Skip to main content
Molecules logoLink to Molecules
. 2021 Jun 28;26(13):3943. doi: 10.3390/molecules26133943

CD47 in the Brain and Neurodegeneration: An Update on the Role in Neuroinflammatory Pathways

Seyed Mohammad Gheibihayat 1, Ricardo Cabezas 2, Nikita G Nikiforov 3,4, Tannaz Jamialahmadi 5,6, Thomas P Johnston 7, Amirhossein Sahebkar 8,9,10,11,*
Editors: Xiaoyuan Mao, Weilin Jin, Yi Wang
PMCID: PMC8271744  PMID: 34203368

Abstract

CD47 is a receptor belonging to the immunoglobulin (Ig) superfamily and broadly expressed on cell membranes. Through interactions with ligands such as SIRPα, TSP-1, integrins, and SH2-domain bearing protein tyrosine phosphatase substrate-1 (SHPS-1), CD47 regulates numerous functions like cell adhesion, proliferation, apoptosis, migration, homeostasis, and the immune system. In this aspect, previous research has shown that CD47 modulates phagocytosis via macrophages, the transmigration of neutrophils, and the activation of T-cells, dendritic cells, and B-cells. Moreover, several studies have reported the increased expression of the CD47 receptor in a variety of diseases, including acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL), chronic myeloid leukemia, non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma (NHL), multiple myeloma (MM), bladder cancer, acute myeloid leukemia (AML), Gaucher disease, Multiple Sclerosis and stroke among others. The ubiquitous expression of the CD47 cell receptor on most resident cells of the CNS has previously been established through different methodologies. However, there is little information concerning its precise functions in the development of different neurodegenerative pathologies in the CNS. Consequently, further research pertaining to the specific functions and roles of CD47 and SIRP is required prior to its exploitation as a druggable approach for the targeting of various neurodegenerative diseases that affect the human population. The present review attempts to summarize the role of both CD47 and SIRP and their therapeutic potential in neurodegenerative disorders.

Keywords: CD47, SIRPα, neurodegeneration, multiple sclerosis, stroke, Alzheimer, Parkinson

1. Introduction

CD47, known as cluster of differentiation 47 or IAP (integrin associated protein), is a widely expressed transmembrane glycoprotein of 50 kDa belonging to the immunoglobulin (Ig) superfamily, which possesses 5 transmembrane domains of interaction. Through interactions with its ligands such as SIRPα, TSP-1, integrins, and SHPS-1, CD47 regulates numerous functions like cell adhesion, proliferation, apoptosis, migration, homeostasis, phagocytosis via macrophages–“don’t eat me signal”, neutrophils migration, and T-cells, B-cells and dendritic cells activation [1,2]. Moreover, several studies have shown that CD47 receptor expression is significantly increased in a variety of diseases, including non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma (NHL), acute myeloid leukemia (AML), acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL), chronic myeloid leukemia, multiple myeloma, bladder cancer, Gaucher disease, Multiple Sclerosis and stroke among others [3,4,5].

The expression of a signal regulatory protein (SIRP), also known as CD172 and its ligand CD47 (also known as integrin-related protein), has been demonstrated to occur on the surface of microglial cells, hippocampal neurons, olygodendrocytes, and astrocytes. In this aspect, it seems like the interaction of SIRP with CD47 is crucial for cell-to-cell communication in the brain both in normal and pathological conditions [5,6,7]. During neurological disorders, CD47 functions as a key neuroimmune modulator responding to chronic and acute CNS injuries and in the process of recovery [5,8]. Additionally, CD47 has broad involvement in the death of neuronal cells, inflammation, and the development of acute ischemic brain injuries [9,10]. The present review attempts to summarize the role of CD47 and its associated receptor SIRPα (signal regulatory protein α) during the development of neurodegenerative disorders such as Multiple Sclerosis, Stroke, Parkinson’s, Alzheimer and traumatic brain injury among others. Finally, the therapeutic potential of SIRP and CD47 as reported by different models will also be examined.

2. Neuroimmune Regulatory Proteins (NIRegs) and CD47 in the CNS

NIREGs are functionally neuroimmune proteins involved in the regulation of the innate immune response and the duration of inflammatory response in the host (Figure 1). These regulators include the proteins CX3CL1, CD47, and CD200, constitutively expressed by neurons, astrocytes, oligodendrocytes, and microglia, and involved in tissue resilience [11,12]. Moreover, CD47, CD95L, CD55, CD200, fH, and CD46, all NIREGs, have been shown to contribute to downregulate immunity at the molecular and cellular levels and, thereby, suppress inflammation in the brain and other organs [13].

Figure 1.

Figure 1

NIREGs such as CD47 provide “don’t eat me signals” and keep microglia in a homeostatic state. Adapted from [14].

Interestingly, it has been shown that oligodendrocytes can express both CD47 and CD200 in order to control microglia behavior and inhibit specific immune reactions in the CNS [15]. Furthermore, oligodendrocytes express SEMA3A [16], which plays a role in inducing microglia apoptosis [17]. Additionally, the expression of NIRegs via oligodendrocytes is highly important in the modulation of the immune response in the brain [18]. Furthermore, another study determined that oligodendrocytes also express FasL which is a type-II transmembrane protein that belongs to the tumor necrosis factor (TNF) family [19]. FasL is able to potentially stimulate apoptosis on FAS (FS-7-associated surface antigen) expressing activated T and NK cells [20] and as a result, limits the inflammatory processes in the brain [15].

Other NIREGS such as CD47, CD200, and CX3CL1 are important in tissue resilience in neurons or through the interaction with co-receptors (SIRPα, CD200R, and CX3CR1) in microglia, modulating the phenotypes from resting to an activated state, among other functions [14]. Importantly, it was recently shown that the expression patterns of both CD47 and SIRPα, prevent excessive microglial phagocytosis and synaptic pruning in the dorsal lateral geniculate nucleus in mice [21]. In the following sections, the numerous roles of CD47 and its receptor SIRPα will be explored along with their signaling mechanisms.

CD47 Signaling Interactions: The Role of SIRPα

SIRPα is an inhibitory receptor with high-affinity interaction for CD47 in brain cells and other tissues. This protein belongs to the SIRP family of receptors which comprise SIRPα, SIRPβ, and SIRPγ as well as soluble SIRPδ members [5,22]. Accumulating evidence shows that the interaction between SIRP and CD47 is important in mediating the cell-cell communication in the brain through different modulatory processes of the microglia [5]. In this aspect, both SIRPα and SIRPβ1 have been shown to be expressed in microglia with different homeostatic functions [23].

Furthermore, various studies have examined the structural interactions and signaling pathways activated by SIRPα/CD47 [24]. In this aspect, both structural and mutagenesis research have produced information concerning structural requirements for the interaction between SIRPα and CD47. Extracellular portions of SIRPα consist of three IgSF domains, including two membrane-proximal IgC domains and one membrane-distal IgV domain (N-terminal). Previous research has shown that the N-terminal IgV domain of SIRPα binds to CD47 [25]. However, for CD47, the extracellular IgV-like fold is responsible for its interactions with SIRPα and its association with three integrins [23]. Within the SIRPα/CD47 complex, four loop structures (i.e., the BC, C’D, DE, and FG loops) at the end of the IgV SIRPα domain create an interface for the specific structural features of CD47 (i.e., the BC and FG loops, C’ strand around the FG loop, and N-terminal pyroglutamic acid) [24]. Though extracellular areas of SIRPα and SIRPβ1 have a degree of homology, CD47 binds to SIRPα (and SIRPγ), but it does not bind to SIRPβ1 [23]. Results from other studies have ascribed the aforementioned binding specificity to supplemental loops within SIRPs, which allow minor sequence modifications that can produce significant alterations in binding affinity [24]. In addition, SIRPβ1 expression has been determined to occur on the cell surface as a disulfide-linked homodimer, which forms via Cys-320-mediated binding in the membrane-proximal Ig loop [26]. However, currently, there is insufficient information about the SIRPβ ligand.

