Skip to main content
mBio logoLink to mBio
. 2021 May 11;12(3):e03443-20. doi: 10.1128/mBio.03443-20

The DnaK/DnaJ Chaperone System Enables RNA Polymerase-DksA Complex Formation in Salmonella Experiencing Oxidative Stress

Ju-Sim Kim a,, Lin Liu a, Andrés Vázquez-Torres a,b,
Editor: Nancy E Freitagc
PMCID: PMC8262869  PMID: 33975942

ABSTRACT

Our previous biochemical approaches showed that the oxidoreductase activity of the DnaJ protein facilitates the interaction of oxidized DksA with RNA polymerase. Investigations herein demonstrate that under biologically relevant conditions the DnaJ- and DksA-codependent activation of the stringent response in Salmonella undergoing oxidative stress involves the DnaK chaperone. Oxidation of DksA cysteine residues stimulates redox-based and holdase interactions with zinc-binding and C-terminal domains of DnaJ. Genetic and biochemical evidence indicates that His33 in the HPD motif in the J domain of DnaJ facilitates interactions of unfolded DksA with DnaK. A mutation in His33 in the J domain prevents the presentation of unfolded DksA to DnaK without limiting the oxidoreductase activity mapped to DnaJ’s zinc-2 site. Thr199 in the ATPase catalytic site of DnaK is required for the formation of the DksA/RNA polymerase complex. The DnaK/DnaJ/DksA complex enables the formation of an enzymatically active RNA polymerase holoenzyme that stimulates transcription of branched-chain amino acid and histidine metabolic genes in Salmonella exposed to reactive oxygen species. The DnaK/DnaJ chaperone protects Salmonella against the cytotoxicity associated with reactive oxygen species generated by the phagocyte NADPH oxidase in the innate host response. The antioxidant defenses associated with DnaK/DnaJ can in part be ascribed to the elicitation of the DksA-dependent stringent response and the protection this chaperone system provides against protein carbonylation in Salmonella undergoing oxidative stress.

KEYWORDS: Salmonella Typhimurium, DksA, DnaK, DnaJ, chaperone, stringent response, oxidative stress, redox, hydrogen peroxide

INTRODUCTION

The Hsp70 DnaK is a major chaperone. DnaK together with DnaJ contributes to protein quality control by facilitating folding of nascent proteins, polypeptides emerging through the Sec system, partially unfolded proteins, and protein aggregates (1). The DnaK-DnaJ chaperone system also catalyzes the formation and disassembly of protein complexes (1, 2). Binding and release of protein clients by DnaK are regulated by the ATP hydrolytic activity inherent to the nucleotide-binding domain (NBD), which itself is under the allosteric control exerted by the cochaperone DnaJ and the nucleotide exchange factor GrpE (1). In the ATP-bound, open-conformation state, DnaK’s β-sandwich substrate binding domain (SBD) binds to client proteins with low affinity. Tight substrate binding and ATPase activity of DnaK are triggered following the translocation of the α-helical lid from a location proximal to the N-terminal β-sandwich to the C terminus (1, 3, 4). This massive reorganization of DnaK is set in motion after the nucleotide-binding domain and linker regions of DnaK interact with the HPD motif in the J domain of DnaJ (1). Binding of DnaJ to DnaK is further assisted by the J and G/F (Gly/Phe-rich) domains of the former (5). Type I DnaJ molecules also harbor a central cysteine-rich region with four CXXCXGXG (C, cysteine; G, glycine; X, any amino acid) repeats arranged in an antiparallel β-sheet conformation that coordinates two zinc cations (6, 7). The zinc-binding domain of DnaJ binds unfolded substrates, possesses holding activity, and cooperates with DnaK to refold denatured clients (5, 8, 9). In addition, cysteine residues holding the structural zinc-binding domain of type I DnaJ proteins harbor oxidoreductase activity (10). The oxidoreductase activity of DnaJ proteins can be coupled to DnaK function (11) or operate as an independent thiol-disulfide exchange system analogous to thioredoxin-like proteins as described for the J-domain-deficient ZnJ2 protein from chloroplasts (12).

Escherichia coli strains deficient for dnaK, dnaJ, or grpE genes are temperature sensitive, are prone to filamentation, and fail to form a replicative complex for bacteriophage λ (1316). In a screen for genes that reversed the temperature sensitivity of a ΔdnaKJ mutant E. coli strain, Kang and Craig discovered a dnaK suppressor gene they named dksA (13). The mechanism by which the overexpression of DksA overcomes the heat shock sensitivity and filamentation of ΔdnaKJ E. coli has been a mystery for 30 years.

DksA regulates the stringent response in Gram-negative bacteria, a genetic program that aids the adaptation to nutritional starvation, heat shock, and oxidative and nitrosative stress (1720). The stringent response is characterized by the transcriptional repression of genes encoding translational machinery and the concomitant activation of genes involved in amino acid biosynthesis, virulence programs, and antibiotic resistance (1720). The stringent response is further regulated through the allosteric interaction of RNA polymerase with guanosine pentaphosphate or tetraphosphate [(p)ppGpp], which in E. coli and Salmonella is synthetized by the enzymes RelA and SpoT. The nucleotide alarmone (p)ppGpp binds to RNA polymerase at a site formed between the interface of the globular and coiled-coil domains of DksA and the β-subunit of RNA polymerase (21, 22). The stringent response in Gram-negative bacteria regulates the kinetics of the DNA open complex through the collision of two aspartic acids at the tip of the coiled-coil domain of DksA with the bridge-helix of RNA polymerase (22).

The DksA protein has multiple functions in the cell, including the regulation of the stringent response, transcriptional fidelity, prevention of conflicts between RNA and DNA polymerases, and DNA strand break repair (2327). The interaction of DksA with the secondary channel of RNA polymerase promotes antioxidant defenses of Salmonella (28). A biochemical reconstitution system demonstrated that binding of oxidized DksA to RNA polymerase can be facilitated by the oxidoreductase activity of DnaJ itself (27), consistent with the idea that the foldase and oxidoreductase activities mapped to the zinc-binding domain (9, 12) may be sufficient to promote DksA-RNA polymerase complexes. In the investigations described below, we tested whether DnaJ-dependent activation of RNA polymerase by oxidized DksA is sufficient to stimulate a stringent response in Salmonella undergoing oxidative stress. Our investigations demonstrate that in vivo, the chaperone DnaK is required for the DnaJ-DksA redox-based regulation of the stringent response that is elicited upon exposure of Salmonella to reactive oxygen species.

RESULTS

DnaK and DnaJ contribute to Salmonella pathogenesis.

DnaJ is critical to Salmonella pathogenesis (27). Because DnaJ can work independently or in tandem with DnaK, we studied whether the contribution of DnaJ to Salmonella pathogenesis involves DnaK. To ascertain the roles of dnaK and dnaJ in Salmonella virulence, we took advantage of the complementation of a ΔdnaK ΔdnaJ (i.e., ΔdnaKJ) double mutant with plasmids expressing dnaK and/or dnaJ genes (see Fig. S1A and B in the supplemental material). We found that a ΔdnaKJ Salmonella strain is attenuated in immunocompetent C57BL/6 mice (Fig. 1A). Strains lacking either dnaK or dnaJ alleles remained attenuated in C57BL/6 mice. However, ΔdnaKJ Salmonella regained virulence upon in trans expression of both dnaK and dnaJ genes from the low-copy-number pWSK29 plasmid (Fig. 1A and Fig. S1A). These findings suggest that both DnaK and DnaJ are required for full Salmonella virulence in mice.

FIG 1.

FIG 1

DnaK and DnaJ contribute to Salmonella pathogenesis. (A) Survival of C57BL/6 mice after intraperitoneal (i.p.) inoculation of ∼150 CFU of the indicated Salmonella strains. Mouse survival was monitored over 2 weeks. The data are from 8 to 10 mice from 2 independent experiments. P values were determined by log-rank analysis (****, P < 0.0001) compared to controls infected with wild-type Salmonella. (B) The competitive index was measured in livers and spleens of C57BL/6 mice 96 h after i.p. inoculation of ∼1,000 CFU of a mixture containing equal numbers of the indicated strains. Horizontal bars represent the medians from 8 mice collected in 2 independent experiments. ***, P < 0.001, as determined by one-way ANOVA.

FIG S1

Determination of DnaK and DnaJ expression of Salmonella strains. Download FIG S1, TIF file, 1.0 MB (1MB, tif) .

Copyright © 2021 Kim et al.

This content is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license.

To investigate the extent of codependency of the dnaJ and dnaK genes in Salmonella pathogenesis, we compared the competitive fitness of wild-type, ΔdnaKJ, and ΔdnaKJ Salmonella expressing the dnaK and/or dnaJ genes when inoculated as mixtures into the peritoneal cavity of C57BL/6 mice. About 100,000-fold fewer CFU of ΔdnaKJ Salmonella were recovered from livers and spleens of C57BL/6 mice than wild-type controls (Fig. 1B). Moreover, ΔdnaKJ Salmonella expressing dnaK or dnaJ alleles was nearly as attenuated as the parent ΔdnaKJ isogenic strain. In contrast, ΔdnaKJ Salmonella complemented with the dnaKJ operon became as virulent as wild-type controls (Fig. 1B and Fig. S1A). These investigations strongly suggest that DnaK and DnaJ mostly work together to promote virulence in this acute model of Salmonella infection.

