Abstract
Parkinson’s disease (PD) is a neurodegenerative synucleinopathy characterized by the degeneration of neuromelanin (NM)-containing dopaminergic neurons and deposition of iron in the substantia nigra (SN). How regional NM loss and iron accumulation within specific areas of SN relate to nigro-striatal dysfunction needs to be clarified. We measured dopaminergic function in pre- and postcommissural putamen by [18F]DOPA PET in 23 Parkinson’s disease patients and 23 healthy control (HC) participants in whom NM content and iron load were assessed in medial and lateral SN, respectively, by NM-sensitive and quantitative R2* MRI. Data analysis consisted of voxelwise regressions testing the group effect and its interaction with NM or iron signals. In PD patients, R2* was selectively increased in left lateral SN as compared to healthy participants, suggesting a local accumulation of iron in Parkinson’s disease. By contrast, NM signal differed between PD and HC, without specific regional specificity within SN. Dopaminergic function in posterior putamen decreased as R2* increased in lateral SN, indicating that dopaminergic function impairment progresses with iron accumulation in the SN. Dopaminergic function was also positively correlated with NM signal in lateral SN, indicating that dopaminergic function impairment progresses with depigmentation in the SN. A complex relationship was detected between R2* in the lateral SN and NM signal in the medial SN. In conclusion, multimodal imaging reveals regionally specific relationships between iron accumulation and depigmentation within the SN of Parkinson’s disease and provides in vivo insights in its neuropathology.
Subject terms: Parkinson's disease, Diagnostic markers
Introduction
Parkinson’s disease (PD) is the second most frequent neurodegenerative disorder worldwide and a growing public health issue given population aging1. Yet, our understanding of PD remains fragmentary. Although the neuropathological hallmark of PD brain consists of the accumulation of insoluble synuclein deposits in both the peripheral and central nervous systems2–4, a strong clinical emphasis has been put on the neuronal loss in dopaminergic neuromelanin (NM)-pigmented neurons of the substantia nigra (SN) compacta5. Indeed, the decline of dopaminergic nigro-striatal neurotransmission is considered as the core mechanism explaining motor symptoms of PD and the diagnosis of PD still mainly relies on the clinical observation of motor signs6. The latter only appear when 50–60% of dopaminergic neurons of SN are already lost7. Unfortunately, even in typical PD cases, the accurate diagnosis of PD remains challenging: only 74–84% diagnostic accuracy is achieved, depending on the practitioner’s expertise in movement disorders8,9. Therefore, there is a need for reliable in vivo diagnostic biomarkers. Measurement of striatal [18F]-DOPA uptake by positron emission tomography (PET) is still regarded as one of the most reliable tool for the in vivo diagnosis of PD because it directly probes the nigro-striate synthesis of dopamine10–12, and as such considered as a measure of dopamine terminal loss. [18F]DOPA uptake is decreased in the putamen in virtually all patients with PD, even in the early stage of the disease12. Nevertheless, the access to [18F]-DOPA PET is limited and the technique exposes patients to radiation hazards. More recently, MRI sequences allowed for the estimation of SN content in NM13–16 as well as brain iron levels which induce an increase in apparent transverse relaxation rates (R2∗)17. In PD, it is expected that R2* would increase in SN due to iron accumulation, whereas the signal of NM-sensitive MRI would decrease in SN, due to dopaminergic neuron loss and depigmentation.
F-DOPA PET, NM-sensitive, and iron-sensitive MRI then probe three different molecular aspects of PD pathophysiology, and although changes in each of these parameters were consistently observed in PD (decreased striatal DA synthesis, NM reduction, and iron accumulation in SN), their joint modifications remain hardly known15. This knowledge gap is important to fill in because these molecular markers of PD provide critical and complementary information on PD pathophysiology. In particular, the specific association between iron deposits and NM loss deserve to be investigated as it could provide precious information about pathological processes that might not be parallel in PD neurodegeneration. These relations might be obscured by the heterogeneous subnuclear distribution of dopaminergic neurons in the SN: nearly half of them are packed in discrete zones. The larger of these packs is located in the dorsal and lateral regions of SN18, where neuronal loss predominates19. Likewise, the depletion of dopamine fibers within the putamen is most pronounced in its posterior portions20. The main goal of this study was precisely to compare, between PD patients and healthy control (HC) participants, the relationships linking the dopaminergic function as measured in putamen by [18F]DOPA PET to NM content and iron load in the SN, using, respectively, NM- and iron-sensitive MRI, taking into account the predominant pattern of disappearance of dopaminergic neurons and fibers, respectively, in lateral SN and posterior putamen. We systematically probed the effect of disease on R2*, NM-sensitive, and [18F]DOPA signal, then the voxelwise relationships between (1) NM and R2* in SN, (2) R2* in SN and whole-brain [18F]-DOPA influx rate constant (Ki), and (3) NM in SN and whole-brain Ki (Fig.1a).
Results
Demographic data appear in Table 1. There were no significant differences between HC and PD patients, in terms of age (two-sample t test; t (44) = −0.12, p = 0.90) and gender (p = 1).
Table 1.
Parkinson’s disease patients (PD) | Healthy controls (HC) | Statistic | |
---|---|---|---|
Total number (n) | 23 | 23 | |
Gender (male:female) | 13:10 | 11:12 | Chi-Square: df = 1; value = 0.3485; p = 0.5550 |
Age (years) | 67.3 ± 9.9 | 67.7 ± 9.7 | Two-sample t test; t (44) = −0.12, p = 0.90 |
Most affected side (right:left) | 16:7 | NA | |
Disease duration (years) | 5.6 ± 3.8 [1–15] | NA | |
Hoehn and Yahr score | 1.9 ± 0.6 [1–3] | NA | |
UPDRS III (motor) | 28.2 ± 11.8 [10–54] | NA | |
LEDD (mg) | 448.2 ± 286.8 [0–937] | NA |
Effective SN values (ESNV, see “Methods” section) skewness was normally distributed across participants (Kolmogorov–Smirnoff, p = 0.124). We observed a significant effect of group (F(1) = 7.10; p = 0.011) and SN ROIs (F(3) = 9.76; p < 0.001). ESNV skewness was more negative in PD than in HC (least square estimates: −0.138 in PD, −0.02 in HC; t (44) = 2.66, p = 0.011, Tukey adjustment for multiple comparison; Fig. 2). By contrast, there was not any significant group by ROI interaction (F(3) = 1.95, p = 0.125). We considered that the decrease in ESNV skewness quantitates SN depigmentation. These results confirm the depopulation of NM-containing neurons in PD, as PD individuals have more voxels with low NM signal than voxels with high NM signal (see Supplementary Fig. 1). They also suggest that the depigmentation evenly involves all SN subdivisions. Finally, no correlation was found between ESNV skewness and unified Parkinson’s disease rating scale part III (UPDRS III), disease duration, Hoehn and Yahr (H&Y) score, or levodopa equivalent daily dose (LEDD).
