Skip to main content
PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases logoLink to PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases
. 2021 Jun 24;15(6):e0009456. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0009456

Undernutrition, food insecurity, and leprosy in North Gondar Zone, Ethiopia: A case-control study to identify infection risk factors associated with poverty

Puneet Anantharam 1, Lisa E Emerson 1, Kassahun D Bilcha 2, Jessica K Fairley 1,3,*, Annisa B Tesfaye 4
Editor: Zulfiqar A Bhutta5
PMCID: PMC8277044  PMID: 34166403

Abstract

Background

Ethiopia has over 3,200 new cases of leprosy diagnosed every year. Prevention remains a challenge as transmission pathways are poorly understood. Susceptibility and disease manifestations are highly dependent on individual host-immune response. Nutritional deficiencies, such as protein-energy malnutrition, have been linked to reduced cell-mediated immunity, which in the case of leprosy, could lead to a higher chance of active leprosy and thus an increased reservoir of transmissible infection.

Methodology/Principal findings

Between June and August 2018, recently diagnosed patients with leprosy and individuals without known contact with cases were enrolled as controls in North Gondar regional health centers. Participants answered survey questions on biometric data, demographics, socioeconomic situation, and dietary habits. Descriptive statistics, univariate, and multivariate logisitic regression examined associations between undernutrition, specifically body mass index (BMI), middle upper arm circumference (MUAC), and leprosy. Eighty-one participants (40 cases of leprosy, 41 controls) were enrolled (75% male) with an average age of 38.6 years (SD 18.3). The majority of cases were multibacillary (MB) (90%). There was a high prevalence of undernutrition with 24 (29.6%) participants underweight (BMI <18.5) and 17 (21%) having a low MUAC. On multivariate analysis, underweight was significantly associated with leprosy (aOR = 9.25, 95% CI 2.77, 30.81). Also found to be associated with leprosy was cutting the size of meals/skipping meals (OR = 2.9, 95% CI 1.0, 8.32) or not having enough money for food (OR = 10, 95% CI 3.44 29.06).

Conclusions/Significance

The results suggest a strong association between leprosy and undernutrition, while also supporting the framework that food insecurity may lead to undernutrition that then could increase susceptibility to leprosy. In conclusion, this study highlights the need to study the interplay of undernutrition, food insecurity, and the manifestations of leprosy.

Author summary

Understanding the effect that nutritional deficiencies, dietary habits, and undernutrition exert on leprosy transmission can improve our ability to better develop strategies and control programs to prevent this debilitating disease. While there is evidence that leprosy and undernutrition are associated, overall the literature is sparse. The authors here provide evidence for the possible role of undernutrition and low BMI on leprosy susceptibility. Additional questions about dietary habits and socioeconomic status support the framework that food insecurity may lead to undernutrition causing an increase in susceptibility to active leprosy disease. Although the study focuses on the leprosy susceptibility, as it relates to undernutrition, in North Gondar Zone, Ethiopia, the outcomes of the study may inform risks in other areas where the dual burden of undernutrition and neglected tropical diseases exist.

Introduction

Ethiopia is endemic for leprosy (Mycobacterium leprae infection), with over 3,200 diagnosed every year, making it the seventh most burdened country globally [1]. Prevention remains a challenge, as transmission pathways are poorly understood and susceptibility and disease manifestations are highly dependent on the individual host immune response [2]. An immune response that predisposes an individual to clinically symptomatic leprosy, in particular multibacillary (MB) infection, could be a driver of more infectious cases in the community. Nutritional deficiencies, such as protein-energy malnutrition, have been linked to reduced cell-mediated immunity and susceptibility to infection [36] and food insecurity has been associated with leprosy [710].

Body mass index (BMI) is a measure of nutritional status in adults [11]. Another indicator for nutritional status in adults is Middle Upper Arm Circumference (MUAC) [12]. While more commonly used and validated in children, it has been used in some contexts to assess adult malnutrition [1214]. Nutrition has long been known to influence the development of infectious diseases such as respiratory infections, infectious diarrhea, measles, and malaria [1517]. Malnutrition often negatively affects the immune system, and in some cases, causes individuals to be more vulnerable to clinically apparent infection. In tuberculosis, another mycobacterial infection, nutritional deficit has been identified as an important risk factor for the development of clinical symptoms of disease [1822].

Due to the fact that poverty is such a broad and complex topic to characterize, a causal relationship between poverty and leprosy is difficult to demonstrate. In addition, uncertainty exists about how leprosy and poverty are associated [8]. Most individuals affected by leprosy are born and raised in poor environments and continue to be pushed into greater depths of poverty due to the stigma and disabilities associated with the disease [9]. Low income families have little money to spend on food and consequently have a low intake of highly nutritious non-rice foods such as meat, fish, milk, eggs, fruits and vegetables. There are few studies investigating leprosy and nutrition; however, they all suggest that nutrition plays a role in the disease [7,9,10]. We seek to increase the body of knowledge on the associations of leprosy and nutrition in the context of Ethiopia, which has not been studied thus far. We hypothesize that undernutrition is a risk factor for leprosy when controlling for S. mansoni co-infection (a highly prevalent helminth that also alters cell-mediated immunity) and socioeconomic status (SES).

Methods

Ethics statement

This study was approved by the Emory Institutional Review Board (IRB) and the ethical review board of the University of Gondar. Informed verbal consent was given by all participants.

