Skip to main content
PLOS One logoLink to PLOS One
. 2021 Jul 9;16(7):e0254225. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0254225

Development of nano-emulsions based on Ayapana triplinervis essential oil for the control of Aedes aegypti larvae

Alex Bruno Lobato Rodrigues 1,*,#, Rosany Lopes Martins 2,#, Érica de Menezes Rabelo 2,#, Rosana Tomazi 2,#, Lizandra Lima Santos 2,#, Lethícia Barreto Brandão 2,#, Cleidjane Gomes Faustino 2,#, Ana Luzia Ferreira Farias 2,#, Cleydson Breno Rodrigues dos Santos 2,#, Patrick de Castro Cantuária 3,#, Allan Kardec Ribeiro Galardo 4,#, Sheylla Susan Moreira da Silva de Almeida 1,2,#
Editor: Ahmed Ibrahim Hasaballah5
PMCID: PMC8270136  PMID: 34242328

Abstract

Ayapana triplinervis is a plant species used in traditional medicine and in mystical-religious rituals by traditional communities in the Amazon. The aim of this study are to develop a nano-emulsion containing essential oil from A. triplinervis morphotypes, to evaluate larvicidal activity against Aedes aegypti and acute oral toxicity in Swiss albino mice (Mus musculus). The essential oils were extracted by steam dragging, identified by gas chromatography coupled to mass spectrometry, and nano-emulsions were prepared using the low energy method. Phytochemical analyses indicated the major compounds, expressed as area percentage, β-Caryophyllene (45.93%) and Thymohydroquinone Dimethyl Ether (32.93%) in morphotype A; and Thymohydroquinone Dimethyl Ether (84.53%) was found in morphotype B. Morphotype A essential oil nano-emulsion showed a particle size of 101.400 ± 0.971 nm (polydispersity index = 0.124 ± 0.009 and zeta potential = -19.300 ± 0.787 mV). Morphotype B essential oil nano-emulsion had a particle size of 104.567 ± 0.416 nm (polydispersity index = 0.168 ± 0.016 and zeta potential = -27.700 ± 1.307 mV). Histomorphological analyses showed the presence of inflammatory cells in the liver of animals treated with morphotype A essential oil nano-emulsion (MAEON) and morphotype B essential oil nano-emulsion (MBEON). Congestion and the presence of transudate with leukocyte infiltration in the lung of animals treated with MAEON were observed. The nano-emulsions containing essential oils of A. triplinervis morphotypes showed an effective nanobiotechnological product in the chemical control of A. aegypti larvae with minimal toxicological action for non-target mammals.

Introduction

Aedes aegypti is an anthropophilic insect vector of contagious infections such as Dengue (DENV), chikungunya (CHIKV), Zika (ZIKV) and Yellow Fever in tropical and subtropical regions of the planet [1]. The spread and survival of the species in human clusters is the result of the destruction of its natural environment, wich selected in the wild population the most lantent anthropophilic characteristics of the genus [2, 3].

Another point that requires attention is the double and triple co-infections between DENGV, ZIKV and CHIKV which can be transmitted simultaneously by A. aegypti [4]. Therefore, the chemical control applied in the larval phase of A. aegypti through the use of plant insecticides is an important tool in stopping mosquito-borne infections and their impacts on public health [5].

Although they are sessile organisms, plants have different forms of defense against phytopathogens and herbivores, including a complex chemical mechanism of secondary metabolites that can be used for chemical control of A. aegypti, as the essential oils of the Ayapana triplinervis [6].

Originally from South America, A. triplinervis (synonym: Eupatorium triplinerves) can be found in Brazil, Ecuador, Peru, Puerto Rico and Guyana, besides being adapted in other countries like India and Vietnam [7]. The species is found in Brazil in two morphotypes: Japana-Branca (morphotype A) and Japana-roxa (morphotype B) [8].

Ayapana triplinervis alkaloids and tannins exhibit greater food deterrence in Plutella xylostella and Crocidolomia binotalis agricultural pests, followed by their phenols and flavonoids. A. triplinervis extracts disrupted the growth and development of Myzus persicae nymphs and showed significant pest control properties, and plant species may be indicated as potential candidates for further study of their potential as botanical pesticides—an alternative to synthetic insecticides [9].

Despite the significant potential for chemical insect control, secondary metabolites from A. triplinervis, especially essential oil (EO), are susceptible to volatility and oxidation by oxygen and light, affecting the biological activity of their chemical constituents, or their limited condition of solubility of the essential oil in the aqueous medium, where A. aegyti larvae develop [10].

One way to enable protection against degradation and oxidation, and even improve the solubility in aqueous medium of EO is through the development of a technological nanoemulsification system, which offers advantages such as ease of handling, stability, protection against oxidation, better distribution, solubility and controlled release [11].

Nano-emulsions are colloidal systems where their particles are submicron size which are carriers of active molecules. Nanocapsulation technology of sparingly soluble bioactives in aqueous medium is useful in the pharmaceutical and food industries to be applied as bioactivity protection and controlled release to improve bioavailability of active compounds [12]. Nanoformulations represent an emerging technology with application in several areas ranging from the pharmaceutical industry, agriculture, to the control of insects of epidemiological interest for public health. Features such as increased efficiency, durability and reduced effective concentration can bring significant benefits and add value to the nanostructured product [13, 14].

When the particle size distribution of an emulsion is below 80 nm, nano-emulsion has advanced properties compared to conventional sized emulsions as transparent visual appearance, high colloidal stability and a large interfacial area relative to volume [15]. This study hypothesized that nano-emulsions containing A. triplinervis essential oil may have insecticidal activity against A. aegypti larvae. Therefore, the aims of this study were to evaluate the larvicidal activity against A. aegypti of nano-emulsions containing essential oils of A. triplinervis morphotypes and their acute oral toxicity in non-target organism.

Material and methods

Plant material

The leaves of Ayapana triplinervis morphotypes A and B were collected in the District of Fazendinha (S 0° 03’69.55" and W 51° 11’03.77’’), in Macapá, Amapá. Specimen samples were identified by Doctor Patrick Cantuária and deposited in Herbarium Amapaense (HAMAB) of the Institute of Scientific and Technological Research of Amapá (IEPA) under the codes ABLR001-HAMAB e ABLR002-HAMAB. Access to the plant samples was authorized by the Brazilian Genetic Heritage Management Council under registration number AC90152.

Essential oils extraction

The essential oils were extracted by hydrodistillation using Clevenger apparatus (São Paulo, SP, Brazil). Dry leaves of morphotype A (2,652 Kg) and morphotype B (0,653 Kg) were extracted for two hours at 100 °C. The essential oils were stored in an amber bottle at -4 °C under light protection [16].

Gas chromatography/mass spectrometry analysis

The chemical compositions of the essential oils were determined by gas chromatography coupled to mass spectrometer (GC-MS) [17] on Shimadzu equipment, model CGMS-QP 2010 (Kyoto, Japan), on a DB-5HT column of the J & W Scientific brand, column 30 m, diameter 0.32 mm, film thickness 0.10 μm and nitrogen as carrier gas. The apparatus was operated under internal column pressure of 56.7 kPa, split ratio 1:20, gas flow in the column of 1.0 mL.min-1 (210 °C), injector temperature 220 °C, and the detector (CG-EM) of 240 °C. The initial temperature of the column was 60 °C with an increase of 3 °C.min-1 until it reached 240 °C, kept constant for 30 minutes. The mass spectrometer was programmed to perform readings in a range of 29 to 400 Da, at intervals of 0.5 seconds, with ionization energy of 70 eV. It was injected 1μL of each sample dissolved in hexane.

A standard mixture of n-alkanes (Sigma-Aldrich, St Louis, MO, C8—C40) was used to verify the performance of the GC-MS system and calculate the linear retention index (LRI) of each compound in the sample. 1 μL of n-alkanes was injected into the GC-MS system operated under the conditions described above, and their respective retention times (RT) were used as an external reference standard for calculating the LRI, together with RT of each compound of interest. The LRI was calculated according to the literature indication and the phytochemical identification was based on the comparison of their pattern of fragmentation mass spectrum with the library of the equipment and by comparing the calculated linear retention index (LRI) to the literature [18].

Nano-emulsification method

Nano-emulsions were prepared by low-energy method by phase inversion emulsification according to the methodology of Ostertard et al. [19] and Oliveira et al. [20], which involves the titration of an aqueous phase in an organic phase with constant stirring at room temperature. The organic phase was formed by adding the surfactant to the oil and homogenized for 30 minutes at 750 rpm. Then the aqueous phase was added dropwise and subjected to a magnetic stirrer (model AP59—Phoenix, Araraquara, SP, Brazil) for 60 minutes. The final essential oil concentration was 25,000 μg.mL-1 and the surfactant/oil ratio (SOR) equal 1:1.

Required hydrophilic-lipophilic balance

A mixture of non-ionic surfactants with variable hydrophilic-lipophilic equilibrium value (sorbitan monooleate HLB = 4.3 (Sigma-Aldrich, St Louis, MO), polyoxyethylene sorbitan monooleate HLB = 15 (Sigma-Aldrich, St Louis, MO), polyoxyethylene sorbitan monolaurate HLB = 16.7 (Sigma-Aldrich, St Louis, MO) was used to achieve a range of values of HLB between 8 and 16. The rHLB value of the mixture was calculated according to Oliveira and co-workers [21].

Particle size distribution and zeta potential measurements

Photon Correlation Spectroscopy analysis was performed using Zetasizer Nano Zs (Malvern Instruments, Malvern, UK) equipment with red laser 10 mW (X = 632.8 nm). Nano-emulsions were diluted in deionized water (1:25, v/v) and analyzed on the 90° angle. Droplet Size, polydispersity index, zeta potential were evaluated in triplicate and expressed as mean and standard deviation [21].

Evaluation of larvicidal lctivity against A. aegypti

Aedes aegypti larvae (Rockefeller strain, weight 22.6 ± 0.8 mg and leight 4.19 ± 0.49 mm) from the colony of Institute of Scientific and Technological Research of Amapá –IEPA were maintained in a room (3 m x 4 m) with controlled climatic conditions: temperature of 25 ± 2 °C, relative air humidity of 75 ± 5%, photoperiod of 12 hours.

The methodology was carried out in accordance with the standardized protocol of the World Health Organizations [22] replacing disposable cups with beakers (120 mL). A preliminary test was conducted at 500, 400, 300, 200 and 100 μg.mL-1 in 100 mL of aqueous solution of essential oil with DMSO at 5% or nano-emulsion. The larvicidal evaluation was performed in triplicate for each concentration, then were added 25 A. aegypti third-instar larvae and their mortality was assessed at 24 and 48 hours after exposure.

The larvae showed different susceptibility to morphotypes A and B of the species and after a preliminary bioassay, the larvicidal activity of morphotype A essential oil and nano-emulsion were adjusted to 150, 125, 100, 75 e 50 μg.mL-1, while morphotype B essential oil and nano-emulsion were adjusted to 100, 80, 60, 40 e 20 μg.mL-1. Negative control was 5% dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) aqueous solution for the essential oil, and nano-emulsion was used surfactant blenda at 2.5%. The positive control was Bacillus thuringiensis subspecies israelensis (BTI) bacteria in commercial solution at 0.37 μg.mL-1. The tests were carried out in quintuplicates and the average temperature of the aqueous solution was 25°C.

Immediately after coming into contact with the nano-emulsion, the behavior of the larvae was observed. After 24 and 48 hours of exposure, dead larvae were counted, taking as dead all those unable to reach the surface. Tests in which the negative control mortality exceeded 20% were discarded and repeated, those with mortality between 5 and 20% were corrected using the Abbott’s equation [23].

Light microscopy analysis

Larvae treated in the highest concentration of each nano-emulsion were fixed in 70% ethanol and analyzed under a light microscope model BX41 (Olympus, Tokyo) and photographed in a camera model MDCE 5C according to Botas and co-workers [24].

Evaluation of acute toxicity of A. triplinervis morphotypes nano-emulsions

This study was approved by the Research Ethics Committee of Universidade Federal do Amapá (CEP—Unifap– 004/2019). All procedures were performed in accordance with international animal care protocols and national animal testing regulations. The experiments used male and female, 12-week old Swiss albino mice (Mus musculus), provided by the Multidisciplinary Center for Biological Research in the Area of Science in Laboratory Animals (CEMIB). Swiss albino mice (mus musculus) represent a model of animal experimentation internationally that can bring relevant information about the toxicological effect in mammals that are not the target of insecticides [25].

Animals were kept in polyethylene cages at a controlled temperature (25 °C) over a 12-hour period of light or dark cycle and had free access to food and water. The animals had restricted food for three hours before the beginning of the experiment, the food was replaced one hour after the treatment with nano-emulsion.

Acute oral toxicity of the nano-emulsions was performed with 03 experimental groups (morphotype A essential oil nano-emulsion (MAEON), morphotyne B essential oil nano-emulsion (MBEON) and negative control), each group with 06 animals (03 males and 03 females).

The test was performed according to the Guideline 423 of the Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development [25] for acute toxic dose class testing. The nanoformulations and negative control were diluted in water at 2,000 mg.kg-1 (limit of 1 mL of the solution per 100 g of body weight of the animals) and administered orally through an appropriate cannula.

The Swiss albino mice (Mus musculus) were observed at 30, 60, 120, 240 and 360 minutes after oral treatment and daily for 14 days. Behavioural changes were assessed and recorded: general activity, vocal frenzy, irritability, touch response, response to tail stimulus, contortion, posterior train position, straightening reflex, body tone, grip strength, ataxia, auricular reflex, corneal reflex, tremors, convulsions, anaesthesia, lacrimation, ptosis, urination, defecation, piloerection, hypothermia, breathing, cyanosis, hyperaemia and death. Water consumption (mL) and food intake (g) were evaluated daily, and body weight every 03 days.

The animals were sacrificed on the 14th in a CO2 chamber, obeying the ethical principles of animal experimentation. Liver, heart, kidneys and lungs were removed for weighing and macroscopic and histopathological analysis [26].

Histopathological analysis

Liver, heart, kidneys and lungs were fixed in 10% formalin buffer solution for 48 hours, then they were dehydrated in different concentrations of alcohols (70%, 80%, 90%, and 100%) and diaphanized in xylol and embedded in paraffin. Paraffin sections (5 μm) were stained with haematoxylin and eosin. The slides were examined under a light microscope model BX41 (Olympus, Tokyo) and the magnified images of the tissues’ structure were captured for further study [26].

Statistical analysis

The data were organized into mean and standard deviations. Probit analyses were used to determine the larvae’s susceptibility and ANOVA to determine the statistical difference between treatments using the Statistical Package for the Social Sciences program (version 22, Chicago, Illinois), with a 95% confidence limit.

Results

The morphotype A essential oil showed a translucent colour and yield 0.248% ± 0.037 (m/m). Phytochemical analyses of the Morphotype A essential oil (MAEO) by GC-MS indicated the major compounds β-Caryophyllene (45.93%) and Thymohydroquinone Dimethyl Ether (32.93%). The Morphotype B essential oil (MBEO) yield 0.753% ± 0.467 m/m and was purple, Thymohydroquinone Dimethyl Ether (84.53%) was the only compound in greater quantity identified in the MBEO by GC-MS.

