Skip to main content
BMJ Case Reports logoLink to BMJ Case Reports
. 2021 Jul 5;14(7):e236903. doi: 10.1136/bcr-2020-236903

Cytomegalovirus skin disease in a kidney transplant patient

Miguel Enrique Cervera-Hernandez 1, Kenji Ikemura 2, Margaret E McCort 1,
PMCID: PMC8258561  PMID: 34226250

Abstract

A 44-year-old man with a history of renal transplantation presented with right lower abdominal wall swelling, redness and pain. A bacterial abscess was drained, and he was discharged home with oral antibiotics. After failing to improve, he returned to the hospital, where he was briefly treated with intravenous antibiotics and discharged home again. The patient returned 5 days later, reporting worsening right groin swelling that extended into the ipsilateral scrotum. Imaging revealed a persistent fluid collection in the region, and he was taken for surgical debridement. Tissue immunochemistry and histopathological evaluation identified cytomegalovirus infection. Plasma quantitative PCR for cytomegalovirus demonstrated high viraemia. The patient was successfully treated with intravenous ganciclovir, followed by oral valganciclovir, with resolution of the skin changes. Persistent hydrocele with epididymitis on imaging suggests that this process may have been the source of the cutaneous cytomegalovirus infection.

Keywords: infectious diseases, pathology

Background

Cytomegalovirus (CMV) is a human herpesvirus that commonly causes a latent and asymptomatic infection. However, immunocompromised patients, such as those living with HIV or receiving organ transplantation, are particularly susceptible to more severe disease.1 In solid organ transplant (SOT) recipients, CMV remains a major contributor to morbidity and mortality despite preventive strategies.2 Manifestations of CMV infection in SOT recipients range from a viral syndrome with fever, myalgias and laboratory abnormalities to tissue-invasive disease that frequently affects the allograft.3 CMV infection of the skin is rare. When present, CMV infection of the skin usually manifests as a rash, nodules or ulcers and has been associated with poor prognosis.4 We present a case of cutaneous CMV disease in a kidney transplant patient. This report underscores the importance of specific microbiological diagnosis and understanding the net state of immunosuppression in transplant recipients.5

Case presentation

A 44-year-old man presented to the emergency department (ED) with right lower abdominal wall swelling, redness and pain for 3 days. Physical examination was notable for a superficial abscess, and a bedside incision and drainage was performed. Purulent material was sent for culture, and the patient was sent home on a 7-day course of oral cephalexin and trimethoprim–sulfamethoxazole. The patient returned to the ED 2 days later having worsening swelling of the affected region, and he was admitted to the hospital for intravenous antibiotics. On hospital day 3, he was discharged home to complete a course of oral antibiotics. The patient returned 5 days later, again reporting worsening right groin swelling that now extended into the ipsilateral scrotum. He was readmitted and infectious diseases was consulted. He was initiated on empiric antibiotics with levofloxacin and doxycycline to cover typical skin flora.

His medical history included type 2 diabetes, hypertension, gout and kidney transplant 14 months prior to presentation. At the time of transplantation, the patient was CMV‐seropositive and received an organ from a deceased CMV‐seronegative donor. His post-transplant course had been complicated by allograft rejection requiring pulse glucocorticoids and antithymocyte globulin 1 month after transplantation. Ten months post-transplant, he developed focal segmental glomerulosclerosis of the graft and required treatment with plasmapheresis and high-dose prednisone. His medications at the time of hospital presentation included tacrolimus, mycophenolate, prednisone, atovaquone, nystatin, insulin, nifedipine, metoprolol and aspirin. Valganciclovir prophylaxis had been discontinued 6 months after renal transplantation.

The patient reported no prior trauma to the affected skin region. Of note, 1 month after transplantation, he developed a perianal abscess that was treated with incision and fistulotomy. Abscess cultures grew Streptococcus constellatus.

He was born in the Caribbean but had been living in the USA for several decades. He was in a monogamous relationship with his wife and reported no history of sexually transmitted infections.