Study design & overview

Between June and August 2018, participants were recruited to a case-control study in North Gondar Zone, Ethiopia. North Gondar Zone is part of the Amhara Region and had a census population of 3,225,022 as of July 1, 2017 [23]. With an urban population of 509,228 (15.79%), a vast majority of the population in North Gondar Zone live in rural or agricultural areas [23]. The total land area of North Gondar Zone is 45,945 square kilometers [24]. Participants were enrolled at the University of Gondar referral hospital and health centers in and around the North Gondar Zone.

Study population

Cases were enrolled as persons with clinical leprosy diagnosed by a practicing dermatologist within the previous 12 months. Both multibacillary (MB) and paucibacillary (PB) cases were included as per the World Health Organization (WHO): MB with greater then 5 lesions and PB less then or equal to 5 lesions [34]. Other case inclusion criteria were being 18 years of age or older and residing in North Gondar Zone of Ethiopia. Controls were adults without contact of known cases of leprosy and who resided in the same communities as the cases. Individuals with previous leprosy infection and suspicious skin or nerve symptoms were excluded as controls based on physical examination and medical history. Controls were recruited from the community, however, pregnant women and children were excluded from the study.

Variables and measurement

Food security survey questions were derived from the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) through the Economic Research Service (ERS) and is an accessible resource on how to measure household food security [25,26]. BMI was calculated using the definition weight (kg)/ height2 (m). Underweight was defined as body mass index (BMI) less than 18.5 kg/m2. Normal was classified as greater than or equal to 18.5 kg/m2 and less than 25 kg/m2. Overweight was classified as greater than or equal to 25 kg/m2 and less than 30 kg/m2 and obese as BMI greater than 30 kg/m2. For MUAC, circumference was measured by finding the midpoint between the participants’ elbow and shoulder. From there, the measuring tape was wrapped around the participants’ arm at the midpoint to determine MUAC in centimeters. Adults with a MUAC below 18 cm were classified as “severe” or “low”risk for malnutrition. Adults with a MUAC between 18 cm and 21 cm are classified as “moderate” or “low” risk for malnutrition. Adults with MUAC greater than 21 cm are classified as “normal” risk for malnutrition [27]. Urine was tested for Schistosoma mansoni infection by Schisto POC-CCA rapid diagnostic test [28].

Data collection

Data collected from participants included anthropometric data (height, weight, and middle upper arm circumberence (MUAC)), demographic information, and a questionnaire administered only in Amharic inquiring about food insecurity, dietary habits, socioeconomic status (SES), and education. Trained data collectors, health center focal persons, were responsible for collecting anthropometric parameters. Measures taken to ensure data quality include one data collector measuring height and weight at each health center, fully calibrated scales for weight measurement, and study coordinators observing accuracy of measurements.

Sample size calculation

There are very few data to guide calculation of a sample size for the associations of low BMI (underweight, BMI < 18.5) and leprosy. Since co-infection with schistosomiasis was also a variable in this study and of interest due to the suppression of cell-mediated immunity from helminth infections, we used published data on the associations of helminths and leprosy, which showed an odds ratio of 4 for the association between helminth and leprosy, to calculate sample size for this pilot study [29]. Based on an estimated helminth burden of 20–25% prevalence in North Gondar Zone, sample size was calculated using an alpha of 0.05 and power of 0.8, resulting in a goal of 40 cases and 40 controls.

Statistical analysis

Data from the questionnaires were entered into an Excel database. After data cleaning, analysis was performed using SAS 9.4 (Cary, NC) [30]. Descriptive statistics were performed on the main study variables and p-values describing differences between cases and controls were calculated for each variable using the chi-square, Fisher’s Exact test, or t-test. In univariate analyses, calculation of odds ratios provided insight into an association between exposures of interest, such as BMI, MUAC, and dietary habits, and the outcome of interest, a clinical diagnosis of leprosy. A p-value of < 0.05 was considered significant. Figs 1 and 2 for visual analysis and representation were developed using Microsoft Excel (2017) and R [31]. After univariate analysis was carried out, the variables significantly associated with M. leprae infection were included in a multivariate backward stepwise logistic regression controlling for confounding factors such as age, sex, and education. The variables that remained statistically significant in these multivariate analyses were considered as the main result. All multivariate analyses were done using SAS 9.4 (Cary, NC) [30].

Fig 1. Comparison of mean BMI (kg / m2) between cases and control.

Fig 1

Fig 2. Comparison of mean MUAC (cm) between cases and controls.

Fig 2

Results

Eighty-one participants, 40 patients (cases) and 41 controls, were enrolled (75% male) with an average age of 38.6 years (SD 18.3). 52 participants (64.2%) had less than eight years of formal education. The majority of cases were MB (90%) and 21 participants (25.9%) had S. mansoni infection. All demographic and clinical data are presented in Table 1.

Table 1. Demographic and clinical data of study population.

P-values determined by chi-square, t-test, or crude logistic regression where appropriate. An alpha = 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Variable Cases (n = 40) Controls (n = 41) Total (n = 81) p-value
Age (years), mean (SD) 42.9 (19.1) 34.4 (16.5) 38.6 (18.3) p = 0.04
Sex, n (%)
    Male
    Female

31 (77.5)
9 (22.5)

30 (73.2)
11 (26.8)

61 (75.3)
20 (24.7)

p = 0.66
WHO Classification, n (%)
    Paucibacillary (PB)
    Multibacillary (MB)

4 (10.0)
36 (90.0)
N/A N/A
Grade of Disability, n (%)
    Grade 1
    Grade 2

12 (30.0)
8 (20.0)
N/A N/A
Education Level, n (%)
    Less than Grade 8
    Grade 8 and above
    Missing

27 (67.5)
4 (10.0)
9 (22.5)

25 (61.0)
15 (36.6)
1 (2.4)

