Skip to main content
Geburtshilfe und Frauenheilkunde logoLink to Geburtshilfe und Frauenheilkunde
. 2021 Jul 13;81(7):789–806. doi: 10.1055/a-1369-9395

Development of Hormonal Intravaginal Rings: Technology and Challenges

Die Entwicklung hormonhaltiger Vaginalringe: Technologie und Herausforderungen

Fojan Rafiei 1, Hadi Tabesh 1,, Shayan Farzad 2, Farah Farzaneh 3, Maryam Rezaei 1, Fateme Hosseinzade 1, Khosrow Mottaghy 4
PMCID: PMC8277443  PMID: 34276064

Abstract

Intravaginal rings (IVRs) are minimally invasive polymeric devices specifically designed to be used for the sustained and prolonged release of various type of drugs such as hormones. One of the benefits of using topical drug delivery systems (e.g., IVRs) is the fact that systemic drug delivery may cause drug resistance due to elevated drug levels. Topical drug delivery also provides higher concentrations of the drug to the target site and has fewer side effects. In addition, when a drug is administered vaginally, the hepatic first-pass effect is avoided, resulting in higher absorption. Contraception and treatments for specific diseases such as endometriosis and hormone deficiencies can be improved by the administration of hormones via an IVR. This article aims to classify and compare various designs of commercially available and non-commercial hormonal IVRs and to analyze their performance. Current challenges affecting the development of IVRs are investigated, and proposed solutions are discussed. A comprehensive search of publications in MEDLINE/PubMed and of commercial product data of IVRs was performed, and the materials, designs, performance, and applications (e.g., contraception, endometriosis, estrogen deficiency and urogenital atrophy) of hormonal IVRs were thoroughly evaluated. Most hormonal IVRs administer female sex hormones, i.e., estrogen and progestogens. In terms of material, IVRs are divided into 3 main groups: silicone, polyurethane, and polyethylene-co-vinyl acetate IVRs. As regards their design, there are 4 major designs for IVRs which strongly affect their performance and the timing and rate of hormone release. Important challenges include reducing the burst release and maintaining the bioavailability of hormones at their site of action over a prolonged period of administration as well as lowering production costs. Hormonal IVRs are a promising method which could be used to facilitate combination therapies by administering multiple drugs in a single IVR while eliminating the side effects of conventional drug administration methods. IVRs could considerably improve womenʼs quality of life all over the world within a short period of time.

Key words: intravaginal ring, hormones, contraception, endometriosis, estrogen deficiency, urogenital atrophy

Introduction

Intravaginal rings (IVRs) are drug delivery systems (DDS) for the systemic or topical administration of one or more drugs 1 . They are doughnut-shaped polymeric devices that can stay in the vagina between 1 and 12 months. This method of drug delivery overcomes many of the challenges associated with more conventional methods, such as gastrointestinal side effects when drugs are administered orally or the hepatic first-pass effect. Another major advantage of IVRs is their ability to deliver drugs at a constant rate. Using IVRs as DDS can eliminate the need for minor surgical procedures required for other implantable drug delivery methods, making IVRs less invasive and more attractive for patients 2 ,  3 .

The first reports on hormonal vaginal rings were published in 1970. The IVR in question was used to deliver the contraceptive drug medroxyprogesterone acetate, but it was not until the 1980s that the first contraceptive trials with vaginal rings were conducted in the United States 4 ,  5 ,  6 . Hormonal IVRs are used to deliver many different types of hormones, particularly steroids, for a number of medical reasons including the treatment of urogenital atrophy and contraception 7 ,  8 ,  9 . Several IVRs are in commercial use today. NuvaRing ® is a hormonal IVR used for contraception which contains a combination of two steroids 10 . Estring ® is another hormonal IVR and is used to treat urogenital atrophy [11]. Annovera ® is a silicone IVR used for contraception and containing segesterone acetate and ethinylestradiol 12 . Some evaluated IVRs are not being marketed 13 .

Sustained release means that a drug is released over a prolonged period of time, while controlled release indicates a predetermined drug release rate resulting in controlled drug concentrations in blood plasma. Such systems mimic drug infusion pumps which maintain stable drug levels in blood plasma by balancing the kinetics of release and elimination. Hormonal IVRs are beneficial in many ways. Using this type of DDS allows a constant and continuous delivery of hormones. Some local (vaginal) side effects of IVRs have been reported such as a slight increase in vaginal discharge 14 . The use of IVRs makes it possible to administer lower hormone doses, leading to fewer systemic side effects from high levels of hormones in the body 15 . In addition, a combination of different hormones to regulate and improve womenʼs menstrual cycles can be administered using IVRs 16 . However, vaginal rings have some drawbacks such as increased vaginal secretions, the potential for unintended IVR expulsion, differences in drug absorption, and cultural sensitivities 17 . Most women who use IVRs report that they do not feel any sexual discomfort when using it. Studies reported no signs of erosion or bacterial invasion in the vaginal tissue of women who used IVRs over a long period of time 14 . Although loss of the ring has not been specifically reported in recent publications, it is to be expected due to the differences in anatomy and 3D structures of the vaginal cavity in females of different ages and ethnicities.

Various types of hormonal IVRs have been designed to date. Selection of the material used to produce the IVR is critical. The rings are made from different polymers such as silicone, EVA, and PU. The design specifications for IVRs vary depending on the application (e.g., matrix IVR, core IVR, sandwich IVR, etc.). The hormones used in IVRs are usually steroid hormones and can either be natural or synthetic. A combination of two or more hormones is used in many IVRs.

The challenges of designing and optimizing IVRs include burst release, costs, and efficacy. This article looks at these general challenges and categorizes the reported solutions. Eliminating surprises when manufacturing IVRs should result in more efficient rings.

To develop optimized, efficient, and novel future applications for IVRs used in combination therapies, it is important to have a comprehensive knowledge and understanding of all types and performances of vaginal rings. The information on hormonal IVRs was collected from various publications and evaluated and summarized in this paper. The purpose of this paper was to evaluate IVRs in terms of their different design specifications and selected materials to suggest a better approach when designing intravaginal rings.

Characteristics of Hormonal IVRs

Hormone classification

For many years, hormones were divided into three groups: peptide and protein-based hormones, acid-based hormones and steroid hormones 18 . More recent discoveries have shown that not all types of hormones fit neatly into these categories. Prostaglandins, for example, are made of small fatty acids 19 . Hormones can also be categorized according to their chemical nature, their mechanism of action, or the effects they trigger. As regards their chemical nature, hormones can be divided into two groups, namely, steroid and non-steroid hormones. Non-steroid hormones consist of five different groups: amines, peptides, proteins, glycoproteins, and eicosanoids ( Fig. 1 ) 20 .

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1

 Classification of hormones according to their chemical nature.

Another way of classifying hormones is to categorize them as natural or synthesized. Natural hormones are produced in the human body while synthesized hormones are produced by synthesis and their chemical structure is not identical to that of natural hormones. Nowadays, natural hormones can also be produced by synthesis.

Modified amino acids in the body make up amine hormones that include thyroid hormones. Modification of amino acids happens when the carboxyl group of amino acids is removed while the amine group remains intact 20 . Thyroid hormones have two major effects on the body. The first effect is on cellular differentiation and development, while the second effect affects the metabolic pathways 18 . Glycoprotein hormones such as follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH), luteinizing hormone (LH), thyroid-stimulating hormone (TSH), and human chorionic gonadotropin (CG) hormone control and regulate numerous reproductive and metabolic functions in the human body. Stimulation from the hypothalamus affects gonadotropin release more than negative feedback from the ovaries. Glycoprotein hormones have various therapeutic potentials due to their extensive regulation roles 21 ,  22 . Protein and peptide hormones are both made from amino acid residues. Protein hormones include insulin, glucagon, and somatotropins while oxytocin and vasopressin are considered peptide hormones 20 . Despite the common belief that androgens are purely male sex hormones, androgens are also produced by the ovaries and adrenal glands in women. Dehydroepiandrosterone (DHEA) is one of the most common adrenal steroids in the human body 23 .

Some steroid hormones are produced by the human adrenal cortex in response to specific stimuli. Cortisol is a hormone that is secreted in response to stress as is aldosterone, another stress hormone. These hormones play an essential role in regulating the water balance and blood pressure levels 18 ,  24 . The other group of steroid hormones are the sex hormones, produced in the testes in males and the ovaries in females 20 . The sexual differentiation of males prior to birth and maturation during puberty is prompted by androgens. Functioning of the male genitals in adult men is also maintained by these hormones. The role of androgens in other organs such as the central nervous system, the immune system, and muscle tissue is less recognized 25 ,  26 .

Progestogens and estrogen play an important role in controlling the secretion of gonadotropins in the body. The most important female sex hormones are estradiol and progesterone. Estrone and estriol are less potent estrogens which become more prominent in pregnancy 27 .

The hormones most commonly used in IVRs are female sex hormones. The capacity of the vaginal epithelium to absorb steroids is one of the reasons why IVRs are so efficient 28 ,  29 . Both natural and synthesized hormones are used in IVRs. Progering ® is a marketed IVR that delivers progesterone, while NuvaRing contains a synthesized type of progestogen called etonogestrel 30 .

Progestogens, levonorgestrel, estradiol acetate, estradiol, segesterone acetate (Nestorone ® ), ethinylestradiol, etonogestrel, megestrol, norgestrienone, and norethindrone acetate are female sex hormones which are used alone or in combination in various commercially available and non-commercial IVRs.

Selection of material

Selecting the proper material for IVRs is one of the most important and critical steps in the modification of the drug release mechanism. Because of how IVRs are applied and the length of time they remain in the body, the characteristics of the IVR material which need to be considered when designing IVRs for the controlled release of drugs are the solubility, diffusion coefficient, initial drug loading and stability of the polymer in addition to the polymerʼs biocompatibility 31 .

Certain properties and physical processes which occur when manufacturing IVRs are limiting factors which influence the rate of drug release. Flexibility and transparency are important physical attributes that need to be considered when designing intravaginal rings 32 . Polymer materials are selected to manufacture IVRs because of their flexibility; their use depends on the grade and composition of the polymer 33 .

Polymers are a mix of amorphous and crystalline structures, and this affects their level of transparency. With transparency one of the factors determining the choice of materials 34 , polymers are a perfect option as the level of transparency can be adjusted. The chains of more transparent polymers are tightly matched 35 . Transparency is an esthetic criterion which can enhance patient compliance 36 . The benefits of using polymeric materials for drug delivery systems are ease of manufacture, flexibility, biocompatibility, transparency, and low cost. Elastomers and thermoplastics are good candidate materials for IVRs. The mechanical properties of IVRs are evaluated based on their function and the duration of drug release. IVRs need to be flexible enough for insertion into the vaginal cavity, rigid enough to stay in place, and soft enough to avoid abrasion to the vaginal epithelium 37 ,  38 , as well as having low vaginal expulsion rates 39 ,  40 . Polymer structures play a critical role in engineering the controlled release of drugs 41 .