On admission, the patient’s vital signs were as follows: temperature 37°C, blood pressure 130/80 mm Hg, heart rate 65 bpm. Skin examination revealed swelling, erythema and tenderness of the right lower quadrant abdominal wall that extended into the right groin and scrotum. Examination of the allograft region was notable for a mature scar. The remainder of the physical examination was unremarkable.

Investigations

Initial laboratory testing was notable for a white cell count of 7.8 cells x 109/L and serum creatinine of 6.9 mg/dL (baseline 3.1). Cultures from the drainage performed in the ED (10 days earlier) revealed susceptible Streptococcus anginosus. Nucleic acid amplification testing of urine was negative for Neisseria gonorrhoeae and Chlamydia trachomatis.

A CT with contrast of the abdomen and pelvis showed a 4.4×4.5×2.3 cm fluid collection and inflammation of the subcutaneous soft tissues at the right lower quadrant extending into the inguinal region that was suggestive of cellulitis. A Doppler ultrasound of the scrotum was compatible with right-sided epididymo-orchitis.

Treatment

The patient was taken to the operating room for the surgical debridement of the abdominal wall. During the procedure, purulent fluid was drained, and subcutaneous tissue was sent for culture and histopathology. Bacterial cultures were negative. However, tissue biopsy identified CMV by inclusions and positive immunohistochemistry staining (figure 1). A plasma quantitative PCR for CMV was elevated, with a viral load of 11 225 IU/mL. The patient was started on intravenous ganciclovir, and antibiotic therapy with levofloxacin and doxycycline was continued.

Figure 1.

Figure 1

(A) H&E stain of tissue from debridement of groin wound. Cytopathic effect of cytomegalovirus (CMV) is demonstrated by a cell (centre of the image) with cytomegaly and a large, single intranuclear inclusion surrounded by a clear halo in the periphery. Prominent acute inflammation is also present. (B) Immunohistochemical staining for CMV. Positive cells are shown staining dark brown.

Outcome and follow-up

After 10 days of ganciclovir therapy, the patient’s plasma CMV viral load became undetectable, and he was transitioned to oral valganciclovir for secondary prophylaxis. A repeat CT of the abdomen and pelvis demonstrated no residual fluid collections in the abdominal wall; however, persistent right scrotal swelling was noted on exam and ultrasonography. Urology consultants attributed the groin swelling to a reactive hydrocele, and no further surgical intervention was recommended.

After a 20-day hospital stay, the patient was discharged home on valganciclovir prophylaxis and a 2-week course of doxycycline and amoxicillin–clavulanate with resolution of his symptoms. At 4 months of follow-up, the patient had no recurrence of the abdominal wall infection. Elective hydrocelectomy was offered for his persistent right scrotal swelling, but the patient declined. Unfortunately, posthospitalisation, the patient developed renal allograft failure and was restarted on haemodialysis. He is currently listed for a second transplant.

Discussion

CMV tissue-invasive disease in SOT recipients commonly presents after antiviral prophylaxis has been discontinued and is characterised by fever, malaise, leucopaenia, thrombocytopaenia, elevated liver function tests and signs of end-organ inflammation (eg, colitis, pneumonitis, etc). In the most cases, CMV identification on histopathology is necessary for diagnosis and, while CMV viraemia is often present in tissue-invasive disease, its absence does not exclude the diagnosis. Ganciclovir and valganciclovir are first-line treatments for CMV disease, and clinical resolution of symptoms and virological clearance should dictate treatment duration.2 6 In our patient, we initially treated with intravenous ganciclovir for 10 days and then transitioned to oral valganciclovir when he displayed clinical improvement and declining plasma viral load. Once he achieved an undetectable CMV viral load, we continued him on secondary prophylaxis with valganciclovir, though the optimal strategy for preventing recurrence has not been established.2

CMV infection can present with protean manifestations, including, in some cases, skin eruptions. However, invasive skin disease proven by histopathology is rare.4 Our patient’s presentation is particularly notable because cellulitis and abscess have not previously been reported in CMV skin disease, to our knowledge. The typical histopathological findings in the stromal layer argue for true cutaneous infection, as opposed to other cases where haematogenous dissemination may have accounted for CMV localisation in the skin.7 On the other hand, it is unlikely that CMV alone caused his clinical presentation. Instead, a concurrent bacterial and viral infection is a more plausible scenario.