We first confirmed that R2* values were related to regional brain iron content extracted from non-PD post mortem material published in the landmark study by Hallgren and Sourander21, a quality control suggested by Martin et al.22 (Fig. 3).
We then looked for the voxelwise main effect of disease on brain R2*. Two-sample t tests revealed that R2* in the left SN lateral tier was significantly higher in PD patients than in controls ([−10 −21 −11] mm; Z = 3.12; pSVC = 0.041; the result does not survive correction for multiple comparisons across two ROIs—medial and lateral SN) suggesting a higher iron content in that area. The lateralization of R2* increase is consistent with the clinically most affected side, as data were all positioned according to the latter (Fig. 4a–c).
By contrast, we did not find any significant variation of R2* according to clinical parameters (UPDRS III, H&Y scale, disease duration, or LEDD).
We then wondered whether brain R2* would covary with lateral SN ESNV skewness, looking for a relationship between iron accumulation and SN pigmented neurons loss. In a dorsal part of left medial SN, we observed a significant difference between PD patients and HC in the regression between R2* and SN ESNV skewness (group by ESNV skewness interaction; [−12 −15 −9 mm]; Z = 3.50; pSVC (medSN) = 0.011). However, as shown on Fig. 4d–f, ESNV skewness in lateral SN unexpectedly increases significantly as R2* increases in left medial SN in PD patients, a behavior which is not observed in HC. This result suggests that lateral SN ESNV skewness becomes more positive, as iron accumulation progresses in the medial SN or, alternatively that lateral ESNV skewness decrease (i.e., depigmentation) is associated with decreased iron content in medial SN.
We checked the effect of disease on the function of nigro-striate neurons, as assessed by in vivo measure of dopamine synthesis (Ki). As expected, putamen Ki values were significantly lower in PD patients than in HCs on both sides ([−25 3 5] mm, Z = 6.46, pFWE < 0.001; [30 0 3], Z = 5.54; pFWE < 0.001, over the whole brain) (Fig. 5), thus representing the loss of dopaminergic terminals.
We further assessed whether there was any relationship between dopaminergic function and NM-sensitive MRI data. We found a significant between-group difference in the regression between Ki and bilateral SN ESNV skewness in the left anterior putamen (group by ESNV skewness interaction; [−15 10 5] mm, Z = 4.57, pSVC = 0.002; Fig. 4g–i). In PD, left anterior putamen, oddly enough not the most denervated part of the striatum20, Ki significantly decreased as individual lateral SN ESNV skewness decreased, whereas no significant regression was found in HC. This result suggests that, in PD, dopamine synthesis is increasingly impaired as SN depigmentation, labeled by a more negative skewness of ESNV distribution, progresses (Supplementary Fig. 1).
Eventually, we wondered whether dopaminergic function varies in proportion to SN iron accumulation, as indicated by R2* measures. [18F]DOPA Ki values of bilateral posterior putamina regressed more tightly in PD than HC with SN R2* of lateral SN, significantly only in the right side ([28 −13 3] mm, Z = 4.14, pSVC = 0.005), indicating that putamen denervation progresses as iron accumulation (R2*) increases in lateral SN (Fig. 4j–l). This regression was significant in PD ([28 −13 3] mm, Z = 3.76, pFWE = 0.024) but not in HC. In addition, these differences differed between posterior and anterior putamen, although the triple interaction (group × R2* × ROI) did not survive correction for multiple comparisons.
Discussion
In this study, three separate imaging biomarkers were, for the first time, jointly used to characterize basal ganglia structure and function in PD patients, as compared to HC: R2* iron-sensitive and NM-sensitive MRI and [18F]DOPA PET. The key results are fivefold: As compared to HC, (1) dopamine accumulation in presynaptic terminals is decreased in PD striatum; (2) NM depigmentation does not progress differently across SN subdivisions and it results in an augmented amount of low NM signal voxels, i.e., a more negatively skewed distribution; (3) by contrast, iron selectively tends to accumulate in the lateral SN of PD patients, as shown by the hint of a larger R2* in left lateral SN in PD than HC; (4) dopaminergic function decreases in anterior putamen as the distribution of NM-sensitive signal is negatively skewed by PD, indicating that the impairment of dopaminergic neurons progresses with lateral SN depigmentation; and (5) dopaminergic function negatively relates to lateral SN R2* in PD, suggesting that dopaminergic function deteriorates as iron accumulates in lateral SN. Unexpectedly, R2* in medial SN differs significantly between PD and HC as lateral SN ESNV skewness increases. This suggests that although both signals in the lateral SN covary with dopaminergic function, their mutual interactions are not straightforward. Indeed, this finding suggests that iron accumulates in the medial SN as high NM signal voxels are over-represented therein.
The signal of NM-sensitive MRI in a neuropathological study of three brains (one PD) was found to correspond to the density of residual NM-containing neurons14. Importantly, the signal was not influenced by iron deposition. Likewise, iron complexed in NM does not profoundly modify NM-sensitive MRI signal23. Several studies showed a reduction of NM-MRI contrast in the SN of PD patients (15,24,25 but see ref. 26 for negative results), over and above an age-dependent SN depigmentation27. However, current NM-sensitive MRI is, at best, semiquantitative. NM SN signal, extracted manually or semiautomatically, has to be corrected for background signal. The latter is taken from either crus cerebri16,28–30, pontine tegmentum31, or superior cerebellar peduncles32. The ensuing dependent variable is either a contrast-to-noise ratio30,33 or the number of voxels above an experimenter-defined threshold value29,31,34. Here, we resorted to a data-based, reproducible, and fully automatic extraction of SN values from SN voxels identified on an independent probabilistic atlas of basal ganglia. Voxel values in SN were generated simply as the difference between SN and background signal. Individual ESNV were not distributed normally, we thus derived their third moment which allowed us to depict their distribution by a single quantitative value. ESNV skewness differed between groups, with PD distribution being more negatively skewed than in HC. However, the effect of PD did not predominate in any SN subregion. These results suggest that depigmentation increases the abundance of voxels with low NM density, explaining a decrease in ESNV skewness.
As for iron within the SN of PD, it was found increased by neuropathological studies (35–37 but see ref. 38 for negative findings). Human local brain iron content can be assessed in vivo by qualitative (susceptibility-weighted imaging)29,39 or quantitative MRI techniques (R2*, R240, susceptibility mapping41). Accordingly, a number of studies22,42–45 and two meta-analysis17,46 report an increase in iron in the SN of PD patients, although negative findings were also reported30. Our results concord with the former results and detect an increase of R2* in PD left lateral SN.