The only polymers currently used to manufacture commercially available hormonal IVRs are polyethylene-co-vinyl acetate (EVA, used in NuvaRing), polydimethylsiloxane (silicone used in Estring and Femring ® ) 41 and polyurethane (PU used in Ornibel ® ) 31 ,  42 ,  43 ,  44 ,  45 ,  46 ,  47 .

Silicone

Silicones are a class of synthetic polymers with a backbone made of repeating silicon-oxygen bonds; the main repeating unit is known as a siloxane. Silicon atoms bond to organic groups, usually methyl groups. The most common silicone is polydimethylsiloxane (PDMS). Other groups such as phenyl, vinyl, and trifluoropropyl may be used as methyl substituents. Silicones are used as fluids, emulsions, resins or elastomers, depending on the concurrent presence of organic groups attached to the inorganic backbone 48 .

Because of their flexibility and biocompatibility, silicone elastomers are widely used in medical devices and drug delivery systems and in the cosmetic and food industries 43 ,  44 . The main characteristics of silicones are chemical stability, low surface energy, and hydrophobicity. Because of their biocompatibility and low toxicity, silicones are widely used in the manufacture of medical products that come into direct contact with the human body 50 .

PU

Polyurethanes (PUs) were first developed by Bayer in 1937. They are a class of condensed polymers which contain urethanes in their molecular backbone 51 ,  52 ,  53 . Polyurethanes are synthesized by a polymerization reaction between isocyanates and polyols in the presence of a catalyst or ultraviolet light activation 54 . Polyurethanes have segmented polymeric characteristics, i.e., hard and soft parts. The hard part is composed of isocyanate components and the soft part of polyol. The mechanical strength of the polymer relies on the hard part and its flexibility depends on the weight percentage of the soft part 53 . Because of its segmented polymeric structure, range of physical properties, and good biocompatibility, PU is used in many biomedical devices including catheters, pacemakers, wound dressings, and drug implants 55 .

In some studies, PU was the base material used in the manufacture of vaginal rings, and the sustained drug release through its polymeric chain was measured 31 ,  41 ,  56 . Ornibel is a commercially available, polyurethane-based intravaginal ring used for contraception.

EVA

Elastomeric polymers such as ethylene-vinyl acetate copolymers (EVA) are a good material for IVRs, due to their rate-controlling properties. EVA is a transparent copolymer made of ethylene and vinyl acetate monomers. The vinyl acetate content plays a key role in determining the mechanical properties, ease of manufacture, and drug release rates from the copolymer 1 ,  57 . The rigidity of the polymer increases as the level of the vinyl acetate decreases. Reduction of the content also leads to an increase in the relative amounts of amorphous structures and reduces the degree of crystallinity, resulting in a rubbery and more permeable polymer which allows drugs to be released more rapidly from the substrate. Accordingly, the release rate of drug increases with EVA 58 ,  59 .

In addition to these properties, EVA is biocompatible, non-toxic, does not stimulate inflammatory reactions, and can be easily processed. More importantly, the solubility and diffusion coefficient of each drug through the EVA polymeric chain can be tailored by changing the amount of vinyl acetate 60 .

Various commercial medical devices make use of the drug delivery properties of EVA. Well-known EVA-based devices include Ocusert ® (an ophthalmologic DDS) to treat glaucoma 61 , Implanon ® /Nexplanon ® which are long-acting implants for the continuous release of etonogestrel 63 ,  64 , Vitrasert ® (an eye implant containing antiviral agents), and ganciclovir to treat cytomegalovirus infection 65 .

Nuvaring is a commercially available contraceptive IVR made from EVA 66 . In some studies, EVA has been used to manufacture IVR prototypes for the sustained release of various active pharmaceutical ingredients (APIs), for example, UC781 (a type of nonnucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor used to prevent the transmission of HIV) 67 , MIV-150 (a nonnucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor), zinc acetate (ZA), carrageenan (CG) and levonorgestrel (LNG) 68 . In some cases, such as UC781, the release rate from EVA-based IVRs was found to be higher than that of silicone IVRs 67 .

Table 1 compares some of physicochemical and biological properties of the three polymers. It shows that silicone, PU and EVA have almost similar physicochemical and biological properties. However, the molecular weight of PU is lower than that of silicone and EVA. In terms of recycling, EVA and PU are more environmentally friendly than silicone.

Table 1  Comparison of important physicochemical and biological properties of polymers generally used for IVR manufacture.

Property Material
Silicone PU EVA
Biocompatibility 69 ,  70 54 ,  71 57
Biostability 49 71 41
Reshaping capabilities 69 ,  70 71 72
Crystallinity 73 74 57
Low cost 75 54 70
Transparency 76 54 ,  74 57
Low weight 75 54 77
Hydrophilic nature 78 71 57 ,  79
Recycling 70 54 ,  71 54 ,  71

Design

Delivering steroid hormones via the female reproductive tract bypasses the first-pass hepatic metabolism and provides constant steroid levels, both of which increase the bioavailability of the steroid hormones 28 . The most common DDS that provide sustained and controlled release are osmotic pressure, reservoir (using a rate-controlling membrane [RCM]), and matrix systems 81 . IVRs are designed either in the form of a matrix (homogeneous dispersion), a reservoir or a hybrid (a combination of matrix and reservoir). IVRs can also be used as a casing for vaginal tablets or rods, and are then referred to as insert IVRs. Fig. 2 shows a comprehensive classification of these four types of IVR design which are commercially available or have been proposed in the literature.

Fig. 2.

Fig. 2

 Intravaginal ring designs.

The cross-sections of the various types of IVRs shown in Fig. 2 are displayed in Fig. 3 , which differentiates between the types of drug distribution through the polymeric substrates.

Fig. 3.

Fig. 3

a  Single-drug matrix IVR, b  multi-drug segmented matrix IVR, c  single-drug core IVR, d  single-drug incomplete core IVR, e  multi-drug continuous core continuous RCM, f  multi-drug segmented core continuous RCM, g  multi-drug segmented core segmented RCM, h  sandwich IVR, i  tablet/pod/rod insert IVR, j  core-matrix (hybrid) IVR.

Matrix (homogeneous dispersion) IVR

Insoluble

A single injection of an elastomer mix containing drug molecules that are dispersed homogeneously in the matrix of the polymer results in a matrix IVR. The solubility of the polymer is lower than the loaded drug in insoluble matrix IVRs 1 . The entire surface area of matrix IVRs is exposed to vaginal tissue/fluid. In the first stage, burst release occurs due to the presence of immobilized drug particles separated from the crystal lattice at the surface of the intravaginal ring. This results in the creation of a concentration gradient that drives the release process thermodynamically. In the second stage, the drug molecules closest to the surface of the ring are diffused through the polymer and released into the medium (i.e., the vaginal fluid and/or interstitial fluid of the vaginal tissue). As the drug release continues, the unmedicated surface is separated from the inner drug-loaded segment of the matrix ring by the creation of a drug exhaustion zone. As the thickness of the unmedicated zone increases, the surface area of the inward-moving depletion border decreases. Consequently, the pathway from where the remaining drug is diffused increases as the amount of the released drug reduces over time and the drug near the surface of the ring becomes depleted. In vitro, the release from a matrix IVR under sink conditions can be explained by the Higuchi equation ( Eq. 1 ) 2 ,  82 ,  83 .

graphic file with name 10-1055-a-1369-9395-ieq1.gif

Where Q denotes cumulative release per unit area, D p signifies the drug diffusion coefficient of the polymer, C p represents drug solubility in the polymer, A designates drug loading per unit volume, and t is time.

Insoluble matrix IVRs can be designed as either multi or single-drug systems. Multi-drug insoluble matrix IVRs can be segmented or continuous. Segmented IVRs are designed for multiple drugs using multiple polymers, while in continuous multi-drug IVRs, different drugs are homogeneously dispersed using one type of polymer. Segmented multi-drug IVRs, shown in Fig. 3 b , provide additional advantages, including the ability to control the release rate of each segment individually, compared to continuous multi-drug IVRs 1 ,  84 .

Bio-soluble

Silicone elastomers, EVA, and PU are biostable polymers which are used to create insoluble homogeneous dispersion matrix IVRs. However, scientists have proposed using certain bio-soluble biocompatible polymers to manufacture IVRs. In a study by Vartiainen et al., matrix rings manufactured from bio-soluble styrene-butadiene block copolymers were tested for their capacity to deliver 17β-estradiol to treat postmenopausal symptoms 85 . Bio-soluble polymers can control the release of drugs by means of degradation mechanisms instead of diffusion. This enables the delivery of both hydrophilic and hydrophobic APIs, including those with large molecular weights, to vaginal tissue. In another study by Han et al., non-hormonal intravaginal rings were manufactured from bio-soluble acacia gum and sodium methacrylate to deliver a combination of antiretroviral HIV microbicides for 28 days 84 ,  86 . This type of IVR can be manufactured as a multi or single-drug device, as shown in Fig. 2 1 .

Reservoir IVR

Core

During the manufacture of core IVRs, a drug is placed in a central zone and surrounded by a drug-free polymeric rate-controlling membrane (RCM). The drug carrier at the core of a reservoir IVR can be either a polymer (the same as the RCM or a different polymer) or another type of biomaterial, e.g., paraffin. Core type IVRs can be designed and manufactured as either single or multi-drug delivery systems. Multi-drug reservoir IVRs can potentially be designed in one of three ways, i.e., as continuous core continuous RCM; segmented core continuous RCM; or segmented core segmented RCM. The core part of reservoir IVRs can vary in length. Depending on the application of the IVR and the amount of the drug required for treatment, the full core can be divided into smaller core lengths ( Fig. 3 c, d, and f ) 1 . The molecules of the drug have to first detach themselves from the core crystal lattice, then diffuse into the drug-free RCM and then disseminate into the medium surrounding the IVR. The drug is constantly released until the drugʼs concentration at the core is depleted. One advantage of core IVRs is that release of drugs occurs in zero order compared to matrix IVRs. Aside from that, the release characteristics of this type of IVR can be easily modified. Modifications can be achieved by changing the thickness of the RCM (h) or by varying the length of the core (L). A reduction in RCM thickness leads to an enhanced release rate, due to the shorter diffusion pathway 2 ,  87 .

graphic file with name 10-1055-a-1369-9395-ieq2.gif

The ratio of core to RCM diameter (b/a) affects the cumulative release rate and is represented by Crankʼs equation 88 .

graphic file with name 10-1055-a-1369-9395-ieq3.gif

Where L denotes core length, a represents the cross-sectional diameter of the core, and b signifies the cross-sectional diameter of the RCM.

As equation 3 shows, when the core length decreases, the rate of drug release also decreases. This type of IVR can be manufactured either by reaction injection molding or by using an extrusion process. A burst release may be observed in the first few days, especially in condensation-cured silicone IVRs, due to the presence of solid drugs in the RCM 2 ,  89 .

