Significance
Crystal structure engineering in nanoparticles represents an important strategy in catalyst design, as catalytic performance is highly dependent on atomic arrangement. However, realizing crystal structure engineering in high-index facet nanocatalysts has been a synthetic challenge for decades. Here, we first employed density functional theory calculations to determine whether surface modifications can stabilize high-index facets during crystal structure transformations and then synthesized a library of multimetallic high-index facet tetrahexahedral (THH) nanoparticles with controllable crystal structures. Importantly, the crystal structural transition between the intermetallic and chemically disordered states is reversable, and the THH morphology of nanocatalysts is maintained during this transformation. This approach broadens the synthetic scope of nanocatalysts available for use in diverse chemical processes.
Keywords: high-index facet nanoparticles, crystal structure control, multimetallic catalysts, surface modifications, intermetallics
Abstract
In the context of metal particle catalysts, composition, shape, exposed facets, crystal structure, and atom distribution dictate activity. While techniques have been developed to control each of these parameters, there is no general method that allows one to optimize all parameters in the context of polyelemental systems. Herein, by combining a solid-state, Bi-influenced, high-index facet shape regulation strategy with thermal annealing, we achieve control over crystal structure and atom distribution on the exposed high-index facets, resulting in an unprecedentedly diverse library of chemically disordered and ordered multimetallic (Pt, Co, Ni, Cu, Fe, and Mn) tetrahexahedral (THH) nanoparticles. Density functional theory calculations show that surface Bi modification stabilizes the {210} high-index facets of the nanoparticles, regardless of their internal atomic ordering. Moreover, we find that the ordering transition temperatures for the nanoparticles are dependent on their composition, and, in the case of Pt3Fe1 THH nanoparticles, increasing Ni substitution leads to an order-to-disorder transition at 900 °C. Finally, we have discovered that ordered intermetallic THH Pt1Co1 nanocatalysts exhibit a catalytic performance superior to disordered THH Pt1Co1 nanoparticles and commercial Pt/C catalysts toward methanol electrooxidation, highlighting the importance of crystal structure and atom distribution control on high-index facets in nanoscale catalysts.
Internal crystal structure is an important design parameter for multimetallic nanoparticle (NP) catalysts, as their performance is highly dependent on atomic arrangement (1–5). Additionally, high-index facet NPs generally exhibit superior activity and selectivity compared to their low-index facet counterparts due to the high density of catalytically favorable low-coordination steps and edges on their surfaces (6–10). As such, a method to engineer the crystal structure of multimetallic high-index facet NPs is highly desirable. However, due to the structural complexity of these NPs, such strategies are lacking to date. While high-index facet nanostructures with specific crystal structures have been prepared by solution-phase methods, the complex reaction kinetics involved in these syntheses limit their generalizability to various compositions and crystal structures (11, 12). On the other hand, thermal annealing treatments are commonly used to modify the internal atomic ordering of as-synthesized NPs, since distinct crystal structures are thermodynamically favored at different annealing temperatures (13–15). This method, however, is not compatible with conventional high-index facet NPs because the organic ligands that stabilize their low-coordination facets decompose upon thermal annealing, resulting in the reconstruction of their facets into low-index ones. One way to circumvent this challenge is to synthesize high-index facet NPs that are stable under high temperatures.
Recently, we reported a highly generalizable strategy for synthesizing a library of multimetallic tetrahexahedral (THH) NPs enclosed by {210} high-index facets through alloying/dealloying with foreign metals (Bi, Sb, Pb, or Te) (16–18). Importantly, these high-index facet NPs are prepared at high temperatures (∼900 °C), offering a wide temperature window to further modify their crystal structures. Here, we demonstrate through density functional theory (DFT) calculations that the {210} high-index facets of multimetallic THH NPs can be stabilized with foreign metals (e.g., Bi), regardless of their internal crystal structure. We further confirm this result by experimentally realizing a library of 16 multimetallic (with components Pt, Co, Ni, Cu, Fe, and Mn) high-index facet THH NPs with either chemically disordered or ordered (intermetallic) crystal structures through Bi modification. Moreover, we show that the crystal structure transition temperatures of these NPs can be modulated by tuning their elemental ratios, and by increasing Ni substitution, the crystal structure of Pt3Fe1 THH NPs changes at 900 °C from ordered L12 to disordered A1. Finally, we evaluate both chemically disordered and intermetallic Pt1Co1 THH NPs as electrocatalysts for the methanol oxidation reaction and find that the intermetallic NPs exhibit superior activity and stability.