Thymol Methyl Ether, γ-Gurjunene and β-Caryophyllene were exclusively detected in morphotype A, and Valencene and α-Cedrene Epoxide were found only in morphotype B, as shown in Table 1. Additional phytochemical data is available on S1 and S2 Figs and S1 and S2 Tables.

Table 1. Chemical composition of essential oils of A. triplinervis morphotypes A and B.

Compound Morphotype A Morphotype B LRI [18]
% Peak Area LRI Percentege LRI
α-Pinene 0.93 948 1.25 948 932
β-Pinene 2.16 943 2.26 943 974
Thymol Methyl Ether 0.68 1231 - - 1232
α-Gurjunene 0.98 1419 0.41 1419 1409
β-Caryophyllene 45.93 1494 - - 1419
Thymohydroquinone Dimethyl Ether 32.93 1423 84.53 1423 1424
α-Humulene 1.60 1579 1.11 1579 1452
Aciphyllene 0.53 1490 - - 1501
β-Selinene 0.88 1469 0.41 1469 1489
α-Muurulene 0.45 1435 - - 1392
Valencene - - 0.53 1474 1496
γ-Gurjenene 0.64 1461 - - 1475
Caryophyllene Oxide 0.76 1506 0.67 1507 1582
2,5-Di-Tert-Buthyl-1,4-Benzenoquinone 4.22 1633 1.82 1633 -
α-Cedrene Epoxide - - 0.93 1293 1574

LRI = Linear retention index calculated; LRI [18] = Linear retention index of literature.

The content of the α-Pinene and β-Pinene monoterpenes added in each morphotype was equivalent to 3.09% in the MAEO and 3.51% in the MBEO. Oxygenated derivatives from p-Cymene such as Thymohydroquinone Dimethyl Ether and 2,5-Di-Tert-Buthyl-1,4-Benzenequinone were found in morphotypes A and B, while Thymol Methyl Ether was found only in morphotype A. Oxygenated derivatives of p-cymene totalled 37.00% in morphotype A and 86.35% in morphotype B.

Reports in the literature have indicated that the Eupatoruim capillifolium essential oil, of which contain 57.1% oxygenated derivatives from p-cymene (36.3% Thymol Methyl Ether and 20.8% Thymohydroquinone Dimethyl Ether), presented repellent activity against A. aegypti and adulticide activity against Stephanitis pyrioides [27].

Carbocyclic and oxygenated sesquiterpenes were found in greater quantity and diversity in morphotype A than in morphotype B. The sesquiterpene β-Caryophyllene was predominant only in morphotype A (45.93%). Scientific literature has reported that antioxidant effect of β-caryophyllene protects rat liver from carbon tetrachloride-induced fibrosis [28].

Studies have shown a variation in the chemical composition of the essential oil of A. triplinervis. However, Thymohydroquinone Dimethyl Ether has been found in high concentrations. Specimens from Lagoa Grande, Amapá State (Brazil) reported the presence of the majority compounds Thymohydroquinone Dimethyl Ether with 69.7% and β-Caryophyllene with 19.7% [29]. Another study that analysed the phytochemical composition of A. triplinervis essential oil collected on Reunion Island indicated the presence of Thymohydroquinone Dimethyl Ether at 89.9% to 92.8% [7]. However, none of the studies differentiated the chemical composition of the essential oils of each A. triplinervis morphotype.

Some species of the Asteraceae family produce Thymohydroquinone Dimethyl Ether as major compounds, among them Eupatorium marginatum (64.2%) [30], Laggera alata (44.0%) [31], Pulicania mauritanica (37.2%) [32], Laggera pterodonta (30.5%) [33], Blumea perrottetiana (30,0%) [34] and Sphaeranthus indicus (18.2%) [35].

Asteraceae are important for their recognized insecticidal activity described in the literature [36, 37]. Alkalamides and coumarins showed insecticidal activity against Sitophylus oryzae and Rhyzopertha dominica [38], polyacetylenes and terpenes have proven insecticide and repellent activities against larvae and adults of A. aegypti [3941].

Essential oils are good candidates for insecticides, however, their terpenes have low solubility in aqueous media, which represents the first stage of development of culicids such as A. aegypti, and are subject to degradation by oxidation and volatility [42]. To improve the solubility of essential oils in water, nano-emulsions were developed by the low energy method using phase inversion composition. This nanoencapsulation technique has advantages: non-heating, solvent free, low cost, and environmentally friendly [43].

Structures with a particle size ranging from 88,830 nm to 333,600 nm were produced for the morphotype A essential oil nano-emulsions (MAEON), and between 99.637 nm and 279.300 nm for the morphotype B essential oil nano-emsulsion (MBEON) on day 0 of analysis. Nano-emulsions formed with the hydrophilic-lipophilic balance (HLB) between 10 and 15 were homogeneous and milky, where the greater HLB’s (15.5 and 16) the nano-emulsions showed a bluish reflex for both morphotypes, as seen in Fig 1 and S3 and S4 Figs.

Fig 1. A. triplinervis morphotype A nano-emulsion in A) HLB 14 and B) HLB 16, and morphotype B nano-emulsion in C) HLB 14 e D) 16 on day 0.

Fig 1

Light scattering on nanoscale colloidal systems causes a characteristic bluish reflection called the Tyndall Effect and represents a parameter indicative of the kinetic stability acquired by nano-emulsions compared to macroemulsions [44]. However, nano-emulsion are susceptible to flocculation, coalescence and sedimentation instabilities [45]. Table 2 shows the physical parameters of the most promising nano-emulsions of the essential oil of each A. triplinervis morphotype.

Table 2. Reports of the most promising and optimized nano-emulsion (HLB 16) of each A. triplinervis morphotype over time.

Nano-emulsion Time (day) HLB Particle Size (nn) Polydispersity Index Zeta Potential (mV) Electrical Conductivity (mS.cm-1)
MAEON 0 16 88.830 ± 0.948 0.138 ± 0.012 -23.200 ± 0.458 0.025 ± 0.011
7 16 92.783 ±0.225 0.120 ± 0.007 -17.667 ±0.404 0.021 ±0.004
14 16 101.167 ± 0.971 0.125 ± 0.009 -20.100 ± 2.787 0.021 ± 0.004
21 16 99.463 ± 0.242 0.121 ± 0.008 -32.767 ± 1.450 0.014 ± 0.002
MBEON 0 16 99.637 ± 0.529 0.213 ± 0.011 -22.000 ± 1.153 0.020 ± 0.013
7 16 104.067 ± 0.306 0.186 ± 0.012 -22.400 ± 1.153 0.022 ± 0.001
14 16 106.567 ± 0.416 0.168 ± 0.016 -26.700 ± 1.308 0.013 ± 0.006
21 16 99.420 ± 0.519 0.132 ±0.008 -31.033 ± 2.178 0.020 ± 0.013

MAEON = Morphotype A Essential Oil Nano-emulsion. MBEON = Morphotype B Essential Oil Nano-emulsion; HLB = hydrophilic-lipophilic balance value

The narrowest emulsions were produced in HLB 16, and their particle size ranged from 88.830 nm to 99.463 nm for the Morphotype A essential oil, and between 99.637 nm to 99.420 nm for the Morphotype B essential oil between days 0 and 21, as shown in the particle size distribution in Fig 2. Emulsions with particle diameters between 20 and 200 nm are called nano-emulsions and possess stability against cremation, flocculation, and sedimentation, but are susceptible to Ostwald ripening over time [45, 46].

Fig 2. Particle size distribution of the A. triplinervis essential oils nano-emulsion A) morphotype A on day 0; B) morphotype B on day 0; C) morphotype A on day 21; and D) morphotype B on day 21.

Fig 2

The X axis has the particle diameter (nm) and the Y axis has the peak intensity (%).

The photon correlation spectroscopy analyses indicated that the morphotype A essential oil nano-emulsion (MAEON) had a particle diameter equal to 101.400 ± 0.971 nm (PdI = 0.124 ± 0.009 and ZP = -19.300 ± 0.787 mV). Morphotype B essential oil nano-emulsion (MBEON) showed particle size 104.567 ± 0.416 nm (PdI = 0.168 ± 0.016 and ZP = -27.700 ± 1.307 mV), as indicated in the particle size distribution and zeta potential distribution graph in Fig 3.

Fig 3. Size distribution by intensity and zeta potential distribution of nano-emulsion containing essential oil of A. triplinervis morphotype A (A and B) and morphotype B (C and D).

Fig 3

The X axis has the particle diameter (nm) and the Y axis has the peak intensity (%).

The solubility of a nano-emulsion can be assessed in terms of the electrical conductivity resulting from the residues of the surfactant organic groups [47]. MAEON presented electrical conductivity equal to 0.021 ± 0.004 mS.cm-1, and MBEON showed conductivity of 0.022 ± 0.001 mS.cm-1. These results indicate that MAEON and MBEON are soluble in aqueous media [48]. Therefore, it can be concluded that the nano-emulsions containing the essential oils of A. triplinervis morphotypes present stability and solubility, and can be used for chemical control of A. aegypti larvae.

In insecticidal activity, A. aegypti larvae showed atypical behaviour ranging from excitation to lethargy when in contact with essential oil or nano-emulsions, and their mortalities varied as a function of exposure time. Larvae of A. aegypti exposed to compounds with neuromuscular action have symptoms such as excitation, convulsions, paralysis, and death [49]. Symptoms observed in the experiment suggest toxic neuromuscular effects from nerve synapses through inhibition of octopamine [50].

Analysis of variance showed differences in the distribution of mean larval mortality caused by nano-emulsions compared to mortality from bulk essential oils (p-value = 0.7340 e F = 0.6247) and indicate that the larvae were more susceptible to nano-emulsions, as shown in Tables 3 and 4.

Table 3. Mortality of A. aegypti larvae in different concentrations of essential oil and nano-emulsion of A. triplinervis morphotype A.

Concentration (μg.mL-1) MAEO MAOEN
Mortality (%) Mortality (%)
24 h 48 h 24 h* 48 h
150 84.80 ± 8.67 a 91.20 ± 8.67 a 92.80 ± 3.35 a 96.80 ± 1.79 a
125 37.60 ± 12.84 ab 47.20 ± 12.46 a 64.00 ± 29.53 a 76.00 ± 38.78 a
100 25.60 ± 12.84 ac 39.20 ± 15.34 a 35.20 ± 20.86 ab 39.20 ± 11.10 a
75 12.80 ± 7.69 a 20.00 ± 5.66 a 27.20 ± 8.20 ac 29.60 ± 7.27 ab
50 10.40 ± 6.07 a 16.80 ± 5.93 a 22.40 ± 8.29 a 27.20 ± 12.13 ac
Negative Control 0.00 ± 0.00 a 0.00 ± 0.00 a 0.00 ± 0.00 a 0.00 ± 0.00 a
Positive Control 100 ± 0.00 a 100 ± 0.00 a 100 ± 0.00 a 100 ± 0.00 a

Means within a column with different letters are significantly different. Means within a row with different simbols are significantly different (p-value ˂0.001, F = 13,464).

Table 4. Mortality of A. aegypti larvae in different concentrations of essential oil and nano-emulsion of A. triplinervis morphotype B.

Concentration (μg.mL-1) MBEO MBEON
24 h 48 h 24 h* 48 h
100 60.00 ± 11.31a 64.80 ± 10.35ª 88.80 ± 5.22ª 92.80 ± 5.22ª
80 42.40 ± 8.29ab 49.60 ± 8.76ªb 80.00 ± 6.93ª 81.60 ± 8.29ª
60 30.40 ± 6.07ac 40.80 ± 8.67ªc 65.60 ± 15.65ª 67.20 ± 20.28ª
40 13.60 ± 5.37a 22.40 ± 7.80ª 54.40 ± 33.42ba 43.20 ± 24.23ba
20 0.80 ± 1.79a 3.20 ± 3.35ª 5.60 ± 2.19ba 34.40 ± 28.93ba
Negative Control 0.00 ± 0.00a 0.00 ± 0.00a 0.00 ± 0.00ba 0.00 ± 0.00ba
Positive Control 100 ± 0.00 a 100 ± 0.00 a 100 ± 0.00 a 100 ± 0.00 a

Means within a column with different letters are significantly different. Means within a row with different simblos are significantly different (p-value = 0.001, F = 7,984).

Nanoencapsulated system provides essential oil with chemical stability, solubility and bioavailability [51]. Bioavailability is facilitated by passive transport of nano-emulsions into cells when they are less than 200 nn in diameter and may represent an increase in nano-emulsion insecticidal activity [52].

Larvicidal compounds may act by absorption into epithelial tissue, respiratory or ingestion or systemic effect on diffusion by different tissues [53]. The mortality effect of A. aegypti larvae in contact with nano-emulsions and bulk essential oils as a function of time can be visualized by lethal concentrations that kills 50% (LC50) and 90% (LC90) exposed larvae in Table 5.

Table 5. Lethal concentration in order to kills 50% and 90% of 3rd instar larvae of A. aegypti in contact with the essential oils or the nano-emulsions of A. triplinervis morphotypes, and their lower and upper limits.

24 h 48 h
LC50 (μg.mL-1) LC90 (μg.mL-1) LC50 (μg.mL-1) LC90 (μg.mL-1)
MAEO 122.082 235.379 105.979 218.231
(99.630–181.737) (165.731–872.543) (84.020–146.794) (154.044–778.960)
X2 (df) = 9,975 (3) X2 (df) = 3,667 (3)
MAEON 96.228 202.042 87.434 177.207
(73.912–127.785) (144.733–675.615) (65.953–110.646) (131.862–455.481)
X2 (df) = 3,535 (3) X2 (df) = 4,430 (3)
MBEO 86.196 200.901 75.347 202.062
(65.812–177.738) (122.421–2351.066) (55.442–135.702) (119.379–2097.984)
X2 (df) = 0.091 (3) X2 (df) = 0.123 (3)
MBEON 44.755 100.473 35.570 117.450
(30.681–57.919) (73.997–214.623) (16.191–50.818) (74.818–629.081)
X2 (df) = 0.826 (3) X2 (df) = 1,269 (3)

Nano-emulsions show toxicity action that could be observed in larval morphology. The magnitude of toxicity was assessed by a combination of confocal and scanning electron microscopy. Results indicated deformation of anal papillae, and changes deriving from peeling epithelial tissue in the region located in the of the larvae abdomen, as shown in Fig 4.

Fig 4. Morphological changes in the anal papillae of A. aegypti 3rd instar larvae in contact with nano-emulsions of morphopotype A essential oil (B) and morphotype B (C) of A. triplinervis compared to control (A) by confocal microscopy (25×).

Fig 4

Essential oils are highly selective for octopaminergic receptors that are distributed in neural and non-neural tissues [54]. Studies have shown that essential oils can modify the activity of neurons by octopamine receptors [5557]. Authors suggest that octopamine acts on insect epithelial tissue to provide plasticity for abdominal distension in breathing and larval movement [58].