R2* signal is primarily modulated by local iron content, although myelin and calcium content, fiber orientation relative to the magnetic field, and macroscopic geometry also participate in T2* signal decay47. Nevertheless, we confirmed that R2* predicts regional brain iron content, as measured by biochemical methods on non-PD human brain samples21 (Fig. 3). The effect size (R2 = 0.82) indicates that iron explains a major part of R2* signal in basal ganglia. Most of brain iron is bound to ferritin48, which is more abundant in glial cells than in neurons49. Within SN dopaminergic neurons, iron is primarily stored within NM, which boasts antioxidant and radical scavenging properties contributing to buffer cellular oxidative stress by binding free iron50,51. Dopaminergic neurons would selectively degenerate5 when NM antioxidant properties are exceeded52. At neuronal death, NM is released in the extracellular space where it stimulates inflammation. As a consequence, in PD SN, iron is observed mainly in reactive microglia rather than in dopaminergic NM-positive neurons11,53.
The topography of iron deposition in SN is still a matter of debate: some authors found R2* increase in lateral17 or posterior SN54, while others report an augmented R2* in medial42 or anterior SN55. We here observed the increase in R2* in the lateral SN of PD patients and postulate that it mainly reflects the accumulation of iron in microglia, as a result of the neuroinflammation accompanying the neuronal loss.
[18F]DOPA uptake rate constants correlate with dopamine cells counts10. However, [18F]DOPA PET, being a functional biomarker, possibly underestimates the loss in dopaminergic neuron because of a compensatory upregulation of amino-acid decarboxylase activity in remaining cells30,56,57. Nonetheless, we found that [18F]DOPA PET signal is related to microstructural information conveyed by iron- and NM-sensitive MRI data.
An original finding consisted of the relationship between putamen Ki and NM-sensitive data in SN. It illustrates the deterioration of dopaminergic function as depigmentation progresses in the SN of PD patients. This result is supported by similar studies, which resorted to dopamine transporter (DAT) imaging to validate NM-sensitive MRI30,32,58,59. In consequence, NM-sensitive MRI is often presented as a useful tool to assess Parkinson’s disease pathology as it can predict dopaminergic dysfunction. Unexpectedly, the alteration of dopaminergic function related to SN depigmentation predominates in the anterior putamen, where dopamine levels decrease less than in the posterior putamen20. This finding suggests that depigmentation is an early event, which results in a proportional decrease in dopamine secretion. By contrast, this relationship is lost with more advanced deterioration of nigro-striate function.
We found that in PD, SN R2* increases as Ki decreases in posterior putamen. This result suggests that iron accumulation in lateral SN is a late process which follows and concurs to60 the deterioration of dopaminergic function in posterior putamen, the area where dopamine depletion predominates.
[18F]DOPA PET and DAT SPECT reflect two different aspects of dopaminergic neurotransmission. The former is directly representative of dopamine synthesis which is the core molecular defect of PD57. [18F]DOPA PET still represents a robust validated10 biomarker for its ability to detect and monitor dopamine deficiency, disease progression11, and for its correlation with clinical rating12,61,62. By contrast, DAT imaging probes the re-uptake sites of dopaminergic synapses. It does not predict the number of nigral neurons in Parkinson disease63 but would be less prone to underestimate dopaminergic dysfunction, as compared to [18F]DOPA PET57.
As for the relations between iron- and NM-sensitive MRI data, we found that medial SN R2* is proportional to lateral SN ESNV skewness, significantly more in PD than in HC. A first explanation would posit that iron accumulation in medial SN decreases as low NM signal voxels accumulate in PD, suggesting that neuroinflammation decreases in medial SN as depigmentation progresses in lateral SN. This interpretation is counterintuitive but might emphasize a regionally specific time course of iron accumulation within SN in PD. Alternatively, this result would arise fortuitously from our limited sample of PD patients. Indeed, relationships between R2* and NM signal are known to be weak44.
This study boasts some methodological strengths. First, most studies exploring the brain correlates of PD used manually drawn regions of interest11,64,65. Such methods are prone to observer bias and cannot be easily compared between laboratories. By contrast, we extracted regions of interest from an independent atlas, freely available to the community. Second, in order to observe the effect of disease processes properly, we strictly matched for age PD patients with HC, on an individual basis. Indeed, brain iron levels increase as a function of age in deep gray matter (GM) structure21,51,66 and age-dependent changes were to be accounted for.
The study also presents some limitations, the first one being the small number of participants. Considering the duration of MRI and PET acquisitions, we could not include patients with advanced PD (H&Y scale > 3) given the discomfort of the experiment. In consequence, the results only show effects predominant in stages H&Y 1–3 or effects stable over for a long period of time. We did not recruit patients with atypical parkinsonism, which did not allow us to study the specificity of the results for the identification of PD and its differentiation from other akinetic-rigid syndromes. Another limitation comes from the methodological sophistication of a group analysis which is not available in most hospitals, thereby of little help for individual PD diagnosis in clinical practice.
We did not find any correlation between imaging data and clinical scores, in concordance with previous reports32,67. Most of the time, results are mixed. In Schwarz et al.’s34 study for example, there was no significant correlation between disease duration or H&Y and NM signal intensity, whereas a correlation with UPDRS was found34.
We have explored the role of these neuroimaging techniques as diagnostic biomarkers. Such biomarkers ideally quantify the presence of the disease, and can be used to provide new insights into pathogenic pathways68. [18F]DOPA PET does not measure the number of dopaminergic neurons, but rather measure a biologic process. NM-MRI offers the opportunity to measure the amount of surviving pigmented neurons. Iron-sensitive MRI shows another aspect of the neuropathological process through iron deposits measurements. The specificity of these two neuroimaging biomarkers regarding PD diagnosis remains to be investigated as our population did not include patients suffering from atypical parkinsonism. While it was proven that there is a progressive regional decline in striatal [18F]DOPA uptake with PD evolution69,70, we cannot make any statement about the use of NM-MRI and iron-sensitive MRI as biomarkers of disease progression as we did not study the alteration of the signal over time.
Finally, this cross-sectional study cannot characterize the evolution of these MRI biomarkers along time, nor specify the differential course of iron, NM, and [18F]DOPA signals, as they might label different pathological processes.
