Skip to main content
Pathology and Oncology Research logoLink to Pathology and Oncology Research
. 2021 Mar 30;27:628323. doi: 10.3389/pore.2021.628323

Case Report: Incidentally Discovered a Rare Cystic Lesion of Liver: Multicystic Biliary Hamartoma

Wentao Mu 1, Peng Su 2, Shanglei Ning 1,*
PMCID: PMC8262196  PMID: 34257591

Abstract

Multicystic biliary hamartoma (MCBH) is an extremely rare cystic lesion of the liver. A 37-year old male patient was admitted to our hospital for incidentally discovered hepatic cystic lesions on abdominal ultrasonography. Abdominal contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CT) showed a multilocular cystic lesion in the segment VI, with mild enhancement in the septae and peripheral wall within the lesion. Only alanine transaminase (ALT) and carbohydrate antigen 19–9 (CA19–9) increased slightly above normal value. Preoperative tests suggested possibility of a benign mucinous cystic neoplasm (MCN) or intraductal papillary neoplasm of the bile duct (IPNB). Laparoscopic complete resection of the lesion was performed. Histopathological examination showed numerous variably sized ductal structures surrounded by periductal glands and fibrous connective tissues containing small blood vessels and smooth muscle bundles. Immunohistochemical staining (IHC) revealed that dilated ducts were positive for cytokeratin CK19, characteristic for biliary tract. Histopathological findings confirmed diagnosis of multicystic biliary hamartoma (MCBH). No recurrence occurred during 6 months follow-up. In conclusion, MCBH should be differentiating from hepatic cystic lesion and could be resected laparoscopically safely.

Keywords: multicystic biliary hamartoma, cystic lesion of liver, laparoscopic resection, liver, immunohistochemistry

Introduction

Multicystic biliary hamartoma (MCBH) is a very rare cystic lesion of the liver and its pathological features were first described in 2005. Although clinical course of MCBH is relatively benign, because of its rarity, the natural history and appropriate treatment are not well established. It is difficult to identify MCBH preoperatively. In this report we present the first case of MCBH fully resected by laparoscopic surgery.

Case Presentation

A 37-year old male patient was found to have a multicystic mass with the size 7.7*5.6 cm in the right hepatic lobe incidentally on abdominal ultrasonography. Then he was admitted to our hospital for mild abdominal distention after eating. Neither other significant clinical symptoms nor positive signs were found after further physical examination. Further examinations including liver function、tumor markers and abdominal contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CT) scan were performed. The laboratory results were as follows: alanine transaminase (ALT), 67U/L (normal: 9–40 U/L); carbohydrate antigen 19–9 (CA19–9), 65 U/mL (normal: 0–39 U/mL); other liver function and tumor markers were all in normal range. Abdominal CT revealed a multilocular cystic lesion in the segment VI of liver (Figure 1C). Interestingly, small calcification was found on precontrast CT (Figure 1A) and the septa and peripheral wall within the cystic lesion showed mild enhancement on postcontrast (Figure 1B). Based on these imaging results, we suspected that the lesion could be mucinous cystic neoplasm (MCN) or intraductal papillary neoplasm of the bile duct (IPNB) of the liver before operation. Laparoscopic complete resection of the lesion was performed (Figure 2). Intraoperative findings showed a lesion was grey-white lesion with multicystic surface. No enlarged lymph nodes were found during the operation. The cut surface of the resected specimen has many dilated ductal structures and hepatic parenchyma between these ducts, while bile-like material was observed within some ducts. Intraoperative frozen histopathological examination suggested preliminary diagnosis of biliary cystadenoma. Histopathological findings of formalin fixed paraffin embedded tissue on revealed periductal glands surrounded by connective tissue containing smooth muscle and small blood vessels but no ovarian-like stroma (Figure 3). Immunohistochemistry showed CK19 positivity of the dilated ducts epithelium and the small vessels were positive for CD30. Final histopathological diagnosis confirmed a multicystic biliary hamartoma (MCBH). After the surgery serum CA19–9 level dropped to normal range (28 U/mL) and there were no signs of recurrence 6 months after surgery.

FIGURE 1.