52 (64.2)
19 (23.5)
10 (12.3)

p = 0.02
Body Mass Index, n (%)
    Underweight (<18.5)
    Normal (18.5–24.9)
    Overweight–Obese (≥25)

20 (50.0)
19 (47.5)
1 (2.5)

4 (9.8)
34 (82.9)
3 (7.3)

24 (29.6)
53 (65.4)
4 (4.9)

p = 0.0004
1 (ref)
p = 0.66
Middle Upper Arm
    Circumference, n (%)
    Low (18–21 cm)
    Normal (>21 cm)

14 (35.0)
26 (65.0)

3 (7.3)
38 (92.7)

17 (21.0)
64 (79.0)

P = 0.003
S. mansoni infection, n (%) 8 (20.0) 13 (31.7) 21 (25.9) P = 0.12

Eight (20% of cases) individuals were diagnosed with Grade II disability, according to WHO classification. Disability Grade II was highest among patients between the age of 39–59 accounting for 36% of cases within that group. BMI ranged from 15.9 to 31.5 with a high prevalence of undernutrition: 24 (29.6%) participants underweight (BMI <18.5) and 17 (21%) with “low” MUAC. Four (9.8%) controls were characterized as underweight, while 20 (50%) cases were classified as underweight by BMI. Fig 1 depicts a comparison of BMI among cases and controls showing that the cases’ mean BMI is statistically significantly lower than that of controls’ mean BMI. Fig 2 depicts a comparison of MUAC among cases and controls, with cases having lower mean MUAC.

On univariate analysis, both low BMI (OR = 9.25, 95% CI 2.77, 30.81) and low MUAC were significantly associated with leprosy (OR = 6.82, 95% CI 1.78, 26.13). Low education level, defined as less than Grade 8, was also significantly associated with leprosy (OR = 4.05, 95% CI 1.18, 13.85). Cutting the size of meals/skipping meals (OR = 2.87, 95% CI 1.0, 8.32) or not having enough money to get more food (OR = 10, 95% CI 3.44, 29.06) was more common in cases of leprosy than controls. Additional outcomes looking at dietary habits and SES as they relate to leprosy can be seen in Table 2. On multivariate analysis (Table 2), underweight was still significantly associated with leprosy (aOR = 10.32, 95% CI 1.79, 59.67) after controlling for age, sex, and education (as a surrogate marker of socioeconomic status). MUAC, also included in the multivariate model, was no longer statistically significantly associated with leprosy (aOR = 1.50, CI 0.22, 10.05).

Table 2. Univariate analysis and multivariate logistic regression of study outcome, leprosy, and demographic, nutritional, infectious, and food security questions.

Variables without an aOR were either not included or were dropped from the final model per the methods.

Variable OR (95% CI) P-Value aOR (95% CI)
Underweight–BMI (<18.5) 9.25 (2.77, 30.81)* <0.0001 10.32 (1.79, 59.67)*
Low–MUAC (≤ 21 cm) 6.82 (1.78, 26.13)* 0.003 1.50 (0.22, 10.05)
Sex
    Male (ref = Female)

1.26 (0.46, 3.48)

0.66

2.35 (0.51, 10.87)
Age, years, continuous ---- ---- 1.01 (0.98, 1.05)
Education level (Less than Grade 8) 4.05 (1.18, 13.85)* 0.02 1.87 (0.41, 8.52)
No utilization of institutional banking 2.89 (1.17, 7.14)* 0.02
S. mansoni infection 0.54 (0.19, 1.49) 0.12
Reducing or skipping meals 2.87 (1.00, 8.32)* 0.05
Insufficient funds for meals 10.0 (3.44, 29.06)* < 0.001
Length of time between each market visit?
    Less than once a week
    (ref = at least once a week)

1.83 (0.71, 4.71)

0.22
Did not eat for a day due to lack of food 1.86 (0.50, 6.82) 0.37
Ate less than participant felt they should have 1.27 (0.42, 3.84) 0.68

*Result is significant with a p-value <0.05.

Discussion

Undernutrition, as defined by low body mass index, showed a striking association with leprosy in this small case control study with an aOR of more than 10. Wagenaar, et al. and Oktaria et al, also both found BMI to be associated with leprosy [7]. More specifically, Wagenaar, et al., found 25% of cases to be underweight, while only 14% of controls were found to be underweight [7]. According to Oktaria, et al., a paired t-test showed a significant difference in BMI between cases and controls [10]. Although both studies’ findings were consistent with our findings overall, their calculations used mean BMI as a continuous variable to compare between cases and controls. By grouping underweight (BMI < 18.5) to Normal–Obese (BMI ≥ 18.5), we have a better picture of the degree of undernutrition in many of the participants, especially those with leprosy. These findings are consistent with Rao, et al., who showed that undernutrition (BMI < 18.5) was more common in people affected by leprosy than in those without leprosy in India [32]. A commonality among all the studies is a high burden of undernutrition, as defined by low BMI, that was present within “case” study populations. Since all these studies are taken at one point in time, it is not possible to know whether the undernutrition predated the infection or not. However, since poor micronutrition and several micronutrient deficiencies, such as vitamin A, can suppress cell-mediated immunity, these findings could show a propensity for undernourished individuals to either present with active leprosy symptoms (as opposed to latent infection) or to present with multibacillary infection instead of paucibacillary infection. In both cases, undernutrition would be sustaining a reservoir of infection in the community. Feenstra et al.’s study supports the notion of malnutrition being a risk factor for leprosy as they found a higher incidence following periods of food shortage and more longitudinal studies need to investigate this further [9].

