Abstract
Plant-herbivore interactions promote the generation and maintenance of both plant and herbivore biodiversity. The antagonistic interactions between plants and herbivores lead to host race formation: the evolution of herbivore types specializing on different plant species, with restricted gene flow between them. Understanding how ecological specialization promotes host race formation usually depends on artificial approaches, using laboratory experiments on populations associated with agricultural crops. However, evidence on how host races are formed and maintained in a natural setting remains scarce. Here, we take a multidisciplinary approach to understand whether populations of the generalist spider mite Tetranychus urticae form host races in nature. We demonstrate that a host race co-occurs among generalist conspecifics in the dune ecosystem of The Netherlands. Extensive field sampling and genotyping of individuals over three consecutive years showed a clear pattern of host associations. Genome-wide differences between the host race and generalist conspecifics were found using a dense set of SNPs on field-derived iso-female lines and previously sequenced genomes of T. urticae. Hybridization between lines of the host race and sympatric generalist lines is restricted by post-zygotic breakdown, and selection negatively impacts the survival of generalists on the native host of the host race. Our description of a host race among conspecifics with a larger diet breadth shows how ecological and reproductive isolation aid in maintaining intra-specific variation in sympatry, despite the opportunity for homogenization through gene flow. Our findings highlight the importance of explicitly considering the spatial and temporal scale on which plant-herbivore interactions occur in order to identify herbivore populations associated with different plant species in nature. This system can be used to study the underlying genetic architecture and mechanisms that facilitate the use of a large range of host plant taxa by extreme generalist herbivores. In addition, it offers the chance to investigate the prevalence and mechanisms of ecological specialization in nature.
Subject terms: Evolutionary biology, Genetic variation, Entomology
Villacis-Perez et al. describe the existence of and the mechanisms sustaining a host race of the spider mite Tetranychus urticae, which was previously regarded as a generalist. Here, the authors identify a specialist host race exhibiting reproductive incompatibility with sympatric generalist populations, as well as significant differences in host performance.
Introduction
For herbivorous arthropods, the transition to a plant-eating lifestyle has contributed to their immense diversity. Herbivorous arthropods are highly speciose1,2, and a substantial proportion of speciation events in insect herbivores can be attributed to shifts towards novel host plant taxa3. Plants and herbivores exert strong selective pressures on each other. These antagonistic interactions may promote local adaptation and potentially host race formation. Following Drès and Mallet4, host races are defined as populations that (i) are associated with their hosts across spatial and temporal scales; (ii) show some extent of genetic differentiation from sympatric conspecifics; and (iii) show incomplete reproductive isolation from sympatric conspecifics. In addition, host races may differ from conspecifics in traits associated with host plant adaptation, but this criterion is not an absolute requirement for host race formation4–6. Host races have been identified in maple- and willow-infesting Neochlamisus bebbianae beetles6,7, in Rhagoletis flies associated with apple or hawthorn8–10, in the pea aphid Acyrthosiphon pisum11–13, in populations of the peach-potato aphid Myzus persicae infesting tobacco14,15, as well as in several other herbivores3,4. In nature, the composition of vegetation varies across spatial and temporal scales, and the availability of certain hosts can be restricted across clines in the landscape16–18. Herbivores with large geographic ranges may encounter a myriad of plant taxa, some more heavily defended against herbivory than others. This results in a mosaic of locally available hosts, in which herbivore population structure can arise due to spatially and temporally varying selection, resulting in local adaptation and extinction events19,20. Local variation in the strength of host selection can contribute to the evolution of host races4,6,21.
Whether generalist herbivores adapt and diverge via the interaction with their host plant is not clear. Most herbivore arthropods are specialists; they only accept species within a single plant family or even one or a few closely related species22–24. Specialist herbivores exploit their hosts by: (i) behavioural avoidance of physical or chemical plant defences, (ii) decreasing the impact of chemical defences through various detoxification enzymatic pathways that are deployed upon exposure to plant-derived defensive metabolites, and (iii) the active transport of these metabolites towards excretion or sequestration25–27. Only a few examples exist of true generalist herbivores occurring on host plant species across families23. Generalists are thought to feed on a large range of plant taxa either by plasticity in characters that determine host range, or by forming cryptic complexes of host-adapted genotypes, like in the whitefly Bemisia tabaci28. The ecological interactions between generalists and the plethora of hosts they use through time in the field are not well understood, and knowledge of the extent to which cryptic complexes of host races within a taxon contribute to these interactions remains scarce29.
The two-spotted spider mite (Tetranychus urticae; Acari: Tetranychidae) has an extremely large host range spanning over a 1000 plant species, distributed over 120 families, some of which are important crops30,31. Two colour morphs of T. urticae occur across its cosmopolitan distribution, the green and the red morphs32. The role of host adaptation in promoting population structure and reproductive isolation in T. urticae in nature is not clear, as it is uncertain whether it is a complex of host races or whether its breadth in host range reflects variation in host preference33–35 or plasticity in its molecular toolkit36–47.
Previous research on the subject is conflicting. Firstly, population differentiation based on genetic markers has rarely been found to correlate with colonized host plant species. Instead, genetic differentiation has been found to decrease when populations are closer to each other and when population densities are large36,48–51. This is likely due to sexual reproduction homogenizing the genetic pool when populations associated with different hosts encounter each other. Still, fine-scale genotyping of individuals has shown that population structure exists40,41,43,49,52. These findings suggest that reproductive barriers between individuals may maintain population structure, even when gene flow seems likely due to physical proximity. Moreover, population differentiation based on genetic markers has rarely been coupled with assays quantifying reproductive compatibility39. Research quantifying hybrid inviability in this species is largely confounded, because the infection status of experimental populations with strains of common mite endosymbionts, which cause similar patterns of reproductive incompatibility, is often not reported53–57. Lastly, experimental assays suggest a genetic basis for increased fitness traits on novel host species, yet most studies that have analysed whether field-collected mite populations are adapted to their host plants have not been coupled with molecular genetic data42, but see refs. 47,58.
Here, we aimed to quantify the extent of genetic differentiation and reproductive isolation between co-occurring populations of T. urticae associated with different plant species in nature. To achieve this, we conducted a holistic analysis that integrates four complementary approaches: (i) extensive field sampling and genetic screening of individuals on multiple host species across a single ecosystem over three consecutive years; (ii) screening for genome-wide and localized patterns of sequence differentiation using field-derived iso-female lines and previously sequenced populations of T. urticae; (iii) quantification of the extent of reproductive isolation between field-derived lines; and (iv) quantification of fitness traits in field-derived lines to test for host plant adaptation. We present clear evidence for the occurrence of a specialist T. urticae host race, which is isolated from conspecifics by a post-zygotic barrier to gene flow, and that is genetically differentiated from sympatric generalist conspecifics that co-occur with the host race at small spatial scales.
Results and discussion
Consistent associations between sympatric mite cytotypes and their host species in nature
To determine if sympatric T. urticae populations showed genetic differentiation based on host species across spatial and temporal scales, we extensively sampled and genotyped individual mites from several co-occurring plant species over the course of three years. Specifically, we looked for consistent associations between spider mite cytotypes (inferred from mitochondrial cytochrome oxidase I [CO1] haplotype groups) and several host plant species in two nature reserves of The Netherlands—the dunes near Castricum and the dunes near Meijendel in the summers of 2015, 2016 and 2017.
We determined 598 bp-long CO1 sequences of 1023 individuals collected over the three years of field sampling from 48 locations (30 in Castricum and 18 in Meijendel). All sequences closely matched GenBank sequences previously annotated and validated as T. urticae59. The 1023 sequences represented 156 different haplotypes. A maximum-likelihood phylogenetic analysis grouped these haplotypes into six clades (hereafter called cytotypes, followed by a number, i.e., C1 through C6) varying in their bootstrap support (Supplementary Fig. 1). While cytotypes C2 and C3 were found on every host sampled, C1 was restricted to honeysuckle (Lonicera peryclimenum), and these association patterns were consistent across the three years of sampling. Cytotypes C4, C5, C6 were rare in the field and were not documented every year; thus, we focused subsequent analyses on C1, C2 and C3, to which the majority of individuals (997 mites) were assigned; 20% of the 997 individuals were assigned to C1, 57% to C2, and 23% to C3 (Fig. 1). The restriction of cytotype C1 to honeysuckle did not seem to be an artefact of our sampling design. Even in locations where mites from any cytotype had an equal chance of colonizing either of two co-occurring wide-spread hosts, honeysuckle or spindle tree (Euonymus europaeus), more than 97% of C1 individuals were found on honeysuckle. The proportion of C1 individuals found on spindle tree was not significantly different from zero (t(21) = 1.28, p = 0.21), and a high proportion of C2 and C3 individuals were also found on honeysuckle (Supplementary Fig. 2). T. urticae mostly disperses passively with the wind and occasionally by actively walking to close-by plants60,61. We only once (2017) found a few C1 individuals on spindle tree shoots growing underneath a large honeysuckle patch which was highly infested with C1 individuals; this large C1 population likely spilled over but did not establish on spindle tree.
