence has demonstrated that signal transducer and activator of transcription 3 (STAT3) signaling participates in CF activation during cardiac fibrosis [10, 11, 12, 13]. C188‐9, a synthetic small‐molecule inhibitor of STAT3, functions by targeting the Src homology 2 (SH2) domain to block phosphorylation and activation [14, 15]. C188‐9 is potent in the treatment of various tumors, such as acute myeloid leukemia and hepatocellular carcinoma [15, 16]. Interestingly, recent studies have indicated that C188‐9 attenuates bleomycin‐induced pulmonary fibrosis [17], skin fibrosis [18], and bile duct ligation‐induced liver fibrosis in mice [19]. However, whether C188‐9 regulates CF activation and subsequent cardiac fibrosis remains to be determined.
This study aimed to investigate the effects of C188‐9 on CF activation and its role in a mouse cardiac fibrosis model. We found that C188‐9 inhibited STAT3 signaling and thus alleviated CF activation, suppressing cardiac fibrosis progression. Our results suggest that these effects of C188‐9 administration protected mice from isoproterenol (ISO)‐induced cardiac dysfunction. Based on these findings, we speculated that C188‐9 is a promising agent for the clinical therapy of cardiac fibrosis and related heart diseases.
Materials and methods
Animal experiments
Male C57BL/6 mice aged 10 weeks were purchased from Vital Laboratory Animal Technology Co. Ltd. (Beijing, China) and raised in a pathogen‐free animal house. To cause cardiac dysfunction through the induction of fibrosis, mice were administered ISO (Sigma, St. Louis, MO, USA, 20 mg·kg−1·day−1) perfusion using osmotic minipumps for 21 days. Mice were then euthanized to harvest their hearts for further analysis. Mice were also intraperitoneally injected with 50 mg·kg−1·day−1 of C188‐9 (Selleck Chemicals, Houston, TX, USA) for 21 consecutive days, whereas a control group received vehicle (DMSO). All animal experimental protocols and procedures were approved by the Ethics Committee of Tianjin Medical University.
Isolation and culture of primary cardiac fibroblasts
Primary CFs were isolated and cultured as previously reported [20] with a few modifications. Briefly, male C57BL/6 mice were anesthetized and their hearts collected. After washing with ice‐cold PBS, mouse hearts were minced and digested with type 2 collagenase (Worthington Biochemical Corp., Lakewood, NJ, USA, 0.1%) and trypsin/EDTA (Gibco, Grand Island, NY, USA, 0.1%). Heart cells were centrifuged at 1000 g for 5 min, suspended in Dulbecco's Modified Eagle's medium (DMEM; Gibco, Grand Island, NY, USA) containing 10% FBS (Gibco, Grand Island, NY, USA), and plated in culture dishes. After 2 h, nonadherent cells were removed. Adherent cells were CFs and detected via immunofluorescence using vimentin staining. After two or four passages, CFs were used for subsequent experiments.
Cell culture and treatment
Primary CFs were cultured in DMEM supplemented with 10% (v/v) FBS, 100 U·mL−1 penicillin, and 100 U·mL−1 streptomycin in a humidified incubator at 37 °C and 5% (v/v) CO2. To induce fibrosis, cells were stimulated with transforming growth factor‐β1 (TGF‐β1; R and D Systems, Minneapolis, MN, USA, 10 ng·mL−1) as previously reported [21]. C188‐9 (10 μm) or vehicle control was administered to CFs 12 h before TGF‐β1 treatment.
Quantitative reverse transcription‐PCR
Total RNA from cultured cells or mouse tissues was extracted using TRIzol Reagent (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA), and 1 μg of RNA was reverse transcribed to cDNA using the PrimeScript™ RT Reagent Kit (Takara, Japan), following manufacturer's protocol. The cDNA was then used for PCR amplification with gene‐specific primers. GAPDH was the endogenous control. The primers used were as follows: Col1a1, F 5′‐GCTCCTCTTAGGGGCCACT‐3′, R 5′‐CCACGTCTCACCATTGGGG‐3′; Col1a2, F 5′‐GTAACTTCGTGCCTAGCAACA‐3′, R 5′‐CCTTTGTCAGAATACTGAGCAGC‐3′; Col3a1, F 5′‐CCTGGCTCAAATGGCTCAC‐3′, R 5′‐CAGGACTGCCGTTATTCCCG‐3′; α‐SMA, F 5′‐GTCCCAGACATCAGGGAGTAA‐3′, R 5′‐TCGGATACTTCAGCGTCAGGA‐3′; ANF, F 5′‐GCTTCCAGGCCATATTGGAG‐3′, R 5′‐GGGGGCATGACCTCATCTT‐3′; BNP, F 5′‐GAGGTCACTCCTATCCTCTGG‐3′, R 5′‐GCCATTTCCTCCGACTTTTCTC‐3′; GAPDH, F 5′‐AGGTCGGTGTGAACGGATTTG‐3′, R 5′‐TGTAGACCATGTAGTTGAGGTCA‐3′.
