Abstract
Oligodendrocytes are the myelinating cells of the central nervous system. They provide trophic, metabolic, and structural support to neurons. In several pathologies such as multiple sclerosis (MS), these cells are severely affected and fail to remyelinate, thereby leading to neuronal death. The gold standard for studying remyelination is the g-ratio, which is measured by means of transmission electron microscopy (TEM). Therefore, studying the fine structure of the oligodendrocyte population in the human brain at different stages through TEM is a key feature in this field of study. Here we study the ultrastructure of oligodendrocytes, its progenitors, and myelin in 10 samples of human white matter using nine different markers of the oligodendrocyte lineage (NG2, PDGFRα, A2B5, Sox10, Olig2, BCAS1, APC-(CC1), MAG, and MBP). Our findings show that human oligodendrocytes constitute a very heterogeneous population within the human white matter and that its stages of differentiation present characteristic features that can be used to identify them by TEM. This study sheds light on how these cells interact with other cells within the human brain and clarify their fine characteristics from other glial cell types.
Keywords: oligodendrocytes, OPCs, human oligodendrocytes, transmission electron microscopy, immunogold, BCAS1
Introduction
Oligodendrocytes are glial cells whose main function is myelination. Myelination leads to the optimization of the saltatory conduction along neuronal axons (McLaurin and Yong, 1995). Moreover, oligodendrocytes perform other supportive activities such as glucose metabolism (Amaral et al., 2016; Saab et al., 2016), calcium influx/efflux towards the axon to impede degeneration (Witte et al., 2019), and pH and ion balance regulation (Inouye and Kirschner, 1988). Given that oligodendroglial or myelin degeneration can produce quite severe pathologies such as in genetic conditions in children (Greenfield, 1933; Renier et al., 1981; Matalon et al., 1988; van der Knaap et al., 1995; Tappino et al., 2010) or neurodegenerative conditions with a very high incidence in adults such as multiple sclerosis (MS; Howard et al., 2016) and that the causes that may trigger oligodendroglial damage can be quite diverse e.g., genetic (Greenfield, 1933; Renier et al., 1981; Matalon et al., 1988; Tappino et al., 2010; van der Knaap et al., 1995), autoimmune (Howard et al., 2016), infectious (Stohlman and Hinton, 2001), and vascular (Volpe, 2001; Chavali et al., 2020)—studying the biology underlying this cell population and its progenitors is a relevant aspect in central nervous system research.
After numerous studies in animal models, evidence suggests that in the postnatal brain oligodendrocytes arise from NG2/PDGFRa/Olig2-positive progenitors in different regions of the brain and spinal cord (Rivers et al., 2008; Zhu et al., 2008; Kang et al., 2010; Sánchez-González et al., 2020). The processes of oligodendrocyte replacement, maturation, and myelin regeneration play a critical role in the adult brain, where remodeling and plasticity are a constant phenomenon. Correspondingly, when there is an insult in the brain, especially in the white matter such as in MS, NG2+-cells are recruited towards the lesions, and thus, studies demonstrate their presence in MS plaques (Wilson et al., 2006).
In rodents, the stages of differentiation of the oligodendroglial lineage have been largely studied and have shed light on the expression of different markers of oligodendrocyte maturation (Barateiro and Fernandes, 2014; Marques et al., 2016; Domingues et al., 2018; Schoor et al., 2019). These studies have described that there are at least three oligodendrocyte stages according to the morphology and protein markers expressed by each population. The first population corresponds to oligodendrocyte precursor cells (OPCs), which express markers such as: NG2, PDGFRα, A2B5, CD9, CNP, GPR17, NKX 2.2, Olig1, Olig2, Sox9, and Sox10. The second population is pre-oligodendrocytes or premyelinating oligodendrocytes (pre-OLs) which can be labeled for CD9, O4, BCAS1, CNP; NKX 2.2, Sox17, Sox10, and Olig2. The last population is myelinating oligodendrocytes (m-OLs) which express: O1, CD9, CNP, MAG, MBP, MOG, PLP1, Sox17, APC1-(CC1), and Olig2 (Goldman and Kuypers, 2015). Furthermore, single-cell transcriptional analysis has described 12 different populations of oligodendrocytes and their progenitors along with the juvenile and adult postnatal brain, thereby describing the great heterogeneity among these cells (Marques et al., 2016; van Bruggen et al., 2017). However, the fine morphology of oligodendrocytes is still elusive.
In contrast to mice, the number of human oligodendrogenesis studies is not as high. This can be explained because of the scarce availability of human brain tissue and poor fixation conditions. This is more evident in ultrastructural studies, which require an outstanding fixation and tissue preservation. Considering that the gold standard for understanding remyelination is the g-ratio measured by transmission electron microscopy (TEM), analyzing human tissue using TEM is fundamental.
