Abstract
Neospora caninum (Family: Sarcocystidae) is an obligate intracellular protozoan. It is one of the most critical abortifacients in ruminants. The seroprevalence of antibodies against N. caninum and its risk factors was investigated among 430 sheep from four North Egyptian governorates, Alexandria, Gharbia, Menofia, and Qalyubia, during the period from 2017 to 2018. Generally, the overall prevalence rate of N. caninum among sheep was 8.6%. The logistic regression analysis for the obtained data revealed that N. caninum increased significantly with age (OR = 2.4, 95% CI: 8.4–18.7) of the ewe (OR = 3.3, 95% CI: 7.6–14.9), particularly among sheep in contact with dogs (OR = 4.9, 95% CI: 7.5–14.3). Besides, locality, season, and pregnancy status of examined sheep had no significant effect on the appearance of N. caninum infection. the present findings confirm the presence of N. caninum among sheep in Egypt which probably play a role in reproductive failure in sheep. Therefore, sanitary measures and monitoring of the infection should be implemented to reduce the spreading of the infection.
Subject terms: Risk factors, Parasitology
Introduction
Neosporosis is a disease caused by Neospora caninum, an obligate intracellular protozoan parasite1. It is a worldwide disease2,3 in which canids are the definitive hosts that shed oocysts to the environment4.
The domestic ruminants like sheep, goats, and cattle act as primary intermediated hosts, getting infected either horizontally through contaminated food and water with sporulated oocysts or vertically from infected mother to offspring5. Neosporosis have a tremendous economic impact as it causes reproductive failure in sheep6. Moreover, it leads to encephalitis in dogs associated with muscle atrophy and difficulty in swallowing. The serosurvey studies on the disease in ruminants including sheep are still minimal7,8.
In the Mediterranean area, sheep farming is favored recently for its increasingly higher production levels, which is regularly not supported by proper feeding and management, unavoidably creating stressful situations and lower resistance to opportunistic pathogens like N. caninum9. Even though the seroprevalence of N. caninum has been reported among sheep and goats worldwide5,10,11, the epidemiological situation of ovine neosporosis in Egypt is rare. There are only two studies had been reported there12,13 and the current situation is still unclear.
Because of the economic importance of neosporosis in ruminants and lack of treatment and vaccination, proper prevention and control strategies are the most approaches for reducing N. caninum infection14,15. Accordingly, the evaluation of related risk factors affecting its prevalence is crucial to reduce the dissemination of the disease2,16–18. Therefore, this study aimed to update the situation of ovine neosporosis among sheep in north Egypt and its associated risk factors after 12 years of missing information.
Materials and methods
Ethics statement
All procedures involving the handling and collection of samples from sheep used in this study were approved by the ethical committee for Animal Experiment of Benha University. The methods were performed in accordance with guidelines and regulations of ethical committee of faculty of veterinary medicine, Benha University and informed consent was obtained from owners.
Study area description
The study area includes four north Egyptian governorates as Alexandria, Gharbia, Menofia, and Qalyubia, situated geographically at 31°12′N 29°55′E; 30.867°N 31.028°E; 30.52°N 30.99°E and 30°25 N to 31°13 E, respectively, Fig. 1. The high temperature representing the climate of selected governorates in summer (average 35 °C) and low temperature (average 15 °C) with little rain in winter allowing vast grazing areas.
Sample collection and preparation
The sample size was calculated using Cochran’s formula19 as follow:
where n is the sample size, Z is the statistic corresponding to level of confidence (95% Confidence interval), p is expected which was 36.1% according to the previous rate reported by El-Ghayash20, e is precision that was 5% and 95% confidence interval. The enrolled sheep were classified by governorates based on the estimated number of sheep in each governorate provided from the governorate's Animal Wealth Development Sector. The enrolled sheep were chosen at random from various geographic locations within governorates.
This seroprevalence study was conducted during the period from 2017 to 2018. A quantitative analysis of questionnaire responses from sheep owners and veterinarians was used to determine the risk factors associated with neosporosis. Such factors include locality, age (< 1, 1–2, and > 2), sex, season, pregnancy status, and dog contact.
