Skip to main content
Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Pathology : JOMFP logoLink to Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Pathology : JOMFP
. 2021 May 14;25(1):110–117. doi: 10.4103/jomfp.JOMFP_226_20

Serum aflatoxin B1 antibody titer, percent hemolysis and transaminases in oral submucous fibrosis

Rahul R Bhowate 1,, Vidya K Lohe 1, Mrunal Ghusaji Meshram 1, Suwarna B Dangore 1
PMCID: PMC8272487  PMID: 34349420

Abstract

Introduction:

Areca nut is deeply rooted sociocultural habit in India. Areca nut reported to be infested by fungi during the field and storage conditions. Areca nut alkaloids, nitrosamines, tobacco and aflatoxin are cytotoxic, immunotoxic to red blood cell and epithelial cell. Hence, the present study was conducted to assess the serum aflatoxin B1 (AFB1) antibody titer, percent hemolysis and transaminases in oral submucous fibrosis (OSMF) patients.

Materials and Methods:

In this study, 128 participants of which 88 were suffering from OSMF. Twenty participants were areca nut habitual without OSMF (habitual control) and 20 participants without any habit (healthy control). For the detection of AFB1 antibody titer, AFB1 antigen (Sigma) A6636 from Aspergillus flavus was used. Percent hemolysis was estimated as per the procedure described by Mathuria and Verma. Serum Glutamic oxalo acetic transaminase (SGOT) and Serum Glutamic pyruvic transaminase (SGPT) were estimated by the optimized ultraviolet method using the enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay kit.

Results:

Mean SGOT, SGPT, percent hemolysis and AFB1 antibody titer were significantly higher in participants with OSMF than the habitual and healthy controls. AFB1 antibody titer and % hemolysis in both OSMF and habitual without OSMF were showed significant correlation, i.e., increased AFB1 antibody titer with increased % hemolysis.

Conclusions:

A study result demonstrates that aflatoxin causes increase in serum transaminases which is indicative of liver damage in OSMF. The combined toxic effects of areca nut alkaloids, tobacco and AFB1 on red blood cell (RBC) cell wall might be responsible for increased percent hemolysis in OSMF and habitual control.

Keywords: Aflatoxin B1, hemolysis, transaminases and oral submucous fibrosis

INTRODUCTION

Oral submucous fibrosis (OSMF) is the morbid condition of areca nut habitual primarily affecting the nonkeratinized oral mucosa form superficial epithelium to the basal layer. It involves any part of the oral cavity from the anterior to posterior oropharyngeal region and sometimes upper aerodigestive tract. Slowly progressive chronic inflammatory change from epithelium to underlying connective tissue causes the deposition of abnormal fibroblast which is responsible for rigidity of oral mucosa and atrophic epithelium. Masticatory microtrauma and irritation from the areca nut may be responsible for recurrent vesicle formation. Rigid oral mucosa leads to difficult opening of mouth, inability to blow/whistle, and eat.[1,2,3,4,5] The prevalence of OSMF in India is in the range of 0.2%–1.2%.[4,5] Malignant transformation of OSMF varied from 2.3% to 7.6% in different studies conducted in India.[4,5,6] Gadbail et al. reported early malignant potential with OSMF at the younger age of 25 years and detected the higher expression of marker used for proliferation, neoangiogenesis, and myofibroblast expression in low-risk epithelial dysplasia of OSMF patients which may show higher malignant potential.[7,8] Sarode et al. suggested that basal cell proliferation more than 26%–50% in OSMF should be strictly followed for malignant changes.[9]

A multi-factorial pathogenesis is responsible for OSMF but leaching out compounds from areca nut remains the principal causative factor.[10,11] Various studies conducted in India suggested that areca nut (areca catechu) product with or without tobacco, slaked lime is responsible for OSMF.[5,6,12,13]

Areca nut proved to be contaminated by various toxin yielding fungi, including Aspergillus flavus in the course of farming and storage.[14] Kolhe and Patil studied the cytotoxicity of aqueous extract of areca nut and tobacco on human erythrocytes red blood cells (RBCs).[15] Therefore, this study was carried out to assess serum aflatoxin B1 (AFB1) antibody titer, percent hemolysis, and transaminases in OSMF patients.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The present study was conducted in the Department of Oral Medicine and Radiology, SPDC, after approval from the Institutional Ethics Committee of DMIMS (DU), Sawangi (M), Wardha, and Maharashtra. The participants were well informed regarding the study procedures, and their consent was obtained.

Study population: A total 88 clinically diagnosed OSMF individuals, aged 18 years and above were included in the present study by the purposive sampling method. Areca nut habit with or without tobacco for more than 12 months was included in the present study, without any medicinal or surgical intervention in the last 12 months for OSMF.