Here we present a detailed study of the fine structure of oligodendrocytes in different stages in human white matter. This analysis includes samples from patients at different ages with exceptional preservation of the tissue combined with pre-embedding immunogold for nine different markers. Our results suggest that oligodendrocytes present three marked ultrastructural stages (Figure 1A): OPCs labeled for NG2, A2B5 and PDGFRα; pre-OLs labeled for BCAS1/NABC1, Sox10 and Olig2; and m-OLs labeled with APC-(CC1) and Olig2. Furthermore, we studied the presence of myelin-associated proteins and myelin ultrastructure labeling for MAG and MBP combined with standard TEM.
Materials and Methods
All reagents were purchased from Sigma Aldrich unless otherwise specified.
Human Sample Collection
Samples were obtained from surgical resections from focal cortical dysplasia patients operated at Hospital Universitarii Politècnic La Fe at Valencia, Spain. Samples included in this study (n = 10) comprehend the non-affected white matter of female and male patients ages 2–44-year-old (Table 1). Sample collection was approved by the Research Ethics committee from the Hospital Universitari i Politècnic La Fe. Patients or their representatives signed an informed consent prior to donating the samples for the study.
Table 1.
Sample code | Age (years) | Sex | Diagnosis | Area |
---|---|---|---|---|
PB2 | 9 | Male | Type IA FCD | Left temporal lobe |
PB3 | 6 | Male | Type IA FCD | Left temporal lobe |
PB4 | 39 | Male | Type IIB FCD | Left frontal lobe |
PB8 | 27 | Male | Type IIA FCD | Right anterior insular cortex |
PB9 | 2 | Female | Type IIB FCD | Right temporal lobe |
PB11 | 13 | Female | Type IC FCD | Left frontal lobe |
PB12 | 44 | Male | Type IIB FCD | Right frontal lobe |
PB16 | 32 | Male | Type IB FCD | Right frontal lobe |
PB19 | 5 | Female | No lesion | Right frontal lobe |
PB20 | 2 | Female | Type IIA FCD | Right frontal lobe |
Note: FCD, focal cortical displasia.
Sample Processing
After surgical resection samples were immediately fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde in 0.1 M phosphate buffer (pH 7.4, PB) for 7 days. Samples were then washed with 0.1 M PB and kept in 0.1 M PB-0.05% sodium azide at 4°C until subsequent use. Brain tissue was sectioned at 50 μm using a Leica VT1000S vibratome (Leica Biosystems, Wetzlar, Germany). We performed the same procedures in a P21 4% PFA perfused mouse as a control for the following experiments, except for A2B5 and PDGFRa immunogold labeling, since the antibodies worked for human tissue only (Table 2).
Table 2.
Antigen | Host species | Antibody | IF concentration | IG concentration | Cell type labeling |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
NG2 | Rabbit | ab5320 (Abcam) | 1:200 | 1:100 | OPCS |
PDGFRα | Mouse | 556001 (BD Biosciences) | 1:50 | 1:50 | OPCs |
A2B5 | Mouse | MAB312 (Millipore) | 1:100 | 1:50 | OPCS |
Olig2 | Rabbit | AB9610 (Millipore) | 1:300 | 1:150 | OPCs, pre-OLs, m-OLs |
BCAS1 | Mouse | sc-136342 (Santa Cruz) | 1:200 | 1:150 | pre-OLs |
Sox10 | Rabbit | ab155279 (Abcam) | 1:300 | 1:150 | pre-OLs |
APC (CC1) | Mouse | ab16794 Abcam | 1:100 | 1:50 | m-OLs |
MAG | Mouse | Mab15667 (Millipore) | 1:100 | 1:100 | myelin |
MBP | Rat | ab7349 (Abcam) | 1:100 | 1:100 | myelin |
GFAP | Mouse | Millipore | 1:200 | 1:100 | Astrocytes |
Immunofluorescence
Sections were washed with 0.1 M PB, incubated in 1:200 Immunosaver (Electron Microscopy Sciences, Hatfield, PA) in water at 60°C for 30 min. Peroxidase blocking was performed using a solution containing 10% methanol and 10% H2O2 in 0.1 M PB. For permeabilization, the samples were washed three times for 5 min in PTA solution: 0.1% Triton X-100, 1 mg/ml bovine serum albumin (BSA) in 0.1 M phosphate buffer saline (PBS). The samples were then incubated in blocking solution (5% normal goat serum in PTA) for 1 h at room temperature. Subsequently, the samples were incubated overnight in primary antibodies diluted in blocking solution [1:300 rabbit anti-Olig2, Merck-Millipore Burlington, MA; 1:200 rabbit anti-NG2, Abcam, Cambridge, United Kingdom; 1:200 mouse anti-GFAP, Merck-Millipore Burlington, MA; 1:200 mouse anti-NABC1, Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Dallas, TX; 1:100 mouse anti-MAG, Merck-Millipore Burlington, MA; 1:100 rat anti MBP, Abcam, Cambridge, United Kingdom, 1:100 mouse anti-APC (CC1), Abcam, Cambridge, United Kingdom; see Table 3]. The following day, samples were thoroughly washed in PTA and incubated in a secondary antibody solution (1:500 AlexaFluor 488 goat anti-mouse, Invitrogen; or 1:500 AlexaFluor 555 goat anti-rabbit, Invitrogen). Samples were then washed in 0.1 M PB and incubated in 1:1,000 DAPI in water for 5 min. Finally, the samples were mounted with FluorSave [Merck Millipore (Calbiochem), Burlington, MA].