Loss of epithelial tissue impairs larval mobility and respiration. Anal papillae morphology and surface dysfunctions affect regulation of osmotic functions and, together with cuticle loss, represent a condition that is detrimental to the survival of A. aegypti larvae. [49]. These data are in agreement with the results observed for Pterodon emarginatus nano-emulsion in Culex quinquefasciatus larvae [21].

In assessment of acute oral toxicity in non-target mammals, mortality was not observed in 2000 mg.Kg-1 of MAEON and MBEON during the 14 days of observation. Hippocratic screening showed that MAEON caused irritability in males and females during the first hour, and corneal reflex in females during the first 3 hours of observation. MBEON caused writhing and irritability in males and females during the first hour of analysis, as shown in Table 6.

Table 6. Effect of oral administration of MAEON and MBEON (2000 mg.kg-1) on behavioural parameters of Swiss albino mice (Mus musculus) during acute toxicity assessment.

Group Adults N° of mice N° of dead mice Toxicity Symptoms
Control Male 3 0 -
Female 3 0 -
MAEON Male 3 0 Irritability
Female 3 0 Irritability and corneal reflex
MBEON Male 3 0 Contortion and irritability
Female 3 0 Contortion and irritability

In physiological analysis, a decrease in water intake was observed in males and females of the MAEON group, and an increase in water consumption was observed for males and females of the MBEON group. However, these results did not present significant differences when compared with the control group. No changes in food intake were observed in the MAEON and MBEON groups, and the body weight gain did not show significant differences when compared to the control group, as shown in Table 7.

Table 7. Physiological parameters of Swiss albino mice (Mus musculus) treated with MAEON and MBEON at 2000 mg.kg-1.

Parameters Control MAEON MBEON
Male Female Male Female Male Female
Water (mL) 13.16 ± 1.46 13.35 ± 1.46 10.27 ± 2.19 12.96 ± 1.68 15.34 ± 1.08 15.92 ± 1.26
Food (g) 6.39 ± 0.34 6.30 ± 0.25 6.24 ± 0.51 5.81 ± 0.46 6.16 ± 1.33 5.91 ± 0.34
Body Weight (g) 28.07 ± 1.45 28.85 ± 1.33 29.50 ± 1.44 25.55 ± 1.07 31.47 ± 0.37 24.75 ± 0.39

Values are expressed as mean ± standard deviation (n = 3). Statistical significance was calculated using One-way Anova followed by Bonferroni’s multiple comparison test (p <0.01).

There were no significant differences in relative weight of heart, kidney, and lung when compared to control group organs. However, there was a statistically significant decrease in the absolute liver weight of males treated with MBEON compared to the control group, as shown in Table 8.

Table 8. Effect of MAEON and MBEON at 2000 mg.kg-1 on the weight of different Swiss albino (Mus musculus) organs after 14 days of treatment.

Organs (%) Control MAEON MBEON
Males Females Males Females Males Females
Liver 5.97 ± 0.42 6.27 ± 0.28 7.55 ± 1.32 7.16 ± 0.50 6.49 ± 0.25* 6.18 ± 0.43
Kidneys 0.81 ± 0.12 0.84 ± 0.12 0.99 ± 0.16 0.76 ± 0.03 0.88 ± 0.05 0.77 ± 0.04
Heart 0.58 ± 0.07 0.54 ± 0.04 0.55 ± 0.09 0.56 ± 0.14 0.49 ± 0.02 0.48 ± 0.01
Lungs 0.73 ± 0.02 0.74 ± 0.02 0.88 ± 0.11 0.85 ± 0.15 0.74 ± 0.15 0.65 ± 0.15

Values are expressed as mean ± standard deviation (n = 3). Statistical significance was calculated using One-way Anova followed by Bonferroni’s multiple comparison test (p <0.01).

Histological evaluation showed no changes in the liver, heart, lung and kidneys of the control group. However, inflammatory cells were observed in the liver of animals treated with MAEON and MBEON. In the lungs, there was congestion and the presence of transudate with leukocyte infiltration in animals treated with MAEON. The hearts and kidneys of these animals were not affected, as shown in the Fig 5. Histopathological analysis of the liver identified a discrete leukocyte infiltrate in the sample. The leukocyte infiltrate may be associated with an increase in the structure of the organ and, as a consequence, an increase in the weight of the liver of the animals treated with MBEON in comparison with the control. Because it is the organ responsible for the metabolism of chemicals and the regulation of the immune response, the liver becomes susceptible to toxic damage and may undergo morphological changes, as indicated [59, 60].

Fig 5. Histological section of animals treated orally with control and MAEON and MBEON.

Fig 5

In A, the normal liver of a control group animal; In B and C, the liver of an animal treated with MAEON and MBEON, with normal hepatocytes (H) and the presence of inflammatory cells (CI). In D and F, the normal lungs of control and MBEON animals, where pulmonary alveoli was observed; In E, the lung of a MAEON group animal, where pulmonary alveoli (AP), congestion (Cg) and oedematous transudate with leukocyte infiltration (TEI) were observed. In G, H and I, the normal kidneys of control, MAEON and MBEON groups with glomerulus (G), Bowmam capsule (CB), distal tubule (DT), proximal tubule (TB). In J, K and L, normal hearts are observed from the control group, MAEON and MBEON.

Discussion

Few studies are dedicated to reporting the biological activity of A. triplinervis in the literature: anxiolytic, antinociceptive and sedative effect on the central nervous system [61], inhibitory activity in the formation of melanin in B16 melanoma cells [62], inhibition of the tyrosinase enzyme [63], antimicrobian activity [64, 65]. Essential oil and Thymohydroquinone Dimethyl Ether isolated from the species demonstrated potential inhibition of ZIKV infection in human cells [66].

The first available chemical data of the A. triplinervis in the scientific literature were reported by Semmler in 1908 and indicated 80% of Thymohydroquinone Dimethyl Ether [67]. We report in this study, for the first time in the scientific literature, the phytochemical composition of the essential oils of A. triplinervis morphotypes A and B.

Two distinct chemotypes of Thymohydroquinone Dimethyl Ether have been cited in the literature: one in Lucknow (India), which presented Selin-4 (15), 7 (11) -dien-8-one with 36.6%; and the second was found in Tamil Nadu (India), which indicated the presence of 2-Tert-Butyl-1,4-dimethoxybenzene with a percentage of 74.27% [68, 69]. However, no study has differentiated the chemical composition of the essential oil of each morphotype.

The interspecific variability of essential oils produces different chemotypes by a combination of genetic and environmental factors [70] and may contribute to the diversification of ecological interactions between plants and insects [71, 72].

A. triplinervis morphotype A essential oil presented Thymohydroquinone Dimethyl Ether and β-caryophyllene as major compounds. β-caryophyllene is a sesqueterpene that has a wide distribution in species of the family Astereaceae and may have anti-inflammatory, antibiotic, insecticide, antioxidant and anticarcinogenic activity [73]. In morphotype B, the concentration of Thymohydroquinone remained similar to that found in our previous studies. The chemical composition can vary through climatic and environmental changes [74], and these results can support the understanding of chemical variability in the species and its morphotypes, however, further studies are needed.

The essential oil of morphotype A is the closest to the chemotype described in Brazil by Maia and his co-workers [29], while the essential oil of morphotype B has a greater chemotypic relationship with the specimen described on Reunion Island by Gauvin-Bialacki and Maradon [7]. A different chemotype was reported in India and indicated Selina-4(15),7(11)-dien-8-one as a major compound with a percentage of 36,6%, followed by β-Caryophyllene with 14.7% [68].

The scientific literature indicates that essential oils are considered eco-friendly insecticides [69], act in low concentrations at the active site, and remain for a short time exposed in nature, however, when inserted into a nanostructured system, they show improvements in insecticidal activity, stability, and safety in their application due to specificity selectivity in insects compared to humans [70].

Essential oils are susceptible to deterioration caused by temperature and radiation, which can induce oxidation of their chemical components and cause significant changes in their pharmacological activity [71]. Therefore, it was possible to develop nano-emulsion as a drug delivery system using low energy emulsification method through composition inversion, which uses low-energy input without heating and is solvent-free organic [20] to improve the chemical stability of A. triplinervis essential oils [70].

Nano-emulsions can be prepared by the high energy method that uses mechanical devices capable of creating shear stress for formation of finely distributed droplets, and the low-energy method, which depends on spontaneous emulsification within the oil-surfactant-water mixture, altered by changes in phase inversion system or solvent separation [72].

Our studies have demonstrated eco-friendly, non-heated and solvent-free nano-emulsions that improved the insecticidal activity against A. aegyti in relation to bulk essential oils with LC50 < 100 μg.mL-1 in 24 hours of exposure. This result corroborates other studies published in the literature that showed that the nano-emulsion of Vitex negundo is more effective in controlling A. aegypti larvae than its bulk essential oil [73], and that the nano-emulsion of Anethum graveolens is more toxic to Anopheles stephensi than its bulk essential oil [74].

The A. aegypti larvae were more susceptible to A. triplinervis nano-emulsions than Baccharis reticularia (Asteraceae) nano-emulsion with particle size equal to 92.9 nm (PdI = 0.412 e ZP = -20.4) and LC50 = 221.273 μg.mL-1 [26]. The larvicidal activity of A. triplinervis morphotypes nano-emulsion was more pronounced than Copaifera duckei nano-emulsion (PS = 145.2 nm and PdI = 0.378) that showed 70% mortality at 200 μg.mL-1 [47], and Pterodon emarginatus nano-emulsion (PS = 128.0 nm and PdI = 0.250) that demonstrated LC50 = 371.6 μg.mL-1 in A. aegypti larvae [75].

When the particle size distribution is polymodal, i.e with a Polydispersity Index (PdI) greater than 0.3, nano-emulsions are susceptible to Ostwald ripening degradation. The mechanism of instability is through the chemical potential difference between smaller droplets and larger droplets caused by mass transport between them, and can cause degradation by coalescence or flocculation [76, 77]. Polydispersity index of morphotype A and B nano-emulsions demonstrated uniform particle size and monomodal distribution, thus is stable against Ostwald ripening [78, 79].

Zeta potential comes from the surface distribution of charges in nano-emulsions and its value of around ± 30 mV indicates a stable system through electrostatic repulsion that prevents flocculation degradation in nano-emulsions [80, 81]. From a zeta potential standpoint, the NOEMA and NOEMB acquired stability over time. The low solubility of essential oils makes their application in chemical control of Aedes aegypti larvae unfeasible, therefore, an O/W (Oil-in-Water) nano-emulsion adds advantages as a nanobiotechnological product because it improves solubility of essential oils in aqueous media [82].

The literature reports some cases that use the low-energy non-heat method to form an insecticidal nano-emulsions-based delivery system with chemical and kinetic stability in HLB 15. Baccharis reticular essential oil, which had a particle size of 138 nm (PdI = 0.453 and ZP = -18.3 mV), and P. emarginatus essential oil nano-emulsion with particle size 116.8 nm (PdI = 0.250 and ZP = -19.9 mV) [24, 83].

In addition, Rosmarinus officinalis essential oil nano-emulsions were produced in HLB 16.7 with a particle size of 174.1 nm (PdI = 0.136 and ZP was not reported) [82]. The contextualization of these results indicates that the nano-emulsion droplet diameter prepared by the phase inversion method depends on the number of HLB for formulating colloidal stability systems [84].

In this study we also exclusively report colloidal systems with high stability in HLB 16 for the essential oils of A. triplinervis morphotypes, which presented monomodal distribution nanostructure and narrow hydrodynamic diameters produced by the low-energy method, non-heat, solvent-free and environmentally friendly with low production costs [20].

The LC50 and LC90 were lower at 48 hours of exposure compared to 24 hours for essential oil and nano-emulsion of morphotype A. The variation in larvicidal activity over time may be due to the increased concentration of bioactive compounds that are released over time in a nanoformulation [85]. These results are in line with previous studies showing that micro or nano-emulsions are more effective in chemical control of Culex pipiens pipiens, Culex quinquefasciatus and Anopheles stephensi larvae compared to their bulk essential oils [74, 86, 87].

Comparing the LC50 between nano-emulsion and the bulk essential oil of each morphotype, it can be observed that the insecticidal activity of morphotype B was more effective in the mortality of A. aegypti larvae than morphotype A. The most pronounced insecticidal bioactivity of morphotype B may be due to the higher percentage of Thymohydroquinone Dimethyl Ether or by the synergism of all phytochemical constituents.

Contrary to this study, the literature reports that Eupatorium capillifolium essential oil, which contains 20.8% Thymohydroquinone Dimethyl Ether, has moderate adulticidal and larvicidal activity but high repellent activity against A. gambiae [88].

Laggera alata essential oil contains 24.4% of Thymohydroquinone Dimethyl Ether and has been described with LC50 = 273.38 mg.mL-1 for A. aegypti [89]. Guateria hispida essential oils were characterized with 21.0% β-caryophyllene, and Piper arboreum essential oil with 10.88% showed LC50 of 85.74 μg.mL-1 and 55.00 μg.mL-1 agains A. aegypti larvae [90, 91]. The results obtained in this study compared to literature data may indicate that the larvicidal activity is related to the major constituents or through the synergistic action of the secondary metabolites [92].

The evaluation of larvicidal activity shows that the essential oil of morphotype A did not show larvicidal activity in A. aegypti (LC50 > 100 μg.mL-1), however, the nano-emulsion of morphotype A and the essential oil of morphotype B were active in the control of A. aegypti larvae (LC50 < 100 μg.mL-1). Morphotype B essential oil nano-emulsion was the most effective in the chemical control of A. aegypti larvae (LC50 < 50 μg.mL-1) [93].

Therefore, it can be concluded that the nano-emulsions containing the essential oils of A. triplinervis morphotypes A and B showed nanobiotechnological potential to be applied in the chemical control of A. aegypti larvae in preliminary laboratory tests.

The larvicidal activity of A. triplinervis essential oils may indicate neuromuscular action by inhibiting the octapaminergic system [94]. Octopamine is a neuromodulator, neurotransmitter and neurohormone that acts on the insect’s nervous system and represents a specific marker of insecticidal activity in essential oils [95].

From the morphological point of view, deformations in the anal papillae influence the larval osmoregulation ability and motility [96]. Similar changes in shrinking of the internal cuticle of anal papillae have been described in A. aegypti larvae in contact with aqueous extracts of different species of the genus Piper and Argemone mexicana [97].

The depreciating effects caused by MAEON and MBEON in the anal papillae and in the cuticle affect motility and influence the survival of A. aegypti larvae. Similar effects are observed in the morphology of Culex quinquefaciatus larvae by the action of P. emarginatus nano-emulsion and A. aegypti larvae by the action of B. reticulate nano-emulsion and may indicate the toxicity mechanism of A. triplinervis essential oil nano-emulsions [21, 24].

The development of formulations for the controlled release of terpenes has great potential for reducing side effects and promoting prolonged insecticidal action [98]. Due to the small size that favours rapid absorption and metabolism, the nano-emulsions have the potential to maximize the toxic effect at high concentrations [99], as shown in this study.

Contortion, irritability and corneal reflex indicate action in the central nervous system, and these observations were in accordance with previous studies that demonstrate sedative, anxiolytic and antidepressant effects in different animal models for A. triplinervis extract [84].