The spatial scale at which the processes that lead to mosaics of genetic variation in herbivore taxa occur largely depends on the local and regional availability of suitable hosts20,62,63. For example, the maintenance of genetically structured populations of the whitefly Bemisia tabaci depends on the seasonality of host availability, which influences interpopulation gene flow by temporally isolating B. tabaci populations associated with hosts with different phenologies64,65. Similarly, variation in the availability and phenology of local hosts across the United States and Mexico promotes the maintenance of apple- and hawthorn-associated host races of Rhagoletis flies10. In contrast, T. urticae genetic population structure has not been previously shown to depend on host species, regardless of the spatial scale at which these hosts occurs38,39,44. Moreover, prior studies have not investigated the temporal persistence of spider mite genotypes in the field. In this study, extensive sampling and genotyping of individuals within and between populations on a small spatial scale, across consecutive years, revealed the spatial scale that promotes spider mite population structure across time in the field.
Genome-wide divergence of honeysuckle-restricted lines relative to sympatric and non-sympatric conspecifics
To confirm and further assess the extent of genetic divergence between host-associated populations, we also asked if the CO1-based cytotypes were consistent with full mitochondrial genomes, as well as with patterns of nuclear variation. To do this, we established 26 iso-female lines from cytotypes C1, C2 and C3 in the laboratory, sequenced the lines using the Illumina method, and predicted single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) for the 90 Mb genome of T. urticae. With a high-quality subset of SNPs, we constructed mitochondrial and nuclear phylogenies. We found that the phylogeny based on the whole mitochondrial genome was congruent with the phylogeny based on CO1 haplotypes (Supplementary Fig. 3). The nuclear phylogeny also split the 26 lines into three clades, hereafter referred to as nucleotypes N1, N2 and N3. While each of the three nucleotypes had >95% bootstrap support, the N1 clade grouped away from N2 and N3, with the latter in a well-supported clade (bootstrap support 100%) (Fig. 2). The 26 lines were subsequently labelled based on their genotype, this is, their cytotype and nucleotype together; e.g. lines belonging to cytotype C1 and to nucleotype N1 belong to genotype group C1N1 (Supplementary Table 1).
To further explore genetic relationships, we performed principal component analyses (PCA) with the nuclear data of the 26 iso-female lines, and included nuclear data of 30 previously sequenced lines of T. urticae green forms, two lines of T. urticae red forms (MR-VL and TuSB9), and two sister species (T. turkestani and T. kanzawai) (Fig. 3a). As expected, T. kanzawai, for which no viable progeny from interspecific crosses with T. urticae have been reported66, was separate from all T. urticae lines along PC1. Previously, viable but infertile F1 progeny have been reported in crosses between T. urticae and T. turkestani67, which clustered separately from all T. urticae lines along PC2. All green forms of T. urticae, including the 26 iso-female lines derived in this study, formed a tight cluster distinct from T. urticae red forms, for which varying levels of incompatibility have been reported56,68. A PCA restricted to nuclear data for the 56 T. urticae green forms revealed that lines of nucleotype N1 clustered together and away from all other green strains along PC1; along PC2, all the lines from our study sites clustered separately from lines reported previously from other geographic locations, as expected for local population differentiation (Fig. 3b). The PCA on nuclear data are therefore consistent with species and population delineations (red versus green forms) reported previously. The PC analyses also revealed no apparent separation of N2 and N3 by host plant species, although the N2 and N3 lines did appear to have a modest genetic separation based on geography (e.g. N2 lines grouped closer to each other based on sampling site, while all members of N3 were collected in Meijendel (Supplementary Fig. 4E).
We also quantified the extent of genetic differentiation between field-derived lines by calculating genome-wide Fst values. Genetic differences between N1 and the other two nucleotypes were substantially higher than between N2 and N3 (FstN1–N2 = 0.46, FstN1–N3 = 0.54, FstN2–N3 = 0.07; Fig. 3c). To understand whether localized genomic regions of unusually high or low genetic differentiation were apparent, we quantified Fst in sliding windows across the genome among the nucleotype groups. We found that divergence between N1 and N2/N3 was approximately uniform along each of the three T. urticae chromosomes (Fig. 3d). Given their co-occurrence at field sites, the genome-wide uniformity of divergence of N1 from the other nucleotypes as assessed with Fst was unexpected. A potential explanation for this finding was revealed by an analysis of genetic variation within nucleotypes. As our study used iso-female lines (expansions from single diploid females), residual genetic variation was anticipated in each line. Consistent with this expectation, segregation of genetic variants was observed for large genomic regions in the N2 and N3 iso-female lines. In striking contrast, each of the N1 lines was inbred, or nearly so, as assessed with the dense, genome-wide SNP data (Supplementary Fig. 5). This pattern can only be explained if the females used for establishing the N1 lines were isogenic (or largely so) at the time of collection from the field. This observation, coupled with the finding that the N1 lines are predominantly identical by allelic state genome-wide (Supplementary Fig. 6), revealed that our N1 nucleotype constituted a highly inbred population across our study locations in nature; this is expected to elevate Fst values in population comparisons69. The N1 lines were not uniformly inbred, however, as revealed by the phylogenetic and PC analyses (Figs. 2 and 3b), and a few small genomic intervals were segregating in a few N1 lines (Supplementary Fig, 5A). Moreover, while twenty-two out of the twenty-six lines formed analogous clades with respect to both the cytotype and the nucleotype, (i.e., N1, N2 and N3 were consistent with C1, C2 and C3, respectively), there were four exceptions (hereafter referred to as cyto-nuclear hybrids, Fig. 2). One of these involved a C2 cytotype and an N1 nucleotype, line C2N1f, for which the nuclear genome was most distinct within the N1 nucleotype group (Figs. 2 and 3b), potentially reflecting introgression in nature.
Together, these data suggest that gene flow is prevalent within and between the N2 and N3 nucleotypes, while the N1 nucleotype co-occurring at minute spatial scales exists across collection sites largely as a genetic clone. The level of homozygosity of N1 resembles those expected of inbreeding in small, isolated populations70. Whether this is a general pattern of host race formation in this system is unclear. In yeast, the early stages in the dynamics of experimental adaptation to a novel environment are accompanied by a loss of genetic diversity71. Haplodiploid taxa, such as tetranychid mites and parasitoid hymenopterans, may exist as inbred populations in nature72,73. Haplodiploids are expected to suffer less from inbreeding than taxa with other sex determinations systems due to a lower genetic load, as deleterious recessive mutations are purged via exposure in haploid males72,74.
Reproductive isolation between sympatric mite genotypes and genetics of cyto-nuclear hybrids
To quantify the extent of reproductive isolation in this system, we assessed the extent of reproductive compatibility between field-derived lines. We performed pairwise reciprocal crosses between individuals of several lines of C1N1, C2N2 and C3N3, and assayed how traits associated with hybrid breakdown, such as percentage of sterile F1 females, F1 sex ratio, and F2 egg mortality, compared between hybrids and parental lines (Supplementary Tables 2 and 3). We found consistent evidence of F1 and F2 hybrid breakdown between members of C1N1 and the other two genotype groups. In contrast, hybrid breakdown was not as apparent in crosses between C2N2 and C3N3 (Fig. 4, Supplementary Tables 2 and 3). These patterns could potentially be confounded by the presence of symbiotic intracellular bacteria common to mite and insects, which can cause reproductive incompatibility between Tetranychus mites e.g. refs. 57,75,76. To assess the presence of known incompatibility-inducing bacteria (Wolbachia, Cardinium and Spiroplasma) we sequenced bacterial 16S rDNA of our lines. These bacterial taxa were not found in any of the laboratory lines, and neither were any other bacterial sequences correlated to a cytotype or nucleotype (Supplementary Fig. 7).
Interline crosses produced F1 offspring with slightly altered sex ratios compared to controls, but daughters were always present, demonstrating fertilization in all interline crosses (Fig. 4, Supplementary Table 2). The asymmetrical pattern of distorted sex ratios in the F1 can be explained by hybridization revealing recessive maladaptive combinations between the cytoplasmatic background and the nuclear-encoded mitochondrial genes in hybrids, as observed in haplodiploid taxa75,77–79. A higher percentage of sterile F1 hybrid female virgins occurred when C1N1 was crossed to C2N2 or C3N3 compared to controls; non-sterile F1 virgins from these crosses also laid significantly fewer F2 eggs than controls. In striking contrast, both reciprocal C2N2 vs.C3 N3 F1 hybrids showed no higher proportion of sterile females, and even a non-significant trend of larger egg clutch sizes compared to controls (Supplementary Table 3), which resembles the outbreeding effects of heterosis found among compatible loci related to female reproduction80. F1 males were not considered in the analysis because they inherit all the genetic material from their mothers and are therefore not hybrids.
