Differential Proximity of Perisynaptic Astrocytic Best1 at the Excitatory and Inhibitory Tripartite Synapses in APP/PS1 and MAOB-KO Mice Revealed by Lattice Structured Illumination Microscopy

Abstract

Bestrophin-1 (Best1) is a GABA- and glutamate-permeable, Ca²⁺-activated Cl^- channel, which is mainly expressed in astrocytes and localized at the microdomain or perisynaptic junction of the tripartite synapse. Distribution of Best1 is dramatically changed in pathological conditions such as Alzheimer’s disease. However, it is still unknown whether Best1 is located at the glutamatergic or GABAergic tripartite synapses. Here, we utilized the Lattice structured illumination microscopy (Lattice SIM) to visualize Best1 expression at the perisynaptic junctions of the tripartite synapses in CA1 of mouse hippocampus. We performed co-labeling with antibodies against 1) Best1 and vesicular glutamate transporter-2 (vGLUT2) or 2) Best1 and vesicular GABA transporter (vGAT) to measure the proximity of Best1-containing perisynapse to glutamatergic or GABAergic presynapse, respectively. In addition, we examined two transgenic mouse lines of 1) APP/PS1 mouse showing high astrocytic MAOB activity and cytosolic GABA and 2) MAOB-KO mouse showing low astrocytic GABA. Lattice SIM images were further processed by Imaris, which allowed 3D-rendering and spot identification. We found that astrocytic Best1 was distributed closer to the glutamatergic synapses than GABAergic synapses in the wild-type mice. In APP/PS1 mice, Best1 distribution was significantly changed by moving away from the glutamatergic synapses while moving closer to the GABAergic synapses. On the contrary, in MAOB-KO mice, the Best1 distribution was dramatically changed by moving closer to the glutamatergic synapses and moving far away from the GABAergic synapses. Our findings propose that the proximity of Best1-containing perisynapses to presynapses dynamically changes according to the level of astrocytic cytosolic GABA.

INTRODUCTION

Bestrophin-1 (Best1) is a Ca²⁺ activated Cl^- channel abundantly expressed in the astrocytes of various brain regions including the hippocampus [1-3]. Astrocytes contact multiple synapses through an ultrastructure called microdomain or perisynapse to form tripartite synapses with presynaptic axon terminals and postsynaptic dendritic spines throughout the whole brain [4, 5]. The astrocytes actively regulate the homeostasis of the synaptic transmission by either releasing various gliotransmitters such as glutamate, GABA, D-serine, and ATP or removing excessive extracellular transmitters [6]. A series of our previous reports have demonstrated that these gliotransmitters including GABA, glutamate, and D-serine are released through Best1, which is localized at the perisynaptic junctions of the tripartite synapses in the hippocampus [2, 3, 7-11]. However, it is still unknown whether Best1 is located mostly at the glutamatergic or GABAergic tripartite synapses.

Under physiological condition, astrocytes in the hippocampus are known to release glutamate and D-serine which contribute to the glutamatergic synaptic transmission and plasticity at the Schaffer collateral-CA1 synapse [9, 11-14]. Unlike the normal astrocytes under the physiological condition, the reactive astrocytes under the pathological conditions with chemical or physical insults aberrantly synthesize and release GABA, leading to a tonic inhibition of the synaptic transmission in the hippocampus [8, 15]. Particularly in APP/PS1 transgenic mice which is a mouse model of Alzheimer's disease (AD), there is a plethora of reactive astrocytes in the hippocampus and they aberrantly and excessively synthesize GABA though the enzymatic action of monoamine oxidase B (MAOB) and release the GABA to tonically inhibit the neighboring neurons, leading to memory deficits [8, 15]. Under physiological conditions, Best1 is known to be mainly localized at the astrocytic microdomain which forms a tripartite synapse with a presynaptic axon terminal and a postsynaptic dendritic spine [8]. In contrast, we previously demonstrated that the distribution of Best1 can be rearranged upon certain pathological conditions such as AD [8]. Particularly, in the hippocampus of APP/PS1 transgenic mice, Best1 is redistributed to the soma and processes of the reactive astrocytes, raising a strong possibility that the redistribution of Best1 is associated with the role of astrocytic GABA released through Best1 [8]. In this regard, we hypothesized that the redistribution of Best1 could be attributed to the level of astrocytic GABA content.

To test this hypothesis, we utilized two different transgenic mouse lines: APP/PS1 and MAOB knockout (MAOB-KO). The hippocampal astrocytes in APP/PS1 transgenic mice contain abundant amount of cytosolic GABA due to the high expression level and enzymatic activity of MAOB which is the main astrocytic GABA-synthetic enzyme [8, 15-17]. On the other hand, the hippocampal astrocytes of the MAOB-KO mice can barely synthesize GABA due to the deficiency of MAOB [17, 18]. To investigate the Best1 distribution at the ultrastructural resolution in these mice, we adopted a cutting-edge microscopic technique, Lattice Structured Illumination Microscopy (SIM) which yields a super optical resolution of ~120 nm [19]. Lattice SIM is superior to the classical SIM in regard of reducing phototoxicity with faster speed than classic SIM, because classical SIM needs to process SIM image at least 15 frames which have illuminated linear structure rotating in 3 directions [20]. Lattice SIM has spot pattern shifted laterally, which allows higher frame rates and less signal to noise background ratio [20, 21]. More importantly, Lattice SIM allows equally high z-axis resolution of near 150 nm, which was not possible with the classical SIM [22-24]. This unique feature allows super-resolution imaging of conventional histological samples at 30~40 μm thickness. By utilizing the Lattice SIM, we assessed the distance between astrocytic Best1 and excitatory or inhibitory synapses which are marked by presynaptic vesicular glutamate transporter-2 (vGLUT2) or vesicular GABA transporter (vGAT), respectively. Current study explores the differential proximity of astrocytic Best1 at the inhibitory or excitatory tripartite synapses in the hippocampal CA1 region in the APP/PS1 and MAOB-KO mice. Our findings further suggest that the different distributions of astrocytic Best1 could be dependent on the astrocytic GABA level and the different Best1 distribution could differentially contribute to differential regulation of the synaptic transmission and plasticity under physiological and pathological conditions.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Animals

All mice were kept in a temperature- and humidity-controlled environment with a 12-h light-dark cycle (lights on at 7 a.m.) and had free access to food and water. All animal care and handling were performed according to the directives of the Animal Care and Use Committee of the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee of IBS (South Korea; Approval No. IBS-2020-053). 10-month-old male APPswe/PSEN1dE9 (APP/PS1) mice of B6C3 hybrid background (Jackson Laboratory #34829), 2-month-old male B6;129S-Maob^tm1Shih/J (MAOB knockout, MAOB-KO) of 129S background (Jackson Laboratory #014133), and 2-month-old Best1^tm1Lmar (Best1 Knockout, Best1-KO) of BALB/c background (MGI #3795281) [25] and their WT littermate mice were used. To determine genotypes, following primers were utilized.

APP/PS1: 42431, 5’-GTG TGA TCC ATT CCA TCA GC-3’; 42432, 5’-GGA TCT CTG AGG GGT CCA GT-3’; 42433, 5’-ATG GTA GAG TAA GCG AGA ACA CG-3’.

MAO-B KO: 11550, 5’-GGG GAA GAC AAG CAG GTG TA-3’; 11551, 5’-CCA CCA TTT CAT GAT TGC AG-3’; oIMR8394, 5’-AGG GGA TCG GCA ATA AAA AG-3’.

Best1-KO: mb0601r, 5’-TGA ATG GTG ACC TCC AAG GCT ATC C-3’; mb9374f, 5’-AAC AAA GGG TAA GCA GGA GTG CCC-3’; and neo2351f, 5’-GGA AGA CAA TAG CAG GCA TGC TGG G-3’.

Immunohistochemistry

For the slice preparation, mice were deeply anesthetized with 2% avertin (20 µg g-1, intraperitoneal injection) and perfused with saline followed by ice-cold 4% paraformaldehyde (PFA; Cat.158127, Sigma, Germany). Post-fixation overnight with 4% PFA was followed by the incubation with 30% sucrose solution for cryoprotection. The fixed brains were embedded with optimal cutting temperature (OCT) compound (FSC 22 Frozen Section Media, Leica, IL, USA) and sectioned into 20-μm-thickness coronal slices with cryostat microtome (CM1950, Leica, IL, USA). For the immunostaining, brain sections were incubated for 1 h in a blocking solution (0.3% Triton X-100, 4% normal donkey serum in 0.1 M PBS) and then immunostained with a mixture of primary antibodies (Chicken anti-GFAP, Millipore, AB5541, 1:500; Mouse anti-vGAT, Cell Signaling, 1:200; Guineapig anti-vGLUT2, Cell Signaling, 1:200; Rabbit anti-Best1, AbFrontier, 1:500) in a blocking solution at 4℃ for overnight. Then, slices were washed with PBS three times, and were incubated with corresponding fluorescent secondary antibodies (Jackson ImmunoResearch Laboratory, PA, USA) for 2 h at RT. DAPI (1:3,000, Pierce) staining was performed in the second of three PBS washing. Finally, sections were mounted with a fluorescent mounting medium (S3023, Dako, Denmark). A series of fluorescent images were obtained with Zeiss Lattice SIM Elyra 7 (Fig. 1A), and Z stack images were processed for further analysis using IMARIS 9.0 program (Bitplane, AG, USA) (Fig. 1B). The antibody against Best1 was validated by the absence of the immunoreactivity in Best1-KO mouse hippocampal sections (Fig. 1C), as previously reported in numerous reports [3, 7, 8, 10, 26].

Fig. 1.

Cutting-edge tools for measuring spot distance in 3D SIM images (Lattice SIM and Imaris XT distance transformation). (A) Schematic principle of diagram of lattice SIM. (B) High magnification image taken by lattice SIM and spot identification and surface rendering 3D image processed by Imaris9.0. (C) Validation of antibody against Best1 in CA1 of WT and Best1 KO mice. The images were taken by Axioscan 7 (Zeiss, Germany).

3D rendering and distance measurement

The distance from astrocytic Best1 at the perisynaptic junction to presynapse was expected to be around several hundred nm [7]. To evaluate the proximity of the molecules more precisely, lattice SIM, the super-resolution microscope, was used for imaging our brain tissues (Fig. 1A). SIM images were rendered to 3D volume images and analyzed with Imaris 9.0 software (Bitplane, AG, USA). Spot identification function was utilized to transfer dot-signals to size-matched spheres, as the signals were shown as sphere-shape dots in the SIM-processed images (Fig.1B). The criteria of spot identification were set by measuring the diameters of each vGLUT2 and vGAT dot signal. To measure the distance of nearest spot from vGAT or vGLUT2 to Best1, XTension distance transform module in Imaris 9.0 was used (Fig. 1A). The nearest distance from the center of each spot in vGAT or vGLUT2 channels to the center of each spot in Best1 channel was measured by creation of new channel which showed the intensity exhibiting the distance information. Each value was exported and analyzed by comparison of all values of each group.

Statistical analyses

Statistical analyses were performed using Prism 9.0.2 (GraphPad, CA, U.S.A.). All measured distance values were exhibited by violin plot to show the tendency of distribution of Best1 at the whole distance. The median value and the quartiles were displayed on each violin plot. Differences between two different groups were analyzed with the two-tailed Student’s unpaired t test. Values under 500 nm were plotted with cumulative distribution frequency of counted number of Best1 over distance. p<0.05 was considered to indicate statistical significance throughout the study (*p<0.05, ***p<0.001, ****p<0.0001; ns, not significant).

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

Lattice SIM images reveal the ultrastructural distribution of Best1, vGLUT2, and vGAT in the hippocampus of APP/PS1 mice and MAOB-KO mice

To investigate the Best1 distribution and its proximity to vGLUT2-positive glutamatergic presynaptic terminals or vGAT-positive GABAergic presynaptic terminals in the CA1 stratum radiatum of the hippocampus of APP/PS1 transgenic mice (Fig. 2A), we performed immunohistochemistry with antibodies against Best1, GFAP, and vGLUT2 or vGAT with the hippocampal tissues of 10-month-old wild-type (WT) and APP/PS1 transgenic mice. The immunostained hippocampal tissues were imaged by utilizing Lattice SIM for visualizing the localization of Best1, vGLUT2, and vGAT at the ultrastructural resolution (Fig. 2B). We found that the astrocytes were more hypertrophied in the hippocampus of APP/PS1 transgenic mice, as previously demonstrated [8]. The Best1, vGLUT2, and vGAT expressions were clearly identified as ~100-nm sized spots (Fig. 2C). We found that Best1 spots were expressed like a cloud surrounding the GFAP-positive astrocytic skeletons (Fig. 2B). And Best1 spots were close (within 1 μm) to vGLUT2 or vGAT spots which represents the glutamatergic or GABAergic presynaptic terminals, respectively. We also found that several Best1 spots and vGLUT2 spots were overlapped whereas Best1 spots and vGAT spots were less overlapped (Fig. 2C). These findings implicate the closer distance between Best1 and vGLUT2, compared to the distance between Best1 and vGAT.

Fig. 2.

Comparison of distance from Best1 to vesicular transporters in CA1 of WT and APP/PS1 mouse brain. (A) Schematic diagram of APP/PS1 transgenic mice. (B) Representative images (upper panel, scale bar=5 μm) and the high magnification images (lower panel, scale bar=1 μm) of vGLUT2 (green), Best1 (red) and GFAP (magenta) in WT and APP/PS1 mice. Yellow arrowheads indicate overlapped vGLUT2 and Best1. (C) Representative images (upper panel, scale bar=5 μm) and the high magnification images (lower panel, scale bar=1 μm) of vGAT (green), Best1 (red) and GFAP (magenta) in WT and APP/PS1 mice. White arrowheads indicate overlapped vGAT and Best1.

We also investigated the Best1 distribution and its proximity to glutamatergic or GABAergic presynaptic terminals in the CA1 stratum radiatum of the hippocampus of 2-month-old WT and MAOB-KO mice (Fig. 3D). We also found that the Lattice SIM images clearly visualized Best1, vGLUT2, and vGAT spots whose sizes were ~100-nm in diameters (Fig. 3B~D). Similar to the images from 10-month-old WT and APP/PS1 mice, we found that several Best1 spots and vGLUT2 spots were overlapped (Fig. 3C). On the other hand, we observe several Best1 spots were overlapped with vGAT spots in WT mice, while we could rarely find Best1 spots overlapped with vGAT spots in MAOB-KO mice (Fig. 3D).

Fig. 3.

Comparison of distance from Best1 to vesicular transporters in CA1 of WT and MAOB-KO mouse brain. (A) Schematic diagram of MAOB-KO transgenic mice. (B) Representative images (upper panel, scale bar=5 μm) and the high magnification images (lower panel, scale bar=1 μm) of vGLUT2 (green), Best1 (red) and GFAP (magenta) in WT and MAOB-KO mice. Yellow arrowheads indicate overlapped vGLUT2 and Best1. (C) Representative images (upper panel, scale bar=5 μm) and the high magnification images (lower panel, scale bar=1 μm) of vGAT (green), Best1 (red) and GFAP (magenta) in WT and MAOB-KO mice. White arrowheads indicate overlapped vGAT and Best1.

Differential proximity of perisynaptic astrocytic Best1 at the excitatory and inhibitory tripartite synapses in APP/PS1 and MAOB-KO mice

We further performed a quantitative analysis of the distribution of Best1 in CA1 stratum radiatum of the hippocampus of APP/PS1 and MAOB-KO mice. Particularly, to estimate the proximity of astrocytic Best1 at the glutamatergic and GABAergic tripartite synapse, we utilized spot identification function and distance transformation XT function of Imaris XT module for quantification of the distance between Best1 and vGLUT2, or Best1 and vGAT. In all WT and transgenic mice, we found that the average distance between Best1 and vGLUT2 or vGAT was approximately 1 μm which was as similar as the average distance between two neighboring synapses (Fig. 4).

Fig. 4.

Differential proximity of perisynaptic astrocytic Best1 at the excitatory and inhibitory tripartite synapses in APP/PS1 and MAOB-KO mice. (A, D, G, J) Violin plot of all measured distance values. (B, E, H, K) Cumulative distribution plot of values under 500 nm. (C, F, I, L) Cumulative fraction of values over 500 nm. (A~C) Distance between Best1 and vGLUT2 in WT (pink) and APP/PS1 (green) mice. (D~F) Distance between Best1 and vGAT in WT (pink) and APP/PS1 (green) mice. (G~I) Distance between Best1 and vGLUT2 in WT (pink) and MAOB-KO (blue) mice. (J~L) Distance between Best1 and vGAT in WT (pink) and MAOB-KO (blue) mice.

More in-depth analysis revealed that the distance between Best1 and vGLUT2 in APP/PS1 transgenic mice was slightly but significantly farther away than that in WT mice (Fig. 4A). To distinguish the distribution of Best1 within or outside of the astrocytic microdomain which forms the tripartite synapse, we set 500 nm as the cut-off distance as it is roughly the half of the distance between two neighboring synapses, according to a previous report [27]. The Best1 localized within 500 nm from the nearest vGLUT2 in the APP/PS1 was significantly more than that in WT mice (Fig. 4B). On the other hand, the Best1 outside of the astrocytic microdomain, which was defined as Best1 located more than 500 nm away from the nearest vGLUT2, was significantly farther from the vGLUT2 in APP/PS1 mice, compared to WT mice (Fig. 4C). These findings indicate that Best1 distribution was significantly changed by moving farther away from the glutamatergic tripartite synapses, especially outside of the astrocytic microdomain, in the APP/PS1 transgenic mice (Fig. 5A). In contrast, the distance between Best1 and vGAT in APP/PS1 transgenic mice was significantly closer than that in WT mice (Fig. 4D). While the Best1 localized within 500 nm from the nearest vGAT in the APP/PS1 was slightly but significantly fewer than that in WT mice (Fig. 4E), the Best1 outside of the astrocytic microdomain was significantly closer from the nearest vGAT in APP/PS1 mice, compared to WT mice (Fig. 4F). These findings indicate that Best1 distribution moves away from glutamatergic synapses but moves closer to the GABAergic tripartite synapses, while the total number of Best1 at the astrocytic microdomain of GABAergic tripartite synapses were slightly but significantly reduced in the APP/PS1 transgenic mice compared to WT mice (Fig. 5A).

Fig. 5.

Schematic principle of diagrams exhibiting differential proximity of perisynaptic astrocytic Best1 at the excitatory and inhibitory tripartite synapses in APP/PS1 and MAOB-KO mice. (A, B) Schematic principle of diagram exhibiting differential proximity of Best1 in excitatory/inhibitory synapse in APP/PS1 and MAOB-KO mice.

In MAOB-KO mice, we found that the distance between Best1 and vGLUT2 in MAOB-KO mice was slightly but significantly closer than that in WT mice (Fig. 4G). Also, the Best1 localized within 500 nm from the nearest vGLUT2 in the MAOB-KO was significantly more than that in WT mice (Fig. 4H). Unlike in APP/PS1 mice, the Best1 outside of the astrocytic microdomain was significantly closer from the nearest vGLUT2 in the MAOB-KO mice, compared to WT mice (Fig. 4I). These findings indicate that Best1 distribution was significantly changed by moving closer to the glutamatergic tripartite synapses in the MAOB-KO mice (Fig. 5B). Meanwhile, the distance between Best1 and vGAT in MAOB-KO mice was significantly farther away than that in WT mice (Fig. 4J). Moreover, the Best1 localized within 500 nm from the nearest vGAT in the MAOB-KO was significantly fewer than that in WT mice (Fig. 4K), while the Best1 outside of the astrocytic microdomain was significantly farther from the nearest vGAT in the MAOB-KO mice (Fig. 4L). These findings indicate that Best1 distribution was significantly changed by getting closer to the glutamatergic synapses and moving away from the GABAergic tripartite synapses in the MAOB-KO mice (Fig. 4E). Meanwhile, the total number of Best1 at the glutamatergic synapses were significantly higher and the total number of Best1 at the GABAergic synapses were significantly lower in MAOB-KO mice compared to WT (Fig. 4E).

Taken together, our findings indicate that astrocytic Best1 is distributed slightly closer to the glutamatergic synapses than GABAergic synapses in the WT mice. In APP/PS1 mice, Best1 distribution was significantly changed by moving away from the glutamatergic synapses while moving closer to the GABAergic synapses. On the contrary, in MAOB-KO mice, the Best1 distribution was dramatically changed by moving closer to the glutamatergic synapses and moving far away from the GABAergic synapses. The different proximity of astrocytic Best1 to the glutamatergic or GABAergic tripartite synapse between APP/PS1 mice and MAOB-KO mice could be attributed to the different level of astrocytic MAOB and cytosolic GABA. Future investigation is needed to determine the causal link between the cytosolic GABA content and Best1 redistribution. Furthermore, the distinctly distributed astrocytic Best1at the tripartite synapses in APP/PS1 and MAOB-KO mice could contribute to a differential regulation of synaptic transmission and plasticity through the Best1-mediated astrocytic GABA release. Finally, lattice SIM provides much improved microscopic resolution to visualize the tripartite synapse and will be very useful for discovering new features and functions for each component of peri-, pre-, and post-synapse in tripartite synapses.