We performed a literature review of all published case reports of CMV skin infection in SOT recipients. The results of our review are shown in table 1. To the best of our knowledge, there have been 29 cases of CMV skin disease in SOT recipients reported to date. The mean age at diagnosis was 48 years (IQR 36.5–61), and the majority were male (20/28, 71.4%). Kidney transplantation was the most common SOT (19/29, 65.5%) among reported cases. The mean time to presentation after transplant was 23.7 months (IQR 1–30), the most frequent localisation was the anogenital region (14/28, 50%), and the most common skin lesion was an ulcer (21/28, 75%). Patients frequently presented with concurrent infections. Reported overall mortality in these cases was 28.5% (8/28), although most deaths were reported before adequate antiviral therapy was available.4 8–28 The predominant type (ulcer) and location (perianal) of cutaneous CMV manifestations noted in SOT recipient reports are echoed in a large review on the topic that included non-immunocompromised hosts, suggesting similar clinical presentation regardless of immune function. However, a specific comparison between SOT and immunocompetent hosts was not performed.29

Table 1.

Clinical characteristics and outcomes of reported cases of cutaneous cytomegalovirus disease in solid organ transplant recipients

Reference Year Age, sex Transplant Post-transplant Localisation Clinical description Extracutaneous CMV Coinfection Treatment Outcome
Minars et al22 1977 24, F Kidney 1 year Elbow, thigh Necrotic ulcer Lungs, liver, kidneys, breast, ovaries, adrenals, parathyroids, eyes Escherichia coli bacteraemia None Died
Pariser et al23 1983 32, M Kidney 3 months Generalised, genital Maculopapular rash, ulcer Liver, bone marrow, lungs None Died
Patterson et al24 1988 39, F Liver 1 month Chest, arm, thighs Necrotic ulcer Liver, blood Sepsis G Died
Elenitsas et al20 1988 7, M Liver 10 days Generalised Purpura Liver, lung, urine Sepsis G Died
Lee4 1989 40, M Liver 1 month Supraclavicular Ulcer None Alive
53, M Heart 2.5 years Hip / wound Ulcer Liver, blood Sepsis, Candida (ulcer), dissem. HSV None Died
29, M Heart, Lung 3 months Generalised Purpura Lung, urine, throat Pseudomonas sepsis None Died
Rees et al*26 1991 Heart Lung Toxoplasmosis G
Trimarchi et al10 2001 56, M Kidney 4 months Trunk Maculopapular rash, ulcer Liver, bone marrow, blood G Alive
Ruiz et al14 2002 70, F Kidney 20 days Leg Plaque Blood Pseudomonas perirenal abscess G Alive
Choi et al9 2006 54, M Liver Gluteal Ulcer Enterocolitis G Alive
54, M Liver Gluteal Ulcer G Alive
31, M Kidney Genital Ulcer G Alive
62, F Kidney Genital Ulcer HSV-2 (ulcer) G Alive
Kaisar et al15 2007 39, F Kidney 7 years Perianal Ulcer G, V Alive
34, M Kidney 6 months Ear Nodule Tongue, blood Pseudomonas osteomyelitis G, V Died
Reino et al27 2008 29, M Kidney 4 months Ureterostomy site Ulcer Pseudomonas UTI G Alive
Moscarelli et al17 2010 54, F Kidney 1 month Perianal Ulcer Blood HSV-2 (ulcer) G, V Alive
Ryan et al28 2011 57, F Liver Perianal Ulcer Blood V Alive
Prasad et al25 2010 52, M Kidney 2.5 years Axilla, genital Ulcer Blood Pseudomonas (ulcer) G, V Alive
Garib et al21 2013 50, F Kidney Thighs, abdomen, genital Exophytic plaques Blood HSV (skin) G Alive
62, M Kidney Genital Verrucous nodule HSV-2 (skin) V Alive
Lloret-Ruiz et al16 2015 60, M Heart 10 years Arm Ulcer Pseudomonas sepsis and skin V Alive
Pinca et al19 2016 65, M Kidney 1 month Scrotal Ulcer Blood V Alive
Ezzatzadegan et al11 2016 67, M Kidney 1 month Face Ulcer Kidney, blood E. coli UTI, HSV (ulcer) G Alive
Neumann et al18 2016 68, M Kidney 2 months Genital Ulcer Tongue, blood Pulmonary sepsis G Died
Mena Lora et al12 2017 47, M Kidney 5 years Elbow Ulcer V Alive
Wang et al13 2018 67, M Kidney 10 years Leg/wound Ulcer Eye, blood G, V, FN, CMV-IG Alive
Present case 44, M Kidney 14 months Abdomen Cellulitis Blood Streptococcus anginosus cellulitis G, V Alive

