ABSTRACT
Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection is associated with a wide variety of neurological complications. Even though SARS-CoV-2 is rarely detected in the central nervous system (CNS) or cerebrospinal fluid, evidence is accumulating that SARS-CoV-2 might enter the CNS via the olfactory nerve. However, what happens after SARS-CoV-2 enters the CNS is poorly understood. Therefore, we investigated the replication kinetics, cell tropism, and associated immune responses of SARS-CoV-2 infection in different types of neural cultures derived from human induced pluripotent stem cells (hiPSCs). SARS-CoV-2 was compared to the neurotropic and highly pathogenic H5N1 influenza A virus. SARS-CoV-2 infected a minority of individual mature neurons, without subsequent virus replication and spread, despite angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 (ACE2), transmembrane protease serine 2 (TMPRSS2), and neuropilin-1 (NPR1) expression in all cultures. However, this sparse infection did result in the production of type III interferons and interleukin-8 (IL-8). In contrast, H5N1 virus replicated and spread very efficiently in all cell types in all cultures. Taken together, our findings support the hypothesis that neurological complications might result from local immune responses triggered by virus invasion, rather than abundant SARS-CoV-2 replication in the CNS.
IMPORTANCE Infections with the recently emerged severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) are often associated with neurological complications. Evidence suggests that SARS-CoV-2 enters the brain via the olfactory nerve; however, SARS-CoV-2 is only rarely detected in the central nervous system of COVID-19 patients. Here, we show that SARS-CoV-2 is able to infect neurons of human iPSC neural cultures but that this infection is abortive and does not result in virus spread to other cells. However, infection of neural cultures did result in the production of type III interferon and IL-8. This study suggests that SARS-CoV-2 might enter the CNS and infect individual neurons, triggering local immune responses that could contribute to the pathogenesis of SARS-CoV-2-associated CNS disease.
KEYWORDS: neurotropism, hiPSC neurons, coronavirus, SARS-CoV-2, COVID-19, influenza A virus, H5N1 virus, IL-8, interferon, influenza virus
INTRODUCTION
Neurological manifestations are present in a substantial proportion of patients suffering from the respiratory coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). Symptoms comprise loss of smell (anosmia), loss of taste (hypogeusia), headache, fatigue, nausea, and vomiting (1–3). Additionally, more severe neurological complications such as seizures, confusion, cerebrovascular injury, stroke, encephalitis, encephalopathies, and altered mental status are being increasingly reported in hospitalized patients (4–6).
It remains to be established whether the reported neurological manifestations are a direct consequence of local invasion by severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) into the central nervous system (CNS), an indirect consequence of the associated systemic immune responses, or a combination of the two. In human and animal models, it has been shown that SARS-CoV-2 is able to replicate in the olfactory mucosa (7, 8), suggesting that the olfactory nerve could function as an important route of entry into the CNS (9), as observed previously for other respiratory viruses (10). Postmortem brain tissue analyses of fatal COVID-19 cases have revealed mild neuropathological changes which might be related to hypoxia, as well as pronounced neuroinflammation in different regions of the brain (11). In the majority of cases, neither SARS-CoV-2 viral RNA, nor virus antigen, could be detected in the CNS (5, 12). In line with this, SARS-CoV-2 viral RNA has rarely been detected in the cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) of COVID-19 patients with neurological symptoms (13–15). Together, this suggests that SARS-CoV-2 might enter the CNS but be unable to replicate there efficiently.
In the brain, viruses encounter a variety of different cell types such as neurons, astrocytes, and microglia. Investigations of CNS cell-type-specific infection of SARS-CoV-2 have been inconsistent (16–23). Most studies have investigated virus replication by the detection of viral RNA but have not reported whether infectious progeny viruses are produced during the course of infection. In order to investigate replication efficiency, cell tropism, and associated immune responses of SARS-CoV-2 infection in cells of the CNS, we infected different types of human neural cultures. These cultures were differentiated from human induced pluripotent stem cells (hiPSCs) along a variety of different neural lineage specifications, which provided a unique and flexible platform to study the neurotropism of viruses in vitro. Specifically, we directed hiPSC colonies toward neural progenitor cells (NPCs) via an embryoid body stage and subsequently differentiated NPCs to mature neural networks (24). In addition, we also utilized a rapid neuronal differentiation protocol based on forced overexpression of the transcription factor Ngn2 in hiPSCs (Fig. 1A) (25, 26) to generate a pure population of neurons that we cocultured with hiPSC-derived astrocytes. Using these specified CNS cell types, we directly compared the characteristics of SARS-CoV-2 infection with the highly pathogenic H5N1 influenza A virus, a virus with zoonotic potential which is known to efficiently replicate in neural cells in vivo (27–32) and in vitro (33–36).
RESULTS
SARS-CoV-2 does not replicate efficiently in hiPSC-derived neural cell types, despite the presence of ACE2, TMPRSS2, and NRP1.
To investigate the replication efficiency of SARS-CoV-2, we utilized hiPSC-derived NPCs and differentiated these to mature forebrain cortical neural cultures using a previously published protocol (24) (Fig. 1A; see also Fig. S1 in the supplemental material). The resulting cultures contain a mix of electrically active neurons, astrocytes, and progenitors. Pure NPC and mixed mature neural network cultures were infected with SARS-CoV-2 and H5N1 virus at a multiplicity of infection (MOI) of 0.1 and 0.5. At 2, 6, 24, 48, and 72 h postinfection (hpi), infectious virus titers in the supernatants were determined by endpoint titration. In contrast to H5N1 virus, no productive infection in SARS-CoV-2-inoculated NPC and mature neural network cultures was detected (Fig. 1B and C). However, in one out of 3 experiments we observed an increase in virus titers at 72 h postinfection, which explains the small increase in virus titer in the mature neural network cultures. As an alternative to the laborious and time-consuming differentiation of mature neural networks through embryoid bodies and NPC stages, we also employed an established rapid differentiation protocol that yields a pure culture of iPSC-derived glutamatergic cortical neurons by overexpressing the transcription factor neurogenin-2 (Ngn2) (25). We further supplemented the Ngn2-induced neurons with hiPSC-derived astrocytes to support their survival and maturation. The final Ngn2 cocultures contain astrocytes and functional forebrain cortical neurons that form synapses (Fig. 1A and Fig. S1). SARS-CoV-2 did not replicate efficiently in the Ngn2 cocultures, in contrast to H5N1 virus (Fig. 1D). As a positive control for virus replication, VeroE6 and MDCK cells were infected with SARS-CoV-2 and H5N1 virus, respectively (Fig. 1E and F).