Basically, receptors in the immunoglobulin superfamily react with the ‘turning off’ signal and thus modulate microglia activation, migration, and phagocytosis [27]. This regulation occurs through a cytoplasmic-domain, immuno-receptor tyrosine-based inhibition motif (ITIM), whereas receptor activation during microglia regulation occurs by a cytoplasmic-domain ITAM [27]. It is notable that the cytoplasmic region of SIRPα, as one of the receptors that recognize the off-signal, consists of two ITIM with four strongly conserved tyrosine residues. In addition, SIRPα ligation via CD47 would induce phosphorylation of these tyrosine residues. Moreover, both C-terminal tyrosine phosphorylation sites; that is, the Y47 and the Y449 sites, create the docking sites for the inhibitory phosphatases SH2 domain-containing phosphatase (SHP)-1 and SHP-2 [28]. Hence, these phosphorylated residues work as de-phosphorylation sites for SHPs. Notably, SHP-2 and SHP-1 exert opposite biological functions [29] (Figure 2). According to some studies, SHP-1 negatively regulates diverse signaling paths to inhibit numerous cell functions. In contrast, SHP-2 positively regulates the signaling events that contribute to cellular activity like migration and growth. As an example, research has demonstrated that SIRPα is involved in the inhibition of macrophage phagocytosis by recruiting SHP-1 [30,31].

Figure 2.

Figure 2

The cell-to-cell cross-talk via the SIRPα-CD47 signaling. (A) Bi-directional signaling between CD47 and SIRPα. CD47 and SIRPα are possibly co-expressed on a similar cell and their ligation could mediate the inter-cellular signaling in a bi-directional manner. Even though SIRPα-CD47 signaling in the microglia is incompletely understood, the specific contribution of SIRPα and CD47 has been examined. Moreover, CD47 and SIRPα interactions could be observed in the phagocytic function of the microglia. (B) SIRP signaling in microglia. SIRPα phosphorylation enables the docking and the recruitment of SHP-1 and SHP-2. In this regard, various studies have shown that SHP-1 and SHP-2 perform opposite biological functions. Different signaling pathways have been negatively regulated by SHP-1 for the inhibition of numerous cell functions like phagocytosis. On the contrary, events affecting the cellular activity such as migration, as well as growth, have been shown to be positively regulated by SHP-2 [5]. Abbreviation: GPCR: G protein-coupled receptor, SIRPα: Signal regulatory protein α, SHP 1/2: SH2 domain-containing phosphatases 1 and 2, SHIP: SH2 domain-containing inositol phosphatase.

3. Bi-Directional Signaling between CD47 and SIRPα

One aspect that is specific to SIRPα-CD47 signaling is that both receptors may be co-expressed on a similar cell, and their subsequent ligation could potentially mediate intercellular signaling in a bi-directional manner [23] (Figure 2). The above property would be of particular importance in the CNS, wherein large overlaps in CD47 and SIRPα expression have been observed [30]. As an example, the expression of CD47 and SIRPα have been observed on the surface of hippocampal neurons; that is, SIRPα is found on dendrites and axons, whereas CD47 is limited to dendrites [30]. Another study showed the significant contribution of CD47-SIRPα interactions between neighboring neurons to the formation of the neuronal network in the hippocampus [32]. Accordingly, co-localization of CD47 and SIRPα has been observed in microglia, whereas myelin, Schwann cells, oligodendrocytes, and astrocytes express CD47 without SIRPα [33].

Even though SIRPα-CD47 signaling in microglia is not completely understood, the specific involvement of SIRPα with CD47 continues to be intensively investigated. As previously mentioned, both SIRPα and CD47 play a role in the phagocytic function of microglia, and in this aspect, the inhibition of microglial phagocytosis is mediated by SIRPα. Also, it has been reported that CD47 cooperates with other surface receptors like TLR4, CD36, scavenger receptor A, TLR2, and integrinα6β1 as a complex and affects microglial interaction with Aβ fibrils [34]. Subsequently, phagocytosis of Aβ fibrils activates intracellular signaling pathways and results in a pro-inflammatory response. These same authors also utilized acutely isolated microglia from mice of various ages and demonstrated a predominance of Aβ fibril phagocytosis in young microglia (harvested from day 0 pups) in a CD47-dependent manner; however, this effect was not observed in aged microglia obtained from 6-month-old mice [35]. Thus, it has been suggested that dysfunctional CD47 may be partly responsible for the non-existent phagocytosis observed with aged microglia. Moreover, SIRP/CD47 signaling was instrumental to the cerebral infiltration of circulating monocytes. Furthermore, interactions between CD47 on endothelial cells (ECs) and SIRP expressed on monocytes promoted the transmigration of monocytes in brain endothelium, which required G1-protein activation rather than monocyte adhesion [36].

4. CD47, SIRP and Neurodegeneration

Neurodegeneration is the progressive loss of structure or function of neurons, which could lead to their death. New research suggests that dietary nutrition helps prevent and cure neurological symptoms in a variety of conditions [37]. Recently, interdisciplinary research in neurology and immunology has established a link between overeating and inflammation in the brain, and in particular, the hypothalamus [38]. Moreover, neurodegenerative diseases may be followed by cognitive decline and seizures that are correlated to neuroinflammation [39]. Additionally, neurodegeneration is accompanied by homeostatic changes in other CNS cells like astrocytes, microglia, and oligodendrocytes in varied forms that include cellular activation, glial scar formation, and cell death [40]. In this aspect, both CD47 and SIRP receptors have been implied in the development of neurodegenerative pathologies and processes such as neuroinflammation, multiple sclerosis, Alzheimer’s, Stroke, spinal cord injuries among others. As mentioned before, during the development of neurological disorders, CD47 has been suggested to function as a key neuroimmune regulator in responding to chronic and acute CNS injuries and its recovery [5,8]. Moreover, CD47 has broad involvement in the death of neuronal cells, neuroinflammation, and the progression of acute ischemic brain injuries [9,10]. In the following sections, we explore the importance of both CD47 and SIRP receptors in different neurodegenerative processes, and their growing importance as therapeutic targets (Table 1).

Table 1.

CD47 effect in neurodegenerative diseases.

Neurodegenerative Diseases CD47 Effect Therapeutic Strategy References
Stroke Stimulation of disease CD47 blocking antibody [10,41]
Multiple Sclerosis Function during initiation and progression has opposing effects Modulating CD47 could be harmful and beneficial, depending on the context [42]
Alzheimer’s Disease Stimulation of disease Inhibition of CD47 [43]
Spinal Cord Injury Stimulation of disease Inhibition of CD47 [7]
Traumatic Brain Injury Progression of brain tissue damage and promotion of neutrophil infiltration Inhibition of CD47 [44]
Parkinson’s Disease Mediation of protective mechanisms Rac1/Akt activation. [45]

4.1. Stroke

It is widely accepted that cerebral ischemic injuries are correlated with various inflammatory events such as the infiltration of circulating immune cells (monocytes and neutrophils) and activation of resident cells [46]. Notably, among different types of leukocytes, neutrophils, which are the primary subtype of polymorphonuclear (PMN) leukocytes, are considered the first cells that undergo infiltration into the ischemic brain. Subsequently, the extravasated PMN leukocytes release lipid peroxidation products and reactive oxygen species and promote the disruption of the BBB, edema, vascular blockage, and infarction development [47]. Moreover, it has been suggested through in vitro experiments that the increase in the expression of adhesion moleculex may occur via CD47 signaling on the endothelium [48]. Such experimental results have advanced the premise that CD47 may possibly represent a potential anti-inflammatory target for the treatment of stroke.