The DnaK-DnaJ chaperone system promotes antioxidant defense in Salmonella.

Because DnaJ helps Salmonella resist the oxidative stress generated by the phagocyte NADPH oxidase in an acute model of salmonellosis (27), we studied whether DnaK participates in the antioxidant defense of this enteropathogen. We noted that ΔdnaKJ mutant Salmonella as well as ΔdnaKJ strains expressing the dnaK or dnaJ genes were as virulent as wild-type controls in nox2−/− mice lacking the gp91phox subunit of the phagocyte NADPH oxidase (Fig. 2A). The attenuation of ΔdnaKJ Salmonella in NOX2-proficient mice is similar to that described for ΔdksA Salmonella (29). These findings strongly suggest that the DnaK/DnaJ chaperone system promotes resistance of Salmonella to oxidative stress engendered in the innate host response. We also noted that ΔdnaKJ Salmonella was extremely sensitive to H2O2 killing (Fig. 2B). Complementation of ΔdnaKJ Salmonella with the dnaK or dnaJ genes improved resistance to H2O2 to levels seen in ΔdnaJ or ΔdksA mutant Salmonella strains. Complementation of ΔdnaKJ Salmonella with a plasmid expressing both dnaK and dnaJ genes reestablished wild-type resistance to H2O2 killing (Fig. 2B). Together, these findings raise the possibility that DnaK and DnaJ genes may participate in the antioxidant defenses of Salmonella in DksA-dependent and -independent manners. Our investigations also suggest that DnaK and DnaJ promote resistance of Salmonella to oxidative stress in codependent and independent ways.

FIG 2.

FIG 2

DnaK and DnaJ protect Salmonella from oxidative stress. (A) Survival of phagocyte NADPH oxidase-deficient nox2−/− mice after i.p. challenge with ∼150 CFU of the indicated Salmonella strains. The data are from 8 to 10 mice in 2 independent experiments. (B) Survival of Salmonella grown overnight in LB broth after 2 h of treatment with 200 μM H2O2 in PBS. The data are the means ± standard deviations (SD) (n = 6) from 6 to 10 independent experiments. ***, P < 0.001, as determined by one-way ANOVA compared to wild-type Salmonella.

The J domain of DnaJ promotes antioxidant defenses of Salmonella.

Our genetic analysis suggests that part of the role played by DnaJ in the antioxidant defenses of Salmonella relies on its cochaperone DnaK. The conserved HPD (His-Pro-Asp) motif in the J domain of DnaJ, in conjunction with the G/F domain (Fig. 3A), stimulates DnaK’s ATPase activity (1, 16). We examined whether DnaJ’s contribution to the antioxidant defenses of Salmonella is dependent on the J and G/F domains. Salmonella expressing a dnaJ allele lacking the J and G/F domains was as hypersusceptible to H2O2 as ΔdnaJ controls (P = 0.9979 as assessed by one-way analysis of variance [ANOVA]) (Fig. 3B). Moreover, a strain expressing the dnaJ H33Q mutation in the J domain was hypersusceptible to H2O2 (Fig. 3B and Fig. S1B). Because the HPD motif in the J domain of DnaJ stimulates ATPase activity of DnaK (1, 5, 16), the susceptibility of Salmonella bearing the dnaJ H33Q allele suggests that at least part of the antioxidant defenses associated with DnaJ is dependent on DnaK. It should be noted that ΔdnaJ mutant Salmonella was as susceptible to H2O2 as an isogenic mutant expressing the dnaJ H33Q gene (P = 0.2815) (Fig. 3B).

FIG 3.

FIG 3

Impact of dnaJ variants in the antioxidant defenses of Salmonella. (A) Schematic representation of DnaJ regions consisting of the J, G/F (Gly/Phe-rich region), zinc-binding, and C-terminal domains. The J domain, via the evolutionarily conserved HPD motif, stimulates DnaK ATPase activity, and the G/F domain assists binding of DnaJ to DnaK. Four CXXCXGXG consensus sequences (where with C represents Cys, X is any other amino acid, and G is glycine) assemble into two zinc-binding domains, Zn1 and Zn2. The C-terminal domain contains 2 additional cysteine residues. (B) Susceptibility of wild-type and the indicated Salmonella mutants grown overnight in LB broth after 2 h of treatment with 200 μM H2O2 in PBS. The data are the means ± SD (n = 6 to 8) from 3 or 4 independent experiments. ***, P < 0.001, as determined by one-way ANOVA compared to wild-type Salmonella. (C) C57BL/6 and nox2/− mice were i.p. inoculated with ∼150 CFU of the indicated Salmonella strains. Mouse survival was monitored over 2 weeks. The data are from 8 to 18 mice collected in 2 or 3 independent experiments. ****, P < 0.0001, as determined by log-rank analysis compared to mice infected with wild-type Salmonella.

To identify domains of DnaJ that contribute to the resistance of Salmonella to oxidative stress, we engineered mutations in cysteine residues in the zinc-binding domain and C-terminal domain (CTD) of DnaJ. Salmonella strains harboring single (C147S or C203S), double (C147S C150S) or quadruple (C147S C150S C200S C203S, referred to as ΔZn1) substitutions in cysteine residues in the zinc 1-binding domain of DnaJ exhibited wild-type resistance to H2O2 killing (Fig. 3B and Fig. S1C). Consistent with published data (27), Salmonella strains expressing a C186H substitution at the zinc 2-binding domain or a C268A mutation at the CTD of DnaJ were more susceptible (P < 0.001) to H2O2 than wild-type controls (Fig. 3B). These findings indicate that the J domain, zinc 2-binding domain, and CTD of DnaJ contribute to the antioxidant defenses of Salmonella. In addition, our findings suggest that the zinc 1-binding domain of DnaJ is dispensable for resistance of Salmonella to H2O2.

To investigate the contribution of DnaJ domains to resistance of Salmonella to oxidative stress generated by the phagocyte NADPH oxidase in the innate host response, C57BL/6 and nox2−/− mice were inoculated with Salmonella strains expressing various dnaJ alleles. C57BL/6 mice survived infection with strains expressing ΔdnaJ or dnaJ H33Q, C186H, or C268A alleles. In contrast, the dnaJ ΔZn1 variant supported full Salmonella virulence (Fig. 3C). The ΔdnaJ mutant and Salmonella strains bearing dnaJ H33Q, C186H, or C268A alleles became as virulent as wild-type controls in immunodeficient nox2−/− mice lacking the gp91phox subunit of the phagocyte NADPH oxidase (Fig. 3C). These findings suggest that the contribution of DnaJ to resistance to the phagocyte NADPH oxidase is mediated by the J-domain-dependent stimulation of DnaK’s ATPase activity as well as by oxidoreductase and holdase activities intrinsic to the zinc 2-binding domain and the CTD.

DnaK and DnaJ minimize protein carbonylation in Salmonella experiencing oxidative stress.

We next examined possible mechanisms by which the DnaK/DnaJ chaperone system adds to the antioxidant defenses of Salmonella. Cells deficient in chaperones accumulate misfolded proteins, a situation that increases the risk of polypeptides becoming carbonylated (30, 31). Carbonylation of side chains of lysine, arginine, proline, and threonine residues can be detected by immunoblotting as 2,4-dinitrophenylhydraxine (DNPH)-derivatized products. To minimize endogenous oxidation of proteins by reactive oxygen species generated in aerobic metabolism, Salmonella strains were grown anaerobically for several days and then treated with or without 1 μM H2O2 for 2 h in an anaerobic chamber. The essential role played by the anaerobic master regulator FNR in resistance of Salmonella to the phagocyte NADPH oxidase suggests that, in some instances during infection, this intracellular pathogen must experience the antimicrobial activity of the respiratory burst under oxygen-limiting conditions (32). Similar to aerobic cultures (Fig. 2B), anaerobic ΔdnaKJ, ΔdnaK, and ΔdnaJ Salmonella strains showed hypersusceptibility when exposed to H2O2 in an anaerobic chamber (Fig. 4A). Proteins isolated from ΔdnaKJ Salmonella showed a 1.6-fold increase in protein carbonylation compared to wild-type controls (Fig. 4B and C). Proteins from single ΔdnaK or ΔdnaJ mutants exhibited less or similar carbonylation compared to control specimens isolated from ΔdnaKJ Salmonella (Fig. 4B and C). Exposure of Salmonella deficient in dnaKJ, dnaK, or dnaJ genes to H2O2 increased the level of carbonylated proteins compared to H2O2-treated wild-type controls (P < 0.001). Moreover, treatment of a strain expressing the dnaK T199A allele with H2O2 also resulted in hypersusceptibility as well as high levels of carbonylated proteins (Fig. 4A to C and Fig. S1D). These results indicate that (i) DnaK and DnaJ prevent protein carbonylation in Salmonella exposed to H2O2 and (ii) DnaK’s ATPase is critical for this activity.

FIG 4.