FIGURE 1

Abdominal contrast enhanced CT showed an intrahepatic multicystic mass in the segment VI of the liver. (A) Calcification was observed in dilated ducts (plain phase arrow); (B) The enhancement of the septa and peripheral wall within the cystic lesion (arterial phase); (C) The lesion showed a low-density honeycomb-like appearance (venous phase).

FIGURE 2.

FIGURE 2

The grey-white and typical multicystic appearance of the lesion was shown during laparoscopic operation (arrow).

FIGURE 3.

FIGURE 3

Histological findings of the resected lesion tumor (Hematoxylin and eosin staining). (A) The lesion consisted of dilated cystic ducts surrounded by the connective tissue of smooth muscle and capillaries (×20); (B) Ducts are lined by columnar epithelium (×100).

Discussion

Multicystic biliary hamartoma (MCBH) is a very rare cystic lesion of the liver, which was first reported in 2005 as solitary bile hamartoma (Kobayashi et al., 2005). The pathogenesis of MCBH is still not entirely understood and Zen et al suspected it may be related to abnormal development of biliary ducts or embryonal foregut (Zen et al., 2006). There are only 15 cases described in the literature to date (Table1). Mean age of the 16 patients (including the presented case) is 54 years, and the gender distribution is ten male and six female. Most of the lesions were located in segment III (six patients) and VI (six patients), and the left lobe lesions located in segment IV and VII. Two patients had hepatitis and increased CA19–9 serum level was observed in three patients. Eleven MCBHs were found near to the liver surface. Pathological results found small stones in dilated ducts in our case, probably it’s the reason for minor elevation of serum CA19–9 level. Morinaga et al reported a 53-year-old MCBH patient with extremely elevated CA19–9 but without evidence of cholangitis (Morinaga et al., 2017). Although the reason for the increase of CA19–9 level in our case is not definite, it decreased to the normal range after resection in both cases.

TABLE 1.

Multicystic biliary hamartoma cases reported to date.

Case no. Authors Publication year Age (years) Gender Size (cm) Location/near liver surface Surgical treatment Co-existing disease
1 Kobayashi et al. (2005) 2005 30 M 3.6 Seg. VI/yes Partial resection None
2 Zen et al. (2006) 2006 59 M 4.2 Seg. IV/yes Left hepatectomy None
3 70 F 1.8 Seg. III/yes Segmentectomy Hepatitis C cirrhosis
4 69 F 2.8 Seg. III/no Segmentectomy None
5 Kai et al. (2008) 2008 55 M 5.0 Seg. VI/no Partial resection Hepatitis B
6 Ryu et al. (2010) 2010 45 M 2.0–3.5 a Seg. VII/no Partial resection None
7 58 M - Seg. III/no Partial resection None
8 55 F - Seg. VI,VII/no Partial resection None
9 Song et al. (2013) 2012 52 M 2.7 Seg. III/yes Partial resection None
10 Beard et al. (2014) 2014 48 F 4.7 Seg. VII/yes Extended right hepatectomy Hepatitis C
11 Yoh et al. (2014) 2014 69 M 3.0 Seg. III/yes Left hepatectomy None
12 Fernández-Carrión et al. (2014) 2014 60 F 5.0 Seg. VI/yes Partial resection CA 199 slightly elevated
13 Tominaga et al. (2015) 2015 26 M 10.0 Seg. V,VI/yes Right hepatectomy None
14 Morinaga et al. (2017) 2017 53 M 12.0 left lobe of the liver/yes Left hepatectomy Ca 199 extremely elevated
15 Ogura et al. (2018) 2018 77 F 12.0 Seg. III/yes Partial resection None
Present case 2020 37 M 8 Seg. VI/yes Laparoscopic partial resection CA199 slightly elevated
a

Ryu et al. actually reported imaging manifestations of four cases, but one of them was a 70-year-old female, which was reported in a 2006 paper by Zen et al. (2006). This table only summarizes the other three cases. This paper provides a range of tumor sizes, but does not provide specific measurements for each tumor.

