Skip to main content
Journal of Clinical Laboratory Analysis logoLink to Journal of Clinical Laboratory Analysis
. 2021 May 14;35(7):e23826. doi: 10.1002/jcla.23826

Genotyping, antifungal susceptibility, enzymatic activity, and phenotypic variation in Candida albicans from esophageal candidiasis

Hadis Jafarian 1, Maral Gharaghani 1, Seyed Saeed Seyedian 3, Ali Zarei Mahmoudabadi 1,2,
PMCID: PMC8274993  PMID: 33988259

Abstract

Background

Esophageal candidiasis is the most frequent form of esophagitis. The pathogenicity of Candida spp. is related to a combination of microbial factors, hydrolytic enzyme secretion and phenotypic switching. This study was designed to investigate esophageal candidiasis, antifungal activity, enzymatic activity patterns, phenotyping, and genotyping profiles of Candida albicans species.

Methods

Nine hundred thirty‐three visited patients were evaluated, and esophageal biopsies from patients were included in this study during 2019–2020. Direct smear, Gram staining, and culture on CHROMagar were performed for each sample. Isolated species were identified with conventional procedures and PCR‐RFLP. Susceptibility to antifungals was determined according to CLSI guidelines. ABC typing, phenotype switching, hemolysin, proteinase, phospholipase, and esterase activity were also determined with the appropriate protocols.

Results

Twenty‐three (2.5%) patients (mean age 55.2 years) were diagnosed with esophageal candidiasis. The species isolated were 19(82.6%) Calbicans, 3(13.1%) Cglabrata, and 1(4.3%) Ctropicalis. Genotype A (57.9%) was the predominant type in Calbicans isolates. 50% of Calbicans isolates exhibited a white phenotype. A high level of phospholipase (47.4%), hemolysin (68.4%), and proteinase activity (36.8%) was observed in the Calbicans isolates. Only three Cglabrata isolates displayed non‐wild type susceptibility to voriconazole and itraconazole.

Conclusion

This study shows that Calbicans are still the most frequent isolates from patients with esophageal candidiasis. The predominance of genotype A, the white phenotype, and strong hemolysin activity may indicate a high prevalence of pathogenicity in these isolates. Sensitivity to antifungal drugs was greatest for amphotericin and fluconazole.

Keywords: antifungals, Candida albicans, enzymatic activity, esophageal candidiasis, genotyping, phenotypic variation


Candida albicans can be separated into three genotypes using the presence or absence of an intron in the internal transcribed spacer 1 (ITS1) region of 26 s rDNA. According to the PCR products, the genotypes of Calbicans can be categorized to group A (450 bp), group B (840 bp), and group C (450 and 840 bp).

graphic file with name JCLA-35-e23826-g001.jpg

1. INTRODUCTION

Candidiasis is a yeast infection with worldwide distribution. Although superficial forms of the disease are benign, deep forms of candidiasis are life‐threatening, especially in immunocompromised patients. Candida spp. are common opportunistic pathogens originating from the mycobiota of human mucosal sites such as the oropharynx, esophagus, and vagina. 1 , 2 The yeast takes advantage of an impaired immune system, which allows proliferation in the esophageal mucosa in the form of adhesive plaques. 3 , 4 Esophageal candidiasis is the most frequent form of infectious esophagitis and is usually common among patients infected with the human immunodeficiency virus. 5 , 6 The prevalence of esophageal candidiasis ranges from up to 5.2% in the general population to 9.8% in HIV‐positive patients. 7 , 8 Associated risk factors reported to date include increasing age, HIV infection, use of antibiotics, herbal medication, heavy drinking, and high‐dose corticosteroids. 8 , 9

The pathogenicity of Candida spp. is related to a combination of microbial factors such as their ability to grow at 37°C, polymorphism, biofilm formation, hydrolytic enzyme secretion, and phenotypic switching. 10 , 11 , 12 Candida spp. can secrete lipolytic enzymes such as esterase and phospholipase. The secretion of phospholipases can disrupt phospholipids in the host mucosal epithelium, which is a major constituent of cell membranes. 13 Esterase activity is also useful in differentiating some Candida spp. 14 Clinical Candida isolates produce considerably more hemolysin than environmental isolates. 15 About ten proteinase isoenzymes with various functions have been described in Candida albicans. Some of them are related to adherence, tissue damage, and changes in the immune response, and increased activity can lead to severe candidiasis. 11

Candida albicans as a major human fungal pathogen 16 , 17 , 18 , 19 can switch between different morphological phenotypes. Histopathological examination in a murine model demonstrated the presence of pseudohyphae and Calbicans yeasts in kidney tissue. 20 The best described fungal phenotype switch is the white‐to‐opaque transition. 21 Different cell types vary in certain features including cell and colony appearance, mating, adherence, enzyme secretion, and their susceptibility to antifungals. 22 , 23 A reproducible and discriminatory strain typing system for Calbicans is beneficial for clinical and epidemiological studies, because it can provide useful information especially on properties such as virulence and antimicrobial resistance.

ABC genotyping is a reproducible and straightforward method of strain typing for Calbicans. It is valuable for primary clinical and epidemiological studies because it provides information especially on the relations between strain types and properties such as virulence and antimicrobial resistance. According to this method, Calbicans is divided into several genotypes based on the electrophoresis banding pattern, for example, A, B, C, D, and E. 24 , 25 In oral, vulvovaginal, and nail samples, the A genotype was the predominant type in previous studies. 26 , 27 , 28

According to the guidelines of the Infectious Diseases Society of America (IDSA), antifungal treatment for Candida infections is restricted to three major classes of antifungal drugs: azoles, polyenes, and echinocandins. 29 Although antifungal resistance in Calbicans is less frequent than in other species, an increasing number of resistant strains are emerging. 22 , 30 However, despite the profusion of data on antifungal susceptibility patterns of Calbicans, there is only limited information on the association between enzymatic activity, phenotypic variation, and antifungal susceptibility. 30 , 31 , 32

This study was designed to investigate etiologic agents of esophageal candidiasis, their antifungal susceptibility profiles, virulence patterns including enzymatic activity (phospholipase, protease, esterase, and hemolysin), phenotype variations, and genotyping methods for Calbicans isolates.