  • Habitual control: Twenty individuals with areca nut chewing habit for more than 12 months with or without tobacco and without OSMF were included in the present study

  • Healthy controls: Twenty individuals without areca nut/tobacco/habit were included in the present study.

An exclusion criterion for all three groups was individual suffering from inflammatory disorder, autoimmune and hematological disorders, treated for any malignancy, alcoholic, systemic diseases, and pregnant women. Habitual and healthy controls were selected from the individual accompanying the OSMF individuals.

Habit history related to areca nut chewing was documented in structured format. 5 ml blood was used for the determination of percent hemolysis and AFB1 antibody titer. Obtained serum was transferred to cryotubes with protease inhibitor cocktail (10 μl/ml) for long storage purpose and kept at −20°C. 100 μl aliquots for single use were prepared for each sample to prevent repeated fluctuations in the temperature of cryotubes and further degradation. 0.5 mL of blood was transferred to EDTA containing (40 μL) bulb, mixed well by stirring for 15 s and then kept undisturbed for 15 min.

The percent hemolysis was estimated for each patient as per the procedure described by Mathuria and Verma.[16] The serum SGOT and SGPT were estimated by the optimized UV method using AST kit by Euro Diagnostic Systems and Liquipath (Pathozyme Diagnostics)-SGPT estimation Kit, respectively. Indirect enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay for the detection and quantification of AFB1 antibody was done for all 128 participants as per the protocol and procedure given by Engvall and Perlman[17] and Avrameas.[18] Aflatoxin antigen used for the procedure was AFB1 Antigen (Sigma A6636) from Aspergillus flavus.

One-way ANOVA (F-test), Dunnett D test, Z-test, and Pearson's correlation coefficient test were used for the statistical analysis.

RESULTS AND OBSERVATIONS

The mean age of OSMF patients was found to be 29.47 ± 8.52 years. Maximum patients with OSMF were in the range of 21–30 years (n = 44) and 31–40 years (n = 23). 94.32% (83 out of 88) areca nut chewers with OSMF were males and 5.68% (5 out of 88) were females (M:F ratio of 16.6:1). The mean age of areca nut chewers without OSMF (habitual control) was 34.05 ± 11.37 years with male:female ratio of 9:1, while that of the individuals in healthy control was 23.5 ± 1.40 years.

In OSMF group, 4 (4.54%) of the 88 patients were only areca nut habitual. 63 (71.59%) of the 88 individuals were kharrha chewers (manually prepared mixture of fully ripened areca nut pieces, tobacco and lime). Three (3.40%) individuals were gutkha chewers. 14 (15.90%) individuals chewed both gutkha and kharrha. 4 (4.54%) chewed paan-containing areca nut. All twenty individuals were habitual of kharrha in habit without OSMF group. In OSMF group, the mean duration of habit was 7.95 ± 6.61 years and in areca nut chewers without OSMF (habitual control) 11.7 ± 7.35 years. Mean inter-incisal opening in OSMF group was 24.68 mm. Mean daily frequency in OSMF was 6.44 ± 1.29 and in habit without OSMF 6.45 ± 2.15. Amount of areca/tobacco consumed in OSMF was 24.47 ± 3.31 grams per day and in habit without OSMF 24.51 ± 4.23 per day [Table 1].

Table 1.

Characteristics of study and control group: descriptive statistics

Characteristics OSMF (n=88) Habit without OSMF (habitual control) (n=20) Healthy control (n=20)
Age (years), mean±SD 29.47 ±8.52 34.05±11.37 23.5±1.40
Gender (%)
 Male 83(94.32) 18 (90) 20 (100)
 Female 5 (5.68) 02 (10) 00
Male:female ratio 16:1 9:1
Type of habit (%)
 Only areca nut 4 (4.54)
 Only Kharrha 63 (71.59) 20 (100)
 Only Gutkha 3 (3.40)
 Kharaa + Gutkha 14 (15.90)
 Pan quid with areca nut 4 (4.54)
Frequency per day, mean±SD 6.44±1.29 6.45±2.15
Amount of betel nut/tobacco consumed per day (g), mean±SD 24.47±3.31 24.51±4.23
Duration of habit (years), mean±SD 7.95±6.61 11.7±7.35
Mean inter-incisal distance (mm) 24.68±6.02

SD: Standard deviation, OSMF: Oral submucous fibrosis

Mean SGOT level in participants of OSMF was 33.90 ± 13.23 IU/L, with areca nut habit without OSMF (habitual control) was 27 ± 8.30 IU/L, and in the healthy control, it was 25.62 ± 9.07 IU/L. One-way ANOVA showed a significant variation in serum SGOT levels amongst the groups (F = 5.32, P = 0.006) and Dunnet D test revealed remarkable contrast between OSMF and healthy control groups (P = 0.012) [Table 2]. Mean SGPT level in the participants of OSMF was 28.32 ± 12.82 IU/L, in areca nut chewers without OSMF was 21.82 ± 6.02 IU/L, and in healthy control, it was 20.96 ± 8.01 IU/L. One-way ANOVA revealed notable variation in the SGPT levels in the three groups (F = 5.12, P = 0.07). Dunnett D test revealed significant difference between OSMF and healthy control group (P = 0.018) [Table 3].