Western blotting
Total protein was extracted from cultured cells or mouse hearts using RIPA lysis buffer (Beyotime, Shanghai, China) supplemented with proteinase inhibitor cocktail (Roche Molecular Biochemicals, Mannheim, Germany) as previously described [22]. Protein concentration was measured using a BCA protein assay kit (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA). Proteins were then separated via SDS/PAGE (10%) and electrotransferred to polyvinylidene difluoride membranes (Millipore, Billerica, MA, USA), incubated with the indicated antibodies, and developed using chemiluminescence methods. The following antibodies were used as follows: anticollagen I (1 : 1000; catalog number: 14695‐1‐AP; ProteinTech Group, Rosemont, IL, USA), anti‐α‐SMA (1 : 1000; catalog number: 14395‐1‐AP; ProteinTech Group, Rosemont, IL, USA), anti‐STAT3 (1 : 1000; catalog number: 9139; Cell Signaling Technology, Danvers, MA, USA), anti‐p‐STAT3 (1 : 1000; catalog number: 9145; Cell Signaling Technology, Danvers, MA, USA), and anti‐GAPDH (1 : 10 000; catalog number: 60004‐1‐Ig; ProteinTech Group, Rosemont, IL, USA).
Echocardiography
Echocardiography and cardiac function evaluation were performed as previously described [23].
Assessment of cardiac fibrosis
Mouse hearts were harvested, fixed with paraformaldehyde, embedded in paraffin, and sectioned at 5 µm. Tissue slices were subjected to Masson's trichrome staining (Sigma) and wheat germ agglutinin (WGA; Thermo Fisher Scientific) staining, following manufacturer protocol. Average collagen area was measured using ImageJ‐v1.8.0, as described previously [24]. Briefly, Masson's trichrome‐stained sections were captured with a BX51 microscope (Olympus, Tokyo, Japan), and collagen area (blue) was measured with the “image‐color” plugin for imagej (NIH, Bethesda, MD, USA).
Statistics
All quantitative data were tested using the Shapiro–Wilk normality test through SPSS version 21.0 (IBM Inc, Armonk, NY, USA) and presented as mean ± standard error of the mean (SEM). The normality assumption was not violated (P > 0.05). Statistical differences between groups were calculated with two‐way ANOVA, followed by Tukey's post hoc test. Significance was set at P < 0.05. Statistics were performed using Microsoft Excel and prism 7.0 (GraphPad Software, San Diego, CA, USA).
Results
C188‐9 reduces fibroblast activation in CFs
We first employed CFs to investigate whether C188‐9 has any effect on cardiac fibrosis. We isolated CFs from C57BL/6 mouse hearts and pretreated them with C188‐9 or vehicle control, followed by TGF‐β1 stimulation to induce fibrosis. After isolating total RNA, quantitative reverse transcription (qRT)‐PCR detected mRNA levels of fibrosis markers. As expected, TGF‐β1 stimulation markedly increased mRNA expression of Col1a1 (Fig. 1A), Col1a2 (Fig. 1B), Col3a1 (Fig. 1C), and α‐SMA (Fig. 1D), whereas C188‐9 treatment significantly reduced this effect (Fig. 1A–D). In addition, western blot measured type I collagen (collagen I) and α‐SMA proteins. C188‐9 treatment also decreased TGF‐β1‐induced expression of collagen I, α‐SMA, and STAT3 phosphorylation, consistent with mRNA data (Fig. 1E,F). Collectively, these results indicate that C188‐9 decreased TGF‐β1‐induced fibrotic response in CFs.