Similarly, Jin et al. 2009, addressed the hypothesis of whether lack of the gene for CD47 would decrease the damage to focal ischemic brain injury [10]. Among its results, the authors determined through western blot, the absence of CD47 in the brains of the CD47 knockout mice, a significative loss of claudin-5 in the ischemic brains of the wild type mice when compared with CD47 knockout mice and an important reduction in neutrophil extravasation into the brain parenchyma in the CD47 knockout mice. Finally, a recent study in mice [41] showed that the use of CD47 blocking antibody speeded hematoma clearance and reduced brain injury after intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH), suggesting a possible clinical application in human patients. These combined results suggest the broad contribution of CD47 to neuroinflammation, as well as the involvement of integrin-associated-proteins in the promotion of neutrophil extravasation, MMP-9 up-regulation, brain swelling, and overall injury to the acute ischemic brain [10].

4.2. Multiple Sclerosis

Multiple sclerosis (MS) is one of the most complex neurodegenerative diseases with a heterogeneous pathology, wherein injury and repair frequently occur concurrently in the CNS tissue. Moreover, this process is frequently associated with significant inflammation in the myelinated areas of the CNS in the acute phase of the disease [49,50]. For this reason, there is a focus on a more complete elucidation of the molecular signature of MS through a rigorous analysis of genes, lipids, antibodies, and proteins involved in its development [51,52].

One investigation compared the proteomic and transcriptomic results from MS lesions with the same pathology and revealed CD47 downregulation at the messenger RNA level and lower protein levels [53]. Moreover, immuno-histochemical results from the above study demonstrated CD47 expression in foamy macrophages, reactive astrocytes in active MS lesions, and normal myelin. Han et al. [42] showed that CD47−/− mice were refractory to experimentally induced autoimmune encephalomyelitis (EAE) and suggested that this was caused by the failure of immune cell activation following immunization with the myelin antigen. In contrast, using a monoclonal antibody against CD47 in the mice at the peak time of paralysis worsened EAE severity and enhanced immune activation in the peripheral immune system [42]. Additionally, in vitro assays have demonstrated that myelin phagocytosis is promoted by blocking CD47 and that this effect is dependent upon SIRPα. As a result, phagocytosis and immune regulation are considered the primary mechanism(s) for CD47 signaling involved with autoimmune-based neuroinflammation. Thus, it has been concluded that CD47 has a dual role, with discordant impacts on the pathogenesis of EAE [42].

Phagocytosis of intact myelin, or myelin debris, by macrophages, has been shown to be enhanced by the complement protein 3bi (C3bi)-receptor 3 (CR3) interaction and suppressed by the CD47-SIRPα interaction. For example, according to results by Bruck and Friedel, when C3bi becomes attached to the Fc domains of anti-myelin debris, specific antibodies opsonized the myelin debris and accelerated phagocytosis via CR3+ macrophages [54,55,56].

Different researches have suggested the importance of CD47 in MS in macrophages around the active lesions and foamy macrophages and activated astrocytes around the active MS lesions [5,6,33,57]. An initial study by Gitik et al. [33] reported that recombinant anti-CD47 antibodies opsonized the CD47+ myelin debris and accelerated FCγR-mediated phagocytosis by SIRPα+ macrophages, suggesting that CD47 protein expressed by either myelin debris, or intact myelin, could be one of the crucial clues associated with the molecular dynamics of CNS repair during the course of demyelination in several neurodegenerative diseases [33]. Similarly, Mahesula et al. [57], using quantitative tandem mass spectrometry-based proteomics at numerous time points, reported a correlation of expression levels of CD47 and other related proteins with importance in the disease progression in the EAE animal model of MS, including MBP:223-228, which corresponded to the basic myelin protein, and MIF:79-87, which corresponded to a pro-inflammatory cytokine that suppresses migration of macrophages [57].

Moreover, Gao et al. examined how blocking CD47 with CD47-Fc fusion protein might affect the prevention and healing of EAE via the infiltration of Th17 cells into the CNS [6]. It was found that CD47 deficiency had no direct influence on migrating Th17 cells. In addition, it was found that inhibiting the degradation of iNOS by CD47 deficiency in the proteasome of macrophages (via the activation of Src) resulted in a greater rate of NO production and the suppression in the production of inflammasome activation-induced IL-1β by iNOSl. These results based on blocking CD47 may suggest a potent treatment strategy for the control of EAE progression [6].

4.3. Alzheimer’s Disease

During Alzheimer´s disease (AD) development, there is a progressive accumulation of amyloid-β (Aβ) peptides that ultimately form neuronal deposits called senile plaques on the outer surfaces of neurons and cause neuronal death and glial activation [58]. It has been assumed that Aβ binding to the plasma membrane is one of the key steps in developing AD, being the formation of Aβ plaques one of the primary triggers for the degeneration of neurons [59,60,61]. Additionally, multiple published reports suggest that NO generated by endothelial cells, as well as neuronal constitutive NOS, may play a neuroprotective role in the course of Aβ-induced cell death, whereas NO produced via iNOS activation appears to play a neurotoxic role due to the inflammatory response elicited by the overproduction of reactive nitrogen species [62,63,64]. It has also been reported that the increased levels of constitutive NO formed by iNOS protects beta-amyloid transgenic mice from the progression of a majority of humanoid symptoms characteristic of AD [65,66]. Moreover, it has been demonstrated that in the case of genetic crossing through an iNOS-null background, mice exhibit widespread tau pathology related to the areas of dense microvascular amyloid deposition. In this aspect, according to the findings of previous studies, Thrombospondin 1 (TSP1) binding to CD47 and CD36, mitigates soluble guanylate cyclase (sGC) activity and cGMP concentrations resulting in NO signaling inhibition in vascular cells [67]. Interestingly, different studies have attributed the protective contribution of NO to the NO/sGC/cGMP/cGK signaling cascades as it relates to the pathogenesis of AD [68,69]. In this aspect, another study has demonstrated the interaction between Aβ and the cell surface receptors CD47 and CD36, which causes TSP1 to inhibit the activation of sGC, suggesting a protective role for CD47 against Aβ activity [70]. Importantly, both receptors, CD36 and CD47, are considered crucial for Aβ to inhibit the accumulation of cGMP. Such results reflect the induction of the CD47-dependent signal via the interaction between Aβ and CD36, which inhibits the activation of sGC. Therefore, the findings described above, when taken together with the inhibition of free fatty acid transfer via CD36, provide a molecular rationale of how Aβ could potentially be involved in the NO signaling deficiency related to AD [70].

On the other hand, some investigations have suggested the involvement of mast cells in AD. Mast cells have been observed in greater numbers in AD brains in particular, close to the amyloid deposits [71]. Because mast cells express the β1-integrin subunit and the CD47 receptor [43,72], phagocytosis may include a cell surface complex similar to the complex described previously for microglial cells. It is important to note that numerous mast cell mediators are secreted by activated microglia, which ultimately contributes to chronic inflammation and neurotoxicity [73]. In this aspect, Niederhoffer et al. conducted a study [43], and their results showed a decrease in Aβ1-42 and fibrillar Aβ1-40 exocytosis by pretreatment with pertussis toxin, as well as antibodies against the CD47 receptor and β1-integrin subunits. In summary, these authors concluded that Aβ-induced activation of mast cells functions through a CD47/β1-integrin membrane complex coupled with G1-protein. These findings support the hypothesis that mast cells, similar to microglial cells, may significantly contribute to the pathogenesis of AD [43].