Hybrid breakdown between C1N1 and either C2N2 or C3N3 was strongest in F2 male offspring, which are recombinant haploid individuals. Compared to controls, fewer F2 hybrid eggs hatched (<8% vs. >90%), with the embryonic development of most eggs stopping before the stage of red-eye formation, which is the stage just prior to larval hatching. However, the few individuals that did hatch completed development and reached adulthood (Supplementary Table 3). This points to genomic incompatibilities between nuclear loci that impact pre-hatching embryonic development. It remains unknown whether the F2 individuals that managed to reach adulthood were indeed balanced hybrids, or alternatively whether they derived mostly from one parental genotype. Hybrids between C2N2 and C3N3 displayed significantly reduced F2 egg hatching rates as well, but to a much lesser degree than crosses involving C1N1 (Supplementary Table 3). This higher hatching rate of C2N2 vs. C3N3 crosses agrees with the larger similarity between C2N2 and C3N3 genomes (Figs. 2, 4 and Supplementary Fig. 6).
Using these compatibility patterns as reference, we hypothesised that two lines would be compatible if their nuclear genomes were similar to each other, or that they would be incompatible if the differences between their nuclear genomes would be large. To test these hypotheses, we performed reciprocal crosses using several cyto-nuclear hybrid lines (Fig. 2, Supplementary Fig. 8). As expected, in incompatible crosses we found a significantly higher percentage of sterile F1 hybrid virgin females as compared to controls, and non-sterile F1 females laid fewer eggs than controls (Supplementary Table 4). Less than 3.5% of F2 eggs laid by these females hatched. Also, as expected, we found that in compatible crosses, F1 females were not more sterile than controls, laid as many or more eggs than controls, and more than 70% of their F2 eggs hatched (Supplementary Fig. 8, Supplementary Table 4). Thus, we related the genome-wide differentiation between C1N1 and either C2N2 or C3N3 to hybrid breakdown due to incompatibility at nuclear loci, as expressed most clearly in F2 recombinant individuals.
In conclusion, strong, yet incomplete post-zygotic barriers to gene flow exist between the honeysuckle race (C1N1) and co-occurring conspecifics with larger host ranges (C2N2 and C3N3). Barriers to gene flow expressed as F2 hybrid breakdown are not uncommon in haplodiploid taxa81,82. It is possible that the interactions between the nuclear and the mitochondrial genomes in hybrids contribute to the patterns in this system, as it is observed in haplodiploid taxa79. For example, although crosses between C2N2 and C3N3 were largely compatible, the fitness of F2 hybrids was asymmetrical: a higher proportion of individuals with a C2 cytotype hatched compared to the reciprocal hybrids with a C3 cytotype (49% vs. 23%, Fig. 4, Supplementary Table 3). Mito-nuclear interactions are found in populations that have recently experienced selection, as the mtDNA needs to accommodate the changes imposed by the selection regime acting on the nuclear genome in order to maintain homeostasis79,83,84. If embryonic development in T. urticae resembles larval development in Nasonia wasps and Tigriopus copepods, we might expect the oxidative phosphorylation pathway to delay or fully stop normal development of hybrid larvae due to an impaired ability to synthesize ATP81,85.
Fitness advantage of the honeysuckle race on its host over sympatric conspecifics
To determine the extent of host adaptation in this system, we quantified fitness traits from the individual to the population levels. Due to its restriction to honeysuckle in the field, we expected C1N1 to either perform better on honeysuckle than on other host species tested, to outperform sympatric conspecifics with larger host ranges (i.e. generalists C2N2 and C3N3) on honeysuckle, or both21,34.
We observed that reproductive performance (eggs/female/day) of individual C1N1 females (1–2 eggs/female/day) from several lines was more than twice lower than that of C2N2 (~5 eggs/female/day) and C3N3 females (~5 eggs/female/day) on leaf discs of honeysuckle, a finding that was consistent as well for most other host plant species tested (Supplementary Fig. 9, Supplementary Table 5). Similar reproductive performance values were also obtained on detached honeysuckle twigs (C1N1 = 1.54 ± 0.14 [mean ± SEM]; C2N2 = 4.92 ± 0.47; n = 12). We focused on early individual female reproductive performance as this is an important trait determining the rate of population increase in spider mite populations34,86,87. The clutch sizes of C1N1 females were low relative to most reports of reproductive output in spider mite females60. Since the reproductive performance of C1N1 females is no better on honeysuckle than on other hosts tested, it is possible that genetic trade-offs in host adaptation are either low or absent, if host adaptation is determined by different loci on the hosts species we selected34,87–91. Alternatively, but not mutually exclusive, since C1N1 lines are largely inbred (Supplementary Fig. 5), the low reproductive performance of C1N1 females might indicate that they suffer from inbreeding depression. Spider mite populations can harbour genetic variation for the number of eggs laid per female, but low egg numbers may result from the expression of deleterious alleles in inbred individuals, rather than from trade-offs as a result of antagonistic pleiotropy of host-adaptation loci58. Furthermore, experimental inbreeding negatively affects the rate of female oviposition compared to outbred populations of T. urticae92. We argue that genetic load could still be prevalent in C1N1 females.
Despite the low reproductive performance of C1N1 females, they nonetheless build significantly larger populations on honeysuckle than conspecifics, as line C1N1a expanded from 30 to 643 ± 243 adult females after two generations, while line C2N3a only produced 188 ± 80 adult females (F1, 10 = 6.88, p = 0.02). We found that this is largely due to the higher survival of C1N1 juveniles compared to generalist juveniles on honeysuckle (Fig. 5). During the development from egg to adult (13–14 days for this species), the survival of juveniles of generalist lines dropped to ~0.8 around day 7, when most individuals were larvae, compared to C1N1 survival, which was close to 1 at that time. The survival of generalist juveniles kept decreasing significantly from that of C1N1 juveniles until day 11 in all experiments (Supplementary Table 5). Generalist juveniles mostly died trying to escape the leaf enclosures, as they got stuck on the wet enclosure barriers, or in sugary exudates on the leaf surface. By day 13, mortality in all lines increased due to adults trying to escape from the arenas. As a reference, survival of C1N1, C2N2 and C3N3 juveniles to adulthood was high (>90%) on common bean, a very permissive host to T. urticae (Supplementary Tables 2 and 3). This disparity in juvenile and maternal traits is not unusual20. In T. urticae, the genetic architecture determining juvenile survival seems to be decoupled from loci that determine female reproductive performance in some cases, but in other cases both traits increase together after experimental isolation to one host e.g. refs. 42,58,91,92.
Together, our data indicate that differences in fitness traits on honeysuckle exist between the honeysuckle race and the generalist conspecifics it co-exists with in nature. The honeysuckle race builds larger populations on its host than generalist conspecifics. This is, unintuitively, not due to a higher reproductive output of host race females over generalist conspecifics on honeysuckle, but rather due to a higher mortality of generalist juveniles on this host. This would give the host race a competitive advantage over conspecifics on honeysuckle. In contrast, the host race is possibly outcompeted on alternative hosts due to its low reproductive output (Supplementary Fig. 9, Supplementary Table 6), especially if the survival of generalist juveniles on non-honeysuckle hosts would be higher than on honeysuckle itself (e.g. Supplementary Table 2). Given the high mortality of generalists on honeysuckle, we could expect selection to act upon variation in mechanisms that prevent generalists from visiting this host, which would further restrict the opportunities for mating encounters and subsequent gene flow between honeysuckle specialists and generalist conspecifics, a possibility that remains to be tested empirically.
Conclusions
We present evidence of intraspecific population structure related to host use and incomplete reproductive isolation in the generalist herbivore T. urticae. Integrating lines of evidence of this process across scales (ecosystem–population–individual) proved imperative to grasp the extent of evolutionary divergence within this species in nature. The distribution of genetic variation of T. urticae across the Dutch dune ecosystem shows a consistent pattern across years, where honeysuckle-restricted genotypes co-exist with generalist conspecifics. Genetic structure was apparent genome-wide between the honeysuckle-restricted genotypes and other available genomes of T. urticae. The persistence of a genetically distinct, inbred population on honeysuckle in sympatry with conspecifics with larger host ranges is potentially due to strong but incomplete post-zygotic reproductive barriers between populations. Selection exerted by honeysuckle impacts negatively the survival of generalists on this host, which is expected to further reduce chances for hybridization with the host race. In nature, patterns of functional variation related to host use can be revealed using common genetic markers, but this is dependent on the choice of markers and on extensive genotyping of individuals within and between populations. Hybridization can occur in this system, but reproductive barriers are incomplete and expressed post-zygotically. Previous genetic studies with T. urticae, often with reproductively compatible green forms collected in greenhouses or agricultural settings, might suggest that host race formation in this generalist species is rare. Yet, host race formation could be more prominent in nature than in agricultural settings, where monocultures and pesticide use may erode genetic variation. Further research focusing on dissecting the patterns of intraspecific functional variation within herbivore taxa is needed to answer this question.