Table 2.

Comparison of serum glutamic oxaloacetic transaminase in three groups

Descriptive statistics

Group n Mean (IU/L) SD SE 95% CI for mean Minimum Maximum

Lower bound Upper bound
OSMF 88 33.90 13.23 1.41 31.10 36.71 13.90 77.80
Habit without OSMF (habitual control) 20 27.35 8.30 1.85 23.46 31.24 14.20 41.70
Healthy control 20 25.62 9.07 2.02 21.37 29.86 14.60 49.10

One-way ANOVA

Source of variation Sum of squares df Mean square F P

Between groups 1543.64 2 771.82 5.325 0.006 (significant), P<0.05
Within groups 18117.97 125 144.94
Total 19661.61 127

SD: Standard deviation, SE: Standard error, CI: Confidence interval, OSMF: Oral submucous fibrosis

Table 3.

Comparison of serum glutamic pyruvic transaminase in three groups

Descriptive statistics

Group n Mean (IU/L) SD SE 95% CI for mean Minimum Maximum

Lower bound Upper bound
OSMF 88 28.32 12.82 1.36 25.61 31.04 11.70 78.10
Habit without OSMF (habitual control) 20 21.82 6.02 1.34 19.00 24.63 12.70 30.40
healthy control 20 20.96 8.01 1.79 17.21 24.71 11.30 35.90

One-way ANOVA

Source of variation Sum of squares df Mean square F P

Between groups 1329.85 2 664.92 5.12 0.007 (significant), P<0.05
Within groups 16215.33 125 129.72
Total 17545.19 127

SD: Standard deviation, SE: Standard error, CI: Confidence interval, OSMF: Oral submucous fibrosis

Mean percent hemolysis in OSMF group was 6.09 ± 8.38; in areca nut habitual without OSMF 3.01 ± 2.27, and in healthy control, it was 1.06 ± 1.02. One-way ANOVA showed significant variation in % hemolysis in three groups (F = 4.15, P = 0.018). Dunnett D test for comparisons between the three groups showed significant difference in percent hemolysis between the OSMF group and healthy control group (P = 0.021) [Table 4].

Table 4.

Comparison of percentage hemolysis in three groups

Descriptive statistics

Group n Mean SD SE 95% CI for mean Minimum Maximum

Lower bound Upper bound
OSMF 88 6.09 8.38 0.89 4.32 7.87 0.20 68.50
Habit without OSMF (habitual control) 20 3.01 2.27 0.50 1.95 4.08 0.90 10.50
Healthy control 20 1.60 1.02 0.22 1.12 2.08 0.30 4.10

One-way ANOVA

Source of variation Sum of squares df Mean square F P
Between groups 414.39 2 207.19 4.15 0.018 (significant), P<0.05
Within groups 6235.29 125 49.88
Total 6649.69 127

SD: Standard deviation, SE: Standard error, CI: Confidence interval, OSMF: Oral submucous fibrosis

Mean serum AFB1 antibody titer in participants of OSMF was 0.67 ± 0.24; in areca nut habit without OSMF was 0.47 ± 0.15, and in the healthy control, it was found to be 0.34 ± 0.07. One-way ANOVA suggested remarkable variation in the serum AFB1 antibody titer among the three groups (F = 22.29, P = 0.00). Dunnett D test for multiple comparisons revealed a significant difference between the AFB1 antibody titer of OSMF and healthy controls [Table 5].

Table 5.

Comparison of Aflatoxin B1 antibody titer in three groups

Descriptive statistics

Group n Mean SD SE 95% CI for mean Minimum Maximum

Lower bound Upper bound
OSMF 88 0.67 0.24 0.02 0.62 0.72 0.23 1.58
Habit without OSMF (habitual control) 20 0.47 0.15 0.03 0.40 0.54 0.23 0.80
Healthy control 20 0.34 0.07 0.01 0.31 0.37 0.21 0.49

One-way ANOVA

Source of variation Sum of squares df Mean square F P
Between groups 2.08 2 1.04 22.29 0.000 (significant), P<0.05
Within groups 5.83 125 0.04
Total 7.91 127

SD: Standard deviation, SE: Standard error, CI: Confidence interval, OSMF: Oral submucous fibrosis, Df: Degrees of freedom

Pearson's correlation coefficient for percent hemolysis and AFB1 antibody revealed significant positive correlation (r = 0.560, P = 0.000). It indicates that increased titer of AFB1 antibody in OSMF patient results in increased RBC destruction [Table 6]. Similarly, positive connection between the percent hemolysis and levels of AFB1 antibodies was found in areca nut habit without OSMF (r = 0.593, P = 0.006) [Table 7].