C188‐9 treatment ameliorated ISO‐induced cardiac dysfunction in mice
Because CFs play important roles in cardiac function, we examined the effect of C188‐9 treatment on ISO‐induced cardiac dysfunction. We treated 10‐week‐old C57BL/6 mice with ISO perfusion for 3 weeks, while simultaneously injecting C188‐9 treatment or vehicle control. Before ISO challenge and after 21 days, we assessed cardiac function using echocardiography (Fig. 2A). Cardiac function (primarily measured as ejection fraction and fractional shortness) sharply decreased after ISO perfusion, and C188‐9 treatment (50 mg·kg−1·day−1) exerted a protective effect against cardiac dysfunction in ISO‐induced mice (Fig. 2B–D). After obtaining body weight (BW), mice were euthanized to collect heart tissue and to measure heart weight (HW) and tubular length (TL). After ISO perfusion, HW/BW (Fig. 2E) and HW/TL (Fig. 2F) ratio increased, whereas the C188‐9 group mice exhibited significantly improved indexes compared with vehicle (Fig. 2E,F). Atrial natriuretic factor (ANF) and brain natriuretic peptide (BNP) are widely recognized markers of cardiac damage. Compared with vehicle, we observed markedly downregulated ANF and BNP RNA expression in injured hearts from C188‐9‐treated mice after ISO perfusion (Fig. 2G,H). Taken together, these data demonstrate that C188‐9 treatment alleviates ISO‐induced cardiac dysfunction in mice.
C188‐9 attenuates ISO‐induced pathological cardiac fibrosis and hypertrophy in mice
Next, we determined whether C188‐9 affected ISO‐induced fibrosis and hypertrophy in mice. C57BL/6 mice were administered ISO perfusion for 3 weeks to stimulate fibrosis, during which C188‐9 or vehicle control was administered daily (Fig. 2A). Masson's trichrome staining was performed to determine fibrosis severity and revealed that C188‐9 treatment markedly reduced ISO‐induced cardiac fibrosis in mice by 21 days after ISO treatment (Fig. 3A,B). Accordingly, the expression levels of Col1a1, Col1a2, Col3a1, and α‐SMA were decreased in heart tissues of C188‐9‐treated mice at days 21 post‐ISO treatment (Fig. 3C–F). Additionally, WGA staining showed a marked reduction in cardiomyocyte size in C188‐9‐treated mice after ISO treatment (Fig. 3G,H). Collectively, these results establish the protective role of C188‐9 against ISO‐induced cardiac fibrosis and hypertrophy in mice.
C188‐9 treatment attenuated ISO‐induced fibrotic gene expression and STAT3 phosphorylation in mouse heart tissues
Next, we detected protein changes in ISO‐induced cardiac fibrosis with or without C188‐9 treatment. Administration of C188‐9 significantly suppressed collagen I and α‐SMA protein levels in mouse hearts at 21 days post‐ISO perfusion (Fig. 4A,B). The STAT3 pathway plays a critical role in cardiac fibrosis by regulating CF phenotype and activation, studies show that C188‐9 inhibition of STAT3 phosphorylation suppresses skin fibrosis [18, 25], and we tested whether C188‐9 inhibited cardiac fibrosis via STAT3, analyzing ISO‐induced mouse hearts with or without C188‐9 treatment. We found that STAT3 phosphorylation (p‐STAT3) increased in ISO‐treated mice hearts compared with vehicle control, but C188‐9 obviously decreased this increase in p‐STAT3 (Fig. 4C,D). Hence, inhibition of STAT3 signaling is the mechanism underlying the protective role of C188‐9 against ISO‐induced cardiac fibrosis in mice (Fig. 4E).
Discussion
Activation and ECM production of CFs is a critical process underlying cardiac fibrosis [2]. Here, we demonstrated that a small‐molecule inhibitor of STAT3, C188‐9, blocked CF activation. More importantly, our data revealed that C188‐9 treatment improved cardiac function in mice by suppressing ECM production and attenuating heart fibrosis, thus laying the groundwork for the development of novel drugs to treat CVDs.