Methods
Associations between sympatric mite cytotypes and their host species in nature
To investigate the occurrence of host-associated populations across spatial and temporal scales, populations of T. urticae were sampled in two coastal nature reserves near Castricum (CAS) and Meijendel (MEY) in The Netherlands, which are part of the European dune ecosystem (Supplementary Table 1). Three to four ~1 km long transects were established within the forested dune areas of each nature reserve. Along a transect, 10 m × 10 m sampling locations were established at least 50 metres away from each other (CAS: 30 locations in total; MEY: 18 locations in total). Sampling took place in 2015, 2016 and 2017. At every location, multiple leaves from every host plant species showing signs of spider mite damage were collected and placed in plastic bags unique to location and host plant species to avoid cross-contamination. Within 48 h after field sampling, DNA was extracted from up to 10 individual mites, preferably adult females, per collection (Supplementary Note 1).
Individuals were genotyped by analysing SNPs in a 598 base pair (bp) stretch within the mitochondrial cytochrome oxidase subunit 1 (CO1) gene; the so-called Folmer fragment93. The region was amplified using PCR and Sanger-sequenced (Supplementary Note 1). Sequence files were analysed and aligned using CodonCode Aligner (v. 6.0.2). To obtain a high-quality sequence, the ends of each sequence were trimmed to a final length of 598 bp. The haplotypes found have been deposited onto GenBank under project SUB7841957. All sequences were run through MegaBLAST to confirm their similarity to previously annotated T. urticae sequences. Sequences were aligned using the MUSCLE algorithm with a maximum of 5 iterations and a UPGMA clustering method in MEGA for Mac (v. 7). A maximum likelihood tree based on the Tamura-Nei nucleotide substitution model and bootstrapped 1000 times was constructed using all the unique haplotypes found across all samples. Clades with bootstrap support of 60% or above were used to define haplotype groups, which we referred to as cytotypes. Based on these clades, each individual mite was assigned to a particular cytotype. Host-mite associations were determined based on the proportion of samples that belonged to each cytotype that were sampled from a particular host plant species, per year. We analysed a subset of these data with samples from locations where we marked the co-occurrence of two wide-spread host species, wild honeysuckle (Lonicera periclymenum) and spindle tree (Euonymus europaeus), whether they were infested by mites or not. For cytotypes with evidence of host associations, we compared the proportion of individuals occurring on the alternative host to zero with a one sample t-test.
Analysis of genomic divergence of honeysuckle-restricted lines relative to sympatric and non-sympatric conspecifics
Establishment of lab populations, DNA extraction and endosymbiont diagnosis
To quantify the extent of genetic divergence between host-associated populations, we established field-derived lines by re-sampling honeysuckle and spindle tree leaves at specific locations in CAS and MEY in August–September 2015 (Supplementary Table 1); infested leaves were collected as mentioned previously. Virgin females at the last moulting stage before adulthood (teleiochrysalis) were isolated individually on common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris cv. Speedy) leaf clippings of 3 × 3 cm surrounded by wet cotton wool, and kept under controlled conditions (25 °C, 16 h:8 h light:dark, 60% relative humidity; hereafter ‘standard conditions’). Virgin females were allowed to oviposit for 7–10 days; their eggs developed under the same conditions, but the females were transferred to a colder chamber (12 °C, standard light regime and humidity) for ~10 days to slow down the aging process while their unfertilized eggs matured into adult males. Once the males emerged, the mother and her sons were placed together to mate on new bean cut-outs. After ~5 days of oviposition, females were collected for individual DNA extraction, CO1 amplification and Sanger sequencing as described above. A total of 26 iso-female lines were established to represent the most common mite cytotypes previously identified and were maintained since their establishment on detached bean leaves in standard conditions. After 2 weeks (~1 generation for this species), up to 800 adult females were pooled per line and their DNA extracted (Supplementary Note 2). The 26 pairs of reads generated as part of this project have been deposited onto sequence-read archive (SRA) under accessions SAMN13693727-52. Dilutions of 1:10 of this DNA and of DNA obtained from three laboratory populations known to harbour reproductive endosymbionts were used to diagnose the presence of bacterial symbionts by sequencing the V3 region of the 16S rDNA subunit on an Illumina MiSeq platform (Supplementary Note 3). The reads generated from the 29 bacterial communities have been deposited under accessions SRR12491964-89 and SRR12492212-14. Protocols followed for processing, mapping and variant calling, validation of species identity using nuclear sequences, quality control of the predicted variants, and assessment of heterozygosity levels in the field-derived lines are specified in Supplementary Notes 3–7.
Mitochondrial genome and phylogenetic tree
Illumina reads were mapped to the T. urticae mitochondrial genome using BWA (v. 0.7.12-r1039)94. We extracted the 13 protein-coding genes from the mitochondrial genomes for use in phylogenetic analyses, and individual alignments for each region were performed using MAFFT v. 7.72195 with the following settings: strategy: auto; gap open penalty = 1.53, offset value = 0.0, and then visually IGV v. 2.396. The 13 T. kanzawai mitochondrial genes were included in the analysis as an outgroup (Supplementary Note 4)97. Subsequently, the 13 regions were concatenated into a supermatrix containing 10225 bp. The best-fitting partitioning scheme was estimated using PartitionFinder298. Several partitioning schemes were tested including division of protein-coding genes into 1st, 2nd and 3rd codon positions. The most suitable partitioning scheme was selected using the Akaike information criterion. Maximum likelihood (ML) phylogenetic analysis of the partitioned dataset was performed using RAxML (v. 8.2.8)99, with BSbrL enabled and 500 bootstrap replicates to evaluate branch support.
Nuclear phylogenetic tree
A phylogenetic tree was constructed based on nuclear SNPs of all the iso-female lines from this study, as well as a previously published line of T. kanzawai97 which served as an outgroup (Supplementary Note 4). To minimize the number of SNPs that were in linkage disequilibrium with each other, SNPs that were used for making the tree had to be spaced at least 20 kb apart. In the event of heterozygosity in a line at a given locus, the allele with higher read depth support was selected. From the resulting set of SNPs, a BioNJ100 neighbour-joining tree based on observed nucleotide differences was constructed in PhyML 3.1101 using the Seaview v. 4.6.1 graphical user interface102 with 500 bootstraps.
PCA and Fst estimation
Principal component analyses (PCAs) and an Fst estimation at the nuclear genome level were performed in R (v. 3.3.2) as described by Zheng103, using packages SNPRelate (v. 1.8.0) and gdsfmt version 1.10.1104. The PC analysis was performed by running the snpgdsPCA function with option autosome.only = FALSE. The snpgdsFst function was used to calculate Fst values following Cockerham and Weir105; autosome.only = FALSE. Additionally, Fst values were also calculated in a sliding window approach. Before conducting the sliding window analysis along the genome, the VCF file was transformed to be concordant with the recently reported three-chromosome assembly47. The R-package PopGenome106 was used to perform pairwise Fst estimations for each window. Fst estimations were calculated based on the bi-allellic positions for windows of 10 kb and a window slide of 2 kb. The curves were smoothed by using the spline interpolation option (span = 0.01).
Reproductive isolation between sympatric mite genotypes and genetics of cyto-nuclear hybrids
Crossing bioassays between field-derived lines
To quantify the extent of reproductive isolation between host-associated mite genotypes, reciprocal crosses between C1N1 and C2N2, C1N1 and C3N3, and C2N2 with C3N3 were carried out with individuals from several lines per genotype group. We quantified multiple fitness proxies in the parental crosses (P0) and in the first and second filial generations (F1 and F2) of the hybrid offspring, using intra-line crosses as controls in each experiment. We measured the sterility of P0 mated and F1 virgin females (frequency of females that did not lay any eggs), mated P0 and virgin F1 egg clutch size (the number of eggs) per female per day, P0 and F1 female mortality (average number of days alive during the experiments), F1 and F2 egg hatchability (percentage of viable eggs over the total number of eggs), F1 and F2 juvenile survival to adulthood (percentage of adult offspring over the number of viable eggs), and the sex ratio of F1 adult progeny (percentage of females over total number of adult offspring). In P0 to F1 experiments, 8–10 virgin females collected at the last juvenile stage before adulthood from an iso-female line were placed together with 4–5 adult males from either the same line for control, or males from a line belonging to a different genotype group for treatments, on a detached leaf disc (⌀ = 24 mm) from common bean (P. vulgaris cv. Speedy). Forty-eight hours later, mated females were transferred to experimental boxes, where each female was placed individually on a new bean leaf disc (⌀ = 15 mm) surrounded by wet cotton wool. For F1 to F2 experiments, F1 individuals were collected from parental crosses similar to the ones described above. Eight to ten female F1 virgin females were collected and placed on new discs for 48 hours without males. All experimental females were allowed to lay eggs for 24 h and were then transferred to a new leaf disc; females were allowed to oviposit for a maximum of 5 days. A total of 951 females were analysed between all experiments, with an average of 50 females per crossing arrangement (Supplementary Tables 2 and 3).