2. MATERIALS AND METHODS

2.1. Sampling and isolation

The present cross‐sectional study was carried out in the department of internal medicine of Golestan Hospital affiliated to Ahvaz Jundishapur University of Medical Sciences, Iran. All patients who underwent endoscopy between 2019 and 2020 were included in the initial screening. Twenty‐three esophageal biopsy samples from patients with candidiasis plaques who underwent gastrointestinal endoscopy were included in this study. Samples were transferred to normal saline and sent to the Medical Mycology Laboratory affiliated to Ahvaz Jundishapur University of Medical Sciences. Direct smears from each specimen were prepared and used for Gram staining; the presence of gram‐positive budding yeast cells with pseudohyphae indicated candidiasis. The samples were cultured on CHROMagar Candida medium (CHROMagar Candida) and incubated at 35°C for 48–72 h.

2.2. Identification of isolates

Yeasts were initially identified by conventional methods, using CHROMagar Candida culture medium, germ tube formation in human serum, growth at 42°C, and the production of chlamydoconidia on cornmeal agar (HiMedia). For accurate identification, the genomic DNA of each strain was extracted with the DNA extraction protocol described by Lõoke et al 33 Briefly, one yeast colony was picked up from an overnight culture of purified yeast with a sterile inoculation needle. Cells were suspended in 100 μl of 200 mM LiOAc (CDH) in 1% SDS (CinnaGen) solution. The suspension was incubated for 5 min at 70°C, and then, 300 μl absolute ethanol (Mojallali) was added. DNA and cell debris were spun down. The pellet was washed with 70% ethanol and dissolved in 100 μl deionized water.

Molecular identification of Candida species was performed with a PCR‐RFLP method previously described by Mirhendi et al 34 Briefly, the ITS1‐5.8SrDNA‐ITS2 region was amplified with a PCR mixture consisting of 12.5 μl Taq DNA Polymerase 2× Master Mix RED with 1.5 mM MgCl2 (Ampliqon), 5 pmol of both ITS1 (5′‐TCCGTAGGTGAACCTGCGG‐3′) and ITS4 (5′‐TCC TCCGCTTATTGATATGC‐3′) primers, 35 and 2 μl extracted DNA in a final volume of 25 μl. The PCR cycling conditions were as follows: initial denaturation at 94°C for 5 min, followed by 34 cycles of denaturation at 94°C for 50 s, annealing at 56°C for 45 s, and extension at 72°C for 45 s, with a final extension at 72°C for 7 min. Ten microliters of each PCR product was separated by electrophoresis on 1.5% agarose gel. Subsequently, the PCR products were digested with MspI (Thermo Fisher Scientific) restriction enzyme according to the manufacturer's protocol. Finally, 10 μl RFLP products was separated by gel electrophoresis on 2% agarose (Sinaclon) gel. Bands of 238, 297 bp; 320, 561 bp; 186, 340 bp; 261, 249 bp; 371, 155, 82 bp; and 520 bp were identified, respectively, as C. albicans, C. glabrata, C. tropicalis, C. krusei, C. guilliermondii, and C. parapsilosis.

2.3. Genotype determination

ABC genotyping was carried out with 1 μL template DNA, 12.5 μl Taq DNA Polymerase 2× Master Mix RED with 1.5 mM MgCl2 (Ampliqon), and 5 pmol of both CAINT‐L (5′‐ATAAGGGAAGTCGGCAAAATAGATCCGTAA‐3′) and CAINT‐R (5′‐CCTTGGCTGTGGTTTCGCTAGATAGTAGAT‐3′) primers. 24 , 25 The PCR cycling conditions were as follows: initial denaturation at 94°C for 5 min, followed by 25 cycles of denaturation at 94°C for 30 s, annealing at 55°C for 30 s, and extension at 72°C for 30 s, with a final extension at 72°C for 7 min. Ten microliters of each PCR product was separated by electrophoresis on 1.5% agarose gel. Candida albicans isolates can be separated into three genotypes depending on the presence or absence of an intron in the internal transcribed spacer 1 (ITS1) region of 26 s rDNA. According to the PCR products, the genotypes of C. albicans can be categorized as group A (450 bp), group B (840 bp), and group C (450 and 840 bp).

2.4. Antifungal susceptibility testing

Antifungal susceptibility testing was done according to CLSI M27 4th edition. 36 Briefly, all isolates were cultured on Sabouraud dextrose agar (SDA) (Pronadisa, Spain) before susceptibility testing to ensure purity and viability. Yeast inoculum was prepared by suspending colonies of each isolate from an overnight culture in sterile distilled water, and suspensions were adjusted to a turbidity of 0.5 McFarland standard to obtain 1 × 106 to 5 × 106 CFU/ml. Antifungal drugs were obtained from their respective manufacturers as standard powders. Stock solutions of amphotericin B (Sigma‐Aldrich), nystatin (Sigma‐Aldrich), itraconazole (Sigma‐Aldrich), fluconazole (Serva), caspofungin (Sigma‐Aldrich), econazole (Sigma‐Aldrich), luliconazole (APIChem), and voriconazole (Sigma‐Aldrich) were prepared in dimethyl sulfoxide (Merck). The final drug concentration ranged from 16 to 0.03 µg/ml for amphotericin B, nystatin and fluconazole; 0.5 to 0.0001 µg/ml for caspofungin, voriconazole, and luliconazole; and 8 to 0.01 µg/ml for itraconazole and econazole.

