Skip to main content

Some NLM-NCBI services and products are experiencing heavy traffic, which may affect performance and availability. We apologize for the inconvenience and appreciate your patience. For assistance, please contact our Help Desk at info@ncbi.nlm.nih.gov.

Springer logoLink to Springer
. 2021 Jan 3;304(2):495–501. doi: 10.1007/s00404-020-05921-8

CD34 and Bcl-2 as predictors for the efficacy of neoadjuvant chemotherapy in cervical cancer

Yun Lin 1,2, Zhi Li 3, Mubiao Liu 1, Haiyan Ye 1, Jianhui He 1, Jianguo Chen 1,
PMCID: PMC8277608  PMID: 33392721

Abstract

Background

Successful neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) could improve the surgical resection rate and radical curability of patients with cervical cancer, but only a subset of patients benefits. Therefore, identifying predictive biomarkers are urgently needed. The aim of this study was to evaluate the predictive value of CD34 and Bcl-2 in the NACT effectiveness of cervical cancer.

Methods

Sixty-seven patients with locally advanced cervical cancer (FIGO stages IB3, IIA2 or IIB) were classified into two groups based on effective (n = 48) and ineffective (n = 19) response to NACT. Immunohistochemistry was employed to identify CD34 and Bcl-2 expression before and after NACT. We analyzed the associations between the pre-NACT expression of these two biomarkers and the response of NACT. The expression of these two biomarkers before and after NACT was also assessed and compared.

Results

More patients were CD34 positive expression before NACT in effective group compared to ineffective group (p = 0.005). However, no statistically significant difference in Bcl-2 expression before NACT were found between two groups (p = 0.084). In NACT effective group, the expression of both CD34 and Bcl-2 after NACT are down-regulated (p < 0.001 and p < 0.001, respectively), while there are no statistical differences between the pre- and post-NACT expression of CD34 and Bcl-2 in NACT ineffective group (p = 0.453 and p = 0.317, respectively).

Conclusion

The positive CD34 expression before NACT may serve as a predictive biomarker for NACT of cervical cancer, but the pre-NACT expression of Bcl-2 is not an independent predictor. The down-regulated expression of these two indicators after NACT may indicate effective NACT.

Keywords: CD34, Bcl-2, Neoadjuvant chemotherapy, Cervical cancer

Introduction

With an estimated 570,000 new cases and 311,000 deaths in 2018 worldwide, cervical cancer ranks as the fourth most frequently diagnosed cancer in women [1]. For decades, radical hysterectomy and concurrent chemoradiation have been applied to treat cervical cancer of FIGO stages IB3 to IIB. However, the overall and recurrence-free survival rate were not significantly improved [2]. Previous study found that the recurrence-free survival was significantly longer in patients who achieved an overall optimal response to NACT than in those who did not, suggesting that effective NACT may be a good indicator to prognose the survival of the patients [3]. However, not all patients have a response to NACT. Insensitive to NACT may result in poorer prognosis and ultimately patient mortality. Therefore, identifying the biomarkers to assist the prediction of prognosis and efficacy of NACT is needed.

Both angiogenesis and apoptosis play essential roles in the growth and metastasis of cervical cancer. Exploring the biomarkers involved in these two pathways may reveal the mechanism of NACT for cervical cancer. CD34, a transmembrane glycoprotein expressed in capillary endothelial cells, is a useful angiogenesis marker reflecting the grade of microvascular modeling in cervical cancer [46]. Bcl-2 plays an important role in the intrinsic apoptotic pathway of malignant cancer and has been shown to interfere with chemotherapy [7]. Preferentially, the expression of CD34 and Bcl-2 were proved to be the predictors of neoadjuvant chemotherapy in urothelial bladder cancer [8] and breast cancer [9, 10]. However, up until now, less study has been dedicated to clarify the association between CD34 or Bcl-2 expression and the response to NACT in cervical cancer.

Therefore, to determine the utility of CD34 and Bcl-2 expression as predictive biomarkers, we investigate the relationship between the expression of two biomarkers before NACT and the efficacy of NACT in cervical cancer. Besides, we also sought to analyze the variation of CD34 and Bcl-2 regarding different NACT response.