Results and Discussion
As an initial proof-of-concept, we targeted the Pt–Co system and evaluated the impact of crystal structure and surface Bi modification on NP morphology using surface-energy calculations. While PtCo NPs can form a chemically disordered A1 structure with any Pt/Co elemental ratio, intermetallic ones can only form over narrow ranges around certain Pt/Co ratios, including L10 Pt1Co1, L12 Pt3Co1, and L12 Pt1Co3 (19, 20). Importantly, L10 Pt1Co1 has a tetragonal structure with ordered, alternating Pt and Co atomic layers along the c axis, which is markedly different from the face-centered cubic (fcc) structure of A1 Pt1Co1, where Pt and Co atoms are randomly distributed within the lattice (14). In previous reports (16), we discovered that surface Bi modification can stabilize the {210} facets of NPs with chemically disordered fcc structures. However, it remains uncertain whether this strategy can be extended to ordered tetragonal structures. To answer this question, we used DFT simulations to calculate the specific surface energies of the (210), (102), and (201) high-index facets, as well as all the low-index facets [including the (111), (100), (001), (101), and (110) facets] of L10 Pt1Co1 NPs before and after Bi modification (Fig. 1A and SI Appendix, Fig. S1). The calculation results show that Bi modification can significantly change the specific surface energies of these facets. Specifically, without Bi modification, the specific surface energies of low-index facets [e.g., 1.70 J/m2 for the (111) facet and 1.42 J/m2 for the (001) facet] are smaller than those of high-index facets [e.g., 2.27 J/m2 for the (210) facet and 2.44 J/m2 for the (201) facet], resulting in a truncated octahedron equilibrium Wulff shape capped by (111), (100), (001), and (101) facets, consistent with literature reports (21). However, with increasing Bi coverage, the specific surface energies of high-index facets decrease drastically. For instance, the (210), (102), and (201) facets all have an ∼90% drop in specific surface energies when the Bi coverage increases from 0 to 100%. On the other hand, Bi modification has the opposite effect on low-index facets, making them energetically unfavorable. Consequently, with 100% Bi coverage, high-index facets exhibit much lower surface energies than low-index ones, and the equilibrium Wulff shape for L10 Pt1Co1 becomes a tetrahexahedron (Fig. 1C).
Fig. 1.
(A and B) Specific surface energies of Bi-modified facets of L10 Pt1Co1 [A; Upper shows the surface energies of (111), (100) and (001) facets, while Lower shows those of other facets evaluated] and L12 Pt3Co1 as a function of the surface Bi coverage (B). (C and D) Wulff structure evolution of L10 Pt1Co1 (C) and L12 Pt3Co1 (D) as a function of surface Bi coverage.
To confirm the DFT results, we experimentally explored the behavior of Pt1Co1 NPs upon Bi surface modification. To achieve compositionally uniform NPs, 8 (±1) nm A1-structured quasispherical Pt1Co1 NPs were synthesized via a solution-phase method to serve as precursor seeds (SI Appendix, Fig. S2) and then transferred to a tube furnace for thermal treatment in a Bi atmosphere. Based on the phase diagram, Pt1Co1 alloys tend to take on the A1 structure at high temperatures and the L10 structure at low temperatures, with a structural transition at ∼820 °C (20). After 1-h annealing at 900 °C, the quasispherical Pt1Co1 NPs were successfully transformed into THH NPs, as confirmed by scanning electron microscopy (SEM), scanning transmission electron microscopy (STEM), and energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDS; Fig. 2A and SI Appendix, Figs. S3 and S4). Furthermore, X-ray diffraction (XRD) data confirm that these THH NPs take on the A1 structure (Fig. 2B), and the Miller indices of their exposed facets were indexed to be {210} (Fig. 2 E and F), consistent with previous results (16). Further annealing of the A1 Pt1Co1 THH NPs at 700 °C for 0.5 to 2 h induced a transition to the L10 phase, as indicated by the appearance of (001) and (110) peaks at 24.2° and 33.4°, respectively, in the XRD patterns, which are forbidden in A1 structures (Fig. 2B). Additionally, due to the difference in intrinsic magnetism between L10 Pt1Co1 (ferromagnetic) and A1 Pt1Co1 (superparamagnetic) at room temperature (20), the crystal structure transition can be