Table 3.
Antigen | NG2 | PDGFRα | A2B5 | Olig2 | BCAS1 | Sox10 | APC-(CC1) | MAG | MPB | GFAP |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PB2 | ||||||||||
PB2 | ||||||||||
PB4 | ||||||||||
PB8 | ||||||||||
PB9 | ||||||||||
PB11 | ||||||||||
PB12 | ||||||||||
PB16 | ||||||||||
PB19 | ||||||||||
PB20 | ||||||||||
Mouse |
Shaded areas correspond to antibodies tested in the samples indicated.
Immunogold Labeling
Tissue sections were cryoprotected in a solution containing 25% saccharose in 0.1 M PB-0.05% azide for 30 min. Immediately after cryoprotection, sections were permeabilized by repeated freeze–thaw cycles by immersion in −60°C 2-methylbutane and rapidly transfer to a room temperature saccharose solution. These steps were repeated three or four times. Subsequently, tissue sections were left in 0.1 M PB and then incubated in primary antibody blocking solution [0.3% BSAc (Aurion, Wageningen, The Netherlands), 0.05% sodium azide in 0.1 M PB] for 1 h. Next, the samples were incubated in primary antibody [1:150 rabbit anti-Olig2, Merck-Millipore Burlington, MA; 1:100 mouse anti-GFAP, Merck-Millipore Burlington, MA; 1:100 mouse anti-MAG, Merck-Millipore Burlington, MA; 1:100 rat anti MBP, Abcam, Cambridge, United Kingdom, 1:50 mouse anti-APC (CC1), Abcam, Cambridge, United Kingdom; 1:50 mouse anti-A2B5 Merck-Millipore Burlington, MA, 1:150 rabbit anti-Sox10 Abcam, Cambridge, United Kingdom; see Table 3] in primary antibody blocking solution for 72 h at 4°C. The samples were rinsed in 0.1 M PB and then incubated in secondary antibody blocking solution consisting of 0.5% BSAc (Aurion), 0.025% CWFS gelatin (Aurion), 0.05% sodium azide in 0.1 M PB for 1 h, followed by incubation in secondary antibody [1:50 goat anti-mouse IgG gold ultrasmall (Aurion); 1:50 goat anti-rabbit IgG gold ultrasmall (Aurion); 1:50 goat-anti-rat IgG gold ultrasmall (Aurion)] diluted in the same secondary antibody blocking solution overnight at 4°C. To enhance gold labeling, we performed silver enhancement (R-GENT SE-LM, Aurion) for 15–25 min in the dark, followed by gentle washing in 2% sodium acetate and incubation in gold toning solution (0.05% gold chloride in water) for 10 min. The samples were then washed twice with 0.3% sodium thiosulfate in water. Finally, we post-fixed with 2% glutaraldehyde (Electron Microscopy Sciences) in 0.1 M PB for 30 min. Samples were rinsed and kept in 0.1 M PB containing 0.05% sodium azide at 4°C until processing them for resin embedding.
For PDGFRa, NABC1, and NG2, we performed Tyramide Signal Amplification. Sections were washed in 0.05% Triton X-100 in PBS (PBS-Tx) at room temperature for 15 min. To quench endogenous peroxidases, we incubated the sections in peroxidase blocking solution (1% H2O2 in PBS-Tx) for 45 min in the dark at room temperature. Samples were washed and incubated in blocking solution [0.87% NaCl, 5% normal goat serum (Gibco), 0.05% sodium azide in 0.1 M Tris-HCl at pH 7.5] for 1 h. Then, the sections were incubated in primary antibody overnight (1:50 mouse anti-PDGFRa, BD Biosciences, Franklin Lakes, NJ; 1:100 rabbit anti-NG2 Abcam, Cambridge, United Kingdom, 1:150 mouse anti-NABC1 Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Dallas, TX; see Table 3) under mild agitation at 4°C. Samples were subsequently washed in PBS-Tx and incubated in secondary antibody solution for 2 h at room temperature. After washing with PBS-Tx, an incubation in Streptavidin-HRP (Vector Labs, San Francisco, CA) solution was performed for 30 min. Then, we incubated the samples in 1:50 biotin-tyramide solution (Akoya Biosciences, Marlborough, MA) for 5 min at room temperature. Subsequently, the sections were blocked in 0.3% BSAc (Aurion, The Netherlands) in 0.1 M PB-0.05% sodium azide for 1 h at room temperature in the dark. Then we incubated the samples in immunogold primary antibody (1:300 mouse anti-Biotin antibody; Jackson Immunoresearch) diluted in blocking solution overnight at 4°C with gentle shaking. The following day, samples were washed and incubated in a blocking solution consisting of 0.5% BSAc and 0.1% fish skin gelatin (Aurion) in 0.1 M PB-0.05% sodium azide. Next, we incubated the samples in 1:50 goat anti-mouse gold-conjugated antibody (Ultra Small; Aurion) in blocking solution for 2 h, in the dark at and under mild agitation. Finally, we proceeded with the silver enhancement process as in the standard immunogold labeling as described above.