Finally, Karki and Nichols [74] also reported a basic contribution of CD47 to the release of microglia cytokines triggered by soluble Ab(1–42) protofibrils. In his study, the pretreatment of primary murine microglia with the CD47 antagonist peptide 4N1K significantly inhibited interleukin-1β (IL-1β) and tumor necrosis factor-α (TNFα) secretion stimulated by Ab(1–42) protofibrils. The findings by Karki et al. demonstrated that the microglial proinflammatory response to Aβ(1–42) protofibril is not dependent on CD47 and that 4N1K demonstrates CD47-independent inhibitory activity [74]. In conclusion, the presented combined results suggest an important role for CD47 and SIRPα in Alzheimer’s development and progression.

4.4. Spinal Cord Injury

Spinal cord injury (SCI) can induce a chronic wound state that undergoes expansion and maintains demyelination associated with an impaired recovery and progressive degeneration accompanied by maladaptive inflammation, and macrophage activation [75]. A preliminary study showed that TSP-1 activation of CD47 induced apoptosis using a caspase-dependent and -independent mechanism in cultivated cerebral cortical neurons and NB4 cells [76]. Moreover, TSP-1-mediated activation of CD47 increased cytotoxicity in CNS-derived EC cultures, although the alteration in the proliferation of the ECs was not evaluated [76]. Similarly, Myers et al. [7] demonstrated that CD47 bound to TSP-1 inhibits angiogenesis and that CD47 binding to SIRPα facilitated neutrophil diapedesis through ECs to the injured areas in a mice model. In the same study, functional improvements were not observed in TSP-1−/− mice when compared to wild-type mice, although CD47−/− mice exhibited greater locomotor development and sparing of white matter following contusive SCI. Moreover, the deletion of either CD47 or TSP-1 enhanced vascularity in the acute epicenter of contused mice, while the deletion of CD47 alone reduced neutrophil diapedesis and enhanced microvascular perfusion. Lastly, using an ex-vivo model of the CNS microvasculature, it was shown that CD47−/− derived microvessels (MVs) significantly exhibited adherent wild-type or CD47−/− neutrophils on the endothelial lumen, while the wild-type-derived MVs did not. Such a condition reflects a deficiency in diapedesis, which is mediated by the loss of CD47 expression on the ECs. Interestingly, in-vitro transmigration assays have demonstrated the contribution of SIRPα to neutrophil diapedesis via the EC monolayer [7]. These results suggest that CD47 partly improves the functional recovery from SCI by enhancing vascular patency and decreasing SIRPα-mediated neutrophil diapedesis rather than abolishing TSP-1-mediated antiangiogenic signaling (Figure 3).

Figure 3.

Figure 3

Improvement of functional recovery from contusive thoracic SCI by CD47 inhibition. CD47 suppression increases the vascular patency following the SCI. Moreover, CD47 suppression reduces neutrophil extravasation into the contusion. For this reason, CD47 has been considered a new treatment target to treat SCI. Adapted from [7].

More recently, Qi et al. [77] investigated the effects and probable mechanisms of miR-34a on neuron apoptosis generated by SCI. Their results showed that the injection of miR-34a agomir and/or si-CD47 could suppress neuronal cell apoptosis, with decreased levels of pro-apoptotic protein (cleaved caspase-3 and Bax) a reduced apoptotic index (AI), and an increased expression of anti-apoptotic proteins (Bcl-2 and Mcl-1). This combined body of evidence, clearly suggests the importance of CD47 and SIRPα in SCI.

4.5. Traumatic Brain Injury (TBI)

Some studies have shown the involvement of two crucial mechanisms in the pathologic cascade following traumatic brain injury (TBI); namely, an initial stage consisting of leukocyte-mediated BBB damage and neuroinflammation, which is followed by vascular remodeling or angiogenesis and synapse plasticity during the later stage. Together, these processes jointly determine the medical consequences (i.e., the biochemical and physiological changes) following a TBI [78,79].

Regarding CD47, a preliminary study employing microarray analysis in rats with induced TBI by head trauma demonstrated an increase in the expression of C1ql2, Cbnl, Sdc1, Bdnf, MMP9, and Cd47 genes, compared with controls, suggesting the importance of these genes during the response of the brain to TBI development [80]. Moreover, different studies have reported the crucial role of CD47 in vascular pathophysiology following brain injury, specifically in the transendothelial migration of leukocytes mediated by the SIRPα-CD47 interaction, as well as in the anti-angiogenic effects exerted via the interaction of TSP-1 with CD47 [81,82]. More recently, Zhao et al. established that CD47 mediated early neutrophil brain infiltration and late brain vascular remodeling following TBI [44]. This research used a controlled cortical impact (CCI) instrument and a CD47 knock-out mice model. Interestingly, knock-out mice exhibited significantly less brain neutrophil infiltration at 24 h, up-regulation in the level of VEGF expression in the perilesional cortex at 7 and 14 days, and enhanced blood vessel density at 21 days following the TBI when compared to these wild-type mice. Moreover, their findings revealed that CD47 knockout remarkably decreased sensorimotor function deficits and brain lesion volume at 21 days following the TBI. Therefore, these combined results suggest that CD47 has a role in the pathophysiology of TBI; specifically, in neutrophil infiltration of the brain, expansion of damage in brain tissue, injury of cerebrovascular remodeling, and recovery [44].

4.6. Parkinson’s Disease

Numerous published articles on the pathogenesis of Parkinson’s disease (PD) suggest a contribution of T-lymphocytes to the neuroimmune activity in the brain of PD patients [83,84,85]. Other studies showed the infiltration of T-lymphocytes into the brain and locations surrounding the degenerating dopaminergic neurons with activated microglia in PD patients, as well as in experimental models of PD [86,87,88]. For example, a study by Huang et al. [45] showed the ability of Treg cells (regulatory T cells) to directly protect dopaminergic neurons against MPP+ (1-methyl-4-phenylpyridinium) treatment as well as inflammatory responses by glial cells, through the interaction between the transmembrane proteins SIRPα and CD47 [45]. In this study, it was also found that SIRPα knockdown in VM neurons resulted in a decrease in neuroprotection by Treg cells. It was also established that Treg cells and VM neurons activated the Rac1/Akt signaling pathway in the VM neurons. Consequently, suppression of Rac1/Akt signaling in VM neurons compromised Treg cell neuroprotection. Finally, the overall conclusion from the study was that Treg cells protect dopaminergic neurons against MPP+ neurotoxicity by a cell-to-cell contact mechanism underlying the CD47-SIRPα interaction and Rac1/Akt activation [45].