further confirmed by measuring their hysteresis loops. Specifically, with increasing annealing time at 700 °C, the coercivity of the resulting Pt1Co1 NPs increased and reached a maximum value of 5.2 kilooersteds (kOe) after 2 h of annealing. Annealing these NPs for another 2 h did not significantly change their coercivity, indicating that Pt1Co1 NPs were fully transformed into L10 structures (Fig. 2 C and D). To unambiguously confirm the formation of L10 Pt1Co1 THH NPs, a selected-area electron diffraction (SAED) pattern was collected from the [001] direction of a single Pt1Co1 THH NP annealed at 700 °C for 2 h. The SAED pattern exhibited (100) and (110) diffraction spots, indicative of L10 Pt1Co1 (Fig. 2 H and I). Additionally, the L10 Pt1Co1 THH NP lattice was directly imaged by using aberration-corrected STEM. Due to differences in their Z-contrast, Pt atoms are brighter than Co atoms in dark-field STEM imaging. In the A1 Pt1Co1 THH NP, no obvious brightness difference was observed due to the random distribution of Pt and Co atoms (Fig. 2G), while alternating Pt and Co atomic layers can be clearly identified in the L10 Pt1Co1 THH NP (Fig. 2J). Finally, the transition between the A1 and L10 structures was confirmed to be reversible. Specifically, the L10 Pt1Co1 THH NPs were transformed back into A1 structures by further annealing them at 900 °C for 1 h (SI Appendix, Fig. S5).
Fig. 2.
Morphology and crystal structure characterization of A1 and L10 Pt1Co1 THH NPs. (A) SEM image of as-prepared Pt1Co1 THH NPs at 900 °C. (B) XRD patterns of A1 and L10 Pt1Co1 THH NPs obtained at 900 and 700 °C, respectively. Standard diffraction patterns of A1 (Powder Diffraction File [PDF]: 04-003-4659) and L10 Pt1Co1 (PDF: 03-065-8969) are provided for comparison. A.u., arbitrary units. (C) Hysteresis loops of Pt1Co1 THH NPs annealed at 700 °C for different times. (D) Three-dimensional model of an L10 Pt1Co1 THH NP, where the gray atoms are Pt and the blue atoms are Co. (E, F, H, and I) TEM images and corresponding SAED patterns of A1 Pt1Co1 (E and F) and L10 Pt1Co1 (H and I) THH NPs. (Scale bars, 25 nm.) (E and H, Insets) Ideal model of a THH NP projected along the [001] direction. (G and J) Aberration-corrected STEM images of an A1 Pt1Co1 THH NP imaged along the [111] direction (G) and an L10 Pt1Co1 THH NP imaged along the [110] direction (J). (J, Inset) An atomic model of the L10 Pt1Co1 structure, where Pt is in red and Co is in blue.
Motivated by the successful crystal structure engineering of Pt1Co1 THH NPs, we further tested this method on Pt3Co1 and Pt1Co3 NPs, which can take on either A1 or intermetallic L12 structures (SI Appendix, Fig. S6). DFT calculations predict that in the L12 Pt3Co1 system with 100% Bi coverage, the specific surface energy of {210} high-index facets (0.11 J/m2) is much smaller than those of low-index facets (0.56 J/m2 for {110}, 1.72 J/m2 for {100}, and 3.94 J/m2 for {111} facets; Fig. 1B). Therefore, L12 Pt3Co1 NPs should form THH rather than truncated octahedron, which is the preferred morphology when there is 0% Bi coverage (Fig. 1D). To test this prediction, we synthesized A1 Pt3Co1 THH NPs by heating corresponding quasispherical ones at 900 °C for 1 h in a Bi atmosphere. Since Pt3Co1 has a structural transition temperature at 735 °C (20), L12 Pt3Co1 NPs were synthesized by further annealing the A1 THH NPs at 700 °C for 2 h (Fig. 3 A and B). As with the Pt1Co1 system, Pt and Co ordering within L12 Pt3Co1 THH NPs resulted in (100) and (110) diffractions. This long-range ordering was characterized by aberration-corrected STEM along the [001] axis, which shows alternating layers of pure Pt and mixed Pt–Co (Fig. 3G). Similarly, A1 and L12 Pt1Co3 THH NPs can be obtained at 900 °C and 600 °C, respectively [structure transition temperature: 655 °C (20); Fig. 3 C, D, and H]. Indeed, the generalizability of this strategy to engineer the crystal structure of high-index facet NPs is unprecedented, and, in this work, we further extended its scope to other systems, including Pt–Ni, Pt–Cu, Pt–Fe, and Pt–Mn (SI Appendix, Figs. S6–S9). For example, A1 Pt1Ni1 THH NPs and Pt1Cu1 THH NPs can be synthesized at 900 °C, and by postannealing them at 600 °C for 12 h and 700 °C for 2 h, respectively, L10 Pt1Ni1 THH NPs and L11 Pt1Cu1 THH NPs can be obtained (Fig. 3 E, F, and I and SI Appendix, Fig. S8).