FIG 4

DnaK and DnaJ lessen protein carbonylation in anaerobic Salmonella exposed to H2O2. (A and D) Survival of anaerobic Salmonella exposed to 1 μM H2O2 for 2 h in an anaerobic chamber. ***, P < 0.001, as determined by one-way ANOVA compared to wild-type Salmonella. The data are the means ± SD from 4 to 6 biological replicates collected in 2 or 3 days. (B and E) Protein carbonylation in anaerobic Salmonella treated with or without 1 μM H2O2 for 2 h was assessed by immunoblotting of DNP-derivatized proteins. The data are representative of 2 or 3 independent experiments. (C and F) Density of protein carbonylation was measured with ImageJ, and the density comparison region is indicated by a dotted line with a cap next to the blots. Fold change in density was calculated as density of mutant/density of wild-type controls. The data are the means ± SD (n = 4) from 4 independent measurements. ****, P < 0.0001, as determined by one-way ANOVA.

Increased susceptibility to H2O2 (Fig. 4D) and high levels of carbonylated proteins (Fig. 4E and F) were also detected in a ΔdnaJ Salmonella strain bearing a dnaJ H33Q allele. These findings suggest that the stimulation of DnaK’s ATPase activity by the J domain of DnaJ minimizes protein carbonylation in response to H2O2.

DnaK and DnaJ activate the stringent response of H2O2-treated Salmonella.

The regulator DksA coordinates transcriptional adaptations that increase fitness of Salmonella in an acute model of infection dominated by the antimicrobial activity of NOX2 (29, 33). Binding of oxidized DksA to RNA polymerase is facilitated by protein-protein redox interactions with DnaJ (27). Because DnaK and DnaJ work together to boost the antioxidant defenses of Salmonella (data herein), we investigated whether the activation of the stringent response in Salmonella undergoing oxidative stress reflects a cooperation between DnaK and DnaJ. We measured expression of livJ branched-chain amino acid transport and hisG histidine biosynthetic genes as proxies of the stringent response elicited upon contact of Salmonella with reactive oxygen species (27, 33). These investigations were performed under anaerobic conditions because a sizable fraction of DksA is oxidized in aerobically grown Salmonella (27). Salmonella grown anaerobically was treated with or without 1 μM H2O2. ΔdnaKJ, ΔdnaK, and ΔdnaJ Salmonella strains failed to activate livJ gene transcription in response to H2O2 (Fig. 5A and B). Complementation of ΔdnaKJ mutant Salmonella with the dnaKJ operon reestablished livJ transcription. As expected (27), the activation of livJ transcription elicited in response to H2O2 was blunted in ΔdksA Salmonella (Fig. 5B). In addition, ΔdnaJ Salmonella complemented with dnaJ H33Q, C186H, or C268A mutant alleles did not support livJ transcription in response to H2O2 (Fig. 5B). On the other hand, Salmonella bearing the dnaJ ΔZn1 allele induced as much livJ transcription in response to H2O2 as wild-type controls (Fig. 5B). Similar results were recorded when hisG transcription was analyzed (Fig. S2A and B). These findings indicate that DnaK and DnaJ cooperate in the stringent response of Salmonella undergoing oxidative stress. Our genetic inquiry also suggests that the allosteric activation of DnaK’s ATPase through interaction with the J domain of DnaJ positively regulates the stringent response of H2O2-treated Salmonella.

FIG 5.

FIG 5

DnaK and DnaJ activate DksA-redox dependent gene expression. (A and B) The indicated Salmonella strains were grown in EGCA medium in an anaerobic chamber. Abundance of livJ transcripts in RNA isolated from anaerobic Salmonella treated with or without 1 μM H2O2 for 30 min was measured by qRT-PCR. The expression of the housekeeping gene rpoD was used as an internal control. The data are the means ± SD from 4 to 6 biological replicates collected in 2 or 3 independent days. ****, P < 0.0001, as determined by one-way ANOVA. (C and D) Activation of livJ transcripts in in vitro transcription reaction mixtures containing 5 μM oxidized DksA, 50 nM DnaJ, and 500 nM DnaK proteins in the presence of RNA polymerase. Interactions of DnaJ and DnaK proteins with oxidized or reduced DksA are shown in panel D. Reduced DksA (5 μM) showed sufficiently activated in vitro livJ transcripts in the absence of DnaJ (50 nM) and DnaK (500 nM) proteins. The abundance of livJ transcripts was analyzed by qRT-PCR. The data are the means ± SD (n = 6 to 20) from at least 3 independent experiments. ****, P < 0.0001, as determined by one-way ANOVA. ns, nonsignificant compared to reaction mixtures containing 5 μM oxidized DksA (C) or reduced DksA (D).

FIG S2

Transcription of hisG in Salmonella strains and titration of DnaK concentration of in vitro transcription. Download FIG S2, TIF file, 0.8 MB (828.3KB, tif) .

Copyright © 2021 Kim et al.

This content is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license.

The cooperation of DnaK, DnaJ, and oxidized DksA seems to be at odds with the fact that DnaJ by itself can facilitate livJ in vitro transcription by oxidized DksA (27). Taking into account that the estimated concentration of DksA in E. coli is approximately 2 μM (22), we estimate that the intracellular concentration of DnaJ is about 50 nM (Fig. S2C). We report that 50 nM DnaJ fails to activate livJ in vitro transcription by oxidized DksA (Fig. 5C and D and Fig. S2D), which is in contrast to the activation seen in reaction mixtures containing 500 nM DnaJ (27). We then tested the effect that the addition of increasing concentrations of untagged DnaK has on livJ in vitro transcription by oxidized DksA, DnaJ, nucleoside triphosphates (NTPs), and RNA polymerase (Fig. S2D and E). A >10-fold induction of livJ in vitro transcription was noted upon the addition of 500 nM DnaK to reaction mixtures containing oxidized DksA, DnaJ, and RNA polymerase (Fig. 5C and D). The recombinant DnaK T199A variant, which lacks a critical threonine in the ATPase catalytic site and shows normal interaction with DnaJ in biochemical in vitro pulldown assays (Fig. S2F and G), and the DnaJ H33Q recombinant variant, which does not support DnaK’s ATPase activity (34), failed to induce livJ in vitro transcription (Fig. 5C). DnaK or DnaJ proteins by themselves and in combination failed to activate livJ in vitro transcription (Fig. 5C). The DnaK/DnaJ couple also failed to enhance the transcription of livJ supported by reduced DksA (Fig. 5D). These investigations demonstrate that at biologically relevant concentrations, the loading of oxidized DksA onto RNA polymerase by DnaJ is facilitated by its DnaK chaperone partner.

DnaJ, not DnaK, directly binds to oxidized DksA.

To further examine the critical role DnaK plays in the activation of the stringent response, we used a bacterial two-hybrid system that reconstitutes interactions of the T18 and T25 subunits of adenylate cyclase. A T18-DksA fusion showed significant binding to the T25-DnaJ construct (Fig. 6A). In sharp contrast, the T18-DksA and T25-DnaK pair exhibited as poor binding as the combination of the T18-DksA and the T25 negative vector control (Fig. 6A). The pair T18-DksA and T25-RpoA, a subunit of RNA polymerase, served as a positive control (Fig. 6A). Because the T25 N-terminal fusion could interfere with DnaK’s binding performance, we conducted biochemical pulldown assays to independently test binding of C-terminal DnaK- and DnaJ-His-tagged proteins to DksA. These investigations showed that oxidized DksA, not the reduced protein, directly interacts with DnaJ (Fig. 6B and Fig. S3A). In sharp contrast, oxidized DksA did not interact with DnaK (Fig. 6B). The DnaK protein also failed to bind to DksA in buffer containing K+, Mg2+, and ATP (Fig. S3B). These findings suggest that DnaK does not bind directly to DksA irrespectively of the redox state of the latter and provide a reasonable explanation for the inability of DnaK alone to support the DksA-dependent activation of livJ transcription (Fig. 5A and C). We also observed that a DnaJ variant bearing the H33Q mutation in the J domain still binds to DnaK using a bacterial two-hybrid system (Fig. S3C) and a biochemical pulldown assay (Fig. S3D and E), indicating that the failure of the DnaJ H33Q variant to stimulate the DnaK- and DksA-dependent stringent response in H2O2-treated Salmonella cannot be explained by its inability to bind to DnaK. These investigations also suggest that the activation of DnaK’s ATPase activity through interactions with the HPD motif of DnaJ is essential for the stimulation of the stringent response in H2O2-treated Salmonella.

FIG 6.

FIG 6

Interactions of DnaK and DnaJ proteins with DksA. Interactions of DnaK and DnaJ proteins with DksA were evaluated by a bacterial two-hybrid system (A and D) and biochemical pulldown assays (B and C). The data in panel A are the means ± SD from 12 to 16 biological replicates from 3 or 4 independent experiments ***, P < 0.001, and ****, P < 0.0001, as determined by one-way ANOVA. ns, nonsignificant compared to the negative vector control. Blots in panels B and C are representative of 3 or 4 independent experiments. (E) Reduced DksA (5 μM) residues were alkylated with AMS, and the proteins were visualized on nonreducing SDS-PAGE gels stained with Coomassie brilliant blue. Samples were treated with or without 500 μM H2O2 at 37°C for 1 h in the presence and absence of 5 μM DnaJ variants. The data are from 2 or 3 independent experiments.

FIG S3

Characterization of DnaK binding to DnaJ H33Q and determination of zinc content of recombinant DnaJ variants. Download FIG S3, TIF file, 1.4 MB (1.4MB, tif) .

Copyright © 2021 Kim et al.

This content is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license.