Another important outcome of this study revealed that food insecurity, measured by having insufficient funds for meals, was also associated with leprosy on univariate analysis. While, again, it is hard to know if the leprosy itself caused the food insecurity (perhaps through stigma or social isolation), there may be a case that having food insecurity leads to malnutrition that then increases the risk of active leprosy. This was consistent with Wagenaar, et al., who found that low income families have only little money to spend on food and consequently have a low intake of highly nutritious non-rice foods such as meat, fish, milk, eggs, fruits and vegetables and thus at higher risk for leprosy infection [7].

The majority of cases being MB (90%) within the study population may highlight comorbid conditions such as undernutrition that may play a role in the shift from PB to MB among patients, since MB is associated with a lack of a sufficient cell-mediated (Th1) response as opposed to a robust cell-mediated response in PB cases [33]. Although numbers of PB cases were too low to study this question directly, further investigation into the association with malnutrition and presentation of leprosy (MB vs PB) is warranted since such much higher rates of transmission occur from patients with MB than PB leprosy [34]. In addition to the MB proportion of patients, about 21 participants (25.9%) in this study presented with S. mansoni infection. Although our study did not find an association with S. mansoni infection and leprosy, further investigations into co-infections and the influence on immune response mechanisms is needed to better understand this interaction with leprosy as several studies have shown a connection, including a recent one in Brazil that showed a significant association between leprosy and schistosomiasis between cases and household / family contacts [35].

Findings from this study support the limited published data on nutrition and leprosy and presents the first study to look at nutrition and leprosy in the Ethiopian context, a country that has dealt with a lot of food insecurity for its citizens in recent decades. A major strength of this study is the survey combining anthropometric data and nutritional questions related to dietary habits and food insecurity. One limitation of the study is the smaller study size. However, with regard to BMI, sample size was sufficient to validate our findings with 80% power at a 0.05 alpha level. Challenges with sample size stemmed from a limited number of reported cases, accessibility to health centers, and willingness of patients to enroll in the study. Additionally, this study did not measure micronutrient deficiencies in participants. Doing so may have provided a more comprehensive study that would add to the literature. Although S. mansoni co-infection data was collected, other co-infections were not studied that could potentially affect immune responses, and thus the risk of active leprosy. While this study found an association with BMI and leprosy, further knowledge and understanding is needed to corroborate the idea that there is a causal pathway between undernutrition and leprosy. As Wagenaar also argues the fact that food shortage may not impact susceptibility to leprosy infection itself irrespective of M. leprae manifestation, but rather the progression from latent infection to clinical manifestation is important to consider [7]. In other words, a better understanding of the individual host response to latent M. leprae and contribution of comorbidities to this response is crucial to controlling leprosy and reducing the human reservoirs of infection in affected areas.

This study is the first of its kind to look at nutrition, food insecurity, and SES in the context of North Gondar Zone, Ethiopia. Addressing the interplay between poverty, undernutrition, dietary habits, and nutritional deficiencies (as shown in Fig 3) may have the potential for impact on leprosy burden in this region and similar endemic areas. As we begin looking forward toward the elimination of leprosy, there are two major components that must be addressed; the reservoir (humans, zoonotic, and possibly environmental) and the host. This study has focused primarily on the host, in terms of undernutrition and dietary habits’ influence on leprosy susceptibility, infection, and/or development of leprosy in a specific population. It is a worthwhile endeavor to pursue a greater understanding of the interconnectedness of nutrition and leprosy to further improve leprosy control, prevention, and intervention.

Fig 3. Diagram showing possible relationships between food insecurity, dietary diversity, nutritional deficiencies, undernutrition, M. leprae infection, and leprosy manifestation.

Fig 3

Acknowledgments

The authors thank Yawyewsew Alemu for assistance in coordinating health center visits and Workye Kassaw for printing and translating services. We also appreciate the assistance of health center staff and thank the participants without which the study could not have been done.

Data Availability

Data cannot be shared publicly because this is a small region of Ethiopia, and a small dataset of a very stigmatized disease, therefore listing the study participants separately by age may violate participant privacy. Data are available for those who meet the criteria for access to confidential data at a third party, Professor Kassahun Alemu Gelaye, PhD, the Director, Institute of Public Health, University of Gondar, Ethiopia: kassalemu@gmail.com.

Funding Statement

JF received donations from the Order of St. Lazarus (https://www.st-lazarus.us). PA and LE received funding from an institutional award: Emory RSPH Global Field Experience Award (https://www.sph.emory.edu/rollins-life/community-engaged-learning/global-field-experience/index.html). There are no grant numbers for either source. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript. No salary support was provided by these funders.

