The use of hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) in the prophylaxis and treatment of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) has received significant attention by politicians and media figures. This has occurred despite limited data supporting its efficacy in COVID-19 as well as considerable concern about its safety when used at high doses (>400 mg daily) and in combination with other QT interval prolonging drugs.1–4
An inaccurate narrative has emerged in recent weeks that patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) who are taking HCQ as a baseline therapy are less affected by or do not develop COVID-19.5–7 This assumption has been challenged by Monti and Montecucco,8 referencing data from the COVID-19 Global Rheumatology Alliance registry on patients with rheumatic disease that previously identified 19/110 (17%) patients with SLE.9 A case series of 17 patients with lupus or antiphospholipid syndrome who developed COVID-19 on a median HCQ dose of 400 mg daily (median HCQ blood level of 648 ng/mL) has since become available.10 As of 17 April 2020, we have now identified 80 patients with SLE and COVID-19 in the global physician-reported registry. Patients were predominantly female (72/80, 90%) and less than 65 years of age (69/80, 86%). Importantly, 64% (51/80) of patients with SLE were taking an antimalarial (HCQ or chloroquine) prior to infection with severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) (30% as monotherapy). Notably, 21.1% (121/573) of all reported patients with rheumatic disease in the registry were treated with an antimalarial prior to onset of COVID-19, yet 49.6% (60/121) required hospitalisation. In patients with SLE, frequency of hospitalisation with COVID-19 did not differ between individuals using an antimalarial versus non-users (55% (16/29) vs 57% (29/51), p=ns; χ2 test). In patients with lupus, escalation to maximum level of care (non-invasive ventilation, invasive ventilation or extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO)) was required regardless of HCQ use (online supplementary table S1). Thus, patients with lupus—even if they are using an antimalarial such as HCQ as baseline therapy—can develop SARS-CoV-2 infection and severe COVID-19 at similar frequency as lupus patients not on antimalarials.
There are currently >40 ongoing clinical trials examining HCQ in the prophylaxis or treatment of SARS-CoV-2 infection that employ highly variable strategies with regards to dosing (total oral loading dose 400–1400 mg), duration and time of initiation.11 However, dosing considerations of HCQ in COVID-19 may be critical to understand why patients with lupus may not be protected from SARS-CoV-2 infection.
Similar to in vitro studies indicating activity of antimalarial 4-aminoquinoline derivatives against SARS-CoV-1 and MERS-CoV,12,13 a putative role for HCQ in the treatment of COVID-19 has been suggested by its antiviral effect in cell culture systems.14,15 Given the assumptions made when moving from a cell-based model to a complex in vivo system, in vitro potency cannot be expected to translate into in vivo efficacy,16 as observed for chloroquine in a mouse model of SARS-CoV-1 infection.17 To date, no in vivo exposure response data are available for HCQ in COVID-19. Few data are available to extrapolate what drug concentrations must be achieved to observe in vivo efficacy and in which compartment (eg, whole blood vs epithelial lining fluid vs lung parenchyma). Even for influenza and approved antiviral drugs (oseltamivir), the direct relationship between drug concentration and in vivo activity is uncertain.18,19 Current in vitro data suggest that the concentration of HCQ at which 50% of the maximal activity against SARS-CoV-2 is obtained (EC50) is 0.72–4.51 μM (ie, ~242–1515 ng/mL),14,15 similar to the EC50 observed in SARS-CoV-1 a nd MERS-CoV.13 Ninety per cent inhibition of SARS-CoV-2 (EC90) with HCQ was achieved at ~5–15 μM (~1679–5038 ng/mL), while clearance required ~20 μM (~6717 ng/mL).14,15 Importantly, both EC50 and EC90 concentrations may be insufficient to improve clinical outcomes. Instead, the concentration of HCQ required to eliminate SARS-CoV-2 may be a more meaningful target.20 Such concentrations of HCQ (ie, ~6700 ng/mL), however, are not safely achievable in whole blood, and little is known about the concomitant concentrations obtainable in lung parenchymal cells in humans (assuming this represents a critical site for antiviral activity in COVID-19). Without an understanding of effective HCQ concentrations in target tissues, effective therapeutic doses remain difficult to predict by simulation. For dosing strategies to be informed, an intricate understanding of HCQ transfer constants between the blood and the lung tissue is required.