Serial twofold dilutions of the different drugs were prepared in RPMI 1640 medium (with l‐glutamine, without bicarbonate) (Bio Basic) and buffered to pH 7.0 with a 0.165 M solution of MOPS (Bio Basic). Yeast suspensions were diluted in RPMI to a concentration of 1 × 103 to 5 × 103 CFU/ml. Minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) were determined in 96‐well plates as follows: inoculated plates were incubated at 35°C and the plates were read visually after 24 h. The MIC was considered the concentration of a drug that elicited 100% inhibition of growth (amphotericin B and nystatin) or 50% inhibition of growth (fluconazole, itraconazole, caspofungin, voriconazole, econazole, and luliconazole). Susceptibility results were interpreted according to the CLSI breakpoints (M27‐S4) 37 and percent ECVs. 38

2.5. Evaluation of Candida albicans microcolonies with fluconazole E test strip

Isolates that exhibited trailing in response to fluconazole were evaluated to identify alterations in antifungal susceptibility profile and phenotype. With E test strips, trailing is apparent as the presence of microcolonies in the inhibition zone. Yeast suspensions were prepared as described in CLSI M27 4th edition. Minimum inhibitory concentrations were determined with fluconazole E test strips (TANA Giotech) after 24 and 48 h of incubation. For microcolonies within the elliptical inhibition zone, one colony situated nearest to the highest concentration was picked up with a sterile needle and cultured on SDA. After 24 h, fluconazole susceptibility was determined with the E test a second time. The MIC of all other antifungal drugs in the present study was also determined, and phenotype variations were assessed. This process was repeated three times. 39

2.6. Phenotype switching

Yeast extract peptone dextrose agar (YPD; Merck) supplemented with phloxine B (5 mg/L) (Merck) was used for phenotype switching assays. Phloxine B stains opaque colonies dark pink and gray colonies light pink, while white colonies remain white. 23 Yeast suspensions were prepared from 24‐h‐old cultures in sterile distilled water and were adjusted to 500–1000 CFU/ml. Thirty microliters of each suspension was spread on YPD plus phloxine B plates and incubated at 37°C for 5 days.

2.7. Enzymatic activity

Proteinase production was evaluated on medium containing 1 g KH2PO4 (Merck), 0.5 g MgSO4 (Merck), 0.1 g yeast extract (Merck, Germany), 10 g glucose (PanReac), and 2 g bovine serum albumin (Merck, Germany) in 100 ml distilled water at pH 5.0. 40 The solution was sterilized by filtration and added to previously autoclaved agar solution (20 g agar powder in 900 ml distilled water). The inoculum was placed on the agar medium and incubated for seven days at 28°C. The proteolysis of bovine serum albumin was visualized as a clear halo around the inoculated zone after staining with 1% amido black (Cellogel).

Phospholipase production was visualized in egg yolk agar plates as described by Samaranayake et al 41 The medium consisted of 65 g SDA, 4.58 g NaCl (Mojallali Chemical Laboratory), and 5.5 g CaCl2 (Merckl in 920 ml distilled water. The medium was sterilized, and after cooling, it was supplemented with 80 ml egg yolk added to the medium. The plates were incubated at 37°C, and the diameters of the colonies with the zones of precipitation were measured after seven days of incubation.

The medium to evaluate esterase activity was prepared as described by Slifkin 14 with 10.0 g Bacto Peptone, 5.0 g NaCl, 0.1 g CaCl2, 15.0 g agar (Mirmedia), and 1000 ml distilled water. The medium was autoclaved and cooled to about 50°C, and then, 5 ml autoclaved Tween 80 was added. The plates were inoculated and then incubated at 30°C and were examined daily for 10 days. Hemolysin activity was evaluated with blood agar plates prepared as described by Negri et al. 15 Sabouraud dextrose agar was supplemented with 3% glucose and 7% sheep blood (Baharafshan). The plates were inoculated and incubated at 37°C for five days. Positive hemolysin activity was demonstrated as a ring of lysis around the colonies.

Enzymatic activity was evaluated by dividing the colony diameter by the clear or precipitation zone plus colony diameter. Values equal to 1 were considered negative, 0.9–0.99 as weak, 0.8–0.89 as mild, 0.7–0.79 as strong, and less than 0.69 as a very strong activity.

3. RESULTS

Among 933 patients who underwent endoscopy, 23 (2.5%) had visible Candida plaques. The diagnosis was confirmed in 23 patients with Gram staining of tissue specimens obtained from these plaques. The mean age of patients with esophageal candidiasis was 55.2 years with a range of 17–91 years, and 58.3% of patients were female. Culture of the isolates with CHROMagar Candida medium yielded 19 green, three violet, and one blue colony. All isolates that produced green colonies grew at 42°C and were positive for chlamydoconidia and germ tube formation. A total of 23 Candida isolates including 19 (82.6%) C. albicans, three (13.1%) C. glabrata, and one (4.3%) C. tropicalis were detected. Among 19 C. albicans isolates, 11 (57.9%) were genotype A, six (31.6%) genotype B, and two (10.5%) genotype C (Table 1 and Figure 1).

TABLE 1.