References

  • 1."Leprosy—Number of new leprosy cases—Data by country", World Health Organization, 2020. [Online]. Available: https://apps.who.int/gho/data/node.main.A1639?lang=en. [Accessed: 13- Jun- 2020]. [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Bratschi M, Steinmann P, Wickenden A, Gillis T. Current knowledge on Mycobacterium leprae transmission: a systematic literature review. Leprosy Review. 2015;(86):142–155. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Ferguson A, Griffin G. Nutrition and the immune system. Elsevier Science Ltd. 2000:747–764. [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Lima E, Roland I, Maroja M, Marcon J. Vitamin A and lipid peroxidation in patients with different forms of leprosy. Revista do Instituto de Medicina Tropical de São Paulo. 2007;49(4):211–214. doi: 10.1590/s0036-46652007000400003 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Mandal D, Reja A, Biswas N, Bhattacharyya P, Patra P, Bhattacharya B. Vitamin D receptor expression levels determine the severity and complexity of disease progression among leprosy reaction patients. New Microbes and New Infections. 2015;6:35–39. doi: 10.1016/j.nmni.2015.04.001 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Lu’o’ng K, Hoàng Nguyễn L. Role of the Vitamin D in Leprosy. The American Journal of the Medical Sciences. 2012;343(6):471–482. doi: 10.1097/MAJ.0b013e318232a6cf [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Wagenaar I, van Muiden L, Alam K, Bowers R, Hossain M, Kispotta K et al. Diet-Related Risk Factors for Leprosy: A Case-Control Study. PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases. 2015;9(5):e0003766. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0003766 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Pescarini J, Strina A, Nery J, Skalinski L, Andrade K, Penna M et al. Socioeconomic risk markers of leprosy in high-burden countries: A systematic review and meta-analysis. PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases. 2018;12(7):e0006622. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0006622 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Feenstra S, Nahar Q, Pahan D, Oskam L, Richardus J. Recent Food Shortage Is Associated with Leprosy Disease in Bangladesh: A Case-Control Study. PLoS Neglected Tropical Diseases. 2011;5(5):e1029. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0001029 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Oktaria S, Hurif N, Naim W, Thio H, Nijsten T, Richardus J. Dietary diversity and poverty as risk factors for leprosy in Indonesia: A case-control study. PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases. 2018;12(3):e0006317. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0006317 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Bailey KV, Ferro-Luzzi A. Use of body mass index of adults in assessing individual and community nutritional status. Bull World Health Organ. 1995;73(5):673–680. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Collins S. Using Middle Upper Arm Circumference to Assess Severe Adult Malnutrition During Famine. JAMA.1996;276(5):391–395. doi: 10.1001/jama.1996.03540050051023 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Chakraborty R., Bose K. and Bisai S., "Mid-upper arm circumference as a measure of nutritional status among adult Bengalee male slum dwellers of Kolkata, India: relationship with self reported morbidity", Anthropologischer Anzeiger, vol. 67, no. 2, pp. 129–137, 2009. Available: doi: 10.1127/0003-5548/2009/0017 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Van Tonder E, Mace L, Steenkamp L, Tydeman-Edwards R, Gerber K, Friskin D. Mid-upper arm circumference (MUAC) as a feasible tool in detecting adult malnutrition. South African Journal of Clinical Nutrition. 2018:1–6. [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Moret Y, Schmid-Hempel P. Survival for immunity: The price of immune system activation for bumblebee workers. Science. 2000;290:1166–1168. doi: 10.1126/science.290.5494.1166 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Scrimshaw NS, SanGiovanni JP. Synergism of nutrition, infection, and immunity: An overview. Am J Clin Nutr. 1997;66:464S–477S. doi: 10.1093/ajcn/66.2.464S [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Ambrus JL Sr, Ambrus JL. Jr Nutrition and infectious diseases in developing countries and problems of acquired immunodeficiency syndrome. Exp Biol Med (Maywood) 2004;229:464–472. doi: 10.1177/153537020422900603 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Gold W M J. Mycobacterial infections in immunosuppressed patients. Sem Respir Infect 1986; 1: 160–165 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Scrimshaw N S, Taylor C E, Gordon J E. Effect of malnutrition on resistance to infection. In: Scrimshaw N S, Taylor C E, Gordon J E, eds. Interactions of Nutrition and Infection. Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization, 1968: 60–142. [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Faber K. Tuberculosis and nutrition. Acta Tuberc Scand 1938; 12: 287ff [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Rich A R. The Pathogenesis of Tuberculosis, 2nd ed. Springfield, IL: C. C. Thomas, 1951: 618–626 [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Gupta KB, Gupta R, Atreja A, Verma M, Vishvkarma S. Tuberculosis and nutrition. Lung India. 2009;26(1):9–16. doi: 10.4103/0970-2113.45198 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.North Gondar Zone [Internet]. Central Statistical Agency of Ethiopia. 2019. [cited 1 October 2019]. Available from: http://www.csa.gov.et/ [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Ethiopia Population Statistics [Internet]. GeoHive. 2019. [cited 1 October 2019]. Available from: https://web.archive.org/web/20120805184429/ http://www.geohive.com/cntry/ethiopia.aspx [Google Scholar]
  • 25.USDA ERS—Survey Tools [Internet]. Economic Research Service. 2019. [cited 1 October 2019]. Available from: https://www.ers.usda.gov/topics/food-nutrition-assistance/food-security-in-the-us/survey-tools.aspx#guide [Google Scholar]
  • 26.“USDA Economic Research Service", United States Department of Agriculture, 2020. [Online]. Available: https://www.ers.usda.gov. [Accessed: 16- Jun- 2020]. [Google Scholar]
  • 27."Determining a Global Mid-Upper Arm Circumference Cutoff to Assess Underweight in Adults (Men and Nonpregnant Women)", Fanta Project, 2020. [Online]. Available: https://www.fantaproject.org/sites/default/files/resources/Global-MUAC-Cutoffs-nonPregnant-Adults-Jun2017.pdf. [Accessed: 16- Jun- 2020]. [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Bezerra D de F, Pinheiro MCC, Barbosa L, Viana AG, Fujiwara RT, Bezerra FS de M. (2021). Diagnostic comparison of stool exam and point-of-care circulating cathodic antigen (POC-CCA) test for schistosomiasis mansoni diagnosis in a high endemicity area in northeastern Brazil. Parasitology, 148(4), 420–426. Cambridge University Press. doi: 10.1017/S0031182020002164 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Diniz L, Magalhães E, Pereira F, Dietze R, Ribeiro-Rodrigues R. (2010). Presence of intestinal helminths decreases T helper type 1 responses in tuberculoid leprosy patients and may increase the risk for multi-bacillary leprosy. Clinical & Experimental Immunology. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2249.2010.04164.x [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.SAS. Cary, North Carolina: SAS Institute Inc.; 2002–2019.
  • 31.R: A language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing; 2008.
  • 32.Rao P, John A. Nutritional status of leprosy patients in India. Indian Journal for leprosy. 2012. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Misch E, Berrington W, Vary J, Hawn T. Leprosy and the Human Genome. Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews. 2010;74(4):589–620. doi: 10.1128/MMBR.00025-10 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34."Classification of leprosy", World Health Organization, 2020. [Online]. Available: https://www.who.int/lep/classification/en/. [Accessed: 16- Jun- 2020]. [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Dennison CL, de Oliveira LB, Fraga LAO, E Lima RS, Ferreira JA, Clennon JA, de Mondesert L, Stephens J, Magueta EB, Castelo Branco A, Rezende MC, Negrão-Corrêa D, de Faria Grossi MA, Fairley JK. Mycobacterium leprae-helminth co-infections and vitamin D deficiency as potential risk factors for leprosy: A case-control study in south-eastern Brazil. Int J Infect Dis. 2021. Apr;105:261–266. doi: 10.1016/j.ijid.2021.02.048 Epub 2021 Feb 13. . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
PLoS Negl Trop Dis. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0009456.r001