Fig. 3.
(A–F) TEM images (Left) and corresponding SAED patterns along the [001] direction (Right) of A1 Pt3Co1 (A), L12 Pt3Co1 (B), A1 Pt1Co3 (C), L12 Pt1Co3 (D), A1 Pt1Ni1 (E), and L10 Pt1Ni1 (F) THH NPs. (G) Aberration-corrected STEM image of a L12 Pt3Co THH NP. (G, Inset) Atomic model of the L12 Pt3Co1 structure, where Pt is in red and Co is in blue. (H and I) STEM images and EDS maps of Pt1Co3 (H) and Pt1Ni1 (I) THH NPs. (Scale bars, 30 nm.)
Due to the high structural transition temperatures of Pt–Fe and Pt–Mn (1,350 °C for bulk Pt3Fe1 and 995 °C for bulk Pt3Mn1) (22), intermetallic L12 Pt3Fe1 and L12 Pt3Mn1 THH NPs were directly obtained after heating the corresponding quasispherical ones at 900 °C for 1 h in a Bi atmosphere (Fig. 4A and SI Appendix, Fig. S9). While further heating these NPs at a sufficiently high temperature (above their structural transition temperatures) can, in principle, produce the corresponding A1 THH NPs, here, we explored elemental substitution as an alternative strategy for synthesizing A1 THH NPs under milder annealing conditions. Taking the Pt–Fe system as an example, incorporating increasing amounts of Ni into the Pt3Fe1 NPs resulted in more disordered structures after annealing at 900 °C for 1 h. With 10% Ni substitution, the (100) and (110) diffraction peaks disappeared in the XRD pattern of the resulting Pt3Fe0.6Ni0.4 THH NPs, indicating the formation of A1 structures (Fig. 4 B and C). Moreover, the 10% Ni-substituted Pt–Fe THH NPs can be reconverted into L12 NPs by annealing at 600 °C for 2 h (SI Appendix, Fig. S10). Taken together, these results indicate that elemental substitution can be used as an additional tool to fine-tune the crystal structure transition process of multimetallic THH NPs. Since the solid-state THH shape regulation strategy works for a vast library of multimetallic NPs (e.g., Pt, Pd, Rh, Au, Cu, Ni, Co, Fe, and Mn) (17), it offers great flexibility in the choice of elemental compositions for engineering the crystal structure of multimetallic high-index facet NPs, including the potential to form high-entropy alloys and intermetallics (23, 24). Indeed, as a proof-of-concept, we prepared quinary Pt45Fe15Co13Ni12Cu15 THH NPs with both A1 and L10 crystal structures at 900 °C and 600 °C, respectively (Fig. 4D and SI Appendix, Fig. S11).
Fig. 4.
(A and B) SEM images, STEM images, and corresponding EDS maps of Pt3Fe1 (A) and Pt3Fe0.6Ni0.4 (B) THH NPs. (C) XRD patterns of PtFe THH NPs with 0% (Pt3Fe1), 5% (Pt3Fe0.8Ni0.2), and 10% (Pt3Fe0.6Ni0.4) Ni substitution synthesized at 900 °C for 1 h. A.u., arbitrary units. (D) SEM image, STEM image, and corresponding EDS maps of a quinary PtFeCoNiCu THH NP. (Scale bars, 50 nm.)