Tissue Processing for TEM Analysis
For TEM analysis, sections were embedded in epoxy resin. First, samples were post-fixed with 1% osmium tetroxide (Electron Microscopy Sciences), 7% glucose in 0.1 M PB for 30 min at room temperature, washed in deionized water, and partially dehydrated in 70% ethanol. Afterward, the samples were contrasted in 2% uranyl acetate (Electron Microscopy Sciences) in 70% ethanol for 2 h at 4°C. The samples were further dehydrated and embedded in Durcupan ACM epoxy resin at room temperature overnight, and then at 70°C for 72 h. Once the resin was polymerized, immunolabeled sections were selected and cut into semithin (1.5 μm) and then into ultrathin sections (60–80 nm) using an Ultracut UC7 ultramicrotome (Leica). Ultrathin sections were placed on formvar-coated single-slot copper grids (Electron Microscopy Sciences) stained with lead citrate and examined at 80 kV on a FEI Tecnai G2 Spirit (FEI Company, Hillsboro, OR) transmission electron microscope equipped with a Morada CCD digital camera (Olympus, Tokyo, Japan).
Criteria Used for Immunogold Analysis
Our general criteria to differentiate label and background is 5:1 ratio of silver-enhanced gold nanoparticles. And depending on the labeled structure and marker (plasma membrane or organelle) we consider a minimum number of silver-enhanced nanoparticles within an ultrathin section as follows:
For NG2: seven silver-enhanced gold nanoparticles/μm2.
PDGFRα: seven silver-enhanced gold nanoparticles/cluster in at least three clusters per cell.
A2B5: seven silver-enhanced gold nanoparticles/μm2 when there is a proximal ER.
BCAS1: 10 silver-enhanced gold nanoparticles within the extent of the plasma membrane.
Olig2: at least 15 silver-enhanced gold nanoparticles within the nucleus.
Sox10: at least 15 silver-enhanced gold nanoparticles within the nucleus.
APC: at least 15 silver-enhanced gold nanoparticles within the cell.
MAG/MBP: at least 15 silver-enhanced gold nanoparticles in the myelin proximity.
GFAP: 15 silver-enhanced gold nanoparticles/μm2.
Results
Human Oligodendrocytes Go Through Three Sequential Morphological Stages of Differentiation
Previous studies indicate that human oligodendrocytes acquire three sequential phenotypes through their maturation (Goldman and Kuypers, 2015). The identification of these maturational stages is typically based on the expression of different molecular markers. In order to establish a connection between the molecular and ultrastructural changes which characteristically follow each maturational stage, we first performed immunofluorescence detection for a group of markers described for oligodendrocytes, their progenitors, and myelin proteins. This analysis was performed in human intraoperatively obtained brain tissue containing white matter from donors of different ages. Our results suggest that oligodendrocytes in the human white matter display three distinctive morphologies and can be labeled with distinctive molecular markers (Figure 1A). The first stage is characterized by star-shaped cells, negative for astrocyte marker GFAP, in which NG2-labeling is distributed as cytoplasmic/plasma membrane dots in cells evenly distributed through the white matter (Figure 1B). NG2 expression defines a population which has been widely described as OPCs with a broad distribution through the white matter. The second stage of differentiation was identified with the oligodendrocyte lineage markers BCAS1/NABC1 and Olig2, corresponding to pre-OLs. Pre-OLs expand their processes and become highly ramified cells with a small soma (Figure 1C). The subcellular localization of Olig2 is limited to the cell nucleus, while in the case of BCAS1/NABC1 it is cytoplasmic. The third and final stage of differentiation comprises m-OLs, which are small cells with scant cytoplasm distributed throughout the white matter and label profusely for the nuclear transcription factor Olig2 and the RNA binding protein quaking7, which binds to APC-(CC1) antibody. This protein appears to be in a cytoplasmic/nuclear localization when detected by immunofluorescence (Figure 1D). Finally, we have observed myelin-associated proteins such as MAG and MBP broadly scattered through the white matter (Figure 1E). Our results confirm that at least three maturational stages can be defined in the oligodendroglial lineage based on molecular marker expression and gross morphology.
OPCs in the Human White Matter Display an Astrocytic-like Morphology and Ultrastructure
To better characterize the ultrastructure of human OPCs, we have analyzed cells labeled for NG2, PDGFRα, A2B5, and Olig2 using immunoelectron microscopy and described their fine features through conventional TEM. Our results show that NG2 is expressed in the cytoplasm, endoplasmic reticulum, and intermediate filaments present in the processes of star-shaped electron-lucent cells (Figure 2A). PDGFRα, on the other hand, is expressed in small clusters in discrete regions of the plasma membrane of OPCs (Figure 2B). A2B5 is observed to be expressed in a cytoplasmic portion of OPCs which includes the endoplasmic reticulum (ER; Figure 2C). Finally, Olig2 labels the nuclei of these populations (Supplementary Figure 2).