*Unable to retrieve for review.

CMV, cytomegalovirus; F, female; FN, foscarnet; G, ganciclovir; HSV, herpes simplex virus; IG, immune globulin; M, male; UTI, urinary tract infection; V, valganciclovir.

Given the paucity of cases, other authors have proposed that the skin offers an unwelcoming environment for CMV.10 Several factors appear to be necessary for infection to occur, including local and systemic inflammation and host immunosuppression. Early works reported that damaged or coinfected tissue might be more susceptible to CMV.4 More recent research has better elucidated the inflammatory milieu that favours reactivation of latent virus. Specifically, stimuli by tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNF‐α), prostaglandins and stress catecholamines appear to be involved.30–33 Many of the cases in SOT recipients presented with either sepsis, concurrent bacterial skin infection, or previous tissue damage. The case we present here had purulent cellulitis with S. anginosus and was severely immunosuppressed.

Finally, our patient presented with right scrotal swelling and ultrasonographic evidence of epididymo-orchitis that was managed expectantly. Epididymo-orchitis caused by CMV in SOT recipients has been rarely reported.34 35 Given the contiguous nature of the abdominal cellulitis, it is possible that CMV was also involved in this process. However, scrotal tissue was not available to reach a definitive diagnosis.

In conclusion, we present a case of CMV cutaneous disease in a kidney transplant recipient presenting as cellulitis of the abdominal wall. Though the patient likely had a concurrent bacterial skin infection, he failed to improve with antibiotics and drainage alone, suggesting that CMV played a causative role in his presentation. This case underscores the importance of specific microbiological diagnosis and maintaining a high index of suspicion for atypical organisms when evaluating SOT patients.

Learning points.

  • Histopathological identification of cytomegalovirus (CMV) inclusions and positive immunohistochemical staining in the stromal layer is critically important in diagnosing invasive cutaneous CMV disease.

  • Cutaneous disease is a rare manifestation of CMV infection in immunocompromised patients; in addition to ulcers, it can present with cellulitis and abscess.

  • Cutaneous CMV infection may be more common in younger patients and those with a history of renal transplant. It may be associated with a concurrent bacterial skin infection and is often found in the anogenital region.

Footnotes

Contributors: MEC-H, KI and MEM drafted the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Funding: The authors have not declared a specific grant for this research from any funding agency in the public, commercial or not-for-profit sectors.

Competing interests: None declared.

Provenance and peer review: Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.

Ethics statements

Patient consent for publication

Obtained.