Table 6.

Correlation of serum Aflatoxin B1 antibody titer and percentage hemolysis in oral submucous fibrosis

Pearson's correlation coefficient

Mean±SD n Correlation “r P
Percentage hemolysis 3.01±2.27 20 0.593 0.006 (significant), P<0.05
Aflatoxin B1 antibody titer 0.47±0.15 20

SD: Standard deviation

Table 7.

Correlation of serum Aflatoxin B1 antibody titer and percent hemolysis in betal nut habitual without oral submucous fibrosis (habitual control)

Pearson’s correlation coefficient

Mean±SD n Correlation “r P
Percentage hemolysis 3.01±2.27 20 0.593 0.006 (significant), P<0.05
Aflatoxin B1 antibody titer 0.47±0.15 20

SD: Standard deviation

DISCUSSION

OSMF is predominantly seen in user of areca nut.[10,12,13,19] It is a serious morbid and gradually developing disease.[3,5,6] Marked rigidity of oral mucosa is due to the abnormal deposition of fibroblasts in underlying connective tissue causing, a gradually developing reduction in opening of the mouth. Areca nut chewer encountered with burning sensation, intermittent oral mucosal ulceration of soft palate, and lips.[3] There is a strong association of chewing areca nut and occurrence of OSMF, leukoplakia, and oral cancer.[2,6,20,21] The peculiarity of the disease is that it is confined to a particular geographic region because of prevalent dietary or cultural habits. In the Indian population, areca nut is mostly chewed in combination with tobacco. The frequency of chewing was directly correlated with OSMF.[22] Comprehensive experimental studies have proved the mutagenicity and carcinogenicity of areca nut.[19,23,24] Mainly, arecoline and arecadine from the areca nut are responsible for abnormal fibroblast growth and collagen synthesis which leads to sequential alteration in the connective tissue in OSMF.[25,26,27,28] Cross linking of collagen occurs through lysyl oxidase and further get stabilized by areca nut flavonoids, chatechin, and tanin.[29,30]

The present study revealed that it is the disease of younger age group and predominantly affects male compared to female which is comparable to previous studies.[31,32,33,34,35] All OSMF individuals and habitual controls were areca nut users, either alone or with combination of tobacco, lime, or piper betel leaf. Majority of the study population (71.59%) was habitual of kharrha. Kharrha is a manual preparation which contains the pieces of matured white half cut areca nut mixed with tobacco and lime. Only three (3.41%) patients consumed Gutkha. The mean duration of chewing areca nut in any form was 7.95 ± 6.61 years. Mean frequency of consumption was 6.44 ± 1.29 per day, and amount of daily consumption in any form was 24.47 ± 3.31 g. Shah and Sharma reported that daily consumption was more significant than total duration of habit.[22] A similar finding was also reported by Maher et al. who stated that daily consumption is a high risk factor than the life-long duration of the habit.[36] However, the present study in agreement with Ahmed et al., who reported that continuous user of areca nut for more than 5 years have greater chance to suffer from OSMF.[37]

Mean serum SGOT and SGPT were increased in OSMF, and a positive correlation was found when compared with habitual and healthy controls. CD Anuradha and C. S. Shyamala Devi revealed a significant increase in the transaminase levels in OSMF patients.[38] Choube and Bhowate reported increased transaminase levels, alkaline phosphatase bilirubin, and HCV RNA in OSMF and OSMF with oral lichenoid lesion.[39] A significant increase in liver enzymes in areca nut users considered a high risk for developing liver cancers and liver cirrhosis as evidenced by studies conducted in Thailand.[40,41,42] Hepatotoxicity and hepatocarcinogenicity of areca nut and its metabolites are attributed to high content of safrole, alkaloids, and nitrosamines and its interaction with bacterial nitrite compounds while chewing and swallowing.[42,43] Areca nut specific nitrosamines may methylate and cyanoethylate liver DNA which is genotoxic to hepatocytes.[42] Lysyl oxidase has also been implicated in other fibrotic diseases, liver fibrosis, and scleroderma.[40,41,44] Nonessential suppression of matrix metalloproteinase enzymes leads to extensive deposition of collagen similar to OSMF and arecoline and safrole synergistically increase expression of MMP-9 (TIMP-1).[45] Increased TIMP-1 in circulation leads to not only fibrosis of the oral cavity but could be implicated for the fibrotic changes in the liver.[42]

