Skip to main content
BMJ Open logoLink to BMJ Open
. 2021 Jul 5;11(7):e043050. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-043050

Substance use disorders and adherence to antituberculosis medications in Southwest Ethiopia: a prospective cohort study

Matiwos Soboka 1,2,, Markos Tesfaye 2,3, Kristina Adorjan 2,4,5, Wolfgang Krahl 2,6, Elias Tesfaye 1, Yimenu Yitayih 1, Ralf Strobl 7,8, Eva Grill 2,7,8
PMCID: PMC8258551  PMID: 34226210

Abstract

Objectives

In Ethiopia, little is known about the association between substance use disorders and adherence to antituberculosis (anti-TB) medications. Therefore, the objective of this study was to assess the effect of substance use disorders on adherence to anti-TB medications in Southwest Ethiopia.

Design

Prospective cohort study.

Settings

Patients were recruited from 22 health centres and four hospitals in Southwest Ethiopia.

Participants

This study was conducted among 268 patients with TB, aged 18–80 in Southwest Ethiopia between October 2017 and October 2018. At baseline, patients who were exposed substance use disorders (134 patients) and unexposed to substance use disorders (134 patients) were recruited. Patients were followed for 6 months, and data were collected on three occasions.

Main outcome measure

Adherence to anti-TB medications.

Results

Patients with substance use disorders had consistently higher prevalence of non-adherence than those without, 16.4% versus 3.0% at baseline, 41.7% versus 14.4% at 2-month follow-up and 45.7% versus 10.8% at 6-month follow-up assessments. Patients with khat use disorder were 3.8 times more likely to be non-adherent to anti-TB medications than patients without khat use disorder (Adjusted odds ratio (aOR)=3.8, 95% CI 1.8 to 8.0). Patients who had alcohol use disorder (AUD) were also 3.2 times likely to have poor adherence compared with their counterparts (aOR=3.2, 95% CI 1.6 to 6.6). In addition, being educated (aOR=4.4, 95% CI 1.7 to 11.3), and being merchant (aOR=6.1, 95% CI 1.2 to 30.8) were associated with non-adherence to anti-TB medications.

Conclusion

Khat and AUDs predict greater likelihood of non-adherence to anti-TB medication. This implies the need to integrate the management for substance use disorders into the existing TB treatment services.

Keywords: substance misuse, tuberculosis, infectious diseases, clinical pharmacology


Strengths and limitations of this study.

  • The strengths of this study are the prospective cohort design, longitudinal data collection, including patients from urban and rural health institutions, intensive training for data collectors, multi-centre data collection and use of standardised instruments.

  • Due to social desirability, patients might minimise reporting of the amount and frequency of the substances they were using.

  • Measuring adherence based on pills count may not reflect the real adherence situation, since patients may not bring all leftover medications during the follow-up.

  • Follow-up and data collections have been carried out by health professionals working in the respective tuberculosis (TB) clinic. As a result, their assessment of adherence might be biased.

  • Hospitalised patients, patients on retreatment and patients with multidrug-resistant-TB were not included in this study, and this may limit the generalisability of the result for these patients.

Introduction

Tuberculosis (TB) is a preventable and treatable disease but it remains one of the major diseases leading to death worldwide.1 2 WHO estimates that 1.6 million persons died of TB in 20171; almost 20% of them were HIV positive.1 The number of patients with TB is estimated at about 10 million with an annual incidence of 6.4%. TB remains the main reason for premature mortality among HIV positive patients.1

TB is most prevalent in middle-income and low-income countries. This exerts enormous pressure on societies as TB mainly affects mostly adults in the economically productive age groups.1 3 4 In fact, 87% of cases worldwide are from Asia, Africa and the Russian Federation.1 5 TB-related morbidity and mortality also remain high in low-income and middle-income countries. Because these countries have poor nutrition, unfavourable housing conditions and unstable healthcare.1 Notably, 117 705 new cases were registered in 2017 in Ethiopia, corresponding to an annual incidence of 164 per 100 000 habitants.1 Ethiopia remains one of the top 22 countries having the highest TB mortality with an estimated mortality rate of 24 per 100 000 inhabitants in 2017.1

Long-term adherence to standardised medication is the key to successful treatment of TB as non-adherence may lead to the emergence of multidrug-resistant TB (MDR-TB), an increasing global health threat.1 6 7 Non-adherence to anti-TB medication could also lead to a lower treatment success rate,8 9 default and death.10 11 Thus, Ethiopia has developed a national TB treatment guideline to ensure adherence through regular appointments and supervised drug administration, and to reduce poor treatment outcomes.12

In Ethiopia, the prevalence of non-adherence among patients with TB has been estimated to range from 10% in Amhara region to 24% in Southern Nations and Nationalities of Ethiopia.13 To counteract this, the Ethiopian has implemented direct observed treatment (DOT) services in almost all health institutions,12 but its impact on medication adherence is unclear and the reasons for non-adherence are still poorly understood.

Among the reasons for non-adherence, substance use disorders have been found to play a dominant role.8 14–16 Substances such as alcohol, tobacco, khat and illicit drugs are commonly used among patients with TB.17–19 Patients with TB are also at risk of increased morbidity, and premature mortality due to substance use disorders.20 Because, substance use disorders such as alcohol and tobacco are associated with MDR-TB.21 22

Khat is a natural stimulant with over 40 active compounds. Among these, psychoactive alkaloids, cathinone and cathine cause the stimulating effect, and lead to craving and dependency.23–26 There is evidence that khat use increases susceptibility to TB,27–31 and maybe associated with poor TB treatment outcomes,14 32 prolonged duration of treatment33 and high load of bacteria in patients with TB.34 In Yemen, khat use has been shown to be associated with non-adherence to anti-TB medications,35 probably because khat disrupts patients’ sleep patterns and causes them to miss their appointments.35 36 Ethiopia, like Yemen, counts among the few countries where khat use is legal. Khat use disorder may be an important but unrecognised threat to anti-TB medication adherence. Filling the information gaps about the effect of substance use disorders will help to improve TB treatment outcomes and inform decision-makers about the need for an integration of substance use disorder treatment in TB control programmes in the future. Therefore, the objective of this study is to assess the effect of substance use disorders (including khat and alcohol) on adherence to anti-TB medications in Southwest Ethiopia. Specifically, we examined the association of the most frequently used substances, namely khat and/or alcohol, on adherence to guideline compatible TB treatment.