Blood samples (5 ml) were collected from each examined sheep's jugular vein using a vacuum tube. The sera were separated from clotted blood after centrifugation at 10.000xg for 15 min, then preserved at − 20 °C until used for the serological analysis.
Serological analysis
Commercial N. caninum Ab ELISA kit (IDexx Laboratories, Westbrook, Maine, USA) was used to investigate the antibodies against N. caninum in examined sheep according to the manufacturer's instructions.
The optical density (OD) of samples was measured by ELISA reader at 450 nm. The results were expressed as the ratio of sample absorbance to positive control absorbance (S/P), according to the following formula:
S/P = OD sample − OD negative control / OD positive control − OD negative control.
A sample was considered positive if S/P% value equals to or more than 40%.
Statistical analysis
The data of the serosurvey was analyzed using SPSS (Ver16, USA). The results were considered significant when the p-value was < 0.05. Univariant logistic regression was used to determine the association between seroprevalence of neosporosis in sheep and variables of age (< 1, 1–2 and > 2 years old), sex (ram and ewes), season (spring, summer, autumn and winter), pregnancy status and presence of dogs in contact with examined sheep. Variables with a P < 0.05 in the univariable analyses were assessed with the multivariable models to determine risk factors, odds ratio (OR) and confidence interval (CI) of each significant variable in Univariable analyses.
Results
Seroprevalence of neosporosis in different governorates
The overall seroprevalence rate of N. caninum in the examined sheep was 8.6%. The seroprevalence rate of N. caninum among sheep was non-significantly different among the surveyed governorates (P = 0.2). The highest seroprevalence rate was observed in Menofia (12.4%, 95% CI: 7.02–29.5), followed by Alexandria (9.6%, 95% CI: 5.2–16.5) and Qalyubia (6.1%, 95% CI: 2.7–12.5), but the lowest prevalence rate was reported in Gharbia (5.8%, 95%CI: 2.1–13.8), Table 1.
Table1.
Locality | No of examined animals | No of positive animals | % | 95%CI | P value |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Alexandria | 125 | 12 | 9.6 | 5.2–16.5 | 0.2 |
Gharbia | 85 | 5 | 5.8 | 2.1–13.8 | |
Menofia | 105 | 13 | 12.4 | 7.02–29.5 | |
Qalyubia | 115 | 7 | 6.1 | 2.7–12.5 | |
Total | 430 | 37 | 8.6 | 6.2–11.7 |
The result is non-significant at P > 0.05.
Risk factors associated with N. caninum infection
The serological data analysis (Table 2) revealed that the seroprevalence rate of N. caninum increased significantly with age (P = 0.03). The highest seropositive rate was observed among sheep > 2 years (12.7%, 95%CI: 8.4–18.7), whereas low rates (5.2%, 95% CI: 1.9–12.4 and 5.8%, 95% CI: 2.8–11.07) were recorded for sheep < 1 and 1–2 years old, respectively.
Table 2.
Parameter | No of examined animals | No of positive | % | 95%CI | P value |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Age | |||||
< 1 | 95 | 5 | 5.2 | 1.9–12.4 | 0.03 |
1–2 | 155 | 9 | 5.8 | 2.8–11.07 | |
> 2 | 180 | 23 | 12.7 | 8.4–18.7 | |
Sex | |||||
Ram | 125 | 4 | 3.2 | 1.03–8.4 | 0.01 |
Ewe | 305 | 33 | 10.8 | 7.6–14.9 | |
Season | |||||
Spring | 94 | 6 | 6.4 | 2.6–13.9 | 0.3 |
Summer | 134 | 15 | 11.2 | 6.6–18.08 | |
Autumn | 116 | 11 | 9.5 | 5.06–16.7 | |
Winter | 86 | 5 | 5.8 | 2.2–13.6 | |
Pregnancy status | |||||
Pregnant | 245 | 24 | 9.8 | 6.5–14.4 | 0.3 |
Non-pregnant | 185 | 13 | 7 | 3.9–11.9 | |
Presence of dogs in contact with sheep | |||||
Yes | 335 | 35 | 10.4 | 7.5–14.3 | 0.01 |
No | 95 | 2 | 2.1 | 0.37–8.1 |
95% CI, 95% confidence interval.