Next, we evaluated the presence of important SARS-CoV-2 entry factors, such as angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 (ACE2), transmembrane protease serine 2 (TMPRSS2), and neuropilin-1 (NRP1). In all cultures, there was clear evidence for ACE2, TMPRSS2, and NRP1 expression, suggesting cellular susceptibility to SARS-CoV-2 infection (Fig. 1G and Fig. S2).
SARS-CoV-2 infects MAP2-expressing neurons and does not induce cleavage of caspase-3.
To determine whether SARS-CoV-2 was able to infect individual cells, we stained for virus nucleocapsid protein (NP) 24 and 72 hpi with an MOI of 0.5. SARS-CoV-2 sparsely infected cells in neural cultures at 24 and 72 hpi. Infection was observed in single scattered MAP2+ neurons (Fig. 2A and B and Fig. S3A and B). In one experiment, we identified a cluster of MAP2+ cells that stained positively for SARS-CoV-2 NP at 72 hpi (Fig. S4A). In the Ngn2 cocultures, we were able to detect only MAP2+/NEUN+ neurons positive for SARS-CoV-2 NP, suggesting that SARS-CoV-2 infects only mature neurons and does so only sparsely (Fig. S4B). We found no convincing evidence of SARS-CoV-2 NP+ cells among SOX2+ NPCs or glial fibrillary acidic protein-positive (GFAP+) astrocytes (Fig. 2A to C). In contrast, H5N1 virus abundantly infected SOX2+ NPCs, GFAP+ astrocytes, and MAP2+ neurons (Fig. 2A to C).
Next, despite the fact that there was no morphological evidence for cell death in the SARS-CoV-2-infected cultures, we wanted to investigate whether SARS-CoV-2 infection induced apoptosis in SARS-CoV-2 NP+ neurons. Therefore, we infected Ngn2 cocultures with SARS-CoV-2 and stained for cleaved caspase-3, an apoptosis marker. We again observed that SARS-CoV-2 infected only MAP2+ neurons. Neurons expressing SARS-CoV-2 NP did not show accumulation of cleaved caspase-3 (Fig. 3A and B and Fig. S4C).
SARS-CoV-2 infection induces IFN-λ2/3 and IL-8.
To determine the immune response of the neural cultures toward SARS-CoV-2 and H5N1 virus infection, we measured a panel of antiviral cytokines in the supernatant of infected neural cultures at 24 and 72 h postinfection (Fig. 4). Even though SARS-CoV-2 infection was scarce, IFN-λ2/3 was induced in both the mixed neural culture and Ngn2 cocultures but not in NPC cultures. Increased secretion of interleukin-8 (IL-8) was observed in NPC cultures, mixed neural culture, and Ngn2 cocultures. H5N1 virus infection induced both type III IFN IFN-λ1 and IFN-λ2/3 in mixed neural cultures and Ngn2 cocultures, but not among NPCs. Furthermore, increased levels of IP-10 were detected only in the H5N1 virus-infected neural cultures. Similarly to SARS-CoV2, H5N1 virus was also able to induce IL-8 in all neural cultures. Neither SARS-CoV-2 nor H5N1 virus infection induced type I interferon (IFN-α/IFN-β) or type II IFN (IFN-γ) or other cytokines such as IL-1b, tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNF-α), IL-12p70, granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF), or IL-10 (Fig. S5).
DISCUSSION
SARS-CoV-2 replicated poorly in all three types of hiPSC-derived neural cultures used in our experiments, which contrasts largely with H5N1 virus, which replicated efficiently to high titers. Even though important entry factors for SARS-CoV-2 are expressed in all of the cultures used, SARS-CoV-2 infected a very small proportion of cells without evidence of subsequent spread. Additionally, we did not observe SARS-CoV-2-induced neuronal cell death, indicated by a lack of colabeling with apoptosis marker cleaved caspase 3 in SARS-CoV-2 NP+ neurons. However, SARS-CoV-2 infection did induce type III IFN and IL-8 production.
Evidence is accumulating that SARS-CoV-2 enters the CNS via the olfactory nerve (7–9), a pathway that is also used by influenza A viruses to enter the CNS in many mammals including humans (10, 37). H5N1 virus spreads efficiently to the CNS via the olfactory nerve in experimentally inoculated ferrets and subsequently replicates very efficiently in the CNS (27, 29, 38). Unlike H5N1 virus infection, SARS-CoV-2 is rarely detected in the CNS of fatal COVID-19 patients or experimentally inoculated animals (11–15). In addition, only a few case reports of SARS-CoV-2-induced encephalitis have been reported (39, 40). In vitro studies have mainly focused on the ability of SARS-CoV-2 to infect cells of the CNS based on the detection of viral RNA or viral antigen (18, 19, 22, 23, 41), but not many have investigated replication efficiency in time by measuring infectious virus titers (17). So far, several studies showed limited infection of neurons in hiPSC-derived brain organoids (22) and BrainSpheres (19), without efficient SARS-CoV-2 replication. So far, only efficient replication has been shown in choroid plexus organoids, especially within choroid plexus epithelium cells (17, 23). Altogether, these observations are consistent with our findings of poor SARS-CoV-2 replication in hiPSC-derived NPCs, neurons, and astrocytes and support a pathophysiological model whereby SARS-CoV-2 invades the CNS but does not replicate efficiently in CNS cell types. However, one caveat of our study is that other cells such as microglia, oligodendrocytes, and vascular cells (pericytes and endothelial cells) are not present. Therefore, we cannot exclude that SARS-CoV-2 can infect and possibly replicate efficiently in other cells of the CNS or neuronal cell types such as cortical parvalbumin (PV) interneurons or midbrain or hindbrain cell types.
Despite the low proportion of SARS-CoV-2-infected cells and the fact that infection seemed to be abortive in the hiPSC-derived neural cultures, we found evidence for cellular immune activation. In particular, SARS-CoV-2 infection of the neural cultures resulted in the induction of type III IFN, especially IFN-λ2/3, but not type I IFN or type II IFN. This result is in accordance with earlier reports suggesting that SARS-CoV-2 triggers only very mild type I and type II IFN responses but does trigger a robust type III IFN response in cell culture, human airway epithelial cells, ferrets, and SARS-CoV-2-infected individuals (42, 43). In addition, IL-8—a chemotactic factor that attracts leukocytes—was induced in all hiPSC-derived cultures. In lung tissue and peripheral venous blood serum of SARS-CoV-2-infected patients, elevated levels of IL-8 are associated with severe COVID-19 (44–46). Furthermore, IL-8 has been detected in the CSF of SARS-CoV-2 patients who developed encephalitis, which might be induced by the SARS-CoV-2-associated brain immune response, since SARS-CoV-2 RNA could not be detected in the CSF (47). However, how exactly these cytokines contribute to the in vivo neuroinflammatory process and if they are directly triggered by SARS-CoV-2 entry into the CNS need further investigations.