Methods

Study area, period and patients

We conducted a prospective cohort study in Jimma zone and Jimma city special zone. Jimma city special zone is the capital city of Jimma zone and located in the Southwestern part of Ethiopia, 352 km from Addis Ababa, the capital of the country. The city has a tertiary hospital and a zonal hospital, as well as four functional health centres those currently providing services. Similarly, Jimma Zone has 18 districts and located in the Southwest of Ethiopia. Overall, the zone has more than 3 million inhabitants. During the period of this study, Jimma Zone had 112 health centres and three hospitals. Out of these government’s public health facilities, 91 health centres and all hospitals were providing services to patients with TB. In this study, data were collected from a total of 26 health institutions (22 health centres and four hospitals). From Jimma city, we randomly selected two health centres and one hospital. We also randomly selected 20 health centres and three hospitals from the Jimma Zone. Patients were included if they had initiated anti-TB treatment within a month of start of the study at the selected health centres and hospitals between October 2017 and October 2018. Patients were recruited over the first 6 months. Follow-ups were done at the end of 2 and 6 months of treatment.

Study design

This study is a multicentre prospective cohort study. We did not pair exposed and non-exposed patients by a certain character. Patients recruited to the cohort were interviewed on three occasions, namely, baseline (starting treatment), first follow-up (after 2 months) and second follow-up (at the end of 6 months).

Sample size assumption and sampling procedure

In Ethiopia and other African countries, we could not find a study done regarding substance use disorders (alcohol, tobacco, cannabis, amphetamine and others) and adherence to anti-TB. So, we were forced to calculate the sample based on the proportion of adherence to anti-TB among khat users patients with TB. The prevalence of non-adherence among patients with TB who also used khat from previous studies was 62.4%.35 The prevalence of non-adherence among non-khat user patients with TB was 43.6%.35 We have included 111 exposed (with substance use) and 111 unexposed (without substance use) individuals to detect a difference of non-adherence to anti-TB medication at an alpha level of 0.05 and with a power of 80% using the corrected Fleiss sample size calculation (EPInfo).37 The total sample size was calculated considering a 20% of drop out rate and the final sample size was 134 in each group which totals 268 patients with TB. New patients with TB who were 18 years or older were recruited to participate in the study. Patients who had been on treatment for more than 1 month, patients on retreatment, and MDR-TB cases were not included in the study.

Instruments

Exposure variables

In this study, the exposure variable is substance use disorder which includes khat and/or alcohol use disorder (AUD).

Substance use disorder

In this study substance use disorder was defined as having khat and/or AUD. Data on tobacco, shisha and cannabis use were collected for explorative data analysis.

Alcohol use disorders

AUD identification test (AUDIT) was used to collect data on AUDs.38 The AUDIT was evaluated over a period of two decades, and provides an accurate measure of risk of AUDs across gender, age and cultures. With a cut-off score of 8 or more, the sensitivity, and specificity of AUDIT for AUDs was 0.90 and 0.80, respectively.39 AUDIT was used in Ethiopian context and questions number two and three regarding standard drinks were adapted to a more locally appropriate question.40

Nicotine dependence

The Fagerstrom test for nicotine dependence (FTND) was used to assess tobacco dependence. A total score of FTND ≥5 was considered as tobacco dependence.41 At a cut-off score ≥5, the FTND has good sensitivity (0.75), and specificity (0.80). The FTND has six items, with a total score ranging from 0 to 10 to measure nicotine dependence. A total FTND score of 5 indicates moderate nicotine dependence, a score of 6–7 indicates high nicotine dependence and a score of 8–10 indicates very high nicotine dependence. Patients were also asked about their reasons for smoking tobacco.41

Cannabis and shisha use

Use of both substances and their frequency were assessed.

Khat use

Khat use was assessed by self-reported questionnaire. Since there is no standardised questionnaire for khat use, patterns and reasons of khat use were assessed by using a structured questionnaire which was developed in the context of a literature review. Any consumption of khat in the last 1 month was considered as current khat use.

In this study, frequent khat use (using khat daily and 2–3 times per week) and using more than one bundle of khat per day was considered as khat use disorder. The term ‘khat use disorder’ is also supported by previous study.42

Outcome variable

Adherence

Adherence status of patients with TB was assessed by DOT (based on missing appointments) and pills counts. In this study, adherence is defined as taking medication regularly and attending follow-up according to appointments and national guideline for TB in Ethiopia.12 In this study, non-adherence is defined as missing at least one follow-up appointment during DOT. Non-adherence during intensive phase is defined as missing at least one dose of the prescribed anti-TB medication and noted separately. Adherence was assessed at baseline (beginning of intensive phase), at second month (end of intensive phase) and at end of sixth month (end of continuation phase).

Explanatory variables

Socio-demographic characterestic

Age, sex, marital status, level of education, religion, ethnicity, income, household size, occupation, place of residence and living conditions were assessed using a structured questionnaire. Income was categorised considering that the minimum monthly wage for employees of governmental organisation in Ethiopia of 1214 Ethiopian birr (€36.67).43 Then the monthly income of each patient was multiplied by 12 months to obtain the annual income, and we used a cut-off 14 568 Ethiopian birr (€439.98).

Disease related factors

Types of TB diagnosis (smear positive, smear negative, extrapulmonary TB and MDR-TB) were collected from patients’ charts.

Comorbidities

All confirmed diagnoses of HIV, previous mental illness, hypertension and diabetes mellitus were collected from patients’ charts.

Social support

Oslo Social Support Scale (The Oslo 3-items) was used to collect data on the strength of social support. The Oslo-3 total score 3–8 indicate poor social support, 9–11 indicate moderate social support and 12–14 indicate strong social support.44 The scale had been validated in Ethiopia among patients with TB.45 Social support was assessed at baseline, second month (at first follow-up) and sixth month (at the completion of anti-TB treatment or second follow-up).