In addition, transwell co-cultures of VM neurons and Treg cells were utilized to assess the effects of the Treg cytokines TGF-β1 and IL-10 on dopaminergic neurons. According to their ‘live-cell’ imaging experiments, there was dynamic contact of Treg cells with VM neurons that were stained with CD47 and SIRPα respectively. Following the silencing of either CD47 in Treg cells or the silencing of SIRPα in VM neurons, these same authors investigated dopaminergic neuronal loss using tyrosine hydroxylase (TH)-immuno-reactive cells. The results of these experiments confirmed that Treg cells prevented MPP+-induced dopaminergic neuronal loss, as well as inflammatory responses by glial cells [45]. However, TGF-β1 and IL-10 secreted from Treg cells did not significantly prevent MPP+-induced dopaminergic neuronal loss in the transwell co-cultures of VM neurons and Treg cells. Furthermore, CD47 and SIRPα were expressed by Treg cells and VM neurons, respectively. It is very important to note that Huang et al. [46] demonstrated that silencing the CD47 gene in Treg cells impaired the ability of the cells to protect dopaminergic neurons against MPP+ toxicity. Similarly, SIRPα knockdown in VM neurons resulted in a decrease in neuroprotection by Treg cells. These same authors also demonstrated that the CD47-SIRPα interaction between Treg cells and VM activated the Rac1/Akt signaling pathway in VM neurons. These combined results suggest that the CD47-SIRPα interaction and Rac1/Akt activation appear as a promising mechanism in the treatment of PD.

5. Conclusions and Future Directions

A growing body of evidence has shown the importance of CD47/SIRPα interaction in the brain, both in normal and pathological conditions, specifically for neutrophil infiltration of the brain, expansion of damage in brain tissue, injury of cerebrovascular remodeling, and recovery. Numerous studies have reported increased expression of the CD47 receptor in a variety of neurological diseases. In the present review, we have highlighted the current evidence regarding the importance of CD47/ SIRPα in pathologies like stroke, Multiple Sclerosis, Alzheimer’s, spinal cord injuries, TBI, and Parkinson’s. Is possible that additional brain pathologies could be influenced through CD47/ SIRPα related processes. In this aspect, a study by Ohnishi et al. [89] using transgenic mice with a truncated form SIRPα that lacked most of its cytoplasmic region, manifested prolonged immobility in the forced swim (FS) test suggesting an association of this receptor in depression-like behavior. However, a major challenge in this aspect would be to properly translate the results established in animal models to human clinical studies.

The differential effects of CD47 on peripheral immune cells and its impact on the CNS have created numerous intriguing issues regarding its exact biological functions. Additional studies are needed in order to understand the precise functions of CD47/SIRPα in astrocytes, neurons, and myelin. For example, a recent study in human and mice glioblastoma cell lines showed that the combined CD47 blockade with temozolomide resulted in a pro-phagocytosis effect against tumorigenic cells [90] compared with normal astrocytes. Consequently, further research pertaining to the specific functions and roles of CD47 and SIRP is required prior to its exploitation as a potential target in the treatment of various neurodegenerative diseases and cancer.

Abbreviations

SHPS-1 SH2-domain bearing protein tyrosine phosphatase substrate-1
ALL Acute lymphoblastic leukemia
NHL Non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma
MM Multiple myeloma
AML Acute myeloid leukemia
IAP Integrin associated protein
SIRP Signal regulatory protein
NIRegs Neuroimmune Regulatory Proteins
TNF Tumor necrosis factor
FAS FS-7-associated surface antigen
ITIM Immuno-receptor tyrosine-based inhibition motif
SHP SH2 domain-containing phosphatase
ECs Endothelial cells
PMN Polymorphonuclear
ICH Intracerebral hemorrhage
MS Multiple sclerosis
EAE Experimentally-induced autoimmune encephalomyelitis
C3bi Complement protein 3bi
AD Alzheimer´s disease
Amyloid-β
TSP1 Thrombospondin 1
sGC Soluble guanylate cyclase
IL-1β Interleukin-1β
TNFα Tumor necrosis factor-α
SCI Spinal cord injury
MVs Microvessels
AI Apoptotic index
TBI Traumatic Brain Injury
CCI Controlled cortical impact
PD Parkinson disease
Treg cells Regulatory T cells
MPP+ 1-methyl-4-phenylpyridinium
TH Tyrosine hydroxylase
FS test Forced swim test
SHIP SH2 domain-containing inositol phosphatase

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, A.S. and S.M.G.; Literature search and data extraction, S.M.G. and R.C.; writing—original draft preparation, S.M.G.; writing—review and editing, A.S., R.C., T.J., N.G.N. and T.P.J.; funding acquisition, N.G.N. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was supported by the Russian Science Foundation (Grant # 20-15-00337).