Highly pathogenic H5N1 virus replication has been reported in vivo (27, 29, 31, 32, 48) and in vitro across several different types of human and mouse neural cell cultures (34–36), including the human neuroblastoma line SK-N-SH (26), suggesting this virus is neurotropic. This fits with our observation that H5N1 virus replicates productively and spreads throughout hiPSC-derived neural cultures, infecting NPCs as well as mature neurons and astrocytes. H5N1 virus infection also results in the upregulation of the type III IFN IFN-λ1 and IFN-λ2/3, as well as the antiviral cytokines IL-8 and IP-10. IP-10 has been detected in the CSF of influenza A virus-infected patients and was found to be elevated in the brains of mice experimentally infected with H5N1 virus (49). However, the mechanism by which H5N1 virus achieves abundant virus replication and robust induction of proneuroinflammatory cytokines remains poorly understood.
Overall, our data fit with clinical findings concerning the ability of these viruses to cause acute CNS disease. In both humans and mammalian animal models, H5N1 virus is able to invade and replicate in cells of the CNS, including neurons, resulting in an acute (meningo-)encephalitis (50–52). In contrast, even though evidence exists that SARS-CoV-2 is able to spread to the CNS via the olfactory nerve (7–9) in SARS-CoV-2-infected patients or experimentally infected animal models, virus is rarely detected in the CNS or associated with acute encephalopathies (13–15).
Altogether, our findings reveal that replication of SARS-CoV-2 in CNS cell types is very limited, which is in contrast to the efficient replication and spread of H5N1 virus. Although the mechanistic pathogenesis of SARS-CoV-2-associated CNS disease remains poorly understood, this study supports the hypothesis that SARS-CoV-2 entry into the CNS and direct infection of a small subset of neurons might trigger inflammation in the brain.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Cell lines.
VeroE6 (ATCC CRL 1586) cells were maintained in Dulbecco’s modified Eagle’s medium (DMEM; Lonza, Breda, the Netherlands) supplemented with 10% fetal calf serum (FCS; Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA), 10 mM HEPES, 1.5 mg/ml sodium bicarbonate, 100 IU/ml penicillin (Lonza, Basel, Switzerland), and 100 μg/ml streptomycin (Lonza). Madin-Darby canine kidney (MDCK) cells were maintained in Eagle minimal essential medium (EMEM; Lonza) supplemented with 10% FCS, 100 IU/ml penicillin, 100 μg/ml streptomycin, 2 mM glutamine, 1.5 mg/ml sodium bicarbonate (1 mM), 10 mM HEPES, and 0.1 mM nonessential amino acids. All cell lines were grown at 37°C in 5% CO2. The medium was refreshed every 3 to 4 days, and cells were passaged at >90% confluence with the use of phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) and trypsin-EDTA (0.05%). The cells were routinely checked for the presence of mycoplasma.
Differentiation of iPSCs to NPCs and mature neural cultures.
Human induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSCs) [WTC-11 Coriell no. GM25256, obtained from the Gladstone Institute, San Francisco, CA, USA] were differentiated to NPCs as previously described (2) with slight modifications. After passage 3, NPC cultures were purified using fluorescence-activated cell sorting (FACS) as described previously (53). Briefly, NPCs were detached from the culture plate and resuspended into a single-cell solution. CD184+/CD44−/CD271−/CD24+ cells were collected using a FACSAria III (BD Bioscience) and expanded in NPC medium (Table 1). NPCs were used for experiments between passages 3 and 7 after sorting or differentiated to neural networks. For differentiation toward mature neural cultures, NPCs were grown in neural differentiation medium (Table 1) for 6 to 8 weeks to achieve mature neural networks (24) and subsequently used for experiments; after week 4, only half of the medium was refreshed. Cultures were kept at 37°C and 5% CO2 throughout the differentiation process.
TABLE 1.
Name | Reagenta | Manufacturer, catalogue no. |
---|---|---|
NPC medium | Advanced DMEM/F-12 | ThermoFisher Scientific, 1634010 |
1% N-2 supplement | ThermoFisher Scientific, 17502048 | |
2% B-27 minus RA supplement | ThermoFisher Scientific, 12587010 | |
1 μg/ml laminin | Sigma-Aldrich, L2020 | |
1% penicillin-streptomycin | ThermoFisher Scientific, 15140122 | |
20 ng/ml basic fibroblast growth factor | Merck, GF003AF | |
Neural differentiation medium | Advanced DMEM/F-12 | ThermoFisher Scientific, 1634010 |
1% N-2 supplement | ThermoFisher Scientific, 17502048 | |
2% B-27 minus RA supplement | ThermoFisher Scientific, 12587010 | |
2 μg/ml laminin | Sigma-Aldrich, L2020 | |
1% penicillin-streptomycin | ThermoFisher Scientific, 15140122 | |
10 ng/ml BDNF | ProSpec Bio, CYT-207 | |
10 ng/ml GDNF | ProSpec Bio CYT-305 | |
1 μM db-cAMP | Sigma, D0627 | |
200 μM ascorbic acid | Sigma, A5960 | |
Ngn2 medium | Neurobasal medium | ThermoFisher Scientific, 21103049 |
2% B-27 minus RA supplement | ThermoFisher Scientific, 12587012 | |
1% GlutaMAX | ThermoFisher Scientific, 35050061 | |
10 ng/ml NT3 | PeproTech, 450-03 | |
10 ng/ml BDNF | ProSpec, CYT-207 | |
1% penicillin-streptomycin | ThermoFisher Scientific, 15140122 |
BDNF, brain-derived neurotrophic factor; GDNF, glial-derived neurotrophic factor.
Differentiation of iPSCs to Ngn2 cocultures.
iPSCs were directly differentiated into excitatory cortical layer 2/3 neurons by forcibly overexpressing the neuronal determinant neurogenin-2 (Ngn2) (25, 26). To support neuronal maturation, hiPSC-derived astrocytes were added to the culture in a 1:1 ratio. At day 3, the medium was changed to Ngn2 medium (Table 1). Cytosine β-d-arabinofuranoside (Ara-C) (2 μM; Sigma; C1768) was added once to remove proliferating cells from the culture and ensure long-term recordings of the cultures. From day 6 onward, half of the medium was refreshed three times per week. Cultures were kept at 37°C and 5% CO2 throughout the differentiation process.