In conclusion, our results show that (1) iron selectively increases in lateral SN; (2) iron in lateral SN increases as dopaminergic function fails in posterior putamen; (3) depigmentation of SN does not show any regional specificity within SN and correlates with dopaminergic failure in anterior putamen; and (4) despite their respective association with dopaminergic function, iron and NM signals show regionally complex interactions. These metrics convey information about separate processes, respectively, inflammation and loss of NM-containing neurons, which might unfold following different time courses. Our study speaks for (1) the need to develop MRI sequences quantifying NM and (2) longitudinal studies of iron- and NM-sensitive imaging to assess their respective sensitivity and specificity to the natural individual evolution of PD across time.
Methods
Patients
Forty-six participants took part in this study, which was approved by the local ethic committee (Belgian approval number 2012/79), and was performed in accordance with the ethical standards described in the Declaration of Helsinki (1964). Written informed consent was obtained from all participants. Twenty-three patients were recruited at the movement disorder clinic of the CHU Liège, Belgium, with a diagnosis of PD according to UK Brain Bank Criteria8 and Movement Disorders Society guidelines6, excluding atypical parkinsonism, vascular and other secondary parkinsonisms. Six patients had early parkinsonism (disease duration ≤ 2 years) and the diagnosis was confirmed 4 years later, using the same criteria (UK Brain Bank and MDS guidelines). All patients had a positive response to dopaminergic drugs/agents. The inclusion criteria were (1) age between 40 and 90 years, (2) H&Y scale < 4, (3) compatibility with MRI, and (4) no pregnancy. Twenty-three HC participants individually matched for age and gender, free from neurological or psychiatric disease, followed the exact same experimental protocol.
Design overview
Participants were invited on a single day to MRI and [18F] DOPA PET imaging sessions. MRI and PET sessions were respectively scheduled in the morning and the afternoon. Clinical assessments were interleaved between imaging sessions.
Parkinson’s disease patients were assessed with UPDRS III71, by two experienced raters to determine motor severity in OFF state (which was defined as absence of any treatment (n = 3) or treatment discontinuation for at least 24 h for all the others). Clinical laterality was established based on medical history and examination at the Movement Disorder Unit. The disease stage was determined using the H&Y scale. Disease duration was estimated as the period since first recalled motor symptoms72. LEDD was calculated for each patient73.
MR image acquisition, preprocessing, and PET acquisitions
All scans were conducted at the GIGA Cyclotron Research Centre-In Vivo Imaging Laboratory of the University of Liège, Belgium. MRI data were acquired on a 3T whole-body MRI-scanner (Magnetom Prisma, Siemens Medical Solutions, Erlangen, Germany). Chartflow of image analysis appear on Fig. 6.
Whole-brain MRI acquisitions included a multiparameter mapping (MPM) protocol74,75 that allows voxelwise R2* quantification (as well as magnetization transfer (MT) saturation, R1 and PD estimation). The whole-brain MRI acquisitions included a MPM protocol, developed in the framework of an international collaborative effort (Weiskopf et al.74; Tabelow et al.75). This protocol consists of three colocalized 3D multiecho fast low angle shot (FLASH) acquisitions at 1 × 1 × 1 mm3 resolution and two additional calibration sequences to correct for inhomogeneities in the RF transmit field76,77. The FLASH data sets were acquired with predominantly proton density (PD), T1, and MT weighting, referred to in the following as PDw, T1w, and MTw, acquired at different echo times. All three had high bandwidth to minimize off-resonance and chemical shift artifacts. Volumes were acquired in 176 sagittal slices using a 256 × 224 voxel matrix. GRAPPA parallel imaging was combined with partial Fourier acquisition to speed up acquisition time to ~20 min.
NM-sensitive (NM-MRI) images of the brainstem were recorded, using high-resolution 3D-FLASH sequence including an MT preparation pulse for NM sensitization78. The following acquisition parameters were used: FoV = 256 × 232 mm2, 52 slices (+23% oversampling), matrix size = 256 × 232 × 52, 1 mm isotropic resolution, TR = 30 ms, TE = 2.61 ms, flip angle = 23°, GRAPPA acceleration factor 2, 6/8 partial Fourier in through-plane direction, 3 averages, bandwidth = 450 Hz/pixel, and acquisition time = 9′10″. The TR was made longer (30–35 ms) to fulfill SAR limitations when needed (normal SAR operating mode for all patients). A T1-weighted anatomical image [3D magnetization-prepared rapid gradient echo sequence] acquired in the same session was used to position the slices accurately.
All participants received 100 mg of oral carbidopa (Lodosyn® 25 mg) 1 h before tracer injection and 50 mg at injection time. Patients were asked to interrupt their treatment at least 12 h before the experiment (withdrawal of L-dopa, rasagiline, entacapone, amantadine, dopamine agonist, and 48 h discontinuation for prolonged duration formulations).
PET imaging was conducted on an ECAT EXACT HR+ scanner (Siemens CTI, Knoxville, TN). Head movements were minimized using a thermoplastic mask molded on the subject’s head. After a 10-min transmission scan for attenuation correction, participants received a single dose of [18F]-DOPA administered as a 1-min bolus in an antecubital vein (injected dose 313.78 ± 20.25 SD MBq). The dynamic image acquisition started immediately after injection and consisted of 34 frames of 6 × 10, 8 × 30, 5 × 120, and 15 × 300 s (total = 90 min). All PET images were reconstructed using filtered back projection (Hann filter, 4.9 mm FWHM) including corrections for attenuation, dead time, random and scatter events using standard software (ECAT 7.1, Siemens/CTI, Knoxville, TN). With these acquisition and reconstruction settings, the transaxial resolution in water is 6.5 mm in the brain volume (voxel size 2.57 × 2.57 × 2.43 mm3).
Image processing
We had strong predictions about where significant changes would be observed: the SN and the striatum. Based on the literature and neuropathological data79, we further split SN into lateral and medial tiers on each side (Fig. 1b, regions 1 and 2; with volumes of left medial, right medial, left lateral, and right lateral SN of 164, 130, 137, and 100 mm3). Likewise, striatum was divided into precommissural, postcommissural, left, and right striatum (Fig. 1b, regions 4 and 520,80; with volumes of left anterior putamen, right anterior putamen, left posterior putamen, and right posterior putamen of 5356, 3787, 5322, and 3203 mm3). ATAG atlas of elderly population striatum and SN (freely available on https://www.nitrc.org/projects/atag) has been nonlinearly registered to DARTEL study space81. Binary masks were derived from the probabilistic images, using an experimenter-defined threshold [corresponding to 4 a.u. (according to ATAG metrics)] that ensures optimal anatomical coverage of SN and striatum. To generate regressors for statistical analyses, SN masks were used to extract values of SN voxels. Data from NM- and iron-sensitive sequences were extracted separately on each side from medial and lateral SN, keeping in mind that NM signal loss is known to predominate in lateral SN15,33. By contrast, for statistical inferences, we used either bilateral masks of medial and lateral SN (for the regression between R2* maps and NM signal) or pre- and postcommissural striatum (for regression with Ki maps).