Material and methods

Patients and tissue sample preparation

We enrolled 67 patients diagnosed with cervical cancer who underwent NACT at Guangdong Provincial People's Hospital between January to December 2018. None of these patients underwent any anti-cancer therapies before NACT. Any subject with other malignant diseases or serious complications was excluded. The histopathology of tissue samples was confirmed by pathologists, and all included patients were squamous cell carcinoma (SCC). Magnetic resonance imaging of pelvic and computer tomography of thorax and abdomen were performed to all patients before and after NACT. The stage of tumor was determined according to the International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO 2018) classification guideline based on clinical examination, colposcopy and imaging.

Three cycles platinum-paclitaxel NACT followed radical hysterectomy with pelvic lymphadenectomy were performed to all included patients. The NACT regimen consisted of cisplatin (70–75 mg/m2) combined with paclitaxel (135-175 mg/m2) were given to patients via intravenous infusion every 21 days. Patients were classified into two groups based on the response to NACT. Clinical examination, colposcopy and imaging were used to evaluate the response to NACT, based upon the changes in the local cervical lesion. The size of the cervical tumor was assessed as the product of anteroposterior diameter and transverse diameter. According to the World Health Organization (WHO) RECIST-criteria (Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors), the tumor response was classified into the complete response (CR), partial response (PR), stable disease (SD), and progressive disease (PD) [11]. CR is defined as complete disappearance of local tumor, PR as at least 30% reduction, PD as at least 20% increase of lesion or appearance of a new lesion, SD as neither sufficient shrinkage to qualify for PR, nor sufficient increase to qualify for PD. The subjects with CR and PR were classified as NACT effective group, while SD and PD were classified as NACT ineffective group. Tumor tissue samples of cervical cancer were obtained by punch biopsy before and after NACT.

Immunohistochemical staining

For immunohistochemistry, 4-μm sections placed on gelatin-coated slides were cut from formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded tissues, and were sequentially dried, dewaxed, re-hydrated and rinsed. The sections were immersed in 0.3% H2O2 for 10 min to block endogenous peroxidase activity and boiled in citrate buffer (pH 6.0) for 10 min in a pressure cooker for antigen retrieval. Then the sections were incubated respectively with rabbit antibodies against CD34 (1:200 dilution; Fine Test, China) and Bcl-2 (1:200 dilution; OmnimAbs, USA) overnight at 4 °C. The antibodies were diluted by primary antibody dilution buffer (Solarbio, Beijing, China) and replaced by phosphate buffer saline (PBS) as a blank control and Rabbit IgG Control (1:200 dilution; R&D Systems, USA) as a positive control. Then each section was rinsed by PBS for 10 min at room temperature to wash out unspecific signal. The EnVision System with diaminobenzidine (Dako Cytomation; Copenhagen, Denmark) was used as the chromogenic substrate to carry out secondary antibody staining for 30 min. Immunostaining results were evaluated in high-power fields (400 ×) using an Olympus CX41 microscope commencing from the first representative field on the left-hand side of the section. The presence of brown color was indicated as positive reactivity. Immunostaining for CD34 was only recorded as positive ( +) and negative (–). The endothelial cells stained with brown color, which were constituted vascular lumen in the form of cluster, were considered as positive. Bcl-2 staining was scored depending on the proportion of positively stained tumor cells, and the intensity of staining was assessed as negative (–), weak ( +), moderate (+ +) and intense (+ + +). Staining of ≤ 5% positive tumor cells was defined as negative (–). For positive immunoreactivity, staining of 5–10% positive tumor cells was defined as weak ( +), 10–30% was defined as moderate (+ +) and more than 30% was defined as intense (+ + +). All sections were assessed by two experienced pathologists blind to each patient’s clinical information. Where discrepancies arose, the section would be evaluated by the third pathologist. The staining of CD34 and Bcl-2 were shown in Figs 1 and 2.