Viruses.
The SARS-CoV-2 isolate (isolate BetaCoV/Munich/BavPat1/2020; European Virus Archive Global no. 026V-03883; kindly provided by C. Drosten) was previously described by Lamers et al. (54, 55) The zoonotic highly pathogenic avian influenza (HPAI) H5N1 virus (A/Indonesia/5/2005) was isolated from a human patient, and the virus was propagated once in embryonated chicken eggs and twice in MDCK cells.
Virus titrations.
The SARS-CoV-2 titers were determined by endpoint dilution on VeroE6 cells, calculated according to the method of Kärber (57) and expressed as 50% tissue culture infectious doses/milliliter (TCID50/ml). SARS-CoV-2 virus titers were determined by preparing 10-fold serial dilutions in triplicates of supernatants in Opti-MEM containing GlutaMAX. Dilution supernatants were added to a monolayer of 40,000 VeroE6 cells/well in a 96-well plate and incubated at 37°C. After 5 days, the plates were examined for the presence of cytopathic effect (CPE). Virus titers of HPAI H5N1 were determined by endpoint dilution on MDCK cells as described previously (56). In short, 10-fold serial dilutions of cell supernatant in triplicates were prepared in influenza infection medium which consists of EMEM supplemented with 100 IU/ml penicillin, 100 μg/ml streptomycin, 2 mM glutamine, 1.5 mg/ml sodium bicarbonate, 10 mM HEPES, 1× (0.1 mM) nonessential amino acids, and 1 μg/μl tosylsulfonyl phenylalanyl chloromethyl ketone (TPCK)-treated trypsin (Sigma-Aldrich). Prior to adding the virus dilutions to the MDCK cells, the cells were washed once with plain EMEM to remove residual FCS. One hundred microliters of the diluted supernatants was used to inoculate 30,000 MDCK cells/well in a 96-well plate. After 1 h, the inoculum was removed and 200 μl fresh influenza infection medium was added. Four days after infection, supernatants of the infected MDCK cells were tested for agglutination. Twenty-five microliters of the supernatant was mixed with 75 μl 0.33% turkey red blood cells and incubated for 1 h at 4°C. The titers of infectious virus were calculated according to the method of Kärber (57) and expressed as TCID50/ml. All experiment with infectious SARS-CoV-2 and H5N1 virus were performed in a class II biosafety cabinet under biosafety level 3 (BSL-3) conditions at the Erasmus Medical Center. The initial 1:10 dilution of cell supernatant resulted in a detection limit of 101.5 TCID50/ml.
Replication kinetic.
Before infection of neural progenitors, network neurons, and Ngn2 neurons, supernatant was removed and cells were infected with SARS-CoV-2 and H5N1 virus at the indicated multiplicity of infection (MOI). As a control for active virus replication, VeroE6 and MDCK cells were infected with SARS-CoV-2 and H5N1 virus, respectively. Before virus infection, the VeroE6 cells were washed with SARS-CoV-2 infection medium (DMEM supplemented with 2% FBS and 100 IU/ml penicillin, 100 μg/ml streptomycin) and MDCK cells were washed with influenza infection medium. After 1 h of incubation at 37°C, the inoculum was removed and replaced with fresh medium and old medium in a 1:1 ratio. After removing the inoculum from VeroE6 and MDCK cells, SARS-CoV-2 infection medium and influenza infection medium, respectively, were added to the cells. At the indicated time points, an aliquot of the supernatant was collected for subsequent virus titration. All experiments were performed in biological triplicates and in either technical duplicates or triplicates.
PCR validation of ACE2, TMPRSS2, and NRP1 expression.
RNA was isolated from the neural cultures and VeroE6 cells using the High Pure RNA isolation kit (Roche). The concentration of RNA was determined using a NanoDrop spectrophotometer. A 2.5-μg amount of RNA was reverse transcribed into cDNA using the SuperScript III reverse transcriptase (Invitrogen) according to the manufacturer’s protocol. cDNA of bronchus-bronchiole organoids was kindly provided by Anna Z. Mykytyn. The presence of ACE2, TMPRSS2, NRP1, and ACT was evaluated by amplifying these genes with gene-specific primers (Table 2) by PCR. Gene products were visualized on a 2% agarose gel which was stained with SYBR Safe. PCR products of the genes were sequenced to validate that the right product was amplified.
TABLE 2.
Species | Gene | Sequence (5′→3′) | Annealing temp (°C) | Amplicon (bp) | Reference |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Human | ACE2-FWD | GGGATCAGAGATCGGAAGAAGAAA | 60 | 124 | 1 |
Human | ACE2-REV | AGGAGGTCTGAACATCATCAGTG | 1 | ||
Human | b-ACTIN-FWD | CCCTGGACTTCGAGCAAGAG | 60 | 153 | 1 |
Human | b-ACTIN-REV | ACTCCATGCCCAGGAAGGAA | 1 | ||
Human | TMPRSS2-FWD | AATCGGTGTGTTCGCCTCTAC | 60 | 106 | 1 |
Human | TMPRSS2-REV | CGTAGTTCTCGTTCCAGTCGT | 1 | ||
Human | NRP1-FWD | GACTGGGGCTCAGAATGGAG | 60 | 187 | |
Human | NRP1-REV | ATGACCGTGGGCTTTTCTGT |
Multiplexed bead assay for cytokine profiling.
Cytokines were measured using the LEGENDplex human antivirus response panel (BioLegend). The kit was used according to the manufacturer’s manual with an additional fixing step. After adding the SA-PE and performing the washing steps, the supernatant and the beads were fixed with formalin for 15 min at room temperature and washed twice with the provided wash buffer. This ensures that all pathogens are not infectious.
Immunofluorescent labeling.
Cells were fixed using 4% formalin in PBS and labeled using immunocytochemistry. Primary antibody incubation was performed overnight at 4°C. Secondary antibody incubation was performed for 2 h at room temperature. Both primary and secondary antibody incubations were performed in staining buffer (0.05 M Tris, 0.9% NaCl, 0.25% gelatin, and 0.5% Triton X-100 [Sigma; T8787] in PBS [pH 7.4]). Primary antibodies and their dilutions can be found in Table 3. Secondary antibodies conjugated to Alexa-488, Alexa-647, or Cy3 were used at a dilution of 1:400 (Jackson ImmunoResearch). Nuclei were visualized using 4′,6-diamidino-2-phenylindole (DAPI) (ThermoFisher Scientific; D1306). Samples were embedded in Mowiol 4-88 (Sigma-Aldrich; 81381) and imaged using a Zeiss LSM 800 confocal microscope (Oberkochen, Germany).