The oral bioavailability of nano-emulsions increases as a function of the particle size, and its surface charge can influence the potential for acute toxicity through the solubility balance, lipid digestion rate and mucosal penetration rate [100].

The presence of leukocyte infiltrates in the liver, congestion in the alveolar septa and transudate with leukocyte infiltration in the lungs indicate inflammatory processes in these organs caused by MAEON and MBEON [101]. However, the literature has suggested that the application of insecticidal nano-emulsion in non-target mammals is safe [102].

Insecticidal nano-emulsion containing Eucalyptus staigeriana essential oil did not show haematological changes in rats [103]. In another study, a nano-emulsion prepared from Manilkara subsericea did not show death or toxicological effects on mice [104]. Nano-emulsion containing Carapa guianensis did not show cytotoxicity, genotoxicity and hepatotoxicity in mice [105], and Thymohydroquinone Dimethyl Ether, the major metabolite of the samples, showed no toxicity in Zebrafish model [66].

The evaluation of acute toxicity showed that the results found for A. triplinervis essential oils nano-emulsions are in accordance with the results described in the literature. The absence of mortality in the nano-emulsion concentration used in this study suggests that the LD50 is superior to the treatment applied (2000 mg.Kg-1) and indicates that nano-emulsions have low toxicity and can be classified in toxicity category 5 [97].

Conclusions

The results indicated that morphotype A presented a different phytochemical composition to that of the major compounds from the morphotype B essential oil. The essential oil nano-emulsions demonstrated kinetic stability, aqueous solubility, monomodal distribution and particle size 101.400 ± 0.971 for morphotype A, and 104.567 ± 0.416 for morphotype B.

The evaluation of larvicidal activity showed that A. aegypti larvae were more susceptible to nano-emulsions than to bulk essential oil. The magnitude of the deleterious effects of nano-emulsions in larvae occurred through the deformation of the anal papillae and the peeling of the cuticle when compared with the control group.

The assessment of acute oral toxicity indicated action on the central nervous system, and histopathological analysis showed damage to the lungs and livers of the animals, however, there was no mortality at the tested dose, indicating that nano-emulsions can be classified in category 5 of toxicity.

In this context, A. triplinervis morphotypes essential oils nano-emulsions proved to be an eco-friendly nanobiotechnological product, effective for chemical control of A. aegypti larvae and safe for non-target mammals that can be used to control of diseases DENGV, CHIKV, ZIKV.

Supporting information

S1 Fig. Chromatogram of the essential oil of A. triplinervis morphotype A.

(DOCX)

S2 Fig. Chromatogram of the essential oil of A. triplinervis morphotype B.

(DOCX)

S3 Fig. Physical parameters of A. triplinervis morphotype A nano-emulsions in different hydrophilic-lipophilic balance values at 0, 7, 14 and 21 days.

(DOCX)

S4 Fig. Physical parameters of nano-emulsions A. triplinervis morphotype B nano-emulsions in different hydrophyl-lipophyle balance values at 0, 7, 14 and 21 days.

(DOCX)

S1 Table. Chemical composition, retention time (RT), percentage and calculated Linear Retention Index (LRI) and literature of essential oil of A. triplinervis morphotype A.

(DOCX)

S2 Table. Chemical composition, retention time (RT), percentage and calculated Linear Retention Index (LRI) and literature of essential oil of A. triplinervis morphotype B.

(DOCX)

Acknowledgments

To the Pharmaceutical Research laboratory—UNIFAP under the responsibility of Dr. José Carlos Tavares Carvalho. To the Laboratory of Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Chemistry—UNIFAP under the responsibility of Dr. Mayara Amoras Teles Fujishima. The Dean of Research and Graduate Studies—PROPESPG—UNIFAP.

Data Availability

All relevant data are within the paper and its Supporting information files.

Funding Statement

This study received support from the following sources: The Amapá Research Support Foundation (FAPEAP), to the Research Program for SUS - PPSUS - Ministry of Health (grant number 250,203,026 / 2016); and The Coordination for the Improvement of Higher Education Personnel (CAPES) / Ministry of Education (MEC; process number 1).