Food insecurity

It was assessed using the Household Food Insecurity Access Scale (HFIAS) to determine whether the respondent has experienced any of the indicators of food insecurity in the previous month. Food secure if none of the items were endorsed on HFIAS, mild food insecurity if the respondent endorsed any of the items 1, 2, 3 and/or 4 but not the items 5–9, ‘moderate food insecurity’ if the respondent has endorsed items 5, and/or 6 but not the items 7–9, and ‘severe food insecurity’ if the respondent has endorsed items 7, 8 and/or 9.46 This tool had been validated in Ethiopia among people living with HIV.47 48 Food insecurity assessed at baseline, second month (at first follow-up) and sixth month (at the completion of anti-TB treatment or second follow-up).

Data collection procedures

Before starting data collection, the questionnaires were pretested on a sample (5% of the total sample) of patients with TB who were on treatment at Agaro health centre. Those patients who participated in the pretest were not included in the main cohort study. Data were collected by trained health professionals working in the respective TB clinics. Data collectors were not blind to exposure status of the patients. Also, district TB focal persons and other health professionals specifically trained for this purpose participated in the supervision of data collection.

Data analysis

Data were entered to Epi Data (V.3.1) and analysed using R studio (V.1.2.1335). Missing values of income were excluded from the analysis. Participants’ characteristics and study variables were presented using descriptive statistics. Generalised linear model was used to examine the longitudinal effect of khat and AUDs on medication adherence (binary outcome). We used an intercept only model to investigate the trajectory of adherence over time (model 0). Model 1 investigated the longitudinal effect of presence or absence of khat and AUDs on adherence without adjusting for covariates, model 2 investigated the longitudinal effect of khat and alcohol on adherence while adjusting for the full set of covariates. Model fit was examined with the Bayesian information criterion (BIC).

The covariate selection was based on a directed acyclic graph (DAG). DAGs are analytical method for visualising hypotheses about causal relationships between exposure (substance use disorders) and outcome (adherence).49 50 This approach has been shown to yield valid adjustment sets of variables and to avoid bias.51

Patient and public involvement

Patients were not involved in development of the research questions, study design, interpretation of results or writing of the manuscript.

Results

Sociodemographic characteristics

A total of 268 newly diagnosed patients (50% with substance use disorders, mean age 32.4, SD 14.4, 60.1% men) with TB were recruited. There was no loss to follow-up.

Of all patients, 10.8% (n=29), and 39.2% (n=105) had alcohol and khat use disorders, respectively. No participant had tobacco, shisha or cannabis use disorders. Age range was 18–80 years with 35% under 25 years (refer to table 1). There were 22 missing data of annual income which we excluded from the analysis.

Table 1.

Sociodemographic characteristics and substance use disorder among a cohort of patients on antituberculosis treatment in Southwest Ethiopia, 2017/2018 (n=268)

Variables Total (%) Substance use disorder
Baseline
N (%)
First follow-up
N (%)
Second follow-up
N (%)
Gender Female 39.9 40 (37.4) 35 (32.7) 45 (42.1)
Male 60.1 94 (58.4) 80 (49.7) 84 (52.2)
Age 18–24 34.7 42 (45.2) 31 (33.3) 38 (40.9)
25–34 32.5 35 (40.2) 34 (39.1) 35 (40.2)
35–44 13.4 23 (63.9) 20 (55.6) 22 (61.1)
45–54 10.1 17 (63.0) 16 (59.3) 18 (66.7)
55–64 9.3 17 (68.0) 14 (56.0) 16 (64.0)
Occupation Merchant 10.8 23 (79.3) 19 (65.5) 20 (69.0)
Farmer 34.3 57 (62.0) 51 (55.4) 57 (62.0)
Government employee 39.2 37 (35.2) 29 (27.6) 33 (31.4)
Daily labourer 15.7 17 (40.5) 16 (38.1) 19 (45.2)
Education No formal education 63.1 68 (40.2) 59 (34.9) 62 (36.7)
Literate 36.9 66 (66.7) 56 (56.6) 67 (67.7)
Annual income in birr <14 568 76.9 108 (52.4) 92 (44.7) 104 (50.5)
≥14 568 14.9 16 (40.0) 17 (42.5) 18 (45.0)
Marital Single 36.2 85 (54.1) 76 (48.4) 87 (55.4)
Married 58.6 39 (40.2) 32 (33.0) 34 (35.1)
Divorced/widowed 5.2 10 (71.4) 7 (50.0) 8 (57.1)
Religion Orthodox 30.6 43 (52.4) 27 (32.9) 43 (52.4)
Muslim 61.6 89 (53.9) 86 (52.1) 82 (49.7)
Protestant/others 7.8 2 (9.5) 2 (9.5) 4 (19.0)
Ethnicity Amhara 22.0 27 (45.8) 17 (28.8) 29 (49.2)
Oromo 61.6 83 (50.3) 82 (49.7) 79 (47.9)
Tigre/Gurage 16.4 24 (54.5) 16 (36.4) 21 (47.7)
Family size Less than five 67.5 89 (49.2) 76 (42.0) 89 (49.2)
Five or greater 32.5 45 (51.7) 39 (44.8) 40 (46.0)
Residence Rural 47.4 72 (56.7) 59 (46.5) 68 (53.5)
Urban 52.6 62 (44.0) 56 (39.7) 61 (43.3)
Type of tuberculosis Smear positive 40.3 54 (50.0) 43 (39.8) 46 (42.6)
Smear negative 32.5 43 (49.4) 39 (44.8) 46 (52.9)
Extra pulmonary 27.2 37 (50.7) 33 (45.2) 37 (50.7)

Clinical characteristics and non-adherence

Out of all patients, 40.3% (n=108), 32.5% (n=87) and 27.2% (n=73) were diagnosed with smear positive, smear negative and extra pulmonary TB, respectively. At baseline, 3.7% (n=10) patients were diagnosed with HIV, and 7.1% (n=19) with other comorbidities. At baseline 9.7% (n=26) were non-adherent to TB medication. At 2 and 6 months of assessment, 26.1% (n=70) and 27.6% (n=74) missed at least one dose of their medications, respectively.

The prevalence of non-adherence among patients with substance use disorder was 16.4% (n=22), 41.7% (n=48) and 45.7% (n=59) at baseline, first and second follow-up, respectively (see table 2).

Table 2.