AFB1 antibody titer and % hemolysis in both OSMF and habitual control OSMF were showed significant correlation, i.e., increased AFB1 antibody titer with increased % hemolysis [Tables 6 and 7]. AFB1 is a well-documented immunotoxic,[14,46] hepatotoxic,[42,47,48] mutagenic,[49] and emrbryotoxic.[50] Misara and Raisuddin reported that aflatoxin and other mycotoxins infested in areca nuts may regulate the toxic potential when consumed with tobacco.[14] Raisuddin and Misara reported that 37.5% of Indian areca nut are contaminated by Aflatoxin, particularly AFB1 favored by its nutritive constituents.[51] Lipid and moisture in areca nut are abundant to encourage the growth of fungi.[52] A serum level of Aflatoxin is directly proportional to the amount of aflatoxin consumed and individual host response. It has been reported that both metabolized (aflatoxicol, M1 and M2) and unmetabolized (B1, B2, G1, and G2) form of Aflatoxin can get excreted in the saliva, stool, urine, and milk. Swallowed salivary Aflatoxin might be absorbed from the gastrointestinal tract and again comes into blood circulation responsible for recycling of aflatoxin in the body.[49] Circulating aflatoxin binds with albumin and to forms aflatoxin albumin-adduct responsible for liver mutagenesis.[53] These aflatoxin albumin adduct represent cumulative amount which is responsible for prolonged toxicity of aflatoxin even after cessation of exposure.[46,49] Lin et al. reported that the use of AFB1 invaded areca nut suppress cell-mediated immune response of the body leading to the increased risk of HBV/HCV infection and perturbed copper metabolism in the liver.[41]

Kolhe and Patil studied the dose-dependent cytotoxic effects of areca nut and tobacco extract on human erythrocytes RBCs and reported cytotoxic effect on cell wall causing RBC lysis.[15] Verma and Raval reported cytotoxic effect of aflatoxin on RBCs and showed that AFB1 causes morphological alterations and hemolysis of human RBCs.[54] Various studies have indicated that greater concentration of aflatoxin in circulation may be responsible for self-destruction of RBCs. On the other hand, lower concentration results in morphological changes and elimination of RBCs in reticuloendothelial tissues.[16,53,54] Liberated iron after RBCs hemolysis may not be available for body utilization. It may deposit in the reticuloendothelial system or form the complexes with haptoglobulin leading to anemia.[55,56]

Fully ripened white half cut areca nut favored the infestation of Aspergillus flavus due to its composition and poor storage condition.[51,57] Mathew et al. conducted a study on the effect of copper-based fungicide and Bordeaux mixture on copper content of areca nut. He reported that increased concentration of copper in ripened areca nut is due to its less moisture content compared with unripe areca nut.[58] The above facts demonstrate that the toxic component of areca nut, tobacco and Aflatoxin which target the hepatocytes as indicated by raised serum transaminases indicative of liver damage in OSMF. The combined effects of arecholine and AFB1 on RBC might be responsible for increased percent hemolysis in OSMF and habitual control group [Figure 1]. This might be due to the daily and prolonged consumption of areca nut contaminated with Aspergillus Flavus species. Hemolysis in disease condition may aggravate its cytotoxic and immunotoxic effect on oral mucosa due to liberated free iron. This increases the cellular damage by increasing oxidative stress.[59] Copper content of areca nut and free liberated iron during hemolysis perturbed Iron and copper metabolism in areca nut habitual increases the potential of malignant transformation in OSMF.

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Role of area nut alkaloids and aflatoxin B1 in the progression of oral submucous fibrosis

CONCLUSION

The present study showed the significant correlation between increased AFB1 antibody titer and percent of hemolysis of RBCs in OSMF, habitual control and healthy control group. This indicates that area nut alkaloid and aflatoxin might be responsible for altered metabolism of iron and copper, increases oxidative stress, hypoxia and toxicity to oral epithelium causing increased chance of malignant potential in preexisting OSMF condition. Clinician treating the cases of OSMF must consider the alteration of iron and copper metabolism in planning the treatment protocol and should consider the hepatoprotective therapeutic agent considering ensuing hepatotoxicity due to arecholine and aflatoxin.

Financial support and sponsorship

Nil.

Conflicts of interest

There are no conflicts of interest.

Acknowledgment

Our thanks are due to the management of Datta Meghe Institute of Medical Sciences, (Deemed to be University), Dr. R M Borle, Vice Chancellor, for providing the facilities at Central Research Laboratory of University. We are also thankful to the faculty and staff of Central Research laboratory.