Having established that oxidized DksA binds to DnaJ but not DnaK (Fig. 6B), we examined the domains of DnaJ responsible for binding to DksA. DnaJ variants bearing H33Q, ΔZn1, or C268A substitutions interacted with DksA with an affinity apparently similar to or greater than that of the wild-type DnaJ protein control (Fig. 6C; Fig. S3F shows input proteins for the pulldown in Fig. 6C). The wild type and DnaJ H33Q, C186H, and C268A variants harbored about 2 molar equivalents of zinc, which contrasts with the equimolar concentrations of zinc bound to DnaJ ΔZn1 (Fig. S3G). A DnaJ C186H protein variant showed slightly reduced binding to DksA compared to wild-type controls (Fig. 6C), a finding that is consistent with our previously published work (27). The binding of DnaJ variants bearing H33Q, ΔZn1, C186H, or C268A substitutions to DksA was independently evaluated using a bacterial two-hybrid system. The T18-DnaJ H33Q construct supported excellent reconstitution of β-galactosidase activity when combined with the T25-DksA plasmid (Fig. 6D). The T25-DksA and T18C-DnaJ variants bearing ΔZn1 or C268A substitution pairs exhibited high levels of binding, whereas the combination of T25-DksA and T18C-DnaJ C186H showed poor interaction compared to wild-type controls (P < 0.0001) (Fig. 6D). Collectively, these investigations suggest that the inability of the dnaJ H33Q variant to activate an H2O2-dependent stringent response cannot be explained by an inability to bind to DksA.

In addition to exhibiting holdase activity, DnaJ reduces two disulfide bonds in oxidized DksA (27). We tested the oxidoreductase activity of the DnaJ H33Q variant (Fig. 6E). These experiments showed that the DnaJ H33Q protein retains excellent oxidoreductase activity for oxidized DksA. Similar results were seen when the DnaJ ΔZn1 variant was tested. As reported previously (27), DnaJ C186H and DnaJ C268A protein variants were unable to reduce oxidized DksA, supporting the idea that cysteine residues in the zinc 2-binding domain and CTD participate in the oxidoreductase activity of DnaJ. Together, these investigations suggest that the inability of the DnaJ H33Q protein to promote Salmonella virulence, antioxidant defense, and DksA-mediated transcription occurs despite its excellent oxidoreductase activity.

DksA cooperates with DnaK and DnaJ in Salmonella pathogenesis but not thermotolerance or motility.

The investigations described above indicate that by interacting with oxidized DksA, the DnaK/DnaJ chaperone system regulates transcriptional signatures characteristic of the stringent response in H2O2-treated Salmonella. It is therefore possible that some of the functions ascribed to the DnaK/DnaJ chaperone couple could be mediated through DksA-dependent transcriptional programs. Thus, we studied the thermotolerance, motility, and intracellular growth of Salmonella strains deficient in dnaK, dnaJ, or dksA genes. A ΔdksA Salmonella strain grew at high temperatures as well as wild-type controls (Fig. 7A) and sustained excellent swimming activity as well (Fig. 7B). In contrast, ΔdnaK and ΔdnaJ mutant Salmonella strains exhibited temperature sensitivity and lost swimming ability (Fig. 7A and B). On the other hand, lack of either dksA, dnaK, or dnaJ genes resulted in similar intracellular growth defects of Salmonella in J774 macrophage-like cells (Fig. 7C). Deficiency of intracellular growth of Salmonella caused by deficient dnaK, dnaJ, or dksA genes was reversed by complementation with the dnaKJ operon or the dksA gene, respectively (Fig. 7C). Salmonella strains which blocked stimulation of DnaK’s ATPase activity by the dnaJ H33Q or the dnaK T199A alleles were hypersensitive to heat, sustained lower swimming ability and showed growth defects in J774 macrophage (Fig. S4A to C). These investigations suggest that DksA, DnaK, and DnaJ work together in Salmonella pathogenesis but not in thermotolerance and motility. This research also indicates that DnaK’s ATPase activity through the HPD domain of DnaJ is essential for thermotolerance, motility, and Salmonella pathogenesis.

FIG 7.

FIG 7

Contribution of dnaK, dnaJ, and dksA to thermotolerance, motility, and pathogenesis of Salmonella. (A) Growth of the indicated Salmonella strains in LB broth for 6 h at 30°C or 45°C in a shaker incubator. The data are the means ± SD (n = 4 to 10) from 4 to 8 independent experiments. (B) Motility was assessed by spotting 107 CFU of the indicated Salmonella strains in 0.3% LB agar plates for 3 h at 37°C. The swimming zone was measured in millimeters. The data are the means ± SD (n =14) from at least 4 independent experiments. (C) Intracellular replication of Salmonella in J774 cells 18 h postinfection was determined by CFU measurement. The data are the means ± SD (n = 8 to 20) from at least 3 independent experiments. ***, P < 0.001, and ****, P < 0.0001, as determined by one-way ANOVA.

FIG S4

Effect of DnaJ H33Q and DnaK T199A mutations on thermotolerance, motility, and pathogenesis of Salmonella. Download FIG S4, TIF file, 0.5 MB (517.2KB, tif) .

Copyright © 2021 Kim et al.

This content is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license.

DISCUSSION

The stringent response aids the adaptation of bacteria to stressful environmental conditions. In Gram-negative bacteria, this genetic program is regulated by the coordinated actions that the DksA protein and the nucleotide alarmone (p)ppGpp exert on the kinetics of the transcription open complex (35). Given that its concentrations are remarkably constant in the cell under various growth conditions (36, 37), how the DksA protein is selectively loaded into the secondary channel of RNA polymerase under starvation and stress conditions has been puzzling. Our present and past investigations indicate that loading of oxidized DksA to RNA polymerase is aided by DnaJ (27). Cysteine residues in the globular domain of DksA are oxidized by reactive oxygen and nitrogen species (27, 33). Disulfide-bonded DksA molecules are recognized by the DnaJ cochaperone, whose oxidoreductase and holdase activities facilitate loading of DksA into RNA polymerase, activating amino acid biosynthesis gene expression in Salmonella undergoing oxidative stress (27). Investigations shown herein demonstrate that DnaJ’s oxidoreductase and foldase activities are not sufficient to assemble RNA polymerase-DksA complexes in vitro or in vivo in the absence of DnaK. Accordingly, in the absence of either DnaK or DnaJ, H2O2-treated Salmonella fails to activate hisG or livJ gene transcription. This conclusion is further substantiated by the observation that together DnaK and DnaJ regulate the transcriptional activity of oxidized DksA in an in vitro transcription system. Our investigations are consistent with the idea that DnaJ/DnaK refold oxidized DksA, thus facilitating the interaction of this transcription factor with RNA polymerase (Fig. 8). Although not tested experimentally, it is likely that the nucleotide exchange factor GrpE enables the release and folding of DksA from DnaK, as recently described for the multidomain protein firefly luciferase in vitro (38).

FIG 8.

FIG 8

Model for the DnaK/DnaJ-mediated assembly of a DksA-RNA polymerase (RNAP) complex in response to reactive oxygen species. Hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) induces disulfide formation and zinc release in the transcriptional regulator DksA. DnaJ recognizes misfolded, disulfide-bonded DksA as a client protein. The oxidoreductase activity of DnaJ reduces the disulfide bonds in DksA, transferring the reduced, unfolded DksA protein to ATP-bound DnaK. The J domain of DnaJ stimulates ATPase activity of DnaK, which firmly binds to unfolded DksA. Although not proven in our investigations, it is possible that the nucleotide exchange factor GrpE facilitates refolding of DksA by DnaK. Together, the DnaK/DnaJ/GrpE chaperone system enables the formation of RNA polymerase-DksA complexes in response to oxidative stress.

The DksA regulator was identified in a genetic screen for loci that complemented heat shock defects of a dnaKJ mutant E. coli strain (13). The authors speculated that “some of the dnaK mutant phenotypes are due to lower expression of dksA.” According to this idea, dksA mRNA levels were increased upon the overexpression of dksA in ΔdnaK E. coli (13). The overexpression of dksA in the suppressor mutant appears to be driven by a transcript originating upstream of the major dksA promoter (39). The overexpression of DksA has been hypothesized to activate the transcription of an unidentified product whose promoter is directly or indirectly regulated by artificially elevated DksA concentrations (13, 39). The differential thermosensitivity of ΔdnaK, ΔdnaJ, and ΔdksA Salmonella strains is in line with the latter model, and suggest that elevated DksA levels reverse some of the phenotypes associated with dnaKJ mutations indirectly. In E. coli, rescuing of the thermosensitivity associated with the ΔdnaKJ mutation by the overexpression of DksA has recently been shown to be dependent on polyphosphate synthesis (40). Kang and Craig entertained the possibility that under some conditions DnaK and DksA may work together (13). Our investigations demonstrate that DnaK, DnaJ, and DksA form a functional complex that activates the transcriptional program known as the stringent response in Salmonella experiencing oxidative stress (Fig. 8). In comparison with its interactions with DnaJ, DksA appears to interact weakly or transiently with DnaK as suggested by the lack of reconstitution of a bacterial two-hybrid system between pT18-DksA and pT25-DnaK constructs. These observations are consistent with our previously published tandem-affinity purification (TAP) approaches, which identified interactions of DksA with DnaJ but not with DnaK (27). Nonetheless, the transient interactions of DnaK with DnaJ/DksA complexes allow the formation of transcriptionally active RNA polymerase in response to oxidative stress.