Measurement of fitness traits in the honeysuckle race on this host against sympatric conspecifics
Reproductive performance on different host plants
To gather evidence of host adaptation, we quantified several fitness proxies of the iso-female lines on different hosts. Oviposition of adult, mated females was measured as the number of eggs laid per mite, per day on detached leaf discs, for five consecutive days (eggs/female/day). An independent experiment was conducted for each of the five plant-species tested: common bean (P. vulgaris cv. Speedy), nightshade (Solanum nigrum), spindle tree (E. europaeus), stinging nettle (Urtica sp.), and honeysuckle (L. periclymenum). Bean and nightshade were grown under greenhouse conditions (25 °C, 16 h L:8 h D, 60%RH), spindle tree and stinging nettle were collected from the field, and honeysuckle was bought from a commercial supplier, defoliated and re-grown under greenhouse conditions. Before each experiment, virgin females in the last juvenile stage (teleiochrysalis) were selected from several laboratory lines belonging to C1N1, C2N2 or C3N3, and were placed together with adult males from the same line on bean leaf discs (⌀ = 24 mm) for 48 h. Then, each ±1-day-old mated female was transferred to an individual leaf disc (⌀ = 15 mm) of the experimental plant, surrounded by wet cotton wool and kept under standard conditions. Females were transferred to freshly cut leaf discs after 24 h, for a maximum of 5 days. Between 64 and 80 females from C1N1, C2N2 or C3N3 were tested on each plant species.
Juvenile survival on detached honeysuckle twigs
To infer fitness advantages of the honeysuckle host race over other genotypes on its host, we quantified the proportion of juveniles that survived to adulthood on honeysuckle. Three independent experiments were conducted, each using a different pair of lines: C1N1a and C2N3a; C1N1d and C2N2d; C1N1e and C2N2b. Experiments were conducted on detached honeysuckle twigs, consisting of two opposing leaves pressed against a bed of wet cotton wool, one with the top and one with the bottom side up. An area of approximately 2 × 3 cm within each leaf was delimited using thin paper tissue strips embedded into the wet cotton bed. An a priori limitation of the mite lines used here is that C2 females lay on average 5–6 eggs per day, whereas females from C1 females lay 1–2 eggs per day on honeysuckle and other hosts (see Results). Taking this into account, 16 adult females from C1 and 8 females from C2 per experiment were placed on each leaf of the experimental arenas. After 24 and 48 h, all eggs were counted and removed from the leaf surface, and any dead females were counted and replaced. Twenty-four hours later, all females were removed; eggs were removed until a total of 12 eggs were left on each leaf. A total of 12 leaves (6 with the top side up and 6 with the bottom side up) with 12 eggs each were used per line. The experiments spanned for the turnover of one generation for the species (approx. 13 days under lab conditions). Survival scoring started from 5 days after egg laying and continued every 2 days for a total of five time points (day 5, 7, 9, 11 and 13), when over 50% of surviving individuals had reached adulthood. At each time point, the number of alive individuals and their life stage were scored, along with the cause of death of the dead individuals.
Population growth on full honeysuckle plants
Store-bought honeysuckle plants were defoliated, replanted in new soil and placed inside a mite-proof cage under standard greenhouse conditions. Experimental plants were used within 4 weeks of planting, but several replicates showed signs of infection by powdery mildew. The number of green leaves and estimates of the percentage of the plant covered by mildew were noted before mite infestation (T0). At T0, each plant was infested with 30 mites from population C1N1a or mites from population C2N3a. After two generations (i.e. ~40 days later), adult female mites were counted non-invasively, and damage by mildew was assessed as at T0. Two blocks of the experiment were performed consecutively and were set up with 4 replicates per line each, for a total of 8 replicates for C1N1a and 8 replicates for C2N3a. Plants were watered once a week during the experiments.
Statistics and reproducibility
Crossing bioassays between host-associated populations
A mixed-effects linear model (package lme4 in R v. 3.6.1) was fitted to analyze the effect of hybridization on (1) P0 and F1 egg clutch size per female per day, (2) F1 and F2 female mortality, (3) F1 and F2 egg hatchability, (4) F1 and F2 juvenile survival to adulthood, and (5) F1 sex ratio. ‘Crossing treatment’ was used as a fixed effect; iso-female line, and experimental box within experiment were used as independent random effects in each model. Sample sizes are specified in Supplementary Tables 2 and 3. When a main significant effect of the crossing treatment was found, significance of pairwise comparisons between crossing scheme pairs were determined using linear hypotheses with a Tukey correction for multiple testing. Basic model assumptions of residual normal distribution and homoscedasticity were assessed for each fitted model and data were log+1 transformed when these assumptions were violated. To compare the frequency of sterile versus fertile females between crosses, we performed a chi-square test of independence and a post-hoc test with multiple pairwise comparisons with a Bonferroni correction to account for multiple comparisons. Sample sizes for crosses between compatible and incompatible lines are specified in Supplementary Fig. 8.
Reproductive performance on different hosts
Differences in the average eggs/female/day between nucleotypes were assessed using a linear mixed model in R (package lme4 in R v. 3.6.1), in which the response variable was the number of eggs/female/day log+1 transformed to meet model assumptions. The average number of eggs/female/day was compared within each host tested, with nucleotype as the fixed factor with three levels (C1N1, C2N2 and C3N3) and iso-female line as the random factor. Between 64 to 80 females from C1N1, C2N2 or C3N3 were tested on each plant species. Females that died before day 1 of the experiment were eliminated from the analyses.
Juvenile survival on detached honeysuckle twigs
Differences in the mean proportion of surviving individuals per time point between members of each pair were analysed using a mixed-linear effects model (package lme4 in R v. 3.6.1). As a response variable, we included the average proportion of individuals alive, square-root-transformed to meet model assumptions. The model parameters, fixed and random, were defined by comparing a full model to reduced versions of it and choosing the one with the lowest Akaike’s information criterion (AIC) score. The full model was defined as: sqrt(alive.percentage) ~ genotype + (1| leaf side) + (1 | genotype:leaf side) + (1 | population:replicate) + (1 | replicate:genotype). The best fitting model was a reduced model, defined as: sqrt(alive.percentage) ~ genotype + (1|leaf side) + (1 | replicate:genotype), where mite iso-female line (genotype) was the fixed effect, and leaf side and replicate per genotype were set as random effects. Sample size n = 12 leaves, 6 with the bottom side up and 6 with the top side up.
Population growth on full honeysuckle plants
We fitted a mixed linear model to test whether the initial conditions of the experimental plants differed significantly between each other. A term representing the interaction between the number of green leaves in each cage with the percentage of mildew covering them (leaves * mildew) was used as the response variable, line was a fixed factor, and block was used as a random factor. Another mixed linear model was used to assess the differences in the number of adult females on the plants after ~40 days between lines. To meet model assumptions, the log-transformed number of females was used as a response variable, the interaction between the final number of green leaves found and their percentage of mildew, line, and number of days since the beginning of the experiment were fixed factors, and block was used as random factor. Sample size n = 8 populations of each mite line, separated in 2 experimental blocks of 4 replicates per mite line.
Reporting summary
Further information on research design is available in the Nature Research Reporting Summary linked to this article.
Supplementary information
Acknowledgements
We thank Huyen Bui and Robert Greenhalgh for help with experiments or analyses and Astrid Bryon, Peter Demaeght, Sabina Bajda-Wybouw, Wannes Dermauw for help with inbreeding. This work was supported by the Institute for Biodiversity and Ecosystem Dynamics (IBED, TVL starters-grant), the Research Foundation Flanders (FWO, Belgium, G053815N to T.V.L.), the European Research Council (ERC) under the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation program (ERC consolidator grant 772026- POLYADAPT to T.V.L. and 773902-SuperPests to T.V.L.) and the US National Science Foundation (award 1457346 to R.M.C.).