TGF‐β signaling is the most extensively studied factor in CF activation, and TGF‐β/Smad is the canonical pathway in pathological cardiac fibrosis [26, 27]. TGF‐β induces ECM protein production depending on Smad3 phosphorylation, as demonstrated in research showing that fibroblast‐specific Smad3 deletion attenuates cardiac fibrotic response and ECM protein expression [28]. In addition to TGF‐β/Smad signaling, an increasing number of studies have found that STAT3 signaling plays essential roles in cardiac physiology and pathology [10, 11, 13, 25]. For example, cardiac constitutive STAT3 activation protects the myocardium from ischemia/reperfusion injury [29]. In a mouse myocardial infarction model, STAT3 inhibition contributed to the reduction in ECM synthesis and protection of cardiac remodeling [30]. Interestingly, TGF‐β1 induces STAT3 phosphorylation and contributes to fibrotic protein accumulation in cultured CFs, whereas genetic or pharmacological blocking of STAT3 activation alleviated cardiac fibrosis by inhibiting autophagy [31]. These observations imply that STAT3 is important in cardiac fibrosis and that inhibiting STAT3 action is a promising strategy in cardiac fibrosis treatment. Here, we found that C188‐9 inhibited STAT3 phosphorylation and ECM expression in an ISO‐induced mouse model. Although we did not explore the mechanistic link between C188‐9 and TGF‐β, our data support the notion that STAT3 signaling is required for regulating cardiac fibrosis.
C188‐9 was recently identified to target the phosphotyrosine peptide‐binding site within the STAT3 SH2 domain, inhibiting granulocyte colony‐stimulating factor‐induced STAT3 phosphorylation and inducing apoptosis in acute myeloid leukemia cell lines [15]. Subsequent research on C188‐9 focused on antitumor potential. C188‐9 treatment inhibited the growth of hepatocellular carcinoma and protected liver function in hepatocyte‐specific‐Pten‐deficient mice [16]. C188‐9 also improves the therapeutic efficacy of 5‐Aza‐2′‐deoxycytidine against pancreatic cancer by regulating demethylation [32]. Other recent studies have shown that C188‐9 is a potential drug for the treatment of fibrotic diseases, decreasing pulmonary fibrosis and reducing collagen deposition in an intraperitoneal bleomycin‐induced mouse model [17]. In other mouse model, C188‐9 decreased TGF‐β‐induced STAT3 phosphorylation and reduced skin fibrosis [18]. Consistent with these findings, our results showed that C188‐9 protects the heart from ISO‐induced cardiac fibrosis. Importantly, C188‐9 is well tolerated and does not cause pathological abnormalities in mice [33]. Despite these promising findings, the clinical application of C188‐9 as a drug requires further investigation.
In summary, our observations demonstrated that C188‐9 attenuated ISO‐induced cardiac fibrosis by inhibiting STAT3 signaling. Thus, C188‐9 is a candidate therapeutic drug for the treatment of cardiac fibrosis.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
Author contributions
JL and SZ designed the project, carried out most of the experiments, collected the data, and performed the analysis. BW and YJ helped with the mouse experiment. JL and SZ wrote the manuscript. JZ revised the manuscript.
Acknowledgements
All authors thank Prof. Ying Yu (Tianjin Medical University) for the kindly support for our work. This work was supported by National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 81870328), China Postdoctoral Science Foundation (No. 2019M652587), and Henan Thousand Talents Program (No. ZYQR201912131).
Edited by Jörg Kobarg
Contributor Information
Jinying Zhang, Email: jyzhang@zzu.edu.cn.
Shengkai Zuo, Email: zuoshengkai@126.com.
Data accessibility
The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.