REFERENCES

  • 1.Paymaster JC. Cancer of the buccal mucosa; a clinical study of 650 cases in Indian patients. Cancer. 1956;9:431–5. doi: 10.1002/1097-0142(195605/06)9:3<431::aid-cncr2820090302>3.0.co;2-t. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Pindborg JJ. Frequency of oral submucous fibrosis in North India. Bull World Health Organ. 1965;32:748–50. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Pindborg JJ, Sirsat SM. Oral submucous fibrosis. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol. 1966;22:764–79. doi: 10.1016/0030-4220(66)90367-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Gupta PC, Mehta FS, Daftary DK, Pindborg JJ, Bhonsle RB, Jalnawalla PN, et al. Incidence rates of oral cancer and natural history of oral precancerous lesions in a 10-year follow-up study of Indian villagers. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol. 1980;8:283–333. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0528.1980.tb01302.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Pindborg JJ, Murti PR, Bhonsle RB, Gupta PC, Daftary DK, Mehta FS. Oral submucous fibrosis as a precancerous condition. Scand J Dent Res. 1984;92:224–9. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0722.1984.tb00883.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Murti PR, Bhonsle RB, Pindborg JJ, Daftary DK, Gupta PC, Mehta FS. Malignant transformation rate in oral submucous fibrosis over a 17-year period. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol. 1985;13:340–1. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0528.1985.tb00468.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Gadbail AR, Chaudhary M, Gawande M, Hande A, Sarode S, Tekade SA, et al. Oral squamous cell carcinoma in the background of oral submucous fibrosis is a distinct clinicopathological entity with better prognosis. J Oral Pathol Med. 2017;46:448–53. doi: 10.1111/jop.12553. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Gadbail AR, Chaudhary MS, Sarode SC, Gawande M, Korde S, Tekade SA, et al. Ki67, CD105, and .-SMA expressions better relate the binary oral epithelial dysplasia grading system of World Health Organization? J Oral Pathol Med. 2017;46:921–7. doi: 10.1111/jop.12612. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Sarode SC, Chaudhary M, Gadbail A, Tekade S, Patil S, Sarode GS. Dysplastic features relevant to malignant transformation in atrophic epithelium of oral submucous fibrosis: A preliminary study. J Oral Pathol Med. 2018;47:410–6. doi: 10.1111/jop.12699. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Tilakaratne WN, Klinikowski MF, Saku T. Oral submucous fibrosis: Review on aetiology and pathogenesis. Oral Oncol. 2006;42:561–8. doi: 10.1016/j.oraloncology.2005.08.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Pillai R, Balaram P, Reddiar KS. Pathogenesis of oral submucous fibrosis. Relationship to risk factors associated with oral cancer. Cancer. 1992;69:2011–20. doi: 10.1002/1097-0142(19920415)69:8<2011::aid-cncr2820690802>3.0.co;2-b. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Gupta PC, Ray CS. Epidemiology of betel quid usage. Ann Acad Med Singap. 2004;33:31–6. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Caniff JP, Harvey W. The aetiology of oral submucous fibrosis. The stimulation of collagen synthesis by extract of areca nut. Int J Oral Surg. 1981;10(Suppl 1):163–7. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Misara JK, Raisuddin S. Occurrence of fungi in marketed betel nut. Indian J Plant Pathol. 1984;2:83–4. [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Kolhe AS, Patil N. Cytotoxicity of aqueous extracts of areca nut and tobacco on human erythrocytes (red cell corpuscles) Int Res J. 2008;2:539–40. [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Mathuria N, Verma RJ. Aflatoxin induced haemolysis and its amelioration by turmeric extracts and curcumin in vitro. Acta Poloniac Pharm Drug Res. 2007;64:165–8. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Engvall E, Perlmann P. Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) Quantitative assay of immunoglobulin G. Immunochemistry. 1971;8:871–4. doi: 10.1016/0019-2791(71)90454-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Avrameas S. Coupling of enzymes to proteins with gluteraldehyde. Use of conjugates for detection of antigens and antibodies. Immunochemistry. 1969;6:43. doi: 10.1016/0019-2791(69)90177-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Betel-Quid and Areca-Nut Chewing. IARC Monographs. 2004;85:1–240. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Pindborg JJ. Oral submucous fibrosis as a precancerous condition. J Dent Res. 1966;45(Suppl 3):546–53. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0722.1984.tb00883.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Lee CH, Ko YC, Huang HL, Chao YY, Tsai CC, Shieh TY, et al. The precancer risk of betel quid chewing, tobacco use and alcohol consumption in oral leukoplakia and oral submucous fibrosis in southern Taiwan. Br J Cancer. 