Zinc-starving Pseudomonas replaces the expression of a zinc-replete C4 DksA protein with a zinc-lacking C2 DksA paralogue (41, 42), suggesting that the metalation of DksA is susceptible to the levels of zinc in the environment. Because the zinc cation plays a structural role in C4 DksA homologues (43), a fraction of DksA could be present as an apoprotein in bacterial cells starved for zinc. Partially unfolded, demetalated DksA apoproteins in zinc-starved bacteria may become clients of the DnaK/DnaJ chaperone system. Future experiments will be needed to determine if the DnaK/DnaJ chaperone system regulates loading of DksA into RNA polymerase in response to stimuli such as zinc starvation.

Our investigations are consistent with a model in which oxidation of thiol groups in the globular domain of DksA triggers partial unfolding of this transcriptional factor (27). Thiol oxidation of DksA cysteines rather than carbonylation of amino acid residues must signal the interaction of oxidized DksA with DnaJ, as suggested by the fact that the addition of the thiol-reducing agent dithiothreitol (DTT) reversed the binding of oxidized DksA to DnaJ (27). The partial unfolding of DksA elicited upon exposure to reactive oxygen species signals binding to DnaJ. Cysteine residues in the Zn2-binding domain and CTD of DnaJ exhibit holdase and oxidoreductase activities against oxidized DksA. Our investigations herein indicate that DnaJ presents the reduced DksA protein to DnaK. This interaction involves the G/F and zinc-binding domains of DnaJ, as shown previously for other clients (9, 44). In the absence of DnaJ, DnaK is unable to bind to oxidized DksA. Independently of delivering DksA to DnaK, DnaJ’s HPD motif must trigger ATPase activity of its cochaperone, as suggested by the fact that a DnaJ H33Q mutant lacking a key residue in the J domain and a DnaK variant bearing the T199A mutation at the ATPase catalytic site are equally unable to stimulate DksA-RNA polymerase complex formation in response to H2O2.

Our investigations demonstrate that the DnaK/DnaJ chaperone system is critically important for the antioxidant defenses of Salmonella. Aerobic and anaerobic Salmonella strains bearing deletions in dnaK or dnaJ are hypersusceptible to the antimicrobial activity of H2O2. This observation is consistent with published data that showed that DnaK and DnaJ protect E. coli and Salmonella, respectively, against H2O2 killing (27, 45). Most of the antioxidant defenses associated with this chaperone system are codependent on DnaK and DnaJ. However, these heat shock proteins can also independently antagonize oxidative stress. For example, DnaJ’s oxidoreductase, holdase, and foldase activities by themselves may contribute to the antioxidant defenses of Salmonella (27). On the other hand, DnaK can form a functional chaperone system with the DnaJ-like proteins CbpA and DjlA (4648). The nucleotide exchange factor GrpE facilitates recycling of DnaK-ADP to DnaK-ATP, thus aiding the folding of client proteins (38). It is quite possible that the DnaK/DnaJ-dependent antioxidant defenses described herein involve GrpE. Unfortunately, we were not able to test this hypothesis, because despite multiple attempts, we were unable to generate a ΔgrpE Salmonella strain. This suggests that grpE is essential in dnaK+ dnaJ+ Salmonella, as described for E. coli (49).

DnaK has previously been shown to mediate antioxidant defense in E. coli. We now demonstrate that the antioxidant defenses associated with DnaK mediate resistance of Salmonella against the oxidative burst of the phagocyte NADPH oxidase. The critical role DnaK plays in resistance to NOX2-dependent antimicrobial activity likely stems from the pleotropic functions of this chaperone. By shortening the dwelling time proteins spend in the unfolded state, the DnaK/DnaJ chaperone system minimizes the risk of metal-catalyzed carbonylation of the side chains of proline, lysine, arginine, and threonine residues (31, 5052). DnaK may add to the antioxidant defenses and Salmonella pathogenesis by other means as well. For example, the DnaK/DnaJ-dependent regulation of branched-chain amino acid biosynthesis could play important roles in Salmonella pathogenesis (19). Moreover, E. coli cells bearing a mutation in dnaK favor the Entner-Doudoroff pathway (53). Oxidative phosphorylation satisfies most energetic needs of cells using the Entner-Doudoroff pathway (52). Because overutilization of the respiratory chain over glycolysis predisposes to oxidative stress (54), a preference for respiration that follows the utilization of the Entner-Doudoroff pathway may contribute to the sensitivity of ΔdnaKJ mutants to oxidative stress. In addition, our investigations demonstrate that DnaK is critical for the H2O2-dependent activation of the stringent response, a genetic program previously associated with antioxidant defenses (27, 29).

The antioxidant defenses associated with the DnaK/DnaJ cochaperone system protect Salmonella against the respiratory burst sustained by the phagocyte NADPH oxidase. It will be interesting to evaluate the extent to which DnaK-regulated resistance to oxidative stress contributes to the virulence ascribed to this chaperone in diverse bacterial pathogens such as Brucella suis, Mycobacterium tuberculosis, Staphylococcus aureus, Streptococcus mutans, Campylobacter, and Helicobacter (55). However, the contribution of DnaK to bacterial pathogenesis is unlikely to be limited to resistance to oxidative stress. For example, DnaK optimizes expression of invasion programs in Salmonella (56).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Bacterial strains, plasmids, and growth conditions.

The derivatives of Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium strain 14032s and Escherichia coli, as well as the plasmids used in this study, are listed in Tables S1 and S2. Deletion mutants were constructed using the λ-Red homologous recombination system (57). Pfu ultra-high-fidelity DNA polymerase (Agilent, Santa Clara, CA) was used to perform genetic mutagenesis. Bacteria were grown in LB broth and E salts medium [0.2% MgSO4, 2% C6H8O7·H2O, 10% K2HPO4, 3.5% Na(NH4)HPO4·4H2O] supplemented with 0.1% Casamino Acids and 4% d-glucose (pH 7.0) (EGCA) (41) at the permissible temperatures 30°C or 37°C. Penicillin, chloramphenicol, and kanamycin were added at the final concentrations of 250, 40, and 50 μg/ml, respectively.

TABLE S1

Bacterial strains used in this study. Download Table S1, DOC file, 0.05 MB (55.5KB, doc) .

Copyright © 2021 Kim et al.

This content is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license.

TABLE S2

Plasmids used in this study. Download Table S2, DOC file, 0.06 MB (58.5KB, doc) .

Copyright © 2021 Kim et al.

This content is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license.

Animal studies.

For survival assays, 6- to 8-week-old C57BL/6 mice and congenic nox2−/− mice deficient in the gp91phox membrane subunit of the phagocyte NADPH oxidase (58) were inoculated intraperitoneally (i.p.) with ∼150 CFU of Salmonella grown overnight in LB broth. Mouse survival was monitored on a daily basis over 2 weeks. Salmonella-infected mice showing signs of disease were humanely euthanized via CO2 inhalation and cervical dislocation. Percent survival was calculated as follows: [(number alive at the end of that day)/(number alive at the beginning of that day)] × 100. For competitive assays, 6- to 8-week-old C57BL/6 mice were inoculated i.p. with ∼1,000 CFU of a mixture containing equal numbers of two strains of Salmonella. The bacterial burden was quantified in livers and spleens 4 days postinfection by plating on LB agar containing the appropriate antibiotics. Competitive index was calculated as follows: (strain 1/strain 2)output/(strain 1/strain 2)input. All mice were used according to protocols approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee (IACUC) at the University of Colorado School of Medicine.

Susceptibility to H2O2.

Stationary-phase Salmonella organisms grown in LB broth at 30°C were diluted in phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) to a final concentration of 106 CFU/ml. The samples were treated with or without 200 μM H2O2 at 37°C for 2 h. Where indicated, anaerobic cultures were challenged with 1 μM H2O2 for 2 h. The percent surviving bacteria was calculated as follows: [(CFU from H2O2-treated sample/CFU from untreated sample)] × 100.

Protein carbonylation.

To minimize endogenous oxidation of proteins generated under aerobic conditions, Salmonella cultures were passaged for 10 days at 30°C in LB broth in a Bactron anaerobic chamber (Shel Lab, Cornelius, OR) containing 5% hydrogen, 5% carbon dioxide, and 90% nitrogen. The bacterial cultures were diluted in PBS to an optical density at 600 nm (OD600) of 0.3 in an anaerobic chamber, and the specimens were treated with or without 1 μM H2O2 at 30°C for 2 h. The cultures were harvested by centrifugation under anaerobic conditions and resuspended in PBS containing 1 mM DTT. Samples were disrupted by sonication with 40% amplitude for 4 s under aerobic conditions, and protein concentration was determined with the bicinchoninic acid (BCA) protein assay kit (Pierce, Rockford, IL). The carbonyl groups in amino acid side chains were derivatized to 2,4-dinitrophenylhydrazone (DNP-hydrazone) by reaction with 2,4-dinitrophenylhydrazine (DNPH) supplied by the Oxyblot protein oxidation detection kit (Millipore Sigma, St. Louis, MO). Two micrograms of DNP-derivatized protein samples was subjected to 12% SDS-PAGE followed by immunoblotting using a 1:2,000 dilution of anti-DNP antibody (Millipore Sigma, St. Louis, MO), followed by a 1:10,000 dilution of goat anti-mouse IgG conjugated with horseradish peroxidase (Pierce). Blots were visualized using the ECL Prime Western blotting detection system supplied by GE (GE Healthcare Life Sciences, Marlborough, MA). Density of protein carbonylation was measured by the ImageJ program provided by NIH. After challenge with 1 μM H2O2 for 2 h under anaerobic conditions, the percent surviving bacteria was enumerated by plating on LB agar and incubated overnight in an anaerobic chamber. Percent survival was calculated as follows: [(CFU from H2O2-treated sample/CFU from untreated sample)] × 100.