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1

Immunohistochemical staining of CD34 in cervical cancer. a Negative staining. b Positive staining. Magnification, ×400

Fig. 2.

Fig. 2

Immunohistochemical staining of Bcl-2 in cervical cancer. a Negative staining. b Weak staining. c Moderate staining. d Intense staining Magnification, ×400

Statistical analysis

All statistical analyses were performed by SPSS software version 20.0 (IBM Corporation; Armonk, United States). Student's t-test or Pearson’s χ2 test was used to examine the relationship between the response to NACT and the patients’ clinicopathological parameters as appropriate. The correlation between CD34/Bcl-2 staining before NACT and the response to NACT was determined by Pearson’s χ2 test. The variation of CD34/Bcl-2 staining before and after NACT were compared using McNemar’s test or Wilcoxon signed-rank test. A threshold of P < 0.05 was considered to indicate the statistical difference.

Results

Patient’s clinicopathological characteristics

A total of 67 patients with cervical cancer were accorded with the included criteria. All patients were divided into NACT effective group (n = 48) and NACT ineffective group (n = 19) based on their response to NACT. Therein, CR rate was 23.88% (16/67), PR rate was 47.76% (32/67), SD rate was 23.88% (16/67), and PD rate was 4.48% (3/67). Table 1 showed the patients’ clinicopathological characteristics in NACT effective and ineffective groups. No statistically significant differences in patients’ age, BMI and FIGO stage were found between two groups (p = 0.703, p = 0.106 and p = 0.343, respectively).

Table 1.

Demographic and clinical characteristics of the patients in the NACT effective and ineffective groups

Clinical variables NACT effective
(n = 48)
NACT ineffective
(n = 19)
P value
Age (years)
 Mean ± SD 52.29±10.56 52.92±6.33 0.703a
 Range 24–72 46–67
BMI (kg/m2)
 Mean ± SD 20.51±3.26 21.24±3.41 0.106a
 Range 17.62~25.14 18.14~25.36
FIGO stage
 IB3 7 5 0.343b
 IIA2 35 7
 IIB 6 7

aStudent's t-test; bχ2 test; NACT neoadjuvant chemotherapy, BMI body mass index. SD standard deviation. FIGO international federation of gynecology and obstetrics. Data are the number of patients, unless indicated

CD34 and Bcl-2 expression before NACT and correlation with NACT efficacy

The relationship between the expression of CD34 before NACT and patients’ response to NACT was investigated. Positive CD34 expression before NACT was seen in 70.83% of NACT effective patients, while only 31.58% patients in the ineffective group had a positive expression of CD34. The proportion of positive CD34 expression in NACT effective group was significantly higher than the ineffective group (P = 0.005, Table 2).

Table 2.

Expression of CD34 or Bcl-2 before NACT in the NACT effective and ineffective group

Before NACT No. of patients (%) P-value
NACT effective NACT ineffective
CD34 14a (29.17%b) 13a (68.42%b) 0.005c
+ 34a (70.83%b) 6a (31.58%b)
Bcl-2 7a (14.58%b) 8a (42.11%b) 0.084c
+ 14a (29.17%b) 4a (21.05%b)
++ 14a (29.17%b) 5a (26.31%b)
+++ 13a (27.08%b) 2a (10.53%b)

aNumber of patients; bpercentage of patients in NACT effective or ineffective group; cχ2 test; NACT neoadjuvant chemotherapy

There was no significant difference between two groups in Bcl-2 expression before NACT (P = 0.084, Table 2). Besides, the proportion of different Bcl-2 stating stages in NACT effective group were similar (29.17% of weak, 29.17% of moderate, 27.08% of intense, respectively).

The down-regulated expression of CD34 and Bcl-2 after NACT in effective group

To explore the effect of NACT on CD34 and Bcl-2, we compared the expression of these two biomarkers before and after NACT respectively in two groups. In NACT effective group, more than half (82.35%) patients’ expression of CD34 turned positive to negative after NACT (P < 0.001, Table 3). Similarly, Bcl-2 expression of NACT effective group significantly decreased after NACT (P < 0.001, Table 4). Up to 39.58% of patients turned negative in Bcl-2 expression after NACT, and another 29.17% of patients’ expression was decreased. While in NACT ineffective group, no significant difference between CD34 or Bcl-2 expression were found before and after NACT (P = 0.453 and 0.317, respectively, Tables 3 and 4).