We tested the effect of crystal structure on the catalytic performance of THH NPs toward methanol electrooxidation, an important anode reaction in direct-methanol fuel cells (25–29), using A1 and L10 Pt1Co1 THH NPs (Fig. 5). To reveal their intrinsic catalytic activity, we normalized the measured current to the electrochemical surface area of Pt. According to the literature (25), a typical methanol-oxidation polarization curve consists of two sweeps. The current peak at ∼0.9 V in the forward sweep originates from methanol oxidation into CO2, CO, and/or other carbonaceous intermediates, while the one at ∼0.65 V in the backward sweep corresponds to the oxidation of the carbonaceous intermediates into CO2. Current densities during the forward sweep are typically used to evaluate the catalytic efficiency of NPs. These measurements indicate that both L10 and A1 Pt1Co1 THH nanocatalysts are more active than the commercial Pt/C catalyst. At an overpotential of 0.8 V, the current densities of L10 and A1 Pt1Co1 THH nanocatalysts are 3.4 and 2.3 mA/cm2, which are 14 and 9 times higher than that of the commercial Pt/C catalyst (0.25 mA/cm2), respectively. This indicates the favorable effect of high-index facets on catalytic activity. Additionally, the L10 Pt1Co1THH nanocatalyst exhibited higher activity than the A1 Pt1Co1 THH nanocatalyst, indicating that atomic ordering within these NPs can further improve catalytic activity (Fig. 5C). We also compared the performance of the THH nanocatalysts to Johnson–Matthey PtRu black, an industry-standard catalyst used in direct methanol-oxidation fuel cells and some recently reported nanocatalysts (SI Appendix, Fig. S12 and Table S1). The L10 and A1 Pt1Co1 THH nanocatalysts exhibited sixfold and fourfold higher activity, respectively, than PtRu black. Finally, amperometric i–t curves revealed that the L10 Pt1Co1 THH nanocatalyst exhibits superior catalytic stability compared to both A1 Pt1Co1 THH and the commercial Pt/C catalysts. After continuous operation for 3,600 s at 0.8 V, the measured current density for L10 Pt1Co1 THH was 0.41 mA/cm2, which is 3 times and 21 times higher than that from A1 Pt1Co1 THH (0.15 mA/cm2) and the commercial Pt/C catalyst (0.02 mA/cm2; Fig. 5D), respectively.
Fig. 5.
Catalytic properties of A1 and L10 Pt1Co1 THH NPs. (A) Cyclic voltammograms of different catalysts in an Ar-saturated 0.5 M H2SO4 solution. (B and C) Polarization curves (B) and histograms (C) of the specific activities at 0.8 V of methanol electrooxidation in Ar-saturated 0.5 M H2SO4 + 1 M CH3OH for different catalysts. RHE, reversible hydrogen electrode.(D) Chronoamperometry curves of methanol electrooxidation for the different catalysts at 0.8 V. Error bars in C represent the SD.
Conclusions
To summarize, we have prepared a library of multimetallic (Pt, Co, Ni, Cu, Fe, and Mn) THH NPs with chemically disordered and intermetallic structures. Bi atoms stabilize the {210} facets of these NPs at high temperatures, which provides a unique opportunity to deliberately control their crystal structure through annealing temperature and chemical composition while keeping THH morphology. Testing of these catalysts for the methanol-oxidation reaction showed that the L10 Pt1Co1 THH nanocatalysts exhibit superior activity and stability over their A1-structured counterparts. Given the generalizability of this synthesis strategy, these findings highlight the vast potential for the design and industrial-scale manufacturing of cost-effective highly optimized catalysts. Additionally, since THH formation is independent of initial NP shape, and the structural transformation between the intermetallic and chemically disordered state of THH NPs is reversable, this strategy may play a role in catalyst recycling and reactivation for diverse chemical processes.
Materials and Methods
Materials.
Platinum acetylacetonate (97%), manganese acetylacetonate (97%), iron acetylacetonate (97%), cobalt acetylacetonate (97%), nickel acetylacetonate (95%), copper acetylacetonate (97%), oleylamine (70%), Pt/C catalyst (20 wt% Pt loading), Nafion solution (5 wt%), ethanol, and hexane were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich, Inc., and utilized without further purification. Carbon black powder (Vulcan XC-72) was purchased from Cabot. Johnson–Matthey PtRu black (HiSPEC 6000) was purchased from Alfa Aesar. Transmission electron microscopy (TEM) grids with silicon nitride support films were purchased from Ted Pella, Inc.
Synthesis of A1-Structured THH NPs.
Colloidal syntheses of uniform Pt-based NP seeds are described in SI Appendix. Then, a piece of silicon wafer or a silicon nitride TEM grid was loaded with colloidally synthesized spherical NPs of interest and placed in the center of a tube furnace. Approximately 1 mg of Bi powder was loaded in a combustion boat and placed in the tube, upstream of the NPs. The thermal treatment was programmed as follows: Under H2 gas flow (flow rate: 200 standard cubic cm/min [sccm]), ramp to 600 °C within 12 min, hold at 600 °C for 10 min, ramp to 900 °C in 10 min, and hold at 900 °C for 1 h. Upon completion of the synthesis, the tube was quenched to room temperature.