RNA isolation and quantitative RT-PCR.

Salmonella grown overnight in LB broth at 30°C in a BACTRON anaerobic chamber were subcultured 1:100 in EGCA medium. Cells grown to an OD600 of 0.3 were treated with or without 1 μM H2O2 at 30°C for 30 min. Total RNA was isolated using the High Pure RNA isolation kit (Roche, Indianapolis, IN). The synthesis of cDNA was achieved using 1 μg of purified RNA, TaqMan gene expression master mix (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Grand Island, NY), and N6 random primers (Thermo Fisher Scientific). Quantitative RT-PCR was performed using specific primers and probes (Table S3) containing 5′,6-carboxyfluorescein and 3′ black hole quencher 1 modification in a CFX Connect real-time system (Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA). PCR-amplified DNA fragments containing the gene of interest were used to generate standard curves. The abundance of transcripts within each sample was normalized to internal transcripts of the housekeeping gene rpoD.

TABLE S3

Oligonucleotides used in this study. Download Table S3, DOC file, 0.08 MB (81.5KB, doc) .

Copyright © 2021 Kim et al.

This content is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license.

Overexpression and purification of proteins.

dksA, dnaK, and its point mutant were cloned into BamHI and XhoI sites of the glutathione S-transferase (GST) fusion plasmid pGEX-6P-1 (GE Healthcare Life Sciences). Full-length dnaK, dnaJ, and its point mutants were cloned as C-terminal 6×His fusions into NdeI and XhoI sites of the pET-22b(+) plasmid (Novagen, Madison, WI). All constructs and mutations were confirmed by sequence analysis. Plasmids were expressed in E. coli BL21(DE3) (Thermo Fisher Scientific) (Table S1). Briefly, cells grown in LB broth at 37°C to an OD600 of 0.5 to 0.8 were treated with 0.1 mM isopropyl-β-d-thiogalactopyranoside. After 3 h, the cells were harvested, disrupted by sonication, and centrifuged to obtain cell extracts. GST and 6×His-tagged fusion proteins were purified using glutathione-Sepharose 4B (bioWORLD, Dublin, OH) and TALON metal-affinity chromatography (Clontech, Mountain View, CA), respectively, according to manufacturer’s protocols.

To perform in vitro transcriptional assays, the GST tags were removed from GST-DksA and GST-DnaK variant proteins bound to a glutathione-Sepharose 4B resin. PreScission protease was added to recombinant GST-DksA, GST-DnaK, or GST-DnaK T199A proteins in PBS containing 10 mM DTT. After overnight incubation at 4°C, untagged proteins were eluted with PBS. For further purification of DksA protein, size exclusion chromatography on Superdex 75 (GE Healthcare Life Sciences) was used. Purified DksA proteins were aliquoted inside a BACTRON anaerobic chamber (Shel Lab). The purity and mass of the recombinant proteins were assessed by SDS-PAGE.

In vitro transcription.

In vitro transcription reactions were quantified by quantitative reverse transcription-PCR (qRT-PCR) as previously described (27, 59). Briefly, oxidized or reduced DksA proteins were prepared by treatment with 1 mM H2O2 or 1 mM DTT in 40 mM HEPES, pH 7.4, at 37°C for 1 h. Excess H2O2 or DTT was removed using an Amicon Ultra-10 centrifugal filter (Millipore Sigma, St. Louis, MO). Transcription reactions were performed in 40 mM HEPES (pH 7.4), 2 mM MgCl2, 60 mM potassium glutamate, 0.1% Nonidet P-40, a 200 μM concentration each of ATP, GTP, CTP, and UTP (Thermo Fisher Scientific), 8 U RiboLock RNase inhibitor (Thermo Fisher Scientific), 1 nM livJ DNA templates (Table S2), 5 nM E. coli holoenzyme RNA polymerase (New England Biolabs, Ipswich, MA), and 5 μM oxidized or reduced DksA proteins. Where indicated, the reaction mixtures contained 50 nM DnaJ variants in the presence and absence of 500 nM tag-free DnaK variant proteins. Reaction mixtures were incubated at 37°C for 10 min and then heat inactivated at 70°C for 10 min. After DNase I treatment, template DNA was removed from the reactions with a DNA-free DNA removal kit (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Grand Island, NY), and the resulting RNA was used as the template to generate cDNA using 100 U Moloney murine leukemia virus (MMLV) reverse transcriptase (Promega, Madison, WI), 0.45 μM N6 random hexamer primers (Thermo Fisher Scientific) and 20 U RNase inhibitor (Promega). The amount of cDNA synthesized following 1 h of incubation at 42°C was quantified by qRT-PCR using gene-specific primers and probes (Table S3). Specific transcripts were normalized to standard curves using known transcript concentrations.

Bacterial two-hybrid system and β-galactosidase activity.

A bacterial adenylate cyclase two-hybrid system (Euromedex, Souffelweyersheim, France) was used to validate interactions between DnaK, DksA, and DnaJ. The pKT25-cloned plasmids harboring DksA, DnaK, DnaJ, or RpoA as a N-terminal T25 fusion were cotransformed with the pUT18C vector encoding DksA, RpoA, or DnaJ variants as a C-terminal T18 fusion into E. coli BTH101. β-Galactosidase activity was determined in samples collected at stationary phase after 18 h of culture at 30°C in a shaker incubator. Enzyme activity expressed as Miller units was calculated as (A420 × 1,000)/[time (min) × A600 × cell volume (ml)] (27).

Pulldown assays.

Interactions between recombinant proteins in vitro were analyzed using pulldown assays (27, 33). Reduced or oxidized GST-DksA proteins were prepared by treatment with 1 mM DTT or 100 μM H2O2 for 1 h at 37°C. One micromole of GST-DksA or GST-DnaK variant proteins (i.e., bait) was incubated for 2 h with 200 μl glutathione-Sepharose 4B beads (bioWORLD, Dublin, OH) in 50 mM Tris-HCl buffer, pH 7.5, at 4°C. The columns were washed with 20 bed volumes of 50 mM Tris-HCl buffer, pH 7.5, and incubated for 2 h at 4°C with rotation in the presence of 1 μmol of C-terminally 6×His-tagged wild-type DnaK, DnaJ, or DnaJ variants (i.e., prey). Where indicated, interactions of GST-DnaK variants with DnaJ-6×His variants were also tested. The columns were washed with 50 mM Tris-HCl buffer, pH 7.5, containing 50 mM NaCl. The proteins were eluted with 50 mM Tris-HCl buffer, pH 7.5, containing 500 mM NaCl. Eluted proteins were precipitated by 10% trichloroacetic acid (TCA). 6×His-tag fusion proteins were loaded onto 12% SDS-PAGE gels and detected by immunoblotting using a 1:1,000 dilution of a rabbit anti-6×His antibody (Rockland Immunochemicals, Limerick, PA), followed by a 1:10,000 dilution of goat anti-rabbit IgG conjugated with horseradish peroxidase (Pierce, Rockford, IL). The blots were processed using the ECL Prime Western blotting detection reagent (GE Healthcare Life Sciences) and visualized with a ChemiDoc XRS imaging system (Bio-Rad). Purified GST proteins were used as negative controls.

Analysis of DksA redox by alkylation with AMS.

To detect thiol modification of recombinant DksA cysteine residues, 5 μM DksA was incubated for 1 h in 100 mM potassium phosphate buffer, pH 7.4, with 1 mM H2O2 at 37°C in the presence and absence of 5 μM DnaJ or DnaJ variants. Samples were precipitated by 15% TCA, resuspended in AMS buffer (1 M Tris-HCl [pH 8.0], 1 mM EDTA, 0.1% SDS, and 15 mM 4-acetamido-4′-maleimidyl stilbene-2,2′-disulfonic acid [AMS] [Thermo Fisher Scientific]), incubated at 37°C for 1 h in the dark, and loaded onto nonreducing 18% SDS-PAGE gels for visualization using Coomassie brilliant blue staining.

Bacterial growth in response to heat.

Salmonella organisms grown overnight in LB broth at 30°C were diluted 1:100 in LB broth and cultured for 6 h at 30°C or 45°C. Bacterial growth was followed spectrophotometrically at A600.

Motility assays.

Approximately 107 Salmonella cells grown in LB broth overnight were spotted on the surfaces of 0.3% LB agar plates. The diameter of growth was measured in millimeters after 3.5 h of incubation at 37°C.

Intracellular survival.

J774 cells were cultured in RPMI medium (Millipore-Sigma) supplemented with 10% heat-inactivated fetal bovine serum (Thermo Fisher Scientific), 1 mM sodium pyruvate (Thermo Fisher Scientific), 2 mM l-glutamine (Thermo Fisher Scientific) and 20 mM HEPES (Thermo Fisher Scientific). Confluent J774 cells were infected at a multiplicity of infection (MOI) of 2 with Salmonella grown overnight in LB broth at 30°C. Intracellular survival was assessed after cell host lysis by the addition of PBS containing 0.1% Triton X-100 (Thermo Fisher Scientific). Specimens were serially diluted in PBS, and the Salmonella burden was enumerated on LB agar plates after overnight growth. Fold replication was calculated from the number of bacteria recovered after 18 h of infection compared to that at time zero.