References
- 1. Murtha LA, Schuliga MJ, Mabotuwana NS, Hardy SA, Waters DW, Burgess JK, Knight DA and Boyle AJ (2017) The processes and mechanisms of cardiac and pulmonary fibrosis. Front Physiol 8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2. Travers JG, Kamal FA, Robbins J, Yutzey KE and Blaxall BC (2016) Cardiac fibrosis: the fibroblast awakens. Circ Res 118, 1021–1040. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3. Fan Z and Guan J (2016) Antifibrotic therapies to control cardiac fibrosis. Biomater Res 20, 13. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4. Ali SR, Ranjbarvaziri S, Talkhabi M, Zhao P, Subat A, Hojjat A, Kamran P, Müller AMS, Volz KS, Tang Z et al. (2014) Developmental heterogeneity of cardiac fibroblasts does not predict pathological proliferation and activation. Circ Res 115, 625–635. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5. Tallquist MD and Molkentin JD (2017) Redefining the identity of cardiac fibroblasts. Nat Rev Cardiol 14, 484–491. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6. Bhandary B, Meng QH, James J, Osinska H, Gulick J, Valiente‐Alandi I, Sargent MA, Bhuiyan S, Blaxall BC, Molkentin JD et al. (2018) Cardiac fibrosis in proteotoxic cardiac disease is dependent upon myofibroblast TGF‐beta signaling. J Am Heart Assoc 7, e010013. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7. Sheng JW, Shim W, Wei H, Lim SY, Liew R, Lim TS, Ong BH, Chua YL and Wong P (2013) Hydrogen sulphide suppresses human atrial fibroblast proliferation and transformation to myofibroblasts. J Cell Mol Med 17, 1345–1354. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8. Li YQ, Li XB, Guo SJ, Chu SL, Gao PJ, Zhu DL, Niu WQ and Jia N (2013) Apocynin attenuates oxidative stress and cardiac fibrosis in angiotensin II‐induced cardiac diastolic dysfunction in mice. Acta Pharmacol Sin 34, 352–359. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9. Porter KE and Turner NA (2009) Cardiac fibroblasts: at the heart of myocardial remodeling. Pharmacol Ther 123, 255–278. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10. Su SA, Yang D, Wu Y, Xie Y, Zhu W, Cai ZJ, Shen J, Fu ZR, Wang YP, Jia LL et al. (2017) EphrinB2 regulates cardiac fibrosis through modulating the interaction of Stat3 and TGF‐beta/Smad3 signaling. Circ Res 121, 617. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11. Bao Q, Zhang B, Suo Y, Liu C, Yang Q, Zhang K, Yuan M, Yuan M, Zhang Y and Li G (2020) Intermittent hypoxia mediated by TSP1 dependent on STAT3 induces cardiac fibroblast activation and cardiac fibrosis. eLife 9, e49923. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12. Chen X, Su J, Feng JY, Cheng L, Li Q, Qiu C and Zheng QJ (2019) TRIM72 contributes to cardiac fibrosis via regulating STAT3/Notch‐1 signaling. J Cell Physiol 234, 17749–17756. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13. Yuan Y, Zhang Y, Han XJ, Li YY, Zhao XB, Sheng L and Li Y (2017) Relaxin alleviates TGF beta 1‐induced cardiac fibrosis via inhibition of Stat3‐dependent autophagy. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 493, 1601–1607. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14. Xu XJ, Kasembeli MM, Jiang XQ, Tweardy BJ and Tweardy DJ (2009) Chemical probes that competitively and selectively inhibit Stat3 activation. PLoS One 4, e4783. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15. Redell MS, Ruiz MJ, Alonzo TA, Gerbing RB and Tweardy DJ (2011) Stat3 signaling in acute myeloid leukemia: ligand‐dependent and ‐independent activation and induction of apoptosis by a novel small‐molecule Stat3 inhibitor. Blood 117, 5701–5709. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16. Jung KH, Yoo W, Stevenson HL, Deshpande D, Shen H, Gagea M, Yoo S‐Y, Wang J, Eckols TK, Bharadwaj U et al. (2017) Multifunctional effects of a small‐molecule STAT3 inhibitor on NASH and hepatocellular carcinoma in mice. Clin Cancer Res 23, 5537–5546. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17. Pedroza M, Le TT, Lewis K, Karmouty‐Quintana H, To S, George AT, Blackburn MR, Tweardy DJ and Agarwal SK (2016) STAT‐3 contributes to pulmonary fibrosis through epithelial injury and fibroblast‐myofibroblast differentiation. FASEB J 30, 129–140. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18. Pedroza M, To S, Assassi S, Wu MH, Tweardy D and Agarwal SK (2018) Role of STAT3 in skin fibrosis and transforming growth factor beta signalling. Rheumatology 57, 1838–1850. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19. Li ZL, Chen B, Dong W, Kong M, Fan Z, Yu L, Wu D, Lu J and Xu Y (2019) MKL1 promotes endothelial‐to‐mesenchymal transition and liver fibrosis by activating TWIST1 transcription. Cell Death Dis 10, 899. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20. Lei Q, Yi T, Li H, Yan ZJ, Lv Z, Li GR and Wang YG (2020) Ubiquitin C‐terminal hydrolase L1 (UCHL1) regulates post‐myocardial infarction cardiac fibrosis through glucose‐regulated protein of 78 kDa (GRP78). Sci Rep 10, 10604. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21. Villalobos E, Criollo A, Schiattarella GG, Altamirano F, French KM, May HI, Jiang N, Nguyen NUN, Romero D, Roa JC et al. (2019) Fibroblast primary cilia are required for cardiac fibrosis. Circulation 139, 2342–2357. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22. Liu J, Zhang SJ, Cao HC, Wang H, Sun C, Liu SN, Yu SX, Li Y, Liu W, Wang H et al. (2017) Deficiency of p38 in macrophage ameliorates d‐galactosamine/TNF–induced acute liver injury in mice. FEBS J 284, 4200–4215. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23. Zuo S, Kong D, Wang C, Liu J, Wang Y, Wan Q, Yan S, Zhang J, Tang J, Zhang Q et al. (2018) CRTH2 promotes endoplasmic reticulum stress‐induced cardiomyocyte apoptosis through m‐calpain. EMBO Mol Med 10, e8237. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24. Rajshankar D, Wang YQ and McCulloch CA (2017) Osteogenesis requires FAK‐dependent collagen synthesis by fibroblasts and osteoblasts. FASEB J 31, 937–953. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25. Patel NJ, Nassal DM, Greer‐Short AD, Unudurthi SD, Scandling BW, Gratz D, Xu XY, Kalyanasundaram A, Fedorov VV, Accornero F et al. (2019) betaIV‐Spectrin/STAT3 complex regulates fibroblast phenotype, fibrosis, and cardiac function. JCI Insight 4, e131046. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26. Hu HH, Chen DQ, Wang YN, Feng YL, Cao G, Vaziri ND and Zhao YY (2018) New insights into TGF‐beta/Smad signaling in tissue fibrosis. Chem Biol Interact 292, 76–83. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27. Hanna A and Frangogiannis NG (2019) The role of the TGF‐beta superfamily in myocardial infarction. Front Cardiovasc Med 6, 140. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28. Khalil H, Kanisicak O, Prasad V, Correll RN, Fu X, Schips T, Vagnozzi RJ, Liu RJ, Huynh T, Lee SJ et al. (2017) Fibroblast‐specific TGF‐beta‐Smad2/3 signaling underlies cardiac fibrosis. J Clin Invest 127, 3770–3783. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29. Oshima Y, Fujio Y, Nakanishi T, Itoh N, Yamamoto Y, Negoro S, Tanaka K, Kishimoto T, Kawase I and Azuma J (2005) STAT3 mediates cardioprotection against ischemia/reperfusion injury through metallothionein induction in the heart. Cardiovasc Res 65, 428–435. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30. Chen Y, Surinkaew S, Naud P, Qi X‐Y, Gillis M‐A, Shi Y‐F, Tardif J‐C, Dobrev D and Nattel S (2017) JAK‐STAT signalling and the atrial fibrillation promoting fibrotic substrate. Cardiovasc Res 113, 310–320. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31. Yuan Y, Zhang Y, Han X, Li Y, Zhao X, Sheng L and Li Y (2017) Relaxin alleviates TGFbeta1‐induced cardiac fibrosis via inhibition of Stat3‐dependent autophagy. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 493, 1601–1607. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32. Kong R, Sun G, Li X, Wu L, Li L, Li Y, Wang F, Xuan P, Yang S, Sun B et al. (2020) Small molecule inhibitor C188–9 synergistically enhances the demethylated activity of low‐dose 5‐Aza‐2'‐deoxycytidine against pancreatic cancer. Front Oncol 10, 612. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33. Bharadwaj U, Eckols TK, Xu X, Kasembeli MM, Chen Y, Adachi M, Song Y, Mo Q, Lai SY and Tweardy DJ (2016) Small‐molecule inhibition of STAT3 in radioresistant head and neck squamous cell carcinoma. Oncotarget 7, 26307–26330. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Data Availability Statement
The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.