Skip to main content
Frontiers in Psychology logoLink to Frontiers in Psychology
. 2021 Jun 24;12:694913. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.694913

Corrigendum: Proximate and Ultimate Perspectives on Romantic Love

Adam Bode 1,*,, Geoff Kushnick 1,
PMCID: PMC8264787  PMID: 34248798

In the original article, there was an error. In the introduction we state “Romantic love serves a variety of functions that vary according to life-stage and duration, including mate choice, courtship, pregnancy, and pair-bonding.” In this sentence, “pregnancy” should be “sex.”

A correction has been made to Introduction, Paragraph 1. The corrected paragraph is shown below.

Romantic love is a complex suite of adaptations and by-products that serves a range of functions related to reproduction (Fletcher et al., 2015; Buss, 2019). It often occurs early in a romantic relationship but can lead to long-term mating. It is a universal or near-universal (Jankowiak and Fischer, 1992; Gottschall and Nordlund, 2006; Jankowiak and Paladino, 2008; Fletcher et al., 2015; Buss, 2019; Sorokowski et al., 2020) and is characterized by a range of cognitive, emotional, behavioral, social, genetic, neural, and endocrine activity. It occurs across the lifespan in both sexes. Romantic love serves a variety of functions that vary according to life-stage and duration, including mate choice, courtship, sex, and pair-bonding. Its evolutionary history is probably coupled with the emergence of pair-bonds relatively recently in human evolutionary history.

Additionally, in the original article, there was an error in the subsection “Sex”. Here, we stated that “The costs associated with romantic love's reproduction function are far greater for women than for men (Trivers, 1972).” In that sentence, the word “reproduction” should be “sex.”

A correction has been made to Ultimate Perspectives, Sex, Paragraph 5. The corrected paragraph is shown below.

The costs associated with romantic love's sex function are far greater for women than for men (Trivers, 1972). Both sexes could be subject to unwanted pregnancy and associated parenting responsibilities (although this impacts women to a greater extent). There is also, however, a risk of damage to an individual's reputation. Women are often subject to criticism from other women for engaging in sexual activity (Koehn and Jonason, 2018), especially if a long-term relationship does not result. Men and women risk damage to their reputation for having sex with a low mate value partner, although men are generally treated far more favorably than women for engaging in sexual activity (see Zaikman and Marks, 2017). For women, a period of pregnancy followed by a lengthy period of lactation may ensue, and this is costly in terms of the ability to obtain sufficient resources and protecting oneself from harm. There is also the possibility that the relationship will dissolve following pregnancy and the woman may be left to raise a child without the father's support (Koehn and Jonason, 2018).

The authors apologize for these errors and state that they do not change the scientific conclusions of the article in any way. The original article has been updated.

References

  1. Buss D. M. (2019). The evolution of love in humans, in The New Psychology of Love, 2nd Edn, eds Sternberg R. J., Sternberg K. (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; ). [Google Scholar]
  2. Fletcher G. J. O., Simpson J. A., Campbell L., Overall N. C. (2015). Pair-bonding, romantic love, and evolution: the curious case of Homo sapiens. Perspect. Psychol. Sci. 10, 20–36. 10.1177/1745691614561683 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Gottschall J., Nordlund M. (2006). Romantic love: A literary universal? Philos. Liter. 30, 450–470. 10.1353/phl.2006.0030 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  4. Jankowiak W. R., Fischer E. F. (1992). A cross-cultural perspective on romantic love. Ethnology 31, 149–155. 10.2307/3773618 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  5. Jankowiak W. R., Paladino T. (2008). Desiring sex, longing for love: A tripartite continuum, in Intimacies: Love and Sex Across Cultures, ed Jankowiak W. R. (New York, NY: Columbia University Press; ), 1–36. [Google Scholar]
  6. Koehn M. A., Jonason P. K. (2018). Costs of short-term mating for women, in Encyclopedia of Evolutionary Psychological Science, eds Shackelford T. K., Weekes-Shackelford V. A. (Cham: Springer International Publishing; ), 1–6. [Google Scholar]
  7. Sorokowski P., Sorokowska A., Karwowski M., Groyecka A., Aavik T., Akello G., et al. (2020). Universality of the triangular theory of love: Adaptation and psychometric properties of the triangular love scale in 25 countries. J. Sex Res. 58, 106–115. 10.1080/00224499.2020.1787318 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Trivers R. L. (1972). Parental investment and sexual selection, in Sexual Selection and the Descent of Man, ed Campbell B. (Chicago, IL: Aldine; ), 136–179. [Google Scholar]
  9. Zaikman Y., Marks M. J. (2017). Promoting theory-based perspectives in sexual double standard research. Sex Roles 76, 407–420. 10.1007/s11199-016-0677-z [DOI] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Frontiers in Psychology are provided here courtesy of Frontiers Media SA

RESOURCES