TEXT S1

Determination of zinc content. Download Text S1, DOC file, 0.06 MB (63KB, doc) .

Copyright © 2021 Kim et al.

This content is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

We thank Jessica Jones-Carson for kindly providing the mice used in this article.

These studies were supported by VA Grants BX002073 and IK6 BX005384, and NIH grants R01AI155493 and R01AI136520.

Footnotes

Citation Kim J-S, Liu L, Vázquez-Torres A. 2021. The DnaK/DnaJ chaperone system enables RNA polymerase-DksA complex formation in Salmonella experiencing oxidative stress. mBio 12:e03443-20. https://doi.org/10.1128/mBio.03443-20.

Contributor Information

Ju-Sim Kim, Email: jusim.kim@cuanschutz.edu.

Andrés Vázquez-Torres, Email: andres.vazquez-torres@cuanschutz.edu.

Nancy E. Freitag, University of Illinois at Chicago

REFERENCES

  • 1.Rosenzweig R, Nillegoda NB, Mayer MP, Bukau B. 2019. The Hsp70 chaperone network. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 20:665–680. doi: 10.1038/s41580-019-0133-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Szabo A, Langer T, Schroder H, Flanagan J, Bukau B, Hartl FU. 1994. The ATP hydrolysis-dependent reaction cycle of the Escherichia coli Hsp70 system DnaK, DnaJ, and GrpE. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 91:10345–10349. doi: 10.1073/pnas.91.22.10345. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Mayer MP, Kityk R. 2015. Insights into the molecular mechanism of allostery in Hsp70s. Front Mol Biosci 2:58. doi: 10.3389/fmolb.2015.00058. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Mayer PM. 2013. Hsp70 chaperone dynamics and molecular mechanism. Trends Biochem Sci 38:507–514. doi: 10.1016/j.tibs.2013.08.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Szabo A, Korszun R, Hartl FU, Flanagan J. 1996. A zinc finger-like domain of the molecular chaperone DnaJ is involved in binding to denatured protein substrates. EMBO J 15:408–417. doi: 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1996.tb00371.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Bardwell JCA, Tilly K, Craig E, King J, Zylicz M, Georgopoulos C. 1986. The nucleotide sequence of the Escherichia coli K12 dnaJ+ gene. J Biol Chem 261:1782–1785. doi: 10.1016/S0021-9258(17)36008-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Martinez-Yamout M, Legge GB, Zhang O, Wright PE, Dyson HJ. 2000. Solution structure of the cysteine-rich domain of the Escherichia coli chaperone protein DnaJ. J Mol Biol 300:805–818. doi: 10.1006/jmbi.2000.3923. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Kröncke KD, Haase H, Beyersmann D, Kolb-Bachofen V, Hayer-Hartl MK. 2001. Nitric oxide inhibits the cochaperone activity of the RING finger-like protein. DnaJ Nitric Oxide 5:289–295. doi: 10.1006/niox.2001.0354. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Linke K, Wolfram T, Bussemer J, Jakob U. 2003. The roles of the two zinc binding sites in DnaJ. J Biol Chem 278:44457–44466. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M307491200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Tang W, Wang CC. 2001. Zinc fingers and thiol-disulfide oxidoreductase activities of chaperone DnaJ. Biochemistry 40:14985–14994. doi: 10.1021/bi0107593. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Mattoo RU, Farina Henriquez Cuendet A, Subanna S, Finka A, Priya S, Sharma SK, Goloubinoff P. 2014. Synergism between a foldase and an unfoldase: reciprocal dependence between the thioredoxin-like activity of DnaJ and the polypeptide-unfolding activity of DnaK. Front Mol Biosci 31:7. doi: 10.3389/fmolb.2014.00007. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Doron L, Goloubinoff P, Shapira M. 2018. ZnJ2 Is a member of a large chaperone family in the chloroplast of photosynthetic organisms that features a DnaJ-like Zn-finger domain. Front Mol Biosci 5:2. doi: 10.3389/fmolb.2018.00002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Kang PJ, Craig EA. 1990. Identification and characterization of a new Escherichia coli gene that is a dosage dependent suppressor of a dnaK deletion mutation. J Bacteriol 172:2055–2064. doi: 10.1128/JB.172.4.2055-2064.1990. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Shi W, Zhou Y, Wild J, Adler J, Gross CA. 1992. DnaK, DnaJ and GrpE are required for flagellum in Escherichia coli. J Bacteriol 174:6256–6263. doi: 10.1128/JB.174.19.6256-6263.1992. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.McCarty J, Walker G. 1994. DnaK mutants defective in ATPase activity are defective in negative regulation of the heat shock response: expression mutant DnaK proteins results in filamentation. J Bacteriol 176:764–780. doi: 10.1128/JB.176.3.764-780.1994. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Wall D, Zylicz M, Georgopoulos C. 1994. The NH2-terminal 108 amino acids of the Escherichia coli DnaJ protein stimulate the ATPase activity of DnaK and are sufficient for λ replication. J Biol Chem 269:5446–5451. doi: 10.1016/S0021-9258(17)37706-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Haseltine WA, Block R. 1973. Synthesis of guanosine tetra- and pentaphosphate requires the presence of a codon-specific, uncharged transfer ribonucleic acid in the acceptor site of ribosomes. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 70:1564–1568. doi: 10.1073/pnas.70.5.1564. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Gallant J, Palmer L, Pao CC. 1977. Anomalous synthesis of ppGpp in growing cells. Cell 11:181–185. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(77)90329-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Fitzsimmons LF, Liu L, Kim JS, Jones-Carson J, Vázquez-Torres A. 2018. Salmonella reprograms nucleotide metabolism in its adaptation to nitrosative stress. mBio 9:e00211-18. doi: 10.1128/mBio.00211-18. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Fitzsimmons LF, Liu L, Kant S, Kim JS, Till JK, Jones-Carson J, Porwollik S, McClelland M, Vázquez-Torres A. 2020. SpoT induces intracellular Salmonella virulence programs in the phagosome. mBio 11:e03397-19. doi: 10.1128/mBio.03397-19. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Ross W, Vrentas CE, Sanchez-Vazquez P, Gaal T, Gourse RL. 2013. The magic spot: a ppGpp binding site on E. coli RNA polymerase responsible for regulation of transcription initiation. Mol Cell 50:420–429. doi: 10.1016/j.molcel.2013.03.021. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Ross W, Sanchez-Vazquez P, Chen AY, Lee JH, Burgos HL, Gourse RL. 2016. ppGpp binding to a site at the RNAP-DksA interface accounts for its dramatic effects on transcription initiation during the stringent response. Mol Cell 62:811–823. doi: 10.1016/j.molcel.2016.04.029. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Paul BJ, Barker MM, Ross W, Schneider DA, Webb C, Foster JW, Gourse RL. 2004. DksA: a critical component of the transcription initiation machinery that potentiates the regulation of rRNA promoters by ppGpp and the initiating NTP. Cell 118:311–322. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2004.07.009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Zenkin N, Yuzenkova Y. 2015. New insights into the functions of transcription factors that bind the RNA polymerase secondary channel. Biomolecules 5:1195–1209. doi: 10.3390/biom5031195. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Tehranchi AK, Blankschien MD, Zhang Y, Halliday JA, Srivatsan A, Peng J, Herman C, Wang JD. 2010. The transcription factor DksA prevents conflicts between DNA replication and transcription machinery. Cell 141:595–605. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2010.03.036. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Myka KK, Gottesman ME. 2019. DksA and DNA double-strand break repair. Curr Genet 65:1297–1300. doi: 10.1007/s00294-019-00983-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Kim JS, Liu L, Fitzsimmons LF, Wang Y, Crawford MA, Mastrogiovanni M, Trujillo M, Till JK, Radi R, Dai S, Vázquez-Torres A. 2018. DksA-DnaJ redox interactions provide a signal for the activation of bacterial RNA polymerase. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 115:E11780–E11789. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1813572115. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Henard CA, Vázquez-Torres A. 2012. DksA-dependent resistance of Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium against the antimicrobial activity of inducible nitric oxide synthase. Infect Immun 80:1373–1380. doi: 10.1128/IAI.06316-11. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Henard CA, Bourret TJ, Song M, Vázquez-Torres A. 2010. Control of redox balance by the stringent response regulatory protein promotes antioxidant defenses of Salmonella. J Biol Chem 285:36785–36793. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M110.160960. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Dukan S, Farewell A, Ballesteros M, Taddei F, Radman M, Nyström T. 2000. Protein oxidation in response to increased transcriptional or translational errors. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 97:5746–5749. doi: 10.1073/pnas.100422497. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Fredriksson Å, Ballesteros M, Dukan S, Nyström T. 2005. Defense against protein carbonylation by DnaK/DnaJ and proteases of the heat shock regulon. J Bacteriol 187:4207–4213. doi: 10.1128/JB.187.12.4207-4213.2005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Fink RC, Evans MR, Porwollik S, Vazquez-Torres A, Jones-Carson J, Troxell B, Libby SJ, McClelland M, Hassan HM. 2007. FNR is a global regulator of virulence and anaerobic metabolism in Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium (ATCC 14028s). J Bacteriol 189:2262–2273. doi: 10.1128/JB.00726-06. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Henard CA, Tapscott T, Crawford MA, Husain M, Doulias PT, Porwollik S, Liu L, McClelland M, Ischiropoulos H, Vazquez-Torres A. 2014. The 4-cysteine zinc-finger motif of the RNA polymerase regulator DksA serves as a thiol switch for sensing oxidative and nitrosative stress. Mol Microbiol 91:790–804. doi: 10.1111/mmi.12498. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.McCarty JS, Walker GC. 1991. Dnak as a thermometer: threonine-199 is site of autophosphorylation and is critical for ATPase activity. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 88:9513–9517. doi: 10.1073/pnas.88.21.9513. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Potrykus K, Cashel M. 2008. (p)ppGpp: still magical? Annu Rev Microbiol 62:35–51. doi: 10.1146/annurev.micro.62.081307.162903. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Barker MM, Gourse RL. 2001. Regulation of rRNA transcription correlates with nucleoside triphosphate sensing. J Bacteriol 183:6315–6323. doi: 10.1128/JB.183.21.6315-6323.2001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Barker MM, Gaal T, Josaitis CA, Gourse RL. 2001. Mechanism of regulation of transcription initiation by ppGpp. I. Effects of ppGpp on transcription initiation in vivo and in vitro. J Mol Biol 305:673–688. doi: 10.1006/jmbi.2000.4327. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Imamoglu R, Balchin D, Hayer-Hartl M, Hartl FU. 2020. Bacterial Hsp70 resolves misfolded states and accelerates productive folding of a multi-domain protein. Nat Commun 11:365. doi: 10.1038/s41467-019-14245-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Chandrangsu P, Wang L, Choi SH, Gourse RL. 2012. Suppression of a dnaKJ deletion by multicopy dksA results from non-feedback-regulated transcripts that originate upstream of the major dksA promoter. J Bacteriol 194:1437–1446. doi: 10.1128/JB.06726-11. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Gray MJ. 2020. Interactions between DksA and stress-responsive alternative sigma factors control inorganic polyphosphate accumulation in Escherichia coli. J Bacteriol 202:e00133-20. doi: 10.1128/JB.00133-20. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Crawford MA, Tapscott T, Fitzsimmons LF, Liu L, Reyes AM, Libby SJ, Trujillo M, Fang FC, Radi R, Vázquez-Torres A. 2016. Redox-active sensing by bacterial DksA transcription factors is determined by cysteine and zinc content. mBio 7:e02161-15. doi: 10.1128/mBio.02161-15. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Furman R, Biswas T, Danhart EM, Foster MP, Tsodikov OV, Artsimovitch I. 2013. DksA2, a zinc-independent structural analog of the transcription factor DksA. FEBS Lett 587:614–619. doi: 10.1016/j.febslet.2013.01.073. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Perederina A, Svetlov V, Vassylyeva MN, Tahirov TH, Yokoyama S, Artsimovitch I, Vassylyev DG. 2004. Regulation through the secondary channel—structural framework for ppGpp-DksA synergism during transcription. Cell 118:297–309. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2004.06.030. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Perales-Calvo J, Muga A, Moro F. 2010. Role of DnaJ G/F-rich domain in conformational recognition and binding of protein substrates. J Biol Chem 285:34231–34239. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M110.144642. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Echave P, Esparza-Ceron MA, Cabiscol E, Tamarit J, Ros J, Membrillo-Hernandez J, Lin EC. 2002. DnaK dependence of mutant ethanol oxidoreductases evolved for aerobic function and protective role of the chaperone against protein oxidative damage in Escherichia coli. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 99:4626–4631. doi: 10.1073/pnas.072504199. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Ueguchi C, Kakeda M, Yamada H, Mizuno T. 1994. An analogue of the DnaJ molecular chaperon in Escherichia coli. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 91:1054–1058. doi: 10.1073/pnas.91.3.1054. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Gur E, Biran D, Shechter N, Genevaux P, Georgopoulos C, Ron EZ. 2004. The Escherichia coli DjlA and CbpA proteins can substitute for DnaJ in DnaK-mediated protein disaggregation. J Bacteriol 186:7236–7242. doi: 10.1128/JB.186.21.7236-7242.2004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Sarraf NS, Baardsnes J, Cheng J, O'Connor-McCourt M, Cygler M, Ekiel I. 2010. Structural basis of the regulation of the CbpA co-chaperone by its specific modulator CbpM. J Mol Biol 398:111–121. doi: 10.1016/j.jmb.2010.03.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Wu B, Ang D, Snavely M, Georgopoulos C. 1994. Isolation and characterization of point mutations in the Escherichia coli grpE heat shock gene. J Bacteriol 176:6965–6973. doi: 10.1128/JB.176.22.6965-6973.1994. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Santra M, Dill KA, de Graff AMR. 2018. How do chaperones protect a cell's proteins from oxidative damage? Cell Syst 6:743–751.E3. doi: 10.1016/j.cels.2018.05.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Fredriksson Å, Ballesteros M, Dukan S, Nystrom T. 2006. Induction of the heat shock regulon in response to increased mistranslation requires oxidative modification of the malformed proteins. Mol Microbiol 59:350–359. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2958.2005.04947.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Flamholz A, Noor E, Bar-Even A, Liebermeister W, Milo R. 2013. Glycolytic strategy as a tradeoff between energy yield and protein cost. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 110:10039–10044. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1215283110. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Angles F, Castanie-Cornet MP, Slama N, Dinclaux M, Cirinesi AM, Portais JC, Letisse F, Genevaux P. 2017. Multilevel interaction of the DnaK/DnaJ(HSP70/HSP40) stress-responsive chaperone machine with the central metabolism. Sci Rep 7:41341. doi: 10.1038/srep41341. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Chakraborty S, Liu L, Fitzsimmons L, Porwollik S, Kim JS, Desai P, McClelland M, Vázquez-Torres A. 2020. Glycolytic reprogramming in Salmonella counters NOX2-mediated dissipation of ΔpH. Nat Commun 11:1783. doi: 10.1038/s41467-020-15604-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Ghazaei C. 2017. Role and mechanism of the Hsp70 molecular chaperone machines in bacterial pathogens. J Med Microbiol 66:259–265. doi: 10.1099/jmm.0.000429. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Takaya A, Tomoyasu T, Matsui H, Yamamoto T. 2004. The DnaK/DnaJ chaperone machinery of Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium is essential for invasion of epithelial cells and survival within macrophages, leading to systemic infection. Infect Immun 72:1364–1373. doi: 10.1128/IAI.72.3.1364-1373.2004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Datsenko KA, Wanner BL. 2000. One-step inactivation of chromosomal genes in Escherichia coli K-12 using PCR products. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 97:6640–6645. doi: 10.1073/pnas.120163297. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Pollock JD, Williams DA, Gifford MA, Li LL, Du X, Fisherman J, Orkin SH, Doerschuk CM, Dinauer MC. 1995. Mouse model of X-linked chronic granulomatous disease, an inherited defect in phagocyte superoxide production. Nat Genet 9:202–209. doi: 10.1038/ng0295-202. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Tapscott T, Kim JS, Crawford MA, Fitzsimmons L, Liu L, Jones-Carson J, Vazquez-Torres A. 2018. Guanosine tetraphosphate relieves the negative regulation of Salmonella pathogenicity island-2 gene transcription exerted by the AT-rich ssrA discriminator region. Sci Rep 8:9465. doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-27780-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