ABC genotype, antifungal susceptibility profile, enzymatic activity, and phenotype switching of isolated yeasts

No. Genotype Amp Flu Vor Itr Cas Nys Eco Lul Hemo Pro Phos Ester Phe swi
C. albicans 4 A WT S S S S 4 1 0.00195 VS VS M VS G
C. albicans 6 A WT S S S S 4 1 0.0156 VS VS VS VS Wh
C. albicans 8 A WT S S SDD S 4 4 0.0156 N M S VS Wh
C. albicans 9 A WT S S SDD S 4 4 0.0156 VS M S VS Wh
C. albicans 10 A WT S S SDD I 4 0.25 0.0156 VS N VS VS Wh & O
C. albicans 12 A WT S S SDD I 2 1 0.125 M N VS VS Wh
C. albicans 13 A WT S S S S 4 0.016 0.000976 VS VS W VS G
C. albicans 16 A WT S S S S 4 0.25 0.0156 VS M M VS Wh & G
C. albicans 17 A WT S S S S 4 0.125 0.0078 M N S VS G
C. albicans 18 A WT S S S S 4 0.062 0.0039 M M S VS Wh & G
C. albicans 19 A WT S S S S 4 0.125 0.0078 W N VS VS Wh & G
C. albicans 1 B WT S S S S 4 0.5 0.0156 VS S VS VS Wh
C. albicans 2 B WT S S S S 4 4 0.0156 VS S VS VS G
C. albicans 7 B WT S S S S 4 1 0.031 VS VS M S Wh
C. albicans 11 B WT S S SDD I 4 0.5 0.031 VS N M VS Wh
C. albicans 14 B WT S S S S 2 0.25 0.000976 VS N S VS Wh & G
C. albicans 15 B WT S S S S 4 0.125 0.0039 W VS VS VS Wh
C. albicans 3 C WT S S S S 4 4 0.0156 VS VS VS VS Wh
C. albicans 5 C WT S S S S 2 4 0.0156 VS VS VS VS G
C. glabrata 1 WT S NW NW S 8 4 0.000976 VS N W N Wh
C. glabrata 2 WT S NW NW S 8 4 0.00976 M M N N P
C. glabrata 3 WT S NW NW S 8 4 0.000976 VS M M VS P
C. tropicalis WT S S WT I 4 0.5 0.031 VS N VS VS Wh & P

Abbreviations: Amp, Amphotericin Bl; Cas, Caspofungin; Eco, Econazole; Ester, Esterase; Flu, Fluconazole; G, Gray; Hem, Hemolysin; I, Intermediate; Itr, Itraconazole; Lul, Luliconazole; M, Mild; N, Negative; Nys, Nystatin; O, Opaque; P, Pink; Phe swi, Phenotype switch; Pho, Phospholipase; Pro, Proteinase; S, Strong; SDD, Susceptible dose‐dependent; Vor, Voriconazole; VS, Very Strong; W, Weak; Wh, White.

FIGURE 1.

FIGURE 1

Examples of genotypes A, B, and C obtained via PCR RFLP of C. albicans isolates

3.1. Antifungal susceptibility

The in vitro susceptibilities of isolated yeasts to amphotericin B, nystatin, caspofungin, voriconazole, fluconazole, itraconazole, econazole, and luliconazole are summarized in Tables 1 and 2. Among C. albicans isolates, 15.8% and 26.3% demonstrated intermediate susceptibility to caspofungin and itraconazole, respectively. All of the C. albicans isolates were wild type (isolates without mutational or acquired resistance mechanisms), and all of these C. albicans isolates were susceptible to fluconazole and voriconazole.

TABLE 2.

The in vitro susceptibilities of isolated species

Candida spp. Antifungals Minimum inhibitory concentration, MIC (μg/ml) Break points %ECV
MIC range MIC50 MIC90 MICGM %S %I/SDD %R W Non‐W
Candida albicans (19) Amphotericin B 0.031–0.5 0.125 0.25 0.144 100
Nystatin 2–4 4 4 3.585
Caspofungin 0.00097–0.5 0.031 0.5 0.028 84.2 15.8
Voriconazole 0.00097–0.0156 0.0039 0.0156 0.003 100
Fluconazole 0.125–2 0.5 1 0.432 100
Itraconazole 0.0156–0.5 0.125 0.25 0.093 73.7 26.3
Econazole 0.0156–4 0.5 4 0.537
Luliconazole 0.00097–0.125 0.0156 0.031 0.010
Candida glabrata (3 a ) Amphotericin B 0.5 100
Nystatin 8
Caspofungin 0.125 100
Voriconazole 0.25 100
Fluconazole 4 100
Itraconazole 8 100
Econazole 4
Luliconazole 0.00097
Candida tropicalis (1 a ) Amphotericin B 0.062 100
Nystatin 4
Caspofungin 0.5 100
Voriconazole 0.0156 100
Fluconazole 0.5 100
Itraconazole 0.25 100
Econazole 0.5
Luliconazole 0.031
a

MIC 50 and MIC 90 values could not be calculated because of the small number of isolates (<10).

3.2. Evaluation of Candida albicans microcolonies with fluconazole E test strip

Thirteen C. albicans isolates (68%) demonstrated a trailing effect to fluconazole. Because of biases inherent in the visual readings, the level of the trailing effect was not categorized with the E test method. The susceptibility rate across all three generations was almost identical. Some alterations in phenotype over generations were observed in five isolates as isolates: colonies from two isolates changed from gray to white, and colonies from three isolates changed from white to gray.

3.3. Phenotype switching

Nine C. albicans isolates exhibited white colonies on YPD agar medium containing phloxine B. Five C. albicans isolates produced gray colonies. We observed a combination of white‐gray colonies in four C. albicans isolates, and white‐opaque colonies in one isolate. There were no significant differences between genotypes in the frequency of phenotype switching (p ≤ 0.232) (Table 1).

3.4. Enzymatic activity

A high level of phospholipase activity was observed in nine (47.4%) of the C. albicans strains. Five (26.3%) C. albicans strains were strong phospholipase producers. Very strong hemolysin and proteinase activity was seen in 13 (68.4%) and seven (36.8%) C. albicans strains, respectively. Eighteen (94.7%) C. albicans strains presented very strong esterase activity with a mean value of 0.39. There were no significant differences between genotypes in the frequency of hemolysin (  0.8), proteinase (  0.1), or phospholipase activity (  0.4), whereas a significant difference between genotypes was found for esterase activity, with  0.04 (Table 3).

TABLE 3.