The fine structure of OPCs is very similar to that of astrocytes present in the human white matter (Supplementary Figure 1). TEM analysis shows that human OPCs can be identified as star-shaped cells with electron-lucent nucleus and non-condensed euchromatin (Figure 3A). Their soma exhibits several filamentous processes (Figure 3B) and their electron-lucent cytoplasm presents abundant short dilated endoplasmic reticulum, similar to that of classic oligodendrocytes, being also rich in mitochondria and ribosomes (Figure 3C).
Pre-oligodendrocytes in the Human White Matter Show Scarce Organelle Variety
Since pre-myelinating oligodendrocytes presented a distinctive morphology in our immunofluorescence studies, we performed immunogold and conventional TEM analyses to study whether these morphological changes can be correlated with characteristic ultrastructural features. Our TEM data corroborate that the soma of pre-OLs is small, with the vast majority of its volume occupied by the nucleus. We found that the expression of BCAS1/NABC1, a novel marker of intermediate oligodendroglial maturational stages (Fard et al., 2017), is tightly associated with the plasma membrane of this population and allows the identification of cellular processes which contact thin myelin sheets (Figure 4A). On the other hand, the transcription factors Olig2 and Sox 10 are expressed in the nuclei of pre-OLs (Figures 4B,C). The distribution of both markers is similar to that of loosely condensed euchromatin within the nuclear space.
Prior immunogold characterization of pre-OLs allowed us to further study this cell population in better-preserved conventional TEM samples. As a result, we observed that pre-OLs are highly ramified cells with scant electron-lucent cytoplasm and slightly condensed chromatin (Figure 5A). Since the cytoplasmic area is rather small, this population does not present a great organelle abundance. Polyribosomes are the most frequent organelle in pre-OLs (Figure 5B), while they also present few mitochondria and short dilated ER. Interestingly, this subset of cells displays a stretch contact with myelin sheets (Figure 5C).
Mature Oligodendrocytes Are Electron-Dense Cells Distributed Through the White Matter
To gain insight into the fine structure of fully differentiated oligodendrocytes in the human white matter, we performed immunogold labeling using Olig2 and APC-(CC1) antibodies combined with standard TEM analysis. As observed in the previous stages of differentiation, Olig2 is also expressed in m-OLs. The distribution of this transcription factor is associated with non-condensed chromatin within the nucleus (Figure 6A). Conversely, the RNA-binding protein quaking7 labeled with APC-(CC1) was found associated both to euchromatin and heterochromatin as well as in the cytoplasm (Figure 6B).
Conventional ultrastructural characterization allowed us to describe that m-OLs are small electron-dense cells with a broad distribution in the human white matter. These cells are intermingled between myelin-wrapped axons (Figure 7A). Their chromatin is more condensed than that observed in earlier stages of oligodendroglial differentiation. Frequently, highly condensed chromatin is bound to the inner nuclear membrane (Figure 7B). m-OLs display characteristic short dilated ER, mitochondria, dense degradation vesicles, and polyribosomes (Figure 7C).
Human Myelin-Associated Proteins Are Observed in Different Portions of the Wrapping Sheets in Pre-embedding Immunogold
To further investigate into the structure of human myelin structure, we sought to study the expression and localization of two well-studied myelin-associated proteins (MBP and MAG) by pre-embedding immunogold detection. Our analysis shows that MBP localizes to the outermost layer of the myelinated axon in the cerebral white matter (Figure 8A), while MAG is observed in the most internal layer of the myelinated axon in direct contact with the axon (Figure 8B). However, to study the fine structure of myelin sheets in different stages of the myelination process, conventional TEM is necessary. Our analysis unveiled that for the study of different myelin features, such as thickness (Figure 8C) or the number of myelin sheets wrapping a particular axon (Figure 8D) high-quality fixation with glutaraldehyde is required. The drawback of this fixation protocol is that it is, in many cases, non-compatible with immunogold labeling. Nevertheless, the combination of immunogold detection and conventional TEM allowed us to observe that while tightly packed, human white matter myelin presents variable periaxonal space as well as myelin thickness, which could be related to the particular type or function for each axon.
Discussion
Oligodendrocytes and their progenitors are cells of great interest because of the several diseases related to their malfunction and the potential that this population represents in the regeneration of the central nervous system. On the other hand, ultrastructural studies in human brain tissue are scarce since most of the studies are based on post-mortem samples, in which the quality of the tissue is not optimal neither for TEM analysis nor for immunogold labeling and processing. TEM studies are highly valuable in oligodendrocyte analysis given that the gold standard to determine the remyelination rate in white matter regeneration is measured by the g-ratio.
The identification of different stages of morphological transformation in the oligodendroglial lineage from NG2-positive cells has been described in mouse control tissue (Sánchez-González et al., 2020). Furthermore, the generation of oligodendrocytes from OPCs has also been studied in mouse models of focal demyelination in the white matter (Menn et al., 2006). However, because of the above-mentioned technical limitations in the obtention of well-preserved human tissue, these studies are scarce.