Author contributions
E.V.P., T.V.L. and J.B. designed the experimental set up. E.V.P. conducted field surveys and experimental assays. S.S. and A.K. conducted the genomic analyses, under supervision of R.M.C. E.V.P., S.S. and A.K. analysed the data and drafted the manuscript. R.M.C., T.V.L. and J.B. supervised the writing, critically revised the manuscript and contributed to its final version. E.V.P., S.S. and A.K. designed the figures.
Data availability
Sequence data that support the findings of this study have been deposited in the following databases: CO1 sequences in GenBank with the accession codes MT814055-MT814210; whole-genome sequences of field-derived mite lines in SRA with accessions SAMN13693727-52; 16S bacterial sequences of field-derived mite lines in SRA with accessions SRR12491964-89 and of laboratory lines with accessions SRR12492212-14; whole-genome sequencing of Tetranychus urticae green and red morphs, and T. turkestani, T. kanzawai sequences in SRA under bioproject PRJNA530192. Datasets used to generate Figs. 1, 4, 5, Supplementary Figs. 2, 8 and 9, and Supplementary Tables 2 and 3 are available in figshare107. Additional datasets that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Footnotes
Peer review information Communications Biology thanks the anonymous reviewers for their contribution to the peer review of this work. Primary Handling Editors: Luciano Matzkin and Caitlin Karniski. Peer reviewer reports are available.
Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
These authors contributed equally: Ernesto Villacis-Perez, Simon Snoeck.
Contributor Information
Ernesto Villacis-Perez, Email: e.a.villacisperez@uva.nl.
Johannes A. J. Breeuwer, Email: j.a.j.breeuwer@uva.nl
Thomas Van Leeuwen, Email: Thomas.VanLeeuwen@UGent.be.
Supplementary information
The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1038/s42003-021-02380-y.
References
- 1.Mitter C, Farrell B, Wiegmann B. The phylogenetic study of adaptive zones: has phytophagy promoted insect diversification? Am. Naturalist. 1988;132:107–128. doi: 10.1086/284840. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Futuyma DJ, Agrawal AA. Macroevolution and the biological diversity of plants and herbivores. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA. 2009;106:18054–18061. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0904106106. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Forbes AA, et al. Revisiting the particular role of host shifts in initiating insect speciation. Evolution. 2017;71:1126–1137. doi: 10.1111/evo.13164. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Dres M, Mallet J. Host races in plant-feeding insects and their importance in sympatric speciation. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B: Biol. Sci. 2002;357:471–492. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2002.1059. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Futuyma DJ, Peterson SC. Genetic variation in the use of resources by insects. Annu. Rev. Entomol. 1985;30:217–238. doi: 10.1146/annurev.en.30.010185.001245. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Funk DJ. Of “host forms” and host races: terminological issues in ecological speciation. Int. J. Ecol. 2012;2012:1–8. doi: 10.1155/2012/506957. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Mikheev AV, Kreslavskii AG. Interrelations of the willow and birch races of Lochmaea capreae (Coleoptera, Chrysomelidae) with their food-plants. Zoologicheskii Zhurnal. 1980;59:705–714. [Google Scholar]
- 8.Walsh B. The apple-worm and the apple maggot. J. Hortic. 1867;2:338–343. [Google Scholar]
- 9.Bush, G. L. The taxonomy, cytology, and evolution of the genus Rhagoletis in North America (Diptera, Tephritidae). Bulletin of the Museum of Comparative Zoology at Harvard College134, 431–562 (1966).
- 10.Doellman MM, et al. Standing geographic variation in eclosion time and the genomics of host race formation in Rhagoletis pomonella fruit flies. Ecol. Evol. 2019;9:393–409. doi: 10.1002/ece3.4758. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Via S. Reproductive isolation between sympatric races of pea aphids. I. Gene flow restriction and habitat choice. Evolution. 1999;53:1446–1457. doi: 10.1111/j.1558-5646.1999.tb05409.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Via S, Bouck AC, Skillman S. Reproductive isolation between divergent races of pea aphids on two hosts. II. Selection against migrants and hybrids in the parental environments. Evolution. 2000;54:1626–1637. doi: 10.1111/j.0014-3820.2000.tb00707.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Peccoud J, Ollivier A, Plantegenest M, Simon JC. A continuum of genetic divergence from sympatric host races to species in the pea aphid complex. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. USA. 2009;106:7495–7500. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0811117106. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Nikolakakis N, Margaritopoulos J, Tsitsipis J. Performance of Myzus persicae (Hemiptera: Aphididae) clones on different host-plants and their host preference. Bull. Entomological Res. 2003;93:235. doi: 10.1079/BER2003230. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Margaritopoulos JT, Malarky G, Tsitsipis JA, Blackman RL. Microsatellite DNA and behavioural studies provide evidence of host-mediated speciation in Myzus persicae (Hemiptera: Aphididae) Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 2007;91:687–702. doi: 10.1111/j.1095-8312.2007.00828.x. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Huxley J. Clines: an auxiliary taxonomic principle. Nature. 1938;142:219–220. doi: 10.1038/142219a0. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Endler, J. A. Geographic Variation, Speciation, and Clines (Princeton University Press, 1977). [PubMed]
- 18.Doebeli M, Dieckmann U. Speciation along environmental gradients. Nature. 2003;421:259–264. doi: 10.1038/nature01274. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Levene H. Genetic equilibrium when more than one ecological niche is available. Am. Naturalist. 1953;87:331–333. doi: 10.1086/281792. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Gloss AD, Groen SC, Whiteman NK. A genomic perspective on the generation and maintenance of genetic diversity in herbivorous insects. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Evol. Syst. 2016;47:165–187. doi: 10.1146/annurev-ecolsys-121415-032220. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Kawecki TJ, Ebert D. Conceptual issues in local adaptation. Ecol. Lett. 2004;7:1225–1241. doi: 10.1111/j.1461-0248.2004.00684.x. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Bernays E, Graham M. On the evolution of host specificity in phytophagous arthropods. Ecology. 1988;69:886–892. doi: 10.2307/1941237. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Nosil P. Transition rates between specialization and generalization in phytophagous insects. Evolution. 2002;56:1701–1706. doi: 10.1111/j.0014-3820.2002.tb01482.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Forister ML, et al. The global distribution of diet breadth in insect herbivores. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA. 2015;112:442–447. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1423042112. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Ali JG, Agrawal AA. Specialist versus generalist insect herbivores and plant defense. Trends plant Sci. 2012;17:293–302. doi: 10.1016/j.tplants.2012.02.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Goldman-Huertas B, et al. Evolution of herbivory in Drosophilidae linked to loss of behaviors, antennal responses, odorant receptors, and ancestral diet. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA. 2015;112:3026–3031. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1424656112. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Van Leeuwen T, Dermauw W. The molecular evolution of xenobiotic metabolism and resistance in chelicerate mites. Annu. Rev. Entomol. 2016;61:475–498. doi: 10.1146/annurev-ento-010715-023907. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Liu S-s, Colvin J, De Barro PJ. Species concepts as applied to the whitefly Bemisia tabaci systematics: how many species are there? J. Integr. Agriculture. 2012;11:176–186. doi: 10.1016/S2095-3119(12)60002-1. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Rafter M, Walter G. Generalising about generalists? A perspective on the role of pattern and process in investigating herbivorous insects that use multiple host species. Arthropod-Plant Interact. 2020;14:1–20. doi: 10.1007/s11829-019-09737-5. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Jeppson, L. R., Keifer, H. H. & Baker, E. W. Mites Injurious to Economic Plants (Univ of California Press, 1975).
- 31.Migeon, A., Nouguier, E. & Dorkeld, F. in Trends in Acarology, 557–560 (Springer, 2010).