TABLE 3.
Antibody | Dilution | Manufacturer, catalogue no. |
---|---|---|
SARS-CoV-2 anti-NP | 1:500 | Sino Biological, 40143-MM05 |
SOX2 | 1:250 | Millipore, AB5603 |
NEUN | 1:100 | Merck, ABN78 |
GFAP | 1:200 | Millipore, AB5804 |
MAP2 | 1:200 | Synaptic Systems, 188004 |
H5N1 anti-NP | 1:1,000 | EVL, EBS-I-047, clone Hb65 |
Cleaved caspase-3 | 1:100 | Cell Signaling Technologies, 9661S |
Beta III tubulin (TUJ1) | 1:200 | Millipore, AB9354 |
PSD-95 | 1:100 | Thermo Scientific, MA1-046 |
Synapsin | 1:100 | Synaptic Systems, 106 103 |
FOXG1 | 1:200 | Abcam, 18259 |
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
We thank Anna Z. Mykytyn and Mart M. Lamers for sharing reagents, cDNA of the airway organoids, and SARS-CoV-2 virus stocks and for technical advice and scientific discussions.
This work was funded by a fellowship to D.V.R. from the Netherlands Organization for Scientific Research (VIDI contract 91718308) and a EUR fellowship. This work was also supported by the Netherlands Organ-on-Chip Initiative, an NWO Gravitation project (024.003.001) funded by the Ministry of Education, Culture and Science of the government of the Netherlands (S.A.K., F.M.S.D.V., B.L.), and by an Erasmus MC Human Disease Model Award to F.M.S.D.V.
We declare no conflict of interest.
Contributor Information
Femke M. S. de Vrij, Email: f.devrij@erasmusmc.nl.
Debby van Riel, Email: d.vanriel@erasmusmc.nl.
W. Paul Duprex, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine.
REFERENCES
- 1.Varatharaj A, Thomas N, Ellul MA, Davies NWS, Pollak TA, Tenorio EL, Sultan M, Easton A, Breen G, Zandi M, Coles JP, Manji H, Al-Shahi Salman R, Menon DK, Nicholson TR, Benjamin LA, Carson A, Smith C, Turner MR, Solomon T, Kneen R, Pett SL, Galea I, Thomas RH, Michael BD, Allen C, Archibald N, Arkell J, Arthur-Farraj P, Baker M, Ball H, Bradley-Barker V, Brown Z, Bruno S, Carey L, Carswell C, Chakrabarti A, Choulerton J, Daher M, Davies R, Di Marco Barros R, Dima S, Dunley R, Dutta D, Ellis R, Everitt A, Fady J, Fearon P, Fisniku L, Gbinigie I, et al. 2020. Neurological and neuropsychiatric complications of COVID-19 in 153 patients: a UK-wide surveillance study. Lancet Psychiatry 7:875–882. doi: 10.1016/S2215-0366(20)30287-X. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Bryche B, St Albin A, Murri S, Lacôte S, Pulido C, Ar Gouilh M, Lesellier S, Servat A, Wasniewski M, Picard-Meyer E, Monchatre-Leroy E, Volmer R, Rampin O, Le Goffic R, Marianneau P, Meunier N. 2020. Massive transient damage of the olfactory epithelium associated with infection of sustentacular cells by SARS-CoV-2 in golden Syrian hamsters. Brain Behav Immun 89:579–586. doi: 10.1016/j.bbi.2020.06.032. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Harapan BN, Yoo HJ. 2021. Neurological symptoms, manifestations, and complications associated with severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) and coronavirus disease 19 (COVID-19). J Neurol doi: 10.1007/s00415-021-10406-y. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Guadarrama-Ortiz P, Choreño-Parra JA, Sánchez-Martínez CM, Pacheco-Sánchez FJ, Rodríguez-Nava AI, García-Quintero G. 2020. Neurological aspects of SARS-CoV-2 infection: mechanisms and manifestations. Front Neurol 11:1039. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2020.01039. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Solomon IH, Normandin E, Bhattacharyya S, Mukerji SS, Keller K, Ali AS, Adams G, Hornick JI, Padera RF, Jr, Sabeti P. 2020. Neuropathological features of Covid-19. N Engl J Med 383:989–992. doi: 10.1056/nejmc2019373. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Pennisi M, Lanza G, Falzone L, Fisicaro F, Ferri R, Bella R. 2020. SARS-CoV-2 and the nervous system: from clinical features to molecular mechanisms. Int J Mol Sci 21:5475. doi: 10.3390/ijms21155475. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Zou L, Ruan F, Huang M, Liang L, Huang H, Hong Z, Yu J, Kang M, Song Y, Xia J, Guo Q, Song T, He J, Yen H-L, Peiris M, Wu J. 2020. SARS-CoV-2 viral load in upper respiratory specimens of infected patients. N Engl J Med 382:1177–1179. doi: 10.1056/NEJMc2001737. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Sia SF, Yan L-M, Chin AWH, Fung K, Choy K-T, Wong AYL, Kaewpreedee P, Perera RAPM, Poon LLM, Nicholls JM, Peiris M, Yen H-L. 2020. Pathogenesis and transmission of SARS-CoV-2 in golden hamsters. Nature 583:834–838. doi: 10.1038/s41586-020-2342-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Meinhardt J, Radke J, Dittmayer C, Franz J, Thomas C, Mothes R, Laue M, Schneider J, Brünink S, Greuel S, Lehmann M, Hassan O, Aschman T, Schumann E, Chua RL, Conrad C, Eils R, Stenzel W, Windgassen M, Rößler L, Goebel H-H, Gelderblom HR, Martin H, Nitsche A, Schulz-Schaeffer WJ, Hakroush S, Winkler MS, Tampe B, Scheibe F, Körtvélyessy P, Reinhold D, Siegmund B, Kühl AA, Elezkurtaj S, Horst D, Oesterhelweg L, Tsokos M, Ingold-Heppner B, Stadelmann C, Drosten C, Corman VM, Radbruch H, Heppner FL. 2021. Olfactory transmucosal SARS-CoV-2 invasion as a port of central nervous system entry in individuals with COVID-19. Nat Neurosci 24:168–175. doi: 10.1038/s41593-020-00758-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Van Riel D, Verdijk R, Kuiken T. 2015. The olfactory nerve: a shortcut for influenza and other viral diseases into the central nervous system. J Pathol 235:277–287. doi: 10.1002/path.4461. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Matschke J, Lütgehetmann M, Hagel C, Sperhake JP, Schröder AS, Edler C, Mushumba H, Fitzek A, Allweiss L, Dandri M, Dottermusch M, Heinemann A, Pfefferle S, Schwabenland M, Sumner Magruder D, Bonn S, Prinz M, Gerloff C, Püschel K, Krasemann S, Aepfelbacher M, Glatzel M. 2020. Neuropathology of patients with COVID-19 in Germany: a post-mortem case series. Lancet Neurol 19:919–929. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(20)30308-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Schurink B, Roos E, Radonic T, Barbe E, Bouman CSC, de Boer HH, de Bree GJ, Bulle EB, Aronica EM, Florquin S, Fronczek J, Heunks LMA, de Jong MD, Guo L, Du Long R, Lutter R, Molenaar PCG, Neefjes-Borst EA, Niessen HWM, van Noesel CJM, Roelofs JJTH, Snijder EJ, Soer EC, Verheij J, Vlaar APJ, Vos W, van der Wel NN, van der Wal AC, van der Valk P, Bugiani M. 2020. Viral presence and immunopathology in patients with lethal COVID-19: a prospective autopsy cohort study. Lancet Microbe 1:e290–e299. doi: 10.1016/S2666-5247(20)30144-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Edén A, Kanberg N, Gostner J, Fuchs D, Hagberg L, Andersson L-M, Lindh M, Price RW, Zetterberg H, Gisslén M. 2021. CSF biomarkers in patients with COVID-19 and neurologic symptoms: a case series. Neurology 96:e294–e300. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000010977. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Neumann B, Schmidbauer MI, Dimitriadis K, Otto S, Knier B, Niesen W-D, Hosp JA, Günther A, Lindemann S, Nagy G, Steinberg T, Linker RA, Hemmer B, Bösel J, PANDEMIC and IGNITE study groups . 2020. Cerebrospinal fluid findings in COVID-19 patients with neurological symptoms. J Neurol Sci 418:117090. doi: 10.1016/j.jns.2020.117090. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Destras G, Bal A, Escuret V, Morfin F, Lina B, Josset L, COVID-Diagnosis HCL Study Group . 2020. Systematic SARS-CoV-2 screening in cerebrospinal fluid during the COVID-19 pandemic. Lancet Microbe 1:e149. doi: 10.1016/S2666-5247(20)30066-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Dobrindt K, Hoagland DA, Seah C, Kassim B, O’Shea CP, Murphy A, Iskhakova M, Fernando MB, Powell SK, Deans PJM, Javidfar B, Peter C, Møller R, Uhl SA, Garcia MF, Kimura M, Iwasawa K, Crary JF, Kotton DN, Takebe T, Huckins LM, tenOever BR, Akbarian S, Brennand KJ. 2021. Common genetic variation in humans impacts in vitro susceptibility to SARS-CoV-2 infection. Stem Cell Rep 16:505–514. doi: 10.1016/j.stemcr.2021.02.010. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Pellegrini L, Albecka A, Mallery DL, Kellner MJ, Paul D, Carter AP, James LC, Lancaster MA. 2020. SARS-CoV-2 infects the brain choroid plexus and disrupts the blood-CSF barrier in human brain organoids. Cell Stem Cell 27:951–961.e5. doi: 10.1016/j.stem.2020.10.001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Zhang B-Z, Chu H, Han S, Shuai H, Deng J, Hu Y-F, Gong H-R, Lee AC-Y, Zou Z, Yau T, Wu W, Hung IF-N, Chan JF-W, Yuen K-Y, Huang J-D. 2020. SARS-CoV-2 infects human neural progenitor cells and brain organoids. Cell Res 30:928–931. doi: 10.1038/s41422-020-0390-x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Bullen CK, Hogberg HT, Bahadirli-Talbott A, Bishai WR, Hartung T, Keuthan C, Looney MM, Pekosz A, Romero JC, Sillé FCM, Um P, Smirnova L. 2020. Infectability of human BrainSphere neurons suggests neurotropism of SARS-CoV-2. ALTEX 37:665–671. doi: 10.14573/altex.2006111s. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Wang C, Zhang M, Garcia G, Tian E, Cui Q, Chen X, Sun G, Wang J, Arumugaswami V, Shi Y. 2021. ApoE-isoform-dependent SARS-CoV-2 neurotropism and cellular response. Cell Stem Cell 28:331–342.e5. doi: 10.1016/j.stem.2020.12.018. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Song E, Zhang C, Israelow B, Lu-Culligan A, Vieites Prado A, Skriabine S, Lu P, Weizman O-E, Liu F, Dai Y, Szigeti-Buck K, Yasumoto Y, Wang G, Castaldi C, Heltke J, Ng E, Wheeler J, Madel Alfajaro M, Levavasseur E, Fontes B, Ravindra NG, Van Dijk D, Mane S, Gunel M, Ring A, Kazmi SAJ, Zhang K, Wilen CB, Horvath TI, Plu I, Haik S, Thomas J-L, Louvi A, Farhadian SF, Huttner A, Seilhean D, Renier N, Bilguvar K, Iwasaki A. 2021. Neuroinvasion of SARS-CoV-2 in human and mouse brain. J Exp Med 218:e20202135. doi: 10.1084/jem.20202135. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Ramani A, Müller L, Ostermann PN, Gabriel E, Abida‐Islam P, Müller‐Schiffmann A, Mariappan A, Goureau O, Gruell H, Walker A, Andrée M, Hauka S, Houwaart T, Dilthey A, Wohlgemuth K, Omran H, Klein F, Wieczorek D, Adams O, Timm J, Korth C, Schaal H, Gopalakrishnan J. 2020. SARS ‐CoV‐2 targets neurons of 3D human brain organoids. EMBO J 39:e106230. doi: 10.15252/embj.2020106230. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Jacob F, Pather SR, Huang W-K, Zhang F, Wong SZH, Zhou H, Cubitt B, Fan W, Chen CZ, Xu M, Pradhan M, Zhang DY, Zheng W, Bang AG, Song H, Carlos de la Torre J, Ming G-L. 2020. Human pluripotent stem cell-derived neural cells and brain organoids reveal SARS-CoV-2 neurotropism predominates in choroid plexus epithelium. Cell Stem Cell 27:937–950.e9. doi: 10.1016/j.stem.2020.09.016. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Gunhanlar N, Shpak G, van der Kroeg M, Gouty-Colomer LA, Munshi ST, Lendemeijer B, Ghazvini M, Dupont C, Hoogendijk WJG, Gribnau J, de Vrij FMS, Kushner SA. 2018. A simplified protocol for differentiation of electrophysiologically mature neuronal networks from human induced pluripotent stem cells. Mol Psychiatry 23:1336–1344. doi: 10.1038/mp.2017.56. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Zhang Y, Pak C, Han Y, Ahlenius H, Zhang Z, Chanda S, Marro S, Patzke C, Acuna C, Covy J, Xu W, Yang N, Danko T, Chen L, Wernig M, Südhof TC. 2013. Rapid single-step induction of functional neurons from human pluripotent stem cells. Neuron 78:785–798. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2013.05.029. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Frega M, van Gestel SHC, Linda K, van der Raadt J, Keller J, Van Rhijn J-R, Schubert D, Albers CA, Kasri NN. 2017. Rapid neuronal differentiation of induced pluripotent stem cells for measuring network activity on micro-electrode arrays. J Vis Exp (119):54900. doi: 10.3791/54900. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Schrauwen EJA, Herfst S, Leijten LM, van Run P, Bestebroer TM, Linster M, Bodewes R, Kreijtz JHCM, Rimmelzwaan GF, Osterhaus ADME, Fouchier RAM, Kuiken T, van Riel D. 2012. The multibasic cleavage site in H5N1 virus is critical for systemic spread along the olfactory and hematogenous routes in ferrets. J Virol 86:3975–3984. doi: 10.1128/JVI.06828-11. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Shinya K, Makino A, Hatta M, Watanabe S, Kim JH, Hatta Y, Gao P, Ozawa M, Le QM, Kawaoka Y. 2011. Subclinical brain injury caused by H5N1 influenza virus infection. J Virol 85:5202–5207. doi: 10.1128/JVI.00239-11. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Bodewes R, Kreijtz JHCM, van Amerongen G, Fouchier RAM, Osterhaus ADME, Rimmelzwaan GF, Kuiken T. 2011. Pathogenesis of influenza A/H5N1 virus infection in ferrets differs between intranasal and intratracheal routes of inoculation. Am J Pathol 179:30–36. doi: 10.1016/j.ajpath.2011.03.026. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Park CH, Ishinaka M, Takada A, Kida H, Kimura T, Ochiai K, Umemura T. 2002. The invasion routes of neurovirulent A/Hong Kong/483/97 (H5N1) influenza virus into the central nervous system after respiratory infection in mice. Arch Virol 147:1425–1436. doi: 10.1007/s00705-001-0750-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Jang H, Boltz D, Sturm-Ramirez K, Shepherd KR, Jiao Y, Webster R, Smeyne RJ. 2009. Highly pathogenic H5N1 influenza virus can enter the central nervous system and induce neuroinflammation and neurodegeneration. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 106:14063–14068. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0900096106. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Shinya K, Makino A, Tanaka H, Hatta M, Watanabe T, Le MQ, Imai H, Kawaoka Y. 2011. Systemic dissemination of H5N1 influenza A viruses in ferrets and hamsters after direct intragastric inoculation. J Virol 85:4673–4678. doi: 10.1128/JVI.00148-11. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Siegers JY, van de Bildt MWG, Lin Z, Leijten LM, Lavrijssen RAM, Bestebroer T, Spronken MIJ, De Zeeuw CI, Gao Z, Schrauwen EJA, Kuiken T, van Riel D. 2019. Viral factors important for efficient replication of influenza A viruses in cells of the central nervous system. J Virol 93:e02273-18. doi: 10.1128/JVI.02273. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Ng YP, Lee SMY, Cheung TKW, Nicholls JM, Peiris JSM, Ip NY. 2010. Avian influenza H5N1 virus induces cytopathy and proinflammatory cytokine responses in human astrocytic and neuronal cell lines. Neuroscience 168:613–623. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2010.04.013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Pringproa K, Rungsiwiwut R, Tantilertcharoen R, Praphet R, Pruksananonda K, Baumgärtner W, Thanawongnuwech R. 2015. Tropism and induction of cytokines in human embryonic-stem cells-derived neural progenitors upon inoculation with highly-pathogenic avian H5N1 influenza virus. PLoS One 10:e0135850. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0135850. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Lin X, Wang R, Zhang J, Sun X, Zou Z, Wang S, Jin M. 2015. Insights into human astrocyte response to H5N1 infection by microarray analysis. Viruses 7:2618–2640. doi: 10.3390/v7052618. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.van Riel D, Leijten LM, Verdijk RM, GeurtsvanKessel C, van der Vries E, van Rossum AMC, Osterhaus ADME, Kuiken T. 2014. Evidence for influenza virus CNS invasion along the olfactory route in an immunocompromised infant. J Infect Dis 210:419–423. doi: 10.1093/infdis/jiu097. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Shinya K, Shimada A, Ito T, Otsuki K, Morita T, Tanaka H, Takada A, Kida H, Umemura T. 2000. Avian influenza virus intranasally inoculated infects the central nervous system of mice through the general visceral afferent nerve. Arch Virol 145:187–195. doi: 10.1007/s007050050016. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Casez O, Willaume G, Grand S, Nemoz B, Lupo J, Kahane P, Brion J-P. 2021. Teaching NeuroImages: SARS-CoV-2-related encephalitis: MRI pattern of olfactory tract involvement. Neurology 96:e645–e646. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000011150. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Vandervorst F, Guldolf K, Peeters I, Vanderhasselt T, Michiels K, Berends KJ, Van Laethem J, Pipeleers L, Vincken S, Seynaeve L, Engelborghs S. 2020. Encephalitis associated with the SARS-CoV-2 virus: a case report. Interdiscip Neurosurg 22:100821. doi: 10.1016/j.inat.2020.100821. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Yang L, Han Y, Nilsson-Payant BE, Gupta V, Wang P, Duan X, Tang X, Zhu J, Zhao Z, Jaffré F, Zhang T, Kim TW, Harschnitz O, Redmond D, Houghton S, Liu C, Naji A, Ciceri G, Guttikonda S, Bram Y, Nguyen D-HT, Cioffi M, Chandar V, Hoagland DA, Huang Y, Xiang J, Wang H, Lyden D, Borczuk A, Chen HJ, Studer L, Pan FC, Ho DD, tenOever BR, Evans T, Schwartz RE, Chen S. 2020. A Human pluripotent stem cell-based platform to study SARS-CoV-2 tropism and model virus infection in human cells and organoids. Cell Stem Cell 27:125–136.e7. doi: 10.1016/j.stem.2020.06.015. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Vanderheiden A, Ralfs P, Chirkova T, Upadhyay AA, Zimmerman MG, Bedoya S, Aoued H, Tharp GM, Pellegrini KI, Manfredi C, Sorscher E, Mainou B, Lobby JI, Kohlmeier JE, Lowen AC, Shi P-Y, Menachery VD, Anderson LJ, Grakoui A, Bosinger SE, Suthar MS. 2020. Type I and type III interferons restrict SARS-CoV-2 infection of human airway epithelial cultures. J Virol 94:e00985-20. doi: 10.1128/JVI.00985-20. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Blanco-Melo D, Nilsson-Payant BE, Liu W-C, Uhl S, Hoagland D, Møller R, Jordan TX, Oishi K, Panis M, Sachs D, Wang TT, Schwartz RE, Lim JK, Albrecht RA, tenOever BR. 2020. Imbalanced host response to SARS-CoV-2 drives development of COVID-19. Cell 181:1036–1045.e9. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2020.04.026. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Del Valle DM, Kim-Schulze S, Huang H-H, Beckmann ND, Nirenberg S, Wang B, Lavin Y, Swartz TH, Madduri D, Stock A, Marron TU, Xie H, Patel M, Tuballes K, Van Oekelen O, Rahman A, Kovatch P, Aberg JA, Schadt E, Jagannath S, Mazumdar M, Charney AW, Firpo-Betancourt A, Mendu DR, Jhang J, Reich D, Sigel K, Cordon-Cardo C, Feldmann M, Parekh S, Merad M, Gnjatic S. 2020. An inflammatory cytokine signature predicts COVID-19 severity and survival. Nat Med 26:1636–1643. doi: 10.1038/s41591-020-1051-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.van Riel D, Embregts CWE, Sips GJ, van den Akker JPC, Endeman H, van Nood E, van Kampen J, Molenkamp R, Koopmans M, van de Vijver D, GeurtsvanKessel CH. 2020. Temporal kinetics of RNAemia and associated systemic cytokines in hospitalized COVID-19 patients. bioRxiv doi: 10.1101/2020.12.17.423376. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 46.Chen L, Wang G, Tan J, Cao Y, Long X, Luo H, Tang Q, Jiang T, Wang W, Zhou J. 2020. Scoring cytokine storm by the levels of MCP-3 and IL-8 accurately distinguished COVID-19 patients with high mortality. Signal Transduct Target Ther 5:292. doi: 10.1038/s41392-020-00433-y. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Benameur K, Agarwal A, Auld SC, Butters MP, Webster AS, Ozturk T, Howell JC, Bassit LC, Velasquez A, Schinazi RF, Mullins ME, Hu WT. 2020. Encephalopathy and encephalitis associated with cerebrospinal fluid cytokine alterations and coronavirus disease, Atlanta, Georgia, USA, 2020. Emerg Infect Dis 26:2016–2021. doi: 10.3201/eid2609.202122. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Park CH, Matsuda K, Sunden Y, Ninomiya A, Takada A, Ito H, Kimura T, Ochiai K, Kida H, Umemura T. 2003. Persistence of viral RNA segments in the central nervous system of mice after recovery from acute influenza A virus infection. Vet Microbiol 97:259–268. doi: 10.1016/j.vetmic.2003.10.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Jang H, Boltz D, McClaren J, Pani AK, Smeyne M, Korff A, Webster R, Smeyne RJ. 2012. Inflammatory effects of highly pathogenic H5N1 influenza virus infection in the CNS of mice. J Neurosci 32:1545–1559. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.5123-11.2012. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Kroeze EV, Bauer L, Caliendo V, van Riel D. 2021. In vivo models to study the pathogenesis of extra-respiratory complications of influenza A virus infection. Viruses 13:848. doi: 10.3390/v13050848. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Mak GCK, Kwan MY-W, Mok CKP, Lo JYC, Peiris M, Leung CW. 2018. Influenza A(H5N1) virus infection in a child with encephalitis complicated by obstructive hydrocephalus. Clin Infect Dis 66:136–139. doi: 10.1093/cid/cix707. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Gambotto A, Barratt-Boyes SM, de Jong MD, Neumann G, Kawaoka Y. 2008. Human infection with highly pathogenic H5N1 influenza virus. Lancet 371:1464–1475. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(08)60627-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Yuan SH, Martin J, Elia J, Flippin J, Paramban RI, Hefferan MP, Vidal JG, Mu Y, Killian RL, Israel MA, Emre N, Marsala S, Marsala M, Gage FH, Goldstein LSB, Carson CT. 2011. Cell-surface marker signatures for the Isolation of neural stem cells, glia and neurons derived from human pluripotent stem cells. PLoS One 6:e17540. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0017540. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Lamers MM, Beumer J, van der Vaart J, Knoops K, Puschhof J, Breugem TI, Ravelli RBG, van Schayck JP, Mykytyn AZ, Duimel HQ, van Donselaar E, Riesebosch S, Kuijpers HJH, Schipper D, van de Wetering WJ, de Graaf M, Koopmans M, Cuppen E, Peters PJ, Haagmans BL, Clevers H. 2020. SARS-CoV-2 productively infects human gut enterocytes. Science 3:50–54. doi: 10.1126/science.abc1669. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Lamers MM, Mykytyn AZ, Breugem TI, Wang Y, Wu DC, Riesebosch S, van den Doel PB, Schipper D, Bestebroer T, Wu NC, Haagmans BL. 2021. Human airway cells prevent SARS-CoV-2 multibasic cleavage site cell culture adaptation. bioRxiv doi: 10.1101/2021.01.22.427802v1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 56.Rimmelzwaan GF, Baars M, Claas ECJ, Osterhaus ADME. 1998. Comparison of RNA hybridization, hemagglutination assay, titration of infectious virus and immunofluorescence as methods for monitoring influenza virus replication in vitro. J Virol Methods 74:57–66. doi: 10.1016/S0166-0934(98)00071-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Kärber G. 1931. Beitrag zur kollektiven Behandlung pharmakologischer Reihenversuche. Naunyn Schmiedebergs Arch Exp Pathol Pharmakol 162:480–483. doi: 10.1007/BF01863914. [DOI]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.