References

  • 1.Akiner MM, Demirci B, Babuadze G, Robert V, Schaffner F. Spread of the invasive mosquitoes Aedes aegypti and Aedes albopictus in the Black Sea region increases risk of chikungunya, dengue, and Zika outbreaks in Europe. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2016; 10 (4): 1–5. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0004664 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Leyva M, French L, Pino O, Montada D, Morejón G, Marquetti MDC. Plantas con actividad insecticida: una alternativa natural contra mosquitos. Estado actual de la temática en la región de las Americas. Rev Biomd. 2017; 28: 137–178. doi: 10.32776/revbiomed.v28i3.571 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Teich V, Arinelli R, Fahham L. Aedes aegypti e sociedade: o impacto econômico das arboviroses no Brasil. J Bras Econ Saúde. (2017); 9 (1): 267–276. [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Rückert C, Weger-Lucarelli, Garcia-Luna SM, Young MC, Byas AD, Murrieta RA, et al. Impact of simultaneous exposure to arboviruses on infection and transmission by Aedes aegypti mosquitoes. Nat Commun. 2017; 8: 1–9. doi: 10.1038/s41467-016-0009-6 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Macoris MDLDG, Andrighetti MTM, Wanderley DMV, Ribolla PEM. Impact of insecticide resistance on the field control of Aedes aegypti in the State of São Paulo. Rev Soc Bras Med Trop. 2014; 47: 573–578. doi: 10.1590/0037-8682-0141-2014 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Miresmailli S, Isman MB. Botanical insecticides inspired by plant–herbivore chemical interactions. Trends Plant Sci. 2014; 19(1), 29–35. doi: 10.1016/j.tplants.2013.10.002 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Gauvian-Bialecki A, Marondon C. Essential Oil of Ayapana triplinervis from Reunion Island: A God Natural Source of Trymohydroquinone Dymethil Ether. Biochem Syst Ecol. 2009; 36 (11): 853–858. doi: 10.1016/j.bse.2008.09.006 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Nery MIS, Potiguara RC, Kikuchi TYS, Garcia TB, Lins ALFA. Morphoanatomy of the vegetative aerial axis of Ayapana triplinervis (Vahl) RM King & H. Rob. (Asteraceae). Rev Bras Plan Med. 2016; 16 (1): 62–70. doi: 10.1590/S1516-05722014000100009 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Facknath S, Lalljee B. Study of various extracts of Ayapana triplinervis for their potential in controlling three insect pests of horticultural crops. Tropicultura. 2008; 26 (2):119–124. [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Wu J, Liu H, Ge S, Wang S, Qin Z, Chen L, et al. The preparation, characterization, antimicrobial stability and in vitro release evaluation of fish gelatin films incorporated with cinnamon essential oil nanoliposomes. Food Hydrocoll. 2015; 43 (1): 427–435. doi: 10.1016/j.foodhyd.2014.06.017 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Prakash B, Kujur A, Yadav A, Kumar A, Singh PP, Dubey NK. Nanoencapsulation: An efficient technology to boost the antimicrobial potential of plant essential oils in food system. Food control. 2018; 89 (1), 1–11. doi: 10.1016/j.foodcont.2018.01.018 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Wooster TJ, Golding M, Sanguansri P. Impact of oil type on nano-emulsion formation and Ostwald ripening stability. Langmuir. 2008; 24 (22): 12758–12765. doi: 10.1021/la801685v [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Kookana RS, Boxall AB, Reeves PT, Ashauer R, Beulke S, Chaudhry Q, et al. Nanopesticides: guiding principles for regulatory evaluation of environmental risks. J Agric Food Chem. 2014; 62: 4227–4240. doi: 10.1021/jf500232f [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Kah M, Kookana RS, Gogos A, Bucheli TD. A critical evaluation of nanopesticides and nanofertilizers against their conventional analogues. Nat Nanotechnol. 2018, 13: 677–684. doi: 10.1038/s41565-018-0131-1 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Sari TP, Mann B, Kumar R, Singh RRB, Sharma R, Bhardwaj M, et al. Preparation and characterization of nano-emulsion encapsulating curcumin. Food Hydrocoll. 2015; 43: 540–546. doi: 10.1016/j.foodhyd.2014.07.011 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Farmacopéia Brasileira. 5th. ANVISA: Distrito Federal; 2010.
  • 17.Martins RL, Simões RC, Menezes ÉR, Farias ALF, Rodrigues ABL, Silva RR, et al. Chemical composition, an antioxidant, cytotoxic and microbiological activity of the essential oil from the leaves of Aeollanthus suaveolens Mart. ex Spreng. PloS One. 2016; 11 (12): 1–10. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0166684 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Adams RP. Identification of essential oil components by gas chromatography/ mass spectrometry. Illinois: Allured, 2007, 804p. [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Ostertag F, Weiss J, Mcclements DJ. Low-energy formation of edible nano-emulsions: factors influencing droplet size produced by emulsion phase inversion. J Colloid Interface Sci. 2012; 388 (1): 95–102. doi: 10.1016/j.jcis.2012.07.089 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Oliveira AE, Duarte JL, Cruz RA, Conceição EC, Carvalho JC, Fernandes CP. Utilization of dynamic light scattering to evaluate Pterodon emarginatus oleoresin-based nano-emulsion formation by non-heating and solvent-free method. Rev bras farmacogn. 2017; 27 (1):401–406. doi: 10.1016/j.bjp.2016.11.005 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Oliveira AEMFM, Duarte J L, Cruz RA, Souto RNP, Ferreira RMA, Peniche T, et al. Pterodon emarginatus oleoresin-based nano-emulsion as a promising tool for Culex quinquefasciatus (Diptera: Culicidae) control. J Nanobiotechnol. 2017; 15 (1): 1–11, doi: 10.1186/s12951-016-0234-5 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.World Health Organization. Guidelines for laboratory and field testing of mosquito larvicides. World Health Organization: Geneva; 2005. [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Consoli AGB, Oliveira RL. Principais Mosquitos de Importância Sanitária no Brasil. Rio de Janeiro: Fiocruz; 1994. [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Botas G, Cruz R, Almeida F, Duarte J, Araújo R, Souto R, et al. Baccharis reticularia DC. and limonene nano-emulsions: Promising larvicidal agents for Aedes aegypti (Diptera: Culicidae) control. Molecules. 2017; 22 (11): 1990. doi: 10.3390/molecules22111990 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development—OECD. Guidelines for the Testing of Chemicals, OECD 423. Acute Oral Toxicity-Acute Toxic Class Method. Paris: Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development; 2001. [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Jothy SL, Zakaria Z, Chen Y, Lau YL, Latha LY, Sasidharan S. Acute oral toxicity of methanolic seed extract of Cassia fistula in mice. Molecules. 2011; 16 (6): 5268–5282. doi: 10.3390/molecules16065268 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Tabanca N, Bernier UR, Tsikolia M, Becnel JJ, Sampson B, Werle C, et al. Eupatorium capillifolium essential oil: chemical composition, antifungal activity, and insecticidal activity. Nat Prod Commun. 2010; 5 (9): 1409–1415. doi: 10.1177/1934578X1000500913 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Calleja MA, Vieites JM, Montero-Meterdez T, Torres MI, Faus MJ, Gil A, et al. A. The antioxidant effect of β-caryophyllene protects rat liver from carbon tetrachloride-induced fibrosis by inhibiting hepatic stellate cell activation. Br J Nutr. 2013; 109 (3): 394–401. doi: 10.1017/S0007114512001298 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Mala JGS, Zoghbi MGB, Silva MHL, Andrade EHA. Essential Oils of Eupatorium triplinerve Vahl and E. paniculatum Poepp. et Endl. J Essent Oil Res. 1999; 11 (5), 541–544. doi: 10.1080/10412905.1999.9701210 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Maia JGS, Andrade EHA. Database of the Amazon aromatic plants and their essential oils. Quim Nova. 2009; 32 (3), 595–622. doi: 10.1590/S0100-40422009000300006 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Onayade OA, Scheffer JJC, Schripsema J, Van Gen AD. 6‐Hydroxycarvotanacetone and other constituents of the essential oil of Laggera alata (D. Don) Sch. Bip. ex Oliv. Flavour Frag J. 1990; 5 (3), 165–172. doi: 10.1002/ffj.2730050307 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Xu T, Gherib M, Bekhechi C, Atik‐Bekkara F, Casabianca H, Tomi F, et al. Thymyl esters derivatives and a new natural product modhephanone from Pulicaria mauritanica Coss. (Asteraceae) root oil. Flavour Frag J. 2015; 30(1), 83–90. doi: 10.1002/ffj.3223 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Sohounhloue KD, Sagbo AU, Menut C, Bessière JM. Aromatic plants of tropical West Africa. XIII. Chemical composition of the leaf oil of Laggera pterodonta (DC.) Sch. Bip. ex Oliv. from Benin. J Essent Oil Res. 2004; 16 (3), 193–194. doi: 10.1080/10412905.2004.9698695 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Owolabi MS, Lajide L, Villanueva HE, Setzer WN. Essential oil composition and insecticidal activity of Blumea perrottetiana growing in Southwestern Nigeria. Nat Prod Commun. 2010; 5 (7): 1135–1138. doi: 10.1177/1934578X1000500733 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Kaul PN, Rajeswara Rao B R, Bhattacharya AK, Singh K, Mallavarapu GR, Ramesh S. Essential Oil Composition of Sphaeranthus indicus L. J Essent Oil Res. 2005; 17 (4): 453–454. doi: 10.1080/10412905.2005.9698961 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Silva JAT, Yonekura L, Kaganda J, Mookdasanit J, Nhut DT, Afach G. Important secondary metabolites and essential oils of species within the Anthemideae (Asteraceae). J Herbs Spices Med Plants. 2005; 11 (1): 1–46. doi: 10.1300/J044v11n01_01 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Hussain MI, Qamar Abbas S, Reigosa MJ. Activities and Novel Applications of Secondary Metabolite Coumarins. Planta Daninha. 2018; 36 (1): 1–13. doi: 10.1590/S0100-83582018360100016 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Saadali B., Boriky D, Blaghen M, Vanhaelen M, Talbi M. Alkamides from Artemisia dracunculus. Phytochemistry. 2001; 58 (7): 1083–1086. doi: 10.1016/s0031-9422(01)00347-8 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Arnason T, Swain T, Wat CK, Graham EA, Partington S, Towers GHN, et al. Mosquito larvicidal activity of polyacetylenes from species in the Asteraceae. Biochem Syst Ecol. 1981; 9 (1), 63–68. doi: 10.1016/0305-1978(81)90061-2 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Albuquerque MRJR, Silveira ER, Uchôa DE, Lemos TLG, Souza EB, Santiago GMP, et al. Chemical composition and larvicidal activity of the essential oils from Eupatorium betonicaeforme (DC) Baker (Asteraceae). J Agr Food Chem. 2004; 52 (22), 6708–6711. doi: 10.1021/jf0352881 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Ali A, Tabanca N, Kurkcuoglu M, Duran A, Blythe EK, Khani IA, et al. Chemical composition, larvicidal, and biting deterrent activity of essential oils of two subspecies of Tanacetum argenteum (Asterales: Asteraceae) and individual constituents against Aedes aegypti (Diptera: Culicidae). J Med Entomol. 2014; 51 (4): 824–830. doi: 10.1603/me13249 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Galvão JG, Cerpe P, Santos DA, Gonsalves JK, Santos AJ, Nunes RK, et al. Lippia gracilis essential oil in β‐cyclodextrin inclusion complexes: an environmentally safe formulation to control Aedes aegypti larvae. Pest Manag Sci. 2019; 75 (2): 452–459. doi: 10.1002/ps.5138 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Sedaghat Doost A, Stevens CV, Claeys M, Van Der Meeren P. Fundamental study on the salt tolerance of oregano essential oil-in-water nano-emulsions containing tween 80. Langmuir. 2019; 35: 10572–10581. doi: 10.1021/acs.langmuir.9b01620 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Musazzi UM, Franzè S, Minghetti P, Casiraghi A. Emulsion versus nano-emulsion: how much is the formulative shift critical for a cosmetic product? Drug Deliv Transl Res. 2018; 8 (2): 414–421. doi: 10.1007/s13346-017-0390-7 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Panghal A, Chhikara N, Anshid V, Charan MVS, Surendran V, Malik A, et al. Nano-emulsions: A Promising Tool for Dairy Sector. In: Prasad R, Kumar V, Kumar M, Choudhary D. Nanobiotechnology in Bioformulations. Switzerland: Springer; 2019. pp. 99–117). [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Yuliani S, Muchtadi TR, Syakir M. Changes in characteristics of nano-emulsion of cinnamon oil and their relationships with instability mechanisms during storage. J Food Proces Preserv. 2018; 42 (10): 1–11. doi: 10.1111/jfpp.13745 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Rodrigues EDC, Ferreira AM, Vilhena JC, Almeida FB, Cruz RA, Florentino AC, et al. Development of a larvicidal nano-emulsion with Copaiba (Copaifera duckei) oleoresin. Rev Bras Farmacogn. 2014; 24 (6): 699–705. doi: 10.1016/j.bjp.2014.10.013 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Forgiarini A, Esquena J, González C, Solans C. Studies of the relation between phase behavior and emulsification methods with nano-emulsion formation. Prog Colloid Polym Sci. 2000; 115 (1): 36–39. doi: 10.1007/3-540-46545-6_8 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Chaithong U, Choochote W, Kamsuk K, Jitpakdi A, Tippawangkosol P, Chaiyasit D, et al. Larvicidal effect of pepper plants on Aedes aegypti (L.) (Diptera: Culicidae). J Vector Ecol. 2006; 31 (1): 138–144. doi: 10.3376/1081-1710(2006)31[138:leoppo]2.0.co;2 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Yu KX, Jantan I, Ahmad R, Wong CL. The major bioactive components of seaweeds and their mosquitocidal potential. Parasitol Res. 2014; 113 (9): 3121–3141. doi: 10.1007/s00436-014-4068-5 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Sessa M, Balestrieri ML, Ferrari G, Servillo L, Castaldo D, D’Onofrio N, et al. Bioavailability of encapsulated resveratrol into nano-emulsion-based delivery systems. Food Chem. 2014; 147 (1): 42–50. doi: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2013.09.088 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Danielli LJ, Reis M, Bianchini M, Camargo GS, Bordignon SA, Guerreiro IK, et al. Antidermatophytic activity of volatile oil and nano-emulsion of Stenachaenium megapotamicum (Spreng.) Baker. Ind Crops Prod. 2013; 50 (1): 23–28. doi: 10.1016/j.indcrop.2013.07.027 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Dias CN, Moraes DFC. Essential oils and their compounds as Aedes aegypti L. (Diptera: Culicidae) larvicides. Parasitol Res; 2014, 113 (2), 565–592. doi: 10.1007/s00436-013-3687-6 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Rattan RS. Mechanism of action of insecticidal secondary metabolites of plant origin. Crop Prot. 2010; 29 (9): 913–920. doi: 10.1016/j.cropro.2010.05.008 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Enan E. Insecticidal activity of essential oils: octopaminergic sites of action. Comp Biochem Phys C. 2001; 130 (3): 325–337. doi: 10.1016/s1532-0456(01)00255-1 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Shaaya E, Rafaeli A. Essential oils as biorational insecticides–potency and mode of action. In: Ishaaya I, Nauen R, Horowitz AR, editors. Insecticides design using advanced Technologies. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg; 2007. pp. 249–261). doi: 10.1007/978-3-540-46907-0_11 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Jankowska M, Rogalska J, Wyszkowska J, Stankiewicz M. Molecular targets for components of essential oils in the insect nervous system—a review. Molecules. 2018: 23 (1): 1–34. doi: 10.3390/molecules23010034 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Kostyukovsky M, Rafaeli A, Gileadi C, Demchenko N, Shaaya E. Activation of octopaminergic receptors by essential oil constituents isolated from aromatic plants: possible mode of action against insect pests. Pest Manag Sci. 2002; 58 (11): 1101–1106. doi: 10.1002/ps.548 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Badawi MS. Histological study of the protective role of ginger on piroxicam-induced liver toxicity in mice. J Chin Med Assoc. 2019, 82:11–18. doi: 10.1016/j.jcma.2018.06.006 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Yuan L, Kaplowitz N. Mechanisms of drug-induced liver injury. Clin Liver Dis. 2013, 17: 507–518. doi: 10.1016/j.cld.2013.07.002 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Melo AS, Monteiro MC, Silva JB, Oliveira FR, Vieira JLF, Andrade MA, et al. Antinociceptive, neurobehavioral and antioxidant effects of Eupatorium triplinerve Vahl on rats. J Ethnopharmacol. 2013; 147 (2): 293–301. doi: 10.1016/j.jep.2013.03.002 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Cheriyan BV, Kadhirvelu P, Nadipelly J, Shanmugasundaram J, Sayeli V, Subramanian V. Anti-nociceptive Effect of 7-methoxy Coumarin from Eupatorium Triplinerve vahl (Asteraceae). Pharmacogn Mag. 2017; 13 (49): 81–84. doi: 10.4103/0973-1296.197650 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63.Arung ET, Kuspradini H, Kusuma IW, Shimizu K, Kondo R. Validation of Eupatorium triplinerve Vahl Leaves, a Skin Care Herb from East Kalimantan, Using a Melanin Biosynthesis Assay. J Acupunct Meridian Stud. 2012; 5 (2): 87–92. doi: 10.1016/j.jams.2012.01.003 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64.Halawani E. Antibacterial activity of thymoquinone and thymohydroquinone of Nigella sativa L. and their interaction with some antibiotics. Adv Biol Res. 2009; 3 (6):148–152. doi: 10.1186/1472-6882-11-29 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 65.Unnikrishnan PK, Varughese T, Sreedhar S, Balan N, Balachandran I, Rema Shree AB. Study on Eupatorium triplinerve Vahl from South India, a rich source for thymohydroquinone dimethylether and its antimicrobial activity. J Essent Oil Bear Pl. 2014; 17 (4): 652–657. doi: 10.1080/0972060X.2014.914000 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 66.Haddad JG, Picard M, Bénard S, Desvignes C, Desprès P, Diotel N, et al. Ayapana triplinervis Essential Oil and Its Main Component Thymohydroquinone Dimethyl Ether Inhibit Zika Virus at Doses Devoid of Toxicity in Zebrafish. Molecules. 2019; 24 (19): 1–12. doi: 10.3390/molecules24193447 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 67.Semmler FW. Zur Kenntnis der Bestandteile ätherischer Öle (Zusammensetzung des Ayapana‐öls. Ber Dtsch Chem Ges. 1908; 41: 509–512. doi: 10.1002/cber.19080410195 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 68.Gupta D, Charles R, Garg SN. Chemical Composition of the Essential Oil from the Leaves of Eupatorium triplinerve Vahl. J Essent Oil Res. 2004; 16: 473–475. [Google Scholar]
  • 69.Silvério MRS, Espindola LS, Lopes NP, Vieira PC. Plant natural products for the control of Aedes aegypti: The main vector of important arboviruses. Molecule. 2020, 25: 3484–3526. doi: 10.3390/molecules25153484 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 70.Pavoni L, Benelli G, Maggi F, Bonacucina G. Green nano-emulsion interventions for biopesticide formulations. In: Koul O, editor. Nano-Biopesticides Today and Future Perspectives. Academic Press; 2019. pp. 133–160. [Google Scholar]
  • 71.Turek C, Stintzing FC. Stability of essential oils: a review. Compr Rev Food Sci F. 2013; 12: 40–53. doi: 10.1111/1541-4337.12006 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 72.Silva HD, Cerqueira MÂ, Vicente AA. Nanoemulsions for food applications: development and characterization. Food Bioprocess Tech. 2012; 5: 854–867. doi: 10.1007/s11947-013-1094-8 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 73.Balasubramani S, Rajendhiran T, Moola AK, Diana RKB. Development of nano-emulsion from Vitex negundo L. essential oil and their efficacy of antioxidant, antimicrobial and larvicidal activities (Aedes aegypti L.). Environl Sci Pollut R. 2017; 24 (17): 15125–15133. doi: 10.1007/s11356-017-9118-y [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 74.Osanloo M, Sereshti H, Sedaghat MM, Amani A. Nano-emulsion of Dill essential oil as a green and potent larvicide against Anopheles stephensi. Environ Sci Pollut Res. 2018; 25 (7), 6466–6473. doi: 10.1007/s11356-017-0822-4 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 75.Oliveira AE, Bezerra DC, Duarte JL, Cruz RA, Souto RN, Ferreira RM, et al. Essential oil from Pterodon emarginatus as a promising natural raw material for larvicidal nano-emulsions against a tropical disease vector. Sustain Chem Pharm. 2017; 6 (1): 1–9. doi: 10.1016/j.scp.2017.06.001 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 76.Ryu V, McClements DJ, Corradini MG, McLandsborough L. Effect of ripening inhibitor type on formation, stability, and antimicrobial activity of thyme oil nano-emulsion. Food Chem. 2018; 245 (1): 104–111. doi: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2017.10.084 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 77.Koroleva M, Nagovitsina T, Yurtov E. Nano-emulsions stabilized by non-ionic surfactants: stability and degradation mechanisms. Phys Chem Chem Phys. 2018; 20 (15): 10369–10377. doi: 10.1039/c7cp07626f [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 78.Ozkan G, Kamiloglu S, Capanoglu E, Hizal J, Apak R. Use of Nanotechnological Methods for the Analysis and Stability of Food Antioxidants. In: Grumezescu AM, Holban AM. Impact of Nanoscience in the Food Industry. Academic Press; 2018. pp. 311–350 doi: 10.1016/B978-0-12-811441-4.00011-X [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 79.Jiménez M, Domínguez JA, Pascual-Pineda LA, Azuara E, Beristain C. I. Elaboration and characterization of O/W cinnamon (Cinnamomum zeylanicum) and black pepper (Piper nigrum) emulsions. Food Hydrocoll. 2018; 77 (1): 902–910. doi: 10.1016/j.foodhyd.2017.11.037 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 80.Neves A, Martins S, Segundo M, Reis S. Nanoscale delivery of resveratrol towards enhancement of supplements and nutraceuticals. Nutrients. 2016; 8 (3), 1–14. doi: 10.3390/nu8030131 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 81.Sari TP, Mann B, Kumar R, Singh RRB, Sharma R, Bhardwaj M, et al. Preparation and characterization of nano-emulsion encapsulating curcumin. Food Hydrocoll. 2015; 43 (1): 540–546. doi: 10.1016/j.foodhyd.2014.07.011 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 82.Duarte JL, Amado JR, Oliveira AE, Cruz RA, Ferreira AM, Souto RN, et al. Evaluation of larvicidal activity of a nano-emulsion of Rosmarinus officinalis essential oil. Rev Bras Farmacogn. 2015; 25 (2), 189–192. doi: 10.1016/j.bjp.2015.02.010 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 83.Valentim DSS, Duarte JL, Oliveira AEMFM, Cruz RAS, Carvalho JCT, Conceição EC, et al. Nanoemulsion from essential oil of Pterodon emarginatus (Fabaceae) shows in vitro efficacy against monogeneans of Colossoma macropomum (Pisces: Serrasalmidae). J Fish Dis. 2018; 41: 443–449. doi: 10.1111/jfd.12739 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 84.Tadros T, Izquierdo P, Esquena J, Solans C. Formation and stability of nano-emulsions. Adv Colloid Interfac. 2004; 108: 303–318. doi: 10.1016/j.cis.2003.10.023 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 85.Jesus FL, Almeida FB, Duarte JL, Oliveira AE, Cruz RA, Souto RN, et al. Preparation of a nano-emulsion with Carapa guianensis aublet (Meliaceae) oil by a low-energy/solvent-free method and evaluation of its preliminary residual larvicidal activity. Evid-Based Compl Alt Med. 2017; 2017 (1): 1–8. doi: 10.1155/2017/6756793 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 86.Montefuscoli AR, González JOW, Palma SD, Ferrero AA, Band BF. Design and development of aqueous nanoformulations for mosquito control. Parasitol Res. 2014; 113 (2), 793–800. doi: 10.1007/s00436-013-3710-y [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 87.Sugumar S, Clarke SK, Nirmala MJ, Tyagi BK, Mukherjee A, Chandrasekaran N. Nano-emulsion of eucalyptus oil and its larvicidal activity against Culex quinquefasciatus. Bull Entomol Res. 2014; 104 (3): 393–402. doi: 10.1017/S0007485313000710 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 88.Tabanca N, Bernier UR, Tsikolia M, Becnel JJ, Sampson B, Werle C, et al. Eupatorium capillifolium essential oil: chemical composition, antifungal activity, and insecticidal activity. Nat Prod Commun. 2010; 5 (9), 1–7. doi: 10.1177/1934578X1000500913 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 89.Getahun T, Sharma V, Gupta N. The genus Laggera (Asteraceae)–Ethnobotanical and Ethnopharmacological Information, Chemical Composition as well as Biological Activities of Its Essential Oils and Extracts: A Review. Chem Biodivers. 2019; 16 (8): 1–23. doi: 10.1002/cbdv.201900131 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 90.Aciole SD, Piccoli CF, Costa EV, Navarro-Silva MA, Marques FA, Sales Maia BH, et al. Insecticidal activity of three species of Guatteria (Annonaceae) against Aedes aegypti (Diptera: Culicidae). Rev Colomb de Entomol. 2011; 37 (2): 262–268. [Google Scholar]
  • 91.Santana HT, Trindade FTT, Stabeli RG, Silva AAE, Militão JSTL, Facundo VA Essential oils of leaves of Piper species display larvicidal activity against the dengue vector, Aedes aegypti (Diptera: Culicidae). Rev Bras Plantas Med. 2015; 17 (1): 105–111. doi: 10.1590/1983-084X/13_052 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 92.Singha S, Banerjee S, Chandra G. Synergistic effect of Croton caudatus (fruits) and Tiliacora acuminata (flowers) extracts against filarial vector Culex quinquefasciatus. Asian Pac J Trop Biomed. 2011; 1 (2): S159–S164. doi: 10.1016/S2221-1691(11)60147-0 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 93.Cheng SS, Chang HT, Chang ST, Tsai KH, Chen WJ. Bioactivity of selected plant essential oils against the yellow fever mosquito Aedes aegypti larvae. Bioresour Technol. 2003; 89 (1): 99–102. doi: 10.1016/s0960-8524(03)00008-7 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 94.Rajendran S, Sriranjini V. Plant products as fumigants for stored-product insect control. J Stored Prod Res. 2008, 44 (2), 126–135. doi: 10.1016/j.jspr.2007.08.003 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 95.Tripathi AK, Upadhyay S, Bhuiyan M, Bhattacharya PR. A review on prospects of essential oils as biopesticide in insect-pest management. J Pharmacognosy Phytother. 2009; 1 (5): 52–63. [Google Scholar]
  • 96.Donini A, Gaidhu MP, Strasberg DR, O’Donnell MJ. Changing salinity induces alterations in hemolymph ion concentrations and Na+ and Cl- transport kinetics of the anal papillae in the larval mosquito, Aedes aegypti. J Exp Biol. 2007: 210 (6): 983–992. doi: 10.1242/jeb.02732 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 97.Warikoo R, Kumar S. Impact of Argemone mexicana extracts on the cidal, morphological, and behavioral response of dengue vector, Aedes aegypti L. (Diptera: Culicidae). Parasitol Res. 2013; 112 (10): 3477–3484. doi: 10.1007/s00436-013-3528-7 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 98.Yilmaz E, Borchert HH. Design of a phytosphingosine-containing, positively-charged nano-emulsion as a colloidal carrier system for dermal application of ceramides. Euro J Pharm Biopharm. 2005; 60 (1): 91–98. doi: 10.1016/j.ejpb.2004.11.009 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 99.Borges RS, Keita H, Ortiz BLS, Santos TIS, Ferreira IM, Lima ES, et al. Anti-inflammatory activity of nano-emulsions of essential oil from Rosmarinus officinalis L.: in vitro and in zebrafish studies. Inflammopharmacology. 2018; 26 (4): 1057–1080. doi: 10.1007/s10787-017-0438-9 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 100.McClements DJ. Edible lipid nanoparticles: digestion, absorption, and potential toxicity. Prog Lipid Res. 2013; 52 (4: 09–423. doi: 10.1016/j.plipres.2013.04.008 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 101.Lessa TB, Abreu DK, Bertassoli BM, Ambrósio CE. Arquitetura comparativa dos pulmões de camundongos normais e afetados pela Distrofia Muscular de Duchenne. Pesq Vet Bras. 2015; 35 (1): 56–60. doi: 10.1590/S0100-736X1998000200007 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 102.Wani TA, Masoodi FA, Jafari SM, McClements DJ. Safety of nano-emulsions and their regulatory status. In: Jafari SD, McClements DJ, editors. Nano-emulsions: Formulation, Applications, and Characterization. Academic Press; 2018. pp. 613–628). [Google Scholar]
  • 103.Ribeiro WLC, Camurça-Vasconcelos ALF, Macedo ITF, Santos JML, Araújo-Filho JV, Carvalho JR, et al. In vitro effects of Eucalyptus staigeriana nano-emulsion on Haemonchus contortus and toxicity in rodents. Vet Parasitol. 2015; 212 (3–4): 444–447. doi: 10.1016/j.vetpar.2015.07.019 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 104.Fernandes CP, Almeida FB, Silveira AN, Gonzalez MS, Mello CB, Feder D, et al. Development of an insecticidal nano-emulsion with Manilkara subsericea (Sapotaceae) extract. J Nanobiotechnology. 2014; 12 (1): 22. doi: 10.1186/1477-3155-12-22 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 105.Milhomem-Paixão SSR, Fascineli ML, Muehlmann LA, Melo KM, Salgado HLC, Joanitti GA, et al. Andiroba oil (Carapa guianensis Aublet) nano-emulsions: development and assessment of cytotoxicity, genotoxicity, and hematotoxicity. J Nanomater. 2017; 2017 (1): 1–11. doi: 10.1155/2017/4362046 [DOI] [Google Scholar]