Sandwich (shell)

In sandwich IVRs a layer containing the drug is located below the surface of the IVR. This layer can be located between a nonmedicated polymer surface and a central core that may or may not contain a second drug ( Fig. 3 h ). Since the drug layer is located a fraction of a millimeter below the surface, this particular IVR is suitable for delivering drugs with poor polymer diffusion characteristics. The manufacture of shell IVRs is less costly due to the lower drug concentrations in the drug layers compared with matrix-type IVRs where the drug is homogeneously dispersed throughout the whole IVR. As shown in Fig. 4 , a sandwich IVR can minimize side effects due to the constant drug release compared to other types such as matrix and core IVRs 2 ,  90 . These types of reservoir IVRs can also be manufactured as both multi or single-drug delivery systems. Multi-drug sandwich IVRs can be designed as continuous core continuous RCM, segmented core continuous RCM, and segmented core segmented RCM 1 .

Fig. 4.

Fig. 4

 Cumulative release profile of a  matrix (homogeneous dispersion) IVRs, b  core reservoir and pod IVRs, and c  sandwich reservoir IVRs.

Insert IVR

Tablet and rod

These types of IVRs are manufactured as nonmedicated polymeric bodies with cavities in which multiple drug-loaded vaginal rods or tablets can be inserted. Rods can be manufactured using several different methods. For example, a dispersed mixture of a particular type of polymer and drug can be injected into a PVC tubing using a plastic syringe. The PVC tubing is then removed and the polymeric rod can be cut into suitable sizes for insertion into the body of the ring 91 . These types of insert IVRs can be used as single or multi-drug delivery systems by the insertion of different tablets or drug-loaded rods into a single IVR.

Pod

Single or multi-drug release is achievable using IVRs with several small drug-containing sectors, called pods, which can be loaded with the same or different drugs 2 . Although matrix IVR designs have been developed for clinical trials, pod IVRs can provide sustained drug release over longer periods as indicated by the drug release profile shown in Fig. 4 b 92 .

Pods are made from polymers containing homogeneously dispersed drugs coated with a layer of polymer to create a drug pod. These pods, which can have identical or different geometries, are then incorporated in a nonmedicated continuous or segmented IVR. The release rate of pod IVRs is controlled by their nonmedicated polymeric membrane, the characteristics of the sectors, and the number of pods in each IVR 1 ,  93 , resulting in an independent delivery of drugs in pseudo-zero order from each pod. Pod design also eliminates the initial burst release, which is one of the challenges associated with other IVR designs 93 . The release profile of pod IVRs is similar to that of core IVRs 94 . The safety of pod IVRs has been investigated in both rabbits and humans 95 , and pod IVRs have been shown to be a harmless and efficient drug delivery system 96 ,  97 . Pod IVRs can be manufactured for the delivery of single or multiple drugs.

Hybrid IVR

Using an IVR which is a combination of conventional IVR types, i.e., matrix, reservoir, or insert, is a novel approach suggested by current research. It could be considered a hybrid IVR. It has been proposed that core-matrix hybrid IVRs could be manufactured using a core embedded in a hot-melt extruded polymer containing the active agent 1 ,  68 . Another possible design for a hybrid IVR could be an insert-matrix IVR consisting of a medicated polymeric body with cavities for the insertion of vaginal rods, tablets, or pods ( Fig. 3 j ).

The drug release profiles of the major IVR types (matrix, core, and sandwich) are shown in Fig. 4 .

Some studies have reported on the in vitro cumulative release profiles of matrix and reservoir 12 ,  68 . Another study has discussed the release profile of a reservoir-type IVR releasing different amounts of drug 98 .

Commercially available and non-commercial rings are listed in Tables 2 and 3 .

Table 2  List of commercially available hormonal IVRs.

IVR Name Company Hormone Release rate
Application period
IVR material IVR type Application Ref.
ANNOVERA ® Therapeutics MD Nestorone (segesterone acetate) and ethinylestradiol segesterone acetate: 150 µg
ethinylestradiol: 13 µg
1 year
silicone elastomer pod contraception 99 ,  100 ,  101
Estring Pfizer Inc., USA Estradiol 7.5 µg/day
90 days
silicone elastomer core reservoir urogenital atrophy 4 ,  84
Femring Warner Chilcott/ Actavis, UK estradiol acetate 0.5 µg/day
3 months
silicone elastomer core reservoir urogenital atrophy, estrogen replacement therapy (ERT), contraception 30 ,  84 ,  102 ,  103
Fertiring ® Silesia Laboratories progesterone variable
3 months
silicone elastomer insoluble matrix contraception 80 ,  84 ,  104
NuvaRing NV Organon Co in the Netherlands/Merck & Co., USA etonogestrel and ethinylestradiol 8 µg/day
21 days
EVA core reservoir contraception 84 ,  105 ,  106
Ornibel Exeltis Healthcare etonogestrel and ethinylestradiol 8 µg/day
21 days
PU core and EVA external membrane core reservoir contraception 105
Progering Silesia Laboratories progesterone 10 mg/day
90 days
silicone elastomer insoluble matrix contraception 80 ,  84 ,  103

Table 3  List of non-commercial hormonal IVRs.

Hormones IVR materials IVR type Application Release rate
Intended duration in situ
Ref.
Levonorgestrel silicone elastomer core reservoir contraception 20 µg/day
90 days
107
Nestorone elastomer LSR (liquid silicone rubber) core reservoir contraception 50, 75, or 100 µg/day
6 months
108
Nestorone and ethinylestradiol silicone elastomer rod insert contraception 10, ~ 13.5 and 7.5 µg/day
1 year
109 ,  110 ,  111

Hormonal Ring Applications

Contraception

Contraceptive vaginal rings have been the focus of many gynecological studies for more than 40 years 28 ,  29 .

Steroids, whether alone or in combination, diffuse at a constant rate through the ring and are directly absorbed through the vaginal epithelium into the systemic circulation. Progestogens are not normally used alone in such contraception methods as skin patches, rings, pills, etc. A combination of hormones, for example a combination of estrogen and progestin 112 , etonogestrel/ethinylestradiol (ENG/EE) 28 , segesterone acetate/ethinylestradiol (SA/EE) rings, LNG/E2, norethindrone acetate (NETAc)/EE IVRs 28 , and norelgestromin/ethinylestradiol skin patches 113 and levonorgestrel/ethinylestradiol pills 114 are preferably used in contraceptive DDS. Since progesterone is one of the most important hormones in the menstrual cycle, it has significant uses in contraception. The cyclic release of luteinizing hormone is inhibited by the increased concentration of progesterone in nonpregnant women, with production of the follicle-stimulating hormone inhibited by higher levels of progesterone 115 . There are two methods by which progestins prevent pregnancy:

  1. by preventing sperm from reaching the egg by changing the cervical mucus,

  2. by preventing implantation of the fertilized oocyte through changes to the uterine lining 116 .

A combination of etonogestrel and ethinylestradiol are used in contraceptive vaginal rings. Contraceptive IVRs containing etonogestrel (a progestin) and ethinylestradiol (an estrogen) function by preventing ovulation 105 .

Contraceptive IVRs have several advantages compared with other conventional contraceptive methods: convenience of use, fewer premenstrual symptoms, lighter and more regular menstrual cycles, as well as reducing the risk of certain cancers such as breast cancer because of the lower hormone doses 118 .

Three rings containing only progestogens have been evaluated. These rings contain progesterone, levonorgestrel (LNG), and the progestin Nestorone (NES). Progestogen-only rings are specifically designed for continuous use compared to combination drug IVRs which are designed for cyclic use (3 weeks in/1 week out) 28 .

NuvaRing, a commercially available contraceptive IVR, contains a combination of etonogestrel and ethinylestradiol 16 ,  119 ,  120 . These APIs are loaded in an EVA core with an outer diameter of 54 mm and a cross-section of 4 mm 121 . Using NuvaRing for the recommended 3-week period completely inhibits ovulation with an efficacy of 98% 112 ,  122 .

Progering is another contraceptive ring, manufactured by Silesia SA Laboratories, Chile. A silicone elastomer is used in the manufacture of this ring, and progesterone is homogeneously dispersed inside the matrix IVR. The cross-sectional diameter of Progering is 8.4 mm and the overall diameter is 58 mm. Progesterone is released at an average rate of 10 mg per day over three months 115 ,  123 . Other commercially available contraceptive IVRs are listed in Table 2 .

Research is being conducted into a contraceptive IVR containing Nestorone and ethinylestradiol. The drugs are loaded into two rods, with one rod containing only Nestorone while the other contains both drugs. This ring can be used for 1 year, which makes it an efficient contraceptive method 110 ,  124 . Some of the other non-commercial contraceptive IVRs which are currently being developed are presented in Table 3 .

Endometriosis

Endometriosis is an estrogen-dependent medical condition caused by the ectopic growth of endometrial tissue in women of reproductive age. It occurs when tissue similar to the lining of the uterus or endometrium forms outside the uterine cavity 125 ,  126 . Endometriosis is usually found in the pelvic cavity and can attach to any of the female reproductive organs such as the uterus, fallopian tubes, ovaries, uterosacral ligaments, peritoneum, or any of the spaces between the bladder, uterus, bowel, vagina, and rectum 15 ,  125 ,  128 . The diagnosis of endometriosis in primary care is mainly clinical. There is currently no cure for endometriosis, so medical care has focused on pain reduction. The pituitary gland releases gonadotropins, hormones that stimulate the production of gonadal steroids such as estrogen which aggravate the symptoms of endometriosis and uterine fibroids 15 .

Elagolix is a gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) antagonist that reduces gonadotropin levels, which in turn suppresses estradiol. This decreases dysmenorrhea, dyspareunia, and endometriosis-related pain 127 . Initial treatment consists of the administration of common agents used for primary dysmenorrhea, such as nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), estrogen/progestin combination contraceptives, or progestin-only contraceptives 131 . There is some evidence that these agents are helpful and have few adverse effects. NSAIDs are often the first-line treatment for endometriosis, followed by hormone therapy 132 . Hormonal treatments that decrease estrogen and progesterone production are used to treat endometriosis 127 . The inhibition of aromatase in premenopausal women reduces estrogen production, resulting in counter-regulation by the pituitary. This eventually leads to an increase in gonadotropin levels and stimulates follicular development, which may lead to the formation of ovarian cysts. This can be a drawback when treating premenopausal women 131 . Vaginally administered ethinylestradiol and etonogestrel can be used either for contraception or to treat dysmenorrhea resulting from endometriosis 110 .

IVRs are an ideal method to treat women suffering from endometriosis. The use of IVRs instead of other conventional therapies for endometriosis-associated pain such as transdermal patches was observed to be more effective as they were better at reducing dysmenorrhea. IVRs were noticeably more accepted by patients because of their convenience of use, which resulted in higher user satisfaction 133 . There are currently no IVRs to treat endometriosis on the market; however, research is being conducted into the use of hormonal IVRs to treat this disease. An IVR containing a combination of the aromatase inhibitor anastrozole and progestin has been developed for the treatment of recurrent endometriosis in women of reproductive age 127 ,  131 . In another study, an ethinylestradiol and etonogestrel-loaded IVR, which inhibits ovulation, was observed to be effective to treat women with endometriosis, dysmenorrhea, and polycystic ovarian syndrome 110 .