Various characteristics by adherence to antituberculosis (anti-TB) medications at the three time point assessments among patients with TB in Southwest Ethiopia 2017/2018 (n=268)

Variables Adherence to anti-TB at baseline Adherence to anti-TB at first follow-up Adherence to anti-TB at second follow-up
Adherent
N (%)
Non-adherent
N (%)
Adherent
N (%)
Non-adherent
N (%)
Adherent
N (%)
Non-adherent
N (%)
Substance use disorder No 130 (97.0) 4 (3.0) 131 (85.6) 22 (14.4) 124 (89.2) 15 (10.8)
Yes 112 (83.6) 22 (16.4) 67 (58.3) 48 (41.7) 70 (54.3) 59 (45.7)
Gender Male 143 (88.8) 18 (11.2) 112 (69.6) 49 (30.4) 83 (77.6) 24 (22.4)
Female 99 (92.5) 8 (7.5) 86 (80.4) 21 (19.6) 111 (68.9) 50 (31.1)
Age 18–24 88 (94.6) 5 (5.4) 72 (77.3) 21 (22.7) 69 (74.2) 24 (25.8)
25–34 79 (90.8) 8 (9.2) 64 (73.7) 23 (26.3) 67 (77.0) 20 (23.0)
35–44 28 (77.8) 8 (22.2) 24 (66.7) 12 (33.3) 23 (63.9) 13 (36.1)
45–54 24 (88.9) 3 (11.1) 21 (77.8) 6 (22.2) 19 (70.4) 8 (29.6)
55–64 23 (92.0) 2 (8.0) 17 (68.0) 8 (32.0) 16 (64.0) 9 (36.0)
Occupation Merchant 22 (75.9) 7 (24.1) 17 (58.6) 12 (41.4) 14 (48.3) 15 (51.7)
Farmer 79 (85.9) 23 (14.1) 66 (71.7) 26 (28.3) 64 (69.6) 28 (30.4)
Government employee 21 (95.5) 1 (4.5) 79 (75.2) 26 (24.8) 82 (78.1) 23 (21.9)
Daily labourer 41 (97.6) 1 (2.4) 36 (85.0) 6 (14.3) 34 (81.0) 8 (19.0)
Education No formal education 165 (97.6) 4 (2.4) 145 (85.8) 24 (14.2) 139 (82.2) 30 (17.8)
Literate 77 (77.8) 22 (22.2) 53 (53.5) 46 (46.5) 55 (55.6) 44 (44.4)
Tertiary 20 (71.4) 8 (28.6) 8 (28.6) 20 (71.4) 10 (35.7) 18 (64.3)
Annual income in birr <14 568 185 (89.8) 21 (10.2) 154 (74.8) 52 (25.2) 149 (72.3) 57 (27.7)
≥14 568 37 (92.5) 3 (7.5) 30 (75.0) 10 (25.0) 31 (77.5) 9 (22.5)
Food insecurity No 129 (94.9) 7 (5.1) 105 (72.4) 40 (27.6) 118 (72.8) 44 (27.2)
Middle/moderate 46 (80.7) 11 (19.3) 29 (70.0) 12 (29.3) 26 (60.5) 17 (39.5)
Severe 67 (89.3) 8 (10.7) 64 (78.0) 18 (22.0) 50 (79.4) 13 (20.6)
Marital status Single 92 (94.8) 5 (5.2) 109 (69.4 48 (30.6) 80 (82.5) 17 (17.5)
Married 140 (89.2) 17 (10.8) 80 (85.8) 17 (17.2) 104 (66.2) 53 (33.8)
Divorced/widowed 10 (71.4) 4 (28.6) 9 (64.6) 5 (37.4) 10 (71.4) 4 (28.6)
Religion Orthodox 74 (90.2) 8 (9.8) 63 (76.8) 19 (23.2) 61 (74.4) 21 (25.6)
Muslim 147 (89.7) 18 (10.3) 118 (71.5) 47 (28.5) 114 (69.1) 51 (39.9)
Protestant and others 20 (95.2) 1 (4.8) 17 (81.0) 4 (19.0) 19 (90.5) 2 (9.5)
Ethnicity Amhara 53 (89.8) 6 (10.2) 49 (83.1) 10 (16.9) 48 (81.4) 11 (18.6)
Oromo 160 (90.9) 16 (9.1) 119 (72.1) 46 (27.9) 119 (72.1) 46 (27.9)
Tigre/Gurage 29 (87.9) 4 (12.1) 30 (68.2) 14 (31.8) 27 (61.4) 17 (38.6)
Family size Less than five 165 (91.2) 16 (8.8) 132 (72.9) 49 (27.1) 137 (75.7) 44 (24.3)
Five or greater 77 (88.5) 10 (11.5) 66 (75.9) 21 (24.1) 57 (64.5) 30 (34.5)
Residence Rural 113 (89.0) 14 (11.0) 94 (74.0) 33 (26.0) 93 (73.2) 34 (26.8)
Urban 129 (91.5) 12 (8.5) 104 (73.0) 37 (26.2) 101 (71.6) 40 (28.4)
Type of TB Smear positive 95 (91.9) 13 (8.1) 80 (74.1) 28 (25.9) 78 (72.2) 30 (27.8)
Smear negative 81 (9.1) 6 (6.9) 66 (75.9) 21 (24.1) 64 (73.6) 23 (26.4)
Extra pulmonary 66 (90.4) 7 (9.6) 52 (71.2) 21 (28.8) 52 (71.2) 21 (28.8)
HIV Seronegative 233 (90.3) 25 (9.7) 190 (74.2) 66 (25.8) 183 (73.5) 66 (26.5)
Seropositive 9 (90.0) 1 (10.0) 8 (66.7) 4 (33.3) 11 (57.9) 8 (42.1)
Social support Poor 83 (89.2) 10 (10.8) 83 (74.8) 28 (25.2) 96 (68.6) 44 (34.1)
Moderate 101 (89.4) 12 (10.6) 68 (80.0) 17 (20.0) 58 (78.4) 16 (21.6)
Good 58 (93.5) 4 (6.5) 47 (65.3) 25 (34.7) 40 (74.1) 14 (25.9)