The result is non-significant at P > 0.05.
The result is significant at P < 0.05.
The seropositivity was significantly (P = 0.01) higher among ewes (10.2%, 95% CI: 7.6–14.9) than rams (3.2%, 95%CI: 1.03–8.4). The infection was significantly (P = 0.01) increased in sheep raised in close contact with dogs (10.4%, 95% CI: 7.5–14.3) than in sheep raised without dog contact (2.1%, 95% CI: 0.37–8.1). The season and pregnancy status of the examined sheep showed no significant effect on the prevalence of N. caninum infection, Table 2.
Multivariate logistic regression analysis
Three risk factors have been evaluated by Multivariate logistic regression to assess their effect on the prevalence of N. caninum among sheep. The results revealed that elder sheep > 2 years old, are 2.4 times as likely to be infected than sheep < 1-year-old. Ewes are 3.3 times as likely to be infected than rams (95% CI: 1.2–9.3). Sheep raised in contact with dogs are 4.9 times as likely to be infected with N. caninum than sheep experienced no dog contact (95% CI: 1.2–20.2) (Table 3).
Table 3.
Risk factor | Comparative parameter | Odds ratio (OR) | 95% CI |
---|---|---|---|
Age | < 1 | ref | |
1–2 | 1.1 | 0.36–3.4 | |
> 2 | 2.4 | 0.96–7.1 | |
Sex | Ram | ref | |
Ewe | 3.3 | 1.2–9.3 | |
Dog contact | Yes | 4.9 | 1.2–20.2 |
No dog contact | No | ref |
95% CI, 95% confidence interval; OR, odds ratio.
Discussion
Abortifacient pathogens infecting small ruminants in Egypt include Toxoplasma gondii 21, Brucella spp.22,23, Coxiella burnetti, and Chlamydia psittaci24–29, leading to significant economic losses. Few studies investigated the prevalence of N. caninum in sheep worldwide when compared to those of the other animals. Moreover, the information about the epidemiological situation of neosporosis in Egypt is scarce as there are only two studies conducted more than a decade ago12,20. Therefore, this study revealed the current seroprevalence rate of N. caninum among sheep and evaluated its associated risk factors.
The present study's data confirmed the presence of antibodies against N. caninum among the examined sheep in different localities with a seropositive rate of 8.6%. The reported rate was broadly in line with those reported in central China, 7.3% and 8.4%16,30. On the contrary, it was lower than those reported in Northwest Spain, 10.1%31; the Czech Republic,12%32; Egypt, 36.1%20 and 25.6%13; Italy, 44.4%9; São Paulo, Brazil, 59.23%33; Minas Gerai State, Brazil, 54%34, and Northern Jordan, 63%35 and higher than those of the other rates recorded in Turkey, 2.1%36; Australia, 2.2%37; and Slovakia, 3.7%38. The variation in the disease's prevalence may be attributed to different geographical or ecological factors, sheep breeds, rearing systems, or survey timing or technique8,16,23.
Interestingly, the seropositive rate of N. caninum among sheep in the current study was remarkably increased with the age of animals that come in agreement with previous studies33,39. Such age-related observations may be due to the high infection rate (27.6% ) of N. caninum among Egyptian stray dogs20 playing a substantial role in the horizontal transmission of infection between animals16 or simply because of the increased probability of exposure to the sporulated oocysts of N. caninum by time.
The analysis of the sex factor in this study revealed that the seropositive rate increased significantly in ewes rather than in rams. A similar finding was reported by Wang, et al.16, which is possibly related to different hormone levels between rams and ewes40 and the stress factors related to pregnancy and lactation. On the other hand, some reports showed no significant difference between rams and ewes and emphasize the role of sex difference41,42.