Estrogen deficiency

A decline in the levels of the primary sex hormone in women (estrogen) is referred to as estrogen deficiency. Lower estrogen levels in the body cause changes to the breasts, genitals, urinary tract, and even the skin 134 ,  135 .

Oral estrogens are not absorbed effectively, and about seventy percent is metabolized during the first pass through the liver 2 ,  136 . In addition to the gastrointestinal side effects of oral estrogen, a further challenge of administering estrogen orally is bolus estrogen doses which result in undesirably high levels of estrogen after each dose and the necessity of administering recurrent doses. Transdermal drug delivery systems such as skin patches are the most commonly used estrogen replacement therapies and reduce the risks associated with high doses of estrogen such as thromboembolism. However, studies have reported that excessive estrogen exposure is higher when using transdermal drug delivery systems compared with IVRs or low-dose oral contraceptives 133 . Side effects of high estrogen doses include breast and endometrial cancer, heart attacks, blood clots, and stroke 137 ,  138 . Some of the methods used to ensure constant estrogen levels in the body are aggressive and require surgical insertion and removal. More importantly, these methods are not able to provide suitable doses of estrogen over a long period 139 .

Vaginal estrogen therapy has many advantages such as a direct vaginal impact, the high bioavailability of the administered drugs, the option to use low doses of drugs compared to oral and parenteral administration, higher acceptance by patients, and fewer side effects such as endometrial stimulation, hyperplasia, breast tenderness, and adenocarcinoma 140 ,  141 . Among the estrogens, 17 β-estradiol (E2), is often used to treat estrogen deficiency. This specific type of estrogen compensates for a deficiency of endogenous estrogens caused by ovarian failure. In comparison with other natural estrogens, E2 has proven to be more efficient for estrogen replacement therapy (ERT) and hormone replacement therapy (HT). E2 has fewer side effects, specifically prevents blood clots and decreases the risk of venous thrombosis. This type of natural estrogen is broadly used to treat estrogen deficiency-associated disorders such as urogenital atrophy, and menopausal and postmenopausal symptoms 139 .

ERT was long considered the cornerstone of therapy for postmenopausal women with osteoporosis 142 . Studies in vitro and in vivo have supported the hypothesis that estrogen works by slowing bone resorption by preventing the production of pro-osteoclastogenic cytokines mediated by osteoblast lineage cells. This impedes the formation of osteoclasts and also increases bone mineral density 143 , 144 , 145 . In one study, women who underwent estrogen replacement therapy for longer than 1 year after menopause had an 80% lower incidence risk of Alzheimerʼs disease compared to women who did not have the therapy 146 .

Vaginal creams, tablets, and rings deliver drugs via the vagina, and so far, three creams, two rings, and one vaginal tablet have been approved by FDA for the treatment of urogenital atrophy 147 ,  148 . Estrace 149 , Premarin 150 , and Estragyn 151 are commercially available vaginal creams; Vagifem 152 is the only commercially available vaginal tablet. Estring 153 and Femring 154 are two commercially available vaginal rings to treat urogenital atrophy.

Many patients believe that vaginal creams and tablets are hard to use and sometimes forget to apply the cream or tablet, which needs to be administered at specific times. Other disadvantages of using creams or tablets are their low and uneven absorption capacity. Therefore, a long-acting DDS is ideal for releasing hormones such as estradiol, estriol, and conjugated estrogens 155 ,  156 ,  157 ,  158 ,  159 . Estring and Femring vaginal rings, which offer sustained and controlled release of hormones, provide such conditions.

The risks of systemic estrogen or estrogen plus progestogen administration include stroke, venous thromboembolism, and invasive breast cancer. Low-dose vaginal estrogens have been approved by the FDA. They bypass the hepatic first-pass effect and there is no evidence that they cause the above-mentioned side effects, but they carry the same warnings about health risks (e.g., breast and endometrial cancer, cardiovascular disorder and probable dementia) as estrogens administered systemically 160 . Estradiol levels which are higher than postmenopausal levels lead to endometrial proliferation, which does not occur when vaginal estrogens are used. However, if there is a systemic absorption of estrogen it is suggested that progestogens should be used simultaneously 161 .

Urogenital atrophy

Menopause usually occurs in women between the ages of 49 and 52, when the egg is no longer released from ovaries 142 . Estrogen levels play an essential role in maintaining the mucopolysaccharide and collagen content of the mucosa and in preserving the thickness and moisture of urogenital tract tissue. Changes in the structure and function of the genitourinary system after menopause are the result of decreased estrogen levels. The reduction of estrogen levels leads to physiological, histological, and anatomical changes to the genitourinary system, also known as urogenital atrophy 135 ,  162 . Effects of estrogen deficiency include thinning of the vaginal epithelium, decreased vaginal elasticity and blood flow, and decreased secretion by the Bartholin glands, resulting in damage to the vaginal mucosa 163 . Symptoms of urogenital atrophy include genital symptoms such as dryness, burning, and vaginal irritation; sexual symptoms such as painful intercourse and postpartum hemorrhage; and urinary symptoms including nocturia, recurrent urinary tract infection, urinary incontinence, urinary urgency, etc. In total, these symptoms are referred to as the genitourinary syndrome of menopause 135 ,  147 ,  164 ,  165 ,  166 ,  167 .

HT treats urogenital atrophy by increasing estrogen levels in the body. There are three ways to administer the drug: oral, transdermal, and intravaginal 168 . FDA-approved estrogen-loaded IVRs are suitable to treat postmenopausal urogenital atrophy and lower urinary tract symptoms. These IVRs are usually loaded with low dosages of estradiol and may not need attendant progestogens 155 ,  158 ,  168 . However, symptoms of urogenital atrophy can also occur in women with low estrogen levels for other reasons, for example, due to breastfeeding or drugs that lower estrogen levels 19 . The treatment of urogenital atrophy is highly dependent on the symptoms of the disease. Initially, non-pharmacological treatments can be used; for example, sexual activity can help maintain vaginal health during menopause 169 . Vaginal estrogen therapy can lead to higher levels of estrogen in serum; however, they will not exceed normal postmenopausal ranges. Moreover, high systemic levels of estrogen can have side effects such as venous thromboembolism and stroke 160 .

Estring is a commercially available 17 β-estradiol-loaded IVR developed to treat urogenital atrophy. The IVR is designed to release a low dose of estrogen continuously for 3 months 2 .

Vaginal estradiol therapy can increase the risk of recurrence in patients diagnosed with breast cancer. The use of estradiol-containing vaginal rings and tablets results in a significant increase in estradiol serum levels, indicating systemic absorption in the first few weeks of HT 170 .

The schematic diagram of hormonal IVR applications is demonstrated in Fig. 5 .

Fig. 5.

Fig. 5

 Diagram showing applications for IVRs.

Current Challenges and Possible Solutions

Reduction of burst release

One of the most important challenges complicating the medical use of intravaginal rings is burst release due to Fickian or non-Fickian drug diffusion. In addition to the negative economic effect of higher doses, burst release can have unwelcome side effects 171 .

A number of studies used membranes made of different polymers as coatings for different types of drug delivery devices 17 . One example of this is Nuvaring, which has a membrane of ethylene-vinyl acetate copolymer (EVA) surrounding an EVA core (with a different vinyl acetate content) impregnated with etonogestrel and ethinylestradiol 14 . A high burst release rate of 20 – 40 percent was observed during in vitro tests of IVRs manufactured from EVA. Cellulose membranes are employed to prevent the initial burst release in IVRs. The release rates of EVA rings can be efficiently controlled using membranes 172 .

The release rate can be adjusted to specific required values by modifying the membrane thickness. Membranes have specific permeabilities which control drug release in a DDS. As the membrane becomes thicker, the release rate of the drugs decreases. In summary, the goal is to delay the diffusion of API through the polymeric device to reduce the amount delivered 173 .

Another method for a controlled DDS is to manufacture a system that releases the loaded drug at a prearranged time or in pulses. Such a system can also be manufactured in response to environmental changes 174 .

Long-term drug delivery

The drug delivery times of currently available contraceptive IVRs range from three weeks to one year 175 ,  176 .

The primary argument for a longer delivery duration is to make the product more affordable. Microbicide IVRs are therefore designed for one to three monthsʼ use 177 . The impact of the duration of IVR use on user acceptance, device performance, and biocompatibility has not yet been comprehensively reported and is worth further evaluation.

A long-term polymeric DDS can be created by many methods, including osmotic pumps 178 , matrices with controllable swelling 179 , diffusion 180 , erosion 181 , different drug-loading profiles 182 ,  183 ,  184 , and the use of multilayered membranes as matrices 174 ,  185 . As regards diffusion, drug release increases when the drug has a higher diffusion coefficient 186 . A diffusion barrier such as an empty polymeric barrier can be used to create a long-term DDS 187 . Swelling of the polymer results in an increase in the length of the diffusion pathway. The drug release rate decreases due to a reduction in the drug concentration gradient 53 . Drug delivery systems designed for long-term use should have low erosion and degradation rates. To achieve this goal, water-repellent surfaces can be used to manufacture such systems 55 .

Sustained bioavailability

Drug bioavailability varies as it depends on factors such as the drugʼs solubility in the elastomer and vaginal fluid, the drugʼs diffusion coefficient in the elastomer, the volume of vaginal fluid, the drugʼs partition coefficient between the IVR and the vaginal fluid and tissue, the rate of diffusion and drug removal through vaginal tissue, and the rate of anterior to posterior advection of the vaginal fluid 188 .

One method of achieving sustained bioavailability is to design drug delivery systems that respond to environmental changes. These systems change their drug release rate according to different stimuli such as light, temperature, specific molecules, mechanical forces, etc. to which they are exposed. Drug delivery systems can also be designed to respond to environmental changes. These are all methods which can be used to manufacture controlled drug delivery systems with reduced burst release 174 .

Maximizing efficacy

Increasing the bioavailability of a drug can increase its efficacy. However, if the drug is lipid-soluble, as most hormones are, increasing bioavailability can be difficult. The Population Council is collaborating with HRA Pharma (Paris, France) and the NICHD to develop a 3-month contraceptive IVR which releases a progesterone receptor modulator. The aim is to provide an estrogen-free contraceptive that does not require daily oral intake. Ulipristal acetate, a derivative of 19-norprogesterone, binds specifically to the human progesterone receptor 8 ,  189 . One study reported inhibition of ovulation in 68% of the cycles studied and concluded that further testing with higher release rates of ulipristal acetate was required to achieve ovulation suppression in a higher percentage of cycles 189 .

Using microbicides that contain one or more APIs is another way to increase the efficacy of IVRs. In some studies, drug levels have been shown to correlate best in tissue with microbicide efficacy 190 ,  191 ,  192 ,  193 .

Choosing a suitable polymer for IVRs based on the polymerʼs solubility and stability and the required API release rate is another way to maximize the efficacy of IVRs 193 .

