Skip to main content
Scientific Reports logoLink to Scientific Reports
. 2021 Jul 6;11:14297. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-93674-y

Author Correction: Plastid phylogenomics resolves ambiguous relationships within the orchid family and provides a solid timeframe for biogeography and macroevolution

Maria Alejandra Serna-Sánchez 1,2,#, Oscar A Pérez-Escobar 3,✉,#, Diego Bogarín 4,5,#, María Fernanda Torres-Jimenez 6, Astrid Catalina Alvarez-Yela 7, Juliana E Arcila-Galvis 1, Climbie F Hall 8, Fábio de Barros 8, Fábio Pinheiro 9, Steven Dodsworth 10, Mark W Chase 3, Alexandre Antonelli 3,6,11, Tatiana Arias 1,7,12,
PMCID: PMC8260697  PMID: 34230574

Correction to: Scientific Reports https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-83664-5, published online 25 March 2021

The original version of this Article contained an error in Figure 1 where the image showing "Paphiopedilum villosum" was incorrectly labelled as "Apostasia shenzhenica".

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Maximum Likelihood phylogeny of the orchid family inferred from 78 coding plastid genes. Likelihood bootstrap support values (LBS) <85% at nodes are highlighted in red together with their corresponding subtending branches. Orchid genera, tribes and subfamilies are indicated in the phylogeny together with photographs of selected representative species per subfamily. (Inset): Bar plot showing the frequency of LBS values at branches as computed by bin intervals of 5 units. Photos: O. Pérez-Escobar & D. Bogarín.

The original Figure 1 and accompanying legend appear below.

The original Article has been corrected.

Contributor Information

Oscar A. Pérez-Escobar, Email: o.perez-escobar@kew.org

Tatiana Arias, Email: tatiana.arias48@tdea.edu.co.


Articles from Scientific Reports are provided here courtesy of Nature Publishing Group

RESOURCES