Decision Letter 0

Ahmed Ibrahim Hasaballah

11 Jan 2021

PONE-D-20-35553

Development of nano-emulsions based on Ayapana triplinervis essential oil for the control of Aedes aegypti larvae

PLOS ONE

Dear Dr. de Almeida,

Thank you for submitting your manuscript to PLOS ONE. After careful consideration, we feel that it has merit but does not fully meet PLOS ONE’s publication criteria as it currently stands. Therefore, we invite you to submit a revised version of the manuscript that addresses the points raised during the review process.

Please submit your revised manuscript by Feb 21 2021 11:59PM. If you will need more time than this to complete your revisions, please reply to this message or contact the journal office at plosone@plos.org. When you're ready to submit your revision, log on to https://www.editorialmanager.com/pone/ and select the 'Submissions Needing Revision' folder to locate your manuscript file.

Please include the following items when submitting your revised manuscript:

  • A rebuttal letter that responds to each point raised by the academic editor and reviewer(s). You should upload this letter as a separate file labeled 'Response to Reviewers'.

  • A marked-up copy of your manuscript that highlights changes made to the original version. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Revised Manuscript with Track Changes'.

  • An unmarked version of your revised paper without tracked changes. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Manuscript'.

If you would like to make changes to your financial disclosure, please include your updated statement in your cover letter. Guidelines for resubmitting your figure files are available below the reviewer comments at the end of this letter.

If applicable, we recommend that you deposit your laboratory protocols in protocols.io to enhance the reproducibility of your results. Protocols.io assigns your protocol its own identifier (DOI) so that it can be cited independently in the future. For instructions see: http://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/submission-guidelines#loc-laboratory-protocols

We look forward to receiving your revised manuscript.

Kind regards,

Ahmed Ibrahim Hasaballah

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Journal Requirements:

When submitting your revision, we need you to address these additional requirements.

1) Please ensure that your manuscript meets PLOS ONE's style requirements, including those for file naming. The PLOS ONE style templates can be found at

https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/file?id=wjVg/PLOSOne_formatting_sample_main_body.pdf and

https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/file?id=ba62/PLOSOne_formatting_sample_title_authors_affiliations.pdf

2) In your Methods section, please provide additional information regarding the permits you obtained for the work. Please ensure you have included the full name of the authority that approved the plant material collection site access and, if no permits were required, a brief statement explaining why.

[Note: HTML markup is below. Please do not edit.]

Reviewers' comments:

Reviewer's Responses to Questions

Comments to the Author

1. Is the manuscript technically sound, and do the data support the conclusions?

The manuscript must describe a technically sound piece of scientific research with data that supports the conclusions. Experiments must have been conducted rigorously, with appropriate controls, replication, and sample sizes. The conclusions must be drawn appropriately based on the data presented.

Reviewer #1: Partly

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

2. Has the statistical analysis been performed appropriately and rigorously?

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

3. Have the authors made all data underlying the findings in their manuscript fully available?

The PLOS Data policy requires authors to make all data underlying the findings described in their manuscript fully available without restriction, with rare exception (please refer to the Data Availability Statement in the manuscript PDF file). The data should be provided as part of the manuscript or its supporting information, or deposited to a public repository. For example, in addition to summary statistics, the data points behind means, medians and variance measures should be available. If there are restrictions on publicly sharing data—e.g. participant privacy or use of data from a third party—those must be specified.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

4. Is the manuscript presented in an intelligible fashion and written in standard English?

PLOS ONE does not copyedit accepted manuscripts, so the language in submitted articles must be clear, correct, and unambiguous. Any typographical or grammatical errors should be corrected at revision, so please note any specific errors here.

Reviewer #1: No

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

5. Review Comments to the Author

Please use the space provided to explain your answers to the questions above. You may also include additional comments for the author, including concerns about dual publication, research ethics, or publication ethics. (Please upload your review as an attachment if it exceeds 20,000 characters)

Reviewer #1: The manuscript by Rodrigues et al describes the activity of extracts from two morphotypes of Ayapana triplinervis on Aedes aegypti larvae and in mice. Therein they provide physical characteristics of the extracted essential oils and nano-emulsions prepared from them. The methods that were employed are standard for the field and conducted appropriately. The principal findings include: (1) detailed descriptions of the physical and chemical properties of the extracts, (2) bioassays showing that larval mortality increases with concentration of the extracts and that the nano-emulsions are generally more effective, and (3) low toxicity when orally administered to mice.

While the organization of the manuscript was reasonably linear, it contained some grammatical errors and was unfocused in some sections. The latter was most evident in the Introduction and Discussion. Nearly a third of the Introduction describes the diseased that are transmitted by Ae. aegypti, but these diseases are not part of the study. Additionally, the Results section contained discussion material and some data was mentioned but the results not described (e.g. Supplementary Data). If the data is not described in the Results or Discussion, it should be removed from the manuscript. Of a minor note, it appears that some words should be translated to English. Overall, I recommend the authors refocus the writing and strive to reduce the length of the manuscript. Doing so should improve the impact of the work substantially.

Notably, the Supplementary Data contains mass spectra chromatograms that appear to have been published elsewhere (e.g., by NIST and Adams (2017)). I doubt that PLOS permits the republishing of figures. I recommend the authors remove those figures and either replace them with mass spectra of standards that they generate for each chemical that was analyzed or state the diagnostic fragment ions of each chemical they analyze that match what is reported in the literature.

Below are some comments on specific line numbers in the manuscript should be also be addressed if a revision is submitted.

Mice were used in the study, thus an Ethics Statement is required by PLOS.

16-17: Two symbols are used to indicate equal contribution and each author has one or the other. This suggests that all authors contributed equally and only one symbol is needed.

26: not necessary to capitalize Gas Chromatography or Mass Spectrometry

27-30: I don’t think it necessary to cite the protocols used for larval bioassay and toxicity in the abstract.

31-33: Define what % is referring to (assuming it’s of the total but is it by mass, volume, etc).

34: PdI and ZP are non-standard acronyms and may need to be defined for readers to know their meaning.

47-67: Extensive introduction of DENV, CHIKV and ZIKV is provided but are not highly relevant to the study. Recommend reducing the extent of the introduction of these topics to simply state they are transmitted by Ae. aegypti.

49-51: not accurate that Ae. aegypti spread due to habitat destruction; it is the case they spread because they their habitats were replicated in urban settings and they adapted to it.

77: sentences that start with a species name should not use abbreviation

Methods: all equipment and reagents used in the study should include the manufacturer and location of the company

197: PLOS may require IACUC protocol or approval number to be included in the manuscript.

207: What does “03” refer to?

229: Please describe how the tissues were routinely processed.

230: State microscope brand, model, etc.

239: MAEO is not previously defined

240: Should E be replaced with “Beta”?

256-291: This is discussion that should be moved to Discussion. Note that the Discussion is already overly lengthy.

309: Please state in the Methods how the emulsions were stored for the 21 day study.

Table 2: Only particle size is mentioned in the manuscript outside of this table. The other physical characteristics should be described elsewhere or removed if not of great relevance to the study.

Fig 2 and 3: Fonts for x- and y-axis are too small to view.

333-347: Please integrate into the Discussion

345: O/W (and later, W/O) is not defined

359-360: Please provide data that supports this conclusion.

Table 3 and 4: This data would be much easier to interpret were it presented as a scatter plot with linear regression line fitted to the data. Alternatively, these tables could be removed as the LC50 and LC90 data provided in Table 5 may be sufficient for demonstrating the effect of the extracts on larval mortality. If these tables are retained (not recommended), please state what the dots and asterisk on 24 h and 48 h indicate.

Table 5: Statistical analysis of MAEO vs MAEON and 24h vs 48 h should be conducted.

386: Incorrect statement: LC90 for MBEO and MBEON at 48h was higher than 24h. These differences should be described in the manuscript.

387-415: Discussion material

394-396: There is not sufficient data to draw this conclusion (the most prevalent component may not have the highest biological activity).

397-399: Please indicate how this study contradicts what is presented in the manuscript.

404-406: This statement is not well supported by the data.

408 - 410: Please provide data that supports the rationale for selecting 100 ug/ml as a value for drawing comparisons (it seems arbitrary).

413-415: Field trials of the emulsions would need to be conducted to draw this conclusion.

418: The surface areas of the structures for the controls and treatments should be measured to draw meaningful conclusions that are supported by the data. Samples were fixed in 70% ethanol which would likely deform the structures and reduce their volume. Notably, Figure 4D is indicated as a control, but appears to be more deformed than the treatment displayed in Figure 4E.

419: Please provide arrowheads in Fig4 that show where epithelial tissue is peeling.

Fig 4: Scale bars must be included for each image.

459: Text states there is a significant decrease in liver weight, the weight of the liver of male mice treated with MBEON was higher than control (an increase). Please explain.

Discussion: as noted previously, the Discussion is overly lengthy and relatively unfocused. Many paragraphs are a single run-on sentence. Please revise to improve focus.

523: Please provide evidence that the larvicide is eco-friendly.

622 and elsewhere: The convention is to use commas for separating thousands and periods to signify the decimal place in a value.

Supplementary Tables 7 – 12: These tables are not highly relevant as the results are summarized in Table 5. However, if they are retained, the number of significant digits must be reduced to reflect the actual sample size (mortality was unlikely measured to the thousandths level of precision).

Mass spectra in Supplementary Figures lack label on the x- and y-axis (e.g., m/z, relative abundance, retention time (m))

Tables define LRI Lit. as Linear retention index of literature, which as stated is nonsensical. Recommend replacing with “Linear retention index that is reported in the literature (16))” “16” is the reference.

S15: These images should be analyzed (e.g. structures measured), annotated (e.g. arrowheads) and have scale bars or removed from the manuscript.

Reviewer #2: Review report

Manuscript Number: PONE-D-20-35553

Article Type: Research Article

Full Title: Development of nano-emulsions based on Ayapana triplinervis essential oil for the control of Aedes aegypti larvae

General Comments

Nanopesticides are formulated on the basis of different nanocarrier and the principal chemical targeted for management of insect pests. Application of the insecticides in nature bears inherent problem of affecting the non-target organisms and alteration of the ambient environment. Despite higher efficacy of the insecticides, the cost-effectiveness and the ill-effects to the environment are the primary factors impeding the wide use of the pesticides. Continuous effort in improvement of the pesticides is required to combat the mosquito menace and thus the incidence of mosquito borne diseases. Mosquitoes can exploit wide range of water bodies for breeding, and the strategies for the biological regulation vary accordingly. In majority instances, the preference of the small containers and small spaces as breeding habitats by Aedes aegypti calls for application of the botanicals for effective regulation. No doubt, Ae. aegypti can exploit various other breeding habitats, the application of the botanicals are useful depending its cost-effectiveness, including least effect on non-target organism and reasonable price. Thus the present article is useful from the viewpoint of Ae. aegypti regulation, where the efficacy of a nano-emulsion linked with the essential oil of Ayapana triplinervis was assessed. In general the methodology and results are acceptable, though, improvement in the language quality is required for the article to qualify for publication. Going through the manuscript, I feel that the article is useful and qualifies for publication. However, a revision is required in language quality and the tables and figures to promote the biological control of the dengue vectors with the nano-emulsions. The following points should be considered by the authors during the revision of the manuscript.