Table 3.

Changes in the expression of CD34 before and after NACT in the NACT effective and ineffective group

Expression of CD34 after NACT P value
+
Expression of CD34 before NACT Effective 13 (92.86%) 1 (7.14%) <0.001a
+ 28 (82.35%) 6 (17.65%)
Ineffective 11 (84.62%) 2 (15.38%) 0.453a
+ 5 (83.33%) 1 (16.67%)

Data in table were shown the number and percentage of patients’ CD34 expression

aMcNemar’s test; NACT: neoadjuvant chemotherapy

Table 4.

Changes in the expression of Bcl-2 before and after NACT in the NACT effective and ineffective group

Expression of Bcl-2 after NACT P-value
+ ++ +++
Effective Expression of CD34 before NACT 4 (57.14%) 3 (42.86%) 0 0 < 0.001a
+ 10 (71.43%) 2 (14.29%) 1 (7.14%) 1 (7.14%)
++ 6 (42.86%) 6 (42.86%) 2 (14.28%) 0
+++ 3 (23.08%) 6 (46.16%) 2 (15.38%) 2 (15.38%)
Ineffective Expression of CD34 before NACT 5 (62.50%) 3 (37.50%) 0 0 0.317a
+ 0 3 (75.00%) 0 1 (25.00%)
++ 0 1 (20.00%) 4 (80.00%) 0
+++ 0 0 1 (50.00%) 1 (50.00%)

Data in table were shown the number of patients and percentage of patients’ Bcl-2 expression; a Wilcoxon signed-rank test; NACT: neoadjuvant chemotherapy

Discussion

For cervical cancer, large local tumor lesions and positive parametria may lead to poor prognosis. NACT has been used for down-staging of tumor and inhibition of distant metastasis [12, 13]. NACT is not the recommended approach in NCCN (National Comprehensive Cancer Network) clinical guideline, because of the controversy over survival improvement compared with surgery alone [14, 15]. However, in European guidelines, NACT followed with radical hysterectomy is mentioned as a treatment option. It has been demonstrated that effective NACT before surgery could improve the operability and radical curability [16, 17]. However, a proportion of tumors do not response or later develop resistance to NACT, possibly leading to worse prognosis and ultimately patient mortality. Hence, the present study was conducted to explore reliable predictive markers for the efficacy of NACT in patients with cervical cancer. These may be helpful for clinicians to screen suitable patients for NACT. We found that positive CD34 expression was significantly associated with effective NACT, while no significant difference was found in the pre-NACT expression of Bcl-2 among different NACT efficacy groups. Moreover, both CD34 and Bcl-2 expression were significantly down-regulated after NACT in effective group, albeit to differing degrees.

Angiogenesis plays an important role in cancerous process, including progression, invasion and metastasis [18, 19]. The angiogenic degree of tumor is strongly associated with the aggressiveness and clinical outcome [20]. CD34 is a transmembrane glycoprotein expressed in a vascular endothelial cell that has been used as a direct marker to highlight the microvascular density [21]. An immunohistochemical study was shown that high CD34 expression was significantly associated with tumor size, tumor stage and lymph node metastasis in cervical cancer [22]. The present study revealed a positive relationship between the pre-NACT expression of CD34 and the efficacy of NACT in cervical cancer. Patients with high CD34 expression tended to be more sensitive to NACT. A retrospective analysis involving 55 cervical cancer patients found that the complete response rate of chemotherapy in patients with high microvascular density are 84.21%, which was significantly higher than the low-density group [23]. Similar results were observed in breast cancer [24, 25] and colorectal cancer [26]. High expression of CD34 signifies the presence of an anomalous vessel pattern characterized by high microvascular density. Chemotherapeutic drugs could fully infiltrate into the center of cancer through the rich vascular network and achieve better NACT efficacy [27]. We, therefore, suggest that CD34 expression is suited to be the predictive biomarker of NACT response in cervical cancer. Immunohistochemical staining of CD34 before NACT helps to develop individualized treatment of cervical cancer patients. The patient with positive CD34 expression may be sensitive to NACT and have a good response. NACT has the benefit of reducing tumor size, sterilizing parametria and eradicating the micro-metastatic disease [28]. Thereby, it gives the chance of operability to these chemo-sensitive patients. The CD34 staining before NACT also help the clinicians to screen out those chemotherapeutic non-responders. This may help to avoid delays in treatment and exempt the patients from unnecessary exposure to the toxicity of chemotherapy.