HCQ used in the treatment of SLE is typically prescribed at doses of 5.0–6.5 mg/kg, with a maximum dose of 400 mg daily. The majority of patients with SLE on chronic HCQ treatment do not achieve whole blood concentrations of 5–15 μM (~1679–5038 ng/mL),10,21 corresponding to the EC90 for SARS-CoV-2.14,15 While pulmonary drug concentrations in mice are known to reach much higher levels than in blood, these HCQ concentrations may be required to achieve meaningful antiviral activity in blood. The difficulty of achieving potentially meaningful blood concentrations at HCQ doses typically prescribed in SLE may have important implications for trial design in COVID-19 and needs to be considered when interpreting outcomes of these studies. Notably, results from an open-label, randomised, controlled trial using doses as high as HCQ 1200 mg for 3 days (followed by a maintenance dose of 800 mg daily for 2–3 weeks) did not suggest efficacy of HCQ in suppressing viral replication.22 These efficacy data, and the irrefutable clinical data collected through the COVID-19 Global Rheumatology Alliance registry, establish that patients with lupus on baseline therapy with HCQ are not universally protected from COVID-19.
Supplementary Material
Acknowledgments
Funding MFK was supported by the National Institute of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases (NIAMS) of the National Institutes of Health (NIH) under Award no. T32AR048522 and received personal fees from Bristol-Myers Squibb and Celltrion, unrelated to this manuscript. AHK was supported by grants from NIH/NIAMS and Rheumatology Research Foundation and personal fees from Exagen Diagnostics, Inc and GlaxoSmithKline, unrelated to this manuscript. PMM is supported by the National Institute for Health Research University College London Hospitals Biomedical Research Centre and received consulting or speaker’s fees from Abbvie, Eli Lilly, Novartis and UCB Pharma. JY received personal fees from Astra Zeneca and Eli Lilly, unrelated to this manuscript. PCR reports personal fees from Abbvie, Pfizer, UCB Pharma, Novartis, Eli Lilly and Janssen and non-financial support from Roche.
Competing interests MFK received personal fees from Bristol-Myers Squibb and Celltrion, unrelated to this manuscript. AHK received personal fees from Exagen Diagnostics, Inc and GlaxoSmithKline, unrelated to this manuscript. PMM received personal fees from Abbvie, Eli Lilly, Novartis and UCB Pharma. JY received personal fees from Astra Zeneca and Eli Lilly, unrelated to this manuscript. PCR reports personal fees from Abbvie, Pfizer, UCB Pharma, Novartis, Eli Lilly and Janssen, and non-financial support from Roche.
Footnotes
Disclaimer The views expressed here are those of the authors and participating members of the COVID-19 Global Rheumatology Alliance, and do not necessarily represent the views of the American College of Rheumatology, the European League Against Rheumatism, or any other organisation.
Patient and public involvement Patients and/or the public were not involved in the design, or conduct, or reporting, or dissemination plans of this research.
Patient consent for publication Not required.
Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.
This article is made freely available for use in accordance with BMJ’s website terms and conditions for the duration of the covid-19 pandemic or until otherwise determined by BMJ. You may use, download and print the article for any lawful, non-commercial purpose (including text and data mining) provided that all copyright notices and trade marks are retained.
RefeRences
- 1.AHJ K, Sparks JA, Liew JW, et al. A rush to judgment? rapid reporting and dissemination of results and its consequences regarding the use of hydroxychloroquine for COVID-19. Ann Intern Med 2020:M20–1223. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Lane JCE, Weaver J, Kostka K, et al. Safety of hydroxychloroquine, alone and in combination with azithromycin, in light of rapid wide-spread use for COVID-19: a multinational, network cohort and self-controlled case series study. Rheumatology 2020. [Google Scholar]
- 3.Roden DM, Harrington RA, Poppas A, et al. Considerations for drug interactions on QTc in exploratory COVID-19 (coronavirus disease 2019) treatment. J Am Coll Cardiol 2020. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2020.04.016. [Epub ahead of print: 09 Apr 2020]. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Chorin E, Dai M, Shulman E, et al. The QT interval in patients with SARS-CoV-2 infection treated with Hydroxychloroquine/Azithromycin. Cardiovascular Medicine 2020. [Google Scholar]
- 5.Chen Z, Hu J, Zhang Z, et al. Efficacy of hydroxychloroquine in patients with COVID-19: results of a randomized clinical trial. Epidemiology 2020. [Google Scholar]
- 6.Joob B, Wiwanitkit V. Sle, hydroxychloroquine and NO SLE patients with COVID-19: a comment. Ann Rheum Dis 2020;79:e61. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Remarks by President Trump, Vice President Pence, and Members of the Coronavirus Task Force in Press Briefing. The white house. Available: https://www.whitehouse.gov/briefingsstatements/remarks-president-trump-vice-president-pence-members-coronavirus-task-forcepress-briefing-19/ [Accessed 24 Apr 2020].