Synthesis of Intermetallic PtCo, PtNi, or PtCu THH NPs.
A piece of silicon wafer loaded with the above synthesized A1 THH NPs was placed in a tube furnace for thermal treatment, which differed for different NPs. To synthesize L10 Pt1Co1, L11 Pt1Cu1, and L12 Pt3Co1 THH NPs, ramp to 700 °C in 23 min, and hold at 700 °C for 2 h. To synthesize L12 Pt1Co3, and L10 Pt1Ni1 THH NPs, ramp to 600 °C in 20 min, and hold at 600 °C for 12 h. The thermal treatments were all performed under H2 gas flow (flow rate: 200 sccm).
Synthesis of Intermetallic Pt3Mn1 or Pt3Fe1 THH NPs.
Intermetallic Pt3Mn1 or Pt3Fe1 THH NPs were synthesized by thermal annealing the corresponding colloidally synthesized quasispherical Pt3Fe1 or Pt3Mn1 NPs on a piece of silicon wafer. The thermal treatment condition was the same as that used for the synthesis of A1 Pt1Co1 THH NPs.
Synthesis of Multimetallic THH NPs.
L12 Pt3Fe0.8Ni0.2, A1 Pt3Fe0.6Ni0.4, and A1 Pt45Fe15Co13Ni12Cu15 THH NPs were obtained by annealing Pt3Fe0.8Ni0.2, Pt3Fe0.6Ni0.4, or PtFeCoNiCu colloidal NPs according to the same synthesis procedure as that of A1 Pt1Co1 THH NPs. To synthesize L12 Pt3Fe0.6Ni0.4 and L10 Pt45Fe15Co13Ni12Cu15 THH NPs, further thermal treatments were programmed as follows: Under H2 gas flow (flow rate: 200 sccm), ramp to 600 °C in 20 min, hold at 600 °C for 2 h, and quench to room temperature.
DFT Simulations.
All DFT calculations in this work were performed by using the Vienna ab initio simulation package (30–33) with the projector-augmented wave potentials and the Perdew–Burke–Ernzerhof (34–36) formulation of the generalized gradient approximation. The plane-wave cutoff energy was set to be 400 eV, and the structures were fully relaxed until the energy was converged within 10−5 eV. At least 4,000 k-points per reciprocal atom gamma-centered k-point meshes were generated to sample the Brillouin zone, and spin polarization was included for all DFT calculations in this work. The surface models were constructed by following the procedure used by Huang et al. (16), where a crystal slab containing 11 atomic layers and a vacuum region of 15 Å were stacked in the direction perpendicular to the surface. For slabs with two possible terminations [e.g., (001) and (110) in the L10 structure and (100) and (110) in the L12 structure], only models with lower energies were considered. In the presence of foreign metal (Bi) absorbed on the surface, Bi atoms were only attached to the topmost layer for all surface models. When performing DFT calculations on these surface models, the middle three layers were fixed, while the other layers could relax. The surface energy was calculated by γ = (Eslab − Σniμi)/2Asurface, where Eslab is the total energy of the surface model, ni is the number of atoms, μi is the chemical potential of the element i, and Asurface is the surface area. The total energy per atom of the bulk structure was used as the chemical potential for Pt and Bi, while the chemical potential of Co was determined by subtracting the energy of Pt atoms from the total energy of Co–Pt binary compounds (i.e., ).
Characterization.
SEM images were taken with a Hitachi SU-8030 field-emission SEM with an acceleration voltage of 30 kV and a current of 20 µA. STEM images were taken with a Hitachi HD-2300 STEM at an acceleration voltage of 200 kV. The composition was studied by using the dual EDS detectors on the HD-2300 STEM. The Lα peaks of Pt and the Kα peaks of Mn, Fe, Co, Ni, and Cu in the EDS spectra were used for elemental mapping and composition quantification. Atomic compositions of the NPs were calculated based on EDS spectral analysis with the Cliff–Lorimer correction method. The atomic composition measured by EDS had an inherent error of less than 5% due to X-ray absorption and fluorescence. Thermo Scientific NSS software was used for background subtraction in the EDS maps. High-resolution TEM images and SAED patterns were taken with a JEOL ARM 200F GrandARM TEM at an acceleration voltage of 300 kV. XRD spectra were collected on a Rigaku Ultima with a Cu Kα source. Magnetic properties were measured by using a vibrating sample magnetometer under a maximum applied field of 15 kOe. The electrochemical measurements were performed in a three-electrode glass cell at 298 K using an Epsilon Eclipse Workstation. A coiled Pt wire and an Ag/AgCl electrode were used as the counter and reference electrodes, respectively. All potentials were calibrated versus a reversible hydrogen electrode. The electrochemical surface area was determined electrochemically by the adsorption–desorption of hydrogen between 0.05 and 0.4 V and assuming 210 μC⋅cm−2 for a monolayer of adsorbed hydrogen on the Pt surface. The cyclic voltammetry measurements were carried out in 0.5 M H2SO4 under a flow of Ar gas at a sweep rate of 50 mV⋅s−1. Methanol electrooxidation reactions were measured in 0.5 M H2SO4 + 1 M CH3OH at a sweep rate of 20 mV⋅s−1.