Effect of substance use disorder on the adherence to anti-TB medications

The intercept only model (model 0) showed a significant decrease in the percentage of adherence over time (BIC=642.5). Adding alcohol and khat use disorders (model 1) improved model fit (BIC=627.6): patients with khat use disorder had a significantly higher probability of non-adherence over time (OR=4.2, 95% CI 2.1 to 8.6). The odds of non-adherence among patients with AUD was 3.3 times that of patients free of AUDs (OR=3.3, 95% CI 1.6 to 6.6). Adding covariates did not substantially change this association (OR=2.8, 95% CI 2.0 to 3.8) and further improved model fit (BIC=642.2). In the final model, khat use disorder (aOR=3.8, 95% CI 1.8 to 8.0), or AUD (aOR=3.2, 95% CI 1.6 to 6.6), being educated (aOR=4.4, 95% CI 1.7 to 11.3), and being merchant (aOR=6.1, 95% CI 1.2 to 30.8) were associated with decreasing adherence (see table 3). Patients with khat use disorder were 3.8 times more likely to be non-adherent to anti-TB medications than patients without khat use disorder. Also, participants whose occupation was merchant were 6.1 times more likely to be non-adherent to anti-TB medications compared with daily labourers.

Table 3.

Predictors of non-adherence to antituberculosis (anti-TB) medications among patients with TB in Southwest Ethiopia 2017/2018 (n=268)

Variables Model 0 (intercept only) Model 1 (khat and alcohol including age and gender) Full model
OR 95% CI OR 95% CI Adjusted odds ratio (aOR) 95% CI
Khat UD No Reference
Yes 4.2 2.1 to 8.6 3.8 1.8 to 8.0
AUDs No Reference
Yes 3.3 1.6 to 6.6 3.2 1.6 to 6.6
Age 18–24 Reference
25–34 1.2 0.4 to 3.2
35–44 1.8 0.5 to 6.4
45–54 0.9 0.2 to 4.0
>55 1.2 0.3 to 5.1
Gender Female Reference
Male 1.6 0.7 to 3.6
Education No formal education Reference
Read and write/literate 4.4 1.7 to 11.3
Social support Good Reference
Moderate 0.5 0.2 to 1.2
 Poor 0.8 0.3 to 1.9
Occupation Daily labourer Reference
Farmer 2.1 0.5 to 8.0
Government employee 2.1 0.6 to 8.0
Merchant 6.1 1.2 to 30.8
Time T2 2.7 2.0 to 3.6 2.7 2.0 to 3.6 2.8 2.0 to 3.8
BIC 642.5 672.6 642.2

Discussion

This study conducted in patients undergoing standardised treatment for TB in Southwest Ethiopia revealed three important findings: (1) adherence to medication decreased over the course of treatment; (2) substance use disorders, particularly khat and alcohol contributed to this non-adherence and (3) this association was independent of other factors such as education, social support and occupation.

It is alarming that adherence to TB medication decreased over the course of treatment, as already shown by studies done in South Ethiopia,52 Northwest Ethiopia9 and Addis Ababa,53 Ethiopia. Possible reasons for non-compliance are distance from the health institution that dispenses medications,13 52 lack of knowledge about TB,9 52 psychological distress,53 being busy with work9 and alcohol intake.51 To solve the problem related to adherence, Ethiopian health authorities have reinforced their efforts to implement DOT programmes throughout the whole treatment and all over the country starting from initiation to completion of treatment.12

In this study, the prevalence of non-adherence to anti-TB medication in the first month of treatment was 9.7% which is in line with a systematic review that found 10.0% of non-adherence in the Amhara region.13 54 The proportion of non-adherence to anti-TB medications during the first (26.1%) and second (27.6%) follow-up was slightly higher than findings from South Ethiopia (24.5%),52 Northwest Ethiopia (21.2%)9 and Addis Ababa (19.5%).53 This might be explained by the high proportion of persons with a substance use disorder in our study, in which we deliberately oversampled persons with substance use disorder (SUD) to maximise power. The discrepancy may be also due to patients in our study were using substances whereas in the systematic review there was no data regarding substance use.

In this study, the prevalence of non-adherence among patients with substance use disorder at baseline, first and second follow-up was 16.4%, 41.7% and 45.7%, respectively. This is in line with a study from the USA (39%).9 55 56

Moreover, this study provides the evidence that substance use disorders have a significant negative effect on adherence to anti-TB medications among patients with TB, which supports earlier findings from previous studies that found AUD, tobacco dependence and illicit drug use have a negative impact on adherence in Uzbekistan, Spain and Morocco.57–59 This is also comparable with retrospective studies conducted in Russia and New York which found that AUD and drug addiction were significantly associated with non-adherence to anti-TB medications.8 9 Likewise, the finding of this study is in line with studies conducted in different parts of Ethiopia which found khat, alcohol and tobacco are the main factors for non-adherence to anti-TB medications.9 56 60 In our study, patients with substance use disorder were more than two times more likely not to follow their medication plan than patients without substance use disorders. This finding is in line with the finding of a study conducted in the USA that found the risk of missing a DOT appointment was 2.6 times higher among patients with substance use disorder than in patients without drug consumption.55

In our study, khat use disorder turned out to be the most stringent factor that decreased adherence. This confirms earlier findings from Yemen35 and Ethiopia.14 60 A plausible explanation is that khat chewing disrupts night sleep61 causing patients to oversleep which may lead to missing of the DOT appointments at the health facility. Another reason may be that khat is common substance in Ethiopia, and therefore less attention is paid to its use. Since little is known about the effect of khat on patients with TB,14 it may be considered as part of a normal social interaction.35

A higher level of education was associated with non-adherence to anti-TB medications in our study. This result confirms the findings from Yemen that found more educated patients were 19% times less likely to be adherent to their medication.35 Also, a study from Ethiopia showed that attending primary education was associated with non-adherence to anti-TB medications.60 Our findings are contrary to previous studies which have suggested that lower or no formal education decreases adherence to TB medication.13 62 Our finding seems counterintuitive. However, our results are likely to be related to findings from a study indicating that persons with higher educational attainment might be reluctant to accept DOTS regimes.63 Daily visits to the health facility have been reported as time consuming and probably stigmatising for patients with a job.64 In this study, being merchant was associated with poor adherence to anti-TB medications. This might be due to patients miss their medications because of busy working schedule, but this needs further investigation.