Enzymatic activity of isolated species

Candida spp. Enzymes Enzymatic activity
Negative Weak Mild Strong Very strong Minimum Maximum Mean
Candida albicans (19) Hemolysin 5.3% 10.5% 15.8% 68.4% 0.44 1 0.59
Proteinase 31.6% 21.1% 10.5% 36.8% 0.3 1 0.79
Phospholipase 5.3% 21.1% 26.3% 47.4% 0.2 0.92 0.66
Esterase 5.3% 94.7% 0.1 1 0.39
Candida glabrata (3) Hemolysin 33.3% 66.6% 0.3 0.87 0.623
Proteinase 33.3% 66.7% 0.8 1 0.876
Phospholipase 33.3% 33.3% 33.3% 0.88 1 0.939
Esterase 66.7% 33.3% 0.42 1 0.806
Candida tropicalis (1) Hemolysin 100%
Proteinase 100%
Phospholipase 100%
Esterase 100%

4. DISCUSSION

Esophageal candidiasis is an opportunistic infection frequently reported in immunocompromised patients, although a higher occurrence was also reported in the immunocompetent population with underlying conditions. 42 Once host protection mechanisms are compromised, Candida can proliferate on the esophageal mucosa and form adherent white to yellowish plaques. In a case‐control study of patients with esophageal candidiasis (≥65 years old) a 6‐month mortality rate of 47% compared to 5% in controls 43 was reported. In some rare cases, esophageal candidiasis may result in hemorrhagic esophageal ulcers, 44 invasive candidiasis, 45 and esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. 46

In the present study, the prevalence of esophageal candidiasis was 2.4%. The occurrence rate of esophageal candidiasis ranged from 0.0007% to 5.6% in previous inquiries. 8 , 42 , 43 , 47 , 48 , 49 The prevalence reported by Hani et al 47 was distinctly lower compared with other studies, 8 , 42 , 43 , 47 , 48 , 49 while the highest rate was reported by Mushi et al.. 49 The variation in prevalence rates in different studies is mostly related to differences in the study population and predisposing factors.

Esophageal candidiasis is diagnosed by biopsy or esophageal brushing through endoscopy examination. Nonetheless, the determination of etiologic agents and antifungal susceptibility tests should be taken into account because some Candida species such as C. glabrata and C. krusei are intrinsically resistant to azole agents. 50 According to our findings, the most frequent isolate was C. albicans (82%) followed by C. glabrata (13%), which was in line with other studies. 48 , 51 , 52

We found no reports about the ABC genotyping of C. albicans isolates from esophageal specimens. Therefore, the closest reports were related to isolates from mucosal sites and the oral cavity. We found all three types (A, B, and C) of C. albicans in our study, and genotype A was the predominant one. We also found 2 isolates belonging to genotype C. In contrast, according to the study by Sardi et al, 53 the majority of C. albicans isolates (51.6%) belonged to genotype B, and 48.4% were genotype A; these authors found no genotype C isolates. Odds et al 54 described genotype C as a rare genotype found in only 9% (173/1931) of C. albicans isolates. In a study with diverse clinical samples, Rosca et al 27 found no significant correlation between genotype (A at 52.92%, B at 17.85%, C at 29.20%) and the infection site. It thus appears that genotype A is the most frequent genotype in clinical specimens.

Treatment for esophageal candidiasis always includes systemic antifungal agents. The most commonly used medication to treat esophageal candidiasis is oral fluconazole, with itraconazole, voriconazole, and amphotericin B among other treatment options. Caspofungin may be preferred over amphotericin B because the former has fewer side effects. In the present study, isolated species exhibited no resistance to selected antifungal agents. Three isolates of C. albicans and one C. tropicalis isolate showed intermediate susceptibility to caspofungin. Shields et al. noted that the MIC for anidulafungin or micafungin might be a more reliable predictor of treatment failure in C. glabrata invasive candidiasis, but provided no data regarding C. albicans. 55 Lakshmy et al. reported resistance rates of 6% to fluconazole and 4% to itraconazole in C. albicans isolates, and their non‐C. albicans isolates were resistant to fluconazole. These authors did not report any resistance to amphotericin B. 51 Salehi et al. did not distinguish between C. albicans and non‐albicans isolates in their report and found MICs ranging from 0.125 to 8.0 μg/ml for fluconazole, 0.008 to 0.75 μg/ml for itraconazole, and 0.008 to 0.75 μg/ml for amphotericin B. 52 Luliconazole, as a new member of the azole family, has broad antifungal activity. We found that MIC ranged from 0.00097 to 0.125 μg/ml for C. albicans isolates. Taghipour et al 56 reported that within the range of 0.016 to 2.0 μg/ml, all their C. albicans isolates were sensitive to luliconazole. In view of the urgent need for alternative antifungal agents due to ever‐increasing reports of resistant isolates, systemic formulations and in vivo studies of luliconazole are needed.

Because fluconazole is still a first‐line antifungal agent for esophageal candidiasis, we investigated C. albicans isolates that exhibited trailing effects to identify variations in antifungal susceptibility profile and phenotype. Trailing growth can reflect the degree of azole tolerance; however, no definite molecular explanation has been found for this phenomenon. 57 In the present study, the susceptibility rate across three generations was similar for fluconazole and other drugs. In a similar study, Hauzer et al 39 found no increase in fluconazole susceptibility in microcolonies over three generations. Although in vitro studies support the notion that microcolonies can be disregarded, there is as yet not enough in vivo evidence for the harmlessness of this phenomenon.