Decision Letter 0

Zulfiqar A Bhutta, Abhay R Satoskar

29 Dec 2020

Dear Dr Fairley,

Thank you very much for submitting your manuscript "Undernutrition, food insecurity, and leprosy in North Gondar Zone, Ethiopia: A case-control study to identify infection risk factors associated with poverty" for consideration at PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases. As with all papers reviewed by the journal, your manuscript was reviewed by members of the editorial board and by several independent reviewers. In light of the reviews (below this email), we would like to invite the resubmission of a significantly-revised version that takes into account the reviewers' comments below.

  

We cannot make any decision about publication until we have seen the revised manuscript and your point by point response to the reviewers' comments. Your revised manuscript is also likely to be sent to reviewers for further evaluation.

When you are ready to resubmit, please upload the following:

[1] A letter containing a detailed list of your responses to the review comments and a description of the changes you have made in the manuscript. Please note while forming your response, if your article is accepted, you may have the opportunity to make the peer review history publicly available. The record will include editor decision letters (with reviews) and your responses to reviewer comments. If eligible, we will contact you to opt in or out.

[2] Two versions of the revised manuscript: one with either highlights or tracked changes denoting where the text has been changed; the other a clean version (uploaded as the manuscript file).

Important additional instructions are given below your reviewer comments.

Please prepare and submit your revised manuscript within 60 days. If you anticipate any delay, please let us know the expected resubmission date by replying to this email. Please note that revised manuscripts received after the 60-day due date may require evaluation and peer review similar to newly submitted manuscripts.

Thank you again for your submission. We hope that our editorial process has been constructive so far, and we welcome your feedback at any time. Please don't hesitate to contact us if you have any questions or comments.

Sincerely,

Zulfiqar A. Bhutta, PhD

Associate Editor

PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases

Abhay Satoskar

Deputy Editor

PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases

***********************

Reviewer's Responses to Questions

Key Review Criteria Required for Acceptance?

As you describe the new analyses required for acceptance, please consider the following:

Methods

-Are the objectives of the study clearly articulated with a clear testable hypothesis stated?

-Is the study design appropriate to address the stated objectives?

-Is the population clearly described and appropriate for the hypothesis being tested?

-Is the sample size sufficient to ensure adequate power to address the hypothesis being tested?

-Were correct statistical analysis used to support conclusions?

-Are there concerns about ethical or regulatory requirements being met?

Reviewer #1: Methods

1. It is unclear how the authors ascertain controls. On page 6, 108 -109 It is stated “Controls were adults without contact of known cases of leprosy and who resided in the same communities as the cases…..Individuals with previous leprosy infection and suspicious skin or nerve symptoms were excluded as controls” Is this enough to ascertain controls? This sentence could further be expanded to include if any physical examination and/or any laboratory confirmations were conducted. This is important because it could have led to misclassification. In addition, it is important to describe how controls were recruited i.e. from facility or community?

2. Measurement of variables is not clearly stated. It is explained, to some extent, how MUAC was measured. However, measurement procedures for other anthropometric parameters i.e. height and weight should be explained in detail including if there is training of data collectors, measures taken to ensure data quality, technical error measurements during training (if calculated) and other procedures followed while measuring height and weight need to be clearly explained. Using a separate paragraph for each measurement (anthropometric, dietary and others) under the headline of variables/measurements would improve organization.

3. I found it difficult to link the results of the study with the USDA food security measurement tool the authors described in the data collection section. The collected food security variables doesn’t seem to appropriately measure food security. Moreover, the authors might want to explain why they chose this specific tool to assess food security. On quick literature review, there are evidences of a valid household food insecurity access scale to assess food insecurity including seasonality in Ethiopia (such as Gebreyesus et al. BMC Nutrition 2015, 1:2 http://www.biomedcentral.com/bmcnutr/content/1/1/2 and Kabalo et al. BMC Nutrition (2019) 5:54 https://doi.org/10.1186/s40795-019-0323-6).

4. The sources of measurements (data collection tool) used to assess dietary habit is also not clear and it is very difficult to say the variables stated in table 2 measure dietary habit. Table 2; what does “recently modified dietary intake mean”? Is this increasing or decreasing dietary intake? By how much? How it was measured need to be clearly stated. Is it common to take dietary supplements in Ethiopia, particularly in the study setting?