Limitations

This study has some limitations. Due to social desirability, patients might minimise reporting of the amount and frequency of substance they were using. The tools used for alcohol and khat use disorder are not gold-standard diagnostic for the respective disorders. Also, measuring adherence based on pills count may not reflect the real adherence situation since some patients might not bring all leftover medications during the follow-up. Likewise, follow-up and data collections have been carried out by health professionals working in the respective TB clinics which might have biased their assessment of adherence. However, overestimating adherence may have biased our results towards a null effect and led to underestimating the effect of substance use disorders, so we are confident that our estimates are conservative. The participation of district TB focal persons and other health professionals in the supervision of data collection might have also introduced bias.

Furthermore, hospitalised patients, patients on re-treatment and patients with MDR-TB were not included in this study, so that the results cannot be generalised for these patients. However, patients with MDR-TB are under special treatment and surveillance so that including this group of patients might have biased the results. Finally, we did not assess the reasons for non-adherence. This should be part of a separate study going more into the details of the situation of persons with khat and alcohol problems.

Strengths

The specific strengths of this study are the prospective cohort design, longitudinal data collection, including patients from urban and rural health institutions, intensive training given for data collectors, multi-centre data collection and the use of standardised instruments to assess exposure, outcomes and explanatory variables.

Conclusions

Substance use disorders predict greater likelihood of anti-TB medication non-adherence among patients with TB. Also, khat and AUDs were the main risk factors for anti-TB medication adherence. This finding implies the importance of integrating substance use disorders screening and treatment into the existing TB services to reduce the effect of substances on treatment outcomes including adherence.

Supplementary Material

Reviewer comments
Author's manuscript

Acknowledgments

We are grateful to the study participants for sacrificing their time to participate in the study. Our gratitude is extended to Jimma University for funding the project. We are also grateful to IPPG for funding part of the project. Our gratitude also extends to Dr Michael Odenwald, who contributed money from his pocket to support the project.

Footnotes

Contributors: MS contributed to the conceptualisation, design, statistical analysis and manuscript preparation. MT, KA, WK, ET, YY, RS and EG contributed to the design, analysis and review of the manuscript.

Funding: The study was funded by Jimma University Institute of Health with the grant number of IHRPGC 1095/2017, Institute of Psychiatric Phenomics and Genomics (IPPG) with the grant number of 15106202/2018 and individual throughout data collection. The funders had no role in this study including interpretation and preparation of the manuscript.

Competing interests: None declared.

Patient and public involvement: Patients and/or the public were not involved in the design, or conduct, or reporting, or dissemination plans of this research.

Provenance and peer review: Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.

Data availability statement

Data are available upon reasonable request. Data may be obtained from a third party and are not publicly available. All data relevant to the study are included in the article or uploaded as supplementary information. It will be available upon official request from interested individuals or organisations.

Ethics statements

Patient consent for publication

Not required.

Ethics approval

Ethical clearance was obtained from the Ethical Review Board of Jimma University (IHRPGC1095/2017) and LMU (Nr: 18-017). The study was discussed in detail and written informed consent was obtained from each participant. The anonymity of the study participants was kept at all stages of data processing and write-up of the manuscript. Patients who had alcohol and khat use disorder were advised to contact a mental health professional for further evaluation and treatment.