- 32.Auger P, Migeon A, Ueckermann EA, Tiedt L, Navajas M. Evidence for synonymy between Tetranychus urticae and Tetranychus cinnabarinus (Acari, Prostigmata, Tetranychidae): review and new data. Acarologia. 2013;53:383–415. doi: 10.1051/acarologia/20132102. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Egas M, Sabelis MW. Adaptive learning of host preference in a herbivorous arthropod. Ecol. Lett. 2001;4:190–195. doi: 10.1046/j.1461-0248.2001.00219.x. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Agrawal AA. Host-range evolution: adaptation and trade-offs in fitness of mites on alternative hosts. Ecology. 2000;81:500–508. doi: 10.1890/0012-9658(2000)081[0500:HREAAT]2.0.CO;2. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Agrawal AA, Vala F, Sabelis MW. Induction of preference and performance after acclimation to novel hosts in a phytophagous spider mite: adaptive plasticity? Am. Naturalist. 2002;159:553–565. doi: 10.1086/339463. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Tsagkarakou A, Navajas M, Lagnel J, Pasteur N. Population structure in the spider mite Tetranychus urticae (Acari: Tetranychidae) from Crete based on multiple allozymes. Heredity. 1997;78:84–92. doi: 10.1038/hdy.1997.10. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Tsagkarakou A, Navajas M, Rousset F, Pasteur N. Genetic differentiation in Tetranychus urticae (Acari: Tetranychidae) from greenhouses in France. Exp. Appl. Acarol. 1999;23:365–378. doi: 10.1023/A:1006293627880. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Navajas M. Host plant associations in the spider mite Tetranychus urticae (Acari: Tetranychidae): insights from molecular phylogeography. Exp. Appl. Acarol. 1998;22:201–214. doi: 10.1023/A:1006062214318. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Navajas M, Fenton B. The application of molecular markers in the study of diversity in acarology: a review. Exp. Appl. Acarol. 2000;24:751–774. doi: 10.1023/A:1006497906793. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Weeks AR, van Opijnen T, Breeuwer JAJ. AFLP fingerprinting for assessing intraspecific variation and genome mapping in mites. Exp. Appl. Acarol. 2000;24:775–793. doi: 10.1023/A:1006486400800. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Ben-David T, Melamed S, Gerson U, Morin S. ITS2 sequences as barcodes for identifying and analyzing spider mites (Acari: Tetranychidae) Exp. Appl. Acarol. 2007;41:169–181. doi: 10.1007/s10493-007-9058-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Magalhães S, Fayard J, Janssen A, Carbonell D, Olivieri I. Adaptation in a spider mite population after long-term evolution on a single host plant. J. Evolut. Biol. 2007;20:2016–2027. doi: 10.1111/j.1420-9101.2007.01365.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Hurtado MA, Ansaloni T, Cros-Arteil S, Jacas JA, Navajas M. Sequence analysis of the ribosomal internal transcribed spacers region in spider mites (Prostigmata: Tetranychidae) occurring in citrus orchards in Eastern Spain: use for species discrimination. Ann. Appl. Biol. 2008;153:167–174. [Google Scholar]
- 44.Calatayud J, et al. Geography and major host evolutionary transitions shape the resource use of plant parasites. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA. 2016;113:9840–9845. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1608381113. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Jonckheere W, et al. A gene family coding for salivary proteins (SHOT) of the polyphagous spider mite Tetranychus urticae exhibits fast host-dependent transcriptional plasticity. Mol. Plant-Microbe Interact. 2018;31:112–124. doi: 10.1094/MPMI-06-17-0139-R. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Snoeck S, Wybouw N, Van Leeuwen T, Dermauw W. Transcriptomic plasticity in the arthropod generalist Tetranychus urticae upon long-term acclimation to different host plants. G3. 2018;8:3865–3879. doi: 10.1534/g3.118.200585. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Wybouw N, et al. Long-term population studies uncover the genome structure and genetic basis of xenobiotic and host plant adaptation in the herbivore Tetranychus urticae. Genetics. 2019;211:1409–1427. doi: 10.1534/genetics.118.301803. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.de Boer R. Genetic affinities between spider mite Tetranychus urticae (Acarina:Tetranychidae) populations in a non-agricultural area. Entomologia Experimentalis et. Applicata. 1980;28:22–28. doi: 10.1111/j.1570-7458.1980.tb02983.x. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 49.de Boer R. Genetic affinities between spider mite Tetranychus urticae populations in a non‐agricultural area II. Entomologia Experimentalis et. Applicata. 1981;30:63–67. doi: 10.1111/j.1570-7458.1981.tb03585.x. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Hinomoto N, Takafuji A. Genetic changes in the population structure of the two-spotted spider mite, Tetranychus urticae Koch (Acari: Tetranychidae), on vinyl-house strawberries. Appl. Entomol. Zool. 1995;30:521–528. doi: 10.1303/aez.30.521. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Tsagkarakou A, Navajas M, Papaioannou‐Souliotis P, Nicole P. Gene flow among Tetranychus urticae (Acari: Tetranychidae) populations in Greece. Mol. Ecol. 2002;7:71–79. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-294x.1998.00305.x. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Sun JT, Lian C, Navajas M, Hong XY. Microsatellites reveal a strong subdivision of genetic structure in Chinese populations of the mite Tetranychus urticae Koch (Acari: Tetranychidae) BMC Genet. 2012;13:8. doi: 10.1186/1471-2156-13-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Boudreaux HB. Biological aspects of some phytophagous mites. Annu. Rev. Entomol. 1963;8:137–154. doi: 10.1146/annurev.en.08.010163.001033. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Helle W, Pieterse A. Genetic affinities between adjacent populations of spider mites (Tetranychus urticae Koch) Entomologia Experimentalis et Applicata. 1965;8:305–308. doi: 10.1111/j.1570-7458.1965.tb00866.x. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Overmeer W, Van Zon A. Partial reproductive incompatibility between populations of spider mites (Acarina: Tetranychidae) Entomologia Experimentalis et Applicata. 1976;20:225–236. doi: 10.1111/j.1570-7458.1976.tb02639.x. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Gotoh T, Tokioka T. Genetic compatibility among diapausing red, non-diapausing red and diapausing green forms of the two-spotted spider mite, Tetranychus urticae Koch (Acari: Tetranychidae) Jpn. J. Entomol. 1996;64:215–225. [Google Scholar]
- 57.Breeuwer JAJ. Wolbachia and cytoplasmic incompatibility in the spider mites Tetranychus urticae and T. turkestani. Heredity. 1997;79:41–47. doi: 10.1038/hdy.1997.121. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 58.Tien NS, Sabelis MW, Egas M. The maintenance of genetic variation for oviposition rate in two-spotted spider mites: inferences from artificial selection. Evolution. 2010;64:2547–2557. doi: 10.1111/j.1558-5646.2010.00996.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59.Ros VI, Breeuwer JA. Spider mite (Acari: Tetranychidae) mitochondrial COI phylogeny reviewed: host plant relationships, phylogeography, reproductive parasites and barcoding. Exp. Appl. Acarol. 2007;42:239–262. doi: 10.1007/s10493-007-9092-z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60.Helle, W. & Sabelis, M. W. Spider Mites: their Biology, Natural Enemies and Control (Elsevier Science Publishers B.V., 1985).
- 61.Peterson MA, Denno RF. The influence of dispersal and diet breadth on patterns of genetic isolation by distance in phytophagous insects. Am. Naturalist. 1998;152:428–446. doi: 10.1086/286180. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62.Cogni R, Futuyma DJ. Local adaptation in a plant herbivore interaction depends on the spatial scale. Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 2009;97:494–502. doi: 10.1111/j.1095-8312.2009.01234.x. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 63.Cogni R, Trigo JR, Futuyma DJ. Varying herbivore population structure correlates with lack of local adaptation in a geographic variable plant-herbivore interaction. PLoS ONE. 2011;6:e29220. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0029220. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 64.Naranjo, S. E., Castle, S. J., De Barro, P. J. & Liu, S.-S. in Bemisia: Bionomics and Management of a Global Pest Ch. Chapter 6, 185–226 (2009).
- 65.De Barro P. Genetic structure of the whitefly Bemisia tabaci in the Asia–Pacific region revealed using microsatellite markers. Mol. Ecol. 2005;14:3695–3718. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-294X.2005.02700.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 66.Shih, C.-I. T. & Shiue, S.-P. Copulation competition of male Tetranychus urticae Koch and Tetranychus kanzawai Kishida (Acarina: Tetranychidae) with conspecific and heterospecific females and their isolation mechanism. 中華昆蟲 15, vi+ 239–255 (1995).
- 67.Ben-David T, Gerson U, Morin S. Asymmetric reproductive interference between two closely related spider mites: Tetranychus urticae and T. turkestani (Acari: Tetranychidae) Exp. Appl. Acarol. 2009;48:213–227. doi: 10.1007/s10493-008-9228-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 68.Sugasawa J, Kitashima Y, Gotoh T. Hybrid affinities between the green and the red forms of the two-spotted spider mite Tetranychus urticae (Acari: Tetranychidae) under laboratory and semi-natural conditions. Appl. Entomol. Zool. 2002;37:127–139. doi: 10.1303/aez.2002.127. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 69.Charlesworth B, Nordborg M, Charlesworth D. The effects of local selection, balanced polymorphism and background selection on equilibrium patterns of genetic diversity in subdivided populations. Genet. Res. 1997;70:155–174. doi: 10.1017/S0016672397002954. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 70.Charlesworth D, Willis JH. The genetics of inbreeding depression. Nat. Rev. Genet. 2009;10:783–796. doi: 10.1038/nrg2664. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 71.James TY, et al. Adaptation by loss of heterozygosity in Saccharomyces cerevisiae clones under divergent selection. Genetics. 2019;213:665–683. doi: 10.1534/genetics.119.302411. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 72.Werren, J. H. The evolution of inbreeding in haplodiploid organisms. The natural history of inbreeding and outbreeding 42–59 (1993).