Histologically, MCBH consisted mainly of several ductal structures of different size surrounded with periductal glands and fibrous connective tissues containing small blood vessels and smooth muscle bundles. The dilated ducts contain bile-like material and are positive for biliary-type cytokeratin CK19 (Zen et al., 2006). In 2010, Ryu et al first summarized the imagining features of MCBH: 1) the cut-surface of MCBH showed honeycomb-like appearance and cysts are relatively even in size (above 1 cm); 2) the cystic wall and/or septa within the lesion showed mild enhancement; 3) there was normal hepatic parenchyma within the coalescent lesions; 4) the lesion generally located near the liver surface and protruded from the liver (Ryu et al., 2010). Other reports showed that MCBH also could occur deeper within the hepatic parenchyma (Kai et al., 2008). Cystic liver lesion is the imaging characteristic of many diseases including von Meyenburg Complex (VMC), mesenchymal hamartoma, MCN, Caroli’s disease, and IPNB (Pitchaimuthu and Duxbury, 2017). Because of the overlapping imaging appearances MCBH should also be considered for differential diagnosis of cystic lesion in liver.

Von Meyenburg Complex (VMC) is also known as biliary microhamartoma was firstly reported in 1918 (Shi et al., 2015). Histological findings of VMC also showed irregular or round dilated ductal structures lined with columnar or cuboidal epithelium surrounded by abundant fibrous stroma. Contrary to the relatively larger size of nodules in MCBH (1–5 cm), the size of nodules in biliary microhamartomas are usually between 2 and 5 mm in diameter. Though VMC is generally considered innocuous, in exceptional cases association with cholangiocarcinoma or hepatocellular carcinoma have been described (Sugawara et al., 2018; Heinke et al., 2008). MCBH is reported to be a benign disease and no recurrence or distant metastases have been reported in the literature (Tominaga et al., 2015). Liver mesenchymal hamartoma is characterized by loose mesenchyme or distorted slit like ductal structures and hepatocyte cords, which were not observed in our case (Stocker and Ishak, 1983).

Mucinous cystic neoplasm (MCN) is another relatively common disease which should consider in the differential diagnosis. It is a true neoplasm with malignant potential. The cystic spaces are lined by mucin-producing epithelium. MCN is defined as a multilocular liver lesion and the pathological characteristic is usually with an “ovarian-like” stroma, not like periductal glands and abundant fibrous stroma between dilated ducts as it is in MCBH (Song et al., 2013).

IPNB is characterized by biliary cystic lesion or dilated bile ducts with or without mucin production similar with intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm (IPMN) in pancreas. Papillary components or adenocarcinomas were prevalent in such cystic lesion or dilated ducts, usually resulting biliary obstruction or liver function damage; however, solid process was completely absent in the cystic wall in MCBH. Furthermore, MRCP showed that the lesion always communicated with main hepatic ducts, which is different from MCBH (Tominaga et al., 2015).

Caroli’s disease is a type of congenital disease with dilation of intrahepatic ducts, which was first reported in 1958 (Caroli et al., 1958). With the progression of the disease, chologenic infection and malignant transformation are the main serious complications. Cystic dilated structures in Caroli’s disease arise from existing bile ducts therefore Caroli’s disease ducts always communicate with bile duct system, while the MCBH derives from hamartomas or abnormal ducts and do not communicated with hepatic ducts (Ryu et al., 2010).

In conclusion, we reported the first laparoscopic resection of MCBH with minor CA19–9 elevation. MCBH should be taken into consideration in differential diagnosis of solitary cystic lesions in liver.

Data Availability Statement

The original contributions presented in the study are included in the article/Supplementary Material, further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding author.

Ethics Statement

The studies involving human participants were reviewed and approved by Qilu Hospital of Shandong University. The patients/participants provided their written informed consent to participate in this study. Written informed consent was obtained from the individual(s) for the publication of any potentially identifiable images or data included in this article.

Author Contributions

WM, PS, and SN participated in the conceptual design of the study. SN is responsible for fund acquisition. PS is responsible for immunohistochemical staining. WM and SN participated in the data verification. WM and SN performed the data analysis and wrote the manuscript. All authors have read and reviewed the manuscript.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