References

  • 1.World Health Organization . Global tuberculosis report 2018. Licence: CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO. Geneva: World Health Organization, 2018. https://www.who.int/tb/publications/global_report/en/ [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Grobusch MP, Kapata N. Global burden of tuberculosis: where we are and what to do. Lancet Infect Dis 2018;18:1291–3. 10.1016/S1473-3099(18)30654-6 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Patel V, Chisholm D, Dua T, et al. Neurological, and substance use disorders: disease control priorities, third edition (Volume 4). Washington (DC): The International Bank for Reconstruction and Development / The World Bank, 2016. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Floyd K, Glaziou P, Zumla A, et al. The global tuberculosis epidemic and progress in care, prevention, and research: an overview in year 3 of the end TB era. Lancet Respir Med 2018;6:299–314. 10.1016/S2213-2600(18)30057-2 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.World Health Organization . Global tuberculosis report 2016. Geneva: World Health Organization, 2016. https://apps.who.int/medicinedocs/en/d/Js23098en/ [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Dodor EA. Tuberculosis treatment default at the communicable diseases unit of Effia-Nkwanta regional Hospital: a 2-year experience. Int J Tuberc Lung Dis 2004;8:1337–41. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.World Health Organization . Global tuberculosis report 2013. Geneva: World Health Organization, 2013. http://apps.who.int/medicinedocs/en/m/abstract/Js21534en/ [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Gelmanova IY, Keshavjee S, Golubchikova VT, et al. Barriers to successful tuberculosis treatment in Tomsk, Russian Federation: non-adherence, default and the acquisition of multidrug resistance. Bull World Health Organ 2007;85:703–11. 10.2471/blt.06.038331 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Mekonnen HS, Azagew AW. Non-adherence to anti-tuberculosis treatment, reasons and associated factors among TB patients attending at Gondar town health centers, Northwest Ethiopia. BMC Res Notes 2018;11:691. 10.1186/s13104-018-3789-4 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Mohd Shariff N, Shah SA, Kamaludin F. Predictors of death among drug-resistant tuberculosis patients in Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia: a retrospective cohort study from 2009 to 2013. J Glob Antimicrob Resist 2016;6:102–7. 10.1016/j.jgar.2016.04.005 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Waitt CJ, Squire SB. A systematic review of risk factors for death in adults during and after tuberculosis treatment. Int J Tuberc Lung Dis 2011;15:871–85. 10.5588/ijtld.10.0352 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Federal Democratic Republic of Ethiopia Ministry of Health . Guidelines for clinical and programmatic management of TB, leprosy and TB/HIV in Ethiopia fifth edition, 2012. Available: https://www.mhinnovation.net/sites/default/files/downloads/innovation/reports/ETHIOPIA-NATIONAL-MENTAL-HEALTH-STRATEGY-2012-1.pdf [Accessed 13 Apr 2020].
  • 13.Zegeye A, Dessie G, Wagnew F, et al. Prevalence and determinants of anti-tuberculosis treatment non-adherence in Ethiopia: a systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS One 2019;14:e0210422. 10.1371/journal.pone.0210422 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Ambaw F, Mayston R, Hanlon C, et al. Untreated depression and tuberculosis treatment outcomes, quality of life and disability, Ethiopia. Bull World Health Organ 2018;96:243–55. 10.2471/BLT.17.192658 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Pelissari DM, Diaz-Quijano FA. Impact of alcohol disorder and the use of illicit drugs on tuberculosis treatment outcomes: a retrospective cohort study. Arch Public Health 2018;76:45. 10.1186/s13690-018-0287-z [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Silva MR, Pereira JC, Costa RR, et al. Drug addiction and alcoholism as predictors for tuberculosis treatment default in Brazil: a prospective cohort study. Epidemiol Infect 2017;145:3516–24. 10.1017/S0950268817002631 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Deiss RG, Rodwell TC, Garfein RS. Tuberculosis and illicit drug use: review and update. Clin Infect Dis 2009;48:72–82. 10.1086/594126 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Oeltmann JE, Kammerer JS, Pevzner ES, et al. Tuberculosis and substance abuse in the United States, 1997-2006. Arch Intern Med 2009;169:189–97. 10.1001/archinternmed.2008.535 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.O'Connell R, Chishinga N, Kinyanda E, et al. Prevalence and correlates of alcohol dependence disorder among TB and HIV infected patients in Zambia. PLoS One 2013;8:e74406. 10.1371/journal.pone.0074406 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Christensen A-SH, Roed C, Andersen PH, et al. Long-Term mortality in patients with pulmonary and extrapulmonary tuberculosis: a Danish nationwide cohort study. Clin Epidemiol 2014;6:405–21. 10.2147/CLEP.S65331 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Fleming MF, Krupitsky E, Tsoy M, et al. Alcohol and drug use disorders, HIV status and drug resistance in a sample of Russian TB patients. Int J Tuberc Lung Dis 2006;10:565–70. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Skrahina A, Hurevich H, Zalutskaya A, et al. Multidrug-Resistant tuberculosis in Belarus: the size of the problem and associated risk factors. Bull World Health Organ 2013;91:36–45. 10.2471/BLT.12.104588 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Luqman W, Danowski TS. The use of khat (Catha edulis) in Yemen. social and medical observations. Ann Intern Med 1976;85:246–9. 10.7326/0003-4819-85-2-246 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Gebissa E. Khat in the horn of Africa: historical perspectives and current trends. J Ethnopharmacol 2010;132:607–14. 10.1016/j.jep.2010.01.063 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Dhaifalah I, Santavý J. Khat habit and its health effect. A natural amphetamine. Biomed Pap Med Fac Univ Palacky Olomouc Czech Repub 2004;148:11–15. 10.5507/bp.2004.002 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Alfaifi H, Abdelwahab SI, Mohan S, et al. Catha edulis forsk. (Khat): evaluation of its antidepressant-like activity. Pharmacogn Mag 2017;13:S354–8. 10.4103/pm.pm_442_16 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Wolde D, Tadesse M, Abdella K, et al. Tuberculosis among Jimma university undergraduate students: first insight about the burden of tuberculosis in Ethiopia Universities-Cross-Sectional study. Int J Bacteriol 2017;2017:1–6. 10.1155/2017/9840670 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Alemu YM, Awoke W, Wilder-Smith A. Determinants for tuberculosis in HIV-infected adults in Northwest Ethiopia: a multicentre case-control study. BMJ Open 2016;6:e009058. 10.1136/bmjopen-2015-009058 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Jaber AAS, Khan AH, Sulaiman SAS, et al. Role of socio-demographical factors on tuberculosis outcome in Yemen. Int J Mycobacteriol 2016;5 Suppl 1:S20. 10.1016/j.ijmyco.2016.09.008 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Legesse M, Ameni G, Mamo G, et al. Knowledge and perception of pulmonary tuberculosis in pastoral communities in the middle and lower Awash Valley of afar region, Ethiopia. BMC Public Health 2010;10:187. 10.1186/1471-2458-10-187 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Alvi A, Rizwan M, Sunosi RAL, et al. Does khat chewing increases the risk of Mycobacterium tuberculosis infection by macrophage immune modulation? Med Hypotheses 2014;82:667–9. 10.1016/j.mehy.2014.02.026 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Jaber AAS, Khan AH, Syed Sulaiman SA, et al. Evaluation of health-related quality of life among tuberculosis patients in two cities in Yemen. PLoS One 2016;11:e0156258. 10.1371/journal.pone.0156258 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Jaber AAS, Khan AH, Sulaiman SAS. Evaluating treatment outcomes and durations among cases of smear-positive pulmonary tuberculosis in Yemen: a prospective follow-up study. J Pharm Policy Pract 2017;10:36. 10.1186/s40545-017-0124-8 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Alvi A, Fatima N, Jerah AA, et al. Correlation between resistin, tuberculosis and khat addiction: a study from South Western Province of Saudi Arabia. PLoS One 2015;10:e0140245. 10.1371/journal.pone.0140245 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Anaam MS, Mohamed Ibrahim MI, Al Serouri AW, et al. Factors affecting patients’ compliance to anti-tuberculosis treatment in Yemen. Journal of Pharmaceutical Health Services Research 2013;4:115–22. 10.1111/jphs.12012 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Cox G, Rampes H. Adverse effects of khat: a review. Advances in Psychiatric Treatment 2003;9:456–63. 10.1192/apt.9.6.456 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.EPInfoTM . Available: https://www.openepi.com/SampleSize/SSCohort.htm [Accessed 19 Aug 2019].