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Footnotes

Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

References

  • 1.Leclair P., Lim C.J. CD47 (Cluster of differentiation 47): An anti-phagocytic receptor with a multitude of signaling functions. Anim. Cells Syst. 2020;24:243–252. doi: 10.1080/19768354.2020.1818618. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Logtenberg M.E., Scheeren F.A., Schumacher T.N. The CD47-SIRPα immune checkpoint. Immunity. 2020;52:742–752. doi: 10.1016/j.immuni.2020.04.011. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Oldenborg P.-A. CD47: A cell surface glycoprotein which regulates multiple functions of hematopoietic cells in health and disease. Int. Sch. Res. Not. 2013;2013:614619. doi: 10.1155/2013/614619. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Hayat S.M.G., Bianconi V., Pirro M., Jaafari M.R., Hatamipour M., Sahebkar A. CD47: Role in the immune system and application to cancer therapy. Cell. Oncol. 2020;43:19–30. doi: 10.1007/s13402-019-00469-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Zhang H., Li F., Yang Y., Chen J., Hu X. SIRP/CD47 signaling in neurological disorders. Brain Res. 2015;1623:74–80. doi: 10.1016/j.brainres.2015.03.012. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Gao Q., Zhang Y., Han C., Hu X., Zhang H., Xu X., Tian J., Liu Y., Ding Y., Liu J., et al. Blockade of CD47 ameliorates autoimmune inflammation in CNS by suppressing IL-1-triggered infiltration of pathogenic Th17 cells. J. Autoimmun. 2016;69:74–85. doi: 10.1016/j.jaut.2016.03.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Myers S.A., DeVries W.H., Andres K.R., Gruenthal M.J., Benton R.L., Hoying J.B., Hagg T., Whittemore S.R. CD47 knockout mice exhibit improved recovery from spinal cord injury. Neurobiol. Dis. 2011;42:21–34. doi: 10.1016/j.nbd.2010.12.010. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Jones R.S., Minogue A.M., Connor T.J., Lynch M.A. Amyloid-beta-induced astrocytic phagocytosis is mediated by CD36, CD47 and RAGE. J. Neuroimmune Pharmacol. 2013;8:301–311. doi: 10.1007/s11481-012-9427-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Xing C., Lee S., Kim W.J., Jin G., Yang Y.G., Ji X., Wang X., Lo E.H. Role of oxidative stress and caspase 3 in CD47-mediated neuronal cell death. J. Neurochem. 2009;108:430–436. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-4159.2008.05777.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Jin G., Tsuji K., Xing C., Yang Y.G., Wang X., Lo E.H. CD47 gene knockout protects against transient focal cerebral ischemia in mice. Exp. Neurol. 2009;217:165–170. doi: 10.1016/j.expneurol.2009.02.004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Chitnis T., Imitola J., Wang Y., Elyaman W., Chawla P., Sharuk M., Raddassi K., Bronson R.T., Khoury S.J. Elevated neuronal expression of CD200 protects Wlds mice from inflammation-mediated neurodegeneration. Am. J. Pathol. 2007;170:1695–1712. doi: 10.2353/ajpath.2007.060677. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Koning N., Swaab D.F., Hoek R.M., Huitinga I. Distribution of the immune inhibitory molecules CD200 and CD200R in the normal central nervous system and multiple sclerosis lesions suggests neuron-glia and glia-glia interactions. J. Neuropathol. Exp. Neurol. 2009;68:159–167. doi: 10.1097/NEN.0b013e3181964113. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Griffiths M., Neal J.W., Gasque P. Innate immunity and protective neuroinflammation: New emphasis on the role of neuroimmune regulatory proteins. Int. Rev. Neurobiol. 2007;82:29–55. doi: 10.1016/s0074-7742(07)82002-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Bedoui Y., Neal J.W., Gasque P. The neuro-immune-regulators (NIREGs) promote tissue resilience; a vital component of the host’s defense strategy against neuroinflammation. J. Neuroimmune Pharmacol. 2018;13:309–329. doi: 10.1007/s11481-018-9793-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Griffiths M.R., Gasque P., Neal J.W. The regulation of the CNS innate immune response is vital for the restoration of tissue homeostasis (repair) after acute brain injury: A brief review. Int. J. Inflamm. 2010;2010:151097. doi: 10.4061/2010/151097. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Williams A., Piaton G., Aigrot M.S., Belhadi A., Theaudin M., Petermann F., Thomas J.L., Zalc B., Lubetzki C. Semaphorin 3A and 3F: Key players in myelin repair in multiple sclerosis? Brain. 2007;130:2554–2565. doi: 10.1093/brain/awm202. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Majed H.H., Chandran S., Niclou S.P., Nicholas R.S., Wilkins A., Wing M.G., Rhodes K.E., Spillantini M.G., Compston A. A novel role for Sema3A in neuroprotection from injury mediated by activated microglia. J. Neurosci. 2006;26:1730–1738. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0702-05.2006. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Koning N., Uitdehaag B.M., Huitinga I., Hoek R.M. Restoring immune suppression in the multiple sclerosis brain. Prog. Neurobiol. 2009;89:359–368. doi: 10.1016/j.pneurobio.2009.09.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Li G.L., Farooque M., Olsson Y. Changes of Fas and Fas ligand immunoreactivity after compression trauma to rat spinal cord. Acta Neuropathol. 2000;100:75–81. doi: 10.1007/s004010051195. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Choi C., Benveniste E.N. Fas ligand/Fas system in the brain: Regulator of immune and apoptotic responses. Brain Res. Rev. 2004;44:65–81. doi: 10.1016/j.brainresrev.2003.08.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Lehrman E.K., Wilton D.K., Litvina E.Y., Welsh C.A., Chang S.T., Frouin A., Walker A.J., Heller M.D., Umemori H., Chen C., et al. CD47 protects synapses from excess microglia-mediated pruning during development. Neuron. 2018;100:120–134.e126. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2018.09.017. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Van Beek E.M., Cochrane F., Barclay A.N., van den Berg T.K. Signal regulatory proteins in the immune system. J. Immunol. 2005;175:7781–7787. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.175.12.7781. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Gaikwad S., Larionov S., Wang Y., Dannenberg H., Matozaki T., Monsonego A., Thal D.R., Neumann H. Signal regulatory protein-beta1: A microglial modulator of phagocytosis in Alzheimer’s disease. Am. J. Pathol. 2009;175:2528–2539. doi: 10.2353/ajpath.2009.090147. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Hatherley D., Graham S.C., Turner J., Harlos K., Stuart D.I., Barclay A.N. Paired receptor specificity explained by structures of signal regulatory proteins alone and complexed with CD47. Mol. Cell. 2008;31:266–277. doi: 10.1016/j.molcel.2008.05.026. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Murata Y., Kotani T., Ohnishi H., Matozaki T. The CD47-SIRPalpha signalling system: Its physiological roles and therapeutic application. J. Biochem. 2014;155:335–344. doi: 10.1093/jb/mvu017. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Liu S.Q., Alkema P.K., Tieche C., Tefft B.J., Liu D.Z., Li Y.C., Sumpio B.E., Caprini J.A., Paniagua M. Negative regulation of monocyte adhesion to arterial elastic laminae by signal regulatory protein alpha and Src homology 2 domain-containing protein-tyrosine phosphatase-1. J. Biol. Chem. 2005;280:39294–39301. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M503866200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Linnartz B., Neumann H. Microglial activatory (immunoreceptor tyrosine-based activation motif)- and inhibitory (immunoreceptor tyrosine-based inhibition motif)-signaling receptors for recognition of the neuronal glycocalyx. Glia. 2013;61:37–46. doi: 10.1002/glia.22359. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Kharitonenkov A., Chen Z., Sures I., Wang H., Schilling J., Ullrich A. A family of proteins that inhibit signalling through tyrosine kinase receptors. Nature. 1997;386:181–186. doi: 10.1038/386181a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Neel B.G., Gu H., Pao L. The ‘Shp’ing news: SH2 domain-containing tyrosine phosphatases in cell signaling. Trends Biochem. Sci. 2003;28:284–293. doi: 10.1016/S0968-0004(03)00091-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Ohnishi H., Kaneko Y., Okazawa H., Miyashita M., Sato R., Hayashi A., Tada K., Nagata S., Takahashi M., Matozaki T. Differential localization of Src homology 2 domain-containing protein tyrosine phosphatase substrate-1 and CD47 and its molecular mechanisms in cultured hippocampal neurons. J. Neurosci. 2005;25:2702–2711. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.5173-04.2005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Yamao T., Noguchi T., Takeuchi O., Nishiyama U., Morita H., Hagiwara T., Akahori H., Kato T., Inagaki K., Okazawa H., et al. Negative regulation of platelet clearance and of the macrophage phagocytic response by the transmembrane glycoprotein SHPS-1. J. Biol. Chem. 2002;277:39833–39839. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M203287200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Murata T., Ohnishi H., Okazawa H., Murata Y., Kusakari S., Hayashi Y., Miyashita M., Itoh H., Oldenborg P.A., Furuya N., et al. CD47 promotes neuronal development through Src- and FRG/Vav2-mediated activation of Rac and Cdc42. J. Neurosci. 2006;26:12397–12407. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3981-06.2006. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Gitik M., Liraz-Zaltsman S., Oldenborg P.A., Reichert F., Rotshenker S. Myelin down-regulates myelin phagocytosis by microglia and macrophages through interactions between CD47 on myelin and SIRPalpha (signal regulatory protein-alpha) on phagocytes. J. Neuroinflamm. 2011;8:1–11. doi: 10.1186/1742-2094-8-24. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Koenigsknecht J., Landreth G. Microglial phagocytosis of fibrillar beta-amyloid through a beta1 integrin-dependent mechanism. J. Neurosci. 2004;24:9838–9846. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2557-04.2004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Floden A.M., Combs C.K. Microglia demonstrate age-dependent interaction with amyloid-beta fibrils. J. Alzheimer’s Dis. 2011;25:279–293. doi: 10.3233/JAD-2011-101014. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.de Vries H.E., Hendriks J.J., Honing H., De Lavalette C.R., van der Pol S.M., Hooijberg E., Dijkstra C.D., van den Berg T.K. Signal-regulatory protein alpha-CD47 interactions are required for the transmigration of monocytes across cerebral endothelium. J. Immunol. 2002;168:5832–5839. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.168.11.5832. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Mao X.-Y., Yin X.-X., Guan Q.-W., Xia Q.-X., Yang N., Zhou H.-H., Liu Z.-Q., Jin W.-L. Dietary nutrition for neurological disease therapy: Current status and future directions. Pharmacol. Ther. 2021;226:107861. doi: 10.1016/j.pharmthera.2021.107861. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Cai D. Neuroinflammation and neurodegeneration in overnutrition-induced diseases. Trends Endocrinol. Metab. 2013;24:40–47. doi: 10.1016/j.tem.2012.11.003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Pizza V., Agresta A., W D’Acunto C., Festa M., Capasso A. Neuroinflamm-aging and neurodegenerative diseases: An overview. CNS Neurol. Disord. Drug Targets (Former. Curr. Drug Targets CNS Neurol. Disord.) 2011;10:621–634. doi: 10.2174/187152711796235014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Jellinger K., Stadelmann C. Advances in Research on Neurodegeneration. Springer; Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany: 2000. The enigma of cell death in neurodegenerative disorders; pp. 21–36. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Jing C., Bian L., Wang M., Keep R.F., Xi G., Hua Y. Enhancement of hematoma clearance with CD47 blocking antibody in experimental intracerebral hemorrhage. Stroke. 2019;50:1539–1547. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.118.024578. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Han M.H., Lundgren D.H., Jaiswal S., Chao M., Graham K.L., Garris C.S., Axtell R.C., Ho P.P., Lock C.B., Woodard J.I. Janus-like opposing roles of CD47 in autoimmune brain inflammation in humans and mice. J. Exp. Med. 2012;209:1325–1334. doi: 10.1084/jem.20101974. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Niederhoffer N., Levy R., Sick E., Andre P., Coupin G., Lombard Y., Gies J.-P. Amyloid β peptides trigger CD47-dependent mast cell secretory and phagocytic responses. Int. J. Immunopathol. Pharmacol. 2009;22:473–483. doi: 10.1177/039463200902200224. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Zhao S., Yu Z., Liu Y., Bai Y., Jiang Y., van Leyen K., Yang Y.-G., Lok J.M., Whalen M.J., Lo E.H. CD47 deficiency improves neurological outcomes of traumatic brain injury in mice. Neurosci. Lett. 2017;643:125–130. doi: 10.1016/j.neulet.2016.12.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Huang Y., Liu Z., Cao B.-B., Qiu Y.-H., Peng Y.-P. Treg cells protect dopaminergic neurons against MPP+ neurotoxicity via CD47-SIRPA interaction. Cell. Physiol. Biochem. 2017;41:1240–1254. doi: 10.1159/000464388. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Muir K.W., Tyrrell P., Sattar N., Warburton E. Inflammation and ischaemic stroke. Curr. Opin. Neurol. 2007;20:334–342. doi: 10.1097/WCO.0b013e32813ba151. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Belayev L., Lu Y., Bazan N.G. Basic Neurochemistry. Elsevier; Amsterdam, The Netherlands: 2012. Brain ischemia and reperfusion: Cellular and molecular mechanisms in stroke injury; pp. 621–642. [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Narizhneva N.V., Razorenova O.V., Podrez E.A., Chen J., Chandrasekharan U.M., DiCorleto P.E., Plow E.F., Topol E.J., Byzova T.V. Thrombospondin-1 up-regulates expression of cell adhesion molecules and promotes monocyte binding to endothelium. FASEB J. 2005;19:1158–1160. doi: 10.1096/fj.04-3310fje. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Steinman L. Elaborate interactions between the immune and nervous systems. Nat. Immunol. 2004;5:575–581. doi: 10.1038/ni1078. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Domercq M., Zabala A., Matute C. Purinergic receptors in multiple sclerosis pathogenesis. Brain Res. Bull. 2019;151:38–45. doi: 10.1016/j.brainresbull.2018.11.018. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Sanson C. Ph.D. Thesis. Université Pierre et Marie Curie-Paris VI; Paris, France: 2017. Deciphering the Cellular and Molecular Events Leading to a Successful Remyelination in Multiple Sclerosis Patients. [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Lassmann H. Multiple sclerosis pathology. Cold Spring Harb. Perspect. Med. 2018;8:a028936. doi: 10.1101/cshperspect.a028936. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Walkey C.D., Olsen J.B., Guo H., Emili A., Chan W.C. Nanoparticle size and surface chemistry determine serum protein adsorption and macrophage uptake. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2012;134:2139–2147. doi: 10.1021/ja2084338. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Bryn T., Mahic M., Enserink J.M., Schwede F., Aandahl E.M., Tasken K. The cyclic AMP-Epac1-Rap1 pathway is dissociated from regulation of effector functions in monocytes but acquires immunoregulatory function in mature macrophages. J. Immunol. 2006;176:7361–7370. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.176.12.7361. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Kreutzberg G.W. Microglia: A sensor for pathological events in the CNS. Trends Neurosci. 1996;19:312–318. doi: 10.1016/0166-2236(96)10049-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Bruck W., Friede R.L. Anti-macrophage CR3 antibody blocks myelin phagocytosis by macrophages in vitro. Acta Neuropathol. 1990;80:415–418. doi: 10.1007/BF00307696. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Mahesula S., Raphael I., Raghunathan R., Kalsaria K., Kotagiri V., Purkar A.B., Anjanappa M., Shah D., Pericherla V., Jadhav Y.L.A., et al. Immunoenrichment microwave and magnetic proteomics for quantifying CD 47 in the experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis model of multiple sclerosis. Electrophoresis. 2012;33:3820–3829. doi: 10.1002/elps.201200515. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Alirezaei Z., Pourhanifeh M.H., Borran S., Nejati M., Mirzaei H., Hamblin M.R. Neurofilament Light Chain as a Biomarker, and Correlation with Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Diagnosis of CNS-Related Disorders. Mol. Neurobiol. 2020;57:469–491. doi: 10.1007/s12035-019-01698-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Arranz A.M., De Strooper B. The role of astroglia in Alzheimer’s disease: Pathophysiology and clinical implications. Lancet Neurol. 2019;18:406–414. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(18)30490-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Teter B., Morihara T., Lim G., Chu T., Jones M., Zuo X., Paul R., Frautschy S., Cole G. Curcumin restores innate immune Alzheimer’s disease risk gene expression to ameliorate Alzheimer pathogenesis. Neurobiol. Dis. 2019;127:432–448. doi: 10.1016/j.nbd.2019.02.015. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Li P., Marshall L., Oh G., Jakubowski J.L., Groot D., He Y., Wang T., Petronis A., Labrie V. Epigenetic dysregulation of enhancers in neurons is associated with Alzheimer’s disease pathology and cognitive symptoms. Nat. Commun. 2019;10:1–14. doi: 10.1038/s41467-019-10101-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Chen Y., Fu A.K., Ip N.Y. Synaptic dysfunction in Alzheimer’s disease: Mechanisms and therapeutic strategies. Pharmacol. Ther. 2019;195:186–198. doi: 10.1016/j.pharmthera.2018.11.