Apoptosis results from the activation of two different pathways: the extrinsic pathway by death receptor signaling and the intrinsic pathway via the mitochondria. Bcl-2 protein is located at intracellular membranes and plays a pivotal role in the mitochondrial pathway [29]. Previous study has reported that Bcl-2 expression was increased with the severity of cervical tissue lesions [30]. The 5-year survival rate in cervical cancer was also positively correlated with Bcl-2 expression [31]. Immunohistochemical Bcl-2 expression has been studied for its predictive value of chemotherapy for various cancer types with conflicting results. A multicenter retrospective analysis by Juliana Florinda et. al found that high Bcl-2 expression was associated with poor prognosis in patients with extrapulmonary neuroendocrine cancer treated with platinum-based chemotherapy [32]. Zhu et. al also found that that Bcl-2-negative status was an independent predictor of pathological complete response in breast cancer patients treated with paclitaxel and carboplatin neoadjuvant chemotherapy [9]. However, some trials had drawn different conclusions that positive Bcl-2 may predict a favorable chemotherapeutic effect. For example, Carla and colleagues found that positive expression of Bcl-2 had a significant predictive value for chemotherapy response in primary laryngeal/hypopharyngeal squamous cell cancer patients [33]. As for cervical cancer, less study evaluated the predictive value of Bcl-2 expression in NACT. Our study showed that no significant difference was found in pre-NACT Bcl-2 expression among different NACT efficacy. The earlier clinical study conducted among 247 bladder cancer patients with NACT reported similar findings to ours [8]. With regard to cervical cancer, Harima et al. [34] also presented that the Bcl-2 expression prior to radiotherapy did not correlate with treatment response. Although Bcl-2 are closely related to the stage and survival of cervical cancer, its expression before NACT is not a predictor of NACT in cervical cancer.

Disturbing tumor vasculature and promoting tumor cell apoptosis have been the primary strategies in cancer chemotherapy. Exploring the variation of CD34 and Bcl-2 expression after the administration of NACT, our study found that there was a significant decrease in these two biomarkers among NACT effective patients. Previous study has demonstrated that the effective chemotherapy of prostatic cancer may shrink the tumor size by impairing the vascularization of tumor [35]. Our data is in agreement with the observation of Jong-Yun Woo et. al, which found that the microvascular density within glioblastoma was reduced after effective chemotherapy [36]. Gine’s Luengo-Gil et al. [37] also proved that decreased microvascular density was associated with tumor downstaging in breast cancer after chemotherapy. Thus, the down-regulated expression of CD34 and Bcl-2 may reflect an efficient NACT response in cervical cancer. Li and colleagues found that chemotherapy-mediated miR29b functions as a tumor suppressor on proliferation and angiogenesis of cervical cancer [38]. Nevertheless, further investigations are needed to identify chemotherapeutic molecular mechanisms.

Conclusion

Our study has uncovered that positive CD34 expression before NACT are significantly associated with effective NACT in cervical cancer. We presented that CD34 may be the predictive biomarker of NACT efficacy, while the pre-NACT expression of Bcl-2 is not an independent predictor. The expression of these two indicators significantly decreases after NACT, which may indicate effective NACT. In the future, treatment and diagnosis based on the CD34 and Bcl-2 expression in NACT may yet comprise a promising strategy. However, further researches are still required to investigate the roles of CD34 and Bcl-2 in NACT for patients with cervical cancer.