- 73.Mori K, Saito Y, Sakagami T, Sahara K. Inbreeding depression of female fecundity by genetic factors retained in natural populations of a male-haploid social mite (Acari: Tetranychidae) Exp. Appl. Acarol. 2005;36:15–23. doi: 10.1007/s10493-004-8151-y. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 74.Henter HJ. Inbreeding depression and haplodiploidy: experimental measures in a parasitoid and comparisons across diploid and haplodiploid insect taxa. Evolution. 2003;57:1793–1803. doi: 10.1111/j.0014-3820.2003.tb00587.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 75.Breeuwer JAJ, Werren JH. Microorganisms associated with chromosome destruction and reproductive isolation between two insect species. Nature. 1990;346:558–560. doi: 10.1038/346558a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 76.Groot TV, Breeuwer JAJ. Cardinium symbionts induce haploid thelytoky in most clones of three closely related Brevipalpus species. Exp. Appl. Acarol. 2006;39:257–271. doi: 10.1007/s10493-006-9019-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 77.Breeuwer JAJ, Werren JH. Hybrid breakdown between two haplodiploid species: the role of nuclear and cytoplasmic genes. Evolution. 1995;49:705–717. doi: 10.1111/j.1558-5646.1995.tb02307.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 78.Perrot-Minnot MJ, Migeon A, Navajas M. Intergenomic interactions affect female reproduction: evidence from introgression and inbreeding depression in a haplodiploid mite. Heredity. 2004;93:551–558. doi: 10.1038/sj.hdy.6800552. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 79.Hill GE. Mitonuclear ecology. Mol. Biol. Evol. 2015;32:1917–1927. doi: 10.1093/molbev/msv104. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 80.Knegt B, et al. Detection of genetic incompatibilities in non-model systems using simple genetic markers: hybrid breakdown in the haplodiploid spider mite Tetranychus evansi. Heredity. 2017;118:311–321. doi: 10.1038/hdy.2016.103. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 81.Gibson JD, Niehuis O, Peirson BR, Cash EI, Gadau J. Genetic and developmental basis of F2 hybrid breakdown in Nasonia parasitoid wasps. Evolution. 2013;67:2124–2132. doi: 10.1111/evo.12080. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 82.Beukeboom LW, Koevoets T, Morales HE, Ferber S, van de Zande L. Hybrid incompatibilities are affected by dominance and dosage in the haplodiploid wasp Nasonia. Front. Genet. 2015;6:140. doi: 10.3389/fgene.2015.00140. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 83.Ballard JWO, Rand DM. The population biology of mitochondrial DNA and its phylogenetic implications. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Evol. Syst. 2005;36:621–642. doi: 10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.36.091704.175513. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 84.Baris TZ, Blier PU, Pichaud N, Crawford DL, Oleksiak MF. Gene by environmental interactions affecting oxidative phosphorylation and thermal sensitivity. Am. J. Physiol. Regul. Integr. Comp. Physiol. 2016;311:R157–R165. doi: 10.1152/ajpregu.00008.2016. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 85.Burton RS, Pereira RJ, Barreto FS. Cytonuclear genomic interactions and hybrid breakdown. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Evol. Syst. 2013;44:281–302. doi: 10.1146/annurev-ecolsys-110512-135758. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 86.Yano S, Wakabayashi M, Takabayashi J, Takafuji A. Factors determining the host plant range of the phytophagous mite, Tetranychus urticae (Acari: Tetranychidae): a method for quantifying host plant acceptance. Exp. Appl. Acarol. 1998;22:595–601. doi: 10.1023/A:1006138527904. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 87.Yano S, Takabayashi J, Takafuji A. Trade-offs in performance on different plants may not restrict the host plant range of the phytophagous mite, Tetranychus urticae. Exp. Appl. Acarol. 2001;25:371–381. doi: 10.1023/A:1017926017081. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 88.Gould F. Rapid host range evolution in a population of the phytophagous mite Tetranychus urticae Koch. Evolution. 1979;33:791–802. doi: 10.1111/j.1558-5646.1979.tb04735.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 89.Fry JD. Trade-offs in fitness on different hosts: evidence from a selection experiment with a phytophagous mite. Am. Naturalist. 1990;136:569–580. doi: 10.1086/285116. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 90.Gotoh T, Bruin J, Sabelis M, Menken SBJ. Host race formation in Tetranychus urticae: genetic differentiation, host plant preference, and mate choice in a tomato and a cucumber strain. Entomologia Experimentalis et Applicata. 1993;68:171–178. doi: 10.1111/j.1570-7458.1993.tb01700.x. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 91.Magalhães S, Blanchet E, Egas M, Olivieri I. Are adaptation costs necessary to build up a local adaptation pattern? BMC Evolutinary. Biology. 2009;9:182. doi: 10.1186/1471-2148-9-182. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 92.Tien NS, Sabelis MW, Egas M. Inbreeding depression and purging in a haplodiploid: gender-related effects. Heredity. 2015;114:327–332. doi: 10.1038/hdy.2014.106. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 93.Folmer O, Black M, Hoeh W, Lutz R, Vrijenhoek R. DNA primers for amplification of mitochondrial cytochrome c oxidase subunit I from diverse metazoan invertebrates. Mol. Mar. Biol. Biotechnol. 1994;3:294–299. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 94.Li, H. Aligning sequence reads, clone sequences and assembly contigs with BWA-MEM. arXiv:1303.3997. Preprint at https://arxiv.org/abs/1303.3997 (2013).
- 95.Katoh K, Misawa K, Kuma K, Miyata T. MAFFT: a novel method for rapid multiple sequence alignment based on fast Fourier transform. Nucleic Acids Res. 2002;30:3059–3066. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkf436. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 96.Robinson JT, et al. Integrative genomics viewer. Nat. Biotechnol. 2011;29:24–26. doi: 10.1038/nbt.1754. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 97.Wybouw N, et al. Convergent evolution of cytochrome P450s underlies independent origins of keto-carotenoid pigmentation in animals. Proc. R. Soc. B. 2019;286:20191039. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2019.1039. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 98.Lanfear R, Frandsen PB, Wright AM, Senfeld T, Calcott B. PartitionFinder 2: new methods for selecting partitioned models of evolution for molecular and morphological phylogenetic analyses. Mol. Biol. Evol. 2017;34:772–773. doi: 10.1093/molbev/msw260. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 99.Stamatakis A. RAxML version 8: a tool for phylogenetic analysis and post-analysis of large phylogenies. Bioinformatics. 2014;30:1312–1313. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btu033. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 100.Gascuel O. BIONJ: an improved version of the NJ algorithm based on a simple model of sequence data. Mol. Biol. Evol. 1997;14:685–695. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a025808. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 101.Guindon S, et al. New algorithms and methods to estimate maximum-likelihood phylogenies: assessing the performance of PhyML 3.0. Syst. Biol. 2010;59:307–321. doi: 10.1093/sysbio/syq010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 102.Gouy M, Guindon S, Gascuel O. SeaView version 4: a multiplatform graphical user interface for sequence alignment and phylogenetic tree building. Mol. Biol. Evol. 2010;27:221–224. doi: 10.1093/molbev/msp259. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 103.Zheng, X. A Tutorial for the R/Bioconductor Package SNPRelate (2015).
- 104.Zheng X, et al. A high-performance computing toolset for relatedness and principal component analysis of SNP data. Bioinformatics. 2012;28:3326–3328. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/bts606. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 105.Cockerham CC, Weir BS. Estimation of inbreeding parameters in stratified populations. Ann. Hum. Genet. 1986;50:271–281. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-1809.1986.tb01048.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 106.Pfeifer B, Wittelsburger U, Ramos-Onsins SE, Lercher MJ. PopGenome: an efficient Swiss army knife for population genomic analyses in R. Mol. Biol. Evolultion. 2014;31:1929–1936. doi: 10.1093/molbev/msu136. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 107.Villacis-Perez, E. Adaptive divergence and post-zygotic barriers to gene flow between sympatric populations of a herbivorous mite. Dataset Collection10.21942/uva.c.5447778.v1 (2021). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Data Availability Statement
Sequence data that support the findings of this study have been deposited in the following databases: CO1 sequences in GenBank with the accession codes MT814055-MT814210; whole-genome sequences of field-derived mite lines in SRA with accessions SAMN13693727-52; 16S bacterial sequences of field-derived mite lines in SRA with accessions SRR12491964-89 and of laboratory lines with accessions SRR12492212-14; whole-genome sequencing of Tetranychus urticae green and red morphs, and T. turkestani, T. kanzawai sequences in SRA under bioproject PRJNA530192. Datasets used to generate Figs. 1, 4, 5, Supplementary Figs. 2, 8 and 9, and Supplementary Tables 2 and 3 are available in figshare107. Additional datasets that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.