2003;88:366–72. doi: 10.1038/sj.bjc.6600727. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Shah N, Sharma PP. Role of chewing and smoking habits in the aetiology of oral submucous fibrosis (OSF): A case-control study. J Oral Pathol Med. 1998;27:475–9. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0714.1998.tb01915.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Prokopczyk B, Rivenson A, Bertinato P, Brunnemann KD, Hoffmann D. 3-(Methylnitrosamino) propionitrile: Occurrence in saliva of betel quid chewers, carcinogenicity, and DNA methylation in F344 rats. Cancer Res. 1987;47:467–71. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Abrol BM. Clinicopathological, biochemical and immunological studies in syndrome of idiopathic oral fibrosis. Bombay Hosp J. 1977;19:50–61. [Google Scholar]
  • 25.International Agency for Research on Cancer. Tobacco Habits Other than Smoking; betel-Quid and Areca-nut Chewing; and Some Related Nitrosamines. Vol. 37. Lyon: IARC; 1985. IARC Monographs on the Evaluation of the Carcinogenic Risk of Chemicals to Humans; p. 211. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Shieh TY, Yang JF. Collagenase activity in oral submucous fibrosis. Proc Natl Sci Counc Repub China B. 1992;16:106–10. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Ma RH, Tsaci CC, Shieh TY. Increased lysil oxidase activity in fibroblasts cultured from oral submucous fibrosis associated with betel nut chewing in Taiwan. J Oral Pathol Med. 1995;24:407–12. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0714.1995.tb01210.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Tsai CC, Ma RH, Shieh TY. Deficiency in collagen and fibronectin phagocytosis by human buccal mucosa fibroblasts in vitro as a possible mechanism for oral submucous fibrosis. J Oral Pathol Med. 1999;28:59–63. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0714.1999.tb01997.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Jeng JH, Chang MC, Hahn LJ. Role of areca nut in betel quid-associated chemical carcinogenesis: Current awareness and future perspectives. Oral Oncol. 2001;37:477–92. doi: 10.1016/s1368-8375(01)00003-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Trivedy CR, Warnakulasuriya KA, Peters TJ, Senkus R, Hazarey VK, Johnson NW. Raised tissue copper levels in oral submucous fibrosis. J Oral Pathol Med. 2000;29:241–8. doi: 10.1034/j.1600-0714.2000.290601.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Hazrey VK, Erlewad DM, Mundhe KA, Ughade SN. Oral submucous fibrosis: Study of 1000 cases from central India. J Oral Pathol Med. 2007;34:12–7. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0714.2006.00485.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Kiran Kumar K, Saraswathi TR, Ranganathan K, Uma Devi M, Elizabeth J. Oral submucous fibrosis: A clinico-histopathological study in Chennai. Indian J Dent Res. 2007;18:106–11. doi: 10.4103/0970-9290.33785. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Babu S, Bhat RV, Kumar PU, Sesikaran B, Rao KV, Aruna P, Reddy PR. A comparative clinico-pathological study of oral submucous fibrosis in habitual chewers of pan masala and betel quid. J Toxicol Clin Toxicol. 1996;34:317–22. doi: 10.3109/15563659609013796. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Afroz N, Hasan SA, Naseem S. Oral submucous fibrosis a distressing disease with malignant potential. Indian J Community Med. 2006;31:1–4. [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Haider SM, Merchant AT, Fikree FF, Rahbar MH. Clinical and functional staging of oral submucous fibrosis. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2000;38:12–5. doi: 10.1054/bjom.1999.0062. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Maher R, Lee AJ, Warnakulasuriya KA, Lewis JA, Johnson NW. Role of areca nut in causation of Oral Submucous Fibrosis: A case control study in Pakistan. J Oral Pathol Med. 1994;23:65–9. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0714.1994.tb00258.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Ahmad MS, Ali SA, Ali AS, Chaubey KK. Epidemiological and etiological study of oral submucous fibrosis among gutkha chewers of Patna, Bihar, India. J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent. 2006;24:84–9. doi: 10.4103/0970-4388.26022. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Anuradha CD, Shyamala Devi CS. Studies on enzymes of clinical significance in Oral Submucous Fibrosis. J Clin Biochem Nutr. 1998;24:45–52. [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Choube SH, Bhowate RR. Betel-nut induced oral Lichenoid lesion in oral submucous fibrosis and its relation with liver enzymes and hepatitis C virus-ribonucleic acid. J Indian Acad Oral Med Radiol. 