Cost reduction

Price is one of the parameters at the commercialization stage. The price of the rings is affected by the choice of materials, method of manufacture, and type of loaded drug. Using different low-cost techniques can help reduce the costs of manufacturing drug delivery systems 194 ,  195 . Using low-cost materials such as bio-based polymers is another way to manufacture more economical drug delivery systems 194 ( Table 4 ).

Table 4  Major challenges in development of hormonal IVRs and proposed solutions.

Challenge Possible solutions
Reduction of burst release
  • Additional membranes

  • Modification of membrane thickness

  • Drug released at a prearranged time

Long-term drug delivery
  • Osmotically driven pumps

  • Matrices with controllable swelling

  • Diffusion rates

  • Erosion rates (using water-repellent surface)

  • Non-uniform drug-loading profiles

  • Multilayered matrices

Sustained bioavailability
  • Changes in the drug release rate when faced with different stimuli

Maximizing efficacy
  • Using selective hormone receptors

  • Using microbicides

  • Using the appropriate polymer for the required API

Cost reduction
  • Low-cost techniques

  • Low-cost materials such as bio-based polymers

Future Direction

Intravaginal rings are promising methods for the prolonged delivery of hormones for various purposes. IVRs are currently mainly used for contraception; however, they can also be used to treat diseases such as endometriosis and urogenital atrophy and for estrogen therapy. IVRs will soon also be used in combination therapies, e.g., for HIV prevention and contraception, making IVRs a highly efficient treatment for women alongside implants. In addition to hormones, other drugs can also be delivered systemically through the vaginal tract. Although there are many commercially available IVRs on the market, there are still some challenges which must be overcome for IVRs to become more efficient. One major challenge is to make IVRs that are able to deliver different types of drugs for a long period of time. Other challenges include manufacturing IVRs that are low-cost, as this will make them accessible for larger female populations. Solving these challenges will make IVRs the most efficient drug delivery system, not only specifically for female diseases but to deliver drugs that need to be systemically absorbed.

Conclusion

Hormonal intravaginal rings are highly efficient systems for delivering hormones. The advantages of IVRs are their efficacy in delivering drugs, their ability to bypass the hepatic first-pass effect, prolonged drug release, ease of administration, and a reduction in the number of required appointments with a physician. However, women will still need to see a physician to obtain a prescription and guidance on how to use IVRs. The sustained release of hormones from IVRs and the possibility of using multiple hormones and drugs at the same time can be highly efficient for many patients. Silicone elastomer is one of the most commonly used polymers for the manufacture of different drug delivery systems as it is highly biocompatible. Therefore, silicone is probably the most efficient polymer for IVRs. Various IVR manufacturing designs such as pod, sandwich, and core are used for different therapeutic purposes to maximize the efficiency of the IVR.

Hormonal IVRs are among the most efficient and effective methods to treat a wide range of diseases. These novel drug delivery systems can enhance womenʼs lives in a number of ways and improve their quality of life.

Informed Consent

Informed consent was not required for this study.

Funding

External funding was not required for this investigation.