FIG S1

Determination of DnaK and DnaJ expression of Salmonella strains. Download FIG S1, TIF file, 1.0 MB (1MB, tif) .

Copyright © 2021 Kim et al.

This content is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license.

FIG S2

Transcription of hisG in Salmonella strains and titration of DnaK concentration of in vitro transcription. Download FIG S2, TIF file, 0.8 MB (828.3KB, tif) .

Copyright © 2021 Kim et al.

This content is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license.

FIG S3

Characterization of DnaK binding to DnaJ H33Q and determination of zinc content of recombinant DnaJ variants. Download FIG S3, TIF file, 1.4 MB (1.4MB, tif) .

Copyright © 2021 Kim et al.

This content is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license.

FIG S4

Effect of DnaJ H33Q and DnaK T199A mutations on thermotolerance, motility, and pathogenesis of Salmonella. Download FIG S4, TIF file, 0.5 MB (517.2KB, tif) .

Copyright © 2021 Kim et al.

This content is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license.

TABLE S1

Bacterial strains used in this study. Download Table S1, DOC file, 0.05 MB (55.5KB, doc) .

Copyright © 2021 Kim et al.

This content is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license.

TABLE S2

Plasmids used in this study. Download Table S2, DOC file, 0.06 MB (58.5KB, doc) .

Copyright © 2021 Kim et al.

This content is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license.

TABLE S3

Oligonucleotides used in this study. Download Table S3, DOC file, 0.08 MB (81.5KB, doc) .

Copyright © 2021 Kim et al.

This content is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license.

TEXT S1

Determination of zinc content. Download Text S1, DOC file, 0.06 MB (63KB, doc) .

Copyright © 2021 Kim et al.

This content is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license.


Articles from mBio are provided here courtesy of American Society for Microbiology (ASM)

RESOURCES