- 8.Monti S, Montecucco C. Can hydroxychloroquine protect patients with rheumatic diseases from COVID-19? Response to: ‘Does hydroxychloroquine prevent the transmission of COVID-19?’ by Heldwein and Calado and ‘SLE, hydroxychloroquine and no SLE patients with COVID-19: a comment’ by Joob and Wiwanitkit. Ann Rheum Dis 2020;2020:e62. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Gianfrancesco MA, Hyrich KL, Gossec L, et al. Rheumatic disease and COVID-19: initial data from the COVID-19 global rheumatology alliance provider registries. Lancet Rheumatol 2020:S2665991320300953. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Mathian A, Mahevas M, Rohmer J, et al. Clinical course of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) in a series of 17 patients with systemic lupus erythematosus under long-term treatment with hydroxychloroquine. Ann Rheumat Dis 2020. [Epub ahead of print: 24 Apr 2020]. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Search of: Recruiting, Completed Studies | COVID | Hydroxychloroquine - List Results - ClinicalTrials.gov Available: https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/results?cond=COVID&intr=Hydroxychloroquine&Search=Apply&recrs=a&recrs=e&age_v=&gndr=&type=&rslt=[Accessed 19 Apr 2020].
- 12.Dyall J, Gross R, Kindrachuk J, et al. Middle East respiratory syndrome and severe acute respiratory syndrome: current therapeutic options and potential targets for novel therapies. Drugs 2017;77:1935–66. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Dyall J, Coleman CM, Hart BJ, et al. Repurposing of clinically developed drugs for treatment of middle East respiratory syndrome coronavirus infection. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 2014;58:4885–93. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Yao X, Ye F, Zhang M, et al. In vitro antiviral activity and projection of optimized dosing design of hydroxychloroquine for the treatment of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2). Clin Infect Dis 2020:ciaa237. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Liu J, Cao R, Xu M, et al. Hydroxychloroquine, a less toxic derivative of chloroquine, is effective in inhibiting SARS-CoV-2 infection in vitro. Cell Discov 2020;6:16. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Tuntland T, Ethell B, Kosaka T, et al. Implementation of pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic strategies in early research phases of drug discovery and development at Novartis Institute of biomedical research. Front Pharmacol 2014;5:174. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Barnard DL, Day CW, Bailey K, et al. Evaluation of immunomodulators, interferons and known in vitro SARS-coV inhibitors for inhibition of SARS-coV replication in BALB/c mice. Antivir Chem Chemother 2006;17:275–84. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.CENTER FOR DRUG EVALUATION AND RESEARCH. APPLICATION NUMBER:021246Orig1s045 and 021087Orig1s062 [Abstracted from NDA 21087/S-062 Clinical Review, T. Vargas-Kasambira]. Available: https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/drugsatfda_docs/nda/2012/021246Orig1s045_021087Orig1s062SumR.pdf [Accessed 19 Apr 2020].
- 19.Rayner CR, Bulik CC, Kamal MA, et al. Pharmacokinetic-Pharmacodynamic determinants of oseltamivir efficacy using data from phase 2 inoculation studies. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 2013;57:3478–87. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Arnold SL, Buckner F. Hydroxychloroquine for treatment of SARS-CoV-2 infection? improving our confidence in a model-based approach to dose selection. Clin Transl Sci 2020. doi: 10.1111/cts.12797. [Epub ahead of print: 08 Apr 2020]. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Petri M, Elkhalifa M, Li J, et al. Hydroxychloroquine blood levels predict hydroxychloroquine retinopathy. Arthritis Rheumatol 2020;72:448–53. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Tang W, Cao Z, Han M, et al. Hydroxychloroquine in patients with COVID-19: an openlabel, randomized, controlled trial. Infectious Diseases 2020. [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.