Introduction section

1] Please improve the overall language quality.

2] Consider reducing the number of paragraphs and increase clarity in the working hypothesis

3] Provide few statements on the utility of the study and prospective application. I hope you would agree that several botanicals and synthetic pesticides have been highlighted for their efficacy and use in mosquito regulation, particularly, Ae. aegypti and Ae. albopictus. So, please emphasize the significance of the present work in the context of cost and efficacy for Ae. aegypti regulation.

4] Please consider additional references provided for inclusion in the introduction section.

Methodology section

Please provide an experimental outline in a table or through a flow diagram.

Please elaborate further the methodology mentioned in the section “Evaluation of Larvicidal Activity against A. aegypti’. Please highlight the number of replicates (line 180…is understandable but expand further) used for each dose.

Please expand and elaborate the statements from lines 182 through 185.

Provide a logic for using the Swiss albino mice and its significance of the study in the methods section.

Please provide reasons for not using probit analysis for deducing the median dose for the nano pesticides.

In addition, please provide a clarification about how the Ae. aegypti instar III larvae were identified. Mention the origin of the P generation of Ae. aegypti. I think it would be prudent to provide the length and weight measures of the larvae…. Please consider this suggestion. You are suggesting about the most recent method of mosquito control, so please be specific about the larvae to make the whole compilation more logical and attractive for the readers and scientist.

Why mouse was considered as non-target organism and not freshwater organisms? It would have been prudent if the freshwater organisms were considered.

Results

Considering the results shown in Table 3 and Table 4, it appears that these two tables indicate positive control showed 100% mortality against both morphotype A and B. The biopesticide Bacillus thuringiensis subspecies israelensis (BTI) was used as positive control. If positive control showed 100% mortality it can be said that it has better efficacy than that of the experimental combinations. Then what is the logic to build a larvicide which actually have lower efficacy than that of established larvicide also Bacillus thuringiensis don’t have any toxic effect on non targeted animal. So please provide explanation or consider alternative presentation.

Please consider application of probit analysis for the dose mortality data.

Discussion Section

Please consider the following articles and the relevant points as applicable for the article.

Provide a comparative account of the various botanicals and their efficacy against Ae. aegypti and elaborate how the application of Ayapana triplinerviswould be useful.

Please depict the prospective utility of the present study highlighting whether the nano-emulsion bears prospect in terms of cost and the effects.

Balaure PC, Dragoş B, Gudovan D, Gudovan I. 2017. 4 - Nanopesticides: a new paradigm in crop protection. New Pesticides and Soil Sensors, 129-192. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-804299-1.00005-9

Chowdhury N, Ghosh A, Chandra G. 2008.Mosquito larvicidal activities of Solanum villosum berry extract against the dengue vector Stegomyia aegypti. BMC Complementary Alternative Medicine, 8, 10 (2008).

Djiwanti SR, Kaushik S. 2019. Nanopesticide: Future Application of Nanomaterials in Plant Protection. In: Prasad R. (eds) Plant Nanobionics. Nanotechnology in the Life Sciences. 255-298 pp.Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-16379-2_10

Facknath S, Lalljee B. 2008. Study of various extracts of Ayapana triplinervis for their potential in controlling three insect pests of horticultural crops. Tropicultura, 26(2): 119 – 124.

Ghosh A, Chowdhury N, Chandra G. 2012. Plant extracts as potential mosquito larvicides. Indian Journal of Medical Research, 135:581-598.

Kah M, Kookana RS, Gogos A, Bucheli TD. 2018. A critical evaluation of nanopesticides and nanofertilizers against their conventional analogues. Nature Nanotechnology, 13: 677–684. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41565-018-0131-1

Kookana RS, Boxall ABA, Reeves PT, Ashauer R, Beulke S, Chaudhry Q, Cornelis G, Fernandes TF, Gan J, Kah M, Lynch I, Ranville J, Sinclair C, Spurgeon D, Tiede K, Van den Brink PJ. 2014. Nanopesticides: Guiding Principles for Regulatory Evaluation of Environmental Risks. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, 62 (19): 4227-4240. DOI: 10.1021/jf500232f

Priyanka P, Kumar D, Yadav K, Yadav A. 2019. Nanopesticides: Synthesis, Formulation and Application in Agriculture. In: Abd-Elsalam K., Prasad R. (eds) Nanobiotechnology Applications in Plant Protection. Nanotechnology in the Life Sciences. 129-143 pp. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-13296-5_7

Rawani A, Chowdhury N, Ghosh A, Laskar S, Chandra G. 2013. Mosquito larvicidal activity of Solanum nigrum berry extracts. Indian J Med Research,137:972-976.

Rawani A, Ghosh A, Chandra G. 2014.Laboratory evaluation of molluscicidal & mosquito larvicidal activities of leaves of Solanum nigrum L. Indian Journal of Medical Research, 140:285-295.

Stadler T, Butelar M, Valdez SR, Gitto JG. 2017. Particulate nanoinsecticides: a new concept in insect pest management. DOI: 10.5772/intechopen.72448

Hope these suggestions are useful in enhancement of the manuscript.

Thank you.

**********

6. PLOS authors have the option to publish the peer review history of their article (what does this mean?). If published, this will include your full peer review and any attached files.

If you choose “no”, your identity will remain anonymous but your review may still be made public.

Do you want your identity to be public for this peer review? For information about this choice, including consent withdrawal, please see our Privacy Policy.

Reviewer #1: No

Reviewer #2: No

[NOTE: If reviewer comments were submitted as an attachment file, they will be attached to this email and accessible via the submission site. Please log into your account, locate the manuscript record, and check for the action link "View Attachments". If this link does not appear, there are no attachment files.]

While revising your submission, please upload your figure files to the Preflight Analysis and Conversion Engine (PACE) digital diagnostic tool, https://pacev2.apexcovantage.com/. PACE helps ensure that figures meet PLOS requirements. To use PACE, you must first register as a user. Registration is free. Then, login and navigate to the UPLOAD tab, where you will find detailed instructions on how to use the tool. If you encounter any issues or have any questions when using PACE, please email PLOS at figures@plos.org. Please note that Supporting Information files do not need this step.

Attachment

Submitted filename: Review report PONE-D-20-35553.docx

PLoS One. 2021 Jul 9;16(7):e0254225. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0254225.r002

Author response to Decision Letter 0


25 Mar 2021

Ahmed Ibrahim Hasaballah

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Dear Academic Editor,

We are writing to respond to reviewers for the requested adjustments to the manuscript entitled “Development of nano-emulsions based on Ayapana triplinervis for the control of Aedes aegypti larvae”.

JOURNAL REQUIREMENTS:

1) Please ensure that your manuscript meets PLOS ONE's style requirements, including those for file naming.

Response: The style was revised according to the guidance.

2) In your Methods section, please provide additional information regarding the permits you obtained for the work.

Responde: The number of the document authorizing access to the genetic heritage has been added to the methodology.

REVIEWER #1:

• Mice were used in the study, thus an Ethics Statement is required by PLOS.

Response: The approval code of the ethics and animal research committee was provided on lines 197 and 198. Details of Humane endpoints were provided in a specific form of the Journal in the submission.

• 16-17: Two symbols are used to indicate equal contribution and each author has one or the other. This suggests that all authors contributed equally and only one symbol is needed.

Response: adjusted according to the reviewer's request.

• 26: not necessary to capitalize Gas Chromatography or Mass Spectrometry

Response: adjusted according to the reviewer's request.

• 27-30: I don’t think it necessary to cite the protocols used for larval bioassay and toxicity in the abstract.

Response: adjusted according to the reviewer's request.

• 31-33: Define what % is referring to (assuming it’s of the total but is it by mass, volume, etc).

Response: adjusted according to the reviewer's request.

• 34: PdI and ZP are non-standard acronyms and may need to be defined for readers to know their meaning.

Response: adjusted according to the reviewer's request.

• 47-67: Extensive introduction of DENV, CHIKV and ZIKV is provided but are not highly relevant to the study. Recommend reducing the extent of the introduction of these topics to simply state they are transmitted by Ae. aegypti.

Response: adjusted according to the reviewer's request.

• 77: sentences that start with a species name should not use abbreviation

Response: adjusted according to the reviewer's request.

• Methods: all equipment and reagents used in the study should include the manufacturer and location of the company

Response: adjusted according to the reviewer's request.

• 197: PLOS may require IACUC protocol or approval number to be included in the manuscript.

Response: (CEP – Unifap – 004/2019), in line 190, is the approval number by IACUC.

• 207: What does “03” refer to?

Response: Experimental grups: MAEON; MBEON; and Negative Control.

• 229: Please describe how the tissues were routinely processed.

Response: adjusted according to the reviewer's request.

• 230: State microscope brand, model, etc.

Response: adjusted according to the reviewer's request between lines 224 and 226

• 239: MAEO is not previously defined

Response: adjusted according to the reviewer's request.

• 240: Should E be replaced with “Beta”?

Response: adjusted according to the reviewer's request.

• 256-291: This is discussion that should be moved to Discussion. Note that the Discussion is already overly lengthy.

Response: adjusted according to the reviewer's request.

• 309: Please state in the Methods how the emulsions were stored for the 21 day study.

Responde: Lines 159 to 160.

• Table 2: Only particle size is mentioned in the manuscript outside of this table. The other physical characteristics should be described elsewhere or removed if not of great relevance to the study.

Response: We confirm the importance of physical and chemical characterization. Otherwise, we emphasize the contextualization of particle size, polydispersivity index and zeta potential between lines 330 to 350; electrical conductivity between lines 355 to 361. As for electrophoretic mobility, we chose to exclude such data as suggested by the reviewer.

• Fig 2 and 3: Fonts for x- and y-axis are too small to view.

Response: adjusted according to the reviewer's request in lines 321-322; and 332-333

• 333-347: Please integrate into the Discussion

• Response: adjusted according to the reviewer's request.

• 345: O/W (and later, W/O) is not defined

Response: adjusted according to the reviewer's request.

• 359-360: Please provide data that supports this conclusion.

Response: adjusted according to the reviewer's request.

• Table 3 and 4: This data would be much easier to interpret were it presented as a scatter plot with linear regression line fitted to the data. Alternatively, these tables could be removed as the LC50 and LC90 data provided in Table 5 may be sufficient for demonstrating the effect of the extracts on larval mortality. If these tables are retained (not recommended), please state what the dots and asterisk on 24 h and 48 h indicate.

Response: Dots and asterisks indicate statistical differences on the same line. The meaning is in lines 367 and 368 below the column.

• Table 5: Statistical analysis of MAEO vs MAEON and 24h vs 48 h should be conducted.

Response: adjusted according to the reviewer's request.

• 386: Incorrect statement: LC90 for MBEO and MBEON at 48h was higher than 24h. These differences should be described in the manuscript.

Response: adjusted according to the reviewer's request.

• 394-396: There is not sufficient data to draw this conclusion (the most prevalent component may not have the highest biological activity).

Response: adjusted according to the reviewer's request.

• 397-399: Please indicate how this study contradicts what is presented in the manuscript.

Response: The opposite condition is related to the high content of Thimohydroquinone Dimethyl Ether in morphotype B that showed high larvicidal activity, different from the studies indicated in the reference that presented moderate larvicidal and adulticidal activity of Eupatorium capillifolium that presents with Thymohydroquinone Dimethyl Ether as one of the major compound.

• 404-406: This statement is not well supported by the data.

Response: The Declaration has been corrected.

• 408 - 410: Please provide data that supports the rationale for selecting 100 ug/ml as a value for drawing comparisons (it seems arbitrary).

Response: The LC50 comparison is not arbitrary and is in accordance with the classification proposed by Cheng et al (2003), as mentioned in the paragraph.

• 413-415: Field trials of the emulsions would need to be conducted to draw this conclusion.

Response: The Declaration has been corrected.

• 418: The surface areas of the structures for the controls and treatments should be measured to draw meaningful conclusions that are supported by the data. Samples were fixed in 70% ethanol which would likely deform the structures and reduce their volume. Notably, Figure 4D is indicated as a control, but appears to be more deformed than the treatment displayed in Figure 4E.

Response: The item was adjusted according to what was requested. SEM analyzes were removed to avoid compromising the paper. The result was described according to the new context

• 419: Please provide arrowheads in Fig4 that show where epithelial tissue is peeling.

Response: adjusted according to the reviewer's request.

• Fig 4: Scale bars must be included for each image.

Response: adjusted according to the reviewer's request.

• 459: Text states there is a significant decrease in liver weight, the weight of the liver of male mice treated with MBEON was higher than control (an increase). Please explain.

Response: adjusted according to the reviewer's request. The explanation has been added to the text on lines 425-432 .

• Discussion: as noted previously, the Discussion is overly lengthy and relatively unfocused. Many paragraphs are a single run-on sentence. Please revise to improve focus.

Response: adjusted according to the reviewer's request. Some paragraphs have been deleted

• 523: Please provide evidence that the larvicide is eco-friendly.

Response: A reference was added to the item to support the conclusion.

• 622 and elsewhere: The convention is to use commas for separating thousands and periods to signify the decimal place in a value.

Response: adjusted according to the reviewer's request.

• Supplementary Tables 7 – 12: These tables are not highly relevant as the results are summarized in Table 5. However, if they are retained, the number of significant digits must be reduced to reflect the actual sample size (mortality was unlikely measured to the thousandths level of precision).

Response: The tables were removed according to the reviewer's request.

• S15: These images should be analyzed (e.g. structures measured), annotated (e.g. arrowheads) and have scale bars or removed from the manuscript.

Response: The figures were removed according to the reviewer's request.

REVIEWER #2:

Introduction section

1] Please improve the overall language quality.

Response: The tables were removed according to the reviewer's request.

2] Consider reducing the number of paragraphs and increase clarity in the working hypothesis 3] Provide few statements on the utility of the study and prospective application. I hope you would agree that several botanicals and synthetic pesticides have been highlighted for their efficacy and use in mosquito regulation, particularly, Ae. aegypti and Ae. albopictus. So, please emphasize the significance of the present work in the context of cost and efficacy for Ae. aegypti regulation.

Response:

Response: adjusted according to the reviewer's request.

4] Please consider additional references provided for inclusion in the introduction section

• The following references have been added to the manuscript:Kookana RS, Boxall AB, Reeves PT, Ashauer R, Beulke S, Chaudhry Q, et al. Nanopesticides: guiding principles for regulatory evaluation of environmental risks. J Agric Food Chem. 2014; 62: 4227-4240. doi: 10.1021/jf500232f

• Kah M, Kookana RS, Gogos A, Bucheli, TD. A critical evaluation of nanopesticides and nanofertilizers against their conventional analogues. Nat Nanotechnol. 2018, 13: 677-684. doi: 10.1038/s41565-018-0131-1

• Silvério MRS, Espindola LS, Lopes NP, Vieira PC. Plant natural products for the control of Aedes aegypti: The main vector of important arboviruses. Molecule. 2020, 25: 3484 - 3526. doi: 10.3390/molecules25153484

• Badawi MS. Histological study of the protective role of ginger on piroxicam-induced liver toxicity in mice. J Chin Med Assoc. 2019, 82:11-18. doi: 10.1016/j.jcma.2018.06.006

• Yuan L, Kaplowitz N. Mechanisms of drug-induced liver injury. Clin Liver Dis. 2013, 17: 507-518. doi: 10.1016/j.cld.2013.07.002

Please elaborate further the methodology mentioned in the section “Evaluation of Larvicidal Activity against A. aegypti’. Please highlight the number of replicates (line 180…is understandable but expand further) used for each dose

Please provide reasons for not using probit analysis for deducing the median dose for the nano pesticides.