The ability of C. albicans to produce extracellular enzymes may be linked to its virulence. 12 Candida can produce different enzymes, and their amount and strength vary depending on the isolation site. 40 , 58 In the present study, the most active enzyme was esterase, which showed very strong activity in 18 (94.7%) isolates of C. albicans. Furthermore, 13 (68.4%) isolates showed very strong hemolysin activity, whereas the least active enzyme was proteinase. Slifkin et al. reported that all C. albicans in their analysis demonstrated esterase activity, which was a useful way to distinguish Candida spp. 14 Gharaghani et al 40 reported higher hemolytic and proteinase activities in oral isolates. Dabiri et al 58 reported higher proteinase (50%) and phospholipase activity (100%) compared with the present study. Nouraei et al 59 reported significant differences in hemolysin, proteinase, and phospholipase activity between albicans and non‐albicans isolates. An interesting comparison of heterozygous and homozygous strains of C. albicans demonstrated that the latter had higher phospholipase and proteinase activity than heterozygous strains. 60 Comparisons of ABC genotyping and enzyme production in the present study showed a significant difference between genotypes only for esterase production (  0.04). Because of the low number of non‐albicans isolates in our sample, we were unable not compare them with C. albicans isolates.

Candida albicans can switch between several morphological phenotypes in response to a variety of environmental signals—a trait which is essential for their life as a commensal or pathogenic organism. 61 , 62 Tao et al 23 reported that white colonies demonstrated low proteinase activity, whereas gray colonies had higher proteinase activity. These authors also noted that white colonies were more virulent than gray and opaque colonies. 23 In line with their study, most of the gray colonies in the present study had strong or very strong proteinase activity. In contrast, about half of our C. albicans isolates had no or only mild proteinase activity. Also, most of the C. albicans isolates in our study were white, that is, the phenotype that was most virulent in the ex vivo study by Tao et al.. 23 In this connection, we note that phenotype switching over generations in five of our isolates did not affect trailing.

In conclusion, there is limited information about the characteristics of etiologic agents of esophageal candidiasis or yeast factors operative in the pathogenesis of esophageal candidiasis, and in vivo experiments are scarce. The prevalence of esophageal candidiasis varies in different studies due to differences in study populations and predisposing factors. We found no resistance among our C. albicans isolates to selected antifungals, but because of the low number of isolates studied here, there is a need for larger studies. However, all three C. glabrata isolates remained non‐wild type for voriconazole and itraconazole resistance. New antifungals such as luliconazole may be an effective alternative in cases of antifungal resistance, and further in vivo studies should be done. The predominance of genotype A, the white phenotype, and strong hemolysin activity may indicate a high prevalence of pathogenicity in these isolates.

The present study had some limitations. Because of the COVID‐19 pandemic, sampling was limited and the number of isolates available for analysis was consequently low. We suggest a larger population for further research. Because most of the patients were not hospitalized, we could not investigate their predisposing factors. On the other hand, the present study is the first, to our knowledge, to determine the frequency of phenotype switching and ABC genotypes in C. albicans as the predominant clinical isolate.

INFORMED CONSENT

The consent documents were signed and dated by the patients.

CONFLICT OF INTEREST

The authors state that there is no competitive concern of any nature with this manuscript.

AUTHOR CONTRIBUTIONS

AZM involved in study design, supervision, data interpretation, and manuscript editing. HJ involved in experimentation, data collection, analysis, literature search, and manuscript writing. MG involved in experimentation, data collection. SSS involved in patient sampling.

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

We are thankful to the Ahvaz Jundishapur University of Medical Sciences, Ahvaz, Iran for providing the funds for this study through grant no. OG‐9835. We thank K. Shashok (AuthorAID in the Eastern Mediterranean) for improving the use of English in the manuscript.

DATA AVAILABILITY STATEMENT

Data sharing is not applicable to this article as no datasets were generated or analyzed during the current study.