Masks for bilateral cruces cerebri consisted of two 14-mm3 spheres positioned by the experimenter on the mean study structural image (Fig. 1b, region 3). These masks were used to compute the background signal for SN values (see below). Finally, for voxelwise statistics, an explicit GM mask was used as previously proposed82: the smooth modulated warped individual GM and white matter (WM) maps were averaged across all subjects and the GM mask only included voxels for which the mean GM probability was (1) larger than that of WM and (2) above 20%. This ensures that the GM mask includes voxels (on average over the population) with a sufficient amount of GM and more than of WM.
R2* maps were processed using Matlab R2015b (MathWorks Inc., Natick, MA, USA), SPM12 (Welcome Trust Centre for Neuroimaging, London, UK; www.fil.ion.ucl.ac.uk/spm), and a dedicated SPM toolbox for quantitative MRI (hMRI toolbox, http://hmri.info75). Quantitative maps of PD patients and controls were segmented using the “unified segmentation” scheme81. GM and WM probability maps from all subjects were then warped together into a study-specific reference space, based on diffeomorphic transformations (DARTEL), and aligned with the MNI space, providing a subject-specific deformation field83. For voxel-based analyses, R2* maps were normalized using the subject-specific deformation field without modulation. A tissue-weighted smoothing (4 mm FWHM isotropic) yielded a smoothed tissue-specific multiparameter map which optimally preserved quantitative parameter values within each tissue class75,84. Parametric maps of seven PD patients were flipped according to the clinically most impaired side (the latter was identified following clinical examination by two experienced movement disorder specialists, taking into account the highest UDPRS score of each side), in order to gather the most affected sides of all patients on the left side of the images. However, it must be kept in mind that many of our patients had already bilateral symptoms and signs.
For NM-sensitive MRI, voxel values included in the SN and crus masks were extracted for each participant. NM content was parametrized simply as the difference between any given SN voxel and background values estimated as the median signal in crus cerebri and will be referred to as “ESNV” [ESNV = Si,SN − mean (Scrus), with Si,SN, the value of the ith voxel; median (Scrus), the median value of crus]. Because individual ESNV distributions were not normal (Kolmogorov–Smirnov; p = 0.0157), we derived their skewness, which ultimately served as the dependent variable because it was shown sensitive to SN depigmentation (see “Results”).
PET data were preprocessed using SPM12. For each participant, an average PET image was created using the data acquired between 8 and 20 min corresponding to frames 15–19. The count statistics in this average image makes it a better source image for coregistration of PET data to structural MRI. The average PET image was coregistered to the individual structural MRI and normalized in the common standard space using the flow-field deformation parameters obtained during the spatial normalization of structural MRI. Two regions of interest (putamen and occipital cortex), with and without specific uptake respectively, were identified using the Automated Anatomical Labelling (AAL) atlas85. These two regions were transferred to the space of individual dynamic PET series, after applying the inverse normalization transformations, then used to extract time–activity curves needed to compute parametric maps of [18F]-DOPA influx rate constant (Ki). In order to avoid any additional partial volume effect which might be introduced during the preprocessing of the data, we preferred to send the AAL ROIs back into the subject space, extract the time series directly from the raw data, and then create the Ki maps in the subject space. Kinetic modeling using dynamic PET data and time–activity curves for reference region (occipital cortex and putamen) was conducted in PMOD software (version 3.7, PMOD Technologies, Zurich, Switzerland). Patlak linear graphical analysis was used to compute brain parametric images of Ki map86. The time–activity curve in putamen was used to determine the start time of the linear segment (t*) of the graph (estimated to 30 min) and used to compute voxelwise Ki. The Ki map, generated in the subject space, was then normalized into the MNI space by applying individual normalization parameters computed on the average PET image. Finally, images were smoothed with an isotropic Gaussian kernel of 4 mm.
Statistical analyses
Voxelwise one-tailed “two-sample t test” assessed the group effect by comparing Ki between healthy subjects and PD patients.
A multiple regression tested for the interaction between the group effect and SN R2*. Median R2* was derived from lateral, medial, left, and right SN, centered and included as group specific regressors in an analysis, which also included age and sex as regressors of no interest. Inferences were conducted as above. Contrasts tested the regression of bilateral, lateral, and medial, ESNV on Ki maps (Supplementary Table 1).
A last multiple regression tested for the interaction between the group effect and ESNV skewness, as described above for R2* analyses. Contrasts tested the regression of bilateral, lateral, and medial, R2* on Ki maps (Supplementary Table 1). Inferences were conducted as above.
Whole-brain voxel-based quantification analyses relied on multiple linear regression models embedded in the general linear model framework of SPM12.
Statistics on R2* differences between PD patients and HC in GM were estimated by separate ‘two-sample one-tailed t tests’. Age and sex were included as regressors of no interest.
Within the patient population, multiple regressions looked for significant voxelwise regression between R2* in GM and clinical scores (UPDRS III in OFF state, H&Y scale, LEDD, disease duration).
Finally, a multiple regression tested voxelwise for the interaction between-group effect and ESNV skewness on R2*. As described above, individual ESNV skewnesses were derived from lateral and medial, left and right SN (see section “Image processing”), centered and included as group specific regressors in the analysis, which also included age and sex as regressors of no interest. Contrasts tested the regression of bilateral, lateral, and medial, ESNV on R2*maps (Supplementary Table 1). In all cases, inferences were conducted at the voxel level at p < 0.05 FWE, after small volume correction using the bilateral masks described above. We controlled for the potential type I error over the two masks used for inferences, respectively, for SN (medial and lateral) or striatum (pre and post commissural).
After checking for the normality of ESNV skewness distribution, a generalized linear mixed model tested the effects of group (PD versus HC), SN ROIs (4 sub-ROIs), and their interaction on ESNV skewness, using patient intercept as a random variable and SAS software, version 9.4 (SAS Institute Inc., 2013). The regression between ESNV skewness and UPDRS III, disease duration, H&Y score, or LEDD was also tested.
Statistical analyses on demographic data were computed using SAS software, version 9.4 (SAS Institute Inc., 2013).
Reporting summary
Further information on research design is available in the Nature Research Reporting Summary linked to this article.