Response: Probit analysis was used to deduct the LC50 for essential oil and nanoemulsion of each morphotype of the plant species, as shown in Table 5.

In addition, please provide a clarification about how the Ae. aegypti instar III larvae were identified. Mention the origin of the P generation of Ae. aegypti. I think it would be prudent to provide the length and weight measures of the larvae…. Please consider this suggestion. You are suggesting about the most recent method of mosquito control, so please be specific about the larvae to make the whole compilation more logical and attractive for the readers and scientist.

Response: The information was added on lines 157-158

Why mouse was considered as non-target organism and not freshwater organisms? It would have been prudent if the freshwater organisms were considered.

Response: Mice were considered in this study as non-target organisms due to the anthropophilic characteristics of Ae aegypti. When developing in urban breeders, the direct application of a nanoinsecticide can be ingested through the consumption of water by different domestic animals and even humans. However, future studies may be conducted to assess toxicity in freshwater organisms.

Results

Considering the results shown in Table 3 and Table 4, it appears that these two tables indicate positive control showed 100% mortality against both morphotype A and B. The biopesticide Bacillus thuringiensis subspecies israelensis (BTI) was used as positive control. If positive control showed 100% mortality it can be said that it has better efficacy than that of the experimental combinations. Then what is the logic to build a larvicide which actually have lower efficacy than that of established larvicide also Bacillus thuringiensis don’t have any toxic effect on non targeted animal. So please provide explanation or consider alternative presentation. Please consider application of probit analysis for the dose mortality data.

Response: BTI, as a positive control, was used as a parameter to compare the magnitude of larvicidal activity of A. triplinervis nanoformulations. Despite showing a higher percentage, BTI alone is not able to effectively supply all public policies for the control of Aedes aegypti. In this sense, the nanoformulations of A. triplinervis can be inserted as an auxiliary integrative practice in the control of Ae aegypti. Allied to this point, this study has additional value when it demonstrates the phytochemical profile of essential oils of the species' morphotypes exclusively in the scientific literature. Therefore, we consider A. triplinervis nanoformulations with scientific and biological value within the proposal presented.

Discussion Section

Please consider the following articles and the relevant points as applicable for the article. Provide a comparative account of the various botanicals and their efficacy against Ae. aegypti and elaborate how the application of Ayapana triplinerviswould be useful. Please depict the prospective utility of the present study highlighting whether the nano-emulsion bears prospect in terms of cost and the effects.

Response: We reorganized the paragraphs to meet the requested demand and inserted some of the references to clarify the ideas.

Thank you for your time and consideration to improve this manuscript.

Sincerely,

The autors

Attachment

Submitted filename: Response to Reviewers (1).docx

Decision Letter 1

Ahmed Ibrahim Hasaballah

16 Apr 2021

PONE-D-20-35553R1

Development of nano-emulsions based on Ayapana triplinervis essential oil for the control of Aedes aegypti larvae

PLOS ONE

Dear Dr. de Almeida,

Thank you for submitting your manuscript to PLOS ONE. After careful consideration, we feel that it has merit but does not fully meet PLOS ONE’s publication criteria as it currently stands. Therefore, we invite you to submit a revised version of the manuscript that addresses the points raised during the review process.

Please submit your revised manuscript by May 31 2021 11:59PM. If you will need more time than this to complete your revisions, please reply to this message or contact the journal office at plosone@plos.org. When you're ready to submit your revision, log on to https://www.editorialmanager.com/pone/ and select the 'Submissions Needing Revision' folder to locate your manuscript file.

Please include the following items when submitting your revised manuscript:

  • A rebuttal letter that responds to each point raised by the academic editor and reviewer(s). You should upload this letter as a separate file labeled 'Response to Reviewers'.

  • A marked-up copy of your manuscript that highlights changes made to the original version. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Revised Manuscript with Track Changes'.

  • An unmarked version of your revised paper without tracked changes. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Manuscript'.

If you would like to make changes to your financial disclosure, please include your updated statement in your cover letter. Guidelines for resubmitting your figure files are available below the reviewer comments at the end of this letter.

If applicable, we recommend that you deposit your laboratory protocols in protocols.io to enhance the reproducibility of your results. Protocols.io assigns your protocol its own identifier (DOI) so that it can be cited independently in the future. For instructions see: http://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/submission-guidelines#loc-laboratory-protocols. Additionally, PLOS ONE offers an option for publishing peer-reviewed Lab Protocol articles, which describe protocols hosted on protocols.io. Read more information on sharing protocols at https://plos.org/protocols?utm_medium=editorial-email&utm_source=authorletters&utm_campaign=protocols.

We look forward to receiving your revised manuscript.

Kind regards,

Ahmed Ibrahim Hasaballah

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Journal Requirements:

Please review your reference list to ensure that it is complete and correct. If you have cited papers that have been retracted, please include the rationale for doing so in the manuscript text, or remove these references and replace them with relevant current references. Any changes to the reference list should be mentioned in the rebuttal letter that accompanies your revised manuscript. If you need to cite a retracted article, indicate the article’s retracted status in the References list and also include a citation and full reference for the retraction notice.

[Note: HTML markup is below. Please do not edit.]

Reviewers' comments:

Reviewer's Responses to Questions

Comments to the Author

1. If the authors have adequately addressed your comments raised in a previous round of review and you feel that this manuscript is now acceptable for publication, you may indicate that here to bypass the “Comments to the Author” section, enter your conflict of interest statement in the “Confidential to Editor” section, and submit your "Accept" recommendation.

Reviewer #1: (No Response)

Reviewer #2: All comments have been addressed

**********

2. Is the manuscript technically sound, and do the data support the conclusions?

The manuscript must describe a technically sound piece of scientific research with data that supports the conclusions. Experiments must have been conducted rigorously, with appropriate controls, replication, and sample sizes. The conclusions must be drawn appropriately based on the data presented.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

3. Has the statistical analysis been performed appropriately and rigorously?

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

4. Have the authors made all data underlying the findings in their manuscript fully available?

The PLOS Data policy requires authors to make all data underlying the findings described in their manuscript fully available without restriction, with rare exception (please refer to the Data Availability Statement in the manuscript PDF file). The data should be provided as part of the manuscript or its supporting information, or deposited to a public repository. For example, in addition to summary statistics, the data points behind means, medians and variance measures should be available. If there are restrictions on publicly sharing data—e.g. participant privacy or use of data from a third party—those must be specified.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

5. Is the manuscript presented in an intelligible fashion and written in standard English?

PLOS ONE does not copyedit accepted manuscripts, so the language in submitted articles must be clear, correct, and unambiguous. Any typographical or grammatical errors should be corrected at revision, so please note any specific errors here.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

6. Review Comments to the Author

Please use the space provided to explain your answers to the questions above. You may also include additional comments for the author, including concerns about dual publication, research ethics, or publication ethics. (Please upload your review as an attachment if it exceeds 20,000 characters)

Reviewer #1: The authors may have not noted the concern by this reviewer with the mass spectra chromatograms that are included in the Supplementary Data as there was no author response to this point.

The concern noted in the review is here: "Notably, the Supplementary Data contains mass spectra chromatograms that appear to have been published elsewhere (e.g., by NIST and Adams (2017)). I doubt that PLOS permits the republishing of figures. I recommend the authors remove those figures and either replace them with mass spectra of standards that they generate for each chemical that was analyzed or state the diagnostic fragment ions of each chemical they analyze that match what is reported in the literature."

Please respond to the above comment and make any needed changes to the manuscript that are appropriate.

Authors did not include the scale bars in Fig. 4 that was recommended by the reviewer.

The other author responses to the reviewer comments are acceptable to this reviewer.

Reviewer #2: (No Response)

**********

7. PLOS authors have the option to publish the peer review history of their article (what does this mean?). If published, this will include your full peer review and any attached files.

If you choose “no”, your identity will remain anonymous but your review may still be made public.

Do you want your identity to be public for this peer review? For information about this choice, including consent withdrawal, please see our Privacy Policy.

Reviewer #1: No

Reviewer #2: No

[NOTE: If reviewer comments were submitted as an attachment file, they will be attached to this email and accessible via the submission site. Please log into your account, locate the manuscript record, and check for the action link "View Attachments". If this link does not appear, there are no attachment files.]

While revising your submission, please upload your figure files to the Preflight Analysis and Conversion Engine (PACE) digital diagnostic tool, https://pacev2.apexcovantage.com/. PACE helps ensure that figures meet PLOS requirements. To use PACE, you must first register as a user. Registration is free. Then, login and navigate to the UPLOAD tab, where you will find detailed instructions on how to use the tool. If you encounter any issues or have any questions when using PACE, please email PLOS at figures@plos.org. Please note that Supporting Information files do not need this step.

PLoS One. 2021 Jul 9;16(7):e0254225. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0254225.r004

Author response to Decision Letter 1


17 Jun 2021

Ahmed Ibrahim Hasaballah

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Dear Academic Editor,

We are writing to respond to reviewers for the requested adjustments to the manuscript entitled “PONE-D-20-35553R1 Development of nano-emulsions based on Ayapana triplinervis for the control of Aedes aegypti larvae”

JOURNAL REQUIREMENTS:

1) Please review your reference list to ensure that it is complete and correct. If you have cited papers that have been retracted, please include the rationale for doing so in the manuscript text, or remove these references and replace them with relevant current references. Any changes to the reference list should be mentioned in the rebuttal letter that accompanies your revised manuscript. If you need to cite a retracted article, indicate the article’s retracted status in the References list and also include a citation and full reference for the retraction notice.

RESPONSE: The references were analyzed in detail according to the requirements of the scientific journal. The changes were highlighted in the manuscript, when necessary.

REVIEWER #1:

• The authors may have not noted the concern by this reviewer with the mass spectra chromatograms that are included in the Supplementary Data as there was no author response to this point.

The concern noted in the review is here: "Notably, the Supplementary Data contains mass spectra chromatograms that appear to have been published elsewhere (e.g., by NIST and Adams (2017)). I doubt that PLOS permits the republishing of figures. I recommend the authors remove those figures and either replace them with mass spectra of standards that they generate for each chemical that was analyzed or state the diagnostic fragment ions of each chemical they analyze that match what is reported in the literature." Please respond to the above comment and make any needed changes to the manuscript that are appropriate.

RESPONSE: We regret that this adjustment in the manuscript has gone unnoticed by our team. Receive our sincere apologies! We inform that the chromatograms were removed from the supplementary material, as instructed by the reviewer.

• Authors did not include the scale bars in Fig. 4 that was recommended by the reviewer.

RESPONSE: The scale bar was added to figure 4, according to the reviewer's guidance.

Additionally, we inform that the word nanoemulsion was standardized for nano-emulsion in the manuscript and in the supporting information.

Thank you for your time and consideration to improve this manuscript.

Sincerely,

The autors

Attachment

Submitted filename: Response to Reviewers (2nd round).docx

Decision Letter 2

Ahmed Ibrahim Hasaballah

23 Jun 2021

Development of nano-emulsions based on Ayapana triplinervis essential oil for the control of Aedes aegypti larvae

PONE-D-20-35553R2

Dear Dr. de Almeida,

We’re pleased to inform you that your manuscript has been judged scientifically suitable for publication and will be formally accepted for publication once it meets all outstanding technical requirements.

Within one week, you’ll receive an e-mail detailing the required amendments. When these have been addressed, you’ll receive a formal acceptance letter and your manuscript will be scheduled for publication.

An invoice for payment will follow shortly after the formal acceptance. To ensure an efficient process, please log into Editorial Manager at http://www.editorialmanager.com/pone/, click the 'Update My Information' link at the top of the page, and double check that your user information is up-to-date. If you have any billing related questions, please contact our Author Billing department directly at authorbilling@plos.org.

If your institution or institutions have a press office, please notify them about your upcoming paper to help maximize its impact. If they’ll be preparing press materials, please inform our press team as soon as possible -- no later than 48 hours after receiving the formal acceptance. Your manuscript will remain under strict press embargo until 2 pm Eastern Time on the date of publication. For more information, please contact onepress@plos.org.

Kind regards,

Ahmed Ibrahim Hasaballah

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Acceptance letter

Ahmed Ibrahim Hasaballah

28 Jun 2021

PONE-D-20-35553R2

Development of nano-emulsions based on Ayapana triplinervis essential oil for the control of Aedes aegypti larvae

Dear Dr. de Almeida:

I'm pleased to inform you that your manuscript has been deemed suitable for publication in PLOS ONE. Congratulations! Your manuscript is now with our production department.

If your institution or institutions have a press office, please let them know about your upcoming paper now to help maximize its impact. If they'll be preparing press materials, please inform our press team within the next 48 hours. Your manuscript will remain under strict press embargo until 2 pm Eastern Time on the date of publication. For more information please contact onepress@plos.org.

If we can help with anything else, please email us at plosone@plos.org.

Thank you for submitting your work to PLOS ONE and supporting open access.

Kind regards,

PLOS ONE Editorial Office Staff

on behalf of

Dr. Ahmed Ibrahim Hasaballah

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Associated Data

    This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

    Supplementary Materials

    S1 Fig. Chromatogram of the essential oil of A. triplinervis morphotype A.

    (DOCX)

    S2 Fig. Chromatogram of the essential oil of A. triplinervis morphotype B.

    (DOCX)

    S3 Fig. Physical parameters of A. triplinervis morphotype A nano-emulsions in different hydrophilic-lipophilic balance values at 0, 7, 14 and 21 days.

    (DOCX)

    S4 Fig. Physical parameters of nano-emulsions A. triplinervis morphotype B nano-emulsions in different hydrophyl-lipophyle balance values at 0, 7, 14 and 21 days.

    (DOCX)

    S1 Table. Chemical composition, retention time (RT), percentage and calculated Linear Retention Index (LRI) and literature of essential oil of A. triplinervis morphotype A.

    (DOCX)

    S2 Table. Chemical composition, retention time (RT), percentage and calculated Linear Retention Index (LRI) and literature of essential oil of A. triplinervis morphotype B.

    (DOCX)

    Attachment

    Submitted filename: Review report PONE-D-20-35553.docx

    Attachment

    Submitted filename: Response to Reviewers (1).docx

    Attachment

    Submitted filename: Response to Reviewers (2nd round).docx

    Data Availability Statement

    All relevant data are within the paper and its Supporting information files.


    Articles from PLoS ONE are provided here courtesy of PLOS

    RESOURCES