Author contributions

All authors contributed to the study conception and design. Study design and project development were performed by Mubiao Liu and Jianguo Chen. Material preparation, data collection and analysis were performed by Yun Lin, Zhi Li, Haiyan Ye and Jianhui He. The first draft of the manuscript was written by Yun Lin and all authors commented on previous versions of the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Funding

This research did not receive any specific grant from funding agencies in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interests

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

Study protocol and patient informed consent have been approved by the local ethic committee and are in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki.

Informed consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

Footnotes

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

References

  • 1.Bray FI, Ferlay J, Soerjomataram I, Siegel RL, Torre LA, Jemal A. Global cancer statistics 2018: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA A Cancer J Clin. 2018;68(6):394–424. doi: 10.3322/caac.21492. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Kokka F, Bryant A, Brockbank E, Powell MEB, Oram D (2015) Hysterectomy with radiotherapy or chemotherapy or both for women with locally advanced cervical cancer. Cochrane Database Systematic Rev (4) [DOI] [PubMed]
  • 3.Landoni F, Sartori E, Maggino T, Zola P, Zanagnolo V, Cosio S, Ferrari F, Piovano E, Gadducci A. Is there a role for postoperative treatment in patients with stage Ib2–IIb cervical cancer treated with neo-adjuvant chemotherapy and radical surgery? An Italian multicenter retrospective study. Gynecol Oncol. 2014;132(3):611–617. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2013.12.010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Hosseini S, Behjati F, Rahimi M, Taheri N, Khorshid HRK, Moghaddam FA, Frouzabadi SG, Karimlou M, Sirati F, Keyhani E. Relationship between PIK3CA amplification and P110α and CD34 tissue expression as angiogenesis markers in iranian women with sporadic breast cancer. Iranian J Pathol. 2018;13(4):447–453. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Bernard U, Patrick N, Michel C, Gérard-Yves P. Microvessel density as a prognostic factor in women with breast cancer: a systematic review of the literature and meta-analysis. Can Res. 2004;64(9):2941. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-03-1957. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Aijaz M, Alam K, Maheshwari V, Hakim S, Kamal M. Clinicopathological study of role of CD34 expressions in the stroma of premalignant and malignant lesions of uterine cervix. Ann Diagn Pathol. 2019;38:87–92. doi: 10.1016/j.anndiagpath.2018.11.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Kontos CK, Christodoulou M, Scorilas A. Apoptosis-related BCL2-family Members: Key Players in Chemotherapy. Anticancer Agents Med Chem. 2014;14(3):353–374. doi: 10.2174/18715206113139990091. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Turker P, Segersten U, Malmstrom P, Hemdan T. Is Bcl-2 a predictive marker of neoadjuvant chemotherapy response in patients with urothelial bladder cancer undergoing radical cystectomy? Scand J Urol Nephrol. 2019;53(1):45–50. doi: 10.1080/21681805.2019.1575467. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Zhu T, Xu F, Zhang L, Zhang Y, Yang C, Cheng M, Chen F, Wang K. Measurement of molecular biomarkers that predict the tumor response in estrogen receptor-positive breast cancers after dose-dense (biweekly) paclitaxel/carboplatin neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Oncotarget. 2017;8(60):101087–101094. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.19686. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Luengogil G, Gonzalezbillalabeitia E, Chavesbenito A, Martinez EG, Garre EG, Vicente V, La Pena FAD. Effects of conventional neoadjuvant chemotherapy for breast cancer on tumor angiogenesis. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2015;151(3):577–587. doi: 10.1007/s10549-015-3421-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Tsuchida Y, Therasse P. Response evaluation criteria in solid tumors (RECIST): New guidelines. Med Pediatr Oncol. 