References

  • 1.Gandhi MK, Khanna R. Human cytomegalovirus: clinical aspects, immune regulation, and emerging treatments. Lancet Infect Dis 2004;4:725–38. 10.1016/S1473-3099(04)01202-2 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Razonable RR, Humar A. Cytomegalovirus in solid organ transplant recipients-Guidelines of the American Society of transplantation infectious diseases community of practice. Clin Transplant 2019;33:e13512. 10.1111/ctr.13512 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Fishman JA. Infection in organ transplantation. Am J Transplant 2017;17:856–79. 10.1111/ajt.14208 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Lee JY. Cytomegalovirus infection involving the skin in immunocompromised hosts. A clinicopathologic study. Am J Clin Pathol 1989;92:96–100. 10.1093/ajcp/92.1.96 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Fishman JA, Issa NC. Infection in organ transplantation: risk factors and evolving patterns of infection. Infect Dis Clin North Am 2010;24:273–83. 10.1016/j.idc.2010.01.005 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Kotton CN, Kumar D, Caliendo AM, et al. The third International consensus guidelines on the management of cytomegalovirus in solid-organ transplantation. Transplantation 2018;102:900–31. 10.1097/TP.0000000000002191 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Tanaka A, Yamashita C, Hinogami H, et al. Cytomegalovirus-induced vasculopathy and anogenital skin ulcers in a patient with multiple myeloma. JAAD Case Rep 2020;6:57–9. 10.1016/j.jdcr.2019.04.017 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.The Food and Drug Administration . Ganciclovir injection label [Internet]. Available: https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/drugsatfda_docs/label/2017/209347lbl.pdf [Accessed 2 Mar 2020].
  • 9.Choi Y-L, Kim J-A, Jang K-T, et al. Characteristics of cutaneous cytomegalovirus infection in non-acquired immune deficiency syndrome, immunocompromised patients. Br J Dermatol 2006;155:977–82. 10.1111/j.1365-2133.2006.07456.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Trimarchi H, Casas G, Jordan R, et al. Cytomegalovirus maculopapular eruption in a kidney transplant patient. Transpl Infect Dis 2001;3:47–50. 10.1034/j.1399-3062.2001.003001047.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Ezzatzadegan Jahromi S, Lotfi Z, Torabi-Nezhad S, et al. A potential role for cytomegalovirus in a facial ulcer in a renal transplant recipient. Transpl Infect Dis 2016;18:457–60. 10.1111/tid.12536 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Mena Lora A, Khine J, Khosrodad N, et al. Unusual manifestations of acute cytomegalovirus infection in solid organ transplant hosts: a report of two cases. Case Rep Transplant 2017;2017:1–4. 10.1155/2017/4916973 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Wang CY, Mulley WR, Dendle C, et al. Cytomegalovirus ulcers following radiotherapy for a Marjolin ulcer in a renal transplant recipient. Australas J Dermatol 2019;60:e145–7. 10.1111/ajd.12921 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Ruiz Lascano A, Kuznitzky R, Garay I, et al. [Cytomegalovirus cellulitis]. Medicina 2002;62:572–4. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Kaisar MO, Kirwan RM, Strutton GM, et al. Cutaneous manifestations of cytomegalovirus disease in renal transplant recipients: a case series. Transpl Infect Dis 2008;10:209–13. 10.1111/j.1399-3062.2007.00273.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Lloret-Ruiz C, Moles-Poveda P, Terradez-Raro J-J. Skin leg ulcer in an immunocompromised patient with Pseudomonas aeruginosa sepsis. Cytomegalovirus ulcer. JAMA Dermatol 2015;151:661–2. 10.1001/jamadermatol.2014.5110 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Moscarelli L, Zanazzi M, Rosso G, et al. Can skin be the first site of CMV involvement preceding a systematic infection in a renal transplant recipient? Clin Kidney J 2011;4:53–5. 10.1093/ndtplus/sfq176 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Neumann ABF, Daxbacher ELR, Chiaratti FC, et al. Cutaneous involvement by cytomegalovirus in a renal transplant recipient as an indicator of severe systemic infection. An Bras Dermatol 2016;91:80–3. 