Footnotes

Conflict of Interest The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

References

  • 1.Malcolm R K, Boyd P J, McCoy C F. Microbicide vaginal rings: Technological challenges and clinical development. Advanced Drug Delivery Reviews. 2016;103:33–56. doi: 10.1016/j.addr.2016.01.015. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Malcolm R K. The intravaginal ring. Drug Pharm Sci. 2003;126:775–790. [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Hussain A, Ahsan F. The vagina as a route for systemic drug delivery. J Control Release. 2005;103:301–313. doi: 10.1016/j.jconrel.2004.11.034. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Murphy D J, Boyd P, McCoy C F. Controlling levonorgestrel binding and release in a multi-purpose prevention technology vaginal ring device. J Control Release. 2016;226:138–147. doi: 10.1016/j.jconrel.2016.02.020. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Duncan G W. In: Google Patents; 1970. Medicated devices and methods. [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Schopflin G. Google Patents; 1977. Drug excipient of silicone rubber. [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Guthrie K M, Rosen R K, Vargas S E. User evaluations offer promise for pod-intravaginal ring as a drug delivery platform: A mixed methods study of acceptability and use experiences. PloS One. 2018;13:e0197269. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0197269. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Jensen J, Edelman A, Chen B. Continuous dosing of a novel contraceptive vaginal ring releasing Nestorone ® and estradiol: pharmacokinetics from a dose-finding study . Contraception. 2018;97:422–427. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2018.01.012. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Keller M, Ray L, Atrio J M. Early termination of a phase 1 trial of tenofovir disoproxil fumarate vaginal ring. Contraception. 2018;1:20. [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Nave R, Jalkanen T, Talling C. The Effect of Drug Content Reduction on the In Vitro and In Vivo Properties of Levonorgestrel-Releasing Intravaginal Rings. J Pharm Sci. 2018;107:1020–1027. doi: 10.1016/j.xphs.2017.11.009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Fetherston S M, Boyd P, McCoy C F. A silicone elastomer vaginal ring for HIV prevention containing two microbicides with different mechanisms of action. Eur J Pharm Sci. 2013;48:406–415. doi: 10.1016/j.ejps.2012.12.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Boyd P, Variano B, Spence P. In vitro release testing methods for drug-releasing vaginal rings. J Control Release. 2019;313:54–69. doi: 10.1016/j.jconrel.2019.10.015. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Thurman A R, Schwartz J L, Brache V. Randomized, placebo controlled phase I trial of safety, pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics and acceptability of tenofovir and tenofovir plus levonorgestrel vaginal rings in women. PloS One. 2018;13:e0199778. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0199778. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Lete I, Cuesta M C, Marín J M. Vaginal health in contraceptive vaginal ring users–A review. Eur J Contracept Reprod Health Care. 2013;18:234–241. doi: 10.3109/13625187.2013.801954. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Buggio L, Lazzari C, Monti E. “Per vaginam” topical use of hormonal drugs in women with symptomatic deep endometriosis: a narrative literature review. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2017;296:435–444. doi: 10.1007/s00404-017-4448-z. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Wieder D R, Pattimakiel L. Examining the efficacy, safety, and patient acceptability of the combined contraceptive vaginal ring (NuvaRing ® ) . Int J Womens Health. 2010;2:401. doi: 10.2147/IJWH.S6162. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Helbling I M, Ibarra J C, Luna J A. The optimization of an intravaginal ring releasing progesterone using a mathematical model. Pharm Res. 2014;31:795–808. doi: 10.1007/s11095-013-1201-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Norman A W, Litwack G. Oxford: Academic Press; 1997. Hormones. [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Gandhi J, Chen A, Dagur G. Genitourinary syndrome of menopause: an overview of clinical manifestations, pathophysiology, etiology, evaluation, and management. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2016;215:704–711. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2016.07.045. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Hamid A A, Issa M B, Nizar N NA. 1st ed. Sawston, United Kingdom, Cambridge, United Kingdom: Elsevier; 2018. Hormones; pp. 253–277. [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Manoharan S.Engineering the N-Glycosylation Pathway in Pichia Pastoris for the Expression of Glycoprotein Hormones. Electronic Theses and Dissertations of Indian Institute of Science Bangalore, India: Indian Institute of Science; 2018. Accessed March 12 2020 at:https://etd.iisc.ac.in/handle/2005/3017
  • 22.Cahoreau C, Klett D, Combarnous Y. Structure–function relationships of glycoprotein hormones and their subunitsʼ ancestors. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne) 2015;6:26. doi: 10.3389/fendo.2015.00026. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Arlt W. Androgen therapy in women. Eur J Endocrinol. 2006;154:1–11. doi: 10.1530/eje.1.02062. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Lee D Y, Kim E, Choi M H. Technical and clinical aspects of cortisol as a biochemical marker of chronic stress. BMB Rep. 2015;48:209–216. doi: 10.5483/BMBRep.2015.48.4.275. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Tenover J L. Testosterone replacement therapy in older adult men. Int J Androl. 1999;22:300–306. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2605.1999.00184.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Vanderschueren D, Vandenput L, Boonen S. Androgens and bone. Endocr Rev. 2004;25:389–425. doi: 10.1210/er.2003-0003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Norman A W, Henry H L. Oxford: Elsevier Science; 2014. Hormones. [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Brache V, Payán L J, Faundes A. Current status of contraceptive vaginal rings. Contraception. 2013;87:264–272. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2012.08.037. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Dziuk P, Cook B. Passage of steroids through silicone rubber. Endocrinology. 1966;78:208–211. doi: 10.1210/endo-78-1-208. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Murphy D J, Desjardins D, Boyd P. Impact of ring size and drug loading on the pharmacokinetics of a combination dapivirine-darunavir vaginal ring in cynomolgus macaques. Int J Pharm. 2018;550:300–308. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpharm.2018.08.051. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Verstraete G, Vandenbussche L, Kasmi S. Thermoplastic polyurethane-based intravaginal rings for prophylaxis and treatment of (recurrent) bacterial vaginosis. Int J Pharm. 2017;529:218–226. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpharm.2017.06.076. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.McCoy C F, Millar B G, Murphy D J. Mechanical testing methods for drug-releasing vaginal rings. Int J Pharm. 2019;559:182–191. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpharm.2019.01.026. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Koutsamanis I, Eder S, Beretta M. Formulation and processability screening for the rational design of ethylene-vinyl acetate based intra-vaginal rings. Int J Pharm. 2019;564:90–97. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpharm.2019.04.041. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Malcolm R K, Woolfson A D, Toner C F. Long-term, controlled release of the HIV microbicide TMC120 from silicone elastomer vaginal rings. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2005;56:954–956. doi: 10.1093/jac/dki326. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.McCoy C F, Murphy D J, Boyd P. Packing polymorphism of dapivirine and its impact on the performance of a dapivirine-releasing silicone elastomer vaginal ring. J Pharm Sci. 2017;106:2015–2025. doi: 10.1016/j.xphs.2017.04.026. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.托马斯 ; 施维塔 ; 尤噶昂卡 . Google Patents; 2016. Intravaginal ring for the delivery of unique combinations of antimicrobial compositions. [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Mishell D R, jr., Colodny S Z, Swanson L A. The effect of an oral contraceptive on tests of thyroid function. Fertil Steril. 1969;20:335. doi: 10.1016/s0015-0282(16)36975-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Bounds W, Szarewski A, Lowe D. Preliminary report of unexpected local reactions to a progestogen-releasing contraceptive vaginal ring. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 1993;48:123–125. doi: 10.1016/0028-2243(93)90252-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Demetrio C, Ridout M, Campbell M. Coping with extra Poisson variability in the analysis of factors influencing vaginal ring expulsions. Stat Med. 1994;13:873–876. doi: 10.1002/sim.4780130808. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Campbell M J, Machin D, DʼArcangues C. Coping with extra Poisson variability in the analysis of factors influencing vaginal ring expulsions. Stat Med. 1991;10:241–254. doi: 10.1002/sim.4780100208. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Gupta K M, Pearce S M, Poursaid A E. Polyurethane intravaginal ring for controlled delivery of dapivirine, a nonnucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor of HIV-1. J Pharm Sci. 2008;97:4228–4239. doi: 10.1002/jps.21331. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Boyd P, Fetherston S M, McCoy C F. Matrix and reservoir-type multipurpose vaginal rings for controlled release of dapivirine and levonorgestrel. Int J Pharm. 2016;511:619–629. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpharm.2016.07.051. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Derby N, Aravantinou M, Kenney J. An intravaginal ring that releases three antiviral agents and a contraceptive blocks SHIV-RT infection, reduces HSV-2 shedding, and suppresses hormonal cycling in rhesus macaques. Drug Deliv Transl Res. 2017;7:840–858. doi: 10.1007/s13346-017-0389-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Externbrink A, Eggenreich K, Eder S. Development and evaluation of accelerated drug release testing methods for a matrix-type intravaginal ring. Eur J Pharm Biopharm. 2017;110:1–12. doi: 10.1016/j.ejpb.2016.10.012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Mashak A, Rahimi A. Silicone polymers in controlled drug delivery systems: a review. Iran Polym J. 2009;18:279–295. [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Shabir Q, Webb K, Nadarassan D. Quantification and reduction of the residual chemical reactivity of passivated biodegradable porous silicon for drug delivery applications. Silicon. 2018;10:349–359. [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Kumeria T, McInnes S J, Maher S. Porous silicon for drug delivery applications and theranostics: recent advances, critical review and perspectives. Expert Opin Drug Deliv. 2017;14:1407–1422. doi: 10.1080/17425247.2017.1317245. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Colas A, Curtis J. Silicone biomaterials: history and chemistry. Biomater Sci-UK. 2004;2:80–85. [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Vondráček P, Doležel B. Biostability of medical elastomers: a review. Biomaterials. 1984;5:209–214. doi: 10.1016/0142-9612(84)90017-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Colas A, Aguadisch L. Silicones in pharmaceutical applications. Chimie Nouvelle. 1997;15:1779. [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Bayer O, Siefken W, Rinke H. A process for the production of polyurethanes and polyureas. German Patent DRP. 1937:728981. [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Aksoy A. Ankara, Turkey: Graduate School of Natural and Applied Sciences of Middle East Technical University; 2008. Synthesis and surface modification studies of biomedical polyurethanes to improve long term biocompatibility [Doctoral dissertation]
  • 53.Lowinger M, Barrett S, Zhang F. Sustained release drug delivery applications of polyurethanes. Pharmaceutics. 2018;10:55. doi: 10.3390/pharmaceutics10020055. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Akindoyo J. Polyurethane types, synthesis and applications–a review. Rsc Advances. 2016;6.115:114453–114482. [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Fu Y, Kao W J. Drug release kinetics and transport mechanisms of non-degradable and degradable polymeric delivery systems. Expert Opin Drug Deliv. 2010;7:429–444. doi: 10.1517/17425241003602259. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Clark J T, Clark M R, Shelke N B. Engineering a segmented dual-reservoir polyurethane intravaginal ring for simultaneous prevention of HIV transmission and unwanted pregnancy. PloS One. 2014;9:e88509. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0088509. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Schneider C, Langer R, Loveday D. Applications of ethylene vinyl acetate copolymers (EVA) in drug delivery systems. J Control Release. 2017;262:284–295. doi: 10.1016/j.jconrel.2017.08.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Tallury P, Alimohammadi N, Kalachandra S. Poly (ethylene-co-vinyl acetate) copolymer matrix for delivery of chlorhexidine and acyclovir drugs for use in the oral environment: effect of drug combination, copolymer composition and coating on the drug release rate. Dent Mater. 2007;23:404–409. doi: 10.1016/j.dental.2006.02.011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Brogly M, Nardin M, Schultz J. Effect of vinylacetate content on crystallinity and second‐order transitions in ethylene–vinylacetate copolymers. J Appl Polym Sci. 1997;64:1903–1912. [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Van Laarhoven J, Kruft M, Vromans H. In vitro release properties of etonogestrel and ethinyl estradiol from a contraceptive vaginal ring. Int J Pharm. 2002;232:163–173. doi: 10.1016/s0378-5173(01)00900-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Kuno N, Fujii S. Recent advances in ocular drug delivery systems. Polymers. 2011;3:193–221. [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Pharriss B B, Erickson R, Bashaw J. Progestasert: a uterine therapeutic system for long-term contraception: 1. Philosophy and clinical efficacy. Fertil Steril. 1974;25:915–921. doi: 10.1016/s0015-0282(16)40748-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63.Hohmann H, Creinin M D. The contraceptive implant. Clin Obstet Gynecol. 2007;50:907–917. doi: 10.1097/GRF.0b013e318159c2f6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64.Mommers E, Blum G-F, Gent T G. Nexplanon, a radiopaque etonogestrel implant in combination with a next-generation applicator: 3-year results of a noncomparative multicenter trial. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2012;207:3880–e6. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2012.08.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 65.Bourges J, Bloquel C, Thomas A. Intraocular implants for extended drug delivery: therapeutic applications. Adv Drug Deliv Rev. 2006;58:1182–1202. doi: 10.1016/j.addr.2006.07.026. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 66.Novak A, De la Loge C, Abetz L. The combined contraceptive vaginal ring, NuvaRing ® : an international study of user acceptability . Contraception. 2003;67:187–194. doi: 10.1016/s0010-7824(02)00514-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 67.McConville C, Major I, Friend D R. Development of a UC781 releasing polyethylene vinyl acetate vaginal ring. Drug Deliv Transl Res. 2012;2:489–497. doi: 10.1007/s13346-012-0101-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 68.Ugaonkar S R, Wesenberg A, Wilk J. A novel intravaginal ring to prevent HIV-1, HSV-2, HPV, and unintended pregnancy. J Control Release. 2015;213:57–68. doi: 10.1016/j.jconrel.2015.06.018. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 69.Mc Cullagh S D, Malcolm R K, Woolfson A D. Release kinetics of oleyl alcohol from a self-lubricating silicone biomaterial. J Mater Chem. 2004;14:1093–1098. [Google Scholar]