5. The data analysis section mainly talks about sample size. It would be better understandable if sample size and data analysis were described as separate sections.

6. On page 7, line 147-148; It is stated “education (found to be the most useful marker of socioeconomic status in our study).” How did the authors reach to this conclusion? Also page 9 line 181 stated “education (as a surrogate marker of socioeconomic status)“. These statements seem debatable considering it is stated, in the study setting section, that the vast majority of the population in the study area live in agricultural areas.

7. Why is it that socioeconomic variables i.e. wealth index or at least monthly family income were not measured?

Reviewer #2: Given that this is a case control study, the selection of control is critical. Need more details of how the controls were selected. Currently a superficial description is given that "Controls were adults without contact of known cases of leprosy and who resided in the same communities as the cases". Were they randomly selected from the community? Were they enrolled from the clinics with alternate diagnosis?

Page 6 L125. Low risk should actually be high risk.

Reviewer #3: Major revision

Helminth infection is described in the introduction as having an effect on the cell mediated immunity, what according to theory is also the case of undernutrition in relation to leprosy. Therefore, Helminth infection should be taking into account as a confounding factor in the analysis (in all univariate analyses, and the multivariate analyses).

The hypothesis at the end of the introduction suggests that the analyses are controlled for co-infection, but from the rest of the text it does not become clear if this was indeed done. If it is not done, it should be. If it was done, it should be better described in the methods section.

--------------------

Results

-Does the analysis presented match the analysis plan?

-Are the results clearly and completely presented?

-Are the figures (Tables, Images) of sufficient quality for clarity?

Reviewer #1: Result

1. It looks like majority (75%) of the participants were males. This number is almost similar between cases and controls. Is this a coincidence or did the authors match cases and controls by sex? In case of the later, the authors need to consider appropriate analysis.

2. Results of a characteristics comparison between cases and controls is not included for each variable as stated in the analysis although there is a figure for MUAC and BMI. It would be easy to understand if p-vaues were written next to each variable embedded in table 1.

3. While classifying BMI, Normal and Obese individuals should not be in the same category.

4. Presenting the univariate and multivariate analysis results in one table, by clearly indicating the reference categories for each of the variables would improve understanding.

Reviewer #2: Figure 1 and 2 are exactly the same as Table 3. Should use one of the two.

Reviewer #3: Accept

Figure 1 and 2 do not add much to the information already given in Table 1. I suggest to leave those out, as they are also not of good quality..

--------------------

Conclusions

-Are the conclusions supported by the data presented?

-Are the limitations of analysis clearly described?

-Do the authors discuss how these data can be helpful to advance our understanding of the topic under study?

-Is public health relevance addressed?

Reviewer #1: (No Response)

Reviewer #2: We need better understanding of control selection to say how valid are the results.

Reviewer #3: Accept

It would be interesting to discuss the results of the food insecurity questionnaire a bit further. What could be an explanation that there is a strong correlation between insufficient funds for foods with leprosy, but not with the other food related factors (reduced meals or skipping meals for a day- which you expect to be strongly related to insufficient funds, and eating less than should have).

--------------------

Editorial and Data Presentation Modifications?

Use this section for editorial suggestions as well as relatively minor modifications of existing data that would enhance clarity. If the only modifications needed are minor and/or editorial, you may wish to recommend “Minor Revision” or “Accept”.

Reviewer #1: Some minor comments

1. Expand abbreviation in the abstract

2. Page 6, line 108; “Other case inclusion criteria were being 18 years of age or older or residing in North Gondar Zone of Ethiopia” is it if a person fulfills either one of the 2 criteria or both?

3. Page 6, line 114; was the demographic questions asked in a language other than Amharic?

4. Page 6, 119-21; write measurement unit next to the numbers

5. The sentence “A p-value of < 0.05 was considered significant.” Is repeated on page 7 lines 143 and 150. I think it is enough to just keep one. Same goes for the analysis software.

6. Page 8, lines 63-65; the numbers in table 2 and sentences doesn’t match.

Reviewer #2: (No Response)

Reviewer #3: Minor revisions:

There are a few phrases that could be better formulated in English:

Line 32: " recently diagnosed patients and individuals without contact of known cases were enrolled as controls" suggests that patients were also enrolled as controls. Suggest to rephrase as and "recently diagnosed leprosy patients and controls, i.e. individuals ...., were enrolled."

Line 34: ": Biometric data" should be "anthropometric data"

Line 104: "Cases were enrolled as persons with active leprosy disease" is not correct. Suggest to rephrase as "persons with active leprosy disease were enrolled as cases".

Line 108: "years of age or older or residing" should be "and residing"

Line 108/109: "Controls were adults without contact of known cases of leprosy". Rephrase to either "Controls were adults who were not a contact of leprosy cases" or "Controls were adults without contact with known leprosy cases"

Line 125 and 126: "or “low”risk for malnutrition" is very unclear. With such low MUAC scores it seems not likely that the risk for malnutrition is low.

Line 182 ends unexpectedly

--------------------

Summary and General Comments

Use this section to provide overall comments, discuss strengths/weaknesses of the study, novelty, significance, general execution and scholarship. You may also include additional comments for the author, including concerns about dual publication, research ethics, or publication ethics. If requesting major revision, please articulate the new experiments that are needed.

Reviewer #1: Overall comment

I’m grateful for the opportunity to review your manuscript entitled “Undernutrition, food insecurity, and leprosy in North Gondar Zone, Ethiopia: A case-control study to identify infection risk factors associated with poverty”. The study addressed an interesting issue and could be informative especially with little evidence available on the issue in Ethiopia. The submitted manuscript unfortunately requires major revision before it is ready for publication, as it lacks methodological detail that would facilitate sound interpretation of the results and permit reproducibility of the study elsewhere (details below).