Supplementary Material
Acknowledgments
This material is based upon work supported by Kairos Ventures, the Sherman Fairchild Foundation, Inc., and Air Force Office of Scientific Research Awards FA9550-16-1-0150 and FA9550-17-1-0348. J.S. and C.W were supported by the Materials Research Science and Engineering Centers (MRSEC) program (NSF Grant DMR-1720319) at the Materials Research Center of Northwestern University. The computational resources are supported by the National Energy Research Scientific Computing Center, a US Department of Energy Office of Science User Facility operated under Contract DE-AC02-05CH11231 and the Quest high-performance computing facility at Northwestern University. This work made use of the Electron Probe Instrumentation Center facility of the Northwestern University Atomic and Nanoscale Characterization Experimental Center, which has received support from the Soft and Hybrid Nanotechnology Experimental Resource (NSF Grant ECCS1542205); the MRSEC program (NSF Grant DMR-1720139) at the Materials Research Center; the International Institute for Nanotechnology (IIN); the Keck Foundation; and the State of Illinois, through the IIN. We thank Dr. S. M. Rupich (Northwestern University) for providing editorial input.
Footnotes
The authors declare no competing interest.
This article contains supporting information online at https://www.pnas.org/lookup/suppl/doi:10.1073/pnas.2105722118/-/DCSupplemental.
Data Availability
All study data are included in the article and SI Appendix.
References
- 1.Zhou M., Li C., Fang J., Noble-metal based random alloy and intermetallic nanocrystals: Syntheses and applications. Chem. Rev. 121, 736–795 (2021). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Li J., Sun S., Intermetallic nanoparticles: Synthetic control and their enhanced electrocatalysis. Acc. Chem. Res. 52, 2015–2025 (2019). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Gamler J. T. L., Ashberry H. M., Skrabalak S. E., Koczkur K. M., Random alloyed versus intermetallic nanoparticles: A comparison of electrocatalytic performance. Adv. Mater. 30, e1801563 (2018). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Kim D., et al., Electrochemical activation of CO2 through atomic ordering transformations of AuCu nanoparticles. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 139, 8329–8336 (2017). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Xiong Y., et al., Revealing the atomic ordering of binary intermetallics using in situ heating techniques at multilength scales. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 116, 1974–1983 (2019). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Shi Y., et al., Noble-metal nanocrystals with controlled shapes for catalytic and electrocatalytic applications. Chem. Rev. 121, 649–735 (2021). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Tian N., Zhou Z. Y., Sun S. G., Ding Y., Wang Z. L., Synthesis of tetrahexahedral platinum nanocrystals with high-index facets and high electro-oxidation activity. Science 316, 732–735 (2007). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Xu X., et al., Synthesis of Pt-Ni alloy nanocrystals with high-index facets and enhanced electrocatalytic properties. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl. 53, 12522–12527 (2014). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Wang C., et al., High-indexed Pt3Ni alloy tetrahexahedral nanoframes evolved through preferential CO etching. Nano Lett. 17, 2204–2210 (2017). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Xiao C., et al., High-index-facet- and high-surface-energy nanocrystals of metals and metal oxides as highly efficient catalysts. Joule 4, 1–37 (2020). [Google Scholar]
- 11.Bu L., et al., A general method for multimetallic platinum alloy nanowires as highly active and stable oxygen reduction catalysts. Adv. Mater. 27, 7204–7212 (2015). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Bu L., et al., Surface engineering of hierarchical platinum-cobalt nanowires for efficient electrocatalysis. Nat. Commun. 7, 11850 (2016). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Li J., et al., Fe stabilization by intermetallic L10-FePt and Pt catalysis enhancement in L10- FePt/Pt nanoparticles for efficient oxygen reduction reaction in fuel cells. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 140, 2926–2932 (2018). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Li J., et al., Hard-magnet L10-CoPt nanoparticles advance fuel cell catalysis. Joule 3, 124–135 (2019). [Google Scholar]