Here we have studied the human pre-mortem white matter, which displays a great status of preservation, to shed light on the variation of the ultrastructural morphology of the oligodendroglial lineage combined with pre-embedding immunogold labeling for nine well-known oligodendroglial markers. Our results suggest that, in the human white matter, there are three markedly different stages of differentiation in oligodendrocyte progenitors according to their ultrastructural features and molecular markers.
The first stage of differentiation can be recognized by the expression of PDGFRα, NG2, and A2B5 (Berg and Schachner, 1982; Schnitzer and Schachner, 1982; Richardson et al., 1988; Chang et al., 2000; Rivers et al., 2008). This subset of progenitors presents ultrastructural and morphological characteristics that are very similar to astrocytes such as an electron-lucent filamentous cytoplasm, an electron-lucent nuclear content with scarcely condensed chromatin, dilated ER, mitochondria, and ribosomes. Therefore, when analyzing OPCs through TEM we recommend performing immunogold to avoid misclassification between this population and astrocytes.
The second stage of differentiation (pre-OLs) has been described as a transitory stage of maturation of oligodendrocytes. This phase is characterized by the expression of the molecular marker BCAS1/NABC1, Sox10, and Olig2 (Fard et al., 2017; Ishimoto et al., 2017). Interestingly, this population is more prominently represented in pediatric patients than in adult patients (data not shown; Fard et al., 2017). By immunofluorescence, these cells appear to be highly ramified and present scarce cytoplasmic content. TEM analysis reveals that pre-OLs present scant cytoplasmic content in which the most abundant organelle are polyribosomes and short dilated ER. The chromatin in this population is more condensed than in OPCs. The most interesting feature of pre-OLs is their contact with myelin sheaths, which conforms with the previous studies that indicate that these cells are actively synthesizing myelin (Fard et al., 2017).
The last stage of differentiation in the oligodendroglial lineage are m-OLs, which have been typically labeled with Olig2 and APC-(CC1) (Bin et al., 2016). These cells show a remarkable electron density in their cytoplasm and nucleus. The cytoplasmic portion contains short dilated endoplasmic reticulum, mitochondria, dense degradation vesicles, and polyribosomes, while the nucleus contains abundant heterochromatin associated with the inner nuclear membrane. This indicates that, as oligodendrocytes mature, their chromatin becomes more condensed and attaches to the nuclear membrane. Another remarkable feature shared by all the oligodendroglial lineage populations is that they maintain short, dilated ER through their maturation process.
Moreover, state-of–the-art studies (Bribián et al., 2020; Perlman et al., 2020) depict RNA or protein expression differences between age, sex, and status of activation or differentiation in the oligodendroglial lineage. By immunofluorescence, we observed more ramified BCAS1-positive cells. and an apparently larger number of immature oligodendrocytes in pediatric patients (data not shown). However, our results suggest that these shifts do not translate into ultrastructural differences, thus, allowing the characterization of oligodendrocytes despite the demographic differences.
Regarding the myelin that OLs synthesize, we used MBP and MAG for labeling. The first is found in the outermost portion of the myelinated axon, while the latter is found in direct contact with the axon. However, the conservation of myelin and thereby the labeling are not as precise. We suggest that myelin studies in the human brain require exquisite fixation, which implies the addition of glutaraldehyde in high concentrations (2.5%), which is a barrier to overcome for immunolabeling.
Hereby, studying the differences between the stages of differentiation in human oligodendrocytes has been of great interest because of the neuropathological implications especially in frequent disabling neurodegenerative conditions such as MS (Marques et al., 2016; Fard et al., 2017; Jäkel et al., 2019). In this pathology, the presence of immature oligodendrocytes in lesioned areas can indicate remyelination (Lucchinetti et al., 2000). Nonetheless, the cellular composition combined with the myelination/remyelination status has never been studied at an ultrastructural level, which could enhance the current knowledge and could give clues of intracellular processes within the cells in a lesion. Therefore, the fine characterization of the oligodendroglial lineage in the human brain can lead to future studies that include tissue fixed for TEM studies (i.e., glutaralehyde), that allow the combination of both myelination analysis and subcellular organelle composition for each cell type.
Data Availability Statement
The original contributions presented in the study are included in the article/Supplementary Material, further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding author/s.
Ethics Statement
The studies involving human participants were reviewed and approved by Research Ethics committee from the Hospital Universitari i Politècnic La Fe. Written informed consent to participate in this study was provided by the participants’ legal guardian/next of kin.
Author Contributions
MU-N, VH-P, and JG-V conceived the original idea and supervised the experimental procedures. PP-B and AG-M performed surgical resections. PP-B selected the non-affected areas of the white matter for analysis. MU-N, RM-G, AS-T, and PG-T performed immunofluorescence, immunogold, and TEM processing. MU-N, VH-P, and JG-V wrote the manuscript. All authors contributed to the article and approved the submitted version.
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Acknowledgments
We acknowledge the support of Susana González-Granero at the Laboratory of Comparative Neurobiology of the University of Valencia and the electron microscopy service at the Centro de Investigación Príncipe Felipe (Mario Soriano-Navarro) for their valuable help. Figure 1A was created using Biorender.com.