2001;37(1):1–3. doi: 10.1002/mpo.1154. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Hu T, Shuang L, Chen Y, Jian S, Xiong L, Huang K, Ru Y, Li W, Chen Z, Yao J. Matched-case comparison of neoadjuvant chemotherapy in patients with FIGO stage IB1-IIB cervical cancer to establish selection criteria. Eur J Cancer. 2012;48(15):2353–2360. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2012.03.015. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Uegaki K, Shimada M, Sato S, Deura I, Naniwa J, Sato S, Oishi T, Itamochi H, Harada T, Kigawa J. Outcome of stage IB2–IIB patients with bulky uterine cervical cancer who underwent neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by radical hysterectomy. Int J Clin Oncol. 2014;19(2):348–353. doi: 10.1007/s10147-013-0559-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Gupta S, Maheshwari A, Parab P, Mahantshetty U, Hawaldar R, Sastri S, Kerkar R, Tongaonkar HB, Ghosh J, Gulia S. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by radical surgery versus concomitant chemotherapy and radiotherapy in patients with stage IB2, IIA, or IIB squamous cervical cancer: a randomized controlled trial. J Clin Oncol. 2018;36(16):1548. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2017.75.9985. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Rydzewska L, Tierney JF, Vale CL, Symonds P (2012) Neoadjuvant chemotherapy plus surgery versus surgery for cervical cancer. Cochrane Database System Rev 12 (1) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 16.Sun H, Huang K, Tang F, Li X, Wang X, Long S, Zhou S, Suolangquzhen ZJ, Ning R. Adjuvant chemotherapy after surgery can improve clinical outcomes for patients with IB2-IIB cervical cancer with neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by radical surgery. Sci Rep. 2018;8(1):6443. doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-24413-z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Takatori E, Shoji T, Omi H, Kagabu M, Miura F, Takeuchi S, Kumagai S, Yoshizaki A, Sato A, Sugiyama T. Analysis of prognostic factors for patients with bulky squamous cell carcinoma of the uterine cervix who underwent neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by radical hysterectomy. Int J Clin Oncol. 2015;20(2):345–350. doi: 10.1007/s10147-014-0702-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Paduch R. The role of lymphangiogenesis and angiogenesis in tumor metastasis. Cellular Oncol. 2016;39(5):397–410. doi: 10.1007/s13402-016-0281-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Bing Z, Yang JR, Jiang YQ, Chen SF. Evaluation of angiogenesis in non-small cell lung carcinoma by CD34 immunohistochemistry. Cell Biochem Biophys. 2014;70(1):327–331. doi: 10.1007/s12013-014-9916-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Benazzi C, Al-Dissi A, Chau CH, Figg WD, Sarli G, Oliveira JT, De, Grtner F (2014) Angiogenesis in spontaneous tumors and implications for comparative tumor biology. Scientific World J. 2014;21:919570. doi: 10.1155/2014/919570. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Sidney LE, Branch MJ, Dunphy SE, Dua HS, Andrew H. Concise review: evidence for CD34 as a common marker for diverse progenitors. Stem Cells. 2014;32(6):1380–1389. doi: 10.1002/stem.1661. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Fathy A, Abdelrahman AE (2018) EZH2, endothelin-1, and CD34 as biomarkers of aggressive cervical squamous cell carcinoma: an immunohistochemical study. Turk Patoloji Dergisi 34 (2) [DOI] [PubMed]
  • 23.Gao Z, Wang Q (2015) Curative effect of paclitaxel and cisplatin combined chemotherapy on cervical cancer and its relation with tissue micro vascular and lymphatic vessels density. Pakistan J Pharmac Sci 28 (5 suppl):1849 [PubMed]