- 15.Jiang G., et al., Core/shell face-centered tetragonal FePd/Pd nanoparticles as an efficient non-Pt catalyst for the oxygen reduction reaction. ACS Nano 9, 11014–11022 (2015). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Huang L., et al., Shape regulation of high-index facet nanoparticles by dealloying. Science 365, 1159–1163 (2019). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Huang L., et al., Multimetallic high-index faceted heterostructured nanoparticles. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 142, 4570–4575 (2020). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Huang L., Zheng C. Y., Shen B., Mirkin C. A., High-index-facet metal-alloy nanoparticles as fuel cell electrocatalysts. Adv. Mater. 32, e2002849 (2020). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Wang Z., et al., Structurally ordered low‐Pt intermetallic electrocatalysts toward durably high oxygen reduction reaction activity. Adv. Funct. Mater. 29, 1902987 (2019). [Google Scholar]
- 20.Sanchez J. M., Moran-Lopez J. L., Leroux C., Cadeville M. C., Magnetic properties and chemical ordering in Co-Pt. J. Phys. C Solid State Phys. 21, L1091 (1988). [Google Scholar]
- 21.Dannenberg A., Gruner M. E., Hucht A., Entel P., Surface energies of stoichiometric FePt and CoPt alloys and their implications for nanoparticle morphologies. Phys. Rev. B Condens. Matter Mater. Phys. 80, 245438 (2009). [Google Scholar]
- 22.Okamoto H., “Fe-Pt (Iron-Platinum) and Mn-Pt (Manganese-Platinum)” in Binary Alloy Phase Diagrams, Second Edition, Massalski T. B., Ed. (ASM International, Materials Park, OH, 1990). [Google Scholar]
- 23.Yao Y., et al., Carbothermal shock synthesis of high-entropy-alloy nanoparticles. Science 359, 1489–1494 (2018). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Miracle D. B., Senkov O. N., A critical review of high entropy alloys and related concepts. Acta Mater. 122, 448–511 (2017). [Google Scholar]
- 25.Zhao X., et al., Recent advances in catalysts for direct methanol fuel cells. Energy Environ. Sci. 4, 2736–2753 (2011). [Google Scholar]
- 26.Chen S., et al., High-performance Pt–Co nanoframes for fuel-cell electrocatalysis. Nano Lett. 20, 1974–1979 (2020). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Huang W., et al., Highly active and durable methanol oxidation electrocatalyst based on the synergy of platinum-nickel hydroxide-graphene. Nat. Commun. 6, 10035 (2015). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Reddington E., et al., Combinatorial electrochemistry: A highly parallel, optical screening method for discovery of better electrocatalysts. Science 280, 1735–1737 (1998). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Luo X., et al., Spin regulation on 2D Pd−Fe−Pt nanomeshes promotes fuel electrooxidations. Nano Lett. 20, 1967–1973 (2020). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Hohenberg P., Kohn W., Inhomogeneous electron gas. Phys. Rev. 136, B864–B871 (1964). [Google Scholar]
- 31.Kohn W., Sham L. J., Self-consistent equations including exchange and correlation effects. Phys. Rev. 140, A1133–A1138 (1965). [Google Scholar]
- 32.Kresse G., Furthmüller J., Efficiency of ab-initio total energy calculations for metals and semiconductors using a plane-wave basis set. Comput. Mater. Sci. 6, 15–50 (1996). [Google Scholar]
- 33.Kresse G., Furthmüller J., Efficient iterative schemes for ab initio total-energy calculations using a plane-wave basis set. Phys. Rev. B Condens. Matter 54, 11169–11186 (1996). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Blöchl P. E., Projector augmented-wave method. Phys. Rev. B Condens. Matter 50, 17953–17979 (1994). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Perdew J. P., Burke K., Ernzerhof M., Generalized gradient approximation made simple. Phys. Rev. Lett. 77, 3865–3868 (1996). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Kresse G., Joubert D., From ultrasoft pseudopotentials to the projector augmented-wave method. Phys. Rev. B Condens. Matter Mater. Phys. 59, 1758–1775 (1999). [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Data Availability Statement
All study data are included in the article and SI Appendix.