Footnotes
Funding. This study was funded by the Nano-scaffolding for neuronal migration and generation project (PCI2018-093062) granted by the Spanish Ministry of Science, Innovation and Universities to VH-P through CIBERNED. JG-V was funded by Red deTerapia Celular (TerCel-RD16/0011/0026) and the Valencian Council for Innovation, Universities Science and Digital Society (PROMETEO/2019/075).
Supplementary Materials
The Supplementary Material for this article can be found online at: https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fnana.2021.696376/full#supplementary-material.
References
- Amaral A. I., Tavares J. M., Sonnewald U., Kotter M. R. N. (2016). Oligodendrocytes: development, physiology and glucose metabolism. Adv. Neurobiol. 13, 275–294. 10.1007/978-3-319-45096-4_10 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Barateiro A., Fernandes A. (2014). Temporal oligodendrocyte lineage progression: In vitro models of proliferation, differentiation and myelination. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1843, 1917–1929. 10.1016/j.bbamcr.2014.04.018 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Berg G. J., Schachner M. (1982). Electron-microscopic localization of A2B5 cell surface antigen in monolayer cultures of murine cerebellum and retina. Cell Tissue Res. 224, 637–645. 10.1007/BF00213758 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Bribián A., Medina-Rodríguez E. M., Josa-Prado F., García-Álvarez I., Machín-Díaz I., Esteban P. F., et al. (2020). Functional heterogeneity of mouse and human brain OPCs: relevance for preclinical studies in multiple sclerosis. J. Clin. Med. Res. 9:1681. 10.3390/jcm9061681 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Bin J. M., Harris S. N., Kennedy T. E. (2016). The oligodendrocyte-specific antibody “CC1” binds quaking 7. J. Neurochem. 139, 181–186. 10.1111/jnc.13745 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Chang A., Nishiyama A., Peterson J., Prineas J., Trapp B. D. (2000). NG2-positive oligodendrocyte progenitor cells in adult human brain and multiple sclerosis lesions. J. Neurosci. 20, 6404–6412. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.20-17-06404.2000 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Chavali M., Ulloa-Navas M. J., Pérez-Borredá P., Garcia-Verdugo J. M., McQuillen P. S., Huang E. J., et al. (2020). Wnt-dependent oligodendroglial-endothelial interactions regulate white matter vascularization and attenuate injury. Neuron 108, e5.1130–e5.1145. 10.1016/j.neuron.2020.09.033 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Domingues H. S., Cruz A., Chan J. R., Relvas J. B., Rubinstein B., Pinto I. M. (2018). Mechanical plasticity during oligodendrocyte differentiation and myelination. Glia 66, 5–14. 10.1002/glia.23206 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Fard M. K., van der Meer F., Sánchez P., Cantuti-Castelvetri L., Mandad S., Jäkel S., et al. (2017). BCAS1 expression defines a population of early myelinating oligodendrocytes in multiple sclerosis lesions. Sci. Transl. Med. 9:eaam7816. 10.1126/scitranslmed.aam7816 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Goldman S. A., Kuypers N. J. (2015). How to make an oligodendrocyte. Development 142, 3983–3995. 10.1242/dev.126409 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Greenfield J. G. (1933). A form of progressive cerebral sclerosis in infants associated with primary degeneration of the interfascicular glia. Proc. R. Soc. Med. 26, 690–697. Available online at: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19989245. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Howard J., Trevick S., Younger D. S. (2016). Epidemiology of multiple sclerosis. Neurol. Clin. 34, 919–939. 10.1016/j.ncl.2016.06.016 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Inouye H., Kirschner D. A. (1988). Membrane interactions in nerve myelin. I. Determination of surface charge from effects of pH and ionic strength on period. Biophys. J. 53, 235–245. 10.1016/S0006-3495(88)83085-6 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Ishimoto T., Ninomiya K., Inoue R., Koike M., Uchiyama Y., Mori H. (2017). Mice lacking BCAS1, a novel myelin-associated protein, display hypomyelination, schizophrenia-like abnormal behaviors and upregulation of inflammatory genes in the brain. Glia 65, 727–739. 10.1002/glia.23129 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Jäkel S., Agirre E., Mendanha Falcão A., van Bruggen D., Lee K. W., Knuesel I., et al. (2019). Altered human oligodendrocyte heterogeneity in multiple sclerosis. Nature 566, 543–547. 10.1038/s41586-019-0903-2 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kang S. H., Fukaya M., Yang J. K., Rothstein J. D., Bergles D. E. (2010). NG2+ CNS glial progenitors remain committed to the oligodendrocyte lineage in postnatal life and following neurodegeneration. Neuron 68, 668–681. 10.1016/j.neuron.2010.09.009 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Lucchinetti C., Brück W., Parisi J., Scheithauer B., Rodriguez M., Lassmann H. (2000). Heterogeneity of multiple sclerosis lesions: implications for the pathogenesis of demyelination. Ann. Neurol. 47, 707–717. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Marques S., Zeisel A., Codeluppi S., van Bruggen D., Mendanha Falcão A., Xiao L., et al. (2016). Oligodendrocyte heterogeneity in the mouse juvenile and adult central nervous system. Science 352, 1326–1329. 