2018;30:265–70. [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Hsiao TJ, Liao HW, Hsieh PS, Wong RH. Risk of betel quid chewing on the development of liver cirrhosis: A community-based case-control study. Ann Epidemiol. 2007;17:479–85. doi: 10.1016/j.annepidem.2006.12.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Lin CF, Shiau TJ, Ko YC, Chen PH, Wang JD. Prevalence and determinants of biochemical dysfunction of the liver in Atayal Aboriginal community of Taiwan: Is betel nut chewing a risk factor? BMC Gastroenterol. 2008;8:13. doi: 10.1186/1471-230X-8-13. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Wu GH, Boucher BJ, Chiu YH, Liao CS, Chen TH. Impact of chewing betel-nut (Areca catechu) on liver cirrhosis and hepatocellular carcinoma: a population-based study from an area with a high prevalence of hepatitis B and C infections. Public Health Nutr. 2009;12:129–35. doi: 10.1017/S1368980008002073. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Liu CJ, Chen CL, Chang KW, Chu CH, Liu TY. Safrole in betel quid may be a risk factor for hepatocellular carcinoma: Case report. CMAJ. 2000;162:359–60. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Sarma AB, Chakrabarti J, Chakrabarti A, Banerjee TS, Roy D, Mukherjee D, et al. Evaluation of pan masala for toxic effects on liver and other organs. Food Chem Toxicol. 1992;30:161–3. doi: 10.1016/0278-6915(92)90152-b. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Shieh DH, Chiang LC, Shieh TY. Augmented mRNA expression of tissue inhibitor of metalloproteinase-1 in buccal mucosal fibroblasts by arecoline and safrole as a possible pathogenesis for oral submucous fibrosis. Oral Oncol. 2003;39:728–35. doi: 10.1016/s1368-8375(03)00101-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Williams JH, Phillips TD, Jolly PE, Stiles JK, Jolly CM, Aggarwal D. Human aflatoxicosis in developing countries: A AFB1 and Haemolysis in OSMF review of toxicology, exposure, potential health consequences, and interventions. Am J Clin Nutr. 2004;80:1106–22. doi: 10.1093/ajcn/80.5.1106. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.J. W Bennett, M Klich. Mycotoxins. Clinical Microbiology Reviews. 2003 Jul;16:497–516. doi: 10.1128/CMR.16.3.497-516.2003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Wild CP, Gong YY. Mycotoxins and human disease: A largely ignored global health issue. Carcinogenesis. 2010;31:71–82. doi: 10.1093/carcin/bgp264. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Verma RJ. Aflatoxin causes DNA damage. Int J Human Genet. 2004;4:231–6. [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Nishiyama S, Kurebe M. Prevention by estradiol of aflatoxin-induced cytotoxicity in cultured chick embryo liver cells. J Toxicol Sci. 1981;6:159–68. doi: 10.2131/jts.6.159. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Raisuddin S, Misra JK. Aflatoxin in betel nut and its control by use of food preservatives. Food Addit Contam. 1991;8:707–12. doi: 10.1080/02652039109374028. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Mathew AG, Venkataramu SD, Govindarajan VS. Studies on areca nut: Part 1 changes in chemical composition and physical characteristics of nuts with maturity. Indian J Tech. 1964;2:90–6. [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Verma RJ, Raval PJ. Alterations in erythrocytes during induced chronic aflatoxicosis in rabbits. Bull Environ Contam Toxicol. 1992;49:861–5. doi: 10.1007/BF00203159. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Verma RJ, Raval PJ. Cytotoxicity of aflatoxin on red blood corpuscles. Bull Environ Contam Toxicol. 1991;47:428–32. doi: 10.1007/BF01702206. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Van Vlierberghe H, Langlois M, Delanghe J. Haptoglobin polymorphisms and iron homeostasis in health and in disease. Clin Chim Acta. 2004;345:35–42. doi: 10.1016/j.cccn.2004.03.016. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Langlois MR, Delanghe JR. Biological and clinical significance of haptoglobin polymorphism in humans. Clin Chem. 1996;42:1589–600. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Vander Bijletal P, Stockenstrom S, Vismer HF, Van Wyk CW. Incidence of fungi & aflatoxin in imported areca nut samples. S Afr J Sci. 1996;92:154–6. [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Mathew P, Austin RD, Varghese SS, Manojkumar AD. Effect of copper-based fungicide (Bordeaux mixture) spray on the total copper content of areca nut: Implications in increasing prevalence of oral submucous fibrosis. J Int Soc Prevent Communit Dent. 2015;5:283–9. doi: 10.4103/2231-0762.161755. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Thompson JW, Bruick RK. Protein degradation and iron homeostasis. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2012;1823:1484–90. doi: 10.1016/j.bbamcr.2012.02.003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Pathology : JOMFP are provided here courtesy of Wolters Kluwer -- Medknow Publications

RESOURCES