  • 70.Malcolm R K, Fetherston S M, McCoy C F. Vaginal rings for delivery of HIV microbicides. Int J Womens Health. 2012;4:595. doi: 10.2147/IJWH.S36282. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 71.Kim S, Liu S. Smart and biostable polyurethanes for long-term implants. ACS Biomater Sci Eng. 2018;4:1479–1490. doi: 10.1021/acsbiomaterials.8b00301. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 72.Qi X, Yang W, Yu L. Design of ethylene-vinyl acetate copolymer fiber with two-way shape memory effect. Polymers. 2019;11:1599. doi: 10.3390/polym11101599. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 73.Ohlberg S M, Alexander L E, Warrick E. Crystallinity and orientation in silicone rubber. I. X‐ray studies. J Polym Sci. 1958;27:1–17. [Google Scholar]
  • 74.Gomez C M, Gutierrez D, Asensio M. Transparent thermoplastic polyurethanes based on aliphatic diisocyanates and polycarbonate diol. J Elastom Plast. 2017;49:77–95. [Google Scholar]
  • 75.Rosato D V, Rosato D V, Rosato M V. Oxford: Elsevier; 2004. Plastic Product Material and Process Selection Handbook. [Google Scholar]
  • 76.Vaicekauskaite J, Mazurek P, Vudayagiri S. Mapping the mechanical and electrical properties of commercial silicone elastomer formulations for stretchable transducers. J Mater Chem C. 2020;8:1273–1279. [Google Scholar]
  • 77.Shastri P V. Toxicology of polymers for implant contraceptives for women. Contraception. 2002;65:9–13. doi: 10.1016/s0010-7824(01)00285-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 78.Rajendra V, Chen Y, Brook M A. Structured hydrophilic domains on silicone elastomers. Polym Chem. 2010;1:312–320. [Google Scholar]
  • 79.Stanković M, Frijlink H W, Hinrichs W L. Polymeric formulations for drug release prepared by hot melt extrusion: application and characterization. Drug Discov Today. 2015;20:812–823. doi: 10.1016/j.drudis.2015.01.012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 80.Friend D R. Intravaginal rings: controlled release systems for contraception and prevention of transmission of sexually transmitted infections. Drug Deliv Transl Res. 2011;1:185–193. doi: 10.1007/s13346-011-0024-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 81.Kamaly N, Yameen B, Wu J. Degradable controlled-release polymers and polymeric nanoparticles: mechanisms of controlling drug release. Chem Rev. 2016;116:2602–2663. doi: 10.1021/acs.chemrev.5b00346. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 82.Higuchi T. Mechanism of sustained‐action medication. Theoretical analysis of rate of release of solid drugs dispersed in solid matrices. J Pharm Sci. 1963;52:1145–1149. doi: 10.1002/jps.2600521210. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 83.Roseman T, Higuchi W. Release of medroxyprogesterone acetate from a silicone polymer. J Pharm Sci. 1970;59:353–357. doi: 10.1002/jps.2600590317. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 84.Malcolm R K, Edwards K-L, Kiser P. Advances in microbicide vaginal rings. Antiviral Res. 2010;88:S30–S39. doi: 10.1016/j.antiviral.2010.09.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 85.Vartiainen J, Wahlström T, Nilsson C-G. Effects and acceptability of a new 17β-oestradiol-releasing vaginal ring in the treatment of postmenopausal complaints. Maturitas. 1993;17:129–137. doi: 10.1016/0378-5122(93)90008-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 86.Han Y A, Singh M, Saxena B B. Development of vaginal rings for sustained release of nonhormonal contraceptives and anti-HIV agents. Contraception. 2007;76:132–138. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2007.04.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 87.Chien Y. 2nd ed. New York: Marcel Dekker, Inc; 1992. Nasal Drug Delivery and Delivery Systems; p. 50. [Google Scholar]
  • 88.Crank J. London: Oxford University Press; 1979. The Mathematics of Diffusion. [Google Scholar]
  • 89.Russell J A, Malcolm R K, Campbell K. High-performance liquid chromatographic determination of 17β-estradiol and 17β-estradiol-3-acetate solubilities and diffusion coefficients in silicone elastomeric intravaginal rings. J Chromatogr B Biomed Sci Appl. 2000;744:157–163. doi: 10.1016/s0378-4347(00)00248-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 90.Jackanicz T M. Levonorgestrel and estradiol release from an improved contraceptive vaginal ring. Contraception. 1981;24:323–339. doi: 10.1016/0010-7824(81)90002-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 91.Morrow R J, Woolfson A D, Donnelly L. Sustained release of proteins from a modified vaginal ring device. Eur J Pharm Biopharm. 2011;77:3–10. doi: 10.1016/j.ejpb.2010.10.010. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 92.Spence P, Garg A B, Woodsong C. Recent work on vaginal rings containing antiviral agents for HIV prevention. Curr Opin HIV AIDS. 2015;10:264–270. doi: 10.1097/COH.0000000000000157. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 93.Baum M M, Butkyavichene I, Gilman J. An intravaginal ring for the simultaneous delivery of multiple drugs. J Pharm Sci. 2012;101:2833–2843. doi: 10.1002/jps.23208. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 94.Baum M M, Butkyavichene I, Churchman S A. An intravaginal ring for the sustained delivery of tenofovir disoproxil fumarate. Int J Pharm. 2015;495:579–587. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpharm.2015.09.028. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 95.Ashton P, Brown J, Pearson P. Intravitreal ganciclovir pharmacokinetics in rabbits and man. J Ocul Pharmacol. 1992;8:343–347. doi: 10.1089/jop.1992.8.343. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 96.Anand R, Nightingale S D, Fish R H. Control of cytomegalovirus retinitis using sustained release of intraocular ganciclovir. Arch Ophthalmol. 1993;111:223–227. doi: 10.1001/archopht.1993.01090020077027. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 97.Musch D C, Martin D F, Gordon J F. Treatment of cytomegalovirus retinitis with a sustained-release ganciclovir implant. N Engl J Med. 1997;337:83–90. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199707103370203. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 98.Woolfson A D, Malcolm R K, Morrow R J. Intravaginal ring delivery of the reverse transcriptase inhibitor TMC120 as an HIV microbicide. Int J Pharm. 2006;325:82–89. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpharm.2006.06.026. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 99.Annovera: annual, comfortable, controllable birth controlAccessed December 15, 2020 at:https://www.annovera.com/
  • 100.Annovera – FDA. Issued: 08/2018Accessed May 3, 2021 at:https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/drugsatfda_docs/label/2018/209627s000lbl.pdf
  • 101.McBride J W, Boyd P, Dias N. Vaginal rings with exposed cores for sustained delivery of the HIV CCR5 inhibitor 5P12-RANTES. J Control Release. 2019;298:1–11. doi: 10.1016/j.jconrel.2019.02.003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 102.FDA Prescribing Information. Femring® (estradiol acetate vaginal ring)Accessed May 3, 2021 at:https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/drugsatfda_docs/label/2009/021367s009lbl.pdf
  • 103.Thurman A R, Clark M R, Hurlburt J A. Intravaginal rings as delivery systems for microbicides and multipurpose prevention technologies. Int J Womens Health. 2013;5:695. doi: 10.2147/IJWH.S34030. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 104.Schwarze J-E, Villa S, Manzur A. Progesterone-releasing vaginal ring for luteal phase support after superovulation and intrauterine insemination cycles, a pilot study. JBRA Assist Reprod. 2013 doi: 10.5935/1518-0557.20130072. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 105.Algorta J, Diaz M, de Benito R. Pharmacokinetic bioequivalence, safety and acceptability of Ornibel ® , a new polymer composition contraceptive vaginal ring (etonogestrel/ethinylestradiol 11.00/3.474 mg) compared with Nuvaring ® (etonogestrel/ethinylestradiol 11.7/2.7 mg) . Eur J Contracept Reprod Health Care. 2017;22:429–438. doi: 10.1080/13625187.2017.1413179. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 106.Roumen F J, op ten Berg M M, Hoomans E H. The combined contraceptive vaginal ring (NuvaRing ® ): first experience in daily clinical practice in The Netherlands . Eur J Contracept Reprod Health Care. 2006;11:14–22. doi: 10.1080/13625180500389547. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 107.Koetsawang S, Gao J, Krishna U. Microdose intravaginal levonorgestrel contraception: A multicentre clinical trial: I. Contraceptive efficacy and side effects. Contraception. 1990;41:105–124. doi: 10.1016/0010-7824(90)90141-h. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 108.Brache V, Alvarez-Sanchez F, Faundes A. Progestin-only contraceptive rings. Steroids. 2000;65:687–691. doi: 10.1016/s0039-128x(00)00175-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 109.Massai R, Quinteros E, Reyes M V. Extended use of a progesterone-releasing vaginal ring in nursing women: a phase II clinical trial. Contraception. 2005;72:352–357. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2005.05.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 110.Kerns J, Darney P. Vaginal ring contraception. Contraception. 2011;83:107–115. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2010.07.008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 111.Sivin I, Mishell D R, jr., Alvarez F. Contraceptive vaginal rings releasing Nestorone ® and ethinylestradiol: a 1-year dose-finding trial . Contraception. 2005;71:122–129. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2004.08.010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 112.Bjarnadóttir R I. Update on contraceptive vaginal rings. Reviews in Gynaecological Practice. 2003;3:156–159. [Google Scholar]
  • 113.Galzote R M, Rafie S, Teal R. Transdermal delivery of combined hormonal contraception: a review of the current literature. Int J Womens Health. 2017;9:315. doi: 10.2147/IJWH.S102306. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 114.Stewart M, Black K. Choosing a combined oral contraceptive pill. Aust Prescr. 2015;38:6. doi: 10.18773/austprescr.2015.002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 115.Nath A, Sitruk-Ware R. Progesterone vaginal ring for contraceptive use during lactation. Contraception. 2010;82:428–434. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2010.05.016. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 116.Rivera R, Yacobson I, Grimes D. The mechanism of action of hormonal contraceptives and intrauterine contraceptive devices. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1999;181:1263–1269. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9378(99)70120-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 117.Ballagh S A. Vaginal ring hormone delivery systems in contraception and menopause. Clin Obstet Gynecol. 2001;44:106–113. doi: 10.1097/00003081-200103000-00014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 118.Wagner M-S, Black A. The Combined Contraceptive Vaginal Ring: an Update. Current Obstetrics and Gynecology Reports. 2016;5:1–12. [Google Scholar]
  • 119.Gruber C J. The combined contraceptive vaginal ring (NuvaRing): evaluation of the clinical and pharmacological evidence. Womens Health (Lond) 2006;2:351–356. doi: 10.2217/17455057.2.3.351. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 120.Roumen F J. Review of the combined contraceptive vaginal ring, NuvaRing ®. Ther Clin Risk Manag. 2008;4:441. doi: 10.2147/tcrm.s1964. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 121.Mulders T M, Dieben T O, Bennink H JC. Ovarian function with a novel combined contraceptive vaginal ring. Hum Reprod. 2002;17:2594–2599. doi: 10.1093/humrep/17.10.2594. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 122.Fan G S, Ren M, Di W. Efficacy and safety of the contraceptive vaginal ring (NuvaRing) compared with a combined oral contraceptive in Chinese women: a 1-year randomised trial. Eur J Contracept Reprod Health Care. 2016;21:303–309. doi: 10.1080/13625187.2016.1186269. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 123.Reproductive Health Supplies Coalition Progesterone vaginal ring Brussels, Belgium: Reproductive Health Supplies Coalition; Accessed May 3 2021 at:https://www.rhsupplies.org/fileadmin/uploads/rhsc/Working_Groups/New_Underused_RH_Technologies_Caucus/Documents/Technical_Briefs/rhsc-brief-progesterone_A4.pdf [Google Scholar]