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63.Tang X., Li Z., Zhang W., Yao Z. Nitric oxide might be an inducing factor in cognitive impairment in Alzheimer’s disease via downregulating the monocarboxylate transporter 1. Nitric Oxide. 2019;91:35–41. doi: 10.1016/j.niox.2019.07.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64.Spiers J.G., Chen H.-J.C., Bourgognon J.-M., Steinert J.R. Dysregulation of stress systems and nitric oxide signaling underlies neuronal dysfunction in Alzheimer’s disease. Free Radic. Biol. Med. 2019;134:468–483. doi: 10.1016/j.freeradbiomed.2019.01.025. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 65.Law A., O’Donnell J., Gauthier S., Quirion R. Neuronal and inducible nitric oxide synthase expressions and activities in the hippocampi and cortices of young adult, aged cognitively unimpaired, and impaired Long-Evans rats. Neuroscience. 2002;112:267–275. doi: 10.1016/S0306-4522(02)00082-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 66.Wilcock D.M., Lewis M.R., Van Nostrand W.E., Davis J., Previti M.L., Gharkholonarehe N., Vitek M.P., Colton C.A. Progression of amyloid pathology to Alzheimer’s disease pathology in an amyloid precursor protein transgenic mouse model by removal of nitric oxide synthase 2. J. Neurosci. 2008;28:1537–1545. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.5066-07.2008. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 67.Isenberg J.S., Ridnour L.A., Dimitry J., Frazier W.A., Wink D.A., Roberts D.D. CD47 is necessary for inhibition of nitric oxide-stimulated vascular cell responses by thrombospondin-1. J. Biol. Chem. 2006;281:26069–26080. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M605040200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 68.Paris D., Town T., Parker T., Humphrey J., Mullan M. Beta-Amyloid vasoactivity and proinflammation in microglia can be blocked by cGMP-elevating agents. Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 2000;903:446–450. doi: 10.1111/j.1749-6632.2000.tb06397.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 69.Wirtz-Brugger F., Giovanni A. Guanosine 3′,5′-cyclic monophosphate mediated inhibition of cell death induced by nerve growth factor withdrawal and beta-amyloid: Protective effects of propentofylline. Neuroscience. 2000;99:737–750. doi: 10.1016/S0306-4522(00)00243-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 70.Miller T.W., Isenberg J.S., Shih H.B., Wang Y., Roberts D.D. Amyloid-beta inhibits No-cGMP signaling in a CD36- and CD47-dependent manner. PLoS ONE. 2010;5:e15686. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0015686. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 71.Shaik-Dasthagirisaheb Y.B., Conti P. The role of mast cells in Alzheimer’s disease. Adv. Clin. Exp. Med. 2016;25:781–787. doi: 10.17219/acem/61914. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 72.Sick E., Niederhoffer N., Takeda K., Landry Y., Gies J.-P. Activation of CD47 receptors causes histamine secretion from mast cells. Cell. Mol. Life Sci. 2009;66:1271–1282. doi: 10.1007/s00018-009-8778-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 73.Dong H., Zhang X., Qian Y. Mast cells and neuroinflammation. Med. Sci. Monit. Basic Res. 2014;20:200. doi: 10.12659/MSMBR.893093. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 74.Karki S., Nichols M.R. CD47 does not mediate amyloid-β (1–42) protofibril-stimulated microglial cytokine release. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2014;454:239–244. doi: 10.1016/j.bbrc.2014.10.081. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 75.Gensel J.C., Zhang B. Macrophage activation and its role in repair and pathology after spinal cord injury. Brain Res. 2015;1619:1–11. doi: 10.1016/j.brainres.2014.12.045. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 76.Saumet A., Slimane M.B., Lanotte M., Lawler J., Dubernard V. Type 3 repeat/C-terminal domain of thrombospondin-1 triggers caspase-independent cell death through CD47/alphavbeta3 in promyelocytic leukemia NB4 cells. Blood. 2005;106:658–667. doi: 10.1182/blood-2004-09-3585. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 77.Qi L., Jiang-Hua M., Ge-Liang H., Qing C., Ya-Ming L. MiR-34a inhibits spinal cord injury and blocks spinal cord neuron apoptosis by activating phatidylinositol 3-kinase (PI3K)/AKT pathway through targeting CD47. Curr. Neurovasc. Res. 2019;16:373–381. doi: 10.2174/1567202616666190906102343. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 78.Schwarzmaier S.M., Zimmermann R., McGarry N.B., Trabold R., Kim S.W., Plesnila N. In vivo temporal and spatial profile of leukocyte adhesion and migration after experimental traumatic brain injury in mice. J. Neuroinflamm. 2013;10:1–17. doi: 10.1186/1742-2094-10-32. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 79.Kenney K., Amyot F., Haber M., Pronger A., Bogoslovsky T., Moore C., Diaz-Arrastia R. Cerebral vascular injury in traumatic brain injury. Exp. Neurol. 2016;275:353–366. doi: 10.1016/j.expneurol.2015.05.019. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 80.Colak T., Cine N., Bamac B., Kurtas O., Ozbek A., Bicer U., Sunnetci D., Savli H. Microarray-based gene expression analysis of an animal model for closed head injury. Injury. 2012;43:1264–1270. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2012.01.021. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 81.Martinelli R., Newton G., Carman C.V., Greenwood J., Luscinskas F.W. Novel role of CD47 in rat microvascular endothelium: Signaling and regulation of T-cell transendothelial migration. Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol. 2013;33:2566–2576. doi: 10.1161/ATVBAHA.113.301903. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 82.Isenberg J.S., Shiva S., Gladwin M. Thrombospondin-1-CD47 blockade and exogenous nitrite enhance ischemic tissue survival, blood flow and angiogenesis via coupled NO-cGMP pathway activation. Nitric Oxide. 2009;21:52–62. doi: 10.1016/j.niox.2009.05.005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 83.Dansokho C., Ait Ahmed D., Aid S., Toly-Ndour C., Chaigneau T., Calle V., Cagnard N., Holzenberger M., Piaggio E., Aucouturier P., et al. Regulatory T cells delay disease progression in Alzheimer-like pathology. Brain. 2016;139:1237–1251. doi: 10.1093/brain/awv408. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 84.Kosloski L.M., Kosmacek E.A., Olson K.E., Mosley R.L., Gendelman H.E. GM-CSF induces neuroprotective and anti-inflammatory responses in 1-methyl-4-phenyl-1,2,3,6-tetrahydropyridine intoxicated mice. J. Neuroimmunol. 2013;265:1–10. doi: 10.1016/j.jneuroim.2013.10.009. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 85.Olson K.E., Kosloski-Bilek L.M., Anderson K.M., Diggs B.J., Clark B.E., Gledhill J.M., Jr., Shandler S.J., Mosley R.L., Gendelman H.E. Selective VIP Receptor Agonists Facilitate Immune Transformation for Dopaminergic Neuroprotection in MPTP-Intoxicated Mice. J. Neurosci. 2015;35:16463–16478. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2131-15.2015. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 86.Reynolds A.D., Stone D.K., Hutter J.A., Benner E.J., Mosley R.L., Gendelman H.E. Regulatory T cells attenuate Th17 cell-mediated nigrostriatal dopaminergic neurodegeneration in a model of Parkinson’s disease. J. Immunol. 2010;184:2261–2271. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.0901852. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 87.Gonzalez H., Contreras F., Pacheco R. Regulation of the Neurodegenerative Process Associated to Parkinson’s Disease by CD4+ T-cells. J. Neuroimmune Pharmacol. 2015;10:561–575. doi: 10.1007/s11481-015-9618-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 88.Chung E.S., Lee G., Lee C., Ye M., Chung H.S., Kim H., Bae S.J., Hwang D.S., Bae H. Bee Venom Phospholipase A2, a Novel Foxp3+ Regulatory T Cell Inducer, Protects Dopaminergic Neurons by Modulating Neuroinflammatory Responses in a Mouse Model of Parkinson’s Disease. J. Immunol. 2015;195:4853–4860. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.1500386. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 89.Ohnishi H., Murata T., Kusakari S., Hayashi Y., Takao K., Maruyama T., Ago Y., Koda K., Jin F.-J., Okawa K. Stress-evoked tyrosine phosphorylation of signal regulatory protein α regulates behavioral immobility in the forced swim test. J. Neurosci. 2010;30:10472–10483. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0257-10.2010. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 90.von Roemeling C.A., Wang Y., Qie Y., Yuan H., Zhao H., Liu X., Yang Z., Yang M., Deng W., Bruno K.A. Therapeutic modulation of phagocytosis in glioblastoma can activate both innate and adaptive antitumour immunity. Nat. Commun. 2020;11:1–12. doi: 10.1038/s41467-020-15129-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Molecules are provided here courtesy of Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute (MDPI)

RESOURCES