10.1126/science.aaf6463 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Matalon R., Michals K., Sebesta D., Deanching M., Gashkoff P., Casanova J. (1988). Aspartoacylase deficiency and N-acetylaspartic aciduria in patients with Canavan disease. Am. J. Med. Genet. 29, 463–471. 10.1002/ajmg.1320290234 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- McLaurin J. A., Yong V. W. (1995). Oligodendrocytes and myelin. Neurol. Clin. 13, 23–49. Available online at: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/7739504. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Menn B., Garcia-Verdugo J. M., Yaschine C., Gonzalez-Perez O., Rowitch D., Alvarez-Buylla A. (2006). Origin of oligodendrocytes in the subventricular zone of the adult brain. J. Neurosci. 26, 7907–7918. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1299-06.2006 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Perlman K., Couturier C. P., Yaqubi M., Tanti A., Cui Q.-L., Pernin F., et al. (2020). Developmental trajectory of oligodendrocyte progenitor cells in the human brain revealed by single cell RNA sequencing. Glia 68, 1291–1303. 10.1002/glia.23777 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Renier W. O., Gabreëls F. J., Hustinx T. W., Jaspar H. H., Geelen J. A., Van Haelst U. J., et al. (1981). Connatal pelizaeus-merzbacher disease with congenital stridor in two maternal cousins. Acta Neuropathol. 54, 11–17. 10.1007/BF00691328 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Richardson W. D., Pringle N., Mosley M. J., Westermark B., Dubois-Dalcq M. (1988). A role for platelet-derived growth factor in normal gliogenesis in the central nervous system. Cell 53, 309–319. 10.1016/0092-8674(88)90392-3 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Rivers L. E., Young K. M., Rizzi M., Jamen F., Psachoulia K., Wade A., et al. (2008). PDGFRA/NG2 glia generate myelinating oligodendrocytes and piriform projection neurons in adult mice. Nat. Neurosci. 11, 1392–1401. 10.1038/nn.2220 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Saab A. S., Tzvetavona I. D., Trevisiol A., Baltan S., Dibaj P., Kusch K., et al. (2016). Oligodendroglial NMDA receptors regulate glucose import and axonal energy metabolism. Neuron 91, 119–132. 10.1016/j.neuron.2016.05.016 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Sánchez-González R., Bribián A., López-Mascaraque L. (2020). Cell Fate Potential of NG2 Progenitors. Sci. Rep. 10:9876. 10.1038/s41598-020-66753-9 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Schnitzer J., Schachner M. (1982). Cell type specificity of a neural cell surface antigen recognized by the monoclonal antibody A2B5. Cell Tissue Res. 224, 625–636. 10.1007/BF00213757 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Schoor C., Brocke-Ahmadinejad N., Gieselmann V., Winter D. (2019). Investigation of oligodendrocyte precursor cell differentiation by quantitative proteomics. Proteomics 19:e1900057. 10.1002/pmic.201900057 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Stohlman S. A., Hinton D. R. (2001). Viral induced demyelination. Brain Pathol. 11, 92–106. 10.1111/j.1750-3639.2001.tb00384.x [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Tappino B., Biancheri R., Mort M., Regis S., Corsolini F., Rossi A., et al. (2010). Identification and characterization of 15 novel GALC gene mutations causing Krabbe disease. Hum. Mutat. 31, E1894–E1914. 10.1002/humu.21367 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- van Bruggen D., Agirre E., Castelo-Branco G. (2017). Single-cell transcriptomic analysis of oligodendrocyte lineage cells. Curr. Opin. Neurobiol. 47, 168–175. 10.1016/j.conb.2017.10.005 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- van der Knaap M. S., Barth P. G., Stroink H., van Nieuwenhuizen O., Arts W. F., Hoogenraad F., et al. (1995). Leukoencephalopathy with swelling and a discrepantly mild clinical course in eight children. Ann. Neurol. 37, 324–334. 10.1002/ana.410370308 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Volpe J. J. (2001). Neurobiology of periventricular leukomalacia in the premature infant. Pediatr. Res. 50, 553–562. 10.1203/00006450-200111000-00003 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Wilson H. C., Scolding N. J., Raine C. S. (2006). Co-expression of PDGF alpha receptor and NG2 by oligodendrocyte precursors in human CNS and multiple sclerosis lesions. J. Neuroimmunol. 176, 162–173. 10.1016/j.jneuroim.2006.04.014 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Witte M. E., Schumacher A.-M., Mahler C. F., Bewersdorf J. P., Lehmitz J., Scheiter A., et al. (2019). Calcium influx through plasma-membrane nanoruptures drives axon degeneration in a model of multiple sclerosis. Neuron 101, e5.615–e5.624. 10.1016/j.neuron.2018.12.023 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Zhu X., Bergles D. E., Nishiyama A. (2008). NG2 cells generate both oligodendrocytes and gray matter astrocytes. Development 135, 145–157. 10.1242/dev.004895 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Data Availability Statement
The original contributions presented in the study are included in the article/Supplementary Material, further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding author/s.