Reviewer #2: Important topic, simple design. Need to strengthen the methods and results section.

Reviewer #3: This is a clearly written paper on the relationship between undernutrition and leprosy. The paper is a relevant addition to the knowledge so far, as it studies a different population than earlier papers.

--------------------

PLOS authors have the option to publish the peer review history of their article (what does this mean?). If published, this will include your full peer review and any attached files.

If you choose “no”, your identity will remain anonymous but your review may still be made public.

Do you want your identity to be public for this peer review? For information about this choice, including consent withdrawal, please see our Privacy Policy.

Reviewer #1: No

Reviewer #2: Yes: Syed Asad Ali

Reviewer #3: No

Figure Files:

While revising your submission, please upload your figure files to the Preflight Analysis and Conversion Engine (PACE) digital diagnostic tool, https://pacev2.apexcovantage.com. PACE helps ensure that figures meet PLOS requirements. To use PACE, you must first register as a user. Then, login and navigate to the UPLOAD tab, where you will find detailed instructions on how to use the tool. If you encounter any issues or have any questions when using PACE, please email us at figures@plos.org.

Data Requirements:

Please note that, as a condition of publication, PLOS' data policy requires that you make available all data used to draw the conclusions outlined in your manuscript. Data must be deposited in an appropriate repository, included within the body of the manuscript, or uploaded as supporting information. This includes all numerical values that were used to generate graphs, histograms etc.. For an example see here: http://www.plosbiology.org/article/info%3Adoi%2F10.1371%2Fjournal.pbio.1001908#s5.

Reproducibility:

To enhance the reproducibility of your results, PLOS recommends that you deposit laboratory protocols in protocols.io, where a protocol can be assigned its own identifier (DOI) such that it can be cited independently in the future. For instructions see https://journals.plos.org/plosntds/s/submission-guidelines#loc-methods

Attachment

Submitted filename: Comments_PNTD-D-20-01634.pdf

PLoS Negl Trop Dis. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0009456.r003

Decision Letter 1

Zulfiqar A Bhutta, Abhay R Satoskar

8 May 2021

Dear Dr Fairley,

We are pleased to inform you that your manuscript 'Undernutrition, food insecurity, and leprosy in North Gondar Zone, Ethiopia: A case-control study to identify infection risk factors associated with poverty' has been provisionally accepted for publication in PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases.

Before your manuscript can be formally accepted you will need to complete some formatting changes, which you will receive in a follow up email. A member of our team will be in touch with a set of requests.

Please note that your manuscript will not be scheduled for publication until you have made the required changes, so a swift response is appreciated.

IMPORTANT: The editorial review process is now complete. PLOS will only permit corrections to spelling, formatting or significant scientific errors from this point onwards. Requests for major changes, or any which affect the scientific understanding of your work, will cause delays to the publication date of your manuscript.

Should you, your institution's press office or the journal office choose to press release your paper, you will automatically be opted out of early publication. We ask that you notify us now if you or your institution is planning to press release the article. All press must be co-ordinated with PLOS.

Thank you again for supporting Open Access publishing; we are looking forward to publishing your work in PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases.

Best regards,

Zulfiqar A. Bhutta, PhD

Associate Editor

PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases

Abhay Satoskar

Deputy Editor

PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases

***********************************************************

PLoS Negl Trop Dis. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0009456.r004

Acceptance letter

Zulfiqar A Bhutta, Abhay R Satoskar

21 Jun 2021

Dear Dr Fairley,

We are delighted to inform you that your manuscript, "Undernutrition, food insecurity, and leprosy in North Gondar Zone, Ethiopia: A case-control study to identify infection risk factors associated with poverty," has been formally accepted for publication in PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases.

We have now passed your article onto the PLOS Production Department who will complete the rest of the publication process. All authors will receive a confirmation email upon publication.

The corresponding author will soon be receiving a typeset proof for review, to ensure errors have not been introduced during production. Please review the PDF proof of your manuscript carefully, as this is the last chance to correct any scientific or type-setting errors. Please note that major changes, or those which affect the scientific understanding of the work, will likely cause delays to the publication date of your manuscript. Note: Proofs for Front Matter articles (Editorial, Viewpoint, Symposium, Review, etc...) are generated on a different schedule and may not be made available as quickly.

Soon after your final files are uploaded, the early version of your manuscript will be published online unless you opted out of this process. The date of the early version will be your article's publication date. The final article will be published to the same URL, and all versions of the paper will be accessible to readers.

Thank you again for supporting open-access publishing; we are looking forward to publishing your work in PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases.

Best regards,

Shaden Kamhawi

co-Editor-in-Chief

PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases

Paul Brindley

co-Editor-in-Chief

PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases

Associated Data

    This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

    Supplementary Materials

    Attachment

    Submitted filename: Comments_PNTD-D-20-01634.pdf

    Attachment

    Submitted filename: CommentsResponses_Revision_Final.docx

    Data Availability Statement

    Data cannot be shared publicly because this is a small region of Ethiopia, and a small dataset of a very stigmatized disease, therefore listing the study participants separately by age may violate participant privacy. Data are available for those who meet the criteria for access to confidential data at a third party, Professor Kassahun Alemu Gelaye, PhD, the Director, Institute of Public Health, University of Gondar, Ethiopia: kassalemu@gmail.com.


    Articles from PLoS Neglected Tropical Diseases are provided here courtesy of PLOS

    RESOURCES