  • 38.Babor TF, Higgins-Biddle JC, Saunders JB, et al. The alcohol use disorders identification test guidelines for use in primary care. Geneva: World Health Organization, 2001. https://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/handle/10665/67205/WHO_MSD_MSB_01.6a.pdf;jsessionid=B5D5F8F1F1B82FE622D04E8F02635F05?sequence=1 [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Babor TF, Higgins-Biddle JC, Saunders JB, et al. The alcohol use disorders identification test guidelines for use in primary care. Geneva: World Health Organization, 2001. [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Soboka M, Tesfaye M, Feyissa GT, et al. Alcohol use disorders and associated factors among people living with HIV who are attending services in South West Ethiopia. BMC Res Notes 2014;7:828. 10.1186/1756-0500-7-828 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Mikami I, Akechi T, Kugaya A, et al. Screening for nicotine dependence among smoking-related cancer patients. Jpn J Cancer Res 1999;90:1071–5. 10.1111/j.1349-7006.1999.tb00679.x [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Duresso SW, Matthews AJ, Ferguson SG, et al. Is khat use disorder a valid diagnostic entity? Addiction 2016;111:1666–76. 10.1111/add.13421 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.salaryexplorer . Average salary in Ethiopia, 2019. Available: http://www.salaryexplorer.com/salary-survey.php?loc=69&loctype=1
  • 44.EU . Instrument manual: Oslo‐3 social support scale (OSS‐3), 2006. Available: https://circabc.europa.eu/webdav/CircaBC/ESTAT/healthtf/Library/ehis_wave_2/methodology_ehis/development/instruments/Manual_OSS_3.pdf
  • 45.Duko B, Gebeyehu A, Ayano G. Prevalence and correlates of depression and anxiety among patients with tuberculosis at WolaitaSodo university hospital and Sodo health center, WolaitaSodo, South Ethiopia, cross sectional study. BMC Psychiatry 2015;15:214. 10.1186/s12888-015-0598-3 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Coates JSA, Bilinsky P. Household food insecurity access scale (HFIAS) for measurement of food access: indicator guide (V.3. Washington, D.C: FHI 360/FANTA, 2007. http://www.fao.org/fileadmin/user_upload/eufao-fsi4dm/doc-training/hfias.pdf [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Tesfaye M, Kaestel P, Olsen MF, et al. Food insecurity, mental health and quality of life among people living with HIV commencing antiretroviral treatment in Ethiopia: a cross-sectional study. Health Qual Life Outcomes 2016;14:37. 10.1186/s12955-016-0440-8 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Maes KC, Hadley C, Tesfaye F, et al. Food insecurity among volunteer AIDS caregivers in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia was highly prevalent but buffered from the 2008 food crisis. J Nutr 2009;139:1758–64. 10.3945/jn.109.108548 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Greenland S, Pearl J, Robins JM. Causal diagrams for epidemiologic research. Epidemiology 1999;10:37–48. 10.1097/00001648-199901000-00008 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Textor J, Hardt J, Knüppel S. DAGitty: a graphical tool for analyzing causal diagrams. Epidemiology 2011;22:745. 10.1097/EDE.0b013e318225c2be [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Shrier I, Platt RW. Reducing bias through directed acyclic graphs. BMC Med Res Methodol 2008;8:70. 10.1186/1471-2288-8-70 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Woimo TT, Yimer WK, Bati T, et al. The prevalence and factors associated for anti-tuberculosis treatment non-adherence among pulmonary tuberculosis patients in public health care facilities in South Ethiopia: a cross-sectional study. BMC Public Health 2017;17:269. 10.1186/s12889-017-4188-9 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Tola HH, Garmaroudi G, Shojaeizadeh D, et al. The effect of psychosocial factors and patients' perception of tuberculosis treatment Non-Adherence in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia. Ethiop J Health Sci 2017;27:447–58. 10.4314/ejhs.v27i5.2 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Adane AA, Alene KA, Koye DN, et al. Non-adherence to anti-tuberculosis treatment and determinant factors among patients with tuberculosis in Northwest Ethiopia. PLoS One 2013;8:e78791. 10.1371/journal.pone.0078791 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Ricks PM, Hershow RC, Rahimian A, et al. A randomized trial comparing standard outcomes in two treatment models for substance users with tuberculosis. Int J Tuberc Lung Dis 2015;19:326–32. 10.5588/ijtld.14.0471 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Sahile Z, Yared A, Kaba M. Patients' experiences and perceptions on associates of TB treatment adherence: a qualitative study on dots service in public health centers in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia. BMC Public Health 2018;18:462. 10.1186/s12889-018-5404-y [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Hasker E, Khodjikhanov M, Usarova S, et al. Default from tuberculosis treatment in Tashkent, Uzbekistan; who are these defaulters and why do they default? BMC Infect Dis 2008;8:97. 10.1186/1471-2334-8-97 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Caylà JA, Caminero JA, Rey R, et al. Current status of treatment completion and fatality among tuberculosis patients in Spain. Int J Tuberc Lung Dis 2004;8:458–64. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Dooley KE, Lahlou O, Ghali I, et al. Risk factors for tuberculosis treatment failure, default, or relapse and outcomes of retreatment in Morocco. BMC Public Health 2011;11:40. 10.1186/1471-2458-11-140 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Tesfahuneygn G, Medhin G, Legesse M. Adherence to anti-tuberculosis treatment and treatment outcomes among tuberculosis patients in Alamata district, northeast Ethiopia. BMC Res Notes 2015;8:503. 10.1186/s13104-015-1452-x [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Adane K, Spigt M, Ferede S, et al. Half of pulmonary tuberculosis cases were left undiagnosed in prisons of the Tigray region of Ethiopia: implications for tuberculosis control. PLoS One 2016;11:e0149453. 10.1371/journal.pone.0149453 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Fang X-H, Dan Y-L, Liu J, et al. Factors influencing completion of treatment among pulmonary tuberculosis patients. Patient Prefer Adherence 2019;13:491–6. 10.2147/PPA.S198007 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63.Kawatsu L, Uchimura K, Ohkado A, et al. A combination of quantitative and qualitative methods in investigating risk factors for lost to follow-up for tuberculosis treatment in Japan - Are physicians and nurses at a particular risk? PLoS One 2018;13:e0198075. 10.1371/journal.pone.0198075 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64.Gebreweld FH, Kifle MM, Gebremicheal FE, et al. Factors influencing adherence to tuberculosis treatment in Asmara, Eritrea: a qualitative study. J Health Popul Nutr 2018;37:1. 10.1186/s41043-017-0132-y [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Reviewer comments
Author's manuscript

Data Availability Statement

Data are available upon reasonable request. Data may be obtained from a third party and are not publicly available. All data relevant to the study are included in the article or uploaded as supplementary information. It will be available upon official request from interested individuals or organisations.


Articles from BMJ Open are provided here courtesy of BMJ Publishing Group

RESOURCES