  • 24.Pakalniskis MG, Wells WA, Schwab MC, Froehlich HM, Jiang S. Tumor angiogenesis change estimated by using diffuse optical spectroscopic tomography:demonstrated correlation in women undergoing neoadjuvant chemotherapy for invasive breast cancer? Radiology. 2011;259(2):365. doi: 10.1148/radiol.11100699. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Tanaka S, Ueno T, Ishiguro H, Morita S, Toi M (2017) The lack of increases in circulating endothelial progenitor cell as a negative predictor for pathological response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in breast cancer patients [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 26.Carrasco J, Gizzi M, Pairet G, Lannoy V, Lefesvre P, J-F G, Hubert C, Jouret-Mourin A, Humblet Y, J-L C Pathological responses after angiogenesis or EGFR inhibitors in metastatic colorectal cancer depend on the chemotherapy backbone. British J Cancer. 2015;113(9):1298–1304. doi: 10.1038/bjc.2015.321. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Maae E, Steffensen KD, Jakobsen EH, Brandslund I, Sørensen FB, Jakobsen A. Prognostic impact of placenta growth factor and vascular endothelial growth factor A in patients with breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2012;133(1):257–265. doi: 10.1007/s10549-012-1957-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Sanusi RS. Outcome of combined neoadjuvant chemotherapy and vitamin a in advanced cervical carcinoma: a randomized double-blind clinical trial. Asian Pacific J Cancer Prev. 2019;20(7):2213–2218. doi: 10.31557/APJCP.2019.20.7.2213. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Campbell KJ, Tait SWG. Targeting BCL-2 regulated apoptosis in cancer. Open Biol. 2018;8(5):180002. doi: 10.1098/rsob.180002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Zhou XL, Wang M. Expression levels of survivin, Bcl-2, and KAI1 proteins in cervical cancer and their correlation with metastasis. Genet Mol Res. 2015;14(4):17059–17067. doi: 10.4238/2015.December.16.6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Saito T, Takehara M, Tanaka R, Rong L, Horie M, Wataba K, Ito E, Kudo R. Correlation between responsiveness of neoadjuvant chemotherapy and apoptosis-associated proteins for cervical adenocarcinoma. Gynecol Oncol. 2004;92(1):284–292. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2003.09.027. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Jf DMR, Rss DM, Braghiroli MI, Galvão B, Jeb N, Munhoz RR, Guerra J, Nonogaki S, Kimura L, Pfiffer TE. Expression of ERCC1, Bcl-2, Lin28a, and Ki-67 as biomarkers of response to first-line platinum-based chemotherapy in patients with high-grade extrapulmonary neuroendocrine carcinomas or small cell lung cancer. E Cancer Med Sci. 2017;11:767. doi: 10.3332/ecancer.2017.767. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Moreno-Galindo C, Hermsen M, García-Pedrero JM, Fresno MF, Suárez C, Rodrigo JP. p27 and BCL2 expression predicts response to chemotherapy in head and neck squamous cell carcinomas. Oral Oncol. 2014;50(2):128–134. doi: 10.1016/j.oraloncology.2013.10.018. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Harima Y, Harima K, Shikata N, Oka A, Ohnishi T, Tanaka Y. Bax and Bcl-2 expressions predict response to radiotherapy in human cervical cancer. Gan to Kagaku Ryoho Cancer Chemotherapy. 1998;25(9):1273–1277. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Ogura T, Tanaka Y, Tamaki H, Harada M. Docetaxel induces Bcl-2- and pro-apoptotic caspase-independent death of human prostate cancer DU145 cells. Int J Oncol. 2016;48(6):2330–2338. doi: 10.3892/ijo.2016.3482. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Woo JY, Yang SH, Lee YS, Su YL, Kim J, Yong KH. Continuous low-dose temozolomide chemotherapy and microvessel density in recurrent glioblastoma. J Korean Neurosurg Soc. 2015;58(5):426–431. doi: 10.3340/jkns.2015.58.5.426. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Ginés L-G, Enrique G-B, Asunción C-B, Elena GM, Elisa GG, Vicente V, AdlPa F. Effects of conventional neoadjuvant chemotherapy for breast cancer on tumor angiogenesis. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2015;151(3):1–11. doi: 10.1007/s10549-015-3421-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Li Y, Zhang Z, Xiao Z, Lin Y, Luo T, Zhou Q, Zhang X (2017) Chemotherapy-mediated miR-29b expression inhibits the invasion and angiogenesis of cervical cancer. Oncotarget 8 (9) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]

Articles from Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics are provided here courtesy of Springer

RESOURCES