Dogs play an essential role in N. caninum transmission where they shed sporulated oocyst into the environment that contaminates the food and water of sheep43,44. In the present study, a strong relationship was observed between the number of seropositive sheep and their close contact with dogs. Such findings that come along with previous studies16,35,43 confirmed the close association with dogs is a significant risk factor for the occurrence of N. caninum infection in sheep.
The present findings demonstrated that the season and pregnancy status of the investigated sheep had no significant effect on the prevalence of neosporosis. Such findings are consistent with the previous result demonstrated that the difference in temperature of day and night weakens the impact of season on the disease's occurrence30. Furthermore, N. caninum could be transmitted vertically to the fetus and newborn lamb, but the pregnancy has no significant role in the prevalence of neosporosis in sheep45.
Conclusion
The present study updated the situation of ovine neosporosis in four governorates in the North of Egypt after 12 years of missing data and confirms the presence of antibodies (8.6%) against N. caninum among sheep flocks. Age, sex, and close contact with dogs have significant roles in the appearance of N. caninum infection but season and pregnancy have no important role in the epidemiology of the disease.
Acknowledgements
The authors thank the veterinarians for their support and help in providing data and sample collection throughout the study.
Author contributions
A.S. contributed to the design of the study, was responsible for the management and retrieval of data, contributed to initial data analysis and interpretation, and drafted the initial manuscript. A.S., H.K. and H.A. conceptualized and designed the study, supervised all aspects of the study, critically reviewed and revised the manuscript, and approved the final manuscript as submitted. All authors meet the ICMJE criteria for authorship.
Funding
Not applicable.
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Footnotes
Publisher's note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
References
- 1.Selim A, Abdelhady A. Neosporosis among Egyptian camels and its associated risk factors. Trop. Anim. Health Prod. 2020;52:3381–3385. doi: 10.1007/s11250-020-02370-y. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Mendonça CED, et al. Factors associated with the seroprevalence of Neospora caninum (Apicomplexa: Toxoplasmatinae) in sheep from the State of Sergipe, Brazil. Braz. J. Vet. Med. 2019;41:e002819–e002819. doi: 10.29374/2527-2179.bjvm002819. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Reisberg K, Selim AM, Gaede W. Simultaneous detection of Chlamydia spp., Coxiella burnetii, and Neospora caninum in abortion material of ruminants by multiplex real-time polymerase chain reaction. J. Vet. Diagn. Investig. 2013;25:614–619. doi: 10.1177/1040638713497483. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Silva L, Almeida A, Neto AP, Martinez A. Neosporosis and its epidemiology: A review. Sci. Electron. Arch. 2019;12:145–154. doi: 10.36560/1262019975. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Dahourou LD, et al. Prevalence of Toxoplasma gondii and Neospora caninum infections in households sheep “Elevage en case” in Dakar, Senegal. Vet. World. 2019;12:1028. doi: 10.14202/vetworld.2019.1028-1032. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Moreno B, et al. Occurrence of Neospora caninum and Toxoplasma gondii infections in ovine and caprine abortions. Vet. Parasitol. 2012;187:312–318. doi: 10.1016/j.vetpar.2011.12.034. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Amdouni Y, Rjeibi MR, Awadi S, Rekik M, Gharbi M. First detection and molecular identification of Neospora caninum from naturally infected cattle and sheep in North Africa. Transbound. Emerg. Dis. 2018;65:976–982. doi: 10.1111/tbed.12828. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Semango G, et al. The sero-epidemiology of Neospora caninum in cattle in northern Tanzania. Front. Vet. Sci. 2019;6:327. doi: 10.3389/fvets.2019.00327. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Tamponi C, et al. ISCOM ELISA in milk as screening for Neospora caninum in dairy sheep. Large Anim. Rev. 2015;21:213–216. [Google Scholar]