Supplementary information
Acknowledgements
The authors are particularly thankful to the patients and healthy controls who kindly took part in this study. This project, F.D., E.P., K.B., G.G., and C.P. were supported by the Fonds de la Recherche Scientifique (F.R.S.-FNRS Belgium) and the Fonds Rahier. Infrastructure support for this research was provided by the GIGA-CRC (Cyclotron Research Center) In Vivo Imaging, University of Liège, Liège, Belgium.
Author contributions
Research project: Conception (F.D., G.G.), organization (F.D., E.S., G.G.), and execution (F.D., E.P., L.M., C.D., E.B., E.S.); statistical analysis: Design (F.D., P.M.) and execution (F.D., K.B., C.P., M.A.B., P.M.); review and critique (F.D., P.M.); and manuscript preparation: Writing of the first draft (F.D., P.M.) and review and critique (all authors).
Data availability
MRI data supporting the results of this study are available from the corresponding author, on a collaborative basis.
Code availability
Matlab code developed for this study is available from the corresponding author, on a collaborative basis.
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Footnotes
Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
These authors contributed equally: Pierre Maquet, Gaëtan Garraux.
Supplementary information
The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1038/s41531-021-00199-2.
References
- 1.Erkkinen MG, Kim M, Geschwind MD. Clinical neurology and epidemiology of the major neurodegenerative diseases. Cold Spring Harb. Perspect. Biol. 2018;10:a033118. doi: 10.1101/cshperspect.a033118. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Braak H, Sandmann-Keil D, Gai W, Braak E. Extensive axonal Lewy neurites in Parkinson’s disease: a novel pathological feature revealed by α-synuclein immunocytochemistry. Neurosci. Lett. 1999;265:67–69. doi: 10.1016/S0304-3940(99)00208-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Dickson DW, et al. Neuropathological assessment of Parkinson’s disease: refining the diagnostic criteria. Lancet Neurol. 2009;8:1150–1157. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(09)70238-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Halliday G, Lees A, Stern M. Milestones in Parkinson’ s disease–clinical and pathologic features. Mov. Disord. 2011;26:1015–1021. doi: 10.1002/mds.23669. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Hirsch EC, Graybiel AM, Agid Y. Melanized dopaminergic neurons are differentially affected in Parkinson’s disease. Nature. 1988;334:345–348. doi: 10.1038/334345a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Postuma R, et al. MDS clinical diagnostic criteria for Parkinson’s disease. Mov. Disord. 2015;30:1591–1601. doi: 10.1002/mds.26424. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Cheng HC, Ulane CM, Burke RE. Clinical progression in Parkinson disease and the neurobiology of axons. Ann. Neurol. 2010;67:715–725. doi: 10.1002/ana.21995. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Hughes AJ, Daniel SE, Kilford L, Lees AJ. Accuracy of clinical diagnosis of idiopathic Parkinson’s disease: a clinico-pathological study of 100 cases. J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiatry. 1992;55:181–184. doi: 10.1136/jnnp.55.3.181. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Rizzo G, et al. Accuracy of clinical diagnosis of Parkinson disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Neurology. 2016;86:566–576. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000002350. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Snow BJ, et al. Human positron emission tomographic [18F]Fluorodopa studies correlate with dopamine cell counts and levels. Ann. Neurol. 1993;34:324–330. doi: 10.1002/ana.410340304. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Morrish PK, Sawle GV, Brooks DJ. An [18F]dopa-PET and clinical study of the rate of progression in Parkinson’s disease. Brain. 1996;119:585–591. doi: 10.1093/brain/119.2.585. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Morrish PK, Sawle V, Brooks J. Clinical and [18F]dopa PET findings in early Parkinson’s disease. J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiatry. 1995;59:597–600. doi: 10.1136/jnnp.59.6.597. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Sasaki M, et al. Neuromelanin magnetic resonance imaging of locus ceruleus and substantia nigra in Parkinson’s disease. Neuroreport. 2006;17:1215–1218. doi: 10.1097/01.wnr.0000227984.84927.a7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Kitao S, et al. Correlation between pathology and neuromelanin MR imaging in Parkinson’s disease and dementia with Lewy bodies. Neuroradiology. 2013;55:947–953. doi: 10.1007/s00234-013-1199-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Martin-Bastida A, Pietracupa S, Piccini P. Neuromelanin in parkinsonian disorders: an update. Int. J. Neurosci. 2017;127:1116–1123. doi: 10.1080/00207454.2017.1325883. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Cassidy CM, et al. Neuromelanin-sensitive MRI as a noninvasive proxy measure of dopamine function in the human brain. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA. 2019;116:5108–5117. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1807983116. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Pyatigorskaya N, et al. Iron imaging as a diagnostic tool for Parkinsonas disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Front. Neurol. 2020;11:1–16. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2020.00366. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Damier P, Hirsch EC, Agid Y, Graybiel AM. The substantia nigra of the human brain: I. Nigrosomes and the nigral matrix, a compartmental organization based on calbindin D(28K) immunohistochemistry. Brain. 1999;122:1421–1436. doi: 10.1093/brain/122.8.1421. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Damier, P., Hirsch, E. C., Agid, Y. & Graybiel, A. M. The substantia nigra of the human brain II. Patterns of loss of dopamine-containing neurons in Parkinson’ s disease. Brain122, 1437–1448 (1999). [DOI] [PubMed]
- 20.Kish SJ, Shannak K, Hornykiewicz O. Uneven pattern of dopamine loss in the striatum of patients with idiopathic Parkinson’s disease. N. Engl. J. Med. 1988;318:876–880. doi: 10.1056/NEJM198804073181402. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Hallgren B, Sourander P. The effect of age on the non-haemine iron in the human brain. J. Neurochem. 1958;3:41–51. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-4159.1958.tb12607.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Martin WRW, Wieler M, Gee M. Midbrain iron content in early Parkinson disease: a potential biomarker of disease status. Neurology. 2008;70:1411–1417. doi: 10.1212/01.wnl.0000286384.31050.b5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Trujillo P, et al. Contrast mechanisms associated with neuromelanin-MRI. Magn. Reson. Med. 2017;78:1790–1800. doi: 10.1002/mrm.26584. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Lehéricy S, Sharman MA, Dos Santos CL, Paquin R, Gallea C. Magnetic resonance imaging of the substantia nigra in Parkinson’s disease. Mov. Disord. 2012;27:822–830. doi: 10.1002/mds.25015. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Biondetti E, et al. Spatiotemporal changes in substantia nigra neuromelanin content in Parkinson’s disease. Brain. 2020;143:2757–2770. doi: 10.1093/brain/awaa216. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Langley J, et al. Reproducible detection of nigral iron deposition in 2 Parkinson’s disease cohorts. Mov. Disord. 2019;34:416–419. doi: 10.1002/mds.27608. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Xing Y, Sapuan A, Dineen RA, Auer DP. Life span pigmentation changes of the substantia nigra detected by neuromelanin-sensitive MRI. Mov. Disord. 2018;33:1792–1799. doi: 10.1002/mds.27502. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Chen X, et al. Simultaneous imaging of locus coeruleus and substantia nigra with a quantitative neuromelanin MRI approach. Magn. Reson. Imaging. 2014;32:1301–1306. doi: 10.1016/j.mri.2014.07.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Langley J, et al. A multicontrast approach for comprehensive imaging of substantia nigra. Neuroimage. 2015;112:7–13. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2015.02.045. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Isaias IU, et al. Neuromelanin imaging and dopaminergic loss in Parkinson’s disease. Front. Aging Neurosci. 2016;8:1–12. doi: 10.3389/fnagi.2016.00196. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Schwarz ST, et al. T1-weighted MRI shows stage-dependent substantia nigra signal loss in Parkinson’s disease. Mov. Disord. 2011;26:1633–1638. doi: 10.1002/mds.23722. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Martín-Bastida A, et al. Relationship between neuromelanin and dopamine terminals within the Parkinson’s nigrostriatal system. Brain. 2019;142:2023–2036. doi: 10.1093/brain/awz120. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Ohtsuka C, et al. Changes in substantia nigra and locus coeruleus in patients with early-stage Parkinson’s disease using neuromelanin-sensitive MR imaging. Neurosci. Lett. 2013;541:93–98. doi: 10.1016/j.neulet.2013.02.012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Schwarz ST, Xing Y, Tomar P, Bajaj N, Auer DP. In Vivo assessment of brainstem depigmentation in Parkinson disease: potential as a severity marker for multicenter studies. Radiology. 2017;283:789–798. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2016160662. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Lhermitte J, Kraus WM, McAlpine D. On the occurrence of abnormal deposits of iron in the brain in parkinsonism with special reference to its localisation. J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiatry. 1924;S1-5:195–208. doi: 10.1136/jnnp.s1-5.19.195. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Sofic E, et al. Increased iron (II1) and total iron content in post mortem substantia nigra of parkinsonian brain. J. Neural Transm. 1988;74:199–205. doi: 10.1007/BF01244786. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Hirsch EC, Brandel J‐P, Galle P, Javoy‐Agid F, Agid Y. Iron and aluminum increase in the substantia nigra of patients with Parkinson’s disease: an X‐ray microanalysis. J. Neurochem. 1991;56:446–451. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-4159.1991.tb08170.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Uitti RJ, et al. Regional metal concentrations in parkinson’s disease, other chronic neurological diseases, and control brains. Can. J. Neurol. Sci. 1989;16:310–314. doi: 10.1017/S0317167100029140. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Rossi M, et al. Brain iron deposition and sequence characteristics in parkinsonism. Investig. Radiol. 2010;45:795–802. doi: 10.1097/RLI.0b013e3181ec9c96. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Langkammer C, et al. Quantitative MR imaging of brain iron: a postmortem validation study. Radiology. 2010;257:455–462. doi: 10.1148/radiol.10100495. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Langkammer C, et al. Quantitative susceptibility mapping (QSM) as a means to measure brain iron? A post mortem validation study. Neuroimage. 2012;62:1593–1599. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2012.05.049. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Baudrexel S, et al. Quantitative mapping of T1 and T2* discloses nigral and brainstem pathology in early Parkinson’s disease. Neuroimage. 2010;51:512–520. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2010.03.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Pyatigorskaya N, et al. High nigral iron deposition in LRRK2 and Parkin mutation carriers using R2* relaxometry. Mov. Disord. 2015;30:1077–1084. doi: 10.1002/mds.26218. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Reimão, S. et al. Magnetic resonance correlation of iron content with neuromelanin in the substantia nigra of early-stage Parkinson’s disease. Eur. J. Neurol. 23, 368–374 (2016). [DOI] [PubMed]
- 45.Langley J, Huddleston DE, Liu CJ, Hu X. Reproducibility of locus coeruleus and substantia nigra imaging with neuromelanin sensitive MRI. Magn. Reson. Mater. Phys., Biol. Med. 2017;30:121–125. doi: 10.1007/s10334-016-0590-z. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Wang, J. et al. Meta-analysis of brain iron levels of Parkinson’ s disease patients determined by postmortem and MRI measurements. Nat. Publ. Gr. 1–13 (2016). 10.1038/srep36669. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 47.Bagnato F, et al. Untangling the R2* contrast in multiple sclerosis: a combined MRI-histology study at 7.0 Tesla. PLoS ONE. 2018;13:1–19. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0193839. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Galazka-Friedman J, et al. Iron in parkinsonian and control substantia nigra? A mössbauer spectroscopy study. Mov. Disord. 1996;11:8–16. doi: 10.1002/mds.870110104. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Hare DJ, Double KL. Iron and dopamine: a toxic couple. Brain. 2016;139:1026–1035. doi: 10.1093/brain/aww022. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Zecca L, et al. The role of iron and molecules in the neuronal vulnerability of locus coeruleus and substantia nigra during aging. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA. 2004;101:9843–9848. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0403495101. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Ward RJ, Zucca FA, Duyn JH, Crichton RR, Zecca L. The role of iron in brain ageing and neurodegenerative disorders. Lancet Neurol. 2014;13:1045–1060. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(14)70117-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Zucca FA, et al. Neuromelanin of the human substantia nigra: an update. Neurotox. Res. 2014;25:13–23. doi: 10.1007/s12640-013-9435-y. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Jellinger K, Paulus W, Grundke-Iqbal I, Riederer P, Youdim MBH. Brain iron and ferritin in Parkinson’s and Alzheimer’s diseases. J. Neural Transm. Park. Dis. Dement. Sect. 1990;2:327–340. doi: 10.1007/BF02252926. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Azuma M, et al. Lateral asymmetry and spatial difference of iron deposition in the substantia nigra of patients with Parkinson disease measured with quantitative susceptibility mapping. Am. J. Neuroradiol. 2016;37:782–788. doi: 10.3174/ajnr.A4645. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Arribarat G, et al. Substantia nigra locations of iron-content, free-water and mean diffusivity abnormalities in moderate stage Parkinson’s disease. Park. Relat. Disord. 2019;65:146–152. doi: 10.1016/j.parkreldis.2019.05.033. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Stoessl AJ, Lehericy S, Strafella AP. Imaging insights into basal ganglia function, Parkinson’s disease, and dystonia. Lancet. 2014;384:532–544. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(14)60041-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Kaasinen V, Vahlberg T. Striatal dopamine in Parkinson disease: a meta-analysis of imaging studies. Ann. Neurol. 2017;82:873–882. doi: 10.1002/ana.25103. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58.Kuya K, et al. Correlation between neuromelanin-sensitive MR imaging and 123I-FP-CIT SPECT in patients with parkinsonism. Neuroradiology. 2016;58:351–356. doi: 10.1007/s00234-016-1644-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59.Okuzumi A, et al. Neuromelanin or DaT-SPECT: which is the better marker for discriminating advanced Parkinson’s disease? Eur. J. Neurol. 2019;26:1408–1416. doi: 10.1111/ene.14009. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60.Hirsch EC, Hunot S. Neuroinflammation in Parkinson’s disease: a target for neuroprotection? Lancet Neurol. 2009;8:382–397. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(09)70062-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61.Morrish, P. K., Rakshi, J. S., Bailey, D. L., Sawle, G. V. & Brooks, D. J. Measuring the rate of progression and estimating the preclinical period of Parkinson’ s disease with [18 F] dopa PET. J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiatry64, 314–319 (1998). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 62.Eshuis SA, Maguire RP, Leenders KL, Jonkman S, Jager PL. Comparison of FP-CIT SPECT with F-DOPA PET in patients with de novo and advanced Parkinson’s disease. Eur. J. Nucl. Med. Mol. Imaging. 2006;33:200–209. doi: 10.1007/s00259-005-1904-y. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 63.Saari L, et al. Dopamine transporter imaging does not predict the number of nigral neurons in Parkinson disease. Neurology. 2017;88:1461–1467. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000003810. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 64.Reimão S, et al. Substantia nigra neuromelanin-MR imaging differentiates essential tremor from Parkinson’s disease. Mov. Disord. 2015;30:953–959. doi: 10.1002/mds.26182. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 65.Aquino D, et al. Substantia nigra in Parkinson’s disease: a multimodal MRI comparison between early and advanced stages of the disease. Neurol. Sci. 2014;35:753–758. doi: 10.1007/s10072-013-1595-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 66.Killilea DW, Wong SL, Cahaya HS, Atamna H, Ames BN. Iron accumulation during cellular senescence. Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 2004;1019:365–367. doi: 10.1196/annals.1297.063. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 67.Castellanos G, et al. Automated neuromelanin imaging as a diagnostic biomarker for Parkinson’s disease. Mov. Disord. 2015;30:945–952. doi: 10.1002/mds.26201. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 68.Antoniades CA, Barker R. The search for biomarkers in Parkinson’ s disease: a critical review. Expert Rev. Neurother. 2009;8:1841–1852. doi: 10.1586/14737175.8.12.1841. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 69.Whone AL, et al. Slower progression of Parkinson’s disease with ropinirole versus levodopa: the REAL-PET study. Ann. Neurol. 2003;54:93–101. doi: 10.1002/ana.10609. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 70.Brück A, et al. Striatal subregional 6-[18 F]fluoro- L -dopa uptake in early Parkinson’s disease: a two-year follow-up study. Mov. Disord. 2006;21:958–963. doi: 10.1002/mds.20855. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 71.Goetz CG, et al. Movement disorder society-sponsored revision of the unified Parkinson’s disease rating scale (MDS-UPDRS): scale presentation and clinimetric testing results. Mov. Disord. 2008;23:2129–2170. doi: 10.1002/mds.22340. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 72.Herb JN, et al. Cortical implications of advancing age and disease duration in Parkinson’s disease patients with postural instability and gait dysfunction. J. Parkinsons. Dis. 2016;6:441–451. doi: 10.3233/JPD-150753. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 73.Tomlinson CL, et al. Systematic review of levodopa dose equivalency reporting in Parkinson’s disease. Mov. Disord. 2010;25:2649–2653. doi: 10.1002/mds.23429. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 74.Weiskopf, N. et al. Quantitative multi-parameter mapping of R1, PD*, MT, and R2* at 3T: a multi-center validation. Front. Neurosci. 1–11 (2013). 10.3389/fnins.2013.00095. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 75.Tabelow K, et al. hMRI—a toolbox for quantitative MRI in neuroscience and clinical research. NeuroImage. 2019;194:191–210. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2019.01.029. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 76.Lutti A, Hutton C, Finsterbusch J, Helms G, Weiskopf N. Optimization and validation of methods for mapping of the radiofrequency transmit field at 3T. Magn. Reson. Med. 2010;64:229–238. doi: 10.1002/mrm.22421. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 77.Lutti A, et al. Robust and fast whole brain mapping of the RF transmit field B1 at 7T. PLoS ONE. 2012;7:1–7. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0032379. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 78.Priovoulos N, et al. High-resolution in vivo imaging of human locus coeruleus by magnetization transfer MRI at 3T and 7T. Neuroimage. 2018;168:427–436. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2017.07.045. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 79.Fearnley JM, Lees AJ. Ageing and Parkinson’s disease: substantia nigra regional selectivity. Brain. 1991;114:2283–2301. doi: 10.1093/brain/114.5.2283. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 80.Kordower JH, et al. Disease duration and the integrity of the nigrostriatal system in Parkinson’s disease. Brain. 2013;136:2419–2431. doi: 10.1093/brain/awt192. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 81.Ashburner J, Friston KJ. Unified segmentation. Neuroimage. 2005;26:839–851. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2005.02.018. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 82.Callaghan MF, et al. Widespread age-related differences in the human brain microstructure revealed by quantitative magnetic resonance imaging. Neurobiol. Aging. 2014;35:1862–1872. doi: 10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2014.02.008. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 83.Ashburner J. A fast diffeomorphic image registration algorithm. Neuroimage. 2007;38:95–113. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2007.07.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 84.Draganski B, et al. Regional specificity of MRI contrast parameter changes in normal ageing revealed by voxel-based quantification (VBQ) Neuroimage. 2011;55:1423–1434. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2011.01.052. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 85.Tzourio-Mazoyer N, et al. Automated anatomical labeling of activations in SPM using a macroscopic anatomical parcellation of the MNI MRI single-subject brain. Neuroimage. 2002;15:273–289. doi: 10.1006/nimg.2001.0978. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 86.Patlak CS, Blasberg RG. Graphical evaluation of blood-to-brain transfer constants from multiple-time uptake data. J. Cereb. Blood Flow Metab. 1985;5:584–590. doi: 10.1038/jcbfm.1985.87. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 87.Haber SN. The place of dopamine in the cortico-basal ganglia circuit. Neuroscience. 2014;282:248–257. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2014.10.008. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Data Availability Statement
MRI data supporting the results of this study are available from the corresponding author, on a collaborative basis.
Matlab code developed for this study is available from the corresponding author, on a collaborative basis.