10.1590/abd1806-4841.20163989 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Pinca R, Crawford RI, Au S. Cytomegalovirus scrotal ulcer in a renal transplant patient. J Cutan Med Surg 2016;20:567–9. 10.1177/1203475416650643 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Elenitsas R, Cohen BA. Generalized eruption in a liver transplant patient. CMV. Arch Dermatol 1990;126:1498–501. 10.1001/archderm.126.11.1498 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Garib G, Hughey LC, Elmets CA, et al. Atypical presentation of exophytic herpes simplex virus type 2 with concurrent cytomegalovirus infection: a significant pitfall in diagnosis. Am J Dermatopathol 2013;35:371–6. 10.1097/DAD.0b013e3182539eee [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Minars N, Silverman JF, Escobar MR, et al. Fatal cytomegalic inclusion disease. Associated skin manifestations in a renal transplant patient. Arch Dermatol 1977;113:1569–71. 10.1001/archderm.113.11.1569 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Pariser RJ. Histologically specific skin lesions in disseminated cytomegalovirus infection. J Am Acad Dermatol 1983;9:937–46. 10.1016/S0190-9622(83)70212-4 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Patterson JW, Broecker AH, Kornstein MJ, et al. Cutaneous cytomegalovirus infection in a liver transplant patient. Diagnosis by in situ DNA hybridization. Am J Dermatopathol 1988;10:524–30. 10.1097/00000372-198812000-00009 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Prasad N, Jain M, Gupta A, et al. An unusual case of CMV cutaneous ulcers in a renal transplant recipient and review of literature. Clin Kidney J 2010;3:379–82. 10.1093/ndtplus/sfq082 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Rees AP, Meadors M, Ventura HO, et al. Diagnosis of disseminated cytomegalovirus infection and pneumonitis in a heart transplant recipient by skin biopsy: case report. J Heart Lung Transplant 1991;10:329–32. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Reino A, Rico JE, Cardona X, et al. Ureteritis por citomegalovirus en receptor de trasplante renal. Informe de un caso con presentación inusual. Actas Urol Esp 2008;32:649–52. 10.1016/S0210-4806(08)73903-2 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Ryan C, De Gascun CF, Powell C, et al. Cytomegalovirus-induced cutaneous vasculopathy and perianal ulceration. J Am Acad Dermatol 2011;64:1216–8. 10.1016/j.jaad.2009.11.007 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Drozd B, Andriescu E, Suárez A, et al. Cutaneous cytomegalovirus manifestations, diagnosis, and treatment: a review. Dermatol Online J 2019;25:13030. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Nordøy I, Müller F, Nordal KP, et al. The role of the tumor necrosis factor system and interleukin-10 during cytomegalovirus infection in renal transplant recipients. J Infect Dis 2000;181:51–7. 10.1086/315184 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Kline JN, Hunninghake GM, He B, et al. Synergistic activation of the human cytomegalovirus major immediate early promoter by prostaglandin E2 and cytokines. Exp Lung Res 1998;24:3–14. 10.3109/01902149809046050 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Prösch S, Wendt CE, Reinke P, et al. A novel link between stress and human cytomegalovirus (HCMV) infection: sympathetic hyperactivity stimulates HCMV activation. Virology 2000;272:357–65. 10.1006/viro.2000.0367 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Tan SK, Cheng XS, Kao C-S, et al. Native kidney cytomegalovirus nephritis and cytomegalovirus prostatitis in a kidney transplant recipient. Transpl Infect Dis 2019;21:e12998. 10.1111/tid.12998 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.McCarthy JM, McLoughlin MG, Shackleton CR, et al. Cytomegalovirus epididymitis following renal transplantation. J Urol 1991;146:417–9. 10.1016/S0022-5347(17)37811-4 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Kini U, Nirmala V, Vadakkepat N. Post-transplantation epididymitis associated with cytomegalovirus. Indian J Pathol Microbiol 1996;39:151–3. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from BMJ Case Reports are provided here courtesy of BMJ Publishing Group

RESOURCES