REFERENCES

  • 1. Samaranayake LP, Keung Leung W, Jin L. Oral mucosal fungal infections. Periodontol 2000. 2009;49(1):39‐59. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2. van de Veerdonk FL, Kullberg BJ, Netea MG. Pathogenesis of invasive candidiasis. Curr Opin Crit Care. 2010;16(5):453‐459. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3. Armstrong‐James D, Meintjes G, Brown GD. A neglected epidemic: fungal infections in HIV/AIDS. Trends Microbiol. 2014;22(3):120‐127. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4. Levine MS, Macones AJ Jr, Laufer I. Candida esophagitis: accuracy of radiographic diagnosis. Radiology. 1985;154(3):581‐587. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5. Kliemann DA, Pasqualotto AC, Falavigna M, Giaretta T, Severo LC. Candida esophagitis: species distribution and risk factors for infection. Rev Inst Med Trop Sao Paulo. 2008;50(5):261‐263. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6. Walsh TJ, Hamilton SR, Belitsos N. Esophageal candidiasis. Managing an increasingly prevalent infection. Postgrad Med. 1988;84(2):pp. 193–6, 201–5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7. Alsomali MI, Arnold MA, Frankel WL, et al. Challenges to "classic" esophageal candidiasis: looks are usually deceiving. Am J Clin Pathol. 2017;147(1):33‐42. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8. Takahashi Y, Nagata N, Shimbo T, et al. Long‐term trends in esophageal candidiasis prevalence and associated risk factors with or without HIV infection: lessons from an endoscopic study of 80,219 patients. PLoS One. 2015;10(7):e0133589. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9. Choi JH, Lee CG, Lim YJ, Kang HW, Lim CY, Choi JS. Prevalence and risk factors of esophageal candidiasis in healthy individuals: a single center experience in Korea. Yonsei Med J. 2013;54(1):160‐165. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10. Mayer FL, Wilson D, Hube B. Candida albicans pathogenicity mechanisms. Virulence. 2013;4(2):119‐128. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11. Sardi JCO, Scorzoni L, Bernardi T, Fusco‐Almeida AM, Mendes Giannini MJS. Candida species: current epidemiology, pathogenicity, biofilm formation, natural antifungal products and new therapeutic options. J Med Microbiol. 2013;62(Pt 1):10‐24. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12. Yang YL. Virulence factors of Candida species. J Microbiol Immunol Infect. 2003;36(4):223‐228. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13. Mohan das V, Ballal M. Proteinase and phospholipase activity as virulence factors in Candida species isolated from blood. Rev Iberoam Micol. 2008;25(4):208‐210. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14. Slifkin M. Tween 80 opacity test responses of various Candida species. J Clin Microbiol. 2000;38(12):4626‐4628. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15. Negri MF, Faria MG, Guilhermetti E, Alves AA, Paula CR, Svidzinski TIE. Hemolytic activity and production of germ tubes related to pathogenic potential of clinical isolates of Candida albicans. Rev Ciênc Farm Básica Apl. 2010;31(1):89‐93. [Google Scholar]
  • 16. Aslani N, Janbabaei G, Abastabar M, et al. Identification of uncommon oral yeasts from cancer patients by MALDI‐TOF mass spectrometry. BMC Infect Dis. 2018;18(1):24. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17. Hasanvand S, Azadegan Qomi H, Kord M, Didehdar M. Molecular epidemiology and in vitro antifungal susceptibility of candida isolates from women with vulvovaginal candidiasis in northern cities of Khuzestan province, Iran. Jundishapur J Microbiol. 2017;10(8):e12804. [Google Scholar]
  • 18. Khanmohamadi M, Mehbod ASA, Noraeepour M, Didehdar M. Molecular identification of candida species isolated from women with vulvovaginal candidiasis: brief report. Tehran Univ Med J. 2017;75(7):538‐542. [Google Scholar]
  • 19. Nasri E, Fakhim H, Vaezi A, et al. Airway colonisation by Candida and Aspergillus species in Iranian cystic fibrosis patients. Mycoses. 2019;62(5):434‐440. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20. Fakhim H, Vaezi A, Dannaoui E, et al. Comparative virulence of Candida auris with Candida haemulonii, Candida glabrata and Candida albicans in a murine model. Mycoses. 2018;61(6):377‐382. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21. Slutsky B, Staebell M, Anderson J, Risen L, Pfaller M, Soll DR. "White‐opaque transition": a second high‐frequency switching system in Candida albicans . J Bacteriol. 1987;169(1):189‐197. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22. Soll DR. Candida commensalism and virulence: the evolution of phenotypic plasticity. Acta Trop. 2002;81(2):101‐110. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23. Tao L, Du H, Guan G, et al. Discovery of a "white‐gray‐opaque" tristable phenotypic switching system in candida albicans: roles of non‐genetic diversity in host adaptation. PLoS Biol. 2014;12(4):e1001830. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24. McCullough MJ, Clemons KV, Stevens DA. Molecular epidemiology of the global and temporal diversity of Candida albicans . Clin Infect Dis. 1999;29(5):1220‐1225. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25. McCullough MJ, Clemons KV, Stevens DA. Molecular and phenotypic characterization of genotypic Candida albicans subgroups and comparison with Candida dubliniensis and Candida stellatoidea . J Clin Microbiol. 1999;37(2):417‐421. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26. Emmanuel NN, Romeo O, Mebi AG, et al. Genotyping and fluconazole susceptibility of Candida albicans strains from patients with vulvovaginal candidiasis in Jos. Nigeria. Asian Pac J Trop Dis. 2012;2(1):48‐50. [Google Scholar]
  • 27. Rosca I, Bostanaru A‐C, Minea B, et al. Phenotypic and genotypic variations in Candida albicans isolates from Romanian patients. Rev Romana de Medicina de Lab. 2018;26(4):405‐413. [Google Scholar]
  • 28. Sawadogo PM, Zida A, Soulama I, et al. Genotype analysis of clinical Candida albicans isolates using PCRs targeting 25S rDNA and ALT repeat sequences of the RPS and antifungal susceptibility in Ouagadougou (Burkina Faso). Infect Drug Res. 2019;12:3859‐3866. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29. Pappas PG, Rex JH, Sobel JD, et al. Guidelines for treatment of candidiasis. Clin Infect Dis. 2004;38(2):161‐189. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30. Slutsky B, Buffo J, Soll DR. High‐frequency switching of colony morphology in Candida albicans . Science. 1985;230(4726):666‐669. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31. San‐Blas G, Travassos LR, Fries BC, et al. Fungal morphogenesis and virulence. Med Mycol. 2000;38(suppl 1):79‐86. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32. Vargas K, Messer SA, Pfaller M, et al. Elevated phenotypic switching and drug resistance of Candida albicans from human immunodeficiency virus‐positive individuals prior to first thrush episode. J Clin Microbiol. 2000;38(10):3595‐3607. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33. Looke M, Kristjuhan K, Kristjuhan A. Extraction of genomic DNA from yeasts for PCR‐based applications. Biotechniques. 2011;50(5):325‐328. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34. Mirhendi H, Makimura K, Khoramizadeh M, Yamaguchi H. A one‐enzyme PCR‐RFLP assay for identification of six medically important Candida species. Nihon Ishinkin Gakkai Zasshi. 2006;47(3):225‐229. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35. White TJ, Bruns T, Lee S, Taylor J. Amplification and direct sequencing of fungal ribosomal RNA Genes for phylogenetics. PCR protocols: a guide to methods and applications. 1990;18(1):315‐322. [Google Scholar]
