Skip to main content
PMC home page
Nature Communications logoLink to Nature Communications
. 2021 Jul 6;12:4142. doi: 10.1038/s41467-021-24266-7

A nonS-locus F-box gene breaks self-incompatibility in diploid potatoes

Ling Ma 1,#, Chunzhi Zhang 2,#, Bo Zhang 1,#, Fei Tang 1, Futing Li 1, Qinggang Liao 2, Die Tang 2, Zhen Peng 3, Yuxin Jia 2, Meng Gao 1, Han Guo 4, Jinzhe Zhang 5, Xuming Luo 2, Huiqin Yang 1, Dongli Gao 1, William J Lucas 2,6, Canhui Li 1,✉, Sanwen Huang 2,✉, Yi Shang 1,✉
PMCID: PMC8260799  PMID: 34230469

Abstract

Potato is the third most important staple food crop. To address challenges associated with global food security, a hybrid potato breeding system, aimed at converting potato from a tuber-propagated tetraploid crop into a seed-propagated diploid crop through crossing inbred lines, is under development. However, given that most diploid potatoes are self-incompatible, this represents a major obstacle which needs to be addressed in order to develop inbred lines. Here, we report on a self-compatible diploid potato, RH89-039-16 (RH), which can efficiently induce a mating transition from self-incompatibility to self-compatibility, when crossed to self-incompatible lines. We identify the S-locusinhibitor (Sli) gene in RH, capable of interacting with multiple allelic variants of the pistil-specific S-ribonucleases (S-RNases). Further, Sli gene functions like a general S-RNase inhibitor, to impart SC to RH and other self-incompatible potatoes. Discovery of Sli now offers a path forward for the diploid hybrid breeding program.

Subject terms: Plant breeding, Plant genetics, Self incompatability

Diploid potatoes are typically self-incompatible, complicating efforts to breed diploid cultivars. Here the authors report map-based cloning of the S-locus inhibitor (Sli) gene in potato which encodes a non S-locus F-box protein that is expressed in pollen and can functions like a general S-RNase inhibitor to overcome self-incompatibility.

Introduction

Potato is consumed as a staple food by approximately 1.3 billion people1. Currently, most potato cultivars are tetraploids, carrying four copies of chromosome sets, thereby complicating breeding efforts to introduce new traits. This constitutes a major challenge in terms of expanding potato’s contribution to feeding the fast-growing global population, especially under the threat of climate change2.

A potential pathway to circumvent this impediment of potato breeding is the development of a hybrid potato breeding system3,4, which would convert potato into a diploid seed crop by crossing elite inbred lines. In diploid potato, beneficial alleles can be efficiently introgressed into these inbred lines, thereby shortening the breeding period3,5. Moreover, the hybrid offspring, propagated via true seeds rather than tubers, would facilitate both botanical seed storage and delivery, along with eliminating the risks presently associated with tuber-borne pathogens6. However, given that a majority of diploid potatoes are self-incompatible, this obligate outcrossing mating system poses a major obstacle (another big hurdle is inbreeding depression, including poor vigor and low fertility in potato) to develop diploid inbred lines7–10.

In Solanaceae, the self-incompatibility (SI) system is gametophytic and controlled by a single polymorphic locus, called S-locus11. This locus encodes two types of determinants: female/pistil S-determinant (a cytotoxic S-ribonuclease, S-RNase)12 and male/pollen S-determinant (a set of pollen-specific S-locus F-box proteins, SLFs)13. The S-RNase inhibits the growth of self-pollen tubes by either degrading ribosomal RNA (rRNA)14 or disrupting the dynamic equilibrium of the cytoskeleton15. Based on the collaborative non-self recognition system, the S-RNase could be poly-ubiquitinated and degraded by the interactions with the collective action of 16–20 nonself SLFs that induce compatibility16,17. Otherwise, the S-RNase would not be degraded, as it is not recognized by the self SLFs18. Thus, loss-of-function mutations of S-RNase8,9, and degradation of this protein by the introduction of nonself SLFs19, have been reported to confer self-compatibility (SC) in Solanaceae. However, as genetically modified crops are still widely prohibited and even the acceptance of genome-edited crop is under debate, alternative strategies for addressing SI in the development of diploid inbred lines are preferred.

Previous studies have shown that a dominant locus, S-locus inhibitor (Sli), from a wild diploid potato species, Solanum chacoense Bitt., is responsible for breaking down the stylar incompatible response7,20–22. Although Eggers et al. reported the identification of Sli from the wild species in the Solanaceae International Online Meeting23, the molecular mechanism of Sli was not described. Furthermore, this wild accession produces long stolons and high levels of toxic steroidal glycoalkaloids in tubers8,24,25, which also limits its breeding potential. Alternatively, RH89-039-16 (RH), a long-day adaptive line derived from S. tuberosum group Tuberosum, is another self-compatible diploid potato that produces tubers26,27. Clot et al. has shown that RH also harbors the Sli SC haplotype at the distal end of chromosome 1222. However, the molecular basis underlying the SI to SC transition in RH remains unknown, and it is unknown whether RH can transmit heritable SC to self-incompatible diploid potatoes.

In this study, we identify a non-S-locus F-box (NSF) gene in RH. This gene is identical to the Sli gene, and capable of interacting with multiple allelic variants of S-RNases, functioning like a general S-locus inhibitor to introduce SC to both RH and other self-incompatible lines. The discovery of Sli offers a new and effective path for the hybrid diploid potato breeding program.

Results

SC gene colocalizes with a segregation distortion region

As shown in Fig. 1a, self-pollinated RH plants produced fruits, and their pollen tubes penetrated the style and reached the ovary. To explore the genetic basis underlying the SC phenotype of RH, F1 hybrids (PI 225689 × RH) from RH crossed with PI 225689, a self-incompatible diploid line (a/a) from S. tuberosum group Phureja, were evaluated for self-compatibility (Fig. 1a and Supplementary Fig. 1a). Genetic analysis of F1 progeny established a ~1:1 segregation ratio of SC to SI (131 self-compatible plants versus 107 self-incompatible plants; χ2 = 2.42 < χ20.05 = 3.84), indicating that SC in RH is caused by a single dominant heterozygous gene (A/a) or gametophytic factor. Next, 40 self-compatible and 40 self-incompatible F1 individuals were carefully selected for a bulked segregant analysis (BSA), which exhibited a peak associated with SC/SI located at the end of chromosome 12 (58~61 Mb, Fig. 1b). InDel markers were then developed, and a total of 238 self-compatible and self-incompatible F1 individuals were used to pinpoint the location of the candidate to an interval between the marker M-1 and M-2 (2.24 Mb, Fig. 1c).

Fig. 1. Identification of NSF by map-based cloning and transgenic assay.

Fig. 1

Open in a new tab

a Developmental status of flower, fruit, and pollen tube, after self-pollination of two parental lines: RH (self-compatibility, SC) and PI 225689 (self-incompatibility, SI). The bar is 1 cm on the four left images and 500 μm on the six right images. The arrested pollen tube is identified with the red arrow. The experiments were repeated five times with similar results. b BSA-Seq analysis of the F1 hybrid population (PI 225689 × RH). The SNP index (Δ) of SC and SI pools, prepared from the F1 progeny, as mapped along the RH genome. The red arrow indicates a peak above the threshold value. c Fine mapping of NSF using 238 F1 and 6,624 F2 individuals. The number in the bracket indicates the number of recombinants with the same genotype. The NSF location is indicated in red. d The pollen elongation cease model is proposed to explain the distorted segregation of the F2 population. Pollen with ‘a’ genotype is short of SC gene. Cease of pollen tube elongation resulted in unsuccessful fertilization. Thus, the individuals with ‘aa’ genotype (indicated in pale grey) cannot be identified in the F2 population. e Allelic variation of the candidate gene, PGSC0003DMG400016861, between RH (SC) and PI 225689 (SI). The major difference between the two alleles was a 536 bp deletion within the promoter region of the candidate gene. f Expression level of the candidate gene, in the pollen of RH and PI 225689, normalized against an endogenous reference gene (StEF1-α, elongation factor 1α). Data are presented as means ± s. d. (n = 3 biological replicates). g Phenotype transition, from SI to SC, after transformation of the candidate gene into a self-incompatible line S15–65. Plants transformed with an empty vector served as a negative control. Note the presence of fruit in L1 and L2 and absence in the vector control. L1/2, two NSF transgenic lines. The bar is 1 cm. h Expression level of the candidate gene in the pollen of negative control and two transgenic lines, normalized against StEF1-α. Data are presented as means ± s. d. (n = 3 biological replicates).

Accurate evaluation of self-compatible/incompatible individuals from mapping populations is essential for the fine mapping of the SC gene. Unfortunately, this phenotyping process is labor-intensive and time-consuming, which may explain why the most established SC gene Sli has not been cloned since it was first reported in 199820,21. Interestingly, we observed an extreme segregation distortion (SD), in that only homozygous haplotype A/A or heterozygote A/a, but no homozygous haplotype a/a, was identified in the F2 progeny from crossing PI 225689 and RH (A/A:A/a = 3030:2954 ≈ 1:1, χ2 = 0.97 < χ20.05 = 3.84). Furthermore, the same SD region was also observed in the S1 population of RH27,28. Based on these observations, we hypothesized that selfing of heterozygote self-compatible plants (A/a) would result in SD of the progeny, and the absence of homozygous haplotype a/a in the offspring is linked either to lethal genes or to failed double fertilization resulting from the gametophytic SI in potato. Since RH may harbor SLFs that recognize the S-RNase harbored by PI 225689, individuals carrying the homozygous haplotype a/a were detected in the F1 population (PI 225689 × RH). This result suggests that the SD in the F2 population and the S1 population of RH are caused by the gametophytic SI. Thus, only the pollen harboring the SC gene could penetrate the self-style and fulfil the fertilization to produce progeny, and all the F2 progeny would carry the SC gene and exhibit self-compatible phenotype (Fig. 1d).

SC in RH is controlled by a non-S-locus F-box gene

The discovery of the SD in the F2 population greatly accelerated the mapping of the SC gene in RH, by removing the laborious phenotyping requirement. In total, 6624 F2 individuals produced from the 131 selfed F1 plants were used to narrow down the SC gene to a 64.61 kb interval (Fig. 1c). There were five annotated genes in this region (Fig. 1c), and two of them were expressed in pollen (Supplementary Fig. 1b). Interestingly, sequence variations including a 536 bp insertion at 100 bp upstream of the start codon of PGSC0003DMG400016861, encoding an F-box gene, were observed between RH and PI 225689 (Fig. 1e). In addition, quantitative real-time RT-PCR (qRT-PCR) revealed that this gene was highly expressed in RH pollen, but not in the pollen of PI 225689 (Fig. 1f). Based on these findings, PGSC0003DMG400016861 was considered to be the target gene and was named, hereafter, non-S-locus F-box (NSF) gene.

To confirm the in vivo role of NSF, a 3839 bp DNA sequence, including a 2,100 bp promoter region (Fig. 1g), was cloned from RH and transformed into a self-incompatible diploid potato clone from S. phureja S15–65. A population of 3750 explants was screened, from which 26 transgenic positive lines were selected for further study. Flow cytometry assays revealed that only two of the 26 lines were diploid plants; the others were tetraploid (Supplementary Fig. 2). Consistent with our hypothesis, a phenotype change from SI to SC (Fig. 1g), and high NSF expression in pollen was observed in these two transgenic lines (Fig. 1h). In contrast, the SI phenotype of the plant transformed with an empty vector was not changed (Fig. 1g), suggesting that high expression of NSF in the pollen tissue is required to render SC to RH.

NSF/Sli is efficient in rendering SC to self-incompatible diploid potatoes

The most established method of conferring SC is with the dominant Sli gene22, identified in chc 525-3, a self-compatible clone of the self-incompatible species S. chacoense20. As the Sli gene was also mapped at the distal end of chromosome 12 in S. chacoense21,22, NSF in RH could be identical to the Sli gene in S. chacoense. This possibility was tested by analyzing the collinear region at the distal end of chromosome 12 between RH and M6, a self-compatible inbred clone created by seven generations of self-pollination of S. chacoense24,25. A total of 12 collinear genes, including NSF/Sli, and a 120 kb synteny region were identified (Fig. 2a). We further amplified the collinear region, including the 2100 bp promoter and the 1810 bp gene coding sequence, where NSF/Sli is located in E17229 (a self-compatible F1 individual generated by crossing a self-incompatible diploid line E and chc 525-3). The promoter sequences in E172 and M6 are identical to that of RH, but there are five DNA base differences within the NSF/Sli coding region, resulting in two amino acid changes (C214R and Q249R) in M6 (Supplementary Fig. 3). Based on this result, we speculated that NSF is the Sli gene and confers the SC in M6 and E172.

Fig. 2. Characteristics of NSF/Sli in rendering SC to self-incompatible diploid potatoes.

Fig. 2

Open in a new tab

a Collinearity analysis of the distal ends of chromosome 12 between RH and M6. Orthologous relations between the different syntenic loci are depicted by gray. The NSF gene is identified with the red arrow. b The number of self-compatible diploid potatoes induced by NSF/Sli. Six groups (S. stenotomum, S. goniocalyx, S. tuberosom, S. phureja, S. ajanhuiri, and S. curtilobum) and two subgroups (tuberosum and andigena) are indicated with different colors. The number represents the accessions that transfer from SI to SC after crossing with RH or E172. c Expression patterns of Sli in different developmental stages of RH flowers. Development of the RH flower was divided into five stages, including four developing stages according to bud size (status of each stage was shown as illustration) and one mature stage. Expression level was normalized to the expression in stage 1. StEF1-α was set as an endogenous reference gene. Data are presented as means ± s. d. (n = 3 biological replicates). d In situ mRNA hybridization of Sli in the stage 4 flower bud and mature stamen. d1 and d4, the stage 4 flower bud (d1) and mature pollen (d4) used in the in situ hybridization assay. d2 and d5, the transverse sections of the stage 4 flower bud (d2) and mature stamen (d5). Bar 200 μm. Magnification of the red square in d2 and d5 are presented in d3 and d6, respectively (bar is 20 μm). The experiments were repeated three times with similar results.

To test whether the Sli gene is an efficient pollen SI-breaker, RH and E172 were used as the Sli gene donor to pollinate 125 self-incompatible diploid lines that belong to six groups (50 S. stenotomum, 37 S. goniocalyx, 25 S. phureja11 S. tuberosom, 1 S. ajanhuiri, and 1 S. curtilobum lines, Fig. 2b and Supplementary Table 1). After pollination, 110 F1 populations of the 125 crossings exhibited SC, including 43 S. stenotomum, 34 S. goniocalyx, 20 S. phureja, 11 S. tuberosum (7 tuberosum and 4 andigena), 1 S. ajanhuiri, and 1 S. curtilobum lines (Fig. 2b, Supplementary Table 1). The remaining 15 diploid lines failed to cross with RH or E172 because of different flowering times when compared to that of RH or E172, resulting in unsuccessful pollination. In conclusion, the Sli gene in RH can serve as an efficient SI-breaker to produce self-compatible diploid potatoes.

Sli is capable of interacting with a diverse set of S-RNases

Since Sli is specifically expressed in floral organs, and its transcript gradually increases with the development of pollen, reaching its maximum expression in the mature pollens’ wall (Fig. 2c, d), Sli may play an essential role in mediating the interactions between pollen and stigma, and function like SLFs to interact with and detoxify the S-RNases during pollen tube elongation, to confer SC to self-incompatible lines. To test this hypothesis, firstly, 14 full-length variants of S-RNases (StS-RNase1–14), sharing an amino acid identity ranging from 39.62% to 87.38%, were cloned from diploid potatoes using the method described in Ye et al.8 (Supplementary Table 2). The phylogenetic analysis determined that StS-RNase1–14 and 35 potato S-RNase alleles obtained from Genebank belong to the class III type RNase (Fig. 3a and Supplementary Table 3). Thus, StS-RNase1–14 were considered as the potential female S-determinants, and used in the following assays.

Fig. 3. Wide interactions between Sli and 14 types of potential StS-RNases.

Fig. 3

Open in a new tab

a A phylogenetic tree analysis of the potatoes S-RNases. StS-RNase1–14 are 14 types of S-RNases reported in this study (indicated in red), while the other 35 S-RNases were obtained from GenBank. b Yeast two-hybrid (Y2H) analysis of the interactions between 14 potential S-RNases and the PP2 domain of Sli (BD-PP2). The conserved domains of Sli are indicated by rectangles. The interactions between potential S-RNases and the full length of Sli are shown in Supplementary Fig. 6. The F-box protein interaction domain of a SLF gene (RHC01H2G1617) was used as a negative control [BD-StSLF(t)]. WLHA, synthetic dropout media lacking tryptophan, leucine, histidine, and adenine. BD binding domain, AD activation domain. c The firefly luciferase (LUC) complementation imaging assays of the interactions between the S-RNases and the PP2 domain of Sli. LUC signal was captured in the leaf area co-expressing the PP2 domain of Sli and each of the S-RNases (indicated in red), except for S3, S9, S10, and S13. Sn denote each type of the StS-RNase1–14, nLUC the N terminal of LUC protein, cLUC the C terminal of LUC protein. The experiments were repeated three times with similar results.

The motifs located downstream of the F-box domain can confer substrate specificity for ubiquitination30. Phylogenetic analysis of Sli revealed a Phloem Protein 2 (PP2) domain with ~160 amino acid residues at its C-terminus (Supplementary Fig. 4). Thus, the C-terminus containing the PP2 domain or the full length of Sli was used in yeast two-hybrid (Y2H) assay to assess the interactions between Sli and the S-RNase variants. As revealed by Y2H, the C-terminal region of Sli interacted with the majority of the StS-RNases, with the exception of StS-RNase3, 9, 10, and 13 (Fig. 3b), while full-length Sli failed to interact with StS-RNase3, 9, 11, 13, and 14 (Supplementary Fig. 5). The in vivo interactions between Sli and the StS-RNase1–14 were further tested using a firefly luciferase (LUC) complementation assay. Here, a fluorescent signal was detected in tobacco leaves co-expressing the N-terminal half of Luc (nLUC) plus the PP2 domain of Sli fusion protein, together with the C-terminal half of Luc (cLUC) plus each of the StS-RNase1, 2, 4–8, 11, 12, and 14 fusion protein (Fig. 3c). In contrast, the C-terminal region of a male SLF gene, RHC01H2G1617, selected from the 32 pollen-specific F-box genes in chromosome 1 (Supplementary Fig. 6), could only interact with StS-RNase9 (Fig. 3b). This is consistent with the collaborative nonself-recognition model that one SLF generally interacts with limited types of nonself S-RNases, and thus plants need to carry multiple types of SLFs in one S-haplotype to ensure the detoxification of nonself S-RNases, as well as out-crossing in Solanaceae16.

Discussion

The extensive interactions between various StS-RNases and Sli provide insight into the molecular basis of the phenotype transition from SI to SC in diploid potatoes. Support for such a model is presented by the facts that both Sli and SLFs belong to the F-box family of proteins, and that the collaborative nonself recognition model is conserved in Solanaceae11. It is very interesting to note that, in RH and M6, the SC arose from the evolution of a non-S-locus F box protein, not the novel SLFs as suggested in the two-step model11,31. Since Sli interacts not only with the self S-RNase in RH, but also with multiple types of the S-RNases to promote out-crossing with other diploids, the appearance of Sli may represent an efficient route to introduce a fixed SC phenotype to S-RNase-based self-incompatible plants (Fig. 4). It is also interesting to note that all the three self-compatible lines (RH, M6, and E172) harbor a 536 bp insertion at the promoter of Sli (Fig. 1e, f). Although several SNP mutations were also identified within this region in self-compatible and self-incompatible lines, the 536 bp fragment is most likely to be involved in activating the expression of Sli in the pollen of self-compatible lines. Testing of this hypothesis would provide insights into the regulatory mechanism, as well as the evolutionary trajectory of the Sli gene.

Fig. 4. A model depicting the evolution of Sli in diploid potatoes.

Fig. 4

Open in a new tab

In Solanaceae, a two-step model was proposed to explain the evolution of new SLFs to confer SC to self-incompatible plants, by first interacting with the self S-RNase. Then, the reverse from SC to SI is induced by the loss of ability for these new SLFs to interact with the self S-RNase. The appearance of Sli at the non-S-locus region represents a new strategy, in addition to the loss-of-function (LOF) mutations of S-RNases, to confer SC to self-incompatible lines. The S-haplotypes in RH are StS-RNases2 and 3. Negative regulations of the multiple StS-RNases by the nonself SLFs or Sli are indicated by the barred lines, which constitute the molecular basis to impart SC to RH and other self-incompatible potatoes. SI self-incompatibility, SC self-compatibility, S1–S14 14 types of S-RNases identified from self-incompatible diploid potatoes, Ch chromosome.

Although the Sli gene has been widely used in conferring SC, the fact that Sli cannot interact with all types of S-RNases indicates that the Sli gene cannot be used to confer SC to all the self-incompatible lines. On the other hand, loss-of-function mutations of the S-RNase have been shown to produce a stable SC phenotype in S. pennellii, S. habrochaites, and S. arcanum18. These non-GMO inactivating mutations thus provide another efficient method to break the SI of diploids. In our breeding program, we observed a semi-self-compatible diploid, PG6359, due to the low expression of Ss11-RNase in this line28. Since Sli is located on Ch12 and S-RNase is on Ch01, usage of SC genes from different sources in breeding can effectively avoid the genetic bottlenecks caused by the deleterious mutations linked to these loci, considering that S-RNase is near the centromere while Sli is near the telomere.

In summary, the identification of RH as an efficient SC inducer, the general S-locus inhibitor Sli, as well as the markers associated with the SC/SI phenotype would pave the way for developing the inbred lines and accelerate the hybrid diploid potato breeding.

Methods

Plant materials

The self-compatible material chc525-3 (Solanum chacoense Bitt.) was kindly provided by Prof. K. Hosaka (Obihiro University of Agriculture and Veterinary Medicine) and we selected E172 from a vigorous self-compatible clone in the selfed progeny of chc525-3 to cross with E32. The RH was kindly provided by the Department of Plant Breeding at Wageningen University. The 115 self-incompatible lines and S15–65 were kindly provided by the International Potato Center (CIP). The self-compatible line M6 was kindly provided by the U. S. Department of Agriculture (USDA). All of the diploid lines were grown normally in a controlled glasshouse with a 16 h photoperiod and 25 °C day/18 °C night temperatures. Self-incompatible PI 225689 was crossed with RH to produce the self-compatible F1 individuals that were later selfed to obtain the 6624 F2 population for the map-based cloning of Sli.

SC/SI phenotyping

Mature pollen of the F1 hybrids from RH crossed with PI 225689 (PI 225689×RH) or RH/E172 crossed with the 125 self-incompatible lines was freshly collected and used to pollinate stigmas of the same plant at the blooming stage. Three clones were used to test the SC/SI phenotype for each genotype. This pollination process was repeated at least 30 times for each clone. If all the three clones failed to set berries, this genotype was termed as SI type, while if all the three clones had more than two berries, they were regarded as SC type. Whenever one of the three clones had only one berry, the genotype was regarded as U (uncertain) type.

Bulked segregant analysis sequencing (BSA-Seq)

PI 225689 was crossed with RH to produce the F1 individuals that exhibited a 1:1 segregation ratio of SC to SI types. Four DNA pools were prepared using the female parent (PI 225689), the male parent (RH), 40 self-incompatible F1 individuals, and 40 self-compatible F1 plants. The sequencing of four libraries was performed using NovaSeq 6000 platform (Anoroad Gene Technology, Beijing, China). Raw reads were supplied by Anoroad, and clean reads were obtained by quality evolution. Then, the filtered short reads were aligned against the potato reference DM genome (V4.03), the variant calling of SNPs, and small Indels were excavated by Platypus (V0.7.4) software. The heterozygous and inconsistent SNPs, and small indels between the two F1 pools were selected for calculating the Δ (SNP-index) values.

Fine mapping of Sli

To fine map the Sli locus, recombinants for the Indel marker M-1 and M-2 were screened using 238 plants of F1 population (created by a cross between PI 225689 and RH). Considering the SC/SI type of the recombinants of F1 plants, the Sli locus was further mapped to the interval between F1–4 and F3–4 with a physical interval of 941 Kb. Genotyping of 1800 F2 progenies from 23 selfed F1 plants revealed an extreme segregation distortion (no a/a haplotype). Thus, 6624 F2 individuals from 131 selfed F1 plants were screened for the recombinants, and the Sli locus was mapped to the interval between C7-1 and D5-2 with a physical interval of 64.61 kb. The genomic DNA fragments of the interval in RH and PI 225689 were sequenced and aligned. The polymorphic markers were developed based on the re-sequencing data of RH and PI 225689 according to the method described by Zhang et al.28. The markers and primers used in this analysis are listed in Supplementary Table 2.

Gene transformation of S15–65

For functional identification of the Sli gene, DNA fragments containing the native promoter and genomic sequence of Sli were amplified from RH, and then inserted into BamH I and Hind III sites of the binary vector pCAMBIA1301. This construct was transformed into the Agrobacterium tumefaciens strain GV3101. The S15–65, a diploid self-incompatible line from S. tuberosum group Phureja, was kindly provided by CIP and used in the Agrobacterium-mediated transformation of potato internodes as previously described8. The ploidy of transgenic lines was analyzed by a flow cytometry assay, and the expression level of Sli in the diploid transgenic lines was verified by qRT-PCR. SC/SI phenotypes of the diploid transgenic lines were recorded. The primers used in this analysis are listed in Supplementary Table 2.

Aniline blue fluorochrome staining of pollen tubes

Five pistils were collected 72 h post pollination and immediately treated with 3:1 95% ethanol:glacial acetic acid. After rinsing twice with double-distilled water, the pistils were incubated in 0.005 mg/mL aniline blue fluorochrome in 0.1 M K2HPO4 buffer for 24 h. The colored pistil was placed on a glass slide and viewed under a fluorescence microscope.

Quantitative RT-PCR analysis

Total RNA was isolated using a RNAprep Pure plant Kit (Tiangen) according to the manufacturer’s protocols. First-strand cDNA was synthesized from 1 μg total RNA using the PrimeScript 1st strand cDNA Synthesis Kit (Takara). PCRs were performed using SYBR Premix (Takara) on a 7500 Fast Real-Time PCR system (Applied Biosystems) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Three independent biological experiments were performed in all cases. StEF1-α was used as an internal control gene for normalization. The relative gene expression was calculated using 2−ΔΔCt. The primers used in this analysis are listed in Supplementary Table 2.

In situ hybridization

The 256-bp Sli-specific probe was amplified and labeled using the DIG RNA Labeling Kit according to the manufacturer’s recommendation (SP6/T7, Roche). Pretreatment of tissue sections, hybridization, and immunological detection were performed in accordance with the previously described methods33. The primer pairs used are listed in Supplementary Table 2.

Phylogenetic analysis of Sli

The protein sequence of Sli was queried against Phytozome v13 (https://phytozome-next.jgi.doe.gov/) to retrieve its orthologs or homologs from other dicot and monocot species. Protein sequences showing a similarity of 40% or above and evalue lower than 1e-10 blastp to the query sequence were retrieved and multiple aligned using Mafft (https://mafft.cbrc.jp/alignment/software/). Only the two most similar sequences were retained in each species. For SLFs, the F-box protein located within the S-locus region of RH was considered as the potential SLF (http://solanaceae.plantbiology.msu.edu/rh_potato_download.shtml). A maximum likelihood (ML) phylogenetic tree was constructed using the ML based on the Poisson correction model. The bootstrap consensus tree inferred from 1000 replicates was taken to represent the evolutionary history of Sli.

Identification of S-RNases from diploid lines

Specific primers were designed according to the de novo assembly of RNA-sequencing data from the mature styles of the 125 diploid lines using the method described by Ye et al.8. The cDNA sample prepared from the styles of each diploid line was used to clone the pistil-specific S-RNase. The positive PCR products were then sequenced and considered as the multiple allelic variants of S-RNases. The primers used in this analysis are listed in Supplementary Table 2.

Yeast two-hybrid assay

The codon region of each S-RNase (S1-S14) except for its signal peptide was cloned into the pGADT7 vector (AD-S-RNase). The C-terminal region harboring the PP2 domain (84 to 266 amino acid), and full length of Sli, in addition to the C-terminal region harboring the F-box protein interaction domain (114 to 393 amino acid) of the negative control gene (RHC01H2G1617) were constructed into the pGBKT7 vector [BD-PP2, BD-Sli, and BD-StSLF(t)]. Each type of AD-S-RNase was co-transformed with BD-PP2, BD-Sli, or BD-StSLF(t), respectively, into the Y2H Gold Yeast Strain according to the manufacturer’s instruction (Clontech). The yeast cell harboring pGADT7-T and pGBKT7–53 was used as a positive control, and the cell harboring pGADT7-T and pGBKT7-Lam was used as a negative control. The plate was then incubated for 4 days at 30 °C, and the yeast was grown on the synthetically defined medium (SD/-Trp/-Leu/-His/-Ade) as recorded. The experiments were repeated, independently, at least three times with similar results. The primers used in this analysis are listed in Supplementary Table 2.

Luciferase complementation assay in N. benthamiana leaves

The C-terminal region harboring the PP2 domain (85 to 266 amino acid) of Sli was cloned into pCAMBIA1301-cLUC (cLUC-PP2). The codon region of each S-RNase (S1-S14) except for its signal peptide was cloned into pCAMBIA1301-nLUC (nLUC-S-RNase). Each construct was next transformed into Agrobacterium tumefaciens strain GV3101. Each strain was grown at 28 °C in LB media with kanamycin (50 mg/L) and rifampicillin (50 mg/L) to an OD600 of 0.8. Cells were then harvested by centrifugation at 3000 × g for 5 min and resuspended in 500 mM MES buffer containing 1 M MgCl2 and 100 mM acetosyringone (Sigma), to a final OD600 of 0.6. For co-infiltration, equal volumes of the strain harboring cLUC-PP2 and the strain harboring nLUC-S-RNase were mixed and infiltrated into fully expanded leaves of 4-week-old tobacco using a needleless syringe. After the infiltration, plants were grown under dark for 8 h and then grown under 16 h light/8 h dark for 48 h. Then the substrate D-luciferin (Sigma) was sprayed onto the infiltrated tobacco leaf. After 5 min of incubation in dark, a chemiluminescence signal was observed and captured using NightSHADE LB 985 (Berthold, Germany). The experiments were repeated, independently, at least three times with similar results. The primers used in this analysis are listed in Supplementary Table 2.

Reporting summary

Further information on research design is available in the Nature Research Reporting Summary linked to this article.

Supplementary information

Supplementary Information (1.9MB, pdf)
Peer Review File (6.5MB, pdf)
Reporting Summary (1.2MB, pdf)

Acknowledgements

We thank Prof. K. Hosaka (Obihiro University of Agriculture and Veterinary Medicine), Prof. Jianjian Qi (Inner Mongolia University), Prof. Xueyong Yang (Institute of Vegetables and Flowers, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences), and Prof. Guangtao Zhu (Yunnan Normal University) for experimental and bioinformatics support. This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (32002032 and 31972433), Yunnan Science Fund (202005AE160015 and 2019FJ004 to Y.S.), Shenzhen Science and Technology Program (KQTD2016113010482651 to S.H.), and special funds for Science Technology Innovation and Industrial Development of Shenzhen Dapeng New District (RC201901-05 to S.H.). This work was also supported by Yunnan Provincial and Shenzhen Municipal Governments.

Source data

Source Data (143.6KB, pdf)

Author contributions

Y.S., S.H., L.M., C.L., and C.Z. conceived and organized the research. Q.L., D.T., and Y.J. performed the bioinformatics analyses. B.Z., F.T., F.L., and H.Y. carried out the phenotyping assay. B.Z., F.T., F.L., M.G., and J.Z. performed the cloning and functional analysis of Sli. C.Z. and D.G. tested the efficiency of Sli in SI-breaking. C.Z., B.Z., F.T., X.L., and F.L. identified the alleles of S-RNases from diploid potatoes. Y.S., L.M., and S.H. wrote the manuscript. L.W. and H.G. revised the manuscript.

Data availability

The BSA-Seq data (SRR14637423 and SRR14637422) has been deposited in NCBI under project number PRJNA732509. All other data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request. Source data are provided with this paper.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Footnotes

Peer review information Nature Communications thanks Roger Chetelat, David Douches, and the other, anonymous reviewer(s) for their contribution to the peer review of this work. Peer review reports are available.

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

These authors contributed equally: Ling Ma, Chunzhi Zhang, Bo Zhang.

Contributor Information

Canhui Li, Email: ch2010201@163.com.

Sanwen Huang, Email: huangsanwen@caas.cn.

Yi Shang, Email: shangyi@ynnu.edu.cn.

Supplementary information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1038/s41467-021-24266-7.

References

  • 1.Devaux, A. et al. in The Potato Crop (eds Campos, H. & Ortiz, O.) 3–35 (Springer International Publishing, 2020).
  • 2.Stokstad E. The new potato. Science. 2019;363:574–577. doi: 10.1126/science.363.6427.574. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Lindhout P, et al. Towards F1 hybrid seed potato breeding. Potato Res. 2011;54:301–312. doi: 10.1007/s11540-011-9196-z. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Jansky SH, et al. Reinventing potato as a diploid inbred line-based crop. Crop Sci. 2016;56:1412–1422. doi: 10.2135/cropsci2015.12.0740. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Carputo, D., Aversano, R. & Frusciante, L. Breeding potato for quality traits. Acta Hortic. 684, 55–64 (2005).
  • 6.Alpers R, Jansky S. Diploid true potato seed: relationships among seed weight, germination, and seedling vigor. Am. J. Potato Res. 2019;96:217–224. doi: 10.1007/s12230-018-9675-8. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Birhman RK, Hosaka K. Production of inbred progenies of diploid potatoes using an S-locus inhibitor (Sli) gene, and their characterization. Genome. 2000;43:495–502. doi: 10.1139/g00-012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Ye M, et al. Generation of self-compatible diploid potato by knockout of S-RNase. Nat. Plants. 2018;4:651–654. doi: 10.1038/s41477-018-0218-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Enciso-Rodriguez, F. et al. Overcoming self-incompatibility in diploid potato using CRISPR-Cas9. Front. Plant Sci. 10 (2019). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 10.Lian Q, et al. Acquisition of deleterious mutations during potato polyploidization: variations of deleterious mutations in potato. J. Integr. Plant Biol. 2019;61:7–11. doi: 10.1111/jipb.12748. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Fujii, S., Kubo, K. & Takayama, S. Non-self- and self-recognition models in plant self-incompatibility. Nat. Plants2 (2016). [DOI] [PubMed]
  • 12.McClure BA, et al. Style self-incompatibility gene products of Nicotlana alata are ribonucleases. Nature. 1989;342:955–957. doi: 10.1038/342955a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Ushijima K, et al. Structural and transcriptional analysis of the self-incompatibility locus of almond: identification of a pollen-expressed F-box gene with haplotype-specific polymorphism. Plant Cell. 2003;15:771–781. doi: 10.1105/tpc.009290. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.McClure BA, Gray JE, Anderson MA, Clarke AE. Self-incompatibility in Nicotiana alata involves degradation of pollen rRNA. Nature. 1990;347:757–760. doi: 10.1038/347757a0. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Roldán JA, Rojas HJ, Goldraij A. Disorganization of F-actin cytoskeleton precedes vacuolar disruption in pollen tubes during the in vivo self-incompatibility response in Nicotiana alata. Ann Botany. 2012;110:787–795. doi: 10.1093/aob/mcs153. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Kubo K, et al. Collaborative non-self recognition system in S-RNase-based self-incompatibility. Science. 2010;330:796–799. doi: 10.1126/science.1195243. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Williams JS, Der JP, dePamphilis CW, Kao T. Transcriptome analysis reveals the same 17 S-Locus F-box genes in two haplotypes of the self-incompatibility locus of Petunia inflata. Plant Cell. 2014;26:2873–2888. doi: 10.1105/tpc.114.126920. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Kubo, K. et al. Gene duplication and genetic exchange drive the evolution of S-RNase-based self-incompatibility in Petunia. Nat. Plants1 (2015). [DOI] [PubMed]
  • 19.McClure B, Cruz-García F, Romero C. Compatibility and incompatibility in S-RNase-based systems. Ann. Bot. 2011;108:647–658. doi: 10.1093/aob/mcr179. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Hosaka K, Hanneman RE., Jr Genetics of self-compatibility in a self-incompatible wild diploid potato species Solanum chacoense. 1. Detection of an S locus inhibitor (Sli) gene. Euphytica. 1998;99:191–197. doi: 10.1023/A:1018353613431. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Hosaka K, Hanneman RE., Jr Genetics of self-compatibility in a self-incompatible wild diploid potato species Solanum chacoense. 2. Localization of an S locus inhibitor (Sli) gene on the potato genome using DNA markers. Euphytica. 1998;103:265–271. doi: 10.1023/A:1018380725160. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Clot CR, et al. The origin and widespread occurrence of Sli-based self-compatibility in potato. Theor. Appl. Genet. 2020;133:2713–2728. doi: 10.1007/s00122-020-03627-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Eggers, E. J. et al. in Abstract Book of SOL International Online Meeting 127 (Wageningen University & Research, 2020).
  • 24.Jansky SH, Chung YS, Kittipadukal P. M6: A diploid potato inbred line for use in breeding and genetics research. J. Plant Regist. 2014;8:195–199. doi: 10.3198/jpr2013.05.0024crg. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Leisner CP, et al. Genome sequence of M6, a diploid inbred clone of the high‐glycoalkaloid‐producing tuber‐bearing potato species Solanum chacoense, reveals residual heterozygosity. Plant J. 2018;94:562–570. doi: 10.1111/tpj.13857. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Peterson BA, et al. Self‐fertility in a cultivated diploid potato population examined with the infinium 8303 potato single‐nucleotide polymorphism array. Plant Genome. 2016;9:1–13. doi: 10.3835/plantgenome2016.01.0003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Zhou Q, et al. Haplotype-resolved genome analyses of a heterozygous diploid potato. Nat. Genet. 2020;52:1018–1023. doi: 10.1038/s41588-020-0699-x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Zhang C, et al. The genetic basis of inbreeding depression in potato. Nat. Genet. 2019;51:374–378. doi: 10.1038/s41588-018-0319-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Peng Z, et al. Inheritance of steroidal glycoalkaloids in potato tuber flesh. J. Integr. Agric. 2019;18:2255–2263. doi: 10.1016/S2095-3119(19)62718-8. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Nguyen, K. M. & Busino, L. in Cullin-Ring Ligases and Protein Neddylation. (eds Sun, Y., Wei, W. & Jin, J.) Vol. 1217, p.111–122 (Springer, 2020).
  • 31.Shimizu KK, Tsuchimatsu T. Evolution of selfing: recurrent patterns in molecular adaptation. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Evol. Syst. 2015;46:593–622. doi: 10.1146/annurev-ecolsys-112414-054249. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Jacobs JME, et al. A genetic map of potato (Solanum tuberosum) integrating molecular markers, including transposons, and classical markers. Theor. Appl. Genet. 1995;91:289–300. doi: 10.1007/BF00220891. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Ma L, et al. ABNORMAL VASCULAR BUNDLES regulates cell proliferation and procambium cell establishment during aerial organ development in rice. New Phytol. 2017;213:275–286. doi: 10.1111/nph.14142. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Supplementary Information (1.9MB, pdf)
Peer Review File (6.5MB, pdf)
Reporting Summary (1.2MB, pdf)

Data Availability Statement

The BSA-Seq data (SRR14637423 and SRR14637422) has been deposited in NCBI under project number PRJNA732509. All other data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request. Source data are provided with this paper.

Articles from Nature Communications are provided here courtesy of Nature Publishing Group

RESOURCES