- 10.Liu Z-K, Li J-Y, Pan H. Seroprevalence and risk factors of Toxoplasma gondii and Neospora caninum infections in small ruminants in China. Prev. Vet. Med. 2015;118:488–492. doi: 10.1016/j.prevetmed.2014.12.017. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Villagra-Blanco R, et al. First report on the seroprevalence of Neospora caninum in goats from the Federal State of Hesse, Germany. Berl. Munch. Tierarztl. Wschr. 2017;130:517–522. [Google Scholar]
- 12.Shalaby S, El Azzawy M. Serological diagnosis of Neospora caninum infection in some domestic animals from Egypt. Vet. Med. J. 2003;51:355–361. [Google Scholar]
- 13.Sabry MA, Reda WW. Infection by cyst producing Protozoa among human and food producing animals in Egypt. J. Biol. Sci. 2008;8:889–895. doi: 10.3923/jbs.2008.889.895. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Machado GP. Neosporosis in small ruminants. Silva. 2019;4:211–214. [Google Scholar]
- 15.Hemphill A, Aguado-Martinez A, Mueller J. Approaches for the vaccination and treatment of Neospora caninum infections in mice and ruminant models. Parasitology. 2016;143:245–259. doi: 10.1017/S0031182015001596. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Wang S, et al. Seroprevalence and risk factors of Neospora caninum infection among domestic sheep in Henan province, central China. Parasite. 2018;25:15. doi: 10.1051/parasite/2018019. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Selim A, Ali A-F. Seroprevalence and risk factors for C. burentii infection in camels in Egypt. Comp. Immunol. Microbiol. Infect. Dis. 2020;68:101402. doi: 10.1016/j.cimid.2019.101402. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Selim A, Radwan A, Hamouda F. Seroprevalence and Molecular Characterization of West Nile Virus in Egypt. Comp. Immunol. Microbiol. Infect. Dis. 2020;71:101473. doi: 10.1016/j.cimid.2020.101473. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Fleiss JL, Levin B, Paik MC. Statistical Methods for Rates and Proportions. Wiley; 2013. [Google Scholar]
- 20.El-Ghayash KF, Hilali M, Nassar AM. Serological diagnosis of Neospora caninum infection in some domestic animals from Egypt. Vet. Med. J. Giza. 2003;51:355–361. [Google Scholar]
- 21.Ramadan MY, Abdel-Mageed AD, Khater HF. Seroprevalence and preliminary treatment of toxoplasmosis of pregnant goats in Kalubyia Gobernatore, Egypt. Acta Sci. Vet. 2007;35:295–301. doi: 10.22456/1679-9216.16119. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Selim A, Attia K, Ramadan E, Hafez YM, Salman A. Seroprevalence and molecular characterization of Brucella species in naturally infected cattle and sheep. Prev. Vet. Med. 2019;171:104756. doi: 10.1016/j.prevetmed.2019.104756. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Selim A, Elhaig M, Moawed SA. A serological survey of four abortifacient infectious agents among small ruminant in Egypt. Asian J. Anim. Vet. Adv. 2018;13:114–121. doi: 10.1016/j.cimid.2020.101473. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Selim A, Abdelrahman A, Thiéry R, Sidi-Boumedine K. Molecular typing of Coxiella burnetii from sheep in Egypt. Comp. Immunol. Microbiol. Infect. Dis. 2019;67:101353. doi: 10.1016/j.cimid.2019.101353. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Selim A, Ali A-F, Moustafa SM, Ramadan E. Molecular and serological data supporting the role of Q fever in abortions of sheep and goats in northern Egypt. Microb. Pathog. 2018;125:272–275. doi: 10.1016/j.micpath.2018.09.034. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Selim A, Yang E, Rousset E, Thiéry R, Sidi-Boumedine K. Characterization of Coxiella burnetii strains from ruminants in a Galleria mellonella host-based model. New Microbes New Infect. 2018;24:8–13. doi: 10.1016/j.nmni.2018.02.008. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Selim A. Chlamydophila abortus infection in small ruminants: A review. Asian J. Anim. Vet. Adv. 2016;11:587–593. doi: 10.3923/ajava.2016.587.593. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Selim A, Elhaig M. Q Fever in domestic small ruminant. Asian J. Anim. Vet. Adv. 2016;11:1–8. doi: 10.3923/ajava.2016.1.8. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Selim A, Manaa EA, Waheed RM, Alanazi AD. Seroprevalence, associated risk factors analysis and first molecular characterization of chlamydia abortus among Egyptian sheep. Comp. Immunol. Microbiol. Infect. Dis. 2021;74:101600. doi: 10.1016/j.cimid.2020.101600. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Nie L-B, et al. First report of seroprevalence and risk factors of Neospora caninum infection in Tibetan sheep in China. BioMed Res. Int. 2018;2018:1–4. doi: 10.1155/2018/2098908. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Díaz P, et al. Seroprevalence of Toxoplasma gondiiand Neospora caninumin goats from north-western Spain. Ann. Agric. Environ. Med. 2016;23:587–590. doi: 10.5604/12321966.1226851. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Bártová E, Sedlák K, Literák I. Toxoplasma gondii and Neospora caninum antibodies in sheep in the Czech Republic. Vet. Parasitol. 2009;161:131–132. doi: 10.1016/j.vetpar.2008.12.022. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Paiz LM, Silva RCD, Menozzi BD, Langoni H. Antibodies to Neospora caninum in sheep from slaughterhouses in the state of São Paulo, Brazil. Revista Bras. Parasitol. Vet. 2015;24:95–100. doi: 10.1590/S1984-29612015009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Rossi G, et al. Evaluation of Toxoplasma gondii and Neospora caninum infections in sheep from Uberlândia, Minas Gerais State, Brazil, by different serological methods. Vet. Parasitol. 2011;175:252–259. doi: 10.1016/j.vetpar.2010.10.017. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Abo-Shehada MN, Abu-Halaweh MM. Flock-level seroprevalence of, and risk factors for, Neospora caninum among sheep and goats in northern Jordan. Prev. Vet. Med. 2010;93:25–32. doi: 10.1016/j.prevetmed.2009.08.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Gökçe G, Mor N, Kırmizigul A, Bozukluhan K, Erkılıc E. The first report of seropositivity for Neospora caninum in sheep from Turkey. Israel J. Vet. Med. 2015;70:40–44. [Google Scholar]
- 37.Bishop S, et al. The first report of ovine cerebral neosporosis and evaluation of Neospora caninum prevalence in sheep in New South Wales. Vet. Parasitol. 2010;170:137–142. doi: 10.1016/j.vetpar.2010.01.030. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Špilovská S, Reiterová K, Kováčová D, Bobáková M, Dubinský P. The first finding of Neospora caninum and the occurrence of other abortifacient agents in sheep in Slovakia. Vet. Parasitol. 2009;164:320–323. doi: 10.1016/j.vetpar.2009.05.020. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Tembue AASM, et al. Serological survey of Neospora caninum in small ruminants from Pernambuco State, Brazil. Rev. Bras. Parasitol. Vet. 2011;20:246–248. doi: 10.1590/S1984-29612011000300013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Dubey JP. Review of Neospora caninum and neosporosis in animals. Korean J. Parasitol. 2003;41:1. doi: 10.3347/kjp.2003.41.1.1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Gharekhani J, et al. Prevalence of anti-Neospora caninum antibodies in Iranian goats. Ann. Parasitol. 2016;62:111–114. doi: 10.17420/ap6202.41. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Topazio JP, et al. Seroprevalence and risk factors for Neospora caninum in goats in Santa Catarina state, Brazil. Rev. Bras. Parasitol. Vet. 2014;23:360–366. doi: 10.1590/S1984-29612014062. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Machado GP, Kikuti M, Langoni H, Paes AC. Seroprevalence and risk factors associated with neosporosis in sheep and dogs from farms. Vet. Parasitol. 2011;182:356–358. doi: 10.1016/j.vetpar.2011.05.021. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Wang S, et al. Serological study of Neospora caninum infection in dogs in central China. Parasite. 2016;23:25. doi: 10.1051/parasite/2016025. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Filho PCGA, et al. Incidence and vertical transmission rate of Neospora caninum in sheep. Comp. Immunol. Microbiol. Infect. Dis. 2017;52:19–22. doi: 10.1016/j.cimid.2017.05.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]