  • 36. CLSI . Reference method for broth dilution antifungal susceptibility testing of yeasts; fourth informational supplement. CLSI document M27‐S4. Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute, 950 West Valley Road, Suite 2500, Wayne, Pennsylvania 19087 USA. 2012. [Google Scholar]
  • 37. CLSI . Reference Method for Broth Dilution Antifungal Susceptibility Testing of Yeasts, 4th edn. CLSI standard M27. Wayne, PA: Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute; 2017. [Google Scholar]
  • 38. CLSI . Epidemiological cutoff values for antifungal susceptibility testing. CLSI supplement M59, 2nd edn. Wayne, PA: Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute; 2018. [Google Scholar]
  • 39. Hauzer M, Cohen MJ, Polacheck I, Moses A, Korem M. The prevalence and clinical significance of microcolonies when tested according to contemporary interpretive breakpoints for fluconazole against Candida species using E‐test. Med Mycol. 2019;57(6):718‐723. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40. Gharaghani M, Rezaei‐Matehkolaei A, Zarei Mahmoudabadi A, Keikhaei B. The frequency, antifungal susceptibility and enzymatic profiles of Candida species isolated from neutropenic patients. Jundishapur J Microbiol. 2016;9(11):e41446. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41. Samaranayake LP, Raeside JM, MacFarlane TW. Factors affecting the phospholipase activity of Candida species in vitro. Sabouraudia. 1984;22(3):201‐207. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42. Hoversten P, Otaki F, Katzka DA. Course of esophageal candidiasis and outcomes of patients at a single center. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2019;17(1):200‐2 e1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43. Weerasuriya N, Snape J. A study of candida esophagitis in elderly patients attending a district general hospital in the UK. Dis Esophagus. 2006;19(3):189‐192. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44. Natsui K, Tsuchiya A, Terai S. Refractory hemorrhagic esophageal ulcers by Candida esophagitis with advanced systemic sclerosis. JGH Open. 2020;4(5):1007‐1008. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45. Aghdam MR, Sund S. Invasive esophageal candidiasis with chronic mediastinal abscess and fatal pneumomediastinum. Am J Case Rep. 2016;17:466‐471. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46. Delsing CE, Bleeker‐Rovers CP, van de Veerdonk FL, et al. Association of esophageal candidiasis and squamous cell carcinoma. Med Mycol Case Rep. 2012;1(1):5‐8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47. Hani MB, Al Manasra ARA, Hamouri S, Alqudah M. A retrospective study of esophageal candidiasis in Jordan, a non‐HIV endemic area. Jordan Med J. 2017;51(4):175‐182. [Google Scholar]
  • 48. Mohammadi R, Abdi S. Molecular identification of Candida species isolated from gastro‐oesophageal candidiasis in Tehran. Iran. Gastroenterol Hepatol Bed Bench. 2015;8(4):288‐293. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49. Mushi MF, Ngeta N, Mirambo MM, Mshana SE. Predictors of esophageal candidiasis among patients attending endoscopy unit in a tertiary hospital, Tanzania: a retrospective cross‐sectional study. Afr Health Sci. 2018;18(1):66‐71. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50. Whaley SG, Berkow EL, Rybak JM, Nishimoto AT, Barker KS, Rogers PD. azole antifungal resistance in Candida albicans and emerging non‐albicans Candida species. Front Microbiol. 2016;7:2173. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51. Lakshmy J, Katragadda R, Balaji J. Speciation and antifungal susceptibility of esophageal candidiasis in cancer patients in a tertiary care hospital in South India. J Med Allied Sci. 2016;6(1):29. [Google Scholar]
  • 52. Salehi F, Esmaeili M, Mohammadi R. Isolation of Candida species from gastroesophageal lesions among pediatrics in Isfahan, Iran: Identification and Antifungal susceptibility testing of clinical isolates by E‐test. Adv Biomed Res. 2017;6:103. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53. Sardi JC, Duque C, Hofling JF, Goncalves RB. Genetic and phenotypic evaluation of Candida albicans strains isolated from subgingival biofilm of diabetic patients with chronic periodontitis. Med Mycol. 2012;50(5):467‐475. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54. Odds FC, Bougnoux ME, Shaw DJ, et al. Molecular phylogenetics of Candida albicans . Eukaryot Cell. 2007;6(6):1041‐1052. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55. Shields RK, Nguyen MH, Press EG, Updike CL, Clancy CJ. Anidulafungin and micafungin MIC breakpoints are superior to that of caspofungin for identifying FKS mutant Candida glabrata strains and echinocandin resistance. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2013;57(12):6361‐6365. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56. Taghipour S, Kiasat N, Shafiei S, Halvaeezadeh M, Rezaei‐Matehkolaei A, Zarei MA. Luliconazole, a new antifungal against Candida species isolated from different sources. J Mycol Med. 2018;28(2):374‐378. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57. Delarze E, Sanglard D. Defining the frontiers between antifungal resistance, tolerance and the concept of persistence. Drug Resist Updat. 2015;23:12‐19. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58. Dabiri S, Shams‐Ghahfarokhi M, Razzaghi‐Abyaneh M. Comparative analysis of proteinase, phospholipase, hydrophobicity and biofilm forming ability in Candida species isolated from clinical specimens. J Mycol Med. 2018;28(3):437‐442. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59. Nouraei H, Pakshir K, ZareShahrabadi Z, Zomorodian K. High detection of virulence factors by Candida species isolated from bloodstream of patients with candidemia. Microb Pathog. 2020;149:104574. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60. Nouraei H, Sheykhi S, ZareShahrabadi Z, Khodadadi H, Zomorodian K, Pakshir K. Comparative analysis of virulence factors of homozygous and heterozygous strains of Candida albicans vaginal isolates. Int J Microbiol. 2020;2020:8889224. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61. Huang G. Regulation of phenotypic transitions in the fungal pathogen Candida albicans . Virulence. 2012;3(3):251‐261. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62. Pande K, Chen C, Noble SM. Passage through the mammalian gut triggers a phenotypic switch that promotes Candida albicans commensalism. Nat Gnet. 2013;45(9):1088‐1091. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Data Availability Statement

Data sharing is not applicable to this article as no datasets were generated or analyzed during the current study.


Articles from Journal of Clinical Laboratory Analysis are provided here courtesy of Wiley

RESOURCES