  • 124.Johansson E D, Sitruk-Ware R. New delivery systems in contraception: vaginal rings. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2004;190:S54–S59. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2004.01.056. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 125.Friend D R. Drug delivery for the treatment of endometriosis and uterine fibroids. Drug Deliv Transl Res. 2017;7:829–839. doi: 10.1007/s13346-017-0423-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 126.Parasar P, Ozcan P, Terry K L. Endometriosis: epidemiology, diagnosis and clinical management. Curr Obstet Gynecol Rep. 2017;6:34–41. doi: 10.1007/s13669-017-0187-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 127.Pluchino N, Freschi L, Wenger J-M. Innovations in classical hormonal targets for endometriosis. Expert Rev Clin Pharmacol. 2016;9:317–327. doi: 10.1586/17512433.2016.1129895. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 128.Razzi S, Luisi S, Calonaci F. Efficacy of vaginal danazol treatment in women with recurrent deeply infiltrating endometriosis. Fertil Steril. 2007;88:789–794. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2006.12.077. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 129.Ryan I P, Schriock E D, Taylor R N. Isolation, characterization, and comparison of human endometrial and endometriosis cells in vitro. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 1994;78:642–649. doi: 10.1210/jcem.78.3.8126136. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 130.ACOG Committee on Practice Bulletins–Gynecology . ACOG Practice Bulletin No. 51. Chronic pelvic pain. Obstet Gynecol. 2004;103:589–605. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 131.Reinecke I, Schultze-Mosgau M H, Nave R. Model‐based dose selection for intravaginal ring formulations releasing anastrozole and levonorgestrel intended for the treatment of endometriosis symptoms. J Clin Pharmacol. 2017;57:640–651. doi: 10.1002/jcph.846. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 132.Dunselman G, Vermeulen N, Becker C. ESHRE guideline: management of women with endometriosis. Hum Reprod. 2014;29:400–412. doi: 10.1093/humrep/det457. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 133.Vercellini P, Barbara G, Somigliana E. Comparison of contraceptive ring and patch for the treatment of symptomatic endometriosis. Fertil Steril. 2010;93:2150–2161. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2009.01.071. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 134.Sartori M GF, Feldner P, jr., Jarmy-Di Bella Z. Sexual steroids in urogynecology. Climacteric. 2011;14:5–14. doi: 10.3109/13697137.2010.508542. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 135.Palacios S, Nappi R, Bruyniks N. The European Vulvovaginal Epidemiological Survey (EVES): prevalence, symptoms and impact of vulvovaginal atrophy of menopause. Climacteric. 2018;21:286–291. doi: 10.1080/13697137.2018.1446930. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 136.Van Keep P, Utian W, Vermeulen A. Dordrecht: Springer; 1982. Potency and hepato-cellular Effects of Oestrogens after oral, percutaneous, and subcutaneous Administration; pp. 103–125. [Google Scholar]
  • 137.Antisell J, Poon T, Borey A, Briddell J, Palesch S.Hormone Delivery System: The Contraceptive Ring Ithaca, New York: Cornell University Library; 2006. Accessed May 3 2021 at:https://ecommons.cornell.edu/handle/1813/3060 [Google Scholar]
  • 138.Kuhl H. Pharmacology of estrogens and progestogens: influence of different routes of administration. Climacteric. 2005;8:3–63. doi: 10.1080/13697130500148875. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 139.Nabahi S. Google Patents; 1998. Intravaginal drug delivery device. [Google Scholar]
  • 140.Cicinelli E. Intravaginal oestrogen and progestin administration: advantages and disadvantages. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 2008;22:391–405. doi: 10.1016/j.bpobgyn.2007.08.010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 141.Casper F, Petri E. Local treatment of urogenital atrophy with an estradiol-releasing vaginal ring: a comparative and a placebo-controlled multicenter study. Vaginal Ring Study Group. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct. 1999;10:171–176. doi: 10.1007/s001920050040. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 142.Hill D A, Crider M, Hill S R. Hormone therapy and other treatments for symptoms of menopause. Am Fam Physician. 2016;94:884–889. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 143.Jilka R L, Takahashi K, Munshi M. Loss of estrogen upregulates osteoblastogenesis in the murine bone marrow. Evidence for autonomy from factors released during bone resorption. J Clin Invest. 1998;101:1942–1950. doi: 10.1172/JCI1039. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 144.Khosla S, Oursler M J, Monroe D G. Estrogen and the skeleton. Trends Endocrinol Metab. 2012;23:576–581. doi: 10.1016/j.tem.2012.03.008. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 145.Almeida M, Laurent M R, Dubois V. Estrogens and androgens in skeletal physiology and pathophysiology. Physiol Rev. 2017;97:135–187. doi: 10.1152/physrev.00033.2015. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 146.Paganini-Hill A, Henderson V W. Estrogen deficiency and risk of Alzheimerʼs disease in women. Am J Epidemiol. 1994;140:256–261. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a117244. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 147.Lindahl S H. Reviewing the options for local estrogen treatment of vaginal atrophy. Int J Womens Health. 2014;6:307. doi: 10.2147/IJWH.S52555. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 148.Management of symptomatic vulvovaginal atrophy: 2013 position statement of The North American Menopause Society Menopause 201320888–902.quiz 903–904 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 149.Warner Chilcott Laboratories . Rockaway, NJ: Warner Chilcott Laboratories; 2011. Estrace (estradiol vaginal cream, USP, 0.01 %) [prescribing information] [Google Scholar]
  • 150.Food and Drug Administration NDA 020216/S-067. Supplement ApprovalAccessed May 3, 2021 at:https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/drugsatfda_docs/appletter/2011/020216s067ltr.pdf
  • 151.Rybacki J J.DOSAGE AND ADMINISTRATION. Published at 6/21/2017 on RxList websiteAccessed October 29, 2020 at:https://www.rxlist.com/estragyn-drug.htm
  • 152.Neidecker M V. The Ohio State University; 2009. Patterns of Medication Use and Related Health Care Service Utilization Associated with Vaginal Estrogen Therapy in Medicaid-Enrolled Women [Diss.]
  • 153.New York: Pharmacia & Upjohn Co; 2008. Estring. [Google Scholar]
  • 154.Rockaway, NJ: Warner Chilcott Inc; 2005. Femring. [Google Scholar]
  • 155.Smith P, Heimer G, Lindskog M. Oestradiol-releasing vaginal ring for treatment of postmenopausal urogenital atrophy. Maturitas. 1993;16:145–154. doi: 10.1016/0378-5122(93)90059-q. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 156.Barentsen R, van de Weijer P H, Schram J H. Continuous low dose estradiol released from a vaginal ring versus estriol vaginal cream for urogenital atrophy. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 1997;71:73–80. doi: 10.1016/s0301-2115(96)02612-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 157.Holmgren P-Å, Lindskog M, Von Schoultz B. Vaginal rings for continuous low-dose release of oestradiol in the treatment of urogenital atrophy. Maturitas. 1989;11:55–63. doi: 10.1016/0378-5122(89)90120-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 158.Schmidt G, Andersson S-B, Nordle Ö. Release of 17-beta-oestradiol from a vaginal ring in postmenopausal women: pharmacokinetic evaluation. Gynecol Obstet Invest. 1994;38:253–260. doi: 10.1159/000292492. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 159.Suckling J, Lethaby A, Kennedy R. Local oestrogen for vaginal atrophy in postmenopausal women. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2006;(04):CD001500. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001500.pub2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 160.Crandall C J, Hovey K M, Andrews C A. Breast cancer, endometrial cancer, and cardiovascular events in participants who used vaginal estrogen in the Womenʼs Health Initiative Observational Study. Menopause. 2018;25:11–20. doi: 10.1097/GME.0000000000000956. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 161.Krause M, Wheeler T L, 2nd, Snyder T E. Local Effects of Vaginally Administered Estrogen Therapy: A Review. J Pelvic Med Surg. 2009;15:105–114. doi: 10.1097/SPV.0b013e3181ab4804. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 162.Castelo-Branco C, Cancelo M J, Villero J. Management of post-menopausal vaginal atrophy and atrophic vaginitis. Maturitas. 2005;52:46–52. doi: 10.1016/j.maturitas.2005.06.014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 163.Naumova I, Castelo-Branco C. Current treatment options for postmenopausal vaginal atrophy. Int J Womens Health. 2018;10:387. doi: 10.2147/IJWH.S158913. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 164.Calleja-Agius J, Brincat M. Urogenital atrophy. Climacteric. 2009;12:279–285. doi: 10.1080/13697130902814751. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 165.Bell R J, Rizvi F, Islam R M. A systematic review of intravaginal testosterone for the treatment of vulvovaginal atrophy. Menopause. 2018;25:704–709. doi: 10.1097/GME.0000000000001052. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 166.Robinson D, Cardozo L D. The role of estrogens in female lower urinary tract dysfunction. Urology. 2003;62:45–51. doi: 10.1016/s0090-4295(03)00676-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 167.Pruthi S, Simon J A, Early A P. Current overview of the management of urogenital atrophy in women with breast cancer. Breast J. 2011;17:403–408. doi: 10.1111/j.1524-4741.2011.01089.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 168.Willhite L A, OʼConnell M B. Urogenital atrophy: prevention and treatment. Pharmacotherapy. 2001;21:464–480. doi: 10.1592/phco.21.5.464.34486. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 169.Leiblum S, Bachmann G, Kemmann E. Vaginal atrophy in the postmenopausal woman: the importance of sexual activity and hormones. JAMA. 1983;249:2195–2198. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 170.Moegele M, Buchholz S, Seitz S. Vaginal Estrogen Therapy for Patients with Breast Cancer. Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd. 2013;73:1017–1022. doi: 10.1055/s-0033-1350876. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 171.Huang X, Brazel C S. On the importance and mechanisms of burst release in matrix-controlled drug delivery systems. J Control Release. 2001;73:121–136. doi: 10.1016/s0168-3659(01)00248-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 172.Helbling I M, Ibarra J C, Luna J A. The use of cellulose membrane to eliminate burst release from intravaginal rings. AAPS J. 2016;18:960–971. doi: 10.1208/s12248-016-9914-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 173.Tønnesen H H, Karlsen J. Alginate in drug delivery systems. Drug Dev Ind Pharm. 2002;28:621–630. doi: 10.1081/ddc-120003853. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 174.Sershen S, West J. Implantable, polymeric systems for modulated drug delivery. Adv Drug Deliv Rev. 2002;54:1225–1235. doi: 10.1016/s0169-409x(02)00090-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 175.Tiedeken M, Westhoff C L, Cohen A. Bone turnover markers in women participating in a dose-finding trial of a contraceptive vaginal ring releasing Nestorone and estradiol. Contraception. 2019;99:329–334. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2019.02.012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 176.Stifani B M, Plagianos M, Vieira C S. Factors associated with nonadherence to instructions for using the Nestorone ® /ethinyl estradiol contraceptive vaginal ring . Contraception. 2018;97:415–421. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2017.12.011. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 177.Nel A, Bekker L-G, Bukusi E. Safety, acceptability and adherence of dapivirine vaginal ring in a microbicide clinical trial conducted in multiple countries in Sub-Saharan Africa. PloS One. 2016;11:e0147743. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0147743. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 178.Sefton M V. Implantable pumps. Medical Applications of Controlled Release. 1984;1:129–158. [Google Scholar]
  • 179.Conte U, Maggi L. A flexible technology for the linear, pulsatile and delayed release of drugs, allowing for easy accommodation of difficult in vitro targets. J Control Release. 2000;64:263–268. doi: 10.1016/s0168-3659(99)00147-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 180.Lee E, Kim S, Kim S. Drug release from hydrogel devices with ratecontrolling barriers. J Membr Sci. 1980;7:293–303. [Google Scholar]
  • 181.Yang L, Fassihi R. Modulation of diclofenac release from a totally soluble controlled release drug delivery system. J Control Release. 1997;44:135–140. [Google Scholar]
  • 182.Hildgen P, McMullen J. A new gradient matrix: formulation and characterization. J Control Release. 1995;34:263–271. [Google Scholar]
  • 183.Lu S, Anseth K S. Photopolymerization of multilaminated poly (HEMA) hydrogels for controlled release. J Control Release. 1999;57:291–300. doi: 10.1016/s0168-3659(98)00125-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 184.Lu S, Ramirez W F, Anseth K S. Photopolymerized, multilaminated matrix devices with optimized nonuniform initial concentration profiles to control drug release. J Pharm Sci. 2000;89:45–51. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1520-6017(200001)89:1<45::AID-JPS5>3.0.CO;2-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 185.Qiu Y, Chidambaram N, Flood K. Design and evaluation of layered diffusional matrices for zero-order sustained-release. J Control Release. 1998;51:123–130. doi: 10.1016/s0168-3659(97)00119-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 186.Narasimhan B, Peppas N A. Molecular analysis of drug delivery systems controlled by dissolution of the polymer carrier. J Pharm Sci. 1997;86:297–304. doi: 10.1021/js960372z. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 187.Park M, Park C G, Lee S H. Polymeric tube-shaped devices with controlled geometry for programmed drug delivery. Macromol Res. 2012;20:960–967. [Google Scholar]
  • 188.Johnson T J. Salt Lake City, Utah: The University of Utah; 2012. Antiretroviral eluting intravaginal Rings to prevent the sexual Transmission of HIV. [Google Scholar]
  • 189.Jensen J T. Vaginal ring delivery of selective progesterone receptor modulators for contraception. Contraception. 2013;87:314–318. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2012.08.038. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 190.Singer R, Mawson P, Derby N. An intravaginal ring that releases the NNRTI MIV-150 reduces SHIV transmission in macaques. Sci Transl Med. 2012;4:150ra123. doi: 10.1126/scitranslmed.3003936. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 191.Kenney J, Aravantinou M, Singer R. An antiretroviral/zinc combination gel provides 24 hours of complete protection against vaginal SHIV infection in macaques. PloS One. 2011;6:e15835. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0015835. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 192.Dobard C, Sharma S, Martin A. Durable protection from vaginal simian-human immunodeficiency virus infection in macaques by tenofovir gel and its relationship to drug levels in tissue. J Virol. 2012;86:718–725. doi: 10.1128/JVI.05842-11. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 193.Derby N, Zydowsky T, Robbiani M. In search of the optimal delivery method for anti-HIV microbicides: are intravaginal rings the way forward? Expert Rev Anti Infect Ther. 2013;11:5–8. doi: 10.1586/eri.12.155. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 194.Gao S, Tang G, Hua D. Stimuli-responsive bio-based polymeric systems and their applications. J Mater Chem B. 2019;7:709–729. doi: 10.1039/c8tb02491j. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 195.Jiang J, Xie J, Ma B. Mussel-inspired protein-mediated surface functionalization of electrospun nanofibers for pH-responsive drug delivery. Acta Biomater. 2014;10:1324–1332. doi: 10.1016/j.actbio.2013.11.012. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Geburtshilfe und Frauenheilkunde are provided here courtesy of Thieme Medical Publishers

RESOURCES