References

  1. Beard R. E., Yee E. U., Mortele K. J., Khwaja K. (2014). Multicystic biliary hamartoma: A report of a rare entity and a review of the literature. Int. J. Surg. Case Rep. 5 (12), 919–923. 10.1016/j.ijscr.2014.10.014 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Fernández-Carrión M. J., Robles Campos R., López Conesa A., Brusadín R., Parrilla Paricio P. (2015). Intrahepatic multicystic biliary hamartoma: Presentation of a case report. Cir. Esp. 93 (9), e103-5. 10.1016/j.ciresp.2014.02.015 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Caroli J., Soupault R., Kossakowski J., Plocker L., Paradowska (1958). Congenital polycystic dilation of the intrahepatic bile ducts; attempt at classification. Sem. Hop. 34 (8/2), 488–495. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Heinke T, Pellacani L. B., Costa H. d. O., Fuziy R. A., Franco M. (2008). Hepatocellular carcinoma in association with bile duct hamartomas: report on 2 cases and review of the literature. Ann. Diagn. Pathol. 12 (3), 208–211. 10.1016/j.anndiagpath.2006.12.003 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Kai K., Takahashi T., Miyoshi A., Yasui T., Tokunaga O., Miyazaki K. (2008). Intrahepatic multicystic biliary hamartoma: report of a case. Hepatol. Res. 38 (6), 629–634. 10.1111/j.1872-034x.2007.00314.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Kobayashi A., Takahashi S., Hasebe T, Konishi M, Nakagohri T, Gotohda N, et al. (2005). Solitary bile duct hamartoma of the liver. Scand. J. Gastroenterol. 40 (11), 1378–1381. 10.1080/00365520510023387 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Morinaga T., Imai K., Yamashita Y.-I., Yamao T., Kaida T., Nakagawa S., et al. (2017). Multicystic biliary hamartoma with extremely elevated CA19-9: a case report. Scand. J. Gastroenterol. 52 (8), 916–919. 10.1080/00365521.2017.1322140 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Ogura T., Kurisu Y., Miyano A., Higuchi K. (2018). A huge rapidly-enlarging multicystic biliary hamartoma. Dig. Liver Dis. 50 (7), 723. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Pitchaimuthu M., Duxbury M. (2017). Cystic lesions of the liver-A review. Curr. Probl. Surg. 54 (10), 514–542. 10.1067/j.cpsurg.2017.09.001 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Ryu Y., Matsui O., Zen Y., Ueda K., Abo H., Nakanuma Y., et al. (2010). Multicystic biliary hamartoma: imaging findings in four cases. Abdom Imaging 35 (5), 543–547. 10.1007/s00261-009-9566-z [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Shi Q. S., Xing L. X., Jin L. F., Wang H., Lv X. H., Du L. F., et al. (2015). Imaging findings of bile duct hamartomas: a case report and literature review. Int. J. Clin. Exp. Med. 8 (8), 13145–13153. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Song J. S., Noh S. J., Cho B. H., Moon W. S. (2013). Multicystic biliary hamartoma of the liver. Korean J. Pathol. 47 (3), 275–278. 10.4132/koreanjpathol.2013.47.3.275 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Stocker J. T., Ishak K. G. (1983). Mesenchymal hamartoma of the liver: report of 30 cases and review of the literature. Pediatr. Pathol. 1 (3), 245–267. 10.3109/15513818309040663 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Sugawara T., Shindoh J., Hoshi D., Hashimoto M. (2018). Intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma and portal hypertension developing in a patient with multicystic biliary microhamartomas. Malays. J. Pathol. 40 (3), 331–335. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Tominaga T., Abo T., Kinoshita N., Murakami T., Sato Y., Nakanuma Y., et al. (2015). A variant of multicystic biliary hamartoma presenting as an intrahepatic cystic neoplasm. Clin. J. Gastroenterol. 8 (3), 162–166. 10.1007/s12328-015-0574-y [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Yoh T., Okamura R., Nakayama H., Lin X., Nakamura Y., Kato T. (2014). Multicystic biliary hamartoma mimicking intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: Report of a case. Clin. J. Gastroenterol. 7 (5), 418–421. 10.1007/s12328-014-0513-3 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Zen Y., Terahata S., Miyayama S., Mitsui T., Takehara A., Miura S., et al. (2006). Multicystic biliary hamartoma. Hum. Pathol. 37 (3), 339–344. 10.1016/j.humpath.2005.11.008 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Data Availability Statement

The original contributions presented in the study are included in the article/Supplementary Material, further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding author.


Articles from Pathology and Oncology